## 3 Results
### Critical Test Scenario Selection Example Based on an Existing Vehicle
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c} \hline \hline
**Question** & **Answer** & \
\begin{tabular}{c} **Vector Parameter and** \\ **Value If Applicable** \\ \end{tabular} &
\begin{tabular}{c} **Weight If** \\ **Applicable** \\ \end{tabular} \\ \hline \multirow{3}{*}{**Planned maximum operational speed in**} & & Speed v \(\leq\) 30 = 0 & **0.25** \\  & & Speed 30 \(<\) v \(\leq\) 50 = 1 & **0.25** \\  & & Speed 50 \(<\) v \(\leq\) 100 = 0 & **0.25** \\  & & Speed v \(>\) 100 = 1 & **0.5** \\ \hline \multirow{3}{*}{Planned minimum operational speed in  km/h?} & \multirow{3}{*}{65} & & N/A \\  & & & \\ \hline
**Is the vehicle capable of keeping in the**  lane?** & Yes & Lane keeping = 1 & **1** \\ \hline
**Is the vehicle capable of maintaining a**  safe distance?** & Yes & Safe distance = 1 & **1** \\ \hline \multirow{3}{*}{**Is the vehicle capable of changing**  between lanes? If not, leave it empty.**} &
\begin{tabular}{c} **Yes, to avoid critical** \\ **situations and obstacles;** \\ **Yes, for overtaking** \\ \end{tabular} & Lane changing = 1 & 1 \\ \hline
**Turning (not equivalent with turning for**  lane keeping**). I.e., turning to leave the current road at junctions.** & No & Turning = 0 & **1** \\ \hline
**Handling of traffic rules and signs** (please select from the list below; if none of the options are applicable, please** & \
\begin{tabular}{c} Speed limits (e.g., \\ speed-limit signs or map \\ data), \\ \end{tabular} &
\begin{tabular}{c} **Handling of traffic signs** \\ **and rules = 1** \\ \end{tabular} & **0.4** \\  & **leave it empty.** & Lane markings & \\ \hline
**Handling of junctions (please select from the list below; if none of the options are applicable, please leave it empty).** & Empty &
\begin{tabular}{c} **Handling of** \\ **junctions = 0** \\ \end{tabular} & **0.5** \\ \hline
**Transportation of standing passengers?** & No & \
\begin{tabular}{c} **Relevant for standing** \\ **passengers = 0** \\ \end{tabular} & **0.5** \\ \hline \multirow{3}{*}{Type of supervision} &
\begin{tabular}{c} Safety operator with \\ longitudinal and lateral \\ control \\ \end{tabular} & N/A & N/A \\ \hline
**Capable of reversing in automated**  mode?** & No & Reversing = 0 & **0.5** \\ \hline
**Automated parking (please select from the list below; if none of the options are applicable, please leave it empty).** & \
\begin{tabular}{c} **Parking forward** \\ **perpendicular or angled,** \\ **parking backwards** \\ **perpendicular or angled,** \\ **parallel parking** \\ \end{tabular} & **Parking = 1** & **1** \\ \hline \multirow{3}{*}{Type of sensors for automated functions} &
\begin{tabular}{c} LiDAR, radar, camera, \\ ultrasonic \\ \end{tabular} & N/A & N/A \\ \cline{1-1} \cline{2-2}  & Is the deployment of the vehicle is  planned in left-hand traffic (LHT) or  right-hand traffic (RHT)? & LHT, RHT & N/A & N/A \\ \hline Please provide any additional information  about the vehicle that you think is  important for scenario catalogue  development. & Empty & N/A & N/A \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}  
Highlighted questions with bold text were used to create the vector necessary for filtering  
\end{table} 
Table 2: _Cont._the larger set provided by MD almost entirely contains the cases identified by ED in nearly all instances. Thus, we concluded that MD is preferable for creating a more comprehensive test case collection, while ED is better suited for higher-level overviews. If the threshold value is set to 1, it can be observed that 76 test runs are obtained for ED. After reviewing these cases based on professional expertise, a total of 13 cases were identified as not necessarily relevant for the given vehicle. As a result, over 80% of the test cases were deemed relevant.