# A Survey on Machine Reading Comprehension--Tasks, Evaluation Metrics and Benchmark Datasets
## 4 Benchmark Dataset
### Citation Analysis
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{l c c c c c c} \hline \hline
**Year** & **Datasets** & **Average Monthly Citations** & **Total Citations** & **Months after Publication** & **Date of Publication** & **Date of Statistics** \\ \hline
2016 & SQuAD 1.1 [19] & 33.35 & 1234 & 37 & 2016-10-10 & 2019-12-01 \\
2015 & CNN/Daily Mail [19] & 25.21 & 1210 & 48 & 2015-11-19 & 2019-12-01 \\
2018 & SQuAD 2.0 [66] & 14.65 & 249 & 17 & 2018-06-11 & 2019-12-01 \\
2019 & Natural Questions [80] & 9.00 & 45 & 5 & 2019-07-01 & 2019-12-01 \\
2017 & TriviaQA [59] & 7.97 & 239 & 30 & 2017-05-13 & 2019-12-01 \\
2018 & CoQA [47] & 7.93 & 119 & 15 & 2018-08-21 & 2019-12-01 \\
2016 & WikidMoves [53] & 7.73 & 286 & 37 & 2016-10-10 & 2019-12-01 \\
2016 & CBT [28] & 6.92 & 332 & 48 & 2015-11-07 & 2019-12-01 \\
2016 & MS MARCO [39] & 6.65 & 246 & 37 & 2016-10-31 & 2019-12-01 \\
2015 & WikQA [52] & 6.43 & 328 & 51 & 2015-09-01 & 2019-12-01 \\
2018 & HotpotQA [67] & 5.71 & 80 & 14 & 2018-09-25 & 2019-12-01 \\
2016 & NewsQA [54] & 5.21 & 172 & 33 & 2017-02-07 & 2019-12-01 \\
2016 & MovieQA [53] & 5.00 & 235 & 47 & 2015-12-09 & 2019-12-01 \\
2017 & RACE [60] & 4.87 & 151 & 31 & 2017-04-15 & 2019-12-01 \\
2018 & QuAC [65] & 4.73 & 71 & 15 & 2018-08-27 & 2019-12-01 \\
2013 & MCTest [15] & 4.69 & 347 & 74 & 2013-10-01 & 2019-12-01 \\
2017 & Qangaroo [49] & 4.59 & 78 & 17 & 2018-06-11 & 2019-12-01 \\
2018 & SciTail [74] & 4.16 & 79 & 19 & 2018-04-27 & 2019-12-01 \\
2017 & NarrativeQA [63] & 3.74 & 86 & 23 & 2017-12-19 & 2019-12-01 \\
2019 & DRQ [50] & 3.00 & 27 & 9 & 2019-03-01 & 2019-12-01 \\
2018 & ARC & 2.90 & 58 & 20 & 2018-03-14 & 2019-12-01 \\
2017 & SearchQA [62] & 2.81 & 87 & 31 & 2017-04-18 & 2019-12-01 \\
2018 & OpenBookQA [73] & 2.64 & 37 & 14 & 2018-09-08 & 2019-12-01 \\
2016 & WikidReading [56] & 2.41 & 77 & 32 & 2017-03-15 & 2019-12-01 \\
2019 & CommonSenseQA [82] & 2.33 & 28 & 12 & 2011-11-02 & 2019-12-01 \\
2017 & Qusarar [61] & 1.82 & 51 & 28 & 2017-07-12 & 2019-12-01 \\
2016 & Who-did-What [48] & 1.69 & 66 & 39 & 2016-08-18 & 2019-12-01 \\
2018 & Mulike [75] & 1.67 & 30 & 18 & 2018-06-01 & 2019-12-01 \\
2017 & TQA [31] & 1.55 & 45 & 29 & 2017-07-01 & 2019-12-01 \\
2019 & DREAM [81] & 1.50 & 15 & 10 & 2019-01-31 & 2019-12-01 \\
2018 & ReCoRD [70] & 1.39 & 18 & 13 & 2018-10-30 & 2019-12-01 \\
2016 & LAMBADA [55] & 1.29 & 53 & 41 & 2016-620 & 2019-12-01 \\
2019 & SnAdv [38] & 1.27 & 19 & 15 & 2018-08-28 & 2019-12-01 \\
2018 & MCscript [8] & 1.10 & 22 & 20 & 2018-03-14 & 2019-12-01 \\
2015 & CuratedTREC [51] & 0.98 & 47 & 48 & 2015-11-20 & 2019-12-01 \\
2018 & ReopQA [54] & 0.93 & 13 & 14 & 2018-09-04 & 2019-12-01 \\
2017 & COMCS [33] & 0.86 & 31 & 36 & 2016-11-16 & 2019-12-01 \\
2018 & ProPlan [79] & 0.83 & 15 & 18 & 2018-05-17 & 2019-12-01 \\
2017 & ScQ [64] & 0.79 & 22 & 28 & 2017-07-19 & 2019-12-01 \\
2016 & BookTest [57] & 0.73 & 27 & 37 & 2016-10-04 & 2019-12-01 \\
2018 & DuxDox [68] & 0.63 & 12 & 19 & 2018-04-21 & 2019-12-01 \\
2018 & CIRC [71] & 0.55 & 11 & 20 & 2018-03-26 & 2019-12-01 \\
2018 & CLOTH [60] & 0.42 & 10 & 24 & 2017-11-09 & 2019-12-01 \\
2018 & ReviewQA [5] & 0.08 & 1 & 13 & 2018-10-29 & 2019-12-01 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 9: Citation analysis of the paper in which each dataset was proposed.