## 4 Comparison of Structural Analyses
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c c c} \hline \hline
**Province** & **Base Shear (kN)** & **Displacement (m)** & **K\_elas (kN)/m** & **K\_eff (kN/m)** & **DL (m)** & **SD (m)** & **NC (m)** \\ \hline \multirow{2}{*}{Balikesir} & \multicolumn{4}{c}{0.057} & \multirow{2}{*}{267,214.86} & \multirow{2}{*}{148,931.96} & \multirow{2}{*}{0.035} & \multirow{2}{*}{0.045} & \multirow{2}{*}{0.097} \\  & & 0.160 & & & & & \\  & & 0.362 & & & & & \\ \hline \multirow{2}{*}{Bliecik} & \multirow{2}{*}{8424.72} & \multirow{2}{*}{0.056} & \multirow{2}{*}{267,214.86} & \multirow{2}{*}{179,382.53} & \multirow{2}{*}{0.022} & \multirow{2}{*}{0.029} & \multirow{2}{*}{0.050} \\  & & 0.371 & & & & & \\ \hline \multirow{2}{*}{Bursa} & \multirow{2}{*}{8424.99} & \multirow{2}{*}{0.057} & \multirow{2}{*}{267,214.86} & \multirow{2}{*}{148,094.51} & \multirow{2}{*}{0.034} & \multirow{2}{*}{0.043} & \multirow{2}{*}{0.087} \\  & & 0.362 & & & & & \\ \hline \multirow{2}{*}{Canakkale} & \multirow{2}{*}{8422.70} & \multirow{2}{*}{0.146} & \multirow{2}{*}{267,214.86} & \multirow{2}{*}{148,483.87} & \multirow{2}{*}{0.028} & \multirow{2}{*}{0.036} & \multirow{2}{*}{0.067} \\  & & 0.362 & & & & & \\ \hline \multirow{2}{*}{Edime} & \multirow{2}{*}{8434.02} & \multirow{2}{*}{0.057} & \multirow{2}{*}{267,214.86} & \multirow{2}{*}{148,734.20} & \multirow{2}{*}{0.017} & \multirow{2}{*}{0.022} & \multirow{2}{*}{0.038} \\  & & 0.360 & & & & & \\ \hline \multirow{2}{*}{Istanbul} & \multirow{2}{*}{8429.73} & \multirow{2}{*}{0.057} & \multirow{2}{*}{267,214.86} & \multirow{2}{*}{148,268.31} & \multirow{2}{*}{0.038} & \multirow{2}{*}{0.049} & \multirow{2}{*}{0.102} \\  & & 0.360 & & & & & \\ \hline \multirow{2}{*}{Krklareli} & \multirow{2}{*}{8418.35} & \multirow{2}{*}{0.158} & \multirow{2}{*}{267,214.86} & \multirow{2}{*}{147,970.37} & \multirow{2}{*}{0.016} & \multirow{2}{*}{0.020} & \multirow{2}{*}{0.035} \\  & & 0.354 & & & & & \\ \hline \multirow{2}{*}{Kocaeli} & \multirow{2}{*}{8428.16} & \multirow{2}{*}{0.057} & \multirow{2}{*}{267,214.86} & \multirow{2}{*}{148,451.07} & \multirow{2}{*}{0.067} & \multirow{2}{*}{0.096} & \multirow{2}{*}{0.194} \\  & & 0.362 & & & & & \\ \hline \multirow{2}{*}{Sakarya} & \multirow{2}{*}{8412.15} & \multirow{2}{*}{0.151} & \multirow{2}{*}{267,214.86} & \multirow{2}{*}{149,179.21} & \multirow{2}{*}{0.063} & \multirow{2}{*}{0.091} & \multirow{2}{*}{0.184} \\  & & 0.357 & & & & & \\ \hline \multirow{2}{*}{Tekirdag} & \multirow{2}{*}{8447.99} & \multirow{2}{*}{0.151} & \multirow{2}{*}{267,214.86} & \multirow{2}{*}{149,108.12} & \multirow{2}{*}{0.037} & \multirow{2}{*}{0.047} & \multirow{2}{*}{0.098} \\  & & 0.370 & & & & & \\ \hline \multirow{2}{*}{Yalova} & \multirow{2}{*}{8436.03} & \multirow{2}{*}{0.057} & \multirow{2}{*}{267,214.86} & \multirow{2}{*}{148,495.92} & \multirow{2}{*}{0.057} & \multirow{2}{*}{0.084} & \multirow{2}{*}{0.171} \\  & & 0.354 & & & & & \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 8: Comparison of values obtained in X direction for 3-story building. Figure 13: Comparison of pushover curves for 6-story. To compare the results obtained through the updated earthquake regulation with the previous one, Kocaeli and Bilecik provinces were selected since they produced the highest and the lowest PGA values, respectively. The spectrum curves for these provinces are shown in Figure 14. As the previous regulation does not include vertical design spectrum curves, horizontal elastic design spectrums were used for the comparison. The site-specific spectrum started to be used for each geographical location with the TBEC-2018. In contrast, a single spectrum was used for all of the provinces located in the same earthquake hazard zone in the previous regulation. The comparison was made for the earthquake ground motion level using a 10% probability of exceedance (repetition period 475 years) in 50 years since it is the only one in the previous code. Therefore, a single spectrum curve is shown for TSDC-2007 [10] for Kocaeli and Bilecik.