## 3 Description of the Systematic Impact/Aptitude Land Planning Model
### Diagnosis and Territorial Analysis of the Study Area
#### 4.2.1 Definition of the Environmental Land Units of the Study Area
Reforestation (RF): the planting or seeding of tree species selected according to ecological and/or landscape criteria, with the objective of conserving nature and landscape, is a further option. Figure 7: Map of the final present phytobiological value (FPPV). 5. Camping or recreation (CR): the fixed installation of infrastructure equipped with services. 6. Occasional collection of aromatic species (AS): this refers to the occasional collection by the inhabitants of the area following the recommendations of the environmental authority, which is intended to recover traditional use. 7. Extensive agriculture (EA): this type of practice involves the construction of buildings linked to the exploitation and adaptation of the landscape, etc. 8. Intensive grazing (IG): Cattle grazing outdoors on degraded grassland or scrub. 9. Urbanization (UR): Single-family residences are constructed on medium-sized and contiguous plots. In addition to the construction of the house itself, urbanization entails the installation of sanitation facilities, power lines, and other infrastructure. Figures 8-10 show the results obtained for the final extended phytobiological values (FEPVs) associated with each proposed activity and environmental land unit. The results of the previous inventory phase indicate that the study area exhibited optimal conditions for the endemic species _Vella lucentina_. Consequently, Table 8 presents the results obtained for the land capacity of each environmental land unit based on the presence of _Vella lucentina_ as a singular element to be conserved, which we discuss below. Figure 8: Map of the final extended phytobiological value (FEPV) for the strict maintenance of current activities (SM) (**A**). Map of the final extended phytobiological value (FEPV) for ecosystem regeneration (ER) (**B**). Map of the final extended phytobiological value (FEPV) for scientific–cultural activities (SAs) (**C**). Map of the final extended phytobiological value (FEPV) for reforestation (RE) (**D**). Figure 10: Map of the final extended phytobiological value (FEPV) for urbanization (UR). Figure 9: Map of the final extended phytobiological value (FEPV) for camping or recreation (CR). (**A**). Map of the final extended phytobiological value (FEPV) for the occasional collection of aromatic species (AS) (**B**). Map of the final extended phytobiological value (FEPV) for extensive agriculture (EA) (**C**). Map of the final extended phytobiological value (FEPV) for intensive grazing (IG) (**D**). * Land capacity of Environmental Land Unit 1 (ELU1): This unit exhibited a high land capacity for the strict maintenance of current activities (SM) due to the recovery of its own scrub and for ecosystem regeneration (ER) by restoring the potential natural vegetation. The land capacity was classified as medium for extensive agriculture (EA) and for intensive grazing (IG) due to the lack of abundant scrub vegetation in these areas. The land capacity was classified as low for camping or recreation (CR) and very low for urbanization (UR) due to the impact generated by the construction of the various infrastructure that are needed in each case. However, these activities would generate a positive economic impact in the territory. * Land capacity of Environmental Land Unit 2 (ELU2): The land capacity is medium for scientific-cultural activities (SAs), reforestation (RF), and the occasional collection of aromatic species (AS) activities. Scientific-cultural activities (SAs) could play a role in improving the understanding of ecosystem functioning. Reforestation (RF) could improve and preserve the formation of corpses in the area, maintaining the ecosystem of sclerophyll scrub and thus improving its soil protection and landscing. The occasional collection of aromatic species (AS) would be beneficial when promoting socio-economic activity in the environmental unit, provided that the balance of the ecosystem is not altered. The strict maintenance of current activities (SM), ecosystem regeneration (ER), and intensive grazing (IG) has an indifferent impact.