Clinical trial NCT02536170
Conditions: Sickle Cell Disease Vaso-occlusive Pain Episode
Keywords: Arginine Therapy
Sponsor: Emory University
Start date: 2016-02-01; Completion date: 2021-02-21
Enrollment: 108 participants; Allocation: RANDOMIZED; Intervention model: PARALLEL

Brief summary:
The aim of this study is to determine whether giving extra arginine, a simple amino acid, to patients with sickle cell disease seeking treatment for a pain crisis (vaso-occlusive painful events (VOE) will decrease pain scores, decrease the need for pain medications or decrease length of hospital stay or emergency department visit. Funding Source - FDA OOPD.

Detailed description:
The purpose of this study is to determine the effects of IV L-arginine hydrochloride therapy in children with sickle cell disease (SCD) and vaso-occlusive pain events (VOE). Specifically, the impact on total opioid use (mg/kg) over the duration of their emergency department (ED) visit and hospital stay will be evaluated.

Arms: arm 1: Participants will be randomized to receive an intravenous (IV) infusion of L-arginine (100 mg/kg) three times a day until time of discharge from the emergency department (ED) or hospital. arm 2: Participants will be randomized to receive an intravenous (IV) infusion of one-time loading dose of L-arginine (200 mg/kg) followed by standard dose (100 mg/kg) three times a day until time of discharge from the emergency department (ED) or hospital. arm 3: Participants will be randomized to receive an intravenous (IV) infusion of placebo (normal saline 1-2 ml/kg) three times a day until time of discharge from the emergency department (ED) or hospital.
Interventions: intervention 1: L-arginine intervention 2: L-arginine Loading Dose intervention 3: Placebo
Intervention descriptions: intervention 1: L-arginine will be dispensed intravenously (IV) in the standard dose of 100 mg/kg three times a day until discharge from the emergency department (ED) or hospital. intervention 2: One loading dose of L-arginine will be dispensed intravenously (IV) at 200 mg/kg intervention 3: Placebo of intravenous (IV) normal saline 1-2 ml/kg three times a day until discharge from the emergency department (ED) or hospital.

Protocol documents:
Prot_SAP_000.pdf: 
Protocol Version: 12/23/2020 
PHASE 2 RANDOMIZED CONTROL TRIAL OF ARGININE THERAPY FOR PEDIATRIC 
SICKLE CELL DISEASE PAIN 
NCT02536170 
Date: December 23, 2020 
IRB00076988 


Study Title:  Phase 2 Randomized Control Trial of Arginine Therapy for Pediatric Sickle Cell Disease Pain 
(IND#66,943)
Short Tile: Arginine Therapy for SCD Pain (RCT)
IRB#76988
Principal Investigator:
 Claudia Morris, MD
Protocol Version 12/23/2020


2
Protocol Version: 12/23/2020
ABSTRACT
The purpose of this study is to determine the effects of IV L-arginine hydrochloride therapy in children 
with sickle cell disease (SCD) and vaso-occlusive pain events (VOE).  Specifically, the impact on total opioid 
use (mg/kg) in morphine equivalents over the duration of their emergency department (ED) visit and 
hospital stay will be evaluated.  
Sickle cell disease is an inherited hemolytic anemia that affects approximately 100,000 individuals in the 
US (7), primarily African-Americans, and is therefore an orphan disease.  It represents a group of genetic 
disorders variably characterized by anemia, severe pain, and potentially life-threatening complications 
such as bacterial sepsis, splenic sequestration, acute chest syndrome, stroke and chronic organ damage.  
Vaso-occlusive painful episodes in SCD are common, debilitating, & the leading cause of hospitalizations, 
ED visits, missed school, & are associated with an increased mortality rate (8).  No current therapies 
specifically target vaso-occlusion, with symptomatic interventions limited to analgesia & hydration. Nitric 
oxide (NO), produced by the 5-electron oxidation of L-arginine, is a potent vasodilator and exerts 
pleiotropic effects on vascular and circulating blood cells, including the inhibition of platelet aggregation, 
down-regulation of adhesion molecules, and modulation of ischemia-reperfusion injury, all pathways 
adversely affected during VOE (3).  We and others have found that SCD patients with VOE have acutely 
depleted L-arginine levels (4, 9). Additionally, we have now completed a single-center randomize, double-
blinded, placebo-controlled trial (RCT) of arginine therapy in 54 children with VOE requiring 
hospitalization (1). We observed a reduction in total narcotic usage by 54% and lower pain scores at 
discharge in children who received up to 5 days of 100 mg/kg/dose, three times a day (TID), intravenous 
(IV)  L-arginine therapy compared to placebo (1). We propose to extend these results in a phase II trial of 
L-arginine for VOE in children with SCD to further assess the efficacy and safety of this therapy and 
determine whether a loading dose of IV L-arginine at presentation provides additional benefits. 
Dysregulation of the arginine metabolome contributes to complications in SCD including VOE and early 
mortality (2, 4, 6, 10, 11) . In transgenic mouse models of SCD, L-arginine supplementation has been shown 
to inhibit the red cell Gardos channels (12), reduce red cell density (12, 13), improve perfusion, and reduce 
lung injury, microvascular vaso-occlusion and mortality (14-17).  Arginine also increases erythrocyte 
glutathione levels in both mouse (15) and human trials (18), and may down-regulate inflammatory 
pathways (19). The impact of arginine therapy on glutathione has not yet been studied in children with 
SCD during an acute pain event. In addition, arginine is a key substrate in creatine synthesis, an important 
metabolic pathway not yet sufficiently studied in SCD that may be impacted by an arginine- deficient state. 
Although mechanisms of arginine dysregulation are complex and multifactorial (3, 10), they can be 
overcome through arginine supplementation, a phenomenon known as the “arginine paradox” (20). We 
therefore hypothesize that L-arginine is a safe and inexpensive intervention with narcotic-sparing 
effects in pediatric SCD patients with VOE that will decrease pain scores and contribute to a decreased 
length of hospital stay. By providing a loading dose of L-arginine (twice the usual dose) early on during 
an acute VOE in the emergency department (ED) or clinic setting, when patients are known to 
experience a sudden drop in plasma arginine levels (5),  we hypothesize that global arginine 
bioavailability and pain will improve compared to placebo. The potential of arginine therapy to impact 
ED discharge will also be studied for the first time in this clinical trial.
STUDY OBJECTIVES
The primary hypothesis of this study is that arginine therapy will decrease total narcotic use and improve 
pain scores in children with sickle cell disease (SCD) and vaso-occlusive pain episodes (VOE) compared to 


3
Protocol Version: 12/23/2020
placebo. We also predict that a one-time loading dose of 200 mg/kg IV L-arginine at presentation for acute 
pain will be more effective than the standard dose of 100 mg/kg on clinical and biological outcomes 
studied. 
We anticipate that arginine therapy will impact multiple biological pathways beyond nitric oxide. We 
hypothesize that treatment will improve global arginine bioavailability and erythrocyte redox biology; in 
particular it may increase erythrocyte glutathione concentration, decrease oxidative stress, inflammatory 
biomarkers and endothelin-1, and ultimately improved mitochondrial function.   We will also monitor 
arginase activity, nitric oxide metabolites (NOx), exhaled nitric oxide (NO), and hemolytic rate in order to 
evaluate potential study-drug mechanisms of action.
Specific Aims
1.
To determine the efficacy of IV arginine therapy on the primary endpoint, total parenteral opioid
use (mg/kg of morphine equivalents) in children with SCD and VOE and evaluate whether a loading 
dose provides additional benefits compared to placebo. Important secondary outcome measures 
including length of hospital stay, time to pain crisis resolution, pain scores and discharge rate from 
the emergency department/clinic will also be evaluated. (Efficacy)
2.
To monitor for potential toxicities associated with a loading dose and repeated administration of
IV L-arginine. (Safety)
3.
To characterize alterations in the arginine metabolome in children with SCD and VOE and evaluate
how it is impacted by IV arginine therapy. (Exploratory)
INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND
Mechanisms of Arginine Dysregulation 
Vaso-occlusion is believed to be the root cause of sickle cell pain. NO is a free radical & a potent vasodilator 
(21) that regulates vascular homeostasis & plays a role in vaso-occlusive complications of SCD (1, 3, 22-
27).  NO has properties that can impact every aspect of SCD, from decreasing platelet activation & 
adhesion receptor expression on the vascular endothelium, to decreasing vascular smooth muscle 
proliferation, limiting ischemia-reperfusion injury, modulating endothelial proliferation, & regulating 
inflammation. Given the crucial role of NO depletion in endothelial dysfunction (28), it is not surprising 
that NO dysregulation is a common denominator among varied mechanisms of sickle vasculopathy (3, 10, 
27). NO is produced in the endothelium from its obligate substrate L-arginine, which is converted to 
citrulline by a family of enzymes, the NO synthases (NOS) (21).  Although NOS expression & activity is 
increased, SCD is characterized by a state of NO resistance, NO inactivation, & impaired NO bioavailability 
(27, 29, 30).  Under conditions of increased hemolysis, inflammation or oxidative stress, the compensatory 
upregulation of NO likely becomes overwhelmed & ineffective.  Vascular dysfunction is the end result, 
due to complex & multifactorial interactions (Fig 1) (2). 
Normal arginine metabolism is impaired in SCD (2, 4, 31-34) for many reasons. We found that adults with 
SCD are arginine deficient at steady-state (3, 4), while children have plasma levels that are similar to 
normal controls (4).  The altered arginine metabolome differs in children vs. adults (4). An arginine 
deficiency develops with age & is influenced by acute events & chronic end-organ damage.  However 
plasma arginine concentration decreases significantly in both adults & children with VOE & acute chest 
syndrome (ACS), and is associated with low NOx levels (4). Lowest arginine levels were found in children 
requiring admission for VOE (Fig 2A)(4), with arginine levels returning to baseline during convalescence 
in the hospital (Fig 2B). Of interest, low plasma arginine alone was a sensitive predictor for admission (4), 


4
Protocol Version: 12/23/2020
while NOx levels were not, suggesting a function for arginine bioavailability in VOE severity that goes 
beyond NO.  Arginine bioavailability may represent a novel objective metabolic biomarker of pain severity 
worth exploring further.
Low global arginine bioavailability (GAB) is associated with both early mortality in SCD (2) & VOE (4, 9). 
Increased arginase activity from both inflammatory triggers & more significantly from erythrocyte-
arginase release during hemolysis (2), intracellular arginine transport inhibition, renal dysfunction (which 
impairs the major route for endogenous arginine biosynthesis) (3, 10), elevated endogenous NO synthase 
(NOS) inhibitors like asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) (35-37), competitive inhibitors of arginine 
transport & all NOS isozymes (38), uncoupled NOS (17) & other consequences of oxidative stress (15, 16, 
39, 40) lead to low GAB in SCD. These mechanisms may impact an individual’s response to arginine 
therapy. Although mechanisms of arginine dysregulation are complex & multifactorial (3, 10), they can 
be overcome through arginine supplementation, a phenomenon known as the “arginine paradox” (20). 
Arginine represents a novel NO-based therapy (1, 33) that may have greater therapeutic potential than 
NO gas because of its multi-faceted nature that extends beyond its function as the obligate NO substrate 
(41). 
Why Arginine if NO gas does not treat VOE? Question raised from the DeNOVO trial (41).   Hemolysis 
will drive arginine consumption, which will ultimately exacerbate NO sequestration & decreased NO 
synthesis (3). Under conditions of hypoxia, high ADMA,  low arginine, or low essential NOS cofactors (42), 
NOS will uncoupled, producing reactive oxygen species in lieu of NO,  further reducing NO bioavailability 
& adding to the milieu of oxidative stress.  An imbalance between eNOS-derived NO & superoxide 
generation exists in SCD (43). Upregulation of NOS would therefore enhance oxidative stress when the 
local milieu favors NOS uncoupling.  Indeed, studies in transgenic SCD mice demonstrate that NOS activity 
is paradoxically increased & uncoupled while NO bioavailability is low (17).  With NOS uncoupling, inhaled 
NO gas will be rapidly sequestered by superoxide, forming peroxinitrite known to cause lung damage & 
cell death. It is plausible that the provision of NO excess in SCD may lack therapeutic benefit in the 
absence of sufficient arginine bioavailability. This is a potential pitfall of sildenafil therapy as well as 
inhaled NO gas (41, 44). 
Therapeutic Potential of Arginine Therapy in SCD.  In transgenic mouse models of SCD, L-arginine 
supplementation inhibits the red cell Gardos channels (12), reduces red cell density (12, 13), improves 
perfusion, & reduces lung injury, microvascular vaso-occlusion & mortality (14-17). Arginine increases 
erythrocyte glutathione levels in both mouse (15) & human trials (18).  Independent of SCD, low global 
arginine bioavailability is associated with major adverse cardiovascular events including mortality in 
patients screened for cardiovascular disease (45), mortality risk in malaria (46), & is associated with 
pulmonary hypertension risk (11, 33, 47).  Rapid healing of leg ulcers was reported with IV arginine-
butyrate in both SCD & thalassemia (48). Short term arginine therapy improved pulmonary hypertension 
in SCD (6), & acutely increases both plasma & exhaled NO when administered to ethnically matched 
normal controls & patients with VOE (5, 49). When arginine is given to SCD patients at steady-state, a 
paradoxical decrease in NOx occurs (Fig 3A) that is not overcome by higher doses (Fig 3B)(5), clearly 
indicating that arginine is metabolized differently in SCD compared to controls. However, when arginine 
is given during VOE (Fig 3B), a robust dose-dependent increase in NOx is observed. (Fig 4)(5)  This indicates 
that arginine is also metabolized differently in SCD at steady-state compared to times of acute illness 
including pain and acute chest syndrome (4, 5, 49). These early observations may account for the negative 
outcome of the Comprehensive Sickle Cell Centers’ (CSCC) arginine trial, particularly since the primary 
outcome measure of that study was an increase in plasma NOx levels, when published data in fact 


5
Protocol Version: 12/23/2020
demonstrated a decrease in NOx with arginine supplementation at baseline. Ultimately nutritional therapy 
like arginine may only be beneficial during a deficient state such as VOE.       
Arginine effect is dose-dependent in VOE: Rational for a loading dose in the ED. Low dose arginine 
therapy is likely to be subtherapeutic in SCD, & may represent an additional flaw in the CSCC prophylactic 
arginine trial design, as doses used were close to placebo based on the cardiovascular literature (50, 51). 
Previous studies have shown that low-dose arginine is unlikely to impact NO synthesis (51), an observation 
confirmed in the CSCC study. The capacity of arginine to increase NOx production in SCD is dose-
dependent (5). Higher levels of plasma arginine are likely needed to overcome multi-factorial effects 
including impact of arginase & ADMA on global arginine bioavailability, & accelerated arginine 
consumption during VOE compared to baseline (Fig 5B). However, the long-term safety of doses > 100 
mg/kg/dose TID is unknown in SCD,  although a 1-time dose of 30 grams IV is safe & commonly used for 
growth hormone stimulation testing (52, 53). Since the arginine formula is L-arginine hydrochloride, the 
wisdom of higher doses over time is questionable given the potential to induce acidosis & must be taken 
into consideration. However, using a one-time loading dose upon initial presentation for pain should be 
safe based on endocrine experience with growth hormone stimulation testing using 500 mg/kg/dose for 
children, would avoid risks of repeated higher doses, and may theoretically be more efficacious by quickly 
overcoming effects of excess arginase and ADMA. This is the rationale behind investigating clinical effects 
of a loading dose of 200 mg/kg.  
Although specific mechanisms contributing to changes in the arginine metabolome during VOE are 
unknown, hemolysis is unlikely to play a major role at least initially, as straightforward VOE is not typically 
associated with a lower than baseline hemoglobin (Hb), although our data shows a significant Hb drop 
within the first 24 hours after admission (1). A ≥1 gram drop in baseline Hb at presentation for pain can 
be a red-flag for impending ACS (54, 55). Our early studies revealed a falling arginine level reaching a nadir 
within 24 hours of a positive CXR (Fig 5A), days into the VOE admission, a pattern that differed from 
uncomplicated VOE (Fig 2B) (4). Dysregulation of arginine metabolism appears to be different in VOE vs. 
ACS (4), & mechanisms for arginine consumption in VOE should be sought out in future arginine trials 
since it may impact response to arginine therapy. Insight into these paradigms may allow us to develop 
novel targeted therapies. L-arginine supplementation inhibits the red cell Gardos channels (12), reduces 
red cell density (12), improves perfusion, and reduces lung injury, microvascular vaso-occlusion and 
mortality (14-17). Arginine also increases erythrocyte glutathione levels in both mouse (15) and human 
trials (18), and may down-regulate inflammatory pathways (19). However, none of these mechanisms of 
action have been studied during VOE in children with SCD.  In addition, arginine is a key substrate in 
creatine synthesis, an important metabolic pathway not yet sufficiently studied in SCD that may be 
impacted by an arginine- deficient state. Although the role of NO in SCD has become controversial (56, 
57), these studies demonstrate that the mechanistic impact of arginine goes beyond NO. We speculate, 
however, that improved NO bioavailability with arginine therapy may also be a contributing factor in 
children with vaso-occlusive pain. 
Based on preliminary pharmacokinetic studies (5, 49), peak plasma arginine concentration after oral 
arginine (0.1 g/kg) is significantly higher during SCD steady-state compared to VOE (Fig 5B), although 
levels are similar by 4 hours. Normal controls reach a peak arginine level between 1-2 hours that is 
maintained at 4 hours, & does not trend down as in SCD (5). Accelerated arginine metabolism or 
consumption occurs during VOE compared to steady-state despite the same oral arginine dose given. 
Results of a single-center randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial of arginine therapy for 
children with VOE requiring hospitalization (1). A total of 56 children >3 years old admitted to CHRCO for 
VOE were enrolled between 2000-2008 in this NIH-supported arginine trial (NHLBI K23 award HL-04386-


6
Protocol Version: 12/23/2020
05). Patients were consented within 24 hours of admission. Patients with significant liver, renal or 
neurological dysfunction, >10 VOE admissions/year or a history of narcotics dependence were excluded. 
A standardized treatment & monitoring program for VOE was followed.  Average age was 13.9 ± 4 years 
(range 3.6-19 years), and 52% were female. 73% of the patients had Hb-SS, 18% had Hb-SC, and 9% carried 
S- thalassemia. Patients received IV or oral arginine (0.1 gram/kg TID, N=28) or placebo (N=28) for 5 days 
or until discharge from the hospital. Two patients randomized to the arginine arm did not receive 
parenteral opioids and were excluded from the analysis. Narcotic records for 2 patients (randomized to 
placebo arm) were incomplete & were not included in the narcotic use analysis. 
RESULTS:  Age was equally distributed between treatment & placebo groups.  57% of the arginine 
treatment group & 46% of the placebo group were female. The overall time between triage in the 
emergency department or presentation to clinic and delivery of first randomized study drug dose was 
20.4±11 hours, with no difference between the placebo and treatment arm. A significant reduction in 
narcotic use (defined as total opioid use over the course of the hospital stay in mg/kg) by 54% was 
observed in the treatment arm receiving IV or oral arginine compared to placebo (mean ± SEM: 1.9 ± 
0.4 mg/kg; n=26 vs. 4.1 ± 0.8mg/kg; n=26, p=0.02; Fig 6A).  Pain scores based on a 10-cm visual analog 
scale of 0-10 reported in the ED or in clinic during initial presentation were similar in both the arginine 
and placebo group (Fig 1B). As expected, pain scores decreased significantly in both the arginine and 
placebo arms at time of discharge compared to initial evaluation.  However, pain scores were significantly 
lower at discharge in the arginine arm compared to placebo (Mean±SD: 1.9±2.4 vs. 3.9±2.9, p=0.01, Fig 
6B).  Comparing the differences in the change from presentation (day 1) to day of discharge adjusting for 
day 1 values between the placebo and arginine arms, a larger drop in pain scores was also observed in the 
arginine arm compared to placebo (p=0.01).  Average length of hospitalization was 4.5 ± 0.4 days, & there 
was no significant difference between the 2 groups (4.1±0.3 vs. 4.8±0.5 days, p=0.27; arginine vs. placebo 
arm), although a clinically relevant trend favored patients treated with arginine. Total opioid use (mg/kg) 
correlated strongly to length of hospital stay (r=0.86, p<0.0001), and represents a surrogate biomarker 
of LOS to evaluate study drug efficacy.  Four episodes of ACS occurred during the study, 3 in the treatment 
arm and one in the placebo arm. One patient experienced clinical deterioration associated with ACS 
requiring emergent transfusion & a transfer to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) in the placebo arm. 
No clinical deterioration or PICU transfers occurred in the arginine arm.  Five in the treatment arm 
received transfusion vs. 4 in the placebo arm.  No drug-related adverse events were observed. No 
significant differences were observed between pre & post therapy liver or renal function, or hematological 
parameters in the arginine treatment group vs. placebo. Arginine is a safe, efficacious and inexpensive 
intervention with narcotic-sparing effects that
should be considered as a potential adjunct to standard therapy for VOE (1, 10, 50).
Details of Adverse Events with RCT of IV Arginine Therapy in SCD. Among 56 pain events treated, a total 
of 3 SAEs and AEs were reported. No serious drug-related adverse events were observed, although one 
AE and one SAE occurred that led to a discontinuation of study drug, and a decision by the principal 
investigator to withdraw the participant from the study without breaking the blinded study drug code 
until the completion of the trial. One patient (randomized to the arginine arm) developed hives during the 
study drug infusion. Although the patient had a history of allergy to paper tape, and paper tape had been 
inadvertently used, study drug was discontinued and the patient was withdrawn from the trial due to an 
AE that was possibly related to study drug. A second patient (randomized to the placebo group) was 
withdrawn from the study after experiencing an acute clinical deterioration during the evolution of ACS, 
requiring an emergency red blood cell transfusion, and transfer from the ward to the intensive care unit.  
A second SAE was also reported (in a patient randomized to the placebo group), involving a clinically 
relevant rise in liver function enzymes (ALT rose from 44 on admission to 197 U/L on day 4 while AST 
increased from 64 to 200 U/L). The clinical team felt this was likely related to SCD, but could possibly be 


7
Protocol Version: 12/23/2020
related to study drug, so an SAE was reported to the IRB & Data Safety Monitoring Board, but the patient 
continued participation in the study and was closely monitored. No other patients experienced clinical 
deterioration, & no other adverse events occurred.  Arginine & placebo were well tolerated.   
STUDY SIGNIFICANCE: The importance of novel approaches to vaso-occlusive pain in sickle cell disease 
Pain is the clinical hallmark of SCD, and a significant problem in emergency medicine (58). Vaso-occlusive 
painful episodes (VOE) are common, debilitating, and a true medical emergency. VOE are the leading 
cause of hospitalizations, emergency room visits, missed school, and are associated with an increased 
mortality rate (8).  There is no effective therapy that targets the underlying mechanisms of VOE.  
Symptomatic relief with analgesics and hydration is the only currently available treatment, and this has 
not changed in decades. Episodic periods of severe pain lead to high use of health care resources (59), 
with high readmission rates even in patients hospitalized for pain management (8).  A recent health care 
utilization report published in 2010 revealed that 20% of patients with SCD experienced 3 or more 
encounters per year (8). This is remarkably higher than the 5.2% with 3-19 visits per year published in 
1991(60). Hospital admission rates are high for children with SCD (61) presenting to ED with VOE, and 
commonly > 60% (62). Although the reason for high pediatric admission rates are unknown, many children 
with SCD live with daily pain to some extent that their families try to control at home through various 
methods. It is when the pain becomes acutely worse, and unbearable, that they present to the ED, often 
in acute distress. Novel approaches to treatment of acute pain for SCD that can be utilized in the ED as 
well on the hospital ward are critically needed. Interventions that target underlying mechanisms of 
sickle cell pain in addition to providing symptomatic relief would be ideal and are worth pursuing. This 
study has the potential to alter standard care for children with this orphan disease.
We have now completed a single-center randomize, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial of arginine 
therapy in 54 children with VOE requiring hospitalization (1). We observed a marked reduction in narcotic 
usage by over 54%, lower pain scores at discharge, and a clinically relevant trend in reduced length of 
hospital stay of approximately 17 hours in children who received L-arginine therapy compared to 
placebo (1). We propose an intervention trial for pain in children with SCD that goes beyond symptomatic 
treatment and will provide valuable mechanistic insight. In addition, the use of a one-time loading dose 
may help overcome the multi-factorial limitations on global arginine bioavailability in SCD.  This proposal 
will therefore provide essential data for product development including the planning of a future multi-
center Phase 3 trial, which will ultimately help gain product approval for an orphan disease targeting the 
indication of decreased length of hospital stay.
Critical Barriers to Care for Patients with Sickle Cell Disease and Pain in the Emergency Department
Acute care of patients with SCD and pain in the ED is a neglected area of sickle cell research. Nationally, 
78% of the nearly 200,000 annual ED visits for SCD are for a complaint of pain (63). Given the high ED 
utilization rate for pain in both adults & children with SCD (8, 59, 63), ED-based research has not received 
the amount of attention and funding that it deserves. Unlike other types of pain, experts point out that 
research support & progress in understanding SCD pain followed a sluggish & almost stagnant, path (64). 
Funding support for pain research that begins in the ED will help to remedy this disparity. Interventions 
designed to minimize SCD complications and avoid hospitalization will also reduce the significant 
economic burden of this disease (65).
Negative attitudes towards patients with painful sickle cell crises. The negative attitudes toward patients 
with painful sickle crises have been compounded by racial stereotypes, the effects of the disease in 
limiting educational & employment opportunities, suboptimal medical coverage, & the large doses of 


8
Protocol Version: 12/23/2020
opioids often required to obtain pain relief (64). Most studies find that ED doctors misunderstand SCD 
pain (66, 67).  Studies indicate that 53% of ED physicians believe that over 20% of SCD patients are 
addicted to opioids, with 22% of ED physicians believe that over 50% are addicted to opioids (68). A recent 
study of 232 patients with SCD that kept detailed pain diaries found 35.5% to be high ED utilizers with 3 
or more ED visits a year (69). However, these patients had lower hemoglobin, lower quality of life, more 
pain & distress, more pain days, more crises, & more transfusions than those not high ED users. Indeed, 
controlling for the severity of their illness, high utilizers did not use more opioids any more often (69). In 
short, they were sicker patients. Improved ED physician education is essential to improve negative 
attitudes commonly perceived by families dealing with SCD when seeking emergency care. This sort of 
advocacy will begin with research in the ED setting, with information filtering to national Emergency 
Medicine meetings, as data is presented in emergency medicine targeted forums. The majority of SCD 
research is presented in venues that target hematologists. Despite high ED utilization & the role of the ED 
physician in treating the most common complication of SCD, the ED physician has for the most part been 
left out of the loop. A pivotal clinical trial to address pain in the ED is a step in the right direction, as it 
extends SCD research into the ED arena, promoting awareness of SCD among a group that most commonly 
manage the disorder, but often misunderstands the disease.   
The chaotic nature of the ED.  Although disparities specific to pain management practices in the ED for 
children with SCD have not been identified (70), ethnic disparities in ED care have been reported (71-73), 
& adults with SCD experience longer delays in the initiation of analgesics compared to other patients with 
pain (74). However, time to initiation of treatment in the ED is often delayed as a result of random events 
that are beyond anyone’s control, such as high patient volumes (35) & acuity of other patients in the ED, 
even when policies are in place for immediate triage of patients with SCD & pain. In a recent study of 
children with SCD, median time from arrival to analgesia administration was 90 minutes, with high ED 
census as the biggest culprit for delays (35). Barriers to rapid care in the ED are common across the 
country, including overcrowding, nursing ratios, insufficient staff coverage, inadequate funding, & slow 
flow of patients from the ED to the wards in addition to patient acuity. These also represent significant 
barriers to performance of successful research in the ED, where emergent clinical care appropriately takes 
priority over research endeavors.  Pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) champions are needed to work 
closely with SCD experts in the field to help establish & disseminate best practices for the treatment of 
pain in the ED that leads to rapid assessment, intervention, & relief of suffering. They are also essential to 
the successful development & implementation of any clinical trial that targets sickle cell care in an ED, 
given their familiarity with the pitfalls of research in this hectic environment & knowledge of means to 
overcoming these barriers. The approach & clinical style of an ED-trained physician differs from that of a 
hematologist, & close cooperation between these 2 sub-specialties is essential to change the current 
paradigm & barriers to ED care described above. Such collaborations are also essential to successful 
clinical trials that address pediatric sickle cell pain in the ED.  SCD experts working outside the ED setting 
often have unrealistic impressions of the ED routine & functional capacity & may be unfamiliar with 
common hurdles known to the PEM physician. Close collaboration between the ED and Aflac hematology 
group at Emory University will insure the success of this clinical trial. 
The results of this proposal may significantly impact patient care & change clinical practice for children 
with SCD in both the ED & hospital wards. It offers greater insight into the pathophysiology of SCD, & it is 
also the foundation for a future multi-center trial.  It holds the potential to improve quality of life for 
patients with SCD.
Innovation
There are several innovative components to the planned research. 


9
Protocol Version: 12/23/2020

We propose a novel therapy to target the leading cause of ED visits & hospitalizations for patients
with SCD, supported by promising data demonstrating significant narcotic-sparing effects, decreased
pain scores at discharge and a trend towards a reduction in length of hospital stay. Early initiation of
arginine therapy in the ED may impact duration of VOE & total narcotic use further. Arginine is a
promising therapy for both hospitalized & ED patients with SCD. Acute care of patients with SCD &
pain in the ED is a neglected area of research. This proposal moves toward remediating the paucity
of ED-based SCD research. Insight into metabolic mechanisms linked to pain will also help change the
prevalence of negative attitudes toward pain in SCD.

Our drug candidate is selected based on an impressive back-bone of basic science, pre-clinical efficacy,
and extensive human safety experience. Arginine has demonstrated marked biological plausibility
for multiple beneficial effects in SCD, including decreased total narcotic use in a recently published
randomized, placebo controlled trial at CHRCO (1). Therapies that target underlying mechanisms of
vaso-occlusive pain are innovative and superior to those targeting symptomatic pain relief alone.

This study expands upon the positive outcomes of a recently published pilot arginine trial (1),
evaluates the effects of a loading dose of arginine compared to standard dosing, & includes
enrollment at 3 high-volume children's hospitals within the CHOA network to insure sufficient
recruitment potential.

This study will for the first time evaluate multiple aspects of the arginine metabolome during VOE and
strives to identify the key mechanisms of action of arginine therapy in SCD.  Although the exact
mechanisms remain unknown & are likely multifactorial, those that have been implicated through
mouse & human pilot studies include vasodilation from increased nitric oxide production & decreased
endothelin-1, impact on global arginine bioavailability & overcoming effects of excess arginase activity
& ADMA, decreased inflammation, increased erythrocyte glutathione levels and improved RBC redox
balance, and decreased oxidative stress. The end result would be altered mitochondrial
function.   Rather than the common model of looking at individual mechanisms in isolation, Dr. Morris
has gathered together a team of experts who can collaboratively view the bigger metabolic picture.
STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS
The research plan is to institute a phase II RCT of IV arginine therapy in children with SCD and VOE in order 
to further knowledge on efficacy and safety of this orphan drug. This study will also determine if arginine 
therapy is superior to placebo in clinical and biological outcomes described.  In addition, this study will 
determine whether a one-time loading dose of arginine (200 mg/kg IV) followed by 100 mg/kg TID dosing 
is superior to 100 mg/kg IV TID alone without a loading dose. Our exploratory objective is to more fully 
characterize the arginine metabolome in children with SCD during VOE, and evaluate the effects of 
arginine therapy on global arginine bioavailability, vasodilation (NO metabolites, endothelin-1) arginase 
activity, hemolytic rate and inflammation, erythrocyte redox biology & oxidative stress, and mitochondrial 
function together with important clinical endpoints (pain scores, time to VOE resolution, hospital length 
of stay and admission rates from the ED/clinic) in children with SCD and VOE. This study will take place in 
CHOA emergency departments (Egleston, Hughes Spalding and Scottish Rite) and/or on the hospital 
inpatient ward. It will initiate at Egleston and open at other campuses as needed to achieve enrollment 
goals. 


10
Protocol Version: 12/23/2020
Specific Aim 1: Efficacy
To determine the efficacy of IV arginine therapy on the primary endpoint, total parenteral opioid use 
(mg/kg) in children with SCD & VOE and evaluate whether a loading dose provides additional benefits.
This is a Phase II RCT of IV arginine therapy in children with SCD with VOE presenting to an acute care 
setting or admitted for treatment of their pain. Children with SCD and moderate-to-severe pain that is 
related to their SCD and not attributable to other non-SCD causes, receiving parenteral opioids are eligible 
for participation. This study will adhere to all investigational new drug and FDA regulations.  
Qualified IRB- approved study personnel who are knowledgeable about the protocol, familiar with the 
consent process and are delegated the responsibility of consenting will be allowed to consent eligible 
patients.  All potential participants will discuss the study with the research study personnel. This may be 
in person or remotely (over the phone, video call etc.). They will be given an opportunity to discuss 
participation with an investigator or research staff member who has been delegated this responsibility. 
Candidate participants will be assured that participation is voluntary, and that participation will not 
affect or influence clinical or medical care. Permission for the child will be obtained by one 
parent/legally authorized representative. Subjects and/or their legally authorized representative will 
agree or decline participation in the study. Electronic consent and assent will be obtained, and this 
process will be documented electronically in REDCap. Electronic consent may be obtained in person 
(using a laptop, iPad, or other touch screen device etc). In the event of technology failures paper 
consent forms may be used. Either an electronic or paper copy of the consent form will be provided to 
the participant. If this copy is provided electronically this may be sent directly via REDCap to the 
participant or it will be sent to the participant via encrypted email. 
Once informed consent is obtained, eligible children and adolescents age 3-21 years will be randomized 
to one of three study arms: Standard L-arginine dose (100 mg/kg IV TID), one-time L-arginine loading dose 
(200 mg/kg IV) + standard dose (100 mg/kg IV TID), or placebo (normal saline 1-2 ml/kg IV TID) up to a 
maximum of 7 days (21 doses) or until discharge, whichever comes first. The maximum loading dose of IV 
L-arginine will be 20 grams, with a standard dose maximum of 10 gms IV TID. A total of 114 patients will 
be treated/randomized in this protocol, 38 in each arm. Up to 150 patients may be enrolled, to account 
for potential screen failures and withdrawals. Patients must be randomized within 24 hours of receiving 
their initial parenteral opioid in the ED or clinic/day hospital. Even though a 24-hr window is established 
for feasibility, the ideal goal is to randomize and deliver study drug within 2-4 hours in the ED or clinic/day 
hospital.  The average time to study drug delivery in the original Morris Arginine study was 20.4±11 hours 
(1). Although this original study was not sufficiently powered to detect a decreased length of hospital stay 
(LOS), the trending decrease by 17 hours is a clinically relevant improvement for patients and their 
families.  A standardized treatment and monitoring protocol for VOE utilized by Emory/Children's 
Healthcare of Atlanta mutually agreed upon by both the ED and department of hematology will be 
followed. Pain scores (0-10 scale or FACES as appropriate) will be obtained at presentation to the acute 
care setting for pain prior to study drug administration and at least TID until discharge. If the patient is 
discharged from the ED or day hospital/clinic without a hospital admission, a discharge pain score will also 
be obtained. A discharge blood draw will be obtained whenever possible for those discharged from the 
ED but will be limited to research labs targeting the arginine metabolome (plasma and erythrocyte amino 
acids, arginase activity, NOx and exhaled NO).  Information on hydroxyurea use (HU) will be obtained. 
Randomization will be stratified for HU use to minimize potential confounding effects of HU use.  Patients, 


11
Protocol Version: 12/23/2020
physicians, and staff involved in patient care will be blinded as to whether each patient receives arginine 
vs. placebo. 
Patients already participating in the clinical trial may not be enrolled more than once.
IV L-Arginine-HCl:  Patients will be randomized to IV arginine/placebo (normal saline).  IV L-Arginine-HCl 
is obtained from Pfizer in a 10% Arginine-HCl injection formulation (R-Gene 10).  See product information 
in active IND# 66943 " Impact Of Arginine Therapy On Pulmonary Hypertension And Biological Markers 
In Sickle Cell Disease" for details on preparation, clinical pharmacology, toxicology, precautions & adverse 
reactions. The preparation will not be modified, and will be administered per manufacturer’s 
recommendations, except that the dosage will be adjusted for this protocol.  There will be sufficient 
access to study drug for this clinical trial.  Study Drug Infusion & Strategy for Managing Infusion 
Complications: Arginine will be infused based on manufacturer's instructions (R-Gene 10, Pfizer), over 30 
minutes. However, rates may be slowed to over 60 minutes for patients experiencing symptoms of 
flushing, nausea, vomiting or headache at research team discretion. 
 It is provided as a ready-to-use solution and is not typically diluted further. Pediatric doses will be drawn 
up by the pharmacy. Patients with SCD undergoing growth hormone stimulation test have tolerated 
500mg/kg/dose over 30 minutes without complication. In practice, arginine infusion protocols are not 
typically modified for SCD.  No complications with infusions were reported during the arginine trial 
recently published (1). Arginine compatibility is similar to that of total parenteral nutrition (TPN) and can 
be co-administered with normal saline/dextrose fluids, ketorolac, opioid analgesia/PCA and antibiotics. 
There are no issues with IV tubing, which can be changed according to CHOA policy. Although it is a 
hypertonic solution, the amount of fluid delivered with 1-2ml/kg is minimal and is not anticipated to 
trigger a pain crisis. In fact our data demonstrated that 1ml/kg of 10% Arginine-HCL given IV TID 
throughout hospitalization significantly decreased pain scores compared to placebo in children with SCD 
hospitalized for VOE (1). Past clinical trial experience with arginine did not support the need for a second 
IV placement specifically for the arginine infusion. Therefore, the clinical IV placed for parenteral opioid 
therapy will be utilized for study drug.  If the IV site should become infiltrated, the IV catheter will be 
removed and the infiltration addressed clinically as needed, per hospital protocol for IV infiltration.  A new 
IV catheter will be placed if the patient's clinical status mandates continued parenteral opioids or IV access 
is required for other reasons. If the patient loses his/her IV and it is no longer clinically needed, IV arginine 
will be discontinued per study protocol. Information on IV infiltration during arginine infusion will be 
collected and reported as an adverse event.
VOE resolution in patients discharged from the ED or day hospital/clinic and hospital will be defined as 
the time in hours, of study drug delivery to the time of the last parenteral opioid.
Length of Stay will be defined as the time in hours, of study drug delivery to the time that the discharge 
order is given in written or electronic form. 
Pain Scores:  Pain associated with VOE will be measured on a numeric pain rating scale of 0-10, with the 
ends representing the extreme limits of "no-pain" (0) and "worst pain" (10), or the FACES pain rating scale 
when appropriate. Pain scores will be obtained at presentation to the acute care setting for pain prior to 
study drug administration and at least TID daily, until discharge and at time of discharge.
Specific Aim 2: Safety monitoring


12
Protocol Version: 12/23/2020
To monitor for potential toxicities associated with a loading dose & repeated administration of IV L-
arginine.
Vital signs including blood pressure, hemoglobin, liver and renal function testing will be obtained at the 
same time as the study blood draw for research labs. Rates of acute chest syndrome, blood transfusion, 
clinical deterioration, need for intensive care and hospital/ED returns within 72 hours and 30 days will be 
monitored in all enrolled patients and compared between study arms. 
Primary Outcome Measure: The primary outcome measure is total parenteral opioid use (morphine 
equivalents mg/kg) calculated from the initial dose of study drug, throughout the ED and/or hospital stay 
in the arginine arms compared to placebo. 
Secondary Outcome Measures:
Clinical Outcomes
1.
Length of hospital stay from study drug delivery to discharge (time of discharge order)
2.
Time to VOE resolution after study drug delivery
3.
Pain scores at presentation vs. discharge
4.
Pain score over time
5.
Length of ED stay (time of ED triage to discharge or admission order)
6.
ED discharge rate
7.
Total opioid dose (mg/kg) in the first 8 hours after study drug delivery
8.
Number of study drug doses
9.
Rate of acute chest syndrome (not present before randomization)
10. Rate of blood transfusion
11. Change in oxygen saturation and use of supplemental oxygen during admission. PROMIS pediatric
Pain and Fatigue short forms (daily for up to 1st 7 days and then on day of discharge: collaboration
with Nitya Bakshi/Carlton Dampier)
12. Symptoms questionnaire
13. 72-hour returns and 30-day return visits to the ED or in-patient hospitalizations
14. Diffusion correlation spectroscopy
Study Labs: Clinical, Research and Safety Monitoring
1.
Clinical and toxicity monitoring: complete blood count, reticulocyte count (retic), comprehensive
metabolic panel, Urine dipstick (monitoring for proteinuria) on study entry (day 0), day 1, day 7 and
or discharge (see table p 17.)  With the ability to use discarded samples saved up to 72 hours for
research tests.
2.
Urine or serum pregnancy test will be done at enrollment in girls ≥12 years if not already done as part
of standard of care within 24 hours of randomization
3.
The arginine metabolome and global arginine bioavailability: plasma arginine, ornithine, citrulline,
arginase, ADMA, NO metabolites (Brown lab - Emory), exhaled NO.
4.
Urine amino acid metabolites (to search for possible renal wasting or arginine as cause of deficiency)
5.
Biomarkers of oxidative stress (glutathione, isoprostanes, malonyldialdehyde, peroxynitrite, B12,
methymalonic acid and its derivatives. (Brown lab)
6.
Inflammation: white blood cell count, CRP, Th-1 and Th-2 cytokines (Brown lab)
7.
Hemolysis: Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), Cell-free hemoglobin (Hb), retic, indirect bilirubin, (Brown
Lab)


13
Protocol Version: 12/23/2020
8.
Mitochondrial function (Shiva mito platelet panel-UPMC)
Specific Aim 3: (Exploratory)
To characterize alterations in the arginine metabolome in children with SCD and VOE and evaluate how 
it is impacted by IV arginine therapy.
The mechanism of action for arginine therapy during VOE is UNKNOWN, although we have shown that 
children are metabolically different during VOE compared to baseline with respect to the arginine 
metabolome. Several biochemical & cellular effects of L-Arginine administration will be evaluated in order 
to provide mechanistic insight into potential benefits of arginine therapy based on pre-clinical data 
supporting each potential mechanism. Since no single mechanism occurs in isolation, multiple mechanism 
are likely. Blood will be drawn, and urine will be obtained, processed and stored for future analyses at the 
time of presentation prior to study drug delivery (day 0), on day 1 (drawn with routine am labs 12-36 hr 
after initiation of study drug) and then on day of 21st dose (day 7) and/or prior to discharge (or ED 
discharge, whichever comes first). Exhaled NO levels will be obtained at presentation and daily in children 
mature enough to perform the procedure based on ATS guidelines (76), or prior to discharge in the ED for 
those not admitted.  Additional information on important clinical outcomes will also be collected. 
Bloodwork for safety/toxicity monitoring will also be obtained with study blood draws (see Specific Aim 
#2). 
Potential Mechanisms Impacted by Arginine Therapy

Global arginine bioavailability (GAB) and the arginine metabolome: (arginine, ornithine,
citrulline, arginase, ADMA, arginase activity/concentration, creatine, urinary arginine/amino
acids).
We have established that the arginine metabolome is dysregulated in SCD (Figure 1) (2, 3), low arginine 
concentration is associated with VOE (4), that arginine supplementation can increase NOx when given 
during VOE (5), and that arginine therapy improves clinical outcomes like pain scores & total opioid use 
(1). The etiology of an acute arginine deficiency during VOE is unknown. Excess renal loss of amino acids 
may occur during VOE, though it has never been evaluated. Urinary arginine/amino acids will be evaluated 
together with plasma levels. ADMA is elevated in SCD (35-37) & will impact GAB (3), and also contributes 
to NOS uncoupling and mitochondrial dysfunction. Recent evidence suggesting a direct role for ADMA in 
NOS uncoupling and mitochondrial dysfunction that is attenuated by treatment with arginine (77, 78) may 
be of particular interest in SCD although this paradigm has not yet been explored in hemolytic anemias. 
Our proposal is the first to evaluate impact of arginine therapy on the arginine metabolome, oxidative 
stress, hemolysis, inflammation and subsequent mitochondrial dysfunction in SCD.

Vasodilation: (Nitric oxide (NO);   Endothelin-1 (ET-1).
Since L-arginine is the obligate substrate for NO production, an impact on this potent vasodilator is 
intuitively plausible and important to investigate.  Our early work demonstrated a dose-dependent impact 
of arginine therapy on NOx production in SCD and VOE (4). The clinical implications of NOx levels remain 
to be determined and can be effected by confounders like diet. Therefore, NOx is not an ideal biomarker 
in isolation but may provide valuable data when combined with information on the arginine metabolome 
including arginase concentration & ADMA levels, peroxynitrite concentration and mitochondrial 
superoxide production. Other studies have shown that IV arginine infusions can decrease levels of ET-1 
(79), a potent vaso-constrictor that may play a role in vaso-occlusive events. The ability for IV arginine to 
improve endothelial dysfunction was associated with elevated ADMA levels (79).   Our proposal will 
investigate the impact of arginine therapy on both NOx, ET-1 and ADMA. One limitation is that values of 
any metabolite in the plasma do not necessarily reflect levels in organ systems or distinct pools.  We will 


14
Protocol Version: 12/23/2020
also follow daily measurements of exhaled NO to evaluate NO bioavailability from the lungs and compare 
this to NOx, mitochondrial superoxide production and peroxynitrite levels (the consequence of NO + 
superoxide).

Oxidative stress (rbc glutathione, GSH/GSSH, peroxynitrite, isoprostanes)
Oxidative stress plays a pivotal role in the pathophysiology of SCD (39). Of interest to this project, the 
erythrocyte may be a major determinant of the global redox environment.  The sickle erythrocyte has 
increased concentrations of the reactive oxygen species compared with normal red blood cells (30, 80-
82). In the presence of alterations in the glutathione buffering system that occurs in these 
hemoglobinopathies (40, 81-88), it is likely that these erythrocytes are incapable of handling the increased 
oxidant burden and this might predispose them to hemolysis. Reduced glutathione (gamma-glutamyl-
cysteinyl-glycine; GSH) is the most abundant low-molecular weight thiol (89) and the principal thiol redox 
buffer in erythrocytes (90, 91).  
The intracellular GSH concentration is the final result of a dynamic balance between the rate of GSH 
synthesis and the combined rate of intracellular GSH consumption & efflux. GSH is readily oxidized to 
glutathione disulfide (GSSG) by free radicals and reactive oxygen and nitrogen species.  GSSG efflux from 
cells contributes to a net loss of intracellular GSH (89). The GSH/GSSG ratio is often used as an indicator 
of the cellular redox state; it is typically ~100  under normal physiological conditions (89).  GSH/GSSG is 
the major redox couple determining the antioxidative capacity of cells (89, 92, 93). Arginine also increases 
erythrocyte glutathione levels in both mouse (15) & human trials (18), and may down-regulate 
inflammatory pathways (19).  
Dr. Lou Ann Brown's lab has published vastly on the topic of GSH and the cellular redox state.
To estimate oxidative stress, this study will measure GSH together with its amino acid precursors, NOx, 
peroxynitrite, isoprostanes, aconitase (biomarker of superoxide production - increased in SCD, and the bi-
product of NOS uncoupling that is influence by low GSH, low arginine bioavailability and/or high ADMA) 
and ultimately mitochondrial function (Shiva lab). Alterations in the erythrocyte redox environment can 
contribute to both increased oxidative stress and hemolysis, and represents a mechanistic model bridging 
two critical pathways that may be impacted by arginine therapy.

Inflammation (CRP, WBC, Th-1/TH-2 cytokines)
Archer et al found that arginine down-regulates inflammatory pathways (19) in the sickle cell transgenic 
mouse model. In particular C-reactive protein (CRP) and interleukin-6 were decreased in mice fed a high 
protein diet. CRP and a panel of inflammatory cytokines will be evaluated pre and post therapy to 
determine if this observation translates to human SCD.

Hemolysis (LDH, Hb, retic count, bilirubin, cell-free Hb).
Hemolysis contributes significantly to an altered arginine metabolome in SCD (2, 29, 94-96) and will be 
evaluated. Whether arginine has any impact hemolytic rate is unknown, however the degree of hemolysis 
in individual patients presenting with VOE may impact the severity of their acute arginine deficiency and 
response to therapy. Past studies demonstrating an effect of arginine therapy on erythrocyte GSH levels 
could impact degree of hemolysis. Our preliminary data demonstrated a trend towards lower retic count 
in the arginine arm compared to placebo (1), and should be followed. 

Exhaled nitric oxide


15
Protocol Version: 12/23/2020
Exhaled nitric oxide is a non-invasive procedure that is considered to be an indirect measurement of 
airway inflammation. It is also impacted by supplemental arginine. Subjects will be instructed to take in a 
deep breath and blow air out at a constant pressure as directed by personnel through a standardized 
method. One measurement will be taken and recorded at Day 0 and daily during hospitalization. 

Cerebral and Muscle Blood Flow
Subjects will have a sticky sensor gently secured to the forehead and/or arm or leg to look at 
blood flowing to the brain or painful arm/leg and blood flow to the arm or leg that does not 
hurt before study drug is delivered, and then after study drug is delivered for up to 8 hours on 
the first day, and then for 5-10 minutes daily (20 minutes maximum).  A blood pressure sensor 
will be secured to the subject’s upper arm and fore finger during this time.

Mitochondrial function
Mitochondrial dysfunction in the platelets of SCD patients.  In a pilot study, we isolated platelets from 
the blood of adult SCD patients & healthy African American volunteers.  Comprehensive analysis of 
mitochondrial function demonstrated that SCD patients manifested mitochondrial dysfunction 
characterized by decreased complex V activity compared to healthy African American subjects (Fig 8).  A 
decrease in complex V activity, the ATPase required for ATP generation by oxidative phosphorylation, 
potentially results in increased mitochondrial reactive oxygen species production (through electron 
buildup in complexes I-IV) and decreased ATP generation.  Consistent with this, we have measured 
increased mitochondrial ROS generation in SCD platelets compared to healthy controls (Fig 9A-C).
Mitochondrial dysfunction in SCD patients can be mimicked by oxidative stress.  To determine whether 
oxidative stress causes mitochondrial dysfunction in mitochondria of SCD patients, healthy human 
platelets were exposed to free hemoglobin in vitro, a generator of oxidants through auto-oxidation of 
heme.  Free hemoglobin (100uM) caused a decrease in mitochondrial complex V activity, which was 
prevented when an antioxidant (TEMPOL; 250uM) was included in the incubation (Figure 10).
Collectively, these data suggest that platelets from SCD patients manifest mitochondrial dysfunction that 
is potentially propagated by oxidative stress. Information on ADMA and mitochondrial dysfunction will 
also provide insight into these 2 overlapping mechanisms.
*Blood volume obtained from children with SCD may sometimes vary due to difficult IV access.  Studies
run for research labs will be prioritized to arginine metabolome. Additional secondary tests will be 
analyzed based on available blood sample. Use of discarded samples saved up to 72 hours will also be 
used to run research specified labs only if needed.
PARTICIPANT SELECTION
The research coordinator/study team will review the ED track board and daily admission logs, and 
approach patients for enrollment who meet the following inclusion criteria:
Inclusion Criteria

Established diagnosis of sickle cell disease (all SCD genotypes)

Age 3-21 years of age

Pain requiring medical care in an acute care setting (ED, hospital ward, day hospital, clinic)


16
Protocol Version: 12/23/2020
not attributable to non-sickle cell causes, that is moderate-to-severe treated with parenteral 
opioids
Exclusion Criteria

Decision to discharge home from acute care setting.

Hemoglobin less than 5 gm/dL or immediate need for red cell transfusion anticipated within
the next 12 hours.

Hepatic dysfunction:  SGPT (ALT) > 3X upper value

Renal dysfunction: Creatinine >1.0

Mental status or neurological changes

Acute stroke or clinical concern for stroke

Pregnancy

Allergy to arginine

Two (2) or more ED visits within the last 7 days prior to CURRENT ED visit

Hospital discharge < 14 days   prior to presentation to ER.

Previous randomization in this arginine RCT (patient consented and screen failed before
receiving study drug or placebo remains eligible for future participation).

Patient refusal

Use of inhaled nitric oxide, sildenafil or arginine within the last month

Acidosis with CO2 ≤ 16

Hypotension requiring treatment with clinical intervention

Not an appropriate candidate in the investigator’s judgement

Newly started on HU for < 3 months

PICU admission from the emergency department
Patients will be given or sent electronically a standard consent form prior to study enrollment approved 
by the institutional review board (IRB). This consent form will provide a brief summary of the study 
protocol and will provide families with contact information for the principle investigator and IRB 
personnel should they have any questions/concerns about the study. Both informed parental consent 
and patient assent, where appropriate, will be obtained electronically, and when appropriate a paper 
consent can be obtained. A copy of the consent and assent, where appropriate, will be placed in the 
patient’s medical chart. If a copy of the consent form is sent electronically to a patient, this will be sent 
either via REDCap or via encrypted email, as such the patient’s electronic mailing address will be 
captured. 
A study binder will be kept by the research coordinator/enrollers that will record the names and unique 
identification code of each patient approached for enrollment in an enrollment log. The names and 
demographic information (age, gender, Hb-genotype) of those who were approached and decline 
enrollment  and the reason for declining (if known) will be recorded as approached/not enrolled.  Age, 
gender and Hb-genotype information on patients screened by the study team/coordinator but found to 
be not eligible will also be collected.  All study binders will be kept in a locked cabinet in the research 
office of the PED or Aflac coordinators and electronic files with any private health information (PHI) will 
be kept in a password protected CHOA supported division sharepoint site that is backed up nightly.  Only 
members of the study team will have access to the study folder.   
Randomization and Arginine/Placebo Administration
Arginine/Placebo will be administered in a blinded fashion.  Using randomization lists prepared by the 


17
Protocol Version: 12/23/2020
research pharmacist, the research pharmacist at Egleston Children's Hospital will perform a block 
randomization for all CHOA sites, and study drug will be allocated to the patient TID until discharge. 
Randomization will be stratified for hydroxyurea use to insure an equal number of patients on HU in all 
arms to minimize this as a potential confounder.  The patient, nurses, and physicians caring for the 
patient will be blinded as to which medication the patient is receiving. 
 Once written informed consent is obtained, and eligibility is confirmed by study staff, children and 
adolescents age 3-21 years will be randomized to one of following three study arms:
1)
Standard L-arginine dose (100mg/kg IV TID)
2)
One-time L-arginine loading dose (200mg/kg IV) plus the standard dose (100mg/kg IV TID)
3)
Placebo (normal saline 1-2 ml/kg IV TID)
Upon enrolment, the patient’s medical record is reviewed for CMP and creatinine testing in the past 
month in the past 12 months.  

If there are no measurements within the past 12 months or if either SGPT/ALT or creatinine
were elevated in the past 12 months (meeting exclusion criteria), the current CMP results must
be reviewed prior to dose administration. (Patient may be randomized; however, delivery of
study drug should be held until CMP results are reviewed and no exclusion criteria are noted).

If CMP and creatinine levels were normal enough to not meet exclusion criteria in the past 12
months, the patient can receive the first dose of study drug and the CMP and creatinine labs
reviewed when available.

Patients with a CMP after randomization that meet exclusion criteria will have study drug
stopped for toxicity monitoring.  With an intention-to-treat analysis, these patients will remain
on study.  Blood analysis and exhaled NOx measurements will continue per protocol, but
arginine/placebo supplementation will be terminated.
Administration of Analgesics to Study Patients
Patient Controlled Analgesia (PCA) devices will be used in admitted patients whenever possible according 
to standard practice at CHOA.  Intravenous ketorolac, oral NSAIDS and oral opioids with acetaminophen 
may be used in addition to parenteral opioids.  Intranasal fentanyl may be administered at presentation 
in the ED per protocol. Dosing of the PCA will follow a standard protocol of pain management established 
by the Aflac sickle cell center. 
Monitoring During Study
Patients will be identified from the over 1400 ED SCD patient visits/year for VOE in children followed by 
the staff at the Aflac Sickle Cell Center of CHOA/Emory University School of Medical. They will be examined 
daily by the clinical team and will undergo routine vital signs including blood pressure per clinical protocol. 
A chart review will be performed, and pertinent data extracted. A pain score will be obtained and recorded 
daily (at least 3 times a day, once per shift) and at time of discharge. Standard of care pain scores will be 
utilized.  A symptom questionnaire to assess for potential side effects of arginine will be completed daily 
by the study coordinator (see appendix).  Information for the symptom’s questionnaire evaluating for 
potential adverse events should be obtained by direct questioning of the patient/family in addition to the 
medical record.  Use of parenteral narcotics will be documented every shift by nursing staff per standard 
protocol and will include narcotics delivered by the PCA device as well as any additional intravenous, 
intranasal and/or oral opioids used. Data on total daily opioid use will be collected by study team 
coordinator.   


18
Protocol Version: 12/23/2020
 Laboratory monitoring will be undertaken according to the schedule below:
DAY 0
DAY 1
Day 7/Discharge*
CBC with retic count (SOC)
X
X
X
Comprehensive metabolic panel
X
X
X
Urinalysis for protein (urine to Brown lab)
X
X
X
BHCG (girls > 12 yrs)
X
RESEARCH LABS 
See Specific Aim 3
Arginine Metabolome
X
X
X
X
X
Total research Blood draw/day < 20 cc (less than 2 tablespoons)
Day 0 pre-study drug delivery and Day 1 is the first day >12 hours after study drug initiation. If routine 
daily labs occur within < 12 hours of the first study drug dose, day 1 labs may be rescheduled to the 
following day. *Discharge bloodwork will be obtained on Day 7 of arginine therapy for prolonged 
admissions AND day of discharge. Day 7 is the day that the last dose # 21 will be given for patients who 
have not yet been discharged. Discharge labs may be obtained with routine daily blood draw whenever 
possible and may be drawn on days when the research and clinical team suspect the patient may be 
discharged, to avoid multiple venipuncture. In the event the patient is not discharged on that date, 
discharge labs should be drawn again prior to discharge.  Tests may be run on discarded samples saved up 
to 72 hours if needed.
Toxicity Monitoring/ Study Drug Stopping Rules
Patients will be removed from the study if they meet the following criteria:
1)
Neurological dysfunction or development of stroke while on protocol
2)
Increase in SGPT to > 6X ULN value
3)
Increase in creatinine to >3X value at study entry or >2.0
4)
Allergic reaction to study medication
5)
Patient’s request
6)
Acidosis with CO2 ≤ 16
7)
Hypotension requiring treatment with clinical intervention
8)
Concern by study team and sickle cell clinical team that a serious adverse event is related to
study drug
Data from patients removed from the study will be collected and analyzed for potential side effects or 
toxicities of arginine.  Blood analysis and exhaled NOx measurements will continue per protocol, but 
arginine/placebo supplementation will be terminated. Patients who ALT values increased >6X ULN, the 
ALT will be monitored daily with a study CMP until the values are no longer increasing, then once weekly 
or until patient is clinically stable for discharge, whichever is first. 
ACS severity definition
ACS is defined as a new pulmonary infiltrate associated with fever, chest pain or respiratory symptoms. 
ACS is a clinical diagnosis and will be determined based on discharge diagnosis by the hematology team. 
Severity of ACS for the purposes of this study will be defined as mild, moderate or severe based on the 


19
Protocol Version: 12/23/2020
criteria below, based on a definition created for other trials in SCD.

Mild: +CXR with no oxygen use or transfusion required

Moderate: +CXR associated with oxygen use or rbc transfusion

Severe: +CXR and PICU transfer, intubation, and/or death
Study Compensation
Each consent participant will receive $30 after randomization and completion of at least 1 study drug 
infusion and a second $30 if they complete the discharge study requirements. Patients that do not 
complete the entire study will be paid for the days they have completed. Each participant will receive a 
total of $60, if all study requirements are completed.
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
Over a 1-year period, >1400 visits to CHOA EDs were recorded for children with SCD presenting for acute 
management of VOE. Over 500 of these visits through 2012 occurred between the hours of 7am and 3pm. 
Therefore, there is more than sufficient access to an eligible patient population due to the large volume 
of patients receiving care at the Aflac sickle cell center and its associated pediatric emergency 
departments. 
The primary goal of this analysis is to compare the standard arginine treatment with placebo.  The power 
analysis is based on this comparison. This sample size calculation is based on a two-sample two-sided t-
test, with the objective of detecting a 55% reduction in opioid use from its mean value (4.1) in the placebo 
group based on the preliminary data generated from the recent Morris arginine trial (1).  Based on these 
findings, the standard deviations are 2.0 and 4.1 (days) in the arginine and the placebo groups, 
respectively. A sample size of 33 subjects per group has 80% power to detect the treatment effect stated 
above on a two-sided test at the 0.05 significance level.  A secondary goal is to compare the other arginine 
treatment arm (with a loading dose) to the placebo arm. Finally the two arginine treatments will be 
compared to determine if there is any difference or trend towards a difference when a loading dose is 
used that is superior to the standard arginine dose used with success in prior studies. Based on past 
experiences with arginine therapy, few patients withdrew from the study after the therapy was switched 
from oral to parenteral. Up to 150 patients will be enrolled, allowing for screen failures and study 
withdrawal, in order to insure randomization and study completion of 108 patients (36 per group) allowing 
for a 7% withdrawal rate. We did not adjust the sample size calculations for multiple comparisons as the 
power calculation only corresponds to the primary goal involving a single comparison of patients receiving 
the standard treatment or the placebo. We anticipate that the "loading dose" arm will be either the same 
or better than the standard dose. We will evaluate the efficacy and safety of this loading dose compared 
to the placebo group.
Each of the comparisons mentioned above will be conducted via a general linear model analysis. 
Predictors will include the treatment indicator, use of HU, age group, gender and the interactions of each 
of the last three covariates with the treatment indicator. By including interactions in the model we will be 
able to determine whether the treatment effect varies across subgroups of patients.  
Assistance with statistical analysis and power calculation was provided by the Department of Biostatistics 
and Bioinformatics at the Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, by Professor Michael Haber 
PhD, who will be the biostatistical consultant on this project.


20
Protocol Version: 12/23/2020
Sample size power analysis for LOS as outcome: Goal for a future phase 3 RCT
This proposal will help provide more accurate data to generate a sample size power analysis for decreased 
LOS as the primary outcome measure in a multi-center Phase 3 RCT in the future.
If the true difference (based on the Morris et al (1)) between groups were 17 hours for LOS, n=150 subjects 
would be required in each group to have 80% power to detect a difference, assuming a 5% type 1 error 
rate and estimated standard deviation of ~ 50 hours.  Given > 20 hour delay in administration of study 
drug from time from ED presentation for most patients in the Morris study (1), study drug administration 
within < 12 hours of ED presentation (ideally < 4 hours) will improve our power to detect a difference in 
LOS, likely requiring a smaller sample size. See below calculations and Figure 11. If the true decrease in 
LOS were closer to 24 hours (theoretically achievable with the elimination of delay in study drug delivery), 
a sample size of 76 patients in each group (n=152 total) is needed, approximately half the size required 
based on our current data. This proposed study is therefore a sound investment to insure the best design 
for a future phase 3 trial that will advance this orphan drug towards FDA regulatory approval. 
Two-Sample T-Test Power Analysis
Numeric Results for Two-Sample T-Test
Null Hypothesis: Mean1=Mean2. Alternative Hypothesis: Mean1≠Mean2
The standard deviations were assumed to be unknown and unequal.
Allocation
Power
N1
N2
Ratio
Alpha
Beta
Mean1
Mean2
S1
S2
0.80251
150
150
1.000
0.05000
0.19749
0.0
17.0
43.0
60.0
0.80277
134
134
1.000
0.05000
0.19723
0.0
18.0
43.0
60.0
0.80154
120
120
1.000
0.05000
0.19846
0.0
19.0
43.0
60.0
0.80007
108
108
1.000
0.05000
0.19993
0.0
20.0
43.0
60.0
0.80385
99
99
1.000
0.05000
0.19615
0.0
21.0
43.0
60.0
0.80254
90
90
1.000
0.05000
0.19746
0.0
22.0
43.0
60.0
0.80045
82
82
1.000
0.05000
0.19955
0.0
23.0
43.0
60.0
0.80361
76
76
1.000
0.05000
0.19639
0.0
24.0
43.0
60.0
Power Analysis Summary Statements
Group sample sizes of 150 and 150 achieve 80% power to detect a difference of -17.0 between the
null hypothesis that both group means are 0.0 and the alternative hypothesis that the mean of
group 2 is 17.0 with estimated group standard deviations of 43.0 and 60.0 and with a
significance level (alpha) of 0.05000 using a two-sided two-sample t-test.
Site Monitoring Plan
The study coordinator will notify the Principle Investigator (PI) of all adverse effects. The PI will review 
the Adverse and Serious Adverse Event reports within 24 hours of being reported.  All Serious Event 
Reports linked to study drug will be submitted to the FDA within the required time frame and the IRB 
will be notified per protocol. Summaries of all Adverse Event Reports will be provided to the FDA 
quarterly and IRB annually. After the occurrence of 2 Serious Adverse Events related to study 
medication, the study will be halted until a modification in design can be considered and submitted for 
IRB and DSMB PCRC Advisory board approval before continuing the study.
Data Safety Monitoring Plan


21
Protocol Version: 12/23/2020
An Independent Data Safety Monitoring board, which is a group of experts not connected to the study, 
will be reviewing the data from this research throughout the study. Participants will be informed about 
new information from this or other studies that may affect their health, welfare, or willingness to stay in 
the study.   The study Principle Investigator (PI) will review the Adverse and Serious Adverse Event 
reports within 24 hours.  All Serious Event Reports linked to study drug will be submitted to the FDA 
within 24 hours and the IRB will be notified per protocol. Summaries of all Adverse Event Reports will be 
provided to the FDA quarterly, and IRB annually. After the occurrence of 2 Serious Adverse Events 
related to study medication, the study will be halted until a modification in design can be considered 
and submitted for IRB and DSMB Advisory board approval before continuing the study.  A Data Safety 
Monitoring Board will be established from individuals not involved in this project, consisting of 1 
pediatric hematologists from the Aflac Sickle Cell Center, one pediatric emergency medicine physician 
from Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, one individual with SCD expertise and past DSMB experience from 
outside Emory, and one biostatistician to be identified from the Data Coordinating Center. Drs. Clint 
Joiner MD, PhD, Director of Hematology, Aflac Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Emory University 
School of Medicine, Harold Simon MD, MBA, Marcus Professor and Vice Chair, Department of Pediatrics, 
Emory University School of Medicine, and Elizabeth Klings MD, Associate Professor of Medicine, Director 
of the Pulmonary Hypertension Program, Boston Medical Center, Boson University School of Medicine, 
have all committed to participation in the DSMB. The DCC biostatistician will be Curtis Travers MPH from 
the Emory Department of Pediatrics. The arginine arms of this study will be performed under an active 
IND for arginine therapy in sickle cell disease held by Dr. Morris amended to reflect this study design.  
Adverse Events
Adverse Event Definition
As defined by the International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) E-6 Guidelines for Good Clinical 
Practice, an adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence in a subject administered an 
investigational product and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment.  An 
AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), 
symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of an investigational product, whether or not 
related to the investigational treatment.
In this study collection of adverse events will begin at the time informed consent is obtained in the ED at 
the time they present for a pain crisis.
Pre-existing conditions which worsen during a study are to be reported as AEs.
Adverse Event Assessment
Adverse events should be assessed for intensity, relationship to the investigational product, 
expectedness, and seriousness.  The investigator team is responsible for the assessment of all adverse 
events.  During the clinical trial all adverse events will be reported on the AE eCRF.  
Intensity
Intensity will be graded as mild, moderate, severe, or life-threatening as defined below:

Mild:  Discomfort noticed but no disruption of normal daily activity

Moderate:  Discomfort such that normal daily activity is affected

Severe:  Inability to work or perform normal daily activity


22
Protocol Version: 12/23/2020

Life Threatening:  Represents an immediate threat to life
The term severe relates to the intensity of the adverse event.  An event may be assessed as “severe” but 
not meet the criteria for a Serious Adverse Event as outlined in Section on Seriousness, below.
Relationship to Study Treatment / Procedures
Relationship to investigational product refers to the cause of the event and will be assessed using the 
following scale:

Definitely Related:  Event clearly related to investigational product.

Probably Related:  Event is likely to be related to the investigational
product.

Possibly Related:  Event is unlikely or doubtful to be related to the
investigational product.

Not Related: Clearly not related to the investigational product.
Expectedness of Adverse Event
All adverse events will be evaluated as to whether their occurrence was expected (anticipated) or 
unexpected (unanticipated). 
Unexpected:  
An unexpected adverse event or adverse treatment reaction is one for which the nature 
or intensity is not consistent with either:

Known information associated with the procedures and described in the
protocol, consent form, or product brochure, and other relevant sources of
information, or

The expected natural progression of any underlying disease, disorder, or
condition of the subject(s) experiencing the adverse event and the subject’s
predisposing risk factor profile for the adverse event.
Expected:  
An event is considered expected if it is known to be associated with the study treatment 
or the expected natural progression of the subjects’ underlying disease or condition.
Expected events related to opioid administration include the following:
Table 1. Expected Adverse Events Related to Opioid Administration
Anorexia
Headache
Apnea
Hypotension
Biliary tract pressure
Miosis
Blurred vision
Nausea
Bradycardia
Palpatations
Bruising
Pruritus
Cardiac arrest
Rash
Confusion
Respiratory arrest
Cramps
Respiratory depression
Diaphoresis
Sedation
Diplopia
Shock
Dizziness
Tinnitus


23
Protocol Version: 12/23/2020
Drowsiness
Urinary retention
Euphoria
Urticaria
Flushing
Vomiting
Expected events related to sickle cell disease progression include the following:
Table 2.   Expected Adverse Events Related to Sickle Cell Disease Progression 
Acute chest syndrome
Jaundice
Angioedema
Leukocytosis
Aplastic crisis
Meningitis
Aplastic crisis/anemia
Metabolic acidosis
Arthralgia
Osteomyelitis
Appendicitis
Pyleonephritis
Bone Infarction
Pain, joint
Cardiomegaly
Pain, long bone
Cerebrovascular accident
Pain, severe abdominal
Cholecystitis, hepatic sequestration
Priapisim
Cranial nerve palsy
Pulmonary embolism
Decreased kidney function
Pulmonary hypertension
Decreased lung function
Pulmonary parenchymal infiltrates on  CXR
Delayed growth/puberty
Pneumonia
Depresses ESR
Rhabdomyolysis
Fever
Renal Failure
Headache
Renal Insufficiency/albuminuria
Hematuria
Renal papillary necrosis
Hemiplegia
Reticulocytosis (10%-20%)
Hemolysis
Retinal disease
Hepato/splenomegaly
Retinal hemorrhage
Hyperplastic bone marrow
Skin ulcers
Hyposthenuria
Splenic sequestration
Hypoxia (PO2 < 85 mm Hg)
Stroke
Hyperkalemia
Sepsis
Hypotension
Upper respiratory infection
Infection, pneumococcal
Urinary tract infection
Seriousness
An adverse event is considered serious if it meets at least one of the following criteria:

Results in death; (Note: Death is an outcome not an event).

Is life-threatening (places the subject at immediate risk of death from the event as it
occurred);

Results in inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization;

Results in a persistent or significant disability/incapacity;

Results in a congenital anomaly/birth defect; or

Based upon appropriate medical judgment, is medically significant or requires
intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above.


24
Protocol Version: 12/23/2020
Adverse events meeting the SAE criteria listed above will be assessed as to intensity, relationship to the 
investigational product and expectedness as outlined in Section F.2.2.
Reporting of Serious Adverse Events
Any serious adverse event occurring within the course of the clinical trial related or probably related to 
study drug must be reported to the DCC within one working day of the investigator learning of the event.  
The investigator team is responsible for notifying the local Ethics Committee/IRB of a SAE in writing as 
soon as possible and in compliance with local and international laws and regulations.  
This study adheres to the definition and reporting requirements of ICH Guidelines for Safety, Data 
Management, Definitions and Standards for Expedited Reporting, Topic E2.  Complete information can be 
found in the Manual of Procedures.
Outcome of Adverse Events (AE) 
Every AE must be followed to a definitive outcome or stabilization of the event, even when this requires 
a time period beyond the scope of the study (this is particularly applicable to serious adverse events 
(SAEs)).  
Outcome is defined as information on recovery and any sequelae; what specific tests and/or treatment 
may have been required and their results.  For a fatal outcome, cause of death and a comment on its 
possible relationship to the suspected reaction should be provided.   
The terms used to define outcome are as follows (outcome of reaction/event at the time of last 
observation): 
• Ongoing
• Resolved without sequelae
• Resolved with sequelae
• Death
Actions taken in response to an AE and follow-up results must be recorded in the subject’s medical record 
(this includes follow-up laboratory results).  Any treatment administered for the adverse event must be 
recorded in the subject’s electronic case report form (eCRF).  When subjects are discontinued from the 
study due to an AE, relevant clinical assessments and laboratory tests will be repeated as necessary until 
final resolution or stabilization occurs. 
Post-Study Procedures for Adverse Events
All adverse events unresolved at the time of the subject's termination from the study will be followed by 
the investigators until the events are resolved, the subject is lost to follow-up, or the adverse event is 
otherwise explained or has stabilized.  Any death or other clinically serious adverse event that may be 
related to the study treatment and that occurs at any time after a subject has discontinued study 
treatment or terminated study participation will be reported.
PHARMACEUTICAL INFORMATION


25
Protocol Version: 12/23/2020
See drug label insert (attachment).
References
1.
Morris CR, Kuypers FA, Lavrisha L, Ansari M, Sweeters N, Stewart M, et al. A randomized,
placebo-controlled trial of arginine therapy for the treatment of children with sickle cell disease 
hospitalized with vaso-occlusive pain episodes. Haematologica. 2013 Sep;98(9):1375-82.
2.
Morris CR, Kato GJ, Poljakovic M, Wang X, Blackwelder WC, V S, et al. Dysregulated
arginine metabolism, hemolysis-associated pulmonary hypertension and mortality in sickle cell 
disease. JAMA. 2005;294:81-90.
3.
Morris CR. Mechanisms of vasculopathy in sickle cell disease and thalassemia.
Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2008;2008:177-85.
4.
Morris CR, Kuypers FA, Larkin S, Vichinsky E, Styles L. Patterns of arginine and nitric
oxide in sickle cell disease patients with vaso-occlusive crisis and acute chest syndrome. J Pediatr 
Hematol Oncol. 2000;22:515-20.
5.
Morris CR, Kuypers FA, Larkin S, Sweeter N, Simon J, Vichinsky EP, et al. Arginine
therapy:  A novel strategy to increase nitric oxide production in sickle cell disease. Brit J Haematol. 
2000;111:498-500.
6.
Morris CR, Morris SM, Jr., Hagar W, van Warmerdam J, Claster S, Kepka-Lenhart K, et
al. Arginine Therapy:  A new treatment for pulmonary hypertension in sickle cell disease? Am J 
Respir Crit Care Med. 2003;168:63-9.
7.
Hassell KL. Population estimates of sickle cell disease in the U.S. Am J Prev Med. 2010
Apr;38(4 Suppl):S512-21.
8.
Brousseau DC, Owens PL, Mosso AL, Panepinto JA, Steiner CA. Acute care utilization
and rehospitalizations for sickle cell disease. JAMA.  Apr 7;303(13):1288-94.
9.
Lopez B, Kreshak A, Morris CR, Davis-Moon L, Ballas S, Ma X. L-arginine levels are
diminished in adult acute vaso-occlusive sickle cell crisis in the emergency department. Br J 
Haematol. 2003;120:532-4.
10.
Morris CR. Role of arginase in sickle cell lung disease and hemolytic anemias. The open
nitric oxide journal. 2010;2:41-54.
11.
Morris CR, Gladwin MT, Kato G. Nitric oxide and arginine dysregulation: A novel pathway
to pulmonary hypertension in hemolytic disorders. Curr Mol Med. 2008;8:81-90.
12.
Romero J, Suzuka S, Nagel R, Fabry M. Arginine supplementation of sickle transgenic
mice reduces red cell density and Gardos channel activity. Blood. 2002;99:1103-8.
13.
Romero J, Susuka S, Nagel R, Fabry M, editors. Arginine supplementation of sickle
transgenic mice leads to a decrease in red cell density and CA2+ - activated K+ channel activity. 
25th Annual Meeting of the National Sickle Cell Disease Program; 2001 April 14-17; New York 
City.
14.
Sinden RE, Barker GC, Paton MJ, Fleck SL, Butcher GA, Waters A, et al. Factors
regulating natural transmission of Plasmodium berghei to the mosquito vector, and the cloning of 
a transmission-blocking immunogen. Parassitologia. 1993 Jul;35 Suppl:107-12.
15.
Dasgupta T, Hebbel RP, Kaul DK. Protective effect of arginine on oxidative stress in
transgenic sickle mouse models. Free Radic Biol Med. 2006 Dec 15;41(12):1771-80.
16.
Kaul DK, Zhang X, Dasgupta T, Fabry ME. Arginine therapy of transgenic-knockout sickle
mice improves microvascular function by reducing non-nitric oxide vasodilators, hemolysis, and 
oxidative stress. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2008 Jul;295(1):H39-47.
17.
Hsu LL, Champion HC, Campbell-Lee SA, Bivalacqua TJ, Manci EA, Diwan BA, et al.
Hemolysis in sickle cell mice causes pulmonary hypertension due to global impairment in nitric 
oxide bioavailability. Blood. 2007;109:3088-98.


26
Protocol Version: 12/23/2020
18.
Little JA, Hauser KP, Martyr SE, Harris A, Maric I, Morris CR, et al. Hematologic,
biochemical, and cardiopulmonary effects of L-arginine supplementation or phosphodiesterase 5 
inhibition in patients with sickle cell disease who are on hydroxyurea therapy. Eur J Haematol. 
2009 Apr;82(4):315-21.
19.
Archer DR, Stiles JK, Newman GW, Quarshie A, Hsu LL, Sayavongsa P, et al. C-reactive
protein and interleukin-6 are decreased in transgenic sickle cell mice fed a high protein diet. J 
Nutr. 2008 Jun;138(6):1148-52.
20.
Gornik HL, Creager MA. Arginine and endothelial and vascular health. J Nutr. 2004
Oct;134(10 Suppl):2880S-7S; discussion 95S.
21.
Moncada S, Higgs A. The L-arginine-nitric oxide pathway. N Engl J Med. 1993;329:2002-
12.
22.
Kaul DK, Liu XD, Fabry ME, Nagel RL. Impaired nitric oxide-mediated vasodilation in
transgenic sickle mouse. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2000;278:H1799-806.
23.
Aslan M, Ryan T, Adler B, Townes T, Parks D, Thompson J, et al. Oxygen radical inhibition
of nitric oxide-dependent vascular function in sickle cell disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 
2001;98:15215-20.
24.
Reiter CD, Gladwin MT. An emerging role for nitric oxide in sickle cell disease vascular
homeostatis and therapy. Curr Opin Hematol. 2003;10:99-107.
25.
Gladwin MT, Kato GJ. Cardiopulmonary complications of sickle cell disease: role of nitric
oxide and hemolytic anemia. Hematology (Am Soc Hematol Educ Program). 2005:51-7.
26.
Mack AK, Kato GJ. Sickle cell disease and nitric oxide: A paradigm shift? Int J Biochem
Cell Biol. 2006 Aug;38(8):1237-43.
27.
Wood KC, Hsu LL, Gladwin MT. Sickle cell disease vasculopathy: a state of nitric oxide
resistance. Free Radic Biol Med. 2008 Apr 15;44(8):1506-28.
28.
Yetik-Anacak G, Catravas JD. Nitric oxide and the endothelium: history and impact on
cardiovascular disease. Vascul Pharmacol. 2006 Nov;45(5):268-76.
29.
Reiter C, Wang X, Tanus-Santos J, Hogg N, Cannon R, Schechter A, et al. Cell-free
hemoglobin limits nitric oxide bioavailability in sickle cell disease. Nat Med. 2002;8:1383-9.
30.
Aslan M, Freeman BA. Oxidant-mediated impairment of nitric oxide signaling in sickle cell
disease--mechanisms and consequences. Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand). 2004 Feb;50(1):95-105.
31.
Enwonwu CO. Increased metabolic demand for arginine in sickle cell anaemia. Med Sci
Res. 1989;17:997-8.
32.
Morris CR, Hagar W, van Warmerdam J, Kuypers F, Larkin S, Claster S, et al. Arginine
Therapy:  A New Treatment for Pulmonary Hypertension in Sickle Cell Disease? Blood. 
2000;96:485a (abstr 2088, suppl. 1).
33.
Morris CR. New Strategies for the Treatment of Pulmonary Hypertension in Sickle Cell
Disease : The Rationale for Arginine Therapy. Treat Respir Med. 2006;5(1):31-45.
34.
Waugh W, Daeschner C, Files B, Gordon D. Evidence that L-arginine is a key amino acid
in sickle cell anemia - a preliminary report. Nutritional Research. 1999;19:501-18.
35.
Schnog JB, Teerlink T, van der Dijs FP, Duits AJ, Muskiet FA. Plasma levels of asymmetric
dimethylarginine (ADMA), an endogenous nitric oxide synthase inhibitor, are elevated in sickle 
cell disease. Ann Hematol. 2005 May;84(5):282-6.
36.
Landburg PP, Teerlink T, Muskiet FA, Duits AJ, Schnog JJ. Plasma concentrations of
asymmetric dimethylarginine, an endogenous nitric oxide synthase inhibitor, are elevated in sickle 
cell patients but do not increase further during painful crisis. Am J Hematol. 2008 Jul;83(7):577-
9.
37.
Kato GJ, Wang Z, Machado RF, Blackwelder WC, Taylor JGt, Hazen SL. Endogenous
nitric oxide synthase inhibitors in sickle cell disease: abnormal levels and correlations with 
pulmonary hypertension, desaturation, haemolysis, organ dysfunction and death. Br J Haematol. 
2009 May;145(4):506-13.


27
Protocol Version: 12/23/2020
38.
Vallance P. The asymmetrical dimethylarginine/dimethylarginine dimethylaminohydrolase 
pathway in the regulation of nitric oxide generation. Clin Sci. 2001;100:159-60.
39.
Hebbel RP. Auto-oxidation and a membrane-associated 'Fenton reagent': a possible 
explanation for development of membrane lesions in sickle erythrocytes. Clin Haematol. 
1985;14(1):129-40.
40.
Morris CR, Suh JH, Hagar W, Larkin S, Bland DA, Steinberg MH, et al. Erythrocyte 
Glutamine Depletion, Altered Redox Environment, and Pulmonary Hypertension in Sickle Cell 
Disease. Blood. 2008;140:104-12
41.
Gladwin MT, Kato GJ, Weiner D, Onyekwere OC, Dampier C, Hsu L, et al. Nitric oxide for 
inhalation in the acute treatment of sickle cell pain crisis: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 
2011 Mar 2;305(9):893-902.
42.
Berka V, Yeh HC, Gao D, Kiran F, Tsai AL. Redox function of tetrahydrobiopterin and 
effect of L-arginine on oxygen binding in endothelial nitric oxide synthase. Biochemistry. 2004 Oct 
19;43(41):13137-48.
43.
Wood KC, Hebbel RP, Lefer DJ, Granger DN. Critical role of endothelial cell-derived nitric 
oxide synthase in sickle cell disease-induced microvascular dysfunction. Free Radic Biol Med. 
2006 Apr 15;40(8):1443-53.
44.
Machado RF, Barst RJ, Yovetich NA, Hassell KL, Kato GJ, Gordeuk VR, et al. 
Hospitalization for pain in patients with sickle cell disease treated with sildenafil for elevated TRV 
and low exercise capacity. Blood. 2011 Jul 28;118(4):855-64.
45.
Tang WHW, Wang Z, Cho L, Brennan DM, Hanzen SL. Diminished global arginine 
bioavailability and increased arginine catabolism as metabolic profile of increased cardiovascular 
risk. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2009;53(22):2061-7.
46.
Omodeo-Sale F, Cortelezzi L, Vommaro Z, Scaccabarozzi D, Dondorp AM. Dysregulation 
of L-arginine metabolism and bioavailability associated to free plasma heme. Am J Physiol Cell 
Physiol. 2010 Jul;299(1):C148-54.
47.
Morris CR, Teehankee C, Kato G, Gardner J, McGlothlin D, Malloy M, et al., editors. 
Decreased arginine bioavailability contributes to the pathogenesis of pulmonary artery 
hypertension. American College of Cardiology Annual Meeting; 2005 March 6-9; Orlando, Florida.
48.
Sher GD, Olivieri NG. Rapid healing of leg ulcers during arginine butyrate therapy in 
patients with sickle cell disease and thalassemia. Blood. 1994;84:2378-80.
49.
Morris CR, Vichinsky EP, van Warmerdam J, Machado L, Kepka-Lenhart D, Morris SM, 
Jr., et al. Hydroxyurea and arginine therapy: impact on nitric oxide production in sickle cell 
disease. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2003;25:629-34.
50.
Morris CR. Reduced global arginine bioavailability: A common mechanism of 
vasculopathy 
in 
sickle 
cell 
disease 
and 
pulmonary 
hypertension. 
. 
Blood. 
2010;http://bloodjournal.hematologylibrary.org/cgi/eletters/blood-2010-02-268193v1 
[e-letter] 
Aprile 22, 2010.
51.
Maxwell AJ, Cooke JP. Cardiovascular effects of L-arginine. Current Opinion in 
Nephrology and Hypertension. 1998;7:63-70.
52.
Merimee TJ, Rabinowitz D, Riggs L, A. BJ, Rimoin DL, McKusick VA. Plasma growth 
hormone after arginine infusion. N Engl J Med. 1967;276:434-9.
53.
Merimee TJ, Rabinowitz D, Fineberg S. Arginine-initiated release of human growth 
hormone. N Engl J Med. 1969;28-:1434-8.
54.
Vichinsky E, Williams R, Das M, Earles AN, Lewis N, Adler A, et al. Pulmonary fat 
embolism: a distinct cause of severe acute chest syndrome in sickle cell anemia. Blood. 
1994;83(11):3107-12.
55.
Vichinsky EP, Styles LA, Colangelo LH, Wright EC, Castro O, Nickerson B. Acute chest 
syndrome in sickle cell disease: clinical presentation and course. Cooperative Study of Sickle Cell 
Disease. Blood. 1997;89(5):1787-92.


28
Protocol Version: 12/23/2020
56.
Gladwin MT, Barst RJ, Castro OL, Gordeuk VR, Hillery CA, Kato GJ, et al. Pulmonary 
hypertension and NO in sickle cell. Blood.  Aug 5;116(5):852-4.
57.
Bunn HF, Nathan DG, Dover GJ, Hebbel RP, Platt OS, Rosse WF, et al. Pulmonary 
hypertension and nitric oxide depletion in sickle cell disease. Blood.  Aug 5;116(5):687-92.
58.
Bunn HF. Pathogenesis and treatment of sickle cell disease. N Engl J Med. 1997 Sep 
11;337(11):762-9.
59.
Lanzkron S, Carroll CP, Haywood C, Jr. The burden of emergency department use for 
sickle-cell disease: An analysis of the national emergency department sample database. Am J 
Hematol.  Jun 29.
60.
Platt OS, Thorington BD, Brambilla DJ, Milner PF, Rosse WF, Vichinsky E, et al. Pain in 
sickle cell disease. Rates and risk factors. N Engl J Med. 1991;325(1):11-6.
61.
Bundy DG, Strouse JJ, Casella JF, Miller MR. Urgency of emergency department visits by 
children with sickle cell disease: a comparison of 3 chronic conditions. Acad Pediatr.  Jul-
Aug;11(4):333-41.
62.
Frei-Jones MJ, Baxter AL, Rogers ZR, Buchanan GR. Vaso-occlusive episodes in older 
children with sickle cell disease: emergency department management and pain assessment. J 
Pediatr. 2008 Feb;152(2):281-5.
63.
Yusuf HR, Atrash HK, Grosse SD, Parker CS, Grant AM. Emergency department visits 
made by patients with sickle cell disease: a descriptive study, 1999-2007. Am J Prev Med.  
Apr;38(4 Suppl):S536-41.
64.
Ballas SK. New era dawns on sickle cell pain. Blood.  Jul 22;116(3):311-2.
65.
Kauf TL, Coates TD, Huazhi L, Mody-Patel N, Hartzema AG. The cost of health care for 
children and adults with sickle cell disease. Am J Hematol. 2009 Jun;84(6):323-7.
66.
Haywood C, Jr., Lanzkron S, Ratanawongsa N, Bediako SM, Lattimer L, Powe NR, et al. 
The association of provider communication with trust among adults with sickle cell disease. J Gen 
Intern Med.  Jun;25(6):543-8.
67.
Zempsky WT. Treatment of sickle cell pain: fostering trust and justice. JAMA. 2009 Dec 
9;302(22):2479-80.
68.
Shapiro BS, Benjamin LJ, Payne R, Heidrich G. Sickle cell-related pain: perceptions of 
medical practitioners. J Pain Symptom Manage. 1997 Sep;14(3):168-74.
69.
Aisiku IP, Smith WR, McClish DK, Levenson JL, Penberthy LT, Roseff SD, et al. 
Comparisons of high versus low emergency department utilizers in sickle cell disease. Ann Emerg 
Med. 2009 May;53(5):587-93.
70.
Zempsky WT, Loiselle KA, McKay K, Lee BH, Hagstrom JN, Schechter NL. Do children 
with sickle cell disease receive disparate care for pain in the emergency department? J Emerg 
Med. 2009 Aug 22.
71.
Tamayo-Sarver JH, Hinze SW, Cydulka RK, Baker DW. Racial and ethnic disparities in 
emergency department analgesic prescription. Am J Public Health. 2003 Dec;93(12):2067-73.
72.
Richardson LD, Babcock Irvin C, Tamayo-Sarver JH. Racial and ethnic disparities in the 
clinical practice of emergency medicine. Acad Emerg Med. 2003 Nov;10(11):1184-8.
73.
Fiscella K, Franks P, Gold MR, Clancy CM. Inequality in quality: addressing 
socioeconomic, racial, and ethnic disparities in health care. JAMA. 2000 May 17;283(19):2579-
84.
74.
Lazio MP, Costello HH, Courtney DM, Martinovich Z, Myers R, Zosel A, et al. A 
comparison of analgesic management for emergency department patients with sickle cell disease 
and renal colic. Clin J Pain.  Mar-Apr;26(3):199-205.
75.
Orringer EP, Casella JF, Ataga KI, Koshy M, Adams-Graves P, Luchtman-Jones L, et al. 
Purified poloxamer 188 for treatment of acute vaso-occlusive crisis of sickle cell disease: A 
randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2001 Nov 7;286(17):2099-106.


29
Protocol Version: 12/23/2020
76.
Dweik RA, Boggs PB, Erzurum SC, Irvin CG, Leigh MW, Lundberg JO, et al. An official 
ATS clinical practice guideline: interpretation of exhaled nitric oxide levels (FENO) for clinical 
applications. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011 Sep 1;184(5):602-15.
77.
Sharma S, Kumar S, Sud N, Wiseman DA, Tian J, Rehmani I, et al. Alterations in lung 
arginine metabolism in lambs with pulmonary hypertension associated with increased pulmonary 
blood flow. Vascul Pharmacol. 2009 Nov-Dec;51(5-6):359-64.
78.
Sharma S, Sun X, Kumar S, Rafikov R, Aramburo A, Kalkan G, et al. Preserving 
mitochondrial function prevents the proteasomal degradation of GTP cyclohydrolase I. Free Radic 
Biol Med.  Jul 15;53(2):216-29.
79.
Piatti P, Fragasso G, Monti LD, Setola E, Lucotti P, Fermo I, et al. Acute intravenous L-
arginine infusion decreases endothelin-1 levels and improves endothelial function in patients with 
angina pectoris and normal coronary arteriograms: correlation with asymmetric dimethylarginine 
levels. Circulation. 2003 Jan 28;107(3):429-36.
80.
Hebbel RP, Eaton JW, Balasingam M, Steinberg MH. Spontaneous oxygen radical 
generation by sickle erythrocytes. J Clin Invest. 1982 Dec;70(6):1253-9.
81.
Chakraborty D, Bhattacharyya M. Antioxidant defense status of red blood cells of patients 
with beta-thalassemia and Ebeta-thalassemia. Clin Chim Acta. 2001 Mar;305(1-2):123-9.
82.
Cheng ML, Ho HY, Tseng HC, Lee CH, Shih LY, Chiu DT. Antioxidant deficit and 
enhanced susceptibility to oxidative damage in individuals with different forms of alpha-
thalassaemia. Br J Haematol. 2005 Jan;128(1):119-27.
83.
Reid ME, Badaloo A, Forrester T, Jahoor F. In vivo rates of erythrocyte glutathione 
synthesis in adults with Sickle Cell Disease. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2006 Jan 
24;291:E73-9.
84.
Fujii S, Kaneko T. Selenium, glutathione peroxidase and oxidative hemolysis in sickle cell 
disease. Acta Haematol. 1992;87(1-2):105-6.
85.
Saad S, Salles SI, Velho PE. Decreased reduced glutathione and glutathione reductase 
activity in subjects with hemoglobin C. Nouv Rev Fr Hematol. 1991;33(1):11-4.
86.
Adelekan DA, Thurnham DI, Adekile AD. Reduced antioxidant capacity in paediatric 
patients with homozygous sickle cell disease. Eur J Clin Nutr. 1989 Sep;43(9):609-14.
87.
Varma RN, Mankad VN, Phelps DD, Jenkins LD, Suskind RM. Depressed erythrocyte 
glutathione reductase activity in sickle cell disease. Am J Clin Nutr. 1983 Dec;38(6):884-7.
88.
Wetterstroem N, Brewer GJ, Warth JA, Mitchinson A, Near K. Relationship of glutathione 
levels and Heinz body formation to irreversibly sickled cells in sickle cell anemia. J Lab Clin Med. 
1984 Apr;103(4):589-96.
89.
Griffith OW. Biologic and pharmacologic regulation of mammalian glutathione synthesis. 
Free Radic Biol Med. 1999 Nov;27(9-10):922-35.
90.
Griffith OW. Glutathione turnover in human erythrocytes. Inhibition by buthionine 
sulfoximine and incorporation of glycine by exchange. J Biol Chem. 1981 May 25;256(10):4900-
4.
91.
Lunn G, Dale GL, Beutler E. Transport accounts for glutathione turnover in human 
erythrocytes. Blood. 1979 Jul;54(1):238-44.
92.
Griffith OW, Bridges RJ, Meister A. Formation of gamma-glutamycyst(e)ine in vivo is 
catalyzed by gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 May;78(5):2777-
81.
93.
Wu G, Fang YZ, Yang S, Lupton JR, Turner ND. Glutathione metabolism and its 
implications for health. J Nutr. 2004 Mar;134(3):489-92.
94.
Kato GJ, McGowan V, Machado RF, Little JA, Taylor Jt, Morris CR, et al. Lactate 
dehydrogenase as a biomarker of hemolysis-associated nitric oxide resistance, priapism, leg 
ulceration, pulmonary hypertension, and death in patients with sickle cell disease. Blood. 2006 
Mar 15;107(6):2279-85.


30
Protocol Version: 12/23/2020
95.
Morris CR. Vascular risk assessment in patients with sickle cell disease. Haematologica. 
2011 Jan;96(1):1-5.
96.
Minniti CP, Sable C, Campbell A, Rana S, Ensing G, Dham N, et al. Elevated tricuspid 
regurgitant jet velocity in children and adolescents with sickle cell disease: association with 
hemolysis and hemoglobin oxygen desaturation. Haematologica. 2009 Mar;94(3):340-7.
97.
Suh JH, Moreau R, Heath SH, Hagen TM. Dietary supplementation with (R)-alpha-lipoic 
acid reverses the age-related accumulation of iron and depletion of antioxidants in the rat cerebral 
cortex. Redox Rep. 2005;10(1):52-60.
98.
Brame CJ, Moran MF, McBroom-Cerajewski LD. A mass spectrometry based method for 
distinguishing between symmetrically and asymmetrically dimethylated arginine residues. Rapid 
Commun Mass Spectrom. 2004;18(8):877-81.
99.
Morris SM, Jr. , Kepka-Lenhart D, Chen L. Differential regulation of arginases and 
inducible nitric oxide synthase in murine macrophage cells. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 
1998;275:740-7.
100.
Khan J, Brennan DM, Bradley N, Gao B, Bruckdorfer R, Jacobs M. 3-Nitrotyrosine in the 
proteins of human plasma determinined by an ELISA method. Biochem J. 1998;330:795-801.
101.
Morris CR, Poljakovic M, Lavisha L, Machado L, Kuypers F, Morris SM, Jr. Decreased 
arginine bioavailability and increased arginase activity in asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 
2004;170:148-53.

ICF_001.pdf: 
Version: 6/19/2019 
PHASE 2 RANDOMIZED CONTROL TRIAL OF ARGININE THERAPY FOR PEDIATRIC 
SICKLE CELL DISEASE PAIN 
NCT02536170 
Date: June 19, 2019 
IRB00076988 


Study No.:IRB00076988
Emory University IRB
IRB use only
Document Approved On: «ApproveDate»
Project Approval Expires On: «ExpireDate»
1
  Version Date 06/19/2019
Emory University and Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta
Consent to be a Research Subject and HIPAA Authorization 
Title: Phase 2 Randomized Control Trial of Arginine Therapy for Pediatric Sickle Cell Disease Pain
Principal Investigator: Claudia R Morris, MD,    Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine
Investigator-Sponsor:  Claudia R Morris, MD,   Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine
If you are the legal guardian of a child who is being asked to participate, the term “you” used in this consent refers to 
your child
Introduction
You are being asked to be in a medical research study. This form is designed to tell you everything you need to think 
about before you decide to consent (agree) to be in the study or not to be in the study.  It is entirely your choice.  If you 
decide to take part, you can change your mind later on and withdraw from the research study. The decision to join or 
not join the research study will not cause you to lose any medical benefits.  If you decide not to take part in this study, 
your doctor will continue to treat you.
Before making your decision:
•
Please carefully read this form or have it read to you
•
Please listen to the study doctor or study staff explain the study to you
•
Please ask questions about anything that is not clear
You can take a copy of this consent form, to keep. Feel free to take your time thinking about whether you would like to 
participate. You may wish to discuss your decision with family or friends. Do not sign this consent form unless you have 
had a chance to ask questions and get answers that make sense to you.  By signing this form you will not give up any 
legal rights.
A description of this clinical trial will be available on http://www.ClinicalTrials.gov, as required by U.S. law. This Web site 
will not include information that can identify you. At most the Web site will include a summary of the results. You may 
search this Web site at any time.
Study Overview
Arginine is a simple amino acid that is found in many foods and is part of the proteins in your body. Patients with sickle 
cell disease have low levels of the amino acid arginine and these low levels may be related to pain episodes.  Increasing 
levels of arginine in the blood may lower pain and/or lower the amount of pain medication (like morphine) that is 
needed to treat your pain. It may also decrease the amount of time spent in the hospital.  The aim of this study is to 
determine whether giving extra arginine to patients with sickle cell disease seeking treatment for a pain crisis (vaso-
occlusive painful events (VOE) will decrease pain scores, decrease the need for pain medications or decrease length of 
hospital stay or emergency department visit.  However, arginine is not FDA approved for this use but we think it can be 
helpful when taken during a pain crisis.  We want to learn whether this drug helps children who are having a pain crisis.  
If this study shows that it is effective for these patients, then it may improve how doctors treat sickle cell patients in a 
pain crisis.
IRB00076988
IRB Approved
10/14/2020


Study No.:IRB00076988
Emory University IRB
IRB use only
Document Approved On: «ApproveDate»
Project Approval Expires On: «ExpireDate»
2
  Version Date 06/19/2019
Procedures
Approximately 150 participants will take part in this study at Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta.
If you agree to participate in this study, your participation will last until you are discharged from the hospital and consist 
of the following:
•
You will be asked a screening history and receive a physical exam (this includes a pregnancy test for girls 12 
years and older)
•
You will be asked to give blood samples from your IV or a butterfly catheter will be placed.  We will make every 
effort to collect the blood sample at the time of routine blood draws whenever possible.  We will collect about 
1-2 tablespoons at the following time points:
o
Before study drug is received
o
Within the first 24 hours if admitted to the hospital. 
o
On day 7 if admitted that long, and prior to discharge  
•
You will be asked to breathe into a tube around the same time of your study blood draw and every day of 
hospitalization (to look at nitric oxide - a test for inflammation in their breath).   
•
You will provide a daily urine sample on the days of the study blood draws.
•
You will be randomly assigned to one of the following groups.  This means that you have an equal chance of 
receiving any of the medications or doses listed below:
o
Arm 1: Standard dose (100mg/kg) IV infusion 3 times a day until IV discontinued or discharged
o
Arm 2: A one-time loading dose (200mg/kg) followed by the standard dose (100mg/kg)IV infusion 3 
times a day until IV discontinued or discharged
o
Arm 3: Placebo (normal saline 1-2 ml/kg) IV infusion 3 times a day until IV discontinued or discharged
•
You will be asked questions by the study staff or your doctor about your symptoms daily along with the usual 
pain score questions and fill out a questionnaire about your pain symptoms. 
•
You will have a sticky sensor gently secured to your forehead and/or arm or leg to look at blood flowing to your 
brain or painful arm/leg and blood flow to the arm or leg that doesn’t hurt before study drug is delivered, and 
then after study drug is delivered, for up to 2 hours on the first day, and then for 5-10 minutes daily (20 minutes 
max), when staff is available.  A blood pressure sensor will be secured to your upper arm and fore finger during 
this time.
•
We will look in your medical chart for information related to your health and this study and also to see if you 
returned to the ED for up to 30 days after going home.
Risks and Discomforts 
Arginine both orally and through the IV is safe and usually well tolerated.  Allergic reaction is a risk with any medication, but no 
serious reaction to arginine has been reported when it is used in proper doses.   You may experience common side effects such 
as flushing, headache and nausea intravenous arginine.  There is always a risk of fainting when blood is drawn or development 
of an infection from the blood draw.  You may experience a rare side effect known as priapism (when an erect penis does not 
return to its normal state).  This is a rare side effect has not yet been reported but possible since nitric oxide is possibly involved 
in this mechanism.   The sticky sensor on your forehead or arm/leg to measure blood flow does not hurt but you can ask to 
have it removed at any time.  The only possible discomfort for children with sensitive skin is minor temporary skin irritation 
from contact with the rubber optical sensor on the forehead or arm/leg.  The light used to make the measurements of blood 
flow in the brain is very low in power and is considered to present minimal risk-that is, no more risk than you would encounter 
in everyday life.  There is no known risk for this procedure.  The energy of the light is well below American National Standards 
Institute (ANSI) light levels and in compliance with the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA).  The energy of the 
light used in this test is many times less then energy you would receive from the sun on an outdoor walk on a sunny day.
If you are a female >11 years old: to protect against possible side effects of the study drug, women who are pregnant or 
nursing a child may not take part in this study.  All females older than 11 years will receive a pregnancy test prior to 
randomization or receiving the study drug
IRB00076988
IRB Approved
10/14/2020


Study No.:IRB00076988
Emory University IRB
IRB use only
Document Approved On: «ApproveDate»
Project Approval Expires On: «ExpireDate»
3
  Version Date 06/19/2019
New Information
It is possible that the researchers will learn something new during the study about the risks of being in it.  If this 
happens, they will tell you about it. Then you can decide if you want to continue to be in this study or not.  You may be 
asked to sign a new consent form that includes the new information if you decide to stay in the study.
Benefits 
If you receive arginine, you may have less pain during your current pain crisis, may require less pain medication, and 
may have a shorter hospital stay, or there may be no direct benefit to you from participating in this study.  This trial may 
lead to a new treatment for pain in sickle cell disease, and may also lead to future studies using arginine therapy to treat 
painful events.  If this study provides a new treatment for pain, it may help all sickle cell disease patients in the future. 
Compensation 
You will get $30 for the first day you participate in all study requirements and another $30 on the day of discharge if all 
study requirements and discharge bloodwork is obtained.   If you do not finish the study, you will be paid for the days 
you have participated. You will receive a total of $60, if you participate in all study visits.
Other Treatment Outside this Study
If you decide not to enter this study, there is care available to you outside of this research.  You do not have to be in this 
study to be treated for sickle cell disease.
Confidentiality
Emory and Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta at Hughes Spalding, Egleston and Scottish Rite will keep any research records 
that it creates private to the extent that this is required to do so by law.  Whenever possible, a study number, rather 
than your name, will be used on study records.  Your name and other identifying information will not appear when we 
present or publish the study results.
Study records can be opened by court order.  They also may be provided in response to a subpoena or a request for the 
production of documents. 
Medical Record
If you are or have been a Children’s Healthcare patient, you have a Children’s Healthcare medical record.  Copies of the 
consent form/HIPAA authorization that you sign will be put in your Children’s Healthcare medical record.  
Results from standard of care test and labs will be documented in your Children’s Healthcare medical record; however 
the results of research study tests or procedures will not be put in your Children’s Healthcare medical record.  The 
confidentiality of the study information in your medical record will be protected by laws like the HIPAA privacy rule.  
State and federal laws may not protect the research information from disclosure. 
Children’s Healthcare does not control results from tests and procedures done at other places, so these results will not 
be placed in your Children’s Healthcare medical record. They will likely not be available to Children’s Healthcare to help 
take care of you.  Children’s do not have control over any other medical records that you may have with other 
healthcare providers.  Children’s Healthcare will not send any test or procedure results from the study to these 
providers.  If you decide to be in this study, it is up to you to let your health providers know. 
Authorization to Use and Disclose Protected Health Information
The privacy of your health information is important to us.  We call your health information that identifies you, your 
“protected health information” or “PHI.”  To protect your PHI, we will follow federal and state privacy laws, including the 
IRB00076988
IRB Approved
10/14/2020


Study No.:IRB00076988
Emory University IRB
IRB use only
Document Approved On: «ApproveDate»
Project Approval Expires On: «ExpireDate»
4
  Version Date 06/19/2019
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act and regulations (HIPAA).  We refer to all of these laws as the “Privacy 
Rules.”  Here we let you know how we will use and disclose your PHI for the study.
PHI that will be Used/Disclosed:  
The PHI that we will use and/or disclose (share) for the research study includes
•
Medical information about you including your medical history and present/past medications.
•
Results of exams, procedures and tests you have before and during the study.
•
Laboratory test results.
Purposes for which your PHI will be Used/Disclosed:
We will use and disclose your PHI for the conduct and oversight of the research study.  We will use and share your PHI to 
provide you with study related treatment and for payment for such treatment.  We will also use and share your PHI to 
conduct normal business operations.  We may share your PHI with other people and places that help us conduct or carry 
out the study, such as laboratories, data management centers, data monitors, contract research organizations, 
Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) and other study sites. If you leave the study, we may use your PHI to determine your 
health, vital status or contact information. 
Use and Disclosure of Your Information that is Required by Law:  
We will use and disclose your PHI when we are required to do so by law. This includes laws that require use to report 
child abuse or abuse of elder or disabled adults. We will also comply with legal requests or orders that require us to 
disclose your PHI. These include subpoenas or court orders.  
Authorization to Use PHI is Required to Participate:
By signing this form, you give us permission to use and share your PHI as described in this document. You do not have to 
sign this form to authorize the use and disclosure of your PHI.  If you do not authorize the use and disclosure of your PHI 
for the study, then you may not participate in the research study or receive research-related treatment.  You may still 
receive non-research related treatment.  
People that will Use and/or Disclose Your PHI:
The following people and groups will use and disclose your PHI in connection with the research study:
•
The Principal Investigator and the research staff will use and disclose your PHI to conduct the study and give you 
study related treatment.
•
Emory, Grady Health System and Children’s Healthcare may use and disclose your PHI to get payment for study 
related treatment and to run normal business operations. 
•
The Principal Investigator and research staff will share your PHI with other people and groups to help conduct 
the study or to provide oversight for the study.
•
The Principal Investigator, Claudia Morris, MD, is the Sponsor of the study.  The Sponsor may use and disclose 
your PHI to make sure the research is done correctly and to collect and analyze the results of the research.  The 
Sponsor may disclose your PHI to other people and groups like study monitors to help conduct the study or to 
provide oversight for the study.  
•
The following people and groups will use your PHI to make sure the research is done correctly and safely:
o
Emory offices that are part of the Human Research Participant Protection Program and those that 
involved in study administration and billing.  These include the Emory IRB, the Emory Research and 
Healthcare Compliance Offices, and the Emory Office for Clinical Research.
o
Children’s Healthcare offices and Grady Health System involved in the study administration and billing.
o
Government agencies that regulate the research including:  [Office for Human Research Protections; 
Food and Drug Administration; Veterans Administration].
IRB00076988
IRB Approved
10/14/2020


Study No.:IRB00076988
Emory University IRB
IRB use only
Document Approved On: «ApproveDate»
Project Approval Expires On: «ExpireDate»
5
  Version Date 06/19/2019
o
Public health agencies.
o
Research monitors and reviewer.
o
Accreditation agencies.
Expiration of Your Authorization
This authorization will not expire because it is a research study.
Revoking Your Authorization
If you sign this form, at any time later you may revoke (take back) your permission to use your information.  If you want 
to do this, you must write to: Dr. Claudia Morris   
At that point, the researchers would not collect any more of your PHI.  But they may use or disclose the information you 
already gave them so they can follow the law, protect your safety, or make sure that the study was done properly and 
the data is correct.  If you revoke your authorization you will not be able to stay in the study. 
Other Items You Should Know
Not all people and entities are covered by the Privacy Rules.  HIPAA only applies to health care providers, health care 
payers or health care clearinghouses.  If we disclose your information to people who are not covered by the Privacy 
Rules, including HIPAA, then your information won’t be protected by the Privacy Rules.  People who do not have to 
follow the Privacy rules can use or disclose your information with others without your permission if they are allowed to 
do so by the laws that cover them.  
To maintain the integrity of this research study, you generally will not have access to your PHI related to this research 
until the study is complete.  When the study ends, and at your request, you generally will have access to your PHI that 
we maintain in a designated record set.  A designated record set is data that includes medical information or billing 
records that your health care providers use to make decisions about you. If it is necessary for your health care, your 
health information will be provided to your doctor. 
We may remove identifying information from your PHI.  Once we do this, the remaining information will not be subject 
to the Privacy Rules.  Information without identifiers may be used or disclosed with other people or organizations and/or 
for other purposes besides this study.  
In Case of Injury
If you get ill or injured from being in the study, Emory, Grady Health System and Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta would 
help you to get medical treatment.   Emory, Grady Health System Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta, and the sponsor have 
not, however, set aside any money to pay you or to pay for this medical treatment. The only exception is if it is proved 
that your injury or illness is directly caused by the negligence of an Emory, Grady Health system or Children’s Healthcare 
of Atlanta, or sponsor employee.  “Negligence” is the failure to follow a standard duty of care. 
If you become ill or injured from being in this study, your insurer will be billed for your treatment costs.  If you do not 
have insurance, or if your insurer does not pay, then you will have to pay these costs.  
If you believe you have become ill or injured from this research, you should contact Dr. Morris 
 
. You should also let any health care provider who treats you know that you are in a research study. 
Costs
There will be no costs to you for participating in this study, other than basic expenses like transportation. You will not be 
charged for any of the research activities.
IRB00076988
IRB Approved
10/14/2020


Study No.:IRB00076988
Emory University IRB
IRB use only
Document Approved On: «ApproveDate»
Project Approval Expires On: «ExpireDate»
6
  Version Date 06/19/2019
Withdrawal from the Study
You have the right to leave a study at any time without penalty.  If you leave the study before the final planned study 
visit, the researchers may ask you to have some of the final steps done.  
The researchers and the US Food and Drug Administration also have the right to stop your participation in this study without 
your consent if:
•
They believe it is in your best interest;
•
You were to object to any future changes that may be made in the study plan;
•
or for any other reason.
Contact Information
Contact Dr. Claudia Morris, MD 
if you have any questions about this study or your part in it,  
•
if you feel you have had a research-related injury or a bad reaction to the study drug, or
•
if you have questions, concerns or complaints about the research
Contact the Emory Institutional Review Board 
•
if you have questions about your rights as a research participant.
•
if you have questions, concerns or complaints about the research.
•
You may also let the IRB know about your experience as a 
 
.
If you are a patient receiving care from Grady Health System and you have a question about your rights, you may 
contact the 
Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta at Hughes Spalding is owned by the Fulton-DeKalb Hospital Authority (FDHA) and 
managed by HSOC, INC., an affiliate of Children’s. The FDHA maintains oversight for the Grady Health System.  If you are 
a patient receiving care at Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta at Hughes Spalding and have a question about your rights, 
please contact Kristine Rogers, 
If you are a patient receiving care at Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta (other than Hughes Spalding) and have a question 
about your rights, please contact Kristine Rogers, 
IRB00076988
IRB Approved
10/14/2020


Study No.:IRB00076988
Emory University IRB
IRB use only
Document Approved On: «ApproveDate»
Project Approval Expires On: «ExpireDate»
7
  Version Date 06/19/2019
Consent
Please print your name and sign below if you agree to be in this study. By signing this consent form, you will not give up 
any of your legal rights. We will give you a copy of the signed consent to keep.
Name of Subject 
Signature of Subject 
Date              Time
Signature of Person Conducting Informed Consent Discussion
Date              Time
__________________________________________________________
Name of Person Conducting Informed Consent Discussion
Signature of Legally Authorized Representative
Date              Time
Authority of Legally Authorized Representative or Relationship to Subject
IRB Approved
10/14/2020