Dyson Ruth: Questions for Oral Answer — Questions to Ministers 
Dyson Ruth: Questions for Oral Answer — Questions to Ministers 
[Volume:675;Page:21136] 
3. 
Hon RUTH DYSON (Labour—Port Hills) 
 to the  
Minister of Conservation 
: Does she support the vision statement of the Department of Conservation which states “Conservation work is an investment in New Zealand’s prosperity because our environment plays a central role in our health and well-being and wealth”? 
Hon KATE WILKINSON (Minister of Conservation) 
: 
 Absolutely. In these tough economic times we are all tightening our belts a little and although the shape of restructuring is largely an operational matter I am pleased to see that the Department of Conservation is confident that it can continue to deliver its core conservation work and that front-line staff and services will be retained. 
Hon Ruth Dyson 
: How will the loss of incomes expertise and the community contribution of Department of Conservation staff sacked from their Whanganui and New Plymouth offices contribute to the well-being of the staff their families and their region? 
Hon KATE WILKINSON 
: It is never an easy task when people lose their jobs but I am assured that the department is confident that it can continue to deliver core conservation work. Front-line staff rangers and services will be retained. 
Hon Ruth Dyson 
: How will the department perform its key function of protecting biodiversity after sacking the scientists who identify the threats write the recovery programmes and then do the field work required? 
Hon KATE WILKINSON 
: Just exactly who may lose their jobs is still unknown as the Department of Conservation is working through the options. But can I say that I am assured the department is confident it will continue to deliver core conservation work and that front-line staff and services will be retained. 
Rahui Katene 
: What consultation was taken with iwi before announcing the disestablishment of some 20 jobs in the New Plymouth Whanganui and Turangi offices and what has been their view about the decision to move the conservancy away from Whanganui which has traditionally been the centre of government for the central North Island? 
Hon KATE WILKINSON 
: That matter is an operational matter. I suggest that discussions be had with the Director-General of Conservation and the conservancy concerned. I am certainly happy to take further questions and put a more definitive answer to the member. 
Hon Ruth Dyson 
: How will the department stand up to the mining industry and protect our precious public land from mining as demanded by thousands of New Zealanders given that the scientific and technical experts from the department are being sacked at the same time as the Ministry of Economic Development is doubling the number of staff in its oil and minerals unit? 
Hon KATE WILKINSON 
: I think that question actually relies on a false assumption. I say that the member might like to have a chat with her colleague Damien O’Connor who has said that the world still relies on coal and oil to run so stopping the mining of high-quality coal was a “dumb idea”. I also say that I welcome the member’s new-found interest in conservation— 
Mr SPEAKER 
: Order! 
Hon Ruth Dyson 
: Does she agree with the increase of staff in the department’s new commercial business unit compared with the loss of scientists who were working to prevent the North Island kiwi from becoming extinct and if she does not agree with that will she act to save these jobs and the kiwi? 
Hon KATE WILKINSON 
: Can I say that the commercial business unit is doing a fantastic job and if the member really did have an interest in conservation she would be aware that only last week Genesis gave $2.5 million to help with the blue duck programme.