## 4 Survey Findings and Results from and Through Discussion
### Interactive Radio-Themed Lessan--RO1
#### 4.2.4 Fourth Segment: Educational Tools and Services
To be more precise, the analysis indicated (a) t(133) = \(-\)3.869, \(p\) < 0.001 for the two unexpected survey phases, with the second survey phase having a higher average value compared to the first survey phase (4.74 \(\pm\) 0.445 and 4.20 \(\pm\) 0.841, respectively) (Table 16); and (b) t(133) = \(-\)2.712, \(p\) < 0.001 for the survey parts, with the second survey part having a higher average value compared to the first survey part (4.53 \(\pm\) 0.625 and 4.18 \(\pm\) 0.897, respectively) (Table 16). \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c c c c c} \hline \hline  & & & \multicolumn{6}{c}{**Educational Tools and Services**} & \\ \cline{5-10}  & & & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Very Poor**} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{**Poor**} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{**Fair**} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{**Good**} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{**Excellent**} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{**N**} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{**Mean**} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{**SD**} \\ \hline \multirow{5}{*}{**First Survey Survey Phase**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**First Experiment \({}^{1}\)**} & - & - & 4–15.4\% & 10–38.65\% & **12–46.2\%** & 26 & 4.31 & 0.736 \\ \cline{3-10}  & **First Survey** & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Second Experiment \({}^{2}\)**} & - & - & - & 9–40.5\% & **13–59.1\%** & 22 & 4.59 & 0.503 \\ \cline{3-10}  & **First Survey** & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Third Experiment \({}^{3}\)**} & 1–7.1\% & 2–14.3\% & 4–28.6\% & **6–42.9\%** & 1–7.1\% & 14 & 3.29 & 1.069 \\ \cline{3-10}  & & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Fourth Experiment \({}^{4}\)**} & - & - & 5–16.1\% & **13–41.9\%** & **13–41.9\%** & 31 & 4.26 & 0.729 \\ \cline{3-10}  & **Second Survey** & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Fourth Experiment \({}^{5}\)**} & - & - & - & 2–20\% & **8–80\%** & 10 & **4.80** & 0.422 \\ \cline{3-10}  & **First Survey Phase** & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Sixth Experiment \({}^{6}\)**} & - & - & - & 9–28.1\% & **23–71.9\%** & 32 & 4.72 & 0.457 \\ \hline \multirow{5}{*}{**Second Survey Phase**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{1–1.1\%} & 2–2.2\% & 13–14\% & 38–40.9\% & **39–41.9\%** & 93 & 4.20 & 0.841 \\  & **Second Survey Phase** & \multicolumn{2}{c}{-} & - & - & 11–26.2\% & **31–73.8\%** & 42 & **4.74** & 0.445 \\ \cline{3-10}  & **First Survey Part** & \multicolumn{2}{c}{1–1.6\%} & 2–3.2\% & 8–12.9\% & 25–40.3\% & **26–41.9\%** & 62 & 4.18 & 0.897 \\ \cline{3-10}  & **Second Survey Part** & \multicolumn{2}{c}{-} & - & - & 5–6.8\% & 24–32.9\% & **44–60.3\%** & 73 & 4.53 & 0.625 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}  
* Undergraduates students, AUTh’s SIMC 1. \({}^{2}\) Postgraduate students, AUTh’s SIMC 2. \({}^{3}\) Learners, IEK. \({}^{4}\) Undergraduates students, AUTh’s SIMC 3. \({}^{5}\) Postgraduate students, AUTh’s SIMC 4. \({}^{6}\) Undergraduates students, UWM’s DCMM.  
\end{table} 
Table 15: Fully grouped subtotal responses from the evaluation form based on “educational tools and services”. Overall, these survey findings and results (Tables 15 and 16) obviously contribute to achieving RO1, as well as their recheck and cross-check; however, the latter needs further research analysis and investigation in the future. Likewise, they also show that the utilization of these educational tools and services used in this lesson plan does not appear to be affected by whether it was a repetition lesson or a compulsory course material, something that should definitely also be investigated in the future. Finally, additional information and details regarding the grouped subtotal responses of budding journalists on the parameter of the \"educational tools and services\", as well as the results of the statistical analysis from independent sample \(t\)-tests, are provided in Tables 15 and 16, respectively.