Sosene Lemauga Lydia; Watts SimonLEMAUGA LYDIA SOSENE (Labour—Māngere): Thank you Mr Chair. I'm very pleased to be able to have the opportunity to also add to the list of questions that my colleagues have asked. Minister it's really important that I am able to give you or highlight the concerns from my community and also for the local Māngere community because we have over 25 early childhood education (ECE) providers which sit across the spectrum from very well resourced to community kindergartens and we have lots of young people little children for whom education in our mother tongue and in our Samoan and Pasifika languages is very important. I do want to thank my colleague the Hon Jenny Salesa for pointing out some of the issues.So Minister I have questions around the consultation because some of the decisions—and I'm referring to the regulatory impact statement and I quickly read the information that has been provided. Why has there been no specific consultation with Māori with Pasifika with ethnic communities—Hon Member: And rural. LEMAUGA LYDIA SOSENE: —and rural communities. That ECE which gives a great boost for languages and early childhood education is a very important component in a child's life. Why has there been no consultation Minister?But Minister also too it tells of all the benefits in the regulatory impact statement of this policy but there's a big weighting aside that the onus is put directly on families. The assumption has been made that many of the families who this impacts are well resourced. What about the families who have English as their second or their third language? How are they supposed to get around understanding this new policy and the speed of this policy?Minister I also want to ask: what was the consultation with ECE centres—specifically ECE centres that come from areas where there's more than one language such as te reo Māori but also in rural communities—and why has that not been provided for our members to understand the impacts of this?Also Minister for your information it now provides a competitive factor for ECE centres that were working really really well in terms of a community like Māngere or South Auckland.So Minister I want to say to you that the policy of FamilyBoost has some good intentions but it provides a number of problems that our families are going to be faced with in communities that I represent. It's really important that the education that is given to communities for who English is their second or third language—that they understand clearly what the benefits are of this policy. How will that help when you've got a very diverse community in different parts of Aotearoa? What is the face of the future of those young children whose parents may not be able to access the system because it's just too complicated Minister? I appreciate that you have provided that Inland Revenue does have a service that provides interpretation or staff. Is Inland Revenue going to be resourced well to cope with the demand that is coming? It's coming in on 1 July—that's what we've got in front of us.So Minister if you could help me understand those specific issues it would be really helpful. Thank you.Hon SIMON WATTS (Minister of Revenue): Well thank you very much. It's good to hear a number of members on my left are supportive of the FamilyBoost policy. I'm looking forward hopefully maybe to see them supporting this part of the bill when we come to the vote.In regards to the Hon David Parker's questions—actually the answer to your question is in the fact sheet which is outlined as part of the documents supporting the Budget. There is a line there for FamilyBoost which outlines the average fiscal impact on the Crown over the period of the Budget.Hon David Parker: What is it?Hon SIMON WATTS: Page 7 which is $0.18 billion on average—$667 million over the total forecast period. It's also outlined—I appreciate the member might not have done too many Budgets before—in the summary of initiatives document as well where it's outlined on that.Hon David Parker: What page? Because I couldn't find it.Hon SIMON WATTS: I haven't got the page but I'm sure if you have a look through it we'll come back.The other questions by the Hon Jo Luxton in regards to public consultation: I've covered that in earlier questions. It's also included in the regulatory impact statement.The questions by the Hon Jan Tinetti in regards to the distributional impacts: again there were questions raised by other members on the same question for which I have provided contents and there is also information in the regulatory impact statement.The Hon Ayesha Verrall in regards to trade-offs between health and other aspects: well I'm proud that we're a coalition Government that is putting $8 billion more into health. That is a significant implication but we're talking about a tax bill here and we're clear in terms of our priorities as part of that bill.The Hon Kieran McAnulty in regards to limitations or implementations around the assessment process and the actual review: again I have answered those questions already. There's information as part of the regulatory impact statement again in regards to that and those are pretty much the questions that I put on my list.