Bridges Simon; Robertson GrantHon SIMON BRIDGES (National—Tauranga): As we continue on the theme of investment in this appropriations debate I'd be interested in the investment into Britain and in particular what we are doing in relation to the expiration of visas there. I note they will expire on 31 July putting I think some Kiwis in that country in a very invidious position particularly given it's very difficult to come back here and we do not realistically have the resources—if I listened to other Ministers in the Government—to do all of the quarantining that could possibly be required. Is the Government working on that and will we see an answer before 31 July on that critical issue of visas for Kiwis in the United Kingdom? Hon GRANT ROBERTSON (Minister of Finance): I think that issue around visas is probably a little outside of this debate. What I would say to the member is that obviously we are very conscious of the fact that many New Zealanders in many different countries around the world have been facing issues to do with the visas in the countries that they're currently in. They have a right to return to New Zealand—there is no question about that. The member will just have to wait a little bit longer to hear how the Government wants to manage some of those movements but in terms of the visas themselves and the country individuals will have been dealing with that. If they are unable to stay in the UK they are entitled to return to New Zealand. Hon SIMON BRIDGES (National—Tauranga): I know there's also investment going into the relationship with South Korea. I note the Prime Minister—having mentioned Zoom—has a call with the President of South Korea and I know that is something that in the appropriations is being worked through and thought about very closely. Does the Government have a position—and will the Prime Minister be raising the issue of a Korean diplomat and an alleged sexual assault so that there is pressure brought to bear on that issue and justice will be seen to be done and done here in New Zealand? MICHAEL WOOD (Senior Whip—Labour): I raise a point of order Madam Chairperson. Matters raised in this question and every other question from the member relate to foreign policy and security policy matters and are not remotely related to the Estimates of the appropriations. The member simply putting the word appropriations" in at the beginning of the question doesn't change that fact and I argue that the questions are not relevant to this debate and actually are getting to the point of creating disorder in the House because they make a mockery of this debate. Hon GRANT ROBERTSON (Minister of Finance): Thank you Madam Chair. With respect to the specific case the member will be aware that this Government—as indeed his Government and any other party in this House—would be appalled by the allegations that we have heard. We would not stand for those and we will be pursuing those through every means possible. In terms of the Prime Minister's call I think it will be clear that the Prime Minister would need to answer that question. But I am of course aware that the call has happened. Vote Foreign Affairs and Trade Vote Official Development Assistance Vote Defence Vote Defence Force Vote Veterans' Affairs - Defence Force and Vote Customs agreed to."