## 4 Results
### Analysis of Strengths and Weaknesses  
An itemized consensual analysis was conducted that calculated the value of Chi-square test for each of the 50 items and compared the distribution of the three response categories (agree, undecided, disagree) in the sample against the expected outcome from the standardization base.  
The analysis showed that 21 items were worth considering as they yielded statistically significant results. Difference values of 0.50 or more, or \(-0.50\) or less indicated major agreement (difference \(>+0.50\)) or major disagreement (difference \(<-0.50\) negative). In contrast, difference values between 0.50 and \(-0.50\) indicate a minor degree of agreement or disagreement. Analyzed results are shown in Table 3.  
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c} \hline \hline
**Scale** & **Mean** & \
\begin{tabular}{c} **Standard** \\ **Deviation** \\ \end{tabular} & **Median** &
\begin{tabular}{c} **Interquartile** \\ **Range (IQR)** \\ \end{tabular} & **Minimum** & **Maximum** \\ \hline Global & 52.38 & 11.10 & 51.0 & 18.0 & 27 & 74 \\ Efficiency & 53.00 & 9.76 & 54.0 & 15.0 & 30 & 67 \\ Affect & 54.69 & 10.97 & 58.5 & 18.0 & 31 & 69 \\ Helpfulness & 50.55 & 11.74 & 51.0 & 17.0 & 26 & 74 \\ Controllability & 52.88 & 10.97 & 53.5 & 16.0 & 27 & 74 \\ Learnability & 50.52 & 9.93 & 48.5 & 10.0 & 32 & 72 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table}
Table 2: Descriptive analysis for SUMI evaluation survey.  
Figure 1: Computer-assisted translation (CAT) tools that are extensively used among participants.  
Figure 2: (a) Means and Standard Deviation. (b) Means with 95% CIs.  
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c l c c} \hline \hline
**Item** & **Scale** & **Statement** & **Difference** & **Verdict** \\ \hline
23 & H & I can understand and act on the information provided by this & +0.73 & Major agreement \\  & & software. & +0.67 & Major agreement \\
2 & A & I would recommend this software to my colleagues. & +0.67 & Major agreement \\
26 & E & Tasks can be performed in a straightforward manner using & +0.65 & Major agreement \\  & & this software. & +0.62 & Major agreement \\
7 & A & I enjoy the time I spend with this software. & +0.61 & Major agreement \\
12 & A & Working with this software is satisfying. & +0.61 & Major agreement \\
44 & C & It is relatively easy to move from one part of a task to another. & +0.60 & Major agreement \\
33 & E & The organization of the menus seems quite logical. & +0.59 & Major agreement \\
13 & H & The way that system information is presented is clear and & +0.58 & Major agreement \\  & & understandable. & +0.55 & Major agreement \\
29 & C & The speed of this software is adequate. & +0.55 & Major agreement \\
31 & E & It is obvious that user needs have been fully taken into consideration. & +0.54 & Major agreement \\
3 & \(H\) & The instructions and prompts are helpful. & +0.48 & Minor agreement \\
48 & \(H\) & It is easy to see at a glance what the options are at each stage. & +0.44 & Minor agreement \\
42 & \(A\) & The software presents itself in a very attractive way. & +0.43 & Minor agreement \\
19 & C & I feel in command of this software when I am using it. & +0.43 & Minor agreement \\
17 & \(A\) & Working with this software is mentally stimulating. & +0.26 & Minor agreement \\
4 & C & This software has at some time stopped unexpectedly. & +0.20 & Minor agreement \\
34 & C & The software allows the user to be economic of keystrokes. & +0.13 & Minor Agreement \\
1 & \(E\) & This software responds too slowly to inputs. & +0.13 & Minor agreement \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table}
Table 3: Items indicating statistically significant results.