Pugh Maureen; Webb DuncanPart 4 Miscellaneous provisionsCHAIRPERSON (Maureen Pugh): Members we now come to Part 4—Hon Dr DUNCAN WEBB (Labour—Christchurch Central): Point of order Madam Chairperson. I'm just seeking some clarification because through that debate we were methodically working through Part 3 and had debated a large part of Subpart 1 but there have been no calls taken on Subpart 2 which is non-consorting orders. Now it might be an oversight or maybe I've got it wrong but are we now going to debate Subpart 2 because the calls were on Subpart 1 and they were coming to Subpart 2 and there has been no debate on those important orders. If the Chair could clarify that that would be appreciated. CHAIRPERSON (Maureen Pugh): I'd just remind the member that I was seeking new material. I did ask members to introduce new material. There were 13 calls during that debate on Part 3. I can't control what the members want to debate and so the repetition—I did warn members that there was a quite a bit of repetition. The decision has been made and I've made a ruling and we're moving now—Hon Ginny Andersen: Speaking to the point of order Madam Chair. There is a significant new power being introduced through legislation—CHAIRPERSON (Maureen Pugh): Are you now arguing with my ruling? Hon Ginny Andersen: Are we allowed to bring up the non-consorting orders in later parts of the bill or is that it—we're not ever allowed to raise that again? CHAIRPERSON (Maureen Pugh): The ruling is that we are moving on to Part 4—Hon Ginny Andersen: So you're preventing us debating non-consorting orders? You took a vote before we were able to talk on that issue—CHAIRPERSON (Maureen Pugh): The 13 calls we have just had have covered it in—Hon Ginny Andersen: Not non-consorting orders—there were no calls. CHAIRPERSON (Maureen Pugh): I can't control what the members want to debate at the time. If you want to use all of your calls to debate clause 9 that's your call. We are moving on to Part 4. This is—Camilla Belich: Point of order Madam Chair. CHAIRPERSON (Maureen Pugh): Is this a new point of order? CAMILLA BELICH (Junior Whip—Labour): This is a new point of order. I just wanted to address the statement that you made in your ruling which I didn't recall being part of this debate for the entire—since the dinner break. The first part was that you reminded members about repetition. I think you did that once very early in the debate and I think that was addressed by members. But there are about 15 clauses that were not debated at all in that part. I know that you have discretion and you've made a ruling but you do have some discretion to allow for material in the subsequent discussion and so I'd just like to request that in order that democracy is best served and those non-consorting orders are addressed there is some leeway given to reference non-consorting orders because without that there will not be an opportunity for this committee of the whole House to scrutinise this quite considerable power that the Government has had and—CHAIRPERSON (Maureen Pugh): I understand the member. Part 3 has ended; the House has voted. We are moving on now to Part 4. Part 4 is the—Hon Dr Duncan Webb: Point of order. CHAIRPERSON (Maureen Pugh): Is this a new point of order? Hon Dr DUNCAN WEBB (Labour—Christchurch Central): Yes. I seek leave of the House that Subpart 2 of Part 3 now be debated. CHAIRPERSON (Maureen Pugh): Leave is sought for that purpose. Is there any objection? There is. Part 4: this is the debate on clauses 27 to 35 Miscellaneous provisions" and Schedule 3. The question is that Part 4 stand part."