Tisch Lindsay: Local Government (Auckland Reorganisation) Bill — In Committee Speaker Recalled In Committee Speaker Recalled In Committee 
Tisch Lindsay: Local Government (Auckland Reorganisation) Bill — In Committee Speaker Recalled In Committee Speaker Recalled In Committee 
[Volume:654;Page:3693] 
The CHAIRPERSON (Lindsay Tisch) 
: We now move to a series of transcript amendments in the name of Sue Kedgley to insert a new Part 4. I will read them out. The first proposed new Part 4 is “Amendments to the Local Electoral Act 2001”. The amendments seek to amend substantially another Act and therefore could change the bill into an omnibus bill; the amendment is therefore out of order. I refer the member to Standing Orders 256 and 257. The next amendment in the name of Sue Kedgley is to insert a new Part 4 “Auckland Rail Transport Transition”. This amendment is outside the scope of the bill as the bill deals with governance not operational aspects and targets. 
Sue Kedgley 
: I raise a point of order Mr Chairperson. I do not want to challenge your ruling but— 
The CHAIRPERSON (Lindsay Tisch) 
: Could I read them through first and then I will give the member the opportunity to take a point of order. The next amendment is to insert a new Part 4 “Transport Funding Transition”. This amendment is also outside the scope of the bill as the bill deals with governance not operational aspects and targets. The next amendment is to insert a new Part 4 “Amendments to the Land Transport Act 1998”. This amendment is also outside the scope of the bill as the bill deals with governance not operational aspects and targets. The next amendment is to insert a new Part 4 “Transition Cost Recovery Plastic Bag Levy”. This amendment is outside the scope of the bill as the bill deals with governance not operational aspects and targets. The next amendment is to insert a new Part 4 “Cruelty Free Auckland Ports”. This amendment is outside the scope of the bill as the bill deals with governance not operational aspects and targets. The next amendment inserts a new Part 4 amending— 
Hon Trevor Mallard 
: I raise a point of order Mr Chairperson. Could you make clear whether these are still Sue Kedgley’s amendments? 
The CHAIRPERSON (Lindsay Tisch) 
: Yes they are. The next amendment inserts a new Part 4 amending the Overseas Investment Act 2005. This amendment is out of order as it proposes a substantive amendment to another Act. The next amendment inserts a new Part 4 headed “Transition to Sustainable Investment”. Part 3 of the bill sets up a transitional agency and all provisions relating to it are logically found there. The proposed amendment is more fairly associated with Part 3. Part 3 has been dealt with by the Committee so the amendment is therefore out of order. The next amendment inserts a new Part 4 headed “Transitional Agency Civil and Political Rights”. Part 3 of the bill sets up a transitional agency and all provisions relating to it are logically found there. The proposed amendment is more fairly associated with clause 13 in Part 3. Part 3 has been dealt with by the Committee so the amendment is therefore out of order. 
Those are the amendments in the name of Sue Kedgley that I have ruled out of order.