Kanongata'a-Suisuiki AnahilaANAHILA KANONGATA'A-SUISUIKI (Labour): Fakaalofa lahi atu Te Mana Whakawā. It's always a privilege to stand in this House to contribute and in this particular legislation—let me read it out so I can get it right Madam Speaker—the Regulatory Systems (Economic Development) Amendment (No 2) Bill the Regulatory Systems (Housing) Amendment Bill (No 2) and the Regulatory Systems (Workforce) Amendment Bill (No 2). I have to respond to Nicola Willis the previous speaker who spoke about National increasing aged-care workers' pay but she failed to record history correctly. They were taken to court to increase aged-care workers' pay in terms of retirement villages. So I just want to add to that.We are fixing what we have accumulated for many years. We know that not everything can be fixed overnight but we are getting started. As the Minister has said the Government is committed to maintaining and updating existing legislation to respond to changing environments which will protect the rights of citizens of this country. These bills make minor fixes that have a big effect on businesses and New Zealanders.I want to first start off with the Regulatory Systems (Housing) Amendment Bill (No 2). I am a member of the Social Services and Community Committee and these changes came before us. I want to let the committee know that we did have four people submit on this bill. As it's late at night I just want to recall that there were two oral submissions. Now one submission that I recall was a person that's writing a book on retirement villages and how they should service New Zealanders and of course the other was from the Ministry of Business Innovation and Employment. I want to remind the committee if I can of what these changes to the Regulatory Systems (Housing) Amendment Bill (No 2) actually are proposing.On the proposed amendment to the Retirement Villages Act we recommended—clause 7 affecting the Retirement Villages Act. We did not discuss any minor or technical changes to the bill but in section 26 of the Act it requires operators and promoters to take all practicable steps to ensure that advertisements are not misleading or deceptive. And section 79 of the Act specifies two penalties for breaching section 26 without reasonable excuse.So when I say—and of course when the Minister says—that the Government is maintaining and updating existing legislation to respond to changing environments to making sure that our citizens are safe it actually looks like this. What we are saying is that a fine not exceeding $15000 for a person or a fine not exceeding $50000 for a body corporate—that refers to section 79(2) of the Retirement Villages Act. The second point is that there is a fine not exceeding $5000 for a person or a fine not exceeding $10000 for a body corporate which is clearly stated in section 79(3).These are changes to the Regulatory Systems (Housing Amendment) Bill (No 2). It is about proposed amendments to the Retirement Villages Act. It clearly defines what is a fine for an individual and what is a fine for a body corporate if they breach these clauses of this proposed bill.I also want to cover the second part of my kōrero in terms of the Regulatory Systems (Workforce) Amendment Bill (No 2). I'd like to pick up on the changes and echo what the Minister had talked about in relation to parental leave and the Parental Leave and Employment Protection Act.Madam Speaker I just need to confirm that my contribution is 10 or five minutes for tonight. ASSISTANT SPEAKER (Hon Ruth Dyson): Five.ANAHILA KANONGATA'A-SUISUIKI: Five. So it's not a split call?ASSISTANT SPEAKER (Hon Ruth Dyson): You could ask the National Party to donate five minutes—you're on a roll! But no you've got 11 seconds to go.ANAHILA KANONGATA'A-SUISUIKI: Ha ha! I want to commend this legislation to the House and especially the hard-working Social Services and Community Committee. Thank you very much.ASSISTANT SPEAKER (Hon Ruth Dyson): My apologies for not advising the member this is a split call.