McAnulty Kieran; Williams PotoKIERAN McANULTY (Labour): Thank you very much Madam Chair. I am a little bit nervous following after that speaker Anahila Kanongata'a-Suisuiki and the detail that she was able to provide on this piece of legislation but let me have a crack.I am excited about speaking about Part 4—I've been waiting all day to do this—and in particular two particular parts. I want to talk about the proposal around the introduction of electronic voting and I also want to talk about clause 84(1). But I'll start with the first clause: clause 81 Sections 26N and 26O and cross-heading repealed". I do want to ask about this—and the point was made by my colleague the Hon Stuart Nash earlier today—and I just wanted to make the point that there might be some concern amongst particularly those in our rural communities around how we might be extending beyond that of allowing those to participate in electronic voting and the impact that we might have on the transitional councils. I take the Minister's point that they may no longer be relevant. However I do urge the Minister that in the communications once this bill—this marvellous bill—is passed we just make some effort into reassuring those who have had a long history with the Fish & Game Council that we might not be exceeding the brief when we're wanting to go about doing this.In clause 82(1) we are replacing section 26Z(1) with the following: "(1) The election of members of Fish and Game Councils must be conducted—(a) using either of the following methods of voting: (i) postal voting: (ii) a combination of electronic voting and postal voting;". I note that the original proposal was "by postal ballot or electronic vote;" and I commend the Government Administration Committee and the Minister for allowing flexibility there and not having that rigid structure of choosing that difficult decision: do we post or do we text? Now you've got the option.However I do want to pose a question around the futureproofing of this piece of legislation and what is currently being proposed because we are currently looking to amend a piece of legislation that was put forward in 1987 30 years later. That suggests to us that we're wanting to make sure that we're proposing something here that will stand the test of time in 30 years' time. If we leave it as is under paragraph (a)(ii)—"a combination of electronic voting and postal voting;"—once this Government places the investment in rural and regional communities around connectivity through rural mobile and broadband there may not need to be the need for postal voting. However as it is currently written you may have to tie them into a combination of electronic voting and postal voting and I just think perhaps I would like to hear from the Minister around how that particular clause might be futureproofed so that we don't get stuck with sort of what is technology that might become out of date.Here's to the exciting bit: clause 84 "Section 2 amended (Interpretation)". This is in Subpart 2 "Amendments to Wildlife Act 1953". I happen to have a copy of that Act in front of me here because I wanted to know what the definition of "associated products" was being proposed in clause 84(1). It says: "In section 2(1) definition of 'associated products' replacing 'products made' with 'goods or services produced or supplied'." Now looking at this Act here under "associated products" it means "products made in association with game bird habitat stamps as part of the game bird habitat stamp programme"—clear as you like.My concern is around the extension of the intention of the original Act because here we're talking about "products made"—production. We're wanting to expand that to "goods or services produced or supplied". There are two parts that I want to raise a question on there. "Products made"—a product that is produced. Here we're expanding "products" to "goods or services". It is no longer just a product; it is also a service.Then we're looking to go beyond production in terms of "products made" to "produced or supplied". So we're moving from production to distribution and I would like some clarification around that.The CHAIRPERSON (Poto Williams): Before I call the honourable Minister can I just suggest to members that we have possibly exhausted the debate on the election of Fish & Game councils so I would ask members that in the continuation of this particular part we look at other clauses to debate."