TITLE: Consulting firms in the public management of epidemics. A scoping-review protocol 
AUTHORS: Lucille Gallardo  , Lara  Gautier, Fanny Chabrol, Lola  Traverson, Sydia  Oliveira, Valery  Ridde

[DESCRIPTION]
The aim of this scoping review is to produce a state of knowledge about the role of private consulting firms in the public management of epidemics. The review will also identify theories, approaches and methods used by researchers to study this subject.

[STEPS]
1. Context

Social sciences research evidences about private consulting firm’s role in public policy is large (Saint-Martin 2006; Empson et al. 2015; Hurl et Vogelpohl 2021a). Studies in sociology, political science, economy, or international relations, reveal that the involvement of these firms with public organizations has not only increased, but has also become normalized over the past 30 years (Saint-Martin 1999; Henry 2012; Bezes 2012; Belorgey et Pierru 2017; Kipping 2021). Some of these authors even consider these firms as transnational public policy actors (Hurl et Vogelpohl 2021b)and show how they played an important role in the diffusion of New Public Management techniques in public sector services (Bezes 2009; Aucoin 2011; Pollitt et Bouckaert 2011; Bezes et Musselin 2015). These approaches remind us of the blurry nature of the separation between public and private action, as suggested by francophone political sociologists on interest groups (Offerlé 1998; Courty 2006; Michel 2010). 

Concerning health care, social scientists have mainly worked on private firm intervention on national sectoral reforms, such as those on the hospital in France (Belorgey 2010; Belorgey and Pierru 2017), or on the National Health Service in the United Kingdom (Kirkpatrick, Lonsdale and Neogy 2016). Some studies are also focused on the international circulation of health norms and policy and have highlighted the role of private firms as "diffusion entrepreneurs" of public policies and policy instruments, alongside other actors. This is the case of our research team, who has worked on the diffusion of health-sector performance-based financing in Sub-Saharan Africa (Gautier et al. 2018; Gautier, De Allegri et Ridde 2019; Gautier et al. 2019).

If the role of consulting firm on the public management of epidemics is, at first glance, less documented by academic literature, recent journalistic pieces have however documented the prominent position of the private actors on national policies to prevent and control COVID-19 in different countries (Hurl et Werner 2021; Aron et Miguel-Aguirre 2021; Laurent 2020; Rice 2020; Tribot Laspière 2021; Collington et Mazzucato 2021; Castonguay 2020; Petitjean 2021). In France, for example, several consulting firms report having supported freely public action to prevent and fight against the COVID-19 pandemic. This is the case of the French branch of Bain & Company, which piloted “pro-bono” the testing strategy (Girard 2020). In the same vein, McKinsey & Company was responsible for developing the logistical and operational aspects of the vaccine strategy in France (Braun and Momtaz 2021; Cohen and Vazquez 2021). These private involvements produced controversies and social and political concerns in France, but also in the UK or in Canada about the effectiveness of their action and their role in public issues (Jacquot 2021; Sturdy 2021; Collington et Mazzucato 2021; Hurl et Werner 2021; Petitjean 2021; France info 2021; Aron et Miguel-Aguirre 2021; Harper 2021; Laurent 2020; Krug 2021).
 
This scoping-review aims to better identify scientific works analyzing consulting firms’ role in the public management of epidemics, and to document and understand what their theoretical/conceptual approaches are, and what research methods are used. 

This work will be based on the expertise on epidemics and the context of COVID-19 pandemic produced by our multidisciplinary and international research team working for a year in Brazil, Canada, France, Japan, and Mali within the framework of the HoSPiCOVID research project (https://u-paris.fr/hospicovid), co-financed by the ANR in France and the CIHR in Canada. It will extend the collaborations between research teams from the North and the South taking part in the project by focusing on the structuring of political choices in the face of epidemics in a context of an increasing privatization of health.
2. Review Objectives

The aim of this scoping review is to produce a state of knowledge about the role of private consulting firms in the public management of epidemics. The review will also identify theories, approaches and methods used by researchers to study this subject.

Based on the results of this scoping-review, an exploratory empirical study will be implemented in France. 
3. Methods

We will conduct a scoping-review (Arksey et O’Malley 2005; Micah DJ Peters et al. 2020; Micah D. J. Peters et al. 2020; Dagenais et al. 2021) which will allow us to: i) summarize, based on a broad search, the state of knowledge on a specific research question in a relatively short period of time; and, ii) identify and analyze gaps in the knowledge base to inform public decision makers, stakeholders, and researchers (Munn et al. 2018; Saul et al. 2013).

We will follow the standardized steps proposed by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) checklist (Tricco et al. 2018). 
4. Data Selection

One reviewer will search the different databases with specific requests and will retrieve the documents using ZOTERO, a bibliographic tool. She will proceed to sorting and removal of duplicates.

Two reviewers will then independently proceed to the first screening of the documents based on titles and abstracts. The same two reviewers will independently read the full text versions of the selected documents and apply the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Any discordance will involve a third reviewer. All the references lists of the documents finally selected will also be screened by these two reviewers, to be sure that all the main references are present in the scoping review.

These screening steps will be documented and justified in a follow-up review document, following the PRISMA flowchart of review process (Micah DJ Peters et al. 2020). 
5. Data Extraction and Quality Assessment

Selected items will be sorted in a data extraction table to record the following information: title, author(s), year of publication, country of publication, study design (methods and fundings), methodological limits, concept/theories used, type and year of epidemic/disease and the main results. 

The quality of the studies will be assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) (Hong et al. 2018).
6. Data Synthesis  and Presentation of the Results

The synthesis of the sources will follow the recommendations of the PRISMA method (Tricco et al. 2018) and will be presented in a descriptive table completed by the two reviewers independently. 

Based on these documents and after a discussion and a validation with all the research team members, the results of this scoping review will be presented in a narrative report that will describe the methods and the search strategy used, and that will present the main findings for each research question. 

A research paper and an article (in an academic journal ) presenting the results of the scoping review will also be published.
7. References

ARKSEY Hilary et O’MALLEY Lisa, 2005, « Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework », International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 1 février 2005, vol. 8, no 1, p. 19‑32.
ARON Matthieu et MIGUEL-AGUIRRE Caroline, 2021, « Des milliards dépensés pour se substituer à l’Etat : enquête sur le République des consultants », L’OBS, 2 juill. 2021 p. 22.
AUCOIN Peter, 2011, « The Political-Administrative Design of NPM » dans The Ashgate Research Companion to New Public Management, s.l., Routledge.
BELORGEY Nicolas et PIERRU Frédéric, 2017, « Une « consultocratie » hospitalière ? », Les Tribunes de la sante, 5 juillet 2017, n° 55, no 2, p. 45‑57.
BEZES Philippe, 2012, « État, experts et savoirs néo-managériaux », Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales, 9 juillet 2012, n° 193, no 3, p. 16‑37.
BEZES Philippe, 2009, Réinventer l’État, s.l., Presses Universitaires de France.
BEZES Philippe et MUSSELIN Christine, 2015, Chapitre 5 / Le new public management, s.l., Presses de Sciences Po.
CASTONGUAY Alec, 2020, « Au coeur de la bataille pour sauver le Québec. Un récit exclusif des dessous de la crise. », L’actualité, 6 mai 2020 p.
COLLINGTON Rosie et MAZZUCATO Mariana, 2021, « Britain’s public sector is paying the price for the government’s consultancy habit », The Guardian, 20 sept. 2021 p.
COURTY Guillaume, 2006, Les groupes d’intérêt, Paris, La Découverte (coll. « Repères »), 128 p.
DAGENAIS Christian, RIDDE Valéry, PROULX Michelle et MCSWEEN-CADIEUX Esther, 2021, Guide de soutien au développement d’une communauté de chercheurs, praticiens, et décideurs compétents pour réaliser des revues de portée (scoping review), s.l., OMS.
EMPSON Laura, MUZIO Daniel, BROSCHAK Joseph P. et HININGS Christopher Robin, 2015, The Oxford Handbook of Professional Service Firms, s.l., Oxford University Press, 561 p.
FRANCE INFO, 2021, Covid-19 : on vous résume la polémique autour de McKinsey, le cabinet qui conseille le gouvernement sur la stratégie vaccinale, https://www.francetvinfo.fr/sante/maladie/coronavirus/vaccin/covid-19-on-vous-resume-la-polemique-autour-de-mckinsey-le-cabinet-qui-conseille-le-gouvernement-sur-la-strategie-vaccinale_4291131.html , 10 février 2021, consulté le 17 novembre 2021.
GAUTIER Lara, COULIBALY Abdourahmane, DE ALLEGRI Manuela et RIDDE Valéry, 2019, « From Amsterdam to Bamako: a qualitative case study on diffusion entrepreneurs’ contribution to performance-based financing propagation in Mali », Health Policy and Planning, 1 novembre 2019, vol. 34, no 9, p. 656‑666.
GAUTIER Lara, DE ALLEGRI Manuela et RIDDE Valéry, 2019, « How is the discourse of performance-based financing shaped at the global level? A poststructural analysis », Globalization and Health, 15 janvier 2019, vol. 15, no 1, p. 6.
GAUTIER Lara, TOSUN Jale, DE ALLEGRI Manuela et RIDDE Valéry, 2018, « How do diffusion entrepreneurs spread policies? Insights from performance-based financing in Sub-Saharan Africa », World Development, 1 octobre 2018, vol. 110, p. 160‑175.
GIRARD Étienne, 2020, Coronavirus : le cabinet privé qui pilote la stratégie de dépistage de la France, https://www.marianne.net/politique/coronavirus-le-cabinet-prive-qui-pilote-la-strategie-de-depistage-de-la-france , 30 avril 2020, consulté le 21 novembre 2021.
HARPER Sam, 2021, McKinsey : à quoi ont servi les millions payés par Québec à un consultant pendant la pandémie? • Pivot, https://pivot.quebec/2021/11/24/mckinsey-a-quoi-ont-servi-les-millions-payes-par-quebec-a-un-consultant-pendant-la-pandemie/ , 24 novembre 2021, consulté le 30 novembre 2021.
HENRY Odile, 2012, Les guérisseurs de l’économie - Socio-genèse du métier de consultant (1900-1944) - CNRS Editions, Paris, CNRS Editions (coll. « Culture et société »), 494 p.
HONG Quan Nha, PLUYE Pierre, FABREGUES Sergi, BARTLETT Gillian, BOARDMAN Felicity, CARGO Margaret, DAGENAIS Pierre, GAGNON Marie-Pierre, GRIFFITHS Frances, NICOLAU Belinda, O’CATHAIN Alicia, ROUSSEAU Marie-Claude et VEDEL Isabelle, 2018, Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). User guide, s.l., Mc Gill - Department of Family Medicine.
HURL Chris et VOGELPOHL Anne, 2021a, Professional Service Firms and Politics in a Global Era: Public Policy, Private Expertise, s.l., Palgrave Macmillan, 351 p.
HURL Chris et VOGELPOHL Anne, 2021b, « The Rise of Professional Service Firms as Public Policy Actors » dans Chris Hurl et Anne Vogelpohl (eds.), Professional Service Firms and Politics in a Global Era. Public Policy, Private Expertise, s.l., Palgrave Macmillan, p. 1‑25.
HURL Chris et WERNER Leah Barrett, 2021, Consulting firms are the « shadow public service » managing the response to COVID-19, http://theconversation.com/consulting-firms-are-the-shadow-public-service-managing-the-response-to-covid-19-170436 , 10 novembre 2021, consulté le 17 novembre 2021.
JACQUOT Guillaume, 2021, « Qui mène les politiques publiques ? » : débuts de la commission d’enquête sur les cabinets de conseil, https://www.publicsenat.fr/article/parlementaire/qui-mene-des-politiques-la-question-au-coeur-de-la-commission-d-enquete-du , 29 novembre 2021, consulté le 30 novembre 2021.
KIPPING Matthias, 2021, « America First: How Consultants Got into the Public Sector » dans Chris Hurl et Anne Vogelpohl (eds.), Professional Service Firms and Politics in a Global Era. Public Policy, Private Expertise, s.l., Palgrave Macmillan, p. 29‑52.
KRUG François, 2021, « McKinsey, un cabinet dans les pas d’Emmanuel Macron », Le Monde.fr, 5 févr. 2021 p.
LAURENT Samuel, 2020, « Des restructurations au coronavirus, l’apport controversé des cabinets de consulting à l’hôpital », Le Monde.fr, 5 juin 2020 p.
MICHEL Hélène, 2010, « Mouvements sociaux, groupes d’intérêts et politiques publiques » dans Politiques publiques 2, s.l., Presses de Sciences Po (P.F.N.S.P.), p. 189‑212.
MUNN Zachary, STERN Cindy, AROMATARIS Edoardo, LOCKWOOD Craig et JORDAN Zoe, 2018, « What kind of systematic review should I conduct? A proposed typology and guidance for systematic reviewers in the medical and health sciences », BMC Medical Research Methodology, 10 janvier 2018, vol. 18, no 1, p. 5.
OFFERLÉ Michel, 1998, Sociologie des groupes d’intérêt, 2ème édition., Paris, France, Montchrestien (coll. « Clefs politique »), 158 p.
ORGANISATION MONDIALE DE LA SANTÉ, 2012, Maladies tropicales négligées. Prévention, lutte, élimination et éradication. Rapport du Secrétariat, Genève, Organisation Mondiale de la Santé.
PAHO WHO, Neglected, Tropical and Vector Borne Diseases - PAHO/WHO | Pan American Health Organization, https://www.paho.org/en/topics/neglected-tropical-and-vector-borne-diseases, consulté le 20 décembre 2021.
PETERS Micah D. J., MARNIE Casey, TRICCO Andrea C., POLLOCK Danielle, MUNN Zachary, ALEXANDER Lyndsay, MCINERNEY Patricia, GODFREY Christina M. et KHALIL Hanan, 2020, « Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews », JBI Evidence Synthesis, octobre 2020, vol. 18, no 10, p. 2119‑2126.
PETERS Micah DJ, GODFREY Christina, MCINERNEY Patricia, MUNN Zachary, TRICCO Andrea et KHALIL Hanan, 2020, « Chapter 11: Scoping reviews - JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis - JBI Global Wiki » dans JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis, s.l., JBI.
PETITJEAN Olivier, 2021, « Covid-19 : ces consultants au coeur de la “défaillance organisée” de l’Etat », Observatoire des multinationales, 3 juin 2021 p.
POLLITT Christopher et BOUCKAERT Geert, 2011, Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis - New Public Management, Governance, and the Neo-Weberian State, s.l., OUP Oxford, 386 p.
RICE Benjamin Hart Andrew, 2020, What a Spectacularly Ill-Advised Idea Says About McKinsey, https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2020/11/what-a-spectacularly-ill-advised-idea-says-about-mckinsey.html , 30 novembre 2020, consulté le 17 novembre 2021.
SAINT-MARTIN Denis, 2006, « Le consulting et l’Etat : une analyse comparée de l’offre et de la demande », Revue francaise d’administration publique, 2006, no 120, no 4, p. 743‑756.
SAINT-MARTIN Denis, 1999, « Les consultants et la réforme managérialiste de l’État en France et en Grande-Bretagne : vers l’émergence d’une « consultocratie »?* », Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique, mars 1999, vol. 32, no 1, p. 41‑74.
SAUL Jessie E., WILLIS Cameron D., BITZ Jennifer et BEST Allan, 2013, « A time-responsive tool for informing policy making: rapid realist review », Implementation Science, 5 septembre 2013, vol. 8, no 1, p. 103.
STURDY Andrew, 2021, Are management consultants the best people to solve the challenges of Covid-19?, https://apolitical.co/solution-articles/en/are-management-consultants-the-best-people-to-solve-the-challenges-of-covid-19 , 22 novembre 2021, consulté le 29 novembre 2021.
TRIBOT LASPIÈRE Victor, 2021, Vaccination Covid-19 : le gouvernement a fait appel à un cabinet de conseil privé pour l’épauler, https://www.francebleu.fr/infos/sante-sciences/vaccination-covid-19-le-gouvernement-a-fait-appel-a-un-cabinet-de-conseil-prive-pour-l-epauler-1609931462 , 6 janvier 2021, consulté le 17 novembre 2021.
TRICCO Andrea C., LILLIE Erin, ZARIN Wasifa, O’BRIEN Kelly K., COLQUHOUN Heather, LEVAC Danielle, MOHER David, PETERS Micah D. J., HORSLEY Tanya, WEEKS Laura, HEMPEL Susanne, AKL Elie A., CHANG Christine, MCGOWAN Jessie, STEWART Lesley, HARTLING Lisa, ALDCROFT Adrian, WILSON Michael G., GARRITTY Chantelle, LEWIN Simon, GODFREY Christina M., MACDONALD Marilyn T., LANGLOIS Etienne V., SOARES-WEISER Karla, MORIARTY Jo, CLIFFORD Tammy, TUNÇALP Özge et STRAUS Sharon E., 2018, « PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation », Annals of Internal Medicine, 2 octobre 2018, vol. 169, no 7, p. 467‑473.
2.1. Research Questions

This exploratory research work is based on two research questions:
1. What is the role of private consulting firms in the public management of epidemics?
2. What are  the theories and the methods used by scholars to study this research object?
3.1. Search Strategy

Several databases will be searched:
1. Generalist databases: Scopus and Web of science
2. Social sciences database: Bielefield Academic Search Engine
3. Biomedical sciences databases: PubMed and Embase
3.2. Keywords Strategy

We carried out preliminary tests prior to validate the keywords strategy. Tests findings showed a scarcity of academic literature on the topic. We thus decided to lead an open oriented research strategy. 

For each concept (i.e., “consulting firms”, “epidemic/infectious and tropical diseases” and “international and national (semi)public institutions”), we will select keywords to create specific requests on the sus-mentioned databases. Due to the limited number of keywords that can be inserted in the Bielefield Academic Search Engine database, we will use a specific and shorter keyword strategy.

The first concept (i.e., “consulting firms”) contains few words used by the academic literature to define the groups at the core of our research interest. The second one (i.e., “epidemic/infectious and tropical diseases”), integrates health crisis issues and epidemics, tropical and infectious diseases defined by the WHO (including neglected and vector borne diseases) which were still present after 2000 (Organisation Mondiale de la Santé 2012; PAHO WHO). The third concept (i.e., “international and national (semi)public institutions”), contains the main institutions to whom consulting firms can sell their services, at the international or national level.
The objective is to get a complete overview of scientific works linked to our research interests. 

 
       Scopus – Web of Science – Embase   - PubMed               Concepts            Consulting firms            Epidemic/infectious   and tropical diseases            International and national (semi) public   institutions               Keywords            service firm;   consulting firm; management consult; big four; professional service firm AND   NOT financial service firm*            health; epidemi; pandemic; outbreak; infectious disease; communicable   disease; tropical disease; virus; covid; coronavirus; h1n1; hiv; aids; ebola;   dengue; sars; influenza; measles; chikungunya; hepatitis; opioid; malaria;   gastroenteritis; fever; ulcer; rabies; trachoma; syphilis; leishmaniasis;   dracunculiasis; trematodosis; onchocerciasis; schistosomiasis;   geohelminthiasis; filariasis; echinococcosis; fascioliasis; cysticercosis;   chagas; trypanosomiasis; yaws; leprosy; zika; tuberculosis; meningitis; polio;   poliomyelitis; cholera; encephalitis            state;   governance; government; polic; ministry of health; public sector; international   agenc; ppp; care international; the global fund to fight aids tuberculosis   and malaria; global fund; gfatm; gavi; the vaccine alliance; global polio   eradication programme;  global alliance   for tb drug development; gatbdd; international aids vaccine initiative; iavi;   international aids society; international federation of red cross and red   crescent societies; ifrc; joint united nations programme on hiv/aids; unaids;   world health organization; who; médecins sans frontières; msf; the partnership   for maternal newborn and child health; pmnch; roll back malaria partnership; rbm;   special programme for research and training in tropical diseases; safe   injections global network; sign; stop tb partnership; save the children;   unitaid; united nations international children’s fund; unicef; world bank;   medicines for malaria venture; united states centers for disease control and   prevention; us cdc; the us president's emergency plan for aids relief;   pepfar; eu public health; european commission's directorate for health and   food safety; european centre for disease prevention and control; ecdc; dg   santé; direction générale de la santé et de la sécurité alimentaire               Bielefield Academic Search Engine               Concepts            Consulting firms            Epidemic/infectious   and tropical diseases            International and national (semi) public   institutions                            service firm; consulting firm; management consult; big   four; professional service firm            Health; epidemi; pandemic; outbreak;   disease            State; governance;   government; polic; ministry of health; public sector; international agenc; ppp         

3.3. Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

We will include references:
Related to “consulting firms’”, that are private firms with for profit ambition which sale expertise services to public actors.
Related to epidemics or health crisis issues which have emerged from the 2000s.
Published between January 1st, 2000, and December 31th, 2021. This time frame is justified because of the important growth of private consulting firms since the 2000s.
Published in English, French, Spanish, Italian and Portuguese.
Original research papers using qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods.
Peer-reviewed journal articles and books/book chapters.

We will exclude:
Non-academic documentation: any reports and working documents also named “grey literature” which are not subject of a peer-reviewed evaluation, like think tank or international and national organization reports. This choice is linked with the objectives of the scoping-review that are to make a state of academic knowledge about our research object.
All the references that do not meet the sus-mentioned inclusion criteria.