Watts SimonSIMON WATTS (National—North Shore): Thank you very much Madam Chair and I thank the Minister of Commerce and Consumer Affairs for his responses in regards to questions around clause 48.I want to move now to clause 51; this takes us on to the actual preparation of the report. And a little bit more context would have been appreciated around the answer that the Minister proposed which is Well it sort of depends really around what we're going to do." And I acknowledge there is a bit of variation but that is pretty wide-ranging. But clause 51(2) provides a number of areas in which the commission may include other recommendations that it thinks fit including recommendations and it outlines from (a) to (e) a number of those. I particularly want to look at clause 51(2)(b)—this is what the commission can recommend—"changes to the policies or practices of central or local government:". You know that's sort of buried on page 40 of the legislation but I think it's—the context around the commission actually being able to have carte blanche ability to make recommendations around changes of policies and practices of central or local government pretty much means that it can make recommendations about anything in regards to Government.So I'm interested around why that is such a broad-ranging aspect around recommendations and is the intent of that particularly around local government that the commission is actually able to you know get into details such as the Resource Management Act consenting or zoning or whether a food safety certificate is applied within a certain duration by a council—what is actually the expectation of what you would expect to see? What's an example of one of the changes in policies around local government and the other aspect around central government? Well that includes all of central government so pretty much you know I can imagine—well I don't know if the commissioner is paid by the hour but I tell you what if you were paid by the hour jeez you could come up with a lot of recommendations couldn't you if that was the scope of your ability? I guess one has to be considerate around whether that's actually going to add value or not. So some context around that subpoint would be interesting to hear.I also—51(2)(e): "persons within the grocery industry changing their behaviour." An interesting clause in itself in that now the commissioner has the remit to make recommendations around the behaviours of individuals of persons working within the sector and where they need to change their behaviour. And it sort of reminds me of the good old days of the school teachers sort of you know saying—I'm sure it wasn't the case the Hon Mark Mitchell because you were always well behaved at school; we know that hypothetically—hypothetically—you were maybe on one day misbehaving and a teacher had a little chat and said—well saying "the Hon Mark Mitchell" for the purpose of this conversation—"You need to change your behaviour." But you know what realistically are we talking about here? Because there's a heck of a lot of people that work within the grocery sector and this is right down to "persons within the grocery industry"—actually it's bigger than just that. You know realistically what are we talking about here in practice? Is the expectation that actually everybody is in scope and what would be an example of the recommendation? Because it says that the commissioner if they think fit—so basically if they feel like it—they can make a recommendation. Realistically what's going to happen? I appreciate context on clause 51 please."