Cosgrove ClaytonHon CLAYTON COSGROVE (Labour): I join with other members in support of this bill and it shows what a quality process this has been in terms of consultation with community groups and stakeholders. As other colleagues have said it has been a quality ministerial process where other legislators from other parliaments were brought into it and the outcome is that we have a high-quality bill in front of us. As the previous speaker Matt Doocey said this will provide certainty—a long time coming but certainty for those victims of the earthquakes. As other speakers have said what could be worse and more nightmarish than knowing that your property has somehow moved and that as my colleague Ruth Dyson pointed out you may well have built over somebody's boundary? It does highlight another point if I can make it and it is interesting that Mr Doocey rose to speak to this piece of legislation. This is an important—vitally important—piece of legislation for a large number of our citizens. We stand here tonight and we are taking short calls to rattle this through because we want to get it through. It has had a pretty efficient gestation period and we want to get it through so that we can provide some measure of comfort and do what we should do as legislators by passing laws and rules that assist people. I just in all seriousness contrast that with the amount of silliness and time-wasting that has occurred over a couple of members' bills—you know Nuk The Bag Man" Korako and the Bag Man's apprentice Matt Doocey who just spoke. Yes we can have a bit of fun and frivolity in this Parliament—that is part of the nature of being a legislator—but to waste hundreds of thousands of dollars and time on silly and stupid pieces of legislation when we have bills like this that are vitally important—[Interruption] I see the Assistant Speaker acknowledging the importance of it the need to expedite those vitally important bills through the House—that is actually what we are here to do. We can have a laugh and a joke and a bit of a leg pull that is true but when you look at the seriousness of the duties that we are charged with as legislators you have got to contrast this bill—good process good ministerial process quality outcome; a bill that will practically help thousands of people in a province that was almost destroyed—with a couple of jokers who are wasting parliamentary time and taxpayers' money with silly stupid pieces of legislation.Matt Doocey: A bit like your speech now.Hon CLAYTON COSGROVE: One of the jokers who has been pulled out of the pack and woken up is sitting down the back of the House now. I say to those two gentlemen: OK comedy hour is over. Maybe they should think again. There is I think under the Standing Orders the ability to withdraw legislation in some way shape or form and maybe this bill is quite a good example—and I say this to the colleagues on the other side of the House because they have acted very very responsibly in relation to this bill—of what we are actually here to do. We are actually here to help people to empower people and to help those in the worst possible circumstances. This is a highly technical piece of legislation. It affects fundamentally people's property rights and this is what we should be here for not acting like it is the comedy hour as some actors in this House have conducted themselves over the last couple of weeks. I support the bill."