Lee MelissaMELISSA LEE (National): Thank you Madam Chair. Te Heamana o te komiti kia mihi mō te karanga. He kaupapa tino nui tēnei.[Madam Chairperson thank you for call. This is an important matter.]In relation to this being Māori Language Week I took some advice from my very good friend from across over there. I texted her and said Give me some Māori kōrero for me to actually say." So thank you very much Louisa Wall for that assistance.Madam Chair thank you for giving me an opportunity to rise. This is the first time today that I'm actually speaking and I look forward to potentially getting another call later on to speak to some of my other Supplementary Order Papers (SOPs) but right now I'd like to talk to two: one is Supplementary Order Paper 332 and the other one is SOP 334. Both are in relation to the SCENZ Group that earlier members have actually spoken about. I'll start with SOP 332. This is to amend clause 19 after clause 19(3) to insert subclause (4) that "No person may be appointed as a member or remain as a member of the SCENZ Group if they have been the subject of a written complaint to any relevant professional body (including for the avoidance of doubt the Health and Disability Commissioner) in relation to any thing done or failed to have been done in accordance with or nominally in accordance with this Act."I think—in light of what's actually happened in many different organisations and particularly so in this bill when we're dealing with life and death situations—the people who are actually looking at reviewing looking at the particular issues in place I think there needs to be more transparency if ever that the people who are representing the families the people who are actually putting our legislation in closer scrutiny they must be beyond reproach. I believe that any complaint that they've ever received they've got to be beyond that.I think earlier Louisa Wall actually supported the very idea that people who have different diverse groups—whether they be ethnicity or religious or cultural I think we do agree. But in this particular case if they have been subject to a complaint if they have in fact had issues with trust and perhaps misconduct I believe they should be removed from this particular grouping in my opinion. So that is what this Supplementary Order Paper 332 actually gets to. As we said it is actually the conduct of the particular member that is in question. I think we need to put extra added protection for our vulnerable communities.The other in relation to the SCENZ Group is the Supplementary Order Paper in my name—both in my name actually. This one SOP 334 is actually in relation—it's very close very similar. This is actually about "A member of the SCENZ Group who becomes aware that they have a close association (whether financial personal or professional) with a person whose actions or inactions are being considered by this SCENZ Group in accordance with its functions detailed in subsection (2) must recuse themselves from such consideration." I believe the word "must" actually goes there. I think if there is actually an issue of conflict of interest—I mean we try and manage this in this Parliament. We expect people who work in the public office to actually manage these issues very very carefully and transparently. I think when we're talking about people who will consider other people's lives in their decision-making process they must have the transparency. If there is in fact any kind of conflict of interest they must recuse themselves from that particular group.Obviously there'll be more that I would actually like to talk about in these SOPs that I'm actually proposing and I hope that other members will actually consider my SOPs 332 and 334 because I believe that these actually give added protection should we actually end up voting for this bill. To put it on the record I stand firmly against this very bill. CHAIRPERSON (Hon Ruth Dyson): I call Alfred Ngaro."