# Smart Intravenous Infusion Dosing System
## 4 Case Study: Oncology Department
### Experiment and Results
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c c c c c c} \hline \hline \multirow{2}{*}{**Gender**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**Group**} & \multirow{2}{*}{
\begin{tabular}{c} **Age** \\ **(Years)** \\ \end{tabular} } & \multicolumn{6}{c}{**Spontaneous Walking Time**} & \multicolumn{6}{c}{**Fast Walking Time**} \\  & & & & \multicolumn{3}{c}{**(s)**} & & \multicolumn{3}{c}{**(s)**} & \\ \cline{5-10}  & & & & **min** & **main** & **max** & **SD** & **min** & **main** & **max** & **SD** \\ \hline \multirow{5}{*}{Female} & I & 18–25 & 21 (52.5) & 28.28 & 30.24 & 33.89 & 1.60 & 21.69 & 24.45 & 27.50 & 1.45 \\ \cline{2-10}  & II & 25–35 & 7 (17.5) & 24.05 & 29.76 & 32.25 & 2.68 & 22.55 & 25.90 & 31.46 & 2.60 \\ \cline{2-10}  & III & 35–45 & 6 (15.0) & 27.19 & 31.70 & 34.06 & 2.57 & 22.66 & 25.47 & 27.39 & 1.80 \\ \cline{2-10}  & IV & 45–55 & 6 (15.0) & 29.05 & 31.77 & 35.34 & 2.27 & 26.05 & 27.60 & 29.14 & 1.05 \\ \cline{2-10}  & & Total & 40 (100) & 24.05 & 30.61 & 35.34 & 2.22 & 21.69 & 25.33 & 31.46 & 2.04 \\ \hline \multirow{5}{*}{Male} & I & 18–25 & 6 (60.0) & 25.72 & 28.08 & 30.76 & 1.72 & 20.62 & 22.39 & 24.01 & 1.40 \\ \cline{2-10}  & II & 25–35 & 1 (10.0) & 26.81 & 26.81 & 26.81 & 0 & 20.36 & 20.36 & 20.36 & 0 \\ \cline{2-10}  & III & 35–45 & 2 (20.0) & 25.24 & 26.20 & 27.16 & 0.96 & 20.25 & 22.94 & 25.64 & 2.70 \\ \cline{2-10}  & IV & 45–55 & 1 (10.0) & 31.84 & 31.84 & 31.84 & 0 & 24.79 & 24.79 & 24.79 & 0 \\ \cline{2-10}  & & Total & 10 (100) & 25.24 & 27.95 & 31.84 & 2.06 & 20.25 & 22.54 & 25.64 & 1.91 \\ \hline \multirow{5}{*}{Female} & I & 18–25 & 27 (54.0) & 25.72 & 29.76 & 33.89 & 1.86 & 20.62 & 23.99 & 27.50 & 1.67 \\ \cline{2-10}  & II & 25–35 & 8 (16.0) & 24.05 & 29.39 & 32.25 & 2.69 & 20.36 & 25.21 & 31.46 & 3.05 \\ \cline{1-1} \cline{2-10}  & III & 35–45 & 8 (16.0) & 25.24 & 30.33 & 34.06 & 3.30 & 20.25 & 24.84 & 27.39 & 2.33 \\ \cline{1-1} \cline{2-10}  & IV & 45–55 & 7 (14.0) & 29.05 & 31.78 & 35.34 & 2.10 & 24.79 & 27.20 & 29.14 & 1.38 \\ \cline{1-1} \cline{2-10}  & & Total & 50 (100) & 24.05 & 30.08 & 35.34 & 2.43 & 20.25 & 24.77 & 31.46 & 2.31 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 2: Response time of medical staff depending on gender and age group. group. In addition, the major times of all male subjects at spontaneous and fast walk were 27.95 \(\pm\) 2.06 s and 22.54 \(\pm\) 1.91 s, respectively. The third part of the table refers to all 50 subjects of both sexes. The first age group includes a total of 27 subjects (54%), the second and third a total of 8 subjects (16%) each, while the fourth group a total of 7 subjects (14%). Therefore, the reaction times of all subjects during spontaneous and fast walking were in the intervals of 24.05-35.34 s and 20.25-31.46 s, respectively. The shortest main reaction time was recorded in the first group and the longest in the fourth group. In addition, the main times of all 50 subjects, both in spontaneous and fast walking, were 30.08 \(\pm\) 2.43 s and 24.77 \(\pm\) 2.31 s, respectively. On the basis of the analysis of the results, we conclude that with increasing age, the response time increased in both sexes. In addition, the response time of male subjects was approximately 10% shorter than that of female subjects. It should be noted that the response time also depended on the height and weight of the subject. Finally, on the basis of the data in Table 2, the average response time of the entire sample of a total of 50 subjects of both sexes was found to be 27.42 s. Accordingly, the response times of the medical staff for each patient individually, according to the paths in Figure 2, were determined by interpolation, as shown in Table 3. The arrangement of the columns in the table is as follows. The first column refers to the number of patient rooms, while the second shows the number of beds in the room. The third column represents the distance from the cytostatic room to the patient. On the basis of this, in the fourth column, the response time of the medical staff for each patient is shown.