## 5 Results
### Comparison of Analytical Results
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c c c c c c c} \hline \hline  & & & \multicolumn{3}{c}{**Vmax**} & & \multicolumn{3}{c}{**FI**} & & \multicolumn{3}{c}{**FMI**} \\ \cline{3-14}
**\#** & **Device** & **Mean** & \begin{tabular}{c} **Std** \\ **Dev** \\ \end{tabular} & **Range** & \begin{tabular}{c} **T-Student** \\ **_p-Value_** \\ \end{tabular} & **Mean** & \begin{tabular}{c} **Std** \\ **Dev** \\ \end{tabular} & **Range** & \begin{tabular}{c} **T-Student** \\ **_p-Value_** \\ \end{tabular} & **Mean** & \begin{tabular}{c} **Std** \\ **Dev** \\ \end{tabular} & **Range** & \begin{tabular}{c} **T-Student** \\ **_p-Value_** \\ \end{tabular} & **Mean** & \
\begin{tabular}{c} **Std** \\ **Dev** \\ \end{tabular} & **Range** &
\begin{tabular}{c} **T-Student** \\ **_p-Value_** \\ \end{tabular} \\ \hline \multirow{2}{*}{1} & A & 334 & 48.5 & 170.6 & \multirow{2}{*}{0.989} & 60 & 6 & 16.6 & \multirow{2}{*}{0.79} & 53 & 7.8 & 26 & \multirow{2}{*}{0.772} \\  & B & 333 & 33.8 & 104 & & 61 & 7.7 & 26.6 & & 52 & 4.4 & 14.8 & \\ \hline \multirow{2}{*}{2} & A & 887 & 78.8 & 291.7 & \multirow{2}{*}{0.982} & 54 & 6.9 & 23 & \multirow{2}{*}{0.094} & 46 & 4.2 & 14.1 & \multirow{2}{*}{0.991} \\  & B & 886 & 81.4 & 263.9 & & 46 & 9.6 & 35.8 & & 46 & 5.5 & 18.4 & \\ \hline \multirow{3}{*}{3} & A & 1598 & 188.6 & 485.1 & \multirow{3}{*}{0.991} & 44 & 6.7 & 20.2 & \multirow{3}{*}{0.096} & 39 & 3.8 & 13.5 & \multirow{3}{*}{0.994} \\  & B & 1599 & 142.9 & 406.6 & & 39 & 3.2 & 10.1 & & 39 & 2 & 6 & \\ \hline \multirow{3}{*}{4} & A & 1607 & 301.6 & 951.8 & \multirow{3}{*}{0.987} & 37 & 2.5 & 7.7 & \multirow{3}{*}{0.325} & 35 & 3.6 & 11.3 & \multirow{3}{*}{0.596} \\  & B & 1605 & 92.8 & 316.2 & & 35 & 4.3 & 13.8 & & 34 & 3.3 & 11 & \\ \hline \multirow{3}{*}{5} & A & 1104 & 109 & 398.5 & \multirow{3}{*}{0.986} & 31 & 6.3 & 17.1 & \multirow{3}{*}{0.743} & 29 & 2.1 & 6.1 & \multirow{3}{*}{0.331} \\  & B & 1105 & 103.4 & 302.8 & & 30 & 4.8 & 15.1 & & 28 & 1.5 & 4.9 & \\ \hline \multirow{3}{*}{6} & A & 1791 & 122.6 & 344 & \multirow{3}{*}{0.989} & 27 & 2.9 & \multirow{3}{*}{9.6} & 25 & 2.2 & 7 & \multirow{3}{*}{0.984} \\  & B & 1790 & 150.9 & 501.2 & & 24 & 3.9 & 12.5 & & 25 & 2.7 & 8.2 & \\ \hline \multirow{3}{*}{7} & A & 2267 & 218.1 & 571.1 & \multirow{3}{*}{0.984} & 20 & 2.9 & \multirow{3}{*}{10.8} & 19 & 1.6 & 4.8 & \multirow{3}{*}{0.988} \\  & B & 2265 & 183.3 & 385 & & 18 & 3.5 & 11.2 & & 19 & 1.9 & 6.5 & \\ \hline \multirow{3}{*}{8} & A & 1949 & 257.1 & 844.3 & \multirow{3}{*}{0.995} & 19 & 3.3 & 11.7 & \multirow{3}{*}{0.069} & 16 & 1.5 & \multirow{3}{*}{5.5} & \multirow{3}{*}{0.999} \\  & B & 1948 & 287.6 & 944.1 & & 16 & 2.2 & 7.3 & & 16 & 2 & 6.5 & \\ \hline \multirow{3}{*}{9} & A & 2430 & 228.8 & 750.4 & \multirow{3}{*}{0.994} & 18 & 2.7 & \multirow{3}{*}{0.76} & 16 & 2.1 & 6.1 & \multirow{3}{*}{0.997} \\  & B & 2431 & 282 & 767.8 & & 16 & 2 & 6.6 & & 16 & 2.7 & \\ \hline \multirow{3}{*}{10} & A & 2783 & 249.7 & 724.5 & \multirow{3}{*}{0.995} & 10 & 0.9 & 2.9 & \multirow{3}{*}{0.076} & 8 & 0.6 & 1.9 & \multirow{3}{*}{2.3} \\  & B & 2782 & 297.9 & 776.4 & & 9 & 1.1 & 3.5 & & 8 & 0.7 & 2.3 & \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 1: Comparative analysis of the wine samples analyzed by Vmax, FI, and FMI.