## Appendix A \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{l c c c c c} \hline \hline \multirow{2}{*}{**Preference**} & \multicolumn{5}{c}{**Green Policymaking Initiative Scale**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**Total**} \\ \cline{2-2} \cline{4-6}  & **Score 1** & **Score 2** & **Score 3** & **Score 4** & **Score 5** \\ \hline Aichi & 3 & 2 & 26 & 11 & 11 & 53 \\ Akita & 7 & 2 & 11 & 2 & 1 & 23 \\ Aomori & 9 & 8 & 15 & 1 & 5 & 38 \\ Chiba & 7 & 3 & 27 & 7 & 5 & 49 \\ Fukui & 2 & 1 & 5 & 5 & 4 & 17 \\ Fukuoka & 9 & 5 & 34 & 6 & 4 & 58 \\ Fukushima & 21 & 10 & 20 & 2 & 2 & 55 \\ Gifu & 9 & 5 & 18 & 5 & 5 & 42 \\ Gunma & 8 & 4 & 10 & 3 & 5 & 30 \\ Hiroshima & 1 & 3 & 9 & 1 & 5 & 19 \\ Hokkaido & 39 & 28 & 80 & 10 & 12 & 169 \\ Hyogo & 4 & 4 & 21 & 5 & 7 & 41 \\ Ibaraki & 5 & 6 & 24 & 8 & 2 & 45 \\ Ishikawa & 1 & 4 & 10 & 2 & 3 & 20 \\ Iwate & 6 & 3 & 16 & 6 & 3 & 34 \\ Kagawa & 1 & 3 & 11 & 2 & 1 & 18 \\ Kagoshima & 7 & 11 & 21 & 1 & 2 & 42 \\ Kanagawa & 3 & 1 & 11 & 7 & 10 & 32 \\ Kochi & 1 & 8 & 14 & 3 & 3 & 29 \\ Kumamoto & 14 & 4 & 17 & 5 & 3 & 43 \\ Kyoto & 2 & 1 & 9 & 7 & 4 & 23 \\ Mie & 2 & 8 & 10 & 6 & 1 & 27 \\ Miyagi & 5 & 5 & 16 & 3 & 4 & 33 \\ Miyagi & 3 & 2 & 9 & 2 & 2 & 18 \\ Miyazaki & 5 & 10 & 8 & 1 & 2 & 26 \\ Nagano & 27 & 7 & 26 & 4 & 5 & 69 \\ Nagasaki & 3 & 4 & 9 & 5 & 1 & 22 \\ Nara & 18 & 5 & 9 & 3 & 1 & 36 \\ Niigata & 5 & 1 & 8 & 8 & 8 & 30 \\ Oita & 3 & 0 & 13 & 1 & 2 & 19 \\ Okayama & 5 & 4 & 12 & 2 & 2 & 25 \\ Okinawa & 5 & 12 & 14 & 2 & 2 & 35 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 1: The cross-tabulation of organization location by the green policymaking initiative scale (\(n=1663\)). \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{l c c c c} \hline \hline  & \multicolumn{3}{c}{**Green Policymaking Initiative Scale**} \\ \cline{2-5}  & \multicolumn{3}{c}{**95\% Confidence Interval**} \\ \cline{2-5}
**Games–Howell Post-Hoc Testing** & **Mean Difference** & **Lower Bound** & **Upper Bound** \\ \hline Aichi vs. Fukushima & 1.308 *** & 0.46 & 2.15 \\ \hline Aichi vs. Hokkaido & 0.898 ** & 0.21 & 1.59 \\ \hline Aichi vs. Kagoshima & 0.948 ** & 0.10 & 1.80 \\ \hline Aichi vs. Kumamoto & 0.960 * & \(-\)0.03 & 1.95 \\ \hline Aichi vs. Miyazaki & 1.049 * & \(-\)0.05 & 2.15 \\ \hline Aichi vs. Nagano & 1.153 *** & 0.30 & 2.00 \\ \hline Aichi vs. Nara & 1.472 *** & 0.46 & 2.48 \\ \hline Aichi vs. Okinawa & 0.929 ** & 0.00 & 1.85 \\ \hline Aichi vs. Wakayama & 1.138 ** & 0.05 & 2.23 \\ \hline Chiba vs. Fukushima & 0.836 * & \(-\)0.05 & 1.72 \\ \hline Chiba vs. Nara & 1.000 * & \(-\)0.04 & 2.04 \\ \hline Fukushima vs. Hokkaido & 0.750 * & \(-\)0.04 & 1.54 \\ \hline Fukushima vs. Hyogo & \(-\)1.007 ** & \(-\)1.96 & \(-\)0.05 \\ \hline Fukushima vs. Kanagawa & \(-\)1.461 ** & \(-\)2.57 & \(-\)0.35 \\ \hline Fukushima vs. Kyoto & \(-\)1.271 ** & \(-\)2.46 & \(-\)0.09 \\ \hline Fukushima vs. Niigata & \(-\)1.270 ** & \(-\)2.51 & \(-\)0.03 \\ \hline Fukushima vs. Osaka & \(-\)1.092 ** & \(-\)2.09 & \(-\)0.09 \\ \hline Fukushima vs. Saitama & \(-\)1.286 *** & \(-\)2.06 & \(-\)0.51 \\ \hline Fukushima vs. Shiga & \(-\)1.415 ** & \(-\)2.51 & \(-\)0.32 \\ \hline Fukushima vs. Shizuoka & \(-\)1.160 ** & \(-\)2.08 & \(-\)0.23 \\ \hline Fukushima vs. Tochigi & \(-\)1.276 ** & \(-\)2.42 & \(-\)0.13 \\ \hline Fukushima vs. Tokyo & \(-\)1.410 *** & \(-\)2.31 & \(-\)0.51 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 1: _Cont._