## 3 Results
### Extraction Accuracy
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{l c c c c c c c c c c c} \hline \hline
**Region** & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Jinxiang**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Laiwu**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Lanling**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Pizhou**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Qixian**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Zhongmuou**} \\ \hline
**Results** & **OA** & **Kappa** & **OA** & **Kappa** & **OA** & **Kappa** & **OA** & **Kappa** & **OA** & **Kappa** & **OA** & **Kappa** \\ \hline
1.me-sr & **92.50** & **85.18** & 92.72 & **85.82** & **94.16** & **88.31** & 87.32 & 70.92 & **90.95** & **84.04** & **94.72** & **91.07** \\
2.mg-sr & 92.12 & 84.47 & 91.28 & 82.79 & 93.57 & 87.11 & **90.70** & **82.39** & 89.39 & 81.32 & 93.83 & 89.57 \\
3.mn-sr & 92.12 & 84.47 & **94.54** & 83.41 & **93.58** & **87.15** & **88.26** & **77.84** & 89.55 & 81.56 & 94.27 & 90.28 \\
4.5n-sr & 84.24 & **84.79** & 92.54 & **85.37** & 93.55 & 87.11 & 87.68 & 89.74 & 81.86 & 94.49 & 90.65 \\
5.e-sr & **92.50** & **85.18** & **93.48** & **87.31** & 92.80 & 85.67 & 87.81 & 76.84 & **89.98** & **82.39** & **95.39** & **92.19** \\
6.n-sr & **92.31** & **84.79** & **94.16** & 82.46 & 93.37 & 86.73 & **88.41** & **78.11** & **89.94** & **82.21** & **94.95** & **91.43** \\
7.n-r & 90.80 & 81.70 & 90.41 & 81.47 & **94.55** & **89.00** & 87.81 & 77.00 & 89.17 & 80.95 & 88.16 & 80.13 \\
8.n- & 89.49 & 79.07 & 86.52 & 74.40 & 90.63 & 81.52 & 87.79 & 76.92 & 84.09 & 71.60 & 77.41 & 62.97 \\
9.n-sswir & 89.31 & 78.64 & 89.36 & 79.28 & 90.86 & 81.48 & 88.21 & 77.70 & 87.82 & 78.53 & 88.82 & 81.44 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}  
* In the table, “OA” represents overall accuracy, with bold values indicating that this method ranks among the top three for accuracy in the corresponding region.  
\begin{tabular}{l c c c c c c c c c c} \hline \hline
**Region** & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Jinxiang**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Laiwu**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Lanling**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Pizhou**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Qixian**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Zhongmuou**} \\ \hline
**Results** & **UA** & **PA** & **UA** & **PA** & **UA** & **PA** & **UA** & **PA** & **UA** & **PA** & **UA** & **PA** \\ \hline
1.me-sr & **91.77** & **97.20** & **87.58** & 94.37 & **94.61** & 91.91 & **95.58** & 86.32 & **92.28** & **91.10** & **94.50** & **96.41** \\
2.mg-sr & 91.45 & 96.57 & 84.91 & 93.75 & 92.82 & **92.38** & **94.41** & **93.86** & 90.25 & 90.25 & 92.58 & 96.39 \\
3.mn-sr & 91.45 & 96.57 & 85.81 & 93.01 & **93.66** & 91.43 & 93.05 & **90.01** & **91.74** & 89.41 & 93.94 & 96.37 \\
4.5n-sr & **91.50** & 87.20 & **87.10** & **95.07** & 93.27 & **92.38** & 93.03 & 89.77 & 90.68 & **90.68** & **94.50** & **96.41** \\
5.e-sr & **91.77** & **97.20** & **87.26** & **95.80** & 91.08 & **92.38** & **93.33** & **90.01** & **91.45** & **90.68** & **96.39** & **96.89** \\
6.n-sr & **91.50** & **97.20** & **85.06** & 92.91 & 93.24 & 91.91 & **92.77** & **90.64** & 90.72 & **91.10** & **95.43** & **96.41** \\
7.n-r & 89.14 & **97.20** & 82.42 & **95.11** & **96.5** & 91.91 & 92.45 & 89.47 & 90.56 & 89.41 & 86.85 & 94.87 \\
8.n- & 88.35 & 96.88 & 78.19 & 91.49 & 91.79 & 90.48 & 92.19 & 89.50 & 81.50 & 87.71 & 79.29 & 92.78 \\
9.n-sswir & 87.85 & 96.89 & 81.01 & 90.78 & 93.30 & 86.19 & 92.77 & 90.01 & 87.19 & 89.41 & 89.86 & 95.39 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}  
* \"UA\" refers to user accuracy, and “PA” denotes producer accuracy, with bolded values indicating that this method ranks among the top three for accuracy in the corresponding region.  
\end{table} 
Table 4: Tables of overall accuracy and Kappa coefficient for garlic extraction.