## 5 Case Study
### Evaluation of the Importance of Urban Rail Network Nodes
#### 5.2.2 Calculation of Evaluation Indicator Weights  
Combined with the value of each evaluation index, according to Formulas (7) and (8), the coefficient of variation method is used to calculate the weight of each index, as shown in Table 2.  
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c c c} \hline \hline \multirow{2}{*}{**Station Type**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**Station Name**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**Network Efficiency Loss**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Maximum Connected**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Network Efficiency**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Unsatisfied Passenger**} \\  & & & **Sub-Network Loss** & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Accessibility Loss**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Demand**} \\ \cline{3-10}  & & **The Original** & **This** & **The Original** & **This** & **The Original** & **This** & **The Original** & **This** \\  & & **Way** & **Paper** & **Way** & **Paper** & **Way** & **Paper** & **Way** & **Paper** \\ \hline \multirow{3}{*}{Interlocking station} & China & \multirow{3}{*}{0.0005} & \multirow{3}{*}{0.0017} & \multirow{3}{*}{0.0005} & \multirow{3}{*}{0.0144} & \multirow{3}{*}{0.0372} & \multirow{3}{*}{0.1017} & \multirow{3}{*}{0.0151} & \multirow{3}{*}{0.0825} \\  & Pharmaceutical & & & & & & & & \\ University Station & (Line 1) & & & & & & & \\ \cline{2-10}  & Tianlongest Station & & & & & & & \\ \cline{2-10}  & (Line 1) & & & & & & & \\ \cline{2-10}  & Gulou Station & & & & & & & \\ \cline{2-10}  & (Line 1) & & & & & & & \\ \hline \multirow{3}{*}{Interlocking station} & Nanjing South & \multirow{3}{*}{0.0032} & \multirow{3}{*}{0.0124} & \multirow{3}{*}{0.0144} & \multirow{3}{*}{0.02145} & \multirow{3}{*}{0.3057} & \multirow{3}{*}{0.0851} & \multirow{3}{*}{0.0733} \\  & Station (Line 53) & & & & & & & \\ \cline{2-10}  & Xiniekou Station & & & & & & & \\ \cline{2-10}  & (Line 2) & & & & & & & \\ \cline{2-10}  & \multirow{3}{*}{Xiniekou Station} & \multirow{3}{*}{0.0069} & \multirow{3}{*}{0.0078} & \multirow{3}{*}{0.0096} & \multirow{3}{*}{0.0240} & \multirow{3}{*}{0.6643} & \multirow{3}{*}{0.6823} & \multirow{3}{*}{0.1414} & \multirow{3}{*}{0.1667} \\  & & & & & & & & \\ \cline{2-10}  & & & & & & & & \\ \cline{2-10}  & & & & & & & & \\ \hline \multirow{3}{*}{ECC station} & Ruanjandadao & \multirow{3}{*}{0.0022} & \multirow{3}{*}{0.0100} & \multirow{3}{*}{0.0048} & \multirow{3}{*}{0.0673} & \multirow{3}{*}{0.0376} & \multirow{3}{*}{0.1981} & \multirow{3}{*}{0.0111} & \multirow{3}{*}{0.1658} \\  & Station (Line 1) & & & & & & & \\ \cline{2-10} Non-centralized & Zhiwianglu Station & \multirow{3}{*}{0.0021} & \multirow{3}{*}{0.0021} & \multirow{3}{*}{0.0048} & \multirow{3}{*}{0.0048} & \multirow{3}{*}{0.1426} & \multirow{3}{*}{0.1426} & \multirow{3}{*}{0.0303} & \multirow{3}{*}{0.0303} \\  & (Line 1) & & & & & & & \\ \cline{2-10} Non-centralized & Xuanwumen & \multirow{3}{*}{0.0016} & \multirow{3}{*}{0.0016} & \multirow{3}{*}{0.0048} & \multirow{3}{*}{0.0048} & \multirow{3}{*}{0.1133} & \multirow{3}{*}{0.1133} & \multirow{3}{*}{0.0245} & \multirow{3}{*}{0.0245} \\  & Station (Line 1) & & & & & & & \\ \cline{2-10} Non-centralized & Yuantong Station & \multirow{3}{*}{0.0085} & \multirow{3}{*}{0.0032} & \multirow{3}{*}{0.0577} & \multirow{3}{*}{0.0048} & \multirow{3}{*}{0.0896} & \multirow{3}{*}{0.0464} & \multirow{3}{*}{0.0670} & \multirow{3}{*}{0.0139} \\  & (Line 2) & & & & & & & \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table}
Table 1: Example of values for evaluation indicators.  
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c} \hline \hline
**Indicator type** & **Indicators** & **Weights** \\ \hline Network topology & Network efficiency loss & 0.1499 \\ Maximum connected & & 0.1897 \\ sub-network loss & & \\ Network efficiency & & \\ accessibility loss & 0.3727 \\ Unsatisfied passenger & & 0.2877 \\ demand & & \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table}
Table 2: Weights of evaluation indicators.