Menéndez March RicardoRICARDO MENÉNDEZ MARCH (Green): Thank you Madam Chair. So just following on from the previous comments from the member to my right—Camilla Belich—I was interested in following on the line of questioning on workers' rights and worker safety.I think worker safety is really important to unpack more because ultimately we're talking about companies that are making profits off the back of these workers—labourers—who often actually put their own lives at risk. This has been alluded to: New Zealand does have quite a high rate of workplace mortality. So I wanted to know whether the Minister thinks that the current resourcing of the labour inspectorate is enough to ensure employers are meeting their legal obligations to workers. If not does she think therefore that an increase in that funding is necessary to ensure that workers are actually being protected and employers meet their legal obligations?I was also interested in I guess comparing the number of complaints that the labour centre's officer received over the period we reviewed and how many of these complaints were actually investigated to the end and then comparing that with the complaints that were unable to be investigated due to lack of resourcing and the workload that exists and whether she thinks that balance is right in terms of the number of investigations that are actually completed to the full extent or otherwise and whether she's received any advice around the capacity of the labour inspectorate regarding its capacity—particularly during the period we're looking at—but how that is actually giving her guidance about any future policy settings that she may be looking at.I acknowledge as well the connection between immigration settings and her portfolio and one of the areas that I wanted to touch on around migrant exploitation and migrant workers' wellbeing was whether she was satisfied that WorkSafe doesn't seem to collate information around people's visa status—whether it's incidents—and whether that's actually useful for the purposes of actually having a clearer picture as to whether people on temporary visas face disproportionate risks.I take the point from the select committee member Parmjeet Parmar that there's this acknowledgment that migrant workers are overrepresented in some of those more dangerous industries but that doesn't actually capture whether having a temporary visa—thinking a migrant worker—in and of itself actually creates a higher risk for those workers to be in situations where their lives may be put at risk. So I'm interested to know whether she thinks that the way in which we collate collect information around workplace incidents accurately paints a picture around the situation that migrant workers are experiencing.I'm also keen for her to expand around the changes that WorkSafe has made since the SageBush report on the Strategic Baseline Review which found that WorkSafe was failing to intervene in key areas. That report is from that period so I'm interested to know whether she's taking that report and taking more actions as a result of it.Finally I'm keen to get a sense of what advice has been provided to WorkSafe or the Ministry of Business Innovation and Employment on banning engineered stone to prevent workers from exposure to silica dust. I mean this has been an ongoing issue—it's not a new issue and it definitely was an issue during the period we're reviewing—but I'm keen to know whether incidents that may or may not have been happening during the period are now informing any of her strategic priorities around the types of materials that workers use that actually put their health at risk.