## 5 Conclusions  
There is clear evidence that workers in the resource sector are susceptible to poor health behaviours (those relating to diet, exercise, alcohol and tobacco consumption), often have low sleep duration and quality, and have a higher prevalence of mental health concerns than the general population. Further, these behaviours and health concerns appear to be exaggerated in FIFO workers. In addressing poor health behaviours, there is an emerging body of evidence that behaviour change interventions driven by the organisation may be able to improve some of these behaviours. In addition, there is strong evidence that organisation-driven interventions positively impact employee well-being and mental health.  
Provision of some primary healthcare is important for FIFO workers, given their time spent away from home. Inappropriate access, such as visiting the emergency department for non-urgent cases which could have been treated by a GP, is otherwise likely. Moreover, the value of organisational-led preventive healthcare and mental health and well-being supports is clear. It is important that organisations have strategies in place for appropriate healthcare or collaboration with local health services which ensure they have sufficient capacity to handle the demand. However, there appears to be no clear answer as to whether partnerships between the public and private sectors (PPPs) may facilitate healthcare access for both resource workers and the local communities. Such arrangements, even on a small scale, are lengthy and complex processes which require significant investments, both to plan and operationalise the partnership, and thus should be critically evaluated/considered.  
Emergency and trauma situations are unlikely events, but can have considerable consequences when they do occur, meaning that required healthcare needs to be timely and of a high quality. The most promising innovations for healthcare and emergency responses, in remote areas in particular, are telehealth and telemedicine strategies. So called 'virtual doctors offices' have consistently showed positive outcomes for employees and organisations. Such models have led to improvements in timely care and patient satisfaction, as well as fewer patients being medically evacuated from the site. Nevertheless, lower-cost e-health models such as tele/video consults and online resources still appear to be valuable measures for particular aspects of healthcare delivery.  
The following supporting information can be downloaded at: [[https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/healthcare11212888/s1](https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/healthcare11212888/s1)]([https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/healthcare11212888/s1](https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/healthcare11212888/s1)), Supplementary Table S1: Complete search strategies used for each database. Supplementary Table S2: Key findings from each relevant document identified in the search. Refs. [65; 66; 67; 68; 69; 70; 71; 720] are cited in the Supplementary Materials.  
**Author Contributions:** Project lead, J.L.F.; conceptualisation, J.L.F., T.G., S.K.-C., T.A.H.P., H.T., A.P. and M.M.; methodology, J.L.F., T.G., S.K.-C. and M.M.; writing, J.L.F., T.G. and M.M. reviewing and editing, J.L.F., T.G., S.K.-C., T.A.H.P., H.T., A.P. and M.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.  
**Funding:** This publication is based on work supported by Shell Australia, provided as a consultancy to The University of Queensland Rural Clinical School.  
**Institutional Review Board Statement:** Not applicable.  
**Informed Consent Statement:** Not applicable.  
**Data Availability Statement:** Not applicable.  
**Conflicts of Interest:** [PERSON] is an employee of Shell Australia, who funded the consultancy provided to the University of Queensland, which supported this work being undertaken.