Davidson MaramaMARAMA DAVIDSON (Green): For the Green Party we of course are very honoured and happy to support the Papawai and Kaikokirikiri Trusts Amendment Bill. There are a couple of main points that I want to pick up on. One of the reasons why the Green Party is happy to support this bill is the call in particular from Ngāti Kahungunu ki Wairarapa iwi and particularly the trust for getting Government a little bit more out of the way so that the trust can run its business to the best of its ability and can make mana motuhake decisions for its whenua and for its whakapapa and for whānau.I absolutely agree that the bill amendments ensure that the intended beneficiaries of the trust Ngāti Kahungunu have more education choices. So it has extended funds being used purely towards the Māori Anglican schools and now allows funds and resources and scholarships to be used for their tamariki for schools outside of just those schools. So absolutely the Green Party supports the choice.At the same time I do just want to acknowledge on a related but more general issue the potential danger—and we have been seeing this around the country—for the history of some of those Anglican schools. I am speaking as an—oh my gosh!—old girl of Queen Victoria School. I understand that Minister Te Ururoa is an old boy of Hato Tipene College. These are examples of the proud legacy of Māori Anglican schools in this country. So I do want to—Hon Member: Both of them are closed.MARAMA DAVIDSON: Yeah both of them are closed; I understand. So I do want to acknowledge the weakening of schools that have done well but absolutely we support the education choice for Kahungunu and Wairarapa descendants.I do want to commend the Papawai and Kaikokirikiri Trusts Board for realising in its review—I think it was several years ago—that the scholarships were restricted to Kahungunu descendants. It wanted to ensure and recognise Rangitāne descendants also so they could access those scholarships. So that again is a fantastic and positive amendment to the bill. One of the final contributions in this short contribution that I want to reference is the clause around upholding the capacity of members to ensure they can do the job that they do. I am very happy that we in the Māori Affairs Committee advised—in the report there you can see that we changed the proposals in the bill that were in my personal view stigmatising people with different mental health capacity. Absolutely you can and must ensure that every member of any given board is able to uphold their responsibility and capacity to do their job. We can do that at the same time as ensuring that we do not create further discrimination as the Attorney-General pointed out towards a whole section of the community who are most definitely unfairly marginalised and discriminated against.The thing is we should all know from our experiences that the ability for board members to make good decisions or not to be able to fulfil their roles or not is absolutely—sometimes people of supposed sound mind can really disappoint us—[Interruption] So I am really glad that we made changes—yeah I see you smiling down there—and amendments to make a clear statement that the judgment is actually not about furthering discrimination to an entire section of the community that already gets a rough deal but that we recognise that we must ensure that members can uphold the responsibility to do their job without further creating that stigma and that totally unwarranted discrimination. So at this stage—thank you very much Mr Chair. Those were the main points that I wanted to highlight in my call.