Smith Nick: Questions for Oral Answer — Questions to Ministers 
Smith Nick: Questions for Oral Answer — Questions to Ministers 
[Volume:628;Page:95] 
9.  
Hon Dr NICK SMITH (National—Nelson) 
 to the  
Minister for the Environment 
: Is he satisfied that his Government’s changes to the Resource Management Act 1991 are working well? 
Hon DAVID BENSON-POPE (Minister for the Environment) 
: 
 Yes. The Resource Management Act is about striking the appropriate balance between economic development and the protection of the environment. The improvements made through the recent amendments to the Act achieve this balance and significantly strengthen local decision-making. 
Hon Dr Nick Smith 
: Is the Minister aware that a Whangarei man citing treaty arguments has appealed under Labour’s amendments the Waitaki water plan and that the effect of this appeal is that billions of dollars’ worth of infrastructure developments including a 250-megawatt power station and 40000 hectares of irrigation are halted at an estimated cost to the South Island economy of $12 million per week; and does this indicate that the amendments as he said are working well? 
Hon DAVID BENSON-POPE 
: I am advised that the court has not accepted Mr Wilkie’s appeal on the basis of its procedural shortcomings. I am further advised that Mr Wilkie will need to seek leave from the court to lodge a late appeal and to date this has not occurred. I would encourage the member to concentrate on facts and not on his fantasy. 
Martin Gallagher 
: What has been the attitude of Local Government New Zealand—the organisation that represents every democratically elected local authority in New Zealand—to the changes to the Resource Management Act 1991? 
Hon DAVID BENSON-POPE 
: Local Government New Zealand has been strongly supportive of the Resource Management Act review process. Its national council member David Walter stated: “On balance a great deal has been achieved in an exemplary collaborative exercise and we will continue to work through that process.” He also said: “Again I thank the Government for the high level of engagement in this reform process and commend the process undertaken.” I am also mindful of the comments made by that well-known economist and political commentator Rod Oram who while commenting on National’s Resource Management Act proposal said: “All in all National’s RMA proposals fall short on some basic measures such as being practical wise and well-considered.” 
Hon Dr Nick Smith 
: Does he think it is good resource management process when a farmer in North Otago applies for the renewal of his water right in 2000 when he makes a submission to his regional council in that year but it is overruled by Labour’s ministerial call-in on which he is asked to make submissions; when he then makes submissions to the select committee on the renewal of his water right and when he then makes submissions to the special water board on the renewal of the water right and he is now facing further delays because of the appeal he is also facing a further round of submissions on the substantive application and 4 years later and after six lots of submissions he is still 2 years away from having his water right renewal considered; is that in the Minister’s mind good process? 
Hon DAVID BENSON-POPE 
: I am sure we would all agree that the process introduced by my predecessor Minister Hobbs has gone a long way to solving a lot of the sorts of problems that Dr Smith is detailing and I would say that those problems were caused not by the legislation or by the acts of this Government but rather by the failings of Environment Canterbury. 
Hon Dr Nick Smith 
: Could the Minister outline for me given that answer specifically how the Government’s amendments have helped that farmer in trying to get the renewal of his water right given that it was under his Government’s legislation that they called in and overrode the resource consent process and after waiting 5 years he still has at least another 2 years before his water right will be considered—how has the Government helped that farmer? 
Hon DAVID BENSON-POPE 
: I am sure it does not escape Dr Smith that the amendments to the Act were passed in this year and he is talking about historical difficulties. 
Hon Dr Nick Smith 
: Does it make sense on a day when the Christchurch  
Press  
and other media lead with stories of power shortages for the Waitaki River which is our most important power resource to be held up with further delays over a water plan that has now been 4 years in the making and will he take responsibility for his mess in the Resource Management Act if the lights go out for tens of thousands of New Zealanders next winter? 
Hon DAVID BENSON-POPE 
: I find a certain irony in that member speculating about the lights going out but what I would say is that I have confidence in the courts to make appropriate decisions in this matter. 
Hon Dr Nick Smith 
: I seek the leave of the House to table the appeal of Mr Bevan Wilkie of Whangarei citing treaty reasons for his High Court appeal against the Waitaki water plan. 
Madam SPEAKER 
: Leave is sought to table that document. Is there any objection? There is objection.