Bayly AndrewANDREW BAYLY (National—Hunua): Thank you Mr Chair. First of all I thank the Minister for standing up and answering some of those questions that my good colleague the Hon Paul Goldsmith put to him. I think one of the responses was a question that I was going to just ask a little bit more about because at the moment anyone making an application for a foreign transaction in New Zealand has to go through a very very expensive Overseas Investment Office form-filling exercise based on a counterfactual argument. And as Minister Parker just said what is proposed is a two- to three-page form and I understand it's going to be an online form. I think that one of the questions I'd like to put to him is: how do you know that you've actually got sufficient information to make a proper judgment? And you Minister Parker being the only Minister who under this proposed bill will be the Minister responsible for making that godlike decision—and so the design of that form is absolutely essential. Of course again I don't want to harken back to his regulation-making power but I hadn't referred to this one—this is the fifth one. This is going to be—because we recommended it; well some members did—that clause 52 could authorise the manner in which the notifications and how the forms are going to be set up in effect.So my question is has the form design been prepared? Is it available today? Because I presume this bill is going through the House this afternoon. So is the form available right now? And if he is I'd very much appreciate the opportunity if the Minister could stand up and elucidate all the key aspects of that rather than talk generically because I think that's absolutely essential for people—not only the people who will advise those foreign investors but also for foreign investors themselves. The other thing—yesterday I spoke on the Budget and I went through some of the gross elements of spending that to me seemed incredibly wasteful. I highlighted that the Prime Minister's department—that she is going to get another $6 million to $7 million for some issue and her house Premier House is going to be repaired. Then probably the one I found most interesting is that in the Budget there was $6 million set aside for after the election for the re-establishment of new ministerial offices and their staff—6 million bucks. I made the point yesterday you know that if we get into that situation in matter of a few months' time I don't think we're going to need that 6 million bucks. We're probably going to hand it back. But what I didn't see in there—I did see something for the Commerce Commission but I saw nothing in the Budget for the Overseas Investment Office. I would have thought you are now going to have to review every single transaction all the staffing requirements the people—that is just a phenomenal amount of transactions that will have to go over your desk Minister. And yet you will be required to have advice no doubt—unless you will do it in a divine right but I presume you're going to be relying on officials to advise you on each transaction based on the two- to three-page form. And so the issues are (a) the staffing requirement and secondly the cost of that. You've just said that you're not going to pass on that cost so that's a net cost to the Government. So I'd really like to hear a little bit further from the Minister on those questions.