Reti ShaneDr SHANE RETI (Deputy Leader—National): Thank you Madam Speaker. Far be it from me to get in the road of what was initially a National Party bill which made sense then and makes sense now. It's sort of a small concern that it's taken us this long to get to this point and we can talk about that but this was a pragmatic approach to solve a couple of problems.The problems we had were that only a limited number of people could access the database—administrators—and for some reason still to be determined faxing was the mechanism to input data and actually as I recall from getting a consent form to get information out they fax the information back not at all suitable to the electronic age. Really we were missing the opportunities that we could have had with modern technology. This was a pragmatic approach to solve those two problems and I think this bill most adequately does that.If I did look back and think about why it's taken so long to get here I think I'd probably reflect on the fact that the anticipation was that the cervical screening register would be updated and that it would be put on top of the bowel screening engine; that was sort of the mechanism—we do the core screening IT and then each individual screening programme be it breast be it cervical or coronavirus as it is here now would sit on top of that core platform and so most of the work would be done. As we found it took a while—in fact there was an 18-month delay—to get the bowel screening programme out because that core engine took a little bit of time to develop. I think that partly explains why it's been a number of years to get to this place tonight where we're signing this through.The select committee process was very fulsome and as invariably happens with select committee it added to this bill. The advice that we received from submitters was meaningful and useful and helped us to make recommendations and changes. I want to acknowledge Louisa Wall who was the chair of that select committee and she particularly brought useful information around data sovereignty for Māori and particularly the National Kaitiaki Group. I was speaking with Louisa earlier around this bill and reflecting back on the time we had through select committee and the discussion was along the lines of how she was keen to see Māori as members of the Kaitiaki Regulations Rōpū translating the information to data that Māori communities can actually use. She was thinking that the kaitiaki group can contribute so much more than what was originally intended. As we brought the thinking out of select committee the Supplementary Order Paper that came through in the committee of the whole House was actually to backtrack some of the recommendations we had because it turned out in the time frame from when we reported back to the House to now that the ministry had looked at what those recommendations were and decided some of them were not manageable for the outcomes we were looking for. We looked at that we had that background knowledge that came through select committee and decided that yes we could understand that position so we supported it in the committee of the whole House.I also want to commend—I think in my second reading I erroneously attributed HPV to Bev Walding when in fact it's Professor Bev Lawton. Bev's done a marvellous job bringing cervical screening through into the HPV which we're now going to roll out as a new screening mechanism. Disappointing it was turned down as a Budget bid in 2020 but here we are now and that will improve the uptake in cervical screening for Māori for non-Māori and for women as a whole as has been the precedent set internationally. This is why we were so enthusiastic for HPV to be the new screening mechanism and I want to congratulate her and her team for continuing to press us continuing to press policy-makers with rational reasoned thinking as to the benefits and the urgency around human papillomavirus screening. While we're talking HPV we should just keep our eyes on a few things related in as much as that we're so consumed by coronavirus at the moment that the normal year 5 community vaccination of children in schools has been stood down because we don't have enough community nurses to deliver that programme. Let's remember the vaccines they give in year 5 in schools is the HPV vaccine as well as diphtheria tetanus and pertussis. So while coronavirus is an umbrella all the other stuff that needed to continue on all the other stuff we needed to do we mustn't take our eye off that or there will be a tail of consequence of the course we did. And while we're talking HPV and cervical screening HPV is the year 5 vaccine we give in schools that has been stood down due to coronavirus and we need to keep an eye on that.In summary this was a good bill when it started it's been made better by the select committee. We've supported the Supplementary Order Paper because that made sense and we believe this will improve the access the data analysis and what we can actually do with cervical screening to improve the outcomes particularly for Māori women who disproportionately have worse outcomes worse access and later diagnosis for cervical cancer. We're particularly keen to see if what we're putting in place tonight can improve that in some way. This is a good bill very glad to see it here. Thank you.