## 1 Introduction  
In recent years, light emitting diodes (LEDs) have attracted great interest for landscape architecture and illumination applications because of their characteristics such as long life expectancy, high tolerance to humidity, low power consumption, light quality, color rendering, and environmental friendliness [1]. Although LEDs have several advantages, light control is still very important to improve the quality of lighting. Light control is the ability to regulate the level of lighting in a given space for specific tasks or situations. Controlling light properly not only helps to save energy, but also enhances lighting satisfaction, which is highly correlated to mood and productivity. Lighting accounts for 25%-30% of energy use in a building's electrical system [2]. In an average home or office, most light controls are just simple ON/OFF switches. This means that whether it's the middle of the day or it's nighttime, the fixtures are putting out the exact same amount of light. Unlike just ON/OFF, through dimming, users can control the quantity of light to fit specific tasks, moods, or situations [2]. Two major approaches to make LEDs dimmable are pulse width modulation (PWM) and analog dimming. Both methods control the time-averaged current through the LED or LED string, but they have differences which become evident when examining their advantages and disadvantages. PWM dimming greatly reduces color changes in the LED with varying brightness levels, because the LED essentially runs at a constant current when it is on and at no current when it is off. However, this advantage comes at the expense of additional logic to create the PWM waveforms [3]. On the contrary, analog dimming can use a simpler circuit, but the variable current supplied to the LED means that the regulator supplying the current to the LED must consume any power not supplied to the LED. This additional power leads to undesirable heat-generating energy waste. In addition, analog dimming may be inappropriate for applications that require a constant color temperature [3]. Recently, location awareness, in particular, for indoor environments, has drawn interest from researchers in many innovative applications of wireless systems, for instance, positioning or tracking people or objects inside buildings. Several existing indoor localization approaches use radio frequency (RF) signals [4; 5; 6; 7]. Practical RF systems usually have the situation of multipath fading and non-line-of-sight (NLOS) conditions in indoor scenarios, therefore it is difficult to measure precise distances using the received signal strength, and the estimated position error can be on the order of meters. It is possible to utilize Ultra Wide Band (UWB) technology to measure precise ranges based on time-difference-of-arrival (TDOA), but this technology requires complicated hardware [8]. Moreover, the use of RF-based positioning systems is restricted in places such as hospitals, kindergartens, airplanes, and areas with RF-sensitive equipment. To overcome these problems the use of visible light, an emerging technology in which LEDs transport information wirelessly, has been proposed [1]. LED light can be used for identification and localization systems, known as LED-ID localization. An LED-ID system includes at least two components, an LED-ID reader and an LED-ID transmitter (tag). The LED-ID reader receives the required information from the LED-ID transmitters. LED-ID systems are very suitable in RF interference-sensitive areas and therefore they are attractive since both illumination and localization purposes can be simultaneously provided. In addition, the use of LEDs is safer to human eyes, due to the intense visible light triggering the blinking reflex, and then preventing a prolonged exposure. This allows for an increase in the transmission power, high illumination levels, better coverage and link robustness, even in NLOS scenarios.