# Exploring the Impact of Thermal Environment on Student Well-Being in Sustainable Campus Settings
## 3 Results and Discussion
### Analysis in the Spring Season  
#### 3.3.1 Influence of Abaya Color Variations on Psychological Factors During Spring Season  
Analysis of the ranks associated with psychological factors in relation to abaya color in Figure 11 reveals distinct patterns. Specifically, wearers of the black and white abayas tended to report more intense experiences across most of the listed psychological factors than did those wearing light brown abayas. Notably, for body heat, skin dryness, thermal discomfort, desire to escape, site unattractiveness, and unproductivity, the light brown abaya wearers demonstrated the lowest mean ranks, suggesting a more comfortable and positive experience. The black abaya wearers had higher mean ranks in factors such as body fatigue, body heat, and desire to escape, potentially indicating a slightly heightened level of discomfort in some areas compared to the white abaya. However, the white abaya wearers led in skin dryness, thermal discomfort, site unattractiveness, and unproductivity. It is imperative to emphasize that while these mean rank differences shed light on potential variations in user experiences across abaya colors, further statistical tests are essential to confirm the significance of these differences.  
The Kruskal-Wallis test results for various psychological factors in relation to abaya color demonstrate variable levels of statistical significance. Among the factors tested, body fatigue (\(p\) = 0.277) and eye fatigue (\(p\) = 0.714) yielded non-significant results, suggesting no clear differentiation across the abaya colors in these two domains. In contrast, significant variations were detected in thermal discomfort (H(2) = 6.144, \(p\) = 0.046), desire to escape (H(2) = 7.790, \(p\) = 0.020), site unattractiveness (H(2) = 8.176, \(p\) = 0.017) and unproductivity (H(2) = 10.466, \(p\) = 0.005) across different abaya colors. Factors such as body heat (H(2) = 4.845, \(p\) = 0.089) approached significance, indicating potential color-related differences, but they did not meet the conventional threshold of 0.05. Overall, while some psychological factors appear to be influenced by abaya color, others seem to be independent of color variation. Consequently, derived from this analysis, it becomes apparent that abaya color exerts some effect on various psychological perceptions of the students during the spring season. Therefore, hypothesis 1 remains partially valid.  
[PERSON] post hoc pairwise comparisons, following the Kruskal-Wallis test for psychological factors relative to abaya colors, spotlighted specific color contrasts that potentially impact these factors, as given in Table 5. Within the domain of thermal discomfort, significant differences are discerned between light brown and white abaya colors  
Figure 11: Students’ psychological perceptions with respect to abaya colors during spring season.  
(Adj. Sig. = 0.053), while the contrast between light brown and black approaches significance (Adj. Sig. = 0.212). In terms of desire to escape, light brown differs significantly from both black (Adj. Sig. = 0.095) and white (Adj. Sig. = 0.027). For site unattractiveness, the most pronounced differentiation is between light brown and white (Adj. Sig. = 0.013). Lastly, unproductivity reveals significant disparities when comparing light brown with both black (Adj. Sig. = 0.018) and white (Adj. Sig.= 0.013). Notably, black and white abayas consistently exhibit non-significant differences across all factors tested. The results suggest that the light brown color may exhibit distinct psychological impacts compared to the other two shades, while black and white abayas generally share similar psychological profiles in the contexts explored.