Lees-Galloway Iain: Oral Questions — Questions to MinistersText is incorporated into the Bound VolumeLees-Galloway Iain: Oral Questions — Questions to Ministers[Sitting date: 29 October 2014. Volume:701;Page:343. Text is incorporated into the Bound Volume.]9.IAIN LEES-GALLOWAY (Labour—Palmerston North)to the Minister for ACC: Is she satisfied that just 54 percent of the public expressed trust and confidence in ACC according to the corporation’s 2014 Annual Report?Hon NIKKI KAYE (Minister for ACC):No I believe that ACC needs to do more to rebuild trust and confidence with New Zealanders. I am confident that ACC has a significant programme of work under way to achieve this. I am also pleased that the annual report shows trust and confidence has been trending upwards for the past few years.Iain Lees-Galloway: Did former Minister Judith Collins damage public trust and confidence in ACC when she admitted that every New Zealander is paying too much for ACC because the Government is using excessive levies to create the perception that it will achieve a fiscal surplus in the current financial year?Hon NIKKI KAYE: Well firstly I disagree with the statement made in that question. But what I can say in terms of levies is that under our Government we have announced $480 million in levy reductions. That is incredibly significant and it is a bit rich to get a lecture after the previous Labour Government left us with a huge deficit in 2008-09 of $4.8 billion.Iain Lees-Galloway: I am going to seek leave to table a media statement but that is because the Minister refuted the premise of my question—Mr SPEAKER: Order! Members need to understand that the purpose of tabling a document is not to make a political point.Iain Lees-Galloway: The purpose is not to make a political point.Mr SPEAKER: Well I think that in the way it has been described to me it is very much about making a political point. The reason people seek leave to table documents is that it is information that is not readily available to members may be difficult to source for members and may be informative to members. If it is something that has been in the media particularly media that is freely available to members I do not intend to start putting the leave.Chris Hipkins: I raise a point of order Mr Speaker. In a ruling that you made—it was either earlier this week or last week—you referred us to a Speaker’s ruling that requires any statements made in a question to be authenticated so if there is any factual material in a question it needs to be authenticated. If a member is not able to table a document to authenticate that claim what is the appropriate way for them to authenticate any claim that they might be making in a question?Mr SPEAKER: The member I think is confused between a primary question and a supplementary question. The authentication is required for a primary question and that is required in the process when it is lodged to the Clerk’s Office and they will be accepted with authentication. With regard to supplementary questions I have to judge relatively immediately whether it is a reasonable question and I do that but it is not as if there is an ability to then table information that substantiates the authentication of a supplementary question. So in this case the primary question was authenticated it was immediately answered in the very first word by the Minister and we have now moved to a supplementary question. The way forward as I continue to advise the House is further incisive supplementary questions.Iain Lees-Galloway: Does the Minister accept—Hon Dr Jonathan Coleman: World weary—he’s not happy. That’s a big sigh.Iain Lees-Galloway: Are you all right? Does the Minister accept that over the 6 years that National has been in Government New Zealanders have overwhelmingly come to perceive ACC as difficult to deal with likely to breach their privacy likely to litigate against claimants and overcharging them for the privilege; if not why not?Hon NIKKI KAYE: No I do not accept all of the statements made by that member. What I can say is what I have said in answer to the primary question: there is more work to do. Obviously by a percentage that shows 54 percent public confidence we have to do better. Let me outline some of the progress that we have made. Firstly you can see at an investment level that ACC is now essentially fully funded. That is an extraordinary achievement for this Government given that we were left in a situation of a debt of $4.8 billion in terms of deficit. Secondly at an organisational level it is very clear—and I am meeting with the board tomorrow—that it has a huge programme around both updating information and communications technology systems to ensure that we have better progress around issues like privacy but also that a huge amount is being done in terms of claims management. I am confident that ACC is on the right track.Iain Lees-Galloway: Will this morning’s article in the New Zealand Herald damage public trust and confidence in ACC given that it detailed an attempt to cover up information about fraudulent activity that the cover-up itself was bungled that when pressed about the extent of fraud ACC could only say that the information it used was not robust and that an accurate figure for the level of fraud has not been provided?Hon NIKKI KAYE: In terms of the article in the New Zealand Herald I do not believe that it will actually damage public trust because you need to understand that the data is—and I want to outline why for a number of reasons—11-year-old data. The data was from 2000 clients and that is out of a total of about a billion claims. So firstly it was a very small sample. I also understand that the figure that was quoted of 8 percent to 10 percent was not the proportion that was fraudulent; it was the proportion that needed another look. So it is old data it is a small sample and it is ropey.Iain Lees-Galloway: Given that the Minister is not satisfied with the level of public trust and confidence in ACC does she believe that the two initiatives to address public trust and confidence listed in the service agreements between ACC and former Minister Collins which are “refresh our communications strategy” and “social media” will be enough to improve confidence in ACC or does she think it might take something a little bit less superficial than that?Hon NIKKI KAYE: In terms of the corporation’s programme to improve public confidence there is a range of initiatives. There is a range of initiatives. The member is referring to a different document. He is not referring to the annual report. If he reads the annual report he will see that not only is there a significant investment plan in terms of dealing with the privacy issues and not only is the ACC doing a huge amount around sensitive claims which is very important but thirdly the Government is looking at the long-term funding policy. When he drills down when he does the work and reads the annual report he will see that one of the areas where we do need to improve public confidence is around businesses’ interaction with the ACC. There is a huge amount to do in terms of that administration side because that is where the public confidence is partly very low.Marama Fox: Ā e Te Mana Whakawā tēnā koe. E Te Minita he aha ngā whakaritenga kia tutuki ai te tekau ōrau o runga mō ngā tono pānga ia tau ia tau ā he aha ō mahere kia pai haere ai ngā tāngata i roto i te pūnaha whakaora?[What arrangements have you in mind for the projected 10 percent increase in new claims each year and what are your plans to improve the involvement of people in the recovery process?]Hon NIKKI KAYE: Just in terms of the translation of that question I got only half of it I think—Mr SPEAKER: I invite Marama Fox to either repeat it in Te Reo or if she wants to she can now repeat the question in English—whichever she would rather do.Marama Fox: Perhaps I will repeat it in English. How is the Minister planning to address the projected 10 percent increase in new sensitive claims each year and what plans does she have in place to involve whānau in the recovery process?Hon NIKKI KAYE: That is a very good question. Firstly one area where the Government is very focused and also the corporation is very focused is the prevention of sexual violence. We have a strategy and an action plan around that and they involve a number of Government agencies. The second thing I would say is I am advised that ACC is currently in the final stages of tendering for new suppliers and providers around some of those sensitive claims. That is very important so that we have more providers. Thirdly with regard to family and whānau support I am pleased to confirm that family and whānau of sensitive claims clients will receive support through the introduction of up to 20 hours of family and whanau support depending on family need. I can confirm that this will be available by the end of the year.Hon Te Ururoa Flavell: I raise a point of order Mr Speaker. Tēnā koe Mr Speaker. Can I just ask the Minister with regard to the question because I was not listening to the translation for further information just in case other members Māori members use Te Reo and we have to switch into English which defeats the purpose. Was the issue that the Minister did not get a good translation that the Minister did not get a translation or that the translation was unclear—just for the purposes of—Mr SPEAKER: I am sure I can answer that on behalf of the Minister. The Minister did not manage to realise it was going to be in Māori. She did not grab the headpiece in time to listen to the translation so she picked up the latter part of the—[Interruption] I will let the Minister explain her own reasoning.Chris Hipkins: I raise a point of order Mr Speaker.Mr SPEAKER: No I am going to hear from the Hon Nikki Kaye first so we will get an explanation.Hon Nikki Kaye: I was listening and I heard only half I think of what the translation was and other members may be able to confirm that.Chris Hipkins: I am happy to speak to this because I also was listening to the translation and the translation bore very little correlation to the question that was then asked in English. This is quite a serious issue for the House because we previously had a situation where questions were asked first in Te Reo Māori and then in English and we moved to a system where we had simultaneous translation. If that translation is not going to actually translate what is asked then we are going to have to reassess that. I listened very carefully to the translation. I can fully understand why the Minister did not understand what the question was. I did not understand what the question was either.Mr SPEAKER: Thank you. I appreciate that. When I finally got my headpiece on again I found much the same as the member Chris Hipkins has said. We need to now investigate whether it was an issue to do with the translation because it is critical if we are going to rely on the translator that we have an accurate interpretation of the question that is asked. Otherwise it could lead to all sorts of difficulties for a Minister. I will look into the matter.