## 3 Results and Discussion
### Determination of judgment Values for Standard and Test Samples
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c} \hline \hline \multirow{2}{*}{**No.**} & **Judgment** & \begin{tabular}{c} **Marker** \\ **Value** \\ \end{tabular} & \begin{tabular}{c} **Marker** \\ **1** \\ \end{tabular} & \begin{tabular}{c} **Marker** \\ **2** \\ \end{tabular} & \begin{tabular}{c} **Marker** \\ **3** \\ \end{tabular} & \begin{tabular}{c} **Marker** \\ **4** \\ \end{tabular} & \begin{tabular}{c} **Marker** \\ **5** \\ \end{tabular} & \begin{tabular}{c} **Marker** \\ **6** \\ \end{tabular} & \begin{tabular}{c} **Marker** \\ **7** \\ \end{tabular} & \begin{tabular}{c} **Marker** \\ **8** \\ \end{tabular} & \begin{tabular}{c} **Marker** \\ **9** \\ \end{tabular} & \begin{tabular}{c} **Marker** \\ **10** \\ \end{tabular} & \
\begin{tabular}{c} **Marker** \\ **11** \\ \end{tabular} &
\begin{tabular}{c} **Marker** \\ **Sample** \\ \end{tabular} & **Note** \\ \hline
1 & 245 & 1 & & & & & & & & & & & & \\ \hline
2 & 247 & 1 & & & & & & & & & & & \\ \hline
3 & 253 & 1 & & & & & & & & & & & \\ \hline
4 & 429 & 1 & & & & & & & & & & & \\ \hline
5 & 447 & 1 & & & & & & & & & & & \\ \hline
6 & 493 & 1 & & & & & & & & & & & \\ \hline
7 & 495 & 1 & & & & & & & & & & & \\ \hline
8 & 541 & 1 & & & & & & & & & & & \\ \hline
9 & 573 & 1 & & & & & & & & & & & \\ \hline
10 & 601 & 1 & & & & & & & & & & \\ \hline
11 & 671 * & 1 & & & & & & & & & & & \\ \hline
12 & 701 & 1 & & & & & & & & & & \\ \hline
13 & 703 & 1 & & 2 & & & & & & & & \\ \hline
14 & 733 & 1 & & & & & & & & & & \\ \hline
15 & 735 & 1 & & 2 & & & & & & & & \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 4: Discrimination table of imported soybeans using judgment values of \(11\) markers for soybean origin. \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c c c c c} \hline \hline \multirow{2}{*}{**No.**} & **Judgment** & \begin{tabular}{c} **Marker** \\ **1** \\ \end{tabular} & \begin{tabular}{c} **Marker** \\ **2** \\ \end{tabular} & \begin{tabular}{c} **Marker** \\ **3** \\ \end{tabular} & \begin{tabular}{c} **Marker** \\ **4** \\ \end{tabular} & \begin{tabular}{c} **Marker** \\ **5** \\ \end{tabular} & \begin{tabular}{c} **Marker** \\ **6** \\ \end{tabular} & \begin{tabular}{c} **Marker** \\ **7** \\ \end{tabular} & \begin{tabular}{c} **Marker** \\ **8** \\ \end{tabular} & \begin{tabular}{c} **Marker** \\ **9** \\ \end{tabular} & \begin{tabular}{c} **Marker** \\ **10** \\ \end{tabular} & \
\begin{tabular}{c} **Marker** \\ **11** \\ \end{tabular} &
\begin{tabular}{c} **Marker** \\ **Sample** \\ \end{tabular} & **Note** \\ \hline
21 & 827 & 1 & 2 & & 8 & 16 & 32 & & & 256 & 512 & 16 & Nampung \\ \hline
22 & 879 & 1 & 2 & 4 & 8 & & & & 256 & 512 & 21 & Dapeung \\ \hline
23 & 937 & 1 & & & & & & & & & & \\ \hline
24 & 939 & 1 & 2 & & 8 & & & 32 & & 128 & 256 & 512 & 16 & \\ \hline
25 & 1041 & 1 & & & & & & & & & & & & \\ \hline
26 & 1045 & 1 & & & & & & & & & & & \\ \hline
27 & 1047 & 1 & 2 & 4 & & & 16 & & & & & & \\ \hline
28 & 1049 & 1 & & & & 8 & 16 & & & & & & \\ \hline
29 & 1077 & 1 & & & & & & & & & & & \\ \hline
30 & 1079 & 1 & 2 & 4 & & 16 & 32 & & & & 1024 & 1 \\ \hline
31 & 1171 & 1 & 2 & & & & & & & & & 1024 & 6 \\ \hline
32 & 1175 & 1 & 2 & 4 & & 16 & & & & & & \\ \hline
33 & 1183 * & 1 & 2 & & & 8 & 16 & & 128 & 1024 & 8 & \\ \hline
34 & 1203 & 1 & 2 & & & & 16 & 32 & 128 & 1024 & 3 & Cheongla1 \\ \hline
35 & 1207 & 1 & 2 & 4 & & 16 & 32 & 128 & 1024 & 8 & \\ \hline
36 & 1215* & 1 & 2 & 4 & 8 & 16 & 32 & 128 & 1024 & 11 & Pungsamsamul \\ \hline  
& & & 16 & & 128 & 512 & 1024 & 1 & \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 3: _Cont._  
The aim of this study was to discriminate the origin of soybeans based on the variation of judgment values between domestic and imported varieties rather than accurately identify the variety of soybeans. For the two domestic varieties that could not be discriminated in the standard samples, the judgment value (655) did not overlap with the judgment values of imported soybeans.