Turei Metiria: Questions for Oral Answer — Questions to Ministers 
Turei Metiria: Questions for Oral Answer — Questions to Ministers 
[Volume:646;Page:15491] 
9.  
METIRIA TUREI (Green) 
 to the  
Minister for Tertiary Education 
: Has he received any reports that student debt will reach the milestone of $10 billion this week; if so what if anything does he plan to do about it? 
Hon PETE HODGSON (Minister for Tertiary Education) 
: 
 Yes I have. Next month’s Budget will contain some measures to further increase student support just like each of our first eight Budgets have already done. I acknowledge in passing the Green Party’s consistent support for progress in this area and I also acknowledge that the National Party has consistently voted against such progress. 
Metiria Turei 
: Does the Minister stand by this statement which he made in January of this year: “Each year under Labour-led governments student support has strengthened”; if so how does he reconcile that comment with the fact that the latest figures show that fewer students received a student allowance in 2006 than when Labour came to power in 1999? 
Hon PETE HODGSON 
: The proportion of eligible students who are receiving the allowance now is well over half—it is about 57 percent—about three-quarters of whom are receiving the full allowance and one-quarter of whom are on the cusp if the member might see what I mean. That is a great many more students than when we first came into office. I cannot express the difference in a percentage however because I do not have the figures with me. 
Hon Mark Burton 
: In the light of the Minister’s response to the primary question does he expect that total student debt will go on to reach $11 billion or even $12 billion; if so why is the total debt still rising? 
Hon PETE HODGSON 
: It is a very good question. The total debt continues to rise because apart from inflation there are more students and more students are studying to a higher level. That is a good thing. It is a good thing. The question is what is happening in the life of an individual student and what is happening there is that conditions continue to improve. They would say “too slowly” but conditions do improve. The average debt is now rising more slowly than the average wage with the average wage being the way that one pays the debt off. For that reason the average repayment of the debt has reduced from where it was in 2001 at 9½ years to where it is now at less than 6 years. So there is an improvement for students. The Greens have assisted with that improvement. We need to make more improvement. 
Dail Jones 
: Does the Minister accept that the problem associated with student debt with or without interest can be substantially reduced by the introduction of New Zealand First’s policy which for many elections has stated that New Zealand First will introduce a universal student allowance that does not require repayment? 
Hon PETE HODGSON 
: Having a universal student allowance is the policy of a number of parties in this House. For my part we are happy in our party to move towards but not to a universal student allowance and this is why: I have other priorities. I need to pay attention to the quality of tertiary education. I need to ensure that the completion rates continue to rise. I need to ensure that the access—especially for Maori and Pacific Islanders which is well below par—must be increased. These things all cost money and I happen to place them above the move to a universal student allowance. On the other hand we make progress towards that universality in most years and I hope we may do so again next month. 
Metiria Turei 
: Does the Minister disagree however that his inadequate student support policy which includes interest-free student loans has actually led to a 9 percent decline in the enrolment of students from poor backgrounds; and will he then make a real commitment to fulfilling the policy of the Green Party the New Zealand University Students Association and obviously New Zealand First for having a universal student allowance which would ensure that today’s students are able to have the same opportunity to learn to buy homes to choose when to have families and to take control of their financial destiny as he and most of the Labour Party leadership have also been able to do? 
Hon PETE HODGSON 
: The short answer is no. I have no advice to the effect of a 9 percent reduction in whatever the member suggested might be occurring for New Zealanders who are from more modest backgrounds. On the contrary there is documented evidence of higher access for Maori and Pacific Islanders but not high enough and of higher completion rates at level 7 and above but not high enough. We have had some dramatic outstanding improvements in education amongst Maori and Pacific Islanders in the tertiary sector in this country—especially in the years 2002 to 2006 which is the latest data available—but I would be the first to say along with all of my colleagues that progress is not yet sufficient. 
Dail Jones 
: Is the Minister aware that student debt can begin to be decreased by increasing the current parental income maximum for a student allowance from $71000 before tax if one lives in a parental home to study and just over $77000 before tax if one lives away from a parental home—the current rate—to say $100000 before tax if one lives in a parental home to study and $105000 before tax if one lives away from a parental home which would cost an estimated and I emphasise “estimated” additional expenditure of about $300 million to the Government and surely this would be a good investment in education and in the future of New Zealand and it would encourage qualified people to stay in New Zealand? 
Hon PETE HODGSON 
: Yes I am aware of that which is why although the member was not able to be with us this Government shifted parental thresholds three times in each of the last three Budgets—by 20 percent 10 percent and 10 percent—and we do not rule out the possibility in the future of a further shift in the thresholds. 
Metiria Turei 
: Is the Minister aware that the Minister of Finance recently told the TaxAgents’ Institute: “We have real ambition for New Zealand and our economy. And we know that by refusing to burden our children and grandchildren with a legacy of debt we are removing one of the biggest obstacles to realising that ambition.”; if so does it worry him that the Minister of Finance is so ignorant of the $10 billion legacy of student debt left by this and previous Governments which has a proven disproportionate exclusionary impact on women Maori and the least well-off New Zealanders? 
Hon PETE HODGSON 
: Just a couple of comments in response: first the level of participation of say New Zealand Maori in our universities is still below that of say New Zealand Europeans but it is getting better not worse. The member shakes her head—she needs to go back and look at the statistics. Second I did not have the pleasure of being in the room when the Minister of Finance made his quoted remarks which is a shame of course but I would not mind betting he was talking about KiwiSaver and that is a magnificent policy that will change the face of this country. 
Metiria Turei 
: I seek leave to table a chart showing that the numbers of students receiving an allowance in 2006 are 5000 fewer than in 1999. 
Document by leave laid on the Table of the House. 
Metiria Turei 
: I seek leave to table an article describing how the under-35s are now effectively shut out permanently from financial security. 
Madam SPEAKER 
: Leave is sought to table that document. Is there any objection? There is objection. 
Metiria Turei 
: I seek leave to table “Freedom from debt freedom to prosper”—the Minister’s speech to the TaxAgents’ Institute of New Zealand given in March this year. 
Document by leave laid on the Table of the House. 
Dail Jones 
: I seek leave to table a document to introduce a universal student allowance being New Zealand First’s election policy. 
Document by leave laid on the Table of the House.