## 1 Introduction  
Modern surveying technologies in cultural heritage (CH) offer new perspectives of application both as regards the acquisition of metric data and the representation or analysis of objects of historical and artistic interest [1]. In this way, it is possible to obtain a digital representation of objects or structures belonging to the CH environment in terms of position, shape, geometry and description of each element. Geomatics surveys are the primary step in the process of conservation, enhancement and management of CH. A geomatics survey can be performed using image-based 3D modelling (IBM) or range-based modelling (RBM).  
IBM methods use 2D images (generated by passive sensor) measurements in order to obtain 3D models. In the last few years, a very successful approach in the construction of 3D models has been that based on the structure from motion (SfM) and multi-view stereo (MVS) algorithms. Using these approaches, a 3D model or 2D orthophotos can be obtained in a rapid and automatic way using photogrammetric software. In general, the several processing steps that lead to the construction of the model are: (_i_) alignment of the images; (_ii_) building a dense point cloud (PC); (_iii_) building mesh and; (_iv_) building an orthomosaic. Furthermore, the passive sensors used in the IBM method may be used even on mobile platforms (such as cranes, unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), hot-air balloons,etc.). In this way, it is possible to acquire data even in big, complex and inaccessible structures, such as upper parts of buildings, aqueducts, bridges etc.  
Range-based modelling is based on active sensors, which provide a highly detailed and accurate representation of a 3D object or structure. An example of active sensor is the terrestrial laser scanner (TLS). TLS is a ground-based method that rapidly acquires accurate 3D dense point clouds of a scene through laser range-finding [2].  
While in the past these two techniques have been often treated as two separate methodologies, comparing them in terms of accuracy, cost and flexibility [3], only in recent times, they have started to be considered as complementary [4]. The benefit of integrating these two technologies is to take advantage of the TLS capability to directly acquire a dense coloured cloud, with the flexibility of photogrammetry to operate even in exceptional conditions.  
By an adequate post-processing of geomatics survey data, it is possible to obtain a georeferenced point cloud of the structure (or object) under investigation.  
Next, it is necessary to transform the point cloud into objects for BIM (building information modelling) and FEM (finite element method) analysis. Recently, many studies have been focusing on the possibility of managing point clouds within BIM or structural analysis software and/or identifying a suitable pipeline in order to obtain 3D model for these purposes [5]. While allowing the import of data, the current BIM and structural analysis software does not provide flexible and manageable procedures such as transforming them into models suitable for subsequent processing. Indeed, this is the main challenge pertaining to modelling, as it is necessary to develop simple methods to obtain BIM or HBIM (historic building information modelling) models that still guarantee accuracy, precision and quality of representation consistent with the acquired data. In addition, the model must be enriched with data and information that are not strictly geometric, such as historical information, analysis of degradation or deformation, and levels of detail not granted by the complete model.