Annual Report (Form 10-K), fiscal year 1994

ITEM 1. BUSINESS
United Industrial Corporation ("United" or the "Company") was incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware on September 14, 1959 under the name Topp Industries Corporation. On December 31, 1959, the name of the corporation was changed to United Industrial Corporation.
The operations of United consist of three principal industry segments: defense, energy systems and plastic products, conducted through four wholly-owned subsidiaries.
Defense -------
AAI Corporation
AAI Corporation ("AAI") is engaged in research, development and manufacture in the following major areas: (1) training and simulation systems; (2) automatic test equipment for electronic systems and components; (3) ordnance systems; (4) mechanical support systems for industrial, military, and marine applications; (5) unmanned air vehicle systems; (6) automated weather monitoring systems; and (7) transportation systems. Since its inception, AAI's business has been primarily in support of the U.S. Department of Defense ("DOD"). Since 1990, the Company has emphasized diversification into other markets to reduce its dependence on the DOD. The United States defense budget has been significantly reduced in recent years and this trend is expected to continue. While 1993 sales were similar to 1992, the 1994 sales decreased $46 million from 1993, primarily in DOD. In 1994 approximately 74% of the sales volume of AAI consisted of research, development and production of military items under defense contracts. Certain of the contracts currently being worked on by AAI involve testing systems for U.S. Navy aircraft, training equipment for the U.S. Air Force and U.S. Navy, and weapons handling systems for the U.S. Army.
The balance of AAI's business consists of work performed in the non- Department of Defense markets. These areas include hydraulic test equipment, transportation equipment and weather systems. AAI was awarded a contract for 1,096 weather systems to be installed in certain government airports throughout the country. In 1994, 145 weather systems were installed bringing total systems installed since inception of the contract to 530.
Because of the variety of its activities, it is not possible to state precisely the competitive position of AAI with respect to each of its product lines. In the area of training and simulation systems, AAI is one of approximately ten leading organizations developing equipment for the U.S. Government. AAI's ability to obtain orders for training and simulation systems is dependent principally on the ability, expertise and training of its employees and the level of funding by the DOD and foreign military users. A number of large and small companies produce automatic test equipment. In the area of weapons and
NYFS11...:\95\78495\0001\1196\FRM31594.Z7D
munitions, AAI ranks high among approximately ten companies engaged in development work. However, AAI's production activity in this field is less significant. AAI began working in the Unmanned Air Vehicle business in 1986. The Company produced the highly successful Pioneer Unmanned Air Vehicle employed by the United States during Operation Desert Storm, and presently is pursuing contracts with foreign countries. AAI is one of several large and small competitors in this field.
On January 16, 1992, AAI acquired, through a newly-formed subsidiary AAI/ACL Technologies, Inc. ("AAI/ACL"), substantially all of the assets and business of ACL Technologies, Inc., a manufacturer of hydraulic test equipment principally for the commercial airline market. Business results of AAI/ACL have been less than anticipated because of the continued unfavorable economic situation of the commercial airline industry in the U.S. and worldwide.
On March 29, 1993, the Company's Board of Directors approved a plan of reorganization and restructuring whereby, in light of existing circumstances such as the declining Department of Defense budget and the continuing financial problems of the airline industry and in order to position itself for both short and long-term growth, it took a one- time restructuring charge. The charge covered the anticipated cost of organizational and product-line changes, the consolidation of facilities, and work force reductions of approximately 300 in AAI and its four subsidiaries. The non-recurring charge of $22.5 million ($14,370,00 or $1.17 per share, net of tax benefit) was taken during 1993. As at December 31, 1993, the restructuring program was substantially completed. During 1994, $750,000 was expended. A major portion of the charge resulted from the discontinuance of operations of AAI/MICROFLITE. AAI/MICROFLITE, acquired in 1991, was formerly the commercial division of Singer-Link Corporation, a manufacturer of flight simulators and training devices for commercial aircraft. All of the remaining assets of AAI/MICROFLITE were sold in 1994.
AAI's administrative offices and the major part of its manufacturing and engineering facilities are located in Hunt Valley, Maryland.
Symtron Systems, Inc.
On January 18, 1994, the Company acquired all of the outstanding shares of Symtron Systems, Inc. ("Symtron"), a producer of fire fighter training simulators for the government, military and commercial markets. The purchase price consisted of initial cash payments of $2,000,000, assumption of certain liabilities of approximately $5,900,000 and contingent payments, not to exceed $1,000,000, based on the net worth at specified dates and future profits on contracts existing at the acquisition date. The maximum of such payments were earned and payable to the sellers at March 31, 1995. Additionally, contingent amounts are payable if certain pretax profits, as defined in the purchase agreement, are earned for each of the years in the five year period ending December 31, 1998. Funds generated from operations and an existing line of credit were utilized to finance the purchase of Symtron.
The acquisition was accounted for as a purchase, and accordingly, the operations of Symtron are included in the Company's 1994 financial statements. In 1994 approximately 71% of the sales volume of Symtron consisted of production for commercial customers. The main office and plant of Symtron are located in Fair Lawn, New Jersey.
Energy Systems --------------
Detroit Stoker Company
Detroit Stoker Company ("Detroit Stoker") is engaged in the manufacture and sale of industrial stokers, combustion systems, pneumatic and hydraulic conveying systems, waste to energy incinerator equipment, rotary seal feeders, shredders, grapples, and replacement parts. Its products are used for industrial power and municipal power plants, utility plants, heating of hospitals, universities and other types of public buildings and municipal and industrial incineration plants. Principal customers include public utilities, manufacturing and industrial plants, universities, pulp and paper mills and sugar mills. Its waste to energy equipment is used extensively for public and private plants burning municipal solid waste as fuel. The primary raw materials used by Detroit Stoker are iron and steel, which are available from many sources. The main office and plant of Detroit Stoker are located in Monroe, Michigan.
The products of Detroit Stoker compete with those of several other manufacturers. Detroit Stoker is presently marketing a liquid and gaseous fuel burning product line with low emissions for the power industry, primarily for boiler applications. Potential customers would consist of original boiler manufacturers and institutions as well as all major industrial manufacturers. Competition is based upon many factors including price, service and performance and competitive bidding.
Its Material Handling division is engaged in the manufacture and sale of mechanical conveyors and miscellaneous auxiliary equipment. Its conveyor products are used by industrial, utility and processing plants to mechanically convey bulk materials. The primary raw materials used are iron and steel, which are available from many sources. This division competes with several other manufacturers of similar equipment.
Midwest Metallurgical Laboratory, Inc. ("Midwest"), a subsidiary of Detroit Stoker, is a foundry engaged in the manufacture of grey and ductile iron, stainless steel and special alloyed iron castings. Approximately 85% of the sales of Midwest are to Detroit Stoker. Midwest's plant is located in Marshall, Michigan.
Plastic Products ----------------
Neo Products Co.
Neo Products Co. ("Neo") engineers and fabricates thermoplastic products to the specifications submitted by its customers. Neo also manufactures items for point of purchase display advertising and consumer products related primarily to infants, food service equipment for a major airline and fuel tank reservoirs for the auto industry.
Sales to customers of items for point of purchase display advertising represented approximately 28% of sales in 1994. These sales principally consisted of display racks and trays. Sales of consumer end use items represented 57% of sales in 1994. These sales primarily included infant seats, carrier cradles, chairs and waste baskets. Sales to the auto industry represented approximately 11% of sales in 1994. The largest customer of Neo accounted for approximately 39% of sales in 1994 compared to 32% and 19% in 1993 and 1992, respectively. Neo's main office and plant are located in Chicago, Illinois.
Neo is engaged in the highly competitive field of thermoplastic fabrication. Neo's operations are in potential and actual competition with fabrication facilities of some of its own customers as well as other thermoplastic fabricators. Neo has improved its competitive position by increasing the size of its larger injection molding presses to accommodate larger size molded parts. Although it is not possible to estimate the position of Neo among competitors in this field, it is believed to hold less than 1% market share. The primary raw material used by Neo is plastic resin, which is available from many sources.
For additional information concerning United's subsidiaries reference is made to information set forth in the sections entitled "AAI Corporation", "Symtron Systems, Inc.", "Detroit Stoker Company" and "Neo Products Company" commencing on page 5, of United's 1994 Annual Report to Shareholders (the "Annual Report"), which sections are incorporated herein by reference.
General ------- Employees
As of March 1, 1995 United and its subsidiaries had approximately 1,900 employees. Approximately 220 of these employees are represented by several unions under contracts expiring between March 1996 and January 1998. United considers its employee relationships to be satisfactory.
Patents
United and its subsidiaries own more than 100 United States patents relating to various products, including stokers, marine equipment, ordnance and electronic equipment, and fire
fighter trainers. In addition, United has numerous pending applications for patents. There is no assurance as to how many patents will be issued pursuant to these pending applications. The applications relate to a wide variety of fields, including automation control systems, ordnance devices, and electronic developments. No patent is considered to be of material importance to United.
Research and Development
During 1994, 1993 and 1992, the subsidiaries of United (exclusive of AAI) expended approximately $ 98,031, $126,300 and $90,400, respectively, on the development of new products and the improvement of existing products. All of the programs and the funds to support such programs are sponsored by the subsidiary involved. In addition to the above amount, AAI is substantially engaged in research and development for the U.S. Government.
Backlog
The backlog of orders by industry segment at December 31, 1993 and 1994 was as follows:
The increase in the backlog for the defense segment was primarily due to increased orders in the non-defense markets. The increase in backlog for energy systems was due to the increased level of new contracts being awarded. Except for approximately $90,951,000 of research and development backlog, substantially all of the backlog orders at December 31, 1994 are expected to be filled in 1995.
Government Contracts
No single customer other than the U.S. Government, principally the Department of Defense, accounted for 10% or more of net sales during the year. Sales to the Government normally carry a lesser margin of profit than commercial sales and may be subject to price redetermination under certain circumstances. Contracts for such sales can be terminated for the convenience of the Government.
Financial Information Relating to Industry Segments
For financial information with respect to industry segments of United, reference is made to the information set forth in Note 12 of the Notes to Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Report, which Note is incorporated herein by reference.
Foreign Operations and Export Sales
United and its subsidiaries have no significant foreign operations. During 1993 export sales by United and its subsidiaries amounted to approximately $31,258,000. Export sales in 1994 and 1992 amounted to less than 10% of net sales for these years.
ITEM 2.



ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
United maintains executive and administrative offices at leased premises at 18 East 48th Street, New York, N.Y., which lease expires in December 1996. The following is a tabulation of the principal properties owned or leased by United's subsidiaries as at March 1, 1995.
Approximate ----------- Principal Area Owned --------- ---- ----- Location Use In Square Feet or Leased -------- --- -------------- ---------
1510 East First Machine 194,910 Owned in fee Street shop, steel floor space Monroe, MI fabrication, on 14.4 engineering acres of and sales land (East facilities Building) of Detroit Stoker
1426 East First Assembly, 101,000 Owned in fee St. shipping and floor space Monroe, MI administrative on 2.2 facilities acres of of Detroit land (West Stoker Building)
15290 Fifteen Foundry, 59,386 Owned in fee Mile Road Midwest floor space Marshall, MI Metallurgical on 28.4 acres of land
Industry Lane Manufacturing, 770,918 Owned in fee Cockeysville, MD engineering floor space and on 92 acres administrative of land facilities of AAI
Approximate ----------- Principal Area Owned --------- ---- ----- Location Use In Square Feet or Leased -------- --- -------------- ---------
Gilroy Road Additional 66,400 Leased to Hunt Valley, MD manufacturing (Building 200) April 22, and 1999 engineering facilities of AAI
1701 Pollitt Administrative, 60,000 Leased to Drive engineering June 30, Fair Lawn, NJ and 2001 manufacturing facilities of Symtrom
1505 E. Warner Manufacturing, 145,000 Leased to Avenue engineering Jan. 31, Santa Ana, CA and 1997 administrative facilities of ACL Technologies
2801 Manufacturing, 71,142 Leased to Professional engineering July 31, Parkway and 1996 Ocoee, FL administrative facilities of AAI
1035 Semoran Sales office 400 Leased to Blvd. for Feb. 28, Winter Park, FL Symtron 1997
5400 S. Kilbourn Manufacturing 45,000 Owned in fee Avenue and Chicago, IL administrative facilities of Neo
For information with respect to obligations for lease rentals, see Note 8 of the Notes to Financial Statements in the Annual Report, which Note is incorporated herein by reference. United considers its properties to be suitable and adequate for its present needs. The properties are being fully utilized.
ITEM 3.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
On December 27, 1989, the Company was named in an administrative order filed by the Arizona Attorney General's Office seeking the Company's response to alleged environmental
NYFS11...:\95\78495\0001\1196\FRM31594.Z7D
contamination at property located on West Osborn Street in Phoenix, Arizona (the "West Osborn property"), that the State alleges formerly was owned by the Company. The Arizona Attorney General's Office and the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality have contended that contamination from the West Osborn property, as well as other properties nearby, has contributed to a groundwater contamination. In 1990, the Company challenged the administrative order and it was withdrawn. Subsequently, the Arizona Attorney General's Office and the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality named the Company and several other parties on a draft consent order holding the Company and the parties jointly and severally liable for the costs of investigating alleged environment contamination at the West Osborn property and for the payment of certain additional past and future investigative costs. During 1991, the Company negotiated with Arizona officials over the scope of the consent decree, although the Company does not presently believe nor has it conceded to the State or to any other party that it bears any liability for the costs of responding to any contamination at the West Osborn property. These negotiations were not producing results and thus were terminated. The draft consent order seeks work and payments totalling approximately $1 to $2 million from all of the allegedly involved parties. On May 18, 1993, the State of Arizona filed suit against the Company in the U.S. District Court of Arizona seeking the recovery of investigative costs, injunctive relief to require the Company to perform a Remedial Investigation and Feasibility Study, and ultimately to require the remediation of alleged soil and ground-water contamination. The State has since brought in co-defendants whose operations at the site were substantially larger than those of the Company. This case is the subject of active discovery by the Company. The Company intends to vigorously contest these actions and believes that the resolution of these actions will not be material to the Company.
On February 11, 1992 a complaint was filed against the Company and ten other named and ten unnamed entities in the Maricopa County Superior Court of Arizona by seven individuals seeking to represent a class. A class in excess of 10,000 was originally alleged. The plaintiffs have amended their complaint to separate the larger property damage and medical monitoring classes into smaller subclasses based on geographic location and alleged exposure to solvents. In the process of amendment, the overall sizes of the respective classes have been significantly reduced. This suit alleges that the members of the class have been exposed to contaminated groundwater in the Phoenix/Scottsdale, Arizona area and suffer increased risk of disease and other physical effects. They also assert property damages under various theories; seek to have certain scientific studies performed concerning health risks, preventative measures and long-term effects; and seek incidental and consequential damages, punitive damages and an injunction against actions causing further exposures. The property and medical classes recently were certified. The Company has joined with the other defendants and appealed the class certification issue to the Arizona Supreme Court. The Company intends to vigorously contest these actions and believes that the resolution of these actions will not be material to the Company.
Three additional lawsuits were filed on April 7, 1993, December 20, 1993, and June 10, 1994 in the Maricopa County Superior Court of Arizona. These matters allege personal
NYFS11...:\95\78495\0001\1196\FRM31594.Z7D
injury and wrongful death by multiple plaintiffs arising from the alleged contamination in the Phoenix/Scottsdale, Arizona area. The Company intends to aggressively defend against these claims, however, at this time, no estimate can be made as to the amount or range of potential loss, if any, to the Company with respect to these matters. In comparison to the other defendants, the operations of the Company were very limited in time and size.
In January 1993, Detroit Stoker was named as a third-party defendant in four lawsuits pending in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio. The third-party plaintiffs that have sued Detroit Stoker are ship owners that have in turn been sued by Great Lakes maritime workers who claim to have suffered injuries and disease as a result of alleged exposure to asbestos while working aboard the ships. The ship owners claim that Detroit Stoker and other suppliers to the ship owners furnished products, supplies or components of the ships that contained asbestos. These cases are currently inactive pending their transfer to the national multi-district asbestos docket in the United States District Court in Philadelphia. Detroit Stoker intends to aggressively defend these claims, however, at this time, no estimate can be made as to the amount or range of potential loss, if any, to Detroit Stoker with respect to this action.
Detroit Stoker was notified in March 1992 by the Michigan Department of Natural Resources ("MDNR") that it is a potentially responsible party in connection with the clean-up of a former industrial landfill located in Port of Monroe, Michigan. MDNR is treating the Port of Monroe landfill site as a contaminated facility within the meaning of the Michigan Environmental Response Act ("MERA"), MCLA section 299.601 et seq. Under MERA, if a release or a potential release of a ------ discarded hazardous substance is or may be injurious to the environment or to the public health, safety, or welfare, MDNR is empowered to undertake or compel investigation and response activities in order to alleviate any contamination threat. Detroit Stoker intends to aggressively defend these claims, however, at this time, no estimate can be made as to the amount or range of potential loss, if any, to Detroit Stoker with respect to this action.
Turpin Wachter Associates, Inc. ("TWAI") commenced an action against AAI Systems Management, Inc. ("SMI") before the American Arbitration Association in December 1993 alleging that SMI was required to exercise options awarding TWAI further work under a subcontract relating to the Navy fire fighter. In December 1994, TWAI was awarded $117,000.
Peak Oilfield Service Corp. ("Peak") sued SMI in the United States District Court for the District of Alaska in December, 1993, alleging that SMI interfered with an implied contract between SMI's subcontractor and Peak. In March 1994, full settlement was reached in this matter which consisted of the payment of $170,000 to the plaintiff.
There are various other lawsuits and claims, including other environmental matters, pending against United. In the opinion of United's management based in part on advice of counsel,
none of these other actions will have a materially adverse effect on the consolidated financial position of the Company.
ITEM 4.

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
None.
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
Annual elections are held in May to elect officers for the ensuing year. Interim elections are held as required. Except as otherwise indicated, each executive officer has held his current position for the past five years.
NYFS11...:\95\78495\0001\1196\FRM31594.Z7D
PART II --------
ITEM 5.

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT'S COMMON STOCK AND RELATED SECURITY HOLDER MATTERS
Reference is made to the information set forth in Note 15 of the Notes to Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Report concerning dividends, stock prices, stock listing and record holders, which information is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 6.

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
Reference is made to the information set forth in the sections entitled "Ten-Year Financial Data" on pages 37 and 38 of the Annual Report and "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" commencing on page 39 of the Annual Report, which sections are incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 7.

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Reference is made to the information set forth in the section entitled "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" commencing on page 39 of the Annual Report, which section is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 8.


ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
The report of independent auditors and consolidated financial statements included on pages 13 through 36 of the Annual Report are incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 9.

ITEM 9. DISAGREEMENTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
NYFS11...:\95\78495\0001\1196\FRM31594.Z7D
PART III --------
ITEM 10.



ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
Reference is made to the information to be set forth in the section entitled "Election of Directors" in the definitive proxy statement involving the election of directors in connection with the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of United to be held on May 8, 1995 (the "Proxy Statement"), which section (other than the Compensation Committee Report and Performance Graph) is incorporated herein by reference. The Proxy Statement will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission not later than 120 days after December 31, 1994, pursuant to Regulation 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
The information required with respect to executive officers is set forth in Part I of this report under the heading "Executive Officers of the Registrant," pursuant to instruction 3 to paragraph (b) of Item 401 of Regulation S-K.
ITEM 11.

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Reference is made to the information to be set forth in the section entitled "Election of Directors" in the Proxy Statement, which section (other than the Compensation Committee Report and Performance Graph) is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 12.

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
Reference is made to the information to be set forth in the section entitled "Voting Rights" and "Security Ownership of Management" in the Proxy Statement, which sections are incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 13.

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Reference is made to the information to be set forth in the section entitled "Election of Directors" in the Proxy Statement, which section (other than the Compensation Committee Report and Performance Graph) is incorporated herein by reference.
NYFS11...:\95\78495\0001\1196\FRM31594.Z7D
PART IV --------
ITEM 14.

ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
(a) (1) Financial Statements:
See Financial Statements Index included in Item 8 of this Report.
(2) Financial Statement Schedules:
FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
INDEX ------
Page No. ---------
Independent Auditors Report
Schedule I Condensed Financial Information of Registrant
Schedule II Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
(3) Exhibits:
(3)(a)- Restated Certificate of Incorporation of United (1).
(3)(b)- By-Laws of United (incorporated by reference to United's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1989).
(3)(c)- Amendment to By-Laws of United as of September 19, 1994.
(10)(a)- United Industrial Corporation 1994 Stock Option Plan (1).
(10)(b)- Purchase Agreement, dated January 18, 1994, between United and Symtron Systems, Inc. (1).
(10)(c)- Note Purchase Agreement (the "Note Agreement") dated as of July 15, 1992 among AAI Corporation ("AAI") and Principal Mutual Life Insurance Company, The Travelers Insurance Company and The Travelers Indemnity Company of Rhode Island (the "Purchasers") (2).
(10)(d)- Guaranty Agreement (the "Note Guaranty") dated as of July 15, 1992 by United in favor of the Purchasers (2).
(10)(e)- Amendment No. 1 dated July 15, 1993 to the Note Agreement (3).
(10)(f)- Amendment No. 1 dated July 15, 1993 to the Note Guaranty (3).
(10)(g)- Amendment No. 2 to Note Agreement dated as of December 20, 1993 among AAI and the Purchasers.
(10)(h)- Amendment No. 3 to Note Agreement dated as of October 13, 1994 among AAI and the Purchasers (4).
(10)(i)- Amendment No. 2 to the Note Guaranty (4).
(10)(j)- Credit Agreement dated as of October 13, 1994 among AAI Corporation, the Lenders parties thereto and First Fidelity Bank, National Association as Agent (the "Agent") and Issuing Bank (4).
(10)(k)- Pledge and Security Agreement dated as of October 13, 1994 by AAI in favor of the Agent (4).
(10)(l)- Pledge and Security Agreement dated as of October 13, 1994 by the Company in favor of the Agent (4).
(10)(m)- Security Agreement dated as of October 13, 1994 between AAI and the Agent (4).
(10)(n)- Security Agreement dated as of October 13, 1994 between each subsidiary of AAI, certain subsidiaries of the Company and the Agent (4).
(10)(o)- Guaranty dated as of October 13, 1994 by the Company and certain of its subsidiaries and by each subsidiary of AAI in favor of the Agent(4).
(10)(p)- Employment Agreement, dated September 20, 1993, between AAI and Richard R. Erkeneff (1).
(10)(q)- Employment Agreement, dated March 16, 1995, between United and P. David Bocksch.
(11) - Computation of Earnings Per Share.
(13) - United's 1994 Annual Report to Shareholders.
(21) - Subsidiaries of United.
(23) - Consent of Independent Auditors
(27) - Financial Data Schedule
-----------------------
(1) Incorporated by reference to United's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1993.
(2) Incorporated by reference to United's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1992.
(3) Incorporated by reference to United's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1993.
(4) Incorporated by reference to United's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,1994.
(b)- Reports on Form 8-K - United did not file any reports on Form 8-K during the quarter ended December 31, 1994.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
UNITED INDUSTRIAL CORPORATION (Registrant)
By: /s/ Bernard Fein ------------------------------- Bernard Fein, President
Date: March 24, 1995 ---------------------------
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the date indicated.
Name Date ---- ----
/s/ Bernard Fein March 24, 1995 --------------------------------- Bernard Fein, President, Chairman of the Board and Director (Principal Executive Officer)
/s/ Howard M. Bloch March 24, 1995 -------------------------------- Howard M. Bloch, Vice President, and Director (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
/s/ Maurice Rosenthal March 24, 1995 -------------------------------- Maurice L. Rosenthal, Director
/s/ Myron Simons March 24, 1995 -------------------------------- Myron Simons, Director
/s/ Rick S. Bierman March 24, 1995 -------------------------------- Rick S. Bierman, Director
Annual Report on Form 10-K
Item 14(a) (1) and (2), (c) and (d)
List of Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedules
Certain Exhibits
Financial Statement Schedules
Year ended December 31, 1994
United Industrial Corporation
New York, New York
NYFS11...:\95\78495\0001\1196\LST3285W.45B
Form 10-K Item 14(a) (1) and (2)
United Industrial Corporation and Subsidiaries
List of Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedules
The following consolidated financial statements of United Industrial Corporation and subsidiaries, included in the annual report of the registrant to its shareholders for the year ended December 31, 1994, are incorporated by reference in Item 8:
Consolidated Balance Sheets December 31, 1994 and 1993 Consolidated Statements of Operations Years Ended December 31, 1994, 1993 and 1992 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows Years Ended December 31, 1994, 1993 and 1992 Notes to Financial Statements
The following consolidated financial statement schedules of United Industrial Corporation and subsidiaries are included in Item 14(d):
Schedule I Condensed Financial Information of Registrant Schedule II Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
All other schedules for which provision is made in the applicable accounting regulation of the Securities and Exchange Commission are not required under the related instructions or are inapplicable and, therefore, have been omitted.
Report of Independent Auditors
Board of Directors and Shareholders United Industrial Corporation
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of United Industrial Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1994 and 1993, and the related consolidated statements of operations and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1994. Our audits also included the financial statement schedules listed in the Index at Item 14(a). These financial statements and schedules are the responsibility of the company s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedules based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of United Industrial Corporation and subsidiaries at December 31, 1994 and 1993 and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1994 in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedules, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, present fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.
ERNST & YOUNG LLP New York, New York
February 28, 1995
SCHEDULE I - CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF REGISTRANT UNITED INDUSTRIAL CORPORATION CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS
See notes to condensed financial statements of registrant.
SCHEDULE I - CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF REGISTRANT
UNITED INDUSTRIAL CORPORATION
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
See notes to condensed financial statements of registrant.
Schedule I - Condensed Financial Information of Registrant United Industrial Corporation
Condensed Statements of Cash Flows
SCHEDULE I - CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF REGISTRANT
UNITED INDUSTRIAL CORPORATION
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (continued)
See notes to condensed financial statements of registrant.
A. ACCOUNTING POLICIES
BASIS OF PRESENTATION
In the parent-company-only financial statements, the Company's investment in subsidiaries is stated at cost plus equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiaries since date of acquisition. The Company's share of net income of its unconsolidated subsidiaries is reflected using the equity method. Parent-company-only financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company's consolidated financial statements.
Certain amounts in the prior years have been reclassified to conform to the current year's classification.
B. EQUITY IN NET INCOME (LOSS) OF SUBSIDIARIES
In 1993, included in the equity in net loss of subsidiaries is a restructuring charge of $22,500,000 ($14,370,000, net of tax benefit) regarding the Company s defense industry subsidiary. A major portion of the charge resulted from the termination of the operations of AAI/MICROFLITE, a manufacturer of flight simulators and training devices, due to a lack of new orders. Also, in 1993 the Company changed its method of accounting for postretirement benefits other than pensions and income taxes. The implementation of these accounting changes resulted in a cumulative effect charge against income of $12,890,000, net of tax benefit and a cumulative effect of $13,884,000 which reduced the 1993 net loss, respectively. Consequently, the net cumulative effect of these accounting changes resulted in a $994,000 reduction of the net loss in 1993.
Schedule II Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
United Industrial Corporation and Subsidiaries
December 31, 1994
EXHIBIT INDEX
EXHIBIT NO. EXHIBIT PAGE ----------- ------- ----
(3)(a)- Restated Certificate of Incorporation of United (1).
(3)(b)- By-Laws of United (incorporated by reference to United's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1989).
(3)(c)- Amendment to By-Laws of United as of September 19, 1994.
(10)(a)- United Industrial Corporation 1994 Stock Option Plan (1).
(10)(b)- Purchase Agreement, dated January 18, 1994, between United and Symtron Systems, Inc. (1).
(10)(c)- Note Purchase Agreement (the "Note Agreement") dated as of July 15, 1992 among AAI Corporation ("AAI") and Principal Mutual Life Insurance Company, The Travelers Insurance Company and The Travelers Indemnity Company of Rhode Island (the "Purchasers") (2).
(10)(d)- Guaranty Agreement (the "Note Guaranty") dated as of July 15, 1992 by United in favor of the Purchasers (2).
(10)(e)- Amendment No. 1 dated July 15, 1993 to the Note Agreement (3).
(10)(f)- Amendment No. 1 dated July 15, 1993 to the Note Guaranty (3).
(10)(g)- Amendment No. 2 to Note Agreement dated as of December 20, 1993 among AAI and the Purchasers.
(10)(h)- Amendment No. 3 to Note Agreement dated as of October 13, 1994 among AAI and the Purchasers (4).
(10)(i)- Amendment No. 2 to the Note Guaranty (4).
(10)(j)- Credit Agreement dated as of October 13, 1994 among AAI Corporation, the Lenders parties thereto and First Fidelity Bank, National Association as Agent (the "Agent") and Issuing Bank (4).
(10)(k)- Pledge and Security Agreement dated as of October 13, 1994 by AAI in favor of the Agent (4).
(10)(l)- Pledge and Security Agreement dated as of October 13, 1994 by the Company in favor of the Agent (4).
(10)(m)- Security Agreement dated as of October 13, 1994 between AAI and the Agent (4).
(10)(n)- Security Agreement dated as of October 13, 1994 between each subsidiary of AAI, certain subsidiaries of the Company and the Agent (4).
(10)(o)- Guaranty dated as of October 13, 1994 by the Company and certain of its subsidiaries and by each subsidiary of AAI in favor of the Agent (4).
(10)(p)- Employment Agreement, dated September 20, 1993, between AAI and Richard R. Erkeneff (1).
(10)(q)- Employment Agreement, dated March 16, 1995, between United and P. David Bocksch.
(11) - Computation of Earnings Per Share.
(13) - United's 1994 Annual Report to Shareholders.
(21) - Subsidiaries of United.
(23) - Consent of Independent Auditors
(27) - Financial Data Schedule
-----------------------
(1) Incorporated by reference to United's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1993.
(2) Incorporated by reference to United's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1992.
(3) Incorporated by reference to United's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1993.
(4) Incorporated by reference to United's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,1994.