Tabuteau FletcherFLETCHER TABUTEAU (NZ First): I would just like to thank Minister Collins for waxing lyrical on the periphery of this bill. It was genuinely entertaining—The CHAIRPERSON (Hon Trevor Mallard): I am going to interrupt the member now and say what I was planning to say if the debate continued and that is that we have now had half a dozen speeches that have been really good third reading contributions. It would be good from now on if people who had lovely third reading contributions could save them for the next sitting day when this bill could be considered. If we just focus on the wee bit that is here and that is the Committee stage then we can get on with it. Thank you.FLETCHER TABUTEAU: It would be my pleasure to focus on the specific parts of this legislation. I do look forward to the title debate because my goodness me this is the most stupidly named piece of legislation I have seen in a long time.I would like to draw the Minister's attention to the secondary networks clause clause 7 of the bill. I am jumping quite far ahead but it is one of particular interest to me and I speak in particular about new Subpart 2A in Part 5. I would like to ask the Minister about her understanding of the Electricity Industry Participation Code of 2010 and the lack of reference to that code in this legislation. It is in my opinion addressing some of the issues that this bill purports to address so the Minister's view on that would be of keen interest to myself—and only to myself I imagine.The other question—and I put it to the Minister with a genuine question mark because New Zealand First does support this legislation—is the question on the current number of secondary electricity networks in New Zealand right now. What information or what data does the Government have? I put it to the Minister that there is a great big question mark from some of the industry itself on the number of secondary networks out there. Then of course the implication of that is if we do not know that number how many consumers are being serviced by secondary networks? I put it to Minister Collins that that makes this a great opportunity for this feeble bit of legislation to not only address those issues but moving forward say what the Government could do with regard to improving reliability of supply and the outcomes for consumers—obviously in particular to the two types of secondary networks and the embedded networks within the infrastructure itself. I do hope the Chair will let me respond to some of the Minister's comments.This does not do enough and there is an amount of ambiguity—forgive me Mr Chair I am not sure to which part specifically I am speaking—around the use of the bus lanes for example for those electric vehicles. It is ambiguous. The identification process is ambiguous and some previous speakers have very fairly pointed out Minister that the lack of identification ability despite having these wonderful digital cameras could—and at this stage will—create havoc on the roads. I am particularly interested as I said in the secondary networks issue in the new Subpart 2A in clause 7. I do look forward to some clarification on that.Actually while I have got the time Mr Chair I will go back to Part 1 because I have got through that quicker than I thought. In new section 129A in Part 1 the new section in clause 6 there it says: The Energy Efficiency and Conservation Authority must before submitting a request to the Minister …". In reading Part 1 up until that point there is no clarification whether that means the energy Minister the Minister of Transport the Minister of Conservation—so you know there is just a clarification issue there probably more than anything else. Actually at this stage that is all I have to ask of the Minister. Thank you very much."