McKelvie Ian; Rurawhe AdrianIAN McKELVIE (National—Rangitīkei): Thank you Mr Assistant Speaker. It might be surprising to you I guess to know that this is the first time someone of my eloquence has had the opportunity to speak in this House in this term. I thought I was going to get to Christmas-time without getting there. First of all I want to congratulate you on your appointment as Assistant Speaker. Of course we're very fortunate to both live in the same electorate the very good electorate of the Rangitīkei which of course you represent a good piece of as well. So thank you for that Mr Assistant Speaker.I want to comment very briefly on this bill the Maritime Transport Amendment Bill in its third reading. I want to comment very briefly on it. Just to make a couple of comments about some comments Minister Jones made earlier on when he talked about relieving business of the burden of bureaucracy: I guess that when sitting in a Government that surrounds itself with bureaucracy it's very refreshing to hear that. I also thought he made an interesting point: that whilst it is a burden on business very few businesses actually commented on the issue of compulsory drug testing and the course of that.I also want to make a bit of a comment on the previous speaker Paul Eagle's talk about the Chathams. I've never been to the Chathams myself and I'd welcome a trip with him anytime he wants to take me.Just briefly on the bill—Hon Kris Faafoi: That's 38 seats left.IAN McKELVIE: Ha ha! It's quite extraordinary I think that in this day and age we're talking about a bill that deals with everything from what is I guess a monopoly on shipping to the Chatham Islands to the launching of space rockets—and things that are probably a little bit beyond my generation even to think about—on the East Coast of the North Island of New Zealand. That's the nature of legislation we put through this House and that's the complication of legislation that the chair of the Transport and Industrial Relations Committee at the time Jonathan Young talked about when he made his speech on the third reading of this bill. It is pretty interesting that we can get into things as diverse as that in a bill like this.I just want to make two other points. One is that whilst this bill I guess came into being initially around oil spills and things like that it also deals with some pretty significant factors that have a big impact on the perception of New Zealand internationally. One of them is the tourism industry and one or two of my colleagues have talked about that. We cannot afford to take risks with these industries. This bill to some extent protects the tourism industry but I think that will be where the risks in my view are: in not making compulsory drug testing part of this game and things like that. But I also understand the reasons for that because I do think that at the end of the day personal responsibility comes into a whole lot of things and those people that are involved in those industries—whilst they work in them they also have a responsibility to themselves and their fellow workers to make sure that they do behave in a rational manner.I don't want to add anything further on the bill. I think that most things have been said. I think it is a good piece of legislation on the whole and I commend it to the House.The ASSISTANT SPEAKER (Adrian Rurawhe): I call Marja Lubeck—five-minute call.