Mitchell MarkHon MARK MITCHELL (National—Rodney): Thank you Mr Speaker. Firstly can I just very quickly acknowledge your ruling around the use of you". When you made that ruling I received this handwritten note from the Hon Ruth Dyson one of your Assistant Speakers saying "Mark victory for you in the Speaker's ruling. Ruth". That was backed up by a whole lot of text messages from my own colleagues so I'd say that I'm definitely a beneficiary of that ruling so thank you. Mr Speaker—Hon Paula Bennett: Thank you—thank you.Hon MARK MITCHELL: Thank you—ha ha!It brings me no joy to stand in the general debate today and raise the issues that I'm going to raise but what I do want to raise—because it is very important—is let's talk about the first matter that's sort of been raised by the deputy leader and that is Tarrant. That is the worst mass killer that we have ever had on our soil in New Zealand. There's one fundamental job that a Government has. The fundamental job of a Government is to try and protect its citizens is to stop it from being subjected to the type of attacks that we've seen. It has happened—unfortunately it has happened. We rallied as a country and a nation around the victims and their families.However we had a Prime Minister that stood in this House and we all agreed with her—we all got behind her. She stood in this House she said "I don't even want to mention his name. We don't even want to mention his name. We don't want to give him any recognition. We don't want to allow him to have a voice". Then she got on a plane and she flew to Paris. She flew to Paris because she wanted to hold the social media companies to account. That's why she did that. While she was in Paris trying to hold social media companies to account the one part of the puzzle that she controls—which is back here in New Zealand in our own corrections service—the one part that she and her Minister controls they were completely ignored—asleep at the wheel.He was back here writing letters spewing his vitriol that was going all around the world while she was overseas trying to hold the social media companies to account to stop them doing that. If you can't see there a massive failure—and I haven't seen one Government Minister yet or the Prime Minister actually just get up and make a heartfelt apology to New Zealand and say that we have made a massive failure on your behalf. They have retraumatised and revictimised victims that are still recovering and still trying to get over that horrendous attack—in fact probably never will. Then we come on to Karel Sroubek. Why does Karel Sroubek have a very high chance next month of being back out in the community? Why is an offender that has been convicted of drug smuggling drug importation—he's stolen identity he's had serious assault charges laid against him he's made threats against his ex-wife he associates with gang members. Why is Karel Sroubek who should have been coming out of jail not being put straight on a plane and deported back to the Czech Republic—where by the way they are very interested in him because they probably want to charge him for some assaults over there. Why is he not getting on a plane and instead he's coming out and there's a very very high risk that he'll be back out in the community. And is he a risk to the community? Absolutely. That finally brings me to Jason Reihana. Jason Reihana committed one of the most violent stabbing homicides—double homicides—this country has ever seen. If you talk to the police officers that went to the scene—and actually if you talk to our leader Simon Bridges who was the Crown prosecutor; he was responsible for taking this case and prosecuting Reihana in court—if you talk to them they'll tell you about a scene where there was blood everywhere splattered up the walls on the floor. One of them had jumped out the window. There were flailing pieces—there were skin and muscle that were caught on the windows. This was a frenzied attack with the use of three knives that not only traumatised—and not only did he threaten and kill his ex-wife and her new partner and the mother of his children he threatened the family as well. He made direct threats against the family.He was released. We understand and we accept the fact it was on humanitarian grounds because he was suffering from cancer. But the family should have been notified. The families should have been told that Reihana was coming out. Simon Bridges worked hard to make sure that he went away for 21 years. They let him out nine years early. The family should have been told he was coming out. His two sons—the sons that lost their mother through a frenzied knife attack stabbing attack by their father Jason Reihana—walked into a relative's house not knowing that he'd been released and were confronted with him sitting there.That's three examples of where this Government is letting us down and letting the community down in terms of community safety. Thank you."