Peters WinstonRt Hon WINSTON PETERS (NZ First): On Suffrage Day the last thing I would've expected was a member of Parliament to get up and attack a woman. They could've left it till tomorrow or next week but no they reverted to type because deviation and sideshows and roadblocks are what they're famous for. They're famous for that because they've got a leader who has an abundance of inquiries and the most serious inquiry should be about his status as a leader of that party.Look the most prominent inquiry in Parliament today concerns the leaking of information by one of his own National Party colleagues. Oh no don't shake one's head. We all knew the moment we heard this story that there were 55 subjects who were all suspects. The inquiry that Mr Bridges launched—now he's the leader of the National Party pro tem—was on 28 August to be conducted by guess who? PricewaterhouseCoopers—they're pretty big but it doesn't stop there oh no—and Simpson Grierson. That was 22 days ago. They're trying to find somebody who we know—that is the identity of the leaker in the National Party—and guess who's paying for the inquiry? Why the New Zealand taxpayer through the Leader of the Opposition's leadership office funding. The New Zealand taxpayer is paying for this absolutely mindless hopeless inquiry the end pathway and result of which we already know. So why don't we just cut to the chase here? Pay the money over to us and we'll give you the answer. Ha ha! It is phenomenal.You know what? Twenty-two days later we are still no wiser with these major New Zealand companies in full pursuit and yet we formed the coalition Government in half that time—11 days—after we knew what the special votes meant. Eleven days to form a coalition; 22 days to try and find out what other people know: namely who leaked on Mr Bridges. There are members over there that should be very nervous. I won't look at them or look where they should be because if I do then the suspicion will be cast on them without us getting the reward for disclosure. We are famous for disclosure especially when it comes to the National Party's sins.Can I just say the National Party has been utterly preoccupied using taxpayers' money and it's a disguise because the National Party has an awfully sorry parliamentary record over the last decade. Do you know how many people they've seen come and go in the last decade since 2008? Two pages full.Clayton Mitchell: Woah and small font too!Rt Hon WINSTON PETERS: Small font—two pages full. Unbelievable. People who either resigned or had to go—and that's far more than two fingers on two hands—then you've got the people who got pushed—Chris Bishop: What happened to Brendan Horan?Rt Hon WINSTON PETERS: —and then the ones like Mr Bishop over here mentions who decided to jump before they got pushed. Forty-five MPs in the space of three terms all gone. My message to the National Party backbench is: your party is a very dangerous place to be. There's no doubt about it. It is simply unbelievable.Let me tell you what in the last 11 months this coalition Government has made 100—no 1000—gee I almost underrated the party's performance. I underrated the coalition's performance. We've made 1057 decisions in just 11 months. It has taken them 11 months to get their boxes down here. That's all they've done—11 long tawdry hopeless months to get their boxes down here whilst we have been making decisions possibly 1200 before the year is up—1200.Can I just say as we come to a close that the National Party in Opposition is dysfunction junction". Nothing's happening there. It's a total mess. The leader can't even get one out of four National Party supporters. Whilst we're interested in good public policy all they care about is public relations. We strive for action; all they strive for is unction. The member—that's Mr Bridges—needs to reveal to the public who the leaker is or I will."