VoteCHAIRPERSON (Maureen Pugh): The question is that the debate on this question now close. All those in favour please say Aye to the contrary No—[Interruption] The votes are taken in silence please. A party vote was called for on the question That debate on this question now close.Ayes 68New Zealand National 49; ACT New Zealand 11; New Zealand First 8.Noes 55New Zealand Labour 34; Green Party of Aotearoa New Zealand 15; Te Pāti Māori 6.Motion agreed to.RICARDO MENÉNDEZ MARCH (Musterer—Green): Point of order Madam Chair. Thank you. I just want you to reflect on—several questions hadn't been addressed. Several members haven't had the chance to ask a question and there was that acknowledgment that because of urgency we didn't have a select committee process. I'm really really concerned about the undermining of our democratic processes by nature of cutting this debate short when people actually are asking still substantive questions. And I believe that we're not being repetitive in the nature of questions that we're asking. We're asking for those questions to be addressed and we're asking about the broad-ranging impact.CHAIRPERSON (Maureen Pugh): Understood thank you. Continuing to ask the same questions and not getting an answer is not a matter for the Chair. I have been very careful to make sure that the people who have amendments on this debate have had ample time to address them. And I have also kept a very close watch prior to coming in and while I've been here on the topics that have been addressed. Repeating the questions expecting a different answer is not something I can—Ricardo Menéndez March: Speaking to the point of order?CHAIRPERSON (Maureen Pugh): Is this a different point of order?Ricardo Menéndez March: So for example there were questions—CHAIRPERSON (Maureen Pugh): Is it a different—Ricardo Menéndez March: It is. Because I would like to challenge the Chair on the fact that for example there were questions around wage scarring the gender wage gap. Those are not repetitive. So like if we're not going to be allowed to continue having a debate on a bill that impacts thousands and thousands of people I would like to find a way to recall the Speaker to get this result.Hon GINNY ANDERSEN (Labour): Point of order. Thank you very much Madam Chair. I appreciate that you identified that there was potentially the same question being asked again and again and there's a debate obviously whether or not that had been answered or not; we believe that it wasn't answered. But I'd just like to point out that as associate spokesperson for social development for Labour I did not have the opportunity to speak on this bill. You took a number of calls in terms of the committee stage of this bill the committee stage which we're in now not the first or the second reading—[Interruption]. As the committee stage—CHAIRPERSON (Maureen Pugh): We'll hear a point of order in silence please.Hon GINNY ANDERSEN: At the committee stage I as the associate spokesperson did not have the opportunity to speak to this bill. So the Government—you are passing this through urgency you are bypassing any democratic process through having members of the public being able to submit at select committee and you're denying the associate spokesperson for the Opposition the opportunity to speak at the committee stage. I believe that is wrong and I believe that's something the Speaker should be alerted to.Hon Members: Point of order?CHAIRPERSON (Maureen Pugh): Excuse me I'm going to call these points of order to a close and take some advice on this. However I would like to say that I did make clear that I was looking for new material and did not get that. So that is why this debate was closed and I'm just going to take some advice please.I am going to continue and put the questions regarding the amendments.TANGI UTIKERE (Chief Whip—Labour): Point of order Madam Chair. I've heard points that have been raised by members. We had a number of speakers and only one was permitted to take any calls. I noticed that Mr Menéndez March has suggested a recall of the Speaker. On behalf of the Opposition that is what we would like to do. We would like to recall the Speaker. We are moving the recall of the Speaker to raise this concern.DEBBIE NGAREWA-PACKER (Co-Leader—Te Pāti Māori): Point of order. We would also like to have reflected that we haven't had a chance to speak at all. And we would also like to recall the Speaker. As the smallest party we do make sure that we have something to say at every part of the stage. This is an important critical bill that has been rushed through and our communities need to know that we're doing all that we can to make sure their voices are heard.CHAIRPERSON (Maureen Pugh): The question is that the Speaker be recalled. All those in favour please say Aye to the contrary No.Hon Members: Party vote.CHAIRPERSON (Maureen Pugh): My advice is that when there is a question that the Speaker be recalled that is not a party vote. We can vote but the convention is that the Speaker be recalled. So we will put that in motion thank you.