## 5 Discussion
#### 5.1.4 Feedback and Cyclical Impacts
In summary, achieving the efficient integration of psychological crisis intervention resources requires the comprehensive consideration of multiple factors, the formulation of flexible and diverse disaster risk reduction strategies, and the adjustment of intervention measures based on specific circumstances. This ensures the effective response to and management of psychological crises and disaster risks in various environments. It involves not only optimizing the psychological crisis intervention itself but also better understanding and utilizing the spatial distribution characteristics of regional resources in disaster and risk management to achieve optimal resource allocation and utilization. Such integrated management can significantly enhance disaster response capabilities and risk management levels, enabling quick and efficient response and intervention during disasters and risks, thereby minimizing the negative impacts of psychological crises and disasters. Exploring the Applicability of Psychological Crisis Intervention Resource Integration Pathways in an International Context  
Although this study focuses on the integration of psychological crisis intervention resources within China, the findings may also be applicable to other regions. Countries with similar socio-economic conditions and centralized governance structures may face comparable challenges in resource allocation and coordination. In other disaster-prone regions, such as Southeast Asia, disaster response frameworks like the ASEAN Agreement on Disaster Management and Emergency Response (AADMER) have played a key role in streamlining resource distribution and disaster governance. During the management of COVID-19, these frameworks effectively coordinated health and disaster management systems through centralized governance, much like China's strategy [66]. [PERSON] and [PERSON] [67] studied disaster response and mental health support systems in South and Southeast Asia, highlighting the challenges of providing psychological support in resource-limited rural areas compared to more developed urban areas. They emphasized the importance of tailoring disaster interventions to regional capacities. In contrast, in countries with decentralized governance structures, where local autonomy and resource allocation are less centralized, the integration pathways for psychological crisis intervention resources may rely more on modular systems and community strength. There is a need to build more flexible emergency management networks at the local level to achieve better resource integration for psychological interventions [68]. Unlike China's efficient approach, these countries may rely on policy incentives and community autonomy to enhance internal resource sharing and collaboration. In addition, low-income or developing countries, with limited socio-economic resources, may face challenges such as insufficient infrastructure and a lack of medical resources when promoting the integration of psychological crisis intervention resources. For these regions, the focus should be on developing primary healthcare systems and community networks, strengthening international aid and cross-border cooperation, or introducing appropriate technological solutions (such as telehealth services) to improve the efficiency of resource utilization in relatively resource-limited environments [69]. Therefore, when applying psychological crisis intervention resource integration pathways in different countries or regions, it is essential to tailor strategies to local conditions, taking into account their social contexts and political structures to develop cost-effective and robust response strategies. This flexible approach not only enhances the applicability of this study internationally but also provides relevant solutions for global disaster emergency management and the mitigation of psychological health crises.