@freewelshspirit @JuliaHB1 @MichaelYeadon3 Those points are not relevant to  my criticism, which is about conditional probability and whether the number of false positives is a significant fraction of the actual positives. Even if the prevalence of actual COVID among people with symptoms is small, it is clearly &gt;&gt; 0.1 %.
@freewelshspirit JuliaHB1 @ @ MichaelYeadon3 Those points are not relevant to my criticism, All which is about conditional probability and Whether the number of false positives is a significant fraction of the actual positives. Even if the actual prevalence of COVID among people with symptoms is small, it is Clearly & gt; & gt; 0.1%.
British dad to a little Dutchie. Astrophysicist @uva_api. Geek: sci-fi, science, history, politics and X-rays from close to black holes are my thing.
British dad to a little Dutchie. Astrophysicist @uva_api. Geek: sci-fi, science, history, politics and X-rays from close to black holes are my thing.