## 3 Results (A Comparison of the Theoretical and Experimental Results)
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c c} \hline \hline  & & \multicolumn{3}{c}{**Energy Activation U\({}_{\mathrm{e}}\) eV**} & \multicolumn{3}{c}{**Balanced Concentration \(n_{\mathrm{e}}\), \(10^{48}\) m\({}^{-3}\)**} \\ \cline{3-8}
**Temperature of** & & & \multicolumn{3}{c}{**Theoretical (Calculated Based on**} & \multicolumn{3}{c}{**Theoretical (Calculated Based on**} \\
**Experimental** & **Type of Relaxator** & **Experimental** & **Without** & **Equation (22))** & **Experimental** & **Without** \\
**TSDC** & & [I,4] & **Considering the Quantum Tunneling** & **Considering the Tunneling** & **(Calculation in This Paper)** & **Considering the Quantum Tunneling** & **Quantium Tunneling** \\ \hline
100 & \(\mathrm{HSiO}_{4}^{3-}\) & \(0.05\pm 0.01\) & 0.12 & 0.06 & 1.4 & 1.5 & 1.4 \\ \hline
130 & \(\mathrm{H}_{\mathrm{B}}\mathrm{O}^{+}\) & \(0.17\pm 0.02\) & 0.19 & 0.18 & 1.3 & 1.33 & 1.29 \\ \hline
178 & \(\mathrm{H}_{\mathrm{B}}\mathrm{O}\) water molecules of crystallization (structural water) & \(0.25\pm 0.03\) & 0.27 & 0.27 & 200 & 208 & 205 \\ \hline
206 & \(\mathrm{H}_{\mathrm{B}}\mathrm{O}\)-adsorbed water molecules (on bundles) & \(0.31\pm 0.03\) & 0.32 & 0.32 & 30 & 32 & 32 \\ \hline
235 & \(\mathrm{OH}^{-}\) & \(0.40\pm 0.04\) & 0.42 & 0.41 & 120 & 122 & 120 \\ \hline
257 & \(\mathrm{LD}\) defects, VL,VD complexes & \(0.49\pm 0.05\) & 0.51 & 0.49 & 200 & 207 & 205 \\ \hline
405 & \(\mathrm{H}_{\mathrm{B}}\mathrm{O}^{+},\mathrm{OH}^{-},\mathrm{H}^{+}\) & \(0.35\pm 0.05\) & 0.45 & 0.42 & 3500 & 3200 & 3520 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 1: Relaxator parameters in natural phloggite \(\mathrm{KM}_{\mathrm{g}_{3}}(\mathrm{AlSi}_{\mathrm{3}}\mathrm{O}_{10})( \mathrm{OH})_{2}\), calculated using the phenomenological theory of thermally stimulated depolarization currents (TSDC) for the parabolic potential barrier model (Graph 1 in Figure 1). \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c c} \hline \hline  & & \multicolumn{3}{c}{**Energy Activation U\({}_{\mathrm{e}}\) eV**} & \multicolumn{3}{c}{**Balanced Concentration \(n_{\mathrm{e}}\), \(10^{48}\) m\({}^{-3}\)**} \\ \cline{3-8}
**Temperature of** & & & \multicolumn{3}{c}{**Theoretical (Calculated Based on**} & \multicolumn{3}{c}{**Theoretical (Calculated Based on**} \\
**Experimental** & **Type of Relaxator** & **Experimental** & **Without** & **Equation (22))** & **Experimental** & **Without** \\
**TSDC** & & [I,4] & **Considering the Quantum Tunneling** & **Considering the Quantum Tunneling** & **(Calculation in** Quantum Tunneling**)** & **Considering the Quantum Tunneling** \\ \hline
86 & \(\mathrm{HSiO}_{4}^{1-}\) & \(0.06\pm 0.01\) & 0.12 & 0.06 & 1.4 & 1.5 & 1.4 \\ \hline
112 & \(\mathrm{H}_{\mathrm{B}}\mathrm{O}^{+}\) & \(0.09\pm 0.02\) & 0.19 & 0.18 & 1.3 & 1.33 & 1.29 \\ \hline  & \(\mathrm{H}_{\mathrm{B}}\mathrm{O}\) water molecules of crystallization (structural water) & \(0.19\pm 0.02\) & 0.27 & 0.27 & 200 & 208 & 205 \\ \hline
206 & \(\mathrm{H}_{\mathrm{B}}\mathrm{O}\)-adsorbed water molecules (on bundles) & \(0.25\pm 0.03\) & 0.32 & 0.32 & 30 & 32 & 32 \\ \hline
230 & \(\mathrm{OH}^{-}\) & \(0.32\pm 0.04\) & 0.42 & 0.41 & 120 & 122 & 120 \\ \hline
251 & \(\mathrm{L}_{\mathrm{D}}\) defects, VL,VD complexes & \(0.41\pm 0.04\) & 0.51 & 0.49 & 200 & 207 & 205 \\ \hline
305 & \(\mathrm{H}_{\mathrm{B}}\mathrm{O}^{+},\mathrm{OH}^{-},\mathrm{H}^{+}\) & \(0.40\pm 0.06\) & 0.49 & 0.43 & 4600 & 3900 & 4610 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 2: Relaxer parameters in natural mineral of onot talc \(\mathrm{Mg}_{3}(\mathrm{Si}_{\mathrm{4}}\mathrm{O}_{10})( \mathrm{OH})_{2}\), calculated using the phenomenological theory of thermally stimulated depolarization currents (TSDC) for the parabolic potential barrier model (Graph 1 in Figure 2). In this article, we will not go into the experimental schemes for studying the properties and parameters of spectra (TSDC) described in [1,4].