O'Connor GregWe all recall the New Lynn supermarket horror attack of 2021 where a person injured six people three of them critically in his frenzied attack. That individual was a lone actor who was inspired by ISIS. Our legislation prevented him from being retained in a prison environment. Because we could not impose stricter control orders upon him he ended up under heavy surveillance and thankfully that surveillance enabled lives to be saved on that horrific day.But we have to be smarter about how we deal with these individuals. That is why ACT is supporting these changes. Having police watching individuals 24 hours a day seven days a week because there's no other option available to them needed to change. With that I'd like to acknowledge the police and the work that they did not only in identifying that this person was a risk but actually being on his shoulder and able to stop that attack from being any worse than it already was.We hope that by changing the legislation and by creating new protocols for managing electronic monitoring and allowing each order to be constructed for and unique to an individual in their circumstances—we expect that will greatly assist New Zealand Police. I'd like to thank the Minister who in the committee of the whole House last night clarified clause 15 within the bill which relates to the objectionable material additions that we have placed into this bill. We did have a lot of concern from members who submitted to us that it would create possible terrorist entities for having possession of certain elements that they were deemed to be prohibited. The clarification from the Minister last night detailed that it's actually not being in possession of objectionable material alone but rather as well as meeting other criteria to be a designated entity. Importing objectionable material alone will not designate a terrorist; rather it will assist in the determination after other factors have been identified.So in summary the changes to the Terrorism Suppression Act 2002 will effectively mean that an individual can be named as a designated entity the expiry of a designation is paused if the person is in jail the three-yearly review is retained but the grounds for that have been amended and the designated entity will still have the ability to challenge the designation and its ongoing status but this will be done through a review process rather than a revocation one. The changes to the control orders will add some new definitions which will include and allow control orders on community-based sentences and electronic monitoring as well as post-detention conditions and residential requirements.In March 2019 we lost our innocence as a country. Our police expect us to help them protect our people and this is a step that we can assist them with once an individual has been designated as a terrorist threat. At least one part of the recommendations from the royal commission inquiry is focusing on the terrorist and their activities rather than the good citizens of this country—that we can and will support.DEPUTY SPEAKER: This debate is interrupted and is set down for resumption next sitting day. The House stands adjourned until 2 p.m. tomorrow.The House adjourned at 9.55 p.m.