Norman Russel William: Questions for Oral Answer — Questions to Ministers 
Norman Russel William: Questions for Oral Answer — Questions to Ministers 
[Volume:659;Page:8593] 
6.  
Dr RUSSEL NORMAN (Co-Leader—Green) 
 to the  
Prime Minister 
: Does he agree with his Associate Minister for Climate Change Issues that it is “extremist” for small developing countries like Tuvalu to push for a legally binding agreement from the Copenhagen climate conference? 
Hon BILL ENGLISH (Acting Prime Minister) 
: 
 I would disagree with the Associate Minister if that was actually what he said but it was not. He said that Tuvalu walking out of the negotiations in order to make that point was extremist. 
Dr Russel Norman 
: How can his Government criticise Tuvalu’s negotiating position and tactics when the Climate Action Tracker report that he trumpeted in this House just yesterday has just downgraded its ranking of New Zealand’s negotiating position from medium to inadequate where inadequate is the lowest ranking possible? 
Hon BILL ENGLISH 
: I am quite satisfied—and the Prime Minister is probably in Copenhagen by now—that those who are representing New Zealand will represent New Zealand’s interests well. The only real question mark over New Zealand’s credibility in these negotiations is the performance of the previous Government of which that member was part which oversaw record increases in carbon emissions. 
Hon David Parker 
: Is he aware that small island nations like Tuvalu have been brave in stepping outside the traditional mantra of the Group of 77 by calling for controls on emissions growth in major developing countries within the Group of 77; if so how then does he justify his Minister criticising Tuvalu rather than congratulating it? 
Hon BILL ENGLISH 
: The Copenhagen discussions are meant to be a negotiation. New Zealand will take part in that negotiation. We are fully aware of the concerns of the small islands. It is a bit hard to negotiate if people leave the room when it gets to the hard bit. 
Dr Russel Norman 
: How can his Government possibly justify calling Tuvalu’s position “extremist” when in fact New Zealand now occupies the extremist position as bringing one of the worst pledges to the table at the climate conference according to the very report from the Climate Action Tracker that he was trumpeting yesterday? 
Hon BILL ENGLISH 
: As I said before the main question mark over New Zealand’s credibility is that over the last decade we had among the fastest growth in carbon emissions of many developed countries. That was under a Government of which that member was part. New Zealand has a very credible position. We have a sensible and wide-ranging emissions trading system and a sensible target. 
Dr Russel Norman 
: Does the Prime Minister believe that Mr Groser’s personal attack on Tuvalu’s chief negotiator will help build New Zealand’s relationship with our Pacific neighbours and foster a successful agreement at the conference? 
Hon BILL ENGLISH 
: As the member will know New Zealand has strong relationships with our Pacific neighbours. As the member will also know Mr Groser is one of the more experienced international negotiators around and I am sure he will contribute to whatever result we can get out of Copenhagen. 
Dr Russel Norman 
: Does the Prime Minister understand that Tuvalu is currently being submerged under water and could be wiped off the map by sea-level rises resulting from climate change; if so can he understand why the delegates from Tuvalu may have strong feelings about the lack of action at the climate conference? 
Hon BILL ENGLISH 
: Yes. We would also argue that New Zealand is one of the few countries that are doing their bit because we now have an emissions trading system in place after much discussion within our Parliament which is more than almost any other country can say. 
Dr Russel Norman 
: Does the Prime Minister agree with Mr Groser’s comment last week that New Zealand’s ranking as medium by the Climate Action Tracker put New Zealand in respectable territory at the Copenhagen talks; if so will the Government now revise New Zealand’s negotiating position given that New Zealand has just in the last few hours been downgraded by the same report—the report that the Prime Minister gives so much weight to—from medium to inadequate? 
Hon BILL ENGLISH 
: We have a credible and respectable position. Those who are representing New Zealand there will negotiate fundamentally in our interests to get some kind of outcome from Copenhagen that is of benefit to the whole planet. New Zealand has a credible and respectable position and we will be sticking to it. 
Dr Russel Norman 
: I seek leave to table the Climate Action Tracker report dated 16 December which rates New Zealand’s climate conference offer as inadequate. 
Mr SPEAKER 
: Leave is sought to table that document. Is there any objection? There is no objection. 
Document by leave laid on the Table of the House.