Robertson GrantHon GRANT ROBERTSON (Minister for Sport and Recreation): I thought I would just take a brief call at this outset to run through essentially the framework of the bill and what we're trying to do here and just reiterate as we have at earlier readings—well particularly the second reading just now—the really good way in which the Social Services and Community Committee worked through this bill and the excellent support provided by officials as we worked through it. It is clear to me that for the vast bulk of members of the House they can see that this is the right thing to do to deal with a set of quite common complex issues but ones that do interact with each other and provide a very clear framework.So essentially Part 1 of the bill as is normally the case deals with definitional issues. There have been one or two changes made there which have been highlighted in the second reading. They are good and useful and constructive changes that will make interpretation of the bill significantly easier.Part 2 is one of the meatier parts of the bill. It's the establishment of the commission as an independent Crown entity. I do just want to mention—it was mentioned in Penny Simmonds' last call I think—that independence from the Government of the day the structures of sport as we know them is actually essential here. I in the nearly six years of being Minister for Sport and Recreation have been the recipient of an awful lot of correspondence about every level of sport that you could imagine all of it heartfelt all of it coming from a place where an independent voice lens and place is critically important because as Penny Simmonds noted these communities are often very small and people do know each other and it's very hard to get the perspectives that are needed. It's also very hard for people to raise complaints—and I will come at a later stage in another reading to talk a little bit about some of the people who have come forward and their courage in doing so. So that point of making it an independent Crown entity is I think a very very important one.Then obviously the series of functions which have been run through at some length in the earlier readings so I won't go through them again now but they are clear and they are important functions for the commission to do all of its job.Then Part 3 is about the codes. I know this was the subject of quite a bit of discussion both in the committee and from submitters. Striking that balance for the codes being both useful documents that can be applicable at different levels of sport from the elite down to the grassroots and ones that don't reinvent the wheel has already been indicated by some speakers—but that have enough meaning that they will be useful and people will know how they can work or how they can work through them. So there's a process to make the codes which is through Part 3 of the bill and consultation processes that are included in that particularly bringing our anti-doping rules into this framework having been in the previous Drug Free Sport New Zealand framework.The other parts of the bill I won't go into in any great detail now but I'm very happy to answer questions around Part 4 where the powers and investigations and disciplinary panels are dealt with and the way in which investigations happen. This is an important area because it will be very sensitive. It will need to be handled in a thoroughly professional way. That is outlined for everybody as to how those processes work all the way through. Then finally Parts 5 and 6 tidy up the various bits of provisions of other Acts.So I just wanted to give that broad introduction. I'm more than happy as is usual to answer questions on the bill. Again I thank all colleagues for their work on it.