Claim: "This article focuses only on specific lines of evidence that climate models disagree with observations. In doing so, the authors ignore research that helps to reconcile differences between models and observations. The authors do not consider alternate datasets and time periods in which models and observations agree. Models are one…
Fact-check: Washington Examiner op-ed cherry-picks data and misleads readers about climate models - Science Feedback
Verdict: washington examiner op-ed cherry-picks data and misleads readers about climate models
Organisation: Science Feedback
Author: Scott Johnson
Date published: 2019-08-31T15:16:04