## 5 Experiments
### Ablation Study  
To validate the importance of the consistency principle in our self-correction reflection framework, we conducted targeted ablation experiments comparing the self-correction reflection with a modified version that removes the Historical Enhancement via Consistency Principle phase (HECP). This isolates the use of the consistency principle of the large language model, so that after the correction perturbation, the historical information of the original text is not retained, which will lead to the loss of semantic information of the original text. Through this ablation experiment, we prove the comprehensiveness of our proposed method. The ablation results in Tables 13 and 14 show that removing HECP leads to a consistent performance drop in all evaluation scenarios, validating the necessity of preserving \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c c c c} \hline \hline \multirow{2}{*}{**LLMs**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**Dataset**} & \multicolumn{3}{c}{**MSCS of SwapAlpha**} & \multicolumn{3}{c}{**MSCS of SwapWord**} & \multicolumn{3}{c}{**MSCS of CaseAlpha**} \\  & & **CTC** & **TextBlob** & **Ours** & **CTC** & **TextBlob** & **Ours** & **CTC** & **TextBlob** & **Ours** \\ \hline \multirow{4}{*}{Qwen2.5} & MMLU & 0.5857 & 0.6120 & 0.6472 & 0.8346 & 0.8338 & 0.8431 & 0.6031 & 0.6221 & 0.6697 \\  & LogQA-en & 0.5333 & 0.5573 & 0.5946 & 0.8330 & 0.8391 & 0.8420 & 0.5588 & 0.5645 & 0.6308 \\  & LSAT & 0.4931 & 0.5085 & 0.5561 & 0.8199 & 0.8167 & 0.8261 & 0.5197 & 0.5139 & 0.5891 \\  & SAT-en & 0.6318 & 0.6500 & 0.6833 & 0.8258 & 0.8263 & 0.8280 & 0.6495 & 0.6571 & 0.7086 \\ \hline \multirow{4}{*}{Falcon3-Lambda} & MMLU & 0.8014 & 0.8089 & 0.8177 & 0.8793 & 0.8792 & 0.8847 & 0.8433 & 0.8425 & 0.8547 \\  & LogQA-en & 0.8026 & 0.8055 & 0.8167 & 0.8822 & 0.8834 & 0.8872 & 0.8465 & 0.8477 & 0.8595 \\  & LSAT & 0.7453 & 0.7422 & 0.7605 & 0.8511 & 0.8491 & 0.8561 & 0.8077 & 0.8137 & 0.8214 \\  & SAT-en & 0.7630 & 0.7699 & 0.7788 & 0.8466 & 0.8502 & 0.8535 & 0.8287 & 0.8263 & 0.8441 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 11: _Cont._ \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c c c c c} \hline \hline \multirow{2}{*}{**LLMs**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**Dataset**} & \multicolumn{3}{c}{**ACC of SwapAlpha**} & \multicolumn{3}{c}{**ACC of SwapWord**} & \multicolumn{3}{c}{**ACC of CaseAlpha**} \\  & & **CTC** & **TextBlob** & **Ours** & **CTC** & **TextBlob** & **Ours** & **CTC** & **TextBlob** & **Ours** \\ \hline \multirow{4}{*}{GLM4} & MMLU & 50.77 & 51.92 & 54.69 & 47.94 & 48.05 & 49.27 & 59.23 & 59.30 & 60.72 \\  & LogQA-en & 33.80 & 34.11 & 40.03 & 28.66 & 29.75 & 32.40 & 36.76 & 36.60 & 46.26 \\  & LSAT & 40.21 & 41.77 & 43.81 & 31.68 & 31.94 & 32.51 & 47.17 & 47.26 & 48.27 \\  & SAT-en & 66.28 & 68.08 & 73.79 & 54.97 & 55.54 & 56.31 & 81.39 & 81.02 & 82.04 \\ \hline \multirow{4}{*}{Llama3.1} & MMLU & 47.34 & 48.90 & 50.85 & 47.49 & 47.08 & 48.07 & 53.85 & 53.92 & 55.42 \\  & LogQA-en & 33.64 & 33.18 & 35.51 & 28.84 & 29.46 & 29.75 & 37.23 & 37.50 & 38.47 \\  & LSAT & 36.07 & 36.66 & 39.45 & 29.70 & 29.74 & 30.72 & 41.02 & 41.72 & 43.11 \\  & SAT-en & 53.37 & 56.59 & 59.71 & 46.94 & 47.66 & 48.06 & 62.59 & 62.53 & 64.08 \\ \hline \multirow{4}{*}{Qwen2.5} & MMLU & 58.55 & 59.46 & 61.80 & 53.32 & 53.19 & 54.37 & 66.17 & 65.79 & 66.37 \\  & LogQA-en & 44.86 & 45.33 & 49.22 & 35.98 & 37.47 & 39.72 & 51.78 & 51.43 & 52.49 \\  & LSAT & 47.97 & 47.02 & 51.34 & 36.37 & 36.29 & 37.66 & 54.22 & 54.11 & 54.81 \\  & SAT-en & 74.27 & 75.24 & 79.61 & 58.77 & 58.91 & 60.19 & 83.44 & 83.16 & 84.95 \\ \hline \multirow{4}{*}{Falcon3-Lambda} & MMLU & 48.50 & 51.56 & 52.10 & 47.85 & 48.00 & 48.43 & 56.52 & 56.44 & 57.56 \\  & LogQA-en & 34.27 & 35.60 & 37.07 & 36.36 & 36.14 & 37.38 & 38.48 & 38.78 & 39.56 \\ \cline{1-1}  & LSAT & 36.37 & 36.17 & 38.35 & 32.70 & 32.89 & 33.60 & 39.35 & 39.33 & 40.93 \\ \cline{1-1}  & SAT-en & 52.91 & 53.68 & 56.80 & 48.56 & 48.66 & 49.51 & 60.62 & 59.77 & 62.62 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table}