Dowie SarahSARAH DOWIE (National—Invercargill): I rise to take a second call on Part 1 of this Families Package (Income Tax and Benefits) Bill.Hon Amy Adams: A second; gosh. Lots left.SARAH DOWIE: Yes absolutely. There's lots left. I have taken the advice of the previous Chair and had a rejig of my amendment relating to paternity orders. So we have now rejigged that and would like that to be considered as Part 1 which goes again to the eligibility criteria for receiving the Best Start tax credits. I've already talked about my previous amendment to Part 1 which relates to eligibility with respect to the Well Child programme and having parents check in for their 15- to 18-month Well Child core check before they receive the third payment for the tax credit which of course puts in place an obligation to make sure that the money from those tax credits is well spent that the children are getting the best start in life and that the money is not just being sent out and spent on whatever the parents' wills may be. It is actually designed to go to lifting children and the family out of poverty which is the overarching aim of this bill. My second amendment relates to paternity orders. Now at the moment fathers do not have the right to have a paternity order. Basically what they have to do is apply to the court for either a declaration or if they want to know the paternity of a child the mother can actually thwart that test and refuse a test to be undertaken. Where I'm going with this is that I think it's important because under the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child it has been said that the child has a right to know who their father is. So this amendment goes to the heart of that making it a criteria that if there is a question about the father's paternity for a child then that test must be carried out so that the child can know their father before those Best Start payments are paid out.Of course this has wider ramifications in regards to raising children and families out of poverty because of course if a father is found to be the parent then he is eligible for child support payments. That then adds to bringing more money into the family and raising the amount of poverty. But also it allows that child to have a connection with their heritage and it allows that child's well-being to be better taken care of so that they know their heritage. They can hopefully establish a relationship with that father should the couple be estranged and again that goes back to the wider principles of this Families Package (Income Tax and Benefits) Bill which is talking about using benefits to raise children out of poverty and add to their well-being.So this amendment makes it an eligibility criteria that to receive a Best Start tax credit under new Subpart MG 1 of the Income Tax Act they will have to comply with sections 47 to 49 of the Families Proceedings Act 1990. So that I think is fair enough to add to the child's well-being to make sure that the father of the child is known and that will allow further benefits to the family to raise them out of poverty. I think this amendment should be supported. I think that we need to look wider at these ramifications that add to the well-being of children and simply not just hand out money without there being obligations on the parent to adhere to.