## 3 Results  
This section presents the buildings chosen by the study participants, a case investigation [55], and the model-based design of the project (Table 1). Photos of the buildings are also shown for further clarification. As we were unable to present each individual building assessment in this paper, an example will be shown in Section 3.1. (similar approaches were taken for other buildings). The results of all 24 projects will be shown in Tables 2-4.  
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c} \hline \hline  & \multicolumn{10}{c}{**RESIDENTIAL**} \\ \hline \hline  & \multicolumn{10}{c}{**Design Features**} \\ \hline  & \multicolumn{10}{c}{**Location**} & \multicolumn{10}{c}{**Name**} & \multicolumn{10}{c}{**BIPV Application**} & \multicolumn{10}{c}{**Special Features**} & \multicolumn{10}{c}{**Energy Aspects**} & \multicolumn{10}{c}{**Financial Aspects**} \\ \hline  & \multicolumn{10}{c}{City, Country,} & \multicolumn{10}{c}{(o) opaque} \\  & GPS coordinates & & \multicolumn{10}{c}{(t) transparent} \\ \hline
1 & \begin{tabular}{c} Silverton, UK; \\ 50°487N, 3°29°W \\ \end{tabular} & \begin{tabular}{c} A common \\ household in UK \\ \end{tabular} & \
\begin{tabular}{c} (o) facade and \\ roof \\ (t) windows \\ \end{tabular} &
\begin{tabular}{c} Battery (6 \(k\)Wh), \\ Generated load \\ profile \\ \end{tabular} & 1200 & 10 & 9.8 & 40 & 98 & 46 & 20 & 14 & 6 & \\ \hline
2 & \begin{tabular}{c} Amsterdam, NL; \\ 52°37N, 4°90°E \\ \end{tabular} & \begin{tabular}{c} Mansion \\ \end{tabular} & \
\begin{tabular}{c} (o) facade (t) \\ windows \\ \end{tabular} &
\begin{tabular}{c} Scaled load \\ profile \\ \end{tabular} & 980 & 12.2 & 5.78 & 26 & 97 & 29 & 40 & 23 & 23 & \\ \hline
3 & \begin{tabular}{c} Florida, US; \\ 28°087N, 8°2637W \\ \end{tabular} & \begin{tabular}{c} _Waterchase_ \\ \end{tabular} & \
\begin{tabular}{c} (o) all \\ \end{tabular} &
\begin{tabular}{c} 2000 \\ \end{tabular} & 10 & 16.8 & 14 & 110 & 8 & 21 & 11 & 16 & 7 \\ \hline
4 & \begin{tabular}{c} Rotterdam, NL; \\ 51°927N, 4°490°E \\ \end{tabular} & \begin{tabular}{c} _Cule House_ \\ \end{tabular} & \
\begin{tabular}{c} (o) all \\ \end{tabular} &
\begin{tabular}{c} 1150 \\ \end{tabular} & 5 & 3 & \multicolumn{10}{c}{} & 10 & 3.4 & \\ \hline
5 & \begin{tabular}{c} Amsterdam, NL; \\ 52°227N, 4°53°E \\ \end{tabular} & \
\begin{tabular}{c} Common house \\ roof (t) windows \\ \end{tabular} &
\begin{tabular}{c} (o) facade and \\ roof (t) windows \\ \end{tabular} & 980 & 9.6 & 7.6 & 10 & 180 & 18 & 12 & & \\ \hline
6 & \begin{tabular}{c} Malaga, ES; \\ 36°727N, 4°42°W \\ \end{tabular} & \
\begin{tabular}{c} Typical summer \\ house \\ \end{tabular} &
\begin{tabular}{c} (o) facade and \\ roof (t) windows \\ \end{tabular} & 1700 & 8.3 & 10 & 6 & 111 & 6.1 & 23 & 20 & 7 \\ \hline
7 & \begin{tabular}{c} Amsterdam NL \\ 52°37N, 4°90°E \\ \end{tabular} & \begin{tabular}{c} Dutch average \\ terrace house \\ \end{tabular} & \
\begin{tabular}{c} (o)/facade and \\ roof (t) windows \\ \end{tabular} &
\begin{tabular}{c} Original load \\ profile \\ \end{tabular} & 980 & 3 & 2 & 20 & 8.5 & 3.3 & 23 & 23 & 7.3 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table}
Table 2: Residential projects—design specifications and numerical results in terms of energy and financial aspects.  
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c} \hline \hline  & \multicolumn{6}{c}{**OPFICE**} \\ \hline \hline  & \multicolumn{6}{c}{**Design Features**} \\ \hline  & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Location**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Name**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**BIPV**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Special Features**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Energy Aspects**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Financial Aspects**} \\ \hline  & \multicolumn{2}{c}{City, Country,} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{(o) opaque} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{(o) opaque} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{(o) transparent} & \multicol