Smith Lockwood: Questions for Oral Answer — Questions to Ministers 
Smith Lockwood: Questions for Oral Answer — Questions to Ministers 
[Volume:633;Page:5287] 
4.  
Dr the Hon LOCKWOOD SMITH (National—Rodney) 
 to the  
Minister of Immigration 
: If as he told the House yesterday with respect to Taito Philip Field’s involvement with Thai nationals in Samoa “the information in question was not placed in the usual system that supported the Associate Minister’s decision making” exactly how was the information used? 
Hon DAVID CUNLIFFE (Minister of Immigration) 
: 
 The Ingram report records at paragraphs 144 155 and 157 that the information received on 9 June was used by the group manager service international in calling the Associate Minister of Immigration’s private secretary to provide that information. 
Dr the Hon Lockwood Smith 
: If as the Minister told Parliament yesterday in respect of information received on 10 May “the director of the Pacific division recalls that he attempted to pass it on to the Minister’s private secretary.” on what date or dates did that happen or is the Minister now telling us that he misled the House yesterday? 
Hon DAVID CUNLIFFE 
: I believe that that matter was covered in my earlier point of order. 
Dr the Hon Lockwood Smith 
: If the director of the Pacific division attempted to pass on information be it on 10 May or whatever to the Associate Minister’s private secretary why did the director of the Pacific division not tell that to the Ingram inquiry? 
Hon DAVID CUNLIFFE 
: In my earlier point of order I made it clear that it was the director of service international who attempted to pass the information. Paragraph 157 of the report sets out Mr Ingram’s view of the likely sequence of events. 
Dr the Hon Lockwood Smith 
: Why did the group manager for service international tell the Ingram inquiry that he received the information he passed on to the Minister’s private secretary in a fax direct from the Apia branch manager Mr James Dalmer not from the director of the Pacific division—how does the Minister explain that? 
Hon DAVID CUNLIFFE 
: It is not for me to revisit the conclusions of the Ingram inquiry. Mr Ingram concludes that a number of the recollections about the transmission of information in that regard appear to have been misplaced. 
Dr the Hon Lockwood Smith 
: What is the truth of the Minister’s statement yesterday that the director of the Pacific division recalled—that is what the Minister said—attempting to pass on the information to the Associate Minister’s private secretary? 
Hon DAVID CUNLIFFE 
: The truth of that matter was clearly covered in my earlier point of order. I apologised. It was the director of service international who gave that recollection to Mr Ingram. 
Dr the Hon Lockwood Smith 
: Who else from the various sections of the Minister’s department attempted to advise the Minister’s private secretary of information on Taito Phillip Field’s involvement with the Thais in Samoa prior to the Minister making his decision on their cases on 17 June 2005? 
Hon DAVID CUNLIFFE 
: The information I have to hand is that the director of service international attempted to pass on that information on 9 June but that the Ingram report inquiry at paragraphs 157 and 158 makes clear the conclusion that in all likelihood the information was not passed to the Minister. I do not have any other information on that to hand. 
Gerry Brownlee 
: I seek leave to table statements made by the president of the Labour Party suggesting that the Ingram report has many factual inaccuracies. 
Document not tabled.