## 3 Results
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c c c} \hline \hline \multirow{2}{*}{**Variable**} & \multicolumn{3}{c}{**Experimental Group**} & \multicolumn{3}{c}{**Control Group**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**Significance**} \\ \cline{2-3} \cline{5-8}  & **Pre** & **Post** & \(\Delta\) & **Pre** & **Post** & \(\Delta\) & \\ \hline \multirow{6}{*}{\begin{tabular}{c} **MBT** \\ **backhand** \\ \end{tabular} } & \multirow{6}{*}{\(9.06\pm 1.00\)} & \multirow{6}{*}{\(9.91\pm 1.35\)} & \multirow{6}{*}{\(+0.85\)} & \multirow{6}{*}{\(9.34\pm 1.41\)} & \multirow{6}{*}{\(9.67\pm 1.36\)} & \multirow{6}{*}{\(+0.33\)} & **Time factor: F\({}_{(1,25)}\) = 15.35;** & & \(p\) = 0.001 \\  & & & & & & & Interaction: F\({}_{(1,25)}\) = 2.97; & \\  & & & & & & & & \(p\) = 0.097 \\  & & & & & & & Groups factor: F\({}_{(1,25)}\) = 0.002; \(p\) = 0.965 \\ \hline \multirow{6}{*}{\begin{tabular}{c} **MBT** \\ **overhead** \\ \end{tabular} } & \multirow{6}{*}{\(8.20\pm 1.52\)} & \multirow{6}{*}{\(8.35\pm 1.45\)} & \multirow{6}{*}{\(+0.15\)} & \multirow{6}{*}{\(8.69\pm 1.36\)} & \multirow{6}{*}{\(8.59\pm 1.17\)} & \multirow{6}{*}{\(-0.10\)} & \multirow{6}{*}{\(-0.10\)} & Time factor: F\({}_{(1,25)}\) = 0.06; & \\  & & & & & & & \(p\) = 0.812 \\  & & & & & & & Interaction: F\({}_{(1,25)}\) = 1.13; \\  & & & & & & & & \(p\) = 0.297 \\  & & & & & & & Groups factor: F\({}_{(1,25)}\) = 0.50; \\  & & & & & & & & \(p\) = 0.484 \\ \hline \multirow{6}{*}{\
\begin{tabular}{c} **SP** \\ **forehand** \\ \end{tabular} } & \multirow{6}{*}{\(32.23\pm 8.02\)} & \multirow{6}{*}{\(\textbf{40.46\pm 8.83\)}} & \multirow{6}{*}{\(+8.23\)} & \multirow{6}{*}{\(27.28\pm 9.13\)} & \multirow{6}{*}{\(27.00\pm 9.69\)} & \multirow{6}{*}{\(-0.28\)} & **Time factor: F\({}_{(1,25)}\) = 7.27;** \\  & & & & & & \(p\) = 0.012 \\  & & & & & & & **Interaction: F\({}_{(1,25)}\) = 8.35;** \\  & & & & & & & \(p\) = 0.008 \\  & & & & & & & **Groups factor: F\({}_{(1,25)}\) = 8.70;** \\  & & & & & & & \(p\) = 0.007 \\ \hline \multirow{6}{*}{
\begin{tabular}{c} **SP** \\ **backhand** \\ \end{tabular} } & \multirow{6}{*}{\(31.61\pm 10.70\)} & \multirow{6}{*}{\(39.61\pm 15.55\)} & \multirow{6}{*}{\(+8.00\)} & \multirow{6}{*}{\(28.36\pm 11.21\)} & \multirow{6}{*}{\(28.57\pm 11.40\)} & \multirow{6}{*}{\(+0.21\)} & \multirow{6}{*}{\(+0.21\)} & Time factor: F\({}_{(1,25)}\) = 5.01; & \\  & & & & & & \(p\) = 0.034 \\  & & & & & & & \(p\) = 0.044 \\  & & & & & & Groups factor: F\({}_{(1,25)}\) = 2.66; \\  & & & & & & \(p\) = 0.115 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}  
\begin{tabular}{c} MBT = Medicine ball throw test; SP = Shoot precision test. **Bold** indicates significant values obtained by the RM-ANOVA. _Bold and italic_ indicated that this post score is significantly higher (\(p\) < 0.05) than the pre score when the 2 groups were analyzed separately using the paired \(t\)-test due to the significant differences between groups of RM-ANOVA.  
\end{table} 
Table 3: _Cont._The RM-ANOVA performed on the backhand shot of the SP test showed a significant effect of time (F\({}_{(1,25)}\) = 5.01; \(p\) = 0.034; \(\eta^{2}_{\text{p}}\) = 0.167). In addition, a significant interaction for time * group was found (F\({}_{(1,25)}\) = 4.50; \(p\) = 0.044; \(\eta^{2}_{\text{p}}\) = 0.153). No significant difference was found between groups (F\({}_{(1,25)}\) = 2.66; \(p\) = 0.115; \(\eta^{2}_{\text{p}}\) = 0.096). The t-test performed on the two groups separately showed that the EG significantly improved precision scores in the SP test backhand in comparison to pre- vs. post-intervention scores (\(p\) = 0.006).