Lee DeniseDENISE LEE (National—Maungakiekie): Thank you Mr Chair for the opportunity to speak. I would like to speak on the topic of the School Leavers' Toolkit. I had the opportunity to ask the Minister of Education during the Estimates hearings around this particular policy and what we discovered was a practical idea that's been put forward. It's a school-leavers' tool kit that's being considered for every single school-leaver equipping them with practical things like a driver's licence workplace competency and financial literacy. Now we're all about practicality. This is a good idea and it apparently replaces the careers education pilot which had a budget of $5.8 million over four years and those four years had been earmarked very clearly. So what have we got here when it comes to this Government's particular policy for school-leavers and their practical tool kit? Well what we have got is a costed-out policy in the Labour Party's manifesto for $175 million and they did take the time to cost it out over four years: $25 million in the first $50 million in the second $50 million in the third and $50 million in the fourth. So now fast-forward to the actual Budget and where literally the rubber hits the road—the money hits the road—what do we have here for the School Leavers' Toolkit? Well we've got $1.7 million in the first year and that's it—nothing in the second or the third or the fourth year. Again it was supposed to be replacing the $5.9 million career pilot scheme; $1.7 million in the first year is less than 1 percent of what they promised they would do—less than 1 percent.Not only is this money a fraction of what was promised; it's not actually even going towards the tool kit itself. It's going to be spent on exploration on prep work and on a little bit of design. How is this transferring your election policy into reality? It's not even going to go to the tool kit itself. Surely during their time heading into this policy they could have figured out where this thing is going to go. Now the Minister did say something in response to this particular question. He said that the three coalition parties couldn't agree on the delivery of the tool kit. So that's really again where the rubber hits this particular road. The proposal can't be delivered because they can't sort out the difference in their views and it's a perfect way—is it not?—to describe not only this issue but also the entire Budget and this entire coalition Government. All three heads are pulling in three different directions and that's why they can't deliver on their promises. Now if you need some more examples from this particular debate on Vote Education that we're having I'll give you three more. Where's the funding for all fully qualified early childhood education teachers? We're not seeing that. How about funding for ending school donations? We're not seeing that either. One more example: ensuring that all school buildings are modern learning environments. These aren't plucked out of thin air. These are promises that aren't being delivered and we're seeing that very clearly in black and white terms as we've journeyed as a select committee through the Estimates and now here we are having a debate. All three members of the coalition have their hands in the cookie jar and what we're seeing is a very big bunch of mishmashed priorities. It's not good for the education future of this country. Thank you.