Clendon David: Questions for Oral Answer — Questions to Ministers 
Text is incorporated into the Bound Volume 
Clendon David: Questions for Oral Answer — Questions to Ministers 
[Sitting date: 18 November 2009. Volume:659;Page:7771. Text is incorporated into the Bound Volume.] 
10.  
DAVID CLENDON (Green) 
 to the  
Minister of Tourism 
: What advice if any has he sought regarding the impact on New Zealand’s tourism industry of last week’s UK  
Guardian 
 article which says that our “green image increasingly defies reality”? 
Hon JOHN KEY (Minister of Tourism) 
: 
 I have not asked for specific advice because I already understand the impact that such articles can have as I pointed out to Federated Farmers in my speech to them this morning. However that does not mean that I accept all the points made in the particular article the member is referring to. 
David Clendon 
: Did he seek advice earlier this year when the World Economic Forum’s  
Travel and Tourism Competitiveness Report 
 ranked New Zealand 92nd on climate change performance; if so what advice did he receive? 
Hon JOHN KEY 
: No but I did lament that we had 9 years of a Labour Government that did absolutely nothing in that area. 
David Clendon 
: What is he doing in response to New Zealand coming last according to the same report at protecting threatened species and does he think this delivers on our “100% Pure New Zealand” brand? 
Hon JOHN KEY 
: Could I ask the member to repeat his question? It was little noisy on the other side of the House. 
Mr SPEAKER 
: I absolutely accept the Minister of Tourism’s point. I ask David Clendon to repeat his question and I ask the House to show some courtesy to a new member. 
David Clendon 
: What is the Minister doing in response to New Zealand coming last according to that same report at protecting threatened species and does he think this delivers on our “100% Pure New Zealand” brand? 
Hon JOHN KEY 
: We are working to improve that area. We have made it clear in areas like conservation that we are keen to engage with the private sector to deal with areas like that. When it comes to climate change we are working hard to have policies that actually work as opposed to rhetoric from the previous Government. 
Charles Chauvel 
: Is the “100% Pure New Zealand” brand still the focus of tourism policy in New Zealand; if so how is it compatible with opening up the Department of Conservation estate to further mining with Gerry Brownlee’s petroleum action plan announced earlier today with a $110 billion subsidy to polluters and with an emissions trading scheme that the Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment says will actually see an increase in greenhouse gas emissions? 
Hon JOHN KEY 
: Yes “100% Pure New Zealand” is still the brand campaign that we are running. Secondly I remind the member that there are 82 concessions currently on the conservation estate many of which were issued by the previous Labour Government— 
Hon Ruth Dyson 
: That is irrelevant. 
Hon JOHN KEY 
: That is a good one actually! That is a little bit like the carbon neutral statement that the previous Government wheeled out—unfortunately it then allowed our emissions to go through the roof. But that is OK; this Government will fix up that problem. 
Mr SPEAKER 
: I call David Clendon. [ 
Interruption 
] I have called David Clendon. I ask members to show some courtesy to the new member at the back of the House. I want to hear him. 
David Clendon 
: Does he agree with the United Nations World Tourism Organization that New Zealand has managed to capture the world’s imagination with its consistent branding and does he also agree that it is crucially important that the reality is in turn consistent with that branding? 
Hon JOHN KEY 
: Yes and yes and that is why we work hard to protect our environment. 
Metiria Turei 
: Will the Minister then accept the very kind offer made by Greenpeace to pay for his fare to the climate change conference in Copenhagen in order to demonstrate to the many potential international tourists that New Zealand does take its environmental responsibility seriously? 
Hon JOHN KEY 
: No I will not be accepting the cheque from Greenpeace to go to Copenhagen. It is very unlikely that I will be going there. I will be well represented by Tim Groser and Nick Smith. Anyway I will be far too busy reading the comments from the co-leader of the Green Party about why she thinks that Phil Goff is a racist. 
Metiria Turei 
: I raise a point of order Mr Speaker. I take exception to that comment. What I said on the radio this morning is absolutely accurate and I stand by those words. But the description of them by the Prime Minister of this country was derogatory and disgusting. I ask that he withdraw and apologise. 
Hon Rodney Hide 
: Point of order—[ 
Interruption 
] 
Mr SPEAKER 
: I do not need further help on this. I do not know who made that interjection but it was not helpful either. It is fortunate that I did not pick up who it was. I say to the Prime Minister that his comment was totally unnecessary; I ask him to stand withdraw and apologise for that comment. 
Hon JOHN KEY 
: I withdraw and apologise. 
Charles Chauvel 
: I raise a point of order Mr Speaker. [ 
Interruption 
]  
Mr SPEAKER 
: I called that I would hear a point of order from the Leader of the Opposition’s own colleague and he made an interjection that is totally unparliamentary and he knows that. I now ask the honourable Leader of the Opposition to stand withdraw and apologise for that. 
Hon Phil Goff 
: I withdraw and apologise. [ 
Interruption 
] 
Mr SPEAKER 
: A point of order is being heard and the senior members—[ 
Interruption 
] The Prime Minister will also be quiet. I say to the Deputy Prime Minister the Prime Minister and all senior members that we have had a fair bit of fun today but I think we should show a little decorum. There have been a lot of visitors in the gallery who would not have been too impressed. 
Charles Chauvel 
: I seek leave to table a copy of a cheque raised by Greenpeace members via cake stalls and sausage sizzles for $4781 to enable the Prime Minister to attend the Copenhagen climate change conference. 
Mr SPEAKER 
: I recently made a ruling in which I made it clear to members that I would not be seeking the leave of the House for members to table articles that have nothing to do with providing information to members of the House. When a request to table an item is purely political grandstanding it is demeaning of this Parliament. I ask members not to do it or I will take serious steps in the future. 
Hon Darren Hughes 
: I raise a point of order Mr Speaker. Can I ask you to reflect on that. The Prime Minister in his answer referred to the cheque from Greenpeace. He introduced that material into the House in his answer. My colleague is simply tabling the information that the Prime Minister referred to in his answer. 
Mr SPEAKER 
: I have ruled on the matter and that is the end of it. 
David Clendon 
: I seek leave to table New Zealand’s country profile in the World Economic Forum’s Travel and Tourism Competitiveness Index which ranks New Zealand near the bottom of the world— 
Mr SPEAKER 
: Leave is sought to table that document. Is there any objection? There is no objection. 
Document by leave laid on the Table of the House.