Brownlee Gerry; Hipkins ChrisSPEAKER: OK right I thank members for the contribution. I think addressing the first point made by the Hon Chris Hipkins I have not yet decided that a question of privilege has arisen. I think I've indicated that I would give it serious consideration but I am deferring that in order for there to be a possible review of the decision that the House took to adopt the current Standing Orders following the review that occurred in 2017. I'll say to Mr Brownlee that he was one of the people who insisted the rules be different for political parties and I accept that that is an unusual position but because of the way that the Standing Orders Committee works on the basis of a broad consensus that is what the Standing Order says and it is up to me if you go nowhere else but to Standing Order 2 to be the person who has the responsibility for enforcing what it says.What it actually says is that I can stop—I'm not sure how people thought that I could technically do it—but it does say that I can stop organisations actually getting the feed. You know I'm not—as people know—a technology expert. I don't know how you would actually do it and I'm pretty sure that it was aimed at media organisations rather than political parties. But as I indicated I've looked very carefully both at the report of the Standing Orders Committee and at the slightly unusual set of Standing Orders on this matter that we have and I am convinced that it is a matter that needs to be looked at and things should be held in abeyance until then. The broadcasting through linking of any speech or any question; I'm not suggesting that people can't do that. What I am saying is that they cannot edit them. At the point that they edit them there is a danger of them becoming an advertisement and until we've considered this matter that's not to continue.Hon GERRY BROWNLEE (National—Ilam): I raise a point of order Mr Speaker. It might then be helpful Mr Speaker if you were able to indicate what it is or what are the bounds you consider for editing".SPEAKER: Clearly a link—you know the member's aware that each of the questions and each of the speeches in the House can be individually linked and if members want to do that and the entirety of the link is available then there is no problem with that. It is when it is shortened and things are taken out of it that I consider that an edit.Hon GERRY BROWNLEE (National—Ilam): I raise a point of order Mr Speaker. It's to get a clarification. So if I for example give a speech in the House on a particular issue—it might be in a general debate it might relate specifically to something in the electorate that I represent—am I breaching Standing Orders under your direction today if I only publicise the part of that speech that I want to publicise?SPEAKER: No if it's the member's own speech there's no problem.Hon CHRIS HIPKINS (Leader of the House): Speaking further to that point of order. I think the reason it's the member's sole discretion is the Standing Orders are quite clear about that: that if you have the permission of the member concerned then of course you can use that footage. Unless the member forbids himself to publish it I don't think there's going to be an issue.SPEAKER: Order! Order! Now Mr Hipkins that's now actually not being helpful. Right is there any further discussion on this point? There appears to be none."