## 1 Introduction
Additionally, no data have been reported for this system regarding energy performance or carbon footprint, nor does it contemplate strategies to reduce or avoid the thermal bridges created by the steel structure [22]. This system generates prefabrication of constructive elements, like conventional construction, but improves performance in the manufacturing stage by being industrializable. Regarding modular solutions, they are less adopted than prefabricated systems. In this category is the WikiHouse system, developed in the United Kingdom, which through subtractive manufacturing allows for the construction of houses using digital manufacturing [23]. The Leeds Sustainability Institute of Leeds Beckett University indicates that compared to a traditional brick or wall construction system, it generates less than half of the greenhouse gases (CO\({}_{2}\)eq), has low heating demand (2000 vs. 4200 [kWh/year]), short construction time (assembly between 4 and 12 weeks), and a reuse rate of parts close to 80%. This system is available in two types of constructive solutions in thicknesses of 200 and 250 [mm], which have not been optimized according to energy consumption or the geographic location of a house. Additionally, the proposal considers traditional thermal insulation materials [24]. Den Bosch is an application of the WikiHouse system in the Netherlands, where a 44 [m\({}^{2}\)] house was built, which has improvements in energy efficiency (compared to regulations). However, the first version of the system was used in the project, generating frames with plywood boards, without the possibility of conducting an energy or environmental analysis or optimizing the thicknesses of the envelope [25]. Although the definition of these constructive systems falls under the concept of industrialized construction, none of them have been designed considering the geographic scenario or based on the current construction challenges, including optimization to reduce costs and time of manufacturing and assembly, maximize energy performance, and reduce the carbon footprint [26]. Additionally, the scientific literature has mostly only identified and declared the benefits of industrialized construction, accompanied by general indicators on the variation (mainly reduction) of costs, construction time, energy performance, and environmental impacts [27; 28; 29; 30]. There are few works that have reported on the performance of traditional or modern constructive solutions (modular, prefabricated), allowing for the comparison of techniques and precisely visualizing the state of industrialized construction [31]. Although the participation of prefabricated and modular construction in the current market is high and their sustainability benefits throughout all stages of the project life cycle are widely recognized, the experimental results and background information on procedures demonstrating these benefits are still lacking [32]. In this regard, the objective of this work was to conduct a systematic literature review (SLR) on the four key indicators related to industrialized construction, (i) cost, (ii) construction time, (iii) energy performance, and (iv) environmental impacts, to group their results and compare them with each other. This grouping of articles by categories will allow visualizing the differences or similarities of the data managed in the scientific literature, specifically when comparing industrialized solutions with traditional ones. This work seeks to answer the following research question: what is the range of variation for costs, manufacturing time, energy demand for heating and cooling, and environmental impacts in industrialized construction solutions and/or projects? This will allow for the analysis of the factors that influence each of these indicators and for the establishment of guidelines that should be considered in the development of new constructive systems for residential building projects to be sustainable.