## 4 Test Experiments and Discussion of DMMAEO
### Comparative Analysis Between DMMAEO and Other Algorithms
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{r c c c c c c c} \hline \hline \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Function**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**EO**} & **PSO** & **GWO** & **HHO** & **SMA** \\ \hline \multirow{10}{*}{Composition} & TF24 & Ave. & \(6.333\times 10^{1}\) & \(1.383\times 10^{2}\) & \(8.685\times 10^{1}\) & \(1.253\times 10^{2}\) & \(7.000\times 10^{1}\) \\  & & Std. & \(4.901\times 10^{1}\) & \(4.377\times 10^{1}\) & \(7.702\times 10^{1}\) & \(5.139\times 10^{1}\) & \(8.769\times 10^{1}\) \\  & TF25 & Ave. & \(1.323\times 10^{2}\) & \(2.026\times 10^{2}\) & \(1.764\times 10^{2}\) & \(1.866\times 10^{2}\) & \(3.650\times 10^{1}\) \\  & & Std. & \(5.273\times 10^{1}\) & \(5.567\times 10^{1}\) & \(3.128\times 10^{1}\) & \(5.661\times 10^{1}\) & \(2.381\times 10^{1}\) \\  & TF26 & Ave. & \(1.709\times 10^{2}\) & \(3.384\times 10^{2}\) & \(2.397\times 10^{2}\) & \(5.612\times 10^{2}\) & \(2.115\times 10^{2}\) \\  & & Std. & \(2.317\times 10^{1}\) & \(1.171\times 10^{1}\) & \(8.298\times 10^{1}\) & \(1.556\times 10^{2}\) & \(4.982\times 10^{1}\) \\  & TF27 & Ave. & \(4.136\times 10^{2}\) & \(5.651\times 10^{2}\) & \(4.306\times 10^{2}\) & \(7.326\times 10^{2}\) & \(3.740\times 10^{2}\) \\  & & Std. & \(1.294\times 10^{2}\) & \(1.451\times 10^{2}\) & \(1.116\times 10^{2}\) & \(1.625\times 10^{2}\) & \(7.542\times 10^{1}\) \\  & TF28 & Ave. & \(6.224\times 10^{1}\) & \(1.637\times 10^{2}\) & \(1.379\times 10^{2}\) & \(1.518\times 10^{2}\) & \(6.624\times 10^{1}\) \\  & & Std. & \(4.801\times 10^{1}\) & \(1.136\times 10^{2}\) & \(7.330\times 10^{1}\) & \(1.197\times 10^{2}\) & \(8.694\times 10^{1}\) \\  & TF29 & Ave. & \(8.658\times 10^{2}\) & \(9.026\times 10^{2}\) & \(8.870\times 10^{2}\) & \(8.969\times 10^{2}\) & \(6.682\times 10^{2}\) \\  & & Std. & \(1.036\times 10^{2}\) & \(2.120\times 10^{-1}\) & \(7.296\times 10^{1}\) & \(1.702\times 10^{1}\) & \(1.840\times 10^{2}\) \\ \hline \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Function**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**MPSO**} & **MELGWO** & **LWMEO** & **EBOwithCMAR** & **DMMAEO** \\ \hline \multirow{10}{*}{CEC2017} & TF30 & Ave. & \(5.667\times 10^{1}\) & \(5.004\times 10^{1}\) & \(2.006\times 10^{1}\) & \(4.667\times 10^{1}\) & \(3.333\times 10^{10}\) \\  & Std. & \(5.040\times 10^{1}\) & \(5.081\times 10^{1}\) & \(4.065\times 10^{1}\) & \(6.288\times 10^{1}\) & \(1.826\times 10^{1}\) \\  & TF25 & Ave. & \(1.878\times 10^{2}\) & \(9.951\times 10^{1}\) & \(1.377\times 10^{2}\) & \(1.435\times 10^{2}\) & \(3.178\times 10^{1}\) \\  & Std. & \(5.345\times 10^{1}\) & \(5.122\times 10^{1}\) & \(7.481\times 10^{1}\) & \(5.605\times 10^{1}\) & \(4.033\times 10^{1}\) \\  & TF26 & Ave. & \(1.622\times 10^{2}\) & \(2.168\times 10^{2}\) & \(3.535\times 10^{2}\) & \(1.493\times 10^{2}\) & \(1.825\times 10^{2}\) \\  & Std. & \(2.020\times 10^{1}\) & \(4.135\times 10^{1}\) & \(8.060\times 10^{1}\) & \(2.095\times 10^{1}\) & \(4.571\times 10^{1}\) \\  & TF27 & Ave. & \(3.896\times 10^{2}\) & \(3.685\times 10^{2}\) & \(5.224\times 10^{2}\) & \(3.344\times 10^{2}\) & \(3.649\times 10^{2}\) \\  & Std. & \(8.975\times 10^{1}\) & \(3.922\times 10^{1}\) & \(6.336\times 10^{1}\) & \(1.108\times 10^{1}\) & \(1.072\times 10^{2}\) \\  & TF28 & Ave. & \(5.268\times 10^{1}\) & \(4.791\times 10^{1}\) & \(8.727\times 10^{1}\) & \(4.488\times 10^{1}\) & \(9.407\times 10^{1}\) \\  & Std. & \(4.718\times 10^{1}\) & \(4.301\times 10^{1}\) & \(5.894\times 10^{1}\) & \(4.961\times 10^{1}\) & \(1.800\times 10^{1}\) \\  & TF29 & Ave. & \(9.024\times 10^{2}\) & \(8.164\times 10^{2}\) & \(7.817\times 10^{2}\) & \(8.286\times 10^{2}\) & \(8.036\times 10^{2}\) \\  & Std. & \(9.790\times 10^{2}\) & \(1.610\times 10^{2}\) & \(1.742\times 10^{2}\) & \(1.513\times 10^{2}\) & \(1.709\times 10^{2}\) \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 10: Results for DMMAEO and several recent promising algorithms across composition test functions.