Stanford EricaERICA STANFORD (National—East Coast Bays): Thank you Madam Chair. I just wanted to carry on from my colleague Paul Goldsmith but in a new and different clause 92C—so that's the equal and opposite clause. So where my colleague Paul Goldsmith was talking about the employer side this is the equal and opposite side for the employees.So basically this section requires the employee bargaining side to represent or to use their best endeavours again to represent the collective interests of all the covered employees whether or not they are members of a union. So my question to the Minister—and he traversed through clause 92F where it says what best endeavours means—but my question here is when you've got a bargaining side that is a union they've got divided interests they've got the interests of their members but they're also under this part supposed to give equal rights to the people who are not their members but are other employees who are part of the bargaining process. And I understand that it says here what they're supposed to do: provide regular updates" "give all covered employees"—whether they're union members or not—"the opportunity to provide feedback"; that's great. Then it says that they have to consider all the feedback received. But where it stops is that it's completely silent around what they need to do with that feedback.So clearly here you will have a conflict between the unions and their members and the other employees who are not covered by the union but are still subject and part of the bargaining process. So where you may have non-union employees giving their feedback as part of this and the feedback being acknowledged and received and considered—there's nothing in here to state that as far as I can see and maybe the Minister can point it out if I've missed it. But there's nothing in here in between say subclause (2)(c) and (d) of clause 92C to actually require the union to do anything with the consideration of that feedback. So my point here is that there is quite clearly going to be in some instances a conflict of interest between the two types of members: the members and the non-members. If the non-members' views and feedback and wants are different than the union members' then what requirement does the union have other than just to consider the feedback of the non-members to actually act and bring those forward in the negotiations? Because it's not laid out here and it's not clear to me and it may well be the same for the employer's side as well; I'm not looking at that at the moment I'm just looking at clause 92C.So my specific question to the Minister is: what happens in the case where a union has its members and non-members who have different feedback and different points of view? What is the requirement on the union who if they are the bargaining party and the only bargaining party to equally put forward both of the views of the members and the non-members when they are conflicting? Because it looks like in the bill all they have to do is to provide the update in clause 92C(2)(a) and then in (b) to give the opportunity for feedback and then in (c) to consider it. What it feels like is missing there is a new subclause 92(ca) which says "then put forward equally the views of both the members and the non-members if those views are divergent and different". And I suppose that the point here is that there is a possibility for conflict when those views are divergent and there is no provision as to what the bargaining party if it is the union should do in that case. I'd be interested in the Minister's explanation as to whether or not he's thought of that whether there is anything in here that potentially I've missed that would address that or what the union would be required to do if they've got a divided interest in this case. Thank you."