Tirikatene RinoRINO TIRIKATENE (Labour—Te Tai Tonga): I am pleased to make a contribution to the Committee stage of this bill the Papawai and Kaikokirikiri Trusts Amendment Bill. I think that in relation to the preamble I do endorse the remarks that have been made around the missed opportunity for having a dual translation of this bill but I think it is a lesson for those who seek to introduce private bills or local bills in this House. If that is what they want to do then that should be planned for at the front end of the legislative drafting process so that all of that work can be done up front so it is not putting pressure on to the select committee after the fact to try to look at the possibility of a translation because it is quite a specialised task.I guess it is just about being prepared and upfront when you are introducing the legislation and if it is the wish of the people who are sponsoring the bill then it would be good if they took those steps to ensure that they carry out the translation at the start. I would hope that the reasons such as practical difficulties and time constraints will not preclude it in the future because we should try to facilitate and help in every way possible in the crafting of legislation to ensure that if that is the wish of the sponsors of the bill the services that are available to draft that translation are at the disposal of those who seek to use those services.I do commend the trust for seeking to modernise itself through this bill. I think it is some 73 years old the legislation that we are amending through this bill so it is quite timely. Processes should be reviewed and updated to these modern times. Just focusing on the preamble the wishes of the trust board are to do four things. There is no need for me to read them out but they are about modernising and updating the powers of the trust board.One that I do want to focus on which has not been covered thus far in the debate is around the definition of the Bishop of Te Upoko o Te Ika. Obviously we are dealing with a private entity the Anglican Church and the Bishop. The Bishop is obviously a senior office holder within the Anglican Church but because of the cross-referencing of that term to the actual definition I do want to refer to the definition of the Bishop of Te Upoko o Te Ika—in particular to one word and that is in section 2(a) inserted by clause 4 where it refers to Polynesia".I just want to ask the member in the chair Alastair Scott—that is quite a broad term: Polynesia. I believe that if we are enacting this legislation to modernise and update this trust board I would like to know exactly what the parameters are. What does it actually mean by "Polynesia"? Are we referring to the Polynesian triangle where we have got thousands of islands in the Moana-nui-a-Kiwa—we have got a Hawaii at the top Easter Island on the far side and Aotearoa in our little corner? Or are we referring to some other Polynesia a more defined more discreet island within Polynesia?So I would not mind clarification because we are enacting this legislation and to put a very sort of vague term such as "Polynesia" into it even though it is an internal private office that is within the Anglican Church—I believe we need to be more exact. I think that if we are enacting legislation we need to be more precise in our terms. So it is a bit vague with "Polynesia". For instance we are referring to "Aotearoa New Zealand and Polynesia". So does that refer to the Realm of New Zealand and the dependent territories that we have within Aotearoa New Zealand? Or does it refer to other associated territories that come within the realm of—"