## 3 Results
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c} \hline \hline
**State** & **National Forest** & \begin{tabular}{c} **Forest Trails** \\ **(Number of Trails)** \\ \end{tabular} & \
\begin{tabular}{c} \(\geq\)**10\% Canopy** \\ **Increase (Number of Trails)** \\ \end{tabular} &
\begin{tabular}{c} **Increased Distance—Canopy** \\ **Correlation Correspondence** \\ **(Number of Trails)** \\ \end{tabular} \\ \hline Pennsylvania & Allegheny & 73 & 10 & 9 \\ Idaho & Boise & 160 & 7 & 7 \\ Wyoming & Bridger-Teton & 222 & 36 & 34 \\ Idaho & Clearwater & 825 & 96 & 94 \\ California & Eldorado & 137 & 6 & 3 \\ Montana & Flathead & 186 & 27 & 21 \\ Florida & Florida & 83 & 25 & 20 \\ Montana & Lolo & 6 & 1 & 1 \\ California & Mendocino & 111 & 21 & 20 \\ California & Modoc & 21 & 3 & 3 \\ Oregon & Mt Hood & 199 & 14 & 12 \\ Nebraska & Nebraska & 21 & 2 & 2 \\ Idaho & N\& Perc & 165 & 18 & 18 \\ Washington & Okanogan-Wenatchee & 306 & 28 & 22 \\ Washington & Olympic & 54 & 6 & 2 \\ Colorado & Rio Grande & 30 & 3 & 3 \\ California & Sierra & 36 & 6 & 6 \\ California & Six Rivers & 69 & 11 & 10 \\ Oregon & Umpqua & 98 & 3 & 2 \\ \hline  & Total & 2802 & 323 & 289 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 1: Displays the forests analyzed across the US with number of forest trails showing an increase of at least 10% of the canopy following the resection of the forest (trails). The overall results show that 86.51% of the cases analyzed are consistent with increased canopy coverage as the distance from the resection increases. The results show the correspondence of increased distance with increased canopy coverage. Forest resection by trails was compared to neuron resection. The neuronal comparison values are taken from [PERSON] et al. [19], who performed in their research on severe crush spinal cord injuries (SCI) in wild-type mice. Following the severe crush SCI, dense astrocytic scars were formed in the mice over a period of two weeks and remained until eight weeks. The consequence of the astrocyte scar formation on axon regeneration was analyzed by three evaluation measurements: descending corticospinal tract (CST), ascending sensory tract (AST), and descending serotonergic (5 HT) tract. As a result of the severe SCI in the mice, transected CST, AST, and 5 HT axons exhibit dieback away from the lesion center (Figure 2B,D,F). Figure 2: (**A,C,E**), Forest resection performed by trails. Numbers (means \(\pm\) s.e.m.) of trees at Florida National Forest (**A**), Allegheny National Forest (**C**), and Rio Grande National Forest (**E**) canopy coverage at various distance from trail lesion center as percentage of total canopy coverage at 450 m proximal. (**B,D,F**), Severe crush spinal cord injuries (SCI) performed on mice [19]. Numbers (means \(\pm\) s.e.m.) of descending corticospinal tract (CST) (**B**), ascending sensory tract (AST) (**D**), and descending serotonergic (5 HT) tract (**F**) axons at various distances from the SCI lesion center as a percentage of the total number of axons present 3 mm proximal (Figure S3). The results of the canopy tree coverage as the distance from the trail extends compared to the results of the neuron axon coverage as the distance from the lesion center extends show a high level of similarity. The expected results of a set of trees acting independently, attempting to maximize their canopy coverage, would yield different results from a growing logarithmic graph consistently appearing in all locations. We can infer from the results that the trees, after resection, attempt to form two independent entities, each trying to perform network knowledge processing to optimize their light resource usage. The alternative explanation of damage by trail travelers which expands past the trail area on both sides would not explain the effect reaching a distance of 450 m on both sides of each trail in all the cases described.