Rurawhe AdrianADRIAN RURAWHE (Labour—Te Tai Hauāuru): Tēnā koe e Te Māngai o Te Whare otirā tēnā tātau katoa i tēnei wiki ngā mi'i nui ki a rātau mā e noho pōuri ana i tēnei wā te tokomaha ō koutou nō reira tēnā tātau.[Thank you Mr Assistant Speaker but at the same time acknowledgments to us all this week and huge condolences to those others experiencing remorse at this moment; the many of you. Therefore acknowledgments to us.]I spoke on the first reading of this bill and that was a very interesting debate to say the very least. Probably my most pressing question to Mr Bishop is: did he get his Lotto ticket from Jono Naylor which he promised to get?The anomaly that the member speaks about addressing—a 6-week period where this book was not available; that is what the member was speaking about. Just to give some context there are some way more important issues that our whānau are dealing with and I will give you one. The name the main character in this book has been given is Te Arepa and for those of you in the House who do not know Te Arepa is more of a title than a name. It is actually part of the name of Jesus Christ. It is a biblical name. When people refer to Te Ārepa me Te Ōmeka it can be taken as referring to Jesus Christ. One of the issues that I have with the book itself is: why did the writer choose that particular name to give to this child? But over and above that getting back to some of the anomalies if that book was written in 2017 that whānau may very well have been living in a car-park in a car. That is probably a way more important anomaly in our society to be dealing with. This is really a First World problem" issue.Over to the bill—what does the bill actually do? I want to acknowledge the four submitters—Louisa Wall: Four?ADRIAN RURAWHE: Four submitters: Family First Shane Campbell the Society for Promotion of Community Standards and the Office of Film and Literature Classification. So there were just four and as my colleague Clare Curran pointed out they were fairly substantial submissions. I want to in particular acknowledge Shane Campbell. I quite enjoyed reading his submission. I thought it was a very well-written one. I was not on the select committee so I do want to acknowledge the work of the Justice and Electoral Committee on this bill.In the end it is not really about the book called Into the River by Ted Dawe—and for the record no I have not read it and I am not going to read it. In effect it is about the process as it applies to every classification of every book. That is the real issue around this particular bill.I do want to acknowledge that it does address something that people might be concerned about and creates more options for classification under the review process to be used because there was a serious lack of options to apply to the classification of this book which led to the book not being available for 6 weeks. It is not like having to wait for a doctor's appointment for 4 months or a dentist's appointment or whatever—you know just to give some context.That is what needed to be addressed through this bill in the select committee and it has been. It has come back to the House with a number of changes which is right and correct and there seems to have been support from all of the committee as far as I understand it but I look forward to hearing from other speakers from the other parties yet to speak.So when we think about the process that they have to go through it also as I understand it introduces other options where one of these additional classifications during that review period has been applied and of course you would naturally need provisions to deal with a case where those conditions have been breached. So the committee has come back with some recommendations and from the departmental report they look absolutely appropriate to include in this bill. The bill has been restructured on the advice also I believe of the department.Getting back to how this really impacts on the whole process—yes it will make that process better. It will mean that in the instance where a book has been classified and then basically challenged then the process and the tools in the tool kit available for that process to happen are more enhanced. I commend the bill to the House. Kia ora."