Davidson MaramaMARAMA DAVIDSON (Co-Leader—Green): Thank you Madam Chair. I am picking up specifically on Part 2 clause 20 and I've also got Supplementary Order Paper (SOP) 497 in front of me which relates to those very clauses. I want to pick up the reasons why the definition of marae" has been included in the original text and I also wanted to ask the Auditor-General if that SOP that is now going to remove the words—the definition of the word "marae" is on the table. There is a longstanding legal use of having to single out marae because of the differentiation between private dwellings and the grey area where marae fit. So I understand it was included in that respect but in Part 2 clause 20 "Powers of entry" it singles out marae specifically originally to actually overlay an extra threshold of protection and criteria so that warrantless entry can happen and we are seeking to remove marae—and I will come to the context of why that too has happened but it also then removes those extra layers of protection. So I will just pick up on the Part 2 part of the bill and it is something that the Greens absolutely believe needs to be scrutinised—these warrantless powers—and absolutely uphold that there needs to be public conversation. Some of that we've heard just overnight in the community on social media. But we worked to provide an extra layer of protection around warrantless entry that included for marae needing to have extra grounds or reasonable grounds and that they would only enter premises if it was necessary to direct people to disperse. There were a number of extra thresholds that were worked on in the current version of the bill. And the SOP—I'm wanting some clarity as to whether those extra protections remain or whether the marae now has the same status as every other venue and place. I'm hoping that I can address the context of why I also understand removing the word "marae" from our perspective is important because there has been public outrage as to that inclusion of the words feeling that marae were being unduly targeted particularly in that Part 2 clause 20 of the bill. That outrage acknowledges a longstanding historical current and colonial context of the justice system being unfairly applied to target Māori communities brown communities and low-income communities. The police themselves have acknowledged that longstanding legacy and I do acknowledge the ongoing work that they are wanting to do to correct that and to have a different approach. But that is one of the changes that has come through in I think SOP 497 but it certainly addresses Part 2 clause 20. Then I simply wanted to put on record that that outrage has come from a particular context and has brought us to some changes which we are seeing today which I am supporting for that purpose. But some misinformation has also been drummed up including by the Opposition members around the meaning and the inclusion of the word "marae" in the very first place. In my final time left on this particular call I understand—again we're going to clause 20 "Powers of entry"—the reasons and the hardships that people have faced with the interruption to our ordinary liberties. We've all felt that in many different ways and particular groups and people and sectors have felt it in big massive ways. We need this legal framework to be able to sit behind alert level 2 and so on and so forth. I do welcome the change to review—rather than have the two-year outset sunset clause we will actually review at more regular and closer terms. I think that that's absolutely something that we all should welcome and I'm very pleased to see that happen also. But I think just if the Auditor-General could explain a little bit more about the inclusion of the word "marae"."