Peters Winston: Oral Questions — Questions to Ministers Questions to MembersText is subject to correctionPeters Winston: Oral Questions — Questions to Ministers Questions to Members[Sitting date: 10 February 2016. Volume:711;Page:8847. Text is subject to correction.]4.Rt Hon WINSTON PETERS (Leader—NZ First) to the Member in charge of the Births Deaths Marriages and Relationships Registration (Preventing Name Change by Child Sex Offenders) Amendment Bill: What indications of support has he received for the Births Deaths Marriages and Relationships Registration (Preventing Name Change by Child Sex Offenders) Amendment Bill?Dr JIAN YANG (Member in charge of the Births Deaths Marriages and Relationships Registration (Preventing Name Change by Child Sex Offenders) Amendment Bill): At this stage on the first reading of the bill on 2 December 2015 the bill had the support of National the Māori Party ACT United Future and New Zealand First. So I will actually take this opportunity to thank the member and his party for their support.Rt Hon Winston Peters: On the basis that National MPs have offered support are there former National MPs in contact with him offering—Mr SPEAKER: Order! There is no responsibility for that question.Rt Hon Winston Peters: I raise a point of order Mr Speaker. [Interruption]Mr SPEAKER: Order! I want to hear from the member.Rt Hon Winston Peters: He has a bill before Parliament and I am asking a strict question that it could have gone to a submission or it could have gone to a written document or it could have gone to a phone record. I am asking him a plain question about support and you are ruling it out before we even get to the end of it.Mr SPEAKER: That is right. I am ruling it out of order because I am aware of a case that is completely suppressed and if the member wishes to raise that he knows he can do so via the Standing Orders and make contact with me. He has not done so. We are moving on.Rt Hon Winston Peters: I raise a point of order Mr Speaker.Mr SPEAKER: It is a fresh point of order I hope.Rt Hon Winston Peters: Yes it is a fresh point of order.Mr SPEAKER: I will hear it.Rt Hon Winston Peters: It is one of clarification as well. What—Mr SPEAKER: No. Points of orders are not for clarification. I have had—[Interruption]. Order! I just want to explain to the member that if he wants to raise a fresh point of order I am happy to hear it. But you do not then say that it is a fresh point of order and seek a point of clarification on a previous point of order that I have ruled on.Rt Hon Winston Peters: I am talking about a misjudgment in a legal sense by you.Mr SPEAKER: Order! [Interruption] The member will resume his seat. [Interruption] Order! I ask members to look very carefully at Speaker’s ruling 23/5. What that in esssence says is that members have a right to raise a point of order but once the decision is made that is the decision that is made. Members do not have to agree with that decision but they certainly have to accept that decision. To continue to raise points of order and attempting to say that they are fresh in order to relitigate a decision will lead to disorder and I will not tolerate it from the member. That concludes oral questions—Rt Hon Winston Peters: You can run but you can’t hide.Mr SPEAKER: Order! I call on Government order of the—Rt Hon Winston Peters: You can run but you can’t hide.Mr SPEAKER: Order! If the member the Rt Hon Winston Peters continues in that vein I will be asking him to leave the Chamber for the rest of the day.