# Design and Analysis of the Composite Stability Control of the Reflective Optoelectronic Platform
## 6 Limitation and Future Work  
This study has some limitations that need to be acknowledged, including (1) the study only considers error correction issues related to dynamics and current control loops, neglecting other crucial errors such as mechanical installation errors and gyroscope noise errors; (2) the study only focuses on correcting and compensating errors through control algorithms, without considering other methods such as error adaptive compensation; and (3) the validation conditions and experimental parameters used are relatively simple and ideal, which may differ from real-world engineering applications.  
Future research will primarily concentrate on enhancing accuracy in more complex and practical engineering applications, such as developing more precise error compensation methods to deal with carrier motion interference. Advanced techniques such as machine learning will be employed to construct error correction based on neural network adaptive models.  
Conceptualization, [PERSON] and [PERSON]; methodology, [PERSON]; software, [PERSON]; validation, [PERSON], [PERSON] and [PERSON]; formal analysis, [PERSON]; investigation, [PERSON]; resources, [PERSON]; data curation, [PERSON]; writing--original draft preparation, [PERSON]; writing--review and editing, [PERSON]; visualization, [PERSON]; supervision, [PERSON]; project administration, [PERSON]; funding acquisition, [PERSON] All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.  
This research was funded by the 66 th batch of general grants from the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation of the Military System under Grant No. 2019M664022.  
Not applicable.  
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c c c c} \hline \hline
**Error Range** & **Proposed** & \multirow{2}{*}{**ZPETC**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**XPC**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**OAK**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**HT**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**LA**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**BS**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**RS**} \\ (**urad) & & Method & & & & & & & & \\ \hline \multirow{8}{*}{Azimuth} & No.1 & 0.056 & 3.854 & 1.983 & 7.342 & 102.5 & 0.632 & 0.029 & 0.285 \\  & No.2 & 0.045 & 3.743 & 2.345 & 7.034 & 100.3 & 0.621 & 0.031 & 0.265 \\  & No.3 & 0.043 & 3.767 & 2.123 & 6.874 & 96.3 & 0.547 & 0.032 & 0.279 \\  & No.4 & 0.047 & 3.967 & 2.324 & 6.987 & 99.2 & 0.587 & 0.025 & 0.269 \\  & No.5 & 0.049 & 4.139 & 1.885 & 6.663 & 103.7 & 0.683 & 0.023 & 0.279 \\  & avg & 0.048 & 3.874 & 2.132 & 6.980 & 100.4 & 0.614 & 0.028 & 0.279 \\ \hline \multirow{8}{*}{Pitch} & No.1 & 0.054 & 3.564 & 2.234 & 3.322 & 135.3 & 0.643 & 0.065 & 0.348 \\  & No.2 & 0.053 & 3.521 & 2.145 & 3.435 & 136.3 & 0.623 & 0.066 & 0.356 \\ \cline{1-1}  & No.3 & 0.047 & 3.323 & 2.023 & 3.021 & 132.5 & 0.598 & 0.062 & 0.358 \\ \cline{1-1}  & No.4 & 0.045 & 3.412 & 1.987 & 3.123 & 132.8 & 0.599 & 0.061 & 0.338 \\ \cline{1-1}  & No.5 & 0.041 & 3.505 & 2.271 & 3.269 & 134.1 & 0.607 & 0.061 & 0.345 \\ \cline{1-1}  & avg & 0.048 & 3.465 & 2.132 & 3.234 & 134.2 & 0.614 & 0.063 & 0.349 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table}
Table 1: The stability precision of different methods under constant frequency disturbance.  
**Acknowledgments:** The authors would like to convey their sincere thanks to [PERSON] and [PERSON] from the School of Intelligence and Technology, National University of Defense Technology, and all the anonymous reviewers for their helpful suggestions on the quality improvement of our paper.  
**Conflicts of Interest:** The authors declare no conflict of interest.  
**Sample Availability:** Samples of the MATLAB Simulink models and the experimental data are available from the authors.