## 6 Results, Analysis, and Discussion
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c} \hline \hline  & **UDP Response** & **TCP Response** \\  & **Time (s)** & **Time (s)** \\ \hline Mean & 0.588236668 & 0.586134868 \\ \hline Variance & 0.006270646 & 0.002491745 \\ \hline Observations & 60 & 60 \\ \hline Hypothesized Mean Difference & 0 & - \\ \hline df & 99 & - \\ \hline t Stat & 0.173922477 & - \\ \hline P (T \textless{=} t) one-tail & 0.431140767 & - \\ \hline t Critical one-tail & 1.660391156 & - \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 3: Results from an independent sample \(t\)-Test. Tables 7 and 8 display the outcome when the independent \(t\)-Test was carried out on the response times when a network was experiencing a DDoS attack from four and five devices, respectively. \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c} \hline  & **UDP Response** & **TCP Response** \\  & **Time (s)** & **Time (s)** \\ \hline Mean & 0.940874563 & 0.870644687 \\ \hline Variance & 0.019226699 & 0.004839068 \\ \hline Observations & 60 & 60 \\ \hline Hypothesized Mean Difference & 0 & - \\ \hline df & 87 & - \\ \hline t Stat & 3.506692348 & - \\ \hline P (T \textless= t) one-tail & 0.000360028 & - \\ \hline t Critical one-tail & 1.662557349 & - \\ \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 6: Results, Experiment 3. \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c} \hline  & **UDP Response** & **TCP Response** \\  & **Time (s)** & **Time (s)** \\ \hline Mean & 0.872771008 & 0.833576175 \\ \hline Variance & 0.015352186 & 0.012659159 \\ \hline Observations & 60 & 60 \\ \hline Hypothesized Mean Difference & 0 & - \\ \hline df & 117 & - \\ \hline t Stat & 1.814000748 & - \\ \hline P (T \textless= t) one-tail & 0.036120153 & - \\ \hline t Critical one-tail & 1.657981659 & - \\ \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 5: Results, Experiment 2. Figure 9: Graph displaying the mean response times of the UDP and TCP phones. From Experiment 6 to Experiment 8 (Tables 9-11), the mean response time for the TCP phones appears to begin to level off at around 1.01, while the response time for the UDP phones continues to increase. This results in an increasing disparity between the two sets of data and is again evidence that the \"Call Me Maybe\" framework is most effective when a network is suffering a strong DDoS attack. The experiment must be conducted against an even greater strength of DoS attack to see if this trend continues. \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c} \hline \hline  & **UDP Response** & **TCP Response** \\  & **Time (s)** & **Time (s)** \\ \hline Mean & 1.040081206 & 0.948375321 \\ \hline Variance & 0.037276289 & 0.01119926 \\ \hline Observations & 60 & 60 \\ \hline Hypothesized Mean Difference & 0 & - \\ \hline tf & 91 & - \\ \hline t Stat & 3.228993223 & - \\ \hline P (T \(<\)= t) one-tail & 0.000864284 & - \\ \hline t Critical one-tail & 1.661771155 & - \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 7: Results, Experiment 4. \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c} \hline \hline  & **UDP Response** & **TCP Response** \\  & **Time (s)** & **Time (s)** \\ \hline Mean & 1.135312606 & 1.008461956 \\ \hline Variance & 0.017175358 & 0.024002806 \\ \hline Observations & 60 & 60 \\ \hline Hypothesized Mean Difference & 0 & - \\ \hline df & 115 & - \\ \hline t Stat & 4.842112008 & - \\ \hline P (T \(<\)= t) one-tail & 2.01876 \(\times\) 10\({}^{-6}\) & - \\ \hline t Critical one-tail & 1.65821183 & - \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 8: Results, Experiment 5. \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c} \hline \hline  & **UDP Response** & **TCP Response** \\  & **Time (s)** & **Time (s)** \\ \hline Mean & 1.156956044 & 1.009764763 \\ \hline Variance & 0.073380824 & 0.018630804 \\ \hline Observations & 60 & 60 \\ \hline Hypothesized Mean Difference & 0 & - \\ \hline df & 87 & - \\ \hline t Stat & 3.758688662 & - \\ \hline P (T \(<\)= t) one-tail & 0.000154308 & - \\ \hline t Critical one-tail & 1.662557349 & - \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 9: Results, Experiment 6.