Stanford Erica; Woods MeganERICA STANFORD (National—East Coast Bays): I just want to go a little bit deeper into amended section 11 set out in clause 7—the second change. The Minister in the chair the Hon Megan Woods in her answer made it clear as to what this change is as set out in new section 11(1)(a)(x): satisfy any specified criteria before entering New Zealand from a place outside New Zealand". Now in her answer she made it very clear that that is about making sure that we are managing the amount of people who are coming into New Zealand so we can make sure we have places for them. I totally understand that. It makes absolute sense. I get that. This bit that we're inserting doesn't say that. It's pretty ambiguous. I mean it gives an example: "which may include being registered to [enter a quarantine facility]". But I want to know why the Minister just didn't say that in this change because it's actually very wide and very broad. It says "satisfy any specified criteria before entering New Zealand" and you're going to have people who say "Well what does that mean?" You've given an example: "which may include being registered to enter [a quarantine facility]" and I totally understand that. But the fact is that this section—or this new part of it that's being inserted—doesn't do exactly what the Minister said. It's far broader than that and it seems to be sloppily drafted and would lead people to think that there may be other things—in fact it does allow other things. It says "satisfy any specified criteria" which will lead people to think that before you can come home there will be other things that you have to undertake whether it's testing or quarantining or vaccination or whatever it is. I mean we don't know because not here. But wouldn't the Minister not agree that that is very broad quite sloppy? If that's not the intent—if her intent is just to make sure we've got enough places in New Zealand as she said why doesn't it just say that? Why is it so broad to say "satisfy any specified criteria"? And would she potentially look at an amendment that would tighten that up?Hon Dr MEGAN WOODS (Minister of Housing): Look I'm happy to answer that. I think the member's probably answered the question herself in the course of her contribution—that this is a framework piece of legislation for which secondary instruments regulation will set specifics. But the critical part of this legislation is making sure it is futureproofed. This is a rapidly evolving global situation. It could in the future include the requirement that someone is vaccinated for example if there is access to a vaccine in the future and that is something that the legislation will have the legal framework to allow for.Erica Stanford: So just to be—CHAIRPERSON (Adrian Rurawhe): Erica Stanford.ERICA STANFORD (National—East Coast Bays): Oh sorry Mr Chair. I apologise. Just to be absolutely clear: this legislation in this part lays the potential future groundwork for people to be required to be vaccinated before they enter New Zealand.Hon Dr MEGAN WOODS (Minister of Housing): I think I've answered that quite fully and addressed it—that it would allow the legal instruments if that was a requirement. I'm not saying it will be. I'm saying it does allow the framework. We at this point obviously do not know if there will be a vaccine when there will be a vaccine or what the efficacy of a vaccine will be or what the evolution of efficacious vaccines around the virus would be. So there does have to be an element that allows for the dynamic situation we're dealing with or it could be that we have more medical understanding of the virus and the way in which it operates and there could be ways in which people could be required to isolate before getting on to an aeroplane.At the moment the bottom line is everybody has to do 14 days' managed isolation in a quarantine facility in New Zealand with testing around day three and testing at day 12 showing negative before they are released from a facility. But we want to set up a framework that does allow for the evolving nature of our medical understanding of the virus. There was also a question that was put to me—while I'm on my feet I will answer it—around how we will handle late payments under the system how that will be calibrated and who they will be recovered from. This of course will all be covered off in regulations and that is the design of the framework that we're putting up.The question was put that the amendments set out on Supplementary Order Paper 566 in the name of the Hon Dr Megan Woods be agreed to.Amendments agreed to."