Smith Lockwood: Questions for Oral Answer — Questions to Ministers Questions to Members 
Smith Lockwood: Questions for Oral Answer — Questions to Ministers Questions to Members 
[Volume:633;Page:4545] 
6.  
Dr the Hon LOCKWOOD SMITH (National—Rodney) 
 to the  
Minister of Immigration 
: What procedures if any are in place to check following the issuing of ministerial special directions for work permits that recipients of those permits are not exploited by employers? 
Hon DAVID CUNLIFFE (Minister of Immigration) 
: 
 New Zealand employment law provides protection for all people in employment relationships working in New Zealand including those on work permits. 
Dr the Hon Lockwood Smith 
: Is the Minister concerned that the MP making representations for a special direction on a work permit for long-time illegal overstayer Mr Chaikhunpol paid Mr Chaikunpol $1500 for painting the entire interior of the house the MP owned at 51 Church Street Otahuhu—less than one-third the market rate for such labour according to the Ingram report—if so what action has he taken to ensure that the other 261 special directions made by the Associate Minister in response to the 438 representations by Taito Phillip Field between January 2003 and October 2005 do not involve other cases of immigrant exploitation? 
Hon DAVID CUNLIFFE 
: Employment law relates to those in employment relationships not in contracting relationships. I note that the member’s colleague Mr Mapp on Radio New Zealand opposed a member’s bill that seeks to extend the law in that direction. 
Dr the Hon Lockwood Smith 
: Is the Minister concerned that the MP who made representations for a ministerial special direction for a work permit for Mr Chaikhunpol paid Mr Chaikhunpol $350 for painting work at his house at 2A Prangley Avenue Mangere—only a quarter the market rate for such labour as revealed by the Ingram report—if so what action has he taken to ensure that the 261 other special directions made by the Minister in response to representations on immigration matters by Taito Phillip Field do not involve other cases of immigrant exploitation? 
Hon DAVID CUNLIFFE 
: In 2005-06 there were approximately 100000 work permits issued. I hope that that member is not suggesting we exercise differential standards of responsibility in favour of members of Parliament’s cases. 
Dr the Hon Lockwood Smith 
: When the Minister wrote to me yesterday advising that his department had taken no specific steps to check on the special directions issued by the Associate Minister in response to representations by Taito Phillip Field why did the Minister state: “I would note that the figure of 261 relates to all cases where Mr Field made a representation and that not all such cases were successful.” when in answer to a parliamentary question on 25 November 2005 the Minister advised the House that Taito Phillip Field had in fact made 438 representations over the 3 years to October 2005 not 261; or does the Minister’s letter confirm that his office has failed to come to terms with the enormity of the issues raised by the Ingram report? 
Hon DAVID CUNLIFFE 
: I can tell the member that that letter to him was provided on the basis of advice that will be checked—along with I might say checks on this Government’s ongoing efforts around strengthening the Employment Relations Act raising the minimum wage and introducing paid-parental leave 4 weeks’ annual holiday and work-life balance. 
Dr the Hon Lockwood Smith 
: If the Minister is so concerned about legislation to do those things he just described why is his Government so unconcerned that a former ministerial colleague of his should not only pay workers at a quarter the market rate for work but actually pay them cash to avoid tax being paid and to exploit the cash economy—something that would be outrageous for any member of Parliament to do? 
Hon DAVID CUNLIFFE 
: It is by now very old news that the member concerned did not exercise good judgment. The member concerned has sought to apologise to this Chamber and the Green Party has sought a motion of censure. Both actions have been blocked by that member’s party just as Mr Mapp has blocked attempts to extend the law to contractors which would solve the problem to which the member refers.