### Statistical Difference Analysis
 } & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**WOMAC**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**WOMAC**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**WOMAC**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Initial**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**VAS Test**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**VAS Test**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**VAS Test**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**VAS Test**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Initial**} \\  & & **Test** & **Test** & **Test** & **Test** & **VAS** & **Test** & **after** & **after** & **after** & **after** & **after** & **after** & **after** & **M Muscle** \\  & & **3 Months** & **6 Months** & **9 Months** & **12 Months** & **10 Months** & **3 Months** & **3 Months** & **6 Months** & **9 Months** & **12 Months** & **3 Months** & **3 Months** \\ \hline CG initial & 1 & 0.9405 & 0.8527 & 0.8501 & 0.8456 & \(-\)0.0934 & \(-\)0.2515 & 0.5589 & 0.3104 & 0.0032 & \(-\)0.4657 \\ WOMAC test & \(p=\) — & \(p=0.000\) & \(p=0.000\) & \(p=0.000\) & \(p=0.741\) & \(p=0.366\) & \(p=0.030\) & \(p=0.260\) & \(p=0.991\) & \(p=0.080\) \\ \hline CG WOMAC & 0.9405 & 1 & 0.8475 & 0.796 & 0.7774 & \(-\)0.0867 & \(-\)0.2788 & 0.6159 & 0.2942 & \(-\)0.1538 & \(-\)0.4413 \\ test after & 3 & \(p=0.000\) & \(p=\) — & \(p=0.000\) & \(p=0.001\) & \(p=0.759\) & \(p=0.314\) & \(p=0.015\) & \(p=0.287\) & \(p=0.584\) & \(p=0.100\) \\ \hline CG WOMAC & 0.8527 & 0.8475 & 1 & 0.9181 & 0.9044 & \(-\)0.0772 & \(-\)0.1555 & 0.5677 & 0.3346 & \(-\)0.1084 & \(-\)0.4292 \\ test after & 0.9000 & \(p=\) — & \(p=0.000\) & \(p=\) 0.000 & \(p=\) 0.784 & \(p=0.580\) & \(p=0.027\) & \(p=0.223\) & \(p=0.700\) & \(p=0.110\) \\ \hline CG WOMAC & 0.8501 & 0.796 & 0.9181 & 1 & 0.9405 & \(-\)0.2109 & \(-\)0.2605 & 0.4734 & 0.1476 & 0.0868 & \(-\)0.4428 \\ test after & \(p=0.000\) & \(p=0.000\) & \(p=\) — & \(p=0.000\) & \(p=\) 0.451 & \(p=0.348\) & \(p=0.075\) & \(p=0.600\) & \(p=0.758\) & \(p=0.098\) \\ \hline CG WOMAC & 0.8456 & 0.7774 & 0.9044 & 0.9405 & 1 & \(-\)0.1191 & \(-\)0.2289 & 0.611 & 0.2513 & 0.2289 & \(-\)0.4783 \\ test after & \(p=0.000\) & \(p=0.001\) & \(p=0.000\) & \(p=\) 0.000 & \(p=\) — & \(p=0.672\) & \(p=\) 0.412 & \(p=0.016\) & \(p=0.366\) & \(p=0.412\) & \(p=0.071\) \\ \hline CG initial VAS & \(-\)0.0934 & \(-\)0.0867 & \(-\)0.0772 & \(-\)0.2109 & \(-\)0.1191 & 1 & 0.7206 & 0.3273 & 0.6124 & \(-\)0.3203 & 0.6124 \\ test & \(p=0.741\) & \(p=0.759\) & \(p=0.784\) & \(p=0.451\) & \(p=0.672\) & \(p=\) — & \(p=0.002\) & \(p=\) 0.234 & \(p=0.015\) & \(p=0.245\) & \(p=0.015\) \\ \hline CG VAS test & \(-\)0.2515 & \(-\)0.2788 & \(-\)0.1555 & \(-\)0.2605 & \(-\)0.2289 & 0.7206 & 1 & \(-\)0.0262 & 0.1961 & \(-\)0.3269 & 0.6864 \\ after 3 months & \(p=0.366\) & \(p=0.314\) & \(p=0.580\) & \(p=0.348\) & \(p=0.412\) & \(p=0.002\) & \(p=\) — & \(p=0.926\) & \(p=\) 0.484 & \(p=0.234\) & \(p=0.005\) \\ \hline CG VAS test & 0.5589 & 0.6159 & 0.5677 & 0.4734 & 0.611 & 0.3273 & \(-\)0.0262 & 1 & 0.5345 & \(-\)0.1048 & \(-\)0.1336 \\ after 6 months & \(p=0.030\) & \(p=0.015\) & \(p=0.027\) & \(p=0.075\) & \(p=0.016\) & \(p=0.234\) & \(p=0.926\) & \(p=\) — & \(p=0.040\) & \(p=\) 0.710 & \(p=0.635\) \\ \hline CG VAS test & 0.3104 & 0.2942 & 0.3346 & 0.1476 & 0.2513 & 0.6124 & 0.1961 & 0.5345 & 1 & \(-\)0.1961 & 0.1667 \\ after 9 months & \(p=0.260\) & \(p=0.287\) & \(p=0.223\) & \(p=0.600\) & \(p=0.366\) & \(p=0.015\) & \(p=0.484\) & \(p=0.040\) & \(p=\) — & \(p=0.484\) & \(p=\) 0.5535 \\ \hline CG VAS test & 0.0032 & \(-\)0.1538 & \(-\)0.1084 & 0.0868 & 0.2289 & \(-\)0.3203 & \(-\)0.3269 & \(-\)0.1048 & \(-\)0.1961 & 1 & \(-\)0.1961 \\ after 12 months & \(p=0.991\) & \(p=0.584\) & \(p=0.700\) & \(p=0.758\) & \(p=0.412\) & \(p=0.245\) & \(p=0.234\) & \(p=0.710\) & \(p=0.484\) & \(p=\) — & \(p=\) 0.484 \\ \hline CG initial muscle strength & \(-\)0.4657 & \(-\)0.4413 & \(-\)0.4292 & \(-\)0.4428 & \(-\)0.4783 & 0.6124 & 0.6864 & \(-\)0.1336 & 0.1667 & \(-\)0.1961 & 1 \\ \hline \(p=\)0.080 & \(p=0.100\) & \(p=0.110\) & \(p=0.098\) & \(p=0.071\) & \(p=0.015\) & \(p=0.005\) & \(p=0.635\) & \(p=0.55 For the PG, the \(t\)-test measured values for the muscle strength magnitudes are presented in Table 7. The \(t\)-tests gave significant values (marked in bold), and there were substantial differences between successive measurement sets.