## 3 Results
### Time on Court, Distance Covered and Running Face by Playing Positions
LWs were the players spending more time running with significant differences with the rest of playing positions (CB, \(p\) < 0.001, ES = 0.62; RB, \(p\) < 0.001, ES = 0.79; LB, \(p\) < 0.001, ES = 0.88; LP, \(p\) < 0.001, ES = 0.76) except for RWs (\(p\) > 0.05). Similarly, RWs spent more time running than these paying positions (CB, \(p\) < 0.001, ES = 0.47; RB, \(p\) < 0.001, ES = 0.62; LB, \(p\) < 0.001, ES = 0.69; LP, \(p\) < 0.001, ES = 0.60). CBs also spent more time running than LBs (\(p\) = 0.032; ES = 0.27). Again, LWs were the players spending significantly more time running at high intensity compared to the other playing positions (CB, \(p\) < 0.001, ES = 1.53; RB, \(p\) < 0.001, ES = 1.85; LB, \(p\) < 0.001, ES = 1.86; LP, \(p\) < 0.001, ES = 1.81) except for RWs (\(p\) > 0.05). Similarly, RWs spent more time running at high intensity than these playing positions (CB, \(p\) < 0.001, ES = 1.30; RB, \(p\) < 0.001, ES = 1.57; LB, \(p\) < 0.001, ES = 1.61; LP, \(p\) < 0.001, ES = 1.54). CBs were the third playing position spending more time at high intensity running showing significant differences with LBs and RBs (\(p\) < 0.001; ES = 0.45; and \(p\) < 0.001; ES = 0.58, respectively) but not with LPs (\(p\) > 0.05). LPs also spent significantly higher time in this locomotion category than LBs and RBs (\(p\) = 0.003; ES = 0.29; and \(p\) < 0.001; ES = 0.40, respectively). Not surprisingly therefore, LWs spent significantly more time sprinting than the rest of playing positions (CB, \(p\) < 0.001, ES = 1.58; RB, \(p\) < 0.001, ES = 1.57; LB, \(p\) < 0.001, ES = 1.69; LP, \(p\) < 0.001, ES = 1.95) except for RWs (\(p\) > 0.05). Similarly, RWs spent more time running at high intensity than the rest of the players with exception to the LWs (CB, \(p\) < 0.001, ES = 1.27; RB, \(p\) < 0.001, ES = 1.27; LBs, \(p\) < 0.001, ES = 1.36; LP, \(p\) < 0.001, ES = 1.61). In regards to distances covered (Table 3), significant differences were found for total distance covered (F = 17.61; \(p\) < 0.001), distance covered walking (F = 3.76; \(p\) = 0.002), jogging (F = 13.47; \(p\) < 0.001), running (F = 44.33; \(p\) < 0.001), at high intensity running (F = 256.67; \(p\) < 0.001) and sprinting (F = 234.04; \(p\) < 0.001). Post-hoc analysis (Figure 4) showed that LWs were the ones covering a longer total distance compared to the other playing positions (CB, \(p\) = 0.017, ES = 0.29; RB, \(p\) < 0.001, ES = 0.54; LB, \(p\) < 0.001, ES = 0.59; LP, \(p\) < 0.001, ES = 0.64) except for RW (\(p\) > 0.05). RW also covered a longer total distance respect to the rest of playing positions (RB, \(p\) < 0.001, ES = 0.35; LB, \(p\) < 0.001, ES = 0.41; LP, \(p\) < 0.001, ES = 0.45), except for CB (\(p\) > 0.05). Next, CB covered a significantly longer total distance than LB (\(p\) = 0.011; ES = 0.30) and LP (\(p\) = 0.001; ES = 0.35). \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c} \hline \hline  & **Left Wing** & **Left Back** & **Center Back** & **Right Back** & **Right Wing** & **Line Player** \\ \hline \(n\) & 213 & 320 & 248 & 246 & 230 & 374 \\ Total Distance & 2547.14 \(\pm\) 1309.52 & 1887.90 \(\pm\) 962.22 & 2194.39 \(\pm\) 1093.97 & 1943.25 \(\pm\) 1003.03 & 2371.89 \(\pm\) 1456.80 & 1835.23 \(\pm\) 979.15 \\ Walking & 1083.56 \(\pm\) 586.68 & 945.81 \(\pm\) 505.53 & 1049.13 \(\pm\) 561.89 & 1002.57 \(\pm\) 557.20 & 1013.69 \(\pm\) 629.55 & 912.11 \(\pm\) 512.94 \\ Jogging & 550.19 \(\pm\) 290.46 & 545.04 \(\pm\) 274.35 & 661.30 \(\pm\) 314.51 & 536.77 \(\pm\) 268.38 & 495.91 \(\pm\) 304.41 & 480.67 \(\pm\) 248.13 \\ Running & 489.65 \(\pm\) 268.09 & 285.83 \(\pm\) 167.70 & 330.35 \(\pm\) 177.98 & 297.88 \(\pm\) 165.59 & 464.45 \(\pm\) 304.97 & 312.72 \(\pm\) 185.30 \\ HIRunning & 337.86 \(\pm\) 202.40 & 73.79 \(\pm\) 73.74 & 103.93 \(\pm\) 74.43 & 70.78 \(\pm\) 50.92 & 320.48 \(\pm\) 221.36 & 92.07 \(\pm\) 62.90 \\ Sprinting & 52.16 \(\pm\) 46.48 & 4.32 \(\pm\) 10.66 & 5.37 \(\pm\) 9.36 & 2.95 \(\pm\) 6.33 & 40.70 \(\pm\) 40.46 & 1.47 \(\pm\) 4.68 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table}