Tanczos Nandor: General Debate 
Tanczos Nandor: General Debate 
[Volume:639;Page:9280] 
NANDOR TANCZOS (Green) 
: 
 I know that members of the House have asked the Greens to justify our position on confidence and supply and I would respond only by saying that when the Green Party makes an agreement to do something that is what we do. It is a question of integrity and I know that is a novel concept for some members of this House. 
However I would like to talk about something different. Like all members of this House I recently received a book by “snail mail”. That is not a rare thing but what was uncommon is that the author’s claim that the book is a serious and significant challenge to our justice system is borne out by reading it. I read Keith Hunter’s  
Trial by Trickery  
because like many New Zealanders I was concerned by the trial of Scott Watson for the murders of Ben Smart and Olivia Hope. I make no comment about guilt or innocence but I am convinced that serious questions about the conduct of the police investigation and the trial need to be answered. 
In 2002 Bruce MacFarlane then Deputy Attorney General of Manitoba reviewed the issue of miscarriages of justice. He listed the conditions linked to miscarriages of justice and found four predisposing factors: public pressure unpopular defendants turning the process of trial into a game and noble cause corruption—that is persuading witnesses to alter their testimony because police believe that the person charged is guilty. He also listed eight direct causes. These were: eyewitness misidentification; police mishandling of the police investigation; inadequate disclosure by the prosecution; unreliable scientific evidence; using criminals as witnesses such as jailhouse informants; inadequate defence work; false confessions; and misleading circumstantial evidence. He said that these factors are present throughout the Commonwealth jurisdictions. 
The bulk of those causes were present in the trial of Scott Watson according to Mr Hunter’s book. Whether or not his allegations can be sustained there is no doubt in my mind that the book raises very significant and very serious questions and that it deserves a response from this Government. It goes beyond this case. It is about how police investigations and trials of serious criminal cases are conducted more generally. It is particularly concerning that in the context of enormous media interest in the sexual misconduct of police officers and the closed-shop culture that goes with it there does not seem to be a corresponding interest in the implications for the integrity of criminal convictions. The fact that Rob Pope who is now Deputy Commissioner of Police is at the centre of the allegations in the book makes that lack of interest more concerning. 
If the Government wants to restore the confidence of New Zealanders in our justice system especially following the Privy Council decision to quash David Bain’s convictions then this Government must take action. Currently once appeal rights have been exhausted the only remaining avenue to address a miscarriage of justice is a petition to the Governor-General. That is then passed to the Minister of Justice and the procedure for dealing with it is ad hoc and entirely unsatisfactory. New Zealand judge Sir Thomas Thorp in his report into miscarriages of justice published just 1½ years ago recommended establishing a body similar to the UK’s Criminal Cases Review Commission specifically to deal with petitions to the Governor-General in a transparent and rigorous manner that New Zealanders can have confidence in. The Green Party strongly supports that call.