Volume 692 Week 50 - Tuesday 6 August 2013(continued on Wednesday 7 August 2013 )Text is incorporated into the Bound VolumeVolume 692 Week 50 - Tuesday 6 August 2013(continued on Wednesday 7 August 2013 )[Sitting date: 06 August 2013. Volume:692;Page:12379. Text is incorporated into the Bound Volume.]Tuesday 6 August 2013(continued on Wednesday 7 August 2013 )Appropriation (2013/14 Estimates) BillThird ReadingImprest Supply DebateDebate resumed from 1 August.Dr DAVID CLARK (Labour—Dunedin North):We are in the estimates debate and we have been for those people who are watching at home and following this debate decrying the record of this Government and its failure to address the really big issues that are confronting New Zealand society. We have a Government here that is distracted by scandals that is focused on cronyism and that seems to be about employing its own folks those with National Party connections to many of the top jobs.The Skycity deal that has been struck is one that is recent in our minds and we can see there the way that that deal has been skewed—skewed—towards Skycity which knew that it had the Government over a barrel. It knew it did. Skycity knew that the Government had politically committed to doing the deal with it. The Government stepped outside the normal transparent process for tendering and said to Skycity: “It’s you or nobody.” effectively. And Skycity—well it is a business operator; of course it maximised the deal.But we see now that in Australia where similar deals are done there is a price to pay for extending the gambling rights for as long as Skycity has extended them on top of the additional gaming machines and tables. Skycity has got a steal. It has got an absolute steal out of this Government because the Government has backed itself into a corner it has done a shady deal and the taxpayers of New Zealand are left picking up the bill.That is just one example. There are so many more. The Government Communications Security Bureau scandal which is dogging the Government right now has the Government wondering where it is going to go next because one minute John Key does not seem to know what is going on then it turns out that he has had a conversation with his staff member but it is not officially a report or a meeting and so the story goes on. John Key here is donkey deep—he is donkey deep. Ordinary New Zealanders do not know whether they can trust him any more and they certainly do not want to be spied on in their own homes by an agency that is supposed to be protecting New Zealand’s interests.Labour on the other hand has a plan. It will adopt a more hands-on strategy to make sure that ordinary people are put first. It will create hope and opportunities for New Zealanders. We will create more jobs and better wages unlike this Government here which is still sitting on higher unemployment than when it took office despite all of the attempts to fudge the figures. Median wages are dropping. Inequality is higher than it has been at any time in recorded New Zealand history. This is not a just society this is not a fair society and this is not a society that reflects New Zealanders’ concern for social justice. National has let New Zealanders down. It has lost touch with the people who are struggling to meet the needs of their family or even to get a job.I know that from my home town as Dunedin gets more bad news today with another rail contract going overseas. As if the Hillside gutting was not enough we now have Invermay in the past week losing 85 highly skilled jobs out of Dunedin. That is on the back of Steven Joyce saying that local institutions are imperative to support the development of a high-value regional economy. Well that rings very hollow in Dunedin right now—that rings very very hollow. And theOtago Daily Times —congratulationsgo to theOtago Daily Times  the local newspaper New Zealand’s largest independent newspaper—is standing up. It is saying that enough is enough. It is time for central government to deliver on the empty promises it has been making. Regional New Zealand is hurting right now and it is begging for a Government that has an economic development strategy unlike this Government which seems to have precisely none. It is not so long ago just a matter of weeks that New Zealand Post closures were also announced in Dunedin and the shifting of the postal centre away from the regions from the small towns to be concentrated in Christchurch where of course there is a housing issue.This Government while it is distracted by cronyism while it is seeing median wages drop while unemployment remains high is not looking after the interests of ordinary New Zealanders. In the meantime a David Shearer - led Labour Party is putting plans out there. It is saying that every child should be able to have a world-class education at their local school—every child should have a world-class education at their local school. Then we are saying that we will build affordable housing. We will tackle the housing issue. We will build 10000 quality houses that are affordable every year for the next 10 years. We will also make sure that there are warm dry rentals for those people who are living currently in cold damp homes. Well I can tell you that that also will make a big difference in my home town of Dunedin. We are sick of the speculators. We are sick of the offshore speculators. We are also going to close down those loopholes and adopt policies like they have in the Pacific Islands and in Singapore similar ideas to what are adopted in many countries close by. But this Government will not. It says: “Hands off! Hands off!”.Let us look at the power market. Well Mr Bridges over there is very quiet. He says nothing. I look across and I see Mr Bridges saying precisely nothing. He is very quiet on this now but previously he has said that the New Zealand power market will work. He says that rising costs which go up and up and up are a result of a power market that is just not mature yet and the Bradford reforms which happened 15 years ago just have not bedded in. Well ordinary New Zealanders do not agree with that Mr Bridges. What do you say now from across there? Silence from Mr Bridges again. He is stunned into silence because he knows he is on the wrong side of this argument.Mr Key says that the prices New Zealanders are paying are fair. That is what Mr Key says. He says that the prices that ordinary New Zealanders are paying are fair. Ordinary New Zealanders do not agree with him and I think Mr Key knows that he is wrong. If we listen what does Mr Key have to say about that now? Mr Key? Precisely nothing. Mr Key is also stunned into silence because he knows that he is on the wrong side of this argument about power prices.Well Labour will take a hands-on approach to power prices. We will make sure that ordinary New Zealanders are paying a fair amount. We in this country used to have one of the cheapest power prices in the OECD—one of the cheapest. Now we are paying right up there and that is because since the Bradford reforms power prices have gone up at twice the rate of inflation. They have gone up five times the rate of inflation in the last year and that is in a time of dropping demand. It is unbelievable but it is happening and Mr Bridges and Mr Key think that it is all fair. They take their hands off and just watch those power prices skyrocket out of control and that is as the assets are sold. As the assets—those precious energy generating assets that used to pay for our schools and hospitals—are sold offshore the revenues dry up. Treasury says that it will send us backwards by $100 million a year—$100 million a year—and this Government is happy to let it happen. It is happy to let New Zealand taxpayer - owned companies be sold for the assets to drift offshore for the profits to drift offshore and for the current account deficit to rise inexorably. This Government has lost touch with ordinary NewZealanders. It is selling off our best assets. It does not have a plan to address power prices. Mr Bridges is still silent. I can say “power prices” as many times as I like and Mr Bridges says nothing. Mr Key says nothing but previously he said that he thinks that it is fair that New Zealanders are paying what they are paying for power right now while people who cannot afford to turn on their heaters in their homes—and I talk to these people in my electorate—are saying that it is not fair.We should be paying only what it costs to generate that power plus a fair return on assets. That is a fair model. That is what NZ Power proposes. That is the Labour model. I think that after two more winters the New Zealand public will realise the benefits of this policy. They already do. They know that the average family will be $300 a week better off as a result of Labour’s NZ Power policy. They know that those affordable homes will matter for the struggling young Kiwis trying to get into houses. They know that the kinds of policies Labour wants to adopt like pro-growth tax reform will make a difference. They will make a difference as will research and development tax credits and a capital gains tax that takes away speculation signals that are in the market and makes sure that productive business is supported. They know that universal KiwiSaver will help with New Zealand’s capital debt problem. They know that exchange rate issues need to be addressed.Let us face it—this Government is not across all the portfolios. Mr Joyce came before the Finance and Expenditure Committee and did not have the answers prepared on the supplementary estimates. He asked for an extension. He was the only Minister to do that. He is stretched because he is fronting so much for a Government that is struggling. I moved a resolution which is on the record of that select committee that we postpone the meeting until such time as the Minister is across his portfolios.Hon Tau Henare: Oh you’re so clever.Dr DAVID CLARK: And what did the Government members do Mr Henare? What did they do? They voted it down. They said that they could not wait for Mr Joyce to get across his portfolios. They did not have that much time. Nobody has that much time. Mr Joyce is struggling and the Government members know that. They knew that so they would not wait. They voted it down. They said: “We can’t postpone this meeting until such time as Mr Joyce is across his portfolios. We simply can’t do it.”This Government is struggling. It is dogged by cronyism and dogged by dodgy deals. A Labour Government would take a hands-on approach and make sure—Mr DEPUTY SPEAKER: Order! [Interruption ] Order! The member’s time has expired.JONATHAN YOUNG (National—New Plymouth):That speech is a very good example of why one should not have too much coffee before 9 a.m. But I do have to thank Dr Clark the previous speaker for giving me the platform to just lay out some information that I think he and New Zealanders will be interested to hear.The fourth Labour Government from 1984 to 1990 saw power prices increase by 98.7 percent. The fourth National Government from 1990 to 1999 saw power prices increase by yes 47 percent. The fifth Labour Government from 1999 to 2008 saw power prices increase by 72 percent. The fifth National Government—the Government that is presently on the Treasury benches—from 2008 to the present has seen power prices increase by 16.2 percent. So when the previous speaker criticises the Bradford reforms this graph will show you exactly what has happened. The Bradford reforms came in here where we see that power prices actually decreased and then of course a Labour Government came back into power and all the reforms in power that had come in were erased by what members opposite say was economic development but what I would say was reckless spending—reckless spending.Of course members of the Opposition are out there talking about their potential electricity reforms and it is wonderful. I say it is wonderful because we had ProfessorWolak in Wellington last week and no doubt those members are very much aware of the comments and reports that he has made. But in terms of the position that we have I think established through the Bradford reforms and then with the Brownlee reforms in 2009-10 ProfessorWolak said to a symposium here in Wellington that he cannot see why New Zealand would want to turn its back on the electricity market structure it has now. [Interruption ] Exactly. This is the man whom Labour says has backed up those members’ policy whom they quoted and whom they said was the one who described the price gouging of $4.3 billion coming out of consumers’ pockets which he refuted of course. He said: “I never gave that figure.” but their policy made it look like it came from him.So anyway we know that our electricity market structure does need continual work. The Electricity Authority is continuing to work on building to have an even more robust competitive structure to it which is going to have the benefit of lowering prices to consumers with regard to electricity. ProfessorWolak certainly gave us the clear impression that we should not ditch what we have got but continue to improve it.I have to say that I really love whatPattrickSmellie said in the Stuff business desk because he then talked about the Labour-Greens single-buyer electricity policy and he said that it “has a problem. While it remains politically resonant with voters who perceive power companies as rapacious and inescapable the American academic whose analysis is a key plank of the Labour-Greens NZ Power proposal says the Opposition parties have got it wrong. Not only that but Stanford University’s Professor FrankWolak—a top US electricity markets academic and a one-time regulator—says that despite repeated assertions to the contrary he never concluded that power companies here had ripped off consumers to the tune of $4.3 billion over the mid-2000’s. Unfortunately that $4.3 b figure has been the smoking gun fact around which the political argument for the policy has been built.”So if I can paraphrase what he is saying: keep what you have got and ditch the shonky snake oil stuff that is being proposed. That was my paraphrase.Hon David Cunliffe: Who are you calling “Shon-key”?JONATHAN YOUNG: I am calling you shonky. So tell me in terms of this Government—which I believe has great momentum going forward—who would you believe and who would you trust? Let us not listen to Opposition members. Who has the weight of credibility? It is National. It is not Labour and the Greens. You will not hear them attack those energy policies with any credence with any facts or with any sense of real depth of data and figures. They have lost the battle over energy—they really have.This Government has got momentum. It has weightiness it has gravitas and it has velocity. It is taking this country forward. We have policies that have traction. That is what is moving this country forward. Economic growth is the highest in 5 years after going through the worst recession in 60 years which everybody conveniently forgets. We have seen the highest growth in 5 years comparable to Australia and higher than for almost every other developed country. Our economy is forecast to grow between 2 percent and 3 percent a year over the next 4 years. Wages are growing cost of living increases have been modest and interest rates are at 50-year lows.Tim Macindoe: And what does Dr Clark have to say about that now?JONATHAN YOUNG: I cannot hear what Dr Clark has to say. In fact the cost of living data shows that consumer prices rose by just 0.7 percent in the year to June. That is phenomenal. It is a phenomenal benefit to the New Zealand consumer that prices have been held at such a low rate and that during this point in time over the lastnumber of years since 2008 household income has risen 20 percent in these last 4 years and is expected to rise by almost 20 percent in the next 4 years.I would say that yes we have our challenges—we are obviously aware of those; even those of recent times withFonterra’s issues—and we know that we have come through some very difficult times in this country but we are a resilient people. We are a people who are innovative and industrious and we put our hand to the plough. We work hard and we come up with great ideas that give us a competitive edge. What this Government is doing through all of its many innovative streams of support funding and investment is building on that great quality that New Zealanders have.As a Government we are responsibly managing the Government’s books. When you understand that this Government actually participates in the economy to the tune of about 30 percent it is very important to understand that the way we manage the Government accounts is incredibly important not only to set an example but also to improve efficiencies and stop wastage in this country so that we can certainly get better value for money. We are building a more competitive and productive economy we are delivering better public services and we are rebuilding Christchurch. We are building a stronger more stable economy that can again weather global storms and deliver opportunities for New Zealanders.This is God’s own country. It has been in the past and it will be in the future where New Zealanders can grow up in this land they can seize opportunities and they can be supported through an education system that ensures that they all succeed—five out of five are going to come through high school with a qualification that is going to enable them to get on to tertiary and further learning and to gain skills and to gain employment. The employment area is one of great importance. It is good to see that more and more people are becoming employed here in New Zealand as this economy starts to deliver more and more for New Zealanders.We are delivering progress and optimism. Yes New Zealand households and businesses have faced some pretty challenging times in the past 5 years. Although these challenges remain the economic recovery is gaining momentum driven by low interest rates investment and strong export prices. We are very thankful right now to have the likes of the Hon Tim Groser working hard for the benefit of New Zealand. He is a man of incredible capacity and great international linkages and relationships and he is able to work through and carry us through in terms of some of the issues we are facing in this current time.I believe that the Budget that has been presented by the Hon Bill English is a great Budget for New Zealand and is progressing this country into a better and stronger state for the benefit of all. Thank you.Hon DAVID CUNLIFFE (Labour—New Lynn):It is a pleasure to rise to take a call in the dead of the morning to debate the Appropriation (2013/14 Estimates) Bill. The member who has just resumed his seat Jonathan Young said that this debate is a test of credibility and asked the question to New Zealanders: “Who do you trust?”. The answer is that they are not going to trust the party that is trying to legalise blanket surveillance on New Zealanders. They are not going to trust a Big Brother State that is intent on doing it to them not doing it with them. They are not going to trust National’s A-team in the House this morning. We have got an expert on shears here. He has shorn lots of them. We have got Tau Henare sitting up the back. He is giving his full attention to the estimates debate. We have got Maurice Williamson sitting down the front the greatest leader the National Party never had. If this is National’s A-team the country’s economy is in trouble because their recipe for economic success is simply to milk more cows. Well man this week we have learnt about the risks associated with that. It seemslike the Government should besurveilling the dairy industry notsurveilling every telephone call that every New Zealander ever makes.New Zealanders are sick to death of this Government; that is the long and short of it. They did not like Muldoon last time around and they do not like Muldoon’s mokopuna this time around either.Hon Tau Henare: What was the last poll? 29 percent.Hon DAVID CUNLIFFE: My goodness me! Tau Henare has woken up. That coffee must have finally found its way through.We had the temerity of the previous speaker lecturing the Labour Party about power prices and crowing that National had put them up by only 16 percent in the last 4 years. That is far more than the rate of inflation and the reason for that as my colleague has said is that National has presided over the worst economic performance in 50 years. The economy has been struggling to get out of first gear. It has not got out of first gear. When we look at unemployment—the human face of National’s failure—we see that it has changed from 3.4 percent under Labour to 7 percent under National. It is sticking very close to 7 percent now.The Government’s economic prescription has failed. Why has it failed? Well it is shatteringly simple and it is rooted in inequality. The idea was and it is a very old idea that if you give tax cuts to the rich and put up GST on the poor suddenly the wealth that is at the top will trickle down and enrich all. It did not work for Ronald Reagan’s America. It did not work for Margaret Thatcher’s Britain. It did not work for Ruth Richardson last time around and it is not working now. It is not working because the top 10 percent got 40 percent of the extra money. That is unethical in a country where 270000 children are growing up under the poverty line.National’s greatest achievement in this term of office has been to shift massive financial resource from the poor to the rich—from the poor to the rich—to massively grow inequality in this country. So its constituents increasingly live behind big walls and razor wire with their security cameras. We are living in a surveillance State. Meanwhile ordinary New Zealanders are struggling to pay their ever-growing power bills and are coping with rental house prices.Labour has the answer to those problems. It is very very simple: build affordable homes. Let us cut through all the nonsense and just admit that we are not going to bring down house prices until supply increases and demand cools off. So that is why we are going to hit the speculators with a capital gains tax. Let me say it again—we are going to hit the property speculators with a capital gains tax. If they are offshore non-resident speculators they are not going to play in our sandpit because we are going to put New Zealanders at the front of the queue. National’s spin machine has been in overdrive over that issue because as theNew Zealand Heraldtold us yesterday two-thirds of New Zealanders think it is a fabulous idea that Kiwis ought to be able to buy a home and put down roots—the Kiwi dream—in their own country not play second fiddle to some foreign plutocrat who slips a few bucks to the National Party.Labour will bring down power bills. I have had enough of being lectured to by the grandchildren of Max Bradford. The Bradford regime had every opportunity to work. Goodness knows the previous Labour Government did its best. It put David Caygill in as electricity commissioner and there were several rounds of reforms to try to perfect the market. The very same Stanford University economist whom Jonathan Young referred to declared a couple of years ago after massive analysis that there was a 20 percent monopoly price premium built into that market because it was not competitive. After 15 years of tweaking Mr Young we have finally come to the conclusion that there is no way of tweaking it beyond monopoly. So we are going to have an agency called NZ Power which will buy power at fair prices and sell it on to New Zealanders.That will take Kiwi power prices down by 300 bucks a year for the average family—over a month and a half of free power bills—if they vote Labour. Let us be clear. If New Zealanders want power prices to come down if they want reasonably affordable housing it is very simple: throw the bums out and vote Labour.Kiwis will not have a better life if they cannot earn a decent living. That is why Labour stands for more good high-wage jobs—more good high-wage jobs. We are not ashamed to have labour laws that allow unions to work on behalf of workers. Yes National hear us. Unions have a role to play in a modern workplace. We are not going to encourage scab labour. We are not going to sell down labour laws just like we are not going to sell down personal freedoms and privacy.Hon Maurice Williamson: I was a member of “Nats for Shearer” but I’m going with this man now. This man should be leader.Hon DAVID CUNLIFFE: You know some people cannot ever get over their own personal disappointments. Maurice Williamson is a living testament—a living testament—to the dogged belief in his own self-image. The problem is nobody else has been listening for about 10 years and they are not listening now.Before I finish I have to give a couple of minutes to the Hon Nathan Guy my recent opposite number in the fisheries portfolio. He is going to get even with Tau Henare very soon because Tau Henare backed thatNgāpuhi special on the foreign charter vessels bill. Let me talk about Nathan Guy’s three great stuff-ups in the fisheries sector. The first is snapper 1. There are 650000 recreational fishermen or fisherwomen in New Zealand of which I am a passionate member myself. That is 650000 voters who will not be voting National because National has had the stroke of genius—the stroke of brilliance—of cutting their snapper bag limit from nine fish a day to just three—nine fish a day to three. You do not need to be a rocket scientist to know that that is going to go down like a bucket of cold sick.Carol Beaumont: It has done.Hon DAVID CUNLIFFE: It has done. National members are sweating because their email boxes are filling up with messages from perturbed recreational fisher people saying: “Leave my snapper alone.” Well the word is that Mr Guy earlier floated the boat—if you can forgive the pun—of a 10 percent cut in the commercial quota. The phones started ringing hot from National’s big business backers and he backed off. And now it is all the recreational fishers who are getting it in the neck and they are not happy. Strike one.Strike two—we agree with National on trying to get rid of slave fishing. We agree with National about flagging foreign charter fishing boats into New Zealand law. We do not agree with National about doing a one-off sleazy deal for one iwi which gives them another 4 years to impose slavery on the fishing industry. It is not going to work and it is not going to stand. No matter what Tau Henare has been up to in the back rooms I am hopeful that Nathan Guy is going to see sense and withdraw that iwi amendment from the foreign slave fishing bill.His third great mistake has been thepaua fishery. He did not have a decent consultation process before wanting—same story again—to increase the commercial quota and get the recreational and customary take down.Hon Members: Ooh!Hon DAVID CUNLIFFE: Ooh what a bad one. What is wrong with this National Party death wish in the fisheries portfolio? I predict that Nathan Guy will not be in that portfolio in a year’s time. I think his record of getting himself donkey deep in commercial interests and shafting recreational and customary interests is going to see him being reshuffled out of that portfolio.I could go on and on and on and on about the failures of this Government but you Mr Deputy Speaker would not let me so I am going to round off now and just remind people that if you want Budget surpluses if you want decent cheap housing and—Mr DEPUTY SPEAKER: Order! Your time has expired.Peseta SAM LOTU-IIGA (National—Maungakiekie):It is an honour to speak on the Appropriation (2013/14 Estimates) Bill. I would not be doing justice if I did not reply to some of the comments Mr Cunliffe has made. May I first congratulate him on his leadership pitch here this morning but with two fellow travellers in his camp that man will not be leader—not in the next week not in the next month and likely not this century. But he has some skills and he has pointed out what a great job this Government is doing. It is a pleasure to talk about real leadership not the fake leadership that that man just demonstrated. Real leadership comes from the Prime Minister John Key by focusing on the things that matter. While members opposite focus on leaks scaremongering and leadership spills within the Labour Party the National Government continues to focus on the economy on jobs on opportunities for our people and on the crisis that has hit this country with the Fonterra milk scare. We are showing leadership in that department.This Budget legislation confirms what most New Zealanders know. The 50 percent who say in polls that they would vote for National—not the 30 percent who would vote for Labour—want leadership. They want demonstrated proven and sound leadership and John Key demonstrates that every day that he is out in our communities and every day that he is in this House and in the Beehive leading our country. This legislation confirms that we are on the right track. We are on the right track with economic growth we are on the right track with more jobs being created and we are on the right track in terms of the rising wages that are occurring in this country.Members opposite have asked: “Where are the jobs?”. Well the jobs are online and in newspapers. I looked at SEEK before I came down to the House this morning. There are 16255 jobs available on SEEK—12956 of those are full-time 1027 are part-time and 2000 are contract jobs. Over 16000 jobs are out there in our communities and those are just the advertised jobs. There are thousands of other jobs available and the issue is that we need to get people skilled and we need to get people motivated to take up those jobs that are on offer in our communities.We are responsibly managing the Government’s books and we know that we are going to reach a projected surplus in the next 2 financial years. We are building a more competitive and productive economy—Carol Beaumont: Tell that to the 146000 people who are unemployed—146000 unemployed.Peseta SAM LOTU-IIGA: —and trying to create jobs out there whether it be mining or whether it be convention centres. All I know is that members opposite including Ms Beaumont cannot stand the fact that we are creating an environment where jobs are being created. People are taking on jobs they are feeding and clothing their families and they are independent from the former Labour Government which promoted reliance and dependence on that Government.So what are we doing? What are we doing in terms of housing? When I go around my electorate in Maungakiekie housing affordability is a real issue. And we know—Hon David Cunliffe: That’s Carol Beaumont’s electorate.Peseta SAM LOTU-IIGA: Carol Beaumont did not get voted in. I love it—I love it! Carol Beaumont is running in Manukau East. The people in Manukau East know it. She is going for selection in Manukau East. She might live in Epsom South but she is running for Manukau East.Anyway we know that 39000 houses need to be built in the next 3 years. What is this Government doing? We are working with councils. There is a housing accord with Auckland Council whereby we are going to free up land and special housing areas. That is particularly important because housing affordability is critical to our economic growth. It is critical to the lives of New Zealanders particularly in my community in Maungakiekie. It critical to those who want to have their own homes. So what are we doing? We are streamlining the Resource Management Act. Amy Adams is reducing red tape around the building of new houses—and this is supported by Nick Smith—by introducing 6-month consenting limits for medium-sized projects. We know that the Hon Maurice Williamson is also doing a fine job in the building sector bringing together parties who are looking to build houses at lower cost and to build those houses faster through a consenting process that supports economic growth.We are launching an inquiry into building material costs. We know that the cost of building houses in New Zealand is 30 percent higher than in Australia. So we have asked the question. We are inquiring into it we are investigating that and we will bring a review that will make changes to the building industry. We are also reviewing development contributions and compliance costs because we know that red tape and bureaucracy dampens development. I have talked to the developers in South Auckland. I have talked to the developers in Maungakiekie. They are telling me that red tape and bureaucracy is the worst thing that can occur because it dampens development dampens economic growth and dampens jobs.This Government is about investing in skills to boost the productivity of the construction sector. Onehunga High School my local high school has a building and construction school that supports the industry in terms of building more houses faster. We also have trades academies across this nation. I have talked to those young kids. The Prime Minister and I visited Onehunga High School 2 months ago and after talking to the kids we know that they are aspirational they want jobs and they want to participate in our communities. That is why the programmes that National is delivering in this Budget are working and New Zealanders know it.The other thing that this Government is doing is creating an economic framework from which jobs and opportunities can be created—an economic framework. We have seen some of the lowest interest rates in New Zealand for a number of years. It is those interest rates that save money for those who are paying mortgages. We have a low inflation rate—the lowest inflation rate. Low inflation and low interest rates mean that when businesses make investment decisions and when they make decisions in terms of hiring people they know that they are making those decisions with a greater degree of certainty confidence and trust not just in the Government but in the economy.Labour members are silent on this. What they are not silent on is their anti-growth policies. They are anti-growth. They belong in the pockets of the faceless men in the unions of this country. Mr Cunliffe in the speech he has just made referred to the unions because he is in their pockets. He needs the unions to defeat Shearer in a leadership spill. That is why he mentions the unions in every speech he makes in this House. It is disgusting. Labour members talk about cronyism—well that is disgusting. So Mr Cunliffe should think seriously about the speeches he makes in this House that refer to the faceless men who support him.Hon David Cunliffe: Keep a straight face Sam.Peseta SAM LOTU-IIGA: That is right. We know that economic growth is the highest in 5 years that it compares well with Australia and that it is higher than in almost every other developed country—every other developed country. I challenge members opposite to go for a visit to America to Europe and to parts of Africa and they will realise what a great country we live in. They will realise what a good soundGovernment we have—one that is promoting growth and opportunities in this country—and they will realise that wages are growing and cost of living increases have been extremely modest in the last few years.My colleague Mr Young referred to the low inflation rate—0.7 percent in the last year. So we know that this Government is on the right track. We know that we are promoting growth and opportunities. But we also know that we are a Government that has compassion. We are a Government that is insulating 46000 more homes for low-income families with a $100 million investment in this Budget. We know that we are a Government that is increasing budget advisory services—one of the biggest issues in my electorate office—by 17 percent which equates to over $10.5 million.We know that this is a compassionate Government. It is providing over $190 million over 4 years for welfare reforms. Why? Because we are work testing people in order to get them back into work. What are we doing also? We are providing $46.8 million for extra income-related rent subsidies which will open up the community housing sector to provide for those families that are most in need. So this Government is delivering warmer drier homes and it is delivering subsidised homes for those most in need in our society.I summarise by saying that this Government with this Budget is delivering on the issues that matter to all New Zealanders. We are a compassionate Government. We have got sound prudential conservative policies that are delivering for New Zealanders right across this country. Thank you.Mr DEPUTY SPEAKER: The next call is a 5-minute call.JAN LOGIE (Green):There are times when I listen to speeches in this House and I do indeed feel as though I am living on another planet. I have just heard the member for Maungakiekie and I do believe he is living on “Planet Key” that same planet that has no toilets and has nobody who needs to clean the toilets. His is a different world indeed from the world I live in and the world that many people I speak to live in.I want to speak today about inequality and how it has been grown by this Government and the agenda it has to benefit the wealthy of this country. I want to point to the latest NBR New Zealand Rich List announced a couple of weeks ago which saw an increase of $3.5 billion in total minimum net worth in 2012 amongst the richlisters in this country. Their combined value is now worth $47.9 billion. I think it is also worth noting that there are no individual women in that top 10. We are being fed this message from this Government and previous Governments that well these people at the top they have earned this and they have contributed so much to New Zealand that they are worth this money.I would like to point them to some UK research quoted in the bookInequality: A New Zealand Crisis  by MaxRashbrooke. It looks at different returns on investment from different areas of work. It says that British researchers have found that highly paid investment bankers by engaging in predatory lending and contributing to financial crises have actually destroyed £7 of wider social economic and environmental value for every £1 they have created. That is a net loss from some of the wealthiest people in Western economies who have sucked out £7 worth of value from that wider economy for every £1 they have contributed. That is in contrast to say very low-paid staff workers in childcare centres who nurture the future generations. They add. For every £1 they are given they contribute between £7 and £9.50 in value.Those are the values that this Government is perpetuating—this misplaced emphasis and value on the people who are actually sucking wealth from our shared collective contribution. They are sucking out that wealth and channelling it to themselves. That is who is being valued by this Government in New Zealand. It is really important to note that this is not just a foreign problem; this is an issue in this country. Currently the top5 percent of the population in New Zealand own over 50 percent of New Zealand’s net worth—50 percent. The top 5 percent in New Zealand—5 percent—own half of the net worth in this country. I do not believe that that is justifiable. I do not believe that anybody has worked hard enough that 5 percent should own 50 percent. The bottom 50 percent of New Zealanders own—let us see take a guess—5 percent of our shared wealth and 20 percent of children in this country are living in inequality and poverty.It does not have to be this way. The policies of this Government create this inequality and it does not serve any of us because we all lose out from inequality. It shows up in higher crimes rates it shows up in a lack of recycling and it shows up in teen pregnancy rates. It shows up in a huge range of social measures that we all lose out from. If we would only take some sensible initiatives like introducing a capital gains tax increasing the bargaining powers of workers to be able to get more of a fair claim of that wealth changing our monetary policy and investing in regional economic initiatives then maybe we could actually have a society where everyone had a fair share recognising that it was a collective wealth to begin with.JACQUI DEAN (National—Waitaki):I want to first congratulate the new member for Ikaroa-Rāwhiti and welcome her to the House to what is a robust debating chamber. I do hope that the new member enjoys her time in Parliament. I did sit and enjoy the member’s maiden statement last evening. It was a good speech. It was a Labour speech and it called very strongly for quality jobs for that member’s electorate and I could not disagree with that. In fact I could not agree more with that call for quality jobs so I am a little surprised that the call for quality jobs by that member in her maiden statement is not really supported by the actions of the Labour Party.My colleague Sam Lotu-Iiga very helpfully passed on some information that I am very interested in. He was able to tell me that on Stuff’s work website this morning there were 16255 jobs offered for all of New Zealand. Of those there were 12956 full-time jobs on offer on that website. Those are just the advertised ones obviously. There are many other jobs out there for those people and there are a number of people who cannot work or choose not to work full-time. There are well over 1000 part-time jobs on offer well over 2000 contracting jobs on offer and 128 casual jobs on offer. Go to the website have a look go down have an interview and see how you go. I know that that member was encouraging people in her electorate to have a go and to find work.I was also a little dismayed with that speech and the lack of support by the Labour Party for the sentiments expressed in that member’s speech. Moana Mackey for example who I know assisted the member in her campaign efforts around the Gisborne area has been unrelentingly—unrelentingly—against any further oil and gas exploration on the North Island’s East Coast. The member Moana Mackey spares no occasion to oppose oil and gas exploration which makes me wonder how many jobs for New Zealanders are involved in oil and gas exploration on the East Coast of New Zealand. How many economic opportunities arise—Hon Michael Woodhouse: Quality jobs.JACQUI DEAN: —quality jobs as my colleague mentions. They are quality jobs well-paying jobs jobs that have a future jobs that have a training pathway and jobs that will provide security for families.Why is it then that on the one hand one member of the Labour Party is calling for quality jobs in her new electorate but on the other hand the rest of the Labour Party is actively—actively—campaigning against those very quality jobs? They are jobs yes but they are also careers. Why is it that on the one hand Labour decries the lack of job opportunities when clearly there are jobs out there but on the other hand the rest of the caucus not just one member but the rest of the caucus is actively—and I could bring some speeches to the House. In fact I might do that and table them at a later date—perhaps this afternoon. They are actively campaigning against the very thing that will underpin the economic—Carol Beaumont: How about regional economic development?JACQUI DEAN: They do not like it—they do not like it. Labour members do not like this Government pointing out the obvious. In fact Labour does not like any policies that are going to promote jobs and are going to promote growth in the New Zealand economy.Let us just go through a few of those policies that Labour will oppose. Of course Labour plans if it gets into Government which seems less and less likely as it is sitting on 29 percent—it is bad to be back in the 20s. But in the event—[Interruption ] Well yes. But in the event that it ever did take a junior partnership with the Greens to form—to deform—a coalition Government from hell the first thing they would do would be to dramatically increase the effect of the emissions trading scheme. Of course they would do that on our trade-exposed businesses. We work in a global economy but Labour yes it plans to lead the world in the emissions trading scheme and absolutely hobble all our trade-exposed economies including our manufacturing and including our agricultural industries. So that is the first thing it will do. It will also impose additional costs on New Zealand households. The impact of its changes to the emissions trading scheme would have something to the effect of an increase of around $500 per annum to the New Zealand household. How does that sit with the new member? How does that policy go with her?Labour plans to introduce a capital gains tax on all productive businesses. What kind of impact is that going to have on productive business? Well I will tell you what impact it is going to have. It is going to suppress investment so I would call that a very anti-growth policy.Labour together with the Greens intends on abandoning sensible monetary policy. They want to intervene they want to interfere and they want to print money because they think that is the answer—deep thinkers over on that side of the House. Of course what impact will that have? It will force down the value of the New Zealand dollar for a while and completely destroy any credibility that the New Zealand economy has in the international market place.Labour and the Greens—or the Greens and Labour I should now say because the polls are really shifting the balance across the other side—would propose to nationalise the power industry. Well what a bright idea that one was. That would have the immediate impact of destroying any competition within the power industry—that competition that is now just coming in. It is being very effective. You can see that with the reforms that the Hon Gerry Brownlee has brought in. We now have an electricity market that is working far better than anything the previous Labour Government could achieve in its last 9 years. It would absolutely destroy and discourage any investment in the New Zealand electricity industry. Innovation? Do not bother. Investment? Why would you bother when there is a single electricity purchaser who is going to wipe out any incentives for any kind of innovation in the New Zealand electricity industry? What is going to happen? I will tell you what is going to happen. The price of electricity is going to rise. It is another anti-growth anti-competitive dog-whistle policy ill-considered not thought through and destined to fail. And guess what? My constituents in Waitaki can see right through it.Labour and the Greens want to borrow more money. They want to borrow more money. They want to indebt future generations of New Zealanders so that they can buy nice stuff now. That is what Labour wants to do. It wants to go back to that borrow hope and spend policy that it was so effective at in the 2000s. Labour wants to go backthere again. Well I can tell you that New Zealanders are wiser than that. They have chosen a Government that has got sound economic growth policies.So what are this Government’s economic growth policies? Unlike Labour which does not frankly know what it stands for or where it wants to go—or in fact who its leader should be; it still has that little problem looming over it it is very confused about that—this Government is absolutely united. We know what we need to do. We need to build a more competitive economy. We need to build a productive economy that gives New Zealand businesses the tools that they need to grow and invest and by the way create more jobs and hire more staff.The reality for New Zealand is that we are a very small nation at the bottom of the world. We are an exporting nation—we always will be—based on agriculture and National is supporting businesses. Our intention is to support businesses so that they can have an impact on the world stage and so that they can compete internationally for trade coming to New Zealand. Our Minister of Trade Tim Groser has been extremely effective in opening up new markets to New Zealand business. The results are beginning to show and this country is absolutely on the right track. We have got a very strong level of confidence in the New Zealand economy. Our economy is in good shape. Thank you.Mr DEPUTY SPEAKER: The next call by my list is a Green call and it is a 5-minute call. You are seeking the call Mr Hague?KEVIN HAGUE (Green):Yes Mr Deputy Speaker I would love to seek it. Thank you very much. By my reckoning it was another two calls away.I have recently had a series of questions for written answer directed to all Cabinet Ministers asking them what meetings they have held with the organisation Crosby/Textor which we know of course is an organisation that in the UK has had a very close relationship with the UK Government lots of contact with UK Ministers and which also has been representing the tobacco industry. So it certainly seems a relevant question to ask here. I have not got all of the answers back yet but some of them have been of the form: “I have not met with Crosby/Textor.” and good on those Ministers. There are other Ministers who have responded: “I have not met Crosby/Textor in my ministerial capacity.” Of course that is technically a sound answer but it does beg the question does it not of what capacity they may have met Crosby/Textor in. Indeed one suspects that they may have met Crosby/Textor in their capacity as members of a political party that is desperate to retain power at any cost.I am interested of course in analysing the advice Crosby/Textor may have given on the basis of this Government’s actions. It seems like a simple plan. One part of the plan is to demonise and penalise those members of our society whom the Government believes its voters do not like. That is why we have seen the beneficiary bashing. That is why we have seen the rhetoric against workers and against unions. That is why we have seen the ongoing rhetoric about being tough on crime. That is actually where this Government comes from. It believes that its voters do not like those things and so that is what it talks about.Another strand of the strategy has got to be a bunch of measures aimed at advantaging National’s mates. That is why we have seen the weakening of worker protections the lowering of wages and the weakening of environmental protections. That is all about driving down the costs of business at the expense of our environment and at the expense of labour which of course is working people. That is why we have seen tax cuts for the rich. That is why we have seen some of the appalling cronyism in this last term of Government. One thinks for example of the appointment of Susan Devoy as Race Relations Commissioner without ostensibly having any qualifications whatsoever for that role. That is why we have seen this gross abuse of proper processaround the Skycity convention centre deal. That is why we have seen the appointment of Ian Fletcher—the Prime Minister’s childhood friend a person who was not even shortlisted for the role—as the head of the Government Communications Security Bureau (GCSB). That sort of cronyism is another part of this Government’s plan.Speaking of the GCSB we are in this House at the moment debating the Government Communications Security Bureau and Related Legislation Amendment Bill a bill that amongst other things greatly expands the role of the GCSB into economic areas and that is a chilling intrusion into the rights of New Zealanders. On all of the other issues besides the ones that are about demonising National’s opponents and advantaging its mates—areas like the economy health and education—National approaches those on the basis of political ideology.Mr DEPUTY SPEAKER: Order! Look I will just pause you here because I am working off a list that has another Green call further on. I am not sure whether this is the one you assumed—whether it is a 5-minute or a 10-minute call. Do you have another Green speaker?KEVIN HAGUE: Yes we do—10 minutes.Mr DEPUTY SPEAKER: Right then yours is a 5-minute call.KEVIN HAGUE: How long do I have?Mr DEPUTY SPEAKER: 1 minute.KEVIN HAGUE: Thank you very much. So all other issues are approached purely from the point of political ideology and that is not in the interests of New Zealanders. Where has all the rhetoric gone about rebalancing the economy? Where is the rhetoric now about the underclass in New Zealand? We do not hear that any more. We ask ourselves the question who is this Government actually for? The answer is that this Government is for its mates. This is not a Government for New Zealanders. It is not a Government intended to advantage this country now or in the long term. Thank you.The ASSISTANT SPEAKER (H V Ross Robertson): Are we going to have another call? Wake up Mr Auchinvole.Chris Auchinvole: I had understood—my apologies—The ASSISTANT SPEAKER (H V Ross Robertson): The member has not called yet. Would he like to call.CHRIS AUCHINVOLE (National):My hesitation was because I understood—I am sorry—that there was to be a further Green speaker but in that absence I am more than happy to fill that gap.I recall attending a presentation by a Governor of the Reserve Bank in Greymouth—I think it was in about 2003—and the governor spoke of economic challenges. I remember that he was asked to describe or quantify what a challenge was exactly and he responded that it was any economic activity or event that impacted on the normal state of the economy. He was then asked in true West Coast interrogative style to describe what the normal state of an economy is or was. His response was that the economy was in a normal state when all of the elements were typically in balance. He was then asked if that ever occurred or was it a mythical concept or was it a bit like the typical summer we all remember as occurring during our childhood that never occurs nowadays. He thought for a while and then agreed that it was in fact like the typical summer that we all remember for an economy to be in a normal state.Well what a series of challenging economic events this Government has had to deal with. New Zealand businesses families and individuals have all faced the effects—the buffeting effects—of the global financial crisis the devastating Christchurch earthquake and continuing global uncertainty. Each of those things on their own would have had an enormous impact on the economy. Any of these things individually could have had a calamitous result when one considers the fragile and failing state of theeconomy this Government was given handed to manage as Labour left the Treasury benches.It would have been easy and understandable if New Zealand had spiralled downwards like other economies through the developed world did. There was however a further event that occurred during the same period that was to have a major impact on how the economy behaved and that was the election of a National-led Government under the prime ministership of the Rt Hon John Key with the Hon Bill English as the Minister of Finance and a very strong and professional committed grouping of Cabinet Ministers.History has continued to play out since that event from the Prime Minister’s commitment to look after everybody and create a brighter future for New Zealand to embarking on a programme to build momentum in the economy. Budget 2013 is a momentum-building Budget. The Budget confirms that New Zealand is on the right track with forecasts of economic growth an increase in jobs rising wages and a return to surplus by 2014-15. There is a firm commitment to having a Government focus on four main priorities: responsibly managing the Government’s books building a more competitive and productive economy delivering better public services and rebuilding Christchurch. National is building towards having a stronger more stable economy that can weather global economic storms and deliver opportunities higher incomes and more jobs for New Zealanders. Budget 2013 continues our work to build a brighter future for Kiwi families.I think everyone realises because the wonderful thing about Parliament is that we all come from different parts of the country that the challenges have spread through the country at a different rate with different periods of effect and at different times have affected different regions. On the West Coast and in Tasman the area that I live in the ripples of the Christchurch earthquake were not restricted to that fair city. Indeed I think it would be fair to say that they were felt throughout the South Island and indeed into the North Island as well. But our second-largest city in the country is in fact a tertiary centre for the whole of the South Island and its recovery is crucial to all families who live and earn a living in the south and we are very very cognisant of that.The work that has been done—and I had the privilege of chairing the committee that set up the Canterbury Earthquake Recovery Authority or reported to the Government on the establishment of that authority and from then on the energy that has poured into Christchurch has been fantastic. We very much are in step with the people who are living out their family lives in that city as it changes and continues to change.The Coast economy held up very well with very high household incomes prior to the economic storm gripping the mining industry and then the dairying sector suffering its first drought on record. The closure of a major employer in Westport although not unexpected—and put off for a further 2 years—has come eventually at a cruel time for the families concerned. The trick however while one is weathering the difficult times is to recognise that the right hands are on the tiller in Government. Things are improving and will continue to do so.Let us look at some of those focus points that we are talking about. There are additional measures to build a more competitive and productive economy. ACC levy cuts will leave another $300 million in the economy for businesses and households in 2014-15 increasing to around $1 billion next year. In the West Coast - Tasman although we do have an extremely large employer in the form of Talley’s and in the form of the major coalminers most of our businesses are small and most are family businesses. ACC cuts will be something that really will make a difference.We have allocated $1.5 billion of proceeds from the successful Mighty River Power share offer to Christchurch hospitals irrigation infrastructure upgrading schools andthe KiwiRail Turnaround Plan. Although I am not trying to be selfish about these things other South Islanders will recognise the significance of those events to people who live down there. The railway is a very important part of our lives. Christchurch Hospital is as I have already said a tertiary centre for the rest of the South Island irrigation infrastructure will increase opportunities for more productive farming throughout Canterbury and I think the schools upgrade will probably be of greater benefit to Christchurch than to anywhere else.Dr Megan Woods: Really? Thanks for reminding us of that.CHRIS AUCHINVOLE: The member across the House is agreeing with everything I say which is nice to see. But yes it is good that we will have those opportunities for development in the South Island. Gosh they deserve it.Meridian will be the next company prepared for a partial share sale to New Zealand investors later this year. Let us hope that we do not see the sorts of spoiler tactics that we saw last time which almost—almost—sort of reached the stage of being malicious I think in the Kiwi mind. They almost reached the stage of being malicious. So that money will then be available for vital infrastructure without further increasing our debt.Legislation to improve housing affordability has been frequently spoken of here. There is a memorandum of understanding with the Reserve Bank Governor confirming a range of measures if needed to protect the economy from periods of excesses and growth in credit and housing prices reduce reliance on unstable sources of funding and require banks and other financial institutions to better manage their own risks.It is significant that I began by speaking about the Reserve Bank Governor and coming to the end of the speech that I am ending with the same thing because it is about the stability of New Zealand’s economy. This Budget does a lot to help it. There was talk this morning on the radio about what would happen if there was a change of Government. I would just like to close with a comment from my Labour neighbours whom I have a lot of fun with especially in the duck-shooting season and that sort of thing. We were having a chat one day and they said: “Oh well if the court case works you could be without one of your MPs and that would mean that you would lose your majority. What are you going to do then?”. I said: “Well I guess what would happen then is there could easily be an election and then you guys could get in and you could form a Government with the Green Party.” Their response was immediate spontaneous and honest. They said: “To hell with that.” I said: “But they’re your guys.” They said: “We’re not ready and we don’t want to be with them.” This is the voter. I can only conclude by putting it the way they put it to me: “We need a strong Government. We need a firm Government. We might not like you very much as National but that’s what you are giving us.” And that is what we will continue to get. Thank you.Dr MEGAN WOODS (Labour—Wigram):It is my pleasure to rise after my fellow southern MP Chris Auchinvole and perhaps address what Budget 2013 meant for us in the South Island and more broadly what Budget 2013 meant for New Zealanders. It was a Budget of no vision. It was a Budget that laid out a series of contracts. That is the way in which these people choose to govern. Members opposite are nodding their heads like this is a good thing. This is the way this Government has chosen to govern: a willing seller and a willing buyer. It is as simple as that for the Government. We have seen it in the creation of charter schools. We have seen it in the fact that we have sold out the education of our young people to a willing seller and a willing buyer. We have seen it in the dodgy deal around Skycity. What we have is a Government that is not about government for the people and for all people; it is about government for its mates and finding the best deal on the table.What we have been told by members opposite is that Budget 2013 was a momentum-building Budget and that it was all part of this brighter future. Well this is somethingthat we fail to see. Budget 2013 was a continuation of letting ordinary New Zealanders down. It was a Budget by a Government that has lost touch with people who are struggling to make ends meet to meet the needs of their families and to even get a job. The Government is more interested in looking after its mates than your mates. It has sold off our assets it has given tax cuts to the most wealthy and it has grown the gap between rich and poor. This is not something anyone can be proud of. [Interruption ]I think the barracking across the House was asking for me to tell you about what Labour would have done. Well I am more than happy to give you some kind of sketch of what Labour’s vision for New Zealand is. Labour will do something to address the fact that people in this country cannot afford a roof over their heads. Labour will take real action. It will not have just rhetoric. It will be a Government that is hands-on and it will lead the building of 100000 houses in this country over 10 years. We are not content to sit idly by and wait for the magic contract to land on the table while ordinary New Zealanders are shut out of the housing market. This is something that any Government has a moral obligation to do something about. A Labour Government will step up. A Labour Government will be a hands-on Government that will do something about this.Labour will finally do something to lower ordinary New Zealanders’ power bills. In my electorate I know there are homes that people simply should not be living in. There are homes that have 90 percent humidity overnight and a temperature of nine degrees. This is not a level of heat that I am willing for my constituents to live in. This is not healthy. This is not something that any New Zealander should be willing to tolerate in their country. The member who spoke before me Chris Auchinvole talked about what Budget 2013 meant for South Islanders. Well for South Islanders struggling through yet another cold South Island winter trying to pay their power bills there was absolutely nothing—zero zilch—in there to address the very real problem of people not being able to pay their power bills.We will under Labour have a Government that will be committed to creating high-wage jobs. We will have a Government that is committed to skills training that is really committed to the tertiary education sector and that will do everything in its power to match workforce requirements with the kinds of skills training we need in this country. What we will not have under a Labour-led Government is a Government like we have now which is ripping tertiary education out of our regional centres. We have had tertiary education provision taken away from a whole list of regions. Canterbury Gisborne Hawke’s Bay Nelson Marlborough the West Coast Otago Taranaki Waikato and Wellington are all regions that now have less tertiary education provision in those regions after this Government came to power. These are also regions that have high levels of unemployment.You would think that offering some kind of training at level 1 and 2 foundation provisions would be a priority for this Government but no it is not. It has done a competitive tender to the private sector through private training establishments and it has shifted the money to urban centres. Once again this is a Government that is leaving the regions of New Zealand to flounder with absolutely no commitment to them.Labour will also be a Government that will be committed to giving all kids a great start in life. We cannot sit idly by while the Minister for Social Development comes to this House question time after question time and gives funny answers about whether or not she is measuring poverty and meanwhile more and more children in this country are born into a life of poverty and their lives are a challenge. We will extend paid parental leave. We will make sure that kids have a great start in life. We will have a real and meaningful focus on early childhood education. We will ensure that every school is world class and we will have the proper supports in place for parents.One of the things that have been listed by members opposite when they rattle off the four priorities of this Government and where Budget 2013 is putting its money is the recovery of Christchurch. Being the member of Parliament for Wigram I cannot help but address some of this. I would like to see some real action. I would encourage the Government to give some real action to addressing the housing crisis in Christchurch. The Minister will not call it a crisis. He calls it a challenge. Frankly I do not care if he calls it Harry. I want him to do something about it. I have my constituents living in garages I have my constituents living in cars and I have my constituents living in overcrowded houses. This is a Government that thinks the market is going to fix an absolute crisis in housing in a city where it is simply failing.Members opposite need to wake up to the fact that there is market failure. It is absolutely negligent of them to sit back and wait for some magic market fix that is not coming. Meanwhile people are not living in any kind of accommodation that I would call acceptable from what I have seen in the course of being a member of Parliament over the last 18 months.We need to see the problems around the Earthquake Commission addressed. People have simply been waiting for far too long. There are problems. We need to find real solutions. People cannot live with the messy situations that their lives are in for much longer. People deserve some certainty in their lives and to have a start where they can rebuild. That is what Christchurch people want. Then to hear the member talk about the investment in Christchurch schools the alleged $1 billion investment. This is not $1 billion worth of new money. Half of that money is money that would have been coming to Christchurch anyway. So let us actually have some honesty in this discussion. It is money that was in the 5-year plan so it would have been there with or without the reorganisation plan.What we have is a Government that has run roughshod over community after community in Christchurch. We have communities that escaped the earthquake that this Government has come in and destroyed by closing those schools. What we now need to do is get behind those schools. We need to get behind those communities. We need to make sure that actually what we are doing is building community and that we are not leaving them to flounder. I can tell you the scars run deep throughout the city because of the schools’ reorganisation.Phillipstown—the member opposite might like to ponder on—is currently before the courts seeing whether it can stop the Government’s closure of its school. It is a school that is in Christchurch Central. A community is no longer going to have the option to send their children to be educated at the school in their community. It is simply not good enough that this is what this Government has chosen to do. This is not about rebuilding communities.I actually think we need to see some real action from the Government on many aspects of the recovery of Christchurch. We all accept that things are going to take time that there has been a huge disaster in Christchurch and a mammoth effort is required but the fact that people do not have proper houses to live in is not something that I can sit idly by and say nothing about. We have to see some action on housing. What we need throughout this country as well as in Christchurch is a Government that is prepared to be hands-on that is prepared to show some leadership and that has a vision. That will be a Labour-led Government and it will be after the next general election. Thank you.Hon TAU HENARE (National):Tēnā koe Mr Assistant Speaker. Kai a koe e hoa e Mita nui atu te mihi ki a koemōtōhaerenga maii rotoi te Whare o te Raiona.Nō reiranau mai haere mai.Ngā mihingā mihingā mihi ki a koe.[Greetings to you Mr Assistant Speaker. To you colleague Mita an overwhelming tribute to you for coming into the House of the Lion. So welcome welcome. Acknowledgments greetings and salutations to you. ]I want to talk first about the farmer-hater whom I heard in the House this morning David Cunliffe—that man who so wants to be the leader of the Labour Party. You know he railed against the rich in his speech. He railed against the rich and told us how he loves the poor. But he does not want to live in New Lynn. He does not want to live with the poor people in New Lynn. He would rather live inWestmere—[Interruption ] Oh I am sorry; it is Herne Bay.I love it when we see the Labour Party members get on their hind legs and yell out: “We are against mining. We don’t want to see any oil exploration or any mining in our electorates.” Do you know what? That same day they go to the airport and wave goodbye to their sons and daughters and their nieces and nephews who are going to Australia so that they can go and get mining jobs. For goodness’ sake! Those members think that that is the way to prosperity.If you were to listen to the speeches we have heard this morning and it is undoubted that we do not listen to them—or many people anyway—this country is in dire straits. This country is falling over. So why do we have 3 percent growth? Why are we projected to have growth in the next few years of 2 to 3 percent? If that was the case if our country was a basket case we would be going backwards economically. All those members can do is say to foreign investors—and mark my words it is not the investment of me and my mates in New Zealand; it is actually the foreign investment—Hon Member: All your rich crony mates.Hon TAU HENARE: —all my rich mates out in TeAtatū North—it is the foreign investors. It is the investment money that comes from overseas that makes us the country we are. Labour’s big policy announcement—and I know that it resounds well with the general public and that goes for any country—is to say that the housing problem is all foreigners. It is due to foreign investment. It is due to the foreigner buying a house in New Zealand as an investment. I have not once heard any Labour MP talk about greenfields andbrownfields. I have not heard one Labour MP talk about freeing up land so we can build houses so people can have what you and I had which is the opportunity to purchase your first home. Once you have got your first home the world is your oyster.Labour members talk about Skycity. Listen we in Auckland and in New Zealand get a free—listen up—a free convention centre. It is a world-class convention centre with thousands of jobs not only in the building of that place but also in the running of that place. The downstream jobs that come out of that are enormous—are enormous. For what? For a couple of hundred extra pokie machines. I tell you what. When the pokie machine number is all tallied up it is still less than it was 10 or so years ago. So what is the big deal?The Government Communications Security Bureau—I see in the papers for the last week there have been some warnings from the United States of America over some terrorist attacks that might happen. I wonder where and I wonder how it got that information. It did not just think about it. It got an intelligence-gathering machine. That is how you protect your nation. The hysteria that is being thrown around by the Labour Party and the Green Party about mass surveillance—it is not going to happen. Here is the reason why. No agency has the capability of mass surveillance. Not one of the organisations in New Zealand has that capability.I want to talk about national standards just for a moment. When national standards were proposed by the Hon Hekia Parata everybody fell off their horses. They said basically that the sun was not going to come up in the morning and the sky was goingto fall in. Well lo and behold because of national standards people are succeeding—people are succeeding. Have a look in theDominion Postfrom yesterday at the front page.Kris Faafoi: It has nothing to do with it.Hon TAU HENARE: Oh it has got nothing to do with standards. It has got nothing to do with national standards says Kris Faafoi from Mana who does not really know where McDonald’s is. I have got to tell him this.Kris Faafoi: Do you know where it is?Hon TAU HENARE: Oh yes I know where every McDonald’s is and I tell you what I even know where the 24-hour ones are. It is like this. If you set standards and you keep standards up then our kids will succeed. There are more people now in training—training for proper jobs quality jobs—than ever before. Gone are the days when you could just go off on your own and get the Government to pay for a basket weaving course that was never going to get you anything or a hair braiding exercise down at the local polytech. No that is not a good spend. That is not a good spend of taxpayers’ money.Andrew Little: Oh not again.Hon TAU HENARE: Oh here he is—here he is. He is the working-class hero Andrew Little just waiting—waiting in the wings—to be able to get that top job. He has always coveted that top job. He was like that in the Engineering Printing and Manufacturing Union but he wanted to move up so he joined the Labour Party and now he is after David’s job. Now he is after David’s job but I am not sure which David.Kris Faafoi: How many parties? Three parties?Hon TAU HENARE: Three mate.Kris Faafoi: Three?Hon TAU HENARE: Three and proud of it—and proud of it. It is something you could not do—well not you Mr Assistant Speaker. But I tell you what we also heard the figure this morning about power price rises. Under a Labour Government there was a 72 percent increase in power prices. Under this Government and we have been in for only one and a half terms it is 16 percent—16 percent. So if Labour members want to quibble and argue about what has been going on—you hear from David Cunliffe that man who lives in Herne Bay and represents the poor people of another electorate. He just loves it does he not? What was that David? No sorry you cannot speak. He talked about the razor wire and the secure gated communities—Hon Anne Tolley: It’s like Herne Bay.Hon TAU HENARE: Yes and he knows this from sitting on his deck in Herne Bay. I have heard that you are not supposed to go down that road and people are representing their electorates but the thing is that when you rail against the rich and you rail against the people on theForbesrich list and then you have the gumption to get up and say: “I support the poor. All our policies are about poor people.” and you do not want to even live in that electorate you do not want to even live with the people whom you supposedly represent—and I know what Labour members are going to say. They will have a go at the Prime Minister. But let me just finish on this note—let me just finish on this note. When you wave goodbye to your sons and daughters and your nieces and nephews but you will not allow them to get a job in that industry in your own country that word starts with an “h” and I will let you work out what that word is.GARETH HUGHES (Green):Kia ora Mr Assistant Speaker.Ngā mihi nui ki a koutou. I understand that Parliamentary Service is currently investigating the future of the Parliament TV broadcast. I mean one idea is that we could have a worm or some sort of vote ticker. I think you would have seen that go backwards very very fast after that contribution from the member Tau Henare. I think what the public of New Zealandheard there was a whole bunch of partisan politics petty point-scoring and personal attacks. I do not think the Kiwis want to hear that when we are talking about the economy. They want to hear about ideas and a vision. They want to have a sense that we are going forward not this petty personal politics of the member. I think it has lost him a whole bunch of votes. So there is one idea to kick off this debate this morning.I rise to speak on the Appropriation (2013/14 Estimates) Bill and the second reading of the Imprest Supply (Second for 2013/14) Bill. Obviously it is a tremendously important debate to our country and to our Parliament. We are talking about the nature of the Budget a significant tool that the Government and the country use as part of our economic future. Right now you can read in all the papers and you can see in the international media the economic challenges New Zealand faces today. When you look at the issue of contaminated whey products and other dairy-based products and the $13 billion worth of our dairy exports around the world we have got to be paying attention. Obviously we need to be doing the basics first which is protecting the health and safety of and providing good information to New Zealand and domestic consumers. But I think it does put in stark relief the risks to brand New Zealand to “100% Pure New Zealand” which obviously the Chinese media has very strongly critiqued and of course the economic dependency that New Zealand has on this one industry. In this debate I want to touch on some of those broad-based economic issues facing us that you can see consistently through the Fonterra dairy dependency we have in New Zealand.In this debate I want to touch on three things. The first is the Green Party’s vision for our economy our plan for the New Zealand economy which is to deliver a smart Green economy lift our kids out of poverty and clean up our waterways and our environments. We can have all three of those things. Secondly I want to touch on the range of Green Party contributions to show the broad brush of positive contributions the Greens have brought to this particular debate and to look at two areas that I am passionate about which are seeing cleaner smarter cheaper energy for New Zealanders and a thriving information and communications technology sector.It is pretty good to be standing here this week after that 5 percent rise for the Green Party in the poll we saw over the weekend. It is pretty good to be standing here because we are an optimistic party. We are a positive party. We are not playing those petty partisan point-scoring political games. We are getting on with proposing plans. We are out there proposing plans that are resonating with New Zealanders. We are offering them trust which I think is in some decline when you look at the Government benches. We are offering real solutions. We are not playing games. This is important. This is the future of New Zealanders. It is about jobs. It is about the quality of life. It is about the standard of living. It is about whether Kiwi kids have shoes and jackets to go to school in. It is about whether you can actually swim in a waterway. If you look at the latest data you just cannot have that iconic Kiwi experience of being able to go for a swim in a New Zealand stream or creek in many of our rivers and streams and that is wrong. It goes against our core Kiwi values. So it is important that we address these issues.We have got some significant structural economic challenges facing our country. It is more than just the surplus which is how the Government has been putting this economic debate. What we have seen is a decline in economic competitiveness relative to other nations. We have seen growing debt and growing numbers of Kiwis out of work. Over the last 60 years we have seen New Zealand steadily decline down those OECD rankings. And we are not seeing the solutions. We are running as fast as we can just to keep up and to stay where we are but still we keep slipping backwards. We work some of the longest hours in the OECD yet we are still slipping backwards vis-à-vis other countries. Sure you can point to Australia as the Government benches are doing but there the Australian Government has actually woken up to the fact that the miningboom is over. The plan to have just an extracted commodity - based economy supplying China is not a winner for Australia and that is why it is trying to diversify away from it.It is an important debate because we are talking about real issues like the structural health of our economy and the future of New Zealanders. We have got real solutions to those challenges. When you look at the sectors we should be supporting we want to see a thriving information and communications technology sector. We believe that we have got a huge opportunity in clean energy. That is what the experts say. When you look around the world net international capital investment outstripped all the investment in fossil fuels and nuclear generation. For electricity generation it went into renewables—things like hydro solar and wind. This is where we have got a niche. It is a $23 billion opportunity according to PricewaterhouseCoopers. It is about exporting clean energy and exporting information and communications technology. It is about being a niche in cleantech. This is where we should be looking. It is what the late Professor Paul Callaghan was talking about. New Zealand needs to focus on its strengths and its niches.Instead what we see is this extracted commodities - based vision from the Government which is all about digging more holes for coal and mining which fewer and fewer people are investing in and wanting to buy internationally and trying to cram more cows on to our paddocks with all the risks we have seen so starkly this week. While we are talking about addressing some of these challenges we need to be looking at that massive current account deficit but we also have to be addressing the environmental deficit which has been growing more and more under the National Government and we need to be approaching the social deficit. What I heard from Jan Logie was that the top 5 percent of New Zealanders own 50 percent of the wealth in our country. We are not seeing ordinary Kiwis getting ahead. National is not working for ordinary New Zealanders.When you look across all the Green contributions in this debate I think you have seen a very strong argument a positive argument from the Green Party. Dr Russel Norman talked about his plan to structurally balance the economy through things like a comprehensive tax on capital gains excluding the family home; broadening the legislative mandate of the Reserve Bank to try to keep that Kiwi dollar under control supporting Kiwi exporters in the productive economy; and then you see the capital market reform including supporting Kiwibank. You see some good contributions there. Kevin Hague talked about health and how we should be planning for the future not just for the short-term plan that Mr Ryall has. Catherine Delahunty talked about the priorities that the Government has got wrong in education and its wasting those precious education dollars on ideologically driven policy. Metiria Turei talked about child poverty and the Greens’ package of solutions from the in-work tax credit through to better housing for Kiwi kids currently growing up in poverty. We know there are more than 200000 of them. Ken Graham talked about the Greens’ plan for global sustainability. We saw Eugenie Sage talking about the Greens’ plan for “100% Pure New Zealand” actually paying lip-service not making it this marketing slogan that is being drawn in the international media and being called “a festering sore” by the State-run Chinese media. It is about that Kiwi value of being able to go for a swim in your stream or river.Dave Clendon talked about the Greens’ prioritisation of spending in the justice system. Holly Walker talked about the Greens’ solutions for housing in terms of building more State houses in terms of supporting Kiwis into ownership and thirdly about making sure those rental properties across the country—and I have seen many of these cold damp unhealthy rental properties—are healthy and are safe. What we need is a minimum standard for our rental houses. Steffan Browning talked about thebiosecurity risks facing our agricultural sector. I talked about our vision for cleaner cheaper smarter energy in New Zealand. Julie Anne Genter talked about the Greens’ plan to dig some holes. The Government always says that the Greens are against digging holes as if digging holes is a bad thing. Actually there are a few holes we would like to dig. One of them is in central Auckland down in the central business district. We want to build a central business district rail loop to transform the Auckland public transport network to empower the Auckland central business district and to transform our biggest city’s economy. We have canvassed a range of positive solutions.In terms of information and communications technology we had massive growth there but the Government is not taking advantage of the potential. It is delaying things like the copyright review which would empower and drive economic development. It is doing things like making rules for Chorus. All New Zealanders will be paying for the subsidies on its copper-based prices. We need a second internet cable because although there is some good investment from the Government in ultra-fast broadband what we risk is having an ultra-fast intranet. We need to have more international connections so that Kiwis can work in New Zealand. Under National what we see is that the main export of New Zealand is skilled Kiwis. What we need to do is have a richer New Zealand with a positive plan going forward and with kids out of poverty. We need a safer cleaner New Zealand where entrepreneurs and Kiwis want to come back to New Zealand where Kiwis can do their work in smart high-tech niches as Professor Callaghan was urging us to do where Kiwis want to move back to New Zealand but can still participate in the global economy and the global culture. This is the Greens’ plan for the economy. It is a smarter economy that focuses on our strengths. It is a cleaner economy so we can have quality of life for New Zealanders and that valuable “100% Pure New Zealand” brand.Ultimately we are not playing those partisan politics games that you have heard in this debate from the other parties. What we are doing is putting forward a positive vision and when you look at the polls it is resonating with New Zealanders. Thank you. Kia ora.NICKY WAGNER (National—Christchurch Central):I am very pleased to speak on this third reading of the Appropriation (2013/14 Estimates) Bill because this Budget confirms that New Zealand is in much better shape economically than most of the countries that we compare ourselves with overseas. Our economy is growing at 3 percent. Our economy is growing faster than that of the US faster than Canada’s and much faster than Japan’s. In contrast to the economies of the UK and Europe which are shrinking our economy is going ballistic. That is because we are absolutely focused.This Government is absolutely focused on getting our economy right back on track. I would like to thank the Hon Bill English for his solid Southland determination and discipline and for getting us through the worst of the global financial crisis in the best way possible. It has been tough and we have all had to tighten our belts but we are building a stronger more stable and more resilient economy that will serve us well in the future. Our goal is to help businesses create more and better-paid jobs. We are doing everything we can to educate train and upskill our young people and we are focusing on developing the areas of the economy that produce the best return. Those areas are higher-value exports in-demand specialist services and building on our strengths to produce new products new technologies and new businesses that will deliver those highly paid jobs for New Zealanders.But to be able to create productive jobs that pay well our basic economic infrastructure has to be efficient and effective. This Government has four strands for delivering a productive framework. The first strand is responsibly managing theGovernment’s books. That means using money wisely and keeping down debt and I have to say that thanks to Bill English we are doing that pretty well.The second strand is to build a more competitive and productive economy so New Zealanders can earn their prosperity on a global market. That work is being led by the Hon Steven Joyce and the Ministry of Business Innovation and Employment. The ministry’s purpose is to grow New Zealand for all and to increase the well-being and the opportunities for all New Zealanders so that they can contribute to the economy and so that they can be part of our productivity.The third strand is delivering better public services. We are doing that by delivering more services for fewer dollars and we are having pretty good successes in this area. We are having successes in areas like procurement. By buying in bulk we are getting better prices. We are cutting overhead costs. We have managed to save $110 million a year on office rentals. We are getting great productivity by utilising online technology to deliver services cheaper and better. Kiwis have really taken to doing business online. They like the convenience. They like the fact that they can do something from their offices or their homes. This year 35 percent of passports were renewed online through the internet 18 percent of companies filed their GST returns online—Hon Clayton Cosgrove: How many jobs did that create?NICKY WAGNER: —and 93 percent of personal tax returns were made online. The Hon Clayton Cosgrove asks how many jobs were created by that. Well actually every single time you cut the cost of doing business you have investment into more jobs. People have more productivity and businesses can increase and grow. But the runaway success of this online work is actually SmartGate at airports. Believe it or not since 2009 6 million people have used SmartGate. That is over 50000 a week. Now we are able to introduce that for US and UK passports as well. It is so much better. It is so much sooner and more convenient.Finally the last and most important priority to me is the rebuild of Christchurch. That is all about supporting people to get their homes fixed to get their communities restored and to rebuild our city—to rebuild the city of Christchurch and the small towns right throughout Canterbury. It is really important as the second-largest city in the country that we get back on our feet and back to being the entrance and the port of the South Island so we can continue to earn our living by exporting products to the world and by welcoming tourists to our city and also to all the other areas that they visit when they come through our city.So these are the Government’s first four priorities—the four important legs of our economic framework. That framework underpins the opportunities the health and the well-being of all New Zealanders. They may sound irrelevant but they have a key effect on every one of us. As New Zealanders we are interested in happy and healthy families safe communities jobs and a decent education for our kids and opportunities for their futures. For that we need economic stability.Right now every family is better off because we have got the lowest mortgage rates for 45 years and because wages are growing faster than inflation so household costs are down whether you pay your mortgage directly or whether your landlord pays his mortgage. Because we have managed the economy well we can pay for public services. We can keep our communities safe. We can fully fund the police and corrections so they can do a great job and they are. Crime is now at its lowest rate for 32 years and in the last year alone the crime rate has dropped by 11 percent. More important it has dropped in the tough areas. Violent crime has dropped by 7 percent and youth crime has dropped by 18 percent.Because we are managing the economy well we can invest in education and training. We are investing more for our little ones getting them into preschool education to getthem a good start. We are investing more for national standards so that no schoolchild will fall through the cracks—so that every child will have a really good basic education and the opportunity to build on that to develop job skills and for further education. We all know that National Certificate of Educational Achievement (NCEA) level 2 is about the minimum you need to be able to survive in our complex society and to be able to contribute. The latest results show that the number of young people getting NCEA level 2 is the highest ever. It has increased from 67.5 percent to 77.5 percent since 2008 which is a 10 percent increase. That has got to be a real bonus. We all want our young people to enjoy school to embrace education and to develop their skills so they can make the very best of every opportunity.Because we have managed the economy well we are also delivering better health services. More babies are being immunised and we know how important that is. More elderly people are getting operations for hips and cataracts and cancer treatment is now being delivered exclusively in New Zealand. There is no need to send Kiwis overseas. We are truly delivering better sooner and more convenient health care. Thank you.MIKE SABIN (National—Northland):That is a very wise choice Mr Assistant Speaker I am sure. I have such a commanding presence in the House Mr Cosgrove so I was the obvious choice. I want to focus a little bit on my electorate and the region of Northland and what this Government has been doing in that area. I am very pleased that this conversation will be heard by another Northlander Shane Jones. That will be welcomed. Northland is an area that is blessed with potential and dogged with underperformance. As a new MP—Rt Hon Winston Peters: Especially from the MP.MIKE SABIN: Opening an office in Whangarei Mr Peters does not make the New Zealand First Party suddenly become a massive presence in the lives of Northlanders. That is about all show and no do Mr Peters. I will welcome that member at any time to come up north and lock horns with me about what we are doing versus what that member is saying about Northland. That member has got a lot to say but he does not do much at all—he does not do much at all. Just visiting thewhānau back there in Whananaki does not make the difference. However I will refocus.Rt Hon Winston Peters: How many roads have you done? How many roads are tarsealed? Come on.MIKE SABIN: If the member took time to actually drive around the electorate he seems to now have such a love and affinity for he might know. Get up there and have a look—get up there and have a look. It is not just about having a coffee in your office. I will come back to my point. Mr Peters will I am sure enjoy my invitation to come and experience what Northland is actually about versus what he can see from the windows in his office.What I did as a new member of Parliament was to say: “What is the economic picture of Northland?” and we put together whole-of-region economic summits two in the middle of last year and asked 14 of the economic sectors of our economy to tell us what the enablers and constrainers were—Rt Hon Winston Peters: And then what happened? Nothing.MIKE SABIN: Listen up Mr Peters. Listen up. The member might learn something about what is happening in Northland at the moment. So what we did was we asked what the enablers and constrainers of the Northland economy are and what will help bring the potential to realisation. What we found was that across those 14 sectors 89 percent of the enablers and constrainers fell into nine very clear core themes. They were led off by infrastructure followed by local government the Resource Management Act the perception of Northland in the hearts and minds of New Zealanders theMāorieconomy the opportunities and the challenges around minerals the energy supply and the high-tech economy that Northland has to offer and is obviously waiting to unleash.So the purpose of the economic summits was to put together an action plan as to how we could develop—Rt Hon Winston Peters: No.MIKE SABIN: Listen up Mr Peters. Listen up. There is plenty to learn. The idea was to ensure that we had a whole-of-region economic plan that ultimately could be driven across sectors so that there was cohesion in how we actually realised that potential. The Northland Economic Advisory Group was born from that. It works with Northland Inc. in terms of a delivery mechanism to help work up—Rt Hon Winston Peters: And what’s happened?MIKE SABIN: —the potential from that. Well if the member listens I will inform him. Some 12 months on—he is leaning forward; he is waiting with bated breath for this—I will give some headlines as to what has happened. In terms of the infrastructure let us focus on that. Mid-next year we will be kicking off the fast-tracking of thePūhoi to Wellsford road of national significance a road that might not have started until 2017 possibly 2021.Rt Hon Winston Peters: That’s good for Dargaville!MIKE SABIN: We will be kicking that off—well it is actually good for Dargaville. If the member took the time to go and talk to some of his friends—the one or two that he has—over there what he would actually find is that the most significant and important component that they see to unlocking the potential of the Kaipara is actually the road of national significance. Those Matakohe bridges—do not worry because I have got a plan for those as well—will be aligned. They will be aligned.Rt Hon Winston Peters: Oh really?MIKE SABIN: Yes absolutely. There is going to be plenty of work going on there. That member will talk about it; I am doing something about it. In terms of the ah—Rt Hon Winston Peters: Oh you’ve forgot your place.MIKE SABIN: No no. I am coming to it; I am just repeating what the member does so often—he stumbles and stammers. When we look at the work that the Transport and Industrial Relations Committee and the Minister of Transport is doing here we are also looking at how to get better synergies across our regional roading networks. There is some very good legislation that I know the member Winston Peters will be keeping a very keen eye on. The review of KiwiRail—I am very confident that Northland’s potential the potential of Marsden Point and that port and the significance of rail infrastructure alongside road infrastructure means that we are going to get home on that.Local government reform—Northland has been dogged by challenges in local government. This Government passed legislation last year to ensure that regions like Northland can reform their local government structure. There is a process in place now for that to occur something that I am sure the Kaipara District Council will welcome with open ears given the travesty that has occurred there. When we look at the Resource Management Act we see that it is a major impediment to business development and the agricultural sector. That is being completely reformed by Amy Adams who I think is doing an absolutely stunning job as Minister for the Environment there cutting red tape simplifying consenting and getting rid of the vexatious stonewalling that we see so often. That has been welcomed with absolute open arms. That will be transformational in its nature.Rt Hon Winston Peters: Why is John Carter coming back?MIKE SABIN: Well I do not know. Ask him.Rt Hon Winston Peters: Well it’s your party.MIKE SABIN: Because he realises that Northland has got so much to offer. Now he is coming back to enjoy it. That is why.No longer will people like Winston Peters use Northland as the poverty whipping boy as the welfare whipping boy and as the poster boy for all that is wrong in New Zealand because this member and this Government is doing something about Northland. We look at the labour force. We look at what is going on in the labour force. We have reformed welfare. There are 90-day trial periods the youth start-up wage and the reforming of the Employment Relations Authority. We are increasing the Youth Guarantee and expanding the trades academies. I could go on but I am a disciplined member and will follow the instructions of my whip.I welcome the opportunity for Winston Peters to come and see what Northland is actually about. This Government is delivering for Northland and it is delivering for New Zealand.Rt Hon WINSTON PETERS (Leader—NZ First):I raise a point of order Mr Speaker. We all know that the House is the master of its own destiny so I move that that member be given a further 10 minutes to try to explain what he was saying in the last 10 minutes because it made no sense at all.The ASSISTANT SPEAKER (H V Ross Robertson): Well the House is the master of its own destiny but the problem is of course that the member cannot ask for leave for someone else.Hon CLAYTON COSGROVE (Labour):Mr Peters touched on a very important point. He identified a salient point in respect of the far north. We now know why John Carter is coming back after a very very swift tenure as an ambassador to the Cook Islands. It is because he is shocked and outraged at the lack of representation by that member over there Mike Sabin. Every member who has got up in this House including that one has been challenged by the Opposition to provide some simple numbers. Those simple numbers are the numbers of jobs created.Mike Sabin: Who got elected in 2011?Hon CLAYTON COSGROVE: He can barrack at me and have a go but it does not cover up the fact that he was asked and I challenge him now. I say to that member now that I will yield to him if he gets up and gives us the number of jobs that his Government has created in Northland. We know that Northland has the highest unemployment of any area in the country. We know and I will give that member some numbers: a 30 percent increase inMāori unemployment under his Government. He talked about pathways and strategies and task forces and priorities. All that the average Kiwi wants to know whether they be in Northland or Southland or Otago or the central North Island Mr Sabin is where the jobs are. They were promised in this Budget and others a brighter future. They were told that things would get better.Māori were told that there would be job opportunities for them. They have been let down and a 30 percent increase in Northland unemployment forMāori is an indictment on that member. No wonder John Carter is coming home I say. No wonder he is coming home.In Northland Sanford Ltd closed the oyster factory under this regime. I say this: if you ask any Kiwi around the country what they want from their Government they simply want something simple. They want a fair go—they want a fair go. They want a job. Why do they want a job? Because it provides some income and some dignity and some pride on the table. That pride leads to what this crowd talks about but does not create. That job that income leads to something called economic and social opportunity—a chance for mum and dad to get up on the ladder a chance for the first-home buyer who is in a job to try to get a house. That is what a job is about. That is what an income is about—opportunity. This crew over here crow about that. They say they have a legacy of creating economic opportunity but that legacy is not matched byany fact whether it be in that member’s electorate in the far north or anywhere else around the country.People want a fair go in respect of asset sales. They do not want them sold. People want a fair go in terms of housing. Young people cannot get up on the ladder. What do we say? We say we are going to build 100000 affordable homes over 10 years. What is National’s plan? No one knows. We say that we are going to put Kiwis—to quote Mr English but we will deliver on it—in terms of housing ahead of the queue and we will stop the foreign speculators coming.We say that we will train young people. We have a policy for the unemployment benefit to train young people and apprentices. Nicky Wagner talks about Christchurch. Well the great man Gerry Brownlee came to the Finance and Expenditure Committee today. What did he tell us? That 25 foreign workers are being imported into Christchurch every day. That is 9125 per year and it is 1/16th of the unemployment rate of 142000. We said to Gerry Brownlee this morning in public session: “Hang on a minute. Shouldn’t you consider the overall costs of things not just the price of a product or getting it the cheapest? Shouldn’t you also consider the transfer costs? When you are doing it cheap and you are importing it the people who are not being employed because you are not training them are on the dole and that is a cost.” But oh no; this crowd do not look at things holistically.People deserve a fair go and they want a fair go in respect of their power bills. John Key says: “Kiwis are not paying too much for power.” That is what he says. Simon Bridges as Minister of Energy and Resources said it as well. Well no one believes these guys.Mike Sabin: 72 percent.Hon CLAYTON COSGROVE: Is Mr Sabin prepared to go up to his peopleMāori and others in Northland and stand on the stump and say to them: “You lucky individuals—you should be grateful because you are not paying too much for your power.”?Mike Sabin: Under Labour it was 72 percent.Hon CLAYTON COSGROVE: Oh no—he has plenty of guts in the House here but he will not go out to Kaikohe and other places and make that claim on the stump. We say we have a power plan. We will bring those power prices down.We have talked about wages. We have talked about training. We say we will give people a fair go with housing. We will introduce incentives to move investment across from the obsession we have about housing speculation and into proper business investment. So we have a plan. Over there we have strategies task forces—all sorts of things. Remember the financial centre of excellence? That was going to be the big hit. It did not happen. Remember the “road to nowhere” the cycleway? That did not create any jobs. So we have a concrete and practical plan over here.I just come back to every member as they crawl their way into the Chamber and to the Minister for Social Development and ask them this: show me the jobs in the regions that this Government has created. Mr Sabin could not tell us. Ms Wagner could not tell us. They bring into Christchurch 25 brothers and sisters from overseas—good souls none the less—as we have 70000 to 80000 young people on the dole and they refuse to train them. They think if you throw a few coins at the polytechs—which are doing an admirable job—that that is training.These geniuses were so stupid. They had an earthquake in Christchurch—a tragedy—that is a massive economic opportunity an opportunity to train the 30000 to 40000 young people in trade training that we so desperately need instead of bringing in 25 of our brothers and sisters per day from overseas. I ask them whether that is a goodstrategy. Who is selling out whom? Where are the job creation opportunities for young people?I come back to this. Kiwis at their essence are not greedy people. They just want a fair go. A job gives an income. An income gives dignity and pride. An income allows you to go home as parents and look your kids in the eye as you paid for the bread you put on their table. It also gives an economic opportunity. You might—might—be able to put a little bit aside. You might be able to become a little bit entrepreneurial. You might be able to say to the wife or the husband or the partner: “We are going to plan and we are going to try to save for a first home.” But it does not help when the Government that was voted in undercuts those Kiwis and those basic Kiwi values and aspirations every time they try to have a crack every time they want to get a job every time they are looking for a training opportunity. Because yes there are some people who slip and slide around the economy; we understand that. But I say this because I believe in this country: 99 percent of Kiwis who are in that lost and lonely category would do anything to get out of it and are—to quote the National Party pamphlets—“ambitious for New Zealand.”Well if this is all National has got—a 30 percent increase inMāori unemployment in Northland—and if that is ambitious I am speechless. If that is the ambition that these people have—[Interruption ] Oh no; you do not get that lucky with me mate. You do not get that lucky. I challenge any of these speakers—the member for Taranaki Mr Young and others—to stand up and tell us just simply what Kiwis want to know. That is how many jobs have these people created? How many practical training opportunities have these people created? Not slogans not task forces not pathways not action plans—those are meaningless to people absolutely meaningless.They talk about fiscal restraint—they talk about fiscal restraint. Well I remind the Minister of Finance as he is on the phone to upstairs trying to work out who is leaking the next set of figures that 9 years of surplus is the legacy of the Labour Government. Nine years of surplus—not waste; surplus. I recall being attacked by that man because the National Party accused the then Labour Government of being too mean because we would not spend it. I say this: zero Crown debt zero Crown debt zero Crown debt.I invite these members to go back to the regions with the two-speed economy we have. Regional New Zealand is withering on the vine thanks to them i.e. Northland—withering on the vine. They will not tell us their unemployment plans. They will not come up and have anything practical but they are good with words and they are good with spin. I say they are out of touch. This Budget is out of touch. The 142000 people who languish on the dole queue every day thanks to this crew are the legacy of this Budget and the legacy of 5 long years—5 long years—of this country being in the wilderness and rudderless with an inward-looking Government that is more concerned with its own scandalous behaviour propped up by two rotten piles Mr Dunne and Mr Banks. This Government needs to get real. It needs to provide some real opportunities for Kiwis.Hon BILL ENGLISH (Minister of Finance):It is a pleasure to bring the Budget debate for 2013 to an end. It is a Budget that has been welcomed by the public but the debate about it in here has been particularly shallow as I think was indicated by the last speaker Clayton Cosgrove who was reiterating the best ideas that Labour had in 1994. Labour members are still talking about the same stuff. If there is a sense of unreality it is in the public’s understanding that Opposition members have not really moved from 1994 and the dynamics of that time. They are still talking to a world that is quite different from the one we are in.I just want to acknowledge today the resilience and the pragmatism of so many New Zealanders who are dealing with difficult circumstances with a positive attitude. Theyare trying to resolve their own problems rather than expecting everyone else to resolve them for them. We find in discussions with all sorts of groups across our community whether it is churches orMāori or iwi or social sector groups a strong sense of willingness to get to the nitty-gritty to resolve problems rather than hang on to them and repeat them for political benefit and increasingly a sense of optimism that we are starting to achieve some things.Just one stray fact that came across this morning is that youth offending has dropped by about 30 percent faster than the crime rate is dropping. I would be the last to claim that that is because of a specific Government programme. What it is because of is a commitment across a broad range of community initiatives supported by Government with action that makes a difference and a focus on the real issues. That is what is adding up to a difference. All that is going on in an economy that has clawed its way out of recession and is starting to show some optimism.There are some imbalances at the heart of this Budget. At the heart of this Budget is a strong focus on housing—Hon Phil Goff: 6.4 percent unemployment again.Hon BILL ENGLISH: —both affordable housing and social housing. I would like to point out to the member that this Budget included the most significant changes in State housing in 70 years with the broad support of the housing sector. We all realise that we can do a better job of assisting those who have serious housing needs as well as running a more efficient property portfolio run by the Government and more important affordable housing.The Government has taken a pretty straightforward view based on sound research. The thing that cuts a lot of Kiwis out of the housing market is restrictive planning laws that stop the supply of new houses. There are a whole lot of other things that have some influence on the housing market but this Budget is decisively focused on the biggest single influence. In the absence of action taken by this Government in that respect it is quite likely that interest rates would be rising sooner faster and in a way that would cost every household in New Zealand more. Interest rates probably are going to rise at some stage but the actions we are taking are pushing that back and putting less pressure into the housing market.The debate I think was characterised on the Opposition’s side by its shallowness. The problem for the Opposition is partly that it is still stuck in a period some almost 20 years ago now but partly that it is just not doing the work to refresh the centre-left’s intellectual way of looking at the policy world. It is just not happening. What the Opposition has relied on is that the politics will fall in its lap. The nasty Tories will slash and burn. They will cut services. The public will hate it and therefore vote Labour. That has not happened.In fact the striking feature of this Budget is that of all the developed countries we are one of the quicker ones to get back to surplus at the same time as increasing public services and improving the public’s perception of public services and that has been an achievement of the National-led Government and its support parties. What has become clear is that the thing that saves the Government money is a better-performing Public Service. What works for the community works for the Government’s books. When we educate a child properly in their first 12 years in the system we do not have to do it again. We save money. If we sort out the alcohol and drug problem of a prisoner in prison they are less likely to reoffend and if they do not we save $90000 per year. One of the more satisfying results of the policy of this Government has been the fact that prisoner numbers are now flat-lining and in my view will start to decrease reflecting the same kind of trend as youth offending.The Opposition got lazy and it has been caught out. In this Budget we have addressed the issue that worries middle New Zealand the most and that is the housing market both for the wider macroeconomic risks—if it goes up too fast and then collapses—but also because of the pressure on the back pockets of New Zealand families trying to get ahead. I think we have now finally persuaded the public that you can get back to surplus you can have responsible fiscal management at the same time as doing a better job for those in the wider community who are the most vulnerable and most in need of support.Finally can I thank our support parties. Putting Budgets together when you are a small support party is not easy but we have found strong pressure from each of our support parties—theMāori Party the ACT Party and United Future—to get what they believe is good for their constituents and New Zealand but at the same time there has been a willingness to resolve those tensions into a coherent plan. They deserve a great deal of credit for that and that is not always noticed.We are very proud of this Budget but of course we are only as good as the next one. We are only as good as the next one and the next Budget has to be about not just getting to surplus but delivering real benefits and improved public services—some real ambition there—and also allowing all those New Zealanders and their businesses and organisations to grow this economy. We know one thing: the answer to a better-growing economy is not the one we are hearing from the other side of the House which is more regulations and more tax. Everyone else knows that that is not the answer. What is the answer is more innovation more risk taking more savings more exports—more of the things that New Zealanders have shown they can do so well at even in the difficult circumstances of the last 4 or 5 years.A party vote was called for on the questionThat the Appropriation (2013/14 Estimates) Bill be now read a third time and the Imprest Supply (Second for 2013/14) Bill be now read a second time.Ayes64New Zealand National 59;Māori Party 3; ACT New Zealand 1; Independent: Dunne.Noes57New Zealand Labour 34; Green Party 14; New Zealand First 7; Mana 1; Independent: Horan.Appropriation (2013/14 Estimates) Bill read a third time.Imprest Supply (Second for 2013/14) Bill read a second time.Imprest Supply (Second for 2013/14) BillThird ReadingHon BILL ENGLISH (Minister of Finance):I moveThat the Imprest Supply (Second for 2013/14) Bill be now read a third time .Bill read a third time.Raukawa Claims Settlement BillFirst ReadingHon TARIANA TURIA (Minister forWhānau Ora)on behalf of theMinister for Treaty of Waitangi Negotiations: I moveThat the Raukawa Claims Settlement Bill be now read a first time. I nominate theMāori Affairs Committee to consider the bill. This Saturday is the unveiling of the headstone ofkaumātua GeorgeWhakatoiRangitūtia. Aswe remember him we remember his crucial leadership. George was the chair of the Raukawa Trust Board who started this latest negotiation phase and I know that today he would be very proud of this milestone. There are many others no longer with us but whose legacy is written into this legislation. This is a settlement built on the vision of honouring the words oftūpuna and building a strong foundation for tamariki mokopuna. Me hokiw’akamurikēahauw’akamua kaneke.The future is behind us.This settlement legislation is the absolute result of the Crown’s actions and omissions. In this first reading we acknowledge the impact of the Crown’s interventions upon Raukawa and on their commercial social cultural and spiritual relationships with the land and waterways in their rohe. There is no question that the Crown failed to prevent Raukawa from becoming virtually landless. This restricted their ability to participate in new economic opportunities and contributed to the economic social and cultural impoverishment of Raukawa. Inevitably then in anticipating what tomorrow will look like for them it is not just useful but vital that we look back over the history that has led us to today.In telling the story we must travel back to the wars of the 1860s. What this bill makes known now is that the Crown acted unjustly in sending Crown forces into the Waikato in July 1863 and occupying the land and the region between 1863 and 1864. The final battle of the Waikato War took place between 31 March and 2 April of 1864 atŌrākau. Approximately 300Māori a significant proportion of whom were Raukawa defendedŌrākauPā against up to 1800 Crown troops for 3 days. If ever there was a tale of David and Goliath this was it. One wonders at the courage and the grit and the determination of the people of this tribe in standing strong against great odds. As a result of the sacking of the peaceful town of Rangiaowhia many innocent Raukawa people were killed including women and children. Those who escaped found their way back to the paramount chief of the day Te Paerata who led Raukawa forces against the invasion atŌrākau. Some escaped but many were killed including Te Paerata.After that battle atŌrākau Raukawa participated in fighting in Tauranga particularly at the battles of GatePā and TeRanga including the bush campaigns. It was this support that led to the confiscation of the Raukawa lands and the earliest of the land courts. Raukawa trialled the land courts that would eventually sweep throughoutMāoridom. Because of their actions the Crown confiscated land at Tauranga and the Waikato that Raukawa had interests in as punishment for what the Crown regarded as rebellion. It is deeply ironic that the Crown returned some land to individual members of Raukawahapū residing in Tauranga but none to thehapū of Raukawa within Waikato. The loss of life and property because of war and raupatu had a severe impact on the overall well-being ofNgāti Raukawa.So today we think back to the confiscation of land and loss of life during those wars. We think about the alienation of land through the operation of native land laws and subsequent Crown and private purchasing and we acknowledge the impact of this history on the economic social and cultural impoverishment of this iwi. To give some sense of what we are talking about in a census at the end of the 1800s Raukawa were identified as one of the largest tribes of this country. Close to a century later in the 1980s Raukawa had been reduced to seeking alliances with surrounding tribes such asTūwharetoa Waikato Tainui and Te Arawa tribes to retain their identity. This then is when the transformation started to occur. At this time the descendants of Te Paerata and otherkaumātua of Raukawa resurrected the name of theirtūpuna under the mantle of the Raukawa Trust Board and filed their first claim Wai 443. These early trustees andkaumātua many of whom are no longer with us have paved the way for contemporary claims to be considered and negotiated. Some 28 years later in May 2008 Raukawamandated the Raukawa Trust Board to negotiate on their behalf for the comprehensive settlement of the historical Treaty of Waitangi claims of Raukawa. The Crown recognised the mandate on 23 September 2008. The rest is their history our history as a Parliament and our history as a nation.This is the day that we acknowledge Raukawa and their ancestors and their descendants. It is deeply interwoven through the hearts of the generations of Raukawa whose recent and past history is one devastated by suffering and hardship. It is a history that resulted in the loss of life and was destructive and demoralising to this tribe. In the legislation today it is noted that Raukawa has practisedmanawhakahaere kaitiakitanga and ahikāroa within their rohe. In saying this the Government pays tribute to the special relationship that Raukawa hold to the land and the waterways in this area. Waterways in particular have been the centre ofRaukawa’s commercial social cultural and spiritual life. So as a nui from the rivers ofW’angaehu andW’anganui I acknowledge Raukawa on this pivotal day.I want to thank Minister Finlayson for allowing me the privilege of opening the debate on this auspicious day. It is a day of tears a day of memories and a day to recall the enormity of the losses borne but also a day to anticipate the next steps forward. I have a deep affection for the peoples of Raukawa—in fact so much so that I have somehow managed to attract one of their brightest young leaders into my office.Tēnā koe Chris. Finally I mihi to VanessaEparaima the dynamic energy force who as the chair of Raukawa is tasked with implementing the outcomes of the settlement. I have to say that the pace of this settlement has been extremely slick and impressive. That reflects well on the leadership but also on the commitment tokotahitanga—the pursuit of a shared future horizon.There is a bold future plan included which other speakers will attest to today which encompasses a wide range of opportunities for development. I am particularly interested in two aspects of the settlement: the right of first refusal for 171 years over 84 properties owned by Housing New Zealand the Waikato District Health Board and the Crown should they be declared surplus to requirements; and the cultural fund and cultural redress package designed aroundRaukawa’s aspirations to reinvigorate their relationship with cultural sites of significance. There are particular aspects ofw’ānau ora—of our ability to thrive as people to plant a legacy for our mokopuna and to keep all our family safe and well now. I commend Raukawa for the vision and the commitment for this work. Finally I acknowledge Nigel TeHiko as the chief researcher and PhyllisTahere PatCowley Mal McKenzie and ThelmaReti as the backbone of that team. Most of all I pay my acknowledgments to the kuiakorohekepakeke rangatahi tamariki and mokopuna who seek to participate in new economic opportunities and challenges emerging within their rohe in the 21st century.Tēnātatou katoa.Hon SHANE JONES (Labour):Ākātitēnātātou katoai rotoitōtātou Whare. Kore he Wharehira atui rotoi te aotōrangapūi te Whare etūnei. Engā manuhirikuatatū mai ki TeŪpoko-o-te-Ika ki temātakitakii amātoungākaitōrangapūMāori me ōmātou hoaPākehātēnā koutou.Roanoatēneirangi etāriaana.Roanoatēneirangi ewhakaarohiaananā reiratēnei koutou emātakitakineipēhearānei te rere o tekōrero tetū o te tangata ki te tautokoi tewhakaarokuapaui a koutou ki tewhakairo ki tekapu o tepepangātahi mengā reo o teKarauna.Nā reira engāmātua engāwhaea engāhuangamaha o roto o Raukawatēnā koutoutēnā koutou.Mepēnei tetīmatanga heiwhakahuaake kiamau ki tekapu o tepepa ongākōrero kapupurutia ki rotoitēnei Whare mewhakahuaakei te roheiputa maiai koutouitēneirā. Maii aWairereHorohoro kiPōhaturoatū mairā kiŌngāroto te whare o te tupunanei aWhāita. MaiiNukuhou kiTaupō-nui-a-Tia kiHūrākia ki tepae maungaiHauhungaroa. Maii Titiraupenga Maunga ki Te Paeroa o Raukawa ki tetihi o te maunga a Wharepuhunga me te maraeiArowhenua ki tepae maungai Whakamaru; katitiro ki tewhānuitanga o te rohe ki TeKoakoaroa-o-Pātetere kiMaungatautau. Atuikonā ki Wharepuhunga ki te tupuna aHoturoa ki te maraeiParāwera.Tēnei iwi a Raukawamētōnaingoawhakakakara.Tēnā peahore hekōreroātaahua atui tepiringa o tetūpuna aTūrongo metanapōuriiriroi tetuatahi aRuaputahangai te tuakana aWhatihua katau tepōuri ki aTūrongo. Ka ahu atu ki roto oKauhungunu taerawa atu kiKahotea.Nōnai reira kawaihangatia te wharenānaiāwhina. Ko TeAngiangi teingoa o tehungarei.Kātahi katau tetitiro kirungai tewahinepūrotu aMāhinarangi.Kīhairawai tetuatahi aTūrongoimōhio ko wairāneitēneiwhakaihi.Otirānōtanarongongai tewhakakakara maiingārau o te kawakawakātahi katatūi a ia tewhakaaro kiariro maii a autēnāwahine hei hoapūmau.Kātahi kaputa ko Raukawa. Ko koutoungā mokopunangā uri owēnātūpuna rangatira o Te AoMāoritēnā koutoutēnā koutoutēnā koutou katoa.[Well then greetings to us in our House. There is no other House in the political world as great as the House that stands before us. To the visitors that have arrived in Wellington to watch usMāori politicians and our European counterparts greetings to you collectively. This day has been a long-awaited and thought-over one. So here you are watching to see in which direction the contributions will go and the position a person will take in support of the thoughts you each gave and crafted together upon the cusp of the paper in the languages of the Crown. Therefore greetings and salutations to you uncles aunties and many relations within Raukawa.I will begin by outlining the region where you have come from today so that places mentioned are captured and retained in the records of this House. It begins at TeWairere andHorohoro and goes toPōhaturoa whereŌngāroto the house of this ancestorWhāita stands. FromNukuhou it goes toTaupō-nui-a-Tia toHūrākia to the mountain range ofHauhungaroa. From Titiraupenga it goes to the mountain range of Raukawa to the peak of Wharepuhunga and the courtyard ofArowhenua to the mountain range at Whakamaru; and to gaze at the vast expanse of the region at TeKaokaoroa-o-Pātetere toMaungatautari. From there it goes to Wharepuhunga to the ancestorHoturoa to the courtyard atParāwera. This is the tribe of Raukawa and its name derived from the aromatic scent of the Raukawa plant.There is probably not a tale more beautiful than the one about the union of the ancestorTūrongo and his distress at the loss of his first loveRuaputahanga to his elder male relativeWhatihua. He was overcome with sadness. He then moved on to the Kahungunu region and eventually settled atKahotea. While he was there a house was constructed and he helped build it. TeAngiangi was the name of his father-in-law. In timeTūrongo’s gaze settled upon the beautiful womanMāhinarangi. He did not know at first who this betrothed woman was. But when the aromatic scent of the leaves from the Raukawa tree on her came to him he resolved immediately that he wanted that woman to be his wife. And so Raukawa was born. You are the grandchildren and descendants of those two noble ancestors ofMāoridom greetings salutations and acknowledgements to you all. ]We rise to support this Raukawa Claims Settlement Bill. This is a bill that relates to a tribe who are a living example of a very bleak period of New Zealand’s history in the North Island. Recently we were told about the stories of ahapū ofNgāti Kahungunu and the effects of colonisation on that part of Aotearoa. But the story that lies behind this particular iwi is a story that opens our eyes and reminds us about how voracious the appetite was amongst our settler pioneer colonial ancestors. They came with a voracious appetite for land and nothing—not the law not tikanga and not the gospel—was going to stand in their way.Ngāti Raukawa are a part of the broader communitythat we refer to inMāoridom as the upholders of theKīngitanga but in this particular story—and that is why this bill is so cleverly crafted—it tells the story that additional grievance was visited uponNgāti Raukawa when 20000 acres of their land was used to settle the grievances of a further dispossessed group ofMāori fromNgāti Kahungunu. In that sense it has got the resonance of the history of the Native American people: moving tribes of Indians from one particular part into Oklahoma and dislocating others. So we have got a little burst of that in our own history.The bill isolates the most egregious examples of what happened to thematuas of this iwi. It links their struggle to one of the most iconic battles in the history of the CrownPākehā and tangata whenua. I refer here toŌrākau. In addition to that it points out that once matters in Tauranga Moana reached the point of bloodshed they also suffered. So in many respects when we deal with this bill we are dealing with an iwi that have had the harshest form of treatment as a result of partly standing up for their rights and observing the obligations of kinship but also partly being at the wrong place at the wrong time and incapable of standing against the voracious appetite of the colonial land-gobbling taniwha. It is all laid out in this bill and although it may not make for pleasant reading unless we observe and acknowledge the debts of history it is difficult to imagine how a small group like this can successfully move forward.We will support this bill. We will take an active role in ensuring that the submissions coming to theMāori Affairs Committee are well received but if there are areas where the bill can be refined then both sides of the House—I have got no doubt in my mind—will have no hesitation in taking on such suggestions. The challenge for a select committee dealing with a Treaty bill is however that the tangata whenua on this side and the Crown on this side they make a deal. It is never a perfect deal because we are on the face of the Earth. We are not in heaven. You certainly are not in heaven when you are in Parliament. We can make only so many improvements because at the end of the day it is a pact between the leaders of theMāori community—whether they come in the form of ahapū or an iwi or as in recent times last week in a bill known as thetokotoru tapu or words to that effect. So they come in various shapes and forms but it is important that the members of this iwi realise that the bill will be expedited to the extent that it can be. There is no great politics of a divisive nature between this side of the House and that side of the House on these particular issues. Sometimes the exigencies of the parliamentary timetable and thekēhua known as urgency do interfere with the sitting time but I have no hesitation in stating that we will be supporting this bill.It is an area where in another time there would have been an inordinately large and flourishing set ofMāori communities. However the household labour force survey on unemployment is out today and I can assure you that forMāori families living in that area it does not make flash reading. We are dealing with a situation in which for many of theMāori families in this particular area young males are afflicted with an unemployment problem of 20 or 25 percent. This bill is not the elixir that will wipe all those problems away but it does provide what Eddie Durie—in times gone by when he was the president of the Waitangi Tribunal and not suing the Crown Forestry Rental Trust—talked about in the Waiheke Island claim report. He talked about a tribal endowment a capital base that the iwi can use rely upon and grow for future generations to grow the prestige of the tribe to maintain the tikanga to maintain the heritage and as time goes on to expand economic opportunities for the people not only of the iwi but of the community who live close to where the iwi is located. It is always a balance as to what can be transferred and what is available to be dedicated to an economic outcome.We have no hesitation on this side of the House in acknowledging the people here today and in working constructively with the Minister for Treaty of WaitangiNegotiations and the Government of the day to ensure that the bill enjoys an expeditious passage. Kia oratātou.Hon TAU HENARE (National):Meatuatahi kei a koe eaku rangatiratēnā koutou.Tēnā koutoui a koutoui haere maii rotoitōmātou Whare te Whare o te Raionatēnā koutoutēnā koutou ātēnā koutou katoa. Ki a koe ki a koutoungā mema o te Whareneitēnā koutou katoa.[The first thing is to you my elders greetings. Acknowledgments to you for coming into our House the lion’s den; greetings and greetings to you all. To you Mr Deputy Speaker and members of this House salutations to all of you. ]Having been around this place for a few years I have been able to listen to and see many Treaty settlements come and go. Without wanting to bewhakahihi which is sometimes my nature—Hon Shane Jones: No no.Hon TAU HENARE: —I said “sometimes”—this bill the Raukawa Claims Settlement Bill is one of the Treaty settlement bills that I have been looking forward to. My colleague my tuakana Shane Jones has mentioned one of the reasons why I have been waiting for this to come to the House. It is a glaring example of the theft of land and how the theft of land the confiscation of land can have such a devastating effect on the economy of its people its social make-up and its cultural make-up. You get all the three things that make a people tick and when that is taken away from you it leaves that entity in such an impoverished state that it is near nigh impossible to get out of. I take my hat off to Raukawa for being able to get out of it in such a way that they are still here today talking about their stories living the life that I am sure theirtūpuna would have wished for them.The settlement of this claim goes some way not all the way. It will never go all the way. We should know that—well we should; I am not sure whether Raukawa will—and we should accept that fact. My colleague Shane Jones talked about how iwi in America were moved from pillar to post and he is absolutely right. One of the stories out of America that I liken to a number of settlements and in particular this settlement is the Trail of Tears. The iwi there moved their whole kit and caboodle thousands of miles and then were turned away after being welcomed into Canada. They turned round and had to go all the way back.To have your own land used to settle somebody else’s grievance is I think to me worse than the act of confiscation. Who knows what the relationship was between Raukawa and Kahungunu. I am not sure and I will not try to figure that one out. But can you imagine the confiscated lands being given to your “enemy”? It beggars belief.Like my colleagues around the House I look forward as the chair of theMāori Affairs Committee to visiting the area and hearing the stories and the submitters on this bill. One of the peculiar things we face as a committee when we do these settlement bills is that we cannot change settlement bills unless of course the two sides agree. I have to say that for a long time until very recently the committee never delved into trying to change settlement bills. We had minor success.My last point is this. I make a call not only to Raukawa but to any of the community that so wishes and feels the need toto make a submission because there are far too many times when people do not make a submission and then they wake up one morning and want to moan and the deal has been done. Well the time to moan and the time to support as well is at the select committee. It is at that stage of the passage of the bill. I am sure I speak for all of my committee members when I ask submitters to please make it interesting. Do not copy the last 50-odd submissions so that it becomes just a bit of an exercise.Again I want to say to the Minister for Treaty of Waitangi Negotiations that he is one out of the bag. He is the sort of person who sees that there is a job to be done and goes for it. I think we have seen the number of settlements that have come across our table in our time as the Government as a testament—not boasting—that these things have to be done. I also want to thank my Labour colleagues Green colleagues New Zealand First colleagues andMāori Party colleagues for the collegial job that we do on theMāori Affairs Committee and not only for Treaty settlement bills. I have no compunction whatsoever in recommending the passage of this bill. Kia ora.RINO TIRIKATENE (Labour—Te Tai Tonga):Ātiheiwa mauri ora ki tewhaiao ki Te AoMārama. Eaku rangatiraNgāti Raukawatēnā koutou. Haere mainau maipiki mai ki te WharePāremata ki teana raiona etakatūnei. Haere mai ki tewhakatutukiingāwawata orātoumā.Nō koutoutēneirā;nō reiratēnā koutoutēnā koutou. Erau rangatiramāhurinoai te Wharetēnā koutoutēnā koutou ātēnātātou katoa.[Behold the breath of life to the World of Light and Enlightenment. ToNgāti Raukawa my esteemed elders greetings to you collectively. Welcome and come hither to the House of Parliament the lion’s den standing in readiness ascend it. Come forth to realise the aspirations of those who have passed on. This is your day; therefore congratulations and acknowledgements to you collectively. To the many leaders throughout the House greetings salutations and acknowledgements to you collectively and to us all. ]Like an orator with a favouritepepeha once again I stand and say that to understand whakapapa is to understandMāori history. Whakapapa is the ties that linkMāori by a common strand of DNA and it is about how the history of the past is for ever remembered by those of the present because of a shared history with a common ancestor. But whakapapa genealogy and oral history—kōreroonamata (ancient history )—is not about just the ancestors of past times; it is also about the here and now. It is about what is happening in the present and being able to guess what the future holds.I would like to welcome thewhānau fromNgāti Raukawa who are here. It is a great privilege for me to stand to tautoko this Raukawa Claims Settlement Bill at this first reading. It is in my time as a member on theMāori Affairs Committee that we have been able to listen to and read the historical accounts of iwiMāori who have been able to settle their grievances with the Crown. I also endorse thekōrero of our chair my whanaunga Tau that the history contained in these bills should be taught in every school throughout the motu throughout the country. I know that other speakers will talk specifically about the various elements and redress thatNgāti Raukawa will receive in this bill but for today I would like to take the time as I do tokōrero about those extraordinary times of the 1860s and the significance of those times relative to today.The 1860s brought significant upheaval in our young nation. Governor Thomas Gore Browne’s hui for loyalistMāori atKohimārama in 1860 proved thatPākehā Governments had no real intention of investigatingMāori hope and aspirations of the time for in 1862 the return of George Grey—HōriKerei—from South Africa was about to set the scene once again. Fresh from oppressing natives and coloureds over in South Africa he blew back into the country in the early 1860s to finish off what he started in Waitara 20 years earlier in starting the first Taranaki Wars. Also he managed to kick up some dust by crossing the Mangatawhiri in July of 1863 thereby starting the Waikato Wars. TheKīngitanga’s refusal to sell any more land ultimately forced the Governor and Parliament to invade the Waikato. In the 1860s the New Zealand Parliament was semi-autonomous and Grey still had some executive powers. It was at this time thatRaukawa as staunch supporters of theKīngitanga were drawn into the WaikatoKīngitanga confederacy because of that thing called whakapapa that I spoke of earlier.Ngāti RaukawaNgāti Maniapoto WaikatoNgātiHauā—these great tribes of the Tainui had shared a common ancestry but on a more contemporary level there were many families ofNgāti Raukawa who had intermarried with the families of Waikato and the Tainui confederation ofKāwhia as well asNgāti Maniapoto. It was this genealogy that made theKīngitanga strong. It was their staunchness that put pressure on Auckland and the Government. Grey master of the conquer-and-divide method of operation brought in New Zealand’s next biggest wave of immigrant: the soldier. Grey brought 18000 soldiers into this country during his second term as Governor. Raukawa suffered because of this whakapapa but especially at Rangiaowhia east of Te Awamutu in February and a few months later in March and April atŌrākau in the year 1864.Ōrākau was the place where innocent people were slaughtered as they fled from their trenches. It was during this battle that Rewi Maniapoto gave his famous retort to GilbertMair’s plea for theMāori to surrender.Rewi’s famous words were translated as: “Friend I shall go on fighting you for ever and ever.” Rewi was a fighting chief ofNgāti Maniapoto and leader of one group of rebels that included many individuals and families ofNgāti Raukawa. They joined because their immediate aunties uncles cousins and grandparents were in direct conflict with Crown forces. For those Raukawa families immediate whakapapa would have been the link—immediate kin of today rather than a shared common ancestor of some 800 years previously. Like in the Waikato there were Raukawa families who were related to the Tauranga tribes and were also drawn into the conflict in 1864 and 1867 in the Bay of Plenty. By the time Grey had Waikato and theKīngitanga suppliant there were still pockets of Raukawa resistance in parts of Tauranga.In 1865Raukawa’s interests in Waikato-Tainui land were extinguished which seriously affected their ability to sustain and maintain their tino rangatiratanga and their mana motuhake. They lost important leaders in their conflict with the Crown. Some carried the stigma of the term “rebel”. Well the Crown of the 1860s may have thought they were rebels then but today the Crown thinks of them as victims of an oppressive colonialist Government and will make the necessary apology to Raukawa and also redress.This bill will also address one of the country’s most shameful pieces of land legislation the 20000 acres lost from thePouakani Block which eventually turned into the incorporated township of Mangakino whose beneficiaries are from a completely different tribe Kahungunu from southern Wairarapa. Could there be a more visible wrong than this travesty of justice? People from Wairarapa having mana over 20000 acres in the township of Mangakino—could there be a more poisonous example of how to alienate rightful owners from their land?But that was not the only case of Raukawa being left out of certain entitlements that were negotiated in the 1860s. They were left out of theTaupō-nui-a-Tia Block and this also is a great mamae within the manyhapū ofNgāti Raukawa. The omission atTaupō caused much suffering to thosehapū of Raukawa. The incidences of thePouakani andTaupō-nui-a-Tia land blocks are a glaring example of Government oppression and ignorance. Being from the south a very similar situation occurred there as “landless natives” folks from the top of the South Island were given lands right at the bottom of Stewart Island to compensate them for their landlessness. These stories are very prevalent right across the country and it is great that we can bring them to light through the enactment of this legislation. With the enactment of this settlement bill thewhānau andhapū ofNgāti Raukawa will be able to start their road back to economic wealth and sustainability.I am looking forward to joining with my colleagues on theMāori Affairs Committee as we awhi the progress of the bill through this House and in particular to hearing submissions up inNgāti Raukawa territory. I would just like to conclude my contribution there and I mihi toNgāti Raukawa who have travelled down here today. I commend this bill to the House. Kia oratātou.DENISE ROCHE (Green):Tēnā koe Mr Deputy Speaker.Tēnā koutoutēnā koutoutēnā koutou katoa. Kingā whanaungai te WharePāremataneitēnā koutoutēnā koutoutēnā koutou katoa.[Thank you Mr Deputy Speaker and greetings salutations and acknowledgments to you all. To the relationships in this House of Parliament greetings salutations and acknowledgments to you all. ]I rise to speak on the first reading of this bill the Raukawa Claims Settlement Bill on behalf of the Greens and I maintain that it is a privilege to do so. Firstly I would like to acknowledge those in the gallery today who have travelled from Tokoroa and Te Awamutu. I particularly want to acknowledge the chair of the Raukawakaumātua kauniheraHōri Dean; thekaumātua James Clare and Lorna and Ross Pope; the deputy chair of the Raukawa Charitable TrustKataraina Hodge; the chair of the Raukawa Settlement Trust VanessaEparaima; trusteesMalvina McKenzie John Stokes and Chris McKenzie;Raukawa’s Settlement Trust chief executive officerMahangaMaha; and Treaty team members Nigel TeHiko and PhyllisTāhere. I know I will have forgotten a lot of people who are up there in the gallery today and I mihi to you as well. For those in the gallery and those who are watching this at home this is a great day because this is the first part of creating legislation that addresses the injustices that Raukawa ki Waikato have lived with since 1860.I also want to acknowledge those who are not here today. On the long journey there have been very many people over many generations who have worked to bring this settlement to the House. In particular I acknowledgekaumātua GeorgeWhakatoiRangitūtia who passed away nearly a year ago to the day. As the former chairman of the Raukawa Settlement Trust he played a huge role in the negotiations and his work was in turn a continuation of the work that his father had done before him. The first claims were lodged in the 1980s but the journey to this day started long before then.I also want to acknowledge and thank the Minister for Treaty of Waitangi Negotiations Chris Finlayson and the member of Parliament for the area Louise Upston for their actions on the day that the deed of settlement was signed at Aotearoa Marae during the Queen’s Birthday weekend last year in taking the deed to Waikato Hospital so that GeorgeRangitūtia could sign the document. It was a great gesture and a completion of a life’s work to have thiskaumātua sign the document on behalf of the settlement trust.I do have to declare my interest. In Raukawa there is a saying: ko Ranginui tetuanui koPapatūānuku te papa kongāpoutūārongo keiPikitū ko tepoutokomanawa keiNgātira kongāpoutāhu keiTārukenga kei TeNgākauōnamaihi taka mai ki TeWairere kiHorohoro.[Ranginui is the roof Papatūānuku is the floor the rear pillars are at Pikitū the central pillar is at Ngātira the front pillars are at Tārukenga and Te Ngākau and the front barge boards hang downwards in the direction of Te Wairere and Horohoro. ]My iwi is Raukawa. Myhapū isNgātiHuri. Our marae isPikitū as is mentioned in the saying. Before entering Parliament I voted on this settlement and I was honoured—very honoured—to join the Crown on the signing of the deed of settlement at Aotearoa Marae last year.The importance of the apology that the Crown has offered can not ever be underestimated. In the bill—and in the piece of law that it will become—clause 10(2) ofthe apology says: “The Crown profoundly regrets and unreservedly apologises to Raukawa for its actions and omissions that led to the virtual landlessness of Raukawa in the Waikato and which caused suffering and hardship to generations of Raukawa.” Those actions and omissions of the Crown are listed in the deed of settlement.Other speakers have outlined in detail some of those injustices. For the record I will include some of them. These injustices include the fierce reactions from the Crown toRaukawa’s involvement in theKīngitanga movement and the Crown’s actions against Raukawa during the 1860s wars in Taranaki Waikato and Tauranga and the subsequent loss of Raukawa lives and the destruction of property. They include the confiscation of land in 1865—the raupatu—the creation of the Native Land Court and the introduction of laws that saw the alienation of Raukawa from their land the gifting of the 20000 acres of thePouakani Block to an iwi with no ancestral ties to the land and the refusal of the Crown to recognise the iwi status of Raukawa until the late 20th century a subsequent failure to respect the rangatiratanga of Raukawa.Section 3.10.2 of the deed of settlement document sums it up pretty well. It reads: “the cumulative effect of the Crown’s actions and omissions particularly its failure to actively protect the interests of Raukawa in the land it wished to retain left Raukawa virtually landless by the mid-twentieth century. The Crown’s failure to ensure Raukawa had sufficient land for their present and future needs was a breach of the Treaty of Waitangi and its principles.”Looking at the settlement it is obvious that the Treaty negotiation team have done a really good job in bringing this settlement to the House today. It also remains clear that Raukawa have been very generous in accepting the terms of the deal. The redress offered by the Crown will never ever compensate for the incredible losses this iwi have endured.The commercial redress package if the central North Island forestry deal is included comes to around $50 million but we need to put this amount into the context of other Government spending. I have said this before when commenting on the commercial redress in Treaty bills. We need to remember that the Government bailed out South Canterbury Finance to the tune of $1.2 billion and those investors did not lose their mana or their land.Too often we find the commercial redress packages for iwi are criticised by New Zealanders who are ignorant of our nation’s history. The history outlined in the House today in the settlement deed and in the bill is acknowledged by both the Crown and Raukawa as being accurate. It saddens me to have read of this terrible suffering of mytīpuna and to know that the ignorant in our society will call this attempt to right some of those wrongs a gravy train. As a nation we have a long way to go to educate all our people on these Treaty settlements and the partnership arrangement betweenMāori and the Crown which represents everyone else in Aotearoa New Zealand.The cultural redress aspect of this bill is also really important especially when we consider that Raukawa were not officially recognised by the Crown as an iwi until around 1988. Ensuring that Raukawa are named and have their relationship with local authorities and Government departments outlined in legislation enshrinesRaukawa’s rightful relationship with their traditional resources which include geothermal areas lands rivers and maunga and it means that right cannot be disputed.But it does not mean that Raukawa are the only iwi with claims in the area. Along with these negotiations neighbouring iwi have also been involved as these areas have shared cultural value. I note that Raukawa have been involved with the co-governance deal on the Waikato River and with Maniapoto on theWaipā River. Of course there may also be other iwi orhapū from whom theMāori Affairs Committee may hear whofeel that they have been left out of the process. That is not surprising given that it is the Crown that dictates who it will and will not negotiate with.For the record I should state that the Green Party position on these Treaty settlement bills is that we do not believe they are a full and final settlement. It cannot be a final settlement when there are generations of Raukawa to come who will be affected by the injustices of the past and it is not a full settlement because how can you compensate for what has been lost? Raukawa are generous in accepting these terms. It was a very good deal but it was a deal none the less. Having said that this is a day of celebration. I acknowledge that this is the time for Raukawa to plan for their future with a much better economic base.I will end with the last part of the Crown apology which says: “The Crown apologises for its past failures to acknowledge the mana and rangatiratanga of Raukawa and looks forward to building an enduring relationship of mutual trust and cooperation with Raukawa that is based on respect for the Treaty of Waitangi and its principles.” It is my sincere hope that we can move forward with that in mind.Nō reiratēnā koutoutēnā koutoutēnā koutou katoa.CLAUDETTE HAUITI (National):Ki TeWairereHorohoroPōhaturoa koŌngāroto koWhāita e.Nukuhou kiTaupō-nui-a-Tia kirunga oHūrākiaHauhungaroaTītīraupengaArowhenua Wharepuhunga Whakamaru Te Paeroa o Raukawa.Titiro atu ki TeKaokaoroa-o-PātetereMaungatautari katitiro ki Wharepuhunga koHoturoa koParāwera ko temanawarā oNgāti Raukawa e. Ki te iwi oNgāti Raukawa mihi atu ki a koutou katoa.[From TeWairereHorohoroPōhaturoa toŌngāroto toWhāita there alas. FromNukuhou toTaupō-nui-a-Tia and up onHūrākiaHauhungaroaTītīraupengaArowhenua Whakamaru and on to Raukawa range. Look upon the vast region of TeKaokaoroa-o-Patētere toMaungatautari and gaze at Wharepuhunga it isHoturoa and the heart ofNgāti RaukawaParāwera alas. To the tribe of Raukawa I salute you all. ]The purpose of this Raukawa Claims Settlement Bill is to give effect to the deed of settlement signed by the Crown and Raukawa. The Crown failed to protect Raukawa from becoming landless and the lack of land and resources undermined the ability of the iwi to participate in new economic opportunities in its rohe. This contributed to the economic social and cultural impoverishment of Raukawa. This settlement rights the wrongs of the past and allows Raukawa to build a stronger future.Raukawa grievances include the Waikato and Tauranga wars of the 1860s and the confiscation of Raukawa land following that conflict. The introduction and implementation of native land laws facilitated the alienation of Raukawa and the Crown’s failure to ensure that Raukawa had adequate lands for its present and future needs contributed to the economic social and cultural impoverishment of Raukawa.The Crown acknowledges that its actions arising from interaction with Raukawa were in breach of the Treaty of Waitangi and its principles. Clause 10 states: “(2) The Crown profoundly regrets and unreservedly apologises to Raukawa for its actions and omissions that led to the virtual landlessness of Raukawa in the Waikato and which caused suffering and hardship to generations of Raukawa. (3) The Crown deeply regrets its actions during the New Zealand wars of the 1860s which resulted in the loss of life and was destructive and demoralising to Raukawa. (4) The Crown apologises for its past failures to acknowledge the mana and rangatiratanga of Raukawa and looks forward to building an enduring relationship of mutual trust and cooperation with Raukawa that is based on respect for the Treaty of Waitangi and its principles.”Raukawa will receive approximately $52 million which includes value transferred under the central North Island settlement in 2008 and estimated interest. Raukawa will have the opportunity to purchase part of the Pureora North Crown forest licence landand will also have the opportunity to purchase up to 25 Crown-owned properties within a deferred selection period after settlement date ranging from 6 months to 5 years. Ten of these properties would be subject to lease back to the Crown. Raukawa will have the right of first refusal for a period of 172 years over 36 Crown properties.The settlement provides support for the strengthening of commercial relationships between Raukawa and Mighty River Power. Raukawa will receive $8 million to explore future commercial arrangements with Mighty River Power. Mighty River Power owns and operates hydroelectricity generation along the Waikato River in areas of cultural significance to Raukawa. The settlement includes an $8 million payment to Raukawa to assist Raukawa and Mighty River Power to enter into commercial arrangements if they so choose. The payment does not impose any obligations on either party.Cultural redress recognises the traditional historical cultural and spiritual associations Raukawa has with places and sites within their rohe or areas of interest. These include the vesting of 11 sites andMaungatautari. The Crown acknowledges thatMaungatautari is of significant cultural historical and spiritual importance to Raukawa and other iwi. The settlement provides for the interests of Raukawa to be recognised in the future transfer ofMaungatautari to tehapori oMaungatautari theMaungatautari community; a $3 million fund to assist Raukawa to negotiate the sale of or access arrangements to sites of significance; and apouwhenua fund which is a $50000 fund to assist Raukawa in the creation and erection ofpouwhenua at sites of significance. In respect of theWaihou River the deed provides for the interests of Raukawa to be recognised in any future arrangement reached regarding theWaihou River within the Raukawa area of interest.Overlay classification acknowledges the traditional cultural spiritual and historical associations of Raukawa sites of significance. The declaration of an area as an overlay classification provides for the Crown to acknowledge iwi values in relation to that area. The settlement provides overlay classifications over the maunga Pureora o Kahu and maungaWharepūhunga. A statutory acknowledgment recognises the association between Raukawa and a particular site or area and enhancesRaukawa’s ability to participate in significant Resource Management Act processes.The settlement also provides acknowledgment over several reserves. The settlement provides a deed of recognition over Crown-owned parts within the Raukawa area of interest part of LakeŌhākuri theWaihou River and theArahiwi Scenic Reserve. In respect of place name changesŌmāhine Stream will becomeMāhina-a-rangi Stream a currently unnamed historic site at the confluence ofŌmāhine Stream withWaiōmau Stream will be calledWhatawhata and a currently unnamed historic site at the source ofŌmāhine Stream will be called Whenua ā-kura. Those will be the place name changes under this deed.Kotahi tehinengaro kotahi te wairua kotahi tengākauarā katipuai temāramatanga ka rereai tetūmanako kapuāwaiai te aroha. With one mind one spirit one heart understanding grows hope soars and love blossoms. I commend this bill to the House.NICKY WAGNER (National—Christchurch Central):Ngā manuhirinōNgāti Raukawanau maipiki mai kitōmātou Wharekōreronau mai ki rotoi te kaupapa o terānei.[To the visitors fromNgāti Raukawa welcome to our speaking House; ascend it and participate in the matter for today .]It is good to see the Raukawa Claims Settlement Bill come to the House. I understand how much time and effort goes into getting to this milestone and I congratulate the people of Raukawa on their commitment to their people on their patience on their determination and on their diligence in getting to this place. I alsorecognise and grieve the passing of Raukawakaumātua and kuia who have contributed to this settlement. As a member of theMāori Affairs Committee I promise we will work hard and respectfully to pass this legislation through as quickly and as efficiently as possible. It is always exciting to see another claim nearing settlement. Since we have been in Government since 2008 we have watched 40 such claims and there are more in the pipeline.I come from the South Island. I come from the area the rohe ofNgāiTahu and so I have seen with my own eyes the value of these settlements. I have seen the benefits to the people ofNgāiTahu and I have seen the benefits to the rest of us who live in the South Island. It has been particularly relevant recently after our earthquakes. It has been relevant becauseNgāiTahu are jointly responsible with local government and central government as partners to rebuild Christchurch and Canterbury. They have a strong leadership role in cultural social and business recovery.NgāiTahu took a very important part in the emergency response immediately after the earthquakes and that immediate response has continued. Now they have a particularly significant role in the development and the property sector of the rebuild of our city and our province. I believe that without this settlement which goes back to the 1990s they would not have the capacity and they would not be in the position to contribute so importantly to this role in our time of need.It is right that the grievances of Raukawa have been recognised in this bill it is right that the Crown has apologised for breaching the Treaty of Waitangi and its principles and it is right that the Crown has apologised for its actions during the New Zealand Wars of the 1860s. It is also right that the Crown apologises for causing suffering for causing hardship and for the demoralisation of the Raukawa people. Looking forward it is also right that the Crown recognises the mana and the rangatiratanga of Raukawa and looks forward to building an enduring relationship of mutual trust and cooperation based on the respect of the Treaty of Waitangi and its principles.I and all members of theMāori Affairs Committee—and you have heard them speaking today—look forward to working with the Raukawa people and officials from the Office of Treaty Settlements to deliver this claims settlement legislation to the best of our ability and we will try not to take too long either.Nō reira engā rangatiranō Raukawatēnā koutoutēnā koutoutēnā koutou katoa.[So to you the chiefs from Raukawa greetings salutations and acknowledgments to you all. ]LOUISA WALL (Labour—Manurewa):Engā mana engā reo engāwhānau o Raukawa.Tēnā koutoutēnā koutoutēnā koutou katoa. It is my pleasure as a member of the LabourMāori caucus to stand here to tautoko this first reading of the Raukawa Claims Settlement Bill which is a translation of this document the deed of settlement that Raukawa have entered into with the Crown.In acknowledging this deed of settlement I want to acknowledge that from April 1988 the Raukawa Trust Board has been formally recognised as an iwi authority. That is incredibly important in this process as we all know because that entity was then recognised by the Crown asRaukawa’s mandated entity to enter into what is a Treaty settlement process for Raukawa. Today is an end of that journey in some respects for Raukawa and so I acknowledge that. I would also like to acknowledge the deed of settlement which had 94.42 percent of iwi support and also 93.19 percent approval for the Raukawa Trust Board to be the governance entity to receive these funds to receive this redress and to work on behalf of the people of Raukawa.So what does this piece of legislation say? I am going to take a brief call as I am no longer a member of theMāori Affairs Committee. It is a pleasure for me to be involved in these settlement processes—our true reconciliation process as a country. But it isalways very interesting to look at what is constituted within this particular piece of legislation. Firstly the Crown apologises for basically two things. One is the conflicts of the 1860s which did result in loss of life for Raukawa. I want to highlight theŌrākau battle. In fact it was within thatŌrākau battle that Raukawa chief Te Paerata was killed. That is obviously significant for thewhānau of Raukawa. What I want to acknowledge about that particular battle was that thewhānau of Raukawa were outnumbered basically seven to one. They held the fort but eventually there was loss of life of up to 160 members of the Raukawawhānau.So these settlements are actually very serious. We had our own land wars our own civil war here in Aotearoa New Zealand. I think we always must remember that these pieces of settlement legislation are a formal acknowledgment of the loss of life in our own country through our own land wars and we must never forget those. The other highlight for me always is about the confiscation of lands because essentially that is what this compensation package is always trying to redress—loss of life and loss of land.Raukawa had 1 million acres of land and how much of that land was taken from them? Well 923358 acres. So today essentially Raukawa has 7 percent of the land that they had before colonisation. When we look at these settlements—and Denise Roche my Green colleague touched on the generosity of Raukawa—we always must remember that the settlement that we have come to today is because of Raukawa. The settlement that Raukawa have entered into is a fraction of what was taken from them. That is what we always should record here in the House through the Treaty settlement process: that ethic of generosity that all iwi have engaged inin allowing us to come to a place of peace and also allowing Raukawa to come to a place of getting some of those assets back working those assets on behalf of their 30000 members.The other part of this piece of legislation I want to highlight is the cultural redress. My colleague Claudette Hauiti has outlined some of those. But I particularly want to focus on the place name changes. For me this is about the whakapapa of Raukawa. This is about thepunga the footprints that Raukawa will have going into the future.Ōmāhine Stream is going to be calledMāhina-a-rangi Stream. Obviously that is incredibly significant for Raukawa. So for ever more that stream will be named after Raukawatūpuna. That is incredibly important. There are also two unnamed historical sites. The confluence ofMāhina-a-rangi Stream with theWaiōmou Stream is to be calledWhatawhata. Again that is incredibly significant for Raukawawhānau. Another unnamed historical site at the source ofMāhina-a-rangi Stream is to be called Whenua ā-kura. So what is in a namewhānau? A lot. These Treaty settlement processes provide redress but they also provide I believe a pathway for the way forward. We guarantee that Raukawa will for ever on their whenua have the place names that signify the whakapapa of that whenua.Finally I just want to talk a little bit again about the financial and commercial redress—$52 million essentially for 923358 acres of land. I have not done the maths today about what an acre is worth within the whenua of Raukawa but what I want to always record on the record is my position as part of the Labour caucus in being incredibly—how can I say it? There is a lot of gratitude that we have forMāori for our iwi in this settlement process for allowing us as a nation to move forward positively. All I can say as a member of Parliament is thank you to Raukawa. Thank you for your ability to enable us as a nation to move on.Nō reiratēnā koutoutēnā koutoutēnātātou katoa.TIM MACINDOE (National—Hamilton West):Kia ora e te ManaWhakawā.Tēnā koe e te Whare. Kia ora engā mihii te iwi Raukawangā mihi nui ki a koutou. I will take a short call as I had not been expecting to speak in this first reading debate ofthe Raukawa Claims Settlement Bill but I want to extend greetings from the Government senior whip and member forTaupō Louise Upston who is a Government member of theMāori Affairs Committee and who very much regrets that she is unable to be here today to support this very important measure. As a fellow Waikato member of Parliament representing the western side of Kirikiriroa home of the stadium at which a magnificent back-to-back Super 15 title was secured by the mighty Chiefs last Saturday—and my colleagues would have been so disappointed if I had not got that in somewhere—I do want to acknowledge in all seriousness the losses that Raukawa suffered in the 19th century. In particular I acknowledge the goodwill of the iwi in their negotiations of this deed of settlement. They were not only losses of the 19th century but obviously losses subsequently to the present time. Kia ora and thank you all for that.Like my colleague the Hon Tau Henare I also pay tribute to the outstanding work of the Hon Christopher Finlayson Minister for Treaty of Waitangi Negotiations who will close this first reading debate shortly. I acknowledge his dedication and boundless energy in meeting the demands of this major portfolio. He is playing a major role in helping this nation to resolve deep and longstanding injustices and I admire his work immensely.My colleagues on all sides of this House have covered the major provisions of this bill and obviously the Minister will touch on more of them shortly. So I want to thank all members for their constructive contributions and for the unanimous support of members for this bill.This is an important and a historic day for Raukawa and for our country: mewhakanuia etātou [we should celebrate it ]. Kia ora.MEKA WHAITIRI (Labour—Ikaroa-Rāwhiti):He reoparikārangarangai te Wharenei karanga mai karanga mai karanga mai. Karanga mai engā uri mokopuna o te tipunamāreikura o Heretaunga aMāhinarangi o te waka tapu oTākitimu. Ka moe iai aTūrongo o te waka Tainuiarā kaputanā tekakara o terākaurongonui ā ko Raukawa. Katū mairā koutoui te WharePārematanei. Hepānuituatahi o tewhakataunga ongā whenua raupatu ongākerēme o te Tiriti o Waitangi. Mihi mai mihi mai mihi mairā.[A resounding voice calls this House calling calling and calling. Call the grandchildren and descendants of the noble ancestressMāhinarangi of Hastings and of the sacred canoe ofTākitimu. She marriedTūrongo of the Tainui canoe and Raukawa was born as a consequence of the aromatic scent from the famous tree. You stand in this House of Parliament here. It is the first reading of the settlement of confiscated lands of the Treaty of Waitangi claims. Extend your greetings salutations and acknowledgements. ]It is fitting that I take my first call in this House of Representatives to stand in solidarity with myMāori Labour caucus members and the House as a whole in supporting this bill the Raukawa Claims Settlement Bill to the House. It is fitting because I am a descendant of theNgāti Kahungunu ki Wairarapa people who were through the actions of the Crown dispossessed of Lake Wairarapa and relocated toPouakani. By standing in support I acknowledge the remaining mamae that this action causes the people of Raukawa.Nōreira e tewhānautēnā koutou katoa.But today is a day of celebration. It is a day of acknowledging the hard mahi of the people of Raukawa and the commitment to getting to this point. As a former mandated negotiator forRongowhakaata I can share with you my emotions sitting where you are today for the first reading of our bill. There were mixed emotions tinged with sadness for those no longer with us and mixed emotions of excitement for what lies ahead. So from me to all of you here today I mihi to you for getting us to this point.To Minister Finlayson thank you for your support in bringing this bill to the House. It is not an easy journey to get here but I know the efforts of all—be it the negotiators be it the officials—to get us to this point and I congratulate you all.Members on this side of the House have touched on the details of this bill but for me and as I said in my maiden speech last night it is about economic development in a post-settlement era. You the people of Raukawa have not been given all the tools but you have been given a good start to aspire to those aspirations and those goals on behalf of yourhapū and yourwhānau and your iwi. So I commend you again for your commitment and your undertaking to bring this bill to the House.I am just sitting here thinking about how quiet this House becomes when we are dealing with Treaty bills. Maybe the House can take a lesson from that—when it joins together in unification on settling Treaty settlements.I just want to touch on the particular parts that I am interested in around the mechanisms that will unleash and unlock your economic potential particularly around your overlay classifications your statutory acknowledgments and your deeds of recognition. Can I commend and support theiwi’s desire to not only protect your taonga in terms of waterways and whenua but also unlock their economic potential should you so wish.There is a role for the Government to support the people of Raukawa. The burden of addressing what has befallen your people should not rest on your shoulders alone. Settlements are merely to help replace in some small part what has been taken away from you as people many many years ago. I know that with the support of my Labour Party colleagues particularly theMāori members we are committed to supporting the aims and aspirations ofwhānau ofhapū and of iwi. I have not much more to add but it has been an absolute honour to stand and commend this bill to the House. Can I say in closingnō reirairōi tewhakataukīnei aNgātai Huata ka ora tewahinepuapua ka ora tewhānaupuāwai ka ora tehapūpuawānanga ka ora te iwipūrotunō reiratēnā koutoutēnā koutoutēnā koutou katoa.[So in this aphorism fromNgātai Huata it says if the woman is cherished then the blossoming family the satellite subtribe and the beautiful tribe will do well greetings salutations and acknowledgements to you all. ]Hon CHRISTOPHER FINLAYSON (Minister for Treaty of Waitangi Negotiations):I too extend a very warm welcome to the representatives of Raukawa who have joined us today for this occasion. They may be wondering why I as the Minister in charge of the Raukawa Claims Settlement Bill was not here for the first speech. The reason for that is quite simple. Mrs Turia is the local MP and she asked me whether she could give the first speech because of her fondness forNgāti Raukawa. When Mrs Turia asks someone to do something you do it and the reason quite apart from the fact that she is the local MP I have to confess is that she is my favourite politician—utterly principled and a very decent woman. In this place folk say that it takes a lot of courage to stand up to one’s enemies. Well it takes a lot more courage to stand up to one’s friends. That is what Mrs Turia did 10 years ago and she won. I just wish that she would forget about retirement and decide to follow Mrs Thatcher’s dictum to go on and on and on.So that is why she gave the first speech. But I acknowledge that it takes skill and courage to reach a settlement. The Raukawa negotiating team has navigated this very tricky river with pragmatism with leadership and with diligence. It is because of these dedicated people that we are here today and I certainly want to pay tribute to them. I acknowledge past and present negotiators Chris McKenzie VanessaEparaima Nigel TeHiko and PatriciaCowley. I think Stephanie O’Sullivan David Bennett has just said to me is not here today but she is watching it on television and I wish her all the verybest. She has done great work forNgāti Raukawa. I first met her when we were still in Opposition in about 2006 with Chris in Hamilton. I know how much she means to the iwi and how much the iwi means to her.But I particularly want to say a few words about GeorgeRangitūtia who has passed away. He championed Raukawa with wisdom and with humility and leadership. I have many memories of George. George the quiet leader. George who just settled things down at that airing of grievances in Tokoroa some years ago. George the very kind host who picked me up at the top of theKaimais one beautiful summer’s morning in January in the bus. With members of Raukawa we drove around the rohe and he dropped me off nearTaupō because I was heading off to be shown the Whanganui River by Archie Taiaroa the next day. The sad thing is that both those fine fine people are gone. So I always remember George as a kind host on that beautiful day and I remember George the ill but optimistic patient. I was very pleased to go and visit him with Louise Upston on the day we signed the deed of settlement. We got his signature on the deed and that was a very special occasion for me.I want to thank Denise Roche for her very kind words. I was frankly in a state of shock because it is the first time a Green member has said anything nice about me. In fact I was so shocked—Hon Trevor Mallard: She’s been smoking!Hon CHRISTOPHER FINLAYSON: Speaking of enemies I hear Mr Mallard piping up. Judith Collins was so surprised she called me over for counselling and wondered whether something had gone wrong. But anyway I want to thank Denise. I will treasure that memory. I want to acknowledge all these people because they have played their part but I particularly want to place on record my deep respect and affection for George and I wish his family all the very best on this special day.Raukawa are no strangers to this House. In 2008 they were here as a party to the central North Island forests land collective settlement legislation. In 2010 they joined us here along with their neighboursNgātiTuwharetoa and Te Arawa to witness and celebrate the passage of the NgatiTuwharetoa Raukawa and Te Arawa Iwi Waikato River Act 2010. The aim of that legislation as you yourself know Mr Assistant Speaker Tisch—not that I am bringing you into the debate but simply to say in passing that as the MP for Waikato you know—is to restore and protect the health and well-being of the great river that flows through your electorate.Raukawa are again our guests today this time for the final steps to their settlement journey. It does address the longstanding historical grievances of Raukawa which are many as this House has said. I thank particularly Mr Tirikatene for his contribution. These matters are long overdue for settlement because what happened up there was simply unjust. I do recall so very well the airing of grievances in Tokoroa when the elderly lady stood up and said that she was forced out of her home because of Public Works Act takings and hydroelectric development in that part of the country and that she resisted going until the waters were just about lapping at the entrance.These unjust actions started in the 19th century and continued right through to the mid-20th century and what they did resulted in the economic social and cultural impoverishment of Raukawa and their special relationship with their lands and waterways. These are not formulaic statements; they are statements from the heart particularly as a result of having got to know these people and the utterly justifiable claims that they have had over such a lengthy period.These grievances started with the wars of the 1860s in the Waikato where the loss of life and property through armed conflict through occupation and through raupatu had such a severe impact on the well-being of Raukawa. Picking up on what Mr Tirikatene said and coming back to that day in Tokoroa I too recall the statements aboutMangakino and thePouakani lands and so on and the utter unfairness of that. It is unfairness that repeats itself year in and year out and I know that it has been—to call it an irritation minimises it—a severe question for Raukawa over the years. Mind you it was not very fair toNgāti Kahungunu ki Wairarapa either. Of course they were given that land because I think people thought it was worthless and then after World War II it proved to be economically viable. What happened there was simply unfair and unbecoming of the Crown and that is why we have these settlements. That is why as others have said it is important to know the history of what happened.So the Crown acknowledges that it has breached the Treaty of Waitangi and its principles in its relationship with Raukawa. It failed to protect the mana and the rangatiratanga of Raukawa. It failed to protect Raukawa interests in customary resources and significant sites. That is why we have had a settlement. That is why this legislation was introduced. That is why I am so very keen to see the legislation move through the House as quickly as possible so that it can be legislated for before the end of the year.Last week I was talking to Vanessa who was a little bit upset that perhaps it was not debated last week and I said to watch this space. We have managed to get it done quicker than either of us thought. I am just so very pleased that now the bill will be off to theMāori Affairs Committee led by the great Mr Henare and his team. They are going to be very busy because they are dealing with the Te Tau Ihu Claims Settlement Bill where there are eight settlements and thehaka; theNgāPunawai o TeTokotoru Claims Settlement Bill where there are three settlements; theNgā Mana Whenua oTāmakiMakaurau Collective Redress Bill; theMaungaharuru-TangitūHapū Claims Settlement Bill; and now this bill. So I simply say to the members of that committee and to Mr Henare in particular that there is no time to muck around. You have got to knuckle down get these bills through the system and get them back to the House as quickly as possible.Hon Member: Listening Tau?Hon CHRISTOPHER FINLAYSON: Of course he’s listening because he is an outstanding chair of theMāori—the member is listening is he not?Hon Tau Henare: Yep.Hon CHRISTOPHER FINLAYSON: He is an outstanding chair of theMāori Affairs Committee. He is a great friend and colleague and I know that he is going to get these bills back post-haste.Bill read a first time.Billreferred to theMāori Affairs Committee.Subordinate Legislation (Confirmation and Validation) Bill (No 2)First ReadingHon CHRIS TREMAIN (Minister of Internal Affairs)on behalf of theLeader of the House: I moveThat the Subordinate Legislation (Confirmation and Validation) Bill (No 2) be now read a first time. I nominate the Regulations Review Committee to consider the bill.This is a routine technical bill and it comes before the House every year. However it is a very important bill all the same. The bill confirms or validates items of subordinate legislation that must be confirmed or validated by Parliament. This is a requirement of the empowering Acts under which the various orders or regulations have been made. The role played by the House in confirming or validating the various items and the scrutiny provided by the Regulations Review Committee provide a layer of protectionin the regulation-making process. Should the House decide to withhold its approval for a particular regulation or order contained in the bill that regulation or order will lapse.In its report on the 2012 bill the Regulations Review Committee acknowledged that it is not reasonable or practicable to introduce subordinate legislation bills in the first half of the calendar year. However the committee also recommended that in order to allow time for scrutiny of the implementation of the policy the Government look at introducing these bills earlier in the year than has been usual—preferably on 1 August or as close to that date as possible. I am happy to report that the Government has introduced this year’s bill as soon as it was practicable.This bill covers a range of regulations—24 orders. I will not delay the House’s time in considering each of these regulations. They will be there in the regulation within the bill. I commend this bill to the House.Hon TREVOR MALLARD (Labour—Hutt South):I do not understand why the Government is filibustering this Subordinate Legislation (Confirmation and Validation) Bill (No 2)! It is one that is relatively simple. It is an annual bill. It goes off to the Regulations Review Committee. If there are particular orders in there that the committee wants to draw the House’s attention to it will. Otherwise there will be smooth passage.KATRINA SHANKS (National):It is my pleasure to take a brief call on this Subordinate Legislation (Confirmation and Validation) Bill (No 2) this morning. As previous members have stated this is a bill that comes to the House every year. It validates and confirms subordinate legislation such as commodity levies and other orders. It comes to the Regulations Review Committee. The select committee basically writes to the Ministers and departments about the levies or the orders that are in place to see whether they are still to be confirmed. The Ministers and departments write back and acknowledge that they should be and then it gets reported back to the House. It is a fairly swift process but it is a very important process because if we do not have this legislation those orders or levies will lapse. I look forward to seeing it in the Regulations Review Committee. I commend this bill to the House.Hon DAVID CUNLIFFE (Labour—New Lynn):I look forward to taking at least three 5-minute calls on this Subordinate Legislation (Confirmation and Validation) Bill (No 2). They say that making legislation is like making sausages—they taste good in the end but you do not want to see them being made. Occasionally what happens in Parliament is that lots of little bits and pieces of legislative offal get bundled up and sent to themincer in the Regulations Review Committee. That is basically what this bill is. It is the conveyor belt for the bits and pieces that the Regulations Review Committee has got to pore over look through the entrails of the legislative process and make sure that the sausages we make in the next little while are fit to eat. Thank you.IAIN LEES-GALLOWAY (Labour—Palmerston North):This will be just a very brief call like other members have taken. The Subordinate Legislation (Confirmation and Validation) Bill (No 2) is a technical bill. It is a fairly regular piece of legislation that goes through.I would simply like to take the opportunity to reflect on the fact that from the War Pensions Act 1954 the lump-sum payments and rates of pensions and allowances are validated and confirmed by this legislation but what—Hon David Cunliffe: Terrific.IAIN LEES-GALLOWAY: —which is a great thing and the people who receive war pensions will be very happy about that. They will be much happier when the Government finally gets on with the job of implementing legislation following the review of the War Pensions Act that was initiated by Labour and carried out by the LawCommission. That has been a long time coming. I know that veterans up and down the country will want to see that happen.I suspect that there will be a few private pilots as well who will be interested in the levies raised by the Civil Aviation Authority. The Regulations Review Committee may find that it has more public interest in that than it might have otherwise suspected. But otherwise like my colleagues I am very happy to see the passage of this legislation.STEFFAN BROWNING (Green):I stand to speak to the Subordinate Legislation (Confirmation and Validation) Bill (No 2). The reason I am taking a call is due to the Commodity Levies Act aspects of this bill. We support those commodity levies and it always concerns me when some productive sectors sometimes choose not to. These levies are absolutely critical both for those organisations to do advocacy for their producer members and also to help organise markets and to do research.There is one shortfall unfortunately through the Commodity Levies Act and a real gap and that is the organics sector which does not have any call on those levies. Organics producers who are often growing to a different management system pay their levies because everyone should if they are producing and marketing through the various forms of marketing from a farmers market if you are a vegetable grower right through to the big exporters. They pay their levies but getting research done and having control of some of the money even proportionate to their size does not happen. That is a real shame because there is a growing international market and even in New Zealand we have had good growth in organics. Even in recent years when there was a bit of a downturn internationally I think Britain was the only place with issues around the global financial crisis.We have seen great growth in organics. We think there should be a lot more. If we did have some of that money going back into research we might not have some of the problems we are having even with our principal co-op in this country at the moment. There are some real issues about some of our productive systems that end up biting us on the butt as such because of the sheer nature of how the production happens. Some of the information around some of the supplementary feeding to bovines to cattle suggests that some of the bacteria that are involved around botulism for example are enhanced through some of the material that is being fed to animals. That needs further investigation.But back to the productive sector—[Interruption ] Excuse me? [Interruption ] I go back to the productive sector in terms of the Commodity Levies Act. We want to see the organics sector grow. It is a safe sustainable direction for New Zealand. It supports the “clean green” New Zealand brand—“100% Pure New Zealand”. The organics sector and best-practice organics help that no end. I will give just a couple of figures. In 2007 the organics market in New Zealand was worth $205 million in 2009 it was $275 million but by 2012 that had boosted up to $350 million. That is the size of the New Zealand market. Internationally it is absolutely massive. We have got growth between 2009 and 2012 of course of 400 percent. Those people deserve to be getting their slice of the levies and it is something that hopefully a future Government will ensure. If we do it through a voting system it is unlikely to happen because people are sick of paying extra levies. We just need to find a device that will split up the levies and that ensures that the organics sector gets some.So that is the main point. The Greens will be supporting this bill but we want to see some changes in the future to the Commodity Levies Act. Thank you.IANMcKELVIE (National—Rangitīkei):That speech from Steffan Browning was a wonderful advertisement for organic chicken.I have got great pleasure in supporting the Subordinate Legislation (Confirmation and Validation) Bill (No 2). I look forward to it coming before the Regulations ReviewCommittee where we will no doubt as Mr Lees-Galloway said have a significant debate about it. I also just wanted to remind Mr Cunliffe that offal is the best part of the sheep—the most tasty part by a mile. Thank you.DENIS O’ROURKE (NZ First):New Zealand First is satisfied that the content of this bill the Subordinate Legislation (Confirmation and Validation) Bill (No 2) is suitable for a subordinate legislation bill. The only matter I would flag at this stage concerns Civil Aviation Authority charges. As a private pilot myself and a member of the Canterbury Aero Club I have been contacted by many of my fellow club members expressing concern about constant increases by the Civil Aviation Authority concerning its charges. So that is something that I will be having a close look at. But subject to that New Zealand First will be supporting the bill’s referral to the Regulations Review Committee at this stage.MIKE SABIN (National—Northland):I also stand in support of this bill the Subordinate Legislation (Confirmation and Validation) Bill (No 2). I will welcome it with open arms when it arrives at the Regulations Review Committee this year. Last year we looked at subordinate legislation bills and thought: “Is there a more pragmatic way for us to pull on the levers and the mechanics of the Parliament to ensure that what needs to be done here can be achieved?”. We have brought this forward a little bit. It is a necessary piece of legislation. I am happy to commend it to the House.TIM MACINDOE (National—Hamilton West):I support the Subordinate Legislation (Confirmation and Validation) Bill (No 2).DENISE ROCHE (Green):I rise to take the second call on the Subordinate Legislation (Confirmation and Validation) Bill (No 2). As discussed—The ASSISTANT SPEAKER (Lindsay Tisch): Excuse me you said “the second call”. Is this a split call or is this a—DENISE ROCHE: A split call.The ASSISTANT SPEAKER (Lindsay Tisch): A split call—a 5-minute split call.DENISE ROCHE: Yes sir.Iain Lees-Galloway: I raise a point of order Mr Speaker. Labour does not intend to take its call so the Green member can take as long as she likes.DENISE ROCHE: Thank you very much. As discussed this is a reasonably straightforward bill. It is essentially a tool to ensure that regulations contained in the primary Acts are confirmed and validated. A good part of this bill has a focus on issues to do with regulations that have levies in them. It refers to the Biosecurity Act 1993 the Civil Aviation Act 1990 the Commodity Levies Act 1990 the Customs and Excise Act 1996—with regulations that prohibit the importation of 10 kilograms or more of trout or trout products for a further 3 years and increases the duties on tobacco and alcohol—the Land Transport Act 1998 the New Zealand Superannuation and Retirement Income Act 2001 the Social Security Act 1964 the Road User Charges Act 2012 the War Pensions Act 1954 and of course the Gambling Act 2003 and that is where I will focus my comments.This bill confirms the Gambling (Problem Gambling Levy) Regulations 2013 which is the levy that is paid by gambling operators to cover the costs of problem gambling. This levy is the amount of money that is paid by casinos pokie-machine operators the Lotteries Commission and the New Zealand Racing Board to the Commissioner of Inland Revenue and it is passed through the Inland Revenue Department to the Ministry of Health and then to the agencies that deal with problem gambling.It is pretty ironic that this bill is being put to the House today when the Gambling (Gambling Harm Reduction) Amendment Bill that was brought to the House byMāori Party MP Te Ururoa Flavell is being discussed in the Committee of the whole House later today. That was a bill that really would have made some changes in terms ofreducing the incidence of problem gambling. However once it was brought back to the House it was essentially gutted of all its good bits that would have dealt with the problem-gambling issue.But going back to this bill and the gambling levy there is a consultative process undertaken before the levy is set. The gambling industry pokie-machine owners casino owners and the lotteries all get involved and attempt to justify why they should not have to pay very much for problem gambling. Usually they trot out the argument that in this country we spend more per capita on problem-gambling services than any other country in the world. Well of course they want to pay less for the gambling levy because that will increase their profits.The levy is negotiated every 3 years and is based on a Ministry of Health strategy that deals with problem gambling. It is interesting that when this levy was being negotiated the Ministry of Health recommended a substantial increase in the levy paid by the casino operators. The reason for this was that research by the Ministry of Health has shown that a person is more likely—five times more likely in fact—to develop a problem with pokies that are located in casinos than with pokies in pubs and clubs. However the casino industry is extremely successful in its negotiations and it has continued to pay a levy that is approximately half of what other pokie owners pay. That is an interesting fact.Another interesting fact about this levy is that although it is determined in order to pay for problem gambling it does not actually pay for the results of problem gambling. So for example this levy does not cover the food banks that are dealing on a daily basis with people who front up because they have no money because they have spent it on the pokies. This levy does not cover the crime that is associated with problem gambling the businesses who lose money and the not-for-profit organisations that lose money because their staff have stolen it and spent it on the pokies. This levy does not pay for that.I guess I have made my point about this levy. We will be supporting this bill but I did want to take the time to talk about the problem gambling levy. Thank you.Dr JIAN YANG (National):I support the Subordinate Legislation (Confirmation and Validation) Bill (No 2). Thank you.A party vote was called for on the questionThat the Subordinate Legislation (Confirmation and Validation) Bill (No 2) be now read a first time.Ayes120New Zealand National 59; New Zealand Labour 34; Green Party 14; New Zealand First 7;Māori Party 3; ACT New Zealand 1; Independents: Dunne Horan.Noes1Mana 1.Bill read a first time.Billreferred to the Regulations Review Committee.The House adjourned at 1 p.m. (Wednesday)