## 4 Data Results
### Influencing Factor Analysis  
Based on demographic characteristics, regression analysis was conducted on the four dimensions (see Table 4 for the results). It is shown that the education mode preference is affected by gender, age and educational background; the environmental education effectiveness is impacted by gender and educational background; and element preference and perception of environmental education are not influenced by demographic characteristics.  
The average scores of gender, age and educational background on educational mode, and gender and educational background on environmental education effectiveness were classified and summarized (see Table 5). Environmental education results best in university education (3.94), but there is little difference with postgraduate education and above (3.91). Men have no obvious preference for educational methods, while women prefer participatory interactive experience activities guided by activity mentors (4.28). The overall average effect of environmental education for women (3.99) was higher than that for men (3.84). Over 60 years old, there is no obvious preference for educational methods. On the whole, guided environmental education activities are favored by all age groups, among which 50-59 years old prefer guided interpretation activities (4.43), and 30-39 years old prefer guided interactive experience activities (4.44).  
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c} \hline
**Dependent Variable** & **Gender** & **Age** & **Education** \\ \hline Environmental education spatial element preference & 0.17 & 0.79 & 0.64 \\ Environmental education mode preference & 0.001 ** & 0.037 * & 0.004 ** \\ Environmental education perception & 0.98 & 0.31 & 0.56 \\ Environmental education effectiveness & 0.001 ** & 0.37 & 0.000 ** \\ \hline \end{tabular}  
* \(p<0.05\) ** \(p<0.01\).  
\end{table}
Table 4: Regression analysis results of demographic characteristics on four major dimensions (coefficients of independent variables).  
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c c c} \hline  & \multicolumn{4}{c}{**Environmental Education Perception**} & \multicolumn{4}{c}{**Environmental Education Effectiveness**} \\ \hline Spatial element & 0.935 & 0.207 & 4.509 & 0.000 ** & 1.671 & 0.165 & 10.105 & 0.000 ** \\ preference constant & 0.935 & 0.207 & 4.509 & 0.000 ** & 1.671 & 0.165 & 10.105 & 0.000 ** \\ YS1 & 0.222 & 0.063 & 3.515 & 0.000 ** & 0.214 & 0.05 & 4.251 & 0.000 ** \\ YS2 & \(-\)0.058 & 0.069 & \(-\)0.845 & 0.399 & 0.024 & 0.055 & 0.441 & 0.66 \\ YS3 & 0.041 & 0.056 & 0.728 & 0.467 & \(-\)0.177 & 0.045 & \(-\)3.972 & 0.000 ** \\ YS4 & 0.095 & 0.063 & 1.507 & 0.132 & 0.037 & 0.05 & 0.736 & 0.462 \\ YS5 & \(-\)0.02 & 0.078 & \(-\)0.261 & 0.794 & 0.149 & 0.062 & 2.391 & 0.017 * \\ YS6 & 0.085 & 0.07 & 1.21 & 0.227 & \(-\)0.031 & 0.056 & \(-\)0.558 & 0.577 \\ YS7 & 0.004 & 0.069 & 0.063 & 0.95 & \(-\)0.031 & 0.055 & \(-\)0.56 & 0.576 \\ YS8 & 0.038 & 0.073 & 0.516 & 0.606 & 0.155 & 0.058 & 2.653 & 0.008 ** \\ YS9 & 0.008 & 0.082 & 0.092 & 0.926 & 0.118 & 0.065 & 1.805 & 0.072 \\ YS10 & \(-\)0.028 & 0.066 & \(-\)0.422 & 0.673 & \(-\)0.023 & 0.053 & \(-\)0.427 & 0.669 \\ YS11 & 0.072 & 0.074 & 0.98 & 0.328 & 0.1 & 0.059 & 1.697 & 0.09 \\ YS12 & 0.189 & 0.062 & 3.037 & 0.003 ** & 0.069 & 0.05 & 1.395 & 0.164 \\ R2 & & & 0.279 & & & & 0.357 & \\ Adjusting R2 & & & 0.26 & & & & 0.34 & \\ F & & F (12,456) = 14.711, \(p=0.000\) & & & & & \\ D-W value & & & 1.673 & & & 1.927 & \\ \hline \end{tabular}  
* Note: B represents the regression coefficient; SE represents the standard error; t represents the statistical value; \(p\) represents the significance level; the significance test of regression coefficient mainly focus on values t and \(p\) (* \(p<0.05\)** \(p<0.01\)); and R2 represents the interpretation of independent variable to dependent variable.  
\end{table}
Table 3: _Cont._