Cunliffe David: Questions for Oral Answer — Questions to Ministers Questions to Members 
Cunliffe David: Questions for Oral Answer — Questions to Ministers Questions to Members 
[Volume:653;Page:2409] 
4.  
Hon DAVID CUNLIFFE (Labour—New Lynn) 
 to the  
Minister of Finance 
: Does he stand by all the statements he made on TVNZ’s  
Q+A 
 programme on Sunday 5 April 2009? 
Hon BILL ENGLISH (Minister of Finance) 
: 
 Yes. 
Hon David Cunliffe 
: Does the Minister stand by his comment that “the national cycleway is not going to happen in a hurry” and that he “won’t be spending $50 million on it this year or next year or the year after.”? Will he now concede that the 4000 jobs the Prime Minister promised the cycleway would create are unrealistic and that as a response to the recession it has already failed? 
Hon BILL ENGLISH 
: Yes and no. 
Hon David Cunliffe 
: Is the reason the Minister will not commit to funding cycleways—cycling from cloud to cloud—that it is too expensive and will he confirm that this silver bullet from the Job Summit has become a “hug a polar bear” initiative: nice to have but a luxury we can no longer afford? 
Hon BILL ENGLISH 
: The Minister is wrong about that; there will be funding— 
Hon Members 
: Oh oh! 
Hon BILL ENGLISH 
: The fortunately former Minister is wrong about that; there will be funding for a national cycleway. 
Peseta Sam Lotu-Iiga 
: How have the Minister’s expectations of economic recovery as discussed in the  
Q+A 
 interview been influenced by earlier predictions about this economic cycle? 
Hon BILL ENGLISH 
: I am surprised that Opposition members believe they have some capacity to pick when recoveries are going to occur. In March last year Helen Clark informed us that the economy was holding up well and that no policy response was being considered. The next day Michael Cullen conceded that New Zealand might be heading for a shallow technical recession. By August 2008 he had revised the outlook to be the most challenging since 1987. The following month he assured New Zealanders that the worst was over—a prediction that was premature at best. 
Hon David Cunliffe 
: Therefore how does the Minister reconcile his statement that “we’re unlikely to aggressively grow out of” the recession with the Prime Minister’s statement that we will “come out of it reasonably aggressively”? How can the public have any confidence whatsoever in the Government’s handling of the economy when even the Prime Minister and his loyal deputy are in such stark disagreement? 
Hon BILL ENGLISH 
: The public have a high level of confidence in the handling of the economy because the National Government is now in charge of it instead of a Labour Government. We are rolling out our plan which is to protect people from the sharp edge of recession in the shorter term and to prepare the economy for growing rapidly as we come out of the recession. That is the only way we will be able to replace the jobs that are currently being lost day by day. I would have thought that Opposition members would take our sharply rising unemployment much more seriously than they do. 
Hon David Cunliffe 
: Does the Minister agree with Treasury’s recent warnings that an additional 60000 people might lose their jobs and that the rise of unemployment could extend the recession and slow recovery? In light of this warning does he stand by his comment regarding the Prime Minister’s optimistic predictions that he “wouldn’t want to say he’s wrong”? 
Hon BILL ENGLISH 
: Treasury is guessing. As I have said to the member before— 
Hon David Cunliffe 
: Oh they’re just guesses? 
Hon BILL ENGLISH 
: Well it is guessing—no one knows quite what is going to happen. As I have said to the member before we do not spend all our time sitting around redoing forecasts; we are getting on with an active and decisive programme that has strong public support. In fact confidence in New Zealand’s economic direction is very high compared with almost any other developed country.