# Urban Heritage Facility Management: A Scoping Review
## 4 Results
### Overview of the Results
#### 4.2.7 Overall Outlook  
To summarize the overall result, a summary table was being developed to give a wider perspective on this study. Findings from the previous subsections were simplified into list of key points for each HUL step (Table 7). The total number of studies from every tool and step were added to give a side-to-side notion of this scoping review. It was evident that the \"reaching consensus\" and \"mapping resources\" steps were not as intensively studied as the other four critical steps of the HUL approach. The potential application of BIMs in the urban heritage facility management context is often discussed in every critical step of HUL, along with adaptive reuse, PPP/PPPP, and citizen awareness and participation.  
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{p{113.8 pt} p{22.8 pt} p{22.8 pt} p{22.8 pt} p{22.8 pt} p{22.8 pt} p{22.8 pt} p{22.8 pt} p{22.8 pt}} \hline \hline \multirow{2}{*}{**HUL Critical Steps**} & \multicolumn{4}{c}{**HUL Supporting Tools**} & \multicolumn{1}{p{22.8 pt}}{\(\Sigma\)} & \multicolumn{1}{p{22.8 pt}}{**Key Points**} \\ \cline{2-11}  & **CE** & **KP** & **RS** & **F** & & & & & & & \\ \hline \multirow{2}{*}{1. Mapping resources} & \multirow{2}{*}{6} & \multirow{2}{*}{10} & \multirow{2}{*}{2} & \multirow{2}{*}{2} & \multirow{2}{*}{2} & \multirow{2}{*}{20} & Mapping resources using BIM/H-BIM, Mapping the existing PPP/PPPP, Mapping the heritage property price and value. \\ \hline \multirow{2}{*}{2. Reaching consensus} & \multirow{2}{*}{6} & \multirow{2}{*}{3} & \multirow{2}{*}{2} & \multirow{2}{*}{1} & \multirow{2}{*}{12} & Citizen awareness, Consensus building, Collaborative Citizen engagement/participation, Education/developing knowledge, Interpretation of technical information. \\ \hline \multirow{2}{*}{3. Assessing vulnerabilities} & \multirow{2}{*}{5} & \multirow{2}{*}{18} & \multirow{2}{*}{9} & \multirow{2}{*}{1} & \multirow{2}{*}{33} & Coping with climate change, Monitoring the impact of urban development, Utility and maintenance assessment, Citizen satisfaction assessment, Urban heritage policy assessment using BIMs. \\ \hline \multirow{2}{*}{4. Integrating values \& vulnerabilities} & \multirow{2}{*}{7} & \multirow{2}{*}{20} & \multirow{2}{*}{3} & \multirow{2}{*}{3} & \multirow{2}{*}{33} & Improving human resources, Improving public participation, Improving health and well-being, BIM and AI to enhance efficiency, Heritage law and regulation improvement. \\ \hline \multirow{2}{*}{5. Prioritizing actions} & \multirow{2}{*}{3} & \multirow{2}{*}{15} & \multirow{2}{*}{7} & \multirow{2}{*}{3} & \multirow{2}{*}{28} & Maintaining the authenticity, Preserving cultural identity, Efficient service delivery from the authorities, Enhance physical and social well-being, Preventive maintenance, Analyptive reuse, Enabled BIM integration approach, Increasing citizen participation. \\ \hline \multirow{2}{*}{6. Establishing framework \& partnership} & \multirow{2}{*}{8} & \multirow{2}{*}{10} & \multirow{2}{*}{7} & \multirow{2}{*}{5} & \multirow{2}{*}{30} & Collaborative governance, Urban collaborative decisions, Digital information optimization, Adaptive reuse approach, PPP/PPPP schemes. \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table}
Table 7: Overall representation showing cross-cutting themes and concepts between urban FM and the HUL approach within the examined papers of scoping review, key points, and the number of studies on each HUL step.