## 4 Discussions and Conclusions
Based on the analysis result, it was revealed that the probability of winning became higher if shot attempts were more from the beginning of a game to elevate scoring probability. Shot attempts should be made beyond a certain level. If players aim to shoot accurately towards the goal post so they can be recognized as SOG, the probability of winning is judged to go up. In the results of a study by [PERSON] et al. (2011), a study of match analysis in para ice hockey, the number of shots was generally higher for the losing team, but the scoring effect was lower for the losing team. This supports the findings of this study by reporting that the winning team's good defense is explained by game management that forces the losing team to shoot from a worse position and rush to score at the end of the game [29]. (3) For the winning and losing factor analysis result, excluding goals and shot-related variables, the probability of winning was 70.9% when the face-off winning percentage was 46.23% or more. However, if the face-off winning percentage was 46.23% or less, the probability of losing was 81.1%. When the total face-off winning percentage was 46.23% or more, and SVS in the second period was 3.5 or less, the probability of winning was 82.7%. This can be seen in the form of team play, which acquires the right to attack through face-off and connects it directly to the goal. In particular, a face-off in the opponent's camp can have a chance to connect with the goal by making a planned play. When the face-off winning percentage was 62.02% or more, although SVS was 3.5 or more in the second period, the probability of winning was 100%. This is seen as being connected to the goal through the team's planned play. According to the analysis result, excluding goal and shot-related variables, the total face-off winning percentage was the most critical factor determining winning and losing, followed by SVS in the second period. It was confirmed that the probability of winning went up if the face-off winning percentage was higher. If the face-off winning percentage was lower, the probability of losing became higher. If players endeavored to elevate the face-off winning percentage in every moment in each period, it is judged that the probability of winning can be increased. This conclusion is consistent with the study results of factors contributing to winning in ice hockey and supports this study. In addition, the previous para ice hockey game analysis study reported that the winning team occupied more pucks [29]. The factors directly affecting winning and losing are excluded by step in this study, and an effort was made to ascertain the factors affecting winning and losing. Synthesizing all these factors, goals and SOG in the first period were drawn as important factors to increase the probability of winning in the PIH games. Goals should be secured at the beginning of a game, and it was analyzed to improve the probability of winning by increasing SOG to the fullest from the beginning of a game. From a game operation aspect, it was analyzed that the probability of winning decreased as attack-related records increased in the latter part of a game. Goals and SOG are the factors related to direct attack power. The factor with the most decisive influence among game factors was the face-off winning percentage. The probability of winning is considered to be elevated if the success rate in the face-off is enhanced in case scoring is not made and when tactics to dominate from the beginning of a game are operated. Although it is impossible to compare these results with previous studies directly, most of them were similar to the winning determinants of team sports. PIH is a team sport, and various game variables occur, including shots, passes, penalties, face-offs, and diverse tactics. Therefore, an analysis of game records can be used as vital information to improve thematic performance. Competition in the PIH is here, and few nations participate in the PIH games.