Annual Report (Form 10-K), fiscal year 1993

Item 1. Business
General. FPL supplies electric service throughout most of the east and lower west coasts of Florida. This service territory contains 27,650 square miles with a population of approximately 6.5 million. During 1993, FPL served approximately 3.4 million customer accounts. Operating revenues amounted to approximately $5.2 billion, of which about 56% was derived from residential customers, 37% from commercial customers, 4% from industrial customers and 3% from other sources.
FPL was incorporated in 1925 under the laws of Florida. All of its common stock is owned by FPL Group; all of its preferred stock is held by non-affiliated persons.
Holding Company Act. FPL Group is a public utility holding company as defined in the Holding Company Act, but is exempt from substantially all of the provisions thereof on the basis that FPL Group's and FPL's businesses are predominantly intrastate in character and carried on substantially in a single state, in which both are incorporated.
Regulation. The retail operations of FPL represent approximately 98% of operating revenues and are regulated by the FPSC, which has jurisdiction over retail rates, service territory, issuances of securities, planning, siting and construction of facilities and other matters. FPL is also subject to regulation by the FERC in various respects, including the acquisition and disposition of certain facilities, interchange and transmission services and wholesale purchases and sales of electric energy.
FPL is subject to the jurisdiction of the NRC with respect to its nuclear power plants. NRC regulations govern the granting of licenses for the construction and operation of nuclear power plants and subject such power plants to continuing review and regulation.
Federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations cover air and water quality, land use, power plant and transmission line siting, electric and magnetic fields from power lines and substations, noise and aesthetics, solid waste and other environmental matters. Compliance with these laws and regulations increases the cost of electric service by requiring, among other things, changes in the design and operation of existing facilities and changes or delays in the location, design, construction and operation of new facilities. FPL estimates that capital expenditures for improvements needed to comply with environmental laws and regulations will be approximately $10 million to $30 million annually for the years 1994 through 1998. These amounts are included in FPL's projected capital expenditures set forth in Item 1. Capital Expenditures.
FPL holds franchises with varying expiration dates to provide electric service in various municipalities and seven counties in Florida. FPL considers its franchises to be adequate for the conduct of its business.
Retail Ratemaking. The underlying concept of utility ratemaking is to set rates at a level that allows the utility to collect total revenues (revenue requirements) equal to its cost of providing service, including a reasonable return on invested capital. To accomplish this, the FPSC uses various ratemaking mechanisms.
The basic costs of providing electric service, other than fuel and certain other costs, are recovered through base rates, which are designed to recover the costs of constructing, operating and maintaining the utility system. These costs include operations and maintenance expenses, depreciation and taxes, as well as a rate of return on FPL's investment in assets used and useful in providing electric service (rate base). The rate of return on rate base approximates FPL's weighted cost of capital, which includes its costs for debt and preferred stock and an allowed ROE. Base rates are determined in rate proceedings which occur at irregular intervals at the initiative of FPL, the FPSC or a substantially affected party.
Fuel costs are recovered through levelized monthly charges established pursuant to the fuel clause. These charges, which are calculated semi-annually, are based on estimated costs of fuel and estimated customer usage for the ensuing six-month period, plus or minus a true-up adjustment to reflect the variance of actual costs and usage from the estimates used in setting the fuel adjustment charges for prior periods.
Capacity payments to other utilities and generators for purchased power are recovered primarily through the capacity clause. Costs associated with implementing energy conservation programs are recovered through rates established pursuant to the conservation clause. Certain other non-fuel costs and the accelerated recovery of the costs of certain projects that displace oil-fired generation are recovered through the oil-backout clause.
Beginning in April 1994, costs of complying with new federal, state and local environmental regulations will be recovered through the environmental compliance cost recovery clause. In the past such costs would have been recoverable through base rates.
The FPSC has the power to disallow recovery of costs which it considers excessive or imprudently incurred. Such costs may include operations and maintenance expenses, the cost of replacing power lost when fossil and nuclear units are unavailable and costs associated with the construction or acquisition of new facilities. Also, the FPSC does not provide any assurance that the allowed ROE will be achieved.
System Capability and Load. FPL's resources for serving load as of January 1, 1994 consist of 16,708 mw of firm electric power generated by FPL-owned facilities (see Item 2.



Item 2. Properties
General. FPL considers that its properties are well maintained and in good operating condition. The electric generating, transmission, distribution and general facilities represent approximately 48%, 12%, 33% and 7%, respectively, of FPL's gross investment in electric utility plant in service.
Generating Facilities. As of December 31, 1993, FPL had the following generating facilities:
(1) Represents FPL's 20% ownership of SJRPP Units Nos. 1 and 2, which are jointly owned with the JEA. (2) Excludes Orlando Utilities Commission's and FMPA's combined share of approximately 15% of St. Lucie Unit No. 2. (3) Represents FPL's 49% ownership of Scherer Unit No. 4, which is jointly owned with the JEA and Georgia Power Company. FPL has contracted to purchase an additional 27% undivided ownership interest in Scherer Unit No. 4 in stages through 1995, including 17% (140 mw) in June 1994.
Transmission and Distribution. FPL owns and operates 451 substations with a total capacity of 100,054,470 kva. Electric transmission and distribution lines owned and in service as of December 31, 1993 are as follows:
(1) Includes approximately 80 miles owned jointly with the JEA.
Character of Ownership. Substantially all of FPL's properties are subject to the lien of its mortgage, which secures debt securities issued by FPL. The principal properties of FPL are held by it in fee and are free from other encumbrances, subject to minor exceptions, none of which is of such a nature as to substantially impair the usefulness to FPL of such properties. Some of the electric lines are located on land not owned in fee but are covered by necessary consents of governmental authorities or rights obtained from owners of private property.
Item 3.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings
In October 1988, Union Carbide Corporation, the corporate predecessor of Praxair, Inc. (Praxair), filed suit against FPL and Florida Power Corporation (Florida Power) in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida. Praxair requested that Florida Power sell power to its facility located within FPL's service territory, and that FPL transport the power to the facility. Florida Power and FPL denied the request as being inconsistent with Florida law and public policy. The FPSC has issued a declaratory statement that FPL's denial of Praxair's request was proper and ordered FPL not to wheel power under such circumstances. The suit alleges that through a territorial agreement, FPL and Florida Power have conspired to eliminate competition for the sale of electric power to retail customers, thereby unreasonably restraining trade and commerce in violation of federal antitrust laws as contained in Section 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act (Sherman Act). The suit seeks an award of three times Praxair's alleged damages in an unspecified amount based on alleged higher prices paid for electricity and product sales lost by Praxair. Cross motions for summary judgment were denied. Both parties are appealing the denials.
In November 1988, TEC Cogeneration, Inc., its affiliate Thermo Electron Corporation, RRD Corp. and its affiliate Rolls Royce Inc. filed suit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida against FPL and FPL Group on behalf of South Florida Cogeneration Associates (SFCA), a joint venture which since 1986 has operated a cogeneration facility for Metropolitan Dade County within FPL's service territory in Miami, Florida. The suit alleges that the defendants have engaged in anti-competitive conduct intended to prevent and defeat competition from cogenerators within FPL's service territory, and from SFCA's Metropolitan Dade County facility in particular. It alleges that the defendants' actions constitute monopolization and attempts to monopolize in violation of Section 2 of the Sherman Act; conspiracy in restraint of trade in violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act; unlawful discrimination in prices, services or facilities in violation of Section 2 of the Clayton Act; and intentional interference with SFCA's contractual relationship with Metropolitan Dade County in violation of Florida law. The suit seeks damages in excess of $100 million, to be trebled under the Sherman and Clayton Acts, as well as compensatory and punitive damages under Florida law, and injunctive relief. FPL's motion for summary judgment has been denied.
FPL believes that it has meritorious defenses to all of the litigation described above and is vigorously defending these suits. Accordingly, the liabilities, if any, arising from this litigation are not anticipated to have a material adverse effect on FPL's financial statements.
Item 4.

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders None
PART II
Item 5.

Item 5. Market for the Registrant's Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters
All of FPL's common stock is owned by FPL Group. For information regarding dividends paid to FPL Group, see Management's Discussion and Note 7.
Item 6.

Item 6. Selected Financial Data
(1) Reduced by after-tax effect of cost reduction program or restructuring charge. See Note 2. (2) Includes unbilled sales. (3) The winter season generally represents November and December of the prior year and January through March of the current year. (4) Includes unbilled and deferred cost recovery clause revenues.
Item 7.

Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
For the three periods presented, net income benefitted from increased energy sales, primarily from customer growth, and the effects of cost control measures. Charges associated with a cost reduction program in 1993 and a corporate restructuring in 1991 reduced net income in those years. In addition, 1992 net income was adversely affected by Hurricane Andrew. In the following discussion, all comparisons are with the corresponding items in the prior year.
Operating Income - FPL's retail operations are regulated by the FPSC. Energy sales to retail customers, which represent over 96% of total energy sales, increased 4.0%, 0.1% and 3.3% in 1993, 1992 and 1991, respectively. Retail customer growth for those years was 2.1%, 1.7% and 2.1%, respectively. Revenues from base rates, which represented 61%, 57% and 56% of operating revenues for 1993, 1992 and 1991, respectively, increased for the three years presented due to higher energy sales. Revenues derived from cost recovery clauses (including fuel) and franchise fees comprise substantially all of the remaining portion of operating revenues. These revenues represent a pass- through of costs and do not significantly affect net income.
With increasing competition in the utility industry, FPL is continuing its efforts to reduce its operating and capital costs and avoid filing for rate increases, the traditional response to increased rate base and cost pressures. In connection with these efforts, a major cost reduction program was implemented during 1993, resulting in a $138 million pretax charge. The charge consisted primarily of severance pay and employee retirement benefits related to a workforce reduction of approximately 1,700 positions. Approximately 45% of the charge relates to retirement benefits. Substantially all of the balance represents severance costs, of which about $60 million remains to be paid in 1994. In addition, substantial reductions were reflected in FPL's 1994-98 capital expenditure forecast, including a $210 million reduction from the previous capital expenditure forecast for 1994. The majority of the reductions in the 1994-97 period reflect a decrease in transmission and distribution expenditures through more efficient use of existing plant and more cost effective designs for new facilities. In 1991, FPL implemented a corporate restructuring that eliminated approximately 1,400 FPL positions and about 900 contractor positions. See Note 2.
Other operations and maintenance expenses reflect cost savings from the 1991 restructuring, partially offset by the effects of an increasing customer base, changes in prices and operating activities, as well as the implementation of two new accounting standards relating to postretirement and postemployment benefits. See Note 4. As a result of FPL's recent cost reduction measures, other operations and maintenance expense is expected to decline in 1994, despite projected sales growth, additional generating units in service and two additional nuclear refueling outages. Higher utility plant balances, reflecting facilities added to meet customer growth, resulted in increased depreciation expense. FPL filed new depreciation studies with the FPSC in December 1993. Changes in depreciation rates, when adopted, will be retroactive to January 1994 and, together with increases in utility plant, will increase depreciation expense in 1994. In addition, FPL is scheduled to file updated nuclear decommissioning studies with the FPSC in December 1994. Changes, if any, in the accrual for nuclear decommissioning costs will be effective January 1995. See Note 1.
Non-Operating Income and Deductions - AFUDC increased in 1993 and 1992 due to higher construction activity in the generation area. In future periods AFUDC is expected to decrease because the repowered Lauderdale units were placed in service in the second quarter of 1993, the Martin units are scheduled to be in service by June 1994 and no new generating capacity is under construction.
During the three year period, FPL has been refunding existing debt and preferred stock with lower rate instruments. The reduction in interest due to these refundings has been offset by the interest on new debt issued to fund growth in electric plant. Premiums paid on the redemption of FPL debt are amortized over the remaining life of the respective debt securities, consistent with the ratemaking treatment. See Note 1.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Capital Requirements and Resources - FPL's primary capital requirements consist of expenditures under its construction program. Total capital expenditures for the period 1994-98, including AFUDC, are expected to be $3.7 billion, including $879 million in 1994. Internally generated funds are expected to fund an increasing percentage of capital expenditures. The balance will be provided primarily through the issuance of long-term debt, preferred stock and commercial paper. See Note 7.
Debt maturities and minimum sinking fund requirements will require cash outflows of approximately $376 million through 1998, including $2 million in 1994. See Note 8. Bank lines of credit currently available to FPL aggregate $800 million.
Financial Covenants - FPL's charter and mortgage contain provisions which, under certain conditions, restrict the payment of dividends and other distributions to FPL Group. Given FPL's current financial condition and level of earnings, these restrictions do not currently limit FPL's ability to pay dividends to FPL Group. FPL's charter limits the amount of unsecured debt and FPL's mortgage limits the amount of secured debt FPL can issue. At December 31, 1993, the charter and mortgage provisions would allow issuance of approximately $1.3 billion of additional unsecured debt and $5.5 billion of additional first mortgage bonds, respectively. The amount of additional first mortgage bonds that are permitted to be issued will increase as the amount of unfunded property additions increases. FPL's charter also prohibits the issuance of preferred stock unless the preferred stock coverage ratio, as prescribed, is at least 1.5; for the twelve months ended December 31, 1993 it was 2.24.
Item 8.


Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY:
We have audited the consolidated financial statements of Florida Power & Light Company and its subsidiaries, listed in the accompanying index as Item 14(a)1 of this Annual Report (Form 10-K) to the Securities and Exchange Commission for the year ended December 31, 1993. Our audits also comprehended the financial statement schedules of Florida Power & Light Company and its subsidiaries, listed in the accompanying index as Item 14(a)2. These financial statements and financial statement schedules are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial statement schedules based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Florida Power & Light Company and its subsidiaries at December 31, 1993 and 1992 and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1993 in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, such financial statement schedules, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, present fairly in all material respects the information shown therein.
As discussed in Notes 3 and 4 to the consolidated financial statements, Florida Power & Light Company and its subsidiaries changed their method of accounting for income taxes and postretirement benefits other than pensions effective January 1, 1993.
DELOITTE & TOUCHE Certified Public Accountants
Miami, Florida February 11, 1994
FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (Thousands of Dollars)
The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.
FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS ASSETS (Thousands of Dollars)
The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.
FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS CAPITALIZATION AND LIABILITIES (Thousands of Dollars)
The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.
FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Thousands of Dollars)
(1) Represents the effect on cash flows from operating activities of the net amounts deferred or recovered under the fuel and purchased power, oil- backout, energy conservation, capacity and environmental cost recovery clauses. (2) Excludes allowance for other funds used during construction.
The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.
FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Years Ended December 31, 1993, 1992 and 1991
1. Summary of Significant Accounting and Reporting Policies
Basis of Presentation - The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Florida Power & Light Company (FPL) and its subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. FPL is a wholly-owned subsidiary of FPL Group, Inc. (FPL Group). Certain amounts included in prior years' consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the current year's presentation.
Regulation - FPL's accounting practices are subject to regulation by the Florida Public Service Commission (FPSC) and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC). As a result of such regulation, FPL follows the accounting practices set forth in Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 71, "Accounting for the Effects of Certain Types of Regulation."
Revenues and Rates - Retail and wholesale utility rate schedules are approved by the FPSC and the FERC, respectively. FPL records the estimated amount of base revenues for energy delivered to customers but not billed. Such unbilled revenues are included in receivables - customers and amounted to approximately $112 million and $120 million at December 31, 1993 and 1992, respectively.
Revenues include amounts resulting from cost recovery clauses, which are designed to permit full recovery of certain costs and provide a return on certain assets utilized by these programs, and franchise fees. Such revenues represent a pass-through of costs and include substantially all fuel, purchased power and interchange expenses, conservation-related expenses, revenue taxes and franchise fees. Revenues from cost recovery clauses are recorded when billed; FPL achieves matching of costs and related revenues by deferring the net under or over recovery.
Electric Utility Plant, Depreciation and Amortization - The cost of additions to units of utility property is added to electric utility plant. The cost of units of property retired, less net salvage, is charged to accumulated depreciation. Maintenance and repairs of property as well as replacements and renewals of items determined to be less than units of property are charged to other operations and maintenance expense.
Depreciation of utility property is provided primarily on a straight-line average remaining life basis. Depreciation studies are performed at least every four years for substantially all utility property. The weighted annual composite depreciation rate was approximately 3.9%, 3.5% and 3.8% for the years 1993, 1992 and 1991, respectively. These rates exclude decommissioning expense and certain accelerated depreciation under cost recovery clauses. All depreciation methods and rates are approved by the FPSC.
Nuclear fuel costs, including a charge for spent nuclear fuel disposal, is accrued in fuel expense on a unit of production method.
Substantially all electric utility plant is subject to the lien of the Mortgage and Deed of Trust, as supplemented, securing FPL's first mortgage bonds.
Allowance for Funds Used During Construction (AFUDC) - FPL recognizes AFUDC as a noncash item which represents the allowed cost of capital used to finance a portion of its construction work in progress. AFUDC is capitalized as an additional cost of utility plant and is recorded as an addition to income. The capitalization rate used in computing AFUDC was 8.67% from January 1993 through June 1993, 8.26% from July 1993 through December 1993, 8.61% in 1992 and 8.46% in 1991.
Nuclear Decommissioning - FPL accrues nuclear decommissioning costs over the expected service life of each plant. Nuclear decommissioning studies are performed at least every five years for FPL's four nuclear units. A provision for nuclear decommissioning of $38 million for each of the years 1993, 1992 and 1991 is included in depreciation expense. The accumulated provision for nuclear decommissioning totaled $445 million and $390 million at December 31, 1993 and 1992, respectively, and is included in accumulated depreciation.
Amounts equal to decommissioning expense are deposited in either qualified funds on a pretax basis or in a non-qualified fund on a net of tax basis. Fund earnings, net of taxes, are reinvested in the funds. Both fund earnings and the charge resulting from reinvestment of the earnings are included in other income (deductions). The related income tax effects are included in deferred taxes. The decommissioning reserve funds may be used only for the payment of the cost of decommissioning FPL's nuclear units. Securities held in the funds consist primarily of tax-exempt obligations and are carried at cost. See Note 9.
The most recent decommissioning studies assume prompt dismantlement for the Turkey Point nuclear units commencing in the year 2005 and for St. Lucie Unit No. 2 commencing in 2021. St. Lucie Unit No. 1 will be mothballed in 2016 until St. Lucie Unit No. 2 is ready for dismantlement. FPL's portion of the cost of decommissioning these units, including dismantlement and reclamation, expressed in 1993 dollars, is currently estimated to aggregate $935 million.
Storm and Property Insurance Reserve Fund - The storm and property insurance reserve fund provides coverage toward storm damage costs and possible retrospective premium assessments stemming from a nuclear incident under the various insurance programs covering FPL's nuclear generating plants. The storm and property insurance reserve represents amounts accumulated to date net of expenditures for storm damages. The related income tax effects are included in accumulated deferred income taxes. Securities held in the fund consist primarily of tax-exempt obligations and are carried at cost. In 1992, $21 million of the storm fund was used for storm damage costs associated with Hurricane Andrew. See Note 9.
Cash Equivalents - Cash equivalents consist of short-term, highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less. The carrying amount of these investments approximates their market value.
Retirement of Long-Term Debt - The excess of reacquisition cost over the book value of long-term debt is deferred and amortized to expense ratably over the remaining life of the original issue, which is consistent with its treatment in the ratemaking process.
Rate Matters - Deferred litigation items at December 31, 1993 and 1992, represent costs approved by the FPSC for recovery over five years commencing with the effective date of new base rates to be established in the next general rate proceeding.
Income Taxes - Deferred income taxes are provided on all significant temporary differences between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities. Investment tax credits are used to reduce current federal income taxes and are deferred and amortized to income over the approximate lives of the related property. FPL is included in the consolidated federal income tax return filed by FPL Group. FPL determines its income tax provision on the "separate return method." See Note 3.
2. Cost Reduction Program and Restructuring Charge
In 1993, FPL implemented a major cost reduction program, which resulted in a $138 million charge and reduced net income by approximately $85 million. The program consisted primarily of a Voluntary Retirement Plan (VRP) and a Special Severance Plan (SSP). The VRP was offered to all employees who were at least 54 years of age and had at least 10 years of service. The plan, among other things, added five years to age and service for the determination of plan benefits to be received by eligible employees. Approximately 700 employees, or 75% of those eligible, elected to retire under this program. The impact on pension cost resulting from the two programs as determined under the provisions of SFAS No. 88, "Employers' Accounting for Settlements and Curtailments of Defined Benefit Pension Plans and for Termination Benefits," was approximately $34 million. The impact on postretirement benefits as determined under SFAS No. 106, "Employers' Accounting for Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions" was approximately $29 million. These amounts are included as part of the total charge of $138 million. See Note 4.
In 1991, FPL recorded a $90 million restructuring charge in connection with a company-wide restructuring which reduced net income by $56 million. The charge included severance pay for departing employees, as well as relocation and facility modification expenditures.
3. Income Taxes
In 1993, FPL adopted SFAS No. 109, "Accounting for Income Taxes," which requires the use of the liability method in accounting for income taxes. Under the liability method, the tax effect of temporary differences between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities are reported as deferred taxes measured at current tax rates. The principal effect of adopting SFAS No. 109 was the reclassification of the revenue equivalent of deferred taxes in excess of the amount required to be reported as a liability under SFAS No. 109 from accumulated deferred income taxes to a newly- established deferred regulatory credit - income taxes. This amount will be amortized over the estimated lives of the assets or liabilities which resulted in the initial recognition of the deferred tax amount. Adoption of this standard had no effect on results of operations. The net result of amortizing the deferred regulatory credit and the related deferred taxes established under SFAS No. 109 is to yield comparable amounts to those included in the tax provision under accounting rules applicable to prior periods.
The components of income taxes are as follows:
A reconciliation between income tax expense and the expected income tax expense at the applicable statutory rates is as follows:
The income tax effects of temporary differences giving rise to FPL's deferred income tax assets and liabilities after adoption of SFAS No. 109 are as follows:
4. Employee Retirement Benefits
Pension Benefits - Substantially all employees of FPL are covered by FPL Group's noncontributory defined benefit pension plan. Plan benefits are generally based on employees' years of service and compensation during the last years of employment. Participants are vested after five years of service. Plan assets consist primarily of bonds, common stocks and short- term investments. Any pension cost recognized by FPL Group is allocated to FPL on a pro rata basis.
For 1993, 1992 and 1991 the components of pension cost which were allocated to FPL, a portion of which has been capitalized, are as follows:
Prior to 1993, an adjustment was made to reflect in the results of operations the pension cost calculated under the actuarial cost method used for ratemaking purposes. In 1993, FPL adopted consistent pension measurements for ratemaking and financial reporting. The accumulated regulatory adjustment is being amortized to income over five years. At December 31, 1993 and 1992, the cumulative amounts of these regulatory adjustments included in other deferred credits were approximately $16 million and $20 million, respectively.
During 1992, the method used for valuing plan assets in the calculation of pension cost was changed from fair value to a calculated market-related value. The new method was adopted to reduce the volatility in annual pension expense that results from short-term fluctuations in the securities markets. The cumulative effect of the change was to reduce prepaid pension cost and the related accumulated regulatory adjustment by approximately $37 million, with no effect on earnings.
During 1993, the effect of a prior plan amendment that changed the manner in which benefits accrue was recognized and included as part of prior service cost to be amortized over the remaining service life of the employees.
FPL funds the pension cost calculated under the entry age normal level percentage of pay actuarial cost method, provided that this amount satisfies the Employee Retirement Income Security Act minimum funding standards and is not greater than the maximum tax deductible amount for the year. No contributions to the plan were required for 1993, 1992 or 1991.
In 1993, the FPL pension plan and the FPL Group pension plan were combined. Accordingly, the 1992 amounts have been restated to present the position of the combined plans. Any pension cost recognized by FPL Group has been allocated to FPL on a pro rata basis. At December 31, 1993, the portion of prepaid pension cost recognized in FPL's statement of position was a liability of approximately $.3 million. A reconciliation of the funded status of the combined FPL Group Plan is presented below:
(1) Includes $37 million effect of changing to calculated market-related method of valuing plan assets.
As of December 31, 1993 and 1992, the weighted-average discount rate used in determining the actuarial present value of the projected benefit obligation was 7.0% and 6.0%, respectively. The assumed rate of increase in future compensation levels at those respective dates was 5.5% and 6.0%. The expected long-term rate of return on plan assets used in determining pension cost was 7.75% for 1993 and 7.0% for 1992 and 1991.
Other Postretirement Benefits - Substantially all employees of FPL are covered by FPL Group's defined benefit postretirement plans for health care and life insurance benefits. Eligibility for health care benefits is based upon age plus years of service at retirement. The plans are contributory, and contain cost-sharing features such as deductibles and coinsurance. FPL Group has capped company contributions for postretirement health care at a defined level which, depending on actual claims experience, may be reached by the year 2000. Generally, life insurance benefits for retirees are capped at $50,000. FPL Group's policy is to fund postretirement benefits in amounts determined at the discretion of management. Benefit payments in 1993 and 1992 totaled $13 million and $12 million, respectively, and were paid out of existing plan assets.
In 1993, FPL adopted SFAS No. 106, "Employers' Accounting for Postretirement Benefits Other than Pensions." For the year ended December 31, 1993, the components of net periodic postretirement benefit cost allocated to FPL, a portion of which has been capitalized, are as follows:
A reconciliation of the funded status of the combined FPL Group Plan is presented below. The portion of accrued postretirement benefit cost recognized in the statement of position of FPL is approximately $44 million.
The weighted-average annual assumed rate of increase in the per capita cost of covered benefits (i.e., health care cost trend rate) for 1993 is 10.5% for retirees under age 65 and 6.5% for retirees over age 65. These rates are assumed to decrease gradually to 6.0% by the year 2000, which is when it is anticipated that benefit costs will reach the defined level at which FPL Group's contributions will be capped. The cap on FPL Group's contributions mitigates the potential significant increase
in costs resulting from an increase in the health care cost trend rate. Increasing the assumed health care cost trend rate by one percentage point would increase the plan's accumulated postretirement benefit obligation as of December 31, 1993 by $8 million, and the aggregate of the service and interest cost components of net periodic postretirement benefit cost of the plan for 1993 by approximately $1 million.
The weighted-average discount rate used in determining the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation was 7.0% at December 31, 1993. The expected long-term rate of return on plan assets was 7.75% at December 31, 1993.
Postemployment Benefits - In 1993, FPL adopted SFAS No. 112, "Employers' Accounting for Postemployment Benefits," which requires a change from recognizing expenses when paid to recording the benefits as the liability is incurred. Implementation of this pronouncement did not have a material effect on FPL's results of operations.
5. Leases
In 1991, FPL expanded its nuclear fuel lease program to include all four of its nuclear units. In connection with this expansion, FPL sold to a non-affiliated lessor and leased back approximately $220 million of nuclear fuel held in reactors of these units, as well as nuclear fuel in various stages of enrichment. The fuel was sold at book value. Nuclear fuel payments, which are based on energy production and are charged to fuel expense, were $122 million, $120 million and $81 million for the years ended December 31, 1993, 1992 and 1991, respectively. Included in these payments was an interest component of $11 million, $13 million and $9 million in 1993, 1992 and 1991, respectively. Under certain circumstances of lease termination, FPL is required to purchase all nuclear fuel in whatever form at a purchase price designed to allow the lessor to recover its net investment cost in the fuel, which totaled $226 million at December 31, 1993. For ratemaking purposes, the leases encompassed within this lease arrangement are classified as operating leases. For financial reporting purposes, the capital lease obligation is recorded at the amount due in the event of lease termination.
In 1992, FPL entered into a noncancellable capital lease arrangement for an office building whose net book value at December 31, 1993 and 1992 was approximately $46 million and $48 million, respectively. The present value of future minimum lease payments at December 31, 1993 totaled $49 million. Future minimum annual lease payments under this lease arrangement, which expires in 2016, are estimated to be $4 million.
Excluding these leases, the amount of assets and capitalized lease obligations for other capital leases is not material.
FPL leases automotive, computer, office and other equipment through rental agreements with various terms and expiration dates. Rental expense totaled $31 million, $53 million and $50 million for 1993, 1992 and 1991, respectively. Minimum annual rental commitments for noncancellable operating leases are $21 million for 1994, $18 million for 1995, $12 million for 1996, $6 million for 1997, $5 million for 1998 and $13 million thereafter.
6. Jointly-Owned Facilities
FPL owns approximately 85% of the St. Lucie Nuclear Unit No. 2, 20% of the St. Johns River Power Park (SJRPP) units and coal terminal and a 49% undivided interest in Scherer Unit No. 4. FPL expects to purchase an additional 27% undivided ownership interest in Scherer Unit No. 4 in two stages through 1995. At December 31, 1993, FPL's investment in St. Lucie Unit No. 2 was $768 million, net of accumulated depreciation of $397 million; the investment in the SJRPP units and coal terminal was $221 million, net of accumulated depreciation of $110 million; the investment in Scherer Unit No. 4 was $296 million, net of accumulated depreciation of $54 million.
FPL is responsible for its share of the operating costs, as well as providing its own financing. At December 31, 1993, there was no significant balance of construction work in progress on these facilities.
7. Common Shareholder's Equity
The changes in common shareholder's equity accounts are as follows:
(1) Common stock, no par value, 1,000 shares authorized, issued and outstanding.
FPL's charter and mortgage contain provisions that, under certain conditions, restrict the payment of dividends and other distributions to FPL Group. Given FPL's current financial condition and level of earnings, these restrictions do not currently limit FPL's ability to pay dividends to FPL Group.
In 1993, 1992 and 1991 FPL paid, as dividends to FPL Group, its net income available to FPL Group on a one-month lag basis.
8. Preferred Stock and Long-Term Debt
Preferred Stock (1)
(1) FPL's charter authorizes the issuance of 5 million shares of subordinated preferred stock, no par value. No shares of subordinated preferred stock are outstanding. In 1993, FPL issued 1,900,000 shares of $100 par value preferred stock. In 1992, FPL issued 5,000,000 shares of $2.00 No Par Value, Series A, preferred stock. There were no issuances of preferred stock in 1991. (2) Not redeemable prior to 2003. (3) Minimum annual sinking fund requirements on preferred stock are approximately $2 million for each of the years 1994 and 1995 and $4 million for each of the years 1996, 1997 and 1998. In the event that FPL should be in arrears on its sinking fund obligations, FPL may not pay dividends on common stock. (4) Entitled to a sinking fund to retire a minimum of 15,000 shares and a maximum of 30,000 shares annually from 1994 through 2026 at $100 per share plus accrued dividends. FPL redeemed and retired 15,000 shares in 1992, satisfying the 1993 minimum annual sinking fund requirement. (5) Entitled to a sinking fund to retire a minimum of 25,000 shares and a maximum of 50,000 shares annually from 1996 through 2015 at $100 per share plus accrued dividends.
Long-Term Debt(1)(2)
(1) Minimum annual maturities and sinking fund requirements of long-term debt are approximately $80 million for 1995, $100 million for 1996 and $181 million for 1998. (2) Available lines of credit aggregated approximately $800 million at December 31, 1993, all of which were based on firm commitments. (3) Excludes approximately $46 million principal amount of bonds removed from the balance sheet in December 1993 as a result of an in-substance defeasance. Such bonds were redeemed in January 1994 with funds previously placed in an irrevocable trust.
9. Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The following estimates of the fair value of financial instruments have been made using available market information and other valuation methodologies. However, the use of different market assumptions or methods of valuation could result in different estimated fair values.
(1) Based on the quoted market prices for these or similar issues. (2) Includes current maturities.
10. Commitments and Contingencies
Capital Commitments - FPL has made certain commitments in connection with its projected capital expenditures. These expenditures, for the construction or acquisition of additional facilities and equipment to meet customer demand, are estimated to be $3.7 billion, including AFUDC, for the years 1994 through 1998.
Insurance - Liability for accidents at nuclear power plants is governed by the Price-Anderson Act, which limits the liability of nuclear reactor owners to the amount of the insurance available from private sources and under an industry retrospective payment plan. In accordance with this Act, FPL maintains $200 million of private liability insurance, which is the maximum obtainable, and participates in a secondary financial protection system under which it is subject to retrospective assessments of up to $317 million per incident at any nuclear utility reactor in the United States, payable at a rate not to exceed $40 million per incident per year.
FPL participates in insurance pools and other arrangements that provide $2.75 billion of limited insurance coverage for property damage, decontamination and premature decommissioning risks at its nuclear plants. The proceeds from such insurance, however, must first be used for reactor stabilization and site decontamination before they can be used for plant repair. FPL also participates in an insurance program that provides limited coverage for replacement power costs if a plant is out of service because of an accident. In the event of an accident at one of FPL's or another participating insured's nuclear plant, FPL could be assessed up to $58 million in retrospective premiums, and in the event of a subsequent accident at such nuclear plants during the policy period, the maximum assessment is $72 million under the programs in effect at December 31, 1993. This contingent liability would be partially offset by a portion of FPL's storm and property insurance reserve (storm fund), which totaled $82 million at that date.
In the event of a catastrophic loss at one of FPL's nuclear plants, the amount of insurance available may not be adequate to cover property damage and other expenses incurred. Uninsured losses, to the extent not recovered through rates, would be borne by FPL and could have a material adverse effect on FPL's financial condition.
In 1993, FPL replaced its transmission and distribution (T&D) property insurance coverage with a self-insurance program due to the high cost and limited coverage available from third-party insurers. Costs incurred under the self-insurance program will be charged against FPL's storm fund. Recovery of any losses in excess of the storm fund from ratepayers will require the approval of the FPSC. FPL's available lines of credit include $300 million to provide additional liquidity in the event of a T&D property loss.
Contracts - FPL has take-or-pay contracts with the Jacksonville Electric Authority (JEA) for 374 megawatts (mw) through 2023 and with the subsidiaries of the Southern Company to purchase 1,406 mw of power through May 1994, and declining amounts thereafter through mid-2010. FPL also has various firm pay-for-performance contracts to purchase 1,031 mw from certain cogenerators and small power producers (qualifying facilities) with expiration dates ranging from 2002 through 2026. These contracts provide for capacity and energy payments. Capacity payments for the pay-for-performance contracts are subject to the qualifying facilities meeting certain contract obligations. Energy payments are based on the actual power taken under these contracts.
The required capacity payments through 1998 under these contracts are estimated to be as follows:
FPL's capacity and energy charges under these contracts for 1993, 1992 and 1991 were as follows:
(1) Recovered through base rates and the capacity cost recovery clause (capacity clause). (2) Recovered through the capacity clause. (3) Recovered through the fuel and purchased power cost recovery clause. (4) Recoverable through base rates.
FPL has take-or-pay contracts for the supply and transportation of natural gas under which it is required to make payments estimated to be $280 million for 1994, $380 million for 1995 and $390 million for each of the years 1996, 1997 and 1998. Total payments made under these contracts were $270 million, $269 million and $221 million for 1993, 1992 and 1991, respectively.
Litigation - Union Carbide Corporation sued FPL and Florida Power Corporation alleging that, through a territorial agreement approved by the FPSC, they conspired to eliminate competition in violation of federal antitrust laws. Praxair, Inc., an entity that was formerly a unit of Union Carbide, has been substituted as the plaintiff. The suit seeks treble damages of an unspecified amount based on alleged higher prices paid for electricity and product sales lost. Cross motions for summary judgment were denied. Both parties are appealing the denials.
A suit brought by the partners in a cogeneration project located in Dade County, Florida, alleges that FPL has engaged in anti-competitive conduct intended to eliminate competition from cogenerators generally, and from their facility in particular, in violation of federal antitrust laws and have wrongfully interfered with the cogeneration project's contractual relationship with Metropolitan Dade County. The suit seeks damages in excess of $100 million before trebling under antitrust law, plus other unspecified compensatory and punitive damages. FPL's motion for summary judgment has been denied.
FPL believes that it has meritorious defenses to all of the litigation described above and is vigorously defending these suits. Accordingly, the liabilities, if any, arising from this litigation are not anticipated to have a material adverse effect on FPL's financial statements.
11. Transactions with Related Parties
FPL provides certain services to and receives services from FPL Group, or other subsidiaries of FPL Group. The full cost of such services is charged to the entity benefitting from the service. In addition, certain common costs of FPL Group are allocated to all subsidiaries, including FPL, based primarily on each subsidiary's equity. Neither current period amounts charged or allocated, nor balances outstanding, were material for any year. See Note 3 - Income Taxes.
12. Quarterly Data (Unaudited)
Condensed consolidated quarterly financial information for 1993 and 1992 is as follows:
(1) In the opinion of FPL, all adjustments, which consist of normal recurring accruals necessary to present a fair statement of such amounts for such periods, have been made. Results of operations for an interim period may not give a true indication of results for the calendar year. (2) Charge resulting from cost reduction program reduced amount shown by $85 million. See Note 2.
Item 9.

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
None
PART III
Item 10.



Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant
DIRECTORS(1)
James L. Broadhead. Mr. Broadhead, 58, is chairman and chief executive officer of FPL. He is also chairman, president and chief executive officer of FPL Group and president and chief executive officer of FPL Group Capital Inc. Mr. Broadhead is a director of FPL Group and its subsidiary FPL Group Capital Inc, Barnett Banks, Inc., Delta Air Lines, Inc. and The Pittston Company. He is also a board fellow of Cornell University. Mr. Broadhead has been a director of FPL since 1989.
Dennis P. Coyle. Mr. Coyle, 55, is general counsel and secretary of FPL and FPL Group. He is also secretary of FPL Group Capital Inc. Mr. Coyle was formerly vice president of FPL Group and partner of the law firm Steel Hector & Davis. Mr. Coyle has been a director of FPL since 1990.
Paul J. Evanson. Mr. Evanson, 52, is senior vice president, finance and chief financial officer of FPL, vice president, finance and chief financial officer of FPL Group and vice president and chief financial officer of FPL Group Capital Inc. He is a director of FPL Group Capital Inc, Lynch Corporation and Southern Energy Homes, Inc. Mr. Evanson was formerly president and chief operating officer of the Lynch Corporation, a diversified holding company. Mr. Evanson has been a director of FPL since 1992.
Stephen E. Frank. Mr. Frank, 52, is president and chief operating officer of FPL. He was formerly executive vice president and chief financial officer of TRW, Inc., a Cleveland-based diversified, high technology, multinational company. He is a director of FPL Group, Arkwright Mutual Insurance Company and Great Western Financial Corporation and a trustee of the University of Miami. Mr. Frank has been a director of FPL since 1990.
Jerome H. Goldberg. Mr. Goldberg, 62, is president of FPL's nuclear division. He was formerly executive vice president of FPL and group vice president- nuclear of Houston Lighting & Power Company, an electric utility. Mr. Goldberg has been a director of FPL since 1990.
Lawrence J. Kelleher. Mr. Kelleher, 46, is senior vice president, human resources of FPL and vice president, human resources of FPL Group. He was formerly chief human resources officer of FPL, director of corporate development of FPL Group and director of management services of FPL. Mr. Kelleher has been a director of FPL since 1990.
J. Thomas Petillo. Mr. Petillo, 49, is senior vice president, external affairs of FPL. He was formerly group vice president of FPL. Mr. Petillo has been a director of FPL since 1991.
C. O. Woody. Mr. Woody, 55, is senior vice president, power generation of FPL. He was formerly executive vice president of FPL. Mr. Woody has been a director of FPL since 1990.
Michael W. Yackira. Mr. Yackira, 42, is senior vice president, market and regulatory services of FPL. He was formerly chief planning officer of FPL, vice president of FPL Group and vice president of GTE Florida, a telecommunications company, and assistant controller of GTE Service Corp., a telecommunications company. Mr. Yackira has been a director of FPL since 1990.
(1) Directors are elected annually and serve until their resignation, removal or until their respective successors are elected. Includes each director's business experience during the past five years.
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS(1)
(1) Executive officers are elected annually by, and serve at the pleasure of, FPL's Board of Directors.
The business experience of the above named executive officers is as follows:
Mr. Davis was previously comptroller of FPL.
Ms. Samil was previously assistant treasurer of FPL and FPL Group.
For the business experience of the remaining executive officers, see Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant - Directors.
Item 11.

Item 11. Executive Compensation
The following table sets forth compensation paid during the past three years to FPL's chief executive officer and the other four most highly-compensated persons who served as executive officers of FPL at December 31, 1993.
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
(1) Dividends at normal rates are paid on restricted common stock. (2) Payouts were made 60% in shares of common stock, valued at $37.875 per share, and 40% in cash. (3) Employer matching contributions to employee thrift plans. (4) At December 31, 1993, Mr. Broadhead held 96,800 shares of restricted common stock with a value of $3,787,300. These shares were awarded in 1991 for the purpose of financing Mr. Broadhead's supplemental retirement plan and will offset lump sum benefits that would otherwise be payable to him in cash upon retirement. See Retirement Plans herein. (5) At December 31, 1993, Mr. Frank held 1,882 shares of restricted common stock with a value of $73,633. A total of 5,644 shares were awarded to Mr. Frank in 1991 pursuant to an undertaking made to him when he was initially employed by FPL and vested in equal installments on February 15, 1992, 1993 and 1994.
Stock Options
The following table sets forth information with respect to the only executive officer named in the Summary Compensation Table who held any stock options or stock appreciation rights (SARs) during 1993.
Long Term Incentive Plan Awards
In 1993 and 1994, awards of performance shares under FPL Group's Long Term Incentive Plan were made to the executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table as set forth in the following table.
LONG TERM INCENTIVE PLAN AWARDS
The performance share awards shown above are payable at the end of the four-year performance periods. The amount of the payout is determined by multiplying the participant's target number of shares by his average level of attainment, expressed as a percentage, which may not exceed 100%, of his targeted awards under the Annual Incentive Plans for each of the years encompassed by the award period. The incentive performance measures were financial (weighted 50%), operating (weighted 30%) and major projects (weighted 20%). The financial performance indicators were operations and maintenance costs, capital expenditure levels, book and regulatory return on equity and net income. The operating performance indicators were customer satisfaction survey results, service reliability as measured by the frequency and duration of service interruptions, system performance as measured by the equivalent availability factors for the fossil and nuclear power plants, unplanned trips of nuclear power plants, the NRC's systematic assessment of licensee performance for the nuclear plants, employee staffing levels, number of significant environmental violations and employee safety. The major projects performance indicators were load management installed capability, the adherence to schedules and budgets for the Lauderdale repowering project, the Martin plant construction project, and customer information system project, implementation of an integrated resource plan and conservation programs annual installed capacity. If FPL Group shareholders approve the Annual Incentive Plan and Long
Term Incentive Plan described in FPL Group's proxy statement for the 1994 Annual Meeting, future annual incentive payouts will be based on achieving specific net income goals. Payouts under the current Long Term Incentive Plan can range from zero to 100% of the target amount. Payouts under the proposed new Long Term Incentive Plan can range from zero to 160%.
Retirement Plans
FPL Group maintains a non-contributory defined benefit pension plan and supplemental executive retirement plans which cover FPL employees. The following table shows the estimated annual benefits, calculated on a straight-line annuity basis, payable upon retirement in 1993 at age 65 after the indicated years of service.
PENSION PLAN TABLE
The compensation covered by the plans includes annual salaries and bonuses of officers of FPL Group and annual salaries of officers of FPL, as shown in the Summary Compensation Table, but no other amounts shown in the Table. The estimated credited years of service for the executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table are: Mr. Broadhead, 5 years; Mr. Frank, 3 years; Mr. Goldberg, 4 years; Mr. Coyle, 4 years; and Mr. Woody, 37 years.
A supplemental retirement plan for Mr. Broadhead provides for a lump-sum retirement benefit equal to the then present value of a joint and survivor annuity providing annual payments to him equal to 61% to 65% of his average annual compensation for the three years prior to his retirement between age 62 (1998) and age 65 (2001) and to his surviving beneficiary of 37.5% of such average annual compensation, reduced by the then present value of the annual amount of payments to which he is entitled under all other pension and retirement plans of FPL Group and former employers. This benefit is further reduced by the then value of 96,800 shares of restricted common stock which vest as to 77,000 shares in 1998 and as to 19,800 shares in 2001. Upon a change of control of FPL Group, (as defined below under Employment Agreements), the restrictions on the restricted stock lapse and the full retirement benefit becomes payable. Upon termination of Mr. Broadhead's employment agreement (also described below) without cause, the restrictions on the restricted stock lapse and he becomes fully vested under the supplemental retirement plan. Absent any such change of control or termination of employment, Mr. Broadhead will have no right to such shares of restricted stock, and there will be no payments under the supplemental retirement plan, unless he remains with the Corporation until at least age 62.
Mr. Goldberg's employment agreement with FPL provides for a retirement benefit which, together with the amount received by him pursuant to his former employer's deferred compensation program, equals the total postretirement benefits he would have received if he had remained employed by such employer until age 65. The terms of Mr. Frank's employment with FPL provide for a benefit, upon retirement at age 62 or more, equal to the difference between a pension benefit for 30 years of credited service and the normal pension plan benefit. A supplemental retirement plan for Mr. Coyle provides for benefits, upon retirement at age 62 or more, based on two times his credited years of service.
FPL Group sponsors a split-dollar life insurance plan for certain of FPL and FPL Group's senior officers. Benefits under the split-dollar plan are provided by universal life insurance policies purchased by FPL Group. If the officer dies prior to retirement, the officer's beneficiaries generally receive two and one-half times the officer's annual salary at the time of death. If the officer dies after retirement, the officer's beneficiaries receive between 50% to 100% of the officer's final annual salary. Each officer is taxable on the insurance carrier's one year term rate for his or her life insurance coverage.
Employment Agreements
FPL Group has entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Broadhead for an initial term ending December 1997, with automatic one-year extensions thereafter unless either party elects not to extend. The agreement provides for a base salary of $795,800 plus annual and long-term incentive compensation opportunities at least equal to those currently in effect. If FPL Group terminates Mr. Broadhead's employment without cause, he is entitled to receive a lump sum payment of two years' compensation. Compensation is measured by the then current base salary plus the average of the preceding two years' annual incentive awards. He would also be entitled to receive all amounts accrued under all performance share grants in progress, prorated for the year of termination and assuming achievement of the targeted award, and to full vesting of his benefits under his supplemental retirement plan.
FPL Group and FPL have entered into employment agreements with certain officers, including the individuals named in the Summary Compensation Table (other than Mr. Goldberg), to become effective in the event of a change of control of FPL Group, which is defined as the acquisition of beneficial ownership of 20% of the voting power of FPL Group, certain changes in FPL Group's Board, or approval by the shareholders of the liquidation of FPL Group or of certain mergers or consolidations or of certain transfers of FPL Group's assets. These agreements are intended to assure FPL of the continued services of key officers. The agreements provide that each officer shall be employed by FPL Group or one of its subsidiaries in his or her then current position, with compensation and benefits at least equal to the then current base and incentive compensation and benefit levels, for an employment period of four, and in certain cases five, years after a change of control occurs.
In the event that the officer's employment is terminated (except for death, disability or cause) or if the officer terminates his or her employment for good reason, as defined in the agreement, the officer is entitled to severance benefits in the form of a lump sum payment equal to the compensation due for the remainder of the employment period or for two years, whichever is longer. Such benefits would be based on the officer's then base salary plus an annual bonus at least equal to the average bonus for the two years preceding the change of control. The officer is also entitled to the maximum amount payable under all long-term incentive compensation grants outstanding, continued coverage under all employee benefit plans, supplemental retirement benefits and reimbursement for any tax penalties incurred as a result of the severance payments.
An employment agreement between Mr. Goldberg and FPL, which expires in 1994, provides for a base salary of at least $350,000 per year, targeted annual incentive compensation equal to 35% of his base salary, and either the retirement benefit described above under Retirement Plans plus a death benefit to his beneficiary equal to 300% of his base salary, payable over 6 years, or, if he dies before his contract expires, a death benefit to his beneficiary equal to 550% of his base salary, payable over 10 years.
Director Compensation
All of the directors of FPL are salaried employees of FPL and do not receive any additional compensation for serving as a director.
Item 12.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
FPL Group owns 100% of FPL's common stock. FPL's directors and executive officers beneficially own shares of common stock as follows:
(1) Includes 1,907 shares held in the Thrift Plans and 96,800 shares of restricted stock as to which Mr. Broadhead has voting but not investment power. (2) Includes 1,864 shares held in the Thrift Plans. (3) Includes 137 shares held in the Thrift Plans. (4) Includes 884 shares held in the Thrift Plans and 1,882 shares of restricted stock as to which Mr. Frank has voting but not investment power. (5) Includes 2,051 shares held in the Thrift Plans. (6) Includes 5,483 shares held in the Thrift Plans. (7) Includes 5,178 shares held in the Thrift Plans and 38 shares held beneficially by a relative of Mr. Petillo with whom he shares investment power and to which he disclaims any beneficial ownership. (8) Includes 12,868 shares held in the Thrift Plans and 1,787 shares subject to exercisable stock options. (9) Includes 2,856 shares held in the Thrift Plans. (10) Less than 1% of the common stock outstanding. Includes 36,960 shares held in the Thrift Plans and 1,787 shares subject to exercisable stock options.
Item 13.

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
None
PART IV
Item 14.

Item 14. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K
(a) 1. Financial Statements Page(s)
Independent Auditors' Report 12 Consolidated Statements of Income for the Years Ended December 31, 1993, 1992 and 1991 13 Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 1993 and 1992 14-15 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 1993, 1992 and 1991 16 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for the Years Ended December 31, 1993, 1992 and 1991 17-29
2. Financial Statement Schedules(1)
Schedule V Property, Plant and Equipment 39-40 Schedule VI Accumulated Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization of Property, Plant and Equipment 41-42 Schedule IX Short-Term Borrowings 43 Schedule X Supplementary Income Statement Information 44
(1) All other schedules are omitted as not applicable or not required.
3. Exhibits including those Incorporated by Reference
Exhibit Number Description
1(a) Form of Proposal and attached Underwriting Agreement dated December 6, 1993
1(b) Underwriting Agreement between the Dade County Industrial Development Authority and Goldman, Sachs & Co., Artemis Capital Group, Inc., First Equity Corporation of Florida and Howard Gary & Company dated December 20, 1993
3(i)a Restated Articles of Incorporation of FPL dated March 23, 1992
3(i)b Amendment to FPL's Restated Articles of Incorporation dated March 23, 1992
3(i)c Amendment to FPL's Restated Articles of Incorporation dated May 11, 1992
3(i)d Amendment to FPL's Restated Articles of Incorporation dated March 12, 1993
3(i)e Amendment to FPL's Restated Articles of Incorporation dated June 16, 1993
3(i)f Amendment to FPL's Restated Articles of Incorporation dated August 31, 1993
3(i)g Amendment to FPL's Restated Articles of Incorporation dated November 30, 1993
*3(ii) Bylaws of FPL dated May 11, 1992 (filed as Exhibit 3 to Form 8-K dated May 1, 1992, File No. 1-3545)
*4(a) Mortgage and Deed of Trust dated as of January 1, 1944, and Ninety-three Supplements thereto between FPL and Bankers Trust Company and The Florida National Bank of Jacksonville (now First Union National Bank of Florida), Trustees (as of September 2, 1992, the sole trustee is Bankers Trust Company) (filed as Exhibit B-3, File No. 2-4845; Exhibit 7(a), File No. 2-7126; Exhibit 7(a), File
No. 2-7523; Exhibit 7(a), File No. 2-7990; Exhibit 7(a), File No. 2-9217; Exhibit 4(a)-5, File No. 2-10093; Exhibit 4(c), File No. 2-11491; Exhibit 4(b)-1, File No. 2-12900; Exhibit 4(b)-1, File No. 2-13255; Exhibit 4(b)-1, File No. 2-13705; Exhibit 4(b)-1, File No. 2-13925; Exhibit 4(b)-1, File No. 2-15088; Exhibit 4(b)-1, File No. 2-15677; Exhibit 4(b)-1, File No. 2-20501; Exhibit 4(b)-1, File No. 2-22104; Exhibit 2(c), File No. 2-23142; Exhibit 2(c), File No. 2-24195; Exhibit 4(b)-1, File No. 2-25677; Exhibit 2(c), File No. 2-27612; Exhibit 2(c), File No. 2-29001; Exhibit 2(c), File No. 2-30542; Exhibit 2(c), File No. 2-33038; Exhibit 2(c), File No. 2-37679; Exhibit 2(c), File No. 2-39006; Exhibit 2(c), File No. 2-41312; Exhibit 2(c), File No. 2-44234; Exhibit 2(c), File No. 2-6502; Exhibit 2(c), File No. 2-48679; Exhibit 2(c), File No. 2-49726; Exhibit 2(c), File No. 2-50712; Exhibit 2(c), File No. 2-52826; Exhibit 2(c), File No. 2-53272; Exhibit 2(c), File No. 2-54242; Exhibit 2(c), File No. 2-56228; Exhibits 2(c) and 2(d), File No. 2-60413; Exhibits 2(c) and 2(d), File No. 2-65701; Exhibit 2(c), File No. 2-66524; Exhibit 2(c), File No. 2-67239; Exhibit 4(c), File No. 2-69716; Exhibit 4(c), File No. 2-70767; Exhibit 4(b), File No. 2-71542; Exhibit 4(b), File No. 2-73799; Exhibits 4(c), 4(d) and 4(e), File No. 2-75762; Exhibit 4(c), File No. 2-77629; Exhibit 4(c), File No. 2-79557; Exhibit 99(a) to Post-Effective Amendment No. 5 to Form S-8, File No. 33-18669; and Exhibit 99(a) to Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Form S-3, File No. 33-46076)
4(b) Ninety-fourth Supplemental Indenture dated as of December 1, 1993 between FPL and Bankers Trust Company, Trustee
12(a) Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
12(b) Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividend Requirements
23 Independent Auditors' Consent
* Incorporated herein by reference
(b) Reports on Form 8-K
A Current report on Form 8-K dated October 22, 1993 was filed on October 22, 1993 reporting one event under Item 5. Other Events.
SCHEDULE V
FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
SCHEDULE V
FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT (Concluded)
(1) Substantially all additions are originally charged to construction work in progress and transferred to electric plant accounts upon completion. Additions at cost give effect to such transfers. (2) The installed cost of individual units of plant retired is not always available. Plant accounts are credited for such retirements on the basis of estimates when the original cost is not available. Nuclear fuel materials sold are reflected as retirements.
SCHEDULE VI
FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION, DEPLETION AND AMORTIZATION OF PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
SCHEDULE VI
FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION, DEPLETION AND AMORTIZATION OF PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT (Concluded)
(1) Depreciation of transportation equipment is charged to various accounts based on the use of such equipment. Amortization of nuclear fuel assemblies is charged to fuel, purchased power and interchange expense. (2) This reserve is maintained for all depreciable property. The amount in the retirement column is net of removal costs and salvage. (3) Includes fossil decommissioning reserves of $102 million, $92 million and $83 million at December 31, 1993, 1992 and 1991, respectively.
SCHEDULE IX
FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES SHORT-TERM BORROWINGS
(1) Represents the maximum amount outstanding at any month end. (2) Computed by dividing the sum of the daily ending balances by the number of days in the year. (3) Computation is based upon the principal amounts weighted by the number of days outstanding.
SCHEDULE X
FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES SUPPLEMENTARY INCOME STATEMENT INFORMATION(1)
(1) Other information required by Article 5, Schedule X - Supplementary Income Statement Information is shown in the Consolidated Financial Statements or notes thereto, or is not presented as such amounts are less than 1% of total revenues.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Florida Power & Light Company Date: March 21, 1994 By STEPHEN E. FRANK Stephen E. Frank (President and Chief Operating Officer and Director)
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the date indicated.
Signature Title Date
JAMES L. BROADHEAD Principal Executive James L. Broadhead Officer and Director (Chairman of the Board)
PAUL J. EVANSON Principal Financial Officer Paul J. Evanson and Director (Senior Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer)
K. MICHAEL DAVIS Principal Accounting Officer K. Michael Davis (Vice President, Accounting, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer)
DENNIS P. COYLE March 21,1994 Dennis P. Coyle
JEROME H. GOLDBERG Jerome H. Goldberg
LAWRENCE J. KELLEHER Directors Lawrence J. Kelleher
J. THOMAS PETILLO J. Thomas Petillo
C. O. WOODY C. O. Woody
MICHAEL W. YACKIRA Michael W. Yackira