Henare PeeniPEENI HENARE (Labour—Tāmaki Makaurau): I rise to speak to the title of this particular bill. Much of the debate from this side of the House has been around those vulnerable members of our community. We have mentioned those who rely on Braille postings and Braille signage for their safety comfort and convenience. I wonder whether perhaps some of the titles that could be offered up in this particular part might be something like Land Transport (Exclusion) Amendment Bill" with reference to the exclusion of a significant part of our community. The point was made earlier by speakers on this particular bill that many of the submitters came in to speak to their safety. Many of them came in to speak particularly to the issue with regard to Braille in the taxis to make sure that those communities that rely on those services were safe and were looked after.Sadly what this Land Transport Amendment Bill (No 2) ends up doing is actually excluding a large part of our community. There were varying numbers I read through the submissions on those who will be affected but they range from 22 percent of our community. In particular one submitter spoke about their disabled community in Papatoetoe South Auckland—The CHAIRPERSON (Hon Trevor Mallard): I am going to interrupt the member and ask him to draw my attention to the specific clauses or subclauses between clause 93 and clause 97 in Part 2 of the bill to which he is referring.PEENI HENARE: Part 2 of the bill?The CHAIRPERSON (Hon Trevor Mallard): Sorry; I apologise. Clauses 1 and 2.PEENI HENARE: I was speaking directly to the title of this particular bill. I mentioned earlier that in an attempt to amend the Land Transport Act in fact it was excluding a significant part of our community and I offered up the "Land Transport (Exclusion of Disabled Communities) Amendment Bill" as a potential title. While some members in this Chamber might cringe the facts were quite clearly laid out to the select committee and as I mentioned earlier some very sensitive topics were raised by those submitters.While there are parts in this bill that of course we agree with and it does seek to amend significant parts in the Land Transport Act there are still other aspects of this particular bill that we—I spoke about the exclusion of those communities. We also spoke about the issues with regard to Uber and the availability of passenger services and how that will impact on traffic in my electorate of Tāmaki Makaurau.I just want to offer a little something for us to think about when we pass this particular bill. Actually it does exclude people. It excludes a large part of our economy and those services in Tāmaki-makau-rau. I heard the Minister speak about how it will ease congestion. Well that is not the vision or evidence to assure this member whose electorate spans right across Tāmaki-makau-rau that those congestion issues in Tāmaki-makau-rau will be settled or will be eased if you like through the passing of this particular bill. I will finish there with the offer of my particular changes to the title in the hope that members across this Chamber will actually remember those submissions by those people affected—that their voices can be heard."