## 4 Results
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c} \hline \hline
**Pic** & **RT (*)** & **Compounds** & **CSEO** & **NAEO** \\ \hline
14 & 10.39 & Anethofuran & 0.7 & - \\ \hline
15 & 10.58 & \(\alpha\)-Terpineol & 8.5 & - \\ \hline
16 & 10.7 & \(\alpha\)-Phellandran-8-ol & 0.7 & - \\ \hline
17 & 10.823 & cis-Piperitol & 2.1 & - \\ \hline
18 & 10.9 & trans-Piperitol & 1.4 & - \\ \hline
19 & 11.09 & gamma.-Isogeraniol & 0.6 & - \\ \hline
20 & 11.22 & cis-Geraniol & 0.4 & - \\ \hline
21 & 11.55 & piperitone & - & 1.7 \\ \hline
22 & 11.85 & 4-Undecanone & 0.3 & - \\ \hline
23 & 11.95 & 2-Caren-10-al & 0.3 & - \\ \hline
24 & 12.13 & 2-Undecanone & - & 0.8 \\ \hline
25 & 12.14 & Cyclohexene, 2-ethenyl-1,3,3-trimethyl- & 0.2 & - \\ \hline
26 & 12.27 & 1-Tetradecyne & 0.3 & 0.8 \\ \hline
27 & 12.34 & 2-Acetoxy-1,8-cineole & 0.4 & - \\ \hline
28 & 12.56 & Boschnialactone & - & 3.6 \\ \hline
29 & 12.87 & Isogeraniol & - & 1.7 \\ \hline
30 & 12.95 & Neryl acetate & 0.5 & - \\ \hline
31 & 13.07 & Geraniol acetate & 3.7 & - \\ \hline
32 & 13.31 & Limonene oxide & - & 1 \\ \hline
33 & 13.43 & \(\beta\)-Bourbonene & - & 0.6 \\ \hline
34 & 13.5 & Elemene & 0.8 & 0.5 \\ \hline
35 & 13.68 & 1-Methyl-2-decalone & - & 6.1 \\ \hline
36 & 13.81 & Oplopanone & - & 1.8 \\ \hline
37 & 13.93 & Cis-caryophyllene & 0.8 & 5.7 \\ \hline
38 & 13.99 & Cyclohexanol, acetate & - & 5 \\ \hline
39 & 14.09 & \(\alpha\)-Bergamotene & 0.2 & - \\ \hline
40 & 14.57 & Inknown & - & 0.9 \\ \hline
41 & 14.63 & 4-Dodecanone, 11-methyl- & 0.3 & - \\ \hline
42 & 14.74 & Phellandral & - & 8.6 \\ \hline
43 & 14.74 & Germacrene D & 0.3 & - \\ \hline
44 & 14.86 & \(\beta\)-eudesmene & 0.2 & - \\ \hline
45 & 14.94 & Methyl(2E)-2-nonenoate & 0.2 & **53.2** \\ \hline
46 & 15.15 & \(\tau\)-cadinene & 0.3 & - \\ \hline
47 & 15.2 & \(\delta\)-cadinene & 0.6 & - \\ \hline
48 & 15.25 & L-calamenene & - & 2 \\ \hline
49 & 15.59 & \(\beta\)-elemol & 7.8 & - \\ \hline
50 & 16.03 & Caryophyllene oxide & 1.2 & 2.8 \\ \hline
51 & 16.31 & Cis-carveol & 0.2 & - \\ \hline
52 & 16.41 & Cubenol & - & 1.5 \\ \hline
53 & 16.52 & Eudesm-7(11)-en-4-ol & 1.4 & - \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 4: _Cont._The results of the in vitro cytotoxicity test against the thirteen (13) cancer cell lines (A2780, A549, HCT116, HEK-293, JIMT-T1, K562, MIA-Paca2, MRC5, NCI-N87, PC3, RT4, U2 OS and U87-MG) are expressed by the 50% inhibition concentrations (IC\({}_{50}\)) in Table 5. After reading the values obtained and comparing them with positive standards such as: Vinblastine, Doxorubicin, Combrestatin A4 and Monomethyl Aurisattin E, the two essential oils have interesting activities against all the cell lines tested, and in many cases, were more effective than the standards tested. The additional antibacterial activity in this work against twelve (12) bacterial strains of two oils: CSEO and NAEO are mentioned in Table 6. The data set obtained did not give good results. All bacteria were resistant to NAEO at a concentration of 5%; however, CSEO showed activity against only four (4) bacteria: _Corynebacterium_ sp., _Staphylococcus aureus_, _Klebsiella pneumoniae_ and _Pseudomonas aeruginosa_. \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c} \hline
**Pic** & **RT (*)** & **Compounds** & **CSEO** & **NAEO** \\ \hline
54 & 16.61 & \(\gamma\)-eudesmol & 0.7 & - \\ \hline
55 & 16.72 & \(\tau\)-cadinol & 0.6 & - \\ \hline
56 & 16.89 & 10-epi-\(\beta\)-eudesmol & 3 & - \\ \hline
57 & 16.97 & Viridiflorol & 0.7 & 1.3 \\ \hline
58 & 17.18 & Trans-2-Hydroxy-1,8-cineole & 0.2 & - \\ \hline
59 & 17.49 & Eudesma-4,11-dien-2-ol & 0.3 & - \\ \hline
60 & 17.68 & longipinocarveol & 0.3 & - \\ \hline
61 & 18.69 & Eudesm-5-en-11-ol & 0.4 & - \\ \hline  & Total (\%) & **99.9** & **99.1** \\ \hline \end{tabular} (*) RT: Retention time.  
\end{table} 
Table 4: _Cont._