White HelenHELEN WHITE (Labour—Mt Albert): Thank you Mr Chair. I have got a couple of things I want to work through but I'll just focus on one of them at the moment because it's connected to the one raised by the Hon Duncan Webb and that is my amendment on the floor which is at clause 4 and it's the definition of cellar door from produce harvested from the land on which the retail premises is situated. So it's a very similar problem that I'm seeing. You need to have very much a connection with the produce and the land on which the retail premises is situated.I actually remember as a teenager walking down Sandringham Road which was dry at the time but it had these old-fashioned shop fronts where they just sold wine that was a little bit like tar. I think it was just me and my friends buying that wine. I'm not sure it was the best thing for Brand New Zealand but that was going on. It certainly wasn't produced at the back of the Sandringham shop but it was a kind of glitch in the system. It would be very nice if you would not glitch the system in this way and so I'd like your response about that connection between the growing—I can see what you're trying to do I can see you're trying to support your region. But that would provide that kind of security of connection and quality of the produce presumably that means it's not being sold in the Sandringham shops next to the dairy. Also I might actually just take the opportunity to talk through the second one of the amendments that I put. This is quite a significant difference and it is really in support of the manufacturers of other products where they are producing the products on site and that is really about the beer manufacturers that are out there. Now I've got that manufacturing and small business portfolio. It's an industry where we've seen the big brewers go sliding down and the struggling of small amazing new industries in this area of really boutique breweries. I cannot see why we would distinguish and keep this for those people who are in small business. They're manufacturing product of this kind in a region like Blenheim and not do that for the people of Morningside who actually do have incredible breweries going and they are there and they are in exactly the same position. That's like for like.I guess I see that as avoiding what we used to call pork-barrel politics. We don't just look after our own region. We take the logical position. We're representatives of all New Zealanders and we need to make sure we're looking after New Zealanders. So I'd like to know why it is that there has been this distinction between the two and why we wouldn't go the whole way to support the same kind of outlet if that's the position. If that's the logic that this is really supposed to help those little businesses why wouldn't we help them all? Especially when we've had an industry that struggled actually in urban areas and right now it's picking up. You can see those little boutique brewers. They are doing better than the bigger industry which is coming down. This would help them enormously. They actually do in my area have tastings etc. So it does happen. There are flights of these specialist beers. So I would genuinely like to know why we wouldn't keep them in the equation. Thank you.