## 4 Conclusions  
In this article the performance of a 1.5 MWP floating PV system using Helioscope software has been simulated and performance of the same has been analyzed to charge different types of EVs, such as the E-bike, E-scooter and E-car. The annual energy generation from the 1.5 MWp floating PV plant is of 2387.89 MWh. The analysis shows that the charging of EV using a floating PV system is more efficient from the point of view of CO\({}_{2}\) emission. The findings indicate that an E-bike, E-scooter, or E-car will be a net zero CO\({}_{2}\) emission vehicle in 25.5 months, 12.1 months, and 7.7 months, respectively, when charged from floating PV plant. When the floating PV system is used to charge various types of electric vehicles for a fixed distance coverage of 10 \(\times 10^{5}\) km, it has been observed that the CO\({}_{2}\) emission savings for the E-bike, E-scooter, and E-car are \(-85.16\) Ton, \(-3.28\) Ton, and 525.6 Ton, respectively. According to the findings of the analysis, all three types of electric vehicles are effective in reducing CO\({}_{2}\) emissions for nations that rely on renewable energy generation; however, when considered for a fixed distance covered, only electric cars save  
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c} \hline \hline \multicolumn{1}{c}{**Parameters**} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{**Value**} \\ \hline  & \(E_{1}\) & 7.9 Wh/km \\ Energy required & \(E_{2}\) & 30.7 Wh/km \\  & \(E_{3}\) & 151 Wh/km \\ \hline Percentage energy more & \(Emore_{1}\) & 289 \\ required & \(Emore_{2}\) & 392 \\ \hline  & \(ACE_{1}\) & 161 Ton/psngr/km \\ Annual CO\({}_{2}\) emissions & \(ACE_{2}\) & 298 Ton/psngr/km \\  & \(ACE_{3}\) & 924 Ton/psngr/km \\ \hline Total CO\({}_{2}\) emission saving & \(TCE_{1}\) & 75.84 Ton/psngr/km \\ when EV charged from FPVS & \(TCE_{2}\) & 294.72 Ton/psngr/km \\ instead of conventional grid & \(TCE_{3}\) & 1449.6 Ton/psngr/km \\ \hline Emission savings when FPVS & Electric bike & \(-85.16\) Ton \\ is used to charge EV & Electric scooter & \(-3.28\) Ton \\  & Electric car & 525.6 Ton \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table}
Table 4: CO\({}_{2}\) emission parameters assuming constant distance coverage.  
carbon emissions. It can be seen that, among the various types of electric vehicles that have been considered, the E-car is the most effective choice in terms of the reduction in CO\({}_{2}\) emission. Additionally, 37,125 kL of water will be saved annually from evaporation owe to the installation of the floating PV plant.  
Data curation, methodology, visualization, writing--original draft preparation, A.R.; Conceptualization, software, formal analysis, investigation, validation, S.C.; writing--review and editing, supervision, D.E.; writing--review and editing, resources, data curation, supervision, funding acquisition, H.K.; resources, data curation, K.M.A., resources, data curation, methodology, visualization, N.C.G.; supervision, project administration, E.B.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.  
This research received no external funding.  
Not applicable.  
The data sources employed for analysis are presented in the text.  
The authors declare no conflict of interest.