## 1 Introduction
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c} \hline \hline
**Publication** & **Researcher(s)** & **Time** & **Engineering Background** & **Equipment** & **Research Content** \\ \hline Ref. [1] & [PERSON] et al. & 2012 & \begin{tabular}{c} A 3-story building \\ at Pudong in Shanghai \\ \end{tabular} & Pressure transducer & Mean or peak pressure \\ \hline Ref. [2] & [PERSON] & 1992 & \begin{tabular}{c} Texas Tech University \\ experimental building \\ \end{tabular} & Pressure tap & Mean or peak pressure \\ \hline Ref. [3] & [PERSON] et al. & 1997 & Silose structures building & Pressure tap & Mean or peak pressure \\ \hline Ref. [4] & [PERSON] et al. & 1997 & Silose structures building & Pressure tap & Mean or peak pressure \\ \hline Ref. [5] & [PERSON] et al. & 1998 & Silose structures building & Pressure tap & Mean or peak pressure \\ \hline Ref. [6] & [PERSON] et al. & 2009 & \begin{tabular}{c} A low-rise building at coastal \\ region in Florida \\ \end{tabular} & Pressure tap & Mean or peak pressure \\ \hline Ref. [7] & [PERSON] & 1975 & \begin{tabular}{c} 57-story Commerce Court Tower \\ in Toronto \\ \end{tabular} & Pressure transducer & Fluctuating pressure \\ \hline Ref. [8] & [PERSON] & 1982 & \begin{tabular}{c} 57-story Commerce Court Tower \\ in Toronto \\ \end{tabular} & Strain gauge, accelerometer and displacement transducer & Dynamic structural response \\ \hline Ref. [9] & [PERSON] et al. & 2005 & \begin{tabular}{c} Central Plaza Tower in Hong \\ Kong and Di Wang Tower in Shenzhen \\ \end{tabular} & Accelerometer & RMS acceleration \\ \hline Ref. [10] & [PERSON] et al. & 2007 & [PERSON] building & Accelerometer & RMS acceleration \\ \hline Ref. [11] & [PERSON] et al. & 2008 & \begin{tabular}{c} Four super-tail buildings \\ in China \\ \end{tabular} & Accelerometer & RMS acceleration \\ \hline Ref. [12] & [PERSON] et al. & 2008 & \begin{tabular}{c} CITIC Plaza Tower in Guangzhou \\ and Di Wang Tower in Shenzhen \\ \end{tabular} & Accelerometer & RMS acceleration \\ \hline Ref. [13] & [PERSON] et al. & 2012 & Guangzhou West Tower & Accelerometer and pressure transducer & RMS acceleration \\ \hline Ref. [14] & [PERSON] & 2001 & Great Belt East suspension bridge & \begin{tabular}{c} Pressure transducer \\ and accelerometer \\ \end{tabular} & Vertical acceleration \\ \hline Ref. [15] & [PERSON] et al. & 2014 & \
\begin{tabular}{c} An asymmetric suspension \\ bridge with a 1650 m central \\ main span \\ \end{tabular} & Accelerometer and pressure measurement system & Vertical acceleration \\ \hline Ref. [16] & [PERSON] & 1982 & A 120 m high cooling tower & Pressure transducer & Characteristics of pressure \\ \hline Ref. [17] & [PERSON] et al. & 2017 &
\begin{tabular}{c} Pengcheng cooling tower of \\ 167 m height \\ \end{tabular} & Pressure transducer & Characteristics of pressure \\ \hline Ref. [18] & [PERSON] & 1996 & A 44.8 m high building & Pressure tap & Characteristics of pressure \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 1: Representative full-scale/model test comparisons with noticeable differences in results. stationary features of the oncoming flow between the two experiments, Re effects, and Jensen number effects. It is evident that the wind engineering community has consistently identified three main similarity problems that adversely affect the reliability of the traditional ABL wind tunnel simulation technique. Firstly, the use of passive simulation devices (spires and roughness elements) means that the complete turbulent flow characteristics of the realistic ABL flow field cannot be accurately simulated in the wind tunnel (referred to as turbulent flow characteristics effects). Secondly, Re effects exist for wind tunnel tests. Thirdly, the non-stationary features of the realistic ABL winds cannot be accurately simulated in a traditional passive wind tunnel (referred to as non-stationarity effects).