Menéndez March RicardoRICARDO MENÉNDEZ MARCH (Musterer—Green): Thank you Madam Chair. I'm acknowledging that I'm going to ask a series of questions that would have been canvassed at the select committee stage.I want to start by first of all asking if a child impact assessment was done on this bill particularly because we know that there is concern around the harm tobacco can cause in children and particularly if people start smoking at a younger age those harms can compound. So I'm interested to know whether a child impact assessment report was done as part of the process of this bill and if not I'm really interested to understand why that wasn't the case because that is a tool that exists to further assess the impacts of policy on children. It is a tool that the Greens at least encourage legislators to use when it comes to the production of bills. So if the Associate Minister didn't think that that was worth doing I'm keen to get a sense as to why. The other one is in relationship to looking at the departmental disclosure statement the list of agencies that were consulted. It's pretty extensive but I'm really keen to get a sense of the feedback and actually would invite the Minister to potentially table some of those papers in relationship to the external consultation.But I'm interested particularly in what feedback was given from the Ministry of Social Development in terms of the impacts that the greater harm that could come from tobacco use would mean for people who are already on low incomes. I'm interested to get a sense of feedback around the Ministry of Education. So what feedback was given in that external consultation in relationship to potential changes of tobacco use in schools?Also I've noted that the Ministry for Ethnic Communities was consulted and that ministry can provide a really important second opinion on a range of policy issues. I'm keen to get a sense of if there was feedback given around how the policy could impact different ethnic groups because we know that substance use can manifest in different ways in different communities and therefore the interventions for harm minimisation could look quite different depending on the different groups. Equally I did note that Whaikaha - Ministry of Disabled People was consulted and keen again to get that intersectional lens around what feedback was given in terms of the impact on disabled people.The reason why I'm asking for those agencies in particular is that we know that the harm of tobacco again compounds when it comes to communities who are already living week to week. The health impacts of tobacco mean that people who already have the least may struggle to access the health services that they need to address some of that harm and so that's why I'm focusing on those agencies. But if the Minister would like to illustrate more broadly or to table documents around the feedback that was given by those agencies that would help inform the debate—right?—because if the feedback from those agencies was encouraging and positive as to what she wants to do then I think the public deserves to know that. If there were concerns from those agencies actually we would invite a more robust debate because that doesn't even have anything to do with the use of urgency which we oppose. But I think we deserve and the public deserves to get a good robust understanding of the feedback that was given as part of that external consultation because we know it happened even with the use of urgency and so we are keen to get an analysis as to not just the feedback but I guess the extent of the process to which that feedback happened. Again I think this is something that we would have been able to canvass within a select committee process but otherwise I think it's pretty fair to ask whether a child impact assessment was done and for the feedback that was given as part of that consultation. Thank you.