## 4 Water Security Assessment of Asian Countries
### Water Security Assessment Results by Key Areas
#### 4.1.3. Core Area 3: Resilience to Water-Related Disasters  
Resilience to water-related disasters was analyzed by classifying water-related vulnerabilities into exposure to drought, flood, and recovery capacity to disasters. The indicator helps assess the frequency of water-related disasters, exposure to vulnerable areas, and society's ability to respond to the event of a disaster. The results of the assessment of 28 countries are shown in Table 9. In the case of Kyrgyzstan, all sub-indicators showed high evaluation results from the perspective of resilience to water-related disasters with a high score of 3.0 or higher. Singapore was rated at 2.5 or lower.  
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c} \hline \hline \multirow{2}{*}{**Nations**} & **Value of Agricultural** & **Value of Industrial** & \multirow{2}{*}{**GDP (Gross Domestic Product)**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**Result**} \\  & **Water Consumption** & **Water Consumption** & & \\ \hline Bangladesh & 1.0 & 2.0 & 1.0 & 1.3 \\ Bhutan & 1.0 & 3.0 & - & 1.3 \\ Brunei Darussalam & - & - & 3.0 & 1.0 \\ Cambodia & 2.0 & 5.0 & 1.0 & 2.7 \\ China & 2.0 & 2.0 & 2.0 & 2.0 \\ Georgia & 1.0 & 1.0 & 1.0 & 1.0 \\ India & 1.0 & 1.0 & 1.0 & 1.0 \\ Indonesia & 1.0 & 2.0 & 1.0 & 1.3 \\ Japan & 1.0 & 5.0 & 4.0 & 3.3 \\ Kazakhstan & 1.0 & 1.0 & 2.0 & 1.3 \\ Kyrgyzstan & 1.0 & - & 1.0 & 0.7 \\ Laos & 1.0 & 1.0 & 1.0 & 1.0 \\ Malaysia & 5.0 & 1.0 & 2.0 & 2.7 \\ Mongolia & 3.0 & 1.0 & 1.0 & 1.7 \\ Myanmar & - & 2.0 & 1.0 & 1.0 \\ Nepal & 1.0 & 2.0 & 1.0 & 1.3 \\ North Korea & - & - & - & 0.0 \\ Pakistan & 1.0 & 2.0 & 1.0 & 1.3 \\ Philippines & 1.0 & 1.0 & 1.0 & 1.0 \\ Singapore & & 3.0 & 5.0 & 2.7 \\ South Korea & 2.0 & 5.0 & 3.0 & 3.3 \\ Sri Lanka & 1.0 & 1.0 & 1.0 & 1.0 \\ Tajikistan & 1.0 & 1.0 & 1.0 & 1.0 \\ Thailand & 1.0 & 3.0 & 1.0 & 1.7 \\ Timor-Leste & 1.0 & 1.0 & 1.0 & 1.0 \\ Turkmenistan & 1.0 & - & - & 0.3 \\ Uzbekistan & - & - & 1.0 & 0.3 \\ Viet Nam & 1.0 & - & 1.0 & 0.7 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table}
Table 8: Assessment results of economic efficiency.  
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c c} \hline \hline \multirow{2}{*}{**Nations**} & **Drought** & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Areas**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Flood**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Areas of**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**Irrigation**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**Flood Control**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**Result**} \\  & **Frequency** & & & & & & \\  & & **Vulnerable to** & & & & & \\  & & **Drought** & & & & \\ \hline Bangladesh & 5.0 & 1.0 & 1.0 & 5.0 & - & 1.0 & 2.2 \\ Bhutan & 3.0 & 5.0 & 1.0 & 4.0 & 1.0 & 1.0 & 2.5 \\ Brunei Darussalam & 3.0 & 5.0 & 3.0 & 2.0 & 1.0 & 1.0 & 2.5 \\ Cambodia & 3.0 & 4.0 & 2.0 & 5.0 & 1.0 & 1.0 & 2.7 \\ China & 4.0 & 4.0 & 2.0 & 3.0 & 3.0 & 2.0 & 3.0 \\ Georgia & 5.0 & 5.0 & 2.0 & 3.0 & 4.0 & 1.0 & 3.3 \\ India & 2.0 & 1.0 & 2.0 & 5.0 & 2.0 & 2.0 & 2.3 \\ Indonesia & 2.0 & 3.0 & 2.0 & 3.0 & 1.0 & 1.0 & 2.0 \\ Japan & 3.0 & 5.0 & 3.0 & 1.0 & 4.0 & 1.0 & 2.8 \\ Kazakhstan & 3.0 & 5.0 & 4.0 & 4.0 & 1.0 & 1.0 & 3.0 \\ Kyrgyzstan & 4.0 & 5.0 & 3.0 & 5.0 & 4.0 & 3.0 & 4.0 \\ Laos & 4.0 & 5.0 & 2.0 & 4.0 & 2.0 & 2.0 & 3.2 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table}
Table 9: Assessment result of resilience to water-related disaster.