Swarbrick ChlöeCHLÖE SWARBRICK (Green—Auckland Central): Chlöe Swarbrick—I've only been here five years Mr Chair! Hon Member: Ageing.CHLÖE SWARBRICK: Ageing—I am. I have two questions at the top of this debate for the Minister that will come as no surprise given the proceeding debate to this point. The first question to the Minister relates to something specifically outlined in the regulatory impact statement at paragraph 23 on page 9—if the Minister or her officials would like to go to that point so that we can get an answer for the committee tonight noting of course that we're not going to have a select committee stage so we're not able to get this information in front of us and thoroughly go through it as parliamentarians through due parliamentary scrutiny; nor are we able to get our Official Information Act requests processed or our written questions answered in the next few hours that the committee has tonight.So the first question relating to paragraph 23 on page 9 which I see the Minister and officials have got to now is: what stakeholders were approached for the targeted conversations" around this policy and the policy decisions that led to this legislation? I think that's a really important piece of information and evidence for the committee to have in front of it as we continue this debate tonight because of course as has been well canvassed what the regulatory impact statement identifies is that tenants are going to be the most impacted by this legislation but it was not tenants who were consulted with. In fact we saw these targeted conversations with stakeholders who were landlords who were property managers and of course as many have already identified Kāinga Ora.The second question to the Minister is kind of elaborating on her response to my questions in the House in question time yesterday. She noted in response to a question that was about exactly these delays to the healthy homes standards and some of the failures of implementation and enforcement of the healthy homes standards that the Government had actually considered a warrant of fitness at some point in time. Again I note that whilst I put in an Official Information Act request yesterday and a written question on precisely this we are not going to get a response in time for that to contribute to the substance of this debate so I would really appreciate further information from the Minister on precisely when and how robustly and to what extent and whether it was consulted on and what on earth happened with this idea of a warrant of fitness which as we've canvassed in earlier speeches throughout this debate would have addressed many of the key issues with the healthy homes standards not least the fact that currently the burden for enforcement falls in practice on tenants to take their issues to the Tenancy Tribunal. So those are the two key questions for the Minister. What key stakeholders were approached for the targeted conversations that led to this policy development and the legislation we're debating tonight and secondly when how to what extent and where did the Government consider a warrant of fitness and why did it come to the conclusions it did to not implement them?"