iGEM 2022 — Team cpu-nanjing

{% extends "layout.html" %}
{% include 'menu.html' %}
{% block page\_content %}
 Notebook

## Overview

### Week 1 (December 6 to December 12, 2021) and Week 2 (December 13 to December 19, 2021)

* 1. Recruiting members
* 2. Introducing to the laboratory of Prof. Hai Qian and meeting Dr. Xin Wang
* 3. Introducing laboratory safety issues
* 4. Making plans and preparing materials for interviews

### Week 3 (December 20 to December 26, 2021) and Week 4 (December 27, 2021 to January 2, 2022)

* 1. Education: preparing online public lessons

### Week 5 (March 15 to March 21, 2022 (the same below))

* 1. Recruiting more members and building team CPU\_Nanjing
* 2. Learning and examining the information about lab safety
* 3.Instructing to all team members about iGEM competition in detail

### Week 6 (March 22 to March 28)

* 1. Brainstorming on the theme of our project
* 2. Analyzing and discussing feasibility by literature research
* 3. Integrated Human Practice (IHP): interviewing Dr. Xingxia Chen online

### Week 7 (March 22 to March 28)

* 1. Designing a questionnaire based on suggestions form Dr. Chen
* 2. IHP: delivering online and offline questionnaire surveys

### Week 8 (March 29 to April 4)

* 1. Analyzing statistics from our questionnaire survey
* 2. Human Practice (HP): interviewing Dr. Weimin Zhang
* HP: bringing back phosphate-free soil from Changxing county

### Week 9 (April 5 to April 11)

* 1. HP: interviewing Dr. Jierong Jiang
* 2. Discussing with team members about more actions related to HP
* 3. Determining the theme of our project based on HP/IHP

### Week 10 (April 12 to April 18)

* 1. Purchasing chemicals for the experiments of our project
* 2. Preparing apparatus, including purchasing new equipment and transporting equipment from other labs (possessed by our PIs or instructors)
* 3. Synthesizing phosphite dehydrogenase gene in our lab

### Week 11 (April 19 to April 25)

* 1. Cloning molecules and constructing bacterial strain
* 2. Holding a plenary meeting to plan the timeline of our project

### Week 12 (April 26 to May 2)

* 1. Testing phosphite oxidation by engineered bacterial strains preliminarily
* 2. Discussing about experimental results and the "inherent laziness" of bacteria
* 3. IHP: interviewing Dr. Xin Wang again for further suggestions

### Week 13 (May 3 to May 9)

* 1.Organizing the next part of our lab and designing our strategy based on suggestions provided by Dr. Xin Wang from our interview
* 2. Operating the site-directed mutagenesis of polyphosphate kinase
* 3. Creating our first Part from polyphosphate kinase

### Week 14 (May 10 to May 16)

* 1. Collaboration: holding a meeting with team NJTech\_China
* 2. Discussing our strategy about equilibrium expression
* 3. Collecting medium-copy number pBBR1MCS2 produced by our lab

### Week 15 (May 17 to May 23)

* 1. Designing a vector co-express polyphosphate kinase and phosphite dehydrogenase
* 2. Constructing our vector and strain

### Week 16 (May 24 to May 30)

* 1.Testing the enhancement of phosphite oxidation
* 2. Witnessing the intermediate polyphosphate for the first time
* 3. Proof of concept (POC): developing quick polyphosphate staining method

### Week 17 (May 31 to June 6)

* 1. Collaboration: team NNU-China introducing us to their lab
* 2. Discussing the order of gene configuration on our vector
* 3. POC: testing the staining method by both labs led by Prof. Liu and Prof. Yang

### Week 18 (June 7 to June 13)

* 1. Engineering: order of polyphosphate kinase and phosphite dehydrogenase on vector
* 2. Education: holding a plenary meeting to plan for more actions related to Education

### Week 19 (June 14 to June 20)

* 1. Collaboration: holding an online meeting with ShanghaiTech\_China
* 2. Discussing the possible challenges for project landing on terrestrial planets
* 3. Education: designing and producing materials used in our Education

### Week 20 (June 21 to June 27)

* 1. IHP: interviewing Dr. Xiaomeng Wang
* 2. Drafting and revising our Preliminary Safety Form

### Week 21 (June 28 to July 4)

* 1. Partnership: meeting with NJTech\_China offline, determining our common goal
* 2. Education: entering high school classrooms, Qingjiang Middle School in Huaian

### Week 22 (July 5 to July 11)

* 1. Engineering: discussing Engineering Success based on the comparison test completed in our lab previously
* 2. Witnessing enhanced polyphosphate accumulation in bacterial cells for the first time
* 3. POC: discussing the possibility that polyphosphate serves as flame retardants

### Week 23 (July 12 to July 18)

* 1. Partnership: brainstorming online to seek for research subject
* 2. Discussing the biosafety of blue-green algae used in our project
* 3. Purchasing blue-green algae, non-toxic Microcystis aeruginosa FACHB-469

### Week 24 (July 19 to July 25)

* 1. Finishing a systematic experiment on phosphate production using SMW medium and phosphite
* 2. Obtaining the final product in the form of high-concentration solution for the first time
* 3. POC: producing polyphosphate under open (unsterile) conditions
* 3. Creating the second and the third new Part

### Week 25 (July 26 to August 1)

* 1. Cultivating algae
* 2. Verifying the general applicability of our design strategy by creating the fourth new Part
* 3. Finishing a systematic experiment performed on Parts to show our improvement

### Week 26 (August 2 to August 8)

* 1. Partnership: making research on dealing with algae separately
* 2. IHP: cooking the algae (inspired by Dr. Xin Wang)
* 3. Testing the utility of algae lysate

### Week 27 (August 9 to August 15)

* 1. Hardware: holding a plenary meeting to plan the Hardware design for bench-scale phosphate production
* 2. IHP: interviewing manager Zheng, Nanjing Organic Glass Factory
* 3. Designing solar-energy-driven sequence batch bioreactor

### Week 28 (August 16 to August 22)

* 1. Education: visiting Purple Mountain Observatory with high school students
* 2. Finishing a systematic experiment on phosphate production using algae lysate
* 3. Education: communicating with public using WeChat official account and Bilibili account

### Week 29 (August 23 to August 29)

* 1. Preparing the promotion video of our project
* 2. Partnership: confirming the effectiveness of algae lysate with NJTech\_China
* 3. POC: preparing a series of media in different forms using algae as the raw material

### Week 30 (August 30 to September 5)

* 1. Collaboration: bringing engineered strains to NNU-China for test
* 2. POC: testing the utility on clarified algae lysate by labs of Prof. Liu and Prof. Yang

### Week 31 (September 6 to September 12)

* 1. Education: stepping into college campus with a new communication form of "ask and answer"
* 2. Hardware: debugging our equipment and starting bench-scale phosphate production
* 3. Implementation: cultivating lettuce by using the produced phosphate

### Week 32 (September 13 to September 19)

* 1. Education: communicating with people in communities, introducing our whole project
* 2. Holding a plenary meeting to make a complete conclusion to our project
* 3. Modeling: starting the modeling process based on experiment data obtained in our lab

### Week 33 (September 20 to September 26)

* 1. Partnership: dining together with NJTech\_China, celebrating the success of our partnership and the completion of each other's project
* 2. Holding a plenary meeting to plan the design of our wiki, including artistic style, main color, font size and so on

### Week 34 (September 27 to October 3)

* 1. Concluding all results obtained by different groups (experiment, human practices, presentation and modeling)
* 2. Bringing our Parts to complete the registration

### Week 35 (October 4 to October 12)

* 1. Completing the construction of our wiki
* 2. Discussing the plan for our presentation video

{% endblock %}

{% extends "layout.html" %}
{% include 'menu.html' %}
{% block page\_content %}

Engineering

## Overview

As a manufacture project, what we concern most is the yield of the final product or the intermediate that positively related to the final product. Therefore, this year, Engineering Cycle consisting of designing, building, testing, and learning from the data collected was adopted in the optimization of our expression strategy.

## Initial Designing, Building and Testing

This year, our team wants to develop an engineered metabolic pathway that can produce phosphate using phosphite as the substrate. The strategy adopted to achieve this goal is co-expression of phosphite dehydrogenase and polyphosphate kinase from the lac promoter in plasmid pBBR1MCS2 [1]. Although phosphite dehydrogenase catalyzes the oxidation of phosphite to phosphate, solo overexpression of this enzyme in chassis cannot realize the manufacture of phosphate. Because once the amount of oxidized phosphite is sufficient to support the growth of chassis, it would not put more effort in this process. Consistent with previous reports, overexpression of phosphite dehydrogenase derived from *Ralstonia sp.* strain 4506 (RPD) [2] in chassis *E. coli* K12 confirmed this biological phenomenon (Figures 1 and 2).

![picture](https://static.igem.wiki/teams/4257/wiki/picture/engineering/es-figure-1.jpg)

Figure 1. Schematic illustration of pBBR1MCS2/RPD.

![picture](https://static.igem.wiki/teams/4257/wiki/picture/engineering/es-figure-2.png)

Figure 2. Optical density and supernatant phosphite concentration of K12/RPD grown in

 synthetic municipal wastewater (SMW) medium with phosphite as the solo phosphorus source.

The key to the success of our strategy is polyphosphate kinase, which catalyzes the synthesis of polyphosphate (polyP) using ATP as the substrate [3, 4]. When this enzyme is overexpressed in *E. coli* K12, a significant amount of intracellular ATP will be redirected into polyP synthesis, during which the terminal phosphate residue from ATP will be deprived and sequestered in the form of polyP. However, regeneration of ATP depends on the assimilation of free phosphate. Under such circumstances, the chassis will be pushed to oxidize more phosphite, favoring its cellular ATP regeneration if phosphite is the only available phosphorus source.

    Given that polyphosphate kinase is the key player in our engineered metabolic pathway, we spent a lot of time on it at the beginning of our project, aiming at obtaining a highly active version of this enzyme (please refer to our new Part BBa\_K4257000 for detailed information) [5]. After we got this done by site-directed mutagenesis of native polyphosphate kinase from *E. coli*, we naturally cloned aforementioned RPD behind this mutant polyphosphate kinase (PPK-M) in pBBR1MCS2 (Figures 3 and 4).

![picture](https://static.igem.wiki/teams/4257/wiki/picture/engineering/es-figure-3.jpg)

Figure 3. Schematic illustration of pBBR1MCS2/PPK-M.

![picture](https://static.igem.wiki/teams/4257/wiki/picture/engineering/es-figure-4.jpg)

Figure 4. Schematic illustration of pBBR1MCS2/PPK-M+RPD.

The effect of our strategy was then tested by supernatant phosphite determination and polyP staining soon after we got the engineered *E. coli* K12 that harbors pBBR1MCS2/PPK-M+RPD. When we found that K12/PPK-M+RPD consumed more phosphite and produced intracellular polyP granules (Figure 5), we knew that our strategy works, because polyP is the polymer of phosphate and more polyP equals to more final product.

![picture](https://static.igem.wiki/teams/4257/wiki/picture/engineering/es-figure-5.png)

Figure 5. (A) Supernatant phosphite concentration of K12/RPD and K12/PPK-M+RPD

 grown in SMW with phosphite, the solo phosphorus source. (B) Light microscopy images of

 toluidine blue stained cells. Intracellular polyP granules appear blue-purple to blue-black. Scale bar, 5 μm.

## Learning, Redesigning and Rebuilding

However, things changed after we performed collaboration with team NNU-China. During interacting, we learned from them that the order of configuration for the same genes in expression vector may affect the final outcomes [6]. As far as our design was concerned, another order of configuration, bringing RPD prior to PPK-M, had not been tested yet. Given that phosphite oxidation is the first step in our designed pathway, the configuration RPD+PPK-M matches the order of such metabolic flux much better. Therefore, we started to rebuild our expression system by constructing pBBR1MCS2/RPD+PPK-M (Figure 6).

![picture](https://static.igem.wiki/teams/4257/wiki/picture/engineering/es-figure-6.jpg)

Figure 6. Schematic illustration of pBBR1MCS2/RPD+PPK-M.

## Testing at Different Levels and Confirming Engineering Success by Comparison with the Initial Design

Eventually, it turns out that K12/RPD+PPK-M performs better than K12/PPK-M+RPD. We confirmed the success of Engineering by subjecting two engineered strains to quantitative assessment and comparison at different levels, including the gene transcription, biomass yield, phosphite utilization, and intracellular polyP accumulation.

    Transcriptional analysis indicated that the gene placed in front showed elevated levels of expression (Figure 7).

![picture](https://static.igem.wiki/teams/4257/wiki/picture/engineering/es-figure-7.jpg)

Figure 7. qRT-PCR analysis of RPD and PPK-M in K12/PPK-M+RPD and K12/RPD+PPK-M sampled from SMW.

Quantification of biomass yield (expressed as maximum OD600) showed that, as far as growth of engineered strains was concerned, both designs had no discriminable differences (Figure 8).

![picture](https://static.igem.wiki/teams/4257/wiki/picture/engineering/es-figure-8.png)

Figure 8. Maximum optical density of each strain grown in SMW with phosphite as the solo phosphorus source.

Under such circumstances, K12/RPD+PPK-M consumed approximately 25% more supernatant phosphite than K12/PPK-M+RPD (Figure 9), indicating an elevated intracellular polyP yield.

![picture](https://static.igem.wiki/teams/4257/wiki/picture/engineering/es-figure-9.png)

Figure 9. Comparison of supernatant phosphite consumed by each engineered strain.

In consistent with biomass and supernatant phosphite tests, the redesigned K12/RPD+PPK-M indeed produced more intracellular polyP, which can be distinguished by the naked eye after the cells were stained by toluidine blue (Figure 10).

![picture](https://static.igem.wiki/teams/4257/wiki/picture/engineering/es-figure-10.png)

Figure 10. Light microscopy images of toluidine blue stained cells.

 Intracellular polyP granules appear blue-purple to blue-black. Scale bar, 5 μm.

## Reference

[1] M.E. Kovach, P.H. Elzer, D.S. Hill, G.T. Robertson, M.A. Farris, R.M. Roop II, K.M. Peterson, Four new derivatives of the broad-host-range cloning vector pBBR1MCS, carrying different antibiotic-resistance cassettes, Gene 166(1) (1995) 175-176.

[2] R. Hirota, S.-t. Yamane, T. Fujibuchi, K. Motomura, T. Ishida, T. Ikeda, A. Kuroda, Isolation and characterization of a soluble and thermostable phosphite dehydrogenase from Ralstonia sp. strain 4506, Journal of Bioscience Bioengineering 113(4) (2012) 445-450.

[3] N.N. Rao, M.R. Gómez-García, A. Kornberg, Inorganic polyphosphate: essential for growth and survival, Annual Review of Biochemistry 78 (2009) 605-647.

[4] M.R. Brown, A. Kornberg, The long and short of it–polyphosphate, PPK and bacterial survival, Trends in Biochemical Sciences 33(6) (2008) 284-290.

[5] A.K. Rudat, A. Pokhrel, T.J. Green, M. Gray, Mutations in Escherichia coli polyphosphate kinase that lead to dramatically increased in vivo polyphosphate levels, Journal of Bacteriology 200(6) (2018) e00697-17.

[6] A. Lechner, E. Brunk, J.D. Keasling, The need for integrated approaches in metabolic engineering, Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology 8(11) (2016) a023903.

{% endblock %}

{% extends "layout.html" %}
{% include 'menu.html' %}
{% block page\_content %}
Experiments

## Part 1 Introduction of phosphate manufacture pathway by generating gene-cassette by coupling phosphite oxidation and polyphosphate synthesis

### Molecular level

Following standard molecular cloning procedure, we obtain several plasmids and corresponding *E. coli* K12 derivatives. Detailed information on these DNA constructs and the derivative strains are listed in Table 1.

Table 1 Detailed information on DNA constructs and derivative strains.

| Plasmids and Strains | Description |
| pBBR1MCS2/RPD | pBBR1MCS2 with phosphite dehydrogenase gene (RPD) [1] |
| pBBR1MCS2/PPK-M | pBBR1MCS2 with mutant polyphosphate kinase gene (PPK-M) [2] |
| pBBR1MCS2/RPD+PPK-M | pBBR1MCS2 with RPD+PPK-M |
| MR | *E. coli* K12 harboring plasmid pBBR1MCS2/RPD |
| MP | *E. coli* K12 harboring plasmid pBBR1MCS2/PPK-M |
| MRP | *E. coli* K12 harboring plasmid pBBR1MCS2/RPD+PPK-M |

All DNA constructs were confirmed by sequencing. After electroporation, derivative strains were obtained by selecting from LB agar plates containing 50 mg/L kanamycin (Figure 1).

![picture](https://static.igem.wiki/teams/4257/wiki/picture/experiments/figure-1-strain.png)

Figure 1. Positive colony grown on LB agar plates containing 50 mg/L kanamycin.

### Transcriptional level

Given that intracellular ATP is involved in the engineered metabolic pathway, we adopted medium-copy pBBR1MCS2 to overexpress the target gene [3], alleviating the metabolic burden imposed upon the host cell. Under such circumstances, transcriptional analysis will be a more sensitive method to detect plasmid-borne gene expression.

    qRT-PCR analysis confirmed that both RPD and PPK-M are successfully overexpressed, though the expression level of PPK-M showed a slight decrease when it was expressed from the RPD+PPK-M-cassette.

![picture](https://static.igem.wiki/teams/4257/wiki/picture/experiments/figure-2-qrt-pcr.png)

Figure 2. qRT-PCR analysis of RPD and PPK-M in *E. coli* K12 derivatives sampled from synthetic

 municipal wastewater (SMW) medium. Results are presented relative to the average expression level of 16s rDNA gene, set as 1.

## Part 2 Identification of intracellular intermediate and extracellular final product

### 2.1 Phosphite utilization test

When cultured in synthetic municipal wastewater (SMW, a nutrient-poor synthetic medium [4, 5] that mimicking the situation that may occurred on terrestrial planets) with phosphite (P, +3 valence) as the solo phosphorus source, only MR and MRP can grow whereas WT and MP cannot (Figure 3).

![picture](https://static.igem.wiki/teams/4257/wiki/picture/experiments/figure-3-od600-in-smw.png)

Figure 3. Optical density of each strain grown in SMW (P, +3 valence).

Supernatant and intracellular phosphorus measurements showed that the growth of MR and MRP in SMW was attributed to their capability to uptake exogenous phosphite (P, +3 valence) and oxidize it to assimilable phosphate (P, +5 valence; Figures 4).

![picture](https://static.igem.wiki/teams/4257/wiki/picture/experiments/figure-4-supernatant-phosphite.png)

Figure 4. Supernatant phosphite concentration of each strain

grown in SMW (P, +3 valence), expressed as milligrams of phosphorus per liter.

Although MR possesses the capacity of phosphite oxidation (Figure 4), it does so just to meet its own growth needs (Figure 3). Once there is enough phosphate for its growth, it is unwilling to oxidize more phosphite to phosphate (Figure 5).

![picture](https://static.igem.wiki/teams/4257/wiki/picture/experiments/figure-5-supernatant-phosphate.png)

Figure 5. Supernatant phosphate concentrationof each strain

 grown in SMW (P, +3 valence), expressed as milligrams of phosphorus per liter.

For MRP, the situation is totally different. As shown in Figures 3 and 4, the biomass yield (expressed as maximum OD600) of MRP almost equals to that of MR, whereas the amount of phosphite that consumed by MRP was much more than that by MR. This portion of phosphorus is significantly beyond cellular growth requirements, resulting in a higher intracellular phosphorus content (Figure 6).

![picture](https://static.igem.wiki/teams/4257/wiki/picture/experiments/figure-6-phosphorous-content.png)

Figure 6. Intracellular phosphorus content of each strain grown in SMW (P, +3 valence),

 expressed as milligrams of phosphorus per gram of dry weight (mg of P/g of DW).

### 2.2 Intracellular intermediate — polyphosphate (polyP)

We next confirmed that the extra portion of phosphate are stored in the form of the intermediate, polyP, in MRP cells. The presence of intracellular polyP was first examined by light microscopy. After staining, blue-purple to blue-black polyP granules in MRP cells can be easily visualized with an optical microscope (Figure 7).

![picture](https://static.igem.wiki/teams/4257/wiki/picture/experiments/figure-7-four-strains.png)

Figure 7. Light microscopy images of stained cells that sampled from

 SMW (P, +3 valence). PolyP granules appear blue-black, and polyP-free cells appear blue. Scale bar, 5 μm.

Based on the principle of our project, synthesis of polyP was catalyzed by PPK-M in the RPD+PPK-M-cassette using cellular ATP as the substrate [6]. Investigations performed on ATP metabolic pathway confirmed that, compared with MR, MRP actively redirected a substantial proportion of cellular ATP to polyP synthesis (Figure 8). Given that one phosphoric acid radical of ATP is deprived by PPK-M for polyP synthesis, regeneration of *in vivo* ATP necessitated the uptake of exogenous phosphorus [7, 8]. That is why MRP can oxidize exogenous phosphite to produce phosphate continuously (Figure 4).

![picture](https://static.igem.wiki/teams/4257/wiki/picture/experiments/figure-8-atp.png)

Figure 8. Intracellular ATP levels of MR and MRP grown in SMW (P, +3 valence) as a function of OD600.

To validate the observed granules are indeed polyP, we extracted them (Figure 9) and then subjected them to gel assay (Figure 10).

![picture](https://static.igem.wiki/teams/4257/wiki/picture/experiments/figure-9-polyp-extraction.png)

Figure 9. Photographs of concentrated MRP cells and polyP extracted from MRP cells.

TBE-Urea PAGE analysis confirmed that they are mixtures of polyP molecules of different chain-length (Figure 10).

![picture](https://static.igem.wiki/teams/4257/wiki/picture/experiments/figure-10-polyp-gel.png)

Figure 10. TBE-Urea PAGE analysis of polyP extracted from MRP at given time points.

 Extracts of MR and MP served as the control. 50 bp DNA ladder and polyP molecules of given chain-length served

 as the markers. Left panel, DAPI stained gel before photobleaching. Right panel, the same gel but imaged after photo-

 -bleaching. PolyP appears as dark bands on the gel, because DAPI bound to polyP photobleached more quickly than that bound to DNA.

### 2.3 Extracellular final product — phosphate

Phosphate rather than polyP is the final product that we want to manufacture, therefore we have to recycle phosphate from MRP. Under anaerobic conditions, polyP can be hydrolyzed by the native exopolyphosphatase in *E. coli* and released back into medium in the form of phosphate [9, 10]. Based on this trait, we collected and concentrated 100 mL of MRP cells to 10 mL and then subjected them to anaerobic phosphate release. After release, we successfully obtained phosphate in the form of high-concentration solution (Figure 11).

![picture](https://static.igem.wiki/teams/4257/wiki/picture/experiments/figure-11-pi-release.png)

Figure 11. Determination of supernatant phosphate that released by enriched MRP cells over time.

 Phosphate + chromogenic reagent: blue; Phosphite + chromogenic reagent: no color development.

## Part 3 Provide the heterotrophic chassis with oxygen and assimilable carbon source for phosphate manufacture on terrestrial planets

As noted above, our strategy involves the energy metabolism of the heterotrophic *E. coli*, for which the energy is essentially derived from the assimilation of glucose in SMW. However, all kinds of organic matters including glucose may be not available on terrestrial planets. Moreover, it is well known that polyP synthesis happens under aerobic conditions [11], which means that this process consumes oxygen. We solve these problems by the introduction of blue-green algae, *Microcystis aeruginosa* FACHB-469 (a *M. aeruginosa* strain incapable of producing cyanotoxins [12, 13]), hereafter abbreviated as algae.

### 3.1 Oxygen produced from photosynthesis by algae

Concurrent with carbon fixation is the release of oxygen, these oxygen bubbles can be easily visualized by the naked eye when the algae was subjected to stilling culture (Figure 12).

![picture](https://static.igem.wiki/teams/4257/wiki/picture/experiments/figure-12-oxygen.png)

Figure 12. Oxygen produced from the photosynthesis of algae.

### 3.2 Algae lysate preparation

Due to the antagonistic action between bacteria and blue-green algae [14], blue-green algae cannot be used to feed *E. coli* directly. Therefore, a pretreatment must be performed to convert live algae to bioassimilable organic matters. For detailed information on how we develop the pretreatment method, please refer to the Proof of Concept. Two 250 mL Erlenmeyer flasks each containing 100 mL of algae culture were subjected to heat using electric heater (Figure 13). After 5 min of boiling, heating was stopped and the lysates were let to cool to room temperature.

![picture](https://static.igem.wiki/teams/4257/wiki/picture/experiments/figure-13-algae-lysate-preparation.png)

Figure 13. Algae lysate prepared by heating.

To facilitate later test on *E. coli* growth, one bottle of lysate was clarified by centrifugation so as to gain a better display (Figure 14).

![picture](https://static.igem.wiki/teams/4257/wiki/picture/experiments/figure-14-clarification.png)

Figure 14. Comparison of algae lysate with or without cell debris.

### 3.3 Algae lysate utilization test

After the addition of phosphite, the algae lysate was subjected to MRP growth test. Compared with the biomass yield from SMW, MRP grew even better in the algae lysate (Figures 3 and 15). After culturing, the clarified lysate became turbid and this phenomenon can be easily visualized by the naked eye (Figure 15).

![picture](https://static.igem.wiki/teams/4257/wiki/picture/experiments/figure-15-biomass.png)

Figure 15. Comparison of the maximum biomass yield obtained from SMW (P, +3 valence) and clarified algae lysate.

For MRP that grown in the lysate without removing algae debris, it is not appropriate to monitor bacterial grown by optical density measurements. Therefore, we determined the colony forming units (CFU) to compare the difference on growth of MRP in these two kinds of lysate. The results showed that approximately 20% increase in biomass yield was further achieved when cultured using lysate with debris (Figure 16). This result implicated that, as far as MRP cultivation was concerned, it is not necessary to remove the debris when the algae lysate was adopted as the medium.

![picture](https://static.igem.wiki/teams/4257/wiki/picture/experiments/figure-16-cfu.png)

Figure 16. Comparison of the maximum biomass yield of MRP that grown in algae lysate with and without cell debris.

Next, to test whether phosphite was oxidized to phosphate by MRP that cultured using the algae lysate, we performed polyP staining. Microscopic observation showed that, as is the situation found with SMW cultivation, intermediate polyP accumulated in each MRP cell in the form of polyP granules (Figure 17). By this time, we confirmed that the algae lysate can be used to support not only the growth of MRP, but also the phosphate production pathway which it was engineered.

![picture](https://static.igem.wiki/teams/4257/wiki/picture/experiments/figure-17-microscopy.png)

Figure 17. Light microscopy images of stained MRP cells that grow in algae lysate with debris. Red arrow, algae cell debris. Scale bar, 5 μm.

## Part 4 Bench-scale phosphate production based on solar-energy driven sequence batch bioreactor

As a manufacture project, we devote ourselves to producing phosphate using phosphite as the substrate. Therefore, as the last part of our experiment, we initiated a bench-scale trial of real phosphate production. To achieve this trial in the context of terrestrial planets’ environment, we designed the suitable device, a solar-energy driven sequence batch bioreactor (Figure 18). Detailed information on design principle, configuration, and running regime, please refer to the Design and Hardware parts.

![picture](https://static.igem.wiki/teams/4257/wiki/picture/experiments/figure-18-hardware.png)

Figure 18. Photograph depicting the profile of solar-energy driven sequence batch bioreactor.

After three cycles, the phosphite from approximately 100L of algae lysate was almost fully taken up by MRP and converted to the intermediate, polyP. After a further membrane concentration, 9L of an enriched MRP cell was obtained and then subjected to anaerobic phosphate release test (Figure 19). At the end of the phosphate release phase, a cell suspension with supernatant phosphate concentrations of approximately 90 mg of P/L was formed.

![picture](https://static.igem.wiki/teams/4257/wiki/picture/experiments/figure-19-the-last.png)

Figure 19. Phosphate recovered from concentrated MRP cells, color

 development test was performed on the solution of powdered solid for better display.

## Part 5 Protocol

### Molecular cloning and culture medium

All DNA fragments (either chemically synthesized or derived from the genomic DNA of *E. coli* K12) encoding the enzymes of interest were amplified using Q5 High-Fidelity DNA Polymerase. Ligation of PCR amplified fragments and the desired linearized vector was performed with In-Fusion HD Cloning Kit. After confirmation by sequencing, the plasmid was incorporated into *E. coli* K12 via electroporation. The positive colony was selected from LB agar plates supplemented with 50 mg/L kanamycin. Synthetic municipal wastewater (SMW) medium was prepared according to the method described by Bassin et al.[5] and contained per liter 300 mg of glucose, 100 mg of tryptone, 50 mg of sodium chloride, 110 mg of magnesium sulfate, 180 mg of ammonium chloride, and 1 mg of yeast extract. The phosphorus concentration in SMW was set at 20 mg of phosphorus per liter (mg-p/L) by the addition of 88 mg of potassium dihydrogen phosphate or 88 mg of sodium phosphite per liter.

### qRT-PCR

Bacterial cells (equivalent to 10 mL culture with an OD600 value of 1) collected from SMW medium were pelleted by centrifugation and washed twice with 20 mM HEPES buffer (pH 7.5). Washed cells were homogenized in 1 ml TRIzol LS reagent by pipetting followed with 10 min of incubation at room temperature. Total RNA was then extracted per the manufacturer’s instructions. 1 mg qualified total RNA was subjected to reverse transcription with a PrimeScript RT reagent kit with gDNA Eraser. qRT-PCR of the resulting cDNA was performed on a CFX Connect Real-Time PCR Detection System with a SYBR Premix Ex Taq kit. Standard curves of cDNA dilutions were used to determine the PCR efficiency. An expression data analysis was performed by the Pfaffl method of relative quantification using CFX Manager software.

### Supernatant phosphite and phosphate measurement

For phosphate concentration determination, 1 mL culture from SMW was clarified by centrifugation at 12,000 rpm for 1 min. Then, 200 μL clarified supernatant was subjected to phosphate quantification by ammonium molybdate spectrophotometry [15]. For phosphite concentration determination, 500 μL clarified supernatant was first digested by potassium persulfate, under which circumstances phosphite was transformed to phosphate. After quantification by ammonium molybdate spectrophotometry, phosphite concentration was calculated by subtracting pre-determined phosphate concentration.

### Intracellular phosphorus content determination

*E. coli* K12 cells cultured using SMW were pelleted by centrifugation at 12,000 rpm for 5 min. Cell dry weight was measured after these pellets were dried at 100°C for 12 h. The dry weight was then correlated to OD600 by standard curve construction. For intracellular phosphorus assay, equal amount of engineered *E. coli* K12 cells (determined by OD600 and culture volume) sampled from SMW medium was digested by potassium persulfate, under which circumstances all the phosphorous compounds were transformed to phosphate. After that, phosphate was quantified by ammonium molybdate spectrophotometry. Then, intracellular phosphorus content was calculated using the determined cell dry weight and phosphate.

### Microscopic observation

The presence of intracellular polyP granules was examined by quick polyP staining method adapted from that of Albert [16]. PolyP staining was performed by mixing bacterial culture and toluidine blue solution (2% w/v) of equal volume. After 5 min of incubation at room temperature, smear the mixture on the preheated glass slide. The excess dye was then washed by water. Dried slide was subjected to light microscopy observation.

### TBE-Urea PAGE analysis

Intracellular polyP formation of engineered *E. coli* K12 was verified by TBE-urea PAGE analysis as described by Ursula et al [17]. Briefly, bacterial cells collected from 1 mL SMW medium were resuspended in 50 µL 20 mM HEPES (pH 7.5) and boiled at 100°C for 10 min. After centrifugation at 12,000 rpm for 10 min, the supernatant was mixed 1:1 with 2 × TBE-urea sample buffer. Samples were then loaded on a 15% TBE-urea PAGE gel that was manually casted with 40% acrylamide/bis-acrylamide (29:1) and urea. PolyP of given chain-length (kindly provided by Dr. Toshikazu Shiba, Regenetiss, Japan) served as the marker. Subsequently, electrophoresis was carried out as described by Heike et al. [18] and “negative” DAPI staining was performed according to Morrissey et al. [19] on the UV sample tray of ChemiDoc Touch Imaging System. Because DAPI bound to polyP photobleached more quickly than that bound to DNA, polyP appears as dark bands on the gel.

### Cellular ATP assay

*In vivo* ATP measurements were performed with a modified protocol described by Gray et al [17]. Briefly, at the indicated OD600, bacterial cells that collected from 100 μL SMW were washed twice by 20 mM HEPES (pH 7.5). After that, washed cells were resuspended in 100 μL of the same buffer and incubated at 99°C for 5 min. The samples were cooled on ice and the total cellular ATP was assayed with the luminescent ATP detection assay kit.

### Extraction of polyP

Engineered *E. coli* K12 cells with intracellular polyP granules were collected by centrifugation at 12,000 rpm for 5 min. The resulted cell pellet was washed and resuspended in pure water. After ultrasonic decomposition, homogenous cell lysate was incubated at 99°C for 1 h to release protein bounded polyP molecules. Then, supernatant that is rich in polyP was pooled by centrifugation at 12,000 rpm for 10 min. PolyP was recovered after lyophilization.

### Algae cultivation and algae lysate preparation

The non-toxic blue-green algae, *Microcystis aeruginosa* FACHB-469 were purchased from the Freshwater Algae Culture Collection at the Institute of Hydrobiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (Wuhan, China). BG11 medium was adopted for the routine maintenance of this algae [20]. After cultivation, algae cells were harvested by centrifugation at 2,000 rpm for 5 min. The harvested algae cells (i.e., concentrated algae cells) can be stored at -20°C for long term preservation, and repeated freeze-thaw cycles have no detectable effect on the usage of it as a raw material for natural medium preparation, except that the color will get darker. To prepare algae lysate, 5 g concentrated algae cells were resuspended in 100 mL water, after which the suspension was boiled for 5 min. Phosphate or phosphite was then added to give a final phosphorus concentration of 20 mg/L before it was used as the culture medium. For algae cultivation in Hardware, phosphate that we manufactured and carbon dioxide served as the phosphorus source and carbon source, respectively, and the corresponding components were omitted from BG11 medium.

## Reference

[1] R. Hirota, S.-t. Yamane, T. Fujibuchi, K. Motomura, T. Ishida, T. Ikeda, A. Kuroda, Isolation and characterization of a soluble and thermostable phosphite dehydrogenase from Ralstonia sp. strain 4506, Journal of Bioscience Bioengineering 113(4) (2012) 445-450.
[2] A.K. Rudat, A. Pokhrel, T.J. Green, M. Gray, Mutations in Escherichia coli polyphosphate kinase that lead to dramatically increased in vivo polyphosphate levels, Journal of Bacteriology 200(6) (2018) e00697-17.
[3] M.E. Kovach, P.H. Elzer, D.S. Hill, G.T. Robertson, M.A. Farris, R.M. Roop II, K.M. Peterson, Four new derivatives of the broad-host-range cloning vector pBBR1MCS, carrying different antibiotic-resistance cassettes, Gene 166(1) (1995) 175-176.
[4] X. Wang, C. Shi, J. Mo, Y. Xu, W. Wei, J. Zhao, An inorganic biopolymer polyphosphate controls positively charged protein phase transitions, Angewandte Chemie 132(7) (2020) 2701-2705.
[5] J. Bassin, R. Kleerebezem, A. Rosado, M.M. van Loosdrecht, M. Dezotti, Effect of different operational conditions on biofilm development, nitrification, and nitrifying microbial population in moving-bed biofilm reactors, Environmental Science Technology 46(3) (2012) 1546-1555.
[6] M.R. Brown, A. Kornberg, The long and short of it–polyphosphate, PPK and bacterial survival, Trends in Biochemical Sciences 33(6) (2008) 284-290.
[7] N.N. Rao, M.R. Gómez-García, A. Kornberg, Inorganic polyphosphate: essential for growth and survival, Annual Review of Biochemistry 78 (2009) 605-647.
[8] X. Wang, X. Wang, K. Hui, W. Wei, W. Zhang, A. Miao, L. Xiao, L. Yang, Highly effective polyphosphate synthesis, phosphate removal, and concentration using engineered environmental bacteria based on a simple solo medium-copy plasmid strategy, Environmental Science Technology 52(1) (2018) 214-222.
[9] S.J. Van Dien, J. Keasling, Control of polyphosphate metabolism in genetically engineered Escherichia coli, Enzyme Microbial Technology 24(1-2) (1999) 21-25.
[10] D. Ault-Riché, C.D. Fraley, C.-M. Tzeng, A. Kornberg, Novel assay reveals multiple pathways regulating stress-induced accumulations of inorganic polyphosphate in Escherichia coli, Journal of Bacteriology 180(7) (1998) 1841-1847.
[11] E. Desmidt, K. Ghyselbrecht, Y. Zhang, L. Pinoy, B. Van der Bruggen, W. Verstraete, K. Rabaey, B. Meesschaert, Global phosphorus scarcity and full-scale P-recovery techniques: a review, Critical Reviews in Environmental Science
Technology 45(4) (2015) 336-384.
[12] Z. Ma, T. Fang, R.W. Thring, Y. Li, H. Yu, Q. Zhou, M. Zhao, Toxic and non-toxic strains of Microcystis aeruginosa induce temperature dependent allelopathy toward growth and photosynthesis of Chlorella vulgaris, Harmful Algae 48 (2015) 21-29.
[13] Q. Wang, W. Pang, S. Ge, H. Yu, C. Dai, X. Huang, J. Li, M. Zhao, Characteristics of Fluorescence Spectra, UV Spectra, and Specific Growth Rates during the Outbreak of Toxic Microcystis aeruginosa FACHB-905 and Non-Toxic FACHB-469 under Different Nutrient Conditions in a Eutrophic Microcosmic Simulation Device, Water 12(8) (2020) 2305.
[14] J. Zhou, Y. Lyu, M.L. Richlen, D.M. Anderson, Z. Cai, Quorum sensing is a language of chemical signals and plays an ecological role in algal-bacterial interactions, Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 35(2) (2016) 81-105.
[15] E.W. Rice, R.B. Baird, A.D. Eaton, L.S. Clesceri, Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, American public health association Washington, DC2012.
[16] R.L. Laybourn, A modification of Albert's stain for the diphtheria bacillus, Journal of the American Medical Association 83(2) (1924) 121-121.
[17] M.J. Gray, W.-Y. Wholey, N.O. Wagner, C.M. Cremers, A. Mueller-Schickert, N.T. Hock, A.G. Krieger, E.M. Smith, R.A. Bender, J.C. Bardwell, Polyphosphate is a primordial chaperone, Molecular Cell 53(5) (2014) 689-699.
[18] H. Summer, R. Grämer, P. Dröge, Denaturing urea polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (Urea PAGE), JoVE (32) (2009) e1485.
[19] S.A. Smith, J.H. Morrissey, Sensitive fluorescence detection of polyphosphate in polyacrylamide gels using 4′, 6‐diamidino‐2‐phenylindol, Electrophoresis 28(19) (2007) 3461-3465.
[20] M. Yilimulati, J. Jin, X. Wang, X. Wang, D. Shevela, B. Wu, K. Wang, L. Zhou, Y. Jia, B. Pan, Regulation of Photosynthesis in Bloom-Forming Cyanobacteria with the Simplest β-Diketone, Environmental Science Technology 55(20) (2021) 14173-14184.

{% endblock %}