# Ischemic Preconditioning (IPC) Enhances the Accuracy and Stability of Proprioception
## 3 Results
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c c} \hline \hline
**Measurement** & **(I) Time** & **(J) Time** & **Error of the** & \multirow{2}{*}{**SD**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**\(p\)**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**CI, 95\%**} \\  & & & & & **Lower** & **Upper** \\ \hline \multirow{10}{*}{TPDR} & \multirow{4}{*}{Pre} & Post & 8.726 * & 1.978 & 0.002 & 2.866 & 14.587 \\  & & 90 min & 16.468 * & 2.498 & \textless{}0.001 & 9. In pairwise comparisons of proprioceptive stability, significant differences were observed: For TPDR: between Pre and 90 min (\(p<0.001\)), Post and 90 min (\(p=0.010\)), and 90 min and 24 h (\(p<0.001\)). For TPDL: between Pre and 90 min (\(p=0.003\)), Post and 90 min (\(p=0.002\)), and 90 min and 24 h (\(p=0.003\)). For D40R: between Pre and 90 min (\(p<0.001\)), Post and 90 min (\(p=0.006\)), and 90 min and 24 h (\(p=0.009\)). For D40L: between Pre and 90 min (\(p=0.001\)) and 90 min and 24 h (\(p=0.003\)) (Table 4). \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c c} \hline \multirow{2}{*}{**Measurement**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**(I) Time**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**(J) Time**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**Error of the Mean (I–J)**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**SD**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**\(p\)**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**CI, 95\%**} \\ \cline{5-8}  & & & & & & & **Lower** & **Upper** \\ \hline \multirow{8}{*}{TPDR} & \multirow{8}{*}{Pre} & Post & 6.442 & 2.749 & 0.185 & \(-\)1.701 & 14.586 \\  & & 90 min & 11.763 * & 2.056 & \(<\)0.001 & 5.671 & 17.856 \\  & & 24 h & 2.426 & 2.452 & 1.000 & \(-\)4.838 & 9.690 \\  & & Pre & \(-\)6.442 & 2.749 & 0.185 & \(-\)14.586 & 1.701 \\  & & Post & 90 min & 5.321 * & 1.442 & 0.010 & 1.049 & 9.593 \\  & & 24 h & \(-\)4.016 & 2.284 & 0.574 & \(-\)10.783 & 2.752 \\  & & Pre & \(-\)11.763 * & 2.056 & \(<\)0.001 & \(-\)17.856 & \(-\)5.671 \\  & 90 min & Post & \(-\)5.321 * & 1.442 & 0.010 & \(-\)9.593 & \(-\)1.049 \\  & & 24 h & \(-\)9.337 * & 1.517 & \(<\)0.001 & \(-\)13.833 & \(-\)4.841 \\  & & Pre & \(-\)2.426 & 2.452 & 1.000 & \(-\)9.690 & 4.838 \\  & 24 h & Post & 4.016 & 2.284 & 0.574 & \(-\)2.752 & 10.783 \\  & & 90 min & 9.337 * & 1.517 & \(<\)0.001 & 4.841 & 13.833 \\ \hline \multirow{8}{*}{TPDL} & \multirow{8}{*}{Pre} & Post & 6.526 & 3.323 & 0.391 & \(-\)3.318 & 16.370 \\  & & 90 min & 12.021 * & 2.814 & 0.003 & 3.684 & 20.359 \\  & & 24 h & 5.253 & 2.094 & 0.132 & \(-\)0.953 & 11.458 \\  & & Pre & \(-\)6.526 & 3.323 & 0.391 & \(-\)16.370 & 3.318 \\  & & Post & 90 min & 5.495 * & 1.252 & 0.002 & 1.786 & 9.203 \\  & & 24 h & \(-\)1.274 & 2.133 & 1.000 & \(-\)7.593 & 5.045 \\  & & Pre & \(-\)12.021 * & 2.814 & 0.003 & \(-\)20.359 & \(-\)3.684 \\  & 90 min & Post & \(-\)5.495 * & 1.252 & 0.002 & \(-\)9.203 & \(-\)1.786 \\  & & 24 h & \(-\)6.768 * & 1.613 & 0.003 & \(-\)11.546 & \(-\)1.990 \\  & & 24 h & \(-\)5.253 & 2.094 & 0.132 & \(-\)11.458 & 0.953 \\  & 24 h & Post & 1.274 & 2.133 & 1.000 & \(-\)5.045 & 7.593 \\  & & 90 min & 6.768 * & 1.613 & 0.003 & 1.990 & 11.546 \\ \hline \multirow{8}{*}{D40R} & \multirow{8}{*}{Pre} & Post & 7.574 & 2.683 & 0.068 & \(-\)0.374 & 15.521 \\  & & 90 min & 12.500 * & 2.465 & \(<\)0.001 & 5.197 & 19.803 \\  & & 24 h & 5.784 & 2.373 & 0.152 & \(-\)1.247 & 12.815 \\  & & Pre & \(-\)7.574 & 2.683 & 0.068 & \(-\)15.521 & 0.374 \\  & Post & 90 min & 4.926 * & 1.244 & 0.006 & 1.239 & 8.613 \\  & & 24 h & \(-\)1.789 & 2.295 & 1.000 & \(-\)8.589 & 5.010 \\  & & Pre & \(-\)12.500 * & 2.465 & \(<\)0.001 & \(-\)19.803 & \(-\)5.197 \\  & 90 min & Post & \(-\)4.926 * & 1.244 & 0.006 & \(-\)8.613 & \(-\)1.239 \\  & & 24 h & \(-\)6.716 * & 1.807 & 0.009 & \(-\)12.070 & \(-\)1.361 \\  & & Pre & \(-\)5.784 & 2.373 & 0.152 & \(-\)12.815 & 1.247 \\  & 24 h & Post & 1.789 & 2.295 & 1.000 & \(-\)5.010 & 8.589 \\  & & 90 min & 6.716 * & 1.807 & 0.009 & 1.361 & 12.070 \\ \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 4: The results of paired comparisons of the stability of proprioception.