## 4 Survey Findings and Results from and Through Discussion
### Interactive Radio-Themed Lessan--RO1  
#### 4.2.1 First Segment: Organization of Acquired Knowledge  
Based on the overall grouped responses of this survey regarding the degree of satisfaction from the first main segment of the evaluation form, related to the \"organization of acquired knowledge\", they predominantly range from Options 3 to 5 (i.e., \"fair\" to \"excellent\") on the five-point Likert scale (Table 6). Arguably, the highest overall percentage appears to be Option 5 (i.e., \"excellent\") in this segment and is observed in the parameter assessing the effectiveness of the \"questions/answers\" at the end of the interactive \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c c c c c c c} \hline \hline  & \multicolumn{3}{c}{**Xers**} & \multicolumn{3}{c}{**Millenials**} & \multicolumn{3}{c}{**Zoomers**} \\ \cline{2-13}  & **f** & & **\%** & **f** & & **\%** & **f** & & **\%** & **f** & **\%** \\ \hline
**Male** & 4 & 50\% & **3\%** & 4 & 44.4\% & **3\%** & 51 & 43.2\% & **37.7\%** \\
**Female** & 4 & 50\% & 3\% & 5 & 55.6\% & **3.7\%** & 67 & 56.8\% & **49.6\%** \\
**Subtotal** & 8 & 100\% & 6\% & 9 & 100\% & **6.7\%** & 118 & 100\% & **87.3\%** \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 4: The statistical distribution of the variable of gender per generational cohort. Figure 3: Budding journalists’ demographics per gender. \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c} \hline \hline  & \multicolumn{3}{c}{**First Experiment 1**} & \multicolumn{3}{c}{**Second Experiment**} & \multicolumn{3}{c}{**Third Experiment 3**} & \multicolumn{3}{c}{**Fourth Experiment 4**} & \multicolumn{3}{c}{**Fifth Experiment 5**} & \multicolumn{3}{c}{**Sixth Experiment 6**} \\ \cline{2-13}  & **f** & **\%** & **f** & **\%** & **f** & **\%** & **f** & **\%** & **f** & **\%** & **f** & **\%** & **f** & **\%** \\ \hline
**Xers** & 4 & 15.4\% & **3\%** & 4 & 18.2\% & **3\%** & - & - & - & - & - & - & - & - & - & - & - \\
**Millenials** & 5 & 19.2\% & **3.7\%** & 4 & 18.2\% & **3\%** & - & - & - & - & - & - & - & - & - & - \\
**Zoomers** & 17 & 65.4\% & **12.6\%** & 14 & 63.6\% & **10.4\%** & 14 & 100\% & **10.4\%** & 31 & 100\% & **23\%** & 10 & 100\% & **7.2\%** & 32 & 100\% & **23.7\%** \\
**Subtotal** & 26 & 100\% & **19.3\%** & 22 & 100\% & **16.4\%** & 14 & 100\% & **10.4\%** & 31 & 100\% & **23\%** & 10 & 100\% & **7.2\%** & 32 & 100\% & **23.7\%** \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 5: The statistical distribution of the variable of generational cohort per experiment. In short, these survey findings and results are indeed very interesting and should be further investigated. However, the most interesting survey finding that definitely needs to be further investigated is what emerged from the statistical analysis based on generational cohorts, in which it is observed that the average values between Xers and Zoomers are closer than among Millennials (Table 8), while there are some that are the same (e.g., the parameters of the \"interesting suggestions\" with MEAN: 4.38, the parameters of the \"discussion time\" with MEAN: 4.50, and the parameters of the \"knowledge\" with MEAN: 4.25) (Table 8). All of this thus confirms the literature that states that Zoomers have common behaviors, views, and attitudes with Xers [50; 185; 186; 59]. Similarly, it could be safely said that Greek Zoomers are probably like their international peers, who tend to be Xers [50; 185; 186; 59], thus rejecting the famous [PERSON] theory about the gap across the generational cohorts [187; 188]. Furthermore, these survey findings and results now align with survey findings and results from empirical studies and research papers and, more explicitly, with the survey findings and results of another related cross-cultural study from the research project MACE with Greek and Greek-Cypriot participants [110; 112], suggesting the need to further investigate this particular issue.