## 4 Evaluated Measurements
### Second Evaluated Step-ANP Model  
Based on Figure 7, Equation (3) were applied to deal with the weight-measurement of 15 experts' questionnaires through computing the pairwise comparison matrix among three analytical attitudes in consolidation with the three main characteristics of IoT technology \"SoLoMo\" but also the three essential \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c} \hline \hline Gender & Male: 58 (60.42\%); Female: 38 (39.58\%) \\ Age & Below 20 years-old: 17 (17.71\%); 20–29 years-old: 38 (39.58\%); 30–39 years-old: 34 (35.41\%); 40 years-old: 7 (7.3\%) \\ Education Background & Below college: 23 (23.95\%); College: 54 (62.52\%); Master: 17 (17.71\%); Doctorate: 2 (2.09\%) \\ Annual Income (NTD) & Below 5200,000 NTD: 44 (45.83\%); 5200,000,000,000 NTD: 37 (38.54\%); 400,000,000 NTD: 9 (9.37\%); Higher than 5600,000 NTD: 6 (6.26\%) \\ Average online-use per day & Below 1 h. 6 (6.26\%); 1-2 h: 32 (33.33\%); 2-3 h: 48 (50\%); Up 3 h: 10 (10.41\%) \\ Average e-commerce & Below 1: 21 (21.87\%), 2 times: 31 (32.29\%), 3 times: 38 (39.58\%), 4 times: 4 (4.16\%); up 5 times: 2 (2.1\%) \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 1: Descriptive statistics of the 96 random surveyed e-commerce customers. elements of SCT theory, four assessed criteria of three purchasing modes (External Variables Exogenous Variable-HS mode, Perceived Usefulness and Perceived Ease of USE-NI mode and Behavioral Intentions to Use-EKB mode), seventeen sub-criteria and final three candidates (Purchasing Original Intentions, Purchasing Attitude Decisions and Purchasing Actual Actions) with computing the communities of seventeen evaluated criteria of the AF approach and measured results of ANP model is demonstrated in Table 5.  
The measured results of ANP model in Table 5 were the highest standardized SNIC (0.5797) was located at \"Purchasing Original Intentions\". Specifically, the three highest evaluated scores \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c} \hline \hline
**Sub-Criteria** & **Initial** & **Extraction** \\ \hline PI & 1 & 0.813 \\ PTP & 1 & 0.705 \\ PP & 1 & 0.725 \\ PFS & 1 & 0.763 \\ OS & 1 & 0.672 \\ SA & 1 & 0.66 \\ PB & 1 & 0.665 \\ PM & 1 & 0.716 \\ IE & 1 & 0.825 \\ PR & 1 & 0.769 \\ IS & 1 & 0.602 \\ AE & 1 & 0.74 \\ PC & 1 & 0.682 \\ DO & 1 & 0.384 \\ PWS & 1 & 0.578 \\ PWNS & 1 & 0.777 \\ BC & 1 & 0.675 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 4: Communities of the seventeen evaluated criteria of FA approach. \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c} \hline \hline
**Sub-Criteria** & **Mean** & **Std. Deviation** & **Valid Interviewees** \\ \hline PI & 3.09 & 0.65 & 96 \\ PTP & 3.23 & 0.672 & 96 \\ PP & 3.19 & 0.799 & 96 \\ PFS & 3.21 & 0.794 & 96 \\ OS & 3.17 & 0.816 & 96 \\ SA & 3.2 & 0.749 & 96 \\ PB & 3.06 & 0.693 & 96 \\ PM & 3.14 & 0.675 & 96 \\ IE & 3.11 & 0.694 & 96 \\ PR & 3.19 & 0.772 & 96 \\ IS & 3.3 & 0.86 & 96 \\ AE & 3.08 & 0.735 & 96 \\ PC & 3.11 & 0.752 & 96 \\ DO & 3.16 & 0.799 & 96 \\ PWS & 3.13 & 0.798 & 96 \\ PWNS & 3.17 & 0.735 & 96 \\ BC & 3.19 & 0.73 & 96 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 2: Mean and standard deviation Statistics of the 96 random surveyed e-commerce customers. \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c} \hline \hline
**Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Bartlett Measure of Sampling Adequacy.** & 0.733 \\ \hline \multirow{3}{*}{[PERSON]’s Test of Sphericity} & Approx. Chi-Square & 1153.392 \\  & df & 136 \\ \cline{1-1}  & Significance & 0.000 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 3: [PERSON] and [PERSON]’s test of FA approach. were \"Purchasing Importance-PI (0.2147), Purchasing Financial Status-PFS (0.1993) and Purchaser's Personality-PP (0.1898)\" in \"purchasing original intentions\". On the contrary, the lowest evaluated score in \"purchasing original intentions\" are \"Decisive Outcome-DO (0.0213), Purchasing with Satisfaction-PWS (0.0315) and Information Search-IS (0.0327)\". Based on the verification of research reliability, in order to testify the measured results of the ANP model, the C.R.