# Polymeric and Crystalline Materials for Effective and Sustainable CO\({}_{2}\) Capture
## 5 Performances Comparison of Polymeric and Crystalline Materials  
In order to give the reader a comparative overview of the polymeric materials discussed previously, Table 1 summarizes the performances of the materials discussed in Sections 3 and 4.  
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c} \hline \hline
**Name** & **Type** & **T (K)** & **P (bar)** &
\begin{tabular}{c} **CO\({}_{2}\) Uptake** \\ **(mmol/g)** \\ \end{tabular} & **Reference** \\ \hline TMU-42 & MOF & — & — & 7.29 & [90] \\ \hline COF-103 & COF & — & 35 bars & 26.8 mmol CO\({}_{2}\) & [112] \\ \hline ZIF-69 & ZIF & 273 & 1 atm & 83 L of CO\({}_{2}\)/L & [104] \\ \hline PEI-PDVB & PEI & 298 & — & 3.70 & [127] \\ \hline TMPTA & PEI & 348 & — & 0.685 & [124] \\ \hline ZN-1500 & PANI & 298 & 1.0 & 3.54 & [125] \\ \hline PIL & PILs & 298 & 1.0 & 0.3 & [129] \\ \hline HPILs & PILs & 298 & 1.0 & 1.47 & [130] \\ \hline BpP6-OTf-CMP-2 & CMP & 273 & 1.0 & 1.83 & [133] \\ \hline LKK-CMP-1 & CMP & 273 & 1.0 & 2.27 & [134] \\ \hline CMP-(bpy)20-Mn & CMP & 298 & 1.0 & 1.06 & [135] \\ \hline CMP-YA & CMP & 298 & 1.0 & 1.27 & [136] \\ \hline CTFs & CTF & 273 & 1.0 & 3.00 & [150] \\ \hline cCTFs & CTF & 273 & 1.0 & 0.93 & [151] \\ \hline CTF-FUM & CTF & 298 & — & 2.55 & [152] \\ \hline Tt-POP-2 & POP & 273 & 1.0 & 1.79 & [153] \\ \hline TPOP-3 & POP & 273 & 1.0 & 4.09 & [159] \\ \hline PPN-81 & POP & 295 & 1.0 & 1.92 & [154] \\ \hline NUT-1 & POP & 273 & 1.0 & 1.87 & [160] \\ \hline NOP-53 & NOP & 273 & 1.0 & 2.27 & [164] \\ \hline NAP-1 & NOP & 298 & 1.0 & 2.25 & [163] \\ \hline NOP-51A & NOP & 273 & 1.0 & 4.22 & [165] \\ \hline HAzo-POP & POP & 273 & 1.0 & 1.68 & [162] \\ \hline BILB-101 & POP & 298 & 0.15 & 1.00 & [161] \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table}
Table 1: Summary of polymer material performances.  
Similarly, Figure 12 shows the performance of the most promising MOF materials in terms of their adsorption pressure and capacity, as discussed in Section 2.3.  
Figure 12: Carbon dioxide adsorption capacity measured at different CO\({}_{2}\) pressures and corresponding BET surface area of some promising candidates among metal–organic frameworks, covalent–organic frameworks, and zeolitic imidazolate frameworks [75, 77, 83, 89, 90, 104, 112].  
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c} \hline \hline
**Name** & **Type** & **T (K)** & **P (bar)** & **CO\({}_{2}\) Uptake** (mmol/g)** & **Reference** \\ \hline DHTP-Ea BZ & POP & 298 & 1.0 & 3.29 & [166] \\ \hline CE-BZ-TPE-POP & POP & 298 & 1.0 & 4.39 & [167] \\ \hline NP-NHC & NHC & 298 & 1.0 & 0.78 & [168] \\ \hline NUT-21 & NHC & 273 & 1.0 & 8.3 & [169] \\ \hline POM-IM & IP & 273 & 1.0 & 3.68 & [170] \\ \hline HIP & IP & 298 & 1.0 & 2.1 & [172] \\ \hline PCP-CI & IP & 298 & 1.0 & 1.4 & [173] \\ \hline CB-PCP-1 & IP & 273 & 1.0 & 2.05 & [174] \\ \hline NSOPC-1 & Biobased & 298 & 1.0 & 3.88 & [183] \\ \hline HMF-GU-Ep/DFA & Biobased & 298 & — & 2.15 & [184] \\ \hline Coconut shell & Biobased & 272.85 & 2.5 & 3.60 & [198] \\ \hline Cherry stones & Biobased & 322.85 & 2.5 & 2.50 & [199] \\ \hline HCP-PS & Biobased & 273 & 1.13 & 1.987 & [185] \\ \hline PSNH2 & Biobased & 273 & 1.13 & 1.987 & [203] \\ \hline EDA-PVC/SBA-15 & Biobased & 298 & — & 0.5 & [204] \\ \hline PET & Biobased & 303 & 1.0 & 1.31 & [207] \\ \hline fPLA & Biobased & 333 & 15 & 3.59 & [208] \\ \hline PLA-b-PEO-b-PLA & Biobased & 298 & 1.0 & 5.22 & [187] \\ \hline poly(E-lyme) & Biobased & 273 & 1.06 & 5.8 & [188] \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table}
Table 1: _Cont._