Woods Megan; Brown SimeonHon Dr MEGAN WOODS (Labour—Wigram): Thank you. Further to my colleague the Hon David Parker's question and the Minister for Transport's answer there I direct the Minister to the departmental disclosure statement where it said that The CRIS developed for this bill did not address the aspects of the Bill relating to the modification of the Clean Car Standard's emission targets." So I think given that the regulatory impact work did not address the issues around the emissions targets I think the question that my colleague put to the Minister has not been adequately answered to the satisfaction of the Opposition in terms of understanding where the Minister is coming from given that that analysis has not been undertaken and the departmental disclosure statement states that. So I'd like the Minister to state what evidence he is relying on—given that there has not been that regulatory impact analysis done on the Clean Car Standard's emission targets—that this will indeed fulfil the title of being a clean vehicle standard and not a dirty vehicle standard?Hon SIMEON BROWN (Minister of Transport): One is this bill doesn't repeal the clean vehicle standard; there will still be a clean vehicle standard. Secondly this bill does not change the standard and so there is no change to the standard by this bill.Hon Dr MEGAN WOODS (Labour—Wigram): I acknowledge that the Minister of Transport is correct and it doesn't repeal the clean vehicle standard but what this does is bring forward by three years the Minister's ability to change that by regulation. So given that he still hasn't answered the fact that there hasn't been the regulatory impact analysis done on the emissions target aspect of this I'd also like to know what evidence he's relying on that this will still be a clean car standard. But I'm also interested to know what the Minister is going to say in terms of fulfilling the name of the bill on the tin—the Clean Car Standard—what the criteria for decision making around changing those regulations will be and whether he will be putting that in the bill and if not why not?Hon SIMEON BROWN (Minister of Transport): If the member read the entirety of the principal Act she would find in section 175A that the Minister must not—later than 30 June 2024—initiate a review. In section 175A(2) it outlines the factors that the Minister must take into account.Hon Dr MEGAN WOODS (Labour—Wigram): Thank you. I ask the Minister how he responds then to the open letter from the Hon Simon Upton the Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment (PCE) who in the absence of being able to go through a select committee process has very clearly risen to the Minister. The very clause that the Minister is saying makes it all OK the Parliamentary Commissioner has got some questions around. So I'd like to know the Minister's response to that; how it is going to fulfil being a clean car standard when the Parliamentary Commissioner's advice very clearly says—Simon Court: Point of order Madam Chair. I detect in the member's question the same line of questioning that she has already pitched twice the Minister has replied to twice.CHAIRPERSON (Barbara Kuriger): The member's actually brought new material into this question. I think it's fine. Thank you.Hon Dr MEGAN WOODS: Thank you Madam Chair. So the question I put there is the paragraph in the PCE's letter that said "Parliament clearly intended that any regulations that are made to set targets would be subject to review. To ensure this is carried through in your amendment bill I suggest you make a minor amendment to the drafting of section 175A(a)" which of course is the clause that the Minister referred to in his previous answer "so that the text that follows 'carbon dioxide emissions set out in section 175' is replaced with 'and not later than 30 June 2025 for targets prescribed in any regulations under section 167C(1)(j)(iv)'." What does the Minister say to that?Hon SIMEON BROWN (Minister of Transport): Well I always enjoy receiving open letters."