Ngarewa-Packer DebbieDEBBIE NGAREWA-PACKER (Co-Leader—Te Paati Māori): Thank you. Look we very rarely lodge Supplementary Order Papers (SOPs) but the gravity of this is so severe that we thought that we must. And I'd like to just capture that for a couple of minutes and then go into my questions.We've put forward SOP 185 that would require that the Act be reviewed within three years and that the Data Iwi Leaders Group (ILG) and the National Urban Māori Authority be consulted on the terms of reference of this on any other review of the legislation. A reminder in 2019 Stats New Zealand and the Data ILG signed a Mana Ōrite Relationship Agreement to work together and develop policies to give effect to the Crown's Te Tiriti obligations and Māori aspirations for Māori data and data sovereignty. In 2020 the Data ILG and Stats New Zealand engaged in a co-design process with the aim of designing a wider model for Māori data governance. So it's really disappointing to see and to hear from the Minister last night that in fact that's been ignored and the bill has progressed without incorporating any of that mahi any of that goodwill and the Mana Ōrite agreement effectively in the outcomes has been ignored.So the bill is being perceived by Te Ao Māori as a slap in the face and yet another example of this Government refusing to work in good faith. Actually I'd also like to go on at the same time to say the expansion of the facial recognition technology which is going on at the same time across Government—again with no engagement with tangata whenua. So we've also tabled two further amendments on behalf of the New Zealand Council for Civil Liberties. One would remove reference to research and delegation of powers and ensure that the data collected under the Act can only be used for statistical purposes the other would require Government to communicate directly to each household that a census return is required and inform them to obtain a paper copy or access a computer.So my questions to the Minister are two: what are you going to do or what are you doing to ensure that this bill honours Te Tiriti o Waitangi? And secondly: what are you going to do to ensure that this bill mitigates tangata whenua's concerns on State profiling and misuse and abuse of data and statistics as tangata whenua have endured and experienced? Kia ora.Hon Dr DAVID CLARK (Minister of Statistics): Kia ora. A few things to say. Obviously in terms of Part 1 of the bill clause 4 puts Te Tiriti o Waitangi out for the first time in this legislation. This is an appropriate and timely update to actually have obligations for the Crown put into the legislation completely absent from what went before.I don't accept the member's characterisation of the relationship with the iwi leaders group and the Mana Ōrite agreement. I really do think that we have a good honest open conversation that has started there that simply did not exist before that Mana Ōrite agreement was signed. It's a work in progress as is I think all of the Crown's work to better engage incorporate and work with Māori for better outcomes. The process as I said last night the work that's going on with the Data Iwi Leaders Group has not yet reached its conclusion. It will be appropriate when that work is completed on governance to revisit to review where the bill is and what the place of Māori data governance in that will be.