Annual Report (Form 10-K), fiscal year 1994





ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
In the opinion of Robert B. Terry, Vice President and General Counsel of Farmland, there is no litigation existing or pending against Farmland, or any of its subsidiaries, which if determined adversely, would have a material adverse effect on the financial position of the Company, and with respect to income tax matters as explained in note 7 of the notes to consolidated financial statements, he has no knowledge which would result in a different conclusion than the opinion of special tax counsel to the Company which is cited in note 7 of the notes to consolidated financial statements.
The Company is involved in two environmental regulatory matters with the government involving potential monetary sanctions as follows:
1) The Company is a party to an administrative enforcement action brought by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA") which alleges violations of the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act and the release reporting requirements of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, as amended, at its Coffeyville, Kansas refinery. This action involves alleged violations of release reporting requirements and seeks a civil fine in the amount of $350,000.
2) The Company is a party to an administrative enforcement action brought by the EPA which alleges violations of the Resource Conservation Recovery Act of 1976, as amended, at its Coffeyville, Kansas refinery. In this action, the government has proposed a civil penalty in the amount of $1,365,000.
ITEM 4.

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
No matter was submitted during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year covered by this report to a vote of security holders, through the solicitation of proxies or otherwise.
PART II
ITEM 5.

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
There is no established public market for the common stock, associate member common stock and capital credits of Farmland. In view of the following, it is unlikely in the foreseeable future that a public market for these equities will develop:
1) the common stock, associate member common stock and capital credits are nondividend bearing;
2) the right of any holder of common stock, associate member common stock and capital credits to receive patronage refunds (including any cash patronage refunds) from Farmland is dependent on whether the holder is an eligible member or associate member of Farmland or is a party to a currently effective patronage refund agreement with Farmland. See "Business and Properties, the Company, 'Voting Members' and 'Associate Members'";
3) the amount of patronage refunds (including any cash patronage refunds) a holder, eligible to receive patronage refunds, may receive is dependent on the net income of Farmland which is attributable to the quantity or value of business such holder transacts with Farmland and the amount by which a holder's investment in Farmland varies from such holder's base capital requirement. See "Patronage Refunds and Distribution of Net Income," and
4) Farmland intends to redeem its equities only in accordance with provisions of its equity redemption plans which provisions are determined by the Farmland Board of Directors at its sole discretion. See "Equity Redemption Plans."
There are approximately 2,570 holders of common stock, 275 holders of associate member common stock, and 9,835 holders of capital credits based upon the number of recordholders.
ITEM 6.

ITEM 6. SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
(1) On July 28, 1983, Farmland sold the stock of Terra Resources, Inc. ("Terra"), a wholly-owned subsidiary engaged in oil and gas exploration and production operations, and exited its oil and gas exploration and production activities. The gain from the sale of Terra amounted to $237,200,000 for tax reporting purposes. During 1983, and prior to the sale of the Terra stock, Farmland received certain distributions from Terra totaling $24,800,000. For tax purposes, Farmland claimed intercorporate dividends-received deductions for the entire amount of such distributions.
On March 24, 1993, the Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") issued a statutory notice to Farmland asserting deficiencies in federal income taxes (exclusive of statutory interest thereon) in the aggregate amount of $70,775,000. The asserted deficiencies relate primarily to the Company's tax treatment of the sale of the Terra stock and the distributions received from Terra prior to the sale. The IRS asserts that Farmland incorrectly treated the Terra sale gain as income against which certain patronage-sourced operating losses could be offset, and that, as a nonexempt cooperative, Farmland was not entitled to an intercorporate dividends-received deduction in respect of the 1983 distribution by Terra. It further asserts that Farmland incorrectly characterized gains for tax purposes aggregating approximately $14,600,000, and a loss of approximately $2,300,000, from the disposition of certain other assets. On June 11, 1993, Farmland filed a petition in the United States Tax Court contesting the asserted deficiencies in their entirety. Discovery and other pre-trial phases of the litigation have since been ongoing. The case is scheduled for trial on March 6, 1995.
If the IRS ultimately prevails on all of the adjustments asserted in the statutory notice, Farmland would have additional federal and state income tax liabilities aggregating approximately $85,800,000 plus accumulating statutory interest thereon through October 31, 1994, of approximately $154,900,000 (before tax benefits of the interest deduction). In addition, such adjustments would affect the computation of Farmland's taxable income for its 1989 tax year and, as a result, could increase Farmland's federal and state income taxes for that year by approximately $5,000,000 plus applicable statutory interest thereon.
No provision has been made in the consolidated financial statements for federal or state income taxes (or interest thereon) in respect of the IRS claims described above. Farmland believes that it has meritorious positions with respect to all of these claims and will continue to vigorously pursue their favorable resolution through the pending litigation.
In the opinion of Bryan Cave, Farmland's special tax counsel, it is more likely than not that the courts will ultimately conclude that (i) Farmland's treatment of the Terra sale gain was substantially, if not entirely, correct; and (ii) Farmland properly claimed a dividends-received deduction in respect of the 1983 distributions which it received from Terra prior to the sale of the Terra stock. Counsel has further advised, however, that none of the issues involved in these disputes is free from doubt, and that there can be no assurance that the courts will ultimately rule in favor of Farmland on any of these issues.
Should the IRS ultimately prevail on all of its asserted claims, all claimed federal and state income taxes as well as accrued interest would become immediately due and payable, and would be charged to current operations. In such case, the Company would be required to renegotiate agreements with its banks to maintain compliance with various requirements of such agreements, including working capital and funded indebtedness provisions. However, no assurance can be given that such renegotiation would be successful. Alternatives could include other financing arrangements or the possible sale of assets.
(2) During the year ended August 31, 1991, the Company changed its method for inventory pricing of certain petroleum inventories from the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method previously used to the last-in, first-out (LIFO) method because the LIFO method better matches current costs with current revenues. Pro forma effects of retroactive application of the LIFO method are not determinable.
(3) Effective June 30, 1992, the Company acquired the grain marketing assets of Union Equity. See "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and note 2 of the notes to consolidated financial statements.
(4) During 1993, Farmland obtained a 58% interest in NBPC, a limited liability company. Effective April 15, 1993, NBPC acquired Idle Wild Food's beef packing plant and feed lot located in Liberal, Kansas. See "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and note 2 of the notes to consolidated financial statements.
(5) On August 30, 1993, Farmland reduced its ownership interest in The Cooperative Finance Association, Inc. ("CFA") to 49%. In addition, CFA purchased the assets and operations of Farmland Financial Services Company. Effective December 1, 1993, CFA owners approved a recapitalization plan which limits the voting rights of any owner (including Farmland) to 20% or less regardless of the number of voting shares held. Accordingly, CFA is not a subsidiary of Farmland at August 31, 1993 and Farmland is no longer engaged in commercial lending operations.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FINANCIAL CONDITION, LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
The Company maintains two primary sources for debt capital: a continuous public offering of its debt securities and bank lines of credit.
The Company's debt securities are offered through a wholly-owned broker/dealer subsidiary on a best-efforts basis. The types of securities offered include certificates payable on demand and five-, ten- and twenty-year subordinated debt certificates. The total amount of such debt outstanding and the flow of funds to, or from, the Company as a result of this public offering is influenced by the rate of interest which Farmland establishes for each type of debt certificate offered and by options of Farmland to call for redemption certain of its outstanding debt certificates. During 1994, the outstanding balance of demand loan and subordinated debt certificates increased $17.6 million.
In 1994, Farmland entered into a $650,000,000 syndicated credit facility provided by eight domestic and international banking institutions. This agreement provides short-term credit of up to $450,000,000 to finance seasonal operations and inventory, and revolving term credit of up to $200,000,000. In addition, this credit facility supports letters of credit issued by participating banks on behalf of Farmland. At August 31, 1994, short-term borrowings under this facility were $217,399,000, revolving term borrowings were $95,000,000 and $62,600,000 was being utilized to support letters of credit.
Farmland pays commitment fees of 1/8 of 1% annually on the unused portion of the short-term commitment and 1/4 of 1% annually on the unused portion of the revolving term commitment. In addition, Farmland must maintain consolidated working capital of not less than $150,000,000, consolidated net worth of not less than $475,000,000 and funded indebtedness and senior funded indebtedness of not more than 52% and 43% of capitalization, respectively. All computations are based on consolidated financial data adjusted to exclude nonrecourse subsidiaries (as defined in the credit agreement). Computed in accordance with the agreement, at August 31, 1994, working capital was $207,383,000, net worth was $585,013,000 and funded indebtedness and senior funded indebtedness were 47.03% and 23.34% of capitalization, respectively.
In addition to the syndicated credit facility, Farmland has credit facilities with various commercial banks. At August 31, 1994, Farmland's available credit from commercial banks under committed and uncommitted arrangements was $26.2 million and $37.2 million, respectively. Borrowings under these committed and uncommitted credit facilities were $26.2 million and $25.0 million, respectively, at August 31, 1994. In addition, $2.2 million was used to support letters of credit issued by such banks on Farmland's behalf. Financial covenants of these arrangements are not more restrictive than Farmland's syndicated credit facilities.
In the opinion of management, these arrangements for debt capital are adequate for the Company's present operating and capital plans. However, alternative financing arrangements are continuously evaluated.
NBPC, 58%-owned by Farmland, maintains borrowing agreements with a bank which provides financing support for its beef packing operations. Borrowings under this credit agreement are nonrecourse to Farmland or Farmland's other affiliates. At August 31, 1994, NBPC's available bank credit of $61,596,000 had been borrowed. All assets of NBPC (carried at $150,409,000) are pledged to support its borrowings. At August 31, 1994, Farmland had issued letters of credit in the amount of $15,000,000 to support NBPC's bank credit agreements.
Tradigrain has borrowing agreements with various international banks which provide financing and letters of credit to support current international grain trading transactions. Obligations of Tradigrain under these loan agreements are nonrecourse to the Company.
Leveraged leasing has been utilized to finance data processing equipment, railcars, and a substantial portion of nitrogen fertilizer production equipment. Under the most restrictive covenants of its leases, the Company has agreed to maintain working capital of at least $75 million, consolidated funded indebtedness not greater than 65% of consolidated capitalization, and consolidated senior funded indebtedness not greater than 50% of consolidated capitalization.
As a cooperative, Farmland's annual net income or loss determined in accordance with income tax regulations in 1994 and in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in 1995 and after is identified to transactions with members eligible to receive patronage refunds ("member-sourced income") or to transactions with parties not entitled to receive patronage refunds ("nonmember-sourced income"). The annual nonmember-sourced income or loss is adjusted for the amount of applicable income tax expense or benefit thereon and the amount remaining is transferred to retained earnings. The member-sourced income is distributed to members as patronage refunds unless the earned surplus account, after such distribution, would be lower than 30% of the sum of the prior year-end balance of outstanding common, associate member stock, capital credits, nonmember capital and patronage refunds for reinvestment. In such cases, member-sourced income shall be reduced by the lesser of 15% or an amount required to increase the earned surplus account to the required 30%. The amount by which the member-sourced income is so reduced is treated as nonmember-sourced income. The member-sourced income remaining is distributed to members as patronage refunds. For the years ended August 31, 1994, 1993 and 1992, the earned surplus account exceeded the required amount by $2.3 million, $3.8 million and $49.5 million, respectively.
Generally, a portion of the patronage refund is distributed in cash and the balance (the "invested portion") is distributed in common stock, associate member common stock, or capital credits (depending on the membership status of the recipient), or the Board of Directors may determine to distribute the invested portion in any other form or forms of equities. The invested portion of the patronage refund is determined annually by the Board of Directors but such invested portion shall not, for any year, exceed 80% of the total patronage refunds. The invested portion of the patronage refund is a source of funds from operations which is retained for use in the business and increases Farmland's equity base. Common stock and associate member common stock representing the invested portion of patronage refunds may be redeemed by cash payments from Farmland to holders thereof who participate in Farmland's base capital plan. Capital credits and other equities of Farmland and Farmland Foods, Inc. may be redeemed under other equity redemptions. The base capital plan and other equity redemption plans are explained under the heading "Equity Redemption Plans."
In 1994, operations generated a net cash inflow of $106.0 million. Other major cash sources include $34.6 million from dispositions of investments and notes receivables, $17.6 million (net) from investors in demand loan and subordinated debt certificates and $17.1 million from sales of property, plant and equipment.
The primary uses of cash include $69.8 million for capital additions or improvements, $36.6 million (net) for repayment of bank loans and other notes payable, $35.8 million for acquisition of businesses (Tradigrain and National Carriers, Inc.) and $22.1 million for investments and notes receivables.
On July 28, 1983, Farmland sold the stock of Terra Resources, Inc. ("Terra"), a wholly-owned subsidiary engaged in oil and gas exploration and production operations, and exited its oil and gas exploration and production activities. The gain from the sale of Terra amounted to $237,200,000 for tax reporting purposes. During 1983, and prior to the sale of the Terra stock, Farmland received certain distributions from Terra totaling $24,800,000. For tax purposes, Farmland claimed intercorporate dividends-received deductions for the entire amount of such distributions.
On March 24, 1993, the Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") issued a statutory notice to Farmland asserting deficiencies in federal income taxes (exclusive of statutory interest thereon) in the aggregate amount of $70,775,000. The asserted deficiencies relate primarily to the Company's tax treatment of the sale of the Terra stock and the distributions received from Terra prior to the sale. The IRS asserts that Farmland incorrectly treated the Terra sale gain as income against which certain patronage-sourced operating losses could be offset, and that, as a nonexempt cooperative, Farmland was not entitled to an intercorporate dividends-received deduction in respect of the 1983 distribution by Terra. It further asserts that Farmland incorrectly characterized gains for tax purposes aggregating approximately $14,600,000, and a loss of approximately $2,300,000, from the disposition of certain other assets. On June 11, 1993, Farmland filed a petition in the United States Tax Court contesting the asserted deficiencies in their entirety. Discovery and other pre-trial phases of the litigation have since been ongoing. The case is scheduled for trial on March 6, 1995.
If the IRS ultimately prevails on all of the adjustments asserted in the statutory notice, Farmland would have additional federal and state income tax liabilities aggregating approximately $85,800,000 plus accumulating statutory interest thereon through October 31, 1994, of approximately $154,900,000 (before tax benefits of the interest deduction). In addition, such adjustments would affect the computation of Farmland's taxable income for its 1989 tax year and, as a result, could increase Farmland's federal and state income taxes for that year by approximately $5,000,000 plus applicable statutory interest thereon.
No provision has been made in the consolidated financial statements for federal or state income taxes (or interest thereon) in respect of the IRS claims described above. Farmland believes that it has meritorious positions with respect to all of these claims and will continue to vigorously pursue their favorable resolution through the pending litigation.
In the opinion of Bryan Cave, Farmland's special tax counsel, it is more likely than not that the courts will ultimately conclude that (i) Farmland's treatment of the Terra sale gain was substantially, if not entirely, correct; and (ii) Farmland properly claimed a dividends-received deduction in respect of the 1983 distributions which it received from Terra prior to the sale of the Terra stock. Counsel has further advised, however, that none of the issues involved in these disputes is free from doubt, and that there can be no assurance that the courts will ultimately rule in favor of Farmland on any of these issues.
Should the IRS ultimately prevail on all of its asserted claims, all claimed federal and state income taxes as well as accrued interest thereon would become immediately due and payable, and would be charged to current operations. In such case, the Company would be required to renegotiate agreements with its banks to maintain compliance with various requirements of such agreements, including working capital and funded indebtedness provisions. However, no assurance can be given that such renegotiation would be successful. Alternatives could include other financing arrangements or the possible sale of assets.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The Company's revenues depend to a large extent on conditions in agriculture and may be volatile due to factors beyond the Company's control, such as weather, crop failures, federal agricultural programs, production efficiencies, and direct imports or exports. In addition, global variables which affect supply, demand and price of crude oil and refined fuels impact the Company's petroleum operations. Management cannot determine the extent to which future operations of the Company may be impacted by these factors. The Company's cash flow and net income may continue to be volatile as conditions affecting agriculture and markets for the Company's products change.
In computing the operating profit (loss) of a business segment, none of the following have been added or deducted: corporate, general and administrative expenses which cannot practicably be identified or allocated to a business segment, interest expense, equity in income (loss) of investees, and miscellaneous income or deductions.
PETROLEUM
SALES
Sales of petroleum products reflect a decrease of $31.9 million in 1994 compared with 1993 primarily due to lower prices of refined fuels and propane. The effect of lower prices was to reduce reported sales by approximately $62.4 million. Part of this decrease was offset by the effect of a 6% increase of refined fuels and propane unit sales.
Sales of the petroleum segment decreased $92.2 million in 1993 compared with 1992, primarily a result of 12% lower unit sales of refined fuels (gasoline, diesel and distillates) and a 2% decline of the average selling price. Unit sales decreased principally because the Company sold its investment in National Cooperative Refinery Association ("NCRA") in June 1992. The refined fuels unit sales decrease in 1993 reduced sales by approximately $92.2 million compared with 1992 and lower prices of refined fuels reduced sales by $17.7 million. Sales of other products (principally asphalt and coke) decreased $12.4 million. Propane sales increased approximately $30.1 million in 1993 due to 27% higher unit sales and 18% higher prices.
In 1992, sales of petroleum products declined $209.7 million compared with 1991. This decrease resulted primarily because unit sales of refined products (gasoline, distillate and diesel) and the average price of these products were lower in 1992 than 1991 by 19% and 16%, respectively. The unit sales and price declines reduced sales of these products by approximately $37.3 million and $154.2 million, respectively. In addition, propane prices in 1992 averaged approximately 82% of the prior year's level, which reduced sales by approximately $13.5 million.
OPERATING PROFIT
Results from petroleum operations increased $31.7 million primarily because unit margins on diesel fuels with low levels of sulfur (required by the Environmental Protection Agency for diesel fuel sold after September 30, 1993) were higher than the corresponding period of the prior year. These margins were significantly higher immediately after the crossover to the low sulfur level diesel. In addition, margins on other refined fuels improved because the cost per barrel of crude oil decreased and because production at the Coffeyville, Kansas refinery was substantially higher than in the prior year.
Operating profit of the petroleum segment decreased $12.8 million in 1993 compared with 1992. The favorable effects of improved margins in propane and lower marketing and administrative expenses were more than offset by the unfavorable effects of lower income from distributing fuels produced by NCRA and the write-down to market value of certain petroleum inventories.
Operating profit of the petroleum segment was $8.2 million in 1992 compared with a loss of $9.3 million loss in 1991. Most of this improvement resulted from elimination in 1992 of losses experienced in 1991 on petroleum futures contracts. The Company changed its hedging practice in March 1991.
CROP PRODUCTION
SALES
Crop production sales in 1994 increased $278.5 million compared with 1994 due to higher plant nutrient prices and unit sales. The average price per ton of nutrient increased approximately 13.3% and unit sales increased approximately 1.1 million tons or 18%.
Sales of the crop production segment decreased $13.0 million in 1993 compared with 1992. Nitrogen fertilizer sales increased $54.1 million due to 8% higher unit sales and because the average selling price increased 3%. Phosphate fertilizer sales decreased $67.1 million. This decrease is primarily a result of the sale of the Green Bay, Florida phosphate plant to a 50%-owned joint venture. Subsequent to this sale (on November 15, 1991) export sales from the Green Bay plant have not been reported in the Company's operations. In 1992, the Company's sales included export sales from the Green Bay plant of $60.9 million.
The crop production segment's sales declined $137.7 million in 1992 compared with 1991. Substantially all of this decrease resulted from lower unit sales and prices for phosphate fertilizers. The Company reported 30% lower phosphate unit sales in 1992 which reduced sales approximately $117.3 million. This decrease resulted principally from the sale on November 15, 1991 of the Green Bay, Florida phosphate plant to a 50%-owned joint venture. In addition, sales of phosphate fertilizer decreased approximately $18.2 million, because the average price was 7% lower. Sales of turf and garden products were approximately $2.9 million lower.
OPERATING PROFIT
Operating profits of the crop production business in 1994 increased $74.4 million compared with 1993. This increase resulted from higher unit sales and unit margins. Unit margins in 1994 were approximately twice the level of 1993 which increased operating profit in this segment approximately $66.8 million. Unit sales increased over one million tons (18%) which increased operating profit approximately $10.8 million. In addition, included in the statement of operations in the caption, "Equity in income (loss) of investees", is $15.3 million in 1994 representing the Company's share of net income from fertilizer joint ventures. This is an increase of $23.4 million compared with 1993. Demand for plant nutrients in 1994 was stronger than in 1993 due to an increase in the number of acres under cultivation, principally corn acreage (corn acreage harvested was relatively low in 1993 due to wet weather and the resulting floods in the Company's trade territory). In addition, demand for plant nutrients was stimulated by favorable weather conditions during the fall and spring application seasons. The increased demand for plant nutrients translated into higher unit sales and margins and contributed significantly to the Company's increased net income in 1994.
Operating profit of the crop production segment decreased $60.3 million in 1993 compared with 1992, primarily because of 29% higher natural gas cost (the principal raw material consumed in producing nitrogen fertilizer) which was not recovered through selling prices. Fertilizer margins decreased approximately $43.2 million because of higher gas cost. In addition, phosphate fertilizer margins decreased approximately $7.1 million because decreased phosphate fertilizer selling prices more than offset decreased cost. In addition, the Company's share of the net loss of fertilizer ventures (included in the Company's statement of operations in the caption, "Equity in loss of investees"), was $8.2 million in 1993 compared with a loss of $1.3 million in 1992.
The crop production segment's operating profit of $111.9 million decreased $13.4 million in 1992 compared with 1991. The decrease resulted primarily from lower phosphate fertilizer selling prices and from realignment of the Company's phosphate fertilizer production operations into two 50%-owned ventures.
FEED
SALES
Sales of feed products increased $48.7 million in 1994 compared with 1993. Unit sales of formula feed and feed ingredients each increased approximately 10% which generated a $39.6 million increase in sales. The balance of the sales increase resulted primarily from higher feed ingredient prices.
Sales of the feed segment increased $33.9 million in 1993 compared with 1992, primarily because of higher unit sales. Formula feed unit sales increased approximately 9% which increased sales $20.3 million. Feed ingredients unit sales increased approximately 12% which increased sales by $18.0 million. In addition, sales of animal health products increased $2.5 million. Lower formula feed selling prices partly offset the effect of higher unit sales.
The feed segment's sales for 1992 decreased $20.9 million compared with 1991, principally because feed ingredients unit sales decreased 22%. Unit sales of feed ingredients decreased because sales efforts were directed from products with near break-even margins to products with higher margins. Feed ingredient sales decreased approximately $41.7 million because of the unit sales decline. Feed ingredient prices increased an average of 8% which increased sales by approximately $11.2 million and formula feed sales increased $6.8 million, principally due to higher unit sales.
OPERATING PROFIT
Operating profit of the feed business segment decreased $3.7 million in 1994 compared with 1993. Gross margins decreased approximately $.5 million reflecting lower margins on feed ingredients and pet food of $.8 million and $.4 million, respectively, partly offset by $.7 million higher margins on animal health products. In addition, sales marketing and feed administration expensed increased $3.2 million primarily due to higher commissions and other variable compensation plans.
Operating profit of the feed segment of $20.7 million in 1993 decreased slightly compared with 1992. The decrease was due to the impact of lower selling prices.
Operating profit of the feed segment for 1992 of $21.3 million decreased $3.2 million compared with 1991. The decrease resulted from $1.3 million lower patronage refund income on purchases from other cooperatives and from $2.2 million higher expenses partly offset by $.4 million higher gross margins.
FOOD PROCESSING AND MARKETING
SALES
Sales of the food marketing and processing business increased $943.0 million in 1994 compared with 1993. Sales of beef increased $735.5 million principally because National Beef Packing Company, L.P. ("NBPC") has been included in the Company's 1994 results for the full year. NBPC was acquired in April 1993. Pork sales increased $207.5 million, due mostly to including operations of the Monmouth, Illinois plant in the Company's results for a full year in 1994. This plant was acquired in February 1993. In addition, sales of specialty meats of the Carando division increased $13.0 million.
Food marketing sales increased $562.5 million in 1993 compared with 1992, primarily due to business acquisitions. In April 1993, the Company and partners organized National Beef Packing Company, L.P. ("NBPC"). Farmland obtained a 58% ownership interest in NBPC which acquired a beef packing plant and feedlot located in Liberal, Kansas. As a result of this acquisition, the Company's sales included beef sales of $442.1 million in 1993. In February 1993, Foods, a 99%-owned subsidiary, purchased a pork processing plant located at Monmouth, Illinois. As a result of this acquisition, sales of pork products increased approximately $90.0 million. Sales of fabricated pork products at the Company's other plants increased $17.0 million and sales of specialty meats of the Carando division increased $8.3 million.
Sales of the food marketing segment in 1992 increased $21.1 million compared with 1991. Sales of specialty meats increased $50.3 million primarily because these products were not included in sales for 1991 prior to April 1, when the Company acquired three specialty meats plants. Fresh and processed pork sales were lower than in 1991 because the effect of lower wholesale prices was greater than the effect of higher unit sales.
OPERATING PROFIT
Operating profit in the Food Marketing and Processing business segment of $20.6 million in 1994 reflects an increase of $4.1 million compared with 1993. The increase includes $13.0 million higher operating profit of the pork business partly offset by an $8.9 million decrease of operating profit of the beef business. Operating profit from pork marketing and processing operations increased primarily due to higher volume and higher margins on fresh pork, branded pork, hams and specialty meats of the Carando division. Operating profit of the beef business decreased owing to weak consumer demands for beef and industry price competition.
Operating profit of the food marketing segment decreased $8.7 million in 1993 compared with 1992. The decrease is primarily due to 4.6% higher live hog cost. Margins on fabricated products and hams increased $3.6 million and $4.4 million, respectively, and margins on beef products (not included in the Company's operations in 1992) were $4.2 million. These increases resulted from acquisitions which increased sales as discussed above. However, these increases were more than offset by the effects of 4.6% higher cost of live hogs which could not be fully recovered through increased wholesale prices of fresh and processed pork products and by higher selling and administrative expenses.
Operating profits of the food marketing segment for 1992 increased $13.8 million compared with 1991. The improvement includes higher gross margins of approximately $26.8 million, partially offset by approximately $13.4 million higher selling, general and administrative expenses. The gross margin increase includes $9.9 million higher margins on specialty meats attributable to ownership of specialty meats plants during all of 1992, compared with only five months of 1991. Additional improvements of gross margins resulted from a more favorable spread between the costs of live hogs and wholesale pork prices, from higher unit sales, and from a shift of sales to value-added products with higher unit margins. Selling, general and administrative expenses of this segment increased, primarily due to expenses incurred in connection with the specialty meats plants which were operated by the Company for only five months in the prior year.
GRAIN MARKETING
SALES AND OPERATING PROFIT
Grain sales increased $673.6 million in 1994 compared with 1993 primarily due to the acquisition of Wells-Bowman Trading Company and from operating elevators in Utah and Idaho which were leased to the Company in 1994.
The grain marketing business had an operating loss of $33.5 million in 1994 compared with near break-even operations in 1993. The operating loss in 1994 includes an operating loss of $14.4 million in the international operations of Tradigrain and an operating loss of $19.1 million in the Company's Union Equity division. The loss in 1994 resulted primarily from negative unit margins on international grain transactions and higher domestic operating expenses.
Grain operations which were acquired in July 1992, reported sales for the full year in 1993 of $953.5 million. Sales for the two months ended August 31, 1992 were $155.2 million.
In 1993, operating profit of the grain business was $.1 million compared with a loss of $.7 million for the two months ended August 31, 1992. In 1993, grain marketing operations were relocated to Kansas City from Enid, Oklahoma, an export elevator at Houston, Texas was sold and certain duplicative administrative assets costs were eliminated. As a result, cost reductions were realized in 1993.
SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES
Selling, general and administrative expenses ("SG & A") increased $81.5 million in 1994 compared with 1993. However, as a percent of sales, these expenses were slightly lower in 1994 than in 1993. Approximately $17.6 million of the increase resulted from acquisition of Tradigrain and National Carriers, Inc. and from including NBPC in the Company's financial statements for the full year in 1994. Approximately $29.0 million of the increase was in pork marketing and processing and resulted primarily from including the Monmouth, Illinois pork plant in the Company's operations for a full year, and from higher sales of pork. Farm supply businesses and the grain marketing business had higher SG & A of $13.1 million and $3.4 million, respectively. The balance of the SG & A increase was primarily variable compensation plans.
These expenses decreased $12.3 million in 1993 compared with 1992 primarily due to SG & A directly connected to business segments. Corporate, general and administrative expenses, not identified to business segments (see note 12 of the notes to consolidated financial statements), decreased $6.3 million in 1993 compared with 1992.
In 1992, corporate general and administrative expenses not identified to business segments decreased $5.2 million compared with 1991. This decrease was mostly lower retirement plan costs, reduced corporate advertising and reduced coverage and cost of liability insurance.
OTHER INCOME (DEDUCTIONS)
INTEREST EXPENSE
Interest expense reflects an increase of $14.7 million in 1994 compared with 1993. The increase is primarily attributable to including the interest costs of NBPC's beef operations in the Company's financial statements for a full year in 1994, the acquisition of National Carriers, Inc. and Tradigrain in May 1994 and by higher interest rates.
Interest expense increased $8.8 million in 1993 compared with 1992 due to an increase of the average level of borrowings, partly offset by lower interest rates. Interest expense decreased $8.9 million in 1992 compared with 1991. The decrease results from lower borrowings and lower interest rates.
PROVISION FOR LOSS ON DISPOSITION OF ASSETS
See note 17 of the notes to consolidated financial statements.
OTHER, NET
See note 16 of the notes to consolidated financial statements.
RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 115, "Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities," was issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") in May 1993 and is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 1993 (the Company's 1995 fiscal year). Statement 115 expands the use of fair value accounting and the reporting for certain investments in debt and equity securities. Management expects the adoption of Statement 115 will not have a significant impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 112, "Employer's Accounting for Postemployment Benefits," was issued by the FASB in November 1992 and is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 1993 (the Company's 1995 fiscal year). Statement 112 establishes standards of accounting and reporting for the estimated cost of benefits provided to former or inactive employees. Management expects that the adoption of Statement 112 will not have a significant impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.
ITEM 8.



ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SCHEDULES
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Independent Auditors' Report . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
Consolidated Balance Sheets, August 31, 1994 and 1993 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
Consolidated Statements of Operations for each of the years in the three-year period ended August 31, 1994 . . . . . 33
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended August 31, 1994 . . . . . 34
Consolidated Statements of Capital Shares and Equities for each of the years in the three-year period ended August 31, 1994 . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements . . . . . . . 37
FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
Farmland Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries for each of the years in the three-year period ended August 31, 1994:
1I--Amounts Receivable from Related Parties 67
V--Property, Plant and Equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . 68
VI--Accumulated Depreciation and Amortization of . . . . 71 Property, Plant and Equipment
IX--Short-term Borrowings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74
X--Supplementary Income Statement Information . . . . . 74
All other schedules are omitted as the required information is inapplicable or the information is presented in the consolidated financial statements or related notes.
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
The Board of Directors Farmland Industries, Inc.:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Farmland Industries, Inc. and subsidiaries as of August 31, 1994 and 1993, and the related consolidated statements of operations, cash flows and capital shares and equities for each of the years in the three-year period ended August 31, 1994. In connection with our audits of the consolidated financial statements, we also have audited the financial statement schedules as listed in the accompanying index. These consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Farmland Industries, Inc. and subsidiaries as of August 31, 1994 and 1993, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended August 31, 1994, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedules, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, present fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.
As discussed in note 7 to the consolidated financial statements, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has examined the Company's tax returns for the years ended August 31, 1984 and 1983, and has proposed certain adjustments. Should the IRS ultimately prevail, the federal and state income taxes and statutory interest thereon could be significant. Farmland believes it has meritorious positions with respect to such claims and, based upon the opinion of special tax counsel, management believes it is more likely than not that the courts will ultimately conclude that Farmland's treatment of such items was substantially, if not entirely, correct. The ultimate outcome of this matter can not presently be determined. Therefore, no provision for such income taxes and interest has been made in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP
Kansas City, Missouri October 21, 1994
FARMLAND INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
ASSETS
FARMLAND INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
LIABILITIES AND EQUITIES
FARMLAND INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
FARMLAND INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FARMLAND INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CAPITAL SHARES AND EQUITIES
FARMLAND INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(1) SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Farmland Industries, Inc. ("Farmland"), a Kansas corporation, is organized and operated as a cooperative and its mission is to be a producer-driven and profitable agricultural supply to consumer foods cooperative system.
Principles of Consolidation -- The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Farmland and all its majority-owned subsidiaries (the "Company"). All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.
Cash and Cash Equivalents -- Investments with maturities of less than three months are included in "Cash and cash equivalents."
Investments -- Investments in companies 20% to 50% owned are accounted for by the equity method. Other investments are stated at cost.
Accounts Receivable -- The Company uses the allowance method to account for doubtful accounts and notes. Uncollectible accounts and notes receivable from members are written off against the Farmland common stock held by members before such uncollectible accounts are charged to operations.
Inventories -- Grain inventories are valued at market adjusted for net unrealized gains or losses on open commodity contracts. Crude oil, refined petroleum products, cattle and beef inventories are valued at the lower of last-in, first-out cost or market. Other inventories are valued at the lower of first-in, first-out cost or market. Supplies are valued at cost. When practicable, the Company hedges certain inventories, advance sales and purchase contracts with fixed prices and anticipated purchases of raw materials.
Property, Plant and Equipment -- These assets are stated at cost and depreciated principally on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful life of the individual assets (3 to 40 years). Leasehold improvements are amortized on a straight-line basis over the terms of the individual leases (15 to 21 years).
Goodwill -- The excess of cost over the fair market value of assets of businesses purchased is amortized on a straight-line basis over a period of 15 to 25 years.
Sales -- The Company's policy is to recognize sales at the time product is shipped. Net margins on international grain merchandised and sales commissions on brokered agricultural chemicals, rather than the value of such products, are included in net sales.
Environmental Costs -- Liabilities related to remediation of contaminated properties are recognized when the related costs are considered probable and can be reasonably estimated. Estimates of these costs are based upon currently available facts, existing technology, undiscounted site specific costs, and currently enacted laws and regulations. In reporting environmental liabilities, no offset is made for potential recoveries. All liabilities are monitored and adjusted regularly as new facts or changes in law or technology occur. Environmental expenditures are capitalized when such costs provide future economic benefits.
Research and Development Costs -- Total research and development costs for the Company for the years ended August 31, 1994, 1993 and 1992 were $2,702,000, $3,303,000 and $3,338,000, respectively.
Federal Income Taxes -- Farmland and its cooperative subsidiaries are subject to income taxes on all income not distributed to patrons as patronage refunds. Farmland and all its subsidiaries file consolidated federal and state income tax returns. Effective September 1, 1993, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, "Accounting for Income Taxes." The Company accounted for income taxes using the deferred method under APB Opinion 11 for the year ended August 31, 1993 and 1992.
(2) ACQUISITIONS AND DISPOSITIONS
Effective June 30, 1992, Farmland acquired substantially all the business and assets of Union Equity Co-Operative Exchange ("Union Equity") in exchange for 2,051,880 shares of Farmland common stock with a par value of $51,297,000 and Farmland's assumption of substantially all of Union Equity's liabilities. The acquisition has been accounted for as a purchase and, accordingly, the results of operations of Union Equity have been included in the Company's consolidated financial statements from June 30, 1992. The excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the net identifiable assets acquired ($20,976,000) has been recorded as goodwill and is being amortized on a straight-line basis over 25 years.
During 1993, Farmland and partners organized NBPC. Farmland retained a 58% ownership interest in NBPC by investing $10,500,000 in cash. On April 15, 1993, NBPC acquired the business of Idle Wild Foods, Inc. ("Idle Wild"), a beef packing plant and feedlot located in Liberal, Kansas. NBPC acquired the assets by assuming liabilities of Idle Wild with a fair value of approximately $130,605,000 (including bank loans which are nonrecourse to NBPC's partners). The acquisition has been accounted for as a purchase and, accordingly, the results of operations of NBPC have been included in the Company's consolidated financial statements from April 15, 1993. The liabilities assumed over the fair value of the net identifiable assets acquired has been recorded as goodwill.
To establish The Cooperative Finance Association ("CFA") as an independent finance association for its members, on August 30, 1993 CFA purchased 10,113,000 shares of its voting common stock from Farmland for a purchase price comprised of $1,541,000 in cash, equities of Farmland (with a par value of $2,406,000) held by CFA and a $6,166,000 subordinated promissory note payable to Farmland bearing interest of 5.3%. In addition, during 1993, CFA: 1) repaid its operating loan from Farmland ($25,181,000); and, 2) purchased the lending operations and assets of Farmland Financial Services Company for a cash payment of $60,505,000 and a $2,128,000, 6% subordinated note payable to Farmland. Farmland repaid $87,227,000 of its borrowings from the National Bank for Cooperatives with the proceeds received from CFA. As a result of CFA's stock purchase and amendments to CFA's bylaws, Farmland's voting control in CFA decreased to 25%. Accordingly, effective August 31, 1993, CFA is not included in the consolidated balance sheet of the Company.
The following unaudited financial information, for the years ended August 31, 1993 and 1992, presents pro forma results of operations of the Company as if the disposition of CFA and the acquisitions of Union Equity and NBPC had occurred at the beginning of each period presented. The pro forma financial information includes adjustments for amortization of goodwill, additional depreciation expense and increased interest expense on debt assumed in the acquisitions. The pro forma financial information does not necessarily reflect the results of operations that would have occurred had the Company been a single entity which excluded CFA and included Union Equity and NBPC for the full years 1993 and 1992.
In October 1993, the Company acquired approximately 53% of the common stock of National Carriers, Inc. ("NCI") and increased its ownership of NCI to 79% in August 1994. NCI is a trucking company located in Liberal, Kansas. NCI provides substantially all the trucking service needs of NBPC. The purchase price of NCI ($4,423,000) was paid in cash.
In December 1993, the Company acquired all the common stock of seven international grain trading companies (collectively referred to as "Tradigrain"). The purchase price for Tradigrain ($31,367,000) was paid in cash.
The acquisitions of NCI and Tradigrain have been accounted for by the purchase method of accounting and, accordingly, the operating results of each enterprise have been included in the Company's consolidated financial statements from the respective dates of acquisition. The excess of the cash paid over the fair value of the net assets acquired has been recorded as goodwill. The pro forma effects of acquisitions of NCI and Tradigrain on the consolidated financial statements are not significant.
(3) INVENTORIES
The carrying values of crude oil and refined petroleum inventories stated under the lower of last-in, first-out ("LIFO") cost or market at August 31, 1994 and 1993 were $86,179,000 and $84,088,000, respectively. Had the lower of first-in, first-out ("FIFO") cost or market been used to value these products, the carrying values of inventories at August 31, 1994 and 1993 would have been lower by $4,145,000 and $5,754,000, respectively.
Net income for 1994, 1993 and 1992 was $1,609,000 lower, $4,119,000 higher and $1,935,000 lower, respectively, as a result of using LIFO as compared with FIFO, including a $3,164,000 recovery in 1994 of an $8,346,000 lower of cost or market adjustment in 1993. Liquidation of prior year inventory layers in 1992 reduced income before income taxes and patronage refunds by $3,302,000.
The carrying values of beef inventories stated under LIFO at August 31, 1994 and 1993 were $24,267,000 and $27,754,000, respectively. The LIFO method of accounting for beef inventories had no effect on the carrying value of inventories or on the results reported in 1994 and 1993, as market value of these inventories was lower than LIFO or FIFO cost.
(4) INVESTMENTS AND LONG-TERM RECEIVABLES
National Bank for Cooperatives ("CoBank") requires borrowers from the bank to maintain an investment in stock of the bank. The amount of investment required is based on the average amount borrowed from CoBank during the previous five years. At August 31, 1994, Farmland's investment in CoBank approximated its requirement. This investment has been pledged to secure borrowings from CoBank under the syndicated loan agreement.
The Company's investments accounted for by the equity method consist principally of 50% equity interests in Hyplains Beef, L.L.C. and in two phosphate fertilizer manufacturing ventures (Farmland Hydro, L.P. and SF Phosphates Limited Company).
On November 15, 1991, Farmland and Norsk Hydro a.s. ("Hydro") formed a joint venture company, Farmland Hydro, to manufacture phosphate fertilizer products for distribution to international markets. As part of the joint venture agreement, Farmland sold a 50% interest in its Green Bay, Florida phosphate fertilizer plant and certain phosphate rock reserves located in Hardee County, Florida to Hydro for an amount approximately equal to Farmland's carrying value of the assets. Subsequently, Farmland and Hydro contributed the assets to the joint venture. Farmland operates the plant under a management agreement with the joint venture and Hydro provides international marketing services. See note 15 of the notes to consolidated financial statements.
Farmland and J. R. Simplot formed a joint venture (SF Phosphates, Limited Company) to operate a phosphate mine located in Vernal, Utah, a fertilizer plant located in Rock Springs, Wyoming, and a 96-mile pipeline that connects the mine with the fertilizer plant. The purchase of the mine, plant and pipeline from Chevron Corporation was completed in April 1992.
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 115, "Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities," was issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") in May 1993 and is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 1993 (the Company's 1995 fiscal year). Statement 115 expands the use of fair value accounting and the reporting for certain investments in debt and equity securities. In the opinion of management, the adoption of Statement 115 will not have a significant impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.
(5) PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
For the years ended August 31, 1994, 1993 and 1992, the Company capitalized construction period interest of $357,000, $1,611,000 and $330,000, respectively.
(6) BANK LOANS, SUBORDINATED DEBT CERTIFICATES AND NOTES PAYABLE
In 1994, Farmland entered into a $650,000,000 syndicated credit facility provided by eight domestic and international banking institutions. This agreement provides short-term credit of up to $450,000,000 to finance seasonal operations and inventory, and revolving term credit of up to $200,000,000. At August 31, 1994, short-term borrowings under this facility were $217,399,000, revolving term borrowings were $95,000,000 and $62,600,000 was being utilized to support letters of credit issued on behalf of Farmland by participating banks.
Farmland pays commitment fees of 1/8 of 1% annually on the unused portion of the short-term commitment and 1/4 of 1% annually on the unused portion of the revolving term commitment. In addition, Farmland must maintain consolidated working capital of not less than $150,000,000, consolidated net worth of not less than $475,000,000 and funded indebtedness and senior funded indebtedness of not more than 52% and 43% of capitalization, respectively. All computations are based on consolidated financial data adjusted to exclude nonrecourse subsidiaries (as defined in the credit agreement). Computed in accordance with the agreement, at August 31, 1994, working capital was $207,383,000, net worth was $585,013,000 and funded indebtedness and senior funded indebtedness were 47.03% and 23.34% of capitalization, respectively.
Farmland and subsidiaries maintain other borrowing arrangements with banks and financial institutions. Under such agreements, at August 31, 1994, $35,495,000 was borrowed from banks and letters of credit issued by banks amounted to $2,200,000. Financial covenants of these arrangements are not more restrictive than the Company's syndicated credit facility.
NBPC, 58%-owned by Farmland, maintains borrowing agreements with a bank which provides financing support for its beef packing operations. Borrowings under this credit agreement are nonrecourse to Farmland or Farmland's other affiliates. At August 31, 1994, NBPC's available bank credit of $61,596,000 had been borrowed. All assets of NBPC (carried at $150,409,000) are pledged to support its borrowings. At August 31, 1994, Farmland had issued letters of credit in the amount of $15,000,000 to support NBPC's bank credit agreements.
Tradigrain has borrowing agreements with various international banks which provide financing and letters of credit to support current international grain trading transactions. Obligations of Tradigrain under these loan agreements are nonrecourse to the Company.
The subordinated debt certificates have been issued under several different indentures. Farmland may redeem subordinated certificates of investments and capital investment certificates in advance of scheduled maturities. Farmland may redeem subordinated certificates of investments, capital investment certificates and subordinated monthly interest certificates upon death of the holder.
The outstanding subordinated debt certificates are subordinated to senior indebtedness. At August 31, 1994, senior indebtedness included $450,827,000 for money borrowed, and other instruments (principally long-term operating leases) provide for aggregate payments over nine years of approximately $126,505,000.
Under industrial revenue bonds and other agreements, property, plant and equipment with a carrying value of $29,267,000 have been pledged.
Bank loans, subordinated debt certificates and notes payable mature during the fiscal years ending August 31 in the following amounts:
(Amounts in Thousands) 1995 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 27,840 1996 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44,884 1997 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 182,996 1998 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54,057 1999 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32,921 2000 and after . . . . . . . . . . . . . 202,948 $ 545,646
(7) INCOME TAXES
On July 28, 1983, Farmland sold the stock of Terra Resources, Inc. ("Terra"), a wholly-owned subsidiary engaged in oil and gas exploration and production operations, and exited its oil and gas exploration and production activities. The gain from the sale of Terra amounted to $237,200,000 for tax reporting purposes. During 1983, and prior to the sale of the Terra stock, Farmland received certain distributions from Terra totaling $24,800,000. For tax purposes, Farmland claimed intercorporate dividends-received deductions for the entire amount of such distributions.
On March 24, 1993, the Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") issued a statutory notice to Farmland asserting deficiencies in federal income taxes (exclusive of statutory interest thereon) in the aggregate amount of $70,775,000. The asserted deficiencies relate primarily to the Company's tax treatment of the sale of the Terra stock and the distributions received from Terra prior to the sale. The IRS asserts that Farmland incorrectly treated the Terra sale gain as income against which certain patronage-sourced operating losses could be offset, and that, as a nonexempt cooperative, Farmland was not entitled to an intercorporate dividends-received deduction in respect of the 1983 distribution by Terra. It further asserts that Farmland incorrectly characterized gains for tax purposes aggregating approximately $14,600,000, and a loss of approximately $2,300,000, from the disposition of certain other assets. On June 11, 1993, Farmland filed a petition in the United States Tax Court contesting the asserted deficiencies in their entirety. Discovery and other pre-trial phases of the litigation have since been ongoing. The case is scheduled for trial on March 6, 1995.
If the IRS ultimately prevails on all of the adjustments asserted in the statutory notice, Farmland would have additional federal and state income tax liabilities aggregating approximately $85,800,000 plus accumulating statutory interest thereon through October 31, 1994, of approximately $154,900,000 (before tax benefits of the interest deduction). In addition, such adjustments would affect the computation of Farmland's taxable income for its 1989 tax year and, as a result, could increase Farmland's federal and state income taxes for that year by approximately $5,000,000 plus applicable statutory interest thereon.
No provision has been made in the consolidated financial statements for federal or state income taxes (or interest thereon) in respect of the IRS claims described above. Farmland believes that it has meritorious positions with respect to all of these claims and will continue to vigorously pursue their favorable resolution through the pending litigation.
In the opinion of Bryan Cave, Farmland's special tax counsel, it is more likely than not that the courts will ultimately conclude that (i) Farmland's treatment of the Terra sale gain was substantially, if not entirely, correct; and (ii) Farmland properly claimed a dividends-received deduction in respect of the 1983 distributions which it received from Terra prior to the sale of the Terra stock. Counsel has further advised, however, that none of the issues involved in these disputes is free from doubt, and that there can be no assurance that the courts will ultimately rule in favor of Farmland on any of these issues.
Should the IRS ultimately prevail on all of its asserted claims, all claimed federal and state income taxes as well as accrued interest would become immediately due and payable, and would be charged to current operations. In such case, the Company would be required to renegotiate agreements with its banks to maintain compliance with various requirements of such agreements, including working capital and funded indebtedness provisions. However, no assurance can be given that such renegotiation would be successful. Alternatives could include other financing arrangements or the possible sale of assets.
The Company adopted FASB Statement 109 effective September 1, 1993. The cumulative effect of this change in accounting for income taxes was immaterial. Prior years' financial statements have not been restated to apply the provisions of Statement 109.
The tax effect of temporary differences that give rise to significant portions of deferred tax liabilities and deferred tax assets at August 31, 1994 is as follows: August 31, 1994 (Amounts in Thousands) Deferred tax liabilities: Property, plant and equipment principally due to differences in depreciation . . . $ 20,242 Prepaid pension cost . . . . . . . . . . . 21,124 Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14,021 Total gross deferred liabilities . . . . $ 55,387
Deferred tax assets: Safe harbor leases . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 5,391 Accrued expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27,017 Accounts receivable, principally due to allowance for doubtful accounts . . . . 4,394 Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12,245 Total gross deferred assets . . . . . . $ 49,047
Net deferred tax liability . . . . . . . . . . $ 6,340
A valuation allowance for deferred tax assets was not necessary at August 31, 1994.
The significant components of deferred income tax benefit attributable to income from continuing operations for the year ended August 31, 1994 are as follows: August 31, 1994 (Amounts in Thousands) Deferred tax benefit . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ (8,044)
Charge in lieu of taxes resulting from initial recognition of acquired tax benefits that are allocated to reduce goodwill related to the acquired entity . . 3,010 $ (5,034)
At August 31, 1994, Farmland and its consolidated subsidiaries have alternative minimum tax credit carryforwards of approximately $7,025,000.
The tax benefit for the year ended August 31, 1993 results from the carryback of nonpatronage-sourced losses to reduce the amount of federal and state income taxes paid during prior years.
During the year ended August 31, 1994, Farmland utilized nonmember-sourced loss carryforwards amounting to $7,525,000 to reduce goodwill for financial reporting purposes by $3,010,000.
During the year ended August 31, 1992, all of Foods' nonmember-sourced loss carryforwards were utilized and deferred income taxes amounting to $1,294,000 were reinstated. During the year ended August 31, 1992, Farmland utilized nonmember-sourced loss carryforwards amounting to $3,168,000 to reduce income tax expense for financial reporting purposes by $1,267,000. Utilization of these loss carryforwards has been presented as an extraordinary item in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations for the year ended August 31, 1992.
In connection with the acquisition of Union Equity, Farmland acquired member-sourced and nonmember-sourced loss carryforwards from Union Equity amounting to approximately $18,600,000 and $10,600,000, respectively. For the year ended August 31, 1992, Farmland was able to utilize member-sourced and nonmember-sourced loss carryforwards amounting to $18,600,000 and $2,800,000, respectively. The benefit of the utilization of the nonmember- sourced loss carryforward amounting to $1,134,000 has been recorded as a reduction of goodwill in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of August 31, 1992. See note 2 of the notes to consolidated financial statements.
(8) MINORITY OWNERS' EQUITY IN SUBSIDIARIES
(9) PREFERRED STOCK, EARNED SURPLUS AND OTHER EQUITIES
The 5-1/2% and 6% preferred stocks have preferential liquidation rights over the Series F preferred stock. Dividends on the 5-1/2% and 6% preferred stock are cumulative if declared by the Farmland Board of Directors and only to the extent earned each year. Series F preferred stock is nondividend bearing. Upon liquidation, holders of all preferred stock are entitled to the par value thereof and, with respect to the 5-1/2% and 6% preferred stock, any declared or unpaid earned dividends.
In accordance with the bylaws of Farmland, the member-sourced portion of its net income or loss and the resulting patronage refund payable to members and patrons are determined annually. The bylaws provide that the amount of the patronage refund payable be reduced if immediately after the payment of such patronage refund, the amount of earned surplus would be less than 30% of the previous year-end balance of members' equity accounts (defined for this purpose as the sum of common stock, associate member common stock, capital credits, nonmember capital and patronage refunds payable in equities). The reduction of patronage refunds is limited to the lesser of 15% or the amount required to increase the balance of the earned surplus account to the required 30%. As of August 31, 1994 and 1993, earned surplus exceeded the required amount by approximately $2,329,000 and $3,874,000, respectively. The patronage refund payable for 1994 is $70,584,000. The cash portion is $26,552,000 and is included in "Other current liabilities" in the consolidated balance sheet at August 31, 1994. The balance ($44,032,000) of the patronage refund is payable in equities of Farmland and is included in the consolidated balance sheet as "Earned surplus and other equities." No patronage refunds were paid by Farmland for 1993. The patronage refund for 1992 was $17,449,000, all of which was paid in cash.
Farmland maintains a base capital plan. The plan's objectives are as follows: 1) to achieve proportionality between the dollar amount of business a member or associate member of Farmland ("Participant") transacts with Farmland and the par value of Farmland equity which the Participant should hold (hereinafter referred to as the Participants' "Base Capital Requirement"); and, 2) provide a method for the Board of Directors, in its discretion, to redeem equities held by a Participant when the par value of the Participant's investment exceeds the Participant's Base Capital Requirement. This plan provides that the relationship between the par value of a Participant's investment in Farmland equity and the Participant's Base Capital Requirement shall influence the cash portion of any patronage refund paid to the Participant.
The Base Capital Requirement shall be determined annually by the Farmland Board of Directors at its sole discretion. At August 31, 1994, common stock and associate member common stock with a par value of $8,740,000 have been approved for redemption by the Board of Directors under the base capital plan and such amounts have been included in "Other current liabilities" in the consolidated balance sheet at August 31, 1994.
Farmland maintains an estate settlement plan for redemption of equities held by estates of deceased individuals (except equities purchased and held less than five years) and a special equity redemption plan to redeem equities of holders who do not participate in the Farmland base capital plan. Under these plans, the Board of Directors, in its discretion, may redeem equities based on certain factors, including the financial position and consolidated net income of the Company. A priority for redeeming equities under these plans has been established.
At August 31, 1994, certain equities of Farmland with a face amount of $3,448,000 and capital equity fund certificates held by certain members of Farmland Foods, Inc. in the amount of $747,000 have been approved by the Board of Directors for redemption under the estate settlement and special equity redemption plan. Accordingly, such amounts have been included in "Other current liabilities" in the consolidated balance sheet at August 31, 1994.
Nonmember capital represents patronage refunds distributed in the form of book credits.
Capital credits are issued: 1) for payment of patronage refunds to patrons who do not satisfy requirements for membership or associate membership; and, 2) upon conversion of common stock or associate member common stock held by persons who do not meet qualifications for membership or associate membership in Farmland.
Unallocated equity represents the cumulative difference between the amount of member-sourced income for financial reporting and income tax reporting purposes.
Additional paid-in surplus results from members donating Farmland equity to Farmland.
None of the aforementioned equities are held by or for the account of Farmland or in any sinking or other special fund of Farmland and none have been pledged by Farmland.
(10) CONTINGENT LIABILITIES AND COMMITMENTS
The Company leases various equipment and real properties under long-term operating leases. For the years ended August 31, 1994, 1993 and 1992, rental expenses totaled $41,794,000, $41,104,000 and $43,300,000, respectively. Rental expense is reduced for mileage credits received on leased railroad cars ($1,866,000 in 1994, $1,939,000 in 1993 and $663,000 in 1992).
The leases have various remaining terms ranging from one year to fifteen years. Some leases are renewable, at Farmland's option, for additional periods. The minimum amount Farmland must pay for these leases during the fiscal years ending August 31 are as follows:
(Amounts in Thousands) 1995 . . . . . . . . . . . $ 49,883 1996 . . . . . . . . . . . 40,275 1997 . . . . . . . . . . . 36,154 1998 . . . . . . . . . . . 29,440 1999 . . . . . . . . . . . 22,209 2000 and after . . . . . . 69,008 $ 246,969
Farmland and its subsidiaries are involved in various lawsuits incidental to the businesses. In the opinion of management, the ultimate resolution of these litigation issues will not have a material adverse effect on the Company's consolidated financial statements.
The Company has certain throughput agreements, take-or-pay agreements, minimum quantity agreements, and minimum charge agreements for various raw material supplies and services through 1996. The Company's minimum obligations under such agreements are $1,248,000 in 1995 and $924,000 in 1996.
The Company has been designated by the Environmental Protection Agency as a potentially responsible party ("PRP") under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act ("CERCLA"), at various National Priority List ("NPL") sites. In addition, the Company is aware of possible obligations associated with environmental matters at other sites, including sites where no claim or assessment has been made. The Company's probable and reasonably determinable obligations for resolution of environmental matters at NPL and other sites are estimated to be $7,164,000 and such amount has been accrued.
The ultimate costs of resolving environmental matters are not quantifiable because many such matters are in preliminary stages and the timing and extent of actions which governmental authorities may ultimately require are unknown. It is possible that the costs of such resolution may be greater than the liabilities which, in the opinion of management, are probable and reasonably determinable at August 31, 1994. In the opinion of management, it is reasonably possible for such costs to approximate $39,000,000 and to extend over 30 years.
CFA has loans receivable from customers engaged in pork production operations and from cooperative associations which are guaranteed by Farmland. At August 31, 1994, such guarantees amounted to $5,868,000. In addition, Farmland has issued letters of credit to support borrowing arrangements of a subsidiary as described in note 6.
At August 31, 1994, the Company was committed to expenditures for acquisition and completion of construction of plant and equipment aggregating approximately $19,000,000.
(11) EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
The Farmland Industries, Inc. Employee Retirement Plan ("the Plan") is a defined benefit plan covering substantially all employees of Farmland and its subsidiaries who meet minimum age and length-of-service requirements. Benefits payable under the Plan are based on years of service and the employee's average compensation during the highest four of the employee's last ten years of employment.
The assets of the Plan are maintained in a trust fund. The majority of the Plan's assets are invested in common stocks, corporate bonds, United States Government securities and short-term investment funds.
The Company's funding policy is to make the maximum annual contribution to the Plan's trust fund that can be deducted for federal income tax purposes.
The discount rate and the rate of increase in future compensation levels used in determining the actuarial present value of the projected benefit obligations at August 31, 1994 were 8.0% and 4.5%, respectively (8.5% and 5% at August 31, 1993, and 9% and 5% at August 31, 1992, respectively). The expected long-term rate of return on assets at August 31, 1994, 1993 and 1992 were 8.5%, 8.5% and 9%, respectively.
The Company provides group life insurance benefits for retired employees who were hired before January 1, 1988 and reach normal retirement age while working for the Company. Prior to 1994, the Company charged operations for the amount of an annual insurance premium paid for group life insurance covering both retired and active employees. In 1994, the cost of providing group life insurance for retired employees was not separable from the cost of providing group life insurance for active employees. For the years ended August 31, 1993 and 1992, such insurance premium were $1,178,000 and $783,000, respectively.
In fiscal year 1994, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 106, "Employers' Accounting for Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions" and the effect was insignificant.
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 112, "Employer's Accounting for Postemployment Benefits," was issued by the FASB in November 1992 and is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 1993 (the Company's 1995 fiscal year). Statement 112 establishes standards of accounting and reporting for the estimated cost of benefits provided to former or inactive employees. Management expects that the adoption of Statement 112 will not have a significant impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.
(12) INDUSTRY SEGMENT INFORMATION
The Company's business is conducted within three general operating areas: cooperative farm supply operations, cooperative marketing operations and other operations. As a farm supply cooperative, the Company engages in manufacturing and wholesale distribution of input products of agricultural production. The Company's principal farm supply products are petroleum, crop production and feed.
Petroleum products include gasoline, distillate, diesel fuel, propane, lube oils, grease and automotive parts and accessories. Products in the crop production area include nitrogen, phosphate and potash fertilizers, herbicides, insecticides and other farm chemicals. Feed products include a complete line of formulated feeds. Supply products are sold primarily at wholesale to local farm cooperatives.
Marketing operations include pork and beef processing, marketing and the distribution of fresh meat products, ham, bacon, sausage, deli meats, Italian specialty meats and boxed beef, and the marketing and storage of grain.
Other operations include convenience fuel and food stores, farm supply stores, finance company operations and services such as accounting, financial, management, environmental and safety, and transportation. See note 2 of the notes to consolidated financial statements.
The operating income (loss) of each industry segment includes the revenue generated on transactions involving products within that industry segment less identifiable and allocated expenses. In computing operating income (loss) of industry segments none of the following items has been added or deducted: interest expense, interest income, other income (deductions) or corporate expenses (included in the statements of operations as selling, general and administrative expenses), which cannot practicably be identified or allocated by industry segment. Operating income (loss) of industry segments for the years ended August 31, 1993 and 1992 have been restated for comparative purposes to exclude certain costs which were not identified to business segments in 1994 but which were identified to business segments in 1993 and 1992. Corporate assets include cash, investments in other cooperatives, the corporate headquarters of Farmland and certain other assets.
(13) SIGNIFICANT GROUP CONCENTRATION OF CREDIT RISK
Farmland extends credit to its customers on terms no more favorable than standard terms of the industries it serves. A substantial portion of Farmland's receivables are concentrated in the agricultural industry. Collections on these receivables may be dependent upon economic returns from farm crop and livestock production. The Company's credit risks are continually reviewed and management believes that adequate provisions have been made for doubtful accounts.
Farmland maintains investments in and advances to cooperatives, cooperative banks and joint ventures from which it purchases products or services. A substantial portion of the business of these investees is dependent upon the agribusiness economic sector. See note 4 of the notes to consolidated financial statements.
(14) DISCLOSURES ABOUT FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The estimated fair value of notes receivable has been determined by discounting future cash flows using a market interest rate.
The estimated fair value of the subordinated debt certificates was calculated using the discount rate for subordinated debt certificates with similar maturities currently offered for sale.
****Investments in National Bank for Cooperatives and other cooperatives' equities which have been purchased are carried at cost and securities received as patronage refunds are carried at par value, less provisions for other than temporary impairment. The Company believes it is not practicable to estimate the fair value of these securities because there is no established market for these securities and it is inappropriate to estimate future cash flows which are largely dependent on future patronage earnings of the cooperatives.
(15) RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Farmland Hydro, L.P., Hyplains Beef, L.C. (50%-owned investees) and National Beef Packing Company, L.P. (a 58%-owned consolidated limited partnership) have credit agreements with various banks. Borrowings under these agreements are nonrecourse to Farmland and its other affiliates. Cash distributions by these entities to their owners are restricted by these credit agreements. To support the efforts of these entities to meet compliance provisions of their credit agreements, Farmland advances funds and provides management and administrative services to these entities, in certain instances, on terms less advantageous to Farmland than transactions conducted by Farmland in the ordinary course of its business. At August 31, 1994, Farmland's equity investments in and advances to these entities amounted to $132,613,000.
(16) OTHER INCOME
In June 1993, the Company filed a lawsuit against 43 insurance carriers and other parties (the "Defendants") seeking declaratory judgments regarding Defendants' insurance coverage obligations for environmental remediation costs. In fiscal year 1994, the Company negotiated settlements with 20 insurance companies and as part of the settlements, the Company provided Defendants with releases of various possible environmental obligations. As a result of these settlements, the Company received cash payments of $13,566,000 in 1994 and has included such amount in the caption "Other income" in the consolidated statement of operations for the year then ended.
(17) PROVISION FOR LOSS ON DISPOSITION OF ASSETS
At August 31, 1993, management was negotiating to sell the Company's refinery at Coffeyville, Kansas. Based on the progress of negotiation and the transactions contemplated, operations for the year ended August 31, 1993 included a $20,022,000 provision for loss on the sale of the refinery. Accordingly, the net carrying value of property, plant and equipment has been reduced by $20,022,000 in the consolidated balance sheets at August 31, 1993. The transactions contemplated were subject to certain conditions, including negotiation of final agreements. During 1994, management determined that final sale terms anticipated by the potential purchaser were not in the Company's best interest. Accordingly, negotiations were terminated and the sale was not consummated.
In 1993, the Company entered discussions with a potential purchaser of a dragline. Based on these discussions, the Company estimated a loss of $6,155,000 from the sale. Accordingly, at August 31, 1993, the carrying value of the dragline was written down by $6,155,000 and a provision for this loss was included in the Company's consolidated statement of operations for the year then ended. In 1994, this sale was consummated on terms substantially as expected.
At August 31, 1993, the carrying value of a pork processing plant at Iowa Falls, Iowa was written down by $3,253,000 to an estimated disposal value.
ITEM 9.

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
No disagreement on any matter of accounting principles or practices or financial statement disclosure was reported. PART III
ITEM 10.



ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
The directors of Farmland are as follows:
Directors are elected for a term of three years by the shareholders of Farmland at its annual meeting. The expiration dates for such three-year terms are sequenced so that about one-third of Farmland's Board of Directors is elected each year. H. D. Cleberg is serving as director-at-large; the remaining twenty-one directors were elected from nine geographically defined districts in Farmland's territory. The executive committee consists of Ronald Amundson, Ben Griffith, Robert Merkle, Otis Molz, Albert Shivley, and H. D. Cleberg. The audit committee consists of Ben Griffith, Richard Detten, Steven Erdman, Barry Jensen and Joe Royster.
The executive officers of Farmland are:
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The following table sets forth the annual compensation awarded to, earned by, or paid to the Chief Executive Officer and the Company's next four most highly compensated executive officers for services rendered to the Company in all capacities during 1994, 1993 and 1992.
An Annual Employee Variable Compensation Plan, a Long-Term Management Incentive Plan, and an Executive Deferred Compensation Plan have been established by the Company to meet the competitive salary programs of other companies, and to provide a method of compensation which is based on the Company's performance.
Under the Company's Annual Employee Variable Compensation Plan, all regular salaried employees total compensation is based on a combination of base and variable pay. The variable compensation payment is dependent upon the employee's position, the performance of the Company for the fiscal year or other performance criteria of the individual's operating unit. Variable compensation is awarded only in years that the Company achieves a performance level, approved each year by the Board of Directors. The Company intends for its total cash compensation (base plus variable) to be competitive, recognizing that in the event the Company fails to achieve a predetermined threshold level of performance, the base pay alone will place the employees well under market rates. This system of variable compensation allows the company to keep its fixed costs (base salaries) lower, and only increase payroll costs consistent with the Company's ability to pay. Amounts accrued under this plan for the years ended August 31, 1994, 1993 and 1992 amounted to $17,779,000, $-0- and $10,033,000, respectively. Distributions under this plan are made annually after the close of each fiscal year.
Under the Long-Term Management Incentive Plan, the Company's executive management employees are paid cash bonus amounts determined by a formula which takes into account the level of management and the average annual net income of the Company over a three-year period. The current Long-Term Management Incentive Plan is effective September 1, 1994 through August 31, 1996. For the year ended August 31, 1994, the Company accrued $1,607,000 under this plan. The Company's performance did not reach a level where incentive was earned under the Long-Term Management Incentive Plan that covered the three-year period ended August 31, 1993. As a result, operations in 1993 were credited by $2,463,000 to reverse provisions for management incentive awards previously charged against operations in 1992 and 1991 ($1,171,000 and $1,292,000, respectively).
The Company's Executive Deferred Compensation Plan permits executive employees to defer part of their salary and/or part or all of their bonus compensation. The amount to be deferred and the period for deferral is specified by an election made semi-annually. Payments of deferred amounts shall begin at the earlier of the end of the specified deferral period, retirement, disability or death. The employee's deferred account balance is credited annually with interest at the highest rate of interest paid by the Company on any subordinated debt certificate sold during the year. Payment of an employee's account balance shall, at the employee's election, be a lump sum or in ten annual installments. Amounts deferred pursuant to the plan for the accounts of the named individuals during the fiscal years 1994, 1993 and 1992 are included in the cash compensation table.
The Company established the Farmland Industries, Inc. Employee Retirement Plan ("Plan") in 1986 for all employees whose customary employment is at the rate of at least 1000 hours per year. Participation in the Plan is optional prior to age 34, but mandatory thereafter. Approximately 6,560 active and 6,540 inactive employees were participants in the Plan on August 31, 1994. The Plan is funded by employer and employee contributions to provide lifetime retirement income at normal retirement age 65, or a reduced income beginning as early as age 55. The Plan also contains provisions for death and disability benefits. The Plan has been determined qualified under the Internal Revenue Code. The Plan is administered by a committee appointed by the Board of Directors of Farmland, and all funds of the Plan are held by a bank trustee in accordance with the terms of the trust agreement. It is the present intent to continue this plan indefinitely. The Company's funding policy is to make the maximum annual contributions to the Plan's trust fund that can be deducted for federal income tax purposes. Company contributions made to the Plan for the year ended August 31, 1994 were $2,885,000. No contributions were made to the Plan in 1993 and 1992.
Payments to participants in the Plan are based upon length of participation and compensation (limited to $150,000 annually for any employee) reported to the Plan for the four highest of the last ten years of employment. See note 11 of the notes to consolidated financial statements.
In 1982, the Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act (TEFRA) imposed a maximum retirement benefit which may be paid by a qualified retirement plan. At the present time, that limit is $118,000.
The following table sets forth the estimated annual benefits payable at age 65 for members of the Retirement Plan, which benefits are not reduced by virtue of Social Security payments:
Subject to the $150,000 maximum limit on annual compensation which may be covered by a qualified pension plan, amounts included in the cash compensation table do not vary substantially from the compensation covered by the pension plan.
The following table sets forth the credited years of service for the executive officers of the Company at August 31, 1994.
Name Years of Creditable Service
H. D. Cleberg . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 G. E. Evans . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 R. W. Honse . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 J. F. Berardi . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 S. P. Dees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
The Company established the Farmland Industries, Inc. Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan ("SERP") effective January 1, 1994. The SERP is intended to supplement the retirement income of executive participants in the Farmland Industries, Inc. Employee Retirement Plan whose retirement benefit would otherwise be reduced because of the limitation of the Internal Revenue Code on the amount of salary which can be included in the computation of retirement income ($150,000) or the amount of retirement benefit which may be paid by a qualified retirement plan ($118,000).
The Company's Board of Directors has appointed an Administrative Committee to administer the SERP. To fund the SERP, the Company purchased cash value life insurance polices on the lives of plan participants. The Company owns these insurance policies and has the sole right to name policy beneficiaries. The total SERP premiums for all participants for the eight months ended August 31, 1994 was $621,012 of which $383,736 was charged to operations.
The Company's obligation to pay supplemental retirement benefits under the SERP is limited to the aggregate cash value of the life insurance policies designated by the Administrative Committee as policies of the SERP. If the benefits under the plan for a year would exceed the total cash value of the policies, each participant's payment will be reduced.
CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS
The Company transacts business in the ordinary course with its directors and with its local cooperative members with which the directors are associated on terms no more favorable than those available to its other local cooperative members.
ITEM 12.


ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
No person owns of record or is known to own beneficially more than five percent of Farmland's equity securities.
ITEM 13.

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
The Company transacts business in the ordinary course with its directors and with its local cooperative members with which the directors are associated on terms no more favorable than those available to its other local cooperative members.
PART IV
ITEM 14.

ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
(A) Listing of Financial Statements, Financial Statement Schedules and Exhibits
(1) Financial Statements
Independent Auditors' Report
Consolidated Balance Sheets, August 31, 1994 and 1993
Consolidated Statements of Operations for each of the years in the three-year period ended August 31,
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended August 31,
Consolidated Statements of Capital Shares and Equities for each of the years in the three-year period ended August 31, 1994
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(2) Financial Statement Schedules
Farmland Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries for each of the years in the three-year period ended August 31, 1994:
II--Amounts Receivable from Related Parties
V--Property, Plant and Equipment
VI--Accumulated Depreciation and Amortization of Property, Plant and Equipment
IX--Short-term Borrowings
X--Supplementary Income Statement Information
All other schedules are omitted as the required information is inapplicable or the information is presented in the consolidated financial statements or related notes.
(3) Exhibits
Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws:
3.A Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws of Farmland Industries, Inc. effective December 1, 1993.
Instruments Defining the Rights of Security Holders, Including Indentures:
4.A(1) Trust Indenture dated November 20, 1981, as amended January 4, 1982, including specimen of Demand Loan Certificates. (Incorporated by Reference - Form S-1, No.2-75071, effective January 7, 1982)
4.A(2) Trust Indenture dated November 8, 1984, as amended January 3, 1985, including specimen of 20-year Subordinated Capital Investment Certificates. (Incorporated by Reference - Form S-1, No.2-94400, effective December 31, 1984)
4.A(2)(1) Amendment Number 2, dated December 3, 1991, to Trust Indenture dated November 8, 1984 as amended January 3, 1985, covering Farmland Industries, Inc.'s 20-Year Subordinated Capital Investment Certificates (Incorporated by Reference - Form SE, filed December 3, 1991)
4.A(3) Trust Indenture dated November 8, 1984, as amended January 3, 1985, including specimen of 10-year Subordinated Capital Investment Certificates. (Incorporated by Reference - Form S-1, No.2-94400, effective December 31, 1984)
4.A(3)(1) Amendment Number 2, dated December 3, 1991, to Trust Indenture dated November 8, 1984 as amended January 3, 1985, covering Farmland Industries, Inc.'s 10-Year Subordinated Capital Investment Certificates. (Incorporated by Reference - Form SE, filed December 3, 1991)
4.A(4) Trust Indenture dated November 8, 1984, as amended January 3, 1985, including specimen of 5-year Subordinated Capital Investment Certificates. (Incorporated by Reference - Form S-1, No.2-94400, effective December 31, 1984)
4.A(4)(1) Amendment Number 2, dated December 3, 1991, to Trust Indenture dated November 8, 1984 as amended January 3, 1985, covering Farmland Industries, Inc.'s 5-Year Subordinated Capital Investment Certificates. (Incorporated by Reference - Form SE, filed December 3, 1991)
4.A(5) Trust Indenture dated November 8, 1984, as amended January 3, 1985 and November 20, 1985, including specimen of 10-year Subordinated Monthly Income Capital Investment Certificates. (Incorporated by Reference - Form S-1, No. 2-94400, effective December 31, 1984)
4.A(6) Trust Indenture dated November 11, 1985 including specimen of the 5-year Subordinated Monthly Income Capital Investment Certificates. (Incorporated by Reference - Form S-1, No. 33-1970, effective December 31, 1985)
Instruments Defining Rights of Owners of Indebtedness not Registered:
4.B(1) Credit Agreement among Farmland Industries, Inc., as Borrower, ABN Amro Bank N.V., The Bank of Nova Scotia, Boatmen's First National Bank of Kansas City, The Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A., Commerce Bank of Kansas City, N.A., NBD Bank, N.A., as Banks and The National Bank for Cooperatives, Cooperatieve Centrale Raiffeisen- Boerenleenbank B.A. "Rabobank Nederland", New York Branch, as Banks and as Co-Agents, dated May 19, 1994, (the "Syndicated Credit Facility"). (Incorporated by Reference - Form 10-Q filed July 14, 1994)
4.B(2) List identifying contents of all omitted schedules referenced in and not filed with, the Syndicated Credit Facility, dated May 19, 1994. (Incorporated by Reference - Form 10-Q, filed July 14, 1994)
Material Contracts:
Lease Contracts:
10.A(1) The First National Bank of Chicago, not individually but solely as Trustee for AT&T Commercial Finance Corporation, The Boatmen's National Bank of St. Louis, Firstier Bank, N.A. and Norwest Bank Minnesota, National Association and Farmland Industries, Inc. consummated a leveraged lease in the amount of $73,153,000 dated September 6, 1991. (Incorporated by Reference - Form SE, filed December 3, 1991.)
10.A(2) The First National Bank of Commerce as Trustee for General Electric Credit Corporation as Beneficiary and Farmland Industries, Inc. consummated a leveraged lease in the amount of $51,909,257.90 dated March 17, 1977. (Incorporated by Reference - Form S-1, No.2-60372, effective December 22, 1977)
Management Remunerative Plans Filed Pursuant to Item 14C of this Report.
10.(iii)(A)(1) Annual Employee Variable Compensation Plan (September 1, 1994 - August 31, 1995)
10.(iii)(A)(2) Farmland Industries, Inc. Management Long-Term Incentive Plan (Effective September 1, 1993). (Incorporated by Reference - Form 10-K, filed November 29, 1993)
10.(iii)(A)(3) Farmland Industries, Inc. Executive Deferred Compensation Plan (Incorporated by Reference - Form SE, filed November 23, 1987)
21. Subsidiaries of the Registrant
Farmland Foods, Inc., a 99%-owned subsidiary, was incorporated under the laws of the State of Kansas. Farmland Foods, Inc. has been included in the consolidated financial statements filed in this registration.
Farmland Insurance Agency, a wholly-owned subsidiary, was incorporated under the laws of the State of Missouri. Farmland Insurance Agency has been included in the consolidated financial statements filed in this registration.
Farmers Chemical Company, a wholly-owned subsidiary, was incorporated under the laws of the State of Kansas. Farmers Chemical Company has been included in the consolidated financial statements filed in this registration.
Farmland Securities Company, a wholly-owned subsidiary, was incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware. Farmland Securities Company has been included in the consolidated financial statements filed in this registration.
Cooperative Service Company, a wholly-owned subsidiary, was incorporated under the laws of the State of Nebraska. Cooperative Service Company has been included in the consolidated financial statements filed in this registration.
Double Circle Farm Supply Company, a wholly-owned subsidiary, was incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada. Double Circle Farm Supply Company has been included in the consolidated financial statements filed in this registration.
National Beef Packing Company, L.P., a 58%-owned subsidiary, was formed under the laws of the State of Delaware. National Beef Packing Company has been included in the consolidated financial statements filed in this registration.
NBPCo, L.L.C., a wholly-owned subsidiary, was formed under the laws of the State of Kansas. NBPCo has been included in the consolidated financial statements filed in this registration.
Farmland Financial Services Company, a wholly-owned subsidiary, was incorporated under the laws of the State of Kansas. Farmland Financial Services Company has been included in the consolidated financial statements filed in this registration.
Farmland Transportation, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary, was incorporated under the laws of the State of Missouri. Farmland Transportation, Inc. has been included in the consolidated financial statements filed in this registration.
Environmental and Safety Services, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary, was incorporated under the laws of the State of Missouri. Environmental and Safety Services, Inc. has been filed in the consolidated financial statements included in this registration.
Penterra, Inc., a 81%-owned subsidiary, was incorporated under the laws of the State of Kansas. Penterra, Inc. has been included in the consolidated financial statements filed in this registration.
Farmland Industries, Ltd., a wholly-owned subsidiary, was incorporated under the laws of the United States Virgin Islands. Farmland Industries, Ltd. has been included in the consolidated financial statements filed in this registration.
Heartland Data Services, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary, was incorporated under the laws of the State of Kansas. Heartland Data Services, Inc. has been included in the consolidated financial statements filed in this registration.
Equity Country, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary, was incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware. Equity Country, Inc. has been included in the consolidated financial statements filed in this registration.
Equity Export Oil and Gas Company, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary, was incorporated under the laws of the State of Oklahoma. Equity Export Oil and Gas Company, Inc. has been included in the consolidated financial statements filed in this registration.
Ceres Realty Corporation, a wholly-owned subsidiary, was incorporated under the laws of the State of Missouri. Ceres Realty Corporation has been included in the consolidated financial statements filed in this registration.
Heartland Wheat Growers, L.P., a 79%-owned subsidiary, was formed under the laws of the State of Kansas. Heartland Wheat Growers has been included in the consolidated financial statements filed in this registration.
Heartland Wheat Growers, Inc., a 79%-owned subsidiary, was incorporated under the laws of the State of Kansas. Heartland Wheat Growers has been included in the consolidated financial statements filed in this registration.
Farmland Industrias S.A. de C.V., a wholly-owned subsidiary, was formed under the laws of Mexico. Farmland Industrias has been included in the consolidated financial statements filed in this registration.
National Carriers, Inc., a 79%-owned subsidiary, was incorporated under the laws of the State of Kansas. National Carriers has been included in the consolidated financial statements filed in this registration.
Supreme Land, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary, was incorporated under the laws of the State of Kansas. Supreme Land has been included in the consolidated financial statements filed in this registration.
Tradigrain, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary, was incorporated under the laws of the State of Tennessee. Tradigrain has been included in the consolidated financial statements filed in this registration.
Tradigrain S.A., a wholly-owned subsidiary, was formed under the laws of Switzerland. Tradigrain has been included in the consolidated financial statements filed in this registration.
Tradigrain Shipping S.A., a wholly-owned subsidiary, was formed under the laws of Switzerland. Tradigrain has been included in the consolidated financial statements filed in this registration.
Tradigrain S.A., a wholly-owned subsidiary, was formed under the laws of France. Tradigrain has been included in the consolidated financial statements filed in this registration.
Tradigrain GmbH, a wholly-owned subsidiary, was formed under the laws of Germany. Tradigrain has been included in the consolidated financial statements filed in this registration.
Tradigrain LTD., a wholly-owned subsidiary, was formed under the laws of Great Britain. Tradigrain has been included in the consolidated financial statements filed in this registration.
Tradigrain S.A., a wholly-owned subsidiary, was formed under the laws of Argentina. Tradigrain has been included in the consolidated financial statements filed in this registration.
24. Power of Attorney
27. Financial Data Schedule (Fiscal Year Ended August 31, 1994).
(B) Reports on Form 8-K
No reports on Form 8-K have been filed during the last quarter of the period covered by this report.
(C) Exhibits
The exhibits required by Item 601 of Regulation S-K are filed herewith or have been filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and are incorporated by reference as part of this Form 10-K. See Item 14(A)(3).
(D) Financial Statement Schedules required by Regulation are filed herewith: See Item 14(A)(2).
FARMLAND INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
SCHEDULE II--AMOUNTS RECEIVABLE FROM RELATED PARTIES
For the Years Ended August 31, 1994, 1993 and 1992
FARMLAND INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
SCHEDULE V--PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
FOR THE YEAR ENDED AUGUST 31, 1994
FARMLAND INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
SCHEDULE V--PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
FOR THE YEAR ENDED AUGUST 31, 1993
FARMLAND INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
SCHEDULE V--PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
FOR THE YEAR ENDED AUGUST 31, 1992
FARMLAND INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
SCHEDULE VI--ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION OF PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
FOR THE YEAR ENDED AUGUST 31, 1994
NOTE: The following percentages are used for computing depreciation:
Land Improvements . . . . . . 6 to 10% Site Improvements . . . . . . 3 to 30% Buildings . . . . . . . . . . 2 to 10% Machinery and Equipment . . . 3 to 20% Automotive Equipment . . . . 10 to 33% Furniture and Fixtures . . . 10 to 20% Livestock . . . . . . . . . 25 to 50% Mining Properties . . . . . . 4 to 21% Leasehold Improvements . . .. 4 to 6% Fertilizer Properties . . .. 6 to 7% Capital Lease . . . . . . .. 6 to 7%
FARMLAND INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
SCHEDULE VI--ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION OF PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
FOR THE YEAR ENDED AUGUST 31, 1993
NOTE: The following percentages are used for computing depreciation:
Land Improvements . . . . . . 6 to 10% Site Improvements . . . . . . 3 to 30% Buildings . . . . . . . . . . 2 to 10% Machinery and Equipment . . . 3 to 20% Automotive Equipment . . . . 10 to 33% Furniture and Fixtures . . . 10 to 20% Livestock . . . . . . . . . 25 to 50% Mining Properties . . . . . . 4 to 21% Leasehold Improvements . . .. 4 to 6% Fertilizer Properties . . .. 6 to 7% Capital Lease . . . . . . .. 6 to 7%
FARMLAND INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
SCHEDULE VI--ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION OF PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
FOR THE YEAR ENDED AUGUST 31, 1992
NOTE: The following percentages are used for computing depreciation:
Land Improvements . . . . . . . . 6 to 10% Site Improvements . . . . . . . . 3 to 30% Buildings . . . . . . . . . . . 2 to 10% Machinery and Equipment . . . . . 3 to 20% Automotive Equipment . . . . . . 10 to 33% Furniture and Fixtures . . . . . 10 to 20% Leasehold Improvements . . . . . 4 to 6% Fertilizer Properties . . . . . 6 to 7%
FARMLAND INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
SCHEDULE IX--SHORT-TERM BORROWINGS
SCHEDULE X--SUPPLEMENTARY INCOME STATEMENT INFORMATION
SIGNATURES
PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SECURITIES ACT, FARMLAND INDUSTRIES, INC. HAS DULY CAUSED THIS FORM 10-K TO BE SIGNED ON ITS BEHALF BY THE UNDERSIGNED, THEREUNTO DULY AUTHORIZED IN THE CITY OF KANSAS CITY, STATE OF MISSOURI ON NOVEMBER 29, 1994.
FARMLAND INDUSTRIES, INC.
BY H. D. CLEBERG H. D. Cleberg President and Chief Executive Officer
BY JOHN F. BERARDI John F. Berardi Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, THIS FORM 10-K HAS BEEN SIGNED FOR THE FOLLOWING PERSONS ON THE DATE INDICATED PURSUANT TO VALID POWER OF ATTORNEY EXECUTED ON OCTOBER 19, 1994.
Signature Title Date
ALBERT J. SHIVLEY Chairman of Board, November 29, 1994 Albert J. Shivley Director
OTIS H. MOLZ Vice Chairman of Board, November 29, 1994 Otis H. Molz Director
LYMAN ADAMS Director November 29, 1994 Lyman Adams
RONALD J. AMUNDSON Director November 29, 1994 Ronald J. Amundson
BAXTER ANKERSTJERNE Director November 29, 1994 Baxter Ankerstjerne
JODY BEZNER Director November 29, 1994 Jody Bezner
RICHARD L. DETTEN Director November 29, 1994 Richard L. Detten
WILLARD ENGEL Director November 29, 1994 Willard Engel
STEVEN ERDMAN Director November 29, 1994 Steven Erdman
BEN GRIFFITH Director November 29, 1994 Ben Griffith
GAIL D. HALL Director November 29, 1994 Gail D. Hall
BARRY JENSEN Director November 29, 1994 Barry Jensen
ROBERT MERKLE Director November 29, 1994 Robert Merkle
GREG PFENNING Director November 29, 1994 Greg Pfenning
VONN RICHARDSON Director November 29, 1994 Vonn Richardson
MONTE ROMOHR Director November 29, 1994 Monte Romohr
Director November 29, 1994 Joe Royster
PAUL RUEDINGER Director November 29, 1994 Paul Ruedinger
RAYMOND J. SCHMITZ Director November 29, 1994 Raymond J. Schmitz
THEODORE J. WEHRBEIN Director November 29, 1994 Theodore J. Wehrbein
ROBERT ZINKULA Director November 29, 1994 Robert Zinkula