## 3 Results
### Female PFP vs. Female Control
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c c c c c} \hline \hline  & \multicolumn{3}{c}{**Female Control**} & \multicolumn{3}{c}{**Female PFP**} & \multicolumn{3}{c}{**\(\boldsymbol{p}\boldsymbol{F}\)**} \\ \cline{2-11}  & **Mean** & _SD_ & _Mean_ & _SD_ & \(t\) & \(b\) & \(b\) (95\% _CD_)_ & \(p\) & **OR** & **OR (99\% _CD_)** \\ \hline \multirow{2}{*}{**Crowal plane**} & \multirow{2}{*}{Ankle angle at footrities (\({}^{\circ}\))} & \multirow{2}{*}{3.36} & \multirow{2}{*}{10.78} & \multirow{2}{*}{10.36} & \multirow{2}{*}{4.67} & \multirow{2}{*}{2.08} & \multirow{2}{*}{3.15} & \multirow{2}{*}{0.02-4.29} & \multirow{2}{*}{0.049} & \multirow{2}{*}{1.18} & \multirow{2}{*}{1 \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c c c c c} \hline  & \multicolumn{3}{c}{**Female Control**} & \multicolumn{3}{c}{**Female PFP**} & & \\ \cline{2-10}  & **Mean** & **SD** & **Mean** & **SD** & **t** & **b** & **b** (95\% CD)** & \(P\) & **OR** & **OR (95\% CD)** \\ \hline Patelefomeral impulse (BW-ms) & 655.07 & 192.48 & 817.74 & 125.04 & 2.51 & 74.88 & 14.18-135.59 & 0.017 & 1.01 & 1.00-1.02 \\ Peaklefomeral force (BW) & 6.13 & 1.79 & 7.31 & 1.08 & 2.13 & 0.58 & 0.02-11.14 & 0.041 & 1.73 & 1.01-29.98 \\ Peaklefomeral forces (Kra/BW) & 10.82 & 2.86 & 13.07 & 1.71 & 2.54 & 1.11 & 0.22-0.20 & 0.016 & 1.53 & 1.06-221 \\ Patelefomeral stress loading (Kra/BW/s) & 318.53 & 124.27 & 402.55 & 129.62 & 6.52 & 55.48 & 10.60-100.36 & 0.017 & 1.01 & 1.00-1.02 \\ Patelefomeral stress impulse (Kra/BW/ms) & 1205.92 & 314.27 & 1567.44 & 192.80 & 3.50 & 167.22 & 70.00-264.45 & 0.001 & 1.00 & 1.00-1.02 \\ Patelefomeral stress per male (BW) & 764.95 & 429.71 & 1116.67 & 361.68 & 2.64 & 203.77 & 50.07-357.46 & 0.01 & 1.01 & 1.00-1.02 \\ Vertical GRP impulse (BW-ms) & 309.02 & 34.06 & 354.18 & 37.04 & 31.7 & 20.13 & 7.21-33.06 & 0.003 & 1.04 & 1.01-1.07 \\ Strike index (\%) & 40.20 & 21.69 & 15.49 & 3.37 & 3.94 & 11.29 & 5.45-17.13 & \(p<0.001\) & 0.79 & 0.68-0.95 \\ \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 8: Joint loading and temporal indices in female PFP participants and controls. \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c c c c c} \hline  & \multicolumn{3}{c}{**Female Control**} & \multicolumn{3}{c}{**Female PFP**} & & \\ \cline{2-10}  & **Mean** & **SD** & **Mean** & **SD** & **t** & **b** & **b(95\% CD)** & \(P\) & **OR** & **OR (95\% CD)** \\ \hline Peak adultotor longs force (BW) & 0.75 & 0.41 & 0.51 & 0.24 & 2.07 & 0.13 & 0.06-0.16 & 0.043 & 0.21 & _0.01-0.97_ \\ Peak biceps femorts force (BW) & 0.80 & 0.23 & 1.01 & 0.28 & 2.52 & 0.12 & 0.02-0.21 & 0.017 & 55.52 & 1.47-2091.52 \\ Peak extensor hallucoles longve (BW) & 0.17 & 0.06 & 0.27 & 0.12 & 2.89 & 0.05 & 0.01-0.09 & 0.007 & 215.28 & 4.57-1034.5189.219 \\ Peak lateral gastrocnemius force (BW) & 0.81 & 0.24 & 1.02 & 0.18 & 2.59 & 0.10 & 0.02-0.18 & 0.014 & 199.27 & 21.6-1837.01 \\ Peak medial gastrocnemius force (BW) & 1.79 & 0.24 & 2.12 & 0.33 & 3.38 & 0.17 & 0.07-0.28 & 0.002 & 305.1 & 2.73-4322.81 \\ Peak pericous low force (BW) & 0.95 & 0.25 & 129 & 0.37 & 3.34 & 0.19 & 0.07-0.30 & 0.002 & 49.52 & 2.37-1035.09 \\ Posa major impulse (BW-ms) & 83.49 & 35.93 & 125.46 & 45.12 & 3.07 & 22.54 & _7.60-0.748_ & 0.004 & 1.03 & 1.00-10.06 \\ Roctus femorts impulse (BW-ms) & 117.08 & 49.13 & 195.94 & 49.2  
The control group comprised 7 rearfoot strikers, 6 midfoot strikers, and 2 forefoot strikers, whereas the female PFP group had 15 rearfoot strikers. The chi-squared test was significant (X\({}^{2}\) (2) = 11.05, \(p\) = 0.004), with statistically more rearfoot strikers in the female PFP group, and more mid- and forefoot strikers in the control group.