Sio WilliamAupito WILLIAM SIO (Labour—Māngere): I want to acknowledge the Minister Chris Finlayson and thank him for the considered way that he has answered many of the questions that have been raised by members in this Committee. He will appreciate that for many of us this is the first time we are getting to have a look at the contents of this particular bill. I therefore want to draw his attention to clause 102 with regard to direct access to data information. It says that the purpose of the subpart is to enable an agency to have direct access to databases storing specified public sector information. I ask the question whether—and just thinking along the lines of public sector information—that would be information that would be gathered when I go in to get a driver's licence. I suspect it would be information that would be gathered if I was renewing my passport. I suspect it would be information that would be gathered by local government if I was paying my rates.Many of us while we are engaging with the relevant Government department will not know that based on this legislation the intelligence agency can now access that information. So what is the preparation that needs to be done in order for the general public to realise that any time they are engaging with a public Government department and information is given to a Government department potentially that information can be seized by an intelligence agency. I refer to clause 104 Matters to which Ministers must have regard to before entering direct access agreement". In paragraph (b) it says that there are adequate safeguards to protect the privacy of individuals. I am not sure having not participated in the select committee whether those safeguards are the following clauses: clause 105 consultation with the Privacy Commissioner and the Minister responsible for the holder agency and the Minister responsible for the intelligence and security agency who give authority to that. Is it consultation with the inspector-general before entering into a direct access agreement? Are those safeguards that he refers to in clause 104(b) adequate safeguards to protect the privacy of individuals?My concern there is that there is a lot of power being given to this agency and when we are giving the intelligence and security agency direct regard to have access to that information it also includes information or activities that would be deemed illegal as we heard in the previous part. Could not one of the safeguards be that—particularly when there are issues that could be of concern to the entire nation—those matters be tabled in this House? With so much power being given away particularly to two relative Ministers it just—and we are talking about the safeguarding of the privacy of individuals; individuals who may not have known beforehand that when they are engaging with a Government department handing over their personal information to access a driver's licence a passport whatever the case may be under this legislation all of that personal information can now be accessed by security intelligence.The other thing that I also just want to draw the attention of Minister to is the fact that in clause 112 we are now including a New Zealand citizen or a permanent resident of New Zealand. Clause 112(2) states: "An application for permission must be made to—(a) the responsible Minister and the Chief Commissioner of Intelligence Warrants if the person is—(i) a New Zealand citizen; or (ii) a permanent resident …". I think there will be members of our communities who may be very worried about that because when this debate started there was some concern. There was an argument put forward that accessing information—"