## 3 Description of the Systematic Impact/Aptitude Land Planning Model
### Diagnosis and Territorial Analysis of the Study Area
#### 4.2.1 Definition of the Environmental Land Units of the Study Area
Camping or recreation (CR) and extensive agriculture (EA) have a low value for land capacity, resulting in a certain impact on the unique elements of the territory. This included a partial loss of the sclerophyll scrub, a certain impact on the landscing, and loss of conservation status. Conversely, it has a certain positive economic effect on the territory. It is therefore recommended that these types of activities should be established in other land units with a greater land capacity. Finally, with regard to urbanization (UR), the land capacity value is very low. * Land capacity of Environmental Land Unit 3 (ELU3): The land capacity is comparable to that of ELU2, with the exception of reforestation (RF), which is inconsequential in this instance given that the climax of vegetation has already been reached. It is noteworthy that the loss of phytobiological value will be somewhat higher in this environmental land unit than in the previous ones. The land capacity value is medium for scientific-cultural activities (SAs), which could play a role in improving our understanding of ecosystem functioning, and for the occasional collection of aromatic species (AS), which could generate an economic benefit for society. * Land capacity of Environmental Land Unit 4 (ELU4): In absolute values, ELU4 behaves in a manner similar to ELU2. As with ELU2, reforestation (RF) would enhance the reception capacity by an average value due to the sustainable maintenance of the tree \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c c} \hline \hline \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Proposed Activity**} & \multicolumn{6}{c}{**Land Capacity**} \\ \cline{2-9} \multicolumn{1}{c}{**(Name and Acronym)**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{ELU1} & ELU2 & ELU3 & ELU4 & ELU5 & ELU6 \\ \hline Strict maintenance of current activities & SM & H. & I & I & I & M & I \\ \hline Ecosystem regeneration & ER & H. & I & I & I & M & I \\ \hline Scientific–cultural activities & SA & I & M & M & M & M \\ \hline Reforestation & RF & I & M & I & M & I & I \\ \hline Camping or recreation & CR & L & L & L & L & L & L \\ \hline Occasional collection of aromatic species & AS & I & M & M & M & I \\ \hline Extensive agriculture & EA & M & L & L & L & L & L \\ \hline Intensive grazing & IG & M & I & I & I & M & L \\ \hline Urbanization & UR & H. & H. & W. & H. & W. & H. \\ \hline
**High** & **Medium** & **Indifferent** & **Low** & & & **Very Low** \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 8: Land capacity of each environmental land unit for proposed activities. masses. The scientific-cultural activities (SAs) and occasional collection of aromatic species (AS) have a mean value, and the reason for this is the same as that observed in ELU2. In the case of camping or recreation (CR), extensive agriculture (EA), and urbanization (UR), these activities exhibit the lowest value of land capacity. The establishment of these land uses could potentially result in adverse impacts, including the loss of landscaping (even leading to its complete transformation in the case of urbanization (UR)), the loss of soil protection (the soil would be partially or entirely devoid of vegetation, including its complete sealing), and the loss of the current conservation status of the endemic _Vella lucentina_. * Land capacity of Environmental Land Unit 5 (ELU5): In absolute terms, ELU5 exhibits similarities to ELU2. The distinguishing features between both are observed in the successful dynamism of vegetation in an intermediate stage of the vegetation series, grassland-scrubland. The strict maintenance of current activities (SM) and ecosystem regeneration (ER) have a medium value, with the potential to improve the shrubby and herbaceous state to more complex vegetation stages. Scientific-cultural activities (SAs) also has a medium value, with the potential to generate an increase in scientific technical knowledge of the functioning of ecosystems and a greater concern for the conservation of unique endemism.