Mallard Trevor: Questions for Oral Answer — Questions to Ministers 
Mallard Trevor: Questions for Oral Answer — Questions to Ministers 
[Volume:656;Page:5885] 
6.  
Hon TREVOR MALLARD (Labour—Hutt South) 
 to the  
Minister of Labour 
: Has she or any Department of Labour official analysed the contract being offered to workers currently employed on behalf of Telecom; if so what advice has been given to those workers or their representatives? 
Hon Dr WAYNE MAPP (Minister of Defence) 
 on behalf of the  
Minister of Labour 
: No. Neither the Minister nor the Department of Labour gets involved in contractual disputes between private sector companies and their workers. 
Hon Trevor Mallard 
: Has the Minister or her officials read the emails received in her office on this subject over the last month? 
Hon Dr WAYNE MAPP 
: I am not in possession of that information myself but it would be extraordinary if a Minister did not read emails. I am sure that she would have read the emails or her staff would have. 
Hon Trevor Mallard 
: Does she agree with her colleague John Carter that the contracts are “a crock” and workers should not sign them? 
Hon Dr WAYNE MAPP 
: Of course Mr Carter is acting on behalf of his constituents in his capacity as the member of Parliament for Northland. He is well known for representing their concerns and that is precisely why he has such a large majority and continues to be voted in by his constituents. 
Hon Trevor Mallard 
: Can the Minister then explain why the contracts are a crock in Northland but are supposedly acceptable around the rest of the country? 
Hon Dr WAYNE MAPP 
: If the member had listened more carefully he would appreciate that the member for Northland was acting on behalf of his constituents. Like all members of Parliament we hear the views of our constituents. That is the normal role and activity of a member of Parliament; it is not a matter of ministerial responsibility. 
Sue Bradford 
: Why is the Minister refusing to meet with the National Distribution Union executive this week because according to the Minister’s office the Telecom workers who belong to the Engineering Printing and Manufacturing Union another union are on strike; and will she be applying the same principle by for example refusing to meet with any business representatives this week because Telecom is involved in an industrial dispute? 
Hon Dr WAYNE MAPP 
: I am advised that the Minister was unable to meet the National Distribution Union because of a clash of commitments. 
Darien Fenton 
: Does the Minister agree that there is an inherent issue of employment fairness at stake when the chief executive of Telecom gets $5 million or more while the Telecom lines engineers are facing redundancy with no compensation; and will she be considering any measures to help to rectify this awful situation? 
Hon Dr WAYNE MAPP 
: I would remind that member that these issues are all resolved under the Employment Relations Act which was passed in the year 2000 by the then Labour Government. 
Sue Bradford 
: I seek leave to table a statement from the National Distribution Union saying it was advised by the Minister’s office that the risks are too great for her to come to the meeting and she cannot meet with the union because Telecom workers are on strike. 
Mr SPEAKER 
: Leave is sought to table that document. Is there any objection? There is no objection. 
Document by leave laid on the Table of the House. 
Hon Trevor Mallard 
: In light of the Minister’s response to my second supplementary question is he prepared to deny in this House that the contract being offered to workers formerly employed on behalf of Telecom is a crock? 
Mr SPEAKER 
: Before I ask the Minister to respond to that I say the Minister is not actually responsible for an employment contract that is being offered by a private company like Telecom. Although I did permit the Minister to give his opinion on the comment made by his ministerial colleague once we get too far down the track on matters that are properly private matters of the company it becomes a bit difficult. 
Hon Trevor Mallard 
: I raise a point of order Mr Speaker. It is a relatively simple one. This is a matter that has been referred on a number of occasions to the responsible Minister’s office. It is something that I am sure the Minister has looked at. She may want to say that she does not want to comment on it but I think the matter is properly before the House. 
Mr SPEAKER 
: I hear the member. I invite the Hon Dr Wayne Mapp to answer the question. 
Hon Dr WAYNE MAPP 
: As is well known Ministers do not get involved in private disputes between private companies and their employees. That is exactly how the Employment Relations Act is supposed to work.