## 3 Results
### Diagnostic Test Performances
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{l c c c c c c c} \hline \hline
**Scenes** & **Center** & **False** & **FP** & **FN** & **Grade of Certainity** & **Motion Intensity** & **Assumed Scene Number** \\  & **N** (**c**) & **N** (**c**) & **N** & **N** & **Median (Q1,3)** & **Median (Q2,3)** & **Median (Q2,3)** \\ \hline
1. Bed empty & 10 (6\%) & 5 (33\%) & 5 & - & 1 (1;2) & 1 (1;2) & 1 (1;20) \\ \hline
2. Subject in bed, wires being attached for standard monitoring & 12 (80\%) & 3 (20\%) & - & 3 & 2 (1;2) & 2 (2;2) & 10 (2;10) \\ \hline
3. Subject in bed detaches wires & 15 (100\%) & 0 & - & - & 3 (2;3) & 2 (2;3) & 4 (4;16) \\ \hline
4. Subject in bed, wires being unany and redless & 15 (00\%) & 0 & - & - & 3 (0;3) & 3 (2;3) & 6 (4;13) \\ \hline
5. Subject lying in bed motionless, breathing shallow & 12 (80\%) & 3 (20\%) & 3 & 1 (1;2) & 1 (1;1) & 1 (1;1) \\ \hline
6. Subject in bed, housing and turning & 15 (100\%) & 0 & - & - & 3 (0;3) & 3 (0;3) & 8 (6;13) \\ \hline
7. Subject lying in bed motionless, breathing normal & 13 (80\%) & 2 (13\%) & 2 & 1 (1;3) & 1 (1;1) & 1 (1;1) \\ \hline
8. Subject in bed, jumping up and down & 15 (100\%) & 0 & - & - & 3 (0;3) & 3 (0;3) & 6 (6;13) \\ \hline
9. Subject lying in bed motionless, breathing shallow & 13 (90\%) & 2 (13\%) & 2 & 1 (1;2) & 1 (1;1) & 1 (1;1) \\ \hline
10. Subject in bed with little and central movements & 14 (90\%) & 1 (6.7\%) & - & 1 & 2 (0;2) & 2 (2;2) & 18 (10;20) \\ \hline
11. Subjects lying in bed motionless, breathing strong & 12 (00\%) & 3 (20\%) & 3 & 1 (1;2) & 1 (1;1) & 1 (1;1) \\ \hline
12. Subject lying in bed motionless, breathing shallow & 12 (80\%) & 3 (20\%) & 3 & 1 (1;2) & 1 (1;2) & 1 (1;1) \\ \hline
13. Subject in bed attempting to leave the bed & 15 (100\%) & 0 & - & 3 (0;3) & 3 (2;3) & 6 (4;13) \\ \hline
14. Subject in bed completing bed test (twice or motion) & 15 (00\%) & 0 & - & - & 3 (0;3) & 3 (2;3) & 13 (6;14) \\ \hline
15. Subject lying in bed motionless, breathing shallow & 14 (90\%) & 1 (6.7\%) & 1 & 1 (1;3) & 1 (1;1) & 1 (1;1) \\ \hline
16. Subject in bed, hitting the bed with the fist & 15 (100\%) & 0 & - & - & 3 (0;3) & 3 (0;3) & 16 (6;16) \\ \hline
17. Subject lying in bed motionless, breathing shallow & 13 (90\%) & 2 (13\%) & 2 & - & 1 (1;3) & 1 (1;1) & 1 (1;1) \\ \hline
18. Subject in bed, exhibiting tremor & 13 (80\%) & 2 (13\%) & - & 2 & 1 (1;2) & 2 (2;2) & 20 (10;20) \\ \hline
19. Solar\({}^{*}\) & 15 (100\%) & 0 & - & - & 3 (0;3) & 3 (0;3) & 13 (6;16) \\ \hline
20. Subject in bed, lying relaxed & 14 (90\%) & 1 (6.7\%) & - & 1 & 2 (0;2) & 2 (2;2) & 10 (10;18) \\ \hline
21. Subject lying in bed motionless, vibrating mobile phone & 6 (40\%) & 9 (60\%) & 9 & - & 2 (1;2) & 2 (1;2) & 4 (1;20) \\ \hline
22. Bed empty, vibrating mobile phone & 8 (53\%) & 7 (40\%) & 7 & - & 2 (1;2) & 1 (1;10) \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular} Number of correct and false identical scenes for each scene (8\%); including false positive (FP) and false negative (FN) results. Further, the grade of constraints of the panel response, the motion intensity, and the corresponding some number antibody by the panel and given median and quartiles). Scores with motions are marked in grey. Cade of certainty of panel response 1—low; 2—medium; 3—high. Motion intensity: 1—no motion; 2—weak motion; 3—strong motion. 4’; lower scene: The test subject could improve one score, whereby all test subjects chose motions of different intensities (Table 2).  
\end{table} 
Table 5: Panel results according to different scenes. Of note, if the eleven scenes with panel disagreements were excluded, the accuracy in the total cohort would have been similar: correct identification in 276 of 319 scenes (86.5%); 37 FP; 6 FN; [PERSON]'s kappa 0.72 (95% CI 0.64; 0.80). Again, kappa was higher if the mobile phone scenes were excluded (0.80 (95% CI 0.73; 0.87)).