Whaitiri MekaMEKA WHAITIRI (Labour—Ikaroa-Rāwhiti): I am happy to take a call again on clauses 1 and 2. Clause 1 says This Act is the Regulatory Systems (Building and Housing) Amendment Act 2016." When I draw the Committee's attention to again the Ministry of Business Innovation and Employment's own advice to the Local Government and Environment Committee it talks again about the purpose of the regulatory systems and gives three reasons why we have them with one being to maintain and improve the effectiveness and efficiency of the regulatory systems. So when I go back to look at clause 1 "This Act is the Regulatory Systems (Building and Housing) Amendment Act 2016." and I look at the officials' purpose for regulatory system bills my question is: has what we are debating here met the test of both maintaining and improving the efficiency and effectiveness of the regulatory systems; if so how? That is the question I want to pose.It talks also about how the purpose of these bills is around including policy change. I do note the Minister in the chair Michael Woodhouse talked about how this was not so much a significant policy change but of a more minor and technical nature but again the reason why and the purpose of why we are making the changes or addressing the amendments is so that we can assure the House and New Zealand that we are continually improving our repairs and maintenance of the regulatory system. So my question again to the Minister is: how do we know we have met that test?When I look at clause 2 and it talks about how "This Act comes into force immediately after the expiry of the 2-month period that starts on the date of Royal assent." I want to refer to a colleague's point around the targeted review. I guess the question that I would pose to the Minister is if we look at the purpose behind the targeted review it does say it is about improving disclosure in dispute resolution regimes—it is about strengthening body corporate governance. The review is also going to address encouraging best practice for body corporate managers. It is going to take long-term maintenance planning and funding and also look at the thresholds of mandatory requirements. Again my question is: through that targeted review what happens to the piece of legislation we are debating here in the Committee stage—in terms of clauses 1 and 2—which the review may throw up as requiring some amendments to the legislation?I would just be interested to hear from the Minister—if the targeted review throws up an anomaly through this bill I would be interested to know from the Minister what process he would recommend so that those anomalies or concerns that are picked up through that targeted review will be addressed in this bill. I am very keen to hear because it is kind of back to front—we are passing this particular regulatory bill and we are undertaking a targeted review. Again I am just really really keen to hear how we would take the comments that people have applied to the review and if it requires some legislative amendments how the Minister proposes to address that. So that is a question I would really like to ask the Minister in the chair if he could shed some light on that. Kia ora.Clause 1 agreed to.Clause 2 agreed to.Bill to be reported without amendment presently."