Bayly AndrewANDREW BAYLY (National—Port Waikato): Thank you Mr Chair. I love that last comment from the Minister We've acted swiftly." So we've had a pandemic in place now for 20 months and only today we're still even trying to pass a piece of legislation to address the prime issue that most small businesses are facing which is they don't have enough cash to meet the requirements of their business. So I think getting a lecture from this Minister about our proposals is quite something. I think probably what's happened since last night someone's given the Minister a call probably Mr Robertson and said "Oh please tone it down about being too hard on the landlords because actually some of them have done a pretty good job." So I can see the attitude that's changed this morning from the Minister.But the central issue Minister—it is too late. It's too late. The Minister should have been putting in place something last year. The lockdown started in March last year we're now heading into November. And the issue is the thousands of businesses that have already gone out of business because they haven't had enough financial cash provided by the Government. I would just suggest to the Minister that I think in history people are going to look back at the response from this Government in terms of the support particularly around this issue and say "This Government was woeful."Now he mentioned that the retail association and some of the other hospitality associations were in support of their rent package. Well I can say to the Minister when I announced what is in my Supplementary Order Paper which changes Schedule 1A that when I suggested the rental support package with the Government fronting 50 percent for those businesses those small business that had a 40 percent or greater decline in their revenue they were highly supportive. In fact I can tell the Minister that they are only giving tacit support to this package that was put up last year and refused by New Zealand First and now reintroduced essentially under the same terms. The only reason they're supporting it—and they've told me that—is it's the best option they've got on the table. It's the only option that the Government's given them. Of course they've got to support it because there is nothing else on the table.This Minister has never done anything to do—and actually provided any concrete changes for 18 months. He's been missing in action—MIA in action. First of all my first question is—the Minister makes these statements like "We've heard that there's a lot of people that are supporting this have entered into arrangements." First question is: what is the source of that data and how many businesses—what is the estimate of the number of businesses that have reached agreement with their landlord? That's the first thing.The second thing: I know that the Minister of Finance quoted 80 percent of businesses had the ADLS—Auckland District Law Society—clause 27.5. He made that comment at one point. Again in talking to hospitality businesses and associations retail association Restaurant Association of New Zealand they all say that the numbers are significantly less and they actually think it's probably closer to between 20 and 40 percent who have got those Auckland District Law Society clauses. So I'd just be quite keen to actually see whether the Minister actually has any data to support any of those comments he made in his opening address."