Ngarewa-Packer DebbieDEBBIE NGAREWA-PACKER (Co-Leader—Te Pāti Māori): Thank you Madam Chair. Again taking into context that 83 percent of Māori did not support this coalition I therefore have some real concerns on assumptions that are made—again through clauses 11 to 15—from a different perspective. Quoting the Minister earlier and his view on the Māori-iwi partnerships and the need to power them up in clauses 11 to 15 if that is indeed the Minister's view the question we have is: how long does the Minister believe it will take to power up the iwi partnership boards? How will they be resourced? What sense or lens will the Minister have over the inequities for Māori as this transitioning is happening particularly remembering our mana hauā our tangata whenua in rural areas our tangata Pasifika?There's a lot of emphasis on iwi-Māori partnerships. Indeed we heard one iwi tonight that has supposedly endorsed this approach—kei te pai if that's the case. But there is a lot of emphasis on iwi-Māori partnerships who have had one-on-one meetings with the Minister who are likely expecting some direct funding and hoping that this model will provide a better resource model than what currently exists. However if the power-up capacity that the Minister himself referred to is not there how long will it take the Minister—and again what we're not hearing is what the gap filler is. What strategy is going to be applied during this transition—assuming that the Minister believes this will happen in a linear coherent way? Knowing Māori and iwi as well as I do each will have—and should have—their own authenticity and indeed their own right to self-determine the path through that. It's not clear. If the Minister would please share how they intend to monitor this progress if indeed they are? At the moment it's really difficult to find data on the iwi-Māori partnerships and indeed the locality plans and indeed the successful prototypes.What is the expected outcome? How will the Minister ensure that we will have sight as communities affected of those particular outcomes—so when he sees that a particular partnership hasn't worked that there isn't the resourcing around that? Let's just take some of the regions that I come from where there hasn't been a successful model in the district health board model. They hadn't gotten up to speed and certainly haven't had the support and the capacity to get to a powered-up model"—again I use the Minister's words not my words.It's really unclear how we can as communities most affected be assured that this would be monitored. It's really unclear for the rest in Aotearoa who are taxpayers who indeed are looking at this being a better model; a better return on investment; a better social return on investment. How is the Minister going to track the success model given that some of the capacity that's been committed to this particular model in Te Aka Whai Ora lose their mahi lose their connection to the very communities that they've been building—I guess rapport?Also what's really not obvious in this if we were to go to clause 28—I mean just bear with me. It says in clause 28 "Section 55 amended" which relates to the development of locality plans by Health New Zealand. The amendments remove the requirement for Health New Zealand—I won't go through the whole thing—to engage and removes the requirement for the relevant iwi-Māori partnership board to agree to the annual report assessing progress against outcomes in the plan.So it is really really important that we are not being sold something that has been set up to fail but most importantly that our communities are going to get less of a service less of a focus on our health inequities. That is our primary objective: that we get clarity from the Minister that there is a guarantee that our people are going to come out with less inequities and a better outcome from this health model."