Questions for Oral Answer — Questions to Ministers 
Questions for Oral Answer — Questions to Ministers 
[Volume:624;Page:19304] 
Questions to Ministers 
High-country Land—Tenure Review 
1. LIANNE DALZIEL (Labour—Christchurch East) 
 to the  
Minister for Land Information 
: What recent reports has he received on tenure review in the South Island high country? 
Hon PETE HODGSON (Minister for Land Information) 
: 
 I have received three reports in the last day: a report from Dr Don Brash stating that tenure review is a deliberate land grab; a second report also from Dr Don Brash conceding that the Government could not grab land that it already owned; and a third report this morning repeating the fact that it is a deliberate land grab. The gentleman is bewildered. 
Lianne Dalziel 
: What other reports has the Minister seen on how much land is being freeholded or added to the conservation estate from the tenure review process? 
Hon PETE HODGSON 
: I have seen one report from the aforementioned Dr Don Brash which quoted a figure of at least 60 percent of land that is going into the conservation estate. He is wrong. The figure to date is not 60 percent but about 35 percent. When advised of his error he blamed runholders for giving him the wrong figures. 
Simon Power 
: Has the Minister received any further reports including a copy of the Department of Conservation’s last annual report indicating that the department failed to meet 21 out of 35 self-imposed performance targets in the area of the management of natural heritage and does he think the department should concentrate on its core business of meeting those targets rather than managing the South Island high country? 
Hon PETE HODGSON 
: I do not receive those reports because I am not the Minister of Conservation. However it is my view that the Department of Conservation has a mandate far broader than just making sure that we do not lose endangered species. I would say to the member that improving access to the high country for the trampers and walkers of our nation is a good idea not a bad one. 
Rod Donald 
: Does the Minister agree with the submission made by the Royal Forest and Bird Protection Society to the Finance and Expenditure Committee yesterday that the sale of Crown-owned pastoral leases to overseas interests should be prohibited and that at the very least the tenure review process should be completed before any sale to overseas interests proceeds; if not why not? 
Hon PETE HODGSON 
: The member will be aware that the Overseas Investment Bill currently before a select committee proposes a somewhat more effective regime in this regard. I trust that the member will support it. 
Hon Peter Dunne 
: Has the Minister seen comments made yesterday by Dr Hugh Barr for the Council of Outdoor Recreation Associations on the subject of the principal question; if so what is his reaction to those comments? 
Hon PETE HODGSON 
: Yes in fact I have. The Council of Outdoor Recreation Associations has said: “Don Brash is way off target with his criticism of pastoral tenure review.” The Royal Forest and Bird Protection Society said: “Brash has an agenda to privatise the high country and restrict access to it to a privileged few.” 
Lianne Dalziel 
: What reports has he seen on attempts to restrict the role of the Department of Conservation in light of the answer that he gave to an earlier supplementary question? 
Hon PETE HODGSON 
: One report from Dr Don Brash who would restrict the Department of Conservation to protecting flora and endangered species curtail its advocacy role and give it a new mission statement that would shut out the Department of Conservation from promoting public access to and enjoyment of not only the high country but also our world-renowned network of tracks and huts. 
Rodney Hide 
: Has the Minister seen the reports that the ACT party has not flip-flopped on its policies that it does consider the land tenure review to be a land-grab and indeed right at this moment Mr Gerrard Eckhoff is out campaigning against this Government’s land-grab along the country’s rivers and waterways and our members will oppose it just as we will oppose all the socialism of this Government? 
Hon PETE HODGSON 
: I am delighted to observe that at least on one issue there is now agreement between the National Party and ACT even if they are both wrong. 
Question time interrupted.