## 4 Results
* For case a, a 100% value was obtained in producer accuracy (precision) with the stable and quasi-stable classes-the remaining sub-classes and statistical cases produced 95% and lower values. * Regarding user accuracy (recall), 100% values were obtained for all statistical cases with sub-class stable. Case a with sub-class failed also produced a 100% value. Other sub-classes and statistical cases registered values of 89% and lower. * The overall accuracy parameter, which defines the quality of the result obtained for the classification method ([PERSON] et al., 2020), provided an 80% value for statistical cases a and b and 70% for case c. \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c c c c} \hline \hline \multirow{2}{*}{**No.**} & \multirow{2}{*}{\begin{tabular}{c} **Zone of** \\ **Ecuador** \\ \end{tabular} } & \multirow{2}{*}{\begin{tabular}{c} **Slope** \\ **Dip** \\ \end{tabular} } & \multirow{2}{*}{\begin{tabular}{c} **Slope Dip** \\ **Direction** \\ \end{tabular} } & \multirow{2}{*}{\begin{tabular}{c} **Failure** \\ **Mode** \\ \end{tabular} } & \multirow{2}{*}{\begin{tabular}{c} **Joint** \\ **DipDir** \\ \end{tabular} } & \multirow{2}{*}{\begin{tabular}{c} **Joint Dip** \\ **DiPDir** \\ \end{tabular} } & \multirow{2}{*}{\begin{tabular}{c} **Joint Dip** \\ **(Wedges)** \\ \end{tabular} } & \multirow{2}{*}{\begin{tabular}{c} **Joint \\ **Cropeen** \\ \end{tabular} } & \multirow{2}{*}{\
\begin{tabular}{c} **Frictional** \\ **Safety FS** \\ \end{tabular} } & \multirow{2}{*}{
\begin{tabular}{c} **Factor of** \\ **Safety FS** \\ \end{tabular} } \\ \hline
1 & Coast & 85 & 060 & Wedge & 072 & 65 & 023 & 48 & 0.27 & Unstable \\ \hline
2 & Coast & 30 & 035 & Planar & 030 & 73 & & 37 & \textgreater{}1 & Stable \\ \hline
3 & Coast & 30 & 215 & Toppling & 192 & 16 & & 37 & \textgreater{}2 & Stable \\ \hline
4 & Coast & 75 & 180 & Toppling & 187 & 15 & & 37 & \textgreater{}3 & Stable \\ \hline
5 & Coast & 50 & 192 & Planar & 180 & 44 & & 30 & 0.6 & Unstable \\ \hline
6 & Coast & 10 & 208 & Toppling & 203 & 17 & & 21 & \textgreater{}1 & Stable \\ \hline
7 & Coast & 20 & 345 & Toppling & 336 & 34 & & 21 & \textgreater{}2 & Stable \\ \hline
8 & Coast & 70 & 110 & Wedge & 034 & 60 & 140 & 30 & 0.73 & Unstable \\ \hline
9 & Andean & 80 & 090 & Wedge & 155 & 77 & 077 & 11 & 0.25 & Unstable \\ \hline
10 & Andean & 75 & 095 & Planar & 108 & 77 & & 25 & \textgreater{}1 & Stable \\ \hline
11 & Andean & 65 & 090 & Wedge & 034 & 62 & 117 & 30 & 0.61 & Unstable \\ \hline
12 & Andean & 75 & 115 & Wedge & 151 & 61 & 048 & 30 & 0.51 & Unstable \\ \hline
13 & Andean & 75 & 180 & Planar & 186 & 49 & & 37 & 0.5 & Unstable \\ \hline
14 & Amazon & 90 & 210 & Toppling & 065 & 80 & & 30 & 0.23 & Unstable \\ \hline
15 & Andean & 77 & 161 & Planar & 175 & 31 & & 32 & \textgreater{}1 & Stable \\ \hline
16 & Coast & 82 & 050 & Toppling & 056 & 82 & & 11 & 0.33 & Unstable \\ \hline
17 & Coast & 80 & 325 & Wedge & 289 & 88 & 038 & 5 & 0.77 & Unstable \\ \hline
18 & Coast & 74 & 272 & Toppling & 272 & 78 & & 11 & 0.58 & Unstable \\ \hline
19 & Coast & 70 & 126 & Wedge & 203 & 85 & 105 & 29 & \textgreater{}1 & Stable \\ \hline
20 & Coast & 78 & 137 & Wedge & 163 & 71 & 063 & 32 & 0.4 & Unstable \\ \hline
21 & Coast & 85 & 145 & Wedge & 139 & 84 & 184 & 30 & 0.31 & Unstable \\ \hline
22 & Andean & 75 & 060 & Planar & 062 & 79 & & 37 & \textgreater{}1 & Stable \\ \hline
23 & Andean & 77 & 120 & Planar & 105 & 76 & & 9 & 0.14 & Unstable \\ \hline
24 & Andean & 70 & 040 & Wedge & 345 & 43 & 272 & 14 & 0.62 & Unstable \\ \hline
25 & Andean & 75 & 020 & Toppling & 010 & 63 & & 14 & 0.59 & Unstable \\ \hline
26 & Andean & 75 & 028 & Wedge & 113 & 44 & 004 & 40 & 0.83 & Unstable \\ \hline
27-28 & Andean & 72 & 005 & Wedge & 309 & 71 & 009 & 20 & 0.33 & Unstable \\ \hline
29 & Andean & 80 & 080 & Planar & 099 & 77 & & 37 & 0.13 & Unstable \\ \hline
30 & Andean & 72 & 015 & wedge & 310 & 77 & 093 & 7 & 1.16 & Stable \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 2: Kinematic assessment of the studied rock slopes.