## 1 Introduction
[PERSON] [38] presented data modeling for the integration between specifications and verification for GPS-compliant cylindricity based on category theory. The importance of data transfer was similarly explored by [PERSON] and [PERSON] [39; 40] but in the area of additive manufacturing. In another study [41], the importance of data in assessing the accuracy of machined parts was highlighted. Several other studies involved investigations of data transfer [42; 43; 44]. Data exchange between different systems is of particular importance in the process of planning. In the production process, this can be in the field of machining or the case of the production of complex-shaped parts, such as the sintering of powders. In all these cases, data processing and the correct exchange of CAD data are important for an efficient production method. Most often, the team making \"strategic\" decisions to start production must have a universal data exchange format that ensures the least loss of data from the \"giver\", i.e., the customer, to the \"recipient\", i.e., the contractor. They must also have appropriate software that is fully compatible with other systems so that the exchange between them is possible. From this point of view, a full compliance analysis consisting of the verification of geometric models and their attributes after import/export is needed to understand all the issues related to data exchange in CAD/CAE systems [10; 21; 29; 45]. The integration of methods, models, tools, and data is the basis for the comprehensive implementation of computer techniques in a modern manufacturing company. The overriding goal is to increase awareness of the existence of errors in the transmission of data between CAx systems. Additionally, the existing research aims to highlight the current level of application of neutral formats and assess the compatibility of converted objects [46; 47; 48]. Errors at the design stage, which include the transfer and transfer of objects using CAx systems, can significantly increase the cost of implementing the production process [49; 50]. This paper draws attention to the possibility of product inconsistency due to incorrect translation between the available programming languages. One of the systems that compares and determines the level of compliance is NIST software 2022. Measuring compliance includes, among other aspects, geometrical dimensioning and tolerancing, surface specification, annotations regarding finishing, welded joints, and material specification [51]. Generating and optimizing section profile data for rapid prototyping and manufacturing was studied in [52], which presents a slicing algorithm based on a geometric continuity model. [PERSON] [53] analyzed a unified approach to a posteriori generation of arbitrary high-order curvilinear meshes via the solid mechanics analogy, and [PERSON] [54] described a STEP standard for product data exchange. Different forms of data processing were studied by [PERSON] et al. [55], who examined the data in heat transfer processes in a heat pipe heat exchanger utilizing a working fluid R134A. Other authors [56; 57; 58] examined transfer data in additive processes and its effect on the evaluation of geometrical performance, while [PERSON] [59] was involved in the development of a data interface for rapid prototyping in STEP-NC. With the use of model-based definitions, most of the data required to design, analyze, and manufacture a product are stored in digital format [60; 61; 62]. An effective communication model between CAD, CAPP, and CAM applications in a distributed manufacturing planning environment is considered a key component of CIM [63]. Data handling in NURBS models based on the STEP format was studied by [PERSON] [64]. [PERSON] [65] and [PERSON] [66] investigated the associations between CAD models, as well as their geometric dimensions and tolerances. Other analyses of data exchange formats can be found in [67; 68; 69], which examine product data exchange and product model sharing.