The \"soda straw\" or \"keyhole effect\" can lead to issues with landmark recognition ([PERSON] and [PERSON] (2000) [40], distance and depth judgments ([PERSON] and [PERSON] (1998) [41], and an impaired ability to detect targets or obstacles ([PERSON] and [PERSON] (2003) [33]. According to [PERSON] and [PERSON] (1998) [35], wider FOVs are useful for maintaining spatial orientation concerning terrain features, ease of operation in off-road driving tasks, and performance in unfamiliar terrain. Moreover, an increase in the number of cameras aided operators in achieving higher efficiency of navigation, according to [PERSON] et al. (2005) [42]. A similar problem was discussed by [PERSON] et al. (2006) [43]. They studied the effectiveness of teleoperations in urban search and rescue missions. They found that the overhead camera produced a mean time about 10% faster vs. the forward-looking camera, and operators used the overhead camera more than the forward camera. The use of two cameras (front and rear) has not significantly reduced the number of collisions because although both windows are displayed, the user is still focused on the primary video window, missing things in the rear camera view. Simultaneous tracking of images from two cameras showing images from different perspectives was not effective; the operator focused on the image from one camera. The test participants considered the use of PTZ cameras to be a significant advantage, but the disadvantage of the solution was the lack of ability to observe the driving wheels and their immediate surroundings. Another method of improving situation awareness while reducing video transmission was studied by [PERSON] (2005) [44]. To improve the efficiency of teleoperations, he used a head-mounted display (HMD) to obtain immersive viewing, which enabled panoramic viewing by turning the operator's head. A camera with a catadioptric lens provided the panoramic image (360\({}^{\circ}\)), which, after transformation into a six-side cube format, was sent to the HMD based on the operator's head position. The system provided low latency in the image acquisition system, but the low effective image resolution of 320 \(\times\) 240 pixels limited the ability to recognize details, and the small FOV of glasses (HMD) worsened the situation of awareness and turned out to be ineffective. [PERSON] et al. (2009) [45] conducted a study on the ability to follow difficult paths using PT camera settings at low altitude and tilt down 1.5\({}^{\circ}\), at medium altitude and tilt down 29\({}^{\circ}\), and at high altitude with tilt down 45\({}^{\circ}\). As a result of the research, it has been found that the higher position of the camera and its greater inclination deteriorate the perception of the perspective and extend the task completion time by about 20%. The possibility of camera control hurts the amount of time needed to complete the task. [PERSON] and [PERSON] (2008) [46] have studied a system of active PTZ camera control with head movements and HMD display. During the search and detection tasks, the operators felt very comfortable, and, depending on the difficulty of the task, the system improved mission performance between 200% and 400%. But quick slalom tests showed that for experienced operators using fixed cameras, the driving times were reduced by approx. 5%. The system enhanced the performance of only inexperienced operators. Moreover, in the course of research, it was found that to improve situation awareness, it is advisable to use additional cameras, which will provide a panoramic view in the window at the top of the screen. Similar effects of limited usability of PT cameras (Pan-Tilt) have been observed by [PERSON] et al. (2017) [47]. The study revealed a decrease in the use of pan-tilt mechanisms as operators gained experience. [PERSON] et al. (2015) [48] studied the impact of increasing the viewing angle on the effectiveness of teleportation with limited video transmission. The robot was equipped with two cameras.