# A Distributed Energy-Throughput Efficient Cross-Layer Framework Using Hybrid Optimization Algorithm
## 4 Performance Evaluation
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c c c} \hline \hline
**Distance [m]** & **1 m** & **2 m** & **3 m** & **4 m** & **5 m** & **6 m** & **9 m** & **12 m** & **15 m** \\ \hline Centralized Cross-layer & 1680 & 1680 & 1680 & 1680 & 1110.8 & 980 & 320 & 440 & 290 \\ \hline DEAP & 1730 & 1730 & 1730 & 1730 & 1140 & 1070 & 1070 & 1070 & 292 \\ \hline BPSK; No FEC & 215 & 215 & 215 & 215 & 215 & 215 & 215 & 215 & 70 \\ \hline BFSK; BCH (63,57,1) & 192 & 192 & 192 & 192 & 192 & 192 & 192 & 192 & 50 \\ \hline DECN-MI Comm & 1780 & 1780 & 1780 & 1780 & 1280 & 1140 & 1140 & 1110 & 410 \\ \hline DECN-MI Waveguide & 1800 & 1800 & 1800 & 1800 & 1800 & 1480 & 1270 & 1270 & 440 \\ \hline DECEN-MI Comm & 1790 & 1790 & 1790 & 1790 & 1310 & 1180 & 1180 & 1100 & 430 \\ \hline DECEN-MI Waveguide & 1810 & 1810 & 1810 & 1810 & 1810 & 1520 & 1290 & 1280 & 445 \\ \hline DECEN-MI WG 3D coils & 1820 & 1820 & 1820 & 1820 & 1820 & 1530 & 1350 & 1290 & 450 \\ \hline DECMN-MI Comm & 1790 & 1790 & 1790 & 1800 & 1320 & 1210 & 1180 & 1100 & 435 \\ \hline DECMN-MI Waveguide & 1810 & 1810 & 1810 & 1820 & 1830 & 1540 & 1290 & 1280 & 445 \\ \hline DECMN-MI WG 3D coils & 1820 & 1820 & 1820 & 1825 & 1840 & 1550 & 1350 & 1290 & 455 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 4: Comparison results for average bit rate (bits/s) as a function of distance (m). \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c} \hline \hline
**Number of Sensors** & **10** & **20** & **30** & **40** & **50** \\ \hline GEO & 460 & 455 & 418 & 413 & 385 \\ \hline TPL & 282 & 250 & 200 & 185 & 165 \\ \hline DEAP & 108.72 & 93.48 & 92.6 & 92.1 & 91.56 \\ \hline DECN-MI Comm & 97.72 & 87.48 & 85.6 & 85.1 & 85.56 \\ \hline DECN-MI Waveguide & 102.72 & 89.48 & 88.6 & 88.1 & 88.16 \\ \hline DECN-MI Comm & 95.92 & 85.68 & 83.6 & 83.1 & 83.56 \\ \hline DECEN-MI Waveguide & 101.32 & 88.08 & 87.8 & 87.2 & 87.1 \\ \hline DECEN-MI Waveguide & 101.32 & 88.08 & 87.8 & 87.2 & 87.1 \\ \hline DECEN-MI WG 3D coils & 103.92 & 90.88 & 89.8 & 89.3 & 89.4 \\ \hline DECNN-MI WG 3D coils & 103.74 & 90.82 & 89.59 & 89.12 & 88.92 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 6: Comparison results of normalized received packet rate (pkt/s) with the varying numbers of sensors. \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c} \hline \hline
**Metric** & **Mean** & **Std** & _p-_Rank** & **f-Rank** \\ \hline Centralized Cross-layer & \(5.21\times 10^{1}\) & \(1.13\times 10^{1}\) & \(-\) & 12 \\ \hline DEAP & \(2.71\times 10^{1}\) & \(3.52\times 10^{0}\) & \(-\) & 11 \\ \hline BPSK; No FEC & \(2.55\times 10^{1}\) & \(1.54\times 10^{0}\) & \(-\) & 10 \\ \hline BFSK; BCH (63,57,1) & \(1.69\times 10^{1}\) & \(1.41\times 10^{0}\) & \(-\) & 9 \\ \hline DECN-MI Comm & \(5.12\times 10^{0}\) & \(2.96\times 10^{0}\) & \(-\) & 7 \\ \hline DECN-MI Waveguide & \(5.19\times 10^{0}\) & \(1.17\times 10^{0}\) & \(-\) & 8 \\ \hline DECEN-MI Comm & \(4.21\times 10^{0}\) & \(7.57\times 10^{-1}\) & \(-\) & 4 \\ \hline DECEN-MI Waveguide & \(4.31\times 10^{2}\) & \(8.13\times 10^{-1}\) & \(-\) & 5 \\ \hline DECEN-MI WG 3D coils & \(4.55\times 10^{0}\) & \(9.75\times 10^{-1}\) & \(-\) & 6 \\ \hline DECMN-MI Comm & \(3.69\times 10^{0}\) & \(1.33\times 10^{-2}\) & \(+\) & 1 \\ \hline DECMN-MI Waveguide & \(4.12\times 10^{0}\) & \(1.37\times 10^{-2}\) & \(+\) & 2 \\ \hline DECMN-MI WG 3D coils & \(4.19\times 10^{0}\) & \(1.57\times 10^{-2}\) & \(+\) & 3 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 7: Statistical results for USWN problem.