## 3 Material Test and Results for LLFD
### LfD Material Test Results and Analysis
#### 3.3.2 Performance Compatibility Conditions of LLFD
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c} \hline \hline
**Classification** & \multicolumn{4}{c}{**Performance Suitability Conditions**} \\ \hline \multirow{6}{*}{Condition 1} & Cycle & \(1\) & \(2\) & \(3\) & Average \\ \cline{2-5}  & \(V_{d,max}\) (kN) & \(220.4\) & \(221.5\) & \(218.6\) & \(220.2\) \\ \cline{2-5}  & \(V_{d,min}\) (kN) & \(-219.3\) & \(-220.3\) & \(-220.6\) & \(-220.1\) \\ \cline{2-5}  & \((V_{d,max}-V_{\text{ave}})/V_{ave}\) & \(0.09\) & \(0.59\) & \(-0.73\) & - \\ \cline{2-5}  & \((V_{d,min}-V_{\text{ave}})/V_{ave}\) & \(-0.36\) & \(0.09\) & \(0.23\) & - \\ \cline{2-5}  & Result & Conforming & Conforming & Conforming & - \\ \hline \multirow{6}{*}{Condition 2} & Cycle & \(1\) & \(2\) & \(3\) & Average \\ \cline{2-5}  & \(V_{d,max}\) (kN) & \(196.3\) & \(199.1\) & \(199.2\) & \(198.2\) \\ \cline{2-5}  & \(V_{d,min}\) (kN) & \(-192.9\) & \(-199.3\) & \(-200.3\) & \(-197.5\) \\ \cline{2-5}  & \((V_{d,max}-V_{\text{ave}})/V_{ave}\) & \(-0.96\) & \(0.45\) & \(0.5\) & - \\ \cline{2-5}  & \((V_{d,min}-V_{\text{ave}})/V_{ave}\) & \(-2.33\) & \(0.91\) & \(1.42\) & - \\ \cline{2-5}  & Result & Conforming & Conforming & Conforming & - \\ \hline \multirow{6}{*}{Condition 3} & Cycle & \(1\) & \(2\) & \(3\) & Average \\ \cline{2-5}  & \(E_{d}\) (kN\(\cdot\)mm) & \(27.4\) & \(27.8\) & \(27.2\) & \(27.5\) \\ \cline{2-5}  & \((E_{d}-E_{d,\text{ave}})/E_{d,\text{ave}}\) & \(-0.36\) & \(1.09\) & \(-1.09\) & - \\ \cline{2-5}  & Result & Conforming & Conforming & Conforming & - \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 7: Performance suitability evaluation of seismic control device of FL-LLFD-2 specimen. \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c} \hline \hline
**Classification** & \multicolumn{4}{c}{**Performance Suitability Conditions**} \\ \hline \multirow{6}{*}{Condition 1} & Cycle & \(1\) & \(2\) & \(3\) & Average \\ \cline{2-5}  & \(V_{d,max}\) (kN) & \(259.7\) & \(259\) & \(260.8\) & \(259.8\) \\ \cline{2-5}  & \(V_{d,min}\) (kN) & \(-262.7\) & \(-261.3\) & \(-267\) & \(-263.7\) \\ \cline{2-5}  & \((V_{d,max}-V_{ave})/V_{ave}\) & \(-0.04\) & \(-0.31\) & \(0.38\) & - \\ \cline{2-5}  & \((V_{d,min}-V_{ave})/V_{ave}\) & \(-0.38\) & \(-0.91\) & \(1.25\) & - \\ \cline{2-5}  & Result & Conforming & Conforming & Conforming & - \\ \hline \multirow{6}{*}{Condition 2} & Cycle & \(1\) & \(2\) & \(3\) & Average \\ \cline{2-5}  & \(V_{d,min}\) (kN) & \(-258.7\) & \(-266\) & \(-271.9\) & \(-265.5\) \\ \cline{2-5}  & \((V_{d,max}-V_{\text{ave}})/V_{ave}\) & \(-3.17\) & \(0.2\) & \(3.01\) & - \\ \cline{2-5}  & \((V_{d,min}-V_{\text{ave}})/V_{ave}\) & \(-2.56\) & \(0.19\) & \(2.41\) & - \\ \cline{2-5}  & Result & Conforming & Conforming & Conforming & - \\ \hline \multirow{6}{*}{Condition 3} & Cycle & \(1\) & \(2\) & \(3\) & Average \\ \cline{2-5}  & \(E_{d}\) (kN\(\cdot\)mm) & \(27.4\) & \(27.8\) & \(27.2\) & \(27.5\) \\ \cline{2-5}  & \((E_{d}-E_{d,\text{ave}})/E_{d,\text{ave}}\) & \(-0.36\) & \(1.09\) & \(-1.09\) & - \\ \cline{1-1} \cline{2-5}  & Result & Conforming & Conforming & Conforming & - \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 8: Performance suitability evaluation of seismic control device of GS-LLFD-1 specimen.