Edmonds BarbaraBARBARA EDMONDS (Labour—Mana): Thank you Madam Chair. Some pretty good debates in the Chamber today. I do actually have some technical questions that I'd like the member to clarify. One of them is in relation to the pre-disclosure requirements. I note the Supplementary Order Paper (SOP) 149 by the member Chris Bishop is moving the following amendments in clause 4—an appropriate alphabetical order of clause 4 is the regulations around including remediation reports prepared by suitably qualified building professional reviews and reports. So as set out earlier in the debate in the previous stages and also through the select committee the select committee absolutely understood the reason why a prospective buyer should have the opportunity to access additional information in pre-disclosure requirements. That's why the select committee recommended in the report-back to bring it back into the bill. And the regulations—I think it's Schedule 33—sets out the different types of pre-disclosure settlement requirements. One of my questions that I'd like to ask the member is—I'm just looking at I think it is Part 2 clause 37. I'm actually going through the list. So the pre-contract disclosure settlement it asks where the body corporate committee has weathertightness issues. Turning the page it also goes into whether the body corporate is involved in any proceedings in any court or tribunal. It asks for financial statements and audit reports of the previous three years; notices and minutes of general meetings of the body corporate and the body corporate committee for the previous three years; the name and contact details of the body corporate manager; the 12-month period comprising the current financial year for the purposes of the financial statements of the body corporate; the body corporate levies; details of the maintenance the body corporate proposes to carry out; the balance of every fund bank account long-term maintenance plan; and the actual list continues all the way down. Subclause (2A) again talks to weathertightness and then it carries on around regulation 34: any court proceedings initiated by the body corporate. I'd just like to ask the member—and it's good to see officials on the bench there—is this just a pick-up from the previous Act and put straight into the new Act so the previous regulations or regulation I think is Schedule 33? And then just a couple of other questions around that. What would entail a suitably qualified building professional? What sort of industry? I mean do they have to be a certified builder a master builder? Are there particular criteria that would meet that sort of definition? And the other question that I'd like to ask is—looking at the schedule I went through the list and there's quite a few things that are needed in there both financial and to the actual state of the building. What other type of defects? Because we do have weathertightness which I think would be a really important issue. Earthquake-prone the financial statements—what is the mischief that that particular SOP is trying to address around remediation reports? So I'd just like to hear from the member what sorts of examples that a remediation report would bring to the surface for a person who was looking at the pre-disclosure. Thank you.