# VR Reading Revolution: Decoding User Intentions Through Task-Technology Fit and Emotional Resonance
## 4 Findings
### Exploratory Factor Analysis and Validation Factor Analysis

Table 4: Total variance explained. \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c c} \hline \hline  & **1** & **2** & **3** & **4** & **5** & **6** & **7** & **8** \\ \hline VBFSB5 & **0.807** & \(-\)0.105 & 0.079 & 0.062 & 0.173 & 0.163 & 0.155 & 0.057 \\ VBFSB4 & **0.802** & \(-\)0.057 & 0.054 & \(-\)0.037 & \(-\)0.007 & 0.082 & 0.148 & 0.080 \\ VBFSB3 & **0.778** & 0.013 & 0.092 & 0.103 & 0.154 & 0.024 & 0.184 & 0.069 \\ VBFSB2 & **0.771** & \(-\)0.111 & 0.107 & 0.073 & 0.106 & 0.088 & 0.165 & 0.065 \\ VBFSB1 & **0.736** & \(-\)0.044 & 0.031 & 0.070 & 0.253 & 0.173 & 0.111 & 0.089 \\ PSR3 & \(-\)0.125 & **0.902** & \(-\)0.040 & \(-\)0.071 & \(-\)0.098 & \(-\)0. As shown in Table 7, all constructs in this study demonstrate strong convergent validity, with standardized factor loadings exceeding 0.6, composite reliabilities (CR) above 0.7, and average variance extracted (AVE) values surpassing 0.5. Specifically, the factor loadings range from 0.727 to 0.910, CR values from 0.800 to 0.915, and AVE values from 0.571 to 0.781, confirming that each variable meets the thresholds for convergent validity. \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{l l l l l} \hline \hline
**Model Fit Indicators** & **Optimal Criterion** & **Statistical Value** & **Fit** \\ \hline CMIN & – & 342.573 & – \\ DF & – & 271 & – \\ CMIN/DF & \textless{}3 & 1.198 & Good \\ RMR & \textless{}0.08 & 0.053 & Good \\ GFI & \textgreater{}0.9 & 0.925 & Good \\ AGFI & \textgreater{}0.9 & 0.902 & Good \\ NFI & \textgreater{}0.9 & 0.931 & Good \\ IFI & \textgreater{}0.9 & 0.988 & Good \\ TLI & \textgreater{}0.9 & 0.985 & Good \\ CFI & \textgreater{}0.9 & 0.988 & Good \\ RMSEA & \textless{}0.08 & 0.025 & Good \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 6: Validation factor model fit. \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{l l l l l l l l l} \hline \hline  & **1** & **2** & **3** & **4** & **5** & **6** & **7** & **8** \\ \hline PI1 & 0.035 & \(-\)0.082 & 0.050 & **0.873** & 0.059 & 0.013 & 0.096 & 0.071 \\ PI2 & 0.053 & 0.058 & 0.093 & **0.843** & 0.025 & 0.173 & 0.072 & 0.113 \\ PI3 & 0.126 & \(-\)0.250 & 0.054 & **0.812** & 0.103 & 0.150 & 0.065 & 0.035 \\ ER2 & 0.119 & \(-\)0.082 & \(-\)0.001 & 0.070 & **0.817** & 0.143 & 0.159 & 0.054 \\ ER1 & 0.263 & \(-\)0.123 & 0.067 & 0.039 & **0.805** & 0.057 & 0.143 & 0.054 \\ ER3 & 0.183 & \(-\)0.005 & 0.179 & 0.081 & **0.795** & 0.167 & 0.093 & 0.120 \\ VBFSE1 & 0.150 & \(-\)0.055 & 0.094 & 0.131 & 0.116 & **0.827** & 0.063 & 0.076 \\ VBFSE3 & 0.139 & \(-\)0.155 & 0.171 & 0.138 & 0.141 & **0.782** & 0.102 & 0.156 \\ VBFSE2 & 0.181 & \(-\)0.246 & 0.123 & 0.088 & 0.139 & **0.755** & 0.159 & 0.137 \\ U11 & 0.307 & \(-\)0.196 & 0.114 & 0.076 & 0.195 & 0.090 & **0.802** & 0.133 \\ U13 & 0.318 & \(-\)0.206 & 0.107 & 0.101 & 0.209 & 0.142 & **0.786** & 0.143 \\ UI2 & 0.325 & \(-\)0.131 & 0.115 & 0.155 & 0.130 & 0.154 & **0.783** & 0.173 \\ TTF1 & 0.092 & \(-\)0.078 & 0.081 & 0.042 & 0.097 & 0.036 & 0.133 & **0.839** \\ TTF2 & 0.131 & \(-\)0.058 & 0.110 & 0.049 & 0.027 & 0.139 & 0.056 & **0.821** \\ TTF3 & 0.057 & \(-\)0.071 & 0.155 & 0.130 & 0.084 & 0.136 & 0.122 & **0.764** \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular} Note: Factor loadings greater than 0.70 are shown in bold to indicate the primary factor on which each item loads. These loadings were used to determine the dimensional structure of the constructs after rotation.  
\end{table} 
Table 5: _Cont._