Bayly AndrewANDREW BAYLY (National—Hunua): Thank you Madam Assistant Speaker. I think the quote of the day has got to be There is a difference between a broken promise and one that is yet to be delivered." Don't you think that's a good one? That's a fantastic statement from the Leader of the House the Hon Chris Hipkins trying to explain why this coalition Government hasn't delivered in the Budget. Despite all the talk of crises that we heard from the coalition Government over the preceding month or so there has only been one winner in this Budget and that has been Winston Peters—Mr Winston Peters who's got the carpets and the curtains for Stockholm and the tax cuts for horse breeders.If you look at the Budget health and education are brought in line with what National had done last year and in the Budgets before that. There is nothing additional at all. So what I find funny is that the middle New Zealanders the hard-working New Zealanders are the ones that are going to miss out in this Budget. They're the ones that are going to be hit by a whole raft of new taxes. In fact if you look at it $2.3 billion of new taxes are being collected by this Government in this Budget—one is around the regional fuel tax and of course we know how that's going to bite soon; they're increasing the five-year brightline test; there's the Amazon tax; and the tax on GST on online goods is being introduced by a Government who campaigned on no new taxes—no new taxes. We didn't campaign on no new taxes; it was that Government on the other side who campaigned on it. That is incorrect and wrong. If you're not going to increase taxes you should say that and make sure you stick to it.Against that they've cut off the $1060 of average tax cuts. Who that hurts most of all is the students; it's the people out there going to university who want to do a job in the holidays and earn enough money; it's the young couple trying to save for a house who do not yet have a family; and it's the older people who're only going to get a measly couple of hundred bucks for the winter energy payment in this first year when they were promised they were going to get an $800 payment this year. That is the travesty around this Budget.But what I also want to focus on is the question of housing. I've got to ask: what is wrong with Mr Twyford who talks of highly-qualified Treasury officials as being kids at Treasury or bean counters at Treasury? They are derogatory terms—absolutely derogatory terms. We know they are highly qualified people. They may be young but it does not mean their view should be discounted. I think the issue that Mr Twyford forgot to look at is that at the end of the Budget documents of course those projections around housing which Treasury had dropped from $5 billion over five years to an estimated $2.5 billion benefit from housing coming in over the next five years were actually signed off by the Secretary of the Treasury—the Secretary of the Treasury. So it had all been through the cascade in the entire Treasury process and yet Mr Twyford took it upon himself to launch a personal attack. I think it's dreadful. That follows the Reserve Bank who had also come to their own view and downgraded the KiwiBuild projections in the last update they gave in December late last year and of course what Fran O'Sullivan said only just a couple of days ago—this is a quote from her—was "It's obvious that the KiwiBuild affordable housing programme will not produce 100000 [new] houses over the next decade".So what I think was missing in this Budget was there was nothing in the Budget about the urban development authority they've spoken of nothing in the Budget about training people involved in the building construction sector nothing in the Budget about speeding up the consenting process for new homes and nothing in the Budget about putting in place a process to speed up new products coming into the country. All we hear about and read about today is K3T panels being installed in houses in Northland. This Budget is a travesty."