# Quality Assessment of Photogrammetric Methods--A Workflow for Reproducible UAS Orthomosaics
## Appendix A
: St. Petersburg, Russia, 2020. * _[PERSON] et al. (2019)_ [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON] A Review of Existing Evaluation Methods for Point Clouds Quality. In Proceedings of the 2019 Workshop on Research, Education and Development of Unmanned Aerial Systems (RED UAS), Cranfield, UK, 25-27 November 2019; pp. 247-252. [CrossRef]
* _[PERSON] et al. (2019)_ [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON] Positional Precision Analysis of Orthomosaics Derived from Drone Captured Aerial Imagery. _Drones_**2019**, \(3\), 46. [CrossRef]
* R Core Team (2020) R Core Team. _R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing_; R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria, 2020. * _[PERSON] et al. (2019)_ [PERSON]; [PERSON] [PERSON] Mapping Coastal Wetland Biomass from High Resolution Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Imagery. _Remote Sens._**2019**, _11_, 540. [CrossRef]
* [PERSON] et al. (2019) [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON] Monitoring the colonization of alluvial deposits using multitemporal UAV RGB -imagery. _Appl. Veg. Sci._**2019**, _22_, 561-572. [CrossRef]
* _[PERSON] et al. (2015)_ [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON] Optimal Altitude, Overlap, and Weather Conditions for Computer Vision UAV Estimates of Forest Structure. _Remote Sens._**2015**, \(7\), 13895-13920. [CrossRef]
* _[PERSON] et al. (2015)_ [PERSON]; [PERSON] [PERSON]; [PERSON] [PERSON] Time Series Analysis of Landslide Dynamics Using an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV). _Remote Sens._**2015**, \(7\), 1736-1757. [CrossRef]
* _[PERSON] et al. (2017)_ [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON] Assessing very high resolution UAV imagery for monitoring forest health during a simulated disease outbreak. _ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens._**2017**, _131_, 1-14. [CrossRef]
* _[PERSON] et al. (2020)_ [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON] [PERSON] Challenges in UAS-Based TIR Imagery Processing: Image Alignment and Uncertainty Quantification. _Remote Sens._**2020**, _12_, 1552. [CrossRef]
* [PERSON] and [PERSON] (2011) [PERSON]; [PERSON] Method for automatic georeferencing aerial remote sensing (RS) images from an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) platform. _Biosyst. Eng._**2011**, _108_, 104-113. [CrossRef]
* _[PERSON] et al. (2020)_ [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON]; et al. Current Practices in UAS-based Environmental Monitoring. _Remote Sens._**2020**, _12_, 1001. [CrossRef]
* _[PERSON] et al. (2020)_ [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON] [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON] [PERSON]; [PERSON], [PERSON]; [PERSON] [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON]; et al. Machine learning estimators for the quantity and quality of grass swards used for silage production using drone-based imaging spectrometry and photogrammetry. _Remote Sens. Environ._**2020**, _246_, 111830. [CrossRef]
* [PERSON] and [PERSON] (2019) [PERSON]; [PERSON] Short Communication: A simple workflow for robust low-cost UAV-derived change detection without ground control points. _Earth Surf. Dyn._**2019**, \(7\), 1009-1017. [CrossRef]
* _[PERSON] (2020)_ [PERSON]; [PERSON] Opening practice: Supporting reproducibility and critical spatial data science. _J. Geogr. Syst._**2020**. [CrossRef]* [PERSON] et al. (2018) [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON]; et al. The next generation of site-based long-term ecological monitoring: Linking essential biodiversity variables and ecosystem integrity. _Sci. Total Environ._**2018**, _613-614_, 1376-1384. [CrossRef]
* **Publisher's Note:** MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.