Lee MelissaMELISSA LEE (National): Thank you Mr Speaker. Over two months ago I put it to this House that the Prime Minister cannot even bring law and order into her own electorate of Mount Albert that she cannot keep the streets of Mount Albert safe. It is now true that she cannot keep the malls safe the businesses safe and our families safe. It is definitely true and you can ask anyone. The terrified store owners shop workers and staff at St Lukes mall don't feel safe anymore. We know. The Hon Mark Mitchell and I actually visited the mall and talked to the people there and some of them are permanently choosing to move to a safer place. They're quitting their jobs because they do not want to work in an environment where they feel vulnerable. That is a terrible indictment on a Government who apparently cares about people. Oh no; they don't actually. They prefer to look after themselves. The MPs who might need lamingtons actually need security detail but people who have guns pointed at them who have batons beating down their doors and things stolen from their stores—work they have put heart and soul into—are not being protected by this Government. Last month I spoke to shopkeepers who are actually sleeping on the floor of their shops because they don't feel they're protected. That is just one issue that this Government is failing at. Today at question time I put some questions to the Minister for Broadcasting and Media who is spending $370 million of taxpayer money—$370 million of taxpayer money—to create a new public media entity replacing RNZ and TVNZ both of which put together are worth less than the money they are spending on this new venture. I asked the Minister whether it in fact had a regulatory impact statement (RIS). He couldn't actually answer that. I asked him if it had had a cost-benefit analysis done. After several questions he told me I could come to his office and get them from him. So guess what I did! I turned up. I didn't actually have the swipe card to go up to his office so I had to wait downstairs and get reception to ring his office. His office was rung. I had to wait about 15 minutes—I guess that's what it took his senior private secretary or the senior staff to print the material for me. Guess what! [Holds up document] The bit in pink is the regulatory impact statement—that is the regulatory impact statement. Members of Parliament normally require a little bit more than that. Literally what it says is that it is exempt from it because it has done a strong public media business case. Guess what the Minister's office printed for me! Not the cost-benefit analysis but the strong media business case. But guess what! This is what comes: the redacted version that is available publicly and it has no costs no money that we can track. There is absolutely no transparency—so typical of this Government. There is no RIS no cost-benefit analysis—which members of this House should have—to decide whether this is a good idea. There is no transparency. How can members genuinely say that the $370 million that the Government will be wasting on an entity replacing RNZ and TVNZ is good money being spent for a good purpose? With this document? I'm sorry members; I certainly can't tell if it's good. I know it's bad because there is a cost of living crisis in New Zealand and $370 million could wipe out the waiting list of people waiting for cancer medication and there would be money left over to deal with tens of thousands of patients waiting for surgery. This is a failure. This is a Government that is not delivering to New Zealanders. I say we need to end this Government.