Hughes Darren: Questions for Oral Answer — Questions to Ministers 
Hughes Darren: Questions for Oral Answer — Questions to Ministers 
[Volume:666;Page:13840] 
5. 
Hon DARREN HUGHES (Labour) 
 to the  
Minister of Transport 
: Does he stand by his statement that “the Government is totally committed to the SuperGold Card”? 
Hon NATHAN GUY (Associate Minister of Transport) 
 on behalf of the  
Minister of Transport 
: Yes. 
Hon Darren Hughes 
: Can he tell us when the review of the SuperGold card will actually result in some decisions given that it has already missed its May and July deadlines causing real concern amongst the hundreds of thousands of senior citizens who use the SuperGold card particularly for off-peak public transport travel? 
Hon NATHAN GUY 
: The report will be completed very soon. 
Hon Darren Hughes 
: Is the Government committed to the current definition of off-peak travel services so that our senior citizens can continue to benefit from free public transport off-peak? 
Hon NATHAN GUY 
: The SuperGold card entitlements that superannuitants receive will not change. 
Hon Darren Hughes 
: I raise a point of order Mr Speaker. My question was different from asking about the entitlements that senior citizens receive. It asked whether the Government was committed to the same definition of off-peak travel services which is one component of the entire SuperGold card. That was the point of my question. 
Mr SPEAKER 
: The Minister answered that entitlements will not change. That was a pretty clear answer. 
Hon Darren Hughes 
: Can I speak further to the point of order? 
Mr SPEAKER 
: I will hear the honourable member further indeed. 
Hon Darren Hughes 
: One of the aspects that has been identified by the Minister in the review that he has asked the Minister of Transport to do concerns the issue of the definition of off-peak transport—the definition of those hours— 
Mr SPEAKER 
: What I invite the member to reflect on though is that he asked a question and the Minister gave on the face of it a reasonable answer. He said the entitlements would not change. The member has knowledge that suggests that maybe the review was looking at layers below the entitlements so it is quite obvious what the next supplementary question should be. We do not need to have a point of order to sort that out. 
Hon Darren Hughes 
: In respect of his complaints about the cost of the scheme going from $18 million to $22 million has he complained to the Minister of Finance that it was possible to find $1.7 billion of taxpayers’ money as a gift to South Canterbury Finance investors but he could not find $4 million for our senior citizens to continue to travel off-peak for free? 
Hon NATHAN GUY 
: I am sure that that member would assume that the operators should not make a profit under the scheme. We want to ensure that we look after superannuitants. As I have just mentioned in the answer to the previous supplementary question there will be no changes for superannuitants under the existing scheme. There has been wide consultation. We are working through those processes now and I look forward to receiving the final report. 
H V Ross Robertson 
: Can the Minister therefore tell the House how the Government’s objectives for senior-citizen mobility and community participation will be enhanced by forcing transport operators to charge a 20 percent top-up for local bus services in Dunedin? 
Hon NATHAN GUY 
: Yes there is some discussion going on about the level of subsidy and that has been widely consulted on with regional councils and operators and with the likes of Grey Power and Age Concern. So far from the 14 regional councils that have been consulted through this process we are getting very very positive support back.