Clinical trial NCT03294109
Conditions: Pain, Postoperative Analgesics, Opioid Analgesics, Non-Narcotic Physiological Effects of Drugs Peripheral Nervous System Agents Patient Satisfaction Return to Work Activity, Sexual
Keywords: TQL block, TAP block, donor nephrectomy, pain, patient satisfaction
Sponsor: University of California, Los Angeles
Start date: 2018-01-01; Completion date: 2020-06-24
Enrollment: 146 participants; Allocation: RANDOMIZED; Intervention model: PARALLEL

Brief summary:
A blinded randomized control trial in living kidney donors. The study group will receive a liposomal bupivacaine Trans Quadratus Lumborum (TQL) block after the induction of general anesthesia. The following study variables will be collected postoperatively following arrival in the post-anesthesia care unit. Current and maximum intensity pain scores will be documented by nurses in Electronic Health Record (EHR). Total opiate dose consumed every 24 hours will be collected from the EHR and pain diary after discharge. Patient satisfaction will be evaluated using the Revised American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire (APS-POQ-R) 24 hours' post-procedure. Incidence of nausea will be extracted from nursing notes.

Detailed description:
This is a blinded (patients are blinded and all the staff and the nurses who collect data are also blinded) randomized controlled trial in living kidney donors who have been approved by a multidisciplinary (nephrology, urology, psychiatry, and social work) team to proceed with donor nephrectomy. Patients will be approached to participate in the study only after they have agreed to kidney donation and have been informed of all of the associated risks. Participants are informed that they can withdraw from kidney donation at any time until they are in the operating room.

Patients meeting these criteria, who also consent to participate in the study, will be randomized (standard of care pain medication vs TQL block). The ratio of male to female patients in each arm will be equal because of the known increased risks for post-operative nausea/vomiting (PONV) in females. The study group will receive a liposomal bupivacaine TQL block after the induction of general anesthesia and liposomal bupivacaine transverse abdominis plane (TAP) block after closure of the midline fascia. All patients including the control group will have infiltration of the skin edges with bupivacaine. Control patients will have a TAP block with 5 cc of bupivacaine on both sides. A placebo 22g needle will be placed at the same site as the TQL block without injection. Intra-operative narcotics will be administered by the anesthesia team based on standard criteria. All participants will receive intravenous ketorolac and acetaminophen at the end of the procedure. Intravenous ketorolac will be continued for 24 hours while hospitalized. Post-operative pain management with intermittent parenteral and enteral narcotics as needed will be the same in both groups.

Liposomal bupivacaine block administration:

After induction of general anesthesia, surgical team will turn the patient to the lateral position (final position for surgery). After prep with and drape, investigators will place ultrasound probe in mid- posterior axillary line, just above iliac crest. The investigators will identify abdominal wall muscles including external oblique, internal oblique, transverse abdominis, and quadratus lumborum as well as thoracolumbar fascia with the help of ultrasound. Then, investigators will insert a 22g nerve block needle and advanced it under direct guidance of ultrasound until it is below the fascial covering of the quadratus lumborum muscle layer or its fascia which forms a continuous fascia compartment with thoracolumbar fascia. After aspiration to rule out intravascular location of the needle, investigators will be inject 20 mL of liposomal bupivacaine mixed with 10ml of normal saline under ultrasound guidance, to monitor spread of the injected fluid . The investigators will aspirate repeatedly every 5cc of local anesthetic. The investigators will remove the needle upon completion of the injection.

The following study variables will be collected postoperatively following arrival in the post-anesthesia care unit. Current and maximum intensity pain scores will be documented by nurses in EHR. Total opiate dose consumed every 24 hours will be collected from the EHR and pain diary after discharge. Patient satisfaction will be evaluated using the Revised American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire (APS-POQ-R) 24 hours' post-procedure. Incidence of nausea will be extracted from nursing notes

Complications will be documented by anesthesia pain service that will follow these patients while admitted.

Outpatient use of narcotics, pain assessment, bowel function, sexual function complications from the block or the donor surgery, and attitudes toward kidney donation will be evaluated with validated survey instruments. Please see the timeline for the collection of the data prior to and after kidney donation. The survey data will be collected using secure links to a REDCap server 3, 5, 10, 30, and 90 days after surgery.

Arms: arm 1: liposomal bupivacain arm 2: no intervention
Interventions: intervention 1: Abdominal wall block with liposomal bupivicaine
Intervention descriptions: intervention 1: Abdominal wall block with liposomal bupivicaine

Protocol documents:
Prot_SAP_000.pdf: 
 
TITLE: Evaluation of Abdominal Wall Block with Liposomal Bupivacaine for Post-
Operative Analgesia in Donor Nephrectomy 
NCT#: NCT03294109 
DATE: May 20, 2020 
 


Study Title: 
“Evaluation of Abdominal Wall Block with Liposomal Bupivacaine for Post-Operative 
Analgesia in Donor Nephrectomy”  
 
List of Abbreviations: 
TAP block: Transverse abdominis plane block  
TQL block: Transmuscular quadratus lumborum block 
LA: Local Anesthetic 
 
Principal Investigator, Research Team, and Study Site: 
Principal investigators: Siamak Rahman MD, Hans Albin Gritsch MD 
Co-Investigators: Parisa Partownavid MD, Joel Stockman MD, Parisa Sadoughi MD, Edward 
Park MD, Eric Miller, MD, Jeremy Blumberg, MD, Michelle McDonald, MD 
 
Research team and contact information:  
UCLA Department of Anesthesiology 
and Perioperative Medicine 
Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center 
757 Westwood Plaza, Suite 3325 
Los Angeles, CA 90095-7403 
Telephone: (310) 267-8694 
University of California, Los Angeles 
 
Department of Urology 
David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA 
10833 Le Conte Avenue 
Box 951738 
Los Angeles, CA 90095-1738 
Phone: (310) 267-7727 
 
Study site: UCLA Medical Center, Ronald Reagan Hospital 
 
Background and study population 
The study population will include patients greater than 18 years of age undergoing laparoscopic 
donor nephrectomy surgery.  
 
Study Design 
Randomized blinded controlled clinical trial  
 
 


Sample Size 
50 each arm. 100 total. 
 
Study Duration 
18-24 months. 
 
Primary Objective 
To determine the degree of pain control in patients receiving a long acting TQL block in addition 
to a short half-life TAP block compared to TAP block alone (i.e., the current standard of care) 
after laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. This outcome will be measured using pain scores on a 
numeric scale obtained during standard inpatient care as well as via the APS-POQR and 
PROMIS-29, two standard, validated questionnaires.  
 
Secondary Objectives 
• To determine patient satisfaction as measured by a satisfaction item at post-operative 
days 1 and 90. 
• To measure changes in quality of life via the PROMIS-29, bowel function via the Bowel 
Habits Questionnaire (BHQ), male (International Index of Sexual Function; IISF) and 
female sexual function (Female Sexual Function Index; FSFI) across time and in the 
study group (patients receiving liposomal bupivacaine TQL block in addition to TAP 
block) as compared to our conventional post-operative pain management. See attached 
questionnaire schedule for timing of these items. 
• To determine if patient-reported nausea and vomiting at post-operative days 1, 3, 5, 10, 
and 30 is significantly decreased in patients in the study group.  
• To measure the rate of block-related complications in the study group. Potential 
complications include local anesthetic toxicity, intravascular injection, persistent 
weakness or paresthesia, nerve injury, voiding dysfunction, persistent numbness, altered 
sexual function, bleeding/hematoma, hypotension, infection at the injection site, or other 
complaints related to the block. 
• To determine if narcotic requirements postoperatively are lower in the study group. To 
determine total anesthetic and operative time, as well as costs. 
 
Background and Significance: 
Living kidney donors are carefully screened prior to recommending kidney donation. They are 
informed of the risks of surgery and the option of changing their mind until the day of kidney 
donation. All of the patients have an abdominal and pelvic CT scan to evaluate the renal anatomy 
and to screen for abnormalities. Our goal is to make the operation as minimally invasive as 
possible and to facilitate the return to normal function as quickly as possible. Currently, most 
patients need narcotics to control the pain after surgery. These medications can have significant 
side effects including nausea and constipation, which can delay recovery from the operation. 


 
Since the first successful living donor kidney transplant between identical twins, the special 
nature of this operation and the anesthetic management has been debated (1). Extensive efforts 
have been made to improve the safety and reduce the morbidity of kidney donation. At UCLA, 
laparoscopic kidney donation was introduced in 1999, and is now the standard of care for 
approximately 150 of these operations annually. Ketorolac analgesia was added to reduce pain in 
2002 and the procedure has continued to evolve to promote return to normal function as soon as 
possible (2). The median length of stay for these patients is currently 1.4 days. 
 
A review of the literature identified three publications with enhanced recovery from surgery 
(ERAS) protocols. The Univ. of Michigan protocol uses a transversus abdominus plane (TAP) 
block under ultrasound guidance using a hydrodissection technique with normal saline followed 
by 15 to 20 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine per side with length of stay (LOS) of 1 day after surgery (3). 
The Duke protocol uses a liposomal bupivacaine TAP block and a hand assisted approach, which 
also achieved a one day LOS (4). A randomized study of hand assisted laparoscopic kidney 
donation at the Univ. of Minnesota compared bupivacaine to liposomal bupivacaine for subcostal 
TAP block which showed a significant reduction in pain scores for the liposomal bupivacaine 
24-48 hours after surgery, but a LOS of 2-3 days in both groups (5). 
 
An alternative local anesthetic approach in laparoscopic gynecologic operations and pediatric 
pyeloplasty is the transmuscular quadratus lumborum (TQL) block. The most important 
advantage of TQL block over TAP block is a consistent posterior spread of local anesthetic up to 
the paravertebral space (6). In preliminary studies, we have placed a TQL block in 6 patients 
using bupivacaine and methylene blue. These patients had excellent pain relief for approximately 
12 – 18 hours, but then had more need for outpatient narcotics after the local anesthetic effect 
wore off. In patients with bupivacaine TAP block, placed either by ultrasound, or by direct 
visualization with the laparoscope, pain relief is achieved for the anterior abdominal wall, but 
patients still need narcotics for relief of pain toward the back. Complications that have been 
reported with TQL block include hypotension which may have been due to sympathetic 
blockade, and motor dysfunction of the leg for over 24 hours (7,8). Based on our minimal 
experience with TQL block and review of the literature, it is our hypothesis that the optimal pain 
management for fully laparoscopic donor nephrectomy is a combined TQL block placed after the 
induction of anesthesia and a TAP block placed after the midline incision is closed using a long 
acting local anesthetic. 
 
Liposomal bupivacaine is a novel local anesthetic designed for prolonged pain relief, up to 72 
hours. Despite its long-acting analgesic potential, liposomal bupivacaine is significantly more 
expensive than other local anesthetic alternatives. The primary aim of this investigation is to 
examine whether or not liposomal bupivacaine provides superior pain relief, clinically significant 


opioid-sparing effects, and improved patient satisfaction versus a control group with our current 
local anesthetic to justify its cost. 
 
Objectives: 
The primary objective of the study will be to determine the degree of improvement in pain 
control seen in patients receiving a TQL block in addition to our conventional method of TAP 
block compared to TAP block alone and intravenous/PO opioids based management. Both 
groups will have injection of 20 cc 0.25% bupivacaine in the transverse abdominus plane and 
subcutaneous infiltration of 10 cc around incisions. This is already our standard of care protocol. 
In addition to this standard care, the study group will receive a TQL block of 20 cc of liposomal 
bupivacaine mixed with 10 cc of normal saline will be under ultrasound guidance following 
induction of general anesthesia.  
 
Both groups will have the same bowel preparation, ERAS fluid management, access to 
antiemetic, opioids, acetaminophen, and NSAIDs on a PRN basis. Assessments of pain scores 
will utilize the visual analog scale (VAS) evaluated by nursing staff when obtained with the vital 
signs per PACU and floor nursing protocol. Information regarding use of opioids after discharge 
will be collected with a pain diary and electronic surveys at least till 90 days. If a patient does not 
complete their 90 day survey the study team will contact them again to attempt an exit survey. 
 
Secondary objectives include patient satisfaction scores obtained with a validated satisfaction 
survey administered to each patient prior to discharge; nausea and vomiting requiring medical 
intervention; block-related complications noted in the immediate perioperative period or post-
operative period; and total opiate requirement during the hospital stay and for 90 days after 
surgery. We will also monitor the return of bowel function, sexual function and general health 
using standardized quality of life instruments. Sexual function following kidney donation has not 
been closely evaluated; yet many patients ask about the potential impact of surgery on this bodily 
function that is important to a normal quality of life. Each patient will complete the validated 
survey instruments prior to and after kidney donation. Patients are not required to answer any 
questions. We will evaluate attitudes toward living kidney donation in relationship to pain 
control. 
 
Study design/methodology: 
This is a randomized, single-blinded controlled trial in patients greater than 18 years of age who 
have agreed to proceed with laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Patients meeting these criteria will 
be offered participation in the study. They will be advised of the risks and potential benefits of 
the study. They will be advised of the request to answer surveys and have information regarding 
their care collected for research. They will be advised that participation requires the ability to 
answer questions using electronic communications. Participation is optional and standard 
anesthesia and pain control will be provided to all patients. Patients have the option to withdraw 


from the study at any time and are not required to answer any of the survey questions. Enrolled 
patients will not know which treatment is provided.  
 
Those patients who agree to participate and provide written consent will be enrolled into the 
study and instructed in the electronic completion of study questionnaires using the Urology 
Patient Data Waystation (UPDW). Unique, personalized log-in information will be sent to the 
patient either by email or using the secure MyChart messaging system, based on patient 
preference, to access UPDW for each time point. Initial questionnaires at enrollment will collect 
baseline quality of life, bowel and sexual function, and demographic data. When the surgery date 
has been determined, patients will receive a message to complete a second set of baseline survey 
questionnaires using the same system if their surgery date is more than 6 months past the date of 
completion of their initial baseline survey. Those participants who completed their initial 
baseline within 6 months of their surgery date will only complete one baseline survey.  
 
When surgery is scheduled, each enrolled patient will be randomized (alternating, blocked 
randomization) to either the study group to receive liposomal bupivacaine TQL block in addition 
to standard of care post-operative pain management or to the control group to receive our current 
standard of care. Randomization will maintain equal numbers of participants in each group by 
sex due to the increased risk of post anesthesia nausea in females. 
 
After induction of general anesthesia, the patient will be placed in the lateral decubitus position. 
For patients randomized to the study group, an ultrasound probe will be placed in the posterior-
axillary line, right above the iliac crest for administration of the TQL block. The transversus 
abdominis, quadratus lumborum, and psoas muscles will be identified with the ultrasound. Using 
sterile technique, a 22g nerve block needle will then be inserted and advanced under ultrasound 
guidance until it is below the fascial covering of the quadratus lumborum (TQL) muscle. Gentle 
aspiration for air or blood will be performed and 20 cc of liposomal bupivacaine mixed with 10 
cc of normal saline will be injected under ultrasound guidance. For each 5cc of local anesthetic 
injected, aspiration will be performed. Upon completion of the injection, the needle will then be 
removed. The control group will instead have a 22 g needle inserted just through the skin in the 
same location using sterile technique. For both groups, the laparoscopic instruments will then be 
inserted using sterile technique. Also for both groups and after the kidney has been extracted and 
the midline abdominal fascia closed, a TAP block of 20 cc of 0.25% bupivacaine will be injected 
in the pre-peritoneal plane under direct vision with the laparoscopic camera using a 22g needle. 
Another 10 cc of 0.25% bupivacaine will be injected around the incisions. To maintain blind and 
increase safety, patients in both control and study groups will receive a wristband after surgery to 
prevent any further local anesthetic injection during the first 96 hours. All study patients will be 
instructed to not receive a second dose of the medication and to remove the wristband 5 days 
after surgery.   
 


The following study variables will be collected postoperatively following arrival in the post-
anesthesia care unit: Current and maximum intensity pain scores will be documented by nurses 
in the electronic medical record (EMR). Total opiate dose consumed every 24 hours will be 
collected from EMR and electronic survey after discharge. Patient satisfaction will be evaluated 
using the Revised American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire (APS-POQ-R) 
provided on post-operative day 1 by a research assistant or study coordinator. The incidence of 
nausea or vomiting will be extracted from nursing notes and queried via electronic surveys. Post-
discharge, which is typically 1-2 days following surgery, patients will be sent surveys delivered 
by the UPDW database server 3, 5, 10, 30, and 90 days post-surgery. If patients do not respond 
90 days post-surgery study team will contact patients to attempt to have the exit survey 
completed. 
 
Complications will be documented in the EMR by the anesthesia pain service, urology service, 
and nurses who will monitor these patients while admitted. Urology and study staff will follow 
the patients following discharge, including a post-operative office follow-up approximately 1 
week post-surgery, as is standard of care 
 
Study Population: 
Patients at least 18 years of age undergoing laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Pregnant patients 
will be excluded. Patients with local infection at the potential block site or any contraindication 
to kidney donation, local, or general anesthesia will be excluded.  
 
Study Duration/Study Timeline: 
We anticipate a high level of enrollment since most patients have previously consented to having 
a block placed and pain minimization is generally a high priority. Given the current volume of 
donor nephrectomies we expect enrollment to be complete within one year. The duration of the 
study will depend on the timing from consent for surgery until the operation is scheduled. In 
most cases this occurs within 2-3 months. The study data collections will conclude 90 days after 
surgery unless the patient was not able to complete the survey. Additional attempt to contact the 
patient after 90 days post-surgery may be enacted to have the patient(s) complete an exit survey.  
See the attached study time line in Appendix A. 
 
Statistical Analysis Plan: 
 
Preliminary power analysis was performed as noted in table 1 below. We believe that utilization 
of this novel block can produce a pain score reduction of approximately 40% compared to 
current standard practice. Assuming a study power of 80% and pain score reduction of 40%, we 
need to enroll approximately 17-20 patients per study arm. However, to demonstrate a clear 
clinically significant difference we need to enroll over 37 patients per arm. Since some patients 
may not complete the study, we feel that 50 patients per group will provide sufficient sample size 


to determine the benefit versus cost of the study procedure. This is similar to the samples sizes 
used in the literature. 
 
Pain scores, nausea scores, and total opiate consumption for 24 hours will be analyzed using a T-
test of means. Satisfaction will be assessed using a T-test.     
 
Table 1. Power Analysis  
Mean 1 
Mean 2 
Std. 
Reduction 
Power 
n per group 
8 
4 
1 
50% 
80% 
3 
7.5 
4.5 
1 
40% 
80% 
4 
7 
5 
1 
29% 
80% 
6 
8 
4 
2 
50% 
80% 
6 
7.5 
4.5 
2 
40% 
80% 
9 
7 
5 
2 
29% 
80% 
17 
8 
4 
3 
50% 
80% 
10 
7.5 
4.5 
3 
40% 
80% 
17 
7 
5 
3 
29% 
80% 
37 
 
Additional Data Use: 
 
We are interested in using the data collected with this protocol in connection with the CURES 
Database to analyze the data and investigate whether participants use narcotics prior to donor 
nephrectomy.  
 
The following will be collected: 
1. Historic use of narcotic medication will be collected using the CURES Database 
(https://oag.ca.gov/cures). Patients will be cross-referenced from this study database to 
the CURES search by name and date of birth. The data points we are searching for are for 
any narcotic prescription 12 months prior to donor nephrectopmy. Also, the date of 
narcotic prescription closest to date of donor nephrectomy.  
2. The milligram morphine equivalent of narcotic medication provided on discharge: 
a. We will get this information from UCLA CareConnect, and cross-referenced with 
CURES database. 
3. Long-term use of narcotic medication will be collected through the CURES Database. 
We are collecting to see if they have any narcotic prescriptions in the 0-12 month period 
after donor nephrectomy excluding discharge prescription. Finally we are finding the 
furthest narcotic prescription in the 0-12 month period after donor nephrectomy 
excluding the discharge prescription. 
 
Informed Consent Process: 


Qualified participants will be identified by the donor nephrectomy surgeon using the EMR’s 
schedule report for each clinic day (typically every Friday). All patients must consent to 
laparoscopic kidney donation prior to recruitment. Patients will be introduced to the study by the 
donor nephrectomy surgeon after the surgical consultation and tentative approval for kidney 
donation by the living donor team. At this time, the surgeon will discuss the differences between 
study arms, potential risks of the procedure, and any questions the patient asks.  
If the patient is interested in participating, the surgeon will introduce the study 
coordinator or trained research assistant to inform the patient about the nature of the study, 
requirement to have access to electronic equipment to complete surveys, and requirement of 
sufficient ability to understand the questions in the English language given the personal nature of 
the some of the questions including bowel and sexual function. If the patient then wishes to 
participate, they will be guided through the informed consent document and given time to ask 
any questions by the study coordinator or trained research assistant. The study coordinator or 
research assistant will respond to any questions about the study procedures at this time. If the 
patient has any further questions about the procedure or other medical aspects of the study, these 
will be directed to the surgeon, who will return to complete the consent process once the study 
coordinator has determined the patient’s intent to participate. This will both ensure that all 
medical questions are directed to a surgeon with accurate knowledge of the relevant procedures 
as well as insulate the participant from undue influence of deference to a physician.  
If patients wish to take more time to think about their participation before making a 
decision, the study coordinator or research assistant will ask the patient the patient whether the 
study coordinator or research assistant may follow up by phone within 14 days. If so, the study 
team member will ask for the best phone number by which to contact the patient for follow up. 
The study coordinator will then schedule a time for the patient to return to the clinic to complete 
the consent process if the patient decides to participate.  
If returning to the clinic for an additional consent visit would be too burdensome for the 
patient – many eligible patients drive or fly several hours to attend appointments at UCLA – the 
study coordinator will arrange for the patient to complete consent by mail. To do so, the study 
coordinator will give the patient two copies of the consent form, the HIPAA form, the patient bill 
of rights, and a pre-paid envelope for returning signed documents. The envelope will be 
addressed to Dr. Gritsch and delivered to his locked office. The study coordinator will follow up 
with the patient within approximately 2 weeks to determine whether the patient has made a 
decision on whether to participate and again probe for further questions, which will be answered 
by the study coordinator or forwarded to a study surgeon depending on the content. Once the 
patient has made a decision, the study coordinator will schedule an appointment for the patient to 
speak with a study surgeon to confirm all questions have been answered and to complete the 
consent process. The patient may then place the signed consent and HIPAA forms in the pre-paid 
envelope to mail to the study team. Once the forms are received, the study coordinator will enroll 
the patient and send the baseline survey as usual. Regardless of methodology, the consent 


process will be documented, including date and time of consent, via paper forms which will be 
stored with the consent form and signed by the physician obtaining consent.  
Patients will be recruited until our goal sample size of 50 patients in each arm of the 
study is achieved. At that time statistical analysis will be performed. Any major complications 
will be reviewed to determine if the study should be continued. 
 
Privacy and confidentiality: 
Participants’ names and contact information will be kept on a password protected database stored 
on a secure server accessible only to the study team and will be linked to outcome data only with 
a study identification number used exclusively for this research. Patient identifiers will only be 
used to verify data accuracy and facilitate data extraction from the EMR. All deidentified study 
data will be entered into a computer database that is password protected and stored on a HIPAA 
compliant, secure server and maintained for a minimum of three years after the completion of the 
study. Consent forms will be scanned and stored in this database as well. Paper copies will be 
locked in a filing cabinet in a locked office separate from any other collected data.  
 
Participants will complete all questionnaires on the UPDW system managed in-house by the 
Department of Urology. UPDW was developed as a secure portal for collection of standard of 
care data electronically and is currently used for every patient who visits the Clark Urology 
Clinic. It interfaces natively with the EMR and allows authorized users to send notifications 
including unique log-in information to patients via e-mail or the secure MyChart system built 
into the EMR depending on patient preference. The surveys are hosted on HIPAA-compliant, 
secure servers maintained by the Department of Urology and store collected data on these same 
servers. UPDW offers two levels of secure access: 1) patient access, available on- and off-site 
via the UPDW site with private log-in information unique to each user; and 2) management level 
access, which is available only onsite at UCLA using workstations logged into the AD network. 
The latter level of access still requires a log-in to the UPDW intranet site using a user’s unique 
credentials in addition to the use of an on-site UCLA workstation. UPDW has the UCLA 
standard 15min timeout for non-activity and the user will be prompted the login screen if they 
need to access UPDW again. UPDW also maintains audit trails for all activities by its users. 
UPDW also allows study staff to monitor the completion of study questionnaires by participants, 
allowing the study coordinator to complete reminder calls to ensure compliance with the data 
collection schedule. Once data is collected, it can be downloaded from the UPDW system into a 
separate, deidentified, secure database accessible only to the study team and removed from the 
UPDW system for even further protection.  
Risk/Benefit: 
Risk to participants: 


Procedure related risk as outlined in the informed consent for donor nephrectomy and consent for 
placement of a local anesthetic block. There is a very low risk of data breach given the security 
that is built into the UCLA electronic medical record and UPDW. 
 
Benefits to Participants 
Potential for improved pain control, reduced nausea, improved satisfaction with the operation 
and more rapid return to normal function and quality of life. 
 
Data Safety Monitoring: 
Intermittent analysis for adverse outcomes for at least 90 days following surgery. All patient will 
have access to the kidney transplant program and urology staff. 
 
Conflict of Interest: 
None 
 
 


References: 
 
1. JA Aldrete, JT Swanson, I Penn, TE Starzl. Anesthesia experience with living renal 
transplant donors. Anesthesia and Analgesia 50(2): 169-174, 1971. 
 
2. EG Treat, PG Schulam, HA.Gritsch, C Liu, S Xiong, F Passos, R Chuang, JC Hu. 
Evolution of laparoscopic donor nephrectomy technique and outcomes: A single-center 
experience with more than 1300 cases. Urology 85: 107-112, 2015. 
 
3. SA Waits, P Hilliard, KH Sheetz, RS Sung, MJ Englesbe. Building the case for enhanced 
recovery protocols in living kidney donors. Transplantation 99: 405–408, 2015. 
 
4. A Rege , HLeraas , D Vikraman , K Ravindra , T Brennan , T Miller , J Thacker , D 
Sudan. Could the use of an enhanced recovery protocol in laparoscopic donor 
nephrectomy be an incentive for live kidney donation? Cureus 8(11):e889. DOI 
10.7759/cureus.889, 2016 
 
5. JL Hutchins, R Kesha, F Blanco, T Dunn, R Hochhalter. Ultrasound-guided subcostal 
transversus abdominis plane blocks with liposomal bupivacaine vs. non-liposomal 
bupivacaine for postoperative pain control after laparoscopic hand-assisted donor 
nephrectomy: a prospective randomised observer-blinded study. Anaesthesia 71: 930–
937, 2016. 
 
6. DK.Baidya, S Maitra, MK Arora, A Agarwal. Quadratus lumborum block: an effective 
method of perioperative analgesia in children undergoing pyeloplasty. J Clin Anesthesia 
27(8):694-696, 2015. 
 
7. Mi Sá, JM Cardoso, H Reis, M Esteves, J Sampaio, I Gouveia, P Carballada, C Pinheiro, 
D Machado. Bloqueio do quadrado lombar: estamos cientesde seus efeitos colaterais? 
Relato de dois casos. Rev Bras Anestesiol. May 23, 2017. 
8. M Wikner. Unexpected motor weakness following quadratus lumborum block for 
gynaecological laparoscopy. Anesthesia Feb 7, 2017. 
9. PA Harris, R Thielke, R Taylor, J Payne, N Gonzalez, JG Conde. Research Electronic 
Data Capture (REDCap) - A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for 
providing translational research informatics support. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 
2008.