Woods Megan; Watts Simon; Tuiono TeanauHon Dr MEGAN WOODS (Labour—Wigram): Thank you Mr Chairman. One of the things that I'm interested in—again apologies to the Minister if it is in some of the associated materials; we haven't got to it yet but maybe the Minister either himself or through his officials can point us to where that analysis is in the accompanying documents.What we heard today where the Government announced the tax measures that are covered out in Part 1 which lays out the rates of these taxes with a number of scenarios—and in some cases the number of families and individuals that would benefit from different scenarios within the tax package that is in this bill. So what we heard was that average income households would receive tax relief of up to $102 a fortnight and eligible families would receive a FamilyBoost childcare payment of up to $150—accepting that the child boost is in the next part of the bill and I'm not asking questions about that.What I would like to know: was there modelling done on the number of families within a variety of different scenarios? So for example how many families will be receiving the maximum? Are there families that will be receiving the $250 a fortnight that was talked about on the election campaign? How many families will be receiving what the Minister indicated in her speech in the House today that these tax cuts would deliver of the $60 a fortnight? What are the brackets of numbers of families and individuals throughout the country and has any analysis been done?I guess in many ways it flows on from some of the questions that my colleague Ricardo Menéndez March has been asking in terms of what this does in terms of the number of families in work and not in work given there is a change to that in-work tax credit. Does that open up differentiation further between poverty levels between those families that are in work and not in work?So we would expect in select committee this is just the kind of analysis that we'd go through to look at what the distributional impacts would be across the number of households; whether there has been any geographic breakdown in terms of where it is that we will see the clusters of families that will be receiving either above average or below average tax relief—well it's not relief—the tax cuts that are delivered through this package.So these are the kinds of things that I think that as a committee who is scrutinising this legislation in the absence of a select committee process; that in this committee of the whole House these are just the kind of understandings that we as legislators need to know. Who is going to benefit? How many people are going to benefit?James Meager: Everyone.Hon Dr MEGAN WOODS: Where are they? We have members opposite who are saying Everybody." Well let's see the modelling. Can the Minister please point to the modelling that shows us where "everybody" and how many—are we talking households? Individuals? People? There are a lot of pieces of information that we need and I would think that members opposite might be interested in knowing whether their constituents indeed are going to benefit or they are going to be worse off.So they're things on this side of the Chamber that we do need to understand and we know that some of this must exist because the Minister used it in both media materials—not this Minister but the Minister of Finance today used it in both media presentations and press releases and speeches in the House when she talked about various scenarios. For some she gave numbers but not others so we would be very interested in understanding what that looks like.Hon SIMON WATTS (Minister of Revenue): Just in response to the questions by the member: Yes a wide range of distributional impact analysis was undertaken in regards to the preparation of the scenarios and the different scenarios that you would expect to see across this Budget. A number of those specific scenarios was and is included within the fact sheet that has been provided out as part of the supporting material for this Budget and there are circa nine examples there.Obviously you can't publish every single scenario because there's a wide range of those but the member will know no doubt that that work has been undertaken and we've published a number of those ones which provide a wide spectrum of range of how the impacts could be felt by different participants and different members of our community.Hon Dr MEGAN WOODS (Labour—Wigram): Point of order Mr Chair. Thank you and I thank the Minister for that answer. While I appreciate every piece of paper of analysis can't be tabled but the Minister has confirmed to us that distributional analysis that does give some of that numerical breakdown exists. I'd ask the Minister if he would table that so the committee could see it—not the summaries that are in the fact sheets but the more detailed breakdown of the number of households. I think the committee would benefit from saying that distributional breakdown.CHAIRPERSON (Teanau Tuiono): Just speaking to the point of order it appears the Minister does not have that document with him at the moment but he might be able to table it at a future date."