Little Andrew: Questions for Oral Answer — Questions to Ministers 
Text is incorporated into the Bound Volume 
Little Andrew: Questions for Oral Answer — Questions to Ministers 
[Sitting date: 13 June 2012. Volume:680;Page:2901. Text is incorporated into the Bound Volume.] 
10. 
ANDREW LITTLE (Labour) 
 to the  
Minister for ACC 
: What responsibility does she take for failures at ACC since the 2011 Election? 
Hon JUDITH COLLINS (Minister for ACC) 
: 
 I take ministerial responsibility for ACC from the date I received my ministerial warrant which was on 14 December 2011. In accordance with the  
Cabinet Manual 
 I take ministerial responsibility for the direction and the priorities of the organisation.  
Andrew Little 
: What discussions did she have with ACC Chairman John Judge ACC Chief Executive Ralph Stewart or her staff about referring allegations made about Bronwyn Pullar in their 16 March report to her to the police before that reference to the police occurred? 
Hon JUDITH COLLINS 
: I received a briefing from the chairman and the chief executive and I can recall that my comment to them was that any decision that they made must be theirs and that I would stand by whatever decision they made as is something that a Minister should do. 
Hon Trevor Mallard 
: Did she say when questioned about the leak: “The fact is it also came from Ms Boag”; if so was she indicating that Ms Boag was a possible source of the leak? 
Hon JUDITH COLLINS 
: Without actually having the full context of that alleged statement it would be difficult to answer because I have learnt from experience not to take everything that is said at face value from that member. 
Hon Trevor Mallard 
: Is she denying that she said when asked about the fact that she had passed the email on to Mr Judge and Mr Stewart: “The fact is it also came from Ms Boag so there are possibilities”; will she deny saying that? 
Hon JUDITH COLLINS 
: Without actually receiving and having a look at any transcript I cannot answer that question that way. The fact is that without it in writing and without proof of it I cannot take that member as having put that supposed comment in context.  
Kevin Hague 
: Is the Minister giving the House a categorical assurance that she neither instructed nor approved nor suggested that ACC make a complaint to the police concerning Bronwyn Pullar? 
Hon JUDITH COLLINS 
: My comments to the chair and the chief executive were that they must make their own decision. It is not for me to be involved in those individual decisions. 
Hon Members 
: You said you backed them. 
Hon Members 
: Back them or sack them? 
Hon JUDITH COLLINS 
: Do they want to hear or not? [ 
Interruption 
]  
Mr DEPUTY SPEAKER 
: Order! 
Hon JUDITH COLLINS 
: My statement was very clear to them: they must make their own decisions and that I would back those decisions whatever they were. Those decisions were made after they received their own legal advice and I have since seen a legal opinion prepared by Mr Judge’s Queen’s Counsel which is after the event but which obviously took into account all of the events which backed the decision of the board to refer that matter to the police for advice. The police were the right and proper authority to look at this issue. 
Rt Hon Winston Peters 
: Can I ask the Minister in terms of her ministerial responsibility as to this from a letter written by Michelle Boag a former head of the National Party: “You will see in the correspondence attached to the email I am forwarding that while Mr Murch asked for the return of the data he did not acknowledge that this would be contingent on reaching an agreement acceptable to both parties which was our understanding.” That is from someone who was guilty and convicted of seeking to pervert the course of justice in a commission of inquiry. Is this not extortion—straight out? 
Hon JUDITH COLLINS 
: I do not have ministerial responsibility for the actions of Ms Boag or of Ms Pullar. 
Kevin Hague 
: Further to her answer to my earlier question is she telling the House that Mr Judge had his own personal counsel working on the matter of the complaint to the police as opposed to an ACC counsel? 
Hon JUDITH COLLINS 
: I am not sure that that is in fact what I am telling the House. I am telling the House that there was legal advice. The board—[ 
Interruption 
]  
Mr DEPUTY SPEAKER 
: Order! 
Hon JUDITH COLLINS 
: I can say that Mr Judge has advised me that he had legal advice not only from ACC and ACC’s lawyers but from his own Queen’s Counsel in this matter. I have seen the opinion and it backs up Mr Judge. 
Andrew Little 
: What knowledge does the Minister have of ACC spending money that ought to be spent on those who have suffered injuries on public relations advice through Acumen Republic including spending on polling to see how ACC’s current problems should be massaged?  
Hon JUDITH COLLINS 
: That is an operational matter but I would also say that— 
Hon Members 
: Oh! 
Hon JUDITH COLLINS 
: It is an operational matter. It is hardly setting the policy or the direction of the board. 
Hon Trevor Mallard 
: I raise a point of order Mr Speaker. That was a very simple question: what knowledge does she have? That is her responsibility. It is not an operational matter. Matters that are the Minister’s knowledge are her responsibility—something she is trying to shift. 
Mr DEPUTY SPEAKER 
: I will ask the member to repeat the supplementary question. 
Andrew Little 
: What knowledge does the Minister have of ACC spending money that ought to be spent on those who have suffered injuries on public relations advice through Acumen Republic including spending on polling to see how ACC’s current problems should be massaged?  
Hon JUDITH COLLINS 
: It is not a matter for me. It is a matter for the board. 
Hon Trevor Mallard 
: I raise a point of order Mr Speaker. Ministers are regularly briefed by the board orally and in writing as to the activities of the board. Those matters then become their knowledge for which they are answerable here. 
Mr DEPUTY SPEAKER 
: The matter that was raised in the supplementary question is in fact an operational matter. It may not satisfy the member but the member has an answer. 
Hon David Parker 
: I raise a point of order Mr Speaker. The Minister was asked about what her knowledge was. That is not a matter of departmental responsibility. She was asked what her knowledge as Minister was. The answer may well be that she had none and that would be a proper answer. But it is fair to ask her what knowledge she had of that. 
Mr DEPUTY SPEAKER 
: I will seek some advice. Order! I have given a ruling and I am going to stand by that. Members have further supplementary questions if they wish to pursue that. Members are seeking to actually litigate a ruling by further points of order. 
Kevin Hague 
: If it is true that the Minister did not instruct approve or suggest the complaint to the police and the matter was entirely an operational ACC matter then why was the legal opinion sought by John Judge shown to the Minister? 
Hon JUDITH COLLINS 
: That is a very good question. Mr Judge sent it to me last week because he was concerned about a story in the  
Dominion Post 
 that made allegations against him. Rather than refer to the editorial policy of the  
Dominion Post 
 he felt it was right to send me the opinion that he had received. 
Andrew Little 
: Is the Minister denying to this House that she knew that ACC has been spending money on public relations advice through Acumen Republic including spending money on polling to see how ACC’s current problems should be massaged? 
Hon JUDITH COLLINS 
: I have no knowledge of any polling being paid for and I do not know why I would have. 
Andrew Little 
: I raise a point of order Mr Speaker. The question was whether she is denying that she knows that the money is being spent. It is not about her knowledge of the polling; it is about money being spent by ACC on that activity. 
Mr DEPUTY SPEAKER 
: No I think that the polling was related to the expenditure of money and the member does have an answer.