## 4 Results
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c c c c c} \hline \hline \multirow{2}{*}{**Sample Material (Clenoid Foss)**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Offosing Material**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Pre-Test Weight (in Grams)**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Post-Test Weight (in Grams)**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Paired T-Test Values**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**95\% C.L.**} \\ \cline{2-13}  & **(Clenoid Foss)** & **(Coupled)** & **(Clenoid Foss)** & **(Clenoid Foss)** & **(Clenoid Foss)** & **(Clenoid Foss)** & **(Clenoid Foss)** & **(Clenoid Foss)** & **(Clenoid Foss)** \\ \hline \multirow{2}{*}{**EBM-Ti**} & _EBM-Ti_ & 16.62604 & 0.07611 & 16.62466 & 0.07695 & 0.00138 & 0.03400 & 0.96820 & 0.04040 & -0.07036 & 0.07312 \\  & _Zirconia_ & 17.85018 & 0.08172 & 17.84729 & 0.08222 & 0.00289 & 0.03700 & 0.93800 & 0.07808 & -0.07413 & 0.07991 \\  & _Acyclic_ & 18.15195 & 0.08310 & 18.15093 & 0.08362 & 0.00102 & 0.03700 & 0.97880 & 0.02740 & -0.07730 & 0.07394 \\ \hline \multirow{2}{*}{**Zirconia**} & _Zirconia_ & 16.50227 & 0.03746 & 16.50022 & 0.03753 & 0.00205 & 0.01700 & 0.90410 & 0.12230 & -0.03318 & 0.03729 \\  & _EBM-Ti_ & 17.24061 & 0.03913 & 17.22936 & 0.03922 & 0.00125 & 0.01800 & 0.94390 & 0.07130 & -0.03536 & 0.03806 \\  & _Acyclic_ & 17.06166 & 0.03873 & 17.06126 & 0.03881 & 0.00040 & 0.01700 & 0.98180 & 0.02310 & -0.03603 & 0.03862 \\ \hline \multirow{2}{*}{**Acyclic**} & _Acyclic_ & 15.43073 & 0.04929 & 15.42984 & 0.05218 & 0.00089 & 0.02300 & 0.96920 & 0.09290 & -0.04680 & 0.04858 \\  & _EBM-Ti_ & 15.31541 & 0.04892 & 15.31420 & 0.05179 & 0.00121 & 0.02300 & 0.95780 & 0.05370 & -0.04612 & 0.04854 \\ \cline{1-1}  & _Zirconia_ & 16.29016 & 0.05204 & 16.28533 & 0.05507 & 0.00483 & 0.02400 & 0.84250 & 0.20160 & -0.04551 & 0.05517 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 3: Mean (\(\pm\) standard deviation) of the pre-test and post-test weights among the solenoid fossa parts of different materials tested against different deploy materials, along with paired t-test values. \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c c c c c} \hline \hline  & & \multicolumn{8}{c}{**Sample Material (Condyle)**} \\ \cline{3-11}  & & \multicolumn{3}{c}{**EBM-Ti**} & \multicolumn{3}{c}{**Zirconia**} & \multicolumn{3}{c}{**Acrylic**} \\ \hline \multirow{3}{*}{
\begin{tabular}{c} **Sample Material (Condyle)** \\ \end{tabular} } & \multicolumn{3}{c}{**EBM-Ti**} & \multicolumn{3}{c}{**Zirconia**} & \multicolumn{3}{c}{**Acrylic**} \\ \cline{3-11}  & **Organog** & & & & & & & & \\ \cline{2-11}
**Sample Material (Condyle)** & \begin{tabular}{c} **Dipposing Material (Glenoid** \\ **Fossa)** \\ \end{tabular} & _EBM-Ti_ & _Zirconia_ & _Acrylic_ & _Zirconia_ & _EBM-Ti_ & _Acrylic_ & _Acrylic_ & _EBM-Ti_ & _Zirconia_ \\ \hline \multirow{3}{*}{EBM-Ti} & _EBM-Ti_ & - & 0.0008 & 0.0009 & 0.0014 & 0.0015 & 0.0016 & 0.0009 & 0.0003 & 0.0001 \\ \cline{2-11}  & _Zirconia_ & - & - & 0.0017 & 0.0023 & 0.0023 & 0.0024 & 0.0017 & 0.0011 & 0.0009 \\ \cline{2-11}  & _Acrylic_ & - & - & - & 0.0006 & 0.0006 & 0.0007 & 0.0001 & 0.0006 & 0.0008 \\ \hline \multirow{3}{*}{\
\begin{tabular}{c} **Zirconia** \\ \end{tabular} } & _Zirconia_ & - & - & - & - & 0.0001 & 0.0002 & 0.0006 & 0.0012 & 0.0013 \\ \cline{2-11}  & _EBM-Ti_ & - & - & - & - & 0.0001 & 0.0006 & 0.0012 & 0.0014 \\ \cline{2-11}  & _Acrylic_ & - & - & - & - & - & - & 0.0007 & 0.0013 & 0.0015 \\ \hline \multirow{3}{*}{
\begin{tabular}{c} **Acrylic** \\ \end{tabular} } & _Acrylic_ & - & - & - & - & - & - & - & 0.0006 & 0.0007 \\ \cline{2-11}  & _EBM-Ti_ & - & - & - & - & - & - & 0.0001 \\ \cline{1-1} \cline{2-11}  & _Zirconia_ & - & - & - & - & - & - & - & - \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 4: Difference between the mean reduction in weights among the condylar part materials tested against different glenoid fossa part materials.