Watts Simon; Parker DavidSIMON WATTS (National—North Shore): Madam Chair—sorry I was just resting. Look just wanting to raise a new point in regards to Part 2 and I guess I'm drawing a distinction between the legislative statement—and I refer to the last sentence where it says If not corrected the drafting error would have sizeable system ramifications for Inland Revenue." And then I refer to another document which we've been provided which is the departmental disclosure statement and I refer to page 7. Within that I refer to section 4.3. The last statement of 4.3 reads "Not correcting this drafting error would introduce increased risk to Inland Revenue's Business Transformation programme." Maybe it's just me or maybe I'm misreading but the legislative statement indicates that this would cause "sizeable system ramifications"—i.e. it is an issue; it will result in that outcome—yet the advice from officials indicates very clearly that this only introduces an increased risk. I don't think I need to necessarily define the difference between an issue and a risk but I think for the people out there that'll be watching this—and no doubt at 12 minutes past 9 on an evening they'll be looking at this going "Well you know what? That guy makes a good point." There is a clear distinction and I'm just wondering—we're here now trying to amend an error in legislation—an error in legislation which was probably rushed through that no one actually did the checking on—and the piece of information that's trying to correct this has actually got another discrepancy quite a significant one I guess if you had the eyes of someone who understands that aspect. I'm now getting reasonably confused around whether we are dealing with an issue Minister Parker or dealing with a risk. I'd really appreciate if you could provide some clarity and actually some context so that you can give me—and I'm sure a number of other members on this side—a bit of comfort around substantiating you know what are we actually dealing with here. I don't think the Waikato District Health Board is dealing with a "risk" of cyber-security. They are dealing with a significant issue and don't get me wrong but there are a heck of a lot of our Government departments out there that are dealing with a lot of risks right now and that is very very different to dealing with an imminent issue. I think that is very important for the Minister to clarify. It might be just a simple typo by the officials—I doubt that—but I'd really appreciate a bit more context on that. Thank you. Hon DAVID PARKER (Minister of Revenue): Thank you Madam Chair. The new system doesn't take over child support until November. Therefore for this issue to be fixed from 1 April 2021 it would have to be done through the legacy system and the legacy system as members on all sides of the Chamber know is very very clunky and very difficult to change and is not being changed because we're sooner moving on to the new system. Therefore it would create risks to the old system to try to change it quickly and it would also be a waste of money. That's why it's better to do what was originally intended and make this have effect from 1 April next year at the latest or such earlier date as we do it by way of Order in Council."