Henare PeeniPEENI HENARE (Labour—Tāmaki Makaurau): Tēnā koe Mr Chair. Thank you very much for this opportunity. First can I just acknowledge the presence of Hau Rāwiri in the gallery who as the representative for Ngāti Paoa is keeping a close eye on this particular bill as it proceeds through the House. I take the point they made in their submissions which is that everything that Ngāti Paoa has done has been premised on aroha pono and tika. I think that is an important point because as we debate this bill I think we will see some transgressions on the part of the Crown with regard to aroha tika and pono and to making sure that all those players who are community stakeholders and everybody across this particular issue were actually engaged with those principles in mind.I just want to go to clause 3 Interpretation" and the definition of "Housing Act Minister". If you look at the Housing Act 1955 it is actually very clear but if I can I will express to the Committee the confusion in the public with regard to who actually is the housing Minister and who is dealing with the issues of housing in Tāmaki-makau-rau. We have seen so many different roles made and so many different actors and players from this Government in the role of housing in Tāmaki-makau-rau I wonder whether or not there can be questions about the interpretation of that.We know for example that the Hon Dr Nick Smith has been leading much of the conversation on this yet when other questions are asked about social housing they are passed on to another Minister. If we read through the content of this bill which we will get into a little bit later on in Part 2 we cannot help but question whether or not some of those interpretations can be blurred or can be a little bit questionable and we hope that we can return to the principles as I mentioned that bring Ngāti Paoa into the gallery here again today.To clause 4 Part 1—my colleague Mr Twyford made a very good point around the "Act binds the Crown." He mentioned in his contribution the need in terms of the engagement with all stakeholders. What the Crown is actually doing here in this particular bill is binding all of those stakeholders. Some have had a small voice on this particular issue and others have had their voices heard multiple times on this issue. Some are more vocal than others. I want to support Mr Twyford's contribution on that in saying that those are some of the concerns that we have with regard to the interpretation. From my understanding of the bill—and once again this will go to Part 2—it actually binds other stakeholders in this particular bill in and around Point England.There is not much more to go through on Part 1. I just want to reiterate the point about those principles of tika pono and aroha as mentioned constantly by Ngāti Paoa. I also want to just touch on once again the definition of the "Housing Act Minister" and where exactly the roles of the Minister sit in this particular development from beginning to end. The content of the bill talks about social housing. Well we know there is actually another Minister for social housing. Questions in the House on the one issue seem to be split across three and sometimes four different people. That is another point that I wanted to make in this contribution. Of course finally the other one is around the "Act binds the Crown." and what that means as the bill progresses. I look forward to getting into Part 2 where I know there is substantial debate to be had. I will close my conclusion here."