Utikere Tangi; Pugh MaureenTANGI UTIKERE (Labour—Palmerston North): Thank you Madam Chair and I thank the Minister for his interest in the Search and Surveillance Act of 2012. The Minister has already alluded to a proposed amendment in my name; I have two in relation to Title" and "Commencement". I invite the Minister to reflect perhaps on the contribution that I'm about to make and then he may wish to inform the House as to whether he has changed his mind or not as to what this should be. I think what's really important is that the title of any bill or any piece of legislation needs to reflect what's actually in it. And when I look at what is proposed here my amendment is effectively to delete the words "Land Transport Management (Repeal of Regional Fuel Tax)" and to replace it with "Land Transport Management (Instructions to Auckland Council Regarding the Regional Fuel Tax)". And that is exactly what this bill is about; it is about setting a set of instructions to Auckland Council about what they are going to do next. It's important I think that when you look at a label it says what you're getting. It says it on the tin. Perhaps this is something that should say: "227g Dole Pineapple Chunk" because that is the cost of living sort of measure that this Government is going to provide as part of this piece of legislation. What is really important is that the title of the bill reflects what it is all about. The Minister you know talks about "Actually it's about a repeal bill"; yes it is but it doesn't have to have that in the title. The content of the bill is what is important. And so your suggestion Minister that well it's called what is suggested because it is a repeal bill; well this House is the author of its own destiny and it can determine what it wishes. And so I encourage the Minister to reflect on whether or not he thinks these are instructions to Auckland Council and if so he may wish to think again. And you know it's never too late to change in terms of support for a fantastic Amendment Paper.Andy Foster: We're still waiting for one!TANGI UTIKERE: The other one is a proposed amendment to clause—what's that?Andy Foster: We're still waiting for one.TANGI UTIKERE: Well we haven't got anything from you so many people will be waiting for quite some time.CHAIRPERSON (Maureen Pugh): Not bringing the Chair—TANGI UTIKERE: My apologies Madam Chair. Mr Foster we're still waiting for a contribution that's meaningful from him. But in terms of "Title" and "Commencement" in clause 2 the suggestion that I've put forward there is to delete the commencement date by one year. And I'm interested in the Minister's thoughts around this because being able to provide a bit of a buffer in terms of a delay to the commencement would mean that some of those transitional provisions could actually be looked at. They could be thought through. So that's the basis on which I've put forward this amendment.Then the second clause there—clause 2 subclause (2)(b)—the dates changing there are effectively consequential amendments that are further aligned. So I'd be interested in the Minister's thoughts around the title to make sure that it intends to say exactly what it intends to do and that the commencement date is such that it provides an opportunity for things to bed in and in particular a number of the unknown elements that may exist can be ironed out. So I look forward to the Minister's contribution."