# Impact of Kinnanthropometric Differences According to Non-Professional Sports Activity Practiced
## 3 Results
### Kinanthropometric Results of the Participants  
From the anthropometric results, indices and percentages were obtained (Table 1) to establish the possible existence or not of differences between the various existing morphotypes (Table 3). \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c c c} \hline \hline \multicolumn{1}{c}{} & \multicolumn{6}{c}{**Kinanthropometric Results of the Participants**} \\ \hline Variables & \multicolumn{6}{c}{Study groups} & \multicolumn{6}{c}{Chi-squared test} \\  & S & A & R & B & S/A & S/R & S/B & R/B \\ BMI Index & 24.23 (\(\pm\)3.46) & 23.63 (\(\pm\)2.44) & 21.89 (\(\pm\)2.36) & 24.21 (\(\pm\)2.31) & & & & \\ Severe thinness & 0.00\% & 0.00\% & 0.00\% & 0.00\% & & & & \\ Moderate thinness & 1.59\% & 1.47\% & 5.00\% & 0.00\% & & & & \\ Mild thinness & 3.17\% & 1.47\% & 5.00\% & 0.00\% & & & & \\ Normal weight & 47.62\% & 64.71\% & 75.00\% & 60.42\% & 0.177 & 0.126 & 0.241 & 0.048 \({}^{*}\) \\ Pre-obesity & 42.86\% & 32.35\% & 15.00\% & 39.58\% & & & & & \\ Obesity class I & 4.76\% & 0.00\% & 0.00\% & 0.00\% & & & & \\ Obesity class II & 0.00\% & 0.00\% & 0.00\% & 0.00\% & & & & \\ Obesity class III & 0.00\% & 0.00\% & 0.00\% & 0.00\% & & & & \\ PI Index & 41.15\(\pm\)(1.99) & 42.27 (\(\pm\)1.52) & 49.44 (\(\pm\)1.66) & 42.02 (\(\pm\)1.38) & & & & \\ Low linearity & 57.14\% & 23.53\% & 15.00\% & 27.08\% & & & & \\ Moderate linearity & 34.92\% & 67.65\% & 70.00\% & 66.67\% & 0.001 \({}^{*}\) & 0.009 \({}^{*}\) & 0.010 \({}^{*}\) & 0.403 \\ Normal linearity & 4.76\% & 4.41\% & 5.00\% & 4.17\% & & & & \\ High linearity & 3.17\% & 4.41\% & 10.00\% & 2.08\% & & & & \\ Very high linearity & 0.00\% & 0.00\% & 0.00\% & 0.00\% & & & & \\ CI Index & 52.38 (\(\pm\)2.84) & 50.38 (\(\pm\)2.84) & 51.54 (\(\pm\)2.93) & 50.63 (\(\pm\)2.70) & & & & \\ Brachycormic & 26.98\% & 52.94\% & 60.00\% & 50.00\% & 50.00\% & \(<\)0.001 \({}^{*}\) & 0.071 & \(<\)0.001 \({}^{*}\) & 0.010 \({}^{*}\) \\ Metriotromic & 47.62\% & 41.18\% & 25.00\% & 47.92\% & & & & \\ Macrocormic & 25.40\% & 5.88\% & 15.00\% & 2.08\% & & & & \\ IRMI Index & 91.51 & 99.15 & 94.19 & 98.22 & & & & \\  & (\(\pm\)11.10) & (\(\pm\)12.08) & (\(\pm\)12.20) & (\(\pm\)11.70) & & & & \\ Brachyseletal & 20.63\% & 2.90\% & 5.00\% & 2.08\% & 0.001 \({}^{*}\) & 0.081 & 0.003 \({}^{*}\) & 0.793 \\ Metroskeletal & 31.75\% & 22.06\% & 20.00\% & 22.92\% & & & & \\ Macroskeletal & 47.62\% & 75.00\% & 75.00\% & 75.00\% & & & & \\ IDC Index & 16.81 (\(\pm\)7.75) & 19.29 (\(\pm\)7.28) & 8.03 (\(\pm\)0.60) & 11.26 (\(\pm\)8.08) & & & & \\ Unhealthy (very low) & 0.00\% & 0.00\% & 0.00\% & 0.00\% & 0.00\% & & & \\ Healthy (lower end) & 25.40\% & 35.30\% & 50.00\% & 29.17\% & 0.017 \({}^{*}\) & 0.031 \({}^{*}\) & 0.084 & 0.227 \\ Healthy (top end) & 44.44\% & 54.40\% & 45.00\% & 58.33\% & & & & \\ Unhealthy (very high) & 30.16\% & 10.30\% & 5.00\% & 12.50\% & & & & \\  & & & & & & & \\  & & & & & & & & \\  & & & & & & & & \\  & & & & & & & & \\  & & & & & & & & \\ Variables & S & A & R & B & S/A & S/R & S/B & R/B \\ F\% & 17.33 (\(\pm\)3.66) & 15.75 (\(\pm\)3.38) & 13.98 (\(\pm\)2.28) & 17.20 (\(\pm\)3.46) & 0.596 & 0.001 \({}^{*}\) & 0.105 \(<\)0.001 \({}^{*}\) \\ M\% & 32.57 (\(\pm\)2.84) & 33.85 (\(\pm\)2.74) & 34.49 (\(\pm\)2.74) & 33.34 (\(\pm\)2.64) & \(<\)0.001 \({}^{*}\) & 0.590 \(<\)0.001 \({}^{*}\) & 0.026 \({}^{*}\) \\ B\% & 28.14 (\(\pm\)3.25) & 27.33 (\(\pm\)2.79) & 27.99 (\(\pm\)2.47) & 26.80 (\(\pm\)2.94) & 0.065 & 0.449 \(\pm\)0.002 \({}^{*}\) & 0.004 \({}^{*}\) \\ R\% & 21.96 (\(\pm\)1.52) & 23.07 (\(\pm\)1.52) & 23.55 (\(\pm\)1.29) & 22.67 (\(\pm\)1.60) & 0.003 \({}^{*}\) & 0.986 \(<\)0.001 \({}^{*}\) & 0.004 \({}^{*}\) \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 3: Kinanthropometric and body composition results of the participants.