Claim: "An accurate and balanced article that gives readers a good flavour of the research but the reference to "Earth's history" might confuse some when it otherwise refers to the studied period: the past 3.5 million years. Neatly explains a lot of the key points in a small word count, but..."
Fact-check: USA Today story accurate but lacks clarity regarding timescales over which warming could be underestimated - Science Feedback
Verdict: usa today story accurate but lacks clarity regarding timescales over which warming could be underestimated
Organisation: Science Feedback
Author: Scott Johnson
Date published: 2018-07-10T01:33:12