Hipkins ChrisHon CHRIS HIPKINS (Minister for COVID-19 Response): Just in relation to the last comment the member Chris Penk made I think he misinterpreted what I had intended by my comment. It's not that I don't think members of Parliament aren't perfectly capable of having views on this; it's that I don't think Parliament should be determining the operating procedures of the court without actually having a conversation with the court about that. So that is the reason why I don't think this is the appropriate place to resolve it because I think the judiciary should be actually leading that conversation not us—which I do believe is actually the point the member is making himself in his contribution. So I just didn't want him to misinterpret what I'd been intending to convey in my earlier comment.In terms of when those issues will be resolved to some extent—well to the largest extent—that is down to the courts. I mean the Government did not require the courts to end or to stop doing jury trials; it was the courts themselves that made that decision and in fact they made that decision before the first lockdown was even enacted by the Government. These were decisions that the courts made independently of the Government and that is quite appropriate.In terms of how much of this legislation is needed for the transition to the COVID protection framework we did go through that quite extensively last night but just to recap on that there are two aspects of the bill. The tool kit is not required for the traffic light framework to be put in place but the additional provisions the changes that particularly allow for additional factors other than exclusively public health criteria to be considered in the making of the orders is required to pass through the House before the protection framework can be put in place.All of the questions David Seymour raised other than that were addressed last night. I accept that he may not have liked the answers but they were in fact answered last night. As I also indicated last night in terms of the release of advice the Government will release advice. We will proactively release the advice and of course people can—there are already enactments of Parliament around the access to official information that will continue to apply. We will of course also be releasing detailed guidance for each individual sector on what the protection framework will mean for them. So there will be absolute clarity in that case. In terms of the issues around funerals we have to acknowledge that funerals are quite high-risk settings and can be quite high-risk settings so hence yes these requirements should still apply to funerals and tangihanga. It's not the Government's intention to exempt them from the framework.Most of the other questions that have been raised this morning relate to provisions or rules if you like that will be made under the empowering provisions here. So they're questions of detail and therefore they are not specific to the bill. They are specific to how the bill may be used in terms of the orders that may be put in place under the bill but the bill itself is a very broad empowering provision and it does not turn its mind to most of the other questions of detail that members have been asking.