## 3 Results
### Effect on Longevity
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c} \hline \hline  & & & & **Statistics** \\ \cline{3-5}  & **Condition** & \multicolumn{3}{c}{**Fisher’s Exact Test**} \\ \cline{3-5}  & **Maximal** & \multicolumn{3}{c}{**Maximal**} & \multicolumn{3}{c}{**Maximal**} & \multicolumn{3}{c}{**Maximal**} \\  & & **Longevity at 25\%** & \multicolumn{3}{c}{**Longevity at 50\%**} & \multicolumn{3}{c}{**Longevity at 75\%**} & \multicolumn{3}{c}{**Longevity at 90\%**} \\ \hline \multirow{5}{*}{F\({}_{0}\)} & Control vs. 0.5 mM & ns & ns & ns & ns \\ \cline{2-5}  & Control vs. 1 mM & ns & ns & ns & ns \\ \cline{2-5}  & Control vs. 2 mM & ns & ns & ns & ns \\ \cline{2-5}  & Control vs. 5 mM & ns & ns & ns & ns \\ \cline{2-5}  & Control vs. 10 mM & ns & ns & ns & ns \\ \hline \multirow{5}{*}{F\({}_{1}\)-N} & Control vs. 0.5 mM & ns & ns & ns & ns \\ \cline{2-5}  & Control vs. 1 mM & ns & ns & ns & ns \\ \cline{2-5}  & Control vs. 2 mM & ns & ns & ns & ns \\ \cline{2-5}  & Control vs. 5 mM & ns & ns & ns & ns \\ \cline{2-5}  & Control vs. 10 mM & * & ns & ns & ns \\ \hline \multirow{5}{*}{F\({}_{1}\)-T} & Control vs. 0.5 mM & ns & ns & ns & ns \\ \cline{2-5}  & Control vs. 1 mM & ns & ns & ns & ns \\ \cline{2-5}  & Control vs. 2 mM & ns & ns & ns & ns \\ \cline{2-5}  & Control vs. 5 mM & ns & ns & ns & ns \\ \cline{2-5}  & Control vs. 10 mM & ns & ns & ns & ns \\ \hline \multirow{5}{*}{F\({}_{2}\)-TN} & Control vs. 0.5 mM & ns & ns & ns & ns \\ \cline{2-5}  & Control vs. 1 mM & ns & ns & ns & ns \\ \cline{2-5}  & Control vs. 2 mM & ns & ns & ns & ns \\ \cline{2-5}  & Control vs. 5 mM & ns & ns & ns & ns \\ \cline{2-5}  & Control vs. 10 mM & ns & ns & ns & ns \\ \hline \multirow{5}{*}{F\({}_{2}\)-TT} & Control vs. 0.5 mM & ns & ns & ns & ns \\ \cline{2-5}  & Control vs. 1 mM & ns & ns & ns & ns \\ \cline{2-5}  & Control vs. 2 mM & ns & ns & ns & ns \\ \cline{2-5}  & Control vs. 5 mM & ns & ns & ns & ns \\ \cline{2-5}  & Control vs. 10 mM & ns & ns & ns & ns \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 1: Statistical analysis of the maximal longevity assay for the F\({}_{0}\) to F\({}_{2}\) generations. Maximal longevity was assessed at several mortality points using Fisher’s exact test. The significance level was set at 0.05. Legend: (ns)—non-significant; *—\(p<\) 0.05; ***—\(p<\) 0.01; ***—\(p<\) 0.005. \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c} \hline \hline  & & & & **Statistics** \\ \cline{3-5}  & **Condition** & \multicolumn{3}{c}{**[PERSON]’s Exact Test**} \\ \cline{3-5}  & **Condition** & \multicolumn{3}{c}{**Maximal**} & \multicolumn{3}{c}{**Maximal**} & \multicolumn{3}{c}{**Maximal**} \\  & **Longevity at 25\%** & \multicolumn{3}{c}{**Longevity at 50\%**} & \multicolumn{3}{c}{**Longevity at 75\%**} & \multicolumn{3}{c}{**Longevity at 90\%**} \\ \hline \multirow{5}{*}{F\({}_{0}\)} & Control vs. 0.5 mM & ns & ns & ns & ns \\ \cline{2-5}  & Control vs. 1 mM & ns & ns & ns & ns \\ \cline{2-5}  & Control vs. 2 mM & ns & ns & ns & ns \\ \cline{2-5}  & Control vs. 5 mM & ns & ns & ns & ns \\ \cline{2-5}  & Control vs. 10 mM & ns & ns & ns & ns \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 2: Statistical comparison between the maximal longevity of F\({}_{1}\)-N and F\({}_{1}\)-T, F\({}_{2}\)-TN and F\({}_{2}\)-TT, and F\({}_{1}\)-T and F\({}_{2}\)-TT. Maximal longevity was assessed at several mortality points using [PERSON]’s exact test. The significance level was set at 0.05 (n = 20 flies/treatment). Legend: (ns)—non-significant; *—\(p<\) 0.05; ***—\(p<\) 0.01; ***—\(p<\) 0.005. Regarding the F\({}_{2}\) generation, a significant increase in the mean survival of F\({}_{2}\)-TN individuals was observed at the two lower concentrations. Significant changes were also observed at 25% mortality at the 10 mM concentration and at 50% mortality at the 0.5 mM (Figure 5E/Table 1). In F\({}_{2}\)-TT, the statistical analysis showed that the observed variations in mean survival were not significant. However, the maximal longevity obtained at 5 mM was shown to be significantly different from that obtained for the control at 50% mortality (Table 1).