## 4 Results and Analysis
### Analysis of NonCompliance Behaviors
#### 4.2.2 Value Conflicts and Noncompliance
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c} \hline \hline
**Authors** & **Research Method** & **Sample Size** & **Findings** \\ \hline \multirow{4}{*}{[12]} & Experience sampling method & & Stress-related security requirements \\  & adopted. hierarchical linear & & cause fatigue and frustration, which \\  & modeling used for results analysis & & later on relate to neutralization. \\  & & & & Moreover, neutralization has a negative \\  & & & behavioral effect on ISP compliance. \\ \hline \multirow{4}{*}{[11]} & ESM research design adopted. & & Work impediment, positive affect, \\  & HLM is used for results & 77 recruited participants filled & negative affect, and computer \\  & and analysis. & surveys correctly & monitoring influence compliance \\  & & & behavior’s daily compliance attitude. \\ \hline \multirow{4}{*}{[98]} & \multirow{2}{*}{Quantitative study design} & 356 employees from the IT & Technostress is positively associated \\  & & industry participated & (direct and indirect) with perceived \\  & & & strain and intention to violate ISP \\ \hline \multirow{4}{*}{[51]} & Quantitative research. PLS used & 393 employees from & Neutralization and beliefs have \\  & for Hypothesis testing & different organizations & significant effects on \\  & & & employees’ noncompliance. \\ \hline \multirow{4}{*}{[99]} & \multirow{2}{*}{Scenario-based quantitative study & & National culture does not affect \\  & design. PLS used for & 615 employees from 48 countries. & deterrence. Shame, neutralization, and \\  & result analysis. & & moral beliefs have significant effects on \\  & & & ISP noncompliance intention of \\  & & & employees from all cultures. \\ \hline \multirow{4}{*}{[101]} & \multirow{2}{*}{Quantitative study design} & 120 female and 101 males & Gender has no effects on ISP \\  & & participated in this study & noncompliance; however, rewards and \\ \cline{1-1}  & & & participants are dependent upon the \\ \cline{1-1}  & & & situation-specific ethical orientation \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 11: Cont. (i.e., denial of the importance of security tasks)--which employees use to avoid security task performance. Employees think the security risks are external factors (i.e., perceived externalities), and their business tasks are more important than the security tasks (triage). This study concluded that employees consider security tasks to be external and less valued and avoid procrastination and psychology detachment. Reference [102] described consequence-delayed information security violation (CDISV). It has been discussed in detail that most employees indulge in risky ISB because of their late results. Long-term orientation towards ISP is considered as the main factor to reduce CDISV intention. Employees having high organizational value identification are more likely to develop long-term orientation (LTO) behavior. LTO has three main dimensions: futurity, perseverance, and continuity. LTO, with the addition of stewardship theory and need theory constructs, was tested to determine LTO's effects on CDISV intention. It has been shown that the degree of LTO negatively affects CDISV intention. Table 12 shows author names, methodologies, and observations from the literature related to value conflicts and noncompliance.