# Systematic Literature Review on Test Case Selection and Prioritization: A Tertiary Study
## 4 Results and Analysis
### RQ3. How Have the Secondary Studies Benefitted from the Existing Tools and Tests?
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c} \hline \hline
**REF** & **Web Link** \\ \hline
1 & [[http://gamma.cc.gatech.edu/aas.html](http://gamma.cc.gatech.edu/aas.html)]([http://gamma.cc.gatech.edu/aas.html](http://gamma.cc.gatech.edu/aas.html)) \\
2 & [[https://github.com/SofyaTool/SofyaTool](https://github.com/SofyaTool/SofyaTool)]([https://github.com/SofyaTool/SofyaTool](https://github.com/SofyaTool/SofyaTool)) \\
3 & [[http://emma.sourceforge.net/](http://emma.sourceforge.net/)]([http://emma.sourceforge.net/](http://emma.sourceforge.net/)) \\
4 & [[https://www.ibm.com/in-en/products/spss-statistics](https://www.ibm.com/in-en/products/spss-statistics)]([https://www.ibm.com/in-en/products/spss-statistics](https://www.ibm.com/in-en/products/spss-statistics)) \\
5 & [[https://www.mathworks.com/products/matlab.html](https://www.mathworks.com/products/matlab.html)]([https://www.mathworks.com/products/matlab.html](https://www.mathworks.com/products/matlab.html)) \\
6 & [[https://github.com/magisis/proteum](https://github.com/magisis/proteum)]([https://github.com/magisis/proteum](https://github.com/magisis/proteum)) \\
7 & [[https://www.cse.nust.edu/~cse870/Materials/FaultTolerant/manual-galileo.htm](https://www.cse.nust.edu/~cse870/Materials/FaultTolerant/manual-galileo.htm)]([https://www.cse.nust.edu/~cse870/Materials/FaultTolerant/manual-galileo.htm](https://www.cse.nust.edu/~cse870/Materials/FaultTolerant/manual-galileo.htm)) \\
8 & [[http://sandmark.cs.arizona.edu/index.html](http://sandmark.cs.arizona.edu/index.html)]([http://sandmark.cs.arizona.edu/index.html](http://sandmark.cs.arizona.edu/index.html)) \\
9 & [[http://codeover.org/](http://codeover.org/)]([http://codeover.org/](http://codeover.org/)) \\
10 & [[https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Gcov.html](https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Gcov.html)]([https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Gcov.html](https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Gcov.html)) \\
11 & [[https://cobertura.github.io/cobertura/](https://cobertura.github.io/cobertura/)]([https://cobertura.github.io/cobertura/](https://cobertura.github.io/cobertura/)) \\
12 & [[https://www.eclemma.org/jacoco/](https://www.eclemma.org/jacoco/)]([https://www.eclemma.org/jacoco/](https://www.eclemma.org/jacoco/)) \\
13 & [[https://www.qa-systems.com/tools/cantata/](https://www.qa-systems.com/tools/cantata/)]([https://www.qa-systems.com/tools/cantata/](https://www.qa-systems.com/tools/cantata/)) \\
14 & [[https://stellar.cleanscape.net/products/testwise/help/introduction.html](https://stellar.cleanscape.net/products/testwise/help/introduction.html)]([https://stellar.cleanscape.net/products/testwise/help/introduction.html](https://stellar.cleanscape.net/products/testwise/help/introduction.html)) \\
15 & [[https://www.mathworks.com/products/connections/product_detail/ldra-tool-suite.html](https://www.mathworks.com/products/connections/product_detail/ldra-tool-suite.html)]([https://www.mathworks.com/products/connections/product_detail/ldra-tool-suite.html](https://www.mathworks.com/products/connections/product_detail/ldra-tool-suite.html)) \\
16 & [[https://invisible-island.net/atac/atac.html](https://invisible-island.net/atac/atac.html)]([https://invisible-island.net/atac/atac.html](https://invisible-island.net/atac/atac.html)) \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular} References for the tools mentioned in Table 6 are given in Table 7.  
\end{table} 
Table 7: Web links for tools (last accessed on 15 November 2021). A few studies mention other tools in addition to those mentioned in Table 5. The secondary study S2 refers to a text [88] that contains a small section of the survey of early tools developed for regression testing, listing their advantages and disadvantages. S6 mentions tools created to automate their own proposed techniques. Some of the tools, such as Vulcan, BMAT, Echelon, deja vu, GCOV, Test runner, Winrunner, Rational test suite, Bugzilla, and Canata++, were only mentioned in one study each. S8 mentions two tools: RTSEM and MISRA-C. S9 mentions three more tools: SPLAR, Feature IDE, and MBT.