# Modeling Evacuees' Intended Responses to a Phased Hurricane Evacuation Order
## 5 Model Estimation Results
### Class-Membership Model
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{l c c c c c c c c c} \hline \hline \multirow{2}{*}{**Variable**} & \multicolumn{4}{c}{**Binary Logit Model**} & \multicolumn{4}{c}{**Latent Class Binary Logit Model**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**Hypothesis**} \\ \cline{2-3} \cline{5-10}  & **Coefficient** & **Std. Error** & & & \multicolumn{1}{c}{**z-Value**} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{**_p-Value_**} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{**Coefficient Std. Error**} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{**z-Value**} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{_p-Value_} \\ \hline An evacuee’s perception of safety responsibility (0 = more an individual/household responsibility, 1 = equal responsibility, 2 = more a government responsibility) & & & & & & & H1 (not fully rejected) \\ \hline \multicolumn{10}{l}{(na)} \\ \hline Whether an evacuee chose the home of a friend/relative as the destination (1 = Yes) & \(-1.04\)*** & \(0.34\) & \(-3.03\) & \(0.00\) & \(-2.16\)** & \(1.02\) & \(-2.1\) & \(0.03\) & \begin{tabular}{c} H4 (rejected) \\ \end{tabular} \\ \hline The number of cars an evacuee specified they will bring during an evacuation & \(-1.14\)*** & \(0.28\) & \(-4.02\) & \(0.00\) & \(-0.97\)** & \(0.42\) & \(-2.28\) & \(0.02\) & \begin{tabular}{c} H5 (not not rejected) \\ \end{tabular} \\ \hline Housing tenure in years & \(0.02\)** & \(0.01\) & \(2.30\) & \(0.02\) & \(0.52\) & \(0.32\) & \(1.61\) & \(0.10\) & \begin{tabular}{c} H8 (rejected) \\ \end{tabular} \\ \hline The length of expected travel delay in hours & \(-0.04\) & \(0.03\) & \(-1.27\) & \(0.20\) & \(0.46\)** & \(0.22\) & \(2.07\) & \(0.03\) & \begin{tabular}{c} H9 (rejected) \\ \end{tabular} \\ \hline \multicolumn{10}{l}{(na)} \\ \hline Whether an evacuee chose the home of a friend/relative as the destination (1 = Yes) & \((na)\) & \((na)\) & \((na)\) & \(-2.16\)** & \(1.02\) & \(-2.1\) & \(0.03\) & \begin{tabular}{c} H4 (rejected) \\ \end{tabular} \\ \hline The number of cars an evacuee specified they will bring during an evacuation & \((na)\) & \((na)\) & \((na)\) & \(-0.97\)** & \(0.42\) & \(-2.28\) & \(0.02\) & \begin{tabular}{c} H5 (not rejected) \\ \end{tabular} \\ \hline \multicolumn{10}{l}{(na)} \\ \hline Whether an evacuee chose the home of a friend/relative as the destination (1 = Yes) & \((na)\) & \((na)\) & \((na)\) & \(-2.16\)** & \(1.02\) & \(-2.1\) & \(0.03\) & \begin{tabular}{c} H4 (rejected) \\ \end{tabular} \\ \hline The number of cars an evacuee specified they will bring during an evacuation & \((na)\) & \((na)\) & \((na)\) & \((na)\) & \(-0.97\)** & \(0.42\) & \(-2.28\) & \(0.02\) & \begin{tabular}{c} H5 (not rejected) \\ \end{tabular} \\ \hline Housing tenure in years & \((na)\) & \((na)\) & \((na)\) & \((na)\) & \(0.03\)** & \(0.01\) & \(1.97\) & \(0.04\) & \
\begin{tabular}{c} H8 (rejected) \\ \end{tabular} \\ \hline The length of expected travel delay in hours & \((na)\) & \((na)\) & \((na)\) & \((na)\) & \(-0.02\) & \(0.06\) & \(-0.37\) & \(0.71\) &
\begin{tabular}{c} H9 (rejected) \\ \end{tabular} \\ \hline Model’s goodness-of-fit statistics & N = 235; \(LL(0)\)= \(-153.1\); \(LL(\hat{b})\)= \(-122.8\); pseudo & N = 235; \(LL(0)\)= \(-162.9\); \(LL(\hat{b})\)= \(-120.8\); pseudo \(R^{2}\)= \(0.26\) & \((na)\) \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular} (Note: 'na’ means not applicable; * \(p\) \(<0.1\); **_p_ \(<0.05\); *** \(p\) \(<0.01\)).  
\end{table} 
Table 2: _Cont._favor of evacuation (\"evacuation keen\"). Those who do not are more likely to belong to Class 2, and are less in favor of evacuation (\"evacuation reluctant\").