Henare PeeniPEENI HENARE (Labour—Tāmaki Makaurau): Tēnā koe Mr Assistant Speaker. Thank you for this opportunity. I rise to take a 5-minute call on behalf of the Labour Party and express its support in the third reading of this particular legislation. Interestingly enough as I was sitting there listening to the debate—and we know that the bills have come all the way through the processes of this particular House; we are now at the third reading—you always think of extra questions that perhaps you should have asked throughout the entire process. I was wondering how—if we are sending those who are released from prison back into homes that are contaminated with P—that affects their chances of staying sober and of not being tested and found positive for having traces of P in their system.One year ago the media reported that a 10-year-old child was found to have P in their system simply by living in a P-contaminated house. This time last year according to the reports—the numbers released under the Official Information Act—it was estimated that there were approximately 600 State homes managed by Housing New Zealand that were contaminated with P. I wonder given some of the testing regimes and some of the questions asked about some of the testing regimes to discover whether or not your house is contaminated with P whether or not that will have an impact somewhere along the line when testing comes around for those who are released into homes under supervision—some strict rules around drug use and of course alcohol. This House has already expressed how these types of provisions ensure that communities are safer. I wonder whether the Government remembers its 2009 Tackling Methamphetamine: an Action Plan. In that action plan it talks about how intensive the counselling is that is required to break somebody from the habit of P in particular but also from alcoholism. I wonder whether those support services have been increased to make sure that those who are susceptible to using drugs and abusing them—and of course alcohol as well—will get the support services that they require; or are we simply setting them up to fail? We are putting them back into communities where arguably the use of drugs such as P is on the increase. We know that in parts of South Auckland that liquor stores are more convenient than McDonald's—and we wonder then whether we are setting them up to fail. We know that this is a step in the right direction but we need to take a very broad view of this particular issue—a very broad view of this particular issue. We are in support of this. I referred to the Tackling Methamphetamine: an Action Plan from 2009—but it is 2016 now. A lot of years have passed by and I am wondering exactly whether or not we have met some of the challenges with drugs in our communities.As to the purposes of this particular legislation we know that this is a step in the right direction. Communities must be kept safe where possible and at all times and we want to make sure that the legislation in this House will certainly lend itself towards that safety in the community. I cannot help but think about the lack of services that are out there to make sure that we are actually dealing with these issues and making sure that those who are released from prison do get the services especially when the Government's Tackling Methamphetamine: an Action Plan report in 2009 acknowledged just how hard it is to provide the counselling and the services that those people require. In the third reading we support these bills. Kia ora.