## 5 Simulation and Experimental Results
### Performance Analysis Concerning Varying Speed
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c} \hline \hline
**Parameters** & **Speed** & **S-AODV** & **ES-AODV** & **ECC-ACO-AODV** & **ECC-GA-PASR** & **S-AODV** \\ \hline \multirow{5}{*}{Energy Efficiency (\%)} & 50 & 75.16 & 81.25 & 88.96 & 99.85 & 75.16 \\  & 100 & 72.49 & 78.23 & 88.15 & 98.81 & 72.49 \\  & 150 & 65.39 & 76.89 & 87.25 & 97.25 & 65.39 \\  & 200 & 61.23 & 71.28 & 6.17 & 97.56 & 61.23 \\  & 250 & 55.78 & 65.23 & 85.13 & 96.28 & 55.78 \\ \hline \multirow{5}{*}{Packet Delivery Ratio (\%)} & 50 & 76.18 & 81.26 & 89.13 & 98.17 & 76.18 \\  & 100 & 71.89 & 80.56 & 87.47 & 98.18 & 71.89 \\  & 150 & 65.24 & 79.17 & 85.01 & 97.16 & 65.24 \\  & 200 & 59.27 & 75.46 & 81.13 & 97.02 & 59.27 \\  & 250 & 55.47 & 65.23 & 75.16 & 96.25 & 55.47 \\ \hline \multirow{5}{*}{Overhead (packets)} & 50 & 1246 & 964 & 429 & 56 & 1246 \\  & 100 & 1934 & 1426 & 758 & 128 & 1934 \\ \cline{1-1}  & 150 & 2571 & 1967 & 1025 & 215 & 2571 \\ \cline{1-1}  & 200 & 3467 & 2864 & 1438 & 358 & 3467 \\ \cline{1-1}  & 250 & 4278 & 3587 & 1868 & 458 & 4278 \\ \hline \multirow{5}{*}{Packet Loss (packets)} & 50 & 434 & 386 & 128 & 62 & 434 \\ \cline{1-1}  & 100 & 587 & 474 & 217 & 118 & 587 \\ \cline{1-1}  & 150 & 715 & 628 & 346 & 147 & 715 \\ \cline{1-1}  & 200 & 864 & 794 & 458 & 196 & 864 \\ \cline{1-1}  & 250 & 945 & 857 & 578 & 254 & 945 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 8: Performance Analysis of Energy Efficiency, Packet Delivery Ratio, overhead, and Packet Loss concerning varying speed. indicate that the overall efficiency performance of the proposed ECC-ACO-AODV is higher than the others. According to varying speed from 15 to 35 (m/s), the packet delivery ratio of the proposed ECC-GA-PASR varies from 98% to 96%, whereas earlier works such as S-AODV, ES-AODV and ECC-ACO-AODV vary from 76% to 55%, from 81% to 65%, and from 89% to 75%, respectively. As per the speed variation, the packet delivery ratio of the proposed ECC-GA-PASR lowered by around 2%, and the earlier such as S-AODV lowered by around 21%, ES-AODV lowered by around 16%, and ECC-ACO-AODV lowered around 14%. The results show that the overall packet delivery ratio performance of all the methods is reduced when increases speed, but the variation is very low in the proposed ECC-GA-PASR, which is reached by concentrating on both optimization and network security. According to varying speed from 15 to 35 (m/s), the overhead of the proposed ECC-GA-PASR increase from 56 packets to 458 packets, whereas earlier works such as S-AODV, ES-AODV, and ECC-ACO-AODV vary from 1246 packets to 4278 packets, from 964 packets to 3587 packets, and from 429 packets to 1868 packets, respectively. As per the speed variation, the overhead of the proposed ECC-GA-PASR increased by around 400 packets, and the earlier such as S-AODV, increased by around 3000 packets, ES-AODV increased by around 2000 packets, and ECC-ACO-AODV increased by around 1500 packets. For all the methods, due to increasing the speed, the overhead is increased, but the variation which is generated by the proposed ECC-GA-PASR method is very low when compared with the others, which is achieved by focusing on data protection and optimization in the network. According to varying speed from 15 to 35 (m/s), the packet loss of the proposed ECC-GA-PASR increased from 62 packets to 254 packets, whereas earlier works such as S-AODV, ES-AODV, and ECC-ACO-AODV varied from 434 packets to 945 packets, from 386 packets to 857 packets, and from 128 packets to 578 packets, respectively. As per the speed variation, the packet loss of the proposed ECC-GA-PASR increased by around 200 packets, and the earlier such as S-AODV, increased by around 500 packets, ES-AODV increased by around 450 packets, and ECC-ACO-AODV increased by around 400 packets. For all the methods, due to increasing the speed, the packet loss is increased, but the differences are very low for the proposed ECC-GA-PASR, which shows that the performance of the proposed method is better than the other.