McKee NicoleHon NICOLE McKEE (Associate Minister of Justice): Thank you Madam Chair. To the member Arena Williams from Labour: I will try my best to answer—there was quite a lot in there. Feel free to come back if I don't get everything. Thank you for your kind words too—it is appreciated because at the end of the day what we are trying to do is promote public safety and the safety and welfare of our front-liners as well. You asked me why I say Labour's regime didn't make New Zealand safer. I only have five minutes so I won't go into full detail. But in relation to the firearms prohibition orders I think that collectively as a Government we actually went about introducing a regime that has started to make New Zealand safer and that these changes just advance that even more. It's safety for our front-liners. It's safety for our elderly that our in their homes answering the door and the children that are asleep on their couches that are being shot at by these people committing drive-by shootings of whom my understanding is they don't have licenses and they're in illegal possession of firearms.You mentioned about the legitimate owners and how I had queried about legitimate owners being caught up in the regime and felt satisfied at where we came to in 2021 after having those discussions and making the small amendments that we did. Keeping in mind as I've mentioned earlier the fact that licensed firearm owners are able to searched at any time as well under section 18 of the Search and Surveillance Act. I'm really inclined to make sure that those firearms prohibition order placed upon them come to a similar level if not more of a regime of being able to be searched because they do not have the same requirements placed upon them as the licensed firearm owners do—so getting them up there.In regard to what happens with the information that's being captured—that's not covered in here. It's not an answer that I can give you because it's not covered in the FPO. However what it does say is that New Zealand Police have a regime in place anyway about what they do with the collection of information. I would expect that they would adhere to their own operation matters in that regard.I'll just move to the Green member Francisco Hernandez—you asked about the firearms definition and arms definition. We have the Arms Act 1983 currently in place. We don't call it the Firearms Act 1983. You yourself mentioned—and this is why it's arms—it encompasses so much. There is a definition for what is a firearm. But we also have collector items that have been made inert for example so they're still arms but they're not capable of firing. That's a very crude way of me trying to explain but they are still arms and the definitions are contained within the Arms Act. The Arms Act also puts controls over restricted weapons as well. So the definition is fine. When we call it arms" it relates to firearms but it also relates to different types of parts it relates to restricted weapons it relates to things like grenades if you like—you know things that you wouldn't normally think of as just being a firearm. So that's why we call it "arms" and that's why we currently have the Arms Act 1983 instead of the Firearms Act 1983. It just encompasses a lot more so I hope that answers that question."