Woods MeganHon Dr MEGAN WOODS (Minister for Greater Christchurch Regeneration): Thank you Madam Chair Williams. I just want to take the chance to respond to a few more of the questions that have been put. I want to return and give Dr Smith the reassurance and reiterate that while it is not the role of the Minister to do the detailed design and engineering work what I've indicated is that I think the working party report will have a huge influence over what is decided and that safety was one of the key things that was signalled in that report. So I can give that member a reassurance that it is well over the 34 percent of code. It is in fact 100 percent of seismic strength along with base isolation that was recommended in that report so I hope that gives that member the level of comfort that he requires.The Hon Maggie Barry asked about the Cathedral Working Group report and where that was referenced within the Act and why it wasn't referenced in clause 10—and this was also an issue that Matt Doocey brought up in his contribution last evening in a question so I get to answer both these questions with one call. The importance of the Cathedral Working Group report is referenced in many parts of the bill. It is there—it is in new background clause 2A and there are amendments to clause 3 where that document is referenced. It was felt that that was sufficient to make sure that that important document was given the weighting it was due in terms of the decision-making powers and it very much will be part of the criteria that the responsible Minister needs to use for that.In regards to the Hon Maggie Barry's question around the role of the local authority I think actually her colleague answered that with her next contribution of course with clause 9(1)(a)(i) in terms of the Christchurch City Council being put there. As a Minister I fully appreciate the role of the council in this process. In fact it is an issue and the cathedral being an issue that I discussed early and often with both the mayor and the full Christchurch City Council both of whom I met with within my first month of being Minister and discussed the issue of how we were going to work together in terms of the cathedral's reinstatement. I see this very much part of the enduring partnership that we as a Government will build with the Christchurch City Council to ensure that we can get the kind of momentum that we need for the future of our city.I think a further question was then put by the last speaker Erica Stanford asking about the role of the council on the review panel. I think actually her colleague the Hon Maggie Barry had addressed that in her earlier contribution—that the review panel is not a representative body; it is a body of experts and there are other ways which are covered off in the bill in which it is absolutely critical that the Christchurch City Council has input into those decisions. But it is not through the expert review panel; it is as part of the consultation that the responsible Minister must do.The final point that was raised by the previous speaker was around ensuring we are protecting against the fact that we have extraordinary powers in this bill and I am confident that we have struck the right balance between the need for momentum and a broad sweep of checks and balances which will ensure that good decisions are being made. These go through from the need to consult across this House and to continue the collegial cross-party approach that we need on Orders in Council which indeed has been the practice on many Orders in Council and extraordinary powers that have been exercised in regard to Canterbury over the last six years right through to the regulations review panel and an independent review panel. So I am confident that we have the necessary checks and balances on what are extraordinary ministerial powers. Thank you.