Claim: "This is a very simplistic, almost naive op-ed on climate change impacts. Some assertions such as the one about CO2 being good for plants demonstrates that the authors do not know or understand how increasing CO2 is good or bad for plants, they are just repeating something they heard."
Fact-check: Wall Street Journal op-ed on economic consequences of climate change found naive by scientists - Science Feedback
Verdict: wall street journal op-ed on economic consequences of climate change found naive by scientists
Organisation: Science Feedback
Author: Scott Johnson
Date published: 2017-08-02T10:19:38