Clinical trial NCT01200355
Conditions: Acute Myelogenous Leukemia Myelodysplastic Syndrome
Keywords: MICAFUNGIN POSACONAZOLE antifungal prolonged neutropenia 10-038
Sponsor: Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Start date: 2010-09-09; Completion date: 2018-04-03
Enrollment: 113 participants; Allocation: RANDOMIZED; Intervention model: PARALLEL

Brief summary:
The purpose of this study is to compare the effects, good and/or bad, of posaconazole and micafungin in preventing fungal infections after chemotherapy for acute leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome. When people take chemotherapy, they are more likely to get infections. Posaconazole has been approved for the prevention of fungal infections in patients who receive induction chemotherapy for acute leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome. Posaconazole is available only as an oral suspension and has to be given with food. After chemotherapy, many patients are not able to tolerate food or oral medication because of severe mucositis. Patients unable to tolerate food and oral medications cannot take posaconazole.

Micafungin is an antifungal medication that is given only intravenously. Micafungin is approved for the treatment of certain fungal infections and for preventing fungal infections in patients who receive bone marrow transplant. The investigators know that micafungin is safe. Micafungin has not been tested for the prevention of fungal infections in patients receiving chemotherapy for acute leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome. Because micafungin is given by vein, it can be given even in patients who cannot take food or medications by mouth after chemotherapy. In this study the investigators want to compare micafungin to posaconazole when given for the prevention of fungal infections in leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome patients.

Detailed description:

Arms: arm 1: This is a single institution (MSKCC), randomized, open-label comparative trial of micafungin and posaconazole administered as prophylaxis against fungal infections during neutropenia following induction chemotherapy for myelogenous leukemia (AML), acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL), myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). arm 2: This is a single institution (MSKCC), randomized, open-label comparative trial of micafungin and posaconazole administered as prophylaxis against fungal infections during neutropenia following induction chemotherapy for myelogenous leukemia (AML), acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL), myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS).
Interventions: intervention 1: micafungin intervention 2: posaconazole
Intervention descriptions: intervention 1: Micafungin 100 mg intravenously once daily. Randomized treatment will be initiated 24-48 h after completion of the last dose of chemotherapy. intervention 2: Posaconazole 400 mg orally twice daily. Randomized treatment will be initiated 24-48 h after completion of the last dose of chemotherapy.

Protocol documents:
Prot_SAP_000.pdf: 
MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER 
IRB PROTOCOL 
IRB#: 10-038 A(17) 
Amended: 03/16/15 
Page 1 of 29
A
A Randomized Open-Label Trial of Posaconazole Versus Micafungin for Prophylaxis Against Invasive 
Fungal Infections During Neutropenia in Patients Undergoing Chemotherapy for Acute Myelogenous 
Leukemia, Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia, or Myelodysplastic Syndrome  
MSKCC THERAPEUTIC/DIAGNOSTIC PROTOCOL 
Principal Investigator/Department: 
Genovefa Papanicolaou, MD 
Medicine/Infectious Disease 
Co-Principal Investigator(s)/Department: 
Rana Kaplan , MD 
Medicine/Pulmonary 
Investigator(s)/Department: 
Ellin Berman, MD 
Renier Brentjens, MD, PhD 
Ross Levine, MD 
Peter Maslak, MD 
David Scheinberg, MD, PhD 
Virginia Klimek, MD  
Martin Tallman, MD 
Jae Park, MD 
Dan Douer, MD 
Susan Seo,  MD  
Mini Kamboj, MD 
Ying Taur, MD 
Kent Sepkowitz, MD 
Monika Shah, MD 
Katherine Panageas, DrPh 
Omar Abdel-Wahab, MD 
Stephen Chung, MD 
Marco Davila, MD 
 
Joo Yeon Lee, MD 
Medicine/ Leukemia 
Medicine/ Leukemia 
Medicine/ Leukemia 
Medicine/ Leukemia 
Medicine/ Leukemia 
Medicine/ Leukemia 
Medicine/ Leukemia 
Medicine/ Leukemia 
Medicine/ Leukemia 
Medicine/ Infectious Disease  
Medicine/ Infectious Disease 
Medicine/ Infectious Disease 
Medicine/ Infectious Disease 
Medicine/ Infectious Disease 
Biostatistics 
Medicine/ Leukemia 
Medicine/ Leukemia 
Medicine/ Leukemia 
 
Medicine/ Infectious Disease  
Consenting Professional(s)/Department: 
Genovefa Papanicolaou, MD 
Ellin Berman, MD 
Renier Brentjens, MD, PhD 
Ross Levine, MD  
Peter Maslak, MD  
David Scheinberg, MD, PhD  
Virginia Klimek,MD 
Martin Tallman, MD 
Jae Park, MD 
Dan Douer, MD 
Susan Seo, MD 
Mini Kamboj, MD 
Ying Taur, MD 
Kent Sepkowitz, MD 
Monika Shah, MD 
Elizabeth Halton, NP 
Omar Abdel-Wahab, MD 
Stephen Chung, MD 
Marco Davila, MD 
Christina Baldwin, NP 
Jamila N. Brutus, NP 
Hilda Quintanilla, NP 
Gaelle Senatus, NP 
Michelle G. Turner, NP 
Joo Yeon Lee, MD 
Medicine/Infect. Dis 
Medicine/Leukemia 
Medicine/Leukemia 
Medicine/Leukemia 
Medicine/Leukemia 
Medicine/Leukemia 
Medicine/ Leukemia 
Medicine/ Leukemia 
Medicine/ Leukemia 
Medicine/ Leukemia 
Medicine/ Infectious Disease 
Medicine/ Infectious Disease 
Medicine/ Infectious Disease 
Medicine/ Infectious Disease 
Medicine/ Infectious Disease 
Medicine/Leukemia 
Medicine/ Leukemia 
Medicine/ Leukemia 
Medicine/ Leukemia 
Medicine/ Leukemia 
Medicine/ Leukemia 
Medicine/ Leukemia 
Medicine/ Leukemia 
Medicine/ Leukemia 
Medicine/ Infectious Disease  
Please Note: A Consenting Professional must have completed the mandatory Human Subjects Education and 
Certification Program.  
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center 
1275 York Avenue 
New York, New York 10065


MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER 
IRB PROTOCOL 
IRB#: 10-038 A(17) 
Amended: 03/16/15 
 
 
Page 2 of 29 
A
Table of Contents 
1.0 
PROTOCOL SUMMARY AND/OR SCHEMA ........................................................................ 3 
2.0 
OBJECTIVES AND SCIENTIFIC AIMS ................................................................................. 4 
3.0 
BACKGROUND AND RATIONALE ....................................................................................... 4 
4.0 
OVERVIEW OF STUDY DESIGN/INTERVENTION .............................................................. 6 
4.1 
Design .................................................................................................................................. 6 
4.2 
Intervention .......................................................................................................................... 6 
5.0 
THERAPEUTIC/DIAGNOSTIC AGENTS .............................................................................. 7 
5.1. 
MICAFUNGIN ..................................................................................................................... 7 
5.2. 
POSACONAZOLE ................................................................................................................ 9 
6.0 
CRITERIA FOR SUBJECT ELIGIBILITY ........................................................................... 13 
6.1 
Subject Inclusion Criteria ..................................................................................................... 13 
6.2 
Subject Exclusion Criteria .................................................................................................... 14 
7.0 
RECRUITMENT PLAN ........................................................................................................ 15 
8.0 
PRETREATMENT EVALUATION ....................................................................................... 14 
9.0 
TREATMENT/INTERVENTION PLAN ............................................................................... 16 
10.0 
EVALUATION DURING TREATMENT/INTERVENTION .................................................. 16 
11.0 
TOXICITIES/SIDE EFFECTS .............................................................................................. 20 
12.0 
CRITERIA FOR THERAPEUTIC RESPONSE/OUTCOME ASSESSMENT ......................... 22 
13.0 
CRITERIA FOR REMOVAL FROM STUDY ....................................................................... 24 
14.0 
BIOSTATISTICS .................................................................................................................. 23 
15.0 
 RESEARCH PARTICIPANT REGISTRATION AND RANDOMIZATION PROCEDURES . 24 
15.2 
Randomization .................................................................................................................... 24 
16.0 
DATA MANAGEMENT ISSUES ........................................................................................... 24 
16.1 
Quality Assurance ............................................................................................................... 24 
16.2 
Data and Safety Monitoring .................................................................................................. 25 
17.0 
PROTECTION OF HUMAN SUBJECTS .............................................................................. 25 
17.1 
Privacy ............................................................................................................................... 26 
17.2 
Serious Adverse Event (SAE) Reporting ................................................................................ 26 
18.0 
INFORMED CONSENT PROCEDURES .............................................................................. 27 
19.0 
REFERENCES ..................................................................................................................... 28 
20.0 
APPENDICES ....................................................................................................................... 29 


MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER 
IRB PROTOCOL 
IRB#: 10-038 A(17) 
Amended: 03/16/15 
 
 
Page 3 of 29 
A
1.0 
PROTOCOL SUMMARY AND/OR SCHEMA 
Background: Induction chemotherapy for acute myelogenous leukemia (AML), acute lymphocytic 
leukemia (ALL), and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) is associated with a high risk of invasive 
fungal infection due to Candida and Aspergillus species.  Posaconazole, an oral broad spectrum 
azole, is currently approved for chemoprophylaxis during induction chemotherapy.  Posaconazole is 
available only as oral formulation and requires food intake for optimal absorption thus limiting its 
utility in patients unable to tolerate oral intake. Micafungin, an echinocandin with antifungal activity 
against Candida and Aspergillus species is approved for the prevention of invasive fungal infections 
during neutropenia in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.  Micafungin is 
available as intravenous formulation and has an excellent safety profile. Micafungin has not been 
evaluated as prophylaxis against fungal infection in patients undergoing induction chemotherapy for 
AML/ALL/MDS.  We hypothesize that micafungin would be a safe and effective alternative to 
posaconazole as antifungal prophylaxis in patients at high risk for invasive fungal infections due to 
neutropenia after induction chemotherapy for AML/ALL/MDS.  
Proposed Study design: This is a single-center, open-labeled, randomized, controlled trial. One 
hundred and fourteen patients undergoing induction chemotherapy for newly diagnosed acute 
myelogenous leukemia (AML), acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL), myelodysplastic syndrome 
(MDS) or re-induction chemotherapy for first relapse of AML at MSKCC will be randomized 1:1 to 
receive micafungin 100mg IV daily or posaconazole 400 mg orally 2 times a day. Patients will be 
stratified by stage of disease ie newly diagnosed AML/ALL/MDS or AML in first relapse. 
Prophylaxis will start 24-48 hours after the last dose of chemotherapy and will be continued until 
neutrophil recovery (ANC>500/mm3 on 2 consecutive days) or maximum of 4 weeks. If the patients 
develop suspected or proven fungal infection the study drug will be discontinued and patients will 
receive antifungal treatment with AmBisome according to the standards of care at MSKCC. The 
patients will be followed up through chart review for a total of 12 weeks to assess survival and if 
applicable outcome of fungal infection. 
A schema of the study design is shown below: 
 
  
 
 
 
Leukemia 
clinic 
Induction 
 
Study Drug Administration  
(Until neutrophil recovery or start 
of antifungal treatment) 
Screening 
Follow-Up 
(Chart Review) 
Randomization to 
Micafungin or 
Posaconazole 
Study Drug 
(Maximum 4 weeks) 
 
 Wk 
12 
 Wk 
8 


MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER 
IRB PROTOCOL 
IRB#: 10-038 A(17) 
Amended: 03/16/15 
 
 
Page 4 of 29 
A
2.0 
OBJECTIVES AND SCIENTIFIC AIMS 
Primary 
• To compare rates of clinical failure between patients who receive posaconazole and 
those who receive micafungin at 4 weeks from randomization.  
Clinical failure is defined as: 1) need for systemic antifungal therapy (AmBisome) for 
> 3 consecutive days for presumptive fungal infection, toxicity or intolerance of study 
medication or 2) death. 
Secondary  
• To compare the number of days on study drug between patients who receive posaconazole 
and patients who receive micafungin. The maximum number of days on study drug is 28 days 
(4 weeks).  
• To compare the incidence of possible, probable or proven IFI between patients who receive 
posaconazole and those who receive micafungin during treatment phase at 4 weeks from start 
of study drug.   
• To compare the incidence of possible, probable or proven IFI between patients who receive 
posaconazole and those who receive micafungin at 12 weeks from randomization. 
•
To compare the rates of discontinuation of study medication for any reason between patients 
who receive posaconazole and those who receive micafungin.  
• To compare overall survival rates at 6 weeks (12 weeks) from randomization between the two 
treatment arms. 
3.0 
BACKGROUND AND RATIONALE 
Invasive fungal infections (IFI) are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with 
hematologic malignancies. Of all hematologic malignancies, patients with AML appear to be at 
greatest risk for an IFI. In a large autopsy series [1], 42% of all IFIs were identified in patients with 
AML and 77% of all IFIs were believed to have contributed to the cause of death. Yet, in almost 75% 
of cases, the IFI was not diagnosed antemortem. Upon review of almost 12,000 patients with 
hematologic malignancies from 18 centers in Italy during 1999-2003, IFI were most commonly seen 
in patients with AML (69% of all proven or probable IFIs identified) [2]. Even more striking was that 
greater than 12% of all patients with AML had a proven or probable IFI. Among the 3,012 patients 
with AML, the attributable mortality from Aspergillosis and Candidiasis was 35-40% [2].  Such 
infections were most commonly seen in patients receiving initial chemotherapy to treat active 
hematologic malignancies rather than in those having been treated with multiple rounds of 
myelosuppressive chemotherapy. The true incidence of IFIs in AML is probably underestimated due 
to our inability to establish the diagnosis of by the percentage of patients with a “proven” or 
“probable” Mortality rates for candidiasis and aspergillosis in high risk patients such as those with 
AML and MDS range between 10-49% and 32-87% respectively [3-4].    
Several trials have evaluated the utility of antifungal prophylaxis in patients undergoing induction 
chemotherapy. Winston et al conducted a prospective-randomized double blinded placebo-controlled 
study in 256 patients 124 of which received fluconazole and 132 of whom received placebo. 
Fluconazole prophylaxis prevented fungal colonization and superficial fungal infections caused by 


MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER 
IRB PROTOCOL 
IRB#: 10-038 A(17) 
Amended: 03/16/15 
 
 
Page 5 of 29 
A
most Candida species. Significantly fewer patients who received fluconazole experienced a proven 
fungal infection. There was no significant difference between the groups in the overall incidence of 
IFI, use of empiric therapy or in overall mortality [5]. Based on these results, fluconazole prophylaxis has 
been used in patients undergoing remission-induction chemotherapy for acute leukemia, even though 
advantages with respect to morbidity or mortality have not been proved and there was no consensus among 
clinicians regarding its use in these high-risk patients [6].   
Morgenstern et al conducted a prospective-randomized open labeled study in 445 neutropenic 
patients with leukemia 227of which received fluconazole 218 of whom received itraconazole. 
Itraconazole and fluconazole were equally effective in preventing IFI.  Itraconazole was more 
effective in preventing aspergillosis. Fewer patients receiving itraconazole received empiric 
amphotericin B compared with patients receiving fluconazole. There was a higher incidence of 
withdrawal caused by side-effects in patients receiving itraconazole [7].  
Although the use of itraconazole seemed to reduce the incidence of proven invasive fungal infections [8] it did 
not confer a significant survival benefit over fluconazole in large trials, and has been associated with greater 
toxicity [5, 9]. 
Mattiuzzi et al conducted a prospective-randomized open labeled study in 200 neutropenic patients 
with acute leukemia 92 of which received itraconazole IV and 108 of whom received Caspofungin.  
Prophylaxis with caspofungin appeared to be as effective and tolerable as prophylaxis with IV 
itraconazole. No statistically significant differences in treatment-related adverse events were noted 
[10]. This study suggests that the echinocandins may be a suitable alternative to the azoles for 
prophylaxis in high risk patients with leukemia.  
Most recently, Cornely and colleagues conducted a randomized, multicenter, open-label, non-
inferiority study to assess the efficacy of posaconazole versus standard triazole therapy for 
prophylaxis of IFIs in 602 high-risk, neutropenic patients with AML/MDS in which 304 patients 
were randomly assigned to receive posaconazole, and 298 patients were randomly assigned to receive 
fluconazole or itraconazole.   Patients received posaconazole 200 mg oral suspension three times 
daily or standard triazole therapy (fluconazole 400 mg orally daily or itraconazole 200 mg oral 
solution twice daily) with each chemotherapy cycle. The study agents were administered until 
patients were no longer neutropenic or until the occurrence of an IFI, up to 84 days after 
randomization. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of proven or probable IFI during the 
treatment phase (from randomization until 7 days after last dose of study drug). Probable or proven 
IFIs occurred in 2% of posaconazole treated patients and 8% of fluconazole- or itraconazole-treated 
patients (P = 0.0009). All-cause mortality rates were lower in the posaconazole group than in the 
standard triazole therapy group (16% vs 22%, P = 0.048).  In summary, posaconazole prevented 
invasive fungal infections more effectively than did either fluconazole or itraconazole and improved 
overall survival. There were more serious adverse events possibly or probably related to treatment in 
the posaconazole group [11].   A patient's ability to swallow is rarely compromised immediately after 
induction chemotherapy, but oral intake may decrease owing to mucositis later in the course of 
treatment. The study was therefore limited in its ability to provide data on the usefulness of azole 
prophylaxis in patients who have severe mucositis and are unable to eat or take oral medication.
Micafungin is an echinocandin with antifungal activity against Candida and Aspergillus species and 
Pneumocystis carinii [12-13]. Micafungin is given intravenously thus achieving reliable serum levels 
in patients unable to tolerate oral intake.  A randomized, double-blind study compared micafungin to 
fluconazole for prophylaxis against invasive fungal infections in 882 neutropenic stem-cell transplant 
recipients [14]. Patients were treated with either fluconazole or micafungin during the period of 
neutropenia or up to a maximum of 42 days after transplant.  Successful prophylaxis (absence of a 


MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER 
IRB PROTOCOL 
IRB#: 10-038 A(17) 
Amended: 03/16/15 
 
 
Page 6 of 29 
A
proven, probable or suspected IFI) was documented in 80.7% of patients receiving micafungin 
compared to 73.7% of those receiving fluconazole (absolute difference 7%, 95% confidence interval 
1.5-12.5%).  Overall, 4.2% of micafungin-treated patients died during the study period compared to 
5.7% of fluconazole-treated (p=NS).  Micafungin is the first echinocandin approved for prophylaxis. 
A smaller study performed in Japan suggested that pre-emptive IFI treatment with micafungin was 
safe and effective [15].  A multinational, non-comparative study utilizing an open-label design 
examined the efficacy of micafungin alone or in combination with another systemic antifungal agent 
as primary or salvage therapy for proven or probable (pulmonary only) Aspergillus species infection 
in a wide variety of patient populations. Micafungin proved efficacious and safe in high-risk patients 
with IA, although patient numbers were small in the micafungin-only groups [16]. 
 
Based on its excellent safety profile and pharmacology, micafungin is promising as an alternative to 
posaconazole as antifungal prophylaxis in patients with AML/MDS.  We propose a randomized, open 
label, single center clinical trial to compare micafungin with posaconazole for prevention of invasive 
fungal infections during neutropenia in patients with AML/ MDS who are undergoing induction 
chemotherapy.  
4.0 
OVERVIEW OF STUDY DESIGN/INTERVENTION 
4.1 
Design 
This is a single institution (MSKCC), randomized, open-label comparative trial of micafungin and 
posaconazole administered as prophylaxis against fungal infections during neutropenia following 
induction chemotherapy for AML/ALL/MDS. One hundred and fourteen patients will be randomized 
1:1 on either treatment arm. See schema in section 1. 
4.2 
Intervention 
Patients will be randomized to one of two arms: 
1. Micafungin 100 mg intravenously once daily. 
or  
2. Posaconazole 400 mg orally twice daily.  
Randomized treatment will be initiated 24-48 h after completion of the last dose of 
chemotherapy.   
Patients will receive the assigned treatment until the earliest of any of the following:  
• Reach absolute neutrophil count (ANC)  of 
500 cells/mm3 for 2 consecutive days;  
•
Completion of 4 weeks on study drug 
• Proven , probable, or suspected invasive fungal infection;  
• Unacceptable drug toxicity; 


MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER 
IRB PROTOCOL 
IRB#: 10-038 A(17) 
Amended: 03/16/15 
 
 
Page 7 of 29 
A
• Adverse event requiring discontinuation; 
• Death;  
• Withdrawal from study participation (patient's decision);  
• Clinically documented mucositis or colitis precluding the administration of oral medication or 
nutritional supplement is considered intolerance to posaconazole since it posaconazole is 
administered orally.  
5.0 
THERAPEUTIC/DIAGNOSTIC AGENTS 
5.1. 
MICAFUNGIN 
5.1.1. Overview 
Micafungin (Mycamine®, Astellas) is an echinocandin antifungal with activity against a broad 
range of yeast and mold, including fluconazole-susceptible and fluconazole-resistant Candida, 
Aspergillus spp. including species resistant to amphotericin and others [17-20].  The primary 
mechanism of action is the inhibition of 1,3-ß-D-glucan synthase, an enzyme utilized in the 
synthesis of 1,3-ß-D-glucan.  Glucan comprises 30–60% of the cell wall of Candida and a lesser 
percentage of the cell wall of Aspergillus and is an excellent target for antifungal activity as 
mammalian cells lack cell walls.   There is little human toxicity attributed to the mechanism of 
action, because glucan polymers are not components of mammalian cells. 
 
In time-kill studies, micafungin demonstrates fungicidal activity against C. albicans, C. krusei, C. 
parapsilosis, and C. glabrata at multiples of the MIC [19]. In animal studies, micafungin 
demonstrates dose- and concentration-dependent fungicidal activity in reducing tissue burdens of 
Candida in rabbits treated over an eight-fold dosage range and in the mouse thigh model of 
Candida infection.  The effect of echinocandins on tissue burden of Candida and Aspergillus 
differs: Candida may be completely eradicated from tissue, while Aspergillus tends to persist, 
perhaps because echinocandins work on the branch points and advancing tips of hyphae, while 
other cells of the hyphal structure may remain viable.  These differences in pharmacologic effects 
may indicate that echinocandins will be more effective for prophylaxis against, rather than 
treatment of, aspergillosis. 
5.1.2. Pharmacokinetics 
The pharmacokinetic parameters of micafungin were assessed in healthy subjects and in adult and 
pediatric patient populations [21-23].  Micafungin is not appreciably absorbed when administered 
orally. In adults and children >2 years of age, steady-state plasma concentrations are achieved by 
day 4 with repeated dosing. Pharmacokinetic parameters indicate dose proportionality for doses up 
to 50 mg (adults) and 1 mg/kg (children) [24].  Plasma concentrations of micafungin are well 
described by a linear 2-compartment model with first-order input. The volume of distribution is 
approximately 0.2 L/kg, and total protein binding of micafungin is at least 99%.  
5.1.3. Indications and usage 
Micafungin is FDA-approved for the: 
• Treatment of patients with candidemia, acute disseminated candidiasis, Candida peritonitis 
and abscesses. 


MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER 
IRB PROTOCOL 
IRB#: 10-038 A(17) 
Amended: 03/16/15 
 
 
Page 8 of 29 
A
• Treatment of patients with esophageal candidiasis  
• 
Prophylaxis of Candida infections in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell 
transplantation.  
Micafungin is the first echinocandin approved for prophylaxis. 
5.1.4. Formulation and labeling 
Vials contain 50mg of sterile micafungin.  The diluent to be used for reconstitution and dilution is 
0.9% sodium chloride injection, USP (without a bacteriostatic agent). Alternatively, 5% Dextrose 
Infection, USP, may be used for reconstitution and dilution of micafungin.   
5mL of 0.9% sodium chloride injection, USP, should be added to a 50mg vial of micafungin to 
yield a preparation containing approximately 10mg/mL.  Reconstituted micafungin should be 
inspected visually for particulate matter and discoloration prior to administration, whenever 
solution and container permit.  To minimize excessive foaming, gently dissolve the micafungin 
powder by swirling the vial and do not vigorously shake.  The diluted solution should be protected 
from light and further diluted in 100ml normal saline for injection before administration.  It is not 
necessary to cover the infusion drip chamber or the tubing. 
5.1.5. Adverse effects 
• Micafungin has been studied in over 3500 subjects in 41 clinical trials and is found to have a 
safety profile comparable to fluconazole. 
• Clinically supported details regarding the safety profile of micafungin can be found at: 
http://www.mycamine.com/about/intro.php 
Laboratory abnormalities in liver function tests have been seen in healthy volunteers and patients 
treated with micafungin.  Elevations in BUN and creatinine have also been reported.  In controlled 
trials, the incidence of drug-related renal adverse events was 0.4% for micafungin and 0.5% for 
fluconazole.  Similarly, the incidence of transaminitis or hepatic dysfunction did not differ between 
micafungin and fluconazole.  Isolated cases of significant hemolysis have been reported in patients 
treated with micafungin.   In a study of micafungin among stem cell transplant recipients, the only 
adverse events noted in >2% of patients were nausea (2.6%), diarrhea (3.1%) and hyperbilirubinemia 
(2.4%).   
Micafungin is pregnancy category C and is found in the milk of lactating, drug-treated rats.  No cases 
of micafungin overdosage have been reported.  Repeated daily doses of up to 8mg/kg (max 896mg) 
in adult patients have been administered in clinical trials with no reported dose-limiting toxicity.  
5.1.6. Drug-drug interactions 
Micafungin is metabolized to M-1 (catechol form) by arylsulfatase, with further metabolism to M-2 
(methoxy form) by catechol-O-methyltransferase.  Hydroxylation by CYP enzymes is not a major 
pathway for micafungin metabolism in vivo and micafungin is neither a substrate nor inhibitor of P-
glycoprotein in vitro.  Fecal excretion is the major route of elimination.  No dose adjustment of 
micafungin is required based on gender or race. 
 


MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER 
IRB PROTOCOL 
IRB#: 10-038 A(17) 
Amended: 03/16/15 
 
 
Page 9 of 29 
A
Eleven drug-drug interaction studies were conducted in healthy controls to evaluate the potential for 
micafungin to interact with other medications [22, 24].  In these studies, no interaction that altered the 
pharmacokinetics of micafungin was observed.  Intravenous doses of micafungin 100 mg were 
unchanged during co-administration in healthy subjects.  
5.1.7. Dosage and administration of micafungin 
All patients will receive micafungin 100mg intravenously daily (see Section 9).  Each dose should be 
infused over 1 hour to minimize infusion-related histamine reactions.   
5.1.8. Dose adjustments 
No dose adjustments will be made during the course of the trial without an IRB-approved, protocol 
deviation. 
5.2. 
POSACONAZOLE 
5.2.1. Overview 
Posaconazole (NOXAFIL® Schering Corporation, Kenilworth, NJ) is a triazole antifungal with a 
broad spectrum of antifungal activity including emerging fungi such as the zygomycetes.  
Like the other triazole antifungals, posaconazole inhibits the fungal enzyme lanosterol 14-alpha-
demethylase (3–5). A reduction in this enzyme causes a decrease in fungal ergosterol synthesis, 
which is vital for the formation of fungal cell walls. The cell wall abnormalities result in either cell 
death or blunted cell growth. 
 
Posaconazole has shown in vitro fungistatic and fungicidal activity against Candida species (2–5, 16–
21). Posaconazole has shown potent in vitro activity against Aspergillus species (3–5, 22, 23). A 
global surveillance program evaluated the in vitro activity of the triazole antifungals and AmB 
against Aspergillus species and other filamentous fungi. This surveillance program found that both 
posaconazole and voriconazole inhibited 94% of all Aspergillus isolates tested. Another study found 
that posaconazole, voriconazole, and caspofungin inhibited 98%, 95%, and 98% of Aspergillus 
isolates tested, respectively. Posaconazole, voriconazole, and caspofungin are more potent than AmB 
against A. fumigatus. 
5.2.2. Pharmacokinetics  
Posaconazole is available as a suspension for oral administration. The pharmacokinetic properties of 
posaconazole are listed on table 1. 
 
Table 1. Pharmacokinetic properties of triazole antifungals*  
Property  
Posaconazole  
Voriconazole  
Fluconazole  
itraconazole  
Bioavailability  
Variable  
>95%  
>90%  
50%–75%  
Protein binding  
>90%  
58%  
11%  
99%  
Volume of distribution  
1774 L  
4.6 L/kg  
0.7–0.8 L/kg  
11 L/kg  
Time to maximum 
concentration  
4–5 hours 
1–2 hours  
2–4 hours  
4–5 hours  
Metabolism  
Hepatic: 
glucuronidation to 
inactive metabolites  
Hepatic: CYP2C19, 2C9, 
3A4  
Hepatic: 11% 
metabolized  
Hepatic: CYP3A4  
Elimination half-life  
25–35 hours  
6–24 hours (variable)  
22–31 hours  
35–64 hours  
Elimination route  
<1% excreted 
unchanged in urine; 
66% excreted 
unchanged in feces  
Hepatic; <2% excreted 
unchanged in urine  
80% excreted 
unchanged in urine  
Hepatic; <1% 
excreted 
unchanged in 
urine  


MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER 
IRB PROTOCOL 
IRB#: 10-038 A(17) 
Amended: 03/16/15 
 
 
Page 10 of 29 
A
Absorption  
 
Posaconazole is absorbed with a median Tmax of ~3 to 5 hours. Dose proportional increases in 
plasma exposure (AUC) to posaconazole were observed following single oral doses from 50 mg to 
800 mg and following multiple-dose administration from 50 mg BID to 400 mg BID. No further 
increases in exposure were observed when the dose was increased from 400 mg BID to 600 mg BID 
in febrile neutropenic patients or those with refractory invasive fungal infections. Steady-state plasma 
concentrations are attained at 7 to 10 days following multiple-dose administration. 
  
Following single-dose administration of 200 mg, the mean AUC and Cmax of posaconazole are 
approximately 3 times higher when administered with a nonfat meal and approximately 4 times 
higher when administered with a high-fat meal (~50 gm fat) relative to the fasted state. Following 
single-dose administration of 400 mg, the mean AUC and Cmax of posaconazole are approximately 3 
times higher when administered with a liquid nutritional supplement (14 gm fat) relative to the fasted 
state. In order to assure attainment of adequate plasma concentrations, it is recommended to 
administer posaconazole with food or a nutritional supplement. 
 Courtney and colleagues conducted a randomized, open-label, crossover, single-dose study in 20 
adult men to evaluate the effect of food on the bioavailability of two formulations of posaconazole 
[25].  
 
Subjects were given posaconazole 200 mg as suspension with a high-fat breakfast, as suspension with 
a nonfat breakfast, or as tablets with a high-fat breakfast after a 10-hour fast. Drug exposure was 
greater, as shown by an increase in the area under the curve (AUC) of 37%, when posaconazole was 
given in suspension rather than tablet form. Mean AUC and maximum concentrations (Cmax) were 
four times greater when posaconazole was administered with a high-fat meal than when it was 
administered after a fast. Drug exposure was 2.6 times greater when posaconazole was given with a 
nonfat meal than when it was given after a fast. The authors concluded that posaconazole suspension 
administered with food is the optimal regimen to ensure maximal systemic exposure. 
 
Sansone-Parsons and colleagues conducted a randomized, open-label, crossover study in 24 adults to 
determine the effect of a nutritional supplement on the pharmacokinetics of posaconazole [26]. Study 
participants received a single dose of posaconazole 400 mg oral suspension either along with 8 
ounces of a nutritional supplement (Boost Plus) or after fasting overnight. The Cmax and AUC values 
were higher in subjects who received posaconazole concomitantly with the nutritional supplement. 
The time to achieve Cmax and the half-life were not different between groups. The authors concluded 
that the bioavailability of posaconazole is increased when given with a nutritional supplement. 
Based on these studies, it is recommended that posaconazole be administered with food or a 
nutritional supplement whenever possible [22, 27-29]. If a patient cannot be fed, posaconazole should 
be divided into multiple daily doses (every 6 hours), and the use of alternative antifungal agents 
should be considered. 
 
Ezzet and colleagues conducted a randomized, open-label, crossover study in 18 healthy men to 
determine the bioavailability of posaconazole when given without food [30]. Subjects were given the 
following doses of posaconazole suspension after fasting for 12 hours: 800 mg once a day (regimen 
A), 400 mg every 12 hours (regimen B), or 200 mg every 6 hours (regimen C). Subjects continued to 
fast for 48 hours after the dose was given. The study found that the bioavailability of posaconazole 
oral suspension increased by 98% when the dose was divided every 12 hours and increased by 220% 
when the dose was divided every 6 hours in fasting subjects. This was roughly equivalent to 


MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER 
IRB PROTOCOL 
IRB#: 10-038 A(17) 
Amended: 03/16/15 
 
 
Page 11 of 29 
A
posaconazole exposure after a nonfat meal. The authors concluded that divided daily dose 
administration (either every 12 or 6 hours) increases exposure to posaconazole under fasting 
conditions. 
 
Distribution  
Posaconazole has an apparent volume of distribution of 1774 L, suggesting extensive extravascular 
distribution and penetration into the body tissues.  
 
Posaconazole is highly protein bound (>98%), predominantly to albumin.  
 
Metabolism  
Posaconazole primarily circulates as the parent compound in plasma. Of the circulating metabolites, the 
majority are glucuronide conjugates formed via UDP glucuronidation (phase 2 enzymes). Posaconazole 
does not have any major circulating oxidative (CYP450 mediated) metabolites. The excreted metabolites 
in urine and feces account for ~17% of the administered radiolabeled dose.  
5.2.3. Indications and usage 
 
Posaconazole (NOXAFIL® ) is approved by the Food and Drug Administration for use as prophylaxis 
against invasive Aspergillus and Candida infections in immunocompromised patients including 
patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation who have graft-versus-host disease and 
patients with hematological malignancies who are receiving chemotherapy. Posaconazole is also 
approved for the treatment of oropharyngeal candidiasis including candidiasis Refractory to 
itraconazole and/or fluconazole [29].  
 
Dose and duration of therapy for each indication are summarized below:  
Indication 
 
 
Dose and duration  
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
5.2.4. Formulation and labeling 
Posaconazole is supplied as a 40-mg/mL oral suspension in 4-ounce amber bottles (3). Each dose of 
posaconazole should be given with a full meal or liquid nutritional supplement to enhance absorption. 
If a patient cannot tolerate feedings, alternative antifungals should be considered. 
 
Prophylaxis of Invasive 
Fungal Infections  
200 mg (5 mL) three times a day. The 
duration of therapy is based on recovery 
from neutropenia or immunosuppression. 
Oropharyngeal 
Candidiasis 
Loading dose of 100 mg (2.5 mL) twice a 
day on the first day, then 100 mg (2.5 
mL) once a day for 13 days. 
Oropharyngeal 
Candidiasis Refractory to 
itraconazole and/or 
fluconazole  
400 mg (10 mL) twice a day. Duration of 
therapy should be based on the severity of 
the patient's underlying disease and 
clinical response. 


MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER 
IRB PROTOCOL 
IRB#: 10-038 A(17) 
Amended: 03/16/15 
 
 
Page 12 of 29 
A
5.2.5. Adverse events 
Raad and associates collected the overall long-term safety data of posaconazole in 428 patients with 
IFIs and 66 patients with fever and neutropenia [31-32]. Overall, treatment-related adverse effects 
were reported in 38% of patients. The most common adverse drug effects reported were nausea (8%) 
and vomiting (6%). Treatment-related prolongation of the corrected QT interval (QTc) occurred in 
1% of patients, and 2% of patients had elevated hepatic enzymes. Overall, the long-term safety of 
posaconazole of six months or longer revealed a favorable adverse-effect profile in seriously ill 
immunocompromised patients. 
 
In clinical reports, the tolerability of posaconazole was acceptable and comparable to other triazoles. 
[11] Common adverse events included fever, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, abdominal pain, dry mouth, 
headache, and fatigue.  Some of the less common but more notable events reported with 
posaconazole administration included hypokalemia, rash, anemia, thrombo -cytopenia, and QTc 
prolongation. 
 
In clinical trials, there were infrequent cases of hepatic reactions (e.g., mild to moderate elevations in 
ALT, AST, alkaline phosphatase, total bilirubin, and/or clinical hepatitis).  Rarely, more severe 
hepatic reactions including cholestasis or hepatic failure including fatalities were reported in patients 
with serious underlying medical conditions (e.g., hematologic malignancies) during treatment with 
posaconazole. Liver function tests should be monitored at the start of and during the course of 
therapy.  
5.2.6. Drug interactions  
Posaconazole has been shown to interact with several medications, including drugs that suppress the 
immune system, and these reactions may be serious [29].  
Co-administration with sirolimus or ergot alkaloids is contraindicated. Co-administration with the 
CYP3A4 substrates terfenadine, astemizole, cisapride, pimozide, halofantrine, or quinidine, is also 
contraindicated since this may result in increased plasma concentrations of these medicinal products, 
leading to QTc prolongation and rare occurrences of torsades de pointes. 
Serious and rare fatal toxicity from cyclosporine has occurred when taken in combination with 
Posaconazole and therefore reduction of the dose of drugs like cyclosporine or tacrolimus and 
frequent monitoring of drug levels of these medications are necessary when taking them in 
combination with Posaconazole 
5.2.7. Dosage and administration 
All patients will receive posaconazole 400mg twice daily. Each dose will be administered with a 
carbonated beverage or high fat nutritional supplement as tolerated to maximize absorption.  
5.2.8. Dose adjustments 
No dose adjustments will be made during the course of the trial without an IRB-approved, protocol 
modification. 
 
 


MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER 
IRB PROTOCOL 
IRB#: 10-038 A(17) 
Amended: 03/16/15 
 
 
Page 13 of 29 
A
6.0 
CRITERIA FOR SUBJECT ELIGIBILITY 
6.1 
Subject Inclusion Criteria 
1. Subjects of greater than or equal to 18 years of age of either sex and of any race. 
 
2. Disease definition: 
 
a. Anticipated or documented prolonged neutropenia (ANC<500/mm3 [0.5x109/L]) at 
baseline or likely to develop within 3 to 5 days and lasting for at least 7 days due to: 
 
i. 
Intensive induction chemotherapy for new diagnosis of acute myelogenous 
leukemia, acute lymphocytic leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome receiving 
standard anthracycline based chemotherapy 
 
ii. 
Re-induction of acute myelogenous or lymphocytic leukemia after primary relapse 
 
iii. 
Myelodysplastic syndromes requiring induction (myelosuppressive) chemotherapy 
 
3. Female subjects of childbearing potential must have a negative serum pregnancy 
test as per MSKCC guidelines.  
 
4. Able to swallow oral medications 
 
6.2 
Subject Exclusion Criteria 
1. Subjects with history of presumed or proven invasive fungal infection within 30 days of 
randomization. 
 
2.  Subjects who are taking the following: 
 
a. Drugs known to interact with posaconazole and that may lead to life-threatening side 
effects (terfenadine, cisapride, and ebastine at entry or within 24 hours before entry, or 
astemizole at entry or within 10 days before entry); 
 
b. Drugs known to lower the serum concentration/efficacy of posaconazole: cimetidine, 
rifampin, carbamazepine, phenytoin, rifabutin, barbiturates, and isoniazid at entry or 
within 24 hours before entry; 
 
c. Subjects who are planned to receive >2mg flat dose of vinca alkaloids. 
 
3.  Subjects with a history of hypersensitivity or idiosyncratic reactions to azole agents. 
 
4. Subjects with renal insufficiency (estimated creatinine clearance less than 20 mL/minute at 
baseline or likely to require dialysis during the study). 
 
5. Subjects having an electrocardiogram with a prolonged QTc interval by manual reading: QTc 
greater than 490 msec. 


MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER 
IRB PROTOCOL 
IRB#: 10-038 A(17) 
Amended: 03/16/15 
 
 
Page 14 of 29 
A
6. Subjects with moderate or severe liver dysfunction at baseline, defined as aspartate 
aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, or alkaline phosphatase levels greater than 5 times 
the upper limit of normal (ULN), or a total bilirubin level greater than 3 times the ULN. 
 
7. Subjects who are undergoing re-induction chemotherapy and have participated in this study 
during their first induction chemotherapy. 
 
8. Subjects who will be receiving dasatinib. 
 
7.0 
RECRUITMENT PLAN 
7.1. Recruitment 
 
Candidates for the study will be identified at the outpatient Leukemia Clinic during the evaluation 
visit prior to admission or upon admission for induction Chemotherapy. The RSA and the PI or co-PI 
will attend the weekly Leukemia scheduling meeting and keep track of upcoming admissions.  
Patients may sign consent for the study during their outpatient visit or upon admission to the hospital 
for induction chemotherapy.  An estimated 7-10 patients per month are admitted to undergo induction 
or re-induction chemotherapy. We estimate to accrue 2-3 patients per month. We estimate to 
complete the study in 4 years.  
 
8.0 
PRETREATMENT EVALUATION 
Baseline Study Procedures  
The assessments noted below are usually conducted as part of the patient routine care prior to 
induction chemotherapy.  
• History, physical examination, weight, height, vital signs performed within 7 days prior to 
randomization. 
 
• For women of childbearing potential: serum pregnancy test as per MSKCC guidelines. 
 
• Blood tests within 7 days from randomization  
  
o Hematology: complete blood count with manual differential and platelet count  
o Serum chemistry: creatinine, blood urea nitrogen, AST, ALT, alkaline phosphatase, 
total bilirubin, sodium, potassium, chloride, calcium, magnesium, and albumin  
o Fungal markers testing (including serum Galactomannan, BD glucan and 3 ml of 
whole blood to be stored for nucleic acid based assays).  
 
• Prior CT scan of the chest (at the discretion of the investigator). 
 
• Baseline EKG prior to chemotherapy as per MSKCC guidelines. 
 
A flowchart of study procedures and assessments is provided on Section 10. 


MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER 
IRB PROTOCOL 
IRB#: 10-038 A(17) 
Amended: 03/16/15 
 
 
Page 15 of 29 
A
9.0  TREATMENT/INTERVENTION PLAN 
 
9.1 Treatment Plan 
 
After signing informed consent patients will be randomized to micafungin or posaconazole. The 
randomization will be performed by the Office of Clinical Research Protocol Participant Registration 
through the Clinical Research Database.  
 
Micafungin will start one day after completing induction chemotherapy and will be administered at 
approximately the same time each day of treatment. Micafungin will be administered as per MSKCC 
guidelines.  
 
Posaconazole will start one day after completing induction chemotherapy and will be administered at 
approximately the same times each day of treatment.  Ten ml of Posaconazole solution (40mg/mL) 
will be administered orally twice daily with fatty snack or a nutritional supplement or a carbonated 
beverage (such as ginger ale). 
 
 
The study drug will continue for maximum of 4 weeks or until an absolute neutrophil count of 
>500/mm3 for 2 consecutive days, systemic antifungal therapy (AmBisome) for > 3 consecutive days, 
toxicity requiring discontinuation, or death whichever occurs first.  
 
If the patient develops clinically suspected or documented fungal infection the study drug will be 
discontinued and the patient will start antifungal therapy with AmBisome as per MSKCC guidelines. 
The evaluations to establish diagnosis of fungal infection are outlined in section 10. 
 
9.2 Toxicity 
 
The study drug will be discontinued if any of the following toxicities occur AND are thought by 
the PI to be related to the study drug.   
 
• Hepatic toxicity: ALT or AST exceeding 5 times the upper limit of normal or 3x above 
baseline.  
 
• Cutaneous toxicity: A skin rash can occasionally occur.  This ordinarily will not constitute 
grounds for discontinuation of study drug unless there is skin necrosis or ulceration or 
generalized exfoliative dermatitis. 
 
• Cardiac toxicity: If a significant arrhythmia or prolongation of QT occurs, study medication 
must be held, and the subject must undergo further assessment by a cardiologist to evaluate 
the significance of the findings. If the PI and cardiologist conclude that it is not related to the 
study drug, study drug can be resumed. Otherwise, the patient will be withdrawn from study 
treatment.  Routine EKG monitoring is not part of the standard of care for patients on 
posaconazole. EKGs will be obtained at the discretion of the treating physician when 
clinically indicated or when the patient requires additional medications known to cause QT 
prolongation alone or given concomitantly with posaconazole (for example quinolones or 
macrolides). 
 


MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER 
IRB PROTOCOL 
IRB#: 10-038 A(17) 
Amended: 03/16/15 
 
 
Page 16 of 29 
A
• Renal insufficiency: The patient experiences serious renal impairment (GFR<25 ) or requires 
hemodialysis 
 
•
For any other Grade III or IV toxicity according to the NCI Common Terminology 
Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.0 which is not typically expected post 
induction chemotherapy and may be possibly related to study drug. 
 
If the PI thinks that toxicity is unlikely due to the study drug it is permissible to have up to 3 days 
interruption of study drug interruption while the cause of toxicity is being investigated.  During 
study drug interruption patient will receive AmBisome 3mg/kg IV daily. If the same toxicity 
recurs after the patient resumes the study drug the primary end point of clinical failure is met and 
the study drug will be discontinued.  
There will be no dose adjustment of study medications for toxicity. 
 
10.0 
EVALUATION DURING TREATMENT/INTERVENTION  
Day 1 through Week 4  
The following assessments will be performed bi-weekly on two non-consecutive days, preferably 
three days apart (e.g., Mondays and Thursdays). A flowchart of study procedures and assessments is 
provided in section 10. 
1. 
Administration of antifungal medications 
 
2. 
Vital signs: body temperature, blood pressure, body weight, and pulse rate. Interim 
history and directed physical exam. The physical exam should focus on organs 
systems that are clinically relevant in the setting of invasive fungal infections. 
3.  
Adverse event recording   
4. 
Blood tests 
 
o Hematology: complete blood count with  differential and platelet count  
o Serum chemistry: creatinine, blood urea nitrogen, AST, ALT, alkaline phosphatase, total 
bilirubin, sodium, potassium, chloride, calcium, magnesium, and albumin  
o 10 ml of blood will be collected for fungal markers including galactomannan assay and BD 
glucan as part of routine care.  Blood will be collected until patient is discharged or Week 6, 
whichever occurs first. 
 
o 10 ml of whole blood will collected in EDTA anticoagulated tube to be stored for future  
testing for fungal pathogens by nucleic acid based assays.  De-identified specimens will be 
sent to Viracor Inc for fungal PCR. Due to the exploratory nature of the assays the results of 
the fungal PCR will not be made available for clinical decision making.  Blood will be 
collected until patient is discharged or Week 6, whichever occurs first. 
 
5.  Weekly fungal surveillance cultures will be obtained specifically for the study: Stool and 
throat fungal cultures will be obtained weekly starting on day 1 prior to starting study drug. 


MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER 
IRB PROTOCOL 
IRB#: 10-038 A(17) 
Amended: 03/16/15 
 
 
Page 17 of 29 
A
Additional stool and throat specimens will be obtained within 24 hours of discontinuation of 
study drug due to suspected or proven fungal infection. Fungal cultures will be processed at 
the clinical microbiology laboratory. Fungal isolates will be stored until completion of the 
study.  We will assess changes in fungal colonization during study drug exposure. We will 
also study antifungal susceptibility patterns over time and correlate the fungal susceptibilities 
of isolates causing colonization with any isolates causing invasive infection.  Surveillance 
cultures will be collected until discharge or Week 6, whichever comes first. 
 
 6. 
Patients with persistent fever (≥96 hours) on broad spectrum antibiotics and/or signs or 
symptoms suggestive of fungal infection will have CAT SCAN of the chest as part of the standards of 
care for the evaluation of neutropenic patients.  CAT scans of the abdomen/pelvis, head or sinuses 
will be obtained if clinically indicated at the discretion of the treating physician  
 
7. 
If the CAT SCAN of the chest is suggestive of an infectious process it is strongly encouraged 
the patient undergoes bronchoscopy with bronchoalveolar lavage unless there is a clinical 
contraindication documented by the treating physician. 
 
8. 
BAL specimens will be sent for: 
• Bacterial and Fungal cultures 
• Cytology 
• Galactomannan  
• Nucleic acid based assays for fungal pathogens. Leftover BAL specimens will be sent to 
Viracor for fungal PCR and will also be tested for fungal DNA by the MSK Clinical 
Microbiology Laboratory using the Luminex platform.  
 
9. 
Patients with persistent fever (>96 hours) on broad spectrum antibiotics and/or signs or 
symptoms suggestive of fungal infection will have fungal marker testing by serum galactomannan 
and BD glucan and 3-5 ml of whole blood collected in an EDTA anticoagulated tube and stored for 
future testing for fungal pathogens by nucleic acid base assay.  
  
10. 
Patients randomized to posaconazole will have the posaconazole serum concentration 
measured on day 7, day 14 and day 28 if they remain on posaconazole or at discontinuation of 
posaconazole if this occurs earlier. 
 
Week 5 - Week 12 (±7 Days)  
A chart review will be done on weeks 6, 8, 10 and 12.  
We will record:  
• Survival status 
 
• Diagnostic or therapeutic procedures performed for diagnosis or treatment of fungal infection. 
 
• Outcome of suspected or documented fungal infections including:  
o Systemic antifungals type dose and duration.  


MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER 
IRB PROTOCOL 
IRB#: 10-038 A(17) 
Amended: 03/16/15 
 
 
Page 18 of 29 
A
o Radiologic assessments 
o Microbiology assessment 
o Pathology reports 
• The investigator’s overall assessment of  fungal infections based on MSG/EORTC criteria 
listed in Appendix 1 
 
One tube of blood (5ml) will be collected once during weeks 5-12 for research purposes. 


MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER 
IRB PROTOCOL 
IRB#: 10-038 A(17) 
Amended: 03/16/15 
 
 
Page 19 of 29 
A
FLOW CHART OF STUDY PROCEDURES
 
 
Screening1 
Day 1 
Week 1 
Week2 
Week 3 
Week 4 
Week 5 
Week 6 
Weeks 7-12 
 
 
 
Day 7 
±2 days 
Day 14 
±2 days 
Day 21 
±2 days 
Day 28 
±3 days 
Day 35 
±2 day 
Day 42 
±2 day 
±5 days 
Informed consent 
X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
History/physical 
X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
X 
Vital signs 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
 
 
 
Administer study drug 
 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
 
 
 
Interim history and Directed Exam 
 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
 
 
 
EKG 
X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Hematology2 
X 
X 
X 
x 
x 
X 
X 
X 
X 
Chemistry2 
X 
X 
X 
x 
x 
X 
X 
X 
X 
Fungal Markers2
 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
 
Serum Pregnancy test 
X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
CAT scan of chest3 
X 
 
X 
X 
X 
X 
 
 
 
Bronchoscopy4  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Bronchoalveolar lavage testing5 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Posaconazole concentration6 
 
 
X 
X 
 
X 
 
 
 
AE Assessment7 
 
 
X 
X 
X 
X 
 
 
X 
Follow up 8 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
X 
Surveillance fungal cultures9 
 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
 
Blood collection for SNPs 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
X 


MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER 
IRB PROTOCOL 
IRB#: 10-038 A(17) 
Amended: 03/16/15 
 
 
Page 20 of 29 
A
 
1 Informed consent may be obtained up to 3 weeks prior to randomization. History/physical, EKG, 
hematology, chemistry and serum pregnancy test (as needed) may obtained within 7 days prior to 
randomization 
2 Assessments will be performed biweekly during weeks 1-6 on two non-consecutive days preferably 
3 days apart. 10 ml of serum will be collected for galactomannan and BD glucan testing. 3-5 ml of 
whole blood will be collected in an EDTA anticoagulated tube and stored for future testing by nucleic 
acid-based assays on a biweekly basis until Week 6 or discharge, whichever occurs first. 
3During weeks 1-4, the initial CAT scan of the chest will be performed will be performed for 
persistent fever (≥96 hours) on broad spectrum antibiotics or when clinically suspected fungal 
infection and thereafter as per standards of care at MSKCC. 
4 It is strongly encouraged for patients with persistent fever for ≥96 hours or signs of fungal infection 
to undergo bronchoscopy and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) unless there is clinical contra-
indication. De-indentified left over BAL specimens will be sent to Luminex to perform nucleic acid 
based assays for fungal pathogens.   
5BAL will be tested for routine bacterial and fungal cultures, viral cultures, AFB cultures and 
cytology, galactomannan concentration . Results from these tests will be available for clinical 
decision making. Left over BAL specimens will be tested for Aspergillus by an exploratory nucleic 
acid-based assay (NASBA).  On the day of BAL, serum will be collected for galactomannan  testing  
and 3ml of blood will be collected in an EDTA anticoagulated  tube for future testing by NASBA. 
6 For patients randomized to posaconazole.
7 Key adverse events will be recorded through 3 days after the last dose of study drug. 
8 Follow up will be done through medical chart review. We will review medical assessments, 
laboratory, radiology and pathology results during week 5-12. 
9  Throat and stool cultures will be obtained weekly specifically for the study. Fungal isolates will be 
stored until further testing. We will study changes in fungal colonization and fungal susceptibility 
profile overtime. This will be obtained for research purposes and will be collected on a weekly basis 
until Week 6 or discharge, whichever occurs first. 
 
10   One tube (5 ml) of blood will be collected once during weeks 5-12 for research purposes. Blood 
will be stored for future testing of genetic polymorphisms of Dectin-1. 
 
11.0 
TOXICITIES/SIDE EFFECTS 
Micafungin and posaconazole are currently FDA approved. Both drugs have been used in thousands 
of immunocompromised patients with very favorable safety profiles.  
 


MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER 
IRB PROTOCOL 
IRB#: 10-038 A(17) 
Amended: 03/16/15 
 
 
Page 21 of 29 
A
 11.1. Micafungin   
• Micafungin has been studied in over 3500 subjects in 41 clinical trials and is found to have a 
safety profile comparable to fluconazole. 
• Clinically supported details regarding the safety profile of micafungin can be found at: 
http://www.mycamine.com/about/intro.php 
Likely 
• Vomiting 
• Nausea 
• Headache   
• Diarrhea 
These side effects disappear after stopping the medication  
Less Likely   
• Fever 
• Abnormal liver function tests 
• Phlebitis (redness, swelling and pain at the vein used to infuse mycamine) 
 
These side effects disappear after stopping the medication 
Rare but serious 
• Anaphylaxis ( A life-threatening allergic reaction that presents with difficulty 
breathing, low blood pressure and throat and face swelling) 
11.2. Posaconazole  
Likely 
• Nausea  
• Diarrhea  
• Vomiting  
• Rash  
• Fever 
• Abdominal Pain 
• Headache 
• Fatigue 
 


MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER 
IRB PROTOCOL 
IRB#: 10-038 A(17) 
Amended: 03/16/15 
 
 
Page 22 of 29 
A
These side effects disappear after stopping the medication  
Less Likely   
• Abnormal EKG (QT/QTc prolongation) 
• Inflammation of the liver     
 
Usually these side-effects disappear after stopping the medication 
Rare but serious  
• Liver failure 
• Life-threatening arrhythmias(torsades de points)  
 
Reproductive risks:  You should not become pregnant or father a baby while on this study because 
the drugs in this study can affect an unborn baby.  Women should not breastfeed a baby while on this 
study.  It is important you understand that you need to use birth control while on this study.  Check 
with your study doctor about what kind of birth control methods to use and how long to use them.  
Some methods might not be approved for use in this study. 
12.0 
CRITERIA FOR THERAPEUTIC RESPONSE/OUTCOME ASSESSMENT 
The principal outcome measure is “clinical success,” which is the absence of clinical failure. 
“Clinical failure” is defined as:  
1. Systemic antifungal therapy with AmBisome for > 3 consecutive days due to any of the following: 
•  Suspected fungal infection defined as: fevers (temperature, 
38°C [
100.4°F]) persisting 
for >96 h during the neutropenic phase, despite broad-spectrum antibacterial therapy and 
exhaustive diagnostic evaluation has excluded other etiologies but has also failed to 
demonstrate a probable or proven invasive fungal infection  
 
• Probable pulmonary aspergillosis  
 
• Proven invasive or disseminated infection.  
 
• For patients randomized to posaconazole clinically documented colitis precluding 
administration of oral medications and or nutritional supplements required for absorptions of 
posaconazole.  
 
• Adverse event requiring discontinuation of study drug. 
 
2. Death 
 
 


MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER 
IRB PROTOCOL 
IRB#: 10-038 A(17) 
Amended: 03/16/15 
 
 
Page 23 of 29 
A
13.0 
CRITERIA FOR REMOVAL FROM STUDY 
In accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, ICH Good Clinical Practice Guidelines, and the US FDA 
Regulations, a patient has the right to withdraw from the study at any time for any reason without prejudice to 
his/her future medical care by the physician or at the institution. The Investigator also has the right to 
withdraw patients from the study (see below). Should a patient (or a patient’s legally authorized 
representative) decide to withdraw, all efforts will be made to complete and report the observations as 
thoroughly as possible. 
 
A complete final evaluation will be made at the time of the patient’s withdrawal with an explanation of why 
the patient is withdrawing, and an attempt should be made to perform a follow-up evaluation. 
 
Patients may be removed from study if one or more of the following events occur: 
 
• 
Significant noncompliance on the part of the patient 
• 
Refusal of the patient to continue treatment or observations 
• 
Unacceptable toxicity 
• 
Progressive disease that in the Investigator’s opinion would interfere with the interpretation of results 
from the study 
• 
 Decision by the Investigator that termination is in the patient’s best medical interest 
• 
Unrelated medical illness or complication 
• 
Lost to follow-up. 
14.0 
BIOSTATISTICS 
This is a single center randomized open label trial to compare micafungin to posaconazole for prevention of 
fungal infection in high risk patients treated for acute leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome at MSKCC. 
Target accrual is 114 patients (57 patients per treatment arm. We anticipate accrual of approximately 2-3 
patients per month and hence accrual should be completed in 4 years. 
The primary objectives of the trial are to compare the rates of clinical failure between the two treatment arms. 
Clinical failure is defined as any of the following: systemic antifungal therapy for >3 days, drug 
discontinuation due to an adverse event or death. We will compare time from start of prophylaxis to need for 
systemic therapy in the two arms using a log-rank. 
On the basis of the prior multicenter, randomized prophylactic trial of posaconazole the rate of clinical failure 
for posaconazole is estimated at 40-50%. Patients who receive > 1 dose of study drug will be included in the 
intent to treat analyses. Randomized patients who receive ≤ 1 dose of study drug will be marked as non-
evaluable and will be replaced. 
With 57 patients per arm, the trial is powered to detect absolute differences of approximately 25% (e.g., 15% 
versus 40% in proportion of clinical failure in the two groups with approximately 80% power and a 
significance level of 5% using a two-tailed test.  A stratified chi-square test will used to compare the two 
groups (stage of disease ie newly diagnosed AML/ALL/MDS or AML in first relapse.  Due to the low event 
rates for secondary endpoints such as proven infection, rate of discontinuation, and toxicity, rates will be 
estimated by treatment arm.  Comparisons between arms will be performed if numbers permit.. If many 
patients die before the landmark time a then a cumulative incidence function will be utilized to estimate the 
rates at 6 and 12 weeks. The number and proportion of clinically successful patients will be computed per 
treatment along with a 95% confidence interval.   Overall survival will be estimated via Kaplan-Meier 
methodology. All patients will be followed for a minimum of 12 weeks and survival rates at 12 weeks will be 
compared between the two treatment arms using Fishers exact test.  
 
 
 


MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER 
IRB PROTOCOL 
IRB#: 10-038 A(17) 
Amended: 03/16/15 
 
 
Page 24 of 29 
A
15.0 
 RESEARCH PARTICIPANT REGISTRATION AND RANDOMIZATION PROCEDURES 
15.1 Research Participant Registration  
 
Confirm eligibility as defined in the section entitled Criteria for Patient/Subject Eligibility. 
Obtain informed consent, by following procedures defined in section entitled Informed Consent 
Procedures. 
During the registration process registering individuals will be required to complete a protocol specific 
Eligibility Checklist. 
All participants must be registered through the Protocol Participant Registration (PPR) Office at 
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. PPR is available Monday through Friday from 8:30am – 
5:30pm at 646-735-8000. Registrations must be submitted via the PPR Electronic Registration 
System (http://ppr/).  The completed signature page of the written consent/RA or verbal script/RA, a 
completed Eligibility Checklist and other relevant documents must be uploaded via the PPR 
Electronic Registration System. 
15.2 
Randomization 
After eligibility is established and immediately after consent is obtained and a patient number is 
assigned patients will be registered and randomized using the Clinical Research Database (CRDB). 
Patients will be 1:1 randomized to the two arms. Randomization will be accomplished by the method 
of random permuted block and stratified by stage of disease ie newly diagnosed AML/MDS or AML 
in first relapse. 
 
16.0 
DATA MANAGEMENT ISSUES 
This is a single institution trial and all patients will be treated at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer 
Center. A Research Study Assistant (RSA) will be assigned to this study. The responsibilities of the 
RSA include project compliance, data collection, abstraction and entry, data reporting, regulatory 
monitoring, problem resolution and prioritization, and coordinate the activities of the protocol study 
team. The data manager will also monitor laboratory compliance throughout the study. Laboratory 
data will be tabulated and summarized based on MSKCC normal ranges. 
 
The data collected for this study will be entered into the MSKCC Clinical Research Data 
Base (CRDB). 
 
16.1 
Quality Assurance 
Registration reports will be generated by the RSA on a regular basis to monitor patient 
accruals and completeness of the registration data. Routine data quality reports will be 
generated to assess missing data and inconsistencies. Accrual rates and extent and accuracy of 
evaluations and follow-up will be monitored periodically throughout the study period and 
potential problems will be brought to the attention of the study team for discussion and action. 
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) has established standard procedures for 
data safety monitoring of clinical research (see Data and Safety Monitoring Plans). 


MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER 
IRB PROTOCOL 
IRB#: 10-038 A(17) 
Amended: 03/16/15 
 
 
Page 25 of 29 
A
16.2 
Data and Safety Monitoring 
The Data and Safety Monitoring (DSM) plans at MSKCC were approved by the National 
Cancer Institute (NCI) in September 2001. The plans address the new policies set forth by 
NCI in the document titled “Policy of the National Cancer Institute for Data and Safety 
Monitoring of Clinical Trials” which can be found at: 
http://cancertrials.nci.nih.gov/researchers/dsm/index.html. The DSM Plans at MSKCC were 
established and are monitored by the Office of Clinical Research. The MSKCC Data and 
Safety Monitoring Plans can be found on the MSKCC Intranet at: 
http://mskweb2.mskcc.org/irb/index.htm.  
 
During the protocol development and review process, each protocol will be assessed for its 
level of risk and degree of monitoring required. Every type of protocol (i.e. NIH sponsored, 
in-house sponsored, industrial sponsored, NCI cooperative group, etc.) will be addressed and 
the monitoring procedures will be established at the time of protocol activation.  
 
17.0 
PROTECTION OF HUMAN SUBJECTS 
Consent process: Participation in this trial is voluntary. All patients will be required to sign a 
statement of informed consent, which must conform to MSKCC IRB guidelines. 
 
Benefits: It is known that posaconazole and micafungin are effective in preventing fungal 
infections in immunocompromised patients. 
 
Protocol Amendments and Study Termination: All protocol amendments will be reviewed 
and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Memorial Hospital before implementation.  
 
Incentives: No incentives will be offered to patient/subjects for participation in this study. 
Participation is voluntary.  
 
Costs: Micafungin will be provided by Astellas and will be  free of charge to the patients. 
Posaconazole will be billed to the patient. Patients and/or their health care plan will need to 
pay for all of the costs of treatments in this study.  All evaluations to be done before initiation 
of treatment and during the treatment are part of our standard evaluation for patients with 
AML/MDS 
 
Eligibility Exceptions: There will be no exceptions to the eligibility requirements for this 
protocol without the authorization of the Institutional Review Board of Memorial Hospital.  
 
Adverse Reporting Requirements: Severe or unexpected adverse reactions will be reported 
to Genovefa Papanicolaou, MD., principal investigator at MSKCC and the MSKCC IRB.  
 
Inclusion of Children in Research: . Posaconazole is not approved for children 13 years of 
age.  The protocol does not include children. 
 
Inclusion of women and minorities: Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center has filed form 
HHS 441 (re: Civil Rights), form HHS 641 (handicapped Individuals), and form 639-A (re: 
Sex Discrimination). In selecting patients for study in the projects proposed in this protocol, 
we have taken due notice of NIH/ADAMHA policies concerning inclusion of women and 


MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER 
IRB PROTOCOL 
IRB#: 10-038 A(17) 
Amended: 03/16/15 
 
 
Page 26 of 29 
A
minorities in clinical research populations. We expect that the study population will be fully 
representative of the range of patients seen at Memorial Hospital without exclusion as to age, 
gender, or ethnic background.  
 
Alternatives to the Planned Study: Alternative treatment options include receiving standard 
antifungal prophylaxis with posaconazole or participation in other investigational studies.  
If relevant, other investigational options will also be outlined. 
 
Confidentiality: Every effort will be made to maintain patient confidentiality. Research and 
hospital records are confidential. Patient's names or any other personally identifying 
information will not be used in reports or publications resulting from this study. The Food and 
Drug Administration or other authorized agencies (e.g., qualified monitors from MSKCC or 
the NCI etc.), and appropriate personnel may review patient records as required. 
 
17.1 
Privacy 
MSKCC’s Privacy Office may allow the use and disclosure of protected health information 
pursuant to a completed and signed Research Authorization form. The use and disclosure of 
protected health information will be limited to the individuals described in the Research 
Authorization form. A Research Authorization form must be completed by the Principal 
Investigator and approved by the IRB and Privacy Board (IRB/PB).  
17.2 
Serious Adverse Event (SAE) Reporting 
Any SAE must be reported to the IRB/PB as soon as possible but no later than 5 calendar 
days. The IRB/PB requires a Clinical Research Database (CRDB) SAE report be submitted 
electronically to the SAE Office at sae@mskcc.org containing the following information:  
Fields populated from CRDB: 
• Subject’s name (generate the report with only initials if it will be sent outside of     
      MSKCC) 
• Medical record number 
• Disease/histology (if applicable) 
• Protocol number and title 
Data needing to be entered: 
• The date the adverse event occurred 
• The adverse event 
• Relationship of the adverse event to the treatment (drug, device, or intervention) 
• If the AE was expected 
• The severity of the AE 


MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER 
IRB PROTOCOL 
IRB#: 10-038 A(17) 
Amended: 03/16/15 
 
 
Page 27 of 29 
A
• The intervention 
• Detailed text that includes the following 
o A explanation of how the AE was handled 
o A description of the subject’s condition 
o Indication if the subject remains on the study 
o If an amendment will need to be made to the protocol and/or consent form. 
The PI’s signature and the date it was signed are required on the completed report. 
The CRDB AE report should be completed as above and the FDA assigned IND/IDE number written 
at the top of the report. The report will be forwarded to the FDA by the Institutional SAE Manager 
through the IND Office. 
17.2.1  
Toxicities will be reported using NCI’s Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 
4.0.   
 
18.0 
INFORMED CONSENT PROCEDURES 
Before protocol-specified procedures are carried out, consenting professionals will explain 
full details of the protocol and study procedures as well as the risks involved to participants 
prior to their inclusion in the study. Participants will also be informed that they are free to 
withdraw from the study at any time. All participants must sign an IRB/PB-approved consent 
form indicating their consent to participate. This consent form meets the requirements of the 
Code of Federal Regulations and the Institutional Review Board/Privacy Board of this Center. 
The consent form will include the following:  
1. The nature and objectives, potential risks and benefits of the intended study.  
2. The length of study and the likely follow-up required. 
3. Alternatives to the proposed study. (This will include available standard and 
investigational therapies. In addition, patients will be offered an option of supportive 
care for therapeutic studies.) 
4. The name of the investigator(s) responsible for the protocol. 
5. The right of the participant to accept or refuse study interventions/interactions and to 
withdraw from participation at any time.  
Before any protocol-specific procedures can be carried out, the consenting professional will 
fully explain the aspects of patient privacy concerning research specific information.  In 
addition to signing the IRB Informed Consent, all patients must agree to the Research 
Authorization component of the informed consent form. 
Each participant and consenting professional will sign the consent form. The participant must 
receive a copy of the signed informed consent form. 


MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER 
IRB PROTOCOL 
IRB#: 10-038 A(17) 
Amended: 03/16/15 
 
 
Page 28 of 29 
A
19.0 
REFERENCES 
1. 
Chamilos, G., et al., Invasive fungal infections in patients with hematologic malignancies in a 
tertiary care cancer center: an autopsy study over a 15-year period (1989-2003). 
Haematologica, 2006. 91(7): p. 986-9. 
2. 
Pagano, L., et al., The epidemiology of fungal infections in patients with hematologic 
malignancies: the SEIFEM-2004 study. Haematologica, 2006. 91(8): p. 1068-75. 
3. 
Cornely, O.A., Aspergillus to Zygomycetes: causes, risk factors, prevention, and treatment of 
invasive fungal infections. Infection, 2008. 36(4): p. 296-313. 
4. 
Lin, S.J., J. Schranz, and S.M. Teutsch, Aspergillosis case-fatality rate: systematic review of 
the literature. Clin Infect Dis, 2001. 32(3): p. 358-66. 
5. 
Winston, D.J., et al., Intravenous and oral itraconazole versus intravenous and oral 
fluconazole for long-term antifungal prophylaxis in allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell 
transplant recipients. A multicenter, randomized trial. Ann Intern Med, 2003. 138(9): p. 705-
13. 
6. 
Kanda, Y., et al., Prophylactic action of oral fluconazole against fungal infection in 
neutropenic patients. A meta-analysis of 16 randomized, controlled trials. Cancer, 2000. 
89(7): p. 1611-25. 
7. 
Morgenstern, G.R., et al., A randomized controlled trial of itraconazole versus fluconazole for 
the prevention of fungal infections in patients with haematological malignancies. U.K. 
Multicentre Antifungal Prophylaxis Study Group. Br J Haematol, 1999. 105(4): p. 901-11. 
8. 
Glasmacher, A., et al., Itraconazole prevents invasive fungal infections in neutropenic 
patients treated for hematologic malignancies: evidence from a meta-analysis of 3,597 
patients. J Clin Oncol, 2003. 21(24): p. 4615-26. 
9. 
Marr, K.A., et al., Itraconazole versus fluconazole for prevention of fungal infections in 
patients receiving allogeneic stem cell transplants. Blood, 2004. 103(4): p. 1527-33. 
10. 
Mattiuzzi, G.N., et al., Open-label, randomized comparison of itraconazole versus 
caspofungin for prophylaxis in patients with hematologic malignancies. Antimicrob Agents 
Chemother, 2006. 50(1): p. 143-7. 
11. 
Cornely, O.A., et al., Posaconazole vs. fluconazole or itraconazole prophylaxis in patients 
with neutropenia. N Engl J Med, 2007. 356(4): p. 348-59. 
12. 
Petraitis, V., et al., Comparative antifungal activities and plasma pharmacokinetics of 
micafungin (FK463) against disseminated candidiasis and invasive pulmonary aspergillosis 
in persistently neutropenic rabbits. Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 2002. 46(6): p. 1857-69. 
13. 
Walsh, T.J., Echinocandins--an advance in the primary treatment of invasive candidiasis. N 
Engl J Med, 2002. 347(25): p. 2070-2. 
14. 
van Burik, J.A., et al., Micafungin versus fluconazole for prophylaxis against invasive fungal 
infections during neutropenia in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. 
Clin Infect Dis, 2004. 39(10): p. 1407-16. 
15. 
Toubai, T., et al., Efficacy and safety of micafungin in febrile neutropenic patients treated for 
hematological malignancies. Intern Med, 2007. 46(1): p. 3-9. 
16. 
Denning, D.W., et al., Micafungin (FK463), alone or in combination with other systemic 
antifungal agents, for the treatment of acute invasive aspergillosis. J Infect, 2006. 53(5): p. 
337-49. 
17. 
Cada, D.J., T. Levien, and D.E. Baker, Micafungin sodium. Hosp Pharm  2005. 40: p. 693-
703. 
18. 
Denning, D.W., Echinocandin antifungal drugs. Lancet, 2003. 362(9390): p. 1142-51. 
 
19. 
Espinel-Ingroff, A., In vitro antifungal activities of anidulafungin and micafungin, licensed 


MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER 
IRB PROTOCOL 
IRB#: 10-038 A(17) 
Amended: 03/16/15 
 
 
Page 29 of 29 
A
agents and the investigational triazole posaconazole as determined by NCCLS methods for 
12,052 fungal isolates: review of the literature. Rev Iberoam Micol, 2003. 20(4): p. 121-36. 
20. 
Wiederhold, N.P. and R.E. Lewis, The echinocandin antifungals: an overview of the 
pharmacology, spectrum and clinical efficacy. Expert Opin Investig Drugs, 2003. 12(8): p. 
1313-33. 
21. 
Hiemenz, J., et al., Pharmacokinetic and maximum tolerated dose study of micafungin in 
combination with fluconazole versus fluconazole alone for prophylaxis of fungal infections in 
adult patients undergoing a bone marrow or peripheral stem cell transplant. Antimicrob 
Agents Chemother, 2005. 49(4): p. 1331-6. 
22. 
http://www.astellas.us/docs/mycamine.pdf. 
23. 
Seibel, N.L., et al., Safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of Micafungin (FK463) in 
febrile neutropenic pediatric patients. Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 2005. 49(8): p. 3317-
24. 
24. 
Theuretzbacher, U., Pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of echinocandins. Eur J Clin 
Microbiol Infect Dis, 2004. 23(11): p. 805-12. 
25. 
Courtney, R., et al., Effect of food on the relative bioavailability of two oral formulations of 
posaconazole in healthy adults. Br J Clin Pharmacol, 2004. 57(2): p. 218-22. 
26. 
Sansone-Parsons, A., et al., Effect of a nutritional supplement on posaconazole 
pharmacokinetics following oral administration to healthy volunteers. Antimicrob Agents 
Chemother, 2006. 50(5): p. 1881-3. 
27. 
Herbrecht, R., Posaconazole: a potent, extended-spectrum triazole anti-fungal for the 
treatment of serious fungal infections. Int J Clin Pract, 2004. 58(6): p. 612-24. 
28. 
Torres, H.A., et al., Posaconazole: a broad-spectrum triazole antifungal. Lancet Infect Dis, 
2005. 5(12): p. 775-85. 
29. 
Noxafil (posaconazole)  oral suspension [package insert]. 2006, Schering Corp: Kenilworth, 
NJ. 
30. 
Ezzet, F., et al., Oral bioavailability of posaconazole in fasted healthy subjects: comparison 
between three regimens and basis for clinical dosage recommendations. Clin Pharmacokinet, 
2005. 44(2): p. 211-20. 
31. 
Raad, II, et al., Safety of long-term oral posaconazole use in the treatment of refractory 
invasive fungal infections. Clin Infect Dis, 2006. 42(12): p. 1726-34. 
32. 
Raad, II, et al., Posaconazole as salvage treatment for invasive fusariosis in patients with 
underlying hematologic malignancy and other conditions. Clin Infect Dis, 2006. 42(10): p. 
1398-403. 
33. 
Ascioglu, S., et al., Defining opportunistic invasive fungal infections in immunocompromised 
patients with cancer and hematopoietic stem cell transplants: an international consensus. 
Clin Infect Dis, 2002. 34(1): p. 7-14. 
 
20.0 
APPENDICES 
Appendix 1.  MSG/EORTC definitions of possible, probable and proven invasive fungal infections.