Claim: As a sitting Supreme Court justice, Daniel Kelly recused himself from a case, then "he pocketed $20,000 in contributions" from the plaintiff and family members and "unrecused himself so he could judge the case."
Fact-check: Kelly did unrecuse himself in voting case.
Verdict: half-true
Organisation: PolitiFact
Author: Laura Schulte
Date published: 2023-03-24T00:00:00