## 4 Discussion  
The aim of this study was to analyze the technical-tactical patterns of scoring actions in para-judo, as well as differences in performance based on weight and combat context. The results provide a clear insight into the trends and strategies used by judokas across different weight categories. \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{l c c} \hline \hline
**DIRECT ATTACKKS** & \multicolumn{1}{c}{**O**} & **I** \\ \hline \multicolumn{3}{l}{**Standing direct attacks**} \\ \hline \multicolumn{3}{l}{Koshi-waza} \\ \hline \multirow{3}{*}{Sutemi-waza} & ((win (standing nsj,lapel-sleeve)) sj,koshi,propan) & 3 & 53 \\  & ((even (standing nsj,lapel-sleeve))(sj,tai-sabaki sj,koshi,waza-ari)) & 3 & 54 \\  & (((not-shido (standing nsj,lapel-sleeve)) sj,lapel-sleeve) sj,sutemi,ippon) & 3 & 55 \\
90 Kg & (even ((standing nsj,lapel-sleeve)(sj,lapel-sleeve sj,static)) sj,ashi,ippon)) & 4 & 41 \\  & ((standing nsj,lapel-sleeve)(sj,lapel-sleeve sj,static)) sj,ashi,ippon) & 5 & 42 \\ M100 Kg & & ((1 st-minute even)(not-shido ((standing nsj,lapel-sleeve) sj,static)) sj,ashi,ippon) & 3 & 43 \\  & (((1 st-minute even)(not-shido (standing sj,lapel-sleeve))) sj,ashi,ippon) & 4 & 44 \\  & (((1 st-minute even)(not-shido (standing sj,lapel-sleeve))) sj,t,waza-ari) & 3 & 45 \\  & (((2 nd-minute even)(standing nsj,lapel-sleeve)) sj,te,waza-ari) & 3 & 45 \\ \hline \multicolumn{3}{l}{**Ground direct attacks**} \\ \hline \multicolumn{3}{l}{60 Kg} \\ \hline \multicolumn{3}{l}{Osaekomi-waza} \\ \hline \multicolumn{3}{l}{66 Kg} \\ \multicolumn{3}{l}{Osaekomi-waza} \\ \hline \multicolumn{3}{l}{Oasekomi-waza} \\ \hline \multicolumn{3}{l}{Shime-waza} \\ \hline \multicolumn{3}{l}{**ThransITION TECHNIQUE (Standing-Ground)**} \\ \hline \multicolumn{3}{l}{81 Kg} \\ \multicolumn{3}{l}{(ground ((sj,transition-technique nsj,inferior-position)(sj,frolling-action sj,osaekomi,waza-ari)))} \\ \multicolumn{3}{l}{M100 Kg} \\ \multicolumn{3}{l}{(ground ((sj,transition-technique nsj,inferior-position)(sj,frolling-action sj,osaekomi,waza-ari)))} \\ \hline \multicolumn{3}{l}{**COMBINATION (Standing-Standing)**} \\ \hline \multicolumn{3}{l}{60 Kg} \\ \multicolumn{3}{l}{90 Kg} \\ \multicolumn{3}{l}{(shido2,nsj ((standing sj,lapel-sleeve)(sj,ashi sj,ashi,waza-ari)))} \\ \multicolumn{3}{l}{(standing (nsj,lapel-sleeve ((sj,lapel-sleeve sj,static)(sj,ashi sj,ashi,ippon))))} \\ \multicolumn{3}{l}{(sj,ashi sj,ashi,ippon))} \\ \hline \multicolumn{3}{l}{**COUNTERATTACK**} \\ \hline \multicolumn{3}{l}{60 Kg} \\ \multicolumn{3}{l}{66 Kg} \\ \multicolumn{3}{l}{((standing nsj,lapel-sleeve)((sj,lapel-sleeve nsj,ashi) sj,te,waza-ari))} \\ \multicolumn{3}{l}{(nsj,static (nsnsj,ssl i,te,waza-ari))} \\ \multicolumn{3}{l}{(nsj,static (nsj,ssl i,te,waza-ari))} \\ \multicolumn{3}{l}{(nsj,static (nsj,ssl i,te,waza-ari))} \\ \multicolumn{3}{l}{(nsj,static (nsj,ssl i,te,waza-ari))} \\ \multicolumn{3}{l}{(nsj,static (nsj,ssl i,te,waza-ari))} \\ \multicolumn{3}{l}{(nsj,static (nsj,ssl i,te,waza-ari))} \\ \multicolumn{3}{l}{(nsj,static (nsj,ssl i,sutemi,waza-ari))} \\ \multicolumn{3}{l}{(nsj,static (nsj,ssl i,sutemi,waza-ari))} \\ \multicolumn{3}{l}{(nsj,ssl i,sutemi,waza-ari)} \\ \multicolumn{3}{l}{(nsj,ssl i,sutemi,waza-ari)} \\ \multicolumn{3}{l}{(nsj,ssl i,sutemi,ippon))} \\ \hline \multicolumn{3}{l}{Note: O = Occurrences; I = Identifier in the text; sj = scoring judoka; nsj = non-scoring judoka.} \\ \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 5: _Cont._In Tachi-waza, it was observed that most points (75.5% of the total) are obtained in the first two minutes of the combat. This trend shows a progressive decrease in the number of scores as the combat progresses. Only five combats were registered during Golden Score. These findings are consistent with previous studies on the same championship, which analyze the duration of combats [17]. Moreover, it is notable that combats in higher weight categories tend to be shorter. Regarding the partial score, it was found that judokas score more frequently when the score is tied. This makes sense, as the combat starts with an equal score.