Brooking RachelHon RACHEL BROOKING (Labour—Dunedin): Thank you Madam Chair. I have been going through fairly much clause by clause so now I'm up to clause 11 and this is about new section 38A criteria for funding management. Now the Minister may by notice in Gazette set that criteria or change it and then there are some issues about what the criteria may include that I'll get to. But I'm interested in the may" in 38A and if in fact this should be a compulsory "must" that the Minister should do to have this criteria and we touched on the transitional provisions before.Then of course the criteria may include things relating to waste management infrastructure limits on the funding costs and identification in relation to an emergency of the things that an emergency waste and whose management will be funded. A little question about whose management will be funded how that works in the context of that section. I presume it's the people who are there doing something in relation to an emergency that are managing something—but it seems a curious wording; that is my point. It's not a policy position there but if there could be some clarification on what that "whose management" means. And then also if the Minister has considered any risk of future events to be included in that criteria.So that's two questions: why is it discretionary one; and two what does "whose management" mean? And actually three questions: has there been any consideration about future and likely events? And I'm thinking here because we know that there are landfills in coastal areas. Is that the sort of thing that should be considered?We touched on before the role of local authorities and we know—as you've said Madam Chair we've well traversed the levy that is going to the Government that the scope has been widened. But the levy that is going to local government the scope hasn't been widened and the Minister has noted that she might be doing some legislation in the future that could widen that local authority's scope to also include site remediation and emergencies.I have an amendment that could do that now. So that would amend—now moving away from clause 11; that would insert a new clause 9A. And in section 32 of the primary legislation of the Act that we're amending I've put in there that Governments could spend on projects that provide for the remediation of contaminated sites and that could be expanded out to emergencies as well to match this amendment bill. So that could be done now and there's a tabled amendment doing that.Going back to some other points there was a discussion about how the previous Government hadn't changed the waste levy and I'd like confirmation from the Minister that her comment there was because the waste levy is normally set in regulations and the regulations were for a period that ended in this next period and that the Government's not changing that.The next comment is that the Minister didn't answer my question in relation to section 30. And if that should also include site contamination the remediation of contaminated sites—that seems to be missing from that section.And also we haven't heard yet that answer about why this expansion needs to apply to fertiliser. That is my precise question on—going back to 4(2)(a) but also as you've heard some questions there about clause 11 and new section 38A."