Doocey MattMATT DOOCEY (National—Waimakariri): That's right! Thank you very much Madam Chair.CHAIRPERSON (Hon Anne Tolley): Late in the night—late in the night.MATT DOOCEY: It's very good—a great choice I thought.Hon Member: Who are you?MATT DOOCEY: Thank you very much for—Hon Iain Lees-Galloway: It's Todd Muller.MATT DOOCEY: —for granting me permission to—just a shorter version ha ha! So to start off with the Minister in the chair we are talking about the regeneration of Christchurch post-earthquakes and we are building one of the best small cities in the world. And what we know about the city of Christchurch and the region of Canterbury—intrinsically linked is our rugby history. We do know we are one of the best rugby regions in the world. So I just want to start off by acknowledging the Crusaders' win over the Hurricanes on the weekend—39:25—which was a historic win beating the mighty Canes. So my first question is to the Minister. I'll be interested in her view.Ian McKelvie: I raise a point of order Madam Chairperson. Surely that's out of order. Ha ha!CHAIRPERSON (Hon Anne Tolley): It's certainly nothing to do with the bill.MATT DOOCEY: Thank you Madam Chair. Back to the bill. As I was saying—CHAIRPERSON (Hon Anne Tolley): You haven't got to it yet.MATT DOOCEY: The regeneration of Christchurch is intrinsically linked to our rugby history. So my first question to the Minister was with the Crusaders playing the Chiefs our first home game of Super Rugby Aotearoa this weekend I'd be interested to know whether she had a view on who would be winning that game this weekend. CHAIRPERSON (Hon Anne Tolley): That's nothing to do with the bill.MATT DOOCEY: My second question to the Minister as well—we've talked about the regenerate entity being disbanded. And as the Minister will know there's real concerns in Christchurch of ensuring things carry on with pace. One of the responsibilities for Regenerate Christchurch was looking at the cathedral precinct and Cathedral Square. So I'd just be interested from the Minister in how we ensure that projects like that continue because of course it's all very good handing back responsibility and local decision-making. But equally I think as we've seen in the House for almost decades since the earthquakes Parliament has stood behind Canterbury and has served the people well from all parties ensuring that there is legislation that ensures Christchurch rebuilds. I feel there is some concern with areas like the cathedral precinct not necessarily the cathedral itself but of course the land around it that Regenerate Christchurch were previously drawing up plans for. So that is my second question. The first one the rugby score; the second about the issue of disbanding Regenerate Christchurch as an entity. And then just my third question I'd be interested in the Minister's view—you know we are handing back responsibility to local decision-makers and I would be interested to know—I'm just noticing the Minister is seeking advice from the advisers so we might be getting some sort of result on the score there; maybe not. But what I was interested in is also looking at the red zone area because what we do know is that is an important area. The Minister will know it covers quite a bit of her electorate as well. How does disbanding Regenerate Christchurch ensure that when we hand back the responsibility to local decision-makers whether that be Christchurch City Council Waimakariri District Council Selwyn District Council Environment Canterbury and Ngāi Tahu projects will carry on and progress well?CHAIRPERSON (Hon Anne Tolley): The Minister is able to answer questions two and three but question one is completely out of order—being a Chiefs supporter.