# A SkSP-R Plan under the Assumption of Gompertz Distribution
## 4 Description of Tables  
To demonstrate how the proposed SkSP-R would be implemented, some tables are presented and discussed for various plan parameters. The necessary tables for values of \(\theta=2,3,4,5\), \(m=2\), \(\beta=0.25,0.05,0.10,0.01\), \(\alpha_{p}=0.10\), termination ratio \(t_{0}/\mu_{0}=0.5,0.75\), \(m=2\), and quality ratio (\(\mu/\mu_{0}\) is \(2,3,4,5,6,7\), and \(8\)) are computed. Plan parameters and probability of lot acceptance for \(\theta=2,3,4,5\) are placed in Tables 1-4, respectively, under the assumption of the proposed plan. In most circumstances, as the termination time grows, the sample size decreases, and this pattern holds true for any value of \(\theta\), \(\beta\) and \(\mu/\mu_{0}\). For each value of \(\theta\) and \(\beta\), if there are decreases from \(0.25\) to \(0.01\) and increases in quality ratio \(\mu/\mu_{0}\), then the sample sizes increases for each considered set up. Similar trends are observed regarding sample size for other choices of \(\theta=3,4,5\) and \(m=2\). Moreover, we have other important aspect associated with the ASN, where it is found that addedthe ASN follows the same pattern as sample size for all considered setups. In case of any selection of \(\theta\), the probability of acceptance of the submitted lot under the assumptions of new plan is greater than \(0.90\) for all values of quality ratio \(\mu/\mu_{0}\). \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c} \hline  & & & & & & & & & & & & & \(a=t_{0}/\mu_{0}=0.75\) & \\ \hline \(\beta\) & \(\mu/\mu_{0}\) & **n** & **c** & **i** & **f** & **k** & \(P_{agg}(p)\) & **ASN** & **n** & **c** & **i** & **f** & **k** & \(P_{agg}(p)\) & **ASN** \\ \hline \multirow{4}{*}{0.25} & 2 & 34 & 10 & 2 & 0.5 & 1 & 0.9535057 & 27.97392 & 24 & 10 & 2 & 0.5 & 1 & 0.9553009 & 20.06413 \\  & 3 & 31 & 9 & 2 & 0.5 & 1 & 0.9959384 & 25.66619 & 22 & 9 & 2 & 0.5 & 1 & 0.996054 & 18.66366 \\  & 4 & 28 & 8 & 2 & 0.5 & 1 & 0.9990554 & 21.41822 & 19 & 8 & 2 & 0.5 & 1 & 0.9994029 & 15.21178 \\  & 5 & 24 & 7 & 2 & 0.5 & 1 & 0.9996647 & 19.1525 & 17 & 7 & 2 & 0.5 & 1 & 0.9996928 & 13.84022 \\  & 6 & 21 & 6 & 2 & 0.5 & 1 & 0.9997141 & 16.87444 & 15 & 6 & 2 & 0.5 & 1 & 0.9997168 & 12.43753 \\  & 7 & 18 & 5 & 2 & 0.5 & 1 & 0.9996190 & 14.58213 & 13 & 5 & 2 & 0.5 & 1 & 0.9995891 & 10.99879 \\  & 8 & 15 & 4 & 2 & 0.5 & 1 & 0.9992690 & 12.27287 & 11 & 4 & 2 & 0.5 & 1 & 0.9991400 & 9.517559 \\ \hline \multirow{4}{*}{0.10} & 2 & 68 & 18 & 2 & 0.5 & 1 & 0.9625093 & 66.06291 & 47 & 18 & 2 & 0.5 & 1 & 0.9689919 & 45.63715 \\  & 3 & 64 & 17 & 2 & 0.5 & 1 & 0.9994385 & 61.85672 & 45 & 17 & 2 & 0.5 & 1 & 0.9994789 & 43.85736 \\  & 4 & 61 & 16 & 2 & 0.5 & 1 & 0.9999713 & 59.12137 & 42 & 16 & 2 & 0.5 & 1 & 0.9999815 & 40.61462 \\ \cline{1-1}  & 5 & 58 & 15 & 2 & 0.5 & 1 & 0.9999963 & 56.36989 & 40 & 15 & 2 & 0.5 & 1 & 0.9999976 & 38.85132 \\ \cline{1-1}  & 6 & 54 & 14 & 2 & 0.5 & 1 & 0.9999993 & 52.20480 & 38 & 14 & 2 & 0.5 & 1 & 0.9999993 & 37.06218 \\ \cline{1-1}  & 7 & 51 & 13 & 2 & 0.5 & 1 & 0.9999997 & 49.46471 & 35 & 13 & 2 & 0.5 & 1 & 0.9999998 & 33.86162 \\ \cline{1-1}  & 8 & 48 & 12 & 2 & 0.5 & 1 & 0.9999998 & 46.70592 & 33 & 12 & 2 & 0.5 & 1 & 0.9999998 & 32.0866 \\ \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 1: Plan parameters of SkSP-R for GmzD with \(\theta=2\) and \(m=2\).