Stanford Erica; Radhakrishnan PriyancaERICA STANFORD (National—East Coast Bays): Thank you. I will repeat my question. In relation to new section 383A inserted by clause 10 Publication of names and information in respect of immigration offences" "(1) The chief executive may in order to promote the objects"—I think it's supposed to say "objectives"—"of this Act publish the information specified in subsection (2)". So my question to the Minister is: what is the framework that the chief executive will be working to and in what circumstances may they or may they not publish this information? I guess the question to the Minister is: is there a seriousness angle to this? Is there some sort of scope as to when they would and wouldn't? Are there any guidelines? And if she could give some examples of potentially in what cases the chief executive may or may not do that.My second question is in relation to that same new section 383A: where would this be published? The first question is: they may publish it but under what circumstances would they or wouldn't they and what guidelines are there? And secondly where would they publish it? And my third question keeping with new section 383A: there is a list of things under new section 383A that the chief executive will do when they publish it. This is under subsection (2). The information that may be published is the following: the name of the employer the employer's trading name and a few other things. One of the things that's missing from there and I'm wondering if it's done on purpose—and if it is why that is—is a description of the infringement.There are three types of things you might be pulled up on under replacement section 359A(1) inserted by clause 7. The employer "must not (a) allow a person who is not entitled under this Act to work in [their employment]". Secondly they must work in a manner that's consistent with their visa—that's the second type of infringement. And then the third type is failure to produce the documents. So in new section 383A(2) there is no requirement in there as far as I can tell to explain what type of offence the infringement is. So I'm just wanting to know from the Minister if that was an oversight or why that has been omitted because at the moment you can have your name published to say "You are an employer here's your name you've been issued with an infringement notice" but it may well be that you just took 11 days rather than 10 or it could be that you allowed someone to work for you who wasn't supposed to be working for you. They're quite different offences under the infringement offence but that detail is not required to be published. So I'm just wondering why that is. So there are those three questions.I'm going to stay on new section 383A because if I feel like if I keep going the Minister won't potentially hear what I have to say on the next part of the bill. So in summary of new section 383A we've got three questions: where would they publish the data? Under what circumstances would they publish the data? Because the word "may" has been included in the bill. And I'd like to know under what circumstances—if there is a severity. And I elaborate on this point because as with my earlier point there are different offences that you can do to get an infringement notice. I'm interested in whether or not the chief executive may choose to publish some and not others depending on the seriousness of those offences. That was the second question. And then the third one: the description of the infringement isn't required to be published and they are quite different offences. So I'm keen to know whether that's been left out on purpose. Thank you.Hon PRIYANCA RADHAKRISHNAN (Associate Minister for Workplace Relations and Safety): New section 383A inserted by clause 10 that the member Erica Stanford has mentioned will basically enable the chief executive to publish the names as mentioned and certain other details of employers who are convicted of offences against the Act or issued with infringement notices in respect of the specific infringement notices in this Act. The whole point of this is really to ensure that we align the frameworks between the Immigration Act and the Employment Relations Act. The point is not to name the conviction or the infringement but the point is actually the consequences of that and to be able to see that. That is what this particular section allows for."