## 4 Discussion
The HF based models and the folding potential approach employed in this study implicitly incorporate these deformation effects, which contributes to the good agreement observed between the calculated angular differential cross sections and experimental measurements. Numbered lists can be added as follows:  
1. \({}^{182}\)W(n,el) Scattering Reaction (Figure 4) * For low-energy neutrons between 1.5 and 3.4 MeV: The observed scattering cross sections are relatively flat, with few minima and maxima. This can be explained by the long neutron wavelength interacting with the entire nucleus, resulting in limited angular resolution. The SHF-WS + SF + TALYS 1.96 model successfully reproduces this flat pattern. * At 4.87 and 6 MeV: A pronounced minimum around \(\sim\)50\({}^{\circ}\) is observed in the experimental data, which is also clearly seen in the SHF-WS + SF calculations. This indicates that the model can capture fine angular structures due to the interaction potentials derived from the density distributions. * At 14 MeV: The scattering structure becomes more complex with more peaks and valleys at higher energy. This arises from the dominance of nucleon-level interactions due to the shorter wavelength. The simulation model reproduces this pattern quite well. 2. \({}^{183}\)W(n,el) Reaction (Figure 5) * Comparison between 3.4 MeV and 14 MeV: At lower energy, wider angular scattering is dominant, whereas at 14 MeV, distinct angular modulations and more peak/trough structures emerge. The model performs successfully in capturing both the general trend and the proximity to experimental data at both energies. \({}^{184}\)W(n,el) Reaction (Figure 6)
* At 4.84 and 6 MeV energy levels: Especially at 6 MeV, a distinct oscillation is observed in the experimental data, which the SHF-WS + SF approach largely reproduces. This result, showing higher sensitivity than the [PERSON] and Delaroche model, suggests a theoretical framework better aligned with the experimental diffraction patterns. * \({}^{186}\)W(n,el) Reaction (Figure 7)
* Generally flatter scattering curves with fewer structural variations: The more stable nature of this isotope may contribute to fewer structural features in the scattering spectrum. However, angular differentiations are still observed at 14 MeV, and the model successfully predicts these trends. Comparison of the Global OM by [PERSON] and [PERSON] [43] and the Microscopic Approach Proposed in This Study Is Presented  
In this study, a method for determining the existing parameters to re-evaluate experimental data is presented. In nuclear physics calculations, parameters are generally derived from the analysis of experimental data for a large number of stable target nuclei. The SHF method has been in use since the 1970s and serves as a fundamental technique for determining nucleon density distributions. The SF method, developed primarily by [PERSON] and [PERSON] since the 1970s, provides a microscopic approach to obtaining the NN interaction potential. These methods offer high theoretical accuracy but are typically limited to local applications (i.e., specific isotopes or energy ranges). The work by [PERSON] and [PERSON] introduced a parametric global model based on an extensive dataset. It enables broad applicability, software integration, and comprehensive optimization with experimental data. However, it does not incorporate microscopic physics (such as SHF or Folding). This reflects a different methodological choice rather than a deficiency (Table 4). While studies such as that of [PERSON] and [PERSON] employ global OM parameters, the present work microscopically computes nucleon densities using SHF-WS to calculate interaction potentials, and compares these potentials with actual interaction surfaces. This enables the use of more physically grounded potentials that can be directly correlated with experimental data.