Kaye NikkiHon NIKKI KAYE (National—Auckland Central): It's good to take a call on this bill. I actually stood up in the previous part so I'm looking forward to lots of contributions in this debate.Firstly can I just acknowledge that I represent Auckland Central. It has the largest number of businesses in New Zealand and I have been aghast at some of the statements that have come out from members opposite regarding what this bill will or will not do. Here is the reality—and I am talking to this part. If you look at the front page of this statute it is so very clear what this bill is about: it's about union rights. This is not about fairness. This is not about reasonableness in terms of the relationship between the employer and the employee. It is far more detrimental to New Zealand than that. We know in Auckland Central that we have major issues at the moment in terms of the economy in part because we have fuel taxes we have uncertainty around overseas investment rules we have uncertainty around immigration and now we have a set of prohibitive rules in law that are passing through this House that are opposed by a lot of businesses and if you look at some of the things that they seek to do they are not only taking New Zealand back but they are also ridiculous in the absurd when you look at some of the detail.I want to start with the 90-day trial period. I want Willie Jackson to please stand up and talk about youth employment. The reality is that while this Government pulled the bill back in terms of the 90-day trial as a result of lobbying by Mark Patterson who's sitting in the back seat there—so I hope he takes a call—when we got the data in select committee and asked about who was going to be most impacted the bigger businesses the ones that have more than 20 employees are the ones that give the greatest number of chances to young people to get into employment. So I want the Prime Minister to come down and participate in this debate. I want her to talk about kindness. I want her to talk about kindness and what it means to snuff out in a piece of legislation a huge number of jobs for young people. I would like her to explain that. I would like Willie Jackson to explain that because the reality is there will be fewer jobs for young people as a result of this bill.I'd also like a conversation about kindness in terms of the reinstatement of certain employees in workplaces where we may have young people vulnerable people. That's why I support Nicola Willis' very sensible Supplementary Order Paper (SOP) 144 and part of the reason that this SOP has been put up by this side is because we actually care about early childhood centres. We actually think it is reasonable to have a very decent debate about the fact that if you get reinstatement wrong the reality is it is entirely inappropriate to have certain people going back into workplaces where there are young children—particularly early childhood education—but also where it comes to older people in rest homes and that is why I back Nicola Willis' amendment in this regard.The other issues that we have raised in this legislative process are not just about young people and they're not just about vulnerable people. They're also about the basic rights of employers as well to get on and create wealth to fund our public services. That's why provisions that are—as I would describe them—freedom to roam by unions in workplaces are totally wrong from our perspective. The reality is they are the 1970s and we are being taken back to the Dark Ages by this legislation and again—I can't say this in this Chamber—let's cut the … The reality is the Labour Party are not doing this for vulnerable people. They're not doing it for young people. They're doing it because of the unions and this is about greater union rights. Whether it is freedom to roam in workplaces whether it is reinstatement provisions whether it is the inflexibility around meal breaks or whether it is 90-day trial periods and snuffing out jobs for young people we need the Labour Party to be honest with people like my constituents in Auckland Central where they're going to not only put a handbrake on economic growth but they're also going to hurt some of our most vulnerable.