## 3 Results
### Statistical Representation of the Categorical Data
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c c} \hline \hline \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Categories of Areas Cultivated by Sole Cultivar**} & \multicolumn{5}{c}{**Categories of Farms Cultivated Area (m2)**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**Total**} \\ \cline{3-8} \multicolumn{2}{c}{} & & \multicolumn{1}{c}{**<500**} & **501–1000** & **1001–10,000** & \multicolumn{1}{c}{**>10,000**} \\ \hline \multirow{8}{*}{**No Area**} & Count & 8 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 9 \\ \cline{2-8}  & \multirow{2}{*}{**No Area**} & \% within Cultivated Area Category & 5.6\% & 0.0\% & 1.3\% & 0.0\% & 3.1\% \\ \cline{3-8}  & & Count & 134 & 28 & 8 & 1 & 171 \\ \cline{3-8}  & \multirow{2}{*}{**<500 m2**} & \% within Cultivated Area Category & 94.4\% & 43.8\% & 10.3\% & 25.0\% & 59.4\% \\ \cline{3-8}  & \multirow{2}{*}{**501–1000 m2**} & Count & 0 & 36 & 14 & 0 & 50 \\ \cline{3-8}  & & \% within Cultivated Area Category & 0.0\% & 56.3\% & 17.9\% & 0.0\% & 17.4\% \\ \cline{3-8}  & \multirow{2}{*}{**1001–10,000 m2**} & Count & 0 & 55 & 2 & 57 \\ \cline{3-8}  & \multirow{2}{*}{**1001–10,000 m2**} & \% within Cultivated Area Category & 0.0\% & 0.0\% & 70.5\% & 50.0\% & 19.8\% \\ \cline{3-8}  & \multirow{2}{*}{**>10,000 m2**} & Count & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 1 \\ \cline{3-8}  & \multirow{2}{*}{**>10,000 m2**} & Count & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 1 \\ \cline{3-8}  & & \% within Cultivated Area Category & 0.0\% & 0.0\% & 0.0\% & 25.0\% & 0.3\% \\ \hline \multirow{8}{*}{**No Area**} & Count & 59 & 18 & 15 & 0 & 92 \\ \cline{3-8}  & \multirow{2}{*}{**\% within Cultivated Area Category**} & 41.5\% & 28.1\% & 19.2\% & 0.0\% & 31.9\% \\ \cline{3-8}  & \multirow{2}{*}{**<500 m2**} & Count & 83 & 38 & 35 & 0 & 156 \\ \cline{3-8}  & \multirow{2}{*}{**<500 m2**} & \% within Cultivated Area Category & 58.5\% & 59.4\% & 44.9\% & 0.0\% & 54.2\% \\ \cline{3-8}  & \multirow{2}{*}{**501–1000 m2**} & Count & 0 & 8 & 15 & 3 & 26 \\ \cline{3-8}  & \multirow{2}{*}{**501–1000 m2**} & Count & 0 & 12.5\% & 19.2\% & 75.0\% & 9.0\% \\ \cline{3-8}  & \multirow{2}{*}{**1001–10,000 m2**} & Count & 0 & 0 & 13 & 0 & 13 \\ \cline{3-8}  & \multirow{2}{*}{**>10,000 m2**} & \% within Cultivated Area Category & 0.0\% & 0.0\% & 16.7\% & 0.0\% & 4.5\% \\ \cline{3-8}  & \multirow{2}{*}{**>10,000 m2**} & Count & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 1 \\ \cline{3-8}  & & \% within Cultivated Area Category & 0.0\% & 0.0\% & 0.0\% & 25.0\% & 0.3\% \\ \hline \multirow{8}{*}{**No Area**} & Count & 78 & 20 & 11 & 0 & 109 \\ \cline{3-8}  & \multirow{2}{*}{**\% within Cultivated Area Category**} & 54.9\% & 31.3\% & 14.1\% & 0.0\% & 37.8\% \\ \cline{3-8}  & \multirow{2}{*}{**<500 m2**} & Count & 64 & 44 & 65 & 1 & 174 \\ \cline{3-8}  & \multirow{2}{*}{**\% within Cultivated Area Category**} & 45.1\% & 68.8\% & 83.3\% & 25.0\% & 60.4\% \\ \cline{3-8}  & \multirow{2}{*}{**501–1000 m2**} & Count & 0 & 0 & 2 & 2 & 4 \\ \cline{3-8}  & \multirow{2}{*}{**501–1000 m2**} & Count & 0.0\% & 0.0\% & 2.6\% & 50.0\% & 1.4\% \\ \cline{3-8}  & \multirow{2}{*}{**1001–10,000 m2**} & Count & 0 & 0 & 1 & 1 \\ \cline{3-8}  & \multirow{2}{*}{**1001–10,000 m2**} & Count & 0 & 0 & 1 & 1 \\ \cline{3-8}  & \multirow{2}{*}{**\% within Cultivated Area Category**} & 0.0\% & 0.0\% & 0.0\% & 25.0\% & 0.3\% \\ \cline{3-8}  & \multirow{2}{*}{**>10,000 m2**} & Count & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ \cline{3-8}  & \multirow{2}{*}{**>10,000 m2**} & Count & 0.0\% & 0.0\% & 0.0\% & 0.0\% & 0.0\% \\ \cline{3-8}  & & \multicolumn{2}{c}{} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{} \\ \cline{3-8}  & \multirow{2}{*}{**\% within Cultivated Area Category**} & 0.0\% & 0.0\% & 0.0\% & 0.0\% & 0.0\% \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 3: The categorical correlation between total areas cultivated by sole cultivars and farms’ cultivated areas. Furthermore, the assessment of goodness-of-fit and the independence of the correlated variables were conducted by applying the [PERSON]'s R (Interval by Interval) and Spearman correlation (Ordinal by Ordinal) tests.