"{\"id\": \"287392\", \"name\": \"STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, vs. CARLTON H. SCRANTON, Defendant\", \"name_abbreviation\": \"State v. Scranton\", \"decision_date\": \"2002-11-14\", \"docket_number\": \"No. ADC-2001-242\", \"first_page\": \"76\", \"last_page\": \"77\", \"citations\": \"313 Mont. 76\", \"volume\": \"313\", \"reporter\": \"Montana Reports\", \"court\": \"Montana Supreme Court\", \"jurisdiction\": \"Montana\", \"last_updated\": \"2021-08-10T22:33:17.630659+00:00\", \"provenance\": \"CAP\", \"judges\": \"\", \"parties\": \"STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, vs. CARLTON H. SCRANTON, Defendant.\", \"head_matter\": \"From: The District Court of the 1st Judicial District. County of Lewis and Clark.\\nSTATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, vs. CARLTON H. SCRANTON, Defendant.\\nNo. ADC-2001-242 Decision\", \"word_count\": \"275\", \"char_count\": \"1699\", \"text\": \"On July 3, 2002, the defendant was sentenced to fifteen (15) years in the Montana State Prison, with five (5) years suspended, for Assault with a Weapon, a felony.\\nOn November 14, 2002, the defendant's application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.\\nThe defendant was present and was represented by Randi Hood. The state was not represented.\\nBefore hearing the application, the defendant was advised that the Sentence Review Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also increase it. The defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Sentence Review Division. The defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to proceed.\\nRule 17 of the Rules of the Sentence Review Division of the Supreme Court of Montana provides that \\\"the sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct, and the sentence will not be reduced or increased unless itis deemed clearly inadequate or excessive.\\\" (\\u00a746-18-904(3), MCA).\\nThe Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to hold that the sentence imposed by the District Court is inadequate or excessive.\\nTherefore, it is the unanimous decision of the Sentence Review Division that the sentence shall be affirmed.\\nDone in open Court this 14th day of November, 2002.\\nDATED this 11th day of December, 2002.\\nChairman, Hon. David Cybulski; Member, Hon. Katherine R. Curtis and Member, Hon. Marc Buyske.\"}"