## 5 Data Analysis and Results
### Descriptive Analysis
The highest item in the construct Information adoption (IA) was IA1, which asks the responders about the easiness to understand the topic through YouTube. The highest item in the construct \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c} \hline \hline
**Range** & **Level** \\ \hline
1–1.80 & very low \\ \hline
1.81–2.60 & low \\ \hline
2.61–3.40 & moderate \\ \hline
3.41–4.20 & high \\ \hline
4.21–5 & very high \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 2: Level lookup table of value and ranges. \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c} \hline \hline
**Type of Variable** & **Variables** & **Mean** & **SD** & **Level** & **Order** \\ \hline \multirow{4}{*}{Independent Variables} & Source Credibility (SC) & 4.1638 & 0.70222 & High & 4 \\ \cline{2-5}  & Information Language (IL) & 3.1055 & 0.48915 & Moderate & 5 \\ \cline{2-5}  & Intrinsic Information Quality (IIQ) & 4.1719 & 0.95858 & High & 3 \\ \cline{2-5}  & Contextual Information Quality (CIQ) & 4.2198 & 0.98594 & Very high & 2 \\ \cline{2-5}  & Accessibility Information Quality (AIQ) & 4.3102 & 0.82849 & Very high & 1 \\ \hline \multirow{4}{*}{\
\begin{tabular}{c} Mediating Variables \\ \end{tabular} } & Information Quality (IQ) & 4.1146 & 1.06993 & High & 3 \\ \cline{2-5}  & Information Usefulness (IU) & 4.2098 & 1.10506 & Very high & 1 \\ \cline{2-5}  & Information Adoption (IA) & 4.1634 & 1.07376 & High & 2 \\ \hline \multirow{2}{*}{
\begin{tabular}{c} Dependent Variable \\ \end{tabular} } & Academic Achievement (AA) & 4.1396 & 1.14964 & High & - \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 3: Overall mean and standard deviation of the study’s variables. academic achievement (AA) was AA1, which asked the responders about how useful. YouTube was to the student. \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c} \hline
**Source Credibility (SC)** & **Mean** & **SD** & **Level** & **Order** \\ \hline SC1: & 3.85 & 0.535 & High & 5 \\ \hline SC2: & 4.15 & 0.780 & High & 4 \\ \hline SC3: & 4.40 & 0.868 & Very high & 1 \\ \hline SC4: & 4.15 & 0.840 & High & 4 \\ \hline SC5: & 4.21 & 0.805 & Very high & 3 \\ \hline SC6: & 4.23 & 0.813 & Very high & 2 \\ \hline Information Language (IL) & Mean & SD & Level & Order \\ \hline IL1: & 3.08 & 0.491 & Moderate & 5 \\ \hline IL2: & 3.15 & 0.620 & Moderate & 4 \\ \hline IL3: & 3.71 & 1.035 & High & 1 \\ \hline IL4: & 2.42 & 0.741 & Low & 7 \\ \hline IL5: & 2.49 & 0.860 & Low & 6 \\ \hline IL6: & 3.70 & 0.627 & High & 2 \\ \hline IL7: & 3.19 & 0.586 & Moderate & 3 \\ \hline Intrinsic Information Quality (IIQ) & Mean & SD & Level & Order \\ \hline IIQ1: & 4.27 & 1.172 & Very high & 2 \\ \hline IIQ2: & 4.14 & 0.830 & High & 4 \\ \hline IIQ3: & 3.97 & 1.098 & High & 5 \\ \hline IIQ4: & 4.20 & 0.823 & High & 3 \\ \hline IIQ5: & 4.28 & 1.192 & Very high & 1 \\ \hline Contextual Information Quality (CIQ) & Mean & SD & Level & Order \\ \hline CIQ1: & 4.35 & 0.590 & Very high & 2 \\ \hline CIQ2: & 4.29 & 1.189 & Very high & 4 \\ \hline CIQ3: & 4.26 & 1.187 & Very high & 5 \\ \hline CIQ4: & 4.00 & 1.101 & High & 10 \\ \hline CIQ5: & 4.49 & 0.825 & Very high & 1 \\ \hline CIQ6: & 4.29 & 1.156 & Very high & 4 \\ \hline CIQ7: & 4.18 & 0.787 & High & 8 \\ \hline CIQ8: & 4.31 & 1.176 & Very high & 3 \\ \hline CIQ9: & 4.22 & 0.770 & Very high & 7 \\ \hline CIQ10: & 4.31 & 1.172 & Very high & 3 \\ \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 4: Mean and standard deviation of the study’s variables.