## 3 Results
#### Interictal Photophobia and Phonophobia  
Four participants of each group reported not to drive (n = 16), so they were not able to quantify the photophobia during this activity. Regarding the prevalence of interictal visual discomfort, the three migraine groups presented a higher prevalence than the control group for driving (x\({}^{2}\) = 8.99, df = 3, \(p\) = 0.031, ES = 0.29), looking at a bright screen (x\({}^{2}\) = 14.37, df = 3, \(p\) = 0.002, ES = 0.34), and performing social activities (x\({}^{2}\) = 16.83, df = 3, \(p\) = 0.001, ES = 0.37, Table 2). No difference was observed between the four groups on the prevalence of interictal photophobia for walking during a sunny day (x\({}^{2}\) = 6.00, df = 3, \(p\) = 0.13, Table 2). For the prevalence of interictal auditory discomfort, the three migraine groups presented a higher prevalence than the control group during social situations (x\({}^{2}\) = 24.30, df = 3, ES = 0.45, \(p\) < 0.001) and for hearing sounds in everyday situations (x\({}^{2}\) = 9.47, df = 3, ES = 0.28, \(p\) = 0.027, Table 2). A similar prevalence of interictal phonophobia was observed between the four groups for listening to conversations in noisy places (x\({}^{2}\) = 1.63, df = 3, \(p\) = 0.735) and for concentrating in noisy surroundings (x\({}^{2}\) = 2.67, df = 3, \(p\) = 0.542, Table 2). The data from the Likert scale showed differences between groups in the intensity of photophobia only for \"driving\" (F(3,75) = 2.92, \(p\) = 0.040, Table 3). In contrast to the control group, the three groups of migraine-sufferts reported higher intensity of interictal photophobia during that activity (MoA vs CG: \(p\) = 0.017, ES = 0.94; MA vs CG: \(p\) = 0.014, ES = 0.77; CM vs CG: \(p\) = 0.013, ES = 0.86; Table 3). Differences in the remaining between-group comparison were not verified (\(p\) < 0.05, Table 3). No differences between groups were observed for interictal photophobia for the following activities: \"looking at a bright screen\" (F(3,72) = 2.44, \(p\) = 0.072), \"social activities\" (F(3,53) = 1.52, \(p\) = 0.219), and \"walking during a sunny day\" (F(3,77) = 2.60, \(p\) = 0.058, Table 3). We observed differences between groups in the intensity of interictal phonophobia in all the activities assessed: \"social activities\" (F(3,85) = 4.70, \(p\) = 0.004), \"hearing sounds in everyday situations\" (F(3,75) = 6.08, \(p\) = 0.001), \"listening to conversations in noisy places\" (F(3106) = 7.26, \(p\) < 0.001), and \"concentrating in noisy surroundings\" (F(3108) = 3.62, \(p\) = 0.015, Table 3). Both groups, migraine with aura and chronic migraine groups, exhibited higher intensity of interictal phonophobia than the control group for performing social activities (MA vs. CG: \(p\) = 0.012, ES = 0.96; CM vs. CG: \(p\) = 0.002, ES = 1.11), hearing sounds in everyday situations (MA vs. CG: \(p\) < 0.0001, ES = 1.37; CM vs. CG: \(p\) = 0.002, ES = 1.24), and listening to conversations in noisy places (MA vs. CG: \(p\) = 0.001, ES = 0.94; CM vs. CG: \(p\) < 0.0001, ES = 1.19). The migraine with aura group also presented higher interictal phonophobia than the control group for concentrating in noisy surroundings (\(p\) = 0.001, ES = 0.91). In addition, higher phonophobia intensity was observed in the chronic migraine