# Evaluation of Lower Extremities Power, Movement, Position and Effectiveness in Volleyball
## 3 Results
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c c c c c} \hline \hline
**Df = 4** & **Libero** & **Opposite** & \
\begin{tabular}{c} **Outside** \\ **Hitter** \\ \end{tabular} & **Setter** &
\begin{tabular}{c} **Middle** \\ **Blocker** \\ \end{tabular} & **Total** & **MT** & \(\chi^{2}\) & \(p\) \\ \hline \multirow{6}{*}{Peace [step/s]} & \(\leq\)M/Ob. & 0.00 & 11.00 & 55.00 & 7.00 & 50.00 & \multirow{6}{*}{123.00} & \multirow{6}{*}{99.43} & \multirow{6}{*}{\(<\)0.001} \\ \cline{2-2}  & Ex. & 20.58 & 15.56 & 33.63 & 18.57 & 34.64 & & & \\ \cline{2-2}  & Ob.-Ex. & \(-\)20.58 & \(-\)4.56 & 21.36 & \(-\)11.57 & 15.35 & & & \\ \cline{2-2}  & \(>\)M/Ob. & 41.00 & 20.00 & 12.00 & 30.00 & 19.00 & & & \\ \cline{2-2}  & Ex. & 20.41 & 15.43 & 33.36 & 18.42 & 34.35 & & & \\ \cline{2-2}  & Ob.-Ex. & 20.58 & 4.56 & \(-\)21.36 & 11.57 & \(-\)15.35 & & & \\ \cline{2-2}  & Total: Ob. & 41.00 & 31.00 & 67.00 & 37.00 & 69.00 & 245.00 & & \\ \hline \multirow{6}{*}{Tstance [cm]} & \(\leq\)M/Ob. & 26.00 & 20.00 & 35.00 & 27.00 & 15.00 & & & \\ \cline{2-2}  & Ex. & 20.58 & 15.56 & 33.63 & 18.57 & 34.64 & & & \\ \cline{2-2}  & Ob.-Ex. & 5.41 & 4.43 & 1.36 & 8.42 & \(-\)19.64 & & & \\ \cline{2-2}  & \(>\)M/Ob. & 15.00 & 11.00 & 32.00 & 10.00 & 54.00 & & & \\ \cline{2-2}  & Ex. & 20.41 & 15.43 & 33.36 & 18.42 & 34.35 & & & \\ \cline{2-2}  & Ob.-Ex. & \(-\)5.41 & \(-\)4.43 & \(-\)1.36 & \(-\)8.42 & 19.64 & & & \\ \cline{2-2}  & Total: Ob. & 41.00 & 31.00 & 67.00 & 37.00 & 69.00 & 245.00 & & \\ \hline \multirow{6}{*}{StepWidth [cm]} & \(\leq\)M/Ob. & 41.00 & 10.00 & 48.00 & 6.00 & 30.00 & & & \\ \cline{2-2}  & Ex. & 22.59 & 17.08 & 36.91 & 20.38 & 38.02 & & & \\ \cline{2-2}  & Ob.-Ex. & 18.40 & \(-\)7.08 & 11.08 & \(-\)14.38 & \(-\)8.02 & & & \\ \cline{2-2}  & \(>\)M/Ob. & 0.00 & 21.00 & 19.00 & 31.00 & 39.00 & & 27.10 & 73.73 & \(<\)0.001 \\ \cline{2-2}  & Ex. & 18.40 & 13.91 & 30.08 & 16.61 & 30.98 & & & \\ \cline{2-2}  & Ob.-Ex. & \(-\)18.40 & 7.08 & \(-\)11.08 & 14.38 & 8.020 & & & \\ \cline{2-2}  & Total: Ob. & 41.00 & 31.00 & 67.00 & 37.00 & 69.00 & 245.00 & & \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 7: Differentiation of player’s position and movement parameters of studied players ([PERSON]’s post hoc). \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c c c c} \hline \hline
**Parameters** & \begin{tabular}{c} **GPF** \\ **Points** \\ \end{tabular}  & \begin{tabular}{c} **GPF** \\ **Serve** \\ \end{tabular}  & \begin{tabular}{c} **GPF** \\ **Reception** \\ \end{tabular}  & \begin{tabular}{c} **GPF** \\ **Attack** \\ \end{tabular}  & \begin{tabular}{c} **EF** \\ **EFF** \\ \end{tabular}  & \begin{tabular}{c} **EF** \\ **Reception** \\ \end{tabular}  & \begin{tabular}{c} **EF Attack** \\ \end{tabular}  & \ \begin{tabular}{c} **EF Sets** \\ \end{tabular}  & \begin{tabular}{c} **GEF Total** \\ \end{tabular}  \\ \hline \multirow{2}{*}{TFlight [s]} & 0.54 & 0.52 & 0.14 & 0.51 & 0.45 & 0.15 & 0.55 & \(-\)0.21 & \(-\)0.40 \\ \cline{2-2}  & \(p=0.042\) & \(p=0.052\) & \(p=0.626\) & \(p=0.060\) & \(p=0.104\) & \(p=0.597\) & \(p=0.038\) & \(p=0.466\) & \(p=0.155\) \\ \cline{2-2}  & \(0.16\) & \(-\)0.040 & \(-\)0.34 & 0.27 & \(-\)0.13 & \(-\)0.34 & 0.30 & \(-\)0.18 & \(-\)0.31 \\ \cline{2-2}  & \(p=0.580\) & \(p=0.893\) & \(p=0.225\) & \(p=0.347\) & \(p=0.648\) & \(p=0.234\) & \(p=0.294\) & \(p=0.528\) & \(p=0.280\) \\ \hline \multirow{2}{*}{JHeight [cm]} & 0.55 & 0.52 & 0.16 & 0.52 & 0.45 & 0.17 & 0.56 & \(-\)0.22 & \(-\)0.40 \\ \cline{2-2}  & \(p=0.040\) & \(p=0.053\) & \(p=0.576\) & \(p=0.057\) & \(p=0.105\) & \(p=0.548\) & \(p=0.036\) & \(p=0.441\) & \(p=0.150\)Figure 1: Correlation between GPF Points and TF. Figure 3: Correlation between EF Service and P.  
Figure 2: Correlation between EF Reception and P.