## 3 Methodology
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{l l l} \hline \hline
**Variables** & \multicolumn{1}{c}{**Sources**} \\ \hline Effort Expectancy (EE) & & SWDs are very convenient for me to use at leisure. \\ EE1 & Using SWDs is fast and easy for me. & [36; 74; 75] \\ EE2 & Using SWDs is fast and easy for me. & [36; 74; 75] \\ EE3 & It is not difficult for me to learn to operate SWDs. & \\ EE4 & Using SWDs is easy for me. & \\ \hline Social Influence (SI) & & \\ SI1 & People who are important to me think that it is good for me & \\  & to use SWDs. & \\ SI2 & People who have an influence on me think that it is good for & \\  & me to use SWDs. & \\ SI3 & People who affect my leisure activities think that I need to & \\  & use SWDs. & \\ SI4 & People who are valuable to me want me to use SWDs. & \\ \hline Facilitating Conditions (FC) & & \\ FC1 & I have enough resources to use SWDs. & \\ FC2 & I have enough knowledge to use SWDs. & [36; 74; 75] \\ FC3 & I have enough skills to use SWDs. & \\ FC4 & When I encounter difficulties using SWD, I can get help & \\  & from others. & \\ \hline Behavioral Intention (BI) & & \\ BI1 & I plan to use SWDs at leisure in the future. & \\  & I plan to use SWDs as soon as I have the opportunity in my & \\  & leisure time. & \\ BI3 & I plan to increase the use of SWDs during my leisure time. & \\ BI4 & I plan to recommend others to use SWDs during leisure in & \\ \hline Perceived Risk (PR) & & \\ PR1 & SWDs cannot ensure the safety of my personal information. & \\ PR2 & The function of a smart wearable device does not meet my & \\  & requirements. & \\ PR3 & It is inconvenient to wear SWDs. & \\ PR4 & The leisure activity data obtained from SWDs is not & \\  & accurate. & \\ \hline Satisfaction (SA) & & \\ SA1 & Using SWDs during leisure time has met my expectations. & \\ SA2 & I am satisfied with using SWDs during leisure time. & [78; 79] \\ SA3 & Using SWDs during leisure time is more satisfying to me & \\  & than general smart devices. & \\ \hline Perceived Function Value (PFV) & & \\ PFV1 & I think the cost of SWDs is economical. & \\ PFV2 & I think SWDs are more portable than general smart devices & \\  & (mobile phones, etc.). & \\ PFV3 & I think SWDs have better functions than other smart & \\  & devices. & \\ PFV4 & Compared with the price, SWDs provide me with many & \\  & benefits. & \\ \hline Perceived Emotion Value (PEV) & & \\ PEV1 & It is happy to use SWDs in leisure. & \\ PEV2 & It is fun to use SWDs in leisure. & [78; 79] \\ PEV3 & It is very exciting to use SWDs in leisure. & \\ \hline Perceived Price Value (PPV) & & \\ PPV1 & The price of SWDs is reasonable. & \\ PPV2 & SWDs are good value for money. & [36; 80] \\ PPV3 & Judging from the current market price, SWDs are very & \\  & cost-effective. & \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 1: _Cont._Owing to the robust computational capabilities intrinsic to R's open-source programming framework, the present investigation harnesses the R-package \"lavaan\" (latent variable analysis) [81] for the purpose of conducting an in-depth exploratory examination of the dataset. Subsequently, an approach structural equation modeling (SEM) analysis [81] is undertaken. In adherence to the methodological guidelines delineated by [PERSON] and [PERSON] [82], exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses are executed, thereby assuring both the internal coherence of the proposed model and the veracity and dependability of its underlying construct. Notably, the measurement model is subjected to meticulous scrutiny across all variables. Ultimately, the conceptual framework posited by this research, along with its hypotheses, undergoes rigorous validation through the lens of SEM.