Tinetti Jan; Rurawhe AdrianJAN TINETTI (Labour): Thank you Mr Speaker. I want to start this afternoon with a little bit of a different tack because I want to do a shout-out and a congratulations to the Duffy Books in Homes team. This week Duffy Books in Homes are celebrating 25 years of changing lives and as a previous Duffy school principal for 11 of those years I truly know how much they do change the lives of young people in low-decile schools in this country. I have to say that one of my highlights since coming into Parliament in 2017 has been the two Government Book Weeks that I have really passionately participated in. In fact this year I think I went to about eight presentations of Government Book Week. I was challenged here this afternoon to actually sing the Duffy Books song but we shall leave that—Kieran McAnulty: No.JAN TINETTI: —for another time. No says Mr McAnulty. But I do think that if you do look on my Facebook page you might see some videos of that so maybe you might want to avoid that.However I do say that speaking in the last spot of the general debate is usually a wonderful position to be in because normally you get this opportunity to hear the speeches from the other side and you can pull those speeches apart but actually there wasn't much content in those speeches today. I do do a shout-out to Mr Yule though for his speech on the review of vocational education because I will be speaking about that in my last minute so it did give me something that I could speak about here this afternoon. We've had some great news this week and the great news came from the Commerce Commission where we know—we know that it's fantastic when they agree—that there are competition issues in the fuel market. All we've heard is the doom and gloom that are coming from the Opposition who are trying to put attack spin on that narrative coming through. Can't stop themselves—cannot help themselves but put that spin on it. Deliberate memory loss of the increase of fuel taxes six times over their year nine years in Government plus the GST that they raised from 12.5 percent to 15 percent forgetting that that actually went on to petrol prices as well. So they've got their lines that they're sticking to but their leader the Hon Simon Bridges cannot stick to those lines. I did not believe it when I got phoned by somebody in the Tauranga electorate this morning about the Radio New Zealand interview. They happened to mention that interview and we've heard it here a lot this afternoon. I couldn't believe it so I went to have a listen. What a train wreck of an interview—the sound of desperation that came from the leader of the Opposition Mr Simon Bridges the Hon Simon Bridges who thought that it was too hard to do anything about that at the time when he said that he knew all about it. Well I say to the Hon Simon Bridges it might be too hard for him but it's certainly not too hard for us. We're not afraid as a Government to take on those hard challenges. We are up for that challenge unlike the previous Government. That previous Government the National-led Government let New Zealanders be fleeced at the pump. They put the protection of the profits of the big oil over the interests of New Zealanders and I've found it very interesting to be here this afternoon to hear from my colleague the Hon Stuart Nash about how long that has been part of the conversation in the previous Government. We're going right back to the previous Government. This Government is tackling the big long-term issues facing New Zealand. We are looking 30 years ahead and not just three—30 years ahead.This is where I want to talk about the review of vocational education. What a forward-thinking fantastic piece of work that will take us well into the future despite the doom and the gloom that we've heard from the other side and we heard that from Mr Yule. He said that he was completely passionate and violently opposed—we didn't really hear that in his address. We do have some big supporters out there. In fact I was reading today in the Taranaki Daily News that there was one of our supporters talking of the need for young people to see agriculture as a career. They said what that means is within our workforce—that increasing demanding even higher levels of skill—you have to have a group of people who aren't currently equipped for that. ASSISTANT SPEAKER (Adrian Rurawhe): Order! The member's time has expired.The debate having concluded the motion lapsed.