edithatogo/nz-hansard-corpus huggingface dataset:
Graham Kennedy: Oral Questions — Questions to MinistersText is incorporated into the Bound VolumeGraham Kennedy: Oral Questions — Questions to Ministers[Sitting date: 18 February 2015. Volume:703;Page:1687. Text is incorporated into the Bound Volume.]11.Dr KENNEDY GRAHAM (Green) to the Minister of Defence: Does he stand by his statement “I’ve made it very clear that we don’t intend to have combat troops in Iraq once you go beyond the wire that’s what you’re involved in”?Hon SIMON BRIDGES (Minister of Energy and Resources)on behalf of theMinister of Defence: Yes and this was made clear by the Prime Minister on 5 November last year when he stated that New Zealand troops would not be sent into a combat role in Iraq.Dr Kennedy Graham: So when the Prime Minister said more recently than that that he could not rule out soldiers going beyond the wire was the Prime Minister misleading the public?Hon SIMON BRIDGES: No.Dr Kennedy Graham: Has Tim Keating the Chief of Defence Force been instructed to rule out New Zealand troops going beyond the wire and engaging in active combat during his meeting with the club’s defence chiefs in Saudi Arabia today?Hon SIMON BRIDGES: As the member is well aware no decision on deployment has been made. We have made quite clear that we are not deploying in combat roles were a decision to be made. But obviously in the event of a decision being made to go to Iraq personnel may for example be in transit. Iraq we know in generalised terms is at a heightened level of danger so protective action cannot be entirely ruled out.Dr Kennedy Graham: Has Tim Keating been instructed to raise the issue of the flow of money to the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant from Saudi Arabia a country also known for its celebration of public beheadings?Hon SIMON BRIDGES: I am not aware of that level of detail.Dr Kennedy Graham: Is the club meeting in Saudi Arabia requested by or even acknowledged by the United Nations Security Council; if not what is the legitimacy of the meeting in terms of the United Nations Charter?Hon SIMON BRIDGES: That is a legal question that I do not have to answer.Dr Kennedy Graham: Can he guarantee that no New Zealanders will engage and potentially be killed in active combat in Iraq?Hon SIMON BRIDGES: I think the member knows quite well now that no decision on deployment has been made. We have been quite clear that were a decision in the positive to be made troops would not be in combat roles and they are not going beyond the wire. But as I have already said in answering the member’s question Iraq is a dangerous place and even behind the wire there are some risks so protective action cannot be entirely ruled out.
Seymour David: Oral Questions — Questions to MinistersText is incorporated into the Bound VolumeSeymour David: Oral Questions — Questions to Ministers[Sitting date: 18 February 2015. Volume:703;Page:1685. Text is incorporated into the Bound Volume.]9.DAVID SEYMOUR (Leader—ACT) to the Minister for the Environment: Is he confident that the Exclusive Economic Zone and Continental Shelf (Environmental Effects) Act 2012 is fit for purpose in light of the Environmental Protection Authority rejecting both the recent ironsands and phosphate seabed mining applications?Hon Dr NICK SMITH (Minister for the Environment): The exclusive economic zone law is new and prior to 2012 New Zealand had no regime for regulating the environment in our vast oceans. I am confident that the purpose of the Act is sound. It is about New Zealand being able to take up the opportunities for economic development in the exclusive economic zone subject to appropriate environmental controls. The Government is taking a careful and considered view on other amendments to the Act. There will not be a knee-jerk reaction to the two consent decisions referred to. Both the Environmental Protection Authority and my ministry in their briefings to me as the incoming Minister raised a number of implementation issues with the Act and flowing from this we will be progressing amendments to make the new regime more practical and workable.David Seymour: In the Minister’s view does the Act currently give enough weighting to the potential for creating investment jobs and growth in provincial areas of New Zealand such as that defined by the boundaries of the Northland electorate?Hon Dr NICK SMITH: The vast exclusive economic zone actually affects the bulk of New Zealand’s electorates and represents an area of about 23 times the size of New Zealand’s land area. That is why it was such a significant decision for our Government to be the very first in New Zealand’s history to have some environmental rules in that space. Any new law that I have been part of in my 25 years in Parliament always requires some finessing and that is why this Government—Grant Robertson: That’s right. Every one that you’ve been part of does.Hon Dr NICK SMITH: From my recollection right through the last 9 years and I will tell you what. We have fixed up a fair share of that Government’s mess-ups—just to mention the $4 billion ACC loss that landed on my plate when I became the Minister. We will be doing some sensible finessing of that law that will work for Northland and the rest of New Zealand.
Barclay Todd: Oral Questions — Questions to MinistersText is incorporated into the Bound VolumeBarclay Todd: Oral Questions — Questions to Ministers[Sitting date: 18 February 2015. Volume:703;Page:1683. Text is incorporated into the Bound Volume.]7.TODD BARCLAY (National—Clutha-Southland) to the Minister of Corrections: What announcements has he made regarding the Government’s initiative to roll out Audio Visual Links in our prisons?Hon Peseta SAM LOTU-IIGA (Minister of Corrections): Yesterday I announced that the $10.68 million project to install audiovisual links in our prisons has been successfully completed. Twelve prisons that hold remand prisoners have the technology along with Auckland prison which holds the highest-risk prisoners. This technology allows for prisoners to attend court appearances without leaving the confines of prison. The audiovisual network is used mainly for procedural hearings such as list appearances call-overs and bail hearings. The technology is particularly useful for remand prisoners who typically have more court appearances. This smart use of technology in our prisons allows our corrections staff to focus more on prison security and offender rehabilitation rather than transporting prisoners to and from court.Todd Barclay: What benefits will the justice sector see from this investment in the wider use of audiovisual links in our prisons?Hon Peseta SAM LOTU-IIGA: Good question. Around 40000 remand hearings take place each year. Each appearance requires considerable resources in transporting prisoners to court some over long distances. It also carries a degree of risk. By ensuring that more appearances occur via audiovisual link within prison complexes potential public risks are reduced. The benefits of appearing via audiovisual link include reducing escape risks transport costs and the risk of contraband being smuggled. Prisoners will also spend more time in rehabilitation and reintegration activities as they do not have to leave prison. It is a great success and I look forward to that number of 5000 remand appearances increasing as the newer site commences its audiovisual link connections.
Muller Todd: Oral Questions — Questions to MinistersText is incorporated into the Bound VolumeMuller Todd: Oral Questions — Questions to Ministers[Sitting date: 18 February 2015. Volume:703;Page:1680. Text is incorporated into the Bound Volume.]4.TODD MULLER (National—Bay of Plenty) to the Minister of Energy and Resources: What update can he give on competition in the New Zealand electricity market as a result of the Government’s reforms?Hon SIMON BRIDGES (Minister of Energy and Resources): I can confirm that a record seven new electricity retailers have entered the retail electricity market since January of last year—more than any previous year. In 2012 and 2013 three new retailers entered the market and in 2011 two new retailers. This brings the total number of retailers to 21 and the total number of retail brands to 27. This is great news for consumers who continue to have more power to choose the innovative and competitive services they want. The entry of new players also continues to put competitive pressure on existing retailers.Todd Muller: In what other ways are consumers benefiting from increasing competition in the electricity market?Hon SIMON BRIDGES: It is clear that competitive pressure from mid-sized retailers is having a very significant effect. In the last couple of years the big four retailers have been consistently losing market share to the mid-sized players: approximately 100000 consumers have moved from big retailers to mid-sized retailers since 2013. Also I am very pleased that so far three of the five largest retailers have publicly said they are holding the energy component of their prices this year. The Government believes that competition is the best way to keep downward pressure on prices and we will continue to promote competitive and innovative measures in the electricity market for the absolute benefit of consumers.
Peters Winston: Oral Questions — Questions to MinistersText is incorporated into the Bound VolumePeters Winston: Oral Questions — Questions to Ministers[Sitting date: 18 February 2015. Volume:703;Page:1680. Text is incorporated into the Bound Volume.]3.Rt Hon WINSTON PETERS (Leader—NZ First) to the Associate Minister of Transport: When will the targeted review of the operating mechanisms of the SuperGold Card free off-peak public transport scheme be completed?Hon CRAIG FOSS (Associate Minister of Transport): I expect final decisions on the review will be made before 30 June 2015 and I am confident that New Zealanders will continue to enjoy the transportation benefits of the SuperGold Card.Rt Hon Winston Peters: If the SuperGold Card review started in October 2009 and was meant to be completed within 5 years is it fair to continue giving Fullers ferries exclusively $1.5 million in SuperGold Card funding when Explore Waiheke has been transporting a large proportion of SuperGold Card holders at Explore Waiheke’s expense over the last 4 months?Hon CRAIG FOSS: Any new entrants to that particular service after the moratorium was put in place took commercial risk and are making decisions to take passengers as they see fit.Rt Hon Winston Peters: Did Auckland Minister Nikki Kaye and Minister for Senior Citizens Maggie Barry alert him and his colleagues that the SuperGold Card Waiheke ferry funding will not cost the taxpayer any more than the current $1.5 million; if so is the Government comfortable with protecting a foreign monopoly against a legitimate New Zealand competitor who thought the review was going to be completed in 2014?Hon CRAIG FOSS: My colleagues have been very robust in their representation from their various portfolios and their local electorate interests and their interest in the management of the SuperGold Card.
Carter David: Points of Order — Parliamentary ICT System—OutagesText is incorporated into the Bound VolumeCarter David: Points of Order — Parliamentary ICT System—Outages[Sitting date: 18 February 2015. Volume:703;Page:1675. Text is incorporated into the Bound Volume.]Mr SPEAKER: I thank the member for his point and I certainly also share the member’s frustration. I have met with the general manager on two occasions this morning. I have met with the ICT manager once this morning. I am aware that a particular switching mechanism collapsed and it has taken some time to fix it. I have asked for a substantive report to be available to present to the Business Committee because it is a matter of order for this House and also for a report to be presented on ways of remedying any further issues. That will be available for the Parliamentary Service Commission when it first meets.
Robertson Grant: Points of Order — Parliamentary ICT System—OutagesText is incorporated into the Bound VolumeRobertson Grant: Points of Order — Parliamentary ICT System—Outages[Sitting date: 18 February 2015. Volume:703;Page:1675. Text is incorporated into the Bound Volume.]GRANT ROBERTSON (Labour—Wellington Central): I raise a point of order Mr Speaker. I want to raise with you a matter that you are not directly responsible for but it does have an impact on this House and in particular on question time. For the last 24 hours or so I understand that around 50 percent of the parliamentary complex has been unable to access the parliamentary system. This has caused a significant disruption not only for parties in Parliament but also for the Clerk’s office and the Parliamentary Library which have been reduced to handwriting out advice and hand-delivering it to some members. Although we all understand that ICT outages occur from time to time it is quite clear that there is not any redundancy in the system. Once it goes down it is downand the way we run Parliament nowadays means that we are utterly reliant upon our technology. I would just ask Mr Speaker whether you could do whatever you can to ensure that the system continues to run in a way that we would like it to.
Amended Answers to Oral Questions — Question No. 5 to MinisterText is incorporated into the Bound VolumeAmended Answers to Oral Questions — Question No. 5 to Minister[Sitting date: 18 February 2015. Volume:703;Page:1688. Text is incorporated into the Bound Volume.]Amended Answers to Oral QuestionsQuestion No. 5 to MinisterHon BILL ENGLISH (Minister of Finance): I just want to correct an answer I gave earlier—Mr SPEAKER: So the member is going to seek leave to correct his answer?Hon BILL ENGLISH: I seek leave to correct an answer.Mr SPEAKER: Leave is sought to correct an answer made earlier today. Is there any objection? There is none.Hon BILL ENGLISH: I think in my answer I said that ACC levy reductions relevant to car registrations would start from 1 April this year. In fact it is 1 July this year.
Points of Order — Parliamentary ICT System—OutagesText is incorporated into the Bound VolumePoints of Order — Parliamentary ICT System—Outages[Sitting date: 18 February 2015. Volume:703;Page:1675. Text is incorporated into the Bound Volume.]Wednesday 18 February 2015Mr Speaker took the Chair at 2 p.m.Prayers.Points of OrderParliamentary ICT System—OutagesGRANT ROBERTSON (Labour—Wellington Central): I raise a point of order Mr Speaker. I want to raise with you a matter that you are not directly responsible for but it does have an impact on this House and in particular on question time. For the last 24 hours or so I understand that around 50 percent of the parliamentary complex has been unable to access the parliamentary system. This has caused a significant disruption not only for parties in Parliament but also for the Clerk’s office and the Parliamentary Library which have been reduced to handwriting out advice and hand-delivering it to some members. Although we all understand that ICT outages occur from time to time it is quite clear that there is not any redundancy in the system. Once it goes down it is downand the way we run Parliament nowadays means that we are utterly reliant upon our technology. I would just ask Mr Speaker whether you could do whatever you can to ensure that the system continues to run in a way that we would like it to.Mr SPEAKER: I thank the member for his point and I certainly also share the member’s frustration. I have met with the general manager on two occasions this morning. I have met with the ICT manager once this morning. I am aware that a particular switching mechanism collapsed and it has taken some time to fix it. I have asked for a substantive report to be available to present to the Business Committee because it is a matter of order for this House and also for a report to be presented on ways of remedying any further issues. That will be available for the Parliamentary Service Commission when it first meets.
Vote: Energy (Fuels Levies and References) Amendment Bill — Third ReadingText is incorporated into the Bound VolumeVote: Energy (Fuels Levies and References) Amendment Bill — Third Reading[Sitting date: 17 February 2015. Volume:703;Page:1666. Text is incorporated into the Bound Volume.]A party vote was called for on the question That the Energy (Fuels Levies and References) Amendment Bill be now read a third time.Ayes 109New Zealand National 59;New Zealand Labour 32; Green Party 14; Māori Party 2; ACT New Zealand 1; United Future 1.Noes 11New Zealand First 11.Bill read a third time.
Vote: Social Security Amendment Bill (No 3) — Second ReadingText is incorporated into the Bound VolumeVote: Social Security Amendment Bill (No 3) — Second Reading[Sitting date: 17 February 2015. Volume:703;Page:1643. Text is incorporated into the Bound Volume.]A party vote was called for on the question That the Social Security Amendment Bill (No 3) be now read a second time.Ayes 95New Zealand National 59; New Zealand Labour 32; Māori Party 2; ACT New Zealand 1; United Future 1.Noes 25Green Party 14; New Zealand First 11.Bill read a second time.
Tisch Lindsay: Energy (Fuels Levies and References) Amendment Bill — Third ReadingText is incorporated into the Bound VolumeTisch Lindsay: Energy (Fuels Levies and References) Amendment Bill — Third Reading[Sitting date: 17 February 2015. Volume:703;Page:1665. Text is incorporated into the Bound Volume.]The ASSISTANT SPEAKER (Lindsay Tisch): I call Stuart Smith—5 minutes.
Tisch Lindsay: Energy (Fuels Levies and References) Amendment Bill — Third ReadingText is incorporated into the Bound VolumeTisch Lindsay: Energy (Fuels Levies and References) Amendment Bill — Third Reading[Sitting date: 17 February 2015. Volume:703;Page:1664. Text is incorporated into the Bound Volume.]The ASSISTANT SPEAKER (Lindsay Tisch): I understand that the next call is a split call. Andrew Bayly—5 minutes.
Tisch Lindsay: Energy (Fuels Levies and References) Amendment Bill — Third ReadingText is incorporated into the Bound VolumeTisch Lindsay: Energy (Fuels Levies and References) Amendment Bill — Third Reading[Sitting date: 17 February 2015. Volume:703;Page:1660. Text is incorporated into the Bound Volume.]The ASSISTANT SPEAKER (Lindsay Tisch): Sorry to interrupt the honourable member.
Borrows Chester: Social Security Amendment Bill (No 3) — Second ReadingText is incorporated into the Bound VolumeBorrows Chester: Social Security Amendment Bill (No 3) — Second Reading[Sitting date: 17 February 2015. Volume:703;Page:1642. Text is incorporated into the Bound Volume.]Mr DEPUTY SPEAKER: Members the House has resumed. Before the dinner break the House was debating the second reading of the Social Security Amendment Bill (No 3). Jono Naylor has 2 minutes 25 seconds remaining to speak should he wish to avail himself of that opportunity.JONO NAYLOR: I was not sure whether I had 2 minutes 25 seconds or 1 minute 13 seconds such was the confusion at the end of the last session. When we as you said Mr Deputy Speaker concluded the last session before the dinner break we were indeed talking about the Social Security Amendment Bill (No 3). I had been addressing primarily in my speech up to that point issues of the anomalies in the accommodation supplement and allowances and what was proposed there. I was just about to move on in fact to the issues around ACC compensation.Compensation is a very practical logical step for us to take in terms of this bill. This is really I think just something that obviously when it was drafted perhaps had not been thought through. But I think it is fair it is reasonable and it is essentially very logical. If somebody is in fact receiving some sort of compensation via ACC it really should not make any difference whatsoever whether or not they are being paid by ACC directly or by an accredited employer. So this particular change to the legislation ensures that really this inconsistency is put to rest.On balance when I look through all of the facets of this bill all of the things that are trying to be achieved I can quite comfortably look at it and say: “Yes I’m happy to endorse it.” I am happy to ensure that we have a system for our students in terms of the benefits and allowances they qualify for that is entirely consistent across the board. I think that that is easy to support. I am also happy to support these changes around ACC and what provisions are required in terms of the rate at which benefits are abated around these ACC payments. I think this is a logical bill. I think it is a sensible bill. It is yet again another piece of good legislation coming through from this Government and I am happy to endorse it. Thank you.
Tisch Lindsay: Social Security Amendment Bill (No 3) — Second ReadingText is incorporated into the Bound VolumeTisch Lindsay: Social Security Amendment Bill (No 3) — Second Reading[Sitting date: 17 February 2015. Volume:703;Page:1635. Text is incorporated into the Bound Volume.]The ASSISTANT SPEAKER (Lindsay Tisch): I call Su’a William Sio—5 minutes.
Tisch Lindsay: Social Security Amendment Bill (No 3) — Second ReadingText is incorporated into the Bound VolumeTisch Lindsay: Social Security Amendment Bill (No 3) — Second Reading[Sitting date: 17 February 2015. Volume:703;Page:1634. Text is incorporated into the Bound Volume.]The ASSISTANT SPEAKER (Lindsay Tisch): I understand that the next call is a split call. Gareth Hughes—5 minutes.
Mallard Trevor: Social Security Amendment Bill (No 3) — Second ReadingText is incorporated into the Bound VolumeMallard Trevor: Social Security Amendment Bill (No 3) — Second Reading[Sitting date: 17 February 2015. Volume:703;Page:1626. Text is incorporated into the Bound Volume.]The ASSISTANT SPEAKER (Hon Trevor Mallard): Matt Doocey. I was going to call you Tom. I am sorry.
Tolley Anne: Debate on Prime Minister’s StatementText is incorporated into the Bound VolumeTolley Anne: Debate on Prime Minister’s Statement[Sitting date: 17 February 2015. Volume:703;Page:1619. Text is incorporated into the Bound Volume.]Hon ANNE TOLLEY (Minister for Social Development): I move That this debate be now adjourned.Motion agreed to.Debate interrupted.
Borrows Chester: Debate on Prime Minister’s StatementText is incorporated into the Bound VolumeBorrows Chester: Debate on Prime Minister’s Statement[Sitting date: 17 February 2015. Volume:703;Page:1614. Text is incorporated into the Bound Volume.]Mr DEPUTY SPEAKER: The next call is a split call between National Party members. I call Scott Simpson.
Borrows Chester: Debate on Prime Minister’s StatementText is incorporated into the Bound VolumeBorrows Chester: Debate on Prime Minister’s Statement[Sitting date: 17 February 2015. Volume:703;Page:1612. Text is incorporated into the Bound Volume.]Mr DEPUTY SPEAKER: This is a split call between the National Party and the Māori Party.
Borrows Chester: Debate on Prime Minister’s StatementText is incorporated into the Bound VolumeBorrows Chester: Debate on Prime Minister’s Statement[Sitting date: 17 February 2015. Volume:703;Page:1609. Text is incorporated into the Bound Volume.]Mr DEPUTY SPEAKER: I understand members that this is a split call within the Green Party. I call Catherine Delahunty.
Stewart Barbara: Debate on Prime Minister’s StatementText is incorporated into the Bound VolumeStewart Barbara: Debate on Prime Minister’s Statement[Sitting date: 17 February 2015. Volume:703;Page:1601. Text is incorporated into the Bound Volume.]BARBARA STEWART (NZ First): In New Zealand First we believe that health is a really critical investment. We were concerned about the lack of focus on health in the Prime Minister’s speech. We have grave concerns when we compare ourselves with other countries like Australia our nearest neighbour. We know that health outcomes should be very similar in Australia and New Zealand but in reality they are not. New Zealand is falling behind and it is not really good enough. There are so many issues on which we should be competing on a level playing field but the reality is that we are not. Health outcomes are basically a defining feature of our First World status.In New Zealand First we are committed to actions to improve health outcomes in the area of non-communicable diseases like obesity and diabetes as well as to stamping out Third World diseases like rheumatic fever. More needs to be done in these areas. A whole heap more needs to be done. The bottom line is that spending more smartly has to be a focus and this means putting an emphasis on preventive measures like for example our SuperGold Health Check Bill which New Zealand First has in the members’ ballot. We believe that putting a fence at the top of the cliff is far easier than having an ambulance at the bottom and of course it is far far cheaper. The ultimate aim for all New Zealanders is to have certainty about their health care and an assurance that there is access to timely services—quality services.The Government cannot ignore these challenges—they are not going to go away—and with an ageing population and a growing population we are going to have greater challenges than we have ever had before. Thank you.
Carter David: Oral Questions — Questions to MinistersText is incorporated into the Bound VolumeCarter David: Oral Questions — Questions to Ministers[Sitting date: 17 February 2015. Volume:703;Page:1599. Text is incorporated into the Bound Volume.]Mr SPEAKER: Order! On this occasion for the third time I am calling Brett Hudson and I expect silence from my right.
Hudson Brett: Oral Questions — Questions to MinistersText is incorporated into the Bound VolumeHudson Brett: Oral Questions — Questions to Ministers[Sitting date: 17 February 2015. Volume:703;Page:1599. Text is incorporated into the Bound Volume.]BRETT HUDSON (National): My question is to the Minister—[Interruption]
Naylor Jono: Oral Questions — Questions to MinistersText is incorporated into the Bound VolumeNaylor Jono: Oral Questions — Questions to Ministers[Sitting date: 17 February 2015. Volume:703;Page:1598. Text is incorporated into the Bound Volume.]9.JONO NAYLOR (National) to the Minister for Courts: How successful has the Government’s new Driver Licence Stop Orders initiative been in collecting unpaid traffic fines during its first year?Hon AMY ADAMS (Minister for Courts): Last February this Government introduced driver licence stop orders. These give the courts the power to suspend the driver’s licence of people who refuse to pay their overdue traffic fines. In the past year nearly 20000 have either paid or started to pay their overdue traffic fines bringing in $20.4 million to date. With only 27 licences currently suspended along with 11 more that were suspended but have since been cleared it is great to see that people are getting the message that they need to do the right thing and pay their traffic fines before they risk losing their licence.Jono Naylor: What results can she report from other new powers that this Government has given the courts to enforce fines?Hon AMY ADAMS: This Government has added to the powers that the court has to enforce court fines and reparations. This has helped bring down overdue fines from $400 million when we became the Government to around $240 million today. We have introduced new data matching with the Inland Revenue Department and the Ministry of Social Development to help find people dodging their fines. Since we started this programme in 2012 we have collected $207 million. We have also allowed courts to share information with credit agencies when people refuse to pay their fines and this has seen a further $86 million in previously unpaid fines being cleared.
Fox Marama: Oral Questions — Questions to MinistersText is incorporated into the Bound VolumeFox Marama: Oral Questions — Questions to Ministers[Sitting date: 17 February 2015. Volume:703;Page:1597. Text is incorporated into the Bound Volume.]8.MARAMA FOX (Co-Leader—Māori Party) to the Associate Minister of Health: What plans does the Government have to achieve smoke-free Aotearoa by 2025?Hon Peseta SAM LOTU-IIGA (Associate Minister of Health): The Government is committed to a smoke-free New Zealand by 2025 but we recognise that it will not be achieved by one measure alone. Our Government has worked hard with our partners the Māori Party in this important area and I do want to acknowledge the work done by the previous Minister Tariana Turia. We have introduced significant legislative changes including increasing taxation levels increasing the penalties and fines for those selling to minors as well as removing retailers’ ability to display tobacco products. In fact as a result of some of the changes we have seen an improvement in the daily smoking rate from 18 percent in 2006 under Labour to 15.5 percent in 2013. I am currently taking advice on a wide range of further options and initiatives including further tax increases banning smoking in cars with children media and health promotion campaigns the role of e-cigarettes and many other options for that target.Marama Fox: Given that we are now identified as world leaders in smoking cessation initiatives through the work of the former associate health Minister is the Minister prepared to continue this momentum and commit to banning smoking in cars; if not why not?Hon Peseta SAM LOTU-IIGA: I am committed to continuing the momentum to reduce the rates of smoking in New Zealand. At this stage there is no plan to legislate to ban smoking in cars. However I have asked officials to prepare advice for Ministers on this particular topic in respect of children passengers along with many other initiatives to achieve our goal to be smoke-free by 2025.Marama Fox: Can the Minister provide any reasons given that he is yet to receive a briefing why banning smoking in cars would not contribute positively to the decrease in effects caused by inhaling second-hand smoke?Hon Peseta SAM LOTU-IIGA: As I have said previously I have asked officials to prepare that advice for Ministers on this topic. Once I have that advice I will be able to give a more informed view on the effects of and the extent to which smoking in cars affects other passengers especially children.
Parmar Parmjeet: Oral Questions — Questions to MinistersText is incorporated into the Bound VolumeParmar Parmjeet: Oral Questions — Questions to Ministers[Sitting date: 17 February 2015. Volume:703;Page:1595. Text is incorporated into the Bound Volume.]6.Dr PARMJEET PARMAR (National) to the Minister for Social Development: What is the Government doing to assist children as they head back to school?Hon ANNE TOLLEY (Minister for Social Development): Before I answer the question could I just acknowledge the death today of Celia Lashlie who is a woman who worked tirelessly and fearlessly in the social sector. In reply to the question to support those looking after vulnerable children we have paid nearly $4.65 million this year in start-of-year grants to families receiving the unsupported child’s benefit or the orphans benefit. This is helping more than 9500 children right around New Zealand with each carer receiving between $400 and $550. These grants help carers buy essentials like uniforms and stationery and other necessities to help settle children into the new school year. The applications for grants do not close until 28 February. They can apply online and I encourage all those carers who qualify to do so.Dr Parmjeet Parmar: How do these grants contribute to the Government’s focus on supporting vulnerable children?Hon ANNE TOLLEY: These payments recognise the valuable role that family carers play by stepping up to help raise vulnerable children often after raising a family of their own. So we want to make their job of raising children as easy as possible and to help with the costs that come with starting a new year is a tangible and practical way to do so. I am really pleased that so many families are applying for these grants. Grandparents and other extended family members do phenomenal work in putting the needs of our vulnerable children ahead of their own and we are giving them a helping hand.
Carter David: Oral Questions — Questions to MinistersText is incorporated into the Bound VolumeCarter David: Oral Questions — Questions to Ministers[Sitting date: 17 February 2015. Volume:703;Page:1589. Text is incorporated into the Bound Volume.]Mr SPEAKER: Order! [Interruption] Order! I do not want that sort of interjection coming from my right when I call someone to ask a primary question.
Peters Winston: Oral Questions — Questions to MinistersText is incorporated into the Bound VolumePeters Winston: Oral Questions — Questions to Ministers[Sitting date: 17 February 2015. Volume:703;Page:1589. Text is incorporated into the Bound Volume.]Rt Hon WINSTON PETERS (Leader—NZ First): My question is to the Prime Minister and asks—Hon Steven Joyce: Are you announcing?Rt Hon WINSTON PETERS: All in good time Sunshine—all in good time.
Vote: Gambling Amendment Bill (No 3) — In CommitteeText is incorporated into the Bound VolumeVote: Gambling Amendment Bill (No 3) — In Committee[Sitting date: 24 September 2015. Volume:709;Page:7097. Text is incorporated into the Bound Volume.]A party vote was called for on the question That clause 2 be agreed to.Ayes 94New Zealand National 59; New Zealand Labour 31; Māori Party 2; ACT New Zealand 1; United Future 1.Noes 25Green Party 13; New Zealand First 12.Clause 2 agreed to.Clause 3 agreed to.Bill to be reported with amendment presently.
Vote: Gambling Amendment Bill (No 3) — In CommitteeText is incorporated into the Bound VolumeVote: Gambling Amendment Bill (No 3) — In Committee[Sitting date: 24 September 2015. Volume:709;Page:7097. Text is incorporated into the Bound Volume.]A party vote was called for on the question That clause 1 be agreed to.Ayes 94New Zealand National 59; New Zealand Labour 31; Māori Party 2; ACT New Zealand 1; United Future 1.Noes 25Green Party 13; New Zealand First 12.Clause 1 agreed to.
Vote: Tariff (Free Trade Agreement between New Zealand and the Republic of Korea) Amendment Bill — Third ReadingText is incorporated into the Bound VolumeVote: Tariff (Free Trade Agreement between New Zealand and the Republic of Korea) Amendment Bill — Third Reading[Sitting date: 24 September 2015. Volume:709;Page:7092. Text is incorporated into the Bound Volume.]A party vote was called for on the question That the Tariff (Free Trade Agreement between New Zealand and the Republic of Korea) Amendment Bill be now read a third time.Ayes 95New Zealand National 59; New Zealand Labour 32; Māori Party 2; ACT New Zealand 1; United Future 1.Noes 25Green Party 13; New Zealand First 12.Bill read a third time.
Mallard Trevor: Sittings of the HouseText is incorporated into the Bound VolumeMallard Trevor: Sittings of the House[Sitting date: 24 September 2015. Volume:709;Page:7105. Text is incorporated into the Bound Volume.]The ASSISTANT SPEAKER (Hon Trevor Mallard): I presume by that that the member means forthwith. Is there any objection to that? There appears to be no objection.
Hayes Joanne: Sittings of the HouseText is incorporated into the Bound VolumeHayes Joanne: Sittings of the House[Sitting date: 24 September 2015. Volume:709;Page:7105. Text is incorporated into the Bound Volume.]JOANNE HAYES (Third Whip—National): I seek leave for the House to rise early.
Mallard Trevor: Construction Contracts Amendment Bill — In CommitteeText is incorporated into the Bound VolumeMallard Trevor: Construction Contracts Amendment Bill — In Committee[Sitting date: 24 September 2015. Volume:709;Page:7099. Text is incorporated into the Bound Volume.]The CHAIRPERSON (Hon Trevor Mallard): Do people understand that the debate will now go over the rest of the Committee stage of this bill all as one debate but that we will have separate votes afterwards. Is there any objection to that process? There appears to be none.
Macindoe Tim: Construction Contracts Amendment Bill — In CommitteeText is incorporated into the Bound VolumeMacindoe Tim: Construction Contracts Amendment Bill — In Committee[Sitting date: 24 September 2015. Volume:709;Page:7098. Text is incorporated into the Bound Volume.]TIM MACINDOE (Senior Whip—National): With the agreement of all the whips in the Committee I seek leave for all parts of the Construction Contracts Amendment Bill to be considered in one debate with the questions to be voted upon separately.The CHAIRPERSON (Hon Trevor Mallard): And the clauses?TIM MACINDOE: And the clauses.The CHAIRPERSON (Hon Trevor Mallard): The remaining parts and clauses—so we are not going to go back to Part 1 are we?TIM MACINDOE: Yes the remaining clauses. Thank you.
Mallard Trevor: Gambling Amendment Bill (No 3) — In CommitteeText is incorporated into the Bound VolumeMallard Trevor: Gambling Amendment Bill (No 3) — In Committee[Sitting date: 24 September 2015. Volume:709;Page:7094. Text is incorporated into the Bound Volume.]The CHAIRPERSON (Hon Trevor Mallard): Order! The member will now resume his seat. He has had two pretty gross offences.
Rurawhe Adrian: Gambling Amendment Bill (No 3) — In CommitteeText is incorporated into the Bound VolumeRurawhe Adrian: Gambling Amendment Bill (No 3) — In Committee[Sitting date: 24 September 2015. Volume:709;Page:7093. Text is incorporated into the Bound Volume.]ADRIAN RURAWHE (Labour—Te Tai Hauāuru): Tēnā koe Mr Chair. Speaking to the title I think this bill could have easily been called the “Gambling (Venue Payments and Other Matters) Amendment Bill”. We have consistently highlighted the issue of commission payments to venues and submitters who made submissions argued that these payments would incentivise gambling. I want to acknowledge the Hon Peter Dunne for his contribution in the earlier parts of this debate when he gave us some assurance around the kind of model that he was looking to come under the regulation that this bill empowers. I did take some comfort from what he said—that he would not be agreeing to a model that incentivised gambling—and I certainly look forward to the new regulations when they come out. That is why I say that this bill could have been called the “Gambling (Venue Payments and Other Matters) Amendment Bill”.I would also like to refer to the other matters within this bill and they are wide ranging. One of the parts of it is around the grant-making decisions. That is one of the other matters that I would refer to in the title. I reflect on the contribution that was made by my colleague Jenny Salesa who highlighted the number of class 4 pokie machines in her electorate the amount of money that was spent within her electorate and the amount of money subsequently distributed outside her electorate.I guess one could also name the bill the “Gambling (Redistribution of Grants and Other Matters) Bill”. Just to highlight this I understand that there is not a single pokie machine in Remuera but distributions from the funds collected through the pokie machines in South Auckland do end up in suburbs in Auckland that do not have pokie machines. I think that the amendments this bill makes to the Act address that issue. I have got to say that these are funds that come from people and communities that can least afford to have that money go out of their communities. The issues within here which could be described within a new title address that and I am pleased that we see that.Another matter is about strengthening provisions around conflicts of interest. There were some changes that were agreed to in the Government Administration Committee and I would like to in this final part of the Committee stage acknowledge the way that the select committee handled this particular bill. So those provisions that have been strengthened around addressing the issues of conflicts of interest are in my opinion very strong.On the deficit side of this bill we could have a title that included the lack of measures to address harm caused by gambling. That was a feature of the submissions on this bill and it could easily have been included.
Foster-Bell Paul: Tariff (Free Trade Agreement between New Zealand and the Republic of Korea) Amendment Bill — Third ReadingText is incorporated into the Bound VolumeFoster-Bell Paul: Tariff (Free Trade Agreement between New Zealand and the Republic of Korea) Amendment Bill — Third Reading[Sitting date: 24 September 2015. Volume:709;Page:7092. Text is incorporated into the Bound Volume.]PAUL FOSTER-BELL (National): In commending the Tariff (Free Trade Agreement between New Zealand and the Republic of Korea) Amendment Bill to the House I just want to congratulate those members of the Opposition who have expressed their support for this valuable measure. It is a very important trading relationship: $4 billion of bilateral trade between Korea and New Zealand; $2 billion each way. There are immediate benefits of around $65 million that will be derived for New Zealand exporters particularly in some of those fruit industries—kiwifruit for instance and wine—but also for New Zealand companies importing from Korea those technical products be they Samsung TVs or smartphones.This is a very positive measure and yet another triumph by our supremely sophisticated Minister of Trade the Hon Tim Groser. In the TV series Yes Minister KCMG meant “Kindly Call Me God”. I think that in future years Mr Groser should be knighted. “Sir Tim Groser” has a nice ring about it. He should get “Kindly Call Me Groser”. Thank you.
Barclay Todd: Tariff (Free Trade Agreement between New Zealand and the Republic of Korea) Amendment Bill — Third ReadingText is incorporated into the Bound VolumeBarclay Todd: Tariff (Free Trade Agreement between New Zealand and the Republic of Korea) Amendment Bill — Third Reading[Sitting date: 24 September 2015. Volume:709;Page:7090. Text is incorporated into the Bound Volume.]TODD BARCLAY (National—Clutha-Southland): It gives me pleasure to speak in support of the Tariff (Free Trade Agreement between New Zealand and the Republic of Korea) Amendment Bill. I just wanted to address one point that fascinated me. It was made by the previous Green speaker Steffan Browning. He said that we need to have a better track record on trade with Korea before we should do more trade. I have a couple of points. Setting aside pesticide and homeopathy the two points are firstly that that is why we are putting through a free-trade agreement—so we can get better outcomes and results from trade with Korea—and secondly it is already our fifth-largest export market. So there are a couple of points just to think about there.I want to acknowledge the Hon Tim Groser our Minister of Trade who has worked hard and tirelessly over his time in Parliament and before he came into Parliament signing up these deals between New Zealand and our counterparts in order to create better more prosperous outcomes for our businesses and our individuals. Often the work that Minister Groser does overseas is unacknowledged or under-acknowledged and I think that here is a time in the House when we can take the time to appreciate the work he does on behalf of our country.On behalf of Southland and Otago economies and indeed New Zealand we are export-driven economies and this agreement creates new opportunities for New Zealand businesses. We are keen to help them take advantage of these opportunities and hopefully when this bill passes through the House we can get on and help these businesses take advantage of the benefits that this agreement will see for them. We simply cannot get rich by buying and selling to ourselves. We are a party in favour of trade liberalisation unlike some of the members who have spoken previously representing their parties.In closing on behalf of the people of my electorate I would like to once again congratulate the Hon Tim Groser on this agreement and also the negotiations team. I would like to offer my unreserved support for this bill.
Tisch Lindsay: Tariff (Free Trade Agreement between New Zealand and the Republic of Korea) Amendment Bill — Third ReadingText is incorporated into the Bound VolumeTisch Lindsay: Tariff (Free Trade Agreement between New Zealand and the Republic of Korea) Amendment Bill — Third Reading[Sitting date: 24 September 2015. Volume:709;Page:7089. Text is incorporated into the Bound Volume.]The ASSISTANT SPEAKER (Lindsay Tisch): I am calling David Seymour—5 minutes.
Tisch Lindsay: Tariff (Free Trade Agreement between New Zealand and the Republic of Korea) Amendment Bill — Third ReadingText is incorporated into the Bound VolumeTisch Lindsay: Tariff (Free Trade Agreement between New Zealand and the Republic of Korea) Amendment Bill — Third Reading[Sitting date: 24 September 2015. Volume:709;Page:7088. Text is incorporated into the Bound Volume.]The ASSISTANT SPEAKER (Lindsay Tisch): I call Steffan Browning—5 minutes.
Borrows Chester: Tariff (Free Trade Agreement between New Zealand and the Republic of Korea) Amendment Bill — Third ReadingText is incorporated into the Bound VolumeBorrows Chester: Tariff (Free Trade Agreement between New Zealand and the Republic of Korea) Amendment Bill — Third Reading[Sitting date: 24 September 2015. Volume:709;Page:7078. Text is incorporated into the Bound Volume.]Mr DEPUTY SPEAKER: I am sorry to interrupt the member but he has been getting the signal for quite some time to sit down. He continues to discuss an agreement that is not before the House. I call—what is his name; he has been away so long—Mark Mitchell.
Vote: Environmental Reporting Bill — Third ReadingText is incorporated into the Bound VolumeVote: Environmental Reporting Bill — Third Reading[Sitting date: 24 September 2015. Volume:709;Page:7074. Text is incorporated into the Bound Volume.]A party vote was called for on the question That the Environmental Reporting Bill be now read a third time.Ayes 63New Zealand National 59; Māori Party 2; ACT New Zealand 1; United Future 1.Noes 58New Zealand Labour 32; Green Party 14; New Zealand First 12.Bill read a third time.
Doocey Matt: Environmental Reporting Bill — Third ReadingText is incorporated into the Bound VolumeDoocey Matt: Environmental Reporting Bill — Third Reading[Sitting date: 24 September 2015. Volume:709;Page:7074. Text is incorporated into the Bound Volume.]MATT DOOCEY (National—Waimakariri): It is an honour to rise to speak in support of the Environmental Reporting Bill at its third reading. Can I acknowledge the hard work of the Hon Dr Nick Smith and also of the chair of the Local Government and Environment Committee Scott Simpson for all his hard work in steering a very busy select committee.This week marks 1 year since this Government was returned to power and over that year a lot of words have been said in this House. A lot of words are said in politics but it is the actions that count. If you look at this Government’s actions it has delivered free GP care to under-13s it has given the first benefit increase in 43 years and it is now implementing environmental reporting standards. We are the only country in the OECD that does not have an environmental reporting framework and it took this National Government to show leadership in the environmental space. We believe in the environment we believe in New Zealanders and we believe in supporting this environment. Some people on that side of the House will say that only they stick up for the environment but we know it is intrinsic to all New Zealanders to have a clean green environment and that is why I support this bill and commend it to the House.
Carter David: Urgent Debates Declined — Child Youth and Family—Expert Advisory Panel ReportText is incorporated into the Bound VolumeCarter David: Urgent Debates Declined — Child Youth and Family—Expert Advisory Panel Report[Sitting date: 24 September 2015. Volume:709;Page:7072. Text is incorporated into the Bound Volume.]Mr SPEAKER: I have received a letter from Carmel Sepuloni seeking to debate under Standing Order 389 the independent expert panel’s interim report on modernising Child Youth and Family. The release of the report is a particular case of recent occurrence involving ministerial responsibility. The report makes concerning findings about the care of children by Child Youth and Family and outlines the nature of changes that the panel considers are required. The report is an interim one that outlines the next stage of work for the panel. Furthermore the operation of Child Youth and Family was extensively debated in an urgent debate on 27 August following the report of the Children’s Commissioner. There will be further opportunities to consider the issues when the final report is presented in December. I am not convinced that the presentation of an interim report warrants the setting aside of the business of the House today.