Walker HamishHAMISH WALKER (National—Clutha-Southland): Mr Chair—I'll make a note. Newbie—excuse that. I just want to discuss the name of this bill—very very interesting. I want to acknowledge the Minister there and I'll get back to Minister Parker later on but I just thought of—just making a few notes here of possible names for this bill. We could rename it from the Overseas Investment Amendment Bill to the Twenty-Three Submitters That Came Up from Queenstown: We Do Not Care about Your Opinion Bill"—who submitted to the Finance and Expenditure Committee. We could also name it the "All Opposed 23 Submitters from Queenstown That Came to the Select Committee Bill". We could rename it the "Exception for Queenstown over $2.5 Million Bill" as many submitters called for. We could also call it the "Similar to Every Other Economic Indicator Bill" where the Government doesn't seem to care about business confidence going out the wall—"We're not going to listen on this or the 23 submitters from Queenstown." We could also call it the "Queenstown Lakes District Council We Aren't Going to Read Your Submission Bill". The council submitted on this and they said "Please just wait. Wait for the evidence because you clearly don't have it."The Mayoral Housing Affordability Taskforce was set up in early 2017 and they've been doing a great job in housing affordability. They actually submitted on this bill—one of the 23 submitters from Queenstown—and they said "Please Minister just wait. Wait for the evidence to come through." You could also call it the "Kill the Golden Goose in the Niche Luxury Market Bill". We had one submitter; he has a construction company with 30-odd employees servicing the high-end market. In his submission he said basically if this bill goes through a lot of his workers will go offshore because they won't have the opportunity to build these luxury homes or to learn from him.Other names you could call it would be "Kill the Service to the Luxury Property Market Bill" which has over 100 people working—Simeon Brown: Kill the bill—kill the bill.HAMISH WALKER: Just "Kill the Queenstown Economy Bill". Another name was actually raised with me on Monday and last Friday: the "David Parker Gone Loose Bill" as David used to be the local member for Queenstown back in the day—and I appreciate your comments earlier on Minister in Dunedin Airport. Very valid but I mean what would someone like Howard Paterson who you did a lot of work for think of this bill Minister? Some other names could be the "No Donations to Queenstown Bill". Take for example one buyer who bought five farms between Queenstown and Wānaka—$60 million. He then spent $50 million to get the farms to a state where they used to be and then he donated 90 percent of those farms back to the Crown through the Queen Elizabeth the Second National Trust; therefore all New Zealanders get to have access to these. He also spends between $3 million and $5 million per year servicing this.We could also call this bill the "No Americans Allowed Bill". Take the American couple at Camp Glenorchy. They've spent $40 million developing the first carbon-zero accommodation camp in the world and it just so happens that they've donated all the profits—all the profits—back to the community. We could call it the "No Affordable Housing Specialist Bill". As many submitters from Queenstown said this won't make housing affordability any better; it's actually going to make it worse because do you meet many first-home buyers who spend $5 million to $10 million on their first home? Well I don't. Or one gentleman who was the chair of the Queenstown housing affordability trust for nine years. He's currently on a New Zealand-wide housing trust. He also mentioned that this is not going to make housing affordability any better.We could also call it the "We Don't Respect the Select Committee Process Bill" as every single submitter to the select committee from Queenstown opposed this bill—every single one—which is a shame because on select committees you often get some really good work through diversity of thought from the different parties. You could call it the "Purchaser in China Sets Up a Company in Singapore to Buy Property in New Zealand Bill" or you could call it the "Loophole Bill".This bill quite clearly judging by the submissions from Queenstown is a dog and I encourage the Minister to look at some of the amendments."