## 4 Evaluation System
### Test and Effect Evaluation
#### 4.4.3 Test Results Before and After the Course
At the end of the course, students were able to propose innovative and feasible solutions to complex geographical problems, and their thinking depth and innovation ability were significantly improved, with an average score of more than 85 points. 5. Comprehensive test of knowledge application. In the report and defense of research results, the average score after the end of the course reached 88 points. In their reports, students were able to accurately apply geographical knowledge, deeply analyze the relationship between the Yellow Sea (Bohai Sea) migratory bird habitat ecosystem and human activities, and clearly explain the application of the \"human-land coordination concept\" in actual cases. For example, when explaining the relationship between wetland protection and the economic development of surrounding communities, they were able to use geographical principles to propose reasonable coordination plans. During the defense of their research, students were able to accurately answer questions raised by experts, showing a deep understanding and proficient application of knowledge. In the evaluation of the study manual and knowledge summary, the average score was 90 points. The students' study manuals were detailed and accurate, not only containing the key points of geographical knowledge, but also recording the observations and thoughts during the field investigation. The personal knowledge summary can systematically sort out the knowledge learned during the study, deeply understand the connection between geographical concepts and principles, and reflect the construction and deepening of the knowledge system. 6. Comprehensive evaluation of practical results. In the display and evaluation of field investigation results, the average score was 92 points. The field investigation materials presented by the students are rich and detailed, and can accurately reflect the current situation and problems of wetland and forest ecosystems. The analysis of the data is in-depth and scientific. For example, by comparing photos of migratory bird habitats in different periods, the causes of ecological changes are accurately analyzed, and targeted protection measures are proposed. The solutions are highly feasible. For example, the proposed wetland ecological restoration plan combines local actual conditions and takes into account multiple factors such as ecology, economy, and society. In the evaluation of innovative practice works, the average score was 90 points. The students' innovative practice works were outstanding in terms of innovation. For example, some propaganda posters used unique perspectives and creative techniques to attract the audience's attention to ecological protection issues; the ecological protection plan proposed a novel ecotourism model that takes into account ecological protection and economic development. The scientificity and practicality of the works have also been recognized by experts. For example, the construction of the ecological prediction model conformed to scientific principles and can provide reference for actual decision-making. 7. Evaluation of the overall performance of the team. In the quality evaluation of the team project results, the average score was 95 points. In the ecological protection community publicity activities, the team effectively raised the ecological protection awareness of community residents through various forms (such as holding lectures, distributing publicity materials, organizing field experiences, etc. ), and the participation in the activities was high, which was highly recognized by the community. In the implementation of the migratory bird habitat protection plan, the team was able to formulate detailed plans based on actual conditions and effectively implement them, achieving significant ecological protection results, such as an increase in the number of migratory birds and improvements in the habitat's ecological environment.