White HelenHELEN WHITE (Labour—Mt Albert): Thank you Madam Chair. I actually had a similar concern because I can't read anything in the small print. It's quite hard to speak meaningfully on a proposal that you can't read so I'd really appreciate it and I genuinely would like to check that script.But I also wondered about the process of the alternative of labels because I don't know where the advice came that this has got some efficacy. I'd like to know how this proposal to generate labels was instigated where this alternative has come whether it's actually got benefit. It may be that it's in the small print but I don't know what these things mean on this label. So I can see that there is a level of emissions of 29"—29 out of what? What kind of emissions are we talking about?I raised earlier issues where I was really worried about the air quality in Auckland and people being subjected to a lot of poisons. I know that we've had child deaths as a result of air-quality issues in the valleys in Auckland and that's often where the motorways are. I have parts of my electorate which just back straight on to the motorway. It's often our vulnerable who live in those places because they're poorer. I'd really like to know about that emissions part but the same is true—I really just have not enough information.I also would like to know whether anybody has consulted health officials about this approach and whether it works or whether there is any international information available where this approach has been successful or otherwise. So those are really genuine concerns I raise on behalf of my constituents. They seem incredibly important. We're given an example here of a plug-in hybrid. I'm not given any example of how this applies in a situation where we're not talking about those hybrids. Are these based on averages of vehicle use in a city in the country etc.?I just need a lot more information than I've got but mainly I want to know about the efficacy and the advice that was given about whether this works and how this has been looked at. I was interested in an answer I received earlier from the Minister about air quality and this was something that—forgive me—relates to both parts I think. But I was standing asking for a call about this. He suggested that there was no relationship between this bill and those issues of air quality.My understanding is—and I was on that select committee—these things were raised at the time they were issues that were very much part of the reason for bringing this about and we have a whole lot of issues around equity as well. I would fully expect the regulations and the decision over the regulations to reflect that. What is the connection? Is this really not an issue that is actually relevant in the eyes of the Minister on this?So I very much genuinely would like to know whether this is seen as separate; if so why? Given that of course cars emit such fuels and electric cars emit much less toxins as do more efficient petrol vehicles. So what is the story here? I'd really genuinely like to know the answers to those questions.I'd like to also know whether these regulations that we have had put before us so quickly have been anywhere near the Regulations Review Committee and if they're consulted what the process is around that? Because if they're overstepping if they really—that is a very wonderful committee. I was deputy chair to the Hon Judith Collins and I saw the value in the work of that committee in terms of where there was an overstep where there was an issue. Yet in this process of rush I'm actually really unclear as to what happens with regards to regulations review. Do they get this legislation after it's been passed and if there has been an overstep it gets reviewed?"