## 4 Results and Discussion
Discontinuity and location of industry types throughout the administrative territory adds value to territorial accessibility, which was identified in the city of Pecs where the maximum accessibility is in the range of up to 30 min, while for the city of Cluj-Napoca access times of more than 60 min were calculated for large areas, thus inducing territorial dysfunction in terms of engineering industry. The other types of creative industries have a similar spatial distribution within the cities, being mainly located near the centres, giving them good accessibility, within the range 0-15 min. For the city of Pecs, the distribution of creative industries is divided into three main clusters: a cluster in the central area of the city, a cluster in the eastern area and a cluster in the south of the city, which does not affect accessibility in terms of time, whereas for the city of Cluj-Napoca, there is a general clustering of industries with development from the peripheral neighbourhoods towards the centre. Due to the different spatial extension, both in terms of geometry and in terms of the surface areas of the administrative territories of the two urban centres, a comparative analysis of territorial accessibility cannot be carried out directly. Thus, for the analysis by components (types of creative industries), at city level, it was decided to analyse the surface areas occupied by each accessibility class in relation to the total surface area of the city. Following this methodology, a quantitative analysis was carried out based on values between 0 and 1. Obtaining the bonus values for each accessibility range based on the proposed equation and methodology involves first calculating the occupied areas of each accessibility range individually, followed by calculating the percentage of land occupancy reported to the total area of the city and integrating them based on the equation system proposed in the analysis methodology. Thus, for the artistic industry, the areas for the accessibility intervals, specific to the city of Pecs, were calculated: 0-5 min (28.12 Km\({}^{2}\)/17.28%), 5-15 min (41.17 Km\({}^{2}\)/25.29%), 15-30 min (50.28 Km\({}^{2}\)/30.89%), 30-60 min (38.41 Km\({}^{2}\)/23.60%), and >60 min (4.75 Km\({}^{2}\)/2.91%) and the total area of the city was 162.3 Km\({}^{2}\). Obtaining the bond value is performed by implementing the equation system of the kind:  
For the accessibility interval of 0-5 min:  
\[(0.20\times 17.28)/100=0.034\] \[0+0.034=0.034\]  
For the accessibility interval of 5-15 min:  
\[(0.20\times 25.29)/100=0.050\] \[0.20+0.050=0.250\]  
Figure 4: Maps of accessibility. For the accessibility interval of 15-30 min:  
\[ \begin{array}{c}(0.20\times 30.89)/100=0.061\\ 0.40+0.061=0.461\end{array} \]  
For the accessibility interval of 30-60 min:  
\[ \begin{array}{c}(0.20\times 23.60)/100=0.047\\ 0.60+0.047=0.647\end{array} \]  
For the accessibility interval of \(>\)60 min:  
\[ \begin{array}{c}(0.20\times 2.91)/100=0.005\\ 0.80+0.005=0.805\end{array} \]  
where 0.20--the value of the scoring interval; 0.034, 0.050, 0.061, 0.047, and 0.005--the value of the accessibility scoring depending on the area; 0, 0.20, 0.40, 0.60, and 0.80--the basic value of the scoring interval; and 0.034, 0.250, 0.461, 0.647, and 0.805--the value of the accessibility scoring depending on the area. Implementing the presented equation system, we obtained scoring values for each type of creative industry and each accessibility interval (Table 3). These values were used in the process of spatial comparative analysis, based on the accessibility of the creative industries of the two administrative-territorial units. Our comparative quantitative analysis of accessibility based on the type of creative industry, intended to highlight functional areas, underscores the impact they have on the territory while also pointing to their functionality or dysfunctionality, which was analysed from the perspective of the characteristics of the respective industry.