## 3 Aim, Materials, and Methods
In this study, the author conducted a comprehensive survey within rural seismic belt areas by collaborating with local emergency management departments, transportation authorities, hospitals, seismological experts, and meteorological experts. The aim was to gain insights into the challenges faced by rural areas during natural disaster response processes, particularly regarding issues related to the implementation of new-generation information technology. Based on these practical problems identified through analysis, further research was conducted. Analytical methodology is a systematic and organized research approach aimed at conducting in-depth analysis and comprehension of diverse information sources. By breaking down complex elements into more manageable components, this method facilitates understanding and examination. It involves evaluating the relationships between these components and drawing logical conclusions based on a comprehensive understanding of each part's significance and interconnections, thereby providing robust support for problem-solving endeavors. Synthetic methodology represents an integrated process that necessitates the harmonious integration of various elements or ideas from multiple perspectives to generate a unified and nuanced outcome. Rather than simply summarizing individual parts, synthesis entails uncovering internal connections and interactions through profound comprehension and analysis. Its objective is to enhance the depth of knowledge by amalgamating different aspects of the subject matter to yield novel insights or perspectives. Comparison serves as an essential method focusing on identifying similarities and differences among research elements or cases. This approach enables us to comprehend problems from multiple perspectives and levels, thus offering additional ideas and solutions for effective problem-solving strategies [40]. Intelligent Emergency Management Mode of Rural Natural Disasters under the Background of Digital Technology  
Through literature analysis and field research, significant disparities in intelligent emergency management modes between rural and urban areas in China have been identified, primarily manifested in the emergency management approach, infrastructure, information technology, emergency resources reserves, information dissemination, and public awareness of disaster response, as illustrated in Table 1. \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c} \hline \hline
**Urban Emergency Management** & **Rural Emergency Management** \\ \hline modernization of management approach & backward management approach \\ advanced infrastructure & poor infrastructure \\ modern information technology & low level of information \\ rich emergency resources reserves & less emergency resource reserves \\ \hline diversified ways of information dissemination & single mode of information dissemination \\ \hline strong public awareness of disaster response & poor public awareness of disaster response \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 1: Comparison table of urban and rural emergency management modes. China's focus on the development of rural emergency management information is evident in eight national documents. These include the Opinions of the CPC Central Committee and the State Council on Comprehensively Promoting Rural Revitalization in 2022 (Zhongfa (2022) No. 1), the National 14 th Five-Year Plan and Long-term Objectives Outline for 2035, as well as plans such as the National Emergency System Plan for the 14 th Five-Year Plan, Development Plan for Radio, Television, and Internet Audiovisual Services in the 14 th Five-Year Plan, and the Development Plan for National Emergency Broadcast System Construction in the 14 th Five-Year Plan. The objective is to promote coordinated integration of rural emergency management resources and governance, accelerate the construction of active release terminals for rural emergency broadcasting, and provide guidance on safe evacuation during emergencies.