Simpson Scott; Cameron MarkHon SCOTT SIMPSON (National—Coromandel): Thank you Madam Chair. I've got a question that relates to clause 21. That's a clause that seeks to amend the Energy Efficiency and Conservation Act 2000. And specifically it seeks to amend that legislation by prescribing requirements in relation to the labelling of vehicles in terms of their carbon dioxide emissions and any financial rebates receivable or charges payable relating to those emissions". And so my question is: what exactly does the Minister envisage that labelling to be and in what form shape or format will that labelling take? Is this to be something as simple as maybe another line on the registration that sits in the little pocket inside your windscreen? Or is this a requirement that will see a vehicle actually having a sticker or a sign or a piece of sign writing added to it? And what form or shape will the labelling take? Will it be required to be waterproof protected from ultraviolet degradation robustness? How will it be affixed to the vehicle? All those sorts of questions.So my question really is: what is the intention relating to the prescription that requires vehicles to be labelled not only for their carbon dioxide emissions but the label that it seems to me on the reading of this will require details relating to the financial rebates receivable or chargeable on the vehicle. Will the label that will be affixed to the car in some way shape or form be sort of like a mark of "There goes a dirty car. There goes a good car."? Will the label for instance have maybe a thumbs up signal for cars that qualify and meet the standard? Or will it perhaps have a thumbs down for those dirty vehicles that don't? I'm keen to know if it is to be a thumbs up or a thumbs down what colour will the thumbs be? There seems to be an increasing level of concern when you use thumbs up and thumbs down in social media about the cultural appropriateness of certain coloured thumbs up and thumbs down.So I'm just concerned and I don't want to make light of it unnecessarily but I do think that this is another detail of practical application that this legislation it's seeking to amend legislation. We already have—and I think it is the Energy Efficiency and Conservation Authority that for instance prescribes labelling to go on domestic appliances like fridges and washing machines and dish driers and things of that nature. Is that the kind of labelling that the Minister envisages will be appropriate under this new clause? And—Simeon Brown: Will it be made of plastic? Hon SCOTT SIMPSON: —I'm keen to know—yeah my colleague Simeon Brown asks a good question: will they be made of plastic these labels? Will it actually be sort of a degree of "greenwashing" and we'll be hailing with enthusiasm the cleanliness of the power train that is providing energy to propel the vehicle but we'll be sticking horrible plastic labels on it somewhere of an indeterminate size?So as I say I don't want to unnecessarily make light of the situation but I do think that the public and the sector and the potential purchasers of vehicles that will be captured under this legislation need to know what the labelling will look like what form it will take how it will be affixed what size and will it be multilingual for instance? Following up on my previous question: will we have elements of te reo on the label? And so those are issues that I'd like the Minister to address please.MARK CAMERON (ACT): Thank you Madam Chair. Just a very quick question. Does the Minister accept perhaps that the ACT Party would have the correct labelling for the vehicles in question and it could be issued as a legitimate ute driver sticker?"