## 3 Results  
### Numerical Results  
The measured values at the 38 sites are shown in Table 1. At the 38 points indicated, 9982 values corresponding to 14 frequency bands were taken using the PEM. Values measured using the PEM, broken down by frequency bands, were not included to avoid excess values in the article, but they are available upon request from the authors. Instead, Table 2 shows the ranges of the PEM frequency bands and the average of the EMF-measured values in each band. The number of decimal places offered by the PEM is higher, since the accuracy of the BBM is two digits; however, in order to improve the presentation, a number of decimal places equal to 3 is considered in Table 2. In the rest of the EMF values, where both types of measurements are compared, 2 decimal places are used to facilitate the reading. In Table 1, first, the site number (SPOT #) and the LOS-NLOS conditions are given. The next two columns correspond to the UTM coordinates of the measurement point. Then, there are the direct measurements made with the BBM EMR-300 and those made with the pair of Satimo 140 PEMs. Finally, the measurements are corrected using a single correction factor (PEM-1) as described by [PERSON] [32] and using a double correction factor (PEM-2) according to the LOS-NLOS condition. The values of the PEM-1 and PEM-2 columns were obtained by equating the mean value of the BBM and PEM column values in the single or dual correction cases. For the sake of comparison, measured and corrected values are given using two decimals. In the PEM-1 case, the ratio between both measurement sets is 1.557. In the PEM-2 case, the ratio between LOS values is 1.651 and that between NLOS values is 1.380. Further details of these corrections are given in the discussion section. \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c c} \hline \hline \multirow{2}{*}{**Spot \#**} & **LOS** & **Latitude** & **Longitude** & **BBM** & **PEM** & **PEM-1** & **PEM-2** \\  & **(Y/N)** & **UTM Coord.** & **UTM Coord.** & **(V/m)** & **(V/m)** & **(V/m)** & **(V/m)** \\ \hline
1 & Y & 39.994206 & \(-\)2.983249 & 0.74 & 0.47 & 0.74 & 0.35 \\
2 & Y & 39.993172 & \(-\)2.98831 & 1.31 & 0.63 & 1.01 & 0.49 \\
3 & N & 39.998579 & \(-\)2.991105 & 0.79 & 0.54 & 0.87 & 0.75 \\
4 & N & 39.999779 & \(-\)2.997955 & 0.47 & 0.25 & 0.41 & 0.12 \\
5 & N & 40.00277 & \(-\)3.000925 & 0.5 & 0.36 & 0.57 & 0.49 \\
6 & Y & 40.003162 & \(-\)3.004844 & 0.72 & 0.36 & 0.58 & 0.13 \\
7 & Y & 40.005329 & \(-\)3.002251 & 0.48 & 0.24 & 0.39 & 0.4 \\
8 & Y & 40.001367 & \(-\)3.011736 & 0.75 & 0.33 & 0.52 & 0.16 \\
9 & N & 40.002663 & \(-\)3.011736 & 0.13 & 0.09 & 0.14 & 0.23 \\
10 & N & 40.007875 & \(-\)3.019171 & 0.13 & 0.11 & 0.18 & 0.14 \\
11 & N & 40.004472 & \(-\)3.019993 & 0.18 & 0.1 & 0.16 & 0.17 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 1: Location and values of BEM, PEM and single (PEM-1) and double (PEM-2) corrected values. \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c c} \hline \hline
**Spot \#** & \begin{tabular}{c} **LOS** \\ **(Y/N)** \\ \end{tabular} & \begin{tabular}{c} **Latitude** \\ **UTM Coord.** \\ \end{tabular} & \begin{tabular}{c} **Longitude** \\ **UTM Coord.** \\ \end{tabular} & \begin{tabular}{c} **BBM** \\ **(V/m)** \\ \end{tabular} & \begin{tabular}{c} **PEM** \\ **(V/m)** \\ \end{tabular} & \
\begin{tabular}{c} **PEM-1** \\ **(V/m)** \\ \end{tabular} &
\begin{tabular}{c} **PEM-2** \\ **(V/m)** \\ \end{tabular} \\ \hline  
\hline  & & Mean & 0.44 & 0.28 & 0.44 & 0.44 \\  & & Median & 0.34 & 0.2 & 0.31 & 0.31 \\  & & Standard Deviation & 0.34 & 0.21 & 0.33 & 0.35 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 1: _Cont._