Mallard Trevor: Questions for Oral Answer — Questions to Ministers 
Mallard Trevor: Questions for Oral Answer — Questions to Ministers 
[Volume:661;Page:10036] 
8. 
Hon TREVOR MALLARD (Labour—Hutt South) 
 to the  
Minister of Education 
: Does she stand by her reported statement in regard to national standards that “criticism has been based on misinterpretations”? 
Hon ANNE TOLLEY (Minister of Education) 
:  
Yes and I am pleased that so many teachers and principals are engaging with the national standards rather than misinterpretations of them. 
Hon Trevor Mallard 
: Does she accept that if a newspaper now asks two schools for their results it can publish a local league table? 
Hon ANNE TOLLEY 
: It can do that now. 
Hon Trevor Mallard 
: How then can she explain the Prime Minister’s comments to Pita Sharples that league tables could not be published under national standards for at least 2 years? 
Hon ANNE TOLLEY 
: I was not at the meeting that took place between the Prime Minister and Minister Sharples but the Government—and Minister Sharples repeated this earlier in the House—will not be publishing league tables. 
Allan Peachey 
: What reports has the Minister received of teachers and principals engaging with national standards? 
Hon ANNE TOLLEY 
: I have received a report from the Ministry of Education that states that so far 81 percent of schools have registered for or participated in the first round of workshops on the implementation of national standards. That is 4695 principals and teachers representing 1759 schools. That is an excellent response and it shows that teachers as professionals are getting on with the job of implementing national standards. 
Hon Trevor Mallard 
: Who is responsible for the misinterpretation of the fact that those workshops have been described as being fully funded when schools have to pay over $200 a day for a reliever to replace the staff member and pay the travel costs as well? 
Hon ANNE TOLLEY 
: It is interesting that the Labour Party does not even want there to be training on national standards. 
Hon Trevor Mallard 
: I raise a point of order Mr Speaker. It was a simple question: who was responsible for that misinterpretation? 
Mr SPEAKER 
: I accept the member’s point of order. The Minister should not commence a perfectly reasonable question with a gratuitous comment. 
Hon ANNE TOLLEY 
: Professional development worth $26 million is being made available to teachers at their request for training on the national standards. It is perfectly normal practice for schools to fund relievers. 
Hon Trevor Mallard 
: I raise a point of order Mr Speaker. It was again a very simple easy question to answer. It asked who was responsible for the statement that the workshops were fully funded. The Minister knows that she made that statement. She should admit it to the House. 
Mr SPEAKER 
: The last bit of that point of order was out of order. The member knows that. He has been in this House long enough to know that he cannot make that kind of accusation or comment under a point of order. I am not sure why he expects me to be terribly sympathetic to his point of order when he does that. In my view the Minister did answer the question. She pointed out what “fully funded” means in normal circumstances for teacher professional development. Other people may have a different view of what it means but that seems to me to be what the Minister was saying. The member has further supplementary questions available should he wish to ask one.