## 3 Results
### Experiments and Discussion
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c} \hline \hline  & \multicolumn{4}{c}{**Malignancy—\(F_{1}\) Score**} \\ \hline
**Category** & **Name** & **Weighted** & **Benign** & **Malignant** \\ \hline \multirow{2}{*}{Decision} & At Least One & 0.61 \(\pm\) 0.06 & 0.32 \(\pm\) 0.07 & 0.79 \(\pm\) 0.05 \\ \cline{2-5}  & Dynamic & **0.84 \(\pm\) 0.03** & 0.78 \(\pm\) 0.07 & **0.87 \(\pm\) 0.02** \\ \hline \multirow{2}{*}{Score} & Mean & 0.83 \(\pm\) 0.03 & 0.78 \(\pm\) 0.08 & 0.87 \(\pm\) 0.02 \\ \cline{2-5}  & Maximum & 0.76 \(\pm\) 0.04 & 0.68 \(\pm\) 0.03 & 0.80 \(\pm\) 0.05 \\ \hline \multirow{2}{*}{MIL} & SIL & 0.70 \(\pm\) 0.04 & 0.50 \(\pm\) 0.10 & 0.83 \(\pm\) 0.03 \\ \cline{2-5}  & MI-SVM & 0.82 \(\pm\) 0.02 & **0.78 \(\pm\) 0.05** & 0.84 \(\pm\) 0.02 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 6: Results for the patient-level classification for Malignancy (LM/LMM and BCC) according to the different methods from Section 2.4. For Malignancy and LM/LMM, the table provides a weighted average \(F_{1}\) score and individual \(F_{1}\) score for the benign and the malignant classes. \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c c} \hline \hline  & & \multicolumn{3}{c}{**Malignancy**} & \multicolumn{3}{c}{**LM/LMM**} \\ \hline
**Name** & **Label** & \(\mathbf{F_{1}}\) **Score** & **Precision** & **Recall** & \(\mathbf{F_{1}}\) **Score** & **Precision** & **Recall** \\ \hline \multirow{3}{*}{Dynamic} & Benign & 0.78 \(\pm\) 0.07 & 0.81 \(\pm\) 0.08 & 0.75 \(\pm\) 0.07 & 0.79 \(\pm\) 0.06 & 0.82 \(\pm\) 0.07 & 0.75 \(\pm\) 0.07 \\ \cline{2-7}  & Malignant & 0.87 \(\pm\) 0.02 & 0.85 \(\pm\) 0.03 & 0.89 \(\pm\) 0.03 & 0.86 \(\pm\) 0.03 & 0.83 \(\pm\) 0.03 & 0.88 \(\pm\) 0.04 \\ \cline{2-7}  & Weighted & 0.84 \(\pm\) 0.03 & 0.84 \(\pm\) 0.03 & 0.84 \(\pm\) 0.03 & 0.83 \(\pm\) 0.03 & 0.83 \(\pm\) 0.03 & 0.83 \(\pm\) 0.03 \\ \hline \multirow{3}{*}{MI-SVM} & Benign & 0.78 \(\pm\) 0.02 & 0.72 \(\pm\) 0.08 & 0.84 \(\pm\) 0.07 & 0.78 \(\pm\) 0.05 & 0.73 \(\pm\) 0.07 & 0.84 \(\pm\) 0.07 \\ \cline{2-7}  & Malignant & 0.84 \(\pm\) 0.02 & 0.89 \(\pm\) 0.05 & 0.80 \(\pm\) 0.05 & 0.82 \(\pm\) 0.03 & 0.87 \(\pm\) 0.06 & 0.78 \(\pm\) 0.07 \\ \cline{2-7}  & Weighted & 0.82 \(\pm\) 0.02 & 0.82 \(\pm\) 0.02 & 0.83 \(\pm\) 0.02 & 0.80 \(\pm\) 0.03 & 0.80 \(\pm\) 0.03 & 0.81 \(\pm\) 0.02 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 7: Detailed results for the patient-level classification for the Decision method based on a Dynamic threshold and MIL based on the MI-SVM assumption. The table provides the \(F_{1}\) score, Precision, and Recall for the benign and malignant classes with these methods. Figure 5: On the **left**, the ROC curves for Malignancy with the Dynamic and MI-SVM methods. On the **right**, the ROC curves for LM/LMM with the Dynamic and MI-SVM methods. Figure 6: Examples of RCM images that mislead the classifier with the highest \(F_{1}\) score (Inception-ResNet + SVM \(-\) Linear). On the left part (**a–c**), RCM images belonging to the benign label and classified as malignant. On the right part (**d–f**), RCM images belonging to the malignant label and classified as benign. In the center of the figure (**c**,**d**), two RCM images of the same patient belonging to benign and malignant labels.