## 5 Implementation and Results
### Data Exploration
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c} \hline \hline
**Id** & **Artwork** & **Count** & **av Likes** & **Max Likes** & **Min Likes** & **Std Likes** \\ \hline
1 & Orange, Red, Yellow & 201 & 469.52 & 2241 & 0 & 472.50 \\
2 & The Gates of the Hell & 209 & 50.22 & 624 & 1 & 87.54 \\
3 & IKB-191 & 389 & 133.41 & 4046 & 0 & 370.65 \\
4 & Tower & 66 & 150.00 & 891 & 11 & 274.57 \\
5 & Solid Sky & 124 & 224.86 & 6925 & 3 & 795.89 \\
6 & Water Tower & 130 & 69.20 & 2062 & 1 & 222.19 \\
7 & Angel of the North & 110 & 92.68 & 1761 & 2 & 246.96 \\
8 & Maman & 391 & 102.47 & 1817 & 2 & 184.41 \\
9 & Cloud Gate & 233 & 55.24 & 1279 & 0 & 106.88 \\
10 & Waiting for the & 101 & 299.43 & 4966 & 7 & 861.66 \\
11 & Melting House & 72 & 53.43 & 193 & 2 & 53.58 \\
12 & The London Mastaba & 212 & 85.44 & 586 & 2 & 87.52 \\
13 & ParaPivot & 108 & 154.04 & 3335 & 4 & 397.95 \\
14 & Illuminated River & 116 & 127.30 & 2129 & 1 & 290.09 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 4: Statistical description of the likes feature of the non-controversial artwork’s dataset. \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c} \hline \hline
**ID** & **Artwork** & **Count** & **av** & **Max** & **Min** & **Std** \\  & & & **Comments** & **Comm** & **Comm** & **Comm** \\ \hline
1 & Artist’s Shift & 352 & 16.34 & 199 & 0 & 29.7 \\
2 & Fountain & 300 & 4.81 & 48 & 0 & 8.10 \\
3 & Campbell’s Soup Cans & 579 & 13.81 & 303 & 0 & 31.14 \\
4 & Piss Christ & 133 & 19.54 & 202 & 0 & 35.47 \\
5 & Ballon Dog Blue & 426 & 15.42 & 202 & 0 & 28.11 \\
6 & My bed & 160 & 75.52 & 102 & 0 & 16.94 \\
7 & Traffic Light Tree & 214 & 8.08 & 41 & 0 & 7.85 \\
8 & La Nona Ora & 278 & 2.54 & 42 & 0 & 5.30 \\
9 & Sylvie & 145 & 2.33 & 26 & 0 & 4.23 \\
10 & Forever Marylin & 265 & 13.77 & 193 & 0 & 31.58 \\
11 & Tree & 128 & 8.63 & 102 & 0 & 15.39 \\
12 & Girl with Balloon/Love & 237 & 24.99 & 321 & 0 & 47.97 \\  & is in the bin & & & & \\
13 & Comedian & 299 & 18.63 & 321 & 1 & 37.41 \\
14 & Rebel Without a Cock & 146 & 9.88 & 121 & 0 & 16.99 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 3: Statistical description of the comments feature of the controversial artwork’s dataset. values for each non-controversial artwork, and the standard deviation. According to the data, the minimum number of comments is 0 and the maximum number of comments related to the artwork IKB-191 is 335. As shown in the preceding table, the percentage of comments for the subsequent works of art is significantly lower. RQ1. What is the popularity of controversial artworks? Considering the data structure and context, an additional ranking study was conducted to determine the most popular controversial and non-controversial works of art. This research query relates to controversial works of art. Due to the size of the sample and the number of discovered artworks, multiple datasets were produced to conduct the ranking experiment. Given the general technical limitations for data searching and downloading, a standard sample size (\(N=3662\)) of controversial Instagram artworks was obtained. The dataset contained nine columns: ID, comments (count of comments per post), likes (count of likes per post), saved to collection (if the users saved the post to their Instagram account's private collection), media type (if the post is a feed, the carousel may contain up to ten photos or videos, which is the maximum number), media count (the number of photos or videos if the post is a carousel), has more comments (if the specific post has the most comments). In all datasets, approximately 80% (11 groups) were designated for training, whereas the remaining 20% (3 groups) were designated for validation testing, as it was desirable to include all posts from the same group. All the selected artworks were included in a testing set to determine their rating scores, despite the fact that the number of artworks is relatively small due to the previously described constraints.