## 3 Results  
Analyzing team results, the significant decrease in JH (\(p<0.05\)) between two seasons was found in regards to all the jumps performed by the players and daily higher jumps of the given sessions. Also, [PERSON]'s d indicates medium effect in both manners of statistical analysis (Table 4). Individual analysis of all jumps performed by the players during two competitive seasons indicates a 4.1% decrease in JH in S2. There is only one player (n9) who did not have his JH reduced in S2. Additionally, individual standard deviation of players' JH decreased by 30.4% in S2 (Table 5). \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{p{227.6 pt}} \hline \hline
**Morning Readiness Chart** \\ \hline
3—injured/illness, not able to participate in any type of training \\
4—extremely fatigued, serious muscle or joint soreness, not able to fully participate in training, requirement of different type of training or recovery day \\
5—very fatigued, moderate muscle or joint soreness, ready to participate in training but some training adjustments may be needed \\
6—slightly fatigued, small muscle or joint soreness, ready to fully participate in training \\
7—feeling well, possible small muscle or joint soreness, ready to fully participate in training \\
8—feeling very well, no sign of muscle or joint soreness, ready to fully participate in training \\
9—fully sested, no sign of muscle or joint soreness, ready to fully participate in training \\
10—fully recovered, no sign of any fatigue or soreness \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 3: Subjective wellness questionnaire. Analyzing data regarding daily higher jumps, a reduction in JH by 4.4% in S2 can be observed (excluding n9, who improved his JH by 1.7%). Individual standard deviation of players' JH decreased by 30% in S2 (Table 6). Analyzing players' results of subjective monitoring (based on Table 3), no significant difference (\(p<0.05\)) was found between measurements of S1 and S2 (Table 7). \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c c c} \hline \hline \multirow{2}{*}{**No.**} & **Number of** & **Number of** & **Mean JH** & **Mean JH** & **Change in \%** & **SD of JH** & **SD of JH** & **Change in \%** \\  & **Jumps in S1** & **Jumps in S2** & **in S1** & **in S2** & **in S1** & **in S2** & **in S1** & **in S2** & **Change in \%** \\ \hline
1 & 33 & 19 & 43.6 & 40.8 & \(-\)6.4 & 2.24 & 1.4 & \(-\)37.5 \\
2 & 33 & 26 & 42.5 & 41 & \(-\)3.5 & 2.7 & 2.2 & \(-\)18.5 \\
3 & 33 & 29 & 50.1 & 46.7 & \(-\)6.8 & 2.63 & 1.2 & \(-\)54.4 \\
4 & 35 & 29 & 52.6 & 50.3 & \(-\)4.4 & 2.12 & 1.4 & \(-\)34 \\
5 & 34 & 27 & 45.8 & 44.2 & \(-\)3.5 & 2.04 & 1.8 & \(-\)11.8 \\
6 & 21 & 28 & 51.5 & 48.6 & \(-\)5.6 & 1.73 & 1.3 & \(-\)24.9 \\
7 & 23 & 27 & 48.7 & 45.3 & \(-\)7 & 2.16 & 1.6 & \(-\)25.9 \\
8 & 32 & 24 & 44.5 & 43 & \(-\)3.4 & 2.1 & 1.29 & \(-\)38.6 \\
9 & 26 & 25 & 47.9 & 48.7 & 1.7 & 2.55 & 2 & \(-\)21.6 \\ x & 30 & 26 & 47.5 & 45.4 & \(-\)4.4 & 2.25 & 1.58 & \(-\)30 \\ SD & 5.2 & 3.1 & 3.6 & 3.4 & & 0.32 & 0.35 & \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular} JH—jump height.  
\end{table} 
Table 6: Individual analysis of daily higher jumps in S1 and S2. \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c} \hline \hline \multirow{2}{*}{**Season**} & **Number of** & **JH (cm)** & **Cohen’s d** \\  & & **Mean \(\pm\) SD** & **\(p\)** & **Cohen’s d** \\ \hline \multicolumn{4}{c}{**All the jumps**} \\ \hline S1 & 540 & 46.7 \(\pm\) 3.5 & \multirow{2}{*}{0.01} & \multirow{2}{*}{0.55} \\ S2 & 468 & 44.8 \(\pm\) 3.3 & & \\  & & **Daily higher jumps** & & \\ \hline S1 & 270 & 47.5 \(\pm\) 3.6 & \multirow{2}{*}{0.01} & \multirow{2}{*}{0.6} \\ S2 & 234 & 45.4 \(\pm\) 3.4 & & \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 4: Team results of JH in S1 and S2. \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c c} \hline \hline \multirow{2}{*}{**No.