## 3 Results
### Seed Yield, Oilseed Cake Extraction Rate, and Yield of Camelina  
The present study proved that fertilization only had a significant effect on the seed yield of the camelina crop (Table 4). Specifically, the highest yields were found in compost plots (1083.6 and 955.2 kg\(\cdot\)ha\({}^{-1}\) in 2015 and 2016, respectively), followed by vermicompost (703.1 and 602.5 kg\(\cdot\)ha\({}^{-1}\) in 2015 and 2016, respectively), with untreated plants yielding the lowest (558.9 and 462.5 kg\(\cdot\)ha\({}^{-1}\) for the corresponding growing periods).  
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c} \hline \hline \multirow{2}{*}{**Treatment**} & **Seed Yield** & **Seed Cake** & **Seed Cake Yield** \\  & **(kg\(\cdot\)ha\({}^{-1}\))** & **Extraction Rate (\%)** & **(kg\(\cdot\)ha\({}^{-1}\))** \\ \hline \hline
**2015** & & & & \\ \hline \hline CT & 759.4 A & 62.20 A & 472.3 A \\ \hline MT & 804.3 A & 62.16 A & 499.9 A \\ \hline \hline \multicolumn{4}{c}{Fertilization} \\ \hline Control & 558.9 c & 62.37 a & 348.6 c \\ \hline Vermicompost & 703.1 b & 62.21 a & 437.4 b \\ \hline Compost & 1083.6 a & 61.95 a & 671.3 a \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table}
Table 4: Seed yield, cake extraction rate, and cake yield as affected by soil tillage system (conventional and minimum tillage: CT and MT, respectively) and fertilization (control, vermicompost, and compost).  
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c} \hline \hline \multirow{2}{*}{\begin{tabular}{c} **Source of** \\ **Variance** \\ \end{tabular} } & \multirow{2}{*}{**Df**} & \begin{tabular}{c} **Total** \\ **Saturated** \\ **Fatty Acids** \\ **(SAFA)** \\ \end{tabular} & \begin{tabular}{c} **Oleic Acid** \\ **(C18:1 \(n\)-9)** \\ \end{tabular} & \begin{tabular}{c} **Cis-11-** \\ **Eicosenoic Acid** \\ **(C20:1)** \\ \end{tabular} & \
\begin{tabular}{c} **Erucic Acid** \\ **(C22:1)** \\ \end{tabular} &
\begin{tabular}{c} **Total Monounsaturated Fatty** \\ **Acids (MUFA)** \\ \end{tabular} \\ \hline Year (Y) & 1 & 9.974 \({}^{**}\) & 376.113 \({}^{***}\) & 1.468 \({}^{\mathrm{ns}}\) & 0.048 \({}^{\mathrm{ns}}\) & 85.196 \({}^{***}\) \\ \hline Tillage (T) & 1 & 0.236 \({}^{\mathrm{ns}}\) & 0.002 \({}^{\mathrm{ns}}\) & 26.996 \({}^{***}\) & 9.809 \({}^{**}\) & 19.186 \({}^{***}\) \\ \hline Fertilization (F) & 2 & 16.618 \({}^{***}\) & 10.187 \({}^{**}\) & 24.657 \({}^{***}\) & 21.363 \({}^{***}\) & 32.930 \({}^{***}\) \\ \hline Y \(\times\) T & 1 & 0.007 \({}^{\mathrm{ns}}\) & 0.509 \({}^{\mathrm{ns}}\) & 0.834 \({}^{\mathrm{ns}}\) & 0.334 \({}^{\mathrm{ns}}\) & 0.903 \({}^{\mathrm{ns}}\) \\ \hline Y \(\times\) F & 2 & 2.523 \({}^{\mathrm{ns}}\) & 1.667 \({}^{\mathrm{ns}}\) & 0.078 \({}^{\mathrm{ns}}\) & 0.024 \({}^{\mathrm{ns}}\) & 0.653 \({}^{\mathrm{ns}}\) \\ \hline T \(\times\) F & 2 & 0.802 \({}^{\mathrm{ns}}\) & 0.072 \({}^{\mathrm{ns}}\) & 0.068 \({}^{\mathrm{ns}}\) & 1.422 \({}^{\mathrm{ns}}\) & 0.224 \({}^{\mathrm{ns}}\) \\ \hline Y \(\times\) T \(\times\) F & 2 & 1.212 \({}^{\mathrm{ns}}\) & 0.540 \({}^{\mathrm{ns}}\) & 0.017 \({}^{\mathrm{ns}}\) & 1.019 \({}^{\mathrm{ns}}\) & 0.148 \({}^{\mathrm{ns}}\) \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table}
Table 3: _Cont._Concerning the seed cake extraction rate of amelina, there were no significant differences among different soil tillage and fertilization plots (Table 4). Seed cake yield was estimated by multiplying the seed yield of the amelina crop and the content of seed cake residue derived from the crop's seeds after removing the fixed oil. According to the combined analysis (Table 3), seed cake yield was only affected by fertilization. Averaged over soil tillage treatments, the highest values of cake yield were found in plants treated with compost (671.3 and 576.1 kg\(\cdot\)ha\({}^{-1}\) in 2015 and 2016, respectively), followed by vermicompost (437.4 and 368.9 kg\(\cdot\)ha\({}^{-1}\) for the respective years; Table 4).