Uffindell SamSAM UFFINDELL (National—Tauranga): Thank you Mr Chair and thank you very much Minister Wood for that detailed explanation then. I had a couple of questions as well around the bargaining side and you did outline that just then to some degree so thank you for that. But it does look like it is quite simplistic in the sense that it's the employee and the employer and obviously there are definitions that extend from that. But I look at the example of if you know you've got a small business say a cafe; you've got one in Westport where wages and cost of living are going to be considerably less than what they may be if you're a cafe in Remuera for instance. I think binding everyone to that one piece is going to be somewhat problematic for the counterparts in the smaller regional sections of society and I was curious as to how much thought or consideration had been given to that.Also when you've got businesses—I mean people don't always just pay a salary; there are other factors as well over and above the minimum conditions that someone would give. You know people don't always go into a workplace because of the salary. There may be other things—a friendly environment close to home or perhaps they are looked after by their employer in other ways. This will be the case for a lot of small businesses as well. They probably have very close relationships with their employees. I own and direct a small business myself and we have a couple of employees but we are very close with them. So what I'm trying to get at here is that they may give them payment not through the traditional means of big employer paying worker X amount of dollars but it may be they look after their kids or they help pick them up or drop them off or perhaps there's some exchange otherwise that would happen. I fear that with the bargaining side defined as it is here there may be an ability for that to be potentially overlooked.I also look at the covered employee piece and where it's got one covered employee. Does this account for when you've got your mum and dad takeaway place somewhere and they've got a son or they've got a young neighbour who comes along and helps all the time for instance a child. So often you will see it; you go into a fish and chip store or you go into a local takeaway or you go into a dairy and quite often they will have a family member in there working. Now obviously they're giving that family member a lot of support in a number of other ways. Are they then captured by some blanket wide agreement that that is imposed on them which is negotiated industry- or sector-wide?You also did talk about the good faith and you know obviously that's a fundamental underpinning of all employment relations. So looking to extend that—I commend you on wanting to extend that. But you did mention in there that they would have to go back to all parties and make sure that they are negotiating in good faith with all of them. But when you've got some significantly big sectors in there I'm curious as to how practical it is for them to go back and work with them on it or even have an understanding of what a small mum and dad business may want or need. I can see this being somewhat overtaken by the much larger players in society and I'm sure you'll recognise that. They'll have a lot more clout at the table and I would imagine that their voices will probably drown out the voices of the numerous numerous small players throughout the country. Are we then going to end up in a situation where the big players have got significantly more ability to do stuff as in to pay wages and meet conditions as opposed to some of those smaller businesses that I've already outlined? So those are the questions that I would put forward to you Minister. Thank you Mr Chair.