Boyack RachelRACHEL BOYACK (Labour—Nelson): Thank you Mr Speaker. It's a pleasure to have the opportunity to take five minutes to reply to my colleagues from across the House for what I think has been a really informative debate about the role of the Cawthron Institute and the importance of this bill.I'm just going to respond to some of the comments and I'd like to start with my colleague Michael Woodhouse who made a very useful observation at the beginning of his speech that is very important and very important to the trust board which is that a lot people don't actually know about the work of Cawthron. It's a particular issue that we at the trust board discuss at every meeting: the importance of ensuring not only does the Nelson community know about the work that we do but that the people of Aotearoa New Zealand need to know. It's one of the reasons why during the 100 years of Cawthron I ensured we had a parliamentary function here so that my fellow parliamentarians could learn more about the incredible work of the Cawthron Institute.On that note I'm really grateful to the number of MPs from across the House and there are MPs certainly from the Labour Party from the Green Party and I know in the past from the National Party who visit the Cawthron Institute—they really enjoy having visitors. The most recent visitor I took through was the climate change Minister James Shaw. They really enjoy having visitors. I would really encourage any member to reach out to me as both the local MP and as a trustee if they want to learn more about Cawthron or have a visit. And I'm putting that invitation first out to my colleague Mr Baillie because you and I are both from Nelson Mr Baillie and I must say I am somewhat disappointed that ACT aren't supporting this bill through to first reading.There's a couple of comments I want to make on that. The first is around your reference to remuneration. Actually currently the trust board members can't be remunerated. The legislation has actually been updated since the legislation you referred to and that explains exactly why we actually need a clean piece of legislation. We have multiple pieces of legislation. We had the Thomas Cawthron Trust Act made in error when it amended the principle Act and we have two High Court judgments. So for those of us who sit around the governance table of Cawthron for anybody seeking to interpret that for legal purposes it's very important that we tidy this up because currently we're actually presenting a lot of legal risk to Cawthron. So we have met the test of the Standing Orders as advised by the Clerk to ensure that we can actually put this bill into the House. There is a very high threshold for having a private bill. So I am somewhat disappointed and would really welcome the opportunity to take Mr Baillie to a meeting with some fellow Cawthron trustees.I just want to respond to my colleague Mr McKelvie. I'm very sorry that we're not sending this to the Governance and Administration Committee the best committee in Parliament but we are sending it to my new second-best committee: the Economic Development Science and Innovation Committee. I note he made some very worthwhile contributions about the role of Cawthron's work in researching in primary industries. The original focus was very much focused on agriculture and horticulture. We still do a lot of that but in today's climate—climate" is probably the appropriate word—a lot of the focus is now on aquaculture on seafood on oceans on water on climate change and on soil research which is incredibly important.So as my colleague Dan Rosewarne noted one of the organisations that we do research for is King Salmon and some of that research has been very important. King Salmon locally in Nelson has lost a lot of money because of fish death because of warming waters. It's a very significant and serious issue for one of the largest companies in my electorate. So one of the things that Cawthron have been doing is stress testing particular genetic lines of salmon to see which ones can survive in warmer waters. It's important that we do that work so that King Salmon can continue to provide some of the best protein to the world and provide a large number of good quality jobs in Nelson.My last thanks is to my colleague Rino Tirikatene who's worked closely with me on this bill. There's one particular piece that the select committee will need to look at and that is the spelling of Te Tau Ihu. Te Tauihu Iwi Chairs want it to be two words and I know there are some who would like three words. While it might seem like a small issue it will be something important for the select committee to grapple with. I wish them well; I look forward to joining them at committee for considering the bill. Finally I commend the bill to the House."