## 2 Research on Evaluation and Analysis of Criteria for GenAI Tools Based on Multi-Criteria Methods
In the case study, only ChatGPT is analyzed. The paper [12] develops a quality assessment framework by integrating the Delphi method and Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) for AI-generated digital educational resources. A systematic literature review identifies initial quality indicators across four key dimensions: content, expression, user aspects, and technical aspects. Expert feedback, gathered through two rounds of Delphi surveys, refines these indicators, while AHP assigns weight coefficients to determine their significance. The criteria considered are as follows: Content characteristics (Authenticity, accuracy, specifications, relevance, novelty, diversity, timeliness). Expression characteristics (Legitimacy, knowledgeability, logicality, comprehensible). User characteristics (Achievement, acquisition, compatibility, friendliness). Technical characteristics (Conciseness, stability, human analogy, security, big data). Findings highlight content quality as the most critical factor, followed by expression, with user and technical aspects also playing a role. Among second-level indicators, authenticity, accuracy, legitimacy, and relevance are prioritized. This paper only analyzes qualitative criteria. It does not analyze the relationships between the criteria. The research [13] identifies and categorizes ethical concerns associated with ChatGPT. The criteria used in AHP method are as follows: Risk (infodemics and misinformation, bias response, plagiarism, privacy and confidentiality, academic integrity concern, risk hallucination-manipulation and mislead, safety and security concern). Reward (question answering, dissemination and diffusion of new information, streamlining the workflow, personalized learning, decrease teaching workflow, idea and text generation and summarization, increase productivity and efficiency). Resilience (appropriate testing framework, acceptable usage in science, co-creation between humans and ai, academic integrity policies, solidity ethical values, transform educative systems, higher-level reasoning skills). In this paper, only ethical criteria associated with ChatGPT are analyzed. The relationships between the criteria are not analyzed. The study [14] identifies critical decision points for AI integration through a systematic literature review and prioritizes them using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). The results highlight adaptive organization structure, specialized AI teams, ethics oversight, governance, and innovation infrastructure as key factors. A sensitivity analysis confirms the robustness of the rankings, showing minimal impact from criteria weight changes. The study contributes to the discussion on workforce transformation in the AI era, providing insights for organizations navigating AI adoption. The paper addresses the issue of AI integration not GenAI selection. It does not analyze the relationships between the criteria. It is not oriented towards academic research. The purpose of the study [15] is to comprehend and address the barriers which are impeding the implementation of GenAI Technologies, such as ChatGPT in the educational landscape. The criteria considered are Ethical concerns (risk of academic integrity, risk of biased outcomes, accessibility and inclusivity). Technological concerns (digital literacy disparity, technological infrastructure, limited up-to-date knowledge, upfront cost, integration with existing systems). Regulatory concerns (data privacy, copyright issues (ownership and licensing), cybersecurity issues). Societal concerns (widening digital divide, economic disparities, job displacement and skills gap, cultural sensitivity, social injustice and inequality, cognitive and emotional development, commercialization, use for malicious purpose). Trust issues (lack of transparency, explainability, accountability). Human values concerns (erosion of critical thinking, lack of focus on holistic development, lack of personal and emotional interaction).