Urgent Debates Declined — Skycity Convention Centre—Signing of Agreement Christchurch City Council—Building Consent Accreditation and Appointment of Crown Manager Primary Industries Ministry—Suspension of Meat Exports to ChinaText is incorporated into the Bound VolumeUrgent Debates Declined — Skycity Convention Centre—Signing of Agreement Christchurch City Council—Building Consent Accreditation and Appointment of Crown Manager Primary Industries Ministry—Suspension of Meat Exports to China[Sitting date: 09 July 2013. Volume:692;Page:11774. Text is incorporated into the Bound Volume.]Urgent Debates DeclinedSkycity Convention Centre—Signing of AgreementChristchurch City Council—Building Consent Accreditation and Appointment of Crown ManagerPrimary Industries Ministry—Suspension of Meat Exports to ChinaMr SPEAKER: Honourable members—[Interruption] Order! I have received a letter from David Shearer seeking to debate under Standing Order 386 the completion of the negotiations between the Government and Skycity and the signing by these two parties of a final agreement to build a convention centre in Auckland. This is a particular case of recent occurrence involving ministerial responsibility. I would have been inclined to accept this application except for the fact that legislation is required to give effect to the final agreement. A Government bill was introduced yesterday and I understand that its first reading may be debated later this week. In these circumstances I am not convinced that I would be justified in setting aside the business of the House for a debate today. The application is therefore declined.I have also received a letter from the Hon Lianne Dalziel seeking to debate under Standing Order 386 the Government’s appointment of a Crown manager to oversee the Christchurch City Council building consent authority. The appointment of a Crown manager is a particular case of recent occurrence involving ministerial responsibility. The test for whether a particular case requires the immediate attention of the House is a high one. Not every ministerial announcement of an appointment will give sufficient grounds for an urgent debate to be held. The purpose of an urgent debate is to hold the Government accountable for its actions. An appointment has been made terms of reference established and an initial plan of action is to be put in place over the next 4 weeks.Although the decision to appoint a Crown manager is an important one working through what needs to be done will take some time. An urgent debate is a way of holding the Government accountable for matters that have occurred. I am not convinced that the situation has reached the stage where in terms of the Government’s responsibility an urgent debate is warranted. The application is therefore declined.I have further received an application from the Hon Damien O’Connor seeking to debate the cessation of the importation of New Zealand meat shipped to China since 1 June 2013 and the failure of the Minister for Primary Industries and his ministry to respond to the issue. The member has provided no authentication with his application. This is in itself a reason not to accept it. The urgent debate is an opportunity to hold the Government accountable for its action where it is responsible. The member’s application does not make out a clear case for holding the Government to account. Furthermore the absence of action on the part of the Government is not a particular case of recent occurrence that can be raised under Standing Order 386. The application is therefore declined.