Lee MelissaMELISSA LEE (National): Thank you Madam Chair. I'd like to go back to the question in relation to Supplementary Order Paper 80 in my name and actually address some of the comments that the Minister has made.But before I do that I'd like to commend my colleagues who have actually mentioned the issues of managed isolation and quarantine (MIQ) and also migrant families and also the travelling by bus that Stuart Smith talked about because many of us do in fact have family who are stranded all around the world.I personally have a family member who's in New York and we only get together at Christmas-time. My brother and his family can't visit. He is a New Zealand citizen. Even my eight-year-old nephew in New York has been vaccinated and that is what is actually happening. But because they can't even get an MIQ slot at the moment we can't even plan Christmas together. I haven't seen them for many years. My father is elderly he's now stuck in Korea and that is because I have told him I don't want him to go through MIQ being elderly and with health conditions that might put him in danger; at risk of contracting in MIQ. He's double vaccinated. He hasn't been home for more than two years. It's been gosh July of 2019—that was the last time that I saw my family.I think there are many risks and there are many questions. One of the reasons why I keep asking in terms of the security of the privacy of the COVID-19 tracer app is because there are many questions that people do in fact ask on many issues including things like: what happens if we move to the traffic light system? If we do the quick response (QR) code and if we keep a record of people coming in and if we do in fact go to the red light of the traffic light system does that mean that having hand sanitisers and wearing personal protective equipment and preventing people who actually have COVID or have tested positive who are not double vaccinated from using some services including hairdressers—is that enough or is there more that the Government actually requires? And there isn't enough information it seems going to the public to make very clear as to what is required of them just like this privacy issue.Speaking to the Supplementary Order Paper 85 in my name can the Minister please outline why he thinks that the short recommendation by the Health Committee in proposed new section 34A in clause 24 is sufficient for addressing the privacy concern raised by stakeholders and members of the public regarding the COVID-19 tracer app. I think he indicated that he does not support the Supplementary Order Paper in my name and if that is in fact the case I'd like to ask him: why not? Is it purely because it something that is recommended by an Opposition member or does he believe that my more comprehensive Supplementary Order Paper does less than what the actual report back from the Health Committee actually means it does? He actually said that there are no concerns in terms of privacy because the Government actually promises to keep that data secure but I'd like to remind the Minister that in August in Indonesia the Health Alert Card—it was reported in Reuters on 1 September—actually exposed the data of over 1.3 million users due to a lack in proactive updates in the app.They also had a situation with Singapore—and it was reported by the BBC on 5 January 2021—as it has allowed COVID tracing data for criminal investigation despite public officials previously explicitly ruling that data would not be used for anything other than the virus tracking.Also the Australian state police forces were using QR code scanning data—reported on 6 September—in the context of a criminal investigation prompting a law reform to be passed in Australia.If that is the case Minister how can we be certain? When other countries promised to actually keep data secure and haven't how do we trust that the New Zealand Government would? I think we need to make sure that it is in fact secure and does—I'm not so sure if the Minister actually heard. Is he just opposing this Supplementary Order Paper in my name No. 85 purely because I'm an Opposition member or does he believe that currently it goes as far or further than what the Supplementary Order Paper is actually trying to promote?