au.com.dius:pact-jvm-consumer-java8 (maven): # pact-jvm-consumer-java8 Provides a Java8 lambda based DSL for use with Junit to build consumer tests. # A Lambda DSL for Pact This is an extension for the pact DSL provided by [pact-jvm-consumer](../pact-jvm-consumer). The difference between the default pact DSL and this lambda DSL is, as the name suggests, the usage of lambdas. The use of lambdas makes the code much cleaner. ## Why a new DSL implementation? The lambda DSL solves the following two main issues. Both are visible in the following code sample: ```java new PactDslJsonArray() .array() # open an array .stringValue(&quot;a1&quot;) # choose the method that is valid for arrays .stringValue(&quot;a2&quot;) # choose the method that is valid for arrays .closeArray() # close the array .array() # open an array .numberValue(1) # choose the method that is valid for arrays .numberValue(2) # choose the method that is valid for arrays .closeArray() # close the array .array() # open an array .object() # now we work with an object .stringValue(&quot;foo&quot;, &quot;Foo&quot;) # choose the method that is valid for objects .closeObject() # close the object and we&apos;re back in the array .closeArray() # close the array ``` ### The existing DSL is quite error-prone Methods may only be called in certain states. For example `object()` may only be called when you&apos;re currently working on an array whereas `object(name)` is only allowed to be called when working on an object. But both of the methods are available. You&apos;ll find out at runtime if you&apos;re using the correct method. Finally, the need for opening and closing objects and arrays makes usage cumbersome. The lambda DSL has no ambiguous methods and there&apos;s no need to close objects and arrays as all the work on such an object is wrapped in a lamda call. ### The existing DSL is hard to read When formatting your source code with an IDE the code becomes hard to read as there&apos;s no indentation possible. Of course, you could do it by hand but we want auto formatting! Auto formatting works great for the new DSL! ```java array.object((o) -&gt; { o.stringValue(&quot;foo&quot;, &quot;Foo&quot;); # an attribute o.stringValue(&quot;bar&quot;, &quot;Bar&quot;); # an attribute o.object(&quot;tar&quot;, (tarObject) -&gt; { # an attribute with a nested object tarObject.stringValue(&quot;a&quot;, &quot;A&quot;); # attribute of the nested object tarObject.stringValue(&quot;b&quot;, &quot;B&quot;); # attribute of the nested object }) }); ``` ## Installation ### Maven ``` &lt;dependency&gt; &lt;groupId&gt;au.com.dius&lt;/groupId&gt; &lt;artifactId&gt;pact-jvm-consumer-java8_2.12&lt;/artifactId&gt; &lt;version&gt;${pact.version}&lt;/version&gt; &lt;/dependency&gt; ``` ## Usage Start with a static import of `LambdaDsl`. This class contains factory methods for the lambda dsl extension. When you come accross the `body()` method of `PactDslWithProvider` builder start using the new extensions. The call to `LambdaDsl` replaces the call to instance `new PactDslJsonArray()` and `new PactDslJsonBody()` of the pact library. ```java io.pactfoundation.consumer.dsl.LambdaDsl.* ``` ### Response body as json array ```java import static io.pactfoundation.consumer.dsl.LambdaDsl.newJsonArray; ... PactDslWithProvider builder = ... builder.given(&quot;some state&quot;) .uponReceiving(&quot;a request&quot;) .path(&quot;/my-app/my-service&quot;) .method(&quot;GET&quot;) .willRespondWith() .status(200) .body(newJsonArray((a) -&gt; { a.stringValue(&quot;a1&quot;); a.stringValue(&quot;a2&quot;); }).build()); ``` ### Response body as json object ```java import static io.pactfoundation.consumer.dsl.LambdaDsl.newJsonBody; ... PactDslWithProvider builder = ... builder.given(&quot;some state&quot;) .uponReceiving(&quot;a request&quot;) .path(&quot;/my-app/my-service&quot;) .method(&quot;GET&quot;) .willRespondWith() .status(200) .body(newJsonBody((o) -&gt; { o.stringValue(&quot;foo&quot;, &quot;Foo&quot;); o.stringValue(&quot;bar&quot;, &quot;Bar&quot;); }).build()); ``` ### Examples #### Simple Json object When creating simple json structures the difference between the two approaches isn&apos;t big. ##### JSON ```json { &quot;bar&quot;: &quot;Bar&quot;, &quot;foo&quot;: &quot;Foo&quot; } ``` ##### Pact DSL ```java new PactDslJsonBody() .stringValue(&quot;foo&quot;, &quot;Foo&quot;) .stringValue(&quot;bar&quot;, &quot;Bar&quot;) ``` ##### Lambda DSL ```java newJsonBody((o) -&gt; { o.stringValue(&quot;foo&quot;, &quot;Foo&quot;); o.stringValue(&quot;bar&quot;, &quot;Bar&quot;); }).build(); ``` #### An array of arrays When we come to more complex constructs with arrays and nested objects the beauty of lambdas become visible! ##### JSON ```json [ [&quot;a1&quot;, &quot;a2&quot;], [1, 2], [{&quot;foo&quot;: &quot;Foo&quot;}] ] ``` ##### Pact DSL ```java new PactDslJsonArray() .array() .stringValue(&quot;a1&quot;) .stringValue(&quot;a2&quot;) .closeArray() .array() .numberValue(1) .numberValue(2) .closeArray() .array() .object() .stringValue(&quot;foo&quot;, &quot;Foo&quot;) .closeObject() .closeArray(); ``` ##### Lambda DSL ```java newJsonArray((rootArray) -&gt; { rootArray.array((a) -&gt; a.stringValue(&quot;a1&quot;).stringValue(&quot;a2&quot;)); rootArray.array((a) -&gt; a.numberValue(1).numberValue(2)); rootArray.array((a) -&gt; a.object((o) -&gt; o.stringValue(&quot;foo&quot;, &quot;Foo&quot;))); }).build(); ``` ##### Kotlin Lambda DSL ```kotlin newJsonArray { newArray { stringValue(&quot;a1&quot;) stringValue(&quot;a2&quot;) } newArray { numberValue(1) numberValue(2) } newArray { newObject { stringValue(&quot;foo&quot;, &quot;Foo&quot;) } } } ``` 
Keywords: consumer-driven-contracts|contract-testing|hacktoberfest|pact