## 1 Introduction
This allows the modelling of human judgment and even experience, unlike traditional MCDM methods, which would be the most suitable solution [2]. In the scope of this study, fuzzy MCDM methods, which can be defined as a group of methods that produce analytical solutions for decision-makers under uncertainty, have been used because the problem is participatory and has a multi-criterion structure. It is recommended to weight the criteria with the Anti-Entropy Weighting (AEW) method, which is an important method used in management decisions, and to rank the alternative targets with the TOPSIS method, which is a frequently used ranking algorithm in the literature, which produces effective results with these weights and has many advantages. The basis of strategic planning includes goals, objectives set under these goals, and the strategies to be developed. This very significant phase of planning, which sets forth the 5-year goals and objectives for companies, is unfortunately prone to the domination of the organization's managers/directors through inefficient meetings. This study focuses on the definition of strategic goals by eliminating the decision-making process followed during inefficient meetings where dominant managers steer the process, and introduces an analytical decision-making model. To the best of the authors' knowledge, no study in the literature has used this method to select strategic goals in Turkiye. This study considers the criteria set forth in the Strategic Planning Guideline and aims to provide an analytical solution to this significant problem. In this study we propose an integrated approach consisting of the Fuzzy Anti-Entropy Weighting (AEW) method and the Fuzzy Technique for Order Performance by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) method to select strategic goals for the institutional capacity of the Scientific and Techno logical Research Council of Turkiye (TUBITAK) (See Figure 1). TUBITAK is a non-profit governmental organization in Turkiye whose main duties are:  
* Developing scientific and technological policies;
* Managing R&D institutes;
* Conducting research, technology, and development studies in line with national priorities;
* Acting as advisory agency to the Turkish government;  
Figure 1: Working systematic of proposed methodology. As an advisory agency, strategic planning is one of the most crucial tasks carried out at TUBITAK. The general methodology for strategic goal selection is as follows: The strategic planning team receives the input of stakeholders. Draft objectives are submitted to the Strategy Development Board for evaluation. The board consists of several senior executives. All these processes are carried out with a lot of official correspondence and inefficient meetings. There are many criteria to be considered in the selection of objectives. However, unfortunately, not all criteria can be considered in the meetings with discussions. If the selected objectives do not meet the criteria sufficiently, they are not accepted by the Presidency of Strategy and Budget, and are sent back. This causes all the efforts to be wasted and the process to be started again. Another disadvantage of this current process is that the dominant executives, who are members of the board, usually say something. This hinders objective and equal participation. However, strategic objectives should reflect the \"ideal\" and \"common\" view of the administration for the future. The number of objectives that can be selected is limited. There is a strong need for a method that can ensure equal participation and make selections considering the criteria that the objectives must meet.