Education Amendment Bill — Third Reading 
Education Amendment Bill — Third Reading 
[Volume:631;Page:2928] 
Education Amendment Bill 
Third Reading 
Debate resumed from 9 May. 
Hon TAU HENARE (National) 
: 
 I was rudely interrupted last night at the closure of the House. I was really disappointed that we could not go for an extra 4 minutes after 10 o’clock and that we could not go another 2 minutes in order to have the vote because members opposite wanted to get home and lick their wounds as they do every night at 10 o’clock after the House has closed. That is why we have not finished this bill. It would have been only 6 minutes; we would have had to wait only 4 minutes for me to speak then 2 minutes for the vote. It would have been all over but oh no it had to be put off until the next day so that members opposite could rush home and most probably watch the end of  
Boston Legal 
 because therein lies what members opposite are like. Darren Hughes is like Denny Crane in  
Boston Legal 
. But I digress. 
We are talking about the Education Amendment Bill—the regulations the micro-management of this legislation the bureaucracy and the sanitised way in which we go about educating our young people. Next year we will have cotton wool on the ground so that little toddlers will not hurt themselves when they go outside to play. Our mothers and fathers and our grandparents— 
Dianne Yates 
: Somebody bounced you on your head. 
Hon TAU HENARE 
: What was that? Did the member say that she does not have a grandmother or grandfather? 
The ASSISTANT SPEAKER (H V Ross Robertson) 
: There are to be no interjections while members are walking on the floor of the House. 
Hon TAU HENARE 
: Our grandmothers and grandfathers our mothers and fathers went through the Second World War for goodness’ sake and they went through the Depression. They brought up their kids they sent them to school and nothing happened. Yes there were broken legs; yes there were scratches when we fell out of trees. But we are not allowed to climb trees any more because nanny State has taken the responsibility instead of parents. Nanny State tells us how to educate our kids what sort of education they are to have and where to send our children whether it be to kohanga kindergarten or whatever. 
The Education Amendment Bill will do one thing that I abhor and it is that after 20 years of the kohanga movement 20 years of great Maori work in early childhood and whanau development this lot over here without a skerrick of consultation want to make kohanga like kindergarten playcentre and everything else—a one-size-fits-all approach and members opposite think it is OK. That will never happen. 
The other thing is that over the next couple of years every early childhood centre in this country—educating 180000 children—will have to be relicensed. Who will pay for that? It will certainly not be this Government and it will certainly not be the Ministry of Education; it will be those individual centres which can hardly run now because education is so so costly. This is nothing more than a PC look at how education is supposed to be delivered and not an opportunity to let individual centres work it out for themselves. The legislation should make sure there are minimum standards but it is over-bureaucratised over-sanitised and over-regulated. 
A party vote was called for on the question  
That the Education Amendment Bill be now read a third time. 
Ayes 67 
New Zealand Labour 50; New Zealand First 7; Green Party 6; United Future 3; Progressive 1. 
Noes 52 
New Zealand National 48; Maori Party 4. 
Bill read a third time.