# User Experience of 5G Video Services in Indonesia: Predictions Based on a Structural Equation Model
## 4 Analysis
### The Results
#### 4.1.1 Correlation Value Analysis of \(\alpha\) and \(\beta\)  
Factor #1: Attractiveness  
The significance value of the influence given by attraction to 4G is \(\alpha_{1}\) = 0.61, while \(\beta_{1}\) = 0.47 is the significance value for 5G. In this case, the video streaming feature with 4G technology still provides a higher appeal compared to using 5G technology that is still a prediction. It can also be assumed that users are satisfied with video streaming on 4G and have not felt the need for newer technology. Factor #2: Perspicuity  
Perspicuity is the level of ease for users in dealing with a device or technology. The significance of this measure of convenience gives the greatest value to 5G technology \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c} \hline \hline
**Factor** & **Correlation Value** &
\begin{tabular}{c} **CR** \\ **(t-Value)** \\ \end{tabular} \\ \hline Attractiveness on UX 4G & \(\alpha_{1}\) = 0.61 & 6.12 \\ Perspicuity on UX 4G & \(\alpha_{2}\) = 0.6 & 6.08 \\ Efficiency on UX 4G & \(\alpha_{3}\) = 0.66 & 6.36 \\ Dependency on UX 4G & \(\alpha_{4}\) = 0.51 & 5.57 \\ Stimulation on UX 4G & \(\alpha_{5}\) = 0.43 & 5 \\ Novelty on UX 4G & \(\alpha_{6}\) = 0.5 & 5.51 \\ Satisfaction on UX 4G & \(\alpha_{7}\) = 0.72 & 6.57 \\ Price on UX 4G & \(\alpha_{8}\) = 0.27 & 3.53 \\ Social on UX 4G & \(\alpha_{9}\) = 0.16 & 2.25 \\ Economy on UX 4G & \(\alpha_{10}\) = 0.47 & 5.46 \\ \hline Attractiveness on UX 5G & \(\beta_{1}\) = 0.47 & 6.81 \\ Perspicuity on UX 5G & \(\beta_{2}\) = 0.81 & 10.95 \\ Efficiency on UX 5G & \(\beta_{3}\) = 0.76 & 10.46 \\ Dependency on UX 5G & \(\beta_{4}\) = 0.75 & 10.42 \\ Stimulation on UX 5G & \(\beta_{5}\) = 0.64 & 9.1 \\ Novelty on UX 5G & \(\beta_{6}\) = 0.62 & 8.83 \\ Satisfaction on UX 5G & \(\beta_{7}\) = 0.67 & 9.53 \\ Price on UX 5G & \(\beta_{8}\) = 0.5 & 7.18 \\ Social on UX 5G & \(\beta_{9}\) = 0.23 & 3.41 \\ Economy on UX 5G & \(\beta_{10}\) = 0.52 & 7.57 \\ \hline
**UX 4G to 5G UX** & \(\gamma\) = 0.42 & **4.53** \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 2: Correlation values for UX video streaming in Indonesia. Figure 4: Comparison chart of correlation values for UX video streaming in Indonesia. compared to 4G, namely \(\beta_{2}=0.81\) compared to \(\alpha_{2}=0.6\), which is the largest significance of all factors for UX 5G. This can be interpreted as meaning that users have a high expectation that with newer technology the level of convenience will be greatly increased. However, the 4G technology used today also provided a result greater than 50%, which means it has provided high convenience for users. Factor #3: Efficiency  
The same as for perspicuity, the significance value for efficiency in 5G of \(\beta_{3}=0.76\) is greater than that of 4G at \(\alpha_{3}=0.66\). Efficiency in the UX assessment of video streaming is judged by the smooth running of the video broadcast so that there are no buffering conditions or interrupted broadcasts. In this regard, user expectations for the efficiency of 5G technology look quite large. Factor #4: Dependability  
The benefits of doing activities on a mobile basis have increased as technology has advanced; there were also pandemic conditions when the survey data were taken, leading to a large significance value for 5G technology in this factor: \(\beta_{4}=0.75\). In contrast, the significance of 4G technology for the dependability value is \(\alpha_{4}=0.51\). The difference is clear, similar to the levels of convenience and efficiency; this shows that users have high expectations to be increasingly able to use mobile video streaming as a daily activity. Factor #5: Stimulation  
This stimulus-related assessment measures how a new feature or device changes users' enjoyment of streaming videos. From the survey results, the stimulus significance value for 4G technology is \(\alpha_{5}=0.43\) and is \(\beta_{5}=0.64\) for 5G technology.