Kedgley Sue: Local Government (Tamaki Makaurau Reorganisation) Bill — Third Reading 
Kedgley Sue: Local Government (Tamaki Makaurau Reorganisation) Bill — Third Reading 
[Volume:654;Page:3724] 
SUE KEDGLEY (Green) 
: 
 The Green Party rises more in sorrow than in anger at the third reading of the Local Government (Tamaki Makaurau) Bill. Once upon a time we in New Zealand took democracy very seriously. Our ancestors fought for democracy and women fought for the right to participate in the democratic process but now the Government can get rid of eight democratically elected city councils without consulting one single Aucklander about whether he or she wishes to get rid of the eight democratically elected councils in Auckland which represent 1.5 million people. 
The Greens would not have a problem if there had been a vote and Aucklanders had agreed to get rid of their eight democratically elected councils. But it is being done by this bill with the stroke of a pen and without a single Aucklander ever having been consulted without a mandate from the people of New Zealand ever having been sought and without voters having been warned in the election manifestos of National and the Act Party that that was their plan. There was no mandate from the Royal Commission on Auckland Governance to get rid of the eight councils and to impose a new model of local governance—a model in which the Mayor of Auckland will have powers that no other mayor in New Zealand has. Why should we suddenly come up with a new model in which the mayor has unprecedented powers unavailable to any other mayor anywhere in New Zealand and all of this without the people of Auckland ever having been consulted and without anyone having been alerted about it in the manifestos? 
One of the things that has concerned the Green Party is the role of the media in the whole debate. The media have been moaning about the fact that it costs $10000 a minute or something for Parliament to meet but no one in the media that I am aware of has raised questions as to why we should not be told what the transition will cost. Nobody in the media has asked that question. The other thing is that nobody in the media has questioned the censorship provisions contained in the bill. There are provisions in the bill that amount to censorship. They say that the handpicked cabal Rodney Hide’s two or three men who will be running the Auckland Transition Agency will have the power to censor to override to prevent any agenda item from being debated over the next 18 months. Has anyone in the media expressed any concern about those censorship provisions? We are up in arms about what is happening in Fiji where the Government there is censoring the media but no one seems to be concerned about the fact that the bill includes provisions to allow the transition agency to censor all the councils of Auckland in the next 18 months. 
Nobody in the media seems to be the slightest bit concerned about the four little words “as it sees fit” that have sneaked into the legislation. These words create a new precedent in New Zealand because they say that the transition agency is to let people know what it is up to only if it sees fit. As MPs we have a Register of Pecuniary Interests—and the latest is about to come out. Imagine if we put an amendment that we would declare our pecuniary interests only as we see fit. The media would be absolutely up in arms. It would be a scandal. It would be on the front pages of the newspapers that politicians were trying to withhold information about their pecuniary interests. But not one single media outlet has expressed any concern about this new precedent. The Government having slipped it into this bill will it now be slipped into all the other bills that come before the House—that information is to be divulged only as people see fit? I am deeply disappointed that the media have been so cynical about this process and have not picked up on those provisions which amount to censorship to the ability to withhold information and to the ability to control the agenda items of the councils over the next 18 months. Nor do the media seem to be the slightest bit concerned about the wiping out of a whole layer of democracy and the imposing of a new model of democracy—the “strong mayor” model which really amounts to giving the Mayor of Auckland the powers of a tsar. 
They do not seem to be the slightest bit concerned about that or the fact that it is being done through the passage of legislation in haste without any consultation with one single Aucklander. It is an absolutely basic principle of governance that if we are to change the system of governance we need to have a majority of the governed assent to it. That is why we have referendums when we seek to change the system of governance—for example with the introduction of MMP. The Government is changing the whole model of governance in Auckland without any referenda without any consultation and without any mandate. The media seem to think that it is a joke. 
Rodney Hide and Roger Douglas must be rubbing their hands with glee. There will be I am sure a considerable celebration—maybe not tonight; they might be too tired. Later on the champagne will be popping and they will say “We’ve done it again. We’ve completely conned Aucklanders.” Actually it is not just Aucklanders because once this measure has been foisted upon Aucklanders we know that it will be rolled out over the rest of New Zealand. They have managed to con New Zealanders and Aucklanders. Those two members will be rubbing their hands. They have used blitzkrieg tactics ramming things through—tactics that were perfected in the Rogernomics era. All of those tactics have been brought out to whip this bill through the House. Roger Douglas will think it was worthwhile his coming out of retirement to return to the House. He has rammed his agenda through. He has come up with the techniques. He has been giving advice as to how to sneak the measure through how to slip in the little words “as it sees fit” so that people do not understand their implication. Rodney Hide will think it was well worth while his choosing the portfolio of Minister of Local Government because he has pulled off what amounts to a coup d’état. He is setting up Auckland in such a way that at the next election not only will the eight democratically elected Auckland councils be expunged but we will have an Auckland Council with a mayor with the powers of a tsar. John Banks is the next likely mayor. Once he is in complete control of the Auckland Council he will unleash stage two which is to sell off the $28 billion of assets of the combined local councils. 
I sought to table a cartoon before but I did not actually table it. I would like to table it now because to me it is the only item in the media that has encapsulated what has happened over the last 3 days. Here is the maniacal demonic vision of Rodney Hide in his yellow jacket with his proud little ACT motif trampling on the councils of Waitakere of Papakura of Rodney of North Shore of Manukau and of Franklin. It shows him stomping on them triumphantly. It is extraordinary that he has managed to do that in such a way that he has conned New Zealanders and it seems the media too. He has got away with a coup d’état in a quite extraordinary and stunning way. I take my hat off to Rodney Hide. It is “Rogernomics Part 2”. He has done it with devastating audacity and devastating speed and seemingly he has conned the media of New Zealand.