## 5 Discussion  
As shown in Table 6, the Significance and Hypothesis testing resulted in the rejection of seven of the sixteen hypotheses. However, all hypotheses will be separately discussed in this section for validation purposes:  
* **\"Hypothesis 1 (H1). **_User Competency is significant to Behavioural Intention to Use_\" was accepted. This hypothesis was instigated by the status quo of BIM adoption in the UK emphasising the shortage of competent users in the industry. Accordingly, an organisation with the intention to uptake BIM within a limited timeframe should consider building in-house user competency as a primary objective. Hence, the strong significance of 'User Competency', supported by the combined effects of the entire framework, explained around 30% of the variance and 24% of predictive relevance in the 'Behavioural Intention to Use' variable. * **\"Hypothesis 2 (H2). **_Knowledge Acquisition is significant to Behavioural Intention to Use_\" was accepted. As with H1, this hypothesis was instigated by the status quo of BIM adoption in the UK and the need to leverage user competency by training and educating employees on workflow processes and the in-house resourcing of knowledge through the use of a dedicated, well publicised, private knowledge portal to ensure employees awareness. This point, in particular, was addressed in questionnaire statement \"KA4--My organisation enables quick access to the relevant knowledge and training material\", which received a mean average of 3.151 or 69%. Thus, 31% of survey participants were unaware that the sponsoring organisation had an elaborated BIM knowledge portal to support and assist their day-to-day WBT and practice needs. Accordingly, it may be speculated that the 'Knowledge Acquisition' variable could have a double star significance rating on behavioural intention should the knowledge portal be better publicised internally. * **\"Hypothesis 3 (H3). **_Organisational Support is significant to Perceived Ease of Use_\" was accepted. Following the calls of [PERSON] & [PERSON] (2014) and [PERSON] et al. (2011) for organisational awareness to be added to the benefits of BIM, this variable was introduced to assess the degree to which employees believe that their organisation's support can lead to reduced effort in BIM learning and implementation. \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c} \hline \hline
**ID** & **Hypotheses** & **_t_-Values** & **_p_-Values** & **Results** \\ \hline
**H11** & CI/Kaizen in Process Training \textgreater{} User Competency & 1.597 & 0.11 & Rejected \\ \hline
**H12** & CI/Kaizen in Technical Training \textgreater{} User Competency & 1.779 & 0.075 & Rejected \\ \hline
**H13** & CI/Kaizen in Knowledge Acquisition \textgreater{} User Competency & 1.1 & 0.271 & Rejected \\ \hline
**H14** & Knowledge Acquisition \textgreater{}Organisational Support & 1.992 & * & 0.046 & Accepted \\ \hline
**H15** & CI/Kaizen to Knowledge Acquisition \textgreater{} Perceived Usefulness & 1.08 & & 0.28 & Rejected \\ \hline
**H16** & Knowledge Acquisition \textgreater{} Attitude & 2.848 & ** & 0.004 & Accepted \\ \hline
**H17** & Technical Training \textgreater{} Attitude & 1.992 & ** & 0.046 & Accepted \\ \hline
**H18** & Attitude \textgreater{} Behavioural Intention to Use & 6.059 & ** & 0 & Accepted \\ \hline
**H19** & Attitude \textgreater{} BIM Uptake & 1.268 & & 0.205 & Rejected \\ \hline
**H20** & Social Factors \textgreater{} Perceived Usefulness & 1.442 & & 0.149 & Rejected \\ \hline
**H21** & User Competency \textgreater{} Social Factors & 1.954 & * & 0.049 & Accepted \\ \hline
**H22** & User Competency \textgreater{} BIM Uptake & 3.49 & ** & 0 & Accepted \\ \hline
**H23** & CI/Kaizen \textgreater{} User Competency & 2.996 & ** & 0.003 & Accepted \\ \hline
**H24** & Lean \textgreater{} BIM Uptake & 0.965 & & 0.335 & Rejected \\ \hline
**H25** & Lean \textgreater{} Organisational Learning & 0.897 & & 0.37 & Rejected \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table}