SpeechJAN LOGIE (Green): Thank you Mr Speaker. I'm not sure I'm being entirely representative by getting to speak again because I too will be opposing this bill though I do want to acknowledge the member Chris Baillie for bringing this forward. I did acknowledge his point in his first speech around the inconsistency in the country and some of the rules not making sense and the difficulty of explaining that.For me the answer to that would be to go back to simplifying that and actually locking in these holidays for the entire country without those inconsistencies. That's kind of at the foundation of why I'm opposing this and it happens that the Greens are all of one mind in terms of our opposition to this. I would say that for myself and quite a few of my colleagues it's not on religious grounds and personally I would love to see this bill renamed so that it wasn't locking one religious belief into our systems. But for me it's fundamentally about the sense of what we value as a country and what makes us happy. In reality—and all of the research tells us this—it's not consumption and it's not alcohol. It is family and friends and nature and connection. We need more opportunities to go back to those values and this bill is taking it in exactly the wrong way. It's just saying that actually the 3½ days a year that we have as a country to be able to have a high chance of being able to get together with other people we care about at the same time is too much—3½ days in a year is too much. The Greens disagree with that and I really think that the fact is that we need to consider our patterns of consumption and acknowledge that globally we've signed up to commit to more responsible consumption and production through the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals and recognise that for decades scientists have been explaining the ways in which humanity is driving the three planetary crises of climate—Hon Member: Chris what have you done? JAN LOGIE: —biodiversity and pollution. Whilst I'm hearing laughter from behind me while talking about the planet burning—it's confusing for me—that's about the fact that those things are connected to us being sold products all of the time. We're being told that those things will make us happy and that we cannot even have 3½ days a year where we are not being sold things and told that they will make us happy—that that is too much to ask.We need more spaces in our lives that are free from being sold free from treating us as if the only reason we have value is by the work we provide for others and free from being told that alcohol is more important than time with our families in a country where 800 people a year die as a direct result of alcohol use and where we acknowledge we have a massive problem around alcohol use in this country. So the Greens are quite keen to protect these two days and the 1½ more so that actually we can all just take a break. We can get back to those things that we care about and recognise as well those patterns of consumption. I do just want to make the point that our country consumes resources at a rate of almost 32 times more than those people in lower-income countries. We are not separate islands even though we are separate islands—it is all connected. The more we drive consumption the more we drive the destruction of our planet. It is countries like ours that need to shift our patterns. This bill is taking us in the wrong direction and the Greens—and myself—cannot support it.