## 4 Analysis and Results
Another factor is the increasing connectivity of vehicles, which exposes them to a higher risk of incidents. Furthermore, the expanding vehicle-to-anything (V2X) infrastructures, as pointed out by [PERSON] et al. [2], make vehicles more susceptible to attacks and breaches as they are designed to connect with a wide range of devices. Moreover, another is the cost of cybersecurity [19; 61]. The vehicle must be economically viable for OEMs and suppliers. In addition, the multitude of vehicle models, technological variations and the associated challenges further complicate this task. The last factors relate to the product life cycle and the portfolio of products, specifically in the case of vehicles. The current market trend is to reduce the life cycle of vehicles, increase the product portfolio and head towards the development of new models. Consequently, this necessitates new advancements in cybersecurity measures. Regarding _PU_, which refers to the usefulness of this technology in enhancing performance or productivity, the results reveal two interconnected challenges cyberattacks and vehicle security. In this sense, the adoption of technology in cybersecurity should aim to ensure vehicle security and the ability to protect against potential cyberattacks [2]. These two factors will positively influence the adoption and maintenance of cybersecurity in the automotive sector. Regarding absorptive capacity as a determining factor in technology adoption, our results emphasize the importance of involving and disseminating cybersecurity to both dealers and consumers to ensure its appropriate implementation. Specifically, dealers and consumers play a critical role in the adoption of this technology, which is conditioned by their ability to follow the usage and maintenance procedures of cybersecurity systems in vehicles [1; 2; 62]. \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c} \hline \hline
**Topic Number** & **Topic Label** & **Average Topic Share** \\ \hline
1 & Diversity and intensity of attacks. & 0.020 \\ \hline
2 & Vehicle Security requirements & 0.015 \\ \hline
3 & Costs of cybersecurity technology. & 0.248 \\ \hline
4 & Collaborations in the supply chain. & 0.059 \\ \hline
5 & Heterogeneity of devices, components and vehicle variants. & 0.088 \\ \hline
6 & Dealers’ and Suppliers’ capability to follow procedures and processes of cybersecurity. & 0.105 \\ \hline
7 & Standards in cybersecurity. & 0.024 \\ \hline
8 & Increasing connectivity of vehicles, such as V2V, V2I and V2X. & 0.105 \\ \hline
9 & Vehicle’s capacity to adopt cybersecurity systems. & 0.163 \\ \hline
10 & Lifecycle of vehicle. & 0.042 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 6: Average topic share per journal article. Regarding inter-organizational relationships as a facilitator of technology adoption, the analysis reveals two interconnected factors closely related to absorptive capacity and technology diffusion in the automotive sector. The first challenge involves the proper interconnection with supply chain agents, thereby facilitating the diffusion of cybersecurity technology [2,4]. Cybersecurity in the automotive supply chain is heavily influenced by the interdependencies between various stakeholders, including original equipment manufacturers (OEMs), tier-one suppliers, and component manufacturers. These collaborations are essential for ensuring that the entire automotive system, from hardware to software, maintains a high level of security. The second challenge arises from the need for standards to regulate cybersecurity procedures and processes [34,35]. Standardizing the supply chain is essential in facilitating organizational procedures and communication. In Table 8, the results present a prioritization map of the maintenance of cybersecurity, illustrating how various challenges affect each component of the automotive supply chain.