## 4 Discussion
To draw more definitive conclusions, future research should examine isolated isometric and glyometric protocols, as well as alternative sequences in which glyometric exercises precede the isometric ones. However, due to the structured schedule of the junior national team's training camp, it was not feasible to implement additional CA protocols within this study. Unilateral activation exercises, which engage one side of the body at a time, offer several benefits for sprimters. Exercises such as the Bulgarian split squat, lunges, or single leg glute bridges are particularly effective, as they closely replicate the movement patterns and demands of sprinting [34]. Unilateral exercises improve coordination and balance between the left and right sides of the body, reducing imbalances and enhancing movement efficiency. Moreover, unilateral resistance exercises significantly engage the core muscles, thereby increasing stability and improving sprinting form [35]. This may be particularly beneficial in compensating for variations in muscle activity during sprinting, as muscle activation differs between straight and curved running [36]. Additionally, exercises such as lunges and Bulgarian split squats develop lower limb strength and power, both of which are essential for explosive block starts and powerful strides during the acceleration phase of sprinting [37]. Unilateral exercises also enhance proprioception, particularly in the ankle, knee, and hip joints, improving neuromuscular coordination and movement efficiency. Training each side of the body individually can optimize muscle activation, leading to a greater sprinting performance. Perhaps the most significant advantage of unilateral resistance exercises is their direct transferability to sprinting, as they mimic the specific movement patterns involved, making strength gains more functional and sprint-specific [32]. Interpreting the results of this experiment requires consideration of its limitations. One of the primary limitations of this study is the absence of a control group. This design choice was dictated by logistical constraints and the elite status of the participants, who were engaged in intensive training schedules. Future studies should include a control group performing the same evaluation protocol without the CA to isolate the effects of CA from other factors, such as repetition or learning effects. Furthermore, the small sample size (\(n=13\)) limits the interpretation of the statistical results, particularly for effect sizes below 0.76, as statistical power falls below 0.8. This limitation is acknowledged, and future studies will aim to include larger participant groups to enhance statistical robustness. Additionally, this study did not evaluate participants' subjective perceptions of performance, motivation, or exertion, limiting the ability to account for potential placebo effects. Future studies should incorporate subjective assessments, such as the rate of perceived exertion scale, to better understand these factors. Finally, caution is warranted when generalizing these findings to different populations. The study was conducted on well-trained junior sprimters, and the observed effects may not necessarily apply to athletes of different performance levels, training backgrounds, or disciplines. Future research should explore the applicability of these results across a broader range of athletic populations.