Xu-Nan LawrenceDr LAWRENCE XU-NAN (Green): Thank you Mr Chair. In terms of clause 6 of this particular bill the Accident Compensation (Interest on Instalment Plans) Amendment Bill I also want to be given the opportunity to take a couple of calls on this because I want to explore the different subclauses here.The first one I want to explore is new clause 17 of Schedule 1AA which our colleague Rachel Boyack has already mentioned as well. A couple of things on this: first of all in terms of subclauses (a) and (b) when we are looking at the total amount of levy collected over the three-month and 6-month periods—I just got myself a copy of the amendment for that as well. We will be in support of having it indicated—and I'll also be interested to hear from the Minister. But the Greens will be in support of having the three-month and six-month options being permanently set at zero percent. This will be something that I think will be really helpful in terms of contributing and having that level of certainty around this particular aspect.The key thing I want to kind of draw attention to is new clause 17(c) of Schedule 1AA which is the setting of the 2.73 percent on the total of levy collected over the 10-month instalment period. Now the reason I want to draw attention to this the first part is that this particular amount has been set which is the current amount of 2.73 percent according to the regulatory impact statement clause 8. However it is stated here that in 2020 the fee for the 10-month plan reduced from 5.4 percent to 2.7 percent as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. This is the amount that currently exists. I kind of wanted to get a sense from the Minister since we're putting this legislation through anyway whether the 5.4 percent has ever been considered since the 2.73 percent was almost an interim measure. This is one of the first questions I have for the Minister.The second part around new clause 17 of Schedule 1AA that I want to get some clarification from the Minister on is that as it stands clause 6 of the bill makes this amendment and has this insertion of new Part 5 into Schedule 1AA of the primary Act. However the amendments that follow on in accordance with new section 239(1)(hb)—which is clauses 5(1) and (2) of the bill—says that any additional adjustments will be done as a result of making regulations. I kind of want to know from the Minister whether the making of the regulations will also be inserted as part of the primary legislation as is indicated in what we have here in terms of subclause 17. And also when we are looking at regulations when we are discussing regulations I'm also conscious of whether we're looking at the possibility of secondary legislation and how that potentially works or interacts with the new Ministry of Regulations—whether there's any discussions or conversations or any need for some sort of collaboration or checking work that has to be done there.So the two questions I have for the Minister on this: the first one is for clause 6 inserting new clause (17)(c) into Schedule 1AA whether 5.4 percent has been considered instead of 2.73 percent due to the COVID interim measures. And the second question is whether any future regulations that are made will be incorporated as part of the primary legislation or will they be in secondary legislation or a regulation? And if so how would that potentially work with the Ministry of Regulations. Thank you.