Kaye Nikki; Rurawhe AdrianHon NIKKI KAYE (National—Auckland Central): I raise a point of order Mr Chairperson. I'm really reluctant to do this because I can't actually think of a time in my political career when I have stood up and been on the edge of questioning a ruling but I am looking at the scale of the Supplementary Order Papers (SOPs) that have been tabled and there are a number of members who have individual SOPs who haven't even had the opportunity to talk to them. I would just potentially like firstly to put this on record for all of New Zealand that is watching: that this side of the House has spent hours drafting legislative amendments—literally hours—many of which are in individual people's names here. You've got members of the Education and Workforce Committee you've got other National MPs and we have not had the opportunity from my perspective but also from my colleagues' perspective to adequately outline them to the committee. So I just want to put that on record. I don't know whether the Chair wants to make any comments about that?David Seymour: Speaking to the point of order?CHAIRPERSON (Adrian Rurawhe): No.David Seymour: I raise a point of order Mr Chairperson.CHAIRPERSON (Adrian Rurawhe): No I'm going to make a ruling now and I'm on my feet. The member will be seated.David Seymour: Are you now saying that we—CHAIRPERSON (Adrian Rurawhe): No sit down. I am ruling on a point of order. David Seymour: This is outrageous.CHAIRPERSON (Adrian Rurawhe): I am ruling—David Seymour: You don't even know what the point of order is.CHAIRPERSON (Adrian Rurawhe): Mr Seymour?David Seymour: Yes?CHAIRPERSON (Adrian Rurawhe): You need to be seated. David Seymour: Do you know what the point of order is?CHAIRPERSON (Adrian Rurawhe): I am ruling on a point of order—David Seymour: That's completely outrageous. I mean you actually do have to take—CHAIRPERSON (Adrian Rurawhe): No what is outrageous is when the presiding officer asks a member of this House to be seated while he is making a ruling on a point of order—to try to stop that. That will lead to disorder and the member will be seated.David Seymour: Well the presiding officer would have more authority—CHAIRPERSON (Adrian Rurawhe): I have got two sanctions available to me: one is to send the member out of the Chamber; the other is to name the member. I will use one of them if the member is not seated within the next five seconds. I will use at least one of them. David Seymour: Well if there's no debate then there's no point.CHAIRPERSON (Adrian Rurawhe): The member will leave the Chamber now thank you.David Seymour withdrew from the Chamber.CHAIRPERSON (Adrian Rurawhe): My comment is that the honourable member Nikki Kaye has put her view on record. That is now on record. The point of order is actually out of order. I have made that ruling. For the member's benefit and for members of the whole committee we have had at least 33 calls on this part of the bill. I would say that I believe I have been very generous in allocating calls. I will also put on record as well that I gave several warnings last night. I did not accept five of the six closure motions; I could have and I have this morning OK? And that's the end of that matter. I will not be entertaining any other interjections or points of order that could lead to disorder.Barbara Kuriger's tabled amendment to Supplementary Order Paper 122 amending new clause 9(6) is out of order as not being in the form of legislation.