Williams Andrew: General DebateText is incorporated into the Bound VolumeWilliams Andrew: General Debate[Sitting date: 10 April 2013. Volume:689;Page:9240. Text is incorporated into the Bound Volume.]ANDREW WILLIAMS (NZ First): I want to tell this House a story not a fairy tale which we have heard from the Government benches but a true story about the history of the political life of one Mr John Key for its benefit. It all started on Waiheke Island where he turned up with a $200-plus bottle of Larose wine to impress his mates in the National Party so he could get the shoulder-tap to become an MP for National. So having influenced them with a $200 bottle of wine they said: “Oh we had betterhave this John Key. He looks like he is a high roller. He is going to bring us a lot of money.” One year later it is October 2003 and he becomes a member of Parliament. He returns from New York having been a money trader there for Merrill Lynch. At the time Don Brash is challenging leader Bill English for the leadership of the National Party. On the night before the vote honest John Key as they thought he was visits Mr Bill English at his home. He promises Mr English that he will support him in the morning in the leadership vote—he promises Bill English he will support him. English and his supporters rejoice.Maggie Barry: What do you know?ANDREW WILLIAMS: Listen to this because you might need to know this history. Backbenchers you will need to know this when you are doing a leadership reshuffle. Anyway English and his supporters rejoice because they are now confident of the numbers that they have got to retain the leadership. Alas the morning comes. The vote is held. To everyone’s shock Don Brash wins by a single vote. The one vote comes from who? The smiling assassin John Key. He double-crosses Bill English. Is it not incredible! The very same John Key who the night before had promised Bill English his support did not support him. He turned and gave his support to Don Brash and Don Brash carried on into the leadership.The same John Key then carried on to build his political career supposedly on integrity. This is the same John Key who in Opposition railed against corruption demanded transparency and pledged to uphold his Ministers to the very highest of ethical standards in all their conduct. But let us not forget this was the same John Key who forgot to declare his financial interests in Tranz Rail. This is the same John Key who forgot about an incriminating email about the Exclusive Brethren. This is the same John Key who swore black and blue that he did not know about his blind trust only to be video-recorded boasting about his shares in that very same vineyard.What is more this is the same John Key who promised not to increase GST only to go and do so. This is also the same John Key who promised to open the Government’s banking with Westpac to competition. What did we get? Simon Power working for the Westpac bank. That was opening it to competition. This is the same John Key who told everyone he had never met with Steven Joyce’s former company MediaWorks to discuss a $43.3 million loan despite the fact that he had. This is the same John Key who blabbed that Standard and Poor’s would give New Zealand a credit downgrade if it elected a new Government even though Standard and Poor’s utterly rejected that suggestion made by John Key.This is the same John Key who apparently cannot remember when the Government Communications Security Bureau first advised him of the spying on Kim Dotcom and also could not remember shoulder-tapping his mate Ian Fletcher for the job as Director of the bureau.The list goes on and on. Do we see a pattern here? Do we see a pattern? It beggars belief that we have a Prime Minister who cannot recall intelligence briefings and also has times when he cannot remember what the true story is. It is truly incredible. He is very economic with the truth—very economic with the truth. It is truly incredible. Not even Hollywood would come up with a plot as extraordinary as we have seen with this Dotcom - Government Communications Security Bureau affair. The Prime Minister is asking us to believe that either he is the victim of an incredible set of coincidences that make it appear as though there is something to hide or he really does have something to hide. What we want to know is what the true answer is. We—New Zealand First—and other parties are calling for an independent inquiry into this to get to the bottom of it. From the facts of this matter we cannot trust John Key to do anything. The National Party certainly cannot trust him. Let us have an inquiry.