Woodhouse Michael; Robertson GrantHon MICHAEL WOODHOUSE (National): Thank you Madam Chair. I appreciate the answer from the Minister for Sport and Recreation. It is true for example that if there is the commission of a crime that's unlawful under the Crimes Act for example then obviously there's a different process to be followed. But what we were hearing about in the Social Services and Community Committee were—well they were grey areas but they were certainly very clear breaches of integrity.So in accepting as I have begrudgingly that the code will be voluntary I wonder regardless of who the Minister of sport might be from November if this Minister would commit to—Angie Warren-Clark: Ha ha!Hon MICHAEL WOODHOUSE: Don't laugh too hard you might get into trouble. If the Minister would commit to ensuring that to use a sporting euphemism some kind of score card is kept of the progress towards ensuring as many as possible of those sporting codes that have been the subject of questions about integrity—whether that's behaviour or betting or drugs—are actually signing up to the integrity codes once they're done. And if they're not then this House might need to reflect on that and do something differently. I just want to note also in clause 20 the consultation has been extended—and I think significantly—to acknowledge the change in definition recommended by Ricardo Menéndez March to describe rainbow people but also that women and girls who frankly putting aside any of the transgender issues were very much the victims and the storytellers. And I think that it's going to be very important for them to be consulted. And the last thing I will say is I absolutely agree with the Minister in his comment about the review of the code at least once every three years. I think that's going to be particularly important in the first three to six years as we get this going. But as I said in my second reading speech Australia's got some pretty good templates. I'm sure if we ask them nicely copyright issues notwithstanding we could probably get a pretty good head start on them.Hon GRANT ROBERTSON (Minister for Sport and Recreation): I thank the member. There were just a couple more points to add to my initial response to him. The first of those is when it comes to the anti-doping rules which of course are being incorporated into this they themselves are usually voluntary but sports want to do them because their athletes' ability to participate actually relies on them being part of them even though they're voluntary. So there is a consistency with the way we deal with anti-doping.The other point is clause 32 of the bill does allow for investigations of a threat to integrity if the public interest test is satisfied. And I think that covers the point that the member was making about the area between the obvious criminal activity and what is perhaps the grey area that he mentioned. If the public interest is deemed to be sufficient there is an ability there beyond the code or anything else for an investigation of threat to integrity. So I think with that that I have sufficient confidence that the scheme is robust. But as both of us have now agreed the review helps us with that.