Henare PeeniHon PEENI HENARE (Labour): Kia ora Madam Chair and thank you very much for the opportunity. There were a couple of matters that I thought were left on the table for the Minister to answer. One of those in particular was the second part of the question or the second leg of the question by my colleague Arena Williams and that was about the Mana Whakahono. The Mana Whakahono part talks to those who are iwi authorities who are already engaged or who wish to initiate the engagement. My question to the Minister which was alluded to by my colleague is for the example given by Ngā Puhi for the well over 100 hapū who—Simon Court: We've had this one.Hon PEENI HENARE: It wasn't answered Mr Court. That's why we're asking again. The 100 hapū—Hon Grant Robertson: Point of order. I apologise to my colleague for interrupting. There are longstanding provisions in Speakers' Rulings that members shouldn't move to improve their position in order to interject and Mr Court was consistently interjecting through Mr Henare's contribution from a seat that is definitely not his.Simon Court: Just responding to the point of order—CHAIRPERSON (Maureen Pugh): I don't think it's necessary Mr Court. Thank you very much.Hon PEENI HENARE: Madam Chair thank you very much. It is important the question about Mana Whakahono and the 100-plus hapū of Ngā Puhi—some of whom are already authorised iwi authorities. Some aren't yet have been recognised through a Waitangi Tribunal process that has heard from those hapū with respect to their mana i te whenua their ability to have interests across their rohe across their lands. I'm asking the Minister because I'm sure they'll be curious how they'll be engaged in this. The Mana Whakahono provision is quite clear here. But for those who aren't an iwi authority here but yet are recognised through the claims process in the Waitangi Tribunal and in other forums I'm wondering whether or not the Minister has any suggestion for Ngā Puhi or advice for Ngā Puhi hapū—and the many hapū around the country—about how they might be able to be engaged here.I also ask with respect to the Treaty provisions here 5(1)(b) and it talks in there and yes relating directly to the fast track to support the capacity of the relevant party to participate effectively in those discussions including by providing appropriate resources;". Madam Chair I'm wondering: what do the appropriate resources look like to the Minister and to the ministries here? For example when the Labour Government was involved in this it wasn't just money. It's talking about bandwidth it's talking about capacity it's talking about expertise and skills. I'm curious here whether or not the Minister has thought about what these resources are and how he might be able to explain to those iwi and hapū how they may be appropriately resourced in order to engage in this.The next question I have is around the report backs through 5(2)(b). It says here: "use the Crown's best endeavours to promote the enactment of the Bill not later than 18 months after the commencement of this clause." and moves into (3) and says "The Crown must also—(a) monitor the progress of the matters set out in subclauses (1) and (2); and (b) make a report to the relevant party on progress every 3 months after this clause and clause 7 come into force." My question here to the Minister is when we look towards the regular three-month updates there's going to be a number of questions that iwi and hapū will have so I'm going to offer some of these here now: one who exactly will he be reporting through? And by through I mean the agency or is the Minister expecting his office to directly engage in that? Two does the Minister have a strict key performance indicator on both the 18-month report back as well as the three-month report back to the relevant party? I'm sure many will be interested to know there are a number of events coming up in the coming months where I'm sure that iwi and hapū will want to hear from the Minister with respect to these particular parts of his repeal bill because the Treaty settlements have often been spoken about in this House as sacrosanct and now here we are; we seem to be going back on them.I think I've left three maybe four questions on the table for consideration by the Minister. Just finally from me with respect to the Mana Whakahono the Minister said that none were officially engaged or have officially signed up to be Mana Whakahono but that doesn't preclude the fact that many have already been on a journey to sign to a Mana Whakahono agreement under the legislation that's being repealed today.I just want to hear once again from the Minister confirmation whether or not it simply goes back to the Resource Management Act process and if so then how does that impact those who have come on their journey to be a mana whakahono in the consideration after this bill is repealed by this Government?"