Fitzsimons Jeanette: Questions for Oral Answer — Questions to Ministers 
Fitzsimons Jeanette: Questions for Oral Answer — Questions to Ministers 
[Volume:631;Page:3462] 
7.  
JEANETTE FITZSIMONS (Co-Leader—Green) 
 to the  
Minister for Food Safety 
: Does she have confidence in the recommendation in the draft assessment report by Food Standards Australia New Zealand to approve the sale and use of food derived from LY038 high lysine corn? 
Hon ANNETTE KING (Minister for Food Safety) 
: 
 I have no opinion on the draft assessment for the setting of the standard of LY038 corn at this stage as the application is part way through the process of consideration. 
Jeanette Fitzsimons 
: Is she aware that high lysine corn is substantially different from normal corn in that its high level of lysine when cooked with the sugars in corn produces highly hazardous compounds and is she concerned that the New Zealand Food Safety Authority has made no attempt to assess this demonstrated food hazard that results from cooking or processing? 
Hon ANNETTE KING 
: I am aware of those comments and they have been made in a submission by Dr Heinemann to Food Standards Australia New Zealand. His submissions will be taken into consideration. 
Darien Fenton 
: What steps need to be followed before a standard may be finalised? 
Hon ANNETTE KING 
: As noted in the original answer the assessment is still at the draft stage and the application for approval of LY038 corn is still in progress. When this is completed a final assessment report with recommendations will be made and considered by the Australia and New Zealand Food Regulation Ministerial Council. The ministerial council will consider a draft standard. It can either accept the recommendation made by Food Standards Australia New Zealand or request two reviews before a final decision is made on a draft standard. 
Sue Kedgley 
: Why on earth is Food Standards Australia New Zealand considering approving for human consumption something that has only ever been approved for animal feed and does this mean that in future anything that has been approved for animal feed will now be allowed in our food supply; if not why not? 
Hon ANNETTE KING 
: The answer to the last part of the question is no but the reason this corn is being considered is that Food Standards Australia New Zealand wants it assessed to see whether it would be safe for human consumption if it should accidentally get into the food chain. 
Jeanette Fitzsimons 
: When she meets with the Australian Ministers to make the final decision will she be asking why the New Zealand Food Safety Authority used controls to assess the corn that do not comply with its own rules or with World Health Organization standards and is she concerned that this decision would set a precedent that Food Standards Australia New Zealand does not have to follow its own rules or those of the World Health Organization and set a precedent that testing for animal feed can substitute for testing for human food and set a precedent that hybrids from this new corn would also be legal human food without further testing? 
Hon ANNETTE KING 
: There is a lot of water to go under the bridge before it reaches the ministerial council including an assessment of the final submissions on this application. This application will take account of those matters raised by Dr Heinemann—the very matters the member has mentioned. I am assured the council will consider them. However Food Standards Australia New Zealand disputes the fact that it has not followed its own rules.