Naylor JonoJONO NAYLOR (National): Sorry I almost forgot to speak for a moment—I thought we were doing the mannequin challenge as was laid down by my colleague who spoke previously Peeni Henare. This is a good bill and certainly as we went through the select committee process I think it actually as other speakers have mentioned brought up a bunch of issues that we possibly had not anticipated as we went through. I think ultimately it is eminently sensible as many of the Government bills are of course because this is a Government that is moving so fast sometimes that to the Opposition it may appear that we are standing still. It is one of those things—such a blur we have got so much on and this is yet another good piece of legislation.I think what we need to do in this kind of context is really look at what it is that we are trying to achieve. What there has been in New Zealand—as I think I mentioned in my speech in the second reading of this bill—is a growing trend for people to seek out low- and no-alcohol drinks. The sale of low- and no-alcohol beer is very much on the rise particularly since we have lowered the alcohol limits for driving and those kinds of things. So what we need to do is ensure that when people go into supermarkets for example and want to purchase such products they are easy for them to find. With the way the law stands currently if you walked into a supermarket looking for low-alcohol beer and went to the beer aisle you probably would not find any unless of course the supermarket is trying to stick to the spirit of the law if not the letter of the law. The likelihood or potential outcome is that someone will walk out with full-strength beer under their arm though that was not what they intended to go in and purchase. In this regard what we are wanting to see happen is to make it logical for people. Obviously when the initial legislation was drafted it was thought that defining drinks by alcohol content made sense but what we discovered as we explored this further is that actually that description really is not that useful. So this is about ensuring that people who are going in looking for low-alcohol beer or wine or mead can actually find it with the other beer or wine or mead and not find it sitting in the soft drinks section.Jacinda Ardern: Good old mead.JONO NAYLOR: Good old mead. Who even knew about mead being sold in supermarkets? This is yet another one of the great learnings that we had during the select committee process. I thought mead was simply something that Friar Tuck made in the Robin Hood movies but no apparently it is sold in our supermarkets. So if people are looking for those particular beverages they will now be able to find them in the appropriate aisle.The other point that I think is really critical is that if something is being marketed as beer or wine or mead it is entirely inappropriate for it to be sitting alongside the Coke Pepsi and Sprite. Children who are going past those aisles are not then being subject to the sorts of beverages that we would normally associate with alcohol.As we went through this process clearly we had some lessons that were learnt. The fact that there is agreement around the House that this is the right course of action for us to be taking I believe helps to reinforce that we have arrived at a sensible place.That is the prime part of the Sale and Supply of Alcohol (Display of Low-alcohol Beverages and Other Remedial Matters) Amendment Bill. There are of course a few other remedial matters that are associated with that—obviously particularly around looking at the idea of companies holding a licence. Again that is pragmatic and sensible. It ensures that we have got some good legislation going forward. I look forward to when we can have the third reading of this legislation and put it into action.