Faafoi KrisKRIS FAAFOI (Labour—Mana): Can I join with the member who has just spoken in sending my sympathies to some of the winemakers in and around the Kaikōura electorate and also in North Canterbury who obviously have had some of their production affected by the events of the last 48 hours. I hope that they can continue with business as usual as soon as possible because as has been mentioned a number of times by a number of speakers already in this debate some of those industries both large and small are very important to those areas that have been affected quite markedly by the quakes over the last 48 hours. Also I should acknowledge Stuart Smith the MP for Kaikōura and our colleague on this side of the House Rino Tirikatene who is the MP for the whole of the South Island who is down there doing some good work as well. Our thoughts obviously go out to the people of Kaikōura.This piece of legislation has come about because our wine is good and because we want to protect the integrity of that and do not want to see anyone else making money off it by scurrilous means we want to protect the geographical indicators of our wine. I guess in plain English that means where it has come from. In the past anything that has had 85 percent of the grapes within it from New Zealand has been able to be passed as New Zealand wine; 15 percent of it could have been from anywhere else and it could have still been passed as New Zealand wine. This piece of legislation will mean that 100 percent of the grapes that go into making wine whether it be for domestic consumption or for export consumption have to be 100 percent New Zealand grapes to be passed as a local wine.I am the one who has to see this out to the end of night but it is an important piece of legislation. Someone has already tested it about 3 years ago when the Woolworths supermarkets in Australia were taken to court here in New Zealand for trying to trademark the South Island and an image of a mountain that bore a very close resemblance to Mount Cook. Woolworths was taken to court by New Zealand Winegrowers and it lost the ability to trademark the South Island as a brand and to have that logo. Interestingly enough though in Australia it has won the ability to have the South Island trademark as a brand. But there is an exception to that rule. Woolworths cannot protest if another brand of wine comes on the market that bears the South Island trademark which obviously New Zealand winegrowers will be very happy with.With the couple of minutes that I have got left I think I do have to again as a previous speaker said mark my protest at the New Zealand First point of opposition to this piece of legislation around the opposition process around Māori trademarks. I think it is a good thing. The select committee has put in a process an advisory council to make sure that has been done so I think that is a good thing and that New Zealand First should rethink its opposition to this piece of legislation. Also around the 5-year trademark I understand from my colleague Stuart Nash that that is around making sure it is financially sustainable—to make sure it can pay for itself—so that of course is also a good thing for the select committee to have done. I think that is all I should say at this stage.