# Hair Removal Combining Saliency, Shape and Color
## 3 Experimental Results
### Quantitative Evaluation
#### 3.3.1 Quantitative Evaluation Based on Quality Measures
** & **MSE** & **PSNR** & **MSE3** & **PSNR3** & **SSIM** & **MSSIM** & **VSNR** & **VIFP** & **UQI** & **NQM** & **WSNR** \\ \hline ISIC\_000040 & Lee & 284.167 & 23.595 & 378.463 & 22.351 & 0.976 & 0.952 & **8.877** & **0.712** & **0.916** & 0.702 & 19.995 \\  & Xie & 184.397 & 25.473 & 295.277 & 23.429 & 0.977 & 0.874 & 3.327 & 0.562 & 0.923 & 2.318 & 19.575 \\  & HR-SSC & **114.313** & **27.550** & **158.448** & **26.132** & **0.982** & **0.985** & 8.688 & 0.697 & 0.611 & **15.389** & **31.447** \\ \hline ISIC\_000096 & [PERSON] & 8.604 & 38.784 & 13.237 & 36.913 & **0.997** & **0.983** & 16.692 & **0.905** & **0.956** & 14.830 & 36.493 \\  & [PERSON] & 164.330 & 25.974 & 236.750 & 24.388 & 0.985 & 0.917 & 3.736 & 0.818 & 0.950 & 2.842 & 21.224 \\  & HR-SSC & **5.160** & **41.005** & **12.589** & **37.131** & 0.996 & 0.961 & **20.198** & 0.716 & 0.614 & **16.606** & **39.021** \\ \hline ISIC\_0000184 & [PERSON] & 26.720 & 33.862 & 39.355 & 32.181 & **0.995** & 0.959 & 20.266 & **0.815** & **0.915** & 16.444 & 31.995 \\  & [PERSON] & 391.069 & 22.208 & 580.441 & 20.493 & 0.966 & 0.848 & 9.115 & 0.711 & 0.903 & 4.434 & 17.907 \\  & HR-SSC & **12.844** & **37.044** & **19.339** & **35.267** & **0.995** & **0.966** & **24.759** & 0.728 & 0.801 & **19.208** & **34.899** \\ \hline ISIC\_000257 & [PERSON] & 14.885 & 36.403 & 20.021 & 35.116 & 0.993 & 0.974 & 14. \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c c c c c c c} \hline \hline
**Dataset** & **Met.** & **MSE** & **PSNR** & **MSE3** & **PSNR3** & **SSIM** & **MSSIM** & **VSNR** & **VIFP** & **UQI** & **NQM** & **WSNR** \\ \hline _H13 GAN-data_ & Lee & 58.441 & 31.454 & 65.314 & 30.752 & 0.863 & 0.948 & 21.176 & 0.379 & 0.651 & 19.719 & 32.927 \\  & Xie & **23.211** & **34.802** & **30.925** & **33.445** & **0.872** & **0.952** & **25.959** & **0.400** & **0.663** & **22.993** & **37.326** \\  & HR-SSC & 59.378 & 31.161 & 66.453 & 30.521 & 0.813 & 0.912 & 20.430 & 0.284 & 0.527 & 19.424 & 32.329 \\ \hline _H13 Sim-data_ & [PERSON] & 50.490 & 32.631 & 51.118 & 32.486 & 0.964 & 0.973 & 20.947 & 0.833 & 0.931 & 19.450 & 32.700 \\  & [PERSON] & **11.919** & **38.485** & **16.792** & **36.968** & **0.996** & **0.975** & **24.728** & **0.914** & **0.958** & **20.241** & **34.727** \\  & HR-SSC & 59.626 & 31.384 & 63.298 & 31.012 & 0.838 & 0.928 & 20.762 & 0.333 & 0.605 & 19.413 & 32.356 \\ \hline _sH13 Sim-data_ & [PERSON] & 41.997 & 34.793 & 56.632 & 33.379 & 0.987 & 0.970 & 15.476 & **0.787** & **0.931** & 12.147 & 31.991 \\  & [PERSON] & 282.272 & 24.356 & 386.863 & 22.953 & 0.966 & 0.870 & 4.628 & 0.645 & 0.923 & 28.833 & 19.447 \\  & HR-SSC & **13.070** & **41.775** & **19.194** & **39.669** & **0.990** & **0.980** & **23.045** & 0.718 & 0.604 & **19.489** & **40.800** \\ \hline _HSim-data_ & [PERSON] & 56.748 & 32.693 & 77.344 & 31.310 & 0.984 & 0.959 & 16.709 & **0.773** & **0.918** & 11.184 & 30.038 \\  & [PERSON] & 376.331 & 23.049 & 509.629 & 21.717 & 0.958 & 0.853 & 7.000 & 0.650 & 0.911 & 3.202 & 18.552 \\  & HR-SSC & **24.525** & **38.001** & **35.450** & **36.237** & **0.988** & **0.972** & **21.952** & 0.714 & 0.677 & **16.212** & **35.725** \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 4: Average quality evaluation of the results on _H13 GAN-data_, _H13 Sim-data_, _sH13 Sim-data_, and _HSim-data_—best results are in bold. Figure 16: Trends of quality measures on _H13 Sim-data_ for the methods Lee, Xie, and HR-SSC.