## 3 Results
### Correlation between Endocrine-Metabolic Setting and Blood Pressure and Body Composition

Table 3: Cardiovascular index correlations. Pearson’s coefficient correlation coefficient was used. Bold numbers represent significant correlations with \(p\) < 0.05. BP: Blood Pressure; B-Systolic blood pressure: Brachial Systolic Blood Pressure; B-Diastolic blood pressure: Brachial Diastolic Blood Pressure; C-Systolic blood pressure: Central Systolic Blood Pressure; C-Diastolic blood pressure: Central Diststolic Blood Pressure; HOMA Index: Homeostatic Model Assessment Index; TyG Index: Triglyceride-Glucose Index; TG/HDL: Triglycerides to High-Density lipoprotein Ratio; Ctot/HDL: Total Cholesterol to High-Density lipoprotein Ratio; LDL/HDL: Low-Density Lipoprotein to High-Density Lipoprotein Ratio; CV Risk: AIP: Atherogenic Index of Plasma; N/ L Ratio: Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio. \(r\) = [PERSON]’s correlation coefficient; \(p\) = \(p\) value. \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c c c c c c} \hline \hline
**Correlations** & **Glicaemia** & **Insulinemia** & **TotColesterol** & **HDL** & **LDL** & **TG** \\ \hline  & \(r\) & \(p\) & \(r\) & \(p\) & \(r\) & \(p\) & \(r\) & \(p\) & \(r\) & \(p\) \\ \hline B-Systolic BP (mmHg) & 0.46 & 0.05 & **0.50** & **0.03** & 0.19 & 0.45 & \(\mathbf{-0.48}\) & **0.04** & 0.36 & 0.14 & 0.40 & 0.09 \\ \hline B-Diastolic BP (mmHg) & 0.33 & 0.18 & 0.28 & 0.25 & 0.33 & 0.17 & \(-0.30\) & 0.17 & 0.30 & 0.21 & 0.31 & 0.20 \\ \hline HR (ppm) & 0.06 & 0.80 & 0.09 & 0.70 & 0.42 & 0.07 & \(-0.25\) & 0.31 & 0.34 & 0.16 & 0.41 & 0.08 \\ \hline C-Systolic BP (mmHg) & 0.44 & 0.06 & 0.42 & 0.08 & 0.16 & 0.52 & \(\mathbf{-0.47}\) & **0.04** & 0.32 & 0.19 & 0.35 & 0.16 \\ \hline C-Diastolic BP (mmHg) & 0.33 & 0.17 & 0.29 & 0.23 & \(-0.34\) & 0.16 & \(-0.30\) & 0.21 & 0.31 & 0.20 & 0.32 & 0.18 \\ \hline AI@75 & 0.14 & 0.56 & **0.56** & **0.01** & 0.10 & 0.67 & \(-0.35\) & 0.15 & 0.09 & 0.70 & 0.20 & 0.40 \\ \hline PWA & 0.31 & 0.20 & 0.43 & 0.69 & \(-0.21\) & 0.40 & \(-0.26\) & 0.30 & 0.01 & 0.93 & 0.02 & 0.92 \\ \hline Weight (Kg) & 0.16 & 0.50 & 0.23 & 0.27 & 0.09 & 0.69 & \(-0.35\) & 0.12 & 0.16 & 0.49 & **0.47** & **0.04** \\ \hline BMI (Kg/m\({}^{2}\)) & 0.17 & 0.47 & 0.23 & 0.34 & 0.10 & 0.67 & \(\mathbf{-0.46}\) & **0.04** & 0.22 & 0.36 & **0.48** & **0.03** \\ \hline WHR & **0.52** & **0.02** & 0.30 & 0.20 & \(-0.00\) & 0.99 & \(-0.18\) & 0.44 & 0.03 & 0.91 & 0.27 & 0.26 \\ \hline Total FM (\%) & 0.32 & 0.18 & 0.31 & 0.19 & \(-0.12\) & 0.62 & \(-0.40\) & 0.09 & 0.07 & 0.75 & 0.18 & 0.46 \\ \hline Lean/Fat Mass & \(-0.32\) & 0.18 & \(-0.33\) & 0.18 & 0.18 & 0.47 & 0.44 & 0.06 & \(-0.06\) & 0.79 & \(-0.14\) & 0.57 \\ \hline VAT (g) & **0.61** & **0.01** & 0.42 & 0.10 & 0.04 & 0.86 & \(-0.24\) & 0.36 & 0.06 & 0.82 & 0.28 & 0.28 \\ \hline IMAT (Kg) & 0.35 & 0.17 & 0.32 & 0.19 & \(-0.05\) & 0.85 & \(-0.37\) & 0.14 & 0.11 & 0.65 & 0.31 & 0.21 \\ \hline ASMI & \(-0.08\) & 0.76 & \(-0.24\) & 0.34 & 0.35 & 0.16 & \(-0.05\) & 0.83 & 0.27 & 0.27 & 0.43 & 0.08 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 4: Lipid laboratory profile correlations. Pearson’s coefficient correlation coefficient was used. Bold numbers represent significant correlations with \(p<0.05\). \(r=\) Pearson’s correlation coefficient; \(p=p\) value.