## 3 Systematic Review Results
### Digital Divide  
The digital divide, the unequal access to information and communication technology (ICT) among different age groups, presents a growing challenge for social inclusion. Fortunately, solutions lie at the intersection of psychology and technology design, as technology skills become increasingly crucial for full social participation [39]. The digital divide manifests in various forms beyond just access to ICT. Studies reveal discrepancies in technology usage behaviours [40]. For example, some individuals may rely on non-electrical assistive devices while neglecting potentially beneficial electronic alternatives. Additionally, generational preferences can come into play, with some favouring familiar, established technologies over newer computerised options [41]. Even within smart home advancements, recent research suggests a preference for simpler innovations over highly automated systems [42]. These nuances highlight the importance of understanding not just access, but also individual needs, comfort levels, and potential apprehension towards newer technologies. Digital inclusion for older adults faces challenges beyond just physical limitations. In [43], the authors identified internalised ageism, negative self-perceptions about technology use due to age, as a significant barrier. This psychological factor lowers motivation and hinders technology adoption. Beyond internalised ageism, external factors also play a role. The authors of [44] highlighted the emotional impact of assistive technologies (ATs). While ATs, such as mobile phones, can offer benefits like safety and independence, it can also evoke negative emotions like anxiety or feelings of stigma. Current AT design often prioritises usability over emotional and psychological needs. [PERSON] advocated for a holistic design approach that considers aesthetics, usability, and user well-being to improve acceptance and user experience. The authors in [45] proposed the Smart Wearables Acceptance Model (SWAM) to understand factors influencing wearable health technology adoption among older adults. Their model incorporates established technology acceptance factors alongside age-related health characteristics. Their findings confirm that perceived ease of use, usefulness, social influence, and positive attitudes significantly impact technology acceptance. Additionally, age, education, computer experience, and health literacy were found to moderate these relationships. The study suggested that interventions promoting ease of use, highlighting usefulness, leveraging social influence, and fostering positive attitudes can increase wearable technology acceptance in older populations. Further research by [46] delved into the multifaceted nature of the digital divide among older adults. Their work identified challenges that extend beyond mere access to technology, including a lack of familiarity, fear of mistakes, and anxieties surrounding social implications. The authors emphasised the need for collaborative efforts, including digital literacy programmes, to bridge this gap. Their research aligns with the concept of a multi-layered digital divide, encompassing access, usage proficiency, and the skills required for effective technology use. By acknowledging these complexities, solutions like targeted education and training initiatives can be implemented to empower older adults and ensure their inclusion in our increasingly digital world. [PERSON] [44] added another layer of complexity to the digital divide, exploring the psychological factors that influence adoption. The study highlighted how anticipation of external prejudice and internalised stereotypes can lead older adults to downplay their need for assistive technologies. This resistance may stem from a desire to maintain dignity or a sense of aesthetics, even when acknowledging the potential benefits of the technology.