Young JonathanJONATHAN YOUNG (National—New Plymouth): Thank you very much Madam Chair. I'm pleased to stand and speak here on the committee stage of the Crown Minerals Amendment Bill. This is a bill which commenced its life and journey under the previous Government and is carried on by the current Government and it does address some pertinent issues. We have received Supplementary Order Paper 182 from the Minister of Energy and Resources which seeks to bring alignment between this bill and the Crown Minerals (Petroleum) Amendment Act that passed just recently in order to bring just a correct alignment because the petroleum amendment bill—well the Act now—is in play and we need to ensure that this is aligned.So in regard to this particular stage some questions that we would like the Minister to consider are in terms of the change of ownership of operator. We would certainly be keen to hear around the provisions that create an exclusion for OMV who were in the process of change of ownership from Shell to themselves prior to the bill coming to the House and we would seek assurance that that exclusion and provision is still robust or continues as they go through their final stages of their change of ownership. The change of ownership of course is a very important aspect in the petroleum space in particular to have Government oversight and it's pertinent that this bill actually addresses that and in particular focuses on those transitions of operator. So it's pertinent to understand that the Economic Development Science and Innovation Committee have spent considerable time looking at this bill. Even though it's particularly short it does address those issues.Just in regard to the previous speaker Andrew Falloon's question regarding financial capability of new operators who come in and the question about what the test is of that I would also like the Minister if possible to answer the question around the financial but also operational capability of those companies that take operator control when it comes to the end-of-life decommissioning of a field. Of course we have an example of that in offshore Taranaki where the interests of AWE have been passed through to Tamarind and Tamarind have specialist capability around decommissioning end-of-life fields. They have that ability because of their niche operations and because of their expertise to be able to bring further resources and capability on those fields and to bring those further resources to market.So I would be interested to hear from the Minister if possible just around decisions particularly for companies who take over operator control who have a specialist field in end of life or the decommissioning of a field just what the criteria are and how they ascertain that they have that capability. The reason why this bill came to this House was because there was a concern that if a company did take over operator control of a field and they didn't have that capability to do the decommissioning as required then the costs of that would fall to the Crown. That of course is a concern and it's also a concern to other companies in the sector in the industry because they did not want to suffer reputational risk regarding that. So if possible can the Minister please give us some greater clarity on the assessment when there's a change of operator particularly around an operator coming and starting to work on a field that's at the end of life.So there are a number of fields of course. There's the Tūī Area field. There's the Māui field. Those would all be considered to be mature fields. They're all offshore fields. So there are considerable—[Time expired]