iGEM 2020 — Team ASTWS-China

[![](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2020/8/8b/HQ_page_logo.jpg)](https://2020.igem.org)

# Team:ASTWS-China/Notebook

[![](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2020/8/88/T--ASTWS-China--logoWhiteBackGround.png)](https://2020.igem.org/Team%3AASTWS-China)

* [Home](https://2020.igem.org/Team%3AASTWS-China)
* Project

  [Description &
  Design](https://2020.igem.org/Team%3AASTWS-China/Description)
  [Implementation](https://2020.igem.org/Team%3AASTWS-China/Implementation)
  [Contribution](https://2020.igem.org/Team%3AASTWS-China/Contribution)
* Experiment

  [Engineering](https://2020.igem.org/Team%3AASTWS-China/Engineering)
  [Proof of
  Concept](https://2020.igem.org/Team%3AASTWS-China/Proof_Of_Concept)
  [Notebook](https://2020.igem.org/Team%3AASTWS-China/Notebook)
  [Protocols](https://2020.igem.org/Team%3AASTWS-China/Protocols)
  [Safety](https://2020.igem.org/Team%3AASTWS-China/Safety)
* Human Practice

  [Human
  Practices](https://2020.igem.org/Team%3AASTWS-China/Human_Practices)
  [Education](https://2020.igem.org/Team%3AASTWS-China/Education)
  [Collaborations](https://2020.igem.org/Team%3AASTWS-China/Collaborations)
* [Model](https://2020.igem.org/Team%3AASTWS-China/Model)
* [Parts](https://2020.igem.org/Team%3AASTWS-China/Parts)
* Team

  [Team
  Member](https://2020.igem.org/Team%3AASTWS-China/Team_Member)
  [Attributions](https://2020.igem.org/Team%3AASTWS-China/Attributions)
  [Partnership](https://2020.igem.org/Team%3AASTWS-China/Partnership)

[![](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2020/8/8b/HQ_page_logo.jpg)](https://2020.igem.org)

# Team:ASTWS-China/Engineering

zhy

[![](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2020/8/88/T--ASTWS-China--logoWhiteBackGround.png)](https://2020.igem.org/Team%3AASTWS-China)

* [Home](https://2020.igem.org/Team%3AASTWS-China)
* Project

  [Description & Design](https://2020.igem.org/Team%3AASTWS-China/Description)
  [Implementation](https://2020.igem.org/Team%3AASTWS-China/Implementation)
  [Contribution](https://2020.igem.org/Team%3AASTWS-China/Contribution)
* Experiment

  [Engineering](https://2020.igem.org/Team%3AASTWS-China/Engineering)
  [Proof of Concept](https://2020.igem.org/Team%3AASTWS-China/Proof_Of_Concept)
  [Notebook](https://2020.igem.org/Team%3AASTWS-China/Notebook)
  [Protocols](https://2020.igem.org/Team%3AASTWS-China/Protocols)
  [Safety](https://2020.igem.org/Team%3AASTWS-China/Safety)
* Human Practice

  [Human Practices](https://2020.igem.org/Team%3AASTWS-China/Human_Practices)
  [Education](https://2020.igem.org/Team%3AASTWS-China/Education)
  [Collaborations](https://2020.igem.org/Team%3AASTWS-China/Collaborations)
* [Model](https://2020.igem.org/Team%3AASTWS-China/Model)
* [Parts](https://2020.igem.org/Team%3AASTWS-China/Parts)
* Team

  [Team Member](https://2020.igem.org/Team%3AASTWS-China/Team_Member)
  [Attributions](https://2020.igem.org/Team%3AASTWS-China/Attributions)
  [Partnership](https://2020.igem.org/Team%3AASTWS-China/Partnership)

# Summary

We have successfully constructed and tested four main composite parts that are important to our project. The strengthening biofilm shortens the distance between PETase and nano/microplastics, and the fluorescent protein reporting system. The co-localization of PETase and enhanced biofilm is also successfully proved by
the results of the fluorescent photo. Besides, p-NP assay results revealed that the proximity effect between enzyme
and substance could improve the degradation efficiency of PETase.

[Plasmid Construction](#list-profile1)
[Protein Expression test](#list-profile2)
[Independent Function Test](#list-profile3)
[Double Reporting system](#list-profile4)
[Real Sample Degradation Test](#list-profile5)
[Future Work](#list-profile6)

## 1. Plasmid Construction

We designed our functional parts and cloning into pET-21a(+) backbone plasmid chemical synthesized by
GenScript. As mentioned on our DESIGN page, strengthening biofilm part and PETase expression part are our two
main parts. To confirm the correctness of the plasmid, BamHI and EcoRI restriction enzymes were used to digest
the plasmids. The results of gel electrophoresis (Figure 1) shown that the lengths of OmpR and PETase genes are
around 1500-2000 bp, which meets the expectation. Besides, we then confirmed the results by sequencing the
whole plasmids.

![](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2020/8/88/T--ASTWS-China--engineering_pic1.png)

Figure 1 Nucleic acid gel electrophoresis results of OmpR234 and PETase.roduction, use, and fate of polymer
resins, synthetic fibers, and additives (1950 to 2015; in million metric tons)[2].

## 2. Protein expression test

SDS-PAGE electrophoresis was used to check the expression of OmpR234 and PETase proteins. As shown in Figure
2, compared to the blank control, the lane contained OmpR234 protein (27 KDa) and PETase (40 KDa) protein
indicated that these two proteins have been successfully expressed.

![](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2020/e/e1/T--ASTWS-China--engineering_pic2.png)

Figure 2 Protein SDS-PAGE electrophoresis results of OmpR234 and PETase.

In our strengthening biofilms system, as shown in Figure 4, a strong T7 promoter (BBa\_I712074) and strong RBS
combination (BBa\_B0034) to maximize protein production, and a double terminator (BBa\_B0015) to end
transcription. Therefore, by overexpressing OmpR234 (BBa\_K342003)​, biofilms could become much more sticky and
easy for capturing nano-/micro-plastics.

## 3.1 Expression of OmpR234 Increases Biofilm Formation

To verify whether the insertion of the OmpR234 gene strengthens the production of biofilm, we mixed a
commonly used dye, Congo Red (CR), with samples in a 2 mL-system, transferring them to 24-well microtiter
plates and incubating with the glass cover for 3 days. If biofilms were present, they would absorb the dye and
appear as red, so the strengthened biofilm production would show a higher concentration of dye.

As shown in Figure 3, compared with the control groups, LB medium and E. Coli (BL21), the third group which
overexpressed OmpR234 demonstrates a stronger red color, which indicated higher production of biofilm.

![](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2020/f/fe/T--ASTWS-China--engineering_pic3.png)

Figure 3 Congo red assay stains biofilm after overexpressing of OmpR234 (BBa\_K3576000).

## 3.2 Enzyme Activity Test of PETase

The enzyme activity of PETase was performed by p-NP assay which is a common way to quantify hydrolytic
activity. We selected p-Nitrophenylbutyrate (pNPB) as the substrate, which can be hydrolyzed to p-nitrophenol
(pNP) (Figure 4-A). The concentration of pNP can be measured by the characteristic absorption at 405 nm.

As shown in Figure 4-B, with the extension of reaction time, the OD405 value of p-NP gradually increased, which
indicates that the degradation activity of the PETase.

![](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2020/5/56/T--ASTWS-China--engineering_pic4.png)

Figure 4 (A)The mechanism of pNPB degradation; (B) OD405 of pNPB hydrolysis by overexpressed PETase.

## 4.1 Plasmid construction

To co-localized the PETase and OmpR234 enhanced biofilm, we introduced the double fluorescence reporting system, including GFP and mCherry. These two components are recombined with PETase and OmpR parts, respectively. Figure 5 shows the genetic circuit design of the GFP-mCherry reporting system. To visually observe whether the expression is successful, GFP and mCherry fluorescent reporters were introduced into the two plasmids (Figure 5). In the following, we will use the abbreviation OmpR-mCherry and eGFP-PETase. If the PETase and enhanced biofilm were co-expressed as expected, we could see the change of fluorescence color. When separated, one appears red and the other appears green, and when combined, the two appear yellow. Therefore, we further constructed the corresponding plasmid and carried out electrophoresis verification.

![](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2020/4/4b/T--ASTWS-China--description7-1.png)

Figure 5 Genetic circuit design of double fluorescence reporting system

## 4.2 Co-expression Verification of Double Reporting System

To verify the recognition of OmpR-mCherry and eGFP-PETase, we transformed three sets of plasmids (OmpR-mCherry, eGFP-PETase, OmpR-mCherry + eGFP-PETase) into E. Coli and observed them with a fluorescence microscope. The results are shown in Figure 6. As mentioned above, E. Coli transformed with OmpR-mCherry was designed with mCherry reporter which display red (Figure 6-B) in micrograph and eGFP-PETase designed with GFP reporter display green (Figure 6-A). It is worth mentioning that when the two expressed together, the microscopic image shows yellow, which also qualitatively proves the effective co-localization of PETase and enhanced biofilm.

![](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2020/9/93/T--ASTWS-China--engineering_pic6.png)

Figure 6 Fluorescence micrograph of engineered E. Coli transformated with (A) eGFP-PETase, (B) OmpR-mCherry, (C) and OmpR-mCherry + eGFP-PETase.

## 4.3 Degradation Activity Test of Co-expressed System

In addition, the p-NP assay was used to further test the effects of the strengthened biofilm on the degradation activity of PETase. eGFP-PETase and OmpR-mCherry + eGFP-PETase plasmids are transformed into E. Coli BL21 and overexpressed respectively. Then these bacteria solutions are mixed with p-NPB substrates and measure the absorbance at the wavelength of 405 nm. Figure 7 demonstrated that, with the extension of time, the OD405 value increases. At the same time, it is significant that the OD405 value of the co-expression system is higher than that of PETase alone. In other words, with the help of enhanced biofilm, the degradation activity of PETase could be improved. After discussing with our instructors, the proximity effect between the substrate and the enzyme may be one of the reasons for the increased degradation efficiency.

![](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2020/3/3e/T--ASTWS-China--engineering_pic7.png)

Figure 7 OD405 of pNPB hydrolysis by overexpressed PETase and PETase+OmpR

## 5. Real Sample Degradation Test

In order to verify the degradation effect of our system on the real PET plastic, we cut the PET plastic bottle and grind it to the microplastic. After expressing our ultimate plasmid and culturing it on plastic fragments, we can see the adhesion of biofilm (Congo red staining test) on the large plastic fragment (Figure 9-B inserted). On the other hand, our simulated microplastics were mixed and cultured with our engineered bacteria, and the concentration of MHET (Mono-(2-hydroxyethyl) terephthalic acid), the PET degradation product, in the solution was measured by HPLC. The results are shown in Figure 8. The relationship between peak area from HPLC results and MHET concentration was plotted to further analyze the degradation efficiency, shown in Figure 9.

Figure 9-A showed the standard curve of the MHET standard. The results show that there is good linearity between MHET concentration and peak area with R^2 = 0.999. Under the same experimental conditions, the engineered E. Coli overexpressed with eGFP-PETase and co-expressed with eGFP-PETase and OmpR-mCherry was also performed to degrade the real PET microplastics. LB medium and unmodified E. Coli solution are set as the control groups. The results shown in Figure 9-B are revealed that the peak area obtained by the co-expressed group (PETase + OmpR) is significantly (approximately 1.66 times) higher than that of the PETase alone group.

![](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2020/d/da/T--ASTWS-China--engineering_pic10-1.png)

Figure 8 HPLC results of MHET standard and real PET fragment degradation.

![](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2020/c/c9/T--ASTWS-China--engineering_pic9-1.png)

Figure 9 (A) Standard curve of MHET standard; (B) HPLC results of MHET concentration in real sample test (inserted is photo of biofilm (Congo red staining test) on the large plastic fragment).

In summary, these results further illustrates that shortening the distance between the enzyme and the
substrate is a reliable solution to improve the degradation efficiency of PETase.

## Future Work

Due to the COVID-19 epidemic, our experimental time is relatively limited this summer. However, according to
the research, the thermal stability is another concern we need to consider. Normally, enzymes like PETase
cannot survive in high-temperature surrounding and therefore not being able to degrade PET efficiently.
Besides, to ensure the biosafety and convenience to use in real world, we also plan to purify the protein to
better demonstrate its degradability (See more details in our Implementation page).

By collaborating with another team (TJUSLS\_China 2020), we know that the thermal stability improvement of
PETase is on the way, sometimes, the stability can be improved to be stable even above 75 ˚C. We have sorted
out the references for improving the degradation efficiency and thermal stability of PETase. Our next goal is
to build a PET degradation system with higher degradation efficiency and higher thermal stability. Hoping our
world is better and safe. Our mission is still on the way.

[![](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2020/8/8b/HQ_page_logo.jpg)](https://2020.igem.org)

# Team:ASTWS-China/Experiments

# Experiments

Describe the research, experiments, and protocols you used in your iGEM project. These should be detailed enough for another team to repeat your experiments.

If you made Parts this year, please remember to put all information, characterization, and measurement data on the Part's Main Page on the [Registry](http://parts.igem.org/Main_Page).

### What should this page contain?

* Protocols
* Experiments

### Inspiration

* [2014 Colombia](https://2014.igem.org/Team%3AColombia/Protocols)
* [2014 Imperial](https://2014.igem.org/Team%3AImperial/Protocols)
* [2014 Caltech](https://2014.igem.org/Team%3ACaltech/Project/Experiments)

[![](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2020/8/8b/HQ_page_logo.jpg)](https://2020.igem.org)

# Team:ASTWS-China/Results

# Results

You can describe the results of your project and your future plans here.

### What should this page contain?

* Clearly and objectively describe the results of your work.
* Future plans for the project.
* Considerations for replicating the experiments.

### Describe what your results mean

* Interpretation of the results obtained during your project. Don't just show a plot/figure/graph/other, tell us what you think the data means. This is an important part of your project that the judges will look for.
* Show data, but remember **all measurement and characterization data must also be on the Part's Main Page on the [Registry](http://parts.igem.org/Main_Page).** Otherwise these data will not be in consideration for any medals or part awards!
* Consider including an analysis summary section to discuss what your results mean. Judges like to read what you think your data means, beyond all the data you have acquired during your project.

### Project Achievements

You can also include a list of bullet points (and links) of the successes and failures you have had over your summer. It is a quick reference page for the judges to see what you achieved during your summer.

* A list of linked bullet points of the successful results during your project
* A list of linked bullet points of the unsuccessful results during your project. This is about being scientifically honest. If you worked on an area for a long time with no success, tell us so we know where you put your effort.

### Inspiration

See how other teams presented their results.

* [2014 TU Darmstadt](https://2014.igem.org/Team%3ATU_Darmstadt/Results/Pathway)
* [2014 Imperial](https://2014.igem.org/Team%3AImperial/Results)
* [2014 Paris Bettencourt](https://2014.igem.org/Team%3AParis_Bettencourt/Results)