Doocey MattMATT DOOCEY (National—Waimakariri): Thank you very much Madam Chair Williams. It is a pleasure to take a call in the committee of the whole House and also an opportunity to address the Minister in the chair Megan Woods as well.I think it's pretty clear for the Minister for Greater Christchurch Regeneration from not only the first reading but now the second to hear how much the Cathedral Working Group Recommendation Report was referred to not only in the readings but in the discussions in the Environment Committee as well. We felt it important that the Cathedral Working Group Recommendation Report and subsequent recommendations were embedded in the bill and the legislation.So coming back into the House from the select committee process we have the reference to the report in the background of the Act under Part 1. There was discussion around including it in the preamble but it was felt and landed that it was best to go in clause 2A Background to this Act" and it refers to the Cathedral Working Group report. It was also included under clause 4 "Interpretation" where we talk about the report and also in the definition of "reinstatement": " 'reinstatement' includes 1 or more of the following: … any activity in relation to any part of the Cathedral that the [Cathedral Working Group] Report contemplates as being a reinstatement activity:".But one thing I would want to raise with the Minister and possibly get the feedback and advice from the Minister about: there was discussion whether the Cathedral Working Group report could be referenced in other parts of the bill and more specifically in clause 10 "Reasons for order must be published". This is around the reasons for the Order in Council. We were working with whether the Minister who made the recommendation needed to include why the order is appropriate and consistent with the Cathedral Working Group report. So I'd be interested in hearing from the Minister in her view why that wasn't included in clause 10 and in fact whether it could be included in clause 10.Another issue that's come up in the committee as well: we talk a lot about the physical building of the cathedral—quite rightly because we are talking about the cathedral—but to many Cantabrians and people from Christchurch as my learned colleague Rino Tirikatene did refer to it's not only the cathedral but it's the Cathedral Square and we've all got great memories of going into the square as well and all the eccentric characters of the Wizard and of course the Birdman as well—we'll never forget the Birdman.What we did as a select committee we had an indicative map of the cathedral area drawn up and that is now in schedule 3. However there was some discussion about how we ensure that we protect the interests of businesses already operating on the edges of that Cathedral Square. No doubt there are some issues as we rebuild the cathedral. In a purely logistical sense a lot of the blocks will have to be close by. The handling of them—the double handling—will take a lot of time so how we streamline that process.There was discussion around some real thought of how we needed to protect the interests of business operating at the edge of that identified area. One good example of that—and I know it quite well because I did take my wife on it but equally it's a great North Canterbury business—Continental caterers. They run the night tram and the dinner tram car and of course this cathedral area covers the tram as it circles round behind the cathedral. So it would be good to hear from the Minister as to how we can ensure that pragmatically as this legislation goes forward we ensure that some of the working businesses in the Cathedral Square area can be supported to ensure that their businesses are protected as well. Thank you."