Clinical trial NCT03117361
Conditions: Multiple Myeloma
Keywords: multiple myeloma plitidepsin Aplidin
Sponsor: PharmaMar
Start date: 2017-05-08; Completion date: 2018-07-30
Enrollment: 10 participants; Allocation: NA; Intervention model: SINGLE_GROUP

Brief summary:
This is a multi-center, open-label, single arm, non-comparative phase II trial, designed to evaluate the efficacy of plitidepsin in combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone in patients with Multiple Myeloma (MM) double refractory to bortezomib and lenalidomide.

Detailed description:
This is a multi-center, open-label, single arm, non-comparative phase II trial, designed to evaluate the efficacy of plitidepsin in combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone in patients with MM double refractory to bortezomib and lenalidomide.The primary endpoint will be overall response rate (ORR), including stringent complete response (sCR), complete response (CR), very good partial response (VGPR) and partial response (PR).

Approximately 64 evaluable patients will be needed for the evaluation of the primary endpoint, ORR.

An early futility analysis will be performed with the efficacy data collected from the first 20 evaluable patients. The futility analysis will commence once patient number 20 has completed two full treatment cycles. Patient recruitment will not be halted during the conduct of this futility analysis.

Arms: arm 1: Plitidepsin + bortezomib + dexamethasone

Plitidepsin will be administered as a 3-hour intravenous (i.v.) infusion on Day(D) 1 and 15 , every four weeks (q4wk)

Bortezomib will be administered as a bolus subcutaneous (s.c.) injection on D 1, 4, 8 and 11,q4wk

Dexamethasone will be taken orally on D1,8,15 and 22, q4wk
Interventions: intervention 1: plitidepsin intervention 2: Bortezomib intervention 3: Dexamethasone
Intervention descriptions: intervention 1: Patients received plitidepsin as a 3-hour i.v. infusion at a dose of 5 mg/m2 on Days 1 and 15 every Four Weeks. intervention 2: BTZ as a 3-5 second bolus s.c. injection at a dose of 1.3 mg/m2 on Days 1, 4, 8 and 11 every four weeks intervention 3: DXM orally at a dose of 40 mg/day on Days 1, 8, 15 and 22 every four weeks

Protocol documents:
Prot_000.pdf: 
 
 
 
SPONSOR 
 
Pharma Mar, S.A. 
Avda de los Reyes, 1 
 
Polígono Industrial “La Mina” 
28770 Colmenar Viejo (Madrid), Spain 
Phone: + 34 918 466 000  
Fax:  
+ 34 918 466 003 
 
 
PharmaMar USA, Inc. 
230 Park Avenue, suite 1000 
New York, NY 10169 
USA 
Phone: +1 212 309 8737 
Fax: +1 646 435 5846 
 
 
 
 
CLINICAL TRIAL PROTOCOL 
 
 
Phase II Trial of Plitidepsin (Aplidin®) in Combination with Bortezomib and 
Dexamethasone in Multiple Myeloma Patients Double Refractory to Bortezomib and 
Lenalidomide 
 
 
INVESTIGATIONAL 
MEDICINAL 
PRODUCTS: 
plitidepsin 
(Aplidin®), 
bortezomib and dexamethasone. 
Protocol No.: APL-B-022-15 
EudraCT No.: 2015-003486-29 
NCT Code: 03117361 
 
 
 
Protocol version 1.0: 10 November 2015 
 


SPONSORS:                                                                                                   
PharmaMar, S.A.
                               
Avda de los Reyes, 1
Polígono Industrial “La Mina”                                    
28770 Colmenar Viejo (Madrid) Spain
Phone: + 34 91 846 6000 
Fax:
+ 34 91 846 6003
PharmaMar USA, Inc.
230 Park Avenue, suite 1000                                        
New York, NY 10169 
USA 
Phone: +1 212 309 8737
Fax:
+1 646 435 5846
CLINICAL TRIAL PROTOCOL
APL-B-022-15
Phase II Trial of Plitidepsin (Aplidin®) in Combination with Bortezomib and Dexamethasone 
in Multiple Myeloma Patients Double Refractory to Bortezomib and Lenalidomide
INVESTIGATIONAL MEDICINAL PRODUCTS: plitidepsin (Aplidin®), bortezomib and 
dexamethasone.
Eudra CT: 2015-003486-29
Protocol version 1.0: 10 November 2015
This trial will be conducted in compliance with the protocol, Good Clinical Practice and applicable 
regulatory requirements.
CONFIDENTIAL
Information and data included in this protocol contain trade secrets and privileged or confidential information 
which is the property of the Sponsor. No person is authorized to make it public without written permission by
the Sponsor.  These restrictions on disclosure will apply equally to all future information supplied to you 
which is indicated as privileged or confidential. This material may be disclosed to and used by your staff and 
associates as it may be necessary to conduct the clinical trial.
CL_0256 1.0
Page 1 of 102
Protocol APL-B-022-15


TRIAL
CONTACTS
NAME AND ADDRESS
CONTACT DETAILS
Pharma Mar, S.A.
Pharma Mar USA, Inc.
Avda. de los Reyes, 1
Polígono Industrial “La Mina”
28770 Colmenar Viejo
Madrid
Spain
One Liberty Plaza
23rd floor, Suite 2335
New York 10006
USA
Phone: +34 91 846 6000
Fax:
+34 91 846 6003
Phone: + 1 212 201 6770
Fax: +1 212 201 6771
Responsible 
Physician(s)
José Rodríguez Diaz-Pavón, 
MD, PhD
Clinical Oncology
Clinical Development Area
Sara Martínez Gonzalez, MD
Clinical Oncology
Clinical Development Area
Phone: +34 91 846 6157
Fax: +34 91 823 4504 
e-mail: jrodriguez@pharmamar.com
Phone: +34 91 823 4647
Fax: +34 91 823 4504 
E-mail: smgonzalez@pharmamar.com
Project Manager
Clinical Trial 
Monitoring
Pilar García Paramio, PhD
Clinical Operations
Clinical Development Area
Pharma Mar, S.A.
Clinical Operations
Clinical Development Area
Phone: +34 91 823 4597
Fax:
+34 91 823 4529
E-mail: mpgarcia@pharmamar.com
Pharmacovigilance
Carmen Martinez Caballero, 
MD
Pharmacovigilance (PhV)
Clinical Development
Pharma Mar, S.A.
Phone: +34 91 823 4569
Fax:    +34 91 846 6004
E-mail: phv@pharmamar.com
Out of office hours (GMT)
PhV service phone:
+34 91 823 47 42
Clinical Pharmacology
Salvador Fudio Muñoz, MD
Clinical Pharmacology
Clinical Development
Pharma Mar, S.A.
Phone: + 34 91 823 4521
Fax:
+ 34 91 823 4504
E-mail: sfudio@pharmamar.com
CL_0256 1.0
Page 2 of 102
Protocol APL-B-022-15


Central Laboratory for 
Pharmacokinetic 
Samples
Soledad García Martinez
DynaKin, S.L.
Parque Tecnológico de Bizkaia
Ed.801-B first floor
48160 Derio,
Vizcaya
Spain
Phone: +34 94 404 5504
Fax:
+34 94 655 9463
E-mail: sgarcia@dynakin.com
Pharmacogenomics
(PGx) contact
Miguel Aracil, Ph.D.
Pharmacogenomics 
Department. 
Pharma Mar, S.A.
Phone: + 34 91 846 6098
Fax:
+ 34 91 846 6001
E-mail: maracil@pharmamar.com
Central Laboratory for 
PGx Samples
RNA/DNA analysis:
Maria Luisa Villahermosa
GENOMICA S.A.U. 
Parque Empresarial Alvento, 
Edificio B
Via de los Poblados 1, 1ª planta
28033 Madrid
Spain      
IHC analysis:
Richard Fink 
Q2 Solutions
Unit B1, Parkway West 
Industrial Estate
Cranford Lane – Heston, 
Middlesex TW5 9QA, 
UK              
Phone: +34 91 674 8990
Fax:      +34 91 674 8991
E- mail:
mlvillahermosa@genomica.com
Phone: +44 208 377 3300
Fax:     +44 208 377 3350
E-mail:
Richard.S.Fink@QuestDiagnostics.com
CL_0256 1.0
Page 3 of 102
Protocol APL-B-022-15


PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS
A full list of Investigators will be available as a separate document. 
CL_0256 1.0
Page 4 of 102
Protocol APL-B-022-15


TABLE OF CONTENTS
TRIAL CONTACTS........................................................................................................................ 2
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS ................................................................................................... 4
TABLE OF CONTENTS................................................................................................................. 5
SYNOPSIS ........................................................................................................................................ 8
SCHEDULE OF ASSESSMENTS................................................................................................ 19
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND DEFINITION OF TERMS ............................................... 22
1.
BACKGROUND........................................................................................................... 25
1.1
Overview of the Disease................................................................................................ 25
1.2
Current Treatment for Multiple Myeloma................................................................. 25
1.3
Plitidepsin ...................................................................................................................... 27
1.3.1
Name and Chemical Information............................................................................ 27
1.3.2
Non-clinical Data ...................................................................................................... 27
1.3.2.1
Mechanism of Action in Cell Lines .......................................................................... 27
1.3.2.2
Plitidepsin as Single Agent: In vitro and In vivo Data............................................. 28
1.3.2.3
Plitidepsin in Combination: In vitro and In vivo Data ............................................ 29
1.3.2.4
Toxicology.................................................................................................................. 33
1.3.2.5
Safety Pharmacology................................................................................................. 33
1.3.3
Clinical Data ............................................................................................................. 34
1.3.3.1
Phase I Trials............................................................................................................. 34
1.3.3.2
Phase II Trials ........................................................................................................... 37
1.3.3.3
Phase III Program..................................................................................................... 38
1.3.4
Summary of Pharmacokinetic Results ................................................................... 39
1.4
Bortezomib .................................................................................................................... 39
1.4.1
Scientific Background .............................................................................................. 39
1.4.2
Mechanism of Action................................................................................................ 40
1.4.3
Preclinical Experience.............................................................................................. 40
1.4.4
Clinical Pharmacology............................................................................................. 41
1.4.5
Phase I Clinical Experience ..................................................................................... 41
1.4.6
Phase II Clinical Experience.................................................................................... 42
1.4.7
Safety Issues .............................................................................................................. 44
1.5
Trial Rationale and Drug Selection............................................................................. 45
2.
OBJECTIVES............................................................................................................... 48
3.
OVERALL TRIAL DESIGN....................................................................................... 48
3.1
Trial Endpoints ............................................................................................................. 49
3.2
Number of Patients....................................................................................................... 50
3.3
Selection of Patients...................................................................................................... 50
3.3.1
Inclusion Criteria...................................................................................................... 50
3.3.2
Exclusion Criteria..................................................................................................... 52
3.3.3
Inclusion Criteria for the Pharmacogenomic (PGx) Sub-study........................... 53
4.
PLAN OF THE TRIAL................................................................................................ 53
4.1
Duration of the Trial Individually per Patient........................................................... 53
4.2
Duration of the Trial (for the Whole Trial)................................................................ 54
4.3
Subject Participation.................................................................................................... 54
4.4
Discontinuations............................................................................................................ 54
4.5
Replacement of Patients ............................................................................................... 55
4.6
Screening and Baseline Assessments........................................................................... 56
4.7
Treatment Period Assessments.................................................................................... 58
4.8
Evaluations at the End of Treatment.......................................................................... 59
4.8.1
End-of-treatment Visit ................................................................................................. 59
4.8.2
Follow-up Visits ............................................................................................................ 61
5.
TRIAL MEDICATION................................................................................................ 61
CL_0256 1.0
Page 5 of 102
Protocol APL-B-022-15


5.1
Plitidepsin ...................................................................................................................... 61
5.1.1
Plitidepsin Recommendations for Safe Handling.................................................. 62
5.1.2
Required Prophylactic Medication......................................................................... 62
5.2
Bortezomib .................................................................................................................... 62
5.2.1
Prophylactic Medication.......................................................................................... 62
5.3
Dexamethasone Drug Formulation ............................................................................. 62
5.4
Treatment Schedule...................................................................................................... 63
5.5
Criteria for Treatment Continuation.......................................................................... 63
5.6
Criteria for Dose Reduction......................................................................................... 64
5.6.1
Plitidepsin.................................................................................................................. 64
5.6.2
Dexamethasone ......................................................................................................... 64
5.6.3
Bortezomib................................................................................................................ 65
5.7
Permitted Treatment and Medication ........................................................................ 66
5.7.1
Transfusions.............................................................................................................. 66
5.7.1.1
Guidelines for Platelet Transfusions ........................................................................ 66
5.7.1.2
Guidelines for Red Cell Transfusions....................................................................... 66
5.7.2
Other Therapies........................................................................................................ 67
5.8
Prohibited Medication.................................................................................................. 67
5.9
Drug Accountability ..................................................................................................... 68
6.
TRIAL ASSESSMENTS .............................................................................................. 68
6.1
Efficacy Assessment...................................................................................................... 68
6.1.1
Response Criteria for Multiple Myeloma............................................................... 68
6.1.1.1
Stringent Complete Response (sCR) ......................................................................... 68
6.1.1.2
Complete Response (CR)........................................................................................... 68
6.1.1.3
Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) ....................................................................... 68
6.1.1.4
Partial Response (PR) ............................................................................................... 68
6.1.1.5
Minimal Response (MR) ........................................................................................... 69
6.1.1.6
Stable Disease (SD) ................................................................................................... 69
6.1.1.7
Progressive Disease (PD) .......................................................................................... 69
6.1.1.8
Overall Response Rate (ORR)................................................................................... 69
6.1.1.9
Clinical Benefit Rate ................................................................................................. 69
6.1.2
Additional Efficacy Endpoints ................................................................................ 70
6.1.3
Efficacy Assessment Determinations ...................................................................... 70
6.1.3.1
Myeloma Protein Measurements .............................................................................. 70
6.1.3.2
Bone Marrow............................................................................................................. 70
6.1.3.3
Skeletal Survey and Other Radiographs................................................................... 71
6.1.3.4
Beta-2-Microglobulin and C-Reactive Protein......................................................... 71
6.2
Safety Assessment ......................................................................................................... 71
6.2.1
Adverse Event Definitions ....................................................................................... 71
6.2.1.1
Adverse Event ............................................................................................................ 71
6.2.1.2
Serious Adverse Event............................................................................................... 72
6.2.1.3
Death.......................................................................................................................... 72
6.2.1.4
Life Threatening Event ............................................................................................. 72
6.2.1.5
Hospitalization /Prolongation of Hospitalization..................................................... 72
6.2.1.6
Unexpected/Unlisted Adverse Event ......................................................................... 73
6.2.1.7
Adverse Reaction ....................................................................................................... 73
6.2.1.8
Adverse Events Related to the Trial Treatment........................................................ 73
6.2.1.9
Expedited Reporting .................................................................................................. 73
6.2.1.10
Causality Assessment ............................................................................................ 74
6.2.2
Adverse Event Reporting Procedures..................................................................... 74
6.2.2.1
Reporting of Adverse Events ..................................................................................... 74
6.2.2.2
Reporting Serious Adverse Events............................................................................ 75
6.2.2.3
Reporting Pregnancy Cases Occurred During this Clinical Trial........................... 75
CL_0256 1.0
Page 6 of 102
Protocol APL-B-022-15


6.2.3
Adverse Events Monitoring..................................................................................... 76
6.3
Pharmacokinetics (PK) Assessment ............................................................................ 76
6.3.1
Analytical Procedures .............................................................................................. 78
6.3.2
Pharmacokinetic Calculations................................................................................. 78
6.4
Pharmacogenomic (PGx) Assessment......................................................................... 78
7.
STATISTICAL METHODS ........................................................................................ 78
7.1
Sample Size Considerations ......................................................................................... 78
7.2
Assessment of Efficacy.................................................................................................. 79
7.3
Toxicity and Adverse Events ....................................................................................... 79
7.4
Other Analyses.............................................................................................................. 80
7.5
Baseline and Demographic Data ................................................................................. 80
7.6
Treatment Administration........................................................................................... 80
7.7
Protocol Deviations....................................................................................................... 81
7.8
Pharmacokinetics.......................................................................................................... 81
7.9
Pharmacogenomics ....................................................................................................... 82
7.10
Procedures for Reporting Deviations to the Original Statistical Analysis Plan...... 82
8.
ADMINISTRATIVE REQUERIMENTS................................................................... 82
8.1
Ethics.............................................................................................................................. 82
8.2
Monitoring, Auditing and Inspecting.......................................................................... 82
8.3
Patient Informed Consent............................................................................................ 83
8.4
Confidentiality/Patients Identification........................................................................ 83
8.5
Case Report Forms ....................................................................................................... 84
8.6
Insurance ....................................................................................................................... 84
8.7
Records Retention......................................................................................................... 84
8.8
Use of Information and Publication............................................................................ 84
9.
REFERENCES.............................................................................................................. 86
10.
APPENDICES............................................................................................................... 91
CL_0256 1.0
Page 7 of 102
Protocol APL-B-022-15


SYNOPSIS
TITLE
Phase II Trial of Plitidepsin (Aplidin®) in Combination with 
Bortezomib and Dexamethasone in Multiple Myeloma Patients 
Double Refractory to Bortezomib and Lenalidomide
PROTOCOL CODE
APL-B-022-15
INVESTIGATORS / 
TRIAL LOCATION
A complete list will be provided as a separate document.
TRIAL OBJECTIVES
Primary objective:
To evaluate
the efficacy of plitidepsin in combination with 
bortezomib and dexamethasone in patients with multiple myeloma 
(MM) double refractory to bortezomib and lenalidomide in terms of
overall response rate (ORR), including stringent complete response 
(sCR), complete response (CR), very good partial response (VGPR) 
and partial response (PR).
Secondary objectives:

To evaluate time-to-event efficacy endpoints of plitidepsin in 
combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone, i.e., duration of 
response (DOR), time to progression (TTP), progression-free 
survival (PFS) and event-free survival (EFS).

To evaluate overall survival (OS) and OS rate at 6 and 12 months 
(OS6 and OS12, respectively).

To evaluate the safety and tolerability of
plitidepsin in 
combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone.

To study the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics 
(PDy) of plitidepsin in combination with bortezomib and 
dexamethasone.

To obtain pharmacogenomic information (Pharmacogenomics 
[PGx]) on markers of response to plitidepsin and bortezomib
treatment.
TRIAL DESIGN
This is a multicenter, open-label, single arm, non-comparative phase
II study to evaluate the efficacy of plitidepsin in combination with 
bortezomib and dexamethasone
in patients with MM double 
refractory to bortezomib and lenalidomide. 

Plitidepsin will be administered as a 3-hour (h) intravenous (i.v.)
infusion at a dose of 5 mg/m2 on Day (D) 1 and 15, every four 
weeks (q4wk).

Bortezomib will be administered as a subcutaneous (s.c.) injection 
at a dose of 1.3 mg/m2 on D1, 4, 8 and 11, q4wk.

Dexamethasone will be taken orally at a dose of 40 mg/day on D1,
8, 15 and 22, q4wk.
Patients will be treated until PD, excessive side effects or withdrawal 
of consent. If patients respond to treatment or achieve stable disease 
(SD) and bortezomib toxicity precludes any further treatment, they 
may continue to receive plitidepsin and dexamethasone at the same 
dose upon Investigator’s decision and agreement with the Sponsor.
CL_0256 1.0
Page 8 of 102
Protocol APL-B-022-15


Once plitidepsin treatment is stopped, patients must be discontinued 
from the trial.
TRIAL POPULATION
Patients with MM double refractory to bortezomib and lenalidomide.
Refractory myeloma is defined as disease that is non-responsive 
while on primary or salvage therapy, or progresses within 60 days of
the last therapy. There are two categories of refractory myeloma:
Primary refractory myeloma is defined as disease that is 
non-responsive in patients who have never achieved a 
minimal response (MR) or better, with any therapy. It 
includes patients who never achieve MR or better in whom 
there is no significant change in monoclonal protein (M-
protein) and no evidence of clinical progression as well as 
primary, refractory disease progression (PD) where patients 
meet criteria for true PD.
Relapsed and refractory myeloma is defined as disease that 
is non-responsive while on salvage therapy, or progresses 
within 60 days of the last therapy in patients who have 
achieved MR or better at some point previously before 
progressing.
INCLUSION 
CRITERIA
1)
Patients must give written informed consent
(IC)
in 
accordance with institutional and local guidelines.
2)
Age ≥18 years.
3)
Patients must have a confirmed diagnosis of MM according 
to the Durie and Salmon criteria.
4)
Patients must have measurable disease defined as any of the 
following:
a)
Serum M-protein ≥0.5 g/dL or ≥0.2 g/24-h urine light chain
(UFLC) excretion. 
b)
In patients who lack measureable M-protein in serum or 
urine, i.e., serum M-protein < 0.5 g/dL and urine M-protein < 
0.2 g/24 h, serum free light chain (SFLC) levels are most 
informative. SFLC levels can be used only if the baseline 
SFLC ratio is abnormal (<0.26 or >1.65),
indicating 
clonality. In addition, the baseline SFLC level must be ≥10 
mg/dl of the appropriate involved light chain isotype.
c)
When applicable, measurable soft tissue plasmacytoma ≥2 
cm, by either physical examination and/or applicable 
radiological evaluation (i.e., magnetic resonance imaging
[MRI], computed tomography [CT]-scan).
5)
Prior autologous and/or allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell 
transplantation (HSCT) patients are allowed. Patients must 
not have acute/chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) or 
be receiving immunosuppressive therapy at least 90 days 
before  the onset of treatment with the trial drug(s).
6)
Patients must have received previous treatment with 
bortezomib and lenalidomide and be refractory to both.
7)
Patients must have an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group 
(ECOG) performance status (PS) ≤ 2.
CL_0256 1.0
Page 9 of 102
Protocol APL-B-022-15


8)
Recovery to grade ≤ 1 from any non-hematological adverse 
event (AE) derived from previous treatment (if present,
alopecia and peripheral neuropathy must be grade <1).
9)
Laboratory data:
a)
Hemoglobin ≥ 8 g/dL.
b)
Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥ 1,000 cells/mm3 (1.0 x 
109/L) (≥ 0.5 x 109/L if due to extensive bone marrow [BM]
involvement by ≥ 50% of plasma cells in BM biopsy). 
Screening of ANC should be independent of granulocyte- and 
granulocyte/macrophage-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF 
and GM-CSF) support for at least one week and of pegylated 
G-CSF for at least two weeks.
c)
Platelet count ≥ 50,000/mm3 (50.0 x 109/L) for patients in 
whom < 50% of the BM nucleated cells are plasma cells.
d)
Platelet count ≥ 25,000/mm3 (25.0 x 109/L) for patients in 
whom ≥50% of BM nucleated cells are plasma cells.
e)
Serum total bilirubin < 1.5 x institutional upper limit of 
normal (ULN) (except when Gilbert syndrome is clearly 
documented and other liver function tests are within normal 
levels).
f)
Aspartate 
aminotransferase 
(AST) 
and 
alanine 
aminotransferase (ALT) 3.0 x institutional ULN and 
alkaline phosphatase (AP) 2.5 x institutional ULN.
g)
Creatinine clearance (CrCl) > 30 mL/min, measured or 
calculated according to Cockcroft and Gault’s formula.
h)
Albumin ≥ 2.5 g/dl.
10)
Evidence of non-childbearing status for women of 
childbearing potential (WOCBP): WOCBP must have a 
negative serum or urine pregnancy test within seven days 
prior to enrolment and must agree to use a highly effective 
contraceptive measure throughout the trial and during six 
months after treatment discontinuation.
Male patients 
enrolled in the study should also use contraceptive methods 
during and after treatment discontinuation.
11)
Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥ 45%.
12)
Patients must have a BM assessment within three weeks prior 
to enrolment.
EXCLUSION CRITERIA
1)
Previous treatment with plitidepsin.
2)
Active or metastatic primary malignancy other than MM.
3)
Serious 
concomitant 
systemic 
disorders 
that 
would 
compromise the safety of the patient or the patient’s ability to 
complete the trial, including the following specific 
conditions: 
a)
Uncontrolled psychiatric illness or medical illness that the 
Investigator feels will compromise the patient’s tolerance of 
the trial medication.
b)
Significant non-neoplastic liver disease.
CL_0256 1.0
Page 10 of 102
Protocol APL-B-022-15


c)
Uncontrolled endocrine diseases (i.e., requiring relevant 
changes in medication within the last month, or hospital 
admission within the last three months).
d)
Uncontrolled systemic infection.
e)
Acute infiltrative pulmonary and pericardial disease.
4)
Other relevant cardiac conditions:
a)
Symptomatic arrhythmia (excluding anemia-related grade ≤ 2 
sinusal tachycardia) or any arrhythmia requiring ongoing 
treatment, and/or prolonged grade ≥ 2 QT-QTc; or presence 
of unstable atrial fibrillation (according to the National 
Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for the 
Classification of Adverse Events [NCI-CTCAE]
v4.0). 
Patients on treatment for stable atrial fibrillation are allowed, 
provided they do not meet any other cardiac or prohibited 
drug exclusion criterion.
b)
History or presence of unstable angina, myocardial 
infarction, valvular heart disease, cardiac amyloidosis or
congestive heart failure within the last 12 months.
c)
Uncontrolled arterial hypertension (≥
150/100
mmHg) 
despite optimal medical therapy.
d)
Previous treatment with doxorubicin at cumulative doses of 
> 400 mg/m², or equivalent.
5)
History of hypersensitivity reactions and/or intolerance to 
bortezomib, polyoxyl 35 castor oil, mannitol, boron or 
dexamethasone.
6)
Myopathy or any clinical situation that causes significant and 
persistent elevation of creatine phosphokinase (CPK) (> 2.5 
ULN) in two different determinations performed within one 
week of each other.
7)
Grade ≥ 1 neuropathy (either bortezomib-related or not) 
according to NCI-CTCAE v4.0.
8)
Any other major illness that, in the Investigator’s judgment, 
will substantially increase the risk associated with the 
patients’ participation in this trial.
9)
Pregnant and/or lactating women.
10)
Known active human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) 
infection (HIV testing is not required unless infection is 
clinically suspected).
11)
Active hepatitis B or C virus (HBV or HCV) infection.
12)
Treatment with any Investigational Medicinal Product (IMP)
in the 30 days before inclusion in the trial.
13)
Concomitant 
medications 
that 
include 
corticosteroids, 
chemotherapy (CT), or other therapy that is or may be active 
against myeloma. Concurrent corticosteroids are allowed as
an equivalent to a prednisone dose of ≤ 10 mg daily, 
administered as an antiemetic or as premedication for blood 
products.
14)
Wash-out periods after the end of the previous therapy:
CL_0256 1.0
Page 11 of 102
Protocol APL-B-022-15


a)
Nitrosoureas must be discontinued six weeks prior to Cycle
(C) 1, D1.
b)
Thirty days for other CTs and 15 days for other biological 
agents prior to C1 D1.
c)
Thirty days after the end of any prior
radiation or 
radionuclide therapy (six weeks in the case of prior extensive 
external beam radiation, with more than 25% of BM 
distribution).
15)
Plasma cell leukemia at the time of trial entry.
16)
Disease-related symptomatic hypercalcemia despite optimal 
medical therapy.
17)
Limitation of the patient’s ability to comply with the 
treatment or follow-up protocol.
18)
Contraindication to use steroids.
INCLUSION CRITERIA 
FOR THE PGx SUB-
STUDY
Only patients with available BM samples and who voluntarily sign 
the Informed Consent Form (ICF) for the PGx sub-study will be able 
to participate. Refusal to participate in the PGx sub-study will not 
affect patient participation in the trial APL-B-022-15.
EXPECTED NUMBER 
OF PATIENTS
Approximately 64 evaluable patients will be needed for the 
evaluation of the primary endpoint, ORR.
An early futility analysis will be performed with the efficacy data 
collected from the first 20 evaluable patients. The futility analysis 
will commence once patient number 20 has completed two full 
treatment cycles. Patient recruitment will not be halted during the 
conduct of this futility analysis.
EXPECTED NUMBER 
OF CENTERS
A complete list of centers (10-15 are expected) will be provided as a 
separate document.
TRIAL DRUGS  
FORMULATION
Plitidepsin (Aplidin®) is supplied as a lyophilized product in a glass 
vial containing 2 mg. The lyophilized powder is a concentrate for 
solution and contains plitidepsin as the active ingredient and mannitol 
as the inactive ingredient. The reconstitution solvent is supplied in 
ampoules, each containing 4 mL
of polyoxyl 35 castor 
oil/ethanol/WFI 
(15/15/70% 
v/v/v).
Plitidepsin 
vials 
and 
reconstitution ampoules should be stored in a locked area with limited 
access at 2 to 8ºC (36ºF to 46ºF) and protected from exposure to light.
Bortezomib is available for i.v. or s.c. injection use. For further 
information on the drug product, please refer to the EU Summary of 
Product Characteristics (SmPC)
or the USP
(US Product 
Information).  
Dexamethasone is administered orally as tablets that should be 
stored in well-closed containers. For further information on the drug 
product, please refer to the EU SmPC or the USP.
TREATMENT 
SCHEDULE
A treatment cycle consists of oral dexamethasone administered on 
D1, 8, 15 and 22, q4wk, at a dose of 40 mg/day at least one hour
before a 3h i.v. infusion of plitidepsin on D1 and 15, q4wk, at a dose 
CL_0256 1.0
Page 12 of 102
Protocol APL-B-022-15


of 5 mg/m2 and immediately followed by a 3-5 second bolus s.c. 
injection of bortezomib on D1, 4, 8 and 11, q4wk at a dose of 1.3 
mg/m2.
Treatment cycles will be repeated q4wk.
Patients will be treated until PD. If the patient responds to treatment
or achieves SD, and if bortezomib toxicity precludes any further 
treatment, 
treatment 
may 
continue 
with 
plitidepsin
and 
dexamethasone at the same dose upon Investigator’s decision and 
agreement with the Sponsor. Once plitidepsin treatment is stopped, 
patients must be discontinued from the trial.
CRITERIA FOR 
TREATMENT 
CONTINUATION
Re-treatment criteria for plitidepsin and dexamethasone will be 
monitored on D1 and D15 and re-treatment criteria for bortezomib 
will be monitored on D1, as defined in the table below:
Plitidepsin/Dexamethasone
Bortezomib
1a and 15b
Day 1a
ANC
1.0 x 109/L
(≥ 0.5 x109/L if due to 
extensive BM involvement)
0.75 x 109/L 
(≥ 0.5 x109/L if 
due to 
extensive BM 
involvement)
Platelet count
≥ 50.0 x 109/L
(≥ 25.0 x 109/L if ≥ 50% of 
BM nucleated cells are plasma 
cells)
≥ 25.0 x 109/L 
Hemoglobin
8.0 g/dL
8.0 g/dL
Serum total bilirubin 
1.5 x ULNe
3.0 x ULNe
AST/ALT
3.0 x ULN
5.0 x ULN
AP
2.5 x ULN
5.0 x ULN
Muscular toxicity 
(myalgia, muscular 
weakness, CPK 
increase)
< Grade 2
< Grade 3
Other non-
hematological drug-
related AEs (except for 
increased GGT, non-
optimally treated 
nausea and vomiting,  
hypertension, 
alopecia)c
< Grade 2
< Grade 3f
ECG
Baseline values
Baseline values
ECHO/MUGAd
Baseline values
Baseline values
aIf a patient does not meet the requirements for plitidepsin/dexamethasone treatment 
continuation while meeting the requirements for bortezomib treatment continuation on 
D1 of the following cycle, the plitidepsin/dexamethasone dose will be omitted and 
bortezomib will be administered.
If a patient does not meet the requirements for plitidepsin/dexamethasone and 
bortezomib 
treatment 
continuation 
on 
D1 
of 
the 
following 
cycle, 
plitidepsin/dexamethasone and bortezomib will be delayed until recovery or for a 
maximum of 14 days. After this period, if the delay is due to toxicity assessed as related 
to a trial drug, a dose reduction (according to the “Criteria for Dose Reduction” section)
is mandatory.
bIf a patient does not meet the requirements for plitidepsin/dexamethasone treatment 
continuation on D15 of the following cycle, the plitidepsin/dexamethasone dose will be 
omitted. 
CL_0256 1.0
Page 13 of 102
Protocol APL-B-022-15


cAny grade accepted for increased GGT.
dTo be performed every three months unless more frequent assessments are clinically 
indicated.
eExcept if Gilbert syndrome is clearly documented and other liver function tests are 
normal.
fIf peripheral neuropathy (PN) occurs, follow the guidelines for 
bortezomib dose reduction available in the “Criteria for Dose Reduction” 
section.
AEs, adverse event(s); ALT, alanine aminotransferase; ANC, absolute neutrophil count; 
AP, alkaline phosphatase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; BM, bone marrow; CPK, 
creatine phosphokinase; D, day; DL, dose level; ECG, electrocardiogram; 
ECHO/MUGA, echocardiogram/multiple-gated acquisition scan; GGT, -glutamyl
transpeptidase; L, liter; ULN, upper limit of normality; PN, peripheral neuropathy.
CRITERIA FOR DOSE 
REDUCTION
Plitidepsin
Under the following circumstances, patients may continue plitidepsin
treatment after a 20-25% dose reduction, upon Investigator’s decision 
and agreement with the Sponsor, if patient benefit is perceived: 

Less than 50% compliance with the treatment schedule, and/or

Grade ≥ 3 febrile neutropenia, or

Grade 4 neutropenia and infection, or grade 4 neutropenia lasting 
> 7 days (except for patients with extensive BM involvement), 
and/or

Grade 4 thrombocytopenia (except for patients with extensive BM 
involvement), and/or

Grade 4 thrombocytopenia with grade ≥ 3 bleeding  (except for 
patients with extensive BM involvement), and/or

Grade ≥ 3 muscular toxicity (weakness, myalgia and/or CPK 
elevations). In the presence of muscular toxicity, plitidepsin will 
be reduced first; if toxicity persists, dexamethasone will then be 
reduced.

Any grade ≥ 3 clinically relevant non-hematological toxicity other 
than non-optimally treated nausea and vomiting, diarrhea lasting < 
48 h and/or grade ≥ 3 asthenia/fatigue lasting < 5 days.
Up to a maximum of two plitidepsin dose reductions (from 5.0 mg/m2
to 4 mg/m2 and from 4 mg/m2 to 3.0 mg/m2) will be allowed upon 
Sponsor’s agreement, if patient benefit is perceived. After two dose 
reductions, trial treatment will be discontinued.
Dexamethasone
Under the following circumstances, and after recovery from toxicity, 
patients may continue dexamethasone treatment after a 50% dose 
reduction: 

Grade ≥ 3 muscular toxicity (weakness, myalgia and/or CPK 
elevations) (in the presence of muscular toxicity, plitidepsin will 
be reduced first; if toxicity persists, dexamethasone will then be 
reduced), or 

Drug-related grade ≥ 3 fatigue, or 

Grade ≥ 2 mood disturbances or agitation, or 

Grade ≥ 3 fluid retention, or 

Grade 4 clinically documented infection. 

Grade ≥ 3 gastrointestinal disorders, despite optimal treatment.
CL_0256 1.0
Page 14 of 102
Protocol APL-B-022-15



Acute pancreatitis (discontinue dexamethasone without previous 
dose reduction).

Grade ≥ 3 hyperglycemia, despite optimal treatment.
Up to a maximum of two consecutive dose reductions (i.e., 20 mg 
D1, 8, 15 and 22, and 20 mg D1 and 15 of each 28-day cycle) will be 
allowed upon Sponsor’s agreement, if patient benefit is perceived. 
After two dose reductions, dexamethasone will be discontinued.
Bortezomib 
The following guidelines must be followed for bortezomib-related 
hematological and non-hematological toxicity:
Severity of toxicity
Recommended modification of 
bortezomib dose and regimen
≥Grade 3 febrile neutropenia, or
Grade 4 neutropenia, or
Grade 4 thrombocytopenia, or
Grade 3 thrombocytopenia with 
bleeding
If two or more doses are omitted 
consecutively or within the same 
cycle, then reduce bortezomib one 
dose level
Herpes Zoster reactivation (any 
grade)
Hold therapy until lesions are dry
≥ Grade 3  bortezomib-related non-
hematological toxicity (as judged by 
the Investigator) 
If two or more doses are omitted 
consecutively or within the same 
cycle, then reduce bortezomib one 
dose level
The following guidelines must be followed for bortezomib-related 
peripheral neuropathy:
Severity of PN
signs and symptomsa
Recommended modification of 
bortezomib dose and regimen
Grade 1 (paresthesia; weakness 
and/or loss of reflexes) without pain
or loss of function
For patients receiving twice-weekly 
bortezomib, change to once-per-week 
schedule (D1, 8, 15, 22, q4wk), then 
Reduce current dose by one DL (from 
1.3 to 1.0 mg/m2) (from 1.0 to 0.7 
mg/m2), then 
Discontinue bortezomib
Grade 1 with pain or grade 2  (with 
no pain but limiting instrumental 
ADLsb)
For patients receiving twice-weekly 
bortezomib, change to a once-per-
week (D1, 8, 15, 22, q4wk) schedule, 
then 
Reduce current dose by one DL (from 
1.3 to 1.0 mg/m2) (from 1.0 to 0.7 
mg/m2) or consider temporary 
discontinuation; upon resolution to 
grade ≤ 1, re-start once-per-week 
dosing (D1, 8, 15, 22, q4wk) at the 
same DL, then 
Discontinue bortezomib
Grade 2 with pain or grade 3 
(limiting self-care and ADLc) or 
grade 4
Discontinue bortezomib
aBased on posology modifications in phase II and III MM studies and post-marketing 
experience. Grading based on NCI-CTCAE v 4.0.
bInstrumental ADL: refers to preparing meals, shopping for groceries or clothes, using 
the telephone, managing money, etc.
cSelf-care ADL: refers to bathing, dressing and undressing, feeding self, using the toilet, 
taking medicinal products, and not bedridden.
ADL, activities of daily living; DL, dose level; MM, multiple myeloma; NCI-CTCAE, 
National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for the Classification of 
CL_0256 1.0
Page 15 of 102
Protocol APL-B-022-15


Adverse Events; PN, peripheral neuropathy.
Up to a maximum of two bortezomib consecutive dose reductions 
will be allowed (from 1.3 mg/m2 to 1.0 mg/m2 and from 1.0 mg/m2 to 
0.7 mg/m2) upon Sponsor’s agreement, if patient benefit is perceived. 
After two dose reductions, bortezomib will be discontinued and 
treatment with plitidepsin/dexamethasone will be continued.
Once a dose reduction of any trial drug has been implemented, the 
dose will not be re-escalated thereafter.
EFFICACY 
EVALUATION 
CRITERIA
Patients are evaluable for efficacy if they receive at least one 
complete treatment cycle (two plitidepsin infusions, four bortezomib 
injections, four doses of dexamethasone), or the equivalent doses 
over two cycles and have, at least, one disease assessment. 
Efficacy will be evaluated according to International Myeloma 
Working Group (IMWG) criteria on D1 of each treatment cycle, if 
response is observed or if clinical symptoms suggest new 
plasmacytomas and/or new bone lytic lesions:  

Overall response rate (ORR), including stringent complete 
response (sCR), complete response (CR), very good partial 
response (VGPR) and partial response (PR).

Minimal response (MR).

Stable disease (SD).

Clinical benefit rate, including ORR plus MR plus SD.

Duration of response (DOR). 

Time to progression (TTP). 

Progression–free survival (PFS).

Event-free survival (EFS).

OS and OS rate at 6 and 12 months (OS6 and OS12, respectively).
SAFETY 
EVALUATIONS
Patients are evaluable for safety if they receive at least one (complete 
or incomplete) dose of plitidepsin.
Safety will be evaluated by the occurrence of clinical and laboratory 
toxicities and changes from baseline in physical examination 
findings, vital signs, and, if applicable, chest X-ray and 
electrocardiogram (ECG) findings. AEs will be graded according to 
NCI-CTCAE v 4.0. Treatment delays, dose reduction requirements 
and reasons for discontinuation will be monitored throughout the 
trial.
PHARMACOKINETIC 
EVALUATIONS
Samples for PK analysis will be obtained during Cycle 1 and Cycle 2.
PK parameters will be calculated using population methods, after 
pooling data from this study with data obtained from other studies. 
PHARMACOGENOMIC 
EVALUATIONS (PGx 
SUB-STUDY) 
The analysis of potential predictive factors of response to plitidepsin 
and bortezomib treatment will be done on prior available BM samples 
obtained at the time of the baseline visit and after a patient who has 
signed a written IC to participate in the PGx sub-study, has responded 
to treatment. The response to trial treatment will be correlated with 
the expression levels of selected genes that could be potentially 
CL_0256 1.0
Page 16 of 102
Protocol APL-B-022-15


predictive factors of response to plitidepsin and bortezomib. Factors 
related to the mechanism of action (MOA) of plitidepsin and/or 
bortezomib and/or related to the pathogenesis of the disease will be 
included in the analysis. Their expression will be analyzed at the 
mRNA or protein level by real-time reverse transcriptase quantitative 
polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) and immunohistochemistry 
(IHC), respectively; polymorphisms and mutations in the selected 
genes could also be analyzed, if relevant.
STATISTICAL 
METHODS
Sample size considerations:
Patients will be treated to test the null hypothesis (H0) that 20% or 
fewer patients achieve a response according to IMWG criteria (p 
0.20) versus the alternative hypothesis (H1) that 40% or more patients 
achieve a response according to IMWG criteria (p ≥ 0.40). The 
variance of the standardized test is based on the empirical estimate. 
The type I error rate (alpha) associated with this one-sided test is 
0.025 and the type II error rate (beta) is 0.1; hence, statistical power is 
90%. In order to test these hypotheses, it is necessary to recruit 64 
evaluable patients. 
A futility analysis based on the primary endpoint (ORR) is planned 
for the time when the first 20 evaluable patients have been recruited. 
The analysis will commence once the last of the 20 patients has 
completed two full treatment cycles. Patient recruitment will not be 
halted during the conduct of this futility analysis. A spending 
function defined by the Gamma family with parameter (-2) has been 
selected. If there are two or fewer responders according to boundaries 
and sample size assumptions, then the alternative hypothesis could be 
rejected and recruitment might be stopped at that time. Otherwise, 
patient accrual will continue to a total of 64 patients. 
Overall, if ≥ 21 (i.e., 33%) patients achieve a response, then the null 
hypothesis can be rejected.
REPLACEMENT OF 
PATIENTS
Patients must be replaced if they are not evaluable for efficacy, the 
primary objective of the trial. Patients must have received at least one 
complete treatment cycle (two plitidepsin infusions, four bortezomib 
injections and four doses of dexamethasone), or the equivalent doses 
over two cycles and must have had at least one tumor assessment. 
PLANNED TRIAL 
PERIODS (individually 
per patient)
Patients will be evaluated at scheduled visits in three trial periods:

Pre-treatment: from signature of the IC to the first trial drug 
infusion.

Treatment: from first infusion of trial drugs to end of treatment 
(EOT).

Follow-up: after EOT, patients will be followed q4wk until 
resolution of all toxicities, if any. Patients who discontinued 
treatment without PD will be followed every three months until 
PD, other antitumor therapy, death or until the date of trial 
termination (clinical cut-off), whichever occurs first. 
Patients will be considered to be on-trial from the signature of the IC 
to the end of the follow-up period. Patients will be considered to be 
CL_0256 1.0
Page 17 of 102
Protocol APL-B-022-15


on-treatment for the duration of their treatment and until the day of 
EOT, immediately before the start of the follow-up period. EOT is 
defined as 30 days after the day of last treatment, unless the patient 
starts a new antitumor therapy or dies (whichever occurs first), in 
which case the date of administration of this new therapy or the date 
of death will be considered the EOT date. An EOT visit will be 
performed within 30 days (± five days) after last treatment, unless the 
patient starts any subsequent new antitumor therapy outside this 
clinical trial, in which case the EOT visit should be performed 
immediately before the start of the new therapy, whenever possible.
Patients will receive the trial drugs while it is considered to be in their 
best interest. Specifically, treatment will continue until:

Confirmed PD.

Life-threatening, unmanageable or unacceptable drug-related 
AEs, including the need for more than two dose reductions, 
except in cases of obvious patient benefit in continuing the 
treatment at the Investigator’s criterion.

Intercurrent illness of sufficient magnitude to preclude safe 
continuation of the trial.

Patient 
refusal 
and/or 
non-compliance 
with 
trial 
requirements.

A major protocol deviation that may affect the balance of the 
risk/benefit ratio for the participating patient.

Treatment delay > 14 days due to toxicity (except in case of 
patient’s clear clinical benefit, with the Sponsor’s approval).

Pregnancy.

Investigator’s decision.
PLANNED TRIAL 
PERIODS (for the whole 
trial)
Planned start date: 1Q2016
Planned enrolment period: approximately 24 months.
Total duration of the trial: approximately 30 months.
Planned end-of-trial date (clinical cut-off): six months after the last 
patient’s treatment discontinuation (last patient-last visit), or nine 
months after accrual of the last evaluable patient, whichever occurs 
first. If there are patients still being treated at the planned cut-off date, 
the actual cut-off date will be the date when those patients have 
completed the ongoing treatment cycle and the corresponding EOT 
visit.
CL_0256 1.0
Page 18 of 102
Protocol APL-B-022-15


SCHEDULE OF ASSESSMENTS
PROCEDURE
Pretreatment
(days)
Treatment: 
C1
Treatment: 
further cycles
End of
treatment
visit
Follow-up
D1
D15
D28=1
D15
Written ICs (general and PGx sub-
study)
Before any 
procedures
-
-
-
-
-
-
Plitidepsin administration
-




-
-
Bortezomib administration
-
D1, 4, 8 and 11
D1, 4, 8 and 11
-
-
Dexamethasone administration
-
D1, 8, 15 and 22
D1, 8, 15 and 22
-
-
Demographic data
-14  to  0
-
-
-
-
-
-
Medical history
-14  to  0
-
-
-
-
-
-
Primary diagnosis/Prior treatment(s)
-14  to  0
-
-
-
-
-
-
Assessment of signs and symptoms 
-14  to  0
†
-

-
-
-
Complete physical examination (1) 
and clinical neurological assessment
-14  to  0
†
-

-

-
ECOG PS (1)
-14  to  0

-

-

-
Concomitant treatments (2)
-14  to  0
Throughout the trial
-
Hematology (3)
-7  to  0
†




-
Coagulation panel
-14 to  0
-
-

-

-
Biochemistry-A ( 4)
-7  to  0
†




-
Biochemistry-B
-7 to  0
-
-

-

-
Creatinine and measured or 
calculated CrCl
-7 to  0
-
-

-

-
Urinalysis (dipstick, sediment)
-14 to  0
-
-
-
-

-
Viral serology
-14  to  0
Repeat if clinically indicated
-
-
Pregnancy test (if applicable) (5)
-7  to  0
-
-

-

-
ECG (6)
-14  to  0

-

-

-
LVEF
-14  to  0
Every 12 weeks

-
PK
NA
C1 and C2 only
-
-
-
AEs (NCI-CTCAE v4.0) (7)
SAEs only
Throughout the trial

Disease Assessments
Serum protein (8)
-14  to  0 

-

-


Urine protein 
-14  to  0

-

-


Serum beta-2 microglobulin
-14  to  0
-
C-reactive protein
-14  to  0
Every 8 weeks


BM for PGx analysis (only if written 
IC given)
Available 
stored BM 
samples
-21 to 0
If response is observed
-
-
BM assessment (9)
-21  to  0
When all parameters indicate CR
If clinically 
indicated
If clinically 
CL_0256 1.0
Page 19 of 102
Protocol APL-B-022-15


PROCEDURE
Pretreatment
(days)
Treatment: 
C1
Treatment: 
further cycles
End of
treatment
visit
Follow-up
D1
D15
D28=1
D15
Clinical and radiological tumor 
assessment in the presence of soft 
tissue plasmacytoma (10)
-14  to 0
If response is observed (to confirm 
CR) or if clinical symptoms suggest 
new plasmacytomas
If clinically 
indicated
indicated
Skeletal evaluation
-28  to  0
If response is observed (to confirm 
CR) or if clinical symptoms suggest 
new bone lytic lesion
If clinically 
indicated
Day 0 = C1D1
†Repeat prior to the first infusion only if more than seven days have elapsed from the last measurement.
A 2-day window is allowed for hematology, biochemistry A and B, coagulation panel, creatinine, CrCl, serum protein,  
urine protein tests, physical examination, assessment of patients’ signs and symptoms and neurological assessments. A 2-
week window is allowed for radiological tumor (to confirm response) and LVEF (by ECHO or MUGA) assessments. 
Note: windows for laboratory assessments only apply prior to the scheduled infusion (e.g. 2-day window = within 48 
hours before the following scheduled infusion, etc.). Windows for radiological tumor and LVEF assessments (by MUGA 
or ECHO) apply either before or after the corresponding scheduled infusion.
1.
ECOG PS and vital signs must be repeated on D1 prior to drug infusion.
2.
A detailed description of all concomitant treatment (drug name, start and end dates, reason for administration, etc.), 
especially transfusion requirements, should be recorded.
3.
Repeat on D1 (prior to first infusion) and D15 of every cycle. Repeat at least every other day if non-febrile grade 4 
neutropenia is present and every day in the presence of febrile neutropenia or grade 4 thrombocytopenia.
4.
Repeat at least every other day in the presence of grade 3/4 vomiting or any other drug-related SAE.
5.
For women of childbearing potential a serum or urine HCG analysis should be done. During the on-treatment period, 
testing should be repeated every cycle, or at least, every four weeks.
6.
To be done just before the first infusion of each cycle. 
It should allow rhythm definition (at least 30 seconds of duration) and include:
- PR interval.
- QT interval (raw and corrected by heart rate using Bazett’s formula).
- QRS complex and the maximum height of QRS complex in leads II.
7.
SAEs will be collected from the time of signature of the ICF.
8.
Protein electrophoresis, serum Ig determination, M-protein measurement and IF and SFLC determination.
9.
BM evaluation is mandatory for all patients at screening (BM morphology, BM cytometry, if available, BM FISH 
and BM cytogenetics), while on treatment if clinically indicated and if there is a CR. BM evaluation must be 
repeated eight weeks later in patients with non-secretory MM, to confirm response or as clinically indicated. 
10. In patients with non-secretory or oligosecretory MM associated with soft tissue plasmacytoma, assessments may be 
done every two cycles (whenever possible) to confirm response or as clinically indicated.
Complete physical examination including weight, BSA and vital signs (HR, ABP and temperature).
Hematology: Differential WBC count, hematocrit, hemoglobin and platelet count.
Coagulation panel: PT, INR, APTT.
Biochemistry A: AP, AST, ALT, LDH, bilirubin, electrolytes (Na+, K+, Ca++, Mg++), glucose, CPK, CPK-MB fraction (if 
applicable), GGT.
Biochemistry B: Total proteins and albumin.
Viral serology: HBV and HCV; CMV in patients who have undergone allogeneic BM transplantation.
Serum protein: Protein electrophoresis, serum Ig determination and M-protein measurement and IF, SFLC.
Urine protein: 24-h urine protein electrophoresis measurement and IF, UFLC and M-protein measurement.
BM: Morphology, cytometry (if available), cytogenetics (if available).
Clinical and radiological tumor assessment: CT-scan or MRI of all involved measurable/evaluable involved sites of 
soft tissue plasmacytoma. For soft tissue plasmacytoma assessment, tumor measurement will be the sum of the cross-
diameters of the measurable target lesions.
Skeletal evaluation: X-ray of skull, vertebral column, pelvis and proximal long bones or MRI.
ABP, arterial blood pressure; AEs, adverse event(s); ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AP, alkaline phosphatase; APTT, 
activated partial thromboplastin time; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; BM, bone marrow; BSA, body surface area; C, 
cycle; CMV, cytomegalovirus; CPK, creatine phosphokinase; CPK-MB, creatine phosphokinase isoenzymes found in 
cardiac muscle (it will be performed only if CPK is increased); CR, complete response; CrCl, creatinine clearance; CRP, 
C-reactive protein; CT-scan, computed tomography scan; D, day; ECG, electrocardiogram; ECOG PS, Eastern 
CL_0256 1.0
Page 20 of 102
Protocol APL-B-022-15


Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status; FISH, fluorescence in situ hybridization; GGT, ɣ-glutamyl 
transpeptidase; HBV, hepatitis B virus; HCG, human chorionic gonadotropin; HCV, hepatitis C virus; HR, heart rate; IC, 
informed consent; ICF, informed consent form; IF, immunofixation; INR, International Normalized Ratio; LDH, lactate 
dehydrogenase; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; MM, multiple myeloma; MRI, Magnet Resonance Imaging; NA, 
not applicable; NCI-CTCAE, National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for the Classification of AEs; 
PGx, pharmacogenomics; PK, pharmacokinetics; PT, pro-thrombin time; SAE, serious adverse event; SFLC, serum free 
light-chain; UFLC, urine free light chain; WBC, white blood cell.
CL_0256 1.0
Page 21 of 102
Protocol APL-B-022-15


LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND DEFINITION OF TERMS
ABP
Arterial Blood Pressure
ADA
After Drug Administration
ADL
Activities of Daily Living
AE(s)
Adverse Event(s)
ALT
Alanine Aminotransferase
ANC 
Absolute Neutrophil Count
AP
Alkaline Phosphatase
APTT
Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time
ASCO
American Society of Clinical Oncology
ASCT
Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation
ASH/FDA
American Society of Hematology/Food and Drug Administration
AST
Aspartate Aminotransferase
ATC-WHO
Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical Drug Classification by the World Health 
Organization
AUC
Area Under the Curve
BM
Bone Marrow
BSA
Body Surface Area
CBP
CREB-binding Protein
CI
Confidence Interval
c.i.v.i.
Continuous Intravenous Infusion
Cmax
Maximum Plasma Concentration
CMV
Cytomegalovirus
CNS
Central Nervous System
CPK
Creatine Phosphokinase
CPK-MB
Serum CPK Isoenzymes (Found In Cardiac Muscle)
CR
Complete Response
CrCl
Creatinine Clearance
CRF
Case Report Form
e-CRF
Electronic Case Report Form
CRO
Contract Research Organization
CRP
C-Reactive Protein
CT
Chemotherapy
CT-scan
Computed Tomography scan
CTCAE
Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events
CV
Cardiovascular
D
Day
DI
Dose Intensity
DL
Dose Level
DLT
Dose Limiting Toxicity
DOR
Duration of Response
DTIC
Dimethyl Triazeno Imidazol Carboxamide
ECG
Electrocardiogram
ECHO
Echocardiogram 
ECOG PS 
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status 
EFS
Event-free Survival
EMA
European Medicines Agency
CL_0256 1.0
Page 22 of 102
Protocol APL-B-022-15


EOI
End of Infusion
EOT
End-of-treatment
FLC
Free Light Chains
GCP
Good Clinical Practice
GCs
Glucocorticoids
G-CSF
Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor
GGT
ɣ-glutamyl Transpeptidase
GM-CSF
Granulocyte/Macrophage Colony Stimulating Factor
GMT
Greenwich Mean Time
h
Hour(s)
HBV
Hepatitis B virus
HCG
Human Chorionic Gonadotropin
HCV
Hepatitis C virus
HDT
High Dose Chemotherapy
HIV
Human Immunodeficiency Virus
HLA
Human Leukocyte Antigen
HSCT
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation 
IB
Investigator’s Brochure
IC
Informed Consent
IC50
Half Maximal Inhibitory Concentration 
ICH
International Conference on Harmonization
IEC
Independent Ethics Committee
IF
Immunofixation
IHC
Immunohistochemistry
IL
Interleukin
IMWG
International Myeloma Working Group
IMIDs
Immunomodulatory Drugs
IMP
Investigational Medicinal Product
INR
International Normalized Ratio for blood clotting time
i.p.
Intraperitoneal
IRB
Institutional Review Board
ITT
Intention-to-treat
i.v.
Intravenous
KPS
Karnofsky Performance Status
LDH
Lactate Dehydrogenase
LVEF
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction
MedDRA AE
Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities for Adverse Events
MM
Multiple Myeloma
MOA
Mechanism of Action
MP
Melphalan Prednisone
MR
Minimal Response
MRI
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
MTD
Maximum Tolerated Dose
MTS
Tetrazolium Salt
MUGA scan
Multiple Uptake Gated Acquisition Scan
NCI-CTCAE
National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria
ORR
Objective Response Rate
CL_0256 1.0
Page 23 of 102
Protocol APL-B-022-15


OS
Overall Survival
OS6
Overall Survival Rate at 6 Months
OS12
Overall Survival Rate at 12 Months
PD
Progressive Disease
PDy
Pharmacodynamics
PFS 
Progression-free Survival
PGx
Pharmacogenomics
PI
Proteasome Inhibitor
PI3K
Phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase
PK
Pharmacokinetics
PN
Peripheral Neuropathy
PR
Partial Response
PS
Performance Status
PT
Pro-thrombin Time
PVC
Polyvinyl Chloride
qRT-PCR
Quantitative Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction
Q3wk
Every Three Weeks
Q4wk
Every Four Weeks
RD
Recommended Dose
RR
Response Rate
SAE(s)
Serious Adverse Event(s)
SAR
Serious Adverse Reaction
s.c.
Subcutaneous
sCR
Stringent Complete Response
SD
Stable Disease
SFLC
Serum Free Light Chains
SmPC
Summary of Product Characteristics
SVT
Supraventricular Tachycardia
TBI
Total Body Irradiation
TTP
Time To Progression
T1/2
Half-life
UFLC
Urine Free Light Chains
ULN
Upper Limit of Normal
US
United States
USP
US Product Information
VBAP
Vincristine, Carmustine, Doxorubicin, Prednisone
VEGF
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor
VEGFR
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor
VGPR
Very Good Partial Response
VMCP
Vincristine, Melphalan, Cyclophosphamide, Prednisone
vs.
Versus
Vss
Volume of Distribution at Steady State
WBC
White Blood Cells
WFI
Water For Injection
wk
Week(s)
WOCBP
Woman/Women of Childbearing Potential
CL_0256 1.0
Page 24 of 102
Protocol APL-B-022-15


1.
BACKGROUND
1.1 Overview of the Disease
Multiple myeloma (MM) is a malignant plasma-cell disorder characterized by the 
production of a monoclonal protein from plasma cells in the bone marrow (BM). 
Information from the National Cancer Institute indicates that in the United States (US), an 
estimated 26,850 new cases of MM are expected to be diagnosed in 2015, and 11,240
people are expected to die from the disease [1]. The incidence of MM in Europe is 4.5-
6.0/100,000 a year with a median age of diagnosis of between 63 and 70 years and a 
mortality rate of 4.1/100,000/year [2]. In the Western hemisphere, about 1% of cancer-
related deaths are due to myeloma. MM may be staged according to either the Durie-
Salmon system (Appendix 1) based on the amount of abnormal monoclonal 
immunoglobulin in the blood or urine, blood calcium levels, the amount of bone damage 
shown by X-ray and blood hemoglobin levels [3], or the newer staging system, the 
International Staging System that relies on the levels of albumin and beta-2-microglobulin 
in the blood [4] (Appendix 1). In both systems, all stages are further subclassified by 
creatinine level either less than 2.0 mg/dL or greater than or equal to 2.0 mg/dL. Impaired 
renal function worsens prognosis regardless of the stage.
The disease primarily affects individuals later in life with a median age of 63-70 years. 
From the time of diagnosis, survival without treatment is between 6 and 12 months and 
extends to 3 years with chemotherapy (CT). MM is treatable but rarely curable. Most 
patients receive multiple treatments over the course of their disease, and the precise 
sequence of therapy and used regimens can be quite variable. With standard dose CT, 
patients have a median survival of 24–30 months. Twenty five percent of patients survive 5 
years or longer, and the 10-year survival rate is approximately 3% [5]. Failure of standard 
therapy to cure these diseases has led to the study of higher doses of chemotherapeutic 
agents. These conditioning regimens may involve ablative/reduced or non-myeloablative 
intensity and the rescue of the immune system following CT may involve autologous or 
allogeneic stem-cell transplantation.
1.2 Current Treatment for Multiple Myeloma
Patients considered candidates for a CT-based intervention are further divided into those 
who are and those who are not eligible for high-dose CT (HDT) followed by stem cell 
rescue, based on age, performance status (PS), and co-morbid medical conditions. HDT for 
MM was introduced in 1983 [6] and showed for the first time that a substantial percentage 
of complete remissions could be induced. Morbidity and mortality however, were high, but 
were strongly reduced later by the application of autologous stem cell rescue.
BM was the source of stem cells in the first studies, peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) are 
now routinely applied as autologous rescue. In 1996, a randomized study was published 
which showed that autologous transplantation was superior to conventional treatment 
regarding response rate (RR), event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) [7]. In 
this study, patients younger than 65 years were randomized at diagnosis to receive
vincristine, 
carmustine, 
doxorubicin, 
prednisone/vincristine, 
melphalan, 
cyclophosphamide, prednisone (VBAP/VMCP) or high dose melphalan 140 mg/m2 and 
total body irradiation (TBI) 8 Gy supported with autologous BM collected after 2 courses 
of VBAP/VMCP. 
CL_0256 1.0
Page 25 of 102
Protocol APL-B-022-15


In summary, and according to several guidelines, HDT with autologous hematopoietic 
stem cell transplantation (HSCT) should be part of the primary treatment strategy in newly 
diagnosed patients up to the age of 65 years with adequate PS and organ function. It may 
also be considered in patients > 65 years with good PS. Allogeneic HSCT with human 
leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched sibling donors may also be considered in patients up to 
the age of 50 years who have achieved at least a partial remission after initial therapy. 
Reduced-intensity conditioning allografting may be considered in patients up to the age of
70 with a HLA-matched sibling donor.
Until recently, there was general agreement that the standard of care for patients who are
not eligible for transplantation was the treatment with melphalan and prednisone (MP), 
despite the low overall response rate (approximately 50%), with few complete responders, 
and the modest improvements in 5-year survival [8]. Other combination chemotherapies 
have been used in this setting and, although they induced a more rapid response and a 
higher overall response rate, the differences did not translate into a survival advantage 
compared to that achieved with MP. However, new knowledge about the pathobiology and 
pathogenetics of MM, and the introduction of novel agents, such as thalidomide, 
bortezomib, arsenic trioxide, and more recently lenalidomide, with novel mechanisms of 
action (MOA) are defining new standards of care.
Novel agents such as immunomodulatory drugs (IMIDs) (thalidomide, lenalidomide, 
pomalidomide) and proteasome inhibitors (PIs) (bortezomib, carfilzomib, etc.) have 
doubled the duration of survival. However, new active agents are still needed for double 
refractory patients to IMIDs and PIs. With a progression-free survival (PFS) of 6 months 
and median survival of a year, treatment in this population is still challenging, an optimal 
combination of chemotherapeutic agents has not been defined and new therapies are 
needed in this setting. In this regard, plitidepsin has shown meaningful activity in patients 
failing treatment with IMIDs and PIs. Moreover, synergism between plitidepsin and 
bortezomib and thalidomide has been shown (unpublished data).
PIs are of particular interest, as they act on the ubiquitin-proteasome system, which is 
responsible for regulation and degradation of the majority of intracellular proteins. 
Proteasome inhibition leads to cell cycle disruption, activation of apoptosis pathways and 
ultimately, cell death. In MM cells, among others, PIs have been shown to target the 
unfolded protein response, a signaling pathway allowing the appropriate folding of 
proteins. A small study showed overall response rates (ORR) (better than minimal 
response) of 50% after re-treatment with bortezomib. Greater responses (56%) were seen
in patients with a free-interval of at least six months when compared to patients re-treated 
within six months (33%). In this study, 75% of patients received bortezomib re-treatment 
in combination with dexamethasone. Hence, patients who relapse after bortezomib 
treatment may receive an additional course of bortezomib-based therapy if they had an 
initial response to the drug lasting at least six months and had no intervening therapies. The 
prognosis for patients who relapse after treatment with bortezomib plus either lenalidomide 
or thalidomide is poor, with a median EFS of only a few months and OS of six months. 
In summary, therapeutic options are still limited and new active drugs are needed in the 
double-refractory population. Novel agents may give rise to new feasible combinations 
based on their activity and safety profiles and plitidepsin combinations with IMIDs and/or 
PIs are warranted.
CL_0256 1.0
Page 26 of 102
Protocol APL-B-022-15


1.3 Plitidepsin
The Sponsor is committed to the development of new drugs in an effort to broaden the 
spectrum of current antitumor therapies. Chemically, plitidepsin is a (now fully synthetic)
natural occurring depsipeptide originally extracted from the Mediterranean Sea tunicate 
Aplidium albicans. Although the main MOA by which plitidepsin inhibits cell growth 
and/or induces cell death remains to be fully characterized, its major effects can be at least 
partially attributed to a cell cycle block in the G0/G1 phases and the induction of apoptosis 
[9-11] via activation of the JNK pathway; this activation leads to a decreased production of 
intracellular glutathione, an increase in reactive oxygen species and an alteration of the 
mitochondrial membrane potential, ultimately leading to both caspase-dependent and
independent apoptosis. In addition to the pro-apoptotic properties of plitidepsin, the 
molecule has demonstrated antiangiogenic properties in several pre-clinical models via 
direct activity on vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-stimulated angiogenesis. In 
fact, plitidepsin has been demonstrated to reduce the secretion of VEGF and its receptor 
type 1 (VEGFR-1) from MOLT-4 human leukemia cells in vitro [12]. It seems that the 
majority of the pharmacological activity of plitidepsin can be attributed to a combination 
of these cellular effects in vivo.
Antitumor activity has been displayed by plitidepsin in in vitro and in vivo models. In 
addition, this observation has been sustained in early clinical trials as a single agent, 
showing clinical responses in patients with hematological malignancies as well as solid 
tumors. The toxicity of plitidepsin in normal hematopoietic tissue is several folds lower 
than in tumor cells. More importantly, this observation translates into a lack of clinically 
significant hematological toxicity in clinical trials to date, even in leukemia/lymphoma 
patients with limited BM reserve capacity. Consequently, plitidepsin may display a 
positive profile for combination with other agents in CT regimens, avoiding overlapping 
toxicity.
Please refer to the Investigator's Brochure (IB) for full information on plitidepsin.
1.3.1 Name and Chemical Information
Aplidin® is the trade name for plitidepsin [leucine, 1-(1,2-dioxopropyl) prolyl-N-methyl-
leucylthreonyl-4-amino-3-hydroxy-6-methylheptanoyl-4-hydroxy-2,5-dimethyl-3-
oxohexanoyl-N, 0-dimethyltyrosylprolyl, O-lactone)], a cyclic depsipeptide originally 
isolated from a Mediterranean marine tunicate, Aplidium albicans, which is currently 
manufactured by total synthesis. 
1.3.2 Non-clinical Data
1.3.2.1
Mechanism of Action in Cell Lines
The major effects of plitidepsin can be specifically attributed to the induction of apoptosis 
secondary to oxidative stress and activation of JNK activity. Exposure of cultured human 
cervical cancer (HeLa) cells to plitidepsin induced oxidative stress resulting in cellular 
apoptosis [13] and a rapid and sustained activation of JNK, p38 MAPK and ERK in human 
breast cancer cells (MDA-MB-231) [14]. In fact, genetically engineered mouse embryo 
fibroblast (MEFs) which did not express any JNK isoforms, were at least an order of 
magnitude less sensitive to plitidepsin [11]. JNK has been shown as a critical component in 
plitidepsin-induced cytotoxicity through a decrease in the intracellular reduced glutathione 
(GSH) levels which, in turn, increases the levels of reactive oxygen species [14]. The 
effects of plitidepsin on a pleiotropic regulatory protein Rac1, would contribute to the 
CL_0256 1.0
Page 27 of 102
Protocol APL-B-022-15


sustained activation of JNK [9, 15]. Additionally, a cell cycle inhibitor, p27 (kip1), has 
been shown to determine plitidepsin sensitivity in vitro, on a panel of mouse sarcoma cells 
from resected tumors [16]. Data on human renal cell carcinoma lines (A-498 and ACHN) 
confirmed the oxidative operating mechanism and recent studies on human melanoma cell 
lines (SK-MEL-28 and UACC-257) have again involved a Rac1/JNK pathway in the 
apoptotic cell arrest induced by plitidepsin [14, 15], thus demonstrating a common 
mechanism in cells of different tumor origins. More recent studies have shown plitidepsin 
to be
able to increase levels of cell membrane phospholipid oxidation and 
deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) oxidation in vitro [9].
Apart from its pro-apoptotic properties, plitidepsin has also demonstrated antiangiogenic 
effects. The addition of the drug reduces the active secretion of VEGF and the expression 
of its receptor (VEGFR-1) on human leukemia (MOLT-4) cells in vitro [12], suggesting 
that the block of cell growth might be mediated by dual inhibition of the VEGF autocrine 
loop. Supporting these findings, plitidepsin has been shown to be highly cytotoxic on acute 
myelogenous leukemia cells, both on regular cultures (K-562, HEL and HL-60) and on 
blasts obtained from patients [17]. Furthermore, plitidepsin was able to reduce the 
secretion of VEGF in a dose-dependent manner, thus confirming previous observations. At 
the functional level, plitidepsin inhibited spontaneous and growth factor-induced 
angiogenesis, prevented proliferation, migration and invasiveness, and hampered formation 
of capillary-like tridimensional structures, in in vivo and in vitro models [18].
In summary, it appears that the pharmacological activity of plitidepsin can be attributed, at 
least in part, to a combination of pro-apoptotic and antiangiogenic effects in vivo.
1.3.2.2
Plitidepsin as Single Agent: In vitro and In vivo Data 
In vitro studies demonstrated antiproliferative activity against a broad spectrum of tumor 
types, namely bladder, breast, stomach, prostate thyroid and lung cancer, melanoma, 
neuroblastoma (with a half maximal inhibitory concentration [IC50] values ranging from 
10-7 to 10-9 M), and leukemia, myeloma and lymphoma (with IC50 values ranging from 10-8
to 10-9 M) [19]. 
In addition, an animal model in MM has been explored [20]. At clinically achievable 
concentrations, plitidepsin exhibited potent in vitro activity against primary MM tumor 
cells and a broad spectrum of human MM cell lines, including cells resistant to 
conventional (e.g., dexamethasone, alkylating agents, and anthracyclines) or novel (e.g., 
thalidomide and bortezomib) anti-MM agents. Plitidepsin was active against MM cells in 
the presence of proliferative/antiapoptotic cytokines or BM stromal cells and had additive 
or synergistic effects with some of the established anti-MM agents. The anti-MM effect of 
plitidepsin was associated with suppression of a constellation of proliferative/antiapoptotic 
genes and up-regulation of several potential regulators of apoptosis. 
In conclusion, plitidepsin showed consistent cytotoxic activity against a broad selection of 
human-derived solid tumor cell lines such as lung, breast, thyroid, prostate, stomach, 
bladder, and kidney, as well as human malignant cell lines of hematological origin.
In the hollow fiber in vivo model, in which athymic rats were treated with intravenous (i.v.)
plitidepsin, tumors of the bladder, stomach, and prostate were shown to be susceptible to 
the drug. In xenograft models, activity was noted against human renal and pancreatic 
tumors when injected to athymic mice. 
CL_0256 1.0
Page 28 of 102
Protocol APL-B-022-15


Additionally, the antitumor and antiangiogenic effects of plitidepsin were evaluated in the 
5T33MM syngeneic orthotopic model of MM [21]. In vitro, plitidepsin inhibited DNA 
synthesis and induced an arrest in transition from G0/G1 to S phase. Furthermore, 
plitidepsin induced apoptosis by lowering the mitochondrial membrane potential. For the 
in vivo experiment, i.p.-injected plitidepsin was well tolerated by the mice and reduced 
serum paraprotein concentration by 42% (p<0.001), while BM invasion with myeloma 
cells was decreased by 35% (p<0.001). Plitidepsin also reduced the myeloma-associated 
angiogenesis to basal values. This antiangiogenic effect was confirmed in vitro and may be 
explained by inhibition of endothelial cell proliferation and vessel formation. In summary, 
these data indicate that plitidepsin is well tolerated in vivo and its antitumor and 
antiangiogenic effects support the use of the drug in MM [22].
1.3.2.3
Plitidepsin in Combination: In vitro and In vivo Data 
Clinical experience in the management of MM patients supports the concept that drug 
combinations induce higher RRs than single agents. The ability of plitidepsin to increase 
the activity of other established anticancer agents was assessed in several human tumor cell 
lines. The plitidepsin/dexamethasone combination selected for further development in solid 
tumors and preclinical data are summarized below.
Plitidepsin-Dexamethasone Combination: Non-clinical Data
The plitidepsin/dexamethasone combination was explored with viability analyses in
MM1.S and U266-LR7 cells. The experimental design included both the non-constant ratio 
(for suboptimal drug doses) and the constant ratio. The effects of single and combined 
treatments after 72 hours (h) were evaluated by MTT assays. The results clearly showed
that plitidepsin increased the anti-MM effect of dexamethasone. The combination was 
additive but tended to be synergistic at higher doses [20] (Figure 1).
Figure 1. MM1.S cell line, 48h incubation.
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
Plitidepsin + Dexamethasone CR
Combination.
Fraction affected
Similar results were obtained in a study by Medina et al. (internal report, March 2008), 
where the plitidepsin/dexamethasone combination (at a fixed ratio of 1/50) was tested in 
four MM cell lines (MM1.S, ARP, RPMI-8226 and the dexamethasone-resistant MM1.R). 
As shown in Figure 2, the plitidepsin/dexamethasone combination resulted in a significant 
increase in cell toxicity in the cell lines MM1.S, ARP and RPMI-8226 compared to either 
drug alone (plitidepsin or dexamethasone). In contrast, only plitidepsin had an effect on the 
dexamethasone-resistant cell line, MM1.R. 
CL_0256 1.0
Page 29 of 102
Protocol APL-B-022-15


Figure 2. Activity of the combination plitidepsin/dexamethasone in MM cell lines.
The plitidepsin/dexamethasone combination was synergistic in the cell lines MM1.S, ARP, 
and RPMI-8226 at all (nanomolar) tested drug concentrations, while it was additive in
MM1.R at high concentrations.
Molecular Rationale Based on the MOA of Dexamethasone: Similarities with Plitidepsin 
Activity
The pleiotropic molecular effects elicited by plitidepsin treatment preclude reaching 
conclusions on which pathways are the most important for its antitumor activity; however, 
they offer a potentially unique MOA and a major therapeutic advantage. In particular, they 
may account for the synchronized targeting of different specific proliferative/antiapoptotic 
pathways in MM tumor cells. In fact, gene expression profiling data in tumor cells provide 
a framework for designing a combinatorial therapy to potentiate each individual antitumor 
effect. It is likely that their pleiotropic and synergistic effects in vitro over MM cells may 
neutralize the pathways that enable tumors to evade cell death and to become resistant to 
anticancer treatment.
Glucocorticoids (GCs), such as dexamethasone, induce apoptosis in the hematological 
lineage, while supporting the survival of several non-hematological tissues, such as the 
mammary gland, ovary, liver or fibroblasts [23-25]. GCs exert their action through 
interaction with the intracellular GC receptor (GR), a ligand regulated transcription factor 
that positively or negatively alters the expression of specific target genes. In turn, GR 
either induces gene transcription by binding to specific DNA elements in the promoter-
enhancer regions of responsive genes or reduces gene transcription by transrepression [25-
28]. Thus, dexamethasone acts over genes responsible for the induction of apoptosis in 
CL_0256 1.0
Page 30 of 102
Protocol APL-B-022-15


lymphoid cells, in what seems a plitidepsin complementary pathway, therefore enhancing 
plitidepsin cytotoxicity [29-32]. 
Like plitidepsin, GCs may induce apoptosis by directly regulating both the extrinsic and 
intrinsic apoptosis pathways. Death receptors (CD95 and TRAIL) and downstream 
effectors have been found deregulated by each of the drugs in the extrinsic pathway. 
Regarding the intrinsic and mitochondria-mediated pathways, which lead to the release of 
pro-apoptotic molecules upon depolarization of the mitochondrial membrane potential, the 
apoptotic response is tightly regulated by the interaction between pro- and anti-apoptotic
Bcl-2 family members. Additionally, both, plitidepsin and dexamethasone, upregulate pro-
apoptotic genes (TRAIL-Rl/DR4 and TRAIL-R2/DR5, Bax, Bak, Bad, Fas, FasL, TRAIL, 
Noxa, PIG3, Bim, Bik and Puma, Bcr-Abl [in CML], c-Myc, and HDAC3), while they 
downregulate pro-survival genes (c-FLIP, MCl-I, Bel-X, and Bcl-2) [26, 33].
On the other hand, both agents have been found to disrupt the cellular redox state (e.g., 
ROS), and damage mitochondria in cells undergoing apoptosis, as an effect of the 
depolarization of mitochondrial membrane, which will enhance the expression of death 
receptors and ligands resulting again in the activation of the caspase cascade.
Moreover, plitidepsin-induced suppression of caspase inhibitors (FLIP, survivin) may 
contribute to the increased sensitivity of plitidepsin-treated MM cells to caspase-dependent 
apoptosis by dexamethasone. Both agents deregulate Hsp90 complexes such as receptor 
FKBP5, HSPs and DNAJs. 
Other molecules and pathways involved in the antiproliferative effect of both 
dexamethasone and plitidepsin, could yet contribute to the synergism of the combination. 
Plitidepsin downregulates genes with a documented role in oncogenic transformation in 
MM: Myb, Myc or Ras families, frequently mutated in MM cells, effect also seen after 
dexamethasone administration [34]. Likewise, both had a synergistic effect on NF-kappaB 
(survival transcription factor) and its inhibitor [35, 36].
Besides, a synergistic effect may occur on the cell cycle, where the arrest induced by the 
combination may be mediated by their joint and coordinated regulation of the expression 
of CDKI (p21WAF1/CIP1, p27 KIP), INK4 family of proteins (p15INK4b, p18INK4c, 
p19INK4d), cycA, cycD1 and D2, suppression of CDK4, suppression of p107, or 
hypophosphorylation of Rb [25].
Plitidepsin treatment also reduces Erk (an extracellular signal-regulated kinase, ERK 1/2) 
activation but increases activation of p38MAPK (Figure 3), enhancing GC sensitivity by 
the induction of apoptosis. Similarly, MAPK pathway activation by plitidepsin may 
improve the effects of GC.
CL_0256 1.0
Page 31 of 102
Protocol APL-B-022-15


Figure 3. Plitidepsin-dexamethasone molecular model of apoptosis.
Combined treatment with plitidepsin and dexamethasone suppresses genes involved in 
cytokine-induced 
proliferative/antiapoptotic
signaling 
pathways 
and 
oncogenic 
transformation triggering MM proliferation: IGF-1R, IL-6R, gp130, CXCR-4 etc.
In addition to the documented effects induced by both drugs at the genomic level, some of 
the effects of dexamethasone seem to be non-specific, i.e., a non-genomic activity, with a 
quick activation of protein kinases, including the MAPK cascade, phosphatidylinositol-3 
kinase (PI3K) and Akt. These non-specific effects could explain the short-term rapid 
synergism of the combination, since plitidepsin has also shown a rapid effect over the same 
pathways.
GR reduces gene transcription by interaction with proinflammatory transcription factors 
such as AP-1 (Fos-Jun heterodimers) and NF-kB (p65-p50 heterodimers). Both require the 
coactivator CREB binding protein (CBP) for maximal activity. Therefore, these data also 
suggest that alterations in chromatin structure may be important in modulating GC actions. 
On this regard, the direct inhibition of CBP-associated histone acetyltransferase (HAT) 
activity and the active recruitment of a histone deacetylase complex 2 (HDAC2) induced in 
cell lines treated with dexamethasone appear crucial [37, 38]. Both complexes are closely 
related to chromatin remodeling and consequently, to the modulation of gene expression 
induced by dexamethasone (Figure 4). 
Figure 4. Glucocorticoids and the chromatin complex.
Glucocorticoids induce the acetylation of specific lysine residues (K5 and K16) in histone 
H4. The consequences of this epigenetic activity are wide, e.g. preventing other 
transcription factors, such as activator protein 1 (AP-1) and nuclear factor қB (NF-қB), 
Plitidepsin
Plitidepsin
CL_0256 1.0
Page 32 of 102
Protocol APL-B-022-15


from activating their target genes by inhibition of acetylation of specific lysine residues in 
histone H4. This may also have an antiangiogenic potential (reducing VEGF expression). 
Therefore, histone H4 K5 acetylation can be considered as a marker of dexamethasone 
transactivation. Dexamethasone predominantly targeted acetylation on histone H4 K5 and 
K16 in all subjects. However, the GR complex inhibits acetylation of K8 and K12 by 
acting both as a direct inhibitor of CBP-associated histone acetylation and by recruiting 
HDAC2 to the p65-CBP HAT complex. Thus, it has been described that both HAT and 
HDAC activities coexist within the same complex in the presence of p65 and GR and that 
they can each act independently. This mechanism for glucocorticoid repression is novel 
and it establishes that inhibition of histone acetylation brings an additional level of control 
of inflammatory/antiproliferative/apoptotic gene expression. This further suggests that 
pharmacological manipulation of specific histone acetylation status is a potentially useful 
approach for the treatment of dexamethasone-sensitive diseases. On this regard, the effects 
of dexamethasone have been shown to improve in the presence of trichostatin A (TSA), a 
classical potent in vitro HDAC inhibitor, and in the presence of SAHA, recently approved 
for in vivo use at the clinical setting. HDACs were also pointed out as playing a role in 
dexamethasone repression. 
Further analysis of the epigenetic activity with dexamethasone revealed an induction of 
phosphorylation of Histone 3 at Ser10 (inhibited in response to TNFα) and histone 3 
methylation at Lysine 4 (H3K4 methylation). These two markers of the histone code are 
targets for rapid hyperacetylation upon treatment with the HDAC inhibitor sodium butyrate 
or with TSA. Moreover, most, if not all, available Lys in the H3 tail becomes acetylated 
when they are marked with K4 methylation or S10 phosphorylation. Such specificity 
suggests that the activation of HATs after treatment with dexamethasone together with an 
HDAC inhibitor is not random.  
1.3.2.4
Toxicology
Plitidepsin, given by i.v. injection in daily (d) x1 (dx1), dx5 or 3-cycle dx5 regimens, 
produced toxicological effects typical of cytotoxic antitumor agents. Tissues containing 
cells with a high turnover were especially targeted. In the dx1 and dx5 studies, the 
principal organs affected were the reticuloendothelial system and the gastrointestinal tract 
in all species, testes in the mouse and rat, and pancreas in the dog. Additional affected
organs were: epididymides, pancreas, heart, mammary gland and skeletal muscle in the rat 
and mouse, and liver, thymus and testes in the dog. In all three species, toxic effects were 
dose-related and generally fully or partially reversible. Most toxicities were reversible at 
the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) level at the end of an acute toxicity evaluation.
Of interest is the observation that the toxicity of plitidepsin in normal hematopoietic tissue 
(IC50: 150-2250 nM) was 1-3 orders lower than in tumor cells (IC50: 0.2-27 nM) [39]. 
These and other data [40] indicate that plitidepsin might be a potential compound in 
multidrug CT regimens, assuming that it does not increase hematotoxicity significantly, 
which is often the dose-limiting toxicity of these regimens.
1.3.2.5
Safety Pharmacology
Cardiovascular System
The cardiovascular (CV) safety pharmacology evaluation of plitidepsin involved both in 
vitro and in vivo studies.
CL_0256 1.0
Page 33 of 102
Protocol APL-B-022-15


Briefly, no inhibition of the hERG tail current was found after a 15-min exposure of 
HEK293 cells stably transfected with hERG cDNA to a concentration of 1M of 
plitidepsin. Moreover, increasing concentrations of plitidepsin (10, 100 and 1000 nM) did 
not produce changes in the action potential morphology of isolated cardiac Purkinje fibers 
from dogs.
The effect of plitidepsin on CV parameters [arterial blood pressure (ABP), heart beating 
rate (HBR) and electrocardiogram (ECG) variables - PR interval, QRS duration, RR 
interval, and QT interval] was evaluated in conscious, telemetered dogs. Plitidepsin
infusions at doses up to 0.03 mg/kg (0.6 mg/m2) did not affect ABP. HBR increased from 2 
to 48 h after administration of 0.03 mg/kg (0.6 mg/m2) of plitidepsin. There were no 
significant effects on corrected QT (QTcF) at the studied plitidepsin doses. No ECG 
abnormalities were observed during or up to 8 h after discontinuation of the plitidepsin 
infusion.
Respiratory System
Intravenous administration of up to 0.50 mg/kg (3 mg/m2) of plitidepsin to male rats did 
not significantly affect either respiratory rate or tidal volume. Significant decreases in tidal 
volume and respiratory rate were detected at 24 h post-dosing with 1.50 mg/kg (9 mg/m2).
Neurotoxicity
Intravenous administration of up to 0.50 mg/kg (3 mg/m2) of plitidepsin to male rats did 
not produce gross behavioral or physiological state changes at any observation period. In 
rats treated with 1.5 mg/kg (9 mg/m2) occasional cage dispersion, increased cutaneous 
blood flow, diarrhea, and vocalization were observed. 
1.3.3 Clinical Data
1.3.3.1
Phase I Trials
Phase I clinical studies with plitidepsin were started in 1998. These studies were conducted 
according to classical phase I study design standards including pharmacokinetic (PK) 
evaluations. All single-agent phase I studies were conducted in the EU and Canada and 
explored five different infusion times or administration schedules of plitidepsin: 3-h 
infusion on D1 and 15 every four weeks (q4wk), 24-h infusion on D1 and 15 q4wk, 1-h 
infusion on D1, 8 and 15 q4wk, 24-h infusion on D1, 8 and 15 q4wk and 1-h infusion on 
D1-5 every three weeks (q3wk). 
Phase I combination studies were conducted in Europe and the US to evaluate plitidepsin
in combination with other antineoplastic drugs. Three of these studies, which evaluated 
plitidepsin combined with cytarabine, bortezomib or docetaxel, were terminated early 
following a decision by the Sponsor (for reasons other than safety). Recommended doses 
(RDs) are currently available for the following plitidepsin combinations: carboplatin, 
dacarbazine (DTIC), sorafenib, bevacizumab and gemcitabine.
Up to the cut-off date of 31 March 2015, 215 adult patients and 38 pediatric patients have 
been treated with single-agent plitidepsin and 122 adult patients with plitidepsin in 
combination with other drugs in these phase I studies, for a total of 375 patients. Results 
obtained in single-agent phase I trials in adult patients are summarized in Table 1.
CL_0256 1.0
Page 34 of 102
Protocol APL-B-022-15


Table 1. Single-agent plitidepsin phase I trials in adult patients.
24 h i.v.
d1,8,15
q4w
3 h i.v.
d1,15
q4w
1 h i.v.
d1,8,15
q4w
24 h c.i.v.i. d1,15 q4w
1 h i.v.
d1-5
q3w
Plitidepsin 
alone
Plitidepsin
+
L-carnitine
No of patients
35
27
48
47
20
37
MTD (mg/m2)
4.50
6
3.60
6
8
1.35
DLTs
MTD
G4 CPK inc. +
muscular 
weakness
G3 trans. inc.
RD
G3 CPK inc. +
renal 
impairment
G3 SVT
MTD
G3 CPK inc.
G4 CPK inc.
+ MOF
RD
G3 CPK 
increase
G3/4 
ALT/AST 
inc.
G3 asthenia
MTD
G3 muscular 
pain + G2 CPK 
elevation
G4 CPK inc.
RD
G3 AP inc.
At 2.7 mg/m2
G3 AST, AP,  
bilirubin inc. +
fatigue
MTD
G4 CPK inc.
G2 CPK inc.
for > 15 days
RD
G4 CPK inc.
MTD
G3 asthenia +
G1 fever
G4 CPK inc.
RD
G4 CPK inc. and 
G3 asthenia +
myalgia
G4 CPK inc.
At 1.5 
mg/m2
G3 emesis 
+ skin rash
G3 
myalgia
MTD
G3 fatigue 
+ skin rash
G3 fatigue 
and 
diarrhea
RD
none
RD (mg/m2)
3.75
5
3.2
5
7
1.2
DI at the RD 
(mg/m2/week)
2.8
2.5
2.4
2.5
3.5
2.0
c.i.v.i., continuous intravenous infusion; CPK, creatine phosphokinase; D, day; DI, Dose intensity; DLT, dose-limiting toxicity; inc.,
increase; i.v., intravenous; MOF, multiorgan failure; MTD, maximum tolerated dose; NCI-CTCAE, National Cancer Institute 
Common Toxicity Criteria for the Classification of Adverse Events; RD, recommended dose; SVT, supraventricular tachycardia; 
trans., transaminase.
Of note, the proposed recommended dose (RD) for further developments as single agent 
after the extensive phase I program consistently delivered a similar dose intensity, around 
2.5 mg/m2/week and a similar pattern of dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), without 
unexpected toxicities regardless of the schedule.
Of relevance, a phase I study of plitidepsin in combination with bortezomib and 
dexamethasone in patients with relapsed or refractory MM was started in 2008. This study 
was terminated early, following a Sponsor’s decision (for reasons other than safety). No 
MTD or RD were reached.
Safety Overview in Adult Single-Agent Phase I Trials
The primary DLTs found in the dose-finding phase I studies with single-agent plitidepsin 
were musculoskeletal AEs. The most common were myalgia, muscle weakness and 
increase in serum creatine phosphokinase (CPK) (non-cardiac fraction) levels. 
In the 77 patients treated at the RD, myalgia occurred in 35 patients (46%) and muscle 
weakness in 12 patients (16%); these events were generally mild and only reached grade 3 
in two (3%) patients each. General symptoms (e.g., fatigue) were also reported during 
treatment with plitidepsin. Grade 1/2 vomiting occurred in about half of the patients treated 
at the RD. Grade 3/4 emesis was far less common, occurring in only two patients (3%). 
Therefore, according to current guidelines, single-agent plitidepsin should be considered as 
a high-emetogenic non-cisplatin agent, and appropriate standard prophylaxis is indicated. 
Mild infusion site reactions were found, particularly (although not exclusively) when 
plitidepsin was administered through a peripheral line. As a result, use of a central line is 
suggested to administer plitidepsin although a peripheral line may be used for the 
fortnightly schedule only whenever a central venous line is deemed unsuitable for any 
reason (e.g., coagulation problems, technical difficulties, patient’s refusal, etc.).
CL_0256 1.0
Page 35 of 102
Protocol APL-B-022-15


Transient and reversible transaminase increases (particularly alanine aminotransferase -
ALT) were dose-limiting in some single-agent phase I studies and in most phase I 
combination studies. Alkaline phosphatase (AP) increases were far less common, whereas 
bilirubin increases were extremely rare and almost universally were disease-related.
In contrast to many other cytotoxic agents, single-agent plitidepsin did not induce 
clinically significant BM toxicity, stomatitis or alopecia within the dose range explored. Of 
note, neither grade 3/4 neutropenia nor grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia were reported in any 
phase I trials with single agent plitidepsin.
Overall, clinical data suggest that the safety profile of plitidepsin is acceptable and 
administration is safe for the treatment of cancer patients.
Almost all deaths that occurred during treatment or follow-up were due to progression of 
the underlying malignancy and were unrelated to plitidepsin. One drug-related death was 
reported (0.4%) among the 214 adult patients treated with single-agent plitidepsin in phase 
I clinical trials. This patient had a metastatic renal carcinoma with prior nephrectomy and 
was receiving plitidepsin at 6 mg/m2 as a 3-h infusion on D1,15, q4wk. Fatal multiorgan 
failure with disseminated intravascular coagulation, acute renal failure, acute hepatic 
failure, myositis with CPK elevation and secondary myocardial events appeared. The 
patient did not improve despite intensive supportive measures, such as hemodialysis.
A total of 29 (14%) of the 214 adult patients treated with single-agent plitidepsin during 
the phase I program had at least one serious adverse event (SAE) that was possibly, 
probably or definitely drug-related (Serious Adverse Reaction). 
Safety Overview in Adult Combination Phase I Trials
At 
the 
time 
of 
writing, 
only 
one 
combination
study
(plitidepsin/bortezomib/dexamethasone) was still ongoing. To this date, dose escalation 
had proceeded
as follows: the first dose level (4.0 mg/m2
plitidepsin/40 mg 
dexamethasone/1.0 mg/m2 bortezomib) included eight patients, three were evaluable for 
DLTs and none had DLTs; the next dose level (4.0 mg/m2 plitidepsin/40 mg 
dexamethasone/1.3 mg/m2 bortezomib) included four patients, three were evaluable for 
DLTs and none had DLTs; the following dose level (5.0 mg/m2 plitidepsin/40 mg 
dexamethasone/1.3 mg/m2 bortezomib) included six patients, five were confirmed to be 
evaluable for DLTs (eligibility was pending in the remaining patient) and none had DLTs.
The most common DLTs found with the plitidepsin combination schedules were 
transaminase increases, which occurred when plitidepsin was combined with carboplatin, 
sorafenib, bevacizumab, gemcitabine or DTIC. DLTs consisting of hematological 
abnormalities were uncommon: grade 4 thrombocytopenia (on its own or concomitant 
with neutropenia for > 5 days) when plitidepsin was combined with carboplatin or 
gemcitabine) and grade 4 febrile neutropenia and pancytopenia, when plitidepsin was 
combined with DTIC. Other DLTs were grade 3 hand-foot syndrome (with plitidepsin and 
sorafenib) and grade 3 fatigue and myalgia (with plitidepsin and bevacizumab). 
Efficacy Data in Phase I Trials
Overall, one confirmed partial response (PR) and three unconfirmed PRs were found in 
phase I studies of plitidepsin as single agent in adult patients. Thirty patients with varied 
tumor types also experienced clinical benefit as stable disease (SD) lasting more than three 
months. 
CL_0256 1.0
Page 36 of 102
Protocol APL-B-022-15


Antitumor activity observed with the plitidepsin combinations includes: 

Patients treated with plitidepsin and gemcitabine: one complete response in a 
patient with NHL, one confirmed PR and three SD > 3 months with tumor 
reduction in patients with Hodgkin’s lymphoma, two SD > 3 months in patients 
with head and neck cancer, one SD > 3 months in a patient with colorectal 
cancer, two SD > 3 months in patients with soft tissue sarcoma and one SD in a 
patient with duodenal cancer of the small intestine.

Patients treated with plitidepsin and DTIC one confirmed PR, two unconfirmed 
PRs and four SD > 3 months in patients with melanoma.

Patients treated with plitidepsin and carboplatin: six SD ≥3 months, two in 
colorectal carcinoma, one in a hepatocarcinoma, one in an adenocarcinoma of 
the gastroesophageal junction, one in a neuroendocrine gallbladder carcinoma 
and one in a malignant melanoma.

Patients treated with plitidepsin and bortezomib: one confirmed PR in one 
patient with MM.

Patients treated with plitidepsin and docetaxel: one SD > 3 months in a patient 
with head and neck cancer.

Patients treated with plitidepsin and bevacizumab: four SD > 3 months, two in 
renal cancer, one in colorectal cancer and one in cancer of the cervix.

Patients treated with plitidepsin and sorafenib: four SD > 3 months, two in renal 
cancer, one with pleural mesothelioma and one with colorectal cancer.
1.3.3.2
Phase II Trials
Two schedules were selected for further evaluation in phase II studies on the basis of the 
findings from phase I studies: a fortnightly schedule with a 3-h i.v. infusion on D1 and 15, 
q4wk at the RD of 5 mg/m2 (a 24-h i.v. infusion was also tested at the same RD and at 7 
mg/m2 if supplemented with L-carnitine) and a weekly schedule (1-h i.v. infusion on D1, 8 
and 15, q4wk at the RD of 3.2 mg/m2).
The results from completed phase II trials confirm the preliminary safety profile described 
from the subset of patients treated at the proposed RD in phase I trials.
Evidence suggests that the use of shorter infusion times may help reduce the incidence of 
some types of drug-related events, including CPK elevations, gastrointestinal (anorexia, 
nausea and vomiting), constitutional (fatigue) and injection site reactions. In addition, 
shorter infusion times are more convenient for the patient and significantly reduce costs 
and treatment complexity. No significant differences were found in the dose intensity and 
the safety profile of the treatment administration schemes. Therefore, the clinical 
development of 24-h continuous i.v. infusion schedules has been discontinued in favor of 
the 1-h and 3-h infusion schedules.
The cardiac safety of plitidepsin does not seem to be of special concern. The most common 
cardiac adverse event (AE) observed to date in the clinical trials are harmless rhythm 
alterations. No cardiac AEs have resulted in a fatal outcome. In addition, no life-
threatening ventricular arrhythmias have occurred. Relevant predisposing factors are 
mostly related with the patient’s baseline characteristics and disease, but not to drug 
exposure or treatment characteristics. 
CL_0256 1.0
Page 37 of 102
Protocol APL-B-022-15


Severe hypersensitivity reactions have been found with plitidepsin, even after prophylactic 
premedication with antihistamines and glucocorticoids. These reactions are rapidly 
reversible and to date none has had a fatal outcome. They may be due to the Polyoxyl 35 
castor oil l present in the formulation, but a direct relationship between plitidepsin itself 
and hypersensitivity may not be excluded yet. 
Phase II Trial of Plitidepsin in Combination with Dexamethasone
The safety and efficacy of plitidepsin in patients with relapsed and/or refractory MM have 
been investigated in a phase II study and final results have been published [41]. This was 
an open-label study of plitidepsin given at a dose of 5 mg/m2, as a 3-h infusion every two 
weeks; the addition of dexamethasone was allowed in patients with suboptimal response to 
plitidepsin alone (defined as disease progression [PD] after three cycles or SD after four
cycles of plitidepsin). The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR = 
complete response [CR]+ partial response [PR] + minimal response [MR]) according to 
strict Bladé criteria [42] in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population according to Myeloma 
Response Criteria. Secondary endpoints were time to progression (TTP) and safety. 
The safety profile of the plitidepsin/dexamethasone combination was acceptable and did
not significantly change after dexamethasone addition. In particular, the incidence of grade 
3-4 drug-related hematological toxicity was very low, with 11% and 21% of patients 
experiencing grade 3-4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, respectively (similar figures 
were obtained for plitidepsin alone).
Response was firstly evaluated using the Myeloma Response Criteria. Two PRs and four 
MRs were found in 47 evaluable patients treated with single-agent plitidepsin (ORR = 
12.8%). Twenty-four other patients had SD, which lasted for >3 months in four patients. 
Nineteen patients who showed PD or SD after receiving four cycles of single-agent 
plitidepsin had dexamethasone added to treatment. Two PRs and two MRs were found in 
18 evaluable patients in this cohort (ORR = 22.2%), while SD for >3 months occurred in 
eight patients. When response was assessed as per Investigator’s criteria, the ORR was 
12.8% for single-agent plitidepsin (3 PRs and 3 MRs in 47 evaluable patients) and 27.8% 
for plitidepsin combined with dexamethasone (3 PRs and 2 MRs in 18 evaluable patients). 
Overall, these results suggest that plitidepsin administered alone or in combination with 
dexamethasone showed clinical activity in patients with relapsed/refractory MM.
1.3.3.3
Phase III Program
An ongoing multicenter, open-label, randomized, Phase III clinical trial started in June 
2010 is comparing the efficacy and safety of plitidepsin combined with dexamethasone 
versus (vs.) dexamethasone alone in patients with relapsed/refractory MM previously 
treated with at least three but not more than six therapeutic regimens. This is the first 
plitidepsin pivotal trial and is expected to randomize up to 250 patients worldwide to 
receive either plitidepsin 5 mg/m2 i.v. as a 3-h infusion on D1 and 15 q4wk plus 
dexamethasone 40 mg orally on D1, 8, 15 and 22, q4wk, or dexamethasone alone at the 
same dose and schedule. 
As of the latest IB cut-off date (31 March 2015), a total of 248 patients have been included 
into this trial and 243 patients have been treated with plitidepsin/dexamethasone or 
dexamethasone alone. A total of 303 SAEs have been reported in 115 patients, regardless 
of treatment arm. Of these, 129 SAEs reported in 63 patients have been considered to be 
related to or with an unknown relationship with the study treatment. The most common 
CL_0256 1.0
Page 38 of 102
Protocol APL-B-022-15


related SAEs were pneumonia (n=8), ALT increases (n=7), aspartate aminotransferase 
(AST) increases and CPK increase (n=6 each), hyperglycemia and sepsis (n=5 each). No 
further safety data are available yet. Of note, an interim analysis of unblinded data from 79 
treated patients conducted by an Independent Data Monitoring Committee (IDMC) found 
no safety reasons to terminate the study. 
On 9 December 2012, the evaluation by the IDMC of efficacy and safety data from the 60 
evaluable patients included in the first stage resulted in a recommendation to continue the 
trial unmodified, as the study met the established efficacy threshold of 30% pre-specified
in the protocol. No safety issues were reported. Therefore, patient accrual was resumed.    
1.3.4 Summary of Pharmacokinetic Results
After non-compartmental analysis, plitidepsin was found to be widely distributed, with 
apparent volumes of distribution in steady state (Vss) of about 500 to 1350 L based on 
plasma, and from about 100 to 225 L based on whole blood, suggesting that blood cells are 
an important distribution compartment. Concentrations were about 3-fold higher in whole 
blood than in plasma. This initial characterization was updated after analyzing data from 
phase II clinical trials, during which samples were collected at later time points than in  
phase I trials. Furthermore, patients included in phase II trials had samples taken for PK 
evaluation during both the first and third treatment cycle, allowing for a more extensive 
analysis. Population methodology was used, as several phase II studies had sparse 
sampling. The final model was a three-compartment disposition model with linear 
elimination within the dose ranges clinically explored. In this analysis, plitidepsin showed 
a prolonged terminal half-life of 88 h (almost double than initial calculations performed by 
non-compartmental methods of analysis of phase I data). Additionally, a population 
Pharmacokinetic [PK]/Pharmacodynamic [PDy] model was developed to evaluate the 
relationship between the pharmacokinetics of plitidepsin and ALT increases, as a measure 
of hepatocyte injury. The main conclusion of this analysis was that the time course of the 
ALT elevation depends on dose and schedule but not on infusion duration. 
1.4 Bortezomib
1.4.1 Scientific Background
Bortezomib is a potent, reversible, and specific inhibitor of the proteasome (PI) and 
represents a first-in-class anti-neoplastic cytotoxic agent that differs from conventional 
cytotoxic agents by a favorable side effect profile, including its lack of significant 
myelosuppression, hair loss and mucositis. 
Bortezomib is a modified dipeptidyl boronic acid derived from leucine and phenylalanine; 
its chemical name is N-pyrazinecarbonyl-L-phenylalanine-L-leucine boronic acid and has 
a molecular weight of 384.25 daltons [43, 44].
Bortezomib was the first clinically-validated boronate-based dipeptide PI approved for use 
in relapsed/refractory MM. It was approved in the USA in 2005 for the treatment of 
patients with MM who have received at least one prior therapy, and in 2008 for front-line 
treatment of patients with MM in combination with melphalan and prednisone. Bortezomib 
reversibly binds the 20S subunit, inhibiting the ChT-active site and also significantly the 
C-L active site; however, it has minimal effect on T-L activity. Bortezomib targets 
numerous pathways by inhibiting the proteasome and controlling key transcription factors. 
The apoptotic activity of bortezomib results from inhibition of NFB activity, disruption of 
cyclin-dependent kinase activity, stabilization of c-Jun N-terminal kinases leading to Fas 
CL_0256 1.0
Page 39 of 102
Protocol APL-B-022-15


upregulation, stabilization of p53, and a shift of the pro-apoptotic and antiapoptotic balance 
in the Bcl-2 family of proteins.
Due to the non-optimal AE profile observed to date with the i.v. administration of 
bortezomib, alternative schemes of administration are currently being investigated. One 
study [45] showed weekly administration of bortezomib to be feasible; more importantly, 
weekly administration, when compared with the standard scheme of administration,
considerably reduced neuropathic toxicity without interference with activity. Furthermore,
subcutaneous (s.c.) administration yields the same activity whilst being much less toxic.
Based on this information, we plan to administer weekly bortezomib subcutaneously in 
combination with biweekly plitidepsin along with the standard low dose weekly 
dexamethasone.
Inhibitors of the 26S proteasome act through multiple mechanisms to suppress tumor 
survival pathways, arrest tumor growth, tumor spread and angiogenesis. Unlike 
conventional chemotherapeutics, bortezomib represents a novel class of anti-cancer agent
because it has the ability to affect a combination of cellular regulatory mechanisms. This 
multiple mechanistic approach potentially represents a more effective anti-cancer strategy 
compared to the antitumor activity afforded by conventional CT [43].
1.4.2 Mechanism of Action
The mechanisms of antitumor activity that have been established for bortezomib involve 
many pathways thought to be integral to cancer treatment strategies [46-49]. The following 
mechanisms have been demonstrated in in vitro and in vivo experiments:

Inhibits activation of NF-kB in cells and in tumor microenvironment 

Reduces adherence of myeloma cells to BM stromal cells 

Blocks production and intracellular signaling of IL-6 in myeloma cells 

Blocks production and expression of pro-angiogenic mediators 

Overcomes defects in apoptotic regulators, such as Bcl-2 overexpression and 
alterations in tumor suppressor p53 

Activity is cell-cycle independent 

Stabilizes cell cycle regulatory proteins 

Unaffected by drug efflux pumps
1.4.3 Preclinical Experience
Pre-clinical research with PIs has demonstrated their ability to induce apoptosis and inhibit 
tumor growth, supporting their potential role in the treatment of various tumor types, 
especially hematological malignancies. 
PK and PDy studies have been conducted in the rat and cynomolgus monkey. Upon i.v.
bolus administration, bortezomib displays a rapid distribution phase (half-life [t1/2α] <10 
min) followed by a longer elimination phase (t1/2β 5–15 h). Bortezomib has a large volume 
of distribution (range 5–50 L/kg). Its plasma PK profile is well described by a 
two-compartment model. The PDy action of bortezomib is well established and can be 
measured through an ex vivo assay (20S proteasome activity) [50].  This assay was used to 
determine the duration of drug effect in lieu of the PK data in the early preclinical 
CL_0256 1.0
Page 40 of 102
Protocol APL-B-022-15


toxicology studies as well as to set a guide for dose escalation in humans. Following 
dosing with bortezomib in the rat and cynomolgus monkey, proteasome inhibition in 
peripheral blood had a half-life less than 24 h, with proteasome activity returning to 
pretreatment baseline within 24 h in monkey and within 48 to 72 h in rat after a single dose 
of bortezomib. Further, intermittent but high inhibition (>70%) of proteasome activity was 
better tolerated than sustained inhibition. Thus, a twice-weekly clinical dosing regimen 
was chosen in order to allow return of proteasome activity towards baseline between dose 
administrations [47, 48, 51, 52].
1.4.4 Clinical Pharmacology
The clinical pharmacology program has been designed and partially carried out to 
investigate the disposition characteristics, and the pharmacodynamics of bortezomib [53, 
54]. Conclusions from the completed investigations are: 

Upon i.v. bolus administration, bortezomib displays a rapid distribution phase 
(t1/2α< 30 min) followed by a longer elimination phase t1/2β> 10 h) and a large 
volume of distribution, all consistent with a 2-compartment PK model. 

The high volume of distribution, rapid distribution phase, prolonged biological 
effect (t1/2~24 h), and high potency (Ki = 0.6 nM with slow off rate), along with 
in vitro metabolic studies suggest that de-boronation and proteolytic cleavage of 
bortezomib at the cellular level represent the majority of the catabolism of this 
compound. This conclusion is based on extensive preclinical evaluation of the 
disposition characteristics, PK and the PDy of bortezomib. Inhibition of 20S 
proteasome activity occurs in a dose-related manner. The maximum 
pharmacodynamic effect on circulating whole blood 20S activity occurs within 
1 h of dosing. The relationship between bortezomib plasma concentrations and 
proteasome inhibition is well described by a simple Emax model.
1.4.5 Phase I Clinical Experience
Data from four phase I studies designed to evaluate the MTD of bortezomib and DLTs in a 
variety of doses and dose schedules have been analyzed. The MTD of bortezomib,
regardless of individual protocol definition, appeared to be dependent on the treatment 
schedule employed and the patient population treated. MTDs and DLTs in these studies 
were as follows: 

The MTD of bortezomib administered twice per week for 2 weeks followed by 
a 10-day rest period to patients with advanced solid tumors was determined to 
be 1.3 mg/m2. DLTs of fatigue, diarrhea and peripheral neuropathy (PN) were
observed at 1.56 mg/m2/dose [55]. 

The MTD of bortezomib administered once per week for 4 weeks followed by a 
14-day rest period to patients with solid tumors was 1.6 mg/m2. This was the 
least dose-intensive schedule but had the highest individual doses administered
[56].

The MTD of bortezomib administered twice per week for four weeks in eight
dose cycles followed by a 14-day rest period to patients with hematological
malignancies was determined to be 1.04 mg/m2. A DLT (hyponatremia) and 
more frequently grade 3 thrombocytopenia was observed at a bortezomib dose 
of 1.04 mg/m2 and 1.38 mg/m2 [57].
CL_0256 1.0
Page 41 of 102
Protocol APL-B-022-15


Neurotoxicity was observed in phase I studies, particularly a painful sensory PN, that was 
dose-related, and more prevalent among patients previously treated with neurotoxic agents 
(e.g., platinum, thalidomide, vincristine and taxane-containing regimens) and dose-limiting 
in patients with refractory solid tumors.
A relatively low incidence of significant myelosuppression in Phase I, febrile neutropenia, 
infections and transfusion-dependent thrombocytopenia or anemia, mucositis or alopecia 
was notable; this has also been borne out in the phase II data evaluated to date. Effects on 
the liver, kidney, and heart were rarely found. Decreases in platelet count have been 
observed on treatment during both phase I and II studies and appear to be related to dose. 
Clinically significant thrombocytopenia can occur and appears to be influenced by baseline 
platelet count. Platelet count tends to recover during the rest period. Patients should be 
carefully 
monitored 
throughout 
treatment 
with 
bortezomib 
for 
hematological 
abnormalities. 
Although demonstration of efficacy was not a primary objective in the phase I clinical 
studies, antitumor activity was observed in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the 
nasopharynx, bronchoalveolar carcinoma of the lung, renal cell carcinoma, prostate cancer, 
lymphoma, Waldenström’s macroglobulinemia and MM.
1.4.6 Phase II Clinical Experience
The safety and efficacy of bortezomib were evaluated in an open-label, single-arm, 
multicenter phase II study of 202 patients with relapsed and refractory MM who had 
received at least 2 prior lines of treatment and were progressing on most recent therapy 
(SUMMIT) [58]. Patients with relapsed and refractory myeloma have an expected survival 
of 6-9 months. 
The 202 patients had multiple poor prognostic factors at study entry including elevated 
beta-2-microglobulin, poor hematopoietic reserve, evidence of organ dysfunction,
abnormal renal function and chromosomal abnormalities. The median number of prior 
lines of therapy was six.
An i.v. bolus injection of bortezomib 1.3 mg/ m2 dose was administered twice weekly for 2 
weeks without routine pre-medication, followed by a 10-day rest period (21 day treatment 
cycle) for a maximum of eight treatment cycles. Patients who experienced benefit from 
bortezomib treatment were allowed to continue treatment in an extension study. Patients 
who experienced PD after at least 2 cycles, or had SD after at least 4 cycles with 
bortezomib were allowed, at their physicians’ discretion, to have high dose dexamethasone 
(40 mg) added to their bortezomib treatment. Response rates to bortezomib alone were 
determined by an independent response committee (IRC) based on Bladé’s criteria [59].
Complete remission required 100% reduction in M-protein and included patients with
positive or negative immunofixation (IF+ or IF-, respectively). All 202 patients were 
evaluable for time to event analyses. A total of 193 patients were evaluated for response 
(nine patients with non-measurable disease could not be evaluated for response by the 
IRC). In SUMMIT, bortezomib demonstrated an overall response rate (CR+PR+MR) of 
35% with 59% patients experiencing improved or SD. A total of 10% of patients 
experienced a complete remission (4% IF- and 6% IF+). The median time to response was 
38 days.
The median survival of all patients enrolled in SUMMIT was 16 months. RR was 
independent of the number or type of previous therapies. In addition, the rate of response 
CL_0256 1.0
Page 42 of 102
Protocol APL-B-022-15


remained consistent regardless of the patients’ gender, race, body surface area, 
performance status, myeloma type or chromosome 13-deletion status. The median time to 
progression for all 202 patients enrolled in SUMMIT was 7 months. Median time to 
progression on their last previous therapy was 3 months and when using patients from 
SUMMIT as their own controls, the median time to progression was twice as long on 
bortezomib relative to the last therapy. Effects on serum and/or urine monoclonal 
paraprotein and plasma cells from BM aspirate and biopsy were also evaluated. Overall,
70% of patients had either reduction or stable serum and/or urine paraprotein levels. A 
total of 69% of patients included in the analysis for BM biopsy results had a 50% decrease 
in plasma cells, thereby demonstrating that treatment with bortezomib reduces the number 
of or clears myeloma cells from the BM. BM aspirate results were consistent with those 
obtained by biopsy. 
Responders (CR+PR) in SUMMIT also had an increase in mean hemoglobin and decreased 
overall transfusion requirements; stable renal function; stable or improved Karnofsky 
Performance Status (KPS) and increased mean non-myeloma immunoglobulin levels (IgM, 
IgA and IgG). The mean IgM returned to the normal range by the end of treatment; 28% 
(15/53) of patients had increases of ≥
2 fold in one of their non-myeloma 
immunoglobulins. An association between RR and improvement in quality of life was 
apparent. Patients who responded to treatment experienced an improvement in EORTC-
C30 Global and Physical parameters, including a decrease in disease symptoms, pain and 
fatigue.
In SUMMIT, 74 patients were administered dexamethasone in combination with 
bortezomib and were assessed for response. Eighteen percent (13/74) achieved an 
improved response (MR or PR) with combination treatment.
The CREST study was a randomized open-label, single-arm, multicenter study which 
enrolled 54 patients with MM that progressed or relapsed on or after front-line therapy 
(CREST) [60]. Bortezomib was administered twice weekly for 2 weeks followed by a 10-
day rest period for a maximum of eight treatment cycles as second line therapy.
Patients were prospectively randomized to receive 1.0 or 1.3 mg/m2/dose. A total of 28 
patients received 1.0 mg/m2/dose and 26 patients were administered 1.3 mg/m2/dose. 
Patients who experienced benefit from bortezomib treatment were allowed to continue 
treatment in an extension study. Patients who experienced PD after at least two cycles or 
SD after at least four cycles with bortezomib alone were allowed, at their physician’s 
discretion, to have high dose dexamethasone (40 mg) added to their treatment.
Both dose groups were similar with regards to demographic and baseline characteristics. 
The median age for all patients was 63 years; 57% had a KPS score of 90 to 100 with only 
13% of patients with a score of ≤  70; 19% had a hemoglobin level <100 g/l and no 
patients had a platelet count < 50 x 109/L. The median duration of time between diagnosis 
of MM and the first dose of bortezomib was 2.0 years and patients had received a median 
of one prior treatment line (median of three prior therapies), including steroids (98% of 
patients), alkylating agents (72% of patients), anthracyclines (54% of patients), prior stem 
cell transplant (48% of patients) and thalidomide (30% of patients). The median time to 
progression for all treated patients was 11 months. Eighty percent of patients were alive at 
1 year. 
In CREST, the combination of bortezomib and dexamethasone was administered to 28 
patients, 16 patients in the 1.0mg/m2 group and 12 patients in the 1.3mg/m2 group. A total 
CL_0256 1.0
Page 43 of 102
Protocol APL-B-022-15


of 9 patients (32%) had an improved response (CR, PR or MR) with combination treatment 
(4 of the 16 patients receiving 1.0 mg/m2 and 5 of the 12 patients in the 1.3 mg/ m2 group). 
Two of these 9 patients achieved a CR while receiving dexamethasone in combination with 
bortezomib therapy. A total of 51 patients entered the extension study. 
Initial data indicate that bortezomib can be administered to patients with relapsed and/or 
refractory MM for longer than six months with similar tolerability to that of the first six
months of treatment. Patients were able to maintain their response or had an improved 
response with additional cycles of bortezomib therapy.
The phase III study (M34101-039), also referred to as the APEX study, was designed to 
determine whether bortezomib provided benefit (TTP, RR, and survival) to patients with 
relapsed and/or refractory MM relative to treatment with high-dose dexamethasone [61].
The study was also designed to determine the safety and tolerability of bortezomib relative 
to high-dose dexamethasone, and whether treatment with bortezomib was associated with 
superior clinical benefit and quality of life relative to high-dose dexamethasone. A total of 
669 patients were enrolled and 663 patients received study drug (bortezomib: 331; 
dexamethasone: 332). Patients randomized to bortezomib received 1.3 mg/m2 i.v. push 
twice weekly on Day 1, 4, 8, and 11 of a 3-week cycle for up to eight treatment cycles as 
induction therapy, followed by 1.3 mg/m2 bortezomib weekly on Day 1, 8, 15, and 22 of a 
5-week cycle for three
cycles as maintenance therapy. Patients randomized to 
dexamethasone received oral dexamethasone 40 mg once daily on Day 1 to 4, 9 to 12, and 
17 to 20 of a 5-week cycle for up to four treatment cycles as induction therapy, followed 
by dexamethasone 40 mg once daily on days 1 to 4 followed of a 4-week cycle for five 
cycles as maintenance therapy. The EBMT response criteria, as described by Bladé were 
utilized to determine disease response.
There was a 78% increase in TTP for the bortezomib arm. Median TTP was 6.2 months for 
the bortezomib arm and 3.5 months for the dexamethasone arm (p <0.0001). CR + PR 
were 38% with bortezomib vs. 18% with dexamethasone (p < 0.0001). CR was 6% with 
bortezomib vs. <1% with dexamethasone (p < 0.0001). The CR + near CR (nCR) rate was
13% with bortezomib vs. 2% with dexamethasone. In patients who had received only one
prior line of treatment (bortezomib: 132; dexamethasone: 119), CR + PR were 45% with 
bortezomib vs. 26% with dexamethasone (p = 0.0035). With a median 8.3 months of 
follow-up, OS was significantly longer (p = 0.0013) for patients on the bortezomib arm vs.
patients on the dexamethasone arm. 
The probability of survival at one year was 80% for the bortezomib arm vs. 66% for the 
dexamethasone arm, which represented a 41% decreased relative risk of death in the first 
year with bortezomib (p = 0.0005). In patients who had received only one prior line of 
treatment, the probability of survival at one year was 89% for the bortezomib arm vs. 72% 
for the dexamethasone arm, which represented a 61% decreased relative risk of death in 
the first year with bortezomib (p = 0.0098) [62].
1.4.7 Safety Issues
The data described below reflect exposure to bortezomib in 256 patients with MM [58]
[59]. The median total dose administered across all 256 patients was 46 mg, median 
duration of treatment was 131 days, and median number of doses administered was 22 (six
cycles). The most commonly reported AEs were nausea (62%), fatigue (54%), diarrhea 
(48%), constipation (41%), thrombocytopenia (41%), pyrexia (36%), vomiting (34%), and 
anorexia (30%).
CL_0256 1.0
Page 44 of 102
Protocol APL-B-022-15


Events reported as PN, peripheral sensory neuropathy and PN aggravated were reported in 
35% of patients. PN was grade 3 for 13% of patients and grade 4 for < 1% of patients. New 
onset or worsening of existing neuropathy was noted throughout the cycles of treatment. 
Five percent (5%) of patients discontinued bortezomib due to neuropathy. Notably, more 
than 80% of patients had signs or symptoms of PN at baseline evaluation. The incidence of 
grade 3 neuropathy was low (2 of 60 patients, 3%) in patients without baseline neuropathy. 
Symptoms may improve in some patients upon discontinuation of bortezomib; complete 
resolution of PN has been reported.
Transient and uncomplicated thrombocytopenia was reported during treatment with 
bortezomib in 42% of patients. The thrombocytopenia observed was characterized by a 
dose-related decrease in platelet count during the bortezomib dosing period (Days 1 to 11) 
with a return to baseline in platelet count during the resting period (Days 12 to 21) in each 
treatment cycle. Thrombocytopenia was assessed as bortezomib-related in 38% of patients 
and grade 3-4 in intensity in 29% of patients. Three percent of patients experienced grade 4 
thrombocytopenia. All episodes of grade 4 events were bortezomib-related. Four percent of 
patients discontinued bortezomib treatment due to thrombocytopenia of any grade.
Notably, infusion reactions, infusion site reactions, alopecia, mucositis, febrile neutropenia 
and sepsis were rarely reported. Acute development or exacerbation of congestive heart 
failure has been seen in subjects with risk factors for or existing heart disease. 
Thirteen percent of patients experienced at least one episode of grade 4 toxicity, with the
most common events being thrombocytopenia (3%) and neutropenia (2%). A total of 124 
(48%) of the 256 patients experienced SAEs during the studies. The most commonly 
reported SAEs included pyrexia (7%), pneumonia (7%), diarrhea (5%), vomiting (5%), 
dehydration (5%) and nausea (4%).
AEs leading to treatment discontinuation were reported in 28% of patients. The reasons for 
discontinuation were evenly distributed across the most common types of toxicity and 
included PN (5%), thrombocytopenia (4%), PD (3%), diarrhea (2%), and fatigue (2%). The 
majority of patients discontinuing treatment due to AEs were not responding to therapy. 
The addition of dexamethasone did not appear to adversely affect the safety profile of 
bortezomib.
1.5 Trial Rationale and Drug Selection 
MM is still an incurable disease. As front-line treatment to reduce tumor burden, HSCT as 
well as emergent drugs used in newly diagnosed patients offer the best chance for long-
term survival. However, while many studies have shown the benefits of this approach, 
most patients will relapse. Thus, additional therapeutic options are needed for these 
patients.
Rationale for the double refractory patient population to bortezomib and 
lenalidomide:
Most MM patients will receive PIs and/or IMIDs, either as frontline therapy prior to 
consolidation with HSCT or as initial therapy in patients who are not eligible for HSCT. 
Furthermore, many patients nowadays receive maintenance treatment with one or both 
types of agents. As a result, resistance to these drugs, two of the most commonly used 
being bortezomib and lenalidomide, is an increasingly observed problem that must be 
CL_0256 1.0
Page 45 of 102
Protocol APL-B-022-15


addressed through the introduction of novel agents and/or combinations within these two 
drug families.
Second generation PIs and IMIDs, such as carfilzomib [63] and pomalidomide [64], are
now becoming available, which are more potent, less toxic and have more convenient 
administration schedules. However, despite observed responses of 25%, most of them PRs, 
when used as single agents or in combination with dexamethasone, efficacy in the double 
refractory population to bortezomib and lenalidomide is still low, with a median PFS of 3.5 
to 4 months [64].
More recently, promising efficacy results have been observed in a phase II study 
(PANORAMA II) carried out in a patient population double refractory to bortezomib and 
lenalidomide when bortezomib and dexamethasone were combined with a histone 
deacetylase inhibitor, panobinostat [65]. This study, together with a randomized phase III 
study of the combination led to the approval of panobinostat in combination with 
bortezomib and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed and refractory MM. These results 
would suggest that double-targeting the proteasome and the aggresome may overcome the 
resistance to PIs and IMIDs [66, 67]. Despite the promising efficacy data from these trials, 
generally low efficacy and substantial hematological (over 60% grade 3-4 
thrombocytopenia) and gastrointestinal toxicity were observed with this combination in a 
population with yet a dismal prognosis.
Promising efficacy results are also being observed with other agents under development 
with differentiated MOAs, such as kinesin spindle protein inhibitors [68, 69] or 
monoclonal antibodies (both for use as single agents or in combination) that target specific 
antigens on the membrane of MM cells (e.g., SLAM7 or CD38) [70]. Specifically, 
promising activity is being reported with daratumomab, a monoclonal antibody that targets 
CD38. 
Despite the developments mentioned above, novel agents with differentiated MOAs and 
showing synergism with the majorly established drugs, such as bortezomib, are urgently 
needed. Moreover, these agents should be able to overcome resistance to widely used 
drugs, such as bortezomib and lenalidomide, when given as part of a combination regimen, 
both during induction and later treatment phases. Given that in the double refractory 
population setting patients will have developed substantial toxicity (e.g., poor BM reserve, 
neuropathy…), the searching for agents and/or drug combinations with activity in this 
setting and with a safe toxicity profile is a must.
Rationale for the combination of plitidepsin with bortezomib and dexamethasone:
In 1999, plitidepsin was found to have substantial in vitro antitumor activity in cells 
isolated from patients with advanced myeloma, and preliminary clinical data are 
confirmatory of activity against refractory and relapsed MM: a 3-h i.v. plitidepsin infusion 
at a dose of 5 mg/m2, q2w induces objective responses (around 20%) with an acceptable 
toxicity profile, and with a remarkable lack of neurological and hematological toxicity
[41]. 
Bortezomib, a novel PI, has been shown to induce clinically significant responses with 
manageable toxic effects in patients with relapsed and/or refractory MM. In a pivotal trial, 
the ORR, including complete responses, was 35%, the median response duration was 12 
months and there was an increase by a factor of 2 to 4 in the TTP with bortezomib therapy 
as compared to the last therapy. In the CREST trial patients with refractory MM were 
CL_0256 1.0
Page 46 of 102
Protocol APL-B-022-15


randomized to receive 1.0 or 1.3 mg/m2 of bortezomib twice weekly for 2 weeks, every 3 
weeks, for a maximum of eight cycles. Dexamethasone was permitted in patients with 
progressive or SD after 2 or 4 cycles, respectively. Patients who received bortezomib at a 
dose of 1.3 mg/m2 had increased CR+PR rates (50% vs. 33%), prolonged median duration 
of response and median TTP (11 months vs. 7 months). Thus, the dose of 1.3 mg/m2, twice 
per week in 3-week cycles seems to be the optimal dose for bortezomib as single agent or 
in the combination with dexamethasone.
The combination of plitidepsin plus bortezomib has been studied in vitro. The degree of 
cytotoxicity was determined by a MTS (tetrazolium salt) assay. Data from the MTS assay 
was expressed as the fraction of cells affected by the dose (Fa) in drug-treated cells as 
compared to single agent treated cells (control). In vitro results of this combination showed 
synergy at the higher dose of the concentration range tested.
The combination was further tested in a human plasmacytoma (MM-1s) subcutaneously 
implanted in NOD SCID mice. The bortezomib combination showed a trend towards a 
better outcome than the single agents, although differences were not very evident, probably 
due to the low doses of plitidepsin and bortezomib used in the experiment. 
A phase I clinical study of plitidepsin in combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone 
is currently ongoing and has indicated a favorable safety profile (out of 11 evaluable 
patients, no DLTs have been reported to date).
The use of bortezomib is limited by its toxicity, such as PN and thrombocytopenia, which 
restricts the clinical dosing regimen to a biweekly (D1, D4) schedule, allowing proteasome 
activity to recover between doses. In an effort to improve tolerability in patients with 
relapsed and/or refractory MM, a recent analysis evaluated the feasibility of a single 
bortezomib dose in the setting of combination therapy. The majority of response 
parameters, including ORR and PFS, were similar, while the safety profile improved (with 
a PN incidence of 8% vs. 28% in patients receiving twice-weekly dosing) [45]. A separate 
phase III trial examined the impact of s.c. bortezomib on safety and efficacy parameters; in 
addition to a more convenient administration, s.c. bortezomib offered similar efficacy but 
lower toxicity [71]. 
Based on the positive results observed with plitidepsin and bortezomib both as single 
agents and in combination with dexamethasone against MM, their different MOA, and the 
potential synergism of the triple combination, the efficacy of plitidepsin plus bortezomib 
and dexamethasone in patients with MM double refractory to bortezomib and lenalidomide
deserves to be addressed in clinical trials.
Rationale for the Pharmacogenomic (PGx) Sub-study:
Several studies have shown that plitidepsin induces apoptosis in a cell type- and dose-
dependent manner, and these effects are related to the induction of early oxidative stress, 
the activation of Rac1 GTPase and the inhibition of protein phosphatases, which in 
conjunction cause the sustained activation of JNK and p38 MAPK. The final consequence 
is the triggering of the mitochondrial apoptotic pathway with caspase-9 and caspase-3 
activation [72]. Additional effects may be mediated by indirect effects on the cell 
microenvironment, mainly mediated by antiangiogenic properties [12, 17, 18] and indirect 
effects on monocyte-derived cells, including follicular dendritic cells [73].
Recently plitidepsin has been shown to interact with GTP-bound eEF1A2. eEF1A2 is 
commonly depleted in plitidepsin-resistant cells and its restitution to normal levels 
CL_0256 1.0
Page 47 of 102
Protocol APL-B-022-15


resensitize them to the compound. These results show that eEF1A2 is the primary target of 
plitidepsin mediating its antitumor activity [74]. Interestingly eEF1A2 is overexpressed in
tumors, including multiple myeloma [75].
Therefore, in the PGx study a panel of markers potentially related to the mechanism of 
action of plitidepsin (e.g., angiogenesis, endoplasmic reticulum stress, oxidative stress 
apoptosis…) will be analyzed and correlated with the clinical outcome.
2.
OBJECTIVES
Primary Objective:
To evaluate the efficacy of plitidepsin in combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone 
in patients with MM double refractory to bortezomib and lenalidomide in terms of overall 
response rate (ORR), including stringent complete response (sCR), complete response 
(CR), very good partial response (VGPR) and partial response (PR). 
Secondary Objectives:

To evaluate time-to-event efficacy endpoints of plitidepsin in combination with 
bortezomib and dexamethasone, i.e., duration of response (DOR), time to 
progression (TTP), progression-free survival (PFS) and event-free survival (EFS).

To evaluate overall survival (OS) and OS rate at 6 and 12 months (OS6 and OS12, 
respectively).

To evaluate the safety and tolerability of plitidepsin in combination with 
bortezomib and dexamethasone.

To study the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PDy) of plitidepsin in 
combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone.

To obtain pharmacogenomic information (Pharmacogenomics [PGx]) on markers 
of response to plitidepsin and bortezomib treatment.
3.
OVERALL TRIAL DESIGN
This is a multi-center, open-label, single arm, non-comparative phase II trial, designed to 
evaluate the efficacy of plitidepsin in combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone in 
patients with MM double refractory to bortezomib and lenalidomide. Plitidepsin will be 
administered as a 3-hour (h) i.v. infusion at a dose of 5 mg/m2, on Day (D) 1 and 15, q4wk,
bortezomib will be administered as a s.c. injection at a dose of 1.3 mg/m2 on D1, 4, 8 and 
11, q4wk and dexamethasone will be taken orally at a dose of 40 mg/day on D1, 8, 15 and 
22, q4wk.
Patients will be evaluated at scheduled visits in three trial periods: pre-treatment, treatment 
and follow-up.
The pre-treatment period includes screening and baseline visits. After providing written 
informed consent (IC) to participate in the trial, patients will be screened for trial eligibility 
during a screening period of up to 28 days. Baseline assessment consists of a detailed 
history of pre-existing diseases, a complete physical examination and clinical neurological 
assessment, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS)
(Appendix 2), ECG, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and laboratory tests
CL_0256 1.0
Page 48 of 102
Protocol APL-B-022-15


(including hematology and biochemistry), urinalysis, hepatitis B and C virus screening and
serum pregnancy tests for women of childbearing potential (WOCBP) (see Table: 
Schedule of Assessments).
Disease-specific markers will be analyzed: beta-2-microglobulin, C-reactive protein 
(CRP), IgG, IgA, IgM, IF from blood and urine, serum free light chains (SFLC), a 
representative BM aspirate and/or BM biopsy, and a skeletal survey: X-rays of the skull, 
vertebral column, pelvis and proximal long bones or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). 
In case of extramedullary soft tissue plasmacytoma, computed tomography (CT)-scan or 
MRI of any site involved will be performed.
During the treatment period, all patients are to attend trial center visits on Day 1, 4, 8, 11
and 15 on an every four-week basis to assess safety and toxicity. All patients are to attend 
an end-of-treatment (EOT) visit 30 (±5) days after the last dose of trial therapy.
Prior to each administration of trial drug, a short medical history focusing on plitidepsin-,
bortezomib- and dexamethasone-associated side effects will be performed as well as 
cardiac markers, kidney and liver function tests. Complete blood counts and biochemistry
tests will be carried out before each plitidepsin administration as described in Section 4.
Other disease-modifying treatments (e.g., alpha interferon) are strictly prohibited.
Tests for disease assessment will be performed during the treatment period described in 
Section 4.7.
A cycle is defined as 28 days, plus any additional days required for dosing delays due to 
any reason. All patients will remain in the trial until PD, excessive side effects or 
withdrawal of consent (see Section 4.4). If patients respond to treatment or achieve SD and 
bortezomib toxicity precludes any further treatment, they may continue to receive 
plitidepsin and dexamethasone at the same dose upon Investigator’s decision and 
agreement with the Sponsor. Once plitidepsin treatment is stopped, patients must be 
discontinued from the trial. Patients who achieve a sCR, a CR, VGPR, PR, MR or SD as 
defined by response criteria may be taken off the trial if eligible to proceed to high dose 
CT and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Treatment may continue in case of 
obvious patient’s benefit according to the Investigator and upon discussion with the 
Sponsor. Patients who discontinue plitidepsin treatment must stop taking bortezomib and 
dexamethasone in the trial setting.
After completion of the treatment period or in case of discontinuation, patients are to 
attend follow-up visits. Patients will be followed for AEs during 30 days after the last 
administration of trial drug and until their resolution. In addition, patients will be followed 
every three months to assess disease status. Patients taken off the trial due to reasons other 
than PD, will be followed for disease status every three months until PD, initiation of 
another anticancer therapy, trial termination or death, whichever comes first. 
Detailed visit-by-visit trial procedures are contained in Section 4.
3.1 Trial Endpoints
Primary Endpoint
ORR (including sCR, CR, VGPR and PR).
CL_0256 1.0
Page 49 of 102
Protocol APL-B-022-15


Secondary Endpoints

Time-to-event efficacy endpoints of plitidepsin in combination with bortezomib 
and dexamethasone, i.e., DOR, TTP, PFS and EFS.

OS and OS rate at 6 and 12 months (OS6 and OS12).

Safety and tolerability of plitidepsin in combination with bortezomib and 
dexamethasone.

PK and PDy of plitidepsin in combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone.

PGx information on markers of response to plitidepsin and bortezomib 
treatment.
3.2 Number of Patients
Approximately 64 evaluable patients will be needed for the evaluation of the primary 
endpoint, ORR.
An early futility analysis will be performed with the efficacy data collected from the first 
20 evaluable patients. The futility analysis will commence once patient number 20 has 
completed two full treatment cycles. Patient recruitment will not be halted during the 
conduct of this futility analysis.
3.3 Selection of Patients
Patients with MM double refractory to bortezomib and lenalidomide will be included.
Refractory myeloma is defined as disease that is non-responsive while on primary or 
salvage therapy, or progresses within 60 days of the last therapy. There are two 
categories of refractory myeloma:
Primary refractory myeloma is defined as disease that is non-responsive in 
patients who have never achieved a MR or better, with any therapy. It includes 
patients who never achieved MR or better in whom there is no significant change in 
monoclonal protein (M-protein) and no evidence of clinical progression as well as 
primary refractory, PD where patients meet criteria for true PD.
Relapsed and refractory myeloma is defined as disease that is non-responsive 
while on salvage therapy, or progresses within 60 days of last therapy in patients 
who have achieved MR or better at some point previously before progressing.
3.3.1
Inclusion Criteria
A patient is eligible for enrolment if all of the following inclusion criteria are met:
1) Patients must give written IC in accordance with institutional and local guidelines.
2) Age ≥ 18 years.
3) Patients must have a confirmed diagnosis of MM according to the Durie-Salmon 
criteria (Appendix 3).
4) Patients must have measurable disease defined as any of the following: 
a) Serum M-protein ≥0.5 g/dL or ≥0.2 g/24-h urine light chain (UFLC) excretion.
b) In patients who lack measureable M-protein in serum or urine, i.e., serum M-
protein < 0.5 g/dL and urine M-protein < 0.2 g/24 h,  serum free light chain
(SFLC) levels are most informative. SFLC levels can be used only if the 
CL_0256 1.0
Page 50 of 102
Protocol APL-B-022-15


baseline SFLC ratio is abnormal (<0.26 or >1.65) indicating clonality. In 
addition, the baseline SFLC level must be ≥10 mg/dL of the appropriate 
involved light chain isotype.
c) When applicable, measurable soft tissue plasmacytoma ≥2 cm, by either 
physical examination and/or applicable radiological evaluation (i.e. MRI, CT-
scan).
5) Prior autologous and/or allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) 
patients are allowed. Patients must not have acute/chronic graft-versus-host disease 
(GVHD) or be receiving immunosuppressive therapy at least 90 days before the 
onset of treatment with the trial drug(s).
6) Patients must have received previous treatment with bortezomib and lenalidomide
and be refractory to both.
7) Patients must have an ECOG PS ≤ 2.
8) Recovery to grade ≤ 1 from any non-hematological AE derived from previous 
treatment (if present, alopecia and peripheral neuropathy must be grade <1).
9) Laboratory data:
a) Hemoglobin ≥ 8 g/dL.
b) Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥ 1,000 cells/mm3 (1.0 x 109/L) (≥ 0.5 x 
109/L if due to extensive BM involvement –by ≥50% of plasma cells in BM
biopsy). Screening of ANC should be independent of granulocyte- and 
granulocyte/macrophage-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF and GM-CSF) 
support for at least one week and of pegylated G-CSF for at least two weeks.
c) Platelet count ≥ 50,000/ mm3 (50.0 x 109/L) for patients in whom < 50% of the 
BM nucleated cells are plasma cells.
d) Platelet count ≥ 25,000/ mm3 (25.0 x 109/L) for patients in whom ≥ 50% of BM 
nucleated cells are plasma cells.
e) Serum total bilirubin < 1.5 x institutional upper limit of normal (ULN) (except 
when Gilbert syndrome is clearly documented and other liver function tests are 
within normal levels).
f)
Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and 
3.0 x institutional ULN and alkaline phosphatase (AP) 2.5 x institutional 
ULN.
g) Creatinine clearance > 30 mL/min, measured or calculated according to 
Cockcroft and Gault’s formula (Appendix 4).
h) Albumin ≥ 2.5 g/dL.
10) Evidence of non-childbearing status for WOCBP: WOCBP must have a negative 
serum or urine pregnancy test within seven days prior to enrolment and must agree 
to use a highly effective contraceptive measure throughout the trial and during six 
months after treatment discontinuation. Valid methods to determine the childbearing 
potential, adequate contraception and requirements for WOCBP partners are 
described in Appendix 5. Male patients enrolled in the study should also use 
contraceptive methods during and after treatment discontinuation.
CL_0256 1.0
Page 51 of 102
Protocol APL-B-022-15


11) Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥ 45%.
12) Patients must have a BM assessment within three weeks prior to enrolment.
3.3.2
Exclusion Criteria
A patient will not be eligible for this trial if any of the following exclusion criteria are met:
1) Previous treatment with plitidepsin.
2) Active or metastatic primary malignancy other than MM. 
3) Serious concomitant systemic disorders that would compromise the safety of the 
patient or the patient’s ability to complete the trial, including the following specific 
conditions: 
a) Uncontrolled psychiatric illness or medical illness that the Investigator feels 
will compromise the patient’s tolerance of the trial medication.
b) Significant non-neoplastic liver disease.
c) Uncontrolled endocrine diseases (i.e., requiring relevant changes in medication 
within the last month, or hospital admission within the last three months).
d) Uncontrolled systemic infection.
e) Acute infiltrative pulmonary and pericardial disease.
4) Other relevant cardiac conditions:
a) Symptomatic arrhythmia (excluding anemia-related grade ≤ 2 sinusal 
tachycardia) or any arrhythmia requiring ongoing treatment, and/or prolonged 
grade ≥ 2 QT-QTc; or presence of unstable atrial fibrillation (according to 
National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for the Classification 
of Adverse Events [NCI-CTCAE] v4.0). Patients on treatment for stable atrial 
fibrillation are allowed, provided they do not meet any other cardiac or 
prohibited drug exclusion criterion.
b) History or presence of unstable angina, myocardial infarction, valvular heart
disease, cardiac amyloidosis or congestive heart failure within the last 12 
months.
c) Uncontrolled arterial hypertension (≥ 150/100 mmHg) despite optimal medical 
therapy.
d) Previous 
treatment 
with 
doxorubicin 
at 
cumulative 
doses 
of 
> 400 mg/m², or equivalent.
5) History of hypersensitivity reaction and/or intolerance to bortezomib, polyoxyl 35 
castor oil, mannitol, boron or dexamethasone.
6) Myopathy or any clinical situation that causes significant and persistent elevation 
of creatine phosphokinase (CPK) (> 2.5 ULN) in two different determinations 
performed within one week of each other.
7) Grade ≥ 1 neuropathy (either bortezomib-related or not) according to NCI-CTCAE 
v4.0.
8) Any other major illness that, in the Investigator’s judgement, will substantially 
increase the risk associated with the patient’s participation in this trial.
9) Pregnant and/or lactating women.
CL_0256 1.0
Page 52 of 102
Protocol APL-B-022-15


10) Known active human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection (HIV testing is not 
required unless infection is clinically suspected).
11) Active hepatitis B or C virus (HBV or HCV) infection.
12) Treatment with any Investigational Medicinal Product (IMP) in the 30 days before 
inclusion in the trial.
13) Concomitant medications that include corticosteroids, CT, or other therapy that is 
or may be active against myeloma. Concurrent corticosteroids are allowed provided 
as an equivalent of a prednisone dose of ≤ 10 mg daily, administered as antiemetic 
or as premedication for blood products.
14) Wash-out periods after the end of previous therapy:
a) Nitrosoureas must be discontinued six weeks prior to Cycle (C)1 D1.
b) Thirty days for other chemotherapies and 15 days for other biological agents 
prior to C1 D1.
c) Thirty days after the end of any prior radiation or radionuclide therapy (six
weeks in the case of prior extensive external beam radiation, with more than 
25% of BM distribution).
15) Plasma cell leukemia at the time of trial entry.
16) Disease-related symptomatic hypercalcemia despite optimal medical therapy.
17) Limitation of the patient’s ability to comply with the treatment or follow-up 
protocol.
18) Contraindication to use steroids.
3.3.3
Inclusion Criteria for the Pharmacogenomic (PGx) Sub-study
Only patients with available BM samples and who voluntarily sign the Informed Consent 
Form (ICF) for the PGx sub-study will be able to participate. Refusal to participate in the 
PGx sub-study will not affect patient participation in the trial APL-B-022-15.
4.
PLAN OF THE TRIAL
4.1 Duration of the Trial Individually per Patient
Patients will be evaluated at scheduled visits in three trial periods:

Pre-treatment: from signature of the IC to the first trial drug infusion.

Treatment: from first infusion of trial drugs to end-of-treatment (EOT).

Follow-up: after EOT, patients will be followed q4wk until resolution of all 
toxicities, if any. Patients who discontinued treatment without disease 
progression will be followed every three months until disease progression, other 
antitumor therapy, death or until the date of trial termination (clinical cut-off), 
whichever occurs first. 
Patients will be considered to be on-trial from the signature of the IC to the end of the 
follow-up period. Patients will be considered to be on-treatment for the duration of their 
treatment and until the day of EOT, immediately before the start of the follow-up period. 
EOT is defined as 30 days after the day of last treatment, unless the patient starts a new 
antitumor therapy or dies (whichever occurs first), in which case the date of administration 
CL_0256 1.0
Page 53 of 102
Protocol APL-B-022-15


of this new therapy or the date of death will be considered the EOT date. An EOT visit will 
be performed within 30 days (± five days) after last treatment, unless the patient starts any 
subsequent new antitumor therapy outside this clinical trial, in which case the EOT visit 
should be performed immediately before the start of the new therapy, whenever possible.
4.2 Duration of the Trial (for the Whole Trial)

Planned start date: 1Q2016

Planned enrolment period: approximately 24 months.

Total duration of the trial: approximately 30 months.

Planned end-of-trial date (clinical cut-off): six months after the last patient’s 
treatment discontinuation (last patient-last visit), or nine months after accrual of 
the last evaluable patient, whichever occurs first. If there are patients still being 
treated at the planned cut-off date, the actual cut-off date will be the date when 
those patients have have completed the ongoing treatment cycle and the 
corresponding EOT visit.
4.3 Subject Participation
Only after giving IC, may patients be enrolled in the trial by completing the electronic 
screening form. The electronic screening form will be checked and approved by the 
Medical Responsible at PharmaMar. No patient can be treated until PharmaMar has given 
treatment authorization. A patient enrollment number will be provided and registration will 
be confirmed and checked by PharmaMar.
This patient number should be used on all future documentation and correspondence 
referring to this patient. Should eligibility criteria problems arise, final decisions will be 
taken between PharmaMar and the Investigator. 
Patients will be evaluated at scheduled visits in up to three trial periods: pre-treatment, 
treatment and follow-up. Patients will receive trial medication while it is considered to be 
in their best interest (see Section 4.4). In responding patients, treatment may continue upon 
Investigators’ discretion.
Patients will be considered to be on-trial for the duration of their treatment and during the 
30 days following treatment discontinuation. Treatment discontinuation is defined as the 
day of the last dose of trial drug administration.
4.4 Discontinuations
A discontinuation occurs when an enrolled patient ceases to participate in the trial, 
regardless of the circumstances, prior to completion of the protocol. The Investigator must 
determine the primary reason for discontinuation, which will be recorded on the electronic 
Case Report Form (e-CRF). The final evaluation required by the protocol will be 
performed 30 ± 5 days after the last dose of trial therapy. A trial discontinuation must be 
reported immediately to the clinical monitor or his/her designated representative if it is due 
to a SAE.
If the patient is discontinued from the trial before completion, every effort should be made
to complete the assessments scheduled during the post-treatment follow-up period.
The Investigator is ultimately responsible for the patient’s safety and wellbeing. Trial
treatment should be discontinued if this is considered to be in the patient’s best interest.
CL_0256 1.0
Page 54 of 102
Protocol APL-B-022-15


Plitidepsin, bortezomib and dexamethasone are to be permanently discontinued for patients 
meeting any of the following criteria:

Confirmed PD.

Life-threatening, unmanageable or unacceptable drug-related AEs, including 
the need for more than two dose reductions, except in cases of obvious patient 
benefit in continuing the treatment at the Investigator’s criterion.

Intercurrent illness of sufficient magnitude to preclude safe continuation of the 
trial.

Patient refusal and/or non-compliance with trial requirements.

A major protocol deviation that may affect the balance of the risk/benefit ratio 
for the participating patient.

Treatment delay > 14 days due to toxicity (except in case of patient’s clear 
clinical benefit, with the Sponsor’s approval).

Pregnancy.

Investigator’s decision.
Trial discontinuation could also occur due to a Sponsor’s decision or unforeseen reasons. 
Patients withdrawn from the trial must not re-enter this trial at any time. Trial withdrawal 
due to an AE (see Section 6.2.1) should be distinguished from withdrawal due to 
insufficient response. 
4.5 Replacement of Patients
Patients must be replaced if they are not evaluable for efficacy, the primary objective of the 
trial. Patients must have received at least one complete treatment cycle (two plitidepsin 
infusions, four bortezomib injections and four doses of dexamethasone), or the equivalent
doses over two cycles and must have had at least one tumor assessment. 
CL_0256 1.0
Page 55 of 102
Protocol APL-B-022-15


4.6 Screening and Baseline Assessments
Table 2. Screening and baseline assessments.
Screening and 
baseline
Investigations
Time
General¥
1. Medical history and 
physical examination
Written ICs (general and PGx sub-
study) signed by the patient.
Prior to any trial-specific procedure.
Demographic data.
Medical history including: 
Date of MM diagnosis, relapse(s) or 
evidence(s) of refractoriness to prior 
treatments.
Documentation of PD prior to 
inclusion.
M-protein determinations.
Previous specific treatments 
(surgery, radiotherapy, CT, 
immunotherapy etc.) with dates, best 
response and TTP.
Concomitant treatments.
Transfusion requirements.
Within 14 days prior to inclusion.
Clinical assessment of signs and 
symptoms (tumor-related or not).
Complete physical examination, 
including weight, height and vital signs 
assessment (HR, ABP and temperature). 
Clinical neurological assessment.
Within 14 days prior to inclusion.
Repeat prior to the first infusion§†.
Baseline ECOG PS (Appendix 2).
Within 14 days prior to inclusion.
Repeat prior to the first infusion.
2. Hematology
Differential WBC count.
Hematocrit, hemoglobin.
Platelet count.
Within 7 days prior to inclusion.
Repeat prior to the first infusion†.
3. Coagulation panel
PT, INR, APTT.
Within 14 days prior to inclusion.
4. Biochemistry 
Biochemistry A: AP, AST, ALT, LDH, 
GGT, bilirubin, electrolytes (Na+, K+, 
Ca++, Mg++), glucose, CPK, CPK-MB 
fraction (if applicable).
Within 7 days prior to inclusion.
Repeat prior to the first infusion§†.
Biochemistry B: Total proteins and 
albumin.
Within 7 days prior to inclusion§.
5. Creatinine and Cr 
Cl
Calculated or measured (Appendix 4).
Within 7 days prior to inclusion.
6. Urinalysis
Dipstick, sediment.
Within 14 days prior to inclusion.
7. Viral serology
HBV and HCV.
CMV in patients who have undergone 
allogeneic BM transplantation.
Within 14 days prior to inclusion.
8. Pregnancy test
Serum or urine in women of 
childbearing potential.
Within 7 days prior to enrolment.
CL_0256 1.0
Page 56 of 102
Protocol APL-B-022-15


Screening and 
baseline
Investigations
Time
9. Heart function
ECG: It should allow a rhythm 
definition (at least 30 second of 
duration).
PR interval.
QT interval (raw and corrected by 
HR using Bazett’s formula).
QRS complex and the maximum 
height of QRS complex in derivation 
II].
LVEF by ECHO or MUGA scan.
Within 14 days prior to inclusion.
Repeat prior to the first infusion§.
10. AEs
Evaluation of AEs (NCI-CTCAE v4.0).
SAEs will be collected from the time 
of signature of the ICF.
Disease assessment¥
11. Serum protein
Protein electrophoresis.
Serum Ig determination and M-protein 
measurement and IF
SFLC.
Within 14 days prior to inclusion.
Repeat prior to the first infusion§.
12. Urine protein
24-h urine protein electrophoresis
UFLC.
Urine M-protein measurement and IF.
13. Serum beta-2-
microglobulin and C-
reactive protein
Within 14 days prior to inclusion.
14. Bone marrow
BM morphology.
BM cytometry (if available).
Within 21 days prior to treatment. 
BM FISH (Appendix 6)
BM cytogenetics.
At diagnosis and prior to entering the 
trial.
PGx sub-study (available stored BM 
samples) (only if written informed 
consent given).
Within 21 days prior to treatment.
15. Clinical and 
radiological tumor 
assessment in the 
presence of soft tissue 
plasmacytoma
CT-scan or MRI of all 
measurable/evaluable involved sites.
Within 14 days prior to inclusion.
16. Skeletal evaluation 
X-ray of skull, vertebral column pelvis 
and proximal long bones or MRI.
Within 4 weeks prior to inclusion.
17. Other relevant 
tests
Where indicated, according to the 
clinical context.
Within 14 days prior to inclusion.
D0=C1D1
¥The day of inclusion is the day the patient is formally registered in the study by the Sponsor(s).
§A 2-day window is allowed for hematology, biochemistry A and B, coagulation panel, creatinine, CrCl, serum protein,  
urine protein tests, physical examination, assessment of patients’ signs and symptoms and neurological assessments. A 2-
week window is allowed for radiological tumor (to confirm response) and LVEF (by ECHO or MUGA) assessments. 
†To be repeated prior to the first infusion if more than seven days have elapsed from the last measurement.
ABP, arterial blood pressure; AE, adverse event; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AP, alkaline phosphatase; APTT, activated partial 
thromboplastin time; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; BM, bone marrow; C, cycle; CMV, cytomegalovirus; CPK, creatine 
CL_0256 1.0
Page 57 of 102
Protocol APL-B-022-15


Screening and 
baseline
Investigations
Time
phosphokinase, CPK-MB fraction, CPK isoenzymes found in cardiac muscle (it will be performed only if CPK is elevated); CrCl,
creatinine clearance; CRP, C-reactive protein; CT, chemotherapy; CT-scan,
computed tomography scan; D, day; ECG, 
electrocardiogram; ECHO, echocardiogram; ECOG PS, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status; FISH, fluorescence in 
situ hybridization; FLC, free light chains; GGT, ɣ-glutamyl transpeptidase; HBV, hepatitis B virus; HCV, hepatitis C virus; HIV, human 
immunodeficiency virus; HR, heart rate; ICF, informed consent form; IF, immunofixation; INR, international normalized ratio for blood 
clotting time; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; MM, multiple myeloma; MUGA scan, multiple 
uptake gated acquisition scan; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; PD, disease progression; PGx, pharmacogenomics; PT, prothrombin 
time; SAE, serious adverse event; SFLC, Serum FLC; TTP, time to progression; UFLC, urine FLC;WBC, white blood cell counts.  
4.7 Treatment Period Assessments
Table 3. Treatment period assessments.
Treatment period
Investigations
Time
General
1. Clinical examination
ECOG PS (Appendix 2).
Physical examination, including weight, 
BSA and vital signs (HR, ABP, 
temperature).
Assessment of patient’s signs and 
symptoms (disease related or not).
Clinical neurological assessment.
D1 of each cycle.
Concomitant treatments (especially 
transfusion requirements)a.
Intercurrent adverse events.
Throughout the trial.
2.  Hematology
Differential WBC count.
Hematocrit, hemoglobin.
Platelet count.
D1, D15 of each cycleb§.
3.  Coagulation panel
PT, INR, APTT.
D1 of each cycle from C2§.
4.  Biochemistry
Biochemistry A: AP, AST, ALT, LDH, 
GGT, bilirubin, electrolytes (Na+, K+, 
Ca++, Mg++), glucose, CPK, CPK-MB 
fraction (if applicable).
D1, D15 of each cyclec§.
Biochemistry B: Total proteins and 
albumin.
D1 of each cycle from C2§.
5.  Creatinine and CrCl
Calculated or measured (Appendix 4).
D1 of each cycle from C2§.
6. Viral serology
HBV and HCV.
CMV in patients who have undergone 
allogeneic BM transplantation.
When clinically indicated
7.  Pregnancy test
Serum or urine HCG.
D1 of each cycle from C2 (an early 
2-day window is allowed)¥.
8.  Heart function

ECG: it should allow a rhythm 
definition (at least 30 second of 
duration).
PR interval.
QT interval (raw and corrected by 
heart rate using Bazett’s formula)
QRS complex and the maximum 
height of QRS complex in derivation 
II.
D1 of each cycle.  
LVEF by ECHO or MUGA scan.
Every 12 weeks§.
9.  AEs 
Evaluation of AEs (NCI-CTCAE v4.0).
Throughout the trial.
CL_0256 1.0
Page 58 of 102
Protocol APL-B-022-15


Treatment period
Investigations
Time
10.  PK
As in Section 6.3.
C1 and C2.
Disease assessmentd
11.  Serum protein

Protein electrophoresis

Serum Ig determination and M-protein 
quantitation and IF.

SFLC.
D1 of each cycle§.
12.  Urine protein

24-h urine protein electrophoresis.

Urine M-protein quantitation and IF.

UFLC.
D1 of each cycle§.
13. C-reactive protein
Every eight weeks.
14.  Bone marrowe

BM morphology.

BM cytometry (if available).
When all parameters indicate CR. 
When clinically indicated.

PGx sub-study.
If response is observed.
15.  Clinical and 
radiological tumor
assessment in the 
presence of soft tissue 
plasmacytomaf

CT-scan or MRI of all 
measurable/evaluable involved sites.
If response is observed (to confirm 
CR) or when clinical symptoms 
suggest new plasmacytomas.
16.  Skeletal evaluation

X-ray of skull, vertebral column pelvis 
and proximal long bones or MRI (if 
clinically indicated).
If response is observed (to confirm 
CR) or when clinical symptoms 
suggest new lytic bone lesion.
17.  Other relevant tests

Where indicated, according to the 
clinical context.
When clinically indicated.
D0=C1D1
§A 2-day window is allowed for hematology, biochemistry A and B, coagulation panel, creatinine, CrCl, serum protein,  
urine protein tests, physical examination, assessment of patients’ signs and symptoms and neurological assessments. A 2-
week window is allowed for radiological tumor (to confirm response) and LVEF (by ECHO or MUGA) assessments.
Note: windows for laboratory assessments only apply prior to the scheduled infusion (e.g. 2-day window = within 48 
hours before the following scheduled infusion, etc.). Windows for radiological tumor and LVEF assessments (by MUGA 
or ECHO) apply either before or after the corresponding scheduled infusion.
a.
Detailed description of the concomitant treatment (drug start and end date, reason for administration, etc.).
b.
At least every other day if non-febrile grade 4 neutropenia is present and every day in the presence of febrile neutropenia or grade 
4 thrombocytopenia.
c.
At least every other day in the presence of grade 3-4 vomiting or any other drug-related SAE.
d.
Disease assessment is to occur at baseline to document the sites of disease; disease response is to be assessed primarily by non-
invasive procedures, if possible. If CR is suspected, then invasive procedures required for disease response assessment (e.g. BM, 
skeletal survey, etc.) are to be performed.
e.
BM evaluation is mandatory in all patients with CR. In patients with non-secretory MM, it must be repeated eight weeks later to 
confirm response. BM evaluation must be repeated in all cases where there is any clinical indication.
f.
In case of non-secretory or oligosecretory MM associated with soft tissue plasmacytoma assessments may be done every two 
cycles (if possible) to confirm response or as clinically indicated.
¥For women of childbearing potential a serum or urine β-HCG analysis should be done. During the on-treatment period, testing should 
be repeated every cycle, or at least, every four weeks.
ABP, arterial blood pressure; AE, adverse event; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AP, alkaline phosphatase; APTT, activated partial 
thromboplastin time; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; HCG, human chorionic gonadotropin; BM, bone marrow; C, cycle; CMV, 
cytomegalovirus; CPK, creatine phosphokinase, CPK-MB fraction, CPK isoenzymes found in cardiac muscle (it will be performed only 
if CPK is elevated); CrCl, creatinine clearance; CRP, C-reactive protein; CT, chemotherapy; CT-scan, computed tomography scan; D, 
day; ECG, electrocardiogram; ECHO, echocardiogram; ECOG PS, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status; FLC, free 
light chains; GGT, ɣ-glutamyl transpeptidase; HBV, hepatitis B virus; HCV, hepatitis C virus; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; 
HR, heart rate; IF, immunofixation; INR, international normalized ratio for blood clotting time; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; LVEF, left 
ventricular ejection fraction; MM, multiple myeloma; MUGA scan, multiple uptake gated acquisition scan; MRI, magnetic resonance 
imaging; NCI-CTCAE, National Cancer Institute Common Criteria for the Classification of Adverse Events; PD, disease progression;
PGx, pharmacogenomics; PT, prothrombin time; SFLC, Serum FLC; UFLC, urine FLC;WBC, white blood cell counts.  
4.8 Evaluations at the End of Treatment
4.8.1
End-of-treatment Visit
Table 4 lists the procedures that are required during the EOT visit. EOT is defined as 30 
days after the last treatment day unless the patient starts a new antitumor therapy or dies 
(whichever comes first), in which case the date of administration of this new therapy or the 
CL_0256 1.0
Page 59 of 102
Protocol APL-B-022-15


date of death will be considered the EOT date. This visit needs to be performed in all 
evaluable patients 30 ± 5 days after the last dose of trial therapy.
Please refer to Section 6.2.2 and 6.2.3 for detailed instructions on Adverse Event Reporting 
and Monitoring. 
Table 4. End of treatment visit.
End of treatment visit
Investigations
Time
1.  Clinical examination

ECOG PS (Appendix 2).

Complete physical examination, including 
weight and vital signs (HR, ABP, 
temperature)

Concomitant treatments (including 
transfusion requirements).

Clinical neurological assessment.
Thirty (±5) days after the last 
dose of trial therapy.
2.  Hematology

Differential WBC count.

Hematocrit, hemoglobin.

Platelet count.
Thirty (±5) days after the last 
dose of trial therapy.
3.  Coagulation panel

PT, INR, APTT.
Thirty (±5) days after the last 
dose of trial therapy.
4.  Biochemistry

Biochemistry A: AP, AST, ALT, LDH,
GGT, bilirubin, electrolytes (Na+, K+, Mg++, 
Ca++), glucose, CPK, CPK-MB fraction (if 
applicable).

Biochemistry B: total proteins, albumin.
Thirty (±5) days after the last 
dose of trial therapy.
5.  Creatinine and CrCl 
Calculated or measured.
Thirty (±5) days after the last 
dose of trial therapy.
6.  Urinalysis 

Dipstick, sediment.
Thirty (±5) days after the last 
dose of trial therapy.
7.  Pregnancy test

Serum or urine.
For women of childbearing 
potential, 30 (±5) days after the 
last dose of trial therapy.
8.  AEs

Evaluation of AEs (NCI-CTCAE v4).
Thirty (+5) days after the last 
dose of trial therapy.
9.  Heart function

ECG: it should allow a rhythm definition (at 
least 30 second of duration).
PR interval.
QT interval (raw and corrected by heart 
rate using Bazett’s formula).
QRS complex and the maximum height of 
QRS complex in derivation II].

LVEF by ECHO or MUGA scan.
Thirty (±5) days after the last 
dose of trial therapy.
Disease assessment
10.  Serum protein

Protein electrophoresis.

Serum Ig quantitation and M-protein 
quantitation and IF.

SFLC
Thirty (±5) days after the last 
dose of trial therapy.
11.  Urine protein

24-h urine protein electrophoresis.

Urine M-protein quantitation and IF.

UFLC
Thirty (±5) days after the last 
dose of trial therapy.
12.  C-reactive protein
Thirty (±5) days after the last 
dose of trial therapy.
CL_0256 1.0
Page 60 of 102
Protocol APL-B-022-15


End of treatment visit
Investigations
Time
13.  BM

BM morphology.

BM cytometry (if available).

BM cytogenetic (if available).
If clinically indicated, thirty (±5) 
days after the last dose of trial 
therapy.
14.  Clinical and 
radiological tumor 
assessment in the 
presence of soft tissue 
plasmacytoma

CT-scan or MRI of all measurable/evaluable 
sites.
If indicated, thirty (±5) days 
after the last dose of trial 
therapy.
15.  Skeletal evaluation

X-ray of skull, vertebral column pelvis and 
proximal long bones or MRI.
If indicated, thirty (±5) days 
after the last dose of trial 
therapy.
16. Other relevant tests 
Where indicated, according to the clinical 
and laboratory context.
Thirty (±5) days after the last 
dose of trial therapy.
ABP, arterial blood pressure; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AP, alkaline phosphatase; APTT, activated partial thromboplastin time; 
AST, aspartate aminotransferase; BM, bone marrow; C, cycle; CMV, cytomegalovirus; CPK, creatine phosphokinase, CPK-MB 
fraction, serum CPK isoenzymes found in cardiac muscle (it will performed only if CPK is elevated); CrCl, creatinine clearance; CRP, 
C-reactive protein; CT, chemotherapy; CT-scan, computed tomography scan; D, day; ECG, electrocardiogram; ECHO, echocardiogram; 
ECOG PS, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status; FLC, free light chains; GGT, ɣ-glutamyl transpeptidase; HBV, 
hepatitis B virus; HCV, hepatitis C virus; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; HR, heart rate; IF, immunofixation; INR, international 
normalized ratio for blood clotting time; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; MM, multiple myeloma; 
MUGA scan, multiple uptake gated acquisition scan; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; NCI-CTCAE, National Cancer Institute 
Common Criteria for the Classification of Adverse Events; PD, disease progression; PT, prothrombin time; SFLC, Serum FLC; UFLC, 
urine FLC;WBC, white blood cell counts.  
4.8.2
Follow-up Visits
Patients who have not progressed at the end of treatment will have a complete disease 
assessment performed every three months until PD has been documented, a new therapy 
has been started, trial termination or death. In this manner, the first follow-up assessment 
should occur at three months after the end-of-treatment visit. All subsequent follow-up 
assessments should be performed in three-month intervals.
Additional parameters and/or increased frequency of observations should be performed at 
the Investigator’s discretion and according to the nature of the AEs observed. In case of 
death, when available, autopsy data should be provided.
The reason and date of removal for all patients will be documented on the e-CRF. The 
Investigator will attempt to complete all discharge procedures at the time a patient is 
discontinued from treatment.
5.
TRIAL MEDICATION
5.1 Plitidepsin
Plitidepsin is supplied as a lyophilized product in a glass vial containing 2 mg. The 
lyophilized powder is a concentrate for solution and contains plitidepsin as the active 
ingredient ad mannitol as the inactive ingredient. The reconstitution solvent is supplied in 
ampoules, each containing 4 mL of polyoxyl 35 castor oil/ethanol/WFI (15/15/70% v/v/v). 
Plitidepsin vials and reconstitution ampoules should be stored in a locked area with limited 
access at 2 to 8ºC (36ºF to 46ºF) and protected from exposure to light.
Upon reconstitution of the 2 mg plitidepsin vial with 4 mL of reconstitution solvent, the 
reconstituted solution will be clear, colorless, essentially clear from visible particles, and 
contain 0.5 mg/mL of plitidepsin. This solution should be immediately diluted with sodium 
CL_0256 1.0
Page 61 of 102
Protocol APL-B-022-15


chloride (0.9%) solution for infusion or glucose (5%) solution for infusion for 
administration as an intravenous infusion.
The required volume of the reconstituted solution should be determined based on the dose 
established for each individual patient: 
Volume (ml) = [Body Surface Area (BSA) (m2) x Individual dosage (mg/m2)]/0.5 mg/mL.
For detailed instructions on reconstitution and dilution refer to the latest plitidepsin IB and 
the “Preparation Guide for Infusion” document.
5.1.1 Plitidepsin Recommendations for Safe Handling
Similar to other antineoplastic potentially toxic agents, caution should be exercised when 
handling plitidepsin and when preparing solutions. Personnel should be trained to 
reconstitute the drug. The use of mask, goggles and gloves is recommended. Should
plitidepsin premix solution, or infusion solution come into contact with the skin or mucous 
membranes, the areas should be immediately and thoroughly washed with water (mucous 
membranes) and water and soap (skin).
5.1.2 Required Prophylactic Medication
Patients must receive the following prophylactic medication before the administration of 
plitidepsin (Table 5).
Table 5. Prophylactic medication for plitidepsin treatment.
Agent
Dose
Route
Administration time
Ondansetron or equivalent
8.0 mg
intravenous
30-60 minutes before 
plitidepsin
Diphenhydramine hydrochloride or equivalent
25 mg
intravenous
Ranitidine
50 mg
intravenous
In addition to the above, and if necessary, 10 mg metoclopramide every 8 h may be 
administered after the infusion, or the duration of treatment with 5-HT3 antagonists and/or 
dexamethasone will be extended.
5.2 Bortezomib
Bortezomib is available for use as i.v. infusion and s.c. injection. For further information 
on bortezomib, please refer to the EU SmPC (Summary of Product Characteristics) and/or 
USP (US Product Information).
5.2.1 Prophylactic Medication
Prophylactic antiemetic medication for bortezomib will be given according to the 
Investigator’s criteria. Herpes virus infection prophylaxis must be given while patients are 
on bortezomib therapy.
5.3 Dexamethasone Drug Formulation 
Dexamethasone is administered orally as tablets. Dexamethasone tablets should be stored 
in well-closed containers. Dexamethasone will be administered orally at a dose of 40 mg 
on D1, 8, 15 and 22 q4wk. For further information on the drug product, please refer to the 
EU SmPC or the USP.
CL_0256 1.0
Page 62 of 102
Protocol APL-B-022-15


5.4 Treatment Schedule
Oral dexamethasone will be administered at least one hour before the administration of 
plitidepsin infusion. Plitidepsin will be administered as a 3-h i.v. infusion; one minute after 
the end of the plitidepsin infusion, bortezomib should be administered as a 3-5 second 
bolus s.c. injection (Table 6).
Treatment cycles will be repeated every 4 weeks.
Patients will be treated until PD. If the patient responds to treatment or achieves SD and 
bortezomib toxicity precludes any further treatment, treatment may continue with 
plitidepsin and dexamethasone at the same dose upon Investigator’s decision and 
agreement with the Sponsor. Once plitidepsin treatment is stopped, patients must be 
discontinued from the trial.
Table 6. Trial drug administration schedule.
Agent
Dose
Route
Day
Dexamethasone
40 mg
Oral
D1, 8, 15 and 22*
Plitidepsin
5 mg/m2
Intravenous
D1 and 15 q4wk*
Bortezomib
1.3 mg/m2
Subcutaneous
D1, 4, 8 and 11 q4wk*
* Patients will be treated until PD. If the patient responds to treatment or achieves SD and bortezomib toxicity 
precludes any further treatment, treatment may continue with plitidepsin and dexamethasone at the same dose upon 
Investigator’s decision and agreement with the Sponsor. Once plitidepsin treatment is stopped, patients must be 
discontinued from the trial.
D, day; PD, disease progression; q4wk, every four weeks; SD, stable disease.
5.5 Criteria for Treatment Continuation 
Re-treatment criteria for plitidepsin and dexamethasone will be monitored on D1 and D15 
and re-treatment criteria for bortezomib will be monitored on D1, as defined in Table 7:
Table 7. Criteria for plitidepsin and bortezomib treatment continuation.
Plitidepsin/Dexamethasone
Bortezomib
1a and 15b
Day 1a
ANC
1.0 x 109/L
(≥ 0.5 x109/L if due to extensive 
BM involvement)
0.75 x 109/L 
(≥ 0.5 x109/L if due 
to extensive BM 
involvement)
Platelet count
≥ 50.0 x 109/L
(≥ 25.0 x 109/L if ≥ 50% of BM 
nucleated cells are plasma cells)
≥ 25.0 x 109/L 
Hemoglobin
8.0 g/dL
8.0 g/dL
Serum total bilirubin 
1.5 x ULNe
3.0 x ULNe
AST/ALT
3.0 x ULN
5.0 x ULN
AP
2.5 x ULN
5.0 x ULN
Muscular toxicity (myalgia, muscular 
weakness, CPK increase)
< Grade 2
< Grade 3
Other non-hematological drug-related 
AEs (except for increased GGT, non-
optimally treated nausea and vomiting,  
hypertension, alopecia)c
< Grade 2
< Grade 3f
ECG
Baseline values
Baseline values
ECHO/MUGAd
Baseline values
Baseline values
CL_0256 1.0
Page 63 of 102
Protocol APL-B-022-15


Plitidepsin/Dexamethasone
Bortezomib
aIf a patient does not meet the requirements for plitidepsin/dexamethasone treatment continuation while meeting the 
requirements for bortezomib treatment continuation on D1 of the following cycle, the plitidepsin/dexamethasone dose 
will be omitted and bortezomib will be administered.
If a patient does not meet the requirements for plitidepsin/dexamethasone and bortezomib treatment continuation on 
D1 of the following cycle, plitidepsin/dexamethasone and bortezomib will be delayed until recovery or for a 
maximum of 14 days. After this period, if the delay is due to toxicity assessed as related to a trial drug, a dose 
reduction (according to the “Criteria for Dose Reduction” section) is mandatory.
bIf a patient does not meet the requirements for plitidepsin/dexamethasone treatment continuation on D15 of the 
following cycle, the plitidepsin/dexamethasone dose will be omitted. 
cAny grade accepted for increased GGT.
dTo be performed every three months unless more frequent assessments are clinically indicated.
eExcept if Gilbert syndrome is clearly documented and other liver function tests are normal.
fIf peripheral neuropathy (PN) occurs, follow the guidelines for bortezomib dose reduction available in the 
“Criteria for Dose Reduction” section.
AEs, adverse event(s); ALT, alanine aminotransferase; ANC, absolute neutrophil count; AP, alkaline phosphatase; 
AST, aspartate aminotransferase; BM, bone marrow; CPK, creatine phosphokinase; D, day; DL, dose level; ECG,
electrocardiogram; ECHO/MUGA, echocardiogram/multiple-gated acquisition scan; GGT, -glutamyl transpeptidase; 
L, liter; ULN, upper limit of normality; PN, peripheral neuropathy.
5.6 Criteria for Dose Reduction
5.6.1 Plitidepsin
Under the following circumstances, patients may continue plitidepsin treatment after a 20-
25% dose reduction, upon Investigator’s decision and agreement with the Sponsor, if 
patient benefit is perceived: 

Less than 50% compliance with the treatment schedule, and/or

Grade ≥ 3 febrile neutropenia, or

Grade 4 neutropenia and infection, or grade 4 neutropenia lasting > 7 days 
(except for patients with extensive BM involvement), and/or

Grade 4 thrombocytopenia (except for patients with extensive BM 
involvement), and/or

Grade 4 thrombocytopenia with grade ≥ 3 bleeding  (except for patients with 
extensive BM involvement), and/or

Grade ≥ 3 muscular toxicity (weakness, myalgia and/or CPK elevations). In the 
presence of muscular toxicity, plitidepsin will be reduced first; if toxicity 
persists, dexamethasone will then be reduced.

Any grade ≥ 3 clinically relevant non-hematological toxicity other than non-
optimally treated nausea and vomiting, diarrhea lasting < 48 h and/or grade ≥ 3 
asthenia/fatigue lasting < 5 days.
Up to a maximum of two plitidepsin dose reductions will be allowed (from 5.0 mg/m2 to 4 
mg/m2 and from 4 mg/m2 to 3.0 mg/m2) upon Sponsor’s agreement, if patient benefit is 
perceived. After two dose reductions, trial treatment will be discontinued.
5.6.2 Dexamethasone
Under the following circumstances, and after recovery from toxicity, patients may continue 
dexamethasone treatment after a 50% dose reduction: 
CL_0256 1.0
Page 64 of 102
Protocol APL-B-022-15



Grade ≥ 3 muscular toxicity (weakness, myalgia and/or CPK elevations) (in the 
presence of muscular toxicity, plitidepsin will be reduced first; if toxicity 
persists, dexamethasone will then be reduced), or 

Drug-related grade ≥ 3 fatigue, or 

Grade ≥ 2 mood disturbances or agitation, or 

Grade ≥ 3 fluid retention, or 

Grade 4 clinically documented infection. 

Grade ≥ 3 gastrointestinal disorders, despite optimal treatment.

Acute pancreatitis (discontinue dexamethasone without previous dose 
reduction).

Grade ≥ 3 hyperglycemia, despite optimal treatment.
Up to a maximum of two consecutive dose reductions (i.e., 20 mg D1, 8, 15 and 22, and 20 
mg D1 and 15 of each 28-day cycle) will be allowed upon Sponsor’s agreement, if patient 
benefit is perceived. After two dose reductions, dexamethasone will be discontinued.
5.6.3 Bortezomib
The following guidelines must be followed before the administration of each bortezomib 
dose: 
Table 8. Dose modifications for bortezomib-related hematological and non-hematological 
toxicity.
Severity of toxicity
Recommended modification of bortezomib dose 
and regimen
≥ Grade 3 febrile neutropenia, or
Grade 4 neutropenia, or
Grade 4 thrombocytopenia, or
Grade 3 thrombocytopenia with bleeding
If two or more doses are omitted consecutively or 
within the same cycle, then reduce bortezomib one 
dose level
Herpes Zoster reactivation (any grade)
Hold therapy until lesions are dry
≥ Grade 3  bortezomib-related non-hematological
toxicity (as judged by the Investigator) 
If two or more doses are omitted consecutively or 
within the same cycle, then reduce bortezomib one 
dose level
Table 9. Dose modifications for bortezomib-related peripheral neuropathy.
Severity of PN
signs and symptomsa
Recommended modification of bortezomib dose 
and regimen [76]
Grade 1 (paresthesia; weakness and/or loss of 
reflexes) without pain or loss of function
For patients receiving twice-weekly bortezomib, 
change to once-per-week schedule (D1, 8, 15, 22, 
q4wk), then 
Reduce current dose by one DL (from 1.3 to 1.0 
mg/m2) (from 1.0 to 0.7 mg/m2), then 
Discontinue bortezomib
CL_0256 1.0
Page 65 of 102
Protocol APL-B-022-15


Severity of PN
signs and symptomsa
Recommended modification of bortezomib dose 
and regimen [76]
Grade 1 with pain or grade 2  (with no pain but 
limiting instrumental ADLsb)
For patients receiving twice-weekly bortezomib, 
change to a once-per-week (D1, 8, 15, 22, q4wk)
schedule, then 
Reduce current dose by one DL, (from 1.3 to 1.0 
mg/m2) (from 1.0 to 0.7 mg/m2) or consider 
temporary discontinuation; upon resolution to 
grade ≤ 1, re-start once-per-week (D1, 8, 15, 22, 
q4wk) dosing at the same DL, then 
Discontinue bortezomib
Grade 2 with pain or grade 3 (limiting self-care and 
ADLc) or grade 4
Discontinue bortezomib
aBased on posology modifications in phase II and III MM studies and post-marketing experience. Grading based on 
NCI-CTCAE v 4.0.
bInstrumental ADL: refers to preparing meals, shopping for groceries or clothes, using the telephone, managing 
money, etc.
cSelf-care ADL: refers to bathing, dressing and undressing, feeding self, using the toilet, taking medicinal products, 
and not bedridden.
ADL, activities of daily living; DL, dose level; MM, multiple myeloma; NCI-CTCAE, National Cancer Institute 
Common Terminology Criteria for the Classification of Adverse Events; PN, peripheral neuropathy.
Up to a maximum of two bortezomib consecutive dose reductions will be allowed (from 
1.3 mg/m2 to 1.0 mg/m2 and from 1.0 mg/m2 to 0.7 mg/m2) upon Sponsor’s agreement, if 
patient benefit is perceived. After two dose reductions, bortezomib will be discontinued
and treatment with plitidepsin/dexamethasone will be continued.
Once a dose reduction of any trial drug has been implemented, the dose will not be re-
escalated thereafter.
5.7 Permitted Treatment and Medication
5.7.1 Transfusions
5.7.1.1 Guidelines for Platelet Transfusions
Thrombocytopenia can occur as a consequence of BM infiltration by myeloma cells or 
may be related to trial
drug administration.
The clinical significance of the 
thrombocytopenia should be assessed in light of its etiology (bortezomib treatment, 
underlying disease or both), the state of the myeloma (stable versus worsening disease), 
and whether the patient is bleeding or being prepared for a surgical procedure.
The use of any platelet product should be considered in the following circumstances:

As preparation for an invasive surgical procedure, transfuse in order to maintain 
a platelet count >50.0 x 109/L to prevent bleeding.

If the patient has an active infection, high fever, rapid decrease in platelet count 
to ≤ 20.0 x 109/L and/or coagulopathy, transfuse to maintain a platelet count to 
> 20.0 x 109/L as prophylaxis for spontaneous bleeding.

If the patient is actively bleeding or has a platelet count below 10.0 x 109/L, 
transfuse in order to maintain a platelet count > 10.0 x 109/L.
5.7.1.2
Guidelines for Red Cell Transfusions
The use of any red cell product should be considered in the following circumstances:
CL_0256 1.0
Page 66 of 102
Protocol APL-B-022-15



If the patient has a hemoglobin < 7.0 g/dL, transfuse to maintain a hemoglobin 
> 8.0 g/dL in order to reduce the risk of inadequate oxygenation. 

If the patient is asymptomatic and has a hemoglobin value between 
≥ 7.0 and ≤ 8.0 g/dL, the Investigator may consider transfusion on a per-patient 
basis in order to maintain a hemoglobin > 8.0 g/dL. 

If the patient is actively bleeding or has symptomatic cardiac or pulmonary 
disease or other extenuating circumstances where oxygenation is impaired, the 
Investigator may elect to transfuse on a per-patient basis. In these instances, the 
trigger hemoglobin value may be > 8.0 g/dL

The use of erythropoietin (e.g. Eprex®/Erypo®) is allowed.
5.7.2 Other Therapies

Therapies for the treatment of preexisting and/or emergent medical conditions 
not specifically forbidden as per protocol elsewhere.

Antiemetics (as in Section 5.1.2 and according to institutional or American 
Society of Clinical Oncology [ASCO] guidelines) [77].

Use of G-CSF/GM-CSF according to institutional or ASCO guidelines [78] and 
after C1.

Palliative local radiation may be applied. The irradiated lesion will then not be 
considered an area of measurable/evaluable disease. 

Systemic and/or local therapies for symptomatic relief, particularly in the case 
of diarrhea or skin toxicity.

Patients who develop grade 2 or greater muscular toxicity may be empirically 
treated with oral L-carnitine at a total daily amount of 3 g, divided into 3 doses, 
until it decreases to grade ≤ 1.

Adequate analgesic medication, including opioids for symptomatic pain relief if 
indicated.

Patients receiving aminobisphosphonates before trial entry may continue to 
receive them during the trial according to ASCO guidelines.
5.8 Prohibited Medication

Concomitant administration of any other antineoplastic therapy.

Other investigational agents.

Immunosuppressive therapies, including systemic corticosteroids, unless given
as an equivalent to a prednisone dose of ≤ 10 mg daily administered as an 
antiemetic or as pre-medication for blood products.

Other disease-modifying treatment (e.g., alpha interferon) is strictly prohibited.

Primary prophylaxis with colony-stimulating factors such as G-CSF  (i.e.,
within the first cycle).
CL_0256 1.0
Page 67 of 102
Protocol APL-B-022-15


5.9 Drug Accountability
Proper drug accountability will be done by the trial monitor. The responsible institution 
will keep records to allow a comparison of quantities of drug received and used at each 
site.
All unused drug supplied by PharmaMar will be properly destroyed at the investigational 
site (documentation of this procedure must be provided) or returned to the drug repository 
with the agreement of PharmaMar.
6.
TRIAL ASSESSMENTS
6.1 Efficacy Assessment
Response or disease progression will be assessed on D1 of each therapy cycle according to 
the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria [79] with evaluation of 
serological myeloma specific markers: M-protein, serum FLC and IF from blood and urine.
When serological markers indicate CR, a BM aspirate or biopsy will be performed. Also, a 
skeletal survey will be performed to confirm no increase in size or number of lytic bone 
lesions (development of a compression fracture does not exclude response).
The efficacy analysis will include ORR, clinical benefit rate (ORR + MR + SD), DOR, 
TTP, PFS, EFS, OS and OS rate at 6 (OS6) and 12 (OS12) months. 
Patients are evaluable for efficacy if they receive at least one complete treatment cycle 
(two plitidepsin infusions, four bortezomib injections, four doses of dexamethasone), or the 
equivalent doses over two cycles and have, at least, one disease assessment. 
6.1.1 Response Criteria for Multiple Myeloma
6.1.1.1
Stringent Complete Response (sCR)
These patients have a normal FLC ratio and
have no clonal cells by BM 
immunohistochemistry (IHC) or immunofluorescence. Clonal cells detected in the BM by 
IHC or immunofluorescence are considered to be present if there is a kappa/lambda ratio of 
> 4:1 or <1:2 after examination of a minimum of 100 plasma cells. 
6.1.1.2
Complete Response (CR)
These patients have absence of M-protein in serum and urine by IF with no current 
evidence of soft tissue plasmacytoma. In addition, BM aspirate and biopsy must 
demonstrate less than 5% clonal plasma cells. In patients who lack measurable M-protein 
in the serum and urine being monitored using the FLC levels, the definition of CR requires 
a normalization of the FLC ratio in addition to the above criteria. 
6.1.1.3
Very Good Partial Response (VGPR)
These patients have serum and urine M-protein detectable by IF but not on electrophoresis
or at least a 90% reduction in serum M-protein with a urine M-protein <100 mg/24 h. In 
patients who lack measurable M-protein in the serum and urine being monitored using the 
FLC levels, the definition of VGPR requires > 90% decrease in the difference between 
involved and uninvolved FLC levels.
6.1.1.4
Partial Response (PR)
These patients have ≥ 50% reduction in serum M-protein and reduction of 24-h urinary M-
CL_0256 1.0
Page 68 of 102
Protocol APL-B-022-15


protein by 90% or to < 200 mg/24 h. In patients who lack measurable M-proteins in the 
serum and urine, the definition of PR requires ≥ 50% decrease in the difference between 
involved and uninvolved FLC levels. If the FLC levels were also immeasurable at baseline, 
a 50% reduction in BM plasma cells is acceptable, as long as the original BM contained at 
least 30% plasma cells. PR also requires a 50% reduction in size of any soft tissue 
plasmacytomas if present at baseline.
6.1.1.5
Minimal Response (MR)
These patients have ≥25% but ≤ 49% reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in 24-h 
urine M-protein by 50-89%. In addition, if present at baseline, 25-49% reduction in the 
size of soft tissue plasmacytomas is also required. No increase in size or number of lytic 
bone lesions.
6.1.1.6
Stable Disease (SD)
These patients do not meet the criteria for sCR, CR, VGPR, PR, MR or PD.
6.1.1.7
Progressive Disease (PD) 
These patients present with a 25% increase from the lowest response value in any of the 
following: serum M-protein (absolute increase must be ≥0.5 g/dL), urine M-protein 
(absolute increase must be ≥200 mg/24h), BM plasma cell percentage (absolute increase 
must be ≥10%), or difference in the kappa and lambda FLC (absolute increase must be >10 
mg/dL). As discussed earlier, the FLC criteria should only be used for patients with 
immeasurable M-protein in the serum and urine. PD is also diagnosed when there is an 
increase in the size or development of new bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas or 
the development of a serum calcium >11.5 mg/dL with no other cause.
6.1.1.8
Overall Response Rate (ORR) 
It includes sCR plus CR plus VGPR plus PR.
6.1.1.9
Clinical Benefit Rate
It includes ORR plus MR plus SD.
Note: clarification to IMWG criteria for coding CR and VGPR in patients in whom the 
only measurable disease is by serum FLC levels: CR in such patients is defined as a normal 
FLC ratio of 0.26–1.65 in addition to the CR criteria listed above. VGPR in such patients is 
defined as a > 90% decrease in the difference between involved and uninvolved free light 
chain (FLC) levels.
All response categories (CR, sCR, VGPR and PR) require two consecutive assessments 
made at any time before the institution of any new therapy; sCR, CR, VGPR, PR and SD 
categories also require no known evidence of progressive or new bone lesions if 
radiographic studies were performed.
Radiographic studies are not required to satisfy these response requirements. Bone marrow 
assessments do not need to be confirmed. 
For PD, serum M-component increases of ≥ 1 g/100 ml are sufficient to define relapse if 
starting M-component is ≥ 5 g/100ml.
CL_0256 1.0
Page 69 of 102
Protocol APL-B-022-15


6.1.2 Additional Efficacy Endpoints 
According to the American Society of Hematology/Food and Drug Administration 
ASH/FDA clinical endpoints in MM:

DOR is defined as the time from the first observation of response to the time of 
PD, with censoring of deaths due to causes other than PD.

TTP is defined as the duration from treatment start to PD, with censoring of 
deaths due to causes other than PD.

PFS is defined as the duration from treatment start to PD or death (regardless of 
the cause of death), whichever comes first.

EFS is defined as the duration from treatment start to PD or death (regardless of 
the cause of death), whichever comes first. It may include additional “events” 
that are considered to be of importance besides death and PD, including serious 
drug toxicity.

OS6 and OS12, defined as the Kaplan-Meier estimate of the percentage of 
patients who are alive at six and 12 twelve months from treatment start, 
respectively.

OS, defined as the time from treatment start to the date of death (of any cause) 
or last patient contact.
The duration of sCR, CR, VGPR and PR should be reported. Observation curves will be 
estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. ORR and clinical benefit rate will be calculated 
with binomial exact 95% Confidence Interval (CI).
6.1.3 Efficacy Assessment Determinations
6.1.3.1
Myeloma Protein Measurements
Serum
Serum quantitation of immunoglobulins and M-protein, and assessment of M-protein by IF
and FLC must be determined for all patients at screening. The same determinations will be 
performed in patients with secretory MM on D1 of every cycle. For patients with “non-
secretory myeloma” FLC will be assessed at the same times. If there is evidence of PD, 
these evaluations must be repeated one to three weeks later in order to confirm PD.
Urine
Quantitation of M-protein and assessment of M-protein by IF from 24-h urine samples 
must be determined for all patients at screening. For patients with positive results, the same 
determinations will be done from 24-h urine samples collected on D1 of every cycle. If 
there is evidence of PD, this evaluation is to be repeated with a second measurement one to 
four weeks later in order to confirm PD. In patients with IF-negative non-secretory MM, 
these tests will not be repeated after screening.
6.1.3.2
Bone Marrow
A representative BM aspirate or a BM biopsy must be obtained at screening. During the 
treatment period, BM assessment is mandatory in the presence of CR. In patients with non-
secretory myeloma, collection and evaluation of BM is required eight weeks later to 
confirm CR. BM examination has to be performed in all cases where it is judged as 
CL_0256 1.0
Page 70 of 102
Protocol APL-B-022-15


clinically necessary.
BM studies will include cytogenetics, fluorescence in situ
hybridization (FISH), pharmacogenomics (PGx) and cell cycle analysis by flow cytometry, 
if available.
6.1.3.3
Skeletal Survey and Other Radiographs
A complete bone survey including examination of the skull, vertebral column, pelvis and 
proximal long bones, should be done at screening. In this period, it is important to 
document sites of myelomatous disease, especially in extramedullary areas. This may 
require clinical examination, CT-scanning or MRI evaluations.
During the treatment phase, a skeletal survey must take place in the presence of CR or if 
clinical symptoms suggest new lytic bone lesions. In the case of non-secretory or 
oligosecretory MM associated with soft tissue plasmacytoma, CT or MRI assessments may 
be performed every two cycles (whenever possible) and to confirm response if clinically 
indicated.
For soft tissue plasmacytomas, tumor assessment will consist of the sum of the cross-
diameters of the measurable lesion.
Radiographic examination of any location must be performed when clinical symptoms 
suggest a new bone lytic lesion.
6.1.3.4
Beta-2-Microglobulin and C-Reactive Protein
Beta-2-microglobulin will be measured at screening and C-reactive protein will be 
measured at screening, every eight weeks during the treatment phase and in the last final 
visit (30±5 days) after the last dose of the trial therapy.
6.2 Safety Assessment 
Individual patients will be evaluated from treatment start until 30 days after the last IMP 
administration or until the patient starts a new antitumor therapy, or until the date of death, 
whichever occurs first.
Patients will be evaluable for safety if they receive at least one (complete or incomplete) 
dose of plitidepsin.
Safety will be evaluated by the occurrence of clinical and laboratory toxicities and changes 
from baseline in physical examination findings, vital signs, and, if applicable, chest X-ray 
and ECG findings. AEs will be graded according to NCI-CTCAE v 4.0. Treatment delays, 
dose reduction requirements and reasons for discontinuation will be monitored throughout 
the study.
Any treatment-related AE will be followed until recovery to at least grade 1 or stabilization 
of symptoms, whichever occurs first.
6.2.1 Adverse Event Definitions
6.2.1.1
Adverse Event
An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical 
investigation subject which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the trial
treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, (e.g., an abnormal 
laboratory finding), or a disease temporarily associated with the use of a medicinal 
product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. Illnesses with onset 
during the study or exacerbation of pre-existing illnesses, including but not limited to 
CL_0256 1.0
Page 71 of 102
Protocol APL-B-022-15


clinically significant changes in physical examination findings and abnormal objective 
tests/procedures findings (e.g., X-ray, ECG) should be recorded.
The criteria for determining whether an abnormal objective test finding should be reported 
as an AE are as follows:

The test result is associated with clinically significant symptoms and/or,

The test result leads to a change in the study dosing or discontinuation from the 
clinical trial, significant additional concomitant drug treatment or other therapy, 
and/or,

The test result leads to any of the outcomes included in the definition of a SAE, 
and/or,

The test result is considered to be clinically relevant by the Investigator.
For the purpose of this protocol, PD or worsening of the underlying MM should not be 
reported as AEs.
6.2.1.2
Serious Adverse Event 
A serious adverse event (SAE) is any adverse experience occurring at any dose that:

results in death (is fatal),

is life-threatening,

requires or prolongs inpatient hospitalization,

results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity,

is a congenital anomaly or birth defect, or

is medically significant.

Any suspected transmission via a medicinal product of an infectious agent.
Medical and scientific judgment should be exercised in deciding whether an event or an 
AE is medically significant or not, in particular those events that may not be immediately 
life-threatening or result in hospitalization but may jeopardize the patient or may require 
intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed in the above definition.
6.2.1.3
Death
Death as such is the outcome of a SAE and should, whenever possible, not be used as the 
SAE term itself. The cause of death should be recorded as the SAE term instead. When 
available, the autopsy report will be provided by the Sponsor.
6.2.1.4
Life Threatening Event
A life threatening event is defined as any event in which the subject is at risk of death at 
the time of the event; it does not refer to an event which hypothetically might have caused 
death if it were more severe.
6.2.1.5
Hospitalization /Prolongation of Hospitalization
Any event requiring hospitalization (or prolongation of hospitalization) that occurs or 
worsens during the course of a patient’s participation in a clinical trial must be reported as 
a SAE. Prolongation of hospitalization is defined as any extension of an inpatient 
CL_0256 1.0
Page 72 of 102
Protocol APL-B-022-15


hospitalization beyond the stay anticipated/required for the initial admission, as determined 
by the Investigator or treating physician.
Hospitalizations that do not meet criteria for SAE reporting are: 

Reasons described in the protocol (e.g., drug administration, protocol-required 
investigations). Hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization for a complication 
of therapy administration or procedure will be reported as a SAE.

Hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization for technical, practical or social 
reasons, in the absence of an AE. 

Pre-planned hospitalizations (i.e., planned before trial entry). Any surgery or 
procedure planned before trial entry must be documented on the e-CRF. Only if 
the pre-planned surgery needs to be performed earlier due to a worsening of the 
condition, should this event (worsened condition) be reported as a SAE.
Other situations that MUST NOT be considered as hospitalizations are:

An emergency visit due to an accident where the patient is treated and 
discharged.

When the patient is held 24 h for observation and is finally not admitted.

Planned treatments at sites not associated to a hospital and generally considered 
as minor surgical procedures (i.e. laser eye surgery, arthroscopy etc.…).
6.2.1.6
Unexpected/Unlisted Adverse Event
An AE is considered unexpected when the nature or severity of which is not consistent 
with the Reference Safety Information. The Reference Safety Information for the
evaluation of expectedness will be:

The IB in force for plitidepsin.

The SmPC for bortezomib and dexamethasone.
6.2.1.7
Adverse Reaction
All untoward and unintended response to an IMP related to any dose administered. This 
definition also covers medication errors and uses outside what is foreseen in the protocol, 
including overdose, lack of efficacy, misuse and abuse of the product. Any event involving 
adverse drug reactions (ADR), illnesses with onset during the trial or exacerbations of pre-
existing illnesses should be recorded.
6.2.1.8
Adverse Events Related to the Trial Treatment
An AE is considered related to the IMPs if the Investigator's assessment of the causal 
relationship to the IMPs is "yes". The Investigator will assess the causal relationship of the 
IMPs to all AEs. The Sponsor will also consider related to the IMPs those events for which 
the Investigator assesses the causal relationship with the IMPs as "Unknown" when it 
cannot rule out a role of the IMP(s) with the events.
6.2.1.9
Expedited Reporting
The Sponsor will assume responsibility for appropriate expedited reporting of serious 
unlisted/unexpected and related adverse events (SUSAR/SUA), including misuse, 
overdose, abuse, medication error and those considered of special interest to the Competent 
CL_0256 1.0
Page 73 of 102
Protocol APL-B-022-15


Authorities. The Sponsor will also report all SAEs, including misuse, overdose, abuse, 
medication error, which are unlisted/unexpected and related to the trial drug(s) [IMP(s)] to 
the Investigators and to the Independent Ethics Committee (IEC)/Institutional Review 
Boards (IRBs) according to current legislation unless otherwise required and documented 
by the IEC/IRB.
6.2.1.10 Causality Assessment
The Investigator must provide an assessment of causality for each of the IMPs (including 
combination and comparator products) according to the following criteria:

Related to trial drug(s): There is a reasonable possibility that the IMP(s) caused 
the SAE.

Not related to trial drug(s): there is no reasonable possibility that the IMP(s) 
caused the SAE and other causes (as listed below) are more probable.
Disease under study.
Other illness (must be specified).
Previous/concomitant treatment/therapy.
Unknown but not related to trial drug.

Unknown: only to be used in some situations when the Investigator has 
insufficient information.
If the causality assessment is unknown and the Investigator cannot rule out relationship to 
the trial drug, then “unknown” should be chosen. If the causality assessment is “unknown 
but not related to the trial drug”, this should be clearly documented on the trial records.
6.2.2 Adverse Event Reporting Procedures
6.2.2.1
Reporting of Adverse Events
The Sponsor will collect AEs from the onset of the treatment period and until 30 days after 
administration of the last dose of trial drug or until the start of a new antitumor therapy, or 
until the date of death, whichever occurs first. All AEs suspected to be related to the trial
drug or the combination of the drugs must be followed after the time of therapy 
discontinuation until the event or its sequelae resolve or stabilize to an acceptable level to 
the Investigator and the Sponsor.
All AEs, including misuse, overdose, abuse, medication error and uses outside what is 
foreseen within the protocol, must be recorded in English using medical terminology on 
the source document and the e-CRF. Whenever possible, the Investigator will record the 
main diagnosis instead of the signs and symptoms normally included in the diagnosis. 
Investigators must assess the severity (grade) of the event following NCI-CTCAE v4.0 and 
assign a relationship to trial medication, pursue and obtain information adequate to 
determine the outcome and to assess whether it meets the criteria for classification as a 
SAE requiring immediate notification to PharmaMar or its designated representative. The 
Investigator must provide any information as requested by the Sponsor in addition to that 
on the e-CRF.
Abnormal laboratory tests obtained during the trial are AEs, but they should only be 
recorded on the AE section of the e-CRF in some cases (please refer to e-CRF instructions
for comprehensive information).
CL_0256 1.0
Page 74 of 102
Protocol APL-B-022-15


6.2.2.2
Reporting Serious Adverse Events
All SAEs (as defined above), regardless of suspected relationship to the trial drug, must be 
reported immediately, and always within 24h to Pharmacovigilance electronically by 
completing the applicable e-CRF section. SAEs occurring during the screening phase 
(from ICF signature), pregnancy, off-study period, or in case of electronic reporting system 
failure, will be reported immediately, and within 24 hours to the Pharmacovigilance 
Department using a paper SAE form, by fax (+34 91 846 6004), e-mail 
(phv@pharmamar.com) or phone (+34 91 823 4569).  Out of hours (Greenwich Meridien 
Time [GMT]), assistance on SAE reporting can be obtained by calling the 
Pharmacovigilance Department on +34 91 823 4742. SAEs initially reported 
conventionally by paper (SAE form), must be followed by a complete electronic SAE 
report through the e-CRF from the Investigational staff within one working day. After the 
database lock, only SAEs that are suspected to be related to the trial drug will trigger the 
reporting to Pharmacovigilance Department using a paper SAE form.
The Sponsor will collect SAEs from the time of signing of the IC. If the patient is 
definitively included in the trial, and the SAE occurs after registration has been confirmed, 
this information will also be recorded on the AE and SAE summary sections of the e-CRF. 
The Sponsor will collect SAEs until 30 days after the administration of the last dose of trial
drug, or until the start of a new antitumor therapy, or until the date of death of the patient, 
whichever occurs first. Beyond this period of time, only those SAEs suspected to be related 
will be reported.
The Sponsor will evaluate any safety information that is spontaneously reported by an 
Investigator beyond the time frame specified in the protocol. All SAEs suspected to be 
related to a trial drug must be followed after the time of therapy discontinuation until the 
event or its sequelae resolve or stabilize to an acceptable level to the Investigator and the 
clinical monitor or his/her designated representative.
The cause of death of a subject in a clinical trial, whether the event is expected or 
associated with the investigational agent, is considered a SAE and should therefore be 
reported using the SAE Form. 
6.2.2.3
Reporting Pregnancy Cases Occurred During this Clinical Trial
Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medicines Agency (EMA)
regulations require that pregnancy be reported as a SAE. Hence, the following events will 
also be handled and reported as SAEs:

Any occurrence of a pregnancy.

Possible exposure of a pregnant woman (this could involve a partner of a male 
patient or a pregnant female who came in contact with the medication).

All reports of elevated/questionable or indeterminate beta human chorionic 
gonadotrophins (beta-hCGs).
Pregnancy and suspected pregnancy (including a positive pregnancy test regardless of age 
or disease state) of a female patient or the female partner of a male patient occurring while 
the patient is on trial drug, or within 30 days of the patient’s discontinuation visit, is 
considered an immediately reportable event. The trial drug must be discontinued 
immediately and the patient instructed to return any unused portion of the trial drug to the 
Investigator. The pregnancy, suspected pregnancy, or positive pregnancy test must be 
CL_0256 1.0
Page 75 of 102
Protocol APL-B-022-15


reported to the Pharmacovigilance Department at PharmaMar immediately by facsimile 
using the SAE Report Form.
The Investigator will follow the pregnancy until completion/termination, and must notify 
the outcome of the pregnancy to the Pharmacovigilance Department at PharmaMar as a 
follow-up to the initial SAE report in patients who receive trial medication.
If the outcome of the pregnancy meets the criteria for immediate classification as a SAE 
(i.e., spontaneous or therapeutic abortion [any congenital anomaly detected in an aborted 
fetus is to be documented], stillbirth, neonatal death, or congenital anomaly [including that 
in an aborted fetus]), the Investigator should follow the procedures for reporting SAEs 
(i.e., report the event to the Pharmacovigilance Department at PharmaMar by facsimile 
within 24 h of the Investigator’s knowledge of the event).
All neonatal deaths that occur within 30 days of birth should be reported, regardless of
causality, as SAEs. In addition, any death of an infant after 30 days of birth that the 
Investigator suspects as related to the in utero exposure to the trial drug should also be 
reported to the Pharmacovigilance Department at PharmaMar by facsimile within 24 h of 
the Investigators’ knowledge of the event. If the female is found not to be pregnant, any 
determination regarding the patient’s continued participation in the trial will be determined 
by the Investigator and the PharmaMar responsible Physician.
6.2.3 Adverse Events Monitoring
Safety review will be performed at Pharma Mar, S.A. once the SAE forms have been 
received electronically or by fax and the CRFs have been completed electronically by the 
Investigator. 
Periodic safety review of clinical data will be performed; however, no formal Data Safety 
Monitoring Board has been appointed for this trial. AEs will be monitored by the 
Investigators and by the trial team at Pharma Mar, S.A. The personnel in charge of this 
process are defined in the section “Trial Contacts” of this protocol. In general, a clinical 
oncologist, together with a member of the Pharma Mar, S.A. Pharmacovigilance 
Department will review the safety data of this trial on an ongoing basis. 
SAEs will be collected, assessed and reported as per the applicable Regulations by the 
Pharmacovigilance Department. Periodic safety reviews of SAE reports are to be 
conducted by the clinical oncologist every 3-6 months, depending on recruitment.
As per the applicable regulations, Pharma Mar, S.A. will report to the IECs/IRBs, 
Investigators and Competent Authorities:

Expeditedly: all serious, related, unlisted/unexpected AEs or critical safety 
finding from this and any other clinical trial with the IMP(s) and, 

Periodically: all relevant safety information generated in all clinical trials with 
the IMP(s) within the Development Safety Update Report.
Non-serious AEs will be assessed during monitoring visits by the monitor.
6.3 Pharmacokinetics (PK) Assessment
All patients included in the trial will be sampled for PK. All sample collection dates and 
times will be recorded on the e-CRF. 
CL_0256 1.0
Page 76 of 102
Protocol APL-B-022-15


Samples will be obtained during C1 and C2 for the PK analysis of plitidepsin. Time points 
for blood sample collection for the determination of whole blood concentrations of 
plitidepsin are detailed on Table 10. 
Table 10. Sampling schedule for the determination of plitidepsin.
Sample 
Number
Cycle
Day
Time points 
for plitidepsin 
samples
Sampling window
1
1
1
Pre-infusion
--
2
1 
1
3 h (just before the EOI)
+/- 2 min
3
1 
4
72 h
+/- 24 h
4
1 
8
168 h
+/- 24 h
5
1
11
240 h
+/- 24 h
6
2 
1
Pre-infusion
--
7
2 
1
3 h (just before the EOI)
+/- 2 min
8
2 
4
72 h
+/- 24 h
9
2
8
168 h
+/- 24 h
10
2
11
240 h
+/- 24 h
EOI, end of infusion.
Should information obtained during the evaluation allow improvement of the schedule, 
sampling times may be changed while maintaining or decreasing the total sample number 
and volume. Accurate recording of actual dosing and sampling times is much more 
important than the strict adherence to the scheduled times.
Samples will have a volume of 2 mL. 
The exact recording of the time of drug administration and sampling times is crucial on 
those days when sampling for PK testing takes place. The infusion rate of plitidepsin will 
be established so that it ensures that the total dose is infused in 3 h. The drug will be 
infused at a constant rate throughout the 3-h period and the infusion rate should not be 
modified once the infusion begins in order to obtain reliable PK information. If a variation 
in the infusion time does eventually occur, it is very important to reflect this modification 
on the e-CRF, writing clearly the beginning and the end times of the infusion. The pre-
established infusion rate should not be changed to maintain the scheduled duration of 
infusion; it would just be enough to record the actual duration on the e-CRF and in the PK
sampling sheet.
Blood samples for PK will be obtained through a peripheral vein located in the 
contralateral side to that of plitidepsin administration. In any case, the sampling vein has to 
be different to that from which drugs are being administered. Even the last sample must 
never be collected from the catheter used for the drug administration. 
If the blood sample is obtained from a catheter, the first milliliter (mL) of blood will be 
discarded to avoid the dilution of the sample with the solution used to keep it clean. 
Heparin (10 U/mL in normal saline solution) or a slow drip of normal saline solution (10 
mL/h) can be used to keep the catheter permeable between extractions.
Samples should be placed in a sodium heparin tube and gently inverted several times to 
ensure proper mixing and the whole blood (without centrifugation) should be transferred to 
the provided polypropylene tubes and stored frozen until the time of shipping for analysis 
to the laboratory. The tubes will be provided by PharmaMar. All the material for PK 
procedures will be provided by the Sponsor(s). 
CL_0256 1.0
Page 77 of 102
Protocol APL-B-022-15


Once all samples from a patient have been collected, they should be shipped to the central 
PK laboratory for analysis as soon as possible, ideally the next shipping day. Samples from 
several patients can be sent in the same shipment; however, the time span between the 
moment the last PK sample for a patient has been collected and the shipment of all samples 
from this patient to the central laboratory should not exceed two months.
A manual of full instructions for sample extraction, labeling, storage, and shipment will be 
provided as a separate document (Procedure Manual for the Collection, Storage and 
Shipment of Plasma Samples for Pharmacokinetics).
6.3.1 Analytical Procedures
Whole blood samples will be analyzed to determine the concentration of plitidepsin using a 
validated, specific and sensitive ultra performance liquid chromatography/mass 
spectrometry/mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) method by or under the supervision of 
the Sponsor.
6.3.2 Pharmacokinetic Calculations
PK parameters will be calculated using population methods, after pooling data from this 
study with data obtained from other studies.
6.4 Pharmacogenomic (PGx) Assessment
For those patients who consent to participate in the PGx sub-study, the response to study 
treatment will be correlated with the expression levels of selected genes. BM samples will 
be obtained at the time of the baseline visit and after a patient has responded to treatment. 
The analysis of potential predictive factors of response to plitidepsin and bortezomib will 
include factors related to the MOA of plitidepsin and/or bortezomib and/or those related to 
the pathogenesis of the disease. 
The following analyses will be carried out in plasma cells isolated from BM aspirates: 

Quantitation of mRNA expression of selected genes related to the MOA of 
plitidepsin and/or bortezomib or to the pathogenesis of the disease by real-time 
quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR).

Quantitation of protein expression of selected genes related to the MOA of 
plitidepsin and/or bortezomib or to the pathogenesis of the disease by IHC.

Analysis of polymorphisms and mutations of the above mentioned selected 
genes will be analyzed, if relevant, by RT-PCR and/or DNA sequencing.
Expression levels of the different markers will be correlated with the patient’s clinical 
outcome.
A manual of instructions for sample extraction, labeling, storage, and shipment will be 
provided.
7.
STATISTICAL METHODS
7.1 Sample Size Considerations
Patients will be treated to test the null hypothesis (H0) that 20% or fewer patients achieve a 
response according to IMWG criteria (p 0.20) versus the alternative hypothesis (H1) that 
40% or more patients achieve a response according to IMWG criteria (p ≥ 0.40). The 
CL_0256 1.0
Page 78 of 102
Protocol APL-B-022-15


variance of the standardized test is based on the empirical estimate. The type I error rate 
(alpha) associated with this one-sided test is 0.025 and the type II error rate (beta) is 0.1; 
hence, statistical power is 90%. In order to test these hypotheses, it is necessary to recruit 
64 evaluable patients. 
A futility analysis based on the primary endpoint (ORR) is planned for the time when the 
first 20 evaluable patients have been recruited. The futility analysis will commence once 
patient number 20 has completed two full treatment cycles. Patient recruitment will not be 
halted during the conduct of this futility analysis. A spending function defined by the 
Gamma family with parameter (-2) has been selected. If there are two or fewer responders 
according to boundaries and sample size assumptions, then the alternative hypothesis could 
be rejected and recruitment might be stopped at that time. Otherwise, patient accrual will 
continue to a total of 64 patients. 
Overall, if ≥ 21 (i.e., 33%) patients achieve a response, then the null hypothesis can be 
rejected.
7.2 Assessment of Efficacy
For the evaluation of ORR and clinical benefit, rates will be calculated with binomial exact 
CI at 95%.
Follow-up time will be calculated from the date of the first infusion to the date of the last 
documented exam. The DOR will be analyzed for all patients in whom a response has been 
observed and will be calculated from the date of the first documentation of response to the 
date of PD. Deaths due to causes other than PD will be censored. 
TTP will be calculated from the date of the first infusion to the date of documented PD or 
death due to PD. PFS will be calculated from the date of the first infusion to the date of 
documented PD or death. EFS will be calculated from the date of the first infusion to the 
date of documented PD or death (may include additional events besides death and PD 
considered of importance). OS will be calculated from the date of the first infusion to the 
date of death (or last patient contact). If any patient is lost to follow-up before PD or death
or receives another antitumor therapy, the TTP, PFS or EFS will be censored on the date of 
the last tumor assessment.  If there were no tumor assessments, the patient will be censored 
on the date of the first drug administration.
Median time to onset and duration of response, TTP, PFS, EFS, OS6, OS12 and estimated 
rates of patients free of progression or alive will be calculated by Kaplan-Meier estimates 
with 95% CI.
7.3 Toxicity and Adverse Events
Analysis of safety will be performed on patients who receive at least one or part of one 
plitidepsin infusion.
Safety evaluations will be based on the incidence, intensity, and type of AEs, and clinically 
significant changes in the patient’s physical examination findings, vital signs and clinical 
laboratory results. Safety variables will be tabulated and presented for all patients who 
receive any amount of plitidepsin, bortezomib and dexamethasone. Exposure to trial drugs
and reasons for discontinuation of trial treatment will be tabulated. Analyses will be 
performed in a descriptive fashion.
CL_0256 1.0
Page 79 of 102
Protocol APL-B-022-15


AEs will be coded using the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA). All 
AEs occurring during the trial will be listed in by-patient data listings. Treatment-emergent 
events will be tabulated, where treatment-emergent is defined as any AE that occurs after 
administration of the first dose of trial drug and up to 30 days after the last dose of trial
drug, any event that is considered drug-related regardless of the start date of the event, or 
any event that is present at baseline but worsens in intensity or is subsequently considered 
drug-related by the Investigator. Events that are considered related to treatment will also be 
tabulated.  Deaths, SAEs and events resulting in trial discontinuation will be tabulated.
Changes from baseline in clinical laboratory parameters will be summarized across time 
throughout the trial, and the frequency of clinically significant abnormal laboratory values 
will be tabulated. Shift tables for each cycle will be produced for selected laboratory 
parameters, to include at least hemoglobin, white blood cell (WBC) count, neutrophils, 
lymphocytes, platelets, AST, ALT, bilirubin, creatinine, AP, CPK and electrolytes. These 
tables will summarize the number of patients with each baseline NCI-CTCAE grade and 
changes to the maximum NCI-CTCAE grade during treatment.
Changes in vital sign parameters will be summarized over time in a similar fashion to 
laboratory parameters, and any abnormal values will be tabulated.  
In order to most clearly enumerate toxicity rates and to further define the safety profile of 
plitidepsin, bortezomib and dexamethasone, additional safety analyses may be done at any 
time without prejudice.
All toxicities will be graded according to NCI-CTCAE version 4.0, whenever an NCI-
CTCAE grading exists. Otherwise, severity will be noted. As a convention, the term 
“grade” will always be used. Toxicities will be described according to the worst NCI-
CTCAE grade or, for toxicities which do not form the subject of NCI-CTCAE
classification, according to the worst severity. NCI-CTCAE grading will be programmed 
and automatically evaluated versus normal laboratory parameters by each center.
Only events reported by the Investigator as ‘not related to plitidepsin +/- bortezomib +/-
dexamethasone’ will be excluded from the trial analysis of drug-related events. A second 
set of tables including all events will also be presented.
7.4 Other Analyses
Categorical variables will be described in frequency tables using counts and percentages.
Continuous variables will be described by median, minimum and maximum values.
7.5 Baseline and Demographic Data
Baseline data such as demographics, serum calcium, renal function (creatinine [Cr], 
creatinine clearance [CrCl]), anemia, bone involvement, serum Ig quantitation and M-
protein quantitation and IF from the beginning of the last CT until inclusion in the current
trial, prior anticancer therapy, biological values, prior relevant history, signs and 
symptoms, ECG and concomitant medication (Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical Drug 
Classification by the World Health Organization [ATC-WHO] coded) will be described.
7.6 Treatment Administration
Cumulative dose, dose intensity and relative dose intensity, cycle delays and dose 
modifications will be described.
CL_0256 1.0
Page 80 of 102
Protocol APL-B-022-15


7.7 Protocol Deviations
A protocol deviation is defined as any departure from what is described in the protocol of a 
clinical trial approved by an IEC/IRB and Competent Authorities. Therefore, this applies to 
deviations related to patient inclusion and clinical procedures (e.g., assessments to be 
conducted or parameters to be determined), and also to other procedures described in the 
protocol that concern Good Clinical Practice (GCP) guidelines or ethical issues (e.g., 
issues related to obtaining the patients’ IC, data reporting, Investigator’s responsibilities 
etc.).
Deviations with no effect on the risk/benefit ratio of the clinical trial (such as minimal 
delays in assessments or visits) will be distinguished from those that might have an effect 
on this risk/benefit ratio, such as:

Deviations that might affect the clinical trial objectives, such as those involving 
the inclusion/exclusion criteria (which could mean that the patient is not 
eligible for the trial) and those having an effect on patient evaluability.

Deviations that might affect the patient’s well-being and/or safety, such as an 
incorrect dosing of the IMP(s) due to not following dose adjustment 
specifications or an incorrect preparation of the medication.

Deviations related to the GCP guidelines compliance as described in the 
protocol and regulations in force, such as deviations when obtaining IC or not 
following the terms established for reporting SAEs, etc.
The investigators may suggest the authorization of certain protocol deviations to the 
Sponsor, especially if they are related to inclusion/exclusion criteria or if they may have an 
effect on the patient’s evaluability. As a general rule, NO deviations that may have an 
effect on the risk/benefit ratio of the clinical trial will be authorized. 
All protocol deviations considered particularly relevant (related to ethical issues, 
fulfillment of GCP guidelines and trial procedures) will be notified to the pertinent 
IEC/IRB and to the Competent Authorities, as established by local regulations.
7.8 Pharmacokinetics
PK parameters will be tabulated and selected parameters will be graphically displayed per 
dose level.
PK interactions between plitidepsin and bortezomib will be evaluated comparing the PK 
parameters obtained in this trial with those obtained from single agent plitidepsin studies 
and with literature data for bortezomib.
The potential influence on selected PK parameters of selected demographic and clinical 
dichotomous variables (gender, laboratory test results above/below selected cut-off values, 
etc.) will be evaluated by a Student’s t test or a Mann-Whitney’s U test, as appropriate.
For multinomial variables, analysis of variance will be used. For selected continuous 
demographic and clinical variables (age, laboratory test results…), the relationship with 
selected PK parameters will be graphically explored and assessed using correlation and 
regression methods.
The potential influence on efficacy and safety of the selected PK parameters will be 
graphically explored. For dichotomous outcomes, a Student’s T test or a Mann-Whitney’s 
CL_0256 1.0
Page 81 of 102
Protocol APL-B-022-15


U test, as appropriate, will be used for assessment. For multinomial outcomes, analysis of 
variance will be used. Continuous outcomes will be assessed using correlation and 
regression methods.
Other tests may be applied if the results of the above evaluations suggest that they may 
yield additional relevant information.
7.9 Pharmacogenomics
Analysis of RNA/protein expression, polymorphisms and mutations will be performed 
blind, and clinical data compiled only after all analyses are completed. A Fisher’s exact 
test/logistic regression for categorical variables and a log rank test/Cox regression for time-
to-event variables will be used to test whether a specific profile is associated with clinical 
outcome after treatment with plitidepsin in combination with bortezomib and 
dexamethasone. The prognosis value of markers will be explored for objective clinical 
response, PFS and OS. In each case, if applicable, a multivariate model will be developed 
by stepwise selection. All tests of statistical significance will be two-sided, and 
significance will be set at 0.05.
7.10 Procedures for Reporting Deviations to the Original Statistical Analysis Plan
All deviations from the original statistical analysis plan will be provided in the final 
Clinical Study Report.
8.
ADMINISTRATIVE REQUERIMENTS
This protocol will be approved by a Competent Authority before the beginning of the trial. 
8.1 Ethics 
This trial will be conducted in accordance with the ethical principles that have their origin 
in the Declaration of Helsinki (Appendix 7) and will be consistent with GCP and other 
applicable regulatory requirements.
Trial personnel involved in conducting this trial will be qualified by education, training and 
experience to perform their respective task(s).
The trial will be conducted in compliance with the protocol. The protocol, any 
amendments and the patient IC will receive IRB/IEC approval/favorable opinion prior to 
initiation. The decision of the IEC/IRB concerning the conduct of the trial will be made in 
writing to the Investigator and a copy of this decision will be provided to the Sponsor 
before commencement of the trial.
The Investigator and/or the Sponsor is/are responsible for keeping the IEC/IRB informed
of significant new information about trial drug.
All protocol amendments will be agreed upon by the Sponsor and the Investigator.
Administrative changes of the protocol are minor corrections and/or clarifications that have 
no impact on the way the trial is to be conducted.
8.2 Monitoring, Auditing and Inspecting
The trial will be monitored by regular site visits and telephone calls to the Investigator by 
the clinical trial monitor designated by PharmaMar.
CL_0256 1.0
Page 82 of 102
Protocol APL-B-022-15


During site visits, the trial monitor should review original patient records, drug 
accountability records and document retention (trial file). Additionally, the monitor should 
observe trial procedures and will discuss any problem with the Investigator.
The Investigator should allocate adequate time for these visits. The Investigator should 
also ensure that the monitor is given direct access (as per International Conference on 
Harmonization  Good Clinical Practice (ICH GCP) Guideline, Sections 4.9.7 and 6.10) to 
the patient’s source documents (i.e., hospital or private charts, original laboratory records, 
appointment books, etc.), which support data entered in the e-CRFs, as defined in the ICH 
GCP Guideline, Sections 1.51. and 1.52.
The necessary systems and procedures will be implemented to assure the quality of every 
aspect of the trial.
At any time during the course or at the end of the trial, the Clinical Quality Assurance 
Department of PharmaMar or external auditors contracted by the Sponsor may conduct an 
onsite audit visit to the centers (ICH guideline glossary Section 1.6).
Participation in this trial implies acceptance of potential inspections by national or foreign 
Competent Authorities.
8.3 Patient Informed Consent
Before agreeing to participate in this trial, all patients will be provided with full written 
information about the trial, as well as about other sub-studies (PGx sub-study), in a 
“Patient Information Sheet” with language that is non-technical and easily understood. The 
Patient Information Sheet will include all elements required by ICH, GCP and other 
applicable regulatory requirements and will be submitted for approval to the IEC/IRB 
along with the protocol. A statement of document approval should be provided before 
commencement of the trial.
The Investigator, or designated person, must provide the patient with a copy of the Patient 
Information Sheet and consent forms and should allow the necessary time for the patient to 
inquire about the details of the trial and the PGx sub-study; then, IC must be freely signed 
and personally dated by the patient and by the person who conducted the IC discussion 
before commencement of the trial. The patient should receive a copy of the signed IC and 
any other written information provided to patients prior to participation in the trial and the 
PGx sub-study.
During a patient's participation in the trial, any updates to the IC form and any updates to 
the written information will be provided to the patient.
If there is a need to obtain new consent from the patients, the Investigator, or designated 
person, should inform the patient of any new information relevant to the patient's 
willingness to continue to participate in the trial, before obtaining the written consent.
8.4 Confidentiality/Patients Identification
The collection and processing of personal data from patients enrolled in this trial will be 
limited to data that are necessary to investigate the efficacy, safety, quality, and utility of 
the IMP(s) used in this trial. It is the Investigator’s responsibility that sufficient 
information pertaining to the patient’s identity be retained. 
CL_0256 1.0
Page 83 of 102
Protocol APL-B-022-15


The trial monitor, auditor at PharmaMar, IRB/IEC, or Competent Authorities should have 
direct access to all requested trial related records and agree to keep the identity of trial
patients confidential.
Data must be collected and processed with adequate precautions to ensure confidentiality 
and compliance with applicable data privacy protection laws and regulations.
PharmaMar shall comply with Directive 95/46/EEC of the European Parliament and of the 
Council of 24 October 1995, on the protection of individuals with regards to the processing 
of personal data and on the free movement of such data. 
8.5 Case Report Forms
Electronic CRFs will be used to record all data for each patient. It is the responsibility of 
the Investigator to ensure that the e-CRFs are properly and completely filled in. Electronic 
CRFs must be completed for all patients who have given IC and have been admitted to the 
trial.
The patient’s source documentation, including but not limited to physician’s patient 
records, nurses notes, pharmacy records, etc. should be maintained at the trial site. 
Data collected in the e-CRF will be entered into a database at PharmaMar which complies
with the Spanish Act implementing Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of 
the Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the 
processing of personal data.
8.6 Insurance
The Sponsor will provide insurance or indemnity in accordance with the applicable 
regulatory requirements.
8.7 Records Retention 
The Investigator/Institution should maintain trial documents according to ICH Topic E6,
Section 8, and as required by the applicable regulatory requirements.
Essential documents should be retained according to ICH guidelines, or for a longer period 
if required by the applicable regulations. 
8.8 Use of Information and Publication
Before the Investigators of this trial submit a paper or abstract for publication or otherwise 
publicly disclose information concerning the trial IMP(s), PharmaMar must be provided 
with at least 60 days to review and approve the proposed publication or disclosure to 
assure protection of confidential and proprietary data. If PharmaMar determines that 
patentable subject matter is disclosed in such proposed publication or disclosure, the 
publication or disclosure shall be withheld during the period of time that it is considered 
convenient.
If the trial is part of a multicenter study, the first publication of the trial shall be done as a
multicenter publication, in collaboration with all investigators and institutions contributing 
data, analysis and comments. However, if such a multicenter publication is not submitted 
within 12 months after conclusion, abandonment or termination of the trial at all sites, the 
present trial may be published individually in accordance with the procedure established 
before.
CL_0256 1.0
Page 84 of 102
Protocol APL-B-022-15


The order of the co-authors will reflect the relative contribution of each one of them to the 
trial development and analysis. In general, the first author will be the Clinical Investigator 
who recruits the highest number of patients with information finally available for data 
analysis. Relevant PharmaMar personnel who have fully participated in the trial must be 
considered for co-authorship of the publication.
CL_0256 1.0
Page 85 of 102
Protocol APL-B-022-15


9.
REFERENCES
1.
National Cancer Institute, Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Program, 
Cancer Statistics: http://seercancergov/statfacts/html/mulmyhtml.
2.
Harousseau JL, Dreyling M. Multiple myeloma: ESMO Clinical Practice 
Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Annals of oncology : official journal of 
the European Society for Medical Oncology / ESMO. 2010 May;21 Suppl 5:v155-7.
3.
Durie BG, Salmon SE. A clinical staging system for multiple myeloma. Correlation 
of measured myeloma cell mass with presenting clinical features, response to treatment, 
and survival. Cancer. 1975;36(3):842-54.
4.
Greipp PR, San Miguel J, Durie BG. International staging system for multiple 
myeloma. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(15):3412-20.
5.
Information about multiple myeloma and other plasma cell neoplasms: treatment, 
clinical trials, research, and statistics from the National Cancer Institute. 
www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/types/myeloma.
6.
McElwain TJ, Powles RL. High-dose intravenous melphalan for plasma-cell 
leukaemia and myeloma. Lancet:. 1983;2(822-4).
7.
Attal M, Harousseau JL, Stoppa AM. A prospective, randomized trial of autologous 
bone marrow transplantation and chemotherapy in multiple myeloma. N Engl JMed. 
1996;335:91-7.
8.
Blade J, San Miguel JF, Alcalá A. Alternating combination VCMP/VBAP 
chemotherapy versus melphalan/prednisone in the treatment of multiple myeloma: a 
randomized multicentric study of 487 patients. J Clin Oncol. 1993;11:1165-71.
9.
Gonzalez-Santiago L, Suarez Y, Zarich N, Munoz-Alonso MJ, Cuadrado A, 
Martinez T, et al. Aplidin induces JNK-dependent apoptosis in human breast cancer cells 
via alteration of glutathione homeostasis, Rac1 GTPase activation, and MKP-1 
phosphatase downregulation. Cell Death Differ. 2006 Nov;13(11):1968-81.
10.
Erba E, Bassano L, Di Liberti G, Muradore I, Chiorino G, Ubezio P, et al. Cell 
cycle phase perturbations and apoptosis in tumour cells induced by aplidine. Br J Cancer. 
2002 May 6;86(9):1510-7.
11.
Cuadrado A, Gonzalez L, Suarez Y, Martinez T, Munoz A. JNK activation is 
critical for Aplidin-induced apoptosis. Oncogene. 2004 Jun 10;23(27):4673-80.
12.
Broggini M, Marchini SV, Galliera E, Borsotti P, Taraboletti G, Erba E, et al. 
Aplidine, a new anticancer agent of marine origin, inhibits vascular endothelial growth 
factor (VEGF) secretion and blocks VEGF-VEGFR-1 (flt-1) autocrine loop in human 
leukemia cells MOLT-4. Leukemia. 2003 Jan;17(1):52-9.
13.
Garcia-Fernandez LF, Losada A, Alcaide V, Alvarez AM, Cuadrado A, Gonzalez 
L, et al. Aplidin induces the mitochondrial apoptotic pathway via oxidative stress-mediated 
JNK and p38 activation and protein kinase C delta. Oncogene. 2002 Oct 24;21(49):7533-
44.
14.
Cuadrado A, Garcia-Fernandez LF, Gonzalez L, Suarez Y, Losada A, Alcaide V, et 
al. Aplidin induces apoptosis in human cancer cells via glutathione depletion and sustained 
activation of the epidermal growth factor receptor, Src, JNK, and p38 MAPK. J Biol 
Chem. 2003 Jan 3;278(1):241-50.
15.
Munoz-Alonso MJ, Gonzalez-Santiago L, Zarich N, Martinez T, Alvarez E, Rojas 
JM, et al. Plitidepsin Has a Dual Effect Inhibiting Cell Cycle and Inducing Apoptosis via 
Rac1/c-Jun NH2-Terminal Kinase Activation in Human Melanoma Cells 
10.1124/jpet.107.132662. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2008 March 1, 2008;324(3):1093-101.
CL_0256 1.0
Page 86 of 102
Protocol APL-B-022-15


16.
Moneo V, Serelde BG, Leal JF, Blanco-Aparicio C, Diaz-Uriarte R, Aracil M, et al. 
Levels of p27(kip1) determine Aplidin sensitivity. Mol Cancer Ther. 2007 Apr;6(4):1310-
6.
17.
Biscardi M, Caporale R, Balestri F, Gavazzi S, Jimeno J, Grossi A. VEGF 
inhibition and cytotoxic effect of aplidin in leukemia cell lines and cells from acute 
myeloid leukemia. Ann Oncol. 2005 Oct;16(10):1667-74.
18.
Taraboletti G, Poli M, Dossi R, Manenti L, Borsotti P, Faircloth GT, et al. 
Antiangiogenic activity of aplidine, a new agent of marine origin. Br J Cancer. 2004 Jun 
14;90(12):2418-24.
19.
Sasak H. The cytotoxic effects of Aplidin in a brad spectrum of human tumor types 
using the MTS proliferation assay. Cambridge, MA, USA: PharmaMar Inc, 2004 PUSA-
SR007.
20.
Mitsiades CS, Ocio EM, Pandiella A, Maiso P, Gajate C, Garayoa M, et al. Aplidin, 
a marine organism-derived compound with potent antimyeloma activity in vitro and in 
vivo. Cancer Res. 2008 Jul 1;68(13):5216-25.
21.
Radl J, De Glopper ED, Schuit HR, Zurcher C. Idiopathic paraproteinemia. II. 
Transplantation of the paraprotein-producing clone from old to young C57BL/KaLwRij 
mice. J Immunol. 1979 Feb;122(2):609-13.
22.
Caers J, Menu E, De Raeve H, Lepage D, Van Valckenborgh E, Van Camp B, et al. 
Antitumour and antiangiogenic effects of Aplidin in the 5TMM syngeneic models of 
multiple myeloma. Br J Cancer. 2008 Jun 17;98(12):1966-74.
23.
Herr I, Gassler N, Friess H, Buchler MW. Regulation of differential pro- and anti-
apoptotic signaling by glucocorticoids. Apoptosis : an international journal on programmed 
cell death. 2007 Feb;12(2):271-91.
24.
Zhang C, Wenger T, Mattern J, Ilea S, Frey C, Gutwein P, et al. Clinical and 
mechanistic aspects of glucocorticoid-induced chemotherapy resistance in the majority of 
solid tumors. Cancer biology & therapy. 2007 Feb;6(2):278-87.
25.
Schaaf MJ, Cidlowski JA. Molecular mechanisms of glucocorticoid action and 
resistance. The Journal of steroid biochemistry and molecular biology. 2002 Dec;83(1-
5):37-48.
26.
Schmidt S, Rainer J, Riml S, Ploner C, Jesacher S, Achmuller C, et al. 
Identification of glucocorticoid-response genes in children with acute lymphoblastic 
leukemia. Blood. 2006 Mar 1;107(5):2061-9.
27.
Adamson PC, Barrett JS. All dex'ed out with nowhere to go? J Clin Oncol. 2008 
Apr 20;26(12):1917-8.
28.
Zhou J, Cidlowski JA. The human glucocorticoid receptor: one gene, multiple 
proteins and diverse responses. Steroids. 2005 May-Jun;70(5-7):407-17.
29.
Distelhorst CW. Recent insights into the mechanism of glucocorticosteroid-induced 
apoptosis. Cell Death Differ. 2002 Jan;9(1):6-19.
30.
Planey SL, Litwack G. Glucocorticoid-induced apoptosis in lymphocytes. 
Biochemical and biophysical research communications. 2000 Dec 20;279(2):307-12.
31.
Kofler R. The molecular basis of glucocorticoid-induced apoptosis of 
lymphoblastic leukemia cells. Histochemistry and cell biology. 2000 Jul;114(1):1-7.
32.
Renner K, Ausserlechner MJ, Kofler R. A conceptual view on glucocorticoid-
lnduced apoptosis, cell cycle arrest and glucocorticoid resistance in lymphoblastic 
leukemia. Current molecular medicine. 2003 Dec;3(8):707-17.
CL_0256 1.0
Page 87 of 102
Protocol APL-B-022-15


33.
Oh HY, Namkoong S, Lee SJ, Por E, Kim CK, Billiar TR, et al. Dexamethasone 
protects primary cultured hepatocytes from death receptor-mediated apoptosis by 
upregulation of cFLIP. Cell Death Differ. 2006 Mar;13(3):512-23.
34.
Tissing WJ, Meijerink JP, den Boer ML, Pieters R. Molecular determinants of 
glucocorticoid sensitivity and resistance in acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Leukemia. 2003 
Jan;17(1):17-25.
35.
Machuca C, Mendoza-Milla C, Cordova E, Mejia S, Covarrubias L, Ventura J, et 
al. Dexamethasone protection from TNF-alpha-induced cell death in MCF-7 cells requires 
NF-kappaB and is independent from AKT. BMC cell biology. 2006;7:9.
36.
Matthews JG, Ito K, Barnes PJ, Adcock IM. Defective glucocorticoid receptor 
nuclear translocation and altered histone acetylation patterns in glucocorticoid-resistant 
patients. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2004 Jun;113(6):1100-8.
37.
Ito K, Yamamura S, Essilfie-Quaye S, Cosio B, Ito M, Barnes PJ, et al. Histone 
deacetylase 2-mediated deacetylation of the glucocorticoid receptor enables NF-kappaB 
suppression. The Journal of experimental medicine. 2006 Jan 23;203(1):7-13.
38.
Ito K, Barnes PJ, Adcock IM. Glucocorticoid receptor recruitment of histone 
deacetylase 2 inhibits interleukin-1beta-induced histone H4 acetylation on lysines 8 and 
12. Molecular and cellular biology. 2000 Sep;20(18):6891-903.
39.
Gomez SG, Faircloth G, Lopez-Lazaro L, Jimeno J, Bueren JA, Albella B. In vitro 
hematotoxicity of Aplidine on human bone marrow and cord blood progenitor cells. 
Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA. 2001 
Aug-Oct;15(4-5):347-50.
40.
Faircloth G, Grant W, Nam S, Jimeno J, Meely K, Rinehart KL. Aplidine is a 
Novel, Marine Derived Depsipeptide with In Vivo Antitumor Activity. Am Assoc Ca Res. 
1998;39:227.
41.
Mateos MV, Cibeira MT, Richardson PG, Blade J, Prosper F, A. O. Final Results 
of a Phase II Trial with Plitidepsin (Aplidin) Alone and in Combination with 
Dexamethasone in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma. 50th American 
Society of HematologyAnnual Meeting; San Francisco, CA, USA; 2008. p. Poster Board 
III-782. 2008.
42.
Joan Bladé DS, Donna Reece, Jane Apperley, Bo BJörkstrand, Gösta Gahrton, 
Morie Gertz, Sergio Giralt, Sundarr Jagannath, David Vesole. Criteria for evaluation 
disease response and progression in patients with multiple myeloma treated by high-dose 
therapy and haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. British Journal of Haematology. 
1998;102(5):1115-23.
43.
Mitchell BS. The Proteasome - An Emerging Therapeutic Target in Cancer. NJEM. 
2003;348:2597-8.
44.
Product Monograph: Velcade®. Janssen-Ortho Inc. 2006.
45.
Bringhen S, Larocca A, Rossi D, Cavalli M, Genuardi M, Ria R, et al. Efficacy and 
safety of once-weekly bortezomib in multiple myeloma patients. Blood. 2010 Dec 
2;116(23):4745-53.
46.
Richardson PG. Clinical update: proteasome inhibitors in hematologic 
malignancies. Cancer Treat Rev. 2003;29(Suppl 1):33-9.
47.
Rajkumar SV, Richardson PG, Hideshima T, Anderson K. Proteasome inhibition as 
a novel therapeutic target in human cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:630-9.
48.
Adams J. Development of the proteasome inhibitor PS-341. Oncologist. 2002;7:9-
16.
CL_0256 1.0
Page 88 of 102
Protocol APL-B-022-15


49.
Fernández Y, T.P. M, Denoyelle C. Chemical Blockage of the Proteasome 
Inhibitory Function of Bortezomib. Impact on tumor cell death. J Biol Chem. 
2006;281:1107-18.
50.
Lightcap ES, McCormack TA, Pien CS, Chau V, Adams J, Elliott PJ. Proteasome 
inhibition measurements: clinical application. Clinical chemistry. 2000 May;46(5):673-83.
51.
Lightcap ES, McCormack TA, Pien CS, Chau V, Adams J, Elliott PJ. Proteasome 
inhibition measurements: clinical application. Clin Chem. 2000;46(5):673-83.
52.
Schwartz R. Pharmacology, Pharmacokinetics, and Practical Applications of 
Bortezomib. Oncology. 2004;18(14 Supplement):14-21.
53.
Schwartz R, Davidson T. Pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, and practical 
applications of bortezomib. Oncology (Williston Park). 2004;18(14 Supplement 11):14-21.
54.
Velcade® Clinical Pharmacology. 
http://www.rxlist.com/cgi/generic/velcade_cp.htm.
55.
Aghajanian C, Soignet S, Dizon DS, Pien CS, Adams J, Elliott PJ. A Phase I trial of 
the novel proteasome inhibitor PS341 in advanced solid tumor malignancies. Clin Cancer 
Res. 2002;8(8):2505-11.
56.
Papandreou CN, Daliani DD, Nix D, Yang H, Madden T, Wang X. Phase I trial of 
the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib in patients with advanced solid tumors with 
observations in androgen-independent prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22(11):2108-21.
57.
Orlowski RZ, Stinchcombe TE, Mitchell BS, Shea TC, Baldwin AS, Stahl S. Phase 
I trial of the proteasome inhibitor PS-341 in patients with refractory hematologic 
malignancies. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20(22):4420-7.
58.
Richardson PG, Barlogie B, Berenson J, Singhal S, Jagannath S, Irwin D. A Phase 
II study of bortezomib in relapsed, refractory myeloma. N Engl J Med. 
2003;348(26):2609-17.
59.
Bladé J, Samson D, Reece D, Apperley J, Bjorkstrand B, Gahrton G. Criteria for 
evaluating disease response and progression in patients with multiple myeloma treated by 
high dose of therapy and haemopoietic stem cell transplantation. Br J Haematol. 
1998;102(5):1115-23.
60.
Jagannath S, Barlogie B, Berenson J, Siegel D, Irwin D, Richardson PG. A phase II 
study of two doses of bortezomib in relapsed or refractory myeloma. British Journal of 
Haematology. 2004;127(2):165-72.
61.
Richardson PG, Sonneveld P, Schuster MW. Bortezomib or high-dose 
dexamethasone for relapsed multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:2487-98.
62.
Richardson PG, Sonneveld P, Schuster MW. Extended follow-up of a phase 3 trial 
in relapsed multiple myeloma: final time-to-event results of the APEX trial. Blood. 
2007;110(10):3557-60.
63.
Kuhn DJ, Orlowski RZ, Bjorklund CC. Second generation proteasome inhibitors: 
carfilzomib and immunoproteasome-specific inhibitors (IPSIs). Current cancer drug 
targets. 2011 Mar;11(3):285-95.
64.
San Miguel J, Weisel K, Moreau P, Lacy M, Song K, Delforge M, et al. 
Pomalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone versus high-dose dexamethasone alone for 
patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (MM-003): a randomised, open-
label, phase 3 trial. The Lancet Oncology. 2013 Oct;14(11):1055-66.
65.
Alsina, M, Schlossman R, Weber, DM, et al. PANORAMA 2: A phase II study of 
panosbinostat in combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone in patients with 
relapsed and bortezomib-refractory multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol. 2012; 30(suppl): abstr 
8012.
CL_0256 1.0
Page 89 of 102
Protocol APL-B-022-15


66.
Hideshima T, Bradner JE, Wong J, Chauhan D, Richardson P, Schreiber SL, et al. 
Small-molecule inhibition of proteasome and aggresome function induces synergistic 
antitumor activity in multiple myeloma. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 
of the United States of America. 2005 Jun 14;102(24):8567-72.
67.
Raje N, Hari PN, Vogl DT, et al. Rocolinostat (ACY-1215), a selective HDAC6 
inhibitor, alone and in combination with bortezomib in multiple myeloma: preliminary 
results from the first-in-human phase I/II study. ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts. 2012; 
120:4061.
68.
Woessner R, Tunquist B, Cox A, et al. Combination of the KSP inhibitor ARRY-
520 with bortezomib or revlimid causes sustained tumor regressions and significantly 
increased time to regrowth in models of multiple myeloma. ASH Annual Meeting 
Abstracts. 2009; 114:2858.
69.
Shah JJ, Zonder JA, Cohen A, et al. The novel KSP inhibitor ARRY-520 is active 
both with and without low-dose dexamethasone in patients with multiple myeloma 
refractory to bortezomib and lenalidomide: results from a phase 2 study. ASH Annual 
Meeting Abstracts. 2012; 120:449.
70.
Kuroda J, Nagoshi H, Shimura Y, Taniwaki M. Elotuzumab and daratumumab: 
emerging new monoclonal antibodies for multiple myeloma. Expert review of anticancer 
therapy. 2013 Sep;13(9):1081-8.
71.
Moreau P, Pylypenko H, Grosicki S, Karamanesht I, Leleu X, Grishunina M, et al. 
Subcutaneous versus intravenous administration of bortezomib in patients with relapsed 
multiple myeloma: a randomised, phase 3, non-inferiority study. The lancet oncology. 
2011 May;12(5):431-40.
72.
Munoz-Alonso MJ, Gonzalez-Santiago L, Martinez T, Losada A, Galmarini CM, 
Munoz A. The mechanism of action of plitidepsin. Current opinion in investigational 
drugs. 2009 Jun;10(6):536-42.
73.
Morande PE, Zanetti SR, Borge M, Nannini P, Jancic C, Bezares RF, et al. The 
cytotoxic activity of Aplidin in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is mediated by a 
direct effect on leukemic cells and an indirect effect on monocyte-derived cells. 
Investigational new drugs. 2012 Oct;30(5):1830-40.
74.
Losada A, Muñoz MJ, C. G, Martinez-Leal JF, Gago F, Cuevas C, et al. eEF1A2 is 
a new target for anticancer therapy. AACR American Association for Cancer research; 
106th Annual Meeting; April 18-22, 2015. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
75.
Li Z, Qi CF, Shin DM, Zingone A, Newbery HJ, Kovalchuk AL, et al. Eef1a2 
promotes cell growth, inhibits apoptosis and activates JAK/STAT and AKT signalling in 
mouse plasmacytomas. PLOS One 5, e10755.
76.
Richardson PG, Delforge M, Beksac M, Wen P, Jongen JL, Sezer O, et al. 
Management of treatment-emergent peripheral neuropathy in multiple myeloma. 
Leukemia. 2012 Apr;26(4):595-608.
77.
Kris MG, Hesketh PJ, Somerfield MR. American Society of Clinical Oncology 
Guideline for Antiemetics in Oncology: Update 2006. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:2932-47.
78.
Smith TJ, Khatcheressian J, Lyman GH, Ozer H, Armitage JO, Balducci L, et al. 
2006 update of recommendations for the use of white blood cell growth factors: an 
evidence-based clinical practice guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2006 Jul 1;24(19):3187-205.
79.
Rajkumar SV, Harousseau JL, Durie B, Anderson KC, Dimopoulos M, Kyle R, et 
al. Consensus recommendations for the uniform reporting of clinical trials: report of the 
International Myeloma Workshop Consensus Panel 1. Blood. 2011 May 5;117(18):4691-5.
CL_0256 1.0
Page 90 of 102
Protocol APL-B-022-15


10. APPENDICES
Appendix 1. Durie-Salmon Staging Criteria
Stage
Durie-Salmon
Criteria
International Staging 
System
(ISS) Criteria
I
All of the following:

Hemoglobin value >10 g/dL

Serum calcium value normal or ≤12 mg/dL

Bone X-ray, normal bone structure (scale 0) or solitary bone 
plasmacytoma only

Low M-component production rate

IgG value <5 g/dL; IgA value <3 g/dL

Bence Jones protein <4 g/24 h
Beta-2-M<3.5 mg/L
Albumin ≥3.5 g/dL
Median survival: 62 months
II
Neither stage I nor stage III
Neither stage I nor stage III*
Median survival: 44 months
III
One or more of the following:

Hemoglobin value <8.5 g/dL

Serum calcium value >12 mg/dL

Advanced lytic bone lesions (scale 3)

High M-component production rate

IgG value >7 g/dL; IgA value >5 g/dL

Bence Jones protein >12 g/24 h
Beta-2-M > 5.5 mg/L
Median survival: 29 months
Durie-Salmon sub classifications (either A or B)
A: Relatively normal renal function (serum creatinine value <2.0 mg/dL)
B: Abnormal renal function (serum creatinine value ≥2.0 mg/dL)
*There are two categories for stage II: serum ß2-microglobulin < 3.5 mg/L but serum albumin < 3.5 g/dL; or serum ß2-
microglobulin 3.5 to < 5.5 mg/L irrespective of the serum albumin level.
CL_0256 1.0
Page 91 of 102
Protocol APL-B-022-15


Appendix 2. Performance Status
Performance Status Criteria
ECOG Performance Status Scale
Grade
Descriptions
0
Normal activity.  Fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease performance without 
restriction.
1
Symptoms, but ambulatory.  Restricted in physically strenuous activity, but 
ambulatory and able to carry out work of a light or sedentary nature (e.g., light 
housework, office work).
2
In bed <50% of the time.  Ambulatory and capable of all self-care, but unable to 
carry out any work activities.  Up and about more than 50% of waking hours.
3
In bed >50% of the time.  Capable of only limited self-care, confined to bed or chair 
more than 50% of waking hours.
4
100% bedridden.  Completely disabled.  Cannot carry on any self-care.  Totally 
confined to bed or chair.
5
Dead.
CL_0256 1.0
Page 92 of 102
Protocol APL-B-022-15


Appendix 3.  Multiple Myeloma Diagnosis Criteria
Durie-Salmon Diagnosis Criteria
Standards for diagnosis currently require confirmation of one major and one minor criteria or three minor 
criteria in a patient displaying symptoms of myeloma. 
Major criteria: 

A biopsy-proven plasmacytoma.

A BM sample showing 30% plasma cells.

Elevated monoclonal immunoglobulin levels in the blood or urine.
Minor criteria: 

A BM sample showing 10-30% plasma cells.

Minor monoclonal immunoglobulin levels in blood or urine.

Imaging studies revealing holes in bones due to tumor growth.

Antibody levels (not produced by the cancer cells) in the blood are abnormally low.
CL_0256 1.0
Page 93 of 102
Protocol APL-B-022-15


Appendix 4. Cockcroft and Gault’s Formula for Calculating Creatinine Clearance
Creatinine clearance (mL/min)  =      
[(140-age (years)) x weight (Kg)]
72 x serum creatinine (mg/dL)
xG1
Creatinine clearance (mL/min)  =    
[(140-age (years)) x weight (Kg)]
72 x serum creatinine (mol/L)
xG1x0,00113
1G(Gender)= 0.85 if Female; 1 if Male.
DW Cockcroft, H Gault. Prediction of creatinine clearance from serum creatinine. Nephron 1976; 16: 31-41.
CL_0256 1.0
Page 94 of 102
Protocol APL-B-022-15


Appendix 5.  Contraception and pregnancy testing
This document is based on the Heads of Medicines Agencies’ Recommendations Related to 
Contraception and Pregnancy Testing in Clinical Trials, published by the Clinical Trial 
Facilitation Group (CTFG) on 15 September 2014 and available at http://www.hma.eu/ctfg.html
(accessed on 17 August 2015).
A woman is considered of childbearing potential (WOCBP) following menarche and until 
becoming post-menopausal unless permanently sterile. Permanent sterilization methods 
include 
hysterectomy, 
bilateral 
salpingectomy 
and 
bilateral 
oophorectomy. 
A 
postmenopausal state is defined as no menses for 12 months without an alternative medical 
cause. A high follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) level in the postmenopausal range may 
be used to confirm a post-menopausal state in women not using hormonal contraception or 
hormonal replacement therapy. However, in the absence of 12 months of amenorrhea, a 
single FSH measurement is insufficient. Immediately after detecting a case of suspected 
pregnancy in a patient, the decision on her continued participation in the clinical trial will 
be jointly taken by the patient, the Investigator and the Sponsor, with the patient’s best 
interest in mind. A decision to continue the pregnancy will require immediate 
discontinuation of any IMP. 
A man is considered fertile after puberty unless permanently sterile by bilateral 
orchidectomy. Fertile male patients included in this trial should refrain from fathering a 
child or donating sperm during the trial and for six months following the last IMP dose. If 
they have WOCBP partners the male subject should use condom during treatment and for 
four months following the last IMP dose. 
Highly effective birth control methods are:
1. Combined (estrogen and progestogen containing) hormonal contraception 
associated with inhibition of ovulation1
a. oral 
b. intravaginal 
c. transdermal 
2. Progestogen-only hormonal contraception associated with inhibition of ovulation 1: 
a. oral 
b. injectable
c. implantable2
3. Intrauterine device (IUD)2
4. Intrauterine hormone-releasing system (IUS)2
5. Bilateral tubal occlusion2  
6. Vasectomized partner2,3
7. Sexual abstinence4
                                                          
1 Hormonal contraception may be susceptible to interaction with the IMP, which may reduce the efficacy of the 
contraception method (see below).
2 Contraception methods that are considered to have low user dependency.
3 Vasectomized partner is a highly effective birth control method provided that partner is the sole sexual partner of the 
WOCBP trial participant and that the vasectomized partner has received medical assessment of the surgical success.
4 Sexual abstinence is considered a highly effective method only if defined as refraining from heterosexual intercourse 
during the entire period of risk associated with the study treatments. The reliability of sexual abstinence needs to be 
evaluated in relation to the duration of the clinical trial and the preferred and usual lifestyle of the subject. Periodic 
abstinence (calendar, symptothermal, post-ovulation methods), withdrawal (coitus interruptus), spermicides only, and 
lactational amenorrhea method (LAM) are not acceptable methods of contraception. Female condom and male condom 
should not be used together.
CL_0256 1.0
Page 95 of 102
Protocol APL-B-022-15


8. A combination of a male condom with either a cervical cap, a diaphragm or a 
sponge with spermicide (double barrier methods) are also considered acceptable, 
but not highly effective, birth control methods.
Contraception methods with low user dependency should preferably be used, in particular 
when contraception is introduced as a result of participation in this trial. It cannot be 
excluded that the IMP may reduce exposure to substrates of CYP3A through enzyme 
induction; the efficacy of hormonal contraceptives may be reduced if co-administered with 
this drug.
CL_0256 1.0
Page 96 of 102
Protocol APL-B-022-15


Appendix 6. Prognostic factors and risk-stratification in myeloma
Prognostic determinant
Standard-risk
High-risk
Therapeutic 
implication
Host factors
ECOG PS 0-2
ECOG PS 3-4
High-risk patients 
typically require a 
decrease in treatment 
intensity
Normal renal function
Renal failure (serum
creatinine ≥ 2.0)
Advanced age
Tumor burden
Durie-Salmon stage I, II
Durie-Salmon stage III
Limited; some stage I 
patients require no 
therapy (smoldering 
myeloma, and some 
require radiation only (if 
solitary bone lesion)
Tumor biology (disease 
aggressiveness)
Hyperdiploidy
t(4;14)*
Treatment of high-risk 
patients remains 
unsatisfactory, but 
bortezomib appears to 
overcome some high-risk 
features (t4;14)
t(11;14)
t(14;16)
t(6;14)
t(14;20)
del17p
High LDH
High plasma cell 
proliferative rate
High-risk signature on 
GEP
Modified from Rajkumar et al with permission.
ECOG PS, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase.
*t(4;14) is considered “intermediate-risk” based on improved results seen now with bortezomib-based initial 
therapy.
Full details available in the full publication: Bergsagel PL, Mateos MV, Gutierrez, NC, 
Rajkumar SV and San Miguel JF. Improving overall survival and overcoming adverse 
prognosis in the treatment of cytogenetically high-risk multiple myeloma. Blood 2013; 
121: 884-892
CL_0256 1.0
Page 97 of 102
Protocol APL-B-022-15


Appendix 7. Declaration of Helsinki
WORLD MEDICAL ASSOCIATION DECLARATION OF HELSINKI
Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects
Adopted by the 18th WMA General Assembly, Helsinki, Finland, June 1964
and amended by the:
29th WMA General Assembly, Tokyo, Japan, October 1975
35th WMA General Assembly, Venice, Italy, October 1983
41st WMA General Assembly, Hong Kong, September 1989
48th WMA General Assembly, Somerset West, Republic of South Africa, October 1996
52nd WMA General Assembly, Edinburgh, Scotland, October 2000
53rd WMA General Assembly, Washington DC, USA, October 2002 (Note of 
Clarification added)
55th WMA General Assembly, Tokyo, Japan, October 2004 (Note of Clarification added)
59th WMA General Assembly, Seoul, Republic of Korea, October 2008
64th WMA General Assembly, Fortaleza, Brazil, October 2013
Preamble
1) The World Medical Association (WMA) has developed the Declaration of Helsinki as 
a statement of ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects, 
including research on identifiable human material and data.
The Declaration is intended to be read as a whole and each of its constituent 
paragraphs should be applied with consideration of all other relevant paragraphs.
2) Consistent with the mandate of the WMA, the Declaration is addressed primarily to 
physicians. The WMA encourages others who are involved in medical research 
involving human subjects to adopt these principles.
General Principles
3) The Declaration of Geneva of the WMA binds the physician with the words, “The 
health of my patient will be my first consideration,” and the International Code of 
Medical Ethics declares that, “A physician shall act in the patient's best interest when 
providing medical care.”
4) It is the duty of the physician to promote and safeguard the health, well-being and 
rights of patients, including those who are involved in medical research. The 
physician's knowledge and conscience are dedicated to the fulfilment of this duty.
5) Medical progress is based on research that ultimately must include studies involving 
human subjects.
6) The primary purpose of medical research involving human subjects is to understand 
the causes, development and effects of diseases and improve preventive, diagnostic 
and therapeutic interventions (methods, procedures and treatments). Even the best 
proven interventions must be evaluated continually through research for their safety, 
effectiveness, efficiency, accessibility and quality.
7) Medical research is subject to ethical standards that promote and ensure respect for all 
human subjects and protect their health and rights.
8) While the primary purpose of medical research is to generate new knowledge, this 
goal can never take precedence over the rights and interests of individual research 
subjects.
CL_0256 1.0
Page 98 of 102
Protocol APL-B-022-15


9) It is the duty of physicians who are involved in medical research to protect the life, 
health, dignity, integrity, right to self-determination, privacy, and confidentiality of 
personal information of research subjects. The responsibility for the protection of 
research subjects must always rest with the physician or other health care 
professionals and never with the research subjects, even though they have given 
consent.
10) Physicians must consider the ethical, legal and regulatory norms and standards for 
research involving human subjects in their own countries as well as applicable 
international norms and standards. No national or international ethical, legal or 
regulatory requirement should reduce or eliminate any of the protections for research 
subjects set forth in this Declaration.
11) Medical research should be conducted in a manner that minimizes possible harm to 
the environment.
12) Medical research involving human subjects must be conducted only by individuals 
with the appropriate ethics and scientific education, training and qualifications. 
Research on patients or healthy volunteers requires the supervision of a competent 
and appropriately qualified physician or other health care professional.
13) Groups that are underrepresented in medical research should be provided appropriate 
access to participation in research.
14) Physicians who combine medical research with medical care should involve their 
patients in research only to the extent that this is justified by its potential preventive, 
diagnostic or therapeutic value and if the physician has good reason to believe that 
participation in the research study will not adversely affect the health of the patients 
who serve as research subjects.
15) Appropriate compensation and treatment for subjects who are harmed as a result of 
participating in research must be ensured.
Risks, Burdens and Benefits
16) In medical practice and in medical research, most interventions involve risks and 
burdens.
Medical research involving human subjects may only be conducted if the importance 
of the objective outweighs the risks and burdens to the research subjects.
17) All medical research involving human subjects must be preceded by careful 
assessment of predictable risks and burdens to the individuals and groups involved in 
the research in comparison with foreseeable benefits to them and to other individuals 
or groups affected by the condition under investigation.
Measures to minimize the risks must be implemented. The risks must be continuously 
monitored, assessed and documented by the researcher.
18) Physicians may not be involved in a research study involving human subjects unless 
they are confident that the risks have been adequately assessed and can be 
satisfactorily managed.
When the risks are found to outweigh the potential benefits or when there is 
conclusive proof of definitive outcomes, physicians must assess whether to continue, 
modify or immediately stop the study.
Vulnerable Groups and Individuals
19) Some groups and individuals are particularly vulnerable and may have an increased 
likelihood of being wronged or of incurring additional harm.
CL_0256 1.0
Page 99 of 102
Protocol APL-B-022-15


All vulnerable groups and individuals should receive specifically considered 
protection.
20) Medical research with a vulnerable group is only justified if the research is responsive 
to the health needs or priorities of this group and the research cannot be carried out in 
a non-vulnerable group. In addition, this group should stand to benefit from the 
knowledge, practices or interventions that result from the research.
Scientific Requirements and Research Protocols
21) Medical research involving human subjects must conform to generally accepted 
scientific principles, be based on a thorough knowledge of the scientific literature, 
other relevant sources of information, and adequate laboratory and, as appropriate, 
animal experimentation. The welfare of animals used for research must be respected.
22) The design and performance of each research study involving human subjects must be 
clearly described and justified in a research protocol.
The protocol should contain a statement of the ethical considerations involved and 
should indicate how the principles in this Declaration have been addressed. The 
protocol should include information regarding funding, sponsors, institutional 
affiliations, potential conflicts of interest, incentives for subjects and information 
regarding provisions for treating and/or compensating subjects who are harmed as a 
consequence of participation in the research study.
In clinical trials, the protocol must also describe appropriate arrangements for post-
trial provisions.
Research Ethics Committees
23) The research protocol must be submitted for consideration, comment, guidance and 
approval to the concerned research ethics committee before the study begins. This 
committee must be transparent in its functioning, must be independent of the 
researcher, the sponsor and any other undue influence and must be duly qualified. It 
must take into consideration the laws and regulations of the country or countries in 
which the research is to be performed as well as applicable international norms and 
standards but these must not be allowed to reduce or eliminate any of the protections 
for research subjects set forth in this Declaration.
The committee must have the right to monitor ongoing studies. The researcher must 
provide monitoring information to the committee, especially information about any 
serious adverse events. No amendment to the protocol may be made without 
consideration and approval by the committee. After the end of the study, the 
researchers must submit a final report to the committee containing a summary of the 
study’s findings and conclusions.
Privacy and Confidentiality
24) Every precaution must be taken to protect the privacy of research subjects and the 
confidentiality of their personal information.
Informed Consent
25) Participation by individuals capable of giving informed consent as subjects in medical 
research must be voluntary. Although it may be appropriate to consult family 
members or community leaders, no individual capable of giving informed consent 
may be enrolled in a research study unless he or she freely agrees.
26) In medical research involving human subjects capable of giving informed consent, 
each potential subject must be adequately informed of the aims, methods, sources of 
funding, any possible conflicts of interest, institutional affiliations of the researcher, 
CL_0256 1.0
Page 100 of 102
Protocol APL-B-022-15


the anticipated benefits and potential risks of the study and the discomfort it may 
entail, post-study provisions and any other relevant aspects of the study. The potential 
subject must be informed of the right to refuse to participate in the study or to 
withdraw consent to participate at any time without reprisal. Special attention should 
be given to the specific information needs of individual potential subjects as well as to 
the methods used to deliver the information.
After ensuring that the potential subject has understood the information, the physician 
or another appropriately qualified individual must then seek the potential subject’s 
freely-given informed consent, preferably in writing. If the consent cannot be 
expressed in writing, the non-written consent must be formally documented and 
witnessed.
  
All medical research subjects should be given the option of being informed about the 
general outcome and results of the study.
27) When seeking informed consent for participation in a research study the physician 
must be particularly cautious if the potential subject is in a dependent relationship 
with the physician or may consent under duress. In such situations the informed 
consent must be sought by an appropriately qualified individual who is completely 
independent of this relationship.
28) For a potential research subject who is incapable of giving informed consent, the 
physician must seek informed consent from the legally authorized representative. 
These individuals must not be included in a research study that has no likelihood of 
benefit for them unless it is intended to promote the health of the group represented by 
the potential subject, the research cannot instead be performed with persons capable 
of providing informed consent, and the research entails only minimal risk and 
minimal burden.
29) When a potential research subject who is deemed incapable of giving informed 
consent is able to give assent to decisions about participation in research, the 
physician must seek that assent in addition to the consent of the legally authorized 
representative. The potential subject’s dissent should be respected.
30) Research involving subjects who are physically or mentally incapable of giving 
consent, for example, unconscious patients, may be done only if the physical or 
mental condition that prevents giving informed consent is a necessary characteristic of 
the research group. In such circumstances the physician must seek informed consent 
from the legally authorized representative. If no such representative is available and if 
the research cannot be delayed, the study may proceed without informed consent 
provided that the specific reasons for involving subjects with a condition that renders 
them unable to give informed consent have been stated in the research protocol and 
the study has been approved by a research ethics committee. Consent to remain in the 
research must be obtained as soon as possible from the subject or a legally authorized 
representative.
31) The physician must fully inform the patient which aspects of their care are related to 
the research. The refusal of a patient to participate in a study or the patient’s decision 
to withdraw from the study must never adversely affect the patient-physician 
relationship.
32) For medical research using identifiable human material or data, such as research on 
material or data contained in biobanks or similar repositories, physicians must seek 
informed consent for its collection, storage and/or reuse. There may be exceptional 
situations where consent would be impossible or impracticable to obtain for such 
CL_0256 1.0
Page 101 of 102
Protocol APL-B-022-15


research. In such situations the research may be done only after consideration and 
approval of a research ethics committee.
Use of Placebo
33) The benefits, risks, burdens and effectiveness of a new intervention must be tested 
against those of the best proven intervention(s), except in the following 
circumstances:
Where no proven intervention exists, the use of placebo, or no intervention, is 
acceptable; or
Where for compelling and scientifically sound methodological reasons the use of any 
intervention less effective than the best proven one, the use of placebo, or no 
intervention is necessary to determine the efficacy or safety of an intervention and the 
patients who receive any intervention less effective than the best proven one, placebo, 
or no intervention will not be subject to additional risks of serious or irreversible harm 
as a result of not receiving the best proven intervention.
Extreme care must be taken to avoid abuse of this option.
Post-Trial Provisions
34) In advance of a clinical trial, sponsors, researchers and host country governments 
should make provisions for post-trial access for all participants who still need an 
intervention identified as beneficial in the trial. This information must also be 
disclosed to participants during the informed consent process.
Research Registration and Publication and Dissemination of Results
35) Every research study involving human subjects must be registered in a publicly 
accessible database before recruitment of the first subject.
36) Researchers, authors, sponsors, editors and publishers all have ethical obligations with 
regard to the publication and dissemination of the results of research. Researchers 
have a duty to make publicly available the results of their research on human subjects 
and are accountable for the completeness and accuracy of their reports. All parties 
should adhere to accepted guidelines for ethical reporting. Negative and inconclusive 
as well as positive results must be published or otherwise made publicly available. 
Sources of funding, institutional affiliations and conflicts of interest must be declared 
in the publication. Reports of research not in accordance with the principles of this 
Declaration should not be accepted for publication.
Unproven Interventions in Clinical Practice
37) In the treatment of an individual patient, where proven interventions do not exist or 
other known interventions have been ineffective, the physician, after seeking expert 
advice, with informed consent from the patient or a legally authorized representative, 
may use an unproven intervention if in the physician's judgment it offers hope of 
saving life, re-establishing health or alleviating suffering. This intervention should 
subsequently be made the object of research, designed to evaluate its safety and 
efficacy. In all cases, new information must be recorded and, where appropriate, made 
publicly available.
CL_0256 1.0
Page 102 of 102
Protocol APL-B-022-15

SAP_001.pdf: 
CL_0289 1.0
Page 1 of 46
SAP APL-B-022-15
APL-B-022-15
(NCT03117361)
A Phase II Trial of Plitidepsin (Aplidin®) in Combination with Bortezomib 
and Dexamethasone in Multiple Myeloma Patients Double Refractory to 
Bortezomib and Lenalidomide 
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS PLAN
Version: 1.0
Date: 13-December-2016


CL_0289 1.0
Page 2 of 46
SAP APL-B-022-15
2 of 46
TABLE OF CONTENTS 
1
STUDY RATIONALE
6
2
STUDY DESIGN
6
3
OBJECTIVES AND ENDPOINTS
7
3.1
Primary Objective
7
3.2
Secondary Objectives
7
3.3
Endpoints
7
4
PATIENTS EVALUABILITY CRITERIA
8
4.1
Definition of Patient Sets for Analysis
8
5
SAMPLE CONSIDERATIONS
8
6
STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY FOR EFFICACY
9
6.1
Planned Analyses and Definitions
9
6.1.1
Primary Endpoint
9
6.1.2
Secondary Endpoints
9
6.1.3
Other Definitions
9
6.2
Efficacy Analysis Methods
10
6.2.1
Primary Analysis
10
6.2.2
Secondary Analyses
10
6.2.3
Other Exploratory Analyses
10
7
STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY FOR SAFETY
10
7.1
Adverse Events
10
7.2
Clinical Laboratory Evaluation
11
7.3
Vital Signs, Physical Examination, Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) and 
Electrocardiogram Findings
12
7.4
Deaths and Other Serious Adverse Events
12
8
OTHER ANALYSES
12
8.1
Baseline and Demographic Data
12
8.2
Treatment Administration
12
8.3
Subsequent Therapy
13
8.4
Protocol Deviations
13
8.5
Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Analyses
13
8.6
Pharmacogenomic Analyses
13
8.7
Decimal Places
13
8.8
Imputation of Incomplete Dates
13
8.9
Subgroup Analyses
14
8.10
Methods for Handling Missing Data
14
8.11
Interim and Group Sequential Analyses
14
8.12
Data Analysis Conventions
14
9
STATISTICAL SOFTWARE
14
APPENDIX I
15
10
Study Patients
15
10.1
Patient Disposition
15
10.2
Reasons for Treatment and Study Discontinuation
16
10.3
Protocol Deviations
17


CL_0289 1.0
Page 3 of 46
SAP APL-B-022-15
3 of 46
11
Efficacy Evaluation
17
11.1
Demographic and Other Baseline Characteristics
17
11.1.1
Patient Characteristics at Baseline
17
11.1.2
Disease at Diagnosis, Time from Diagnosis and Current Disease
18
11.1.3
Cytogenetics
19
11.1.4
Prior Anticancer Therapy
19
11.1.5
Physical Examination, Vital Signs, Electrocardiogram and Other Tests
20
11.1.6
Viral Serology
22
11.1.7
Hematological Values at Baseline
23
11.1.8
Biochemical Values at Baseline
23
11.1.9
Other Metabolic Values at Baseline
24
11.1.10
Signs and Symptoms at Baseline
24
11.1.11
Concomitant Medication/Procedures at Baseline
24
11.2
Efficacy Analysis
25
11.2.1
Primary Analysis
25
11.2.2
Secondary Analyses
25
11.2.3
Other Exploratory Analyses
26
11.2.4
Characteristics of Responders
27
11.2.5
Multivariate analyses
27
12
Safety Analysis
29
12.1
Extent of Exposure
29
12.1.1
Treatment Administration
29
12.1.2
Cycle Delays
29
12.1.3
Dose Omissions
31
12.1.4
Dose Reductions
31
12.2
Adverse Events (AEs)
32
12.2.1
Display of Adverse Events
32
12.3
Serious Adverse Events and deaths.
35
12.3.1
Serious Adverse Events
35
12.3.2
Deaths
36
12.4
Clinical laboratory evaluation
37
12.4.1
Hematological Abnormalities
37
12.4.2
Biochemical Abnormalities
38
12.4.3
Other metabolic parameters
39
12.4.4
Laboratory values over time
39
12.5
Vital Signs, Physical Findings, LVEF, ECG and Other Tests Related to Safety
41
12.5.1
Vital Signs and Physical Findings
41
12.5.2
LVEF and ECG
42
12.6
Concomitant Medication / Procedures according to the ATC Classification. 42
12.7
Safety Analysis in Special Subgroups.
43
12.8
MM Serum/Urine Protein Measurements
44
13
DB Listings
45
14
ICH Listings
46


CL_0289 1.0
Page 4 of 46
SAP APL-B-022-15
4 of 46
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND DEFINITION OF TERMS
AE(s)
Adverse Event(s)
ALT
Alanine Aminotransferase
AP
Alkaline Phosphatase
ASCT
Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation
AST
Aspartate Aminotransferase
ATC
Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical
ATC-WHO
Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical Drug Classification by the 
World Health Organization
BM
Bone Marrow
BSA
Body Surface Area
CBR
Clinical Benefit Rate
CI
Confidence Interval
CMV
Cytomegalovirus
CPK
Creatine Phosphokinase
CPK-MB
Serum CPK Isoenzymes (Found In Cardiac Muscle)
CR
Complete Response
CrCl
Creatinine Clearance
CRF
Case Report Form
CTCAE
Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events
D
Day
DB
Data Base
DLT
Dose Limiting Toxicity
DOR
Duration of Response
ECG
Electrocardiogram
ECHO
Echocardiogram 
ECOG PS 
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status 
e-CRF
Electronic Case Report Form
EFS
Event-free Survival
EOT
End-of-treatment
G-CSF
Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor
GGT
ɣ-glutamyl Transpeptidase
H
Hour
HBV
Hepatitis B virus
HCG
Human Chorionic Gonadotropin
HCV
Hepatitis C virus
HDT
High Dose Chemotherapy
HIV
Human Immunodeficiency Virus
HLA
Human Leukocyte Antigen
HSCT
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation 
ICH
International Conference on Harmonization
IMWG
International Myeloma Working Group
Ig
Immunoglobulin


CL_0289 1.0
Page 5 of 46
SAP APL-B-022-15
5 of 46
IMIDs
Immunomodulatory Drugs
IMP
Investigational Medicinal Product
ISS
International Staging System
i.v
Intravenous
LDH
Lactate Dehydrogenase
LVEF
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction
MedDRA AE
Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities for Adverse Events
MM
Multiple Myeloma
MOA
Mechanism of action
MR
Minimal Response
MUGA scan
Multiple Uptake Gated Acquisition Scan
NA
Not Applicable
NCI-CTCAE
National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria
NOS
Not Otherwise Specified
ORR
Objective Response Rate
OS
Overall Survival
OS6
Overall Survival Rate at 6 Months
OS12
Overall Survival Rate at 12 Months
PCR  
Polymerase Chain Reaction 
PD
Progressive Disease
PDy
Pharmacodynamics
PFS 
Progression-free Survival
PGx
Pharmacogenomics
PI
Proteasome Inhibitor
PK
Pharmacokinetics
PN
Peripheral Neuropathy
PR
Partial Response
PS
Performance Status
R-ISS
Revised International Staging System
RR
Response Rate
SAE(s)
Serious Adverse Event(s)
s.c.
Subcutaneous
sCR
Stringent Complete Response
SD
Stable Disease
SFLC
Serum Free Light Chains
SOC
System Organ Class
StD
Standard Deviation
TTP
Time To Progression
VGPR
Very Good Partial Response
WBC
White Blood Cells
wk
Week(s)
WOCBP
Woman/Women of Childbearing Potential


CL_0289 1.0
Page 6 of 46
SAP APL-B-022-15
6 of 46
1
STUDY RATIONALE

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a malignant plasma-cell disorder characterized by the 
production of a monoclonal protein from plasma cells in the bone marrow (BM).

In the Western hemisphere, about 1% of cancer-related deaths are due to myeloma.

MM is still an incurable disease. As front-line treatment to reduce tumor burden, 
hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) as well as emergent drugs used in 
newly diagnosed patients offer the best chance for long-term survival. However, 
while many studies have shown the benefits of this approach, most patients will 
relapse. Thus, additional therapeutic options are needed for these patients.
A full rationale for the study design including the choice of the double refractory patient 
population and the use of the combination of plitidepsin with
bortezomib and 
dexamethasone may be found in the appropriate sections of the study clinical protocol
(section 1.5).
2
STUDY DESIGN
This is a multi-center, open-label, single arm, non-comparative phase II trial, designed to 
evaluate the efficacy of plitidepsin in combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone in 
patients with MM double refractory to bortezomib and lenalidomide. Plitidepsin will be 
administered as a 3-hour (h) i.v. infusion at a dose of 5 mg/m2, on Day (D) 1 and 15, q4wk, 
bortezomib will be administered as a s.c. injection at a dose of 1.3 mg/m2 on D1, 4, 8 and 
11, q4wk and dexamethasone will be taken orally at a dose of 40 mg/day on D1, 8, 15 and 
22, q4wk.
Patients will be evaluated at scheduled visits in three trial periods: pre-treatment, treatment 
and follow-up.
The pre-treatment period includes screening and baseline visits. Baseline assessment 
consists of a detailed history of pre-existing diseases, physical examination and clinical 
neurological assessment, ECOG PS, ECG, LVEF and laboratory tests, urinalysis, hepatitis 
B and C virus screening and serum pregnancy tests for WOCBP.
During the treatment period, all patients are to attend trial center visits on Day 1, 4, 8, 11 
and 15 on an every four-week basis to assess safety and toxicity. All patients are to attend 
an end-of-treatment (EOT) visit 30 (±5) days after the last dose of trial therapy.
A cycle is defined as 28 days, plus any additional days required for dosing delays due to 
any reason. 
After completion of the treatment period or in case of discontinuation, patients are to attend 
follow-up visits. Patients will be followed for AEs during 30 days after the last 
administration of trial drug and until their resolution. In addition, patients will be followed 
every three months to assess disease status.
A full description for the study may be found in the appropriate sections of the study 
clinical protocol.


CL_0289 1.0
Page 7 of 46
SAP APL-B-022-15
7 of 46
3
OBJECTIVES AND ENDPOINTS
3.1
Primary Objective

To evaluate the efficacy of plitidepsin in combination with bortezomib and 
dexamethasone in patients with MM double refractory to bortezomib and lenalidomide 
in terms of overall response rate (ORR), including stringent complete response (sCR), 
complete response (CR), very good partial response (VGPR) and partial response (PR).
3.2
Secondary Objectives

To evaluate time-to-event efficacy endpoints of plitidepsin in combination with 
bortezomib and dexamethasone, i.e., duration of response (DOR), time to progression 
(TTP), progression-free survival (PFS) and event-free survival (EFS).

To evaluate overall survival (OS) and OS rate at 6 and 12 months (OS6 and OS12, 
respectively).

To evaluate the safety and tolerability of plitidepsin in combination with bortezomib 
and dexamethasone.

To study the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PDy) of plitidepsin in 
combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone.

To obtain pharmacogenomic information (Pharmacogenomics [PGx]) on markers of 
response to plitidepsin and bortezomib treatment.
3.3
Endpoints
Primary endpoint: 

ORR, defined as the percentage of patients with sCR , CR , VGPR or PR according to 
IMWG response criteria.
Secondary endpoints: 

DOR, defined as the time from the first observation of response to the time of PD, with 
censoring of deaths due to causes other than PD

TTP, defined as the time from the date of first drug administration to the date of PD.

PFS, defined as the time from the date of first drug administration to the date of PD or 
death (of any cause).

EFS, defined as the time from the date of first drug administration to the date of drug-
related events leading to treatment discontinuation, PD or death (of any cause), 
whichever comes first.

OS, defined as the time from the date of the first dose to the date of death or last patient 
contact.

OS6 / OS12, defined as the Kaplan-Meier estimate of the percentage of patients who 
are alive at six/twelve months after first drug administration.
Treatment safety [AEs, SAEs and laboratory abnormalities] graded according to the NCI-
CTCAE, v. 4. Dose reductions, skipped doses or dose delays required due to treatment-
related AEs, and reasons for treatment discontinuations will be analyzed.
Other supportive exploratory endpoints are defined in section 6.1.3.


CL_0289 1.0
Page 8 of 46
SAP APL-B-022-15
8 of 46
4
PATIENTS EVALUABILITY CRITERIA
The study population will include patients with MM double refractory to bortezomib and 
lenalidomide. To be enrolled in this study, the patients must meet all inclusion criteria and 
no exclusion criteria.
4.1
Definition of Patient Sets for Analysis
“All Included Patients” analysis set is defined as all patients who are included in the study
(excluding screening failures), independent of whether they received the study drug.
“All Evaluable for Safety Patients” analysis set is defined as all included patients who 
receive at least part of one dose or infusion of plitidepsin.
“All Evaluable for Efficacy Patients” analysis set is defined as all included patients who 
receive at least one complete treatment cycle (two plitidepsin infusions, four bortezomib 
injections, four doses of dexamethasone), or the equivalent doses over two cycles and must 
have had at least one disease assessment.
“All Responder Patients” analysis set is defined as all evaluable patients for efficacy who 
have partial response or better as overall best response.
5
SAMPLE CONSIDERATIONS 
Patients will be treated to test the null hypothesis (H0) that 20% or fewer patients achieve a 
response according to IMWG criteria (p 0.20) versus the alternative hypothesis (H1) that 
40% or more patients achieve a response according to IMWG criteria (p ≥ 0.40). The 
variance of the standardized test will be based on the empirical estimate. The type I error 
rate (alpha) associated with this one-sided test is 0.025 and the type II error rate (beta) is 
0.1; hence, statistical power is 90%. In order to test these hypotheses, it is necessary to 
recruit 64 evaluable patients. 
A futility analysis based on the primary endpoint (ORR) is planned for the time when the 
first 20 evaluable patients have been recruited. The futility analysis will commence once 
patient number 20 has completed two full treatment cycles. Patient recruitment will not be 
halted during the conduct of this futility analysis. A spending function defined by the 
Gamma family with parameter (-2) has been selected. If there are two or fewer responders 
according to boundaries and sample size assumptions, then the alternative hypothesis could 
be rejected and recruitment might be stopped at that time. Otherwise, patient accrual will 
continue to a total of 64 patients. 
Overall, if ≥ 21 (i.e., 33%) patients achieve a response, then the null hypothesis can be 
rejected.


CL_0289 1.0
Page 9 of 46
SAP APL-B-022-15
9 of 46
6
STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY FOR EFFICACY
6.1
Planned Analyses and Definitions
Frequency tables will be performed for categorical variables, whereas continuous variables 
will be described by means of summary tables that will include the mean, standard 
deviation (StD), median, minimum, and maximum of each variable.
The “All Evaluable for Efficacy Patients” analysis set will be used for the analyses of ORR, 
TTP, PFS, EFS, OS, clinical benefit rate (CBR) and disease control rate (DCR).
The “All Responder Patients” analysis set will be used for the analyses of the DOR and 
time to response.
6.1.1
Primary Endpoint
The ORR is calculated as the percentage of the number of responders, based on the IMWG
response criteria, divided by the total number of patients. 
6.1.2
Secondary Endpoints
The DOR will be analyzed for all patients in whom a response has been observed and is 
defined as the time, in months, from the date of first documentation of response to the date 
of disease progression. Response will be assessed according to the IMWG classification 
response criteria. Deaths due to causes other than PD will be censored.
TTP is defined as the time, in months, from the date of the first infusion to the date of 
documented PD or death due to PD. TTP will be censored on the date of the last tumor 
assessment or on the date of the first drug administration if there are no tumor assessments.
PFS is defined as the time, in months, from the date of first drug administration to the date 
of documented PD, or death (of any cause). If any patient is lost to follow-up before PD or 
receives another antitumor therapy, PFS will be censored on the date of the last tumor 
assessment. If there are no tumor assessments, these parameters will be censored on the 
date of the first drug administration.
EFS is defined as the time, in months, from the date of first drug administration to the date 
of onset of the first drug-related event leading to treatment discontinuation, documented PD 
or death. The censoring rules defined above for PFS will be used for EFS.
OS, defined as the time, in months, from the date of first drug administration to the date of 
death (of any cause) or last patient contact (in this case, survival will be censored on that 
date).
OS6/OS12, defined as the Kaplan-Meier estimate of the percentage of patients who are 
alive at six/twelve months after first drug administration.
6.1.3
Other Definitions
CBR was defined in the protocol as SD or better but to homogenize with nowadays 
standard practice it has been considered to report it as MR or better. Nevertheless, to 
maintain the definition in the protocol, it will be called DCR for the analyses and it is 
defined as SD or better.


CL_0289 1.0
Page 10 of 46
SAP APL-B-022-15
10 of 46
Duration of Minor Response, defined as the time, in months, from the first observation of 
MR to the time of PD, with censoring of deaths due to causes other than PD.
Time to response, defined as the time, in months, from the first drug administration to the 
first documentation of response.
6.2
Efficacy Analysis Methods
6.2.1
Primary Analysis
For the evaluation of the primary endpoint, ORR, the exact binomial estimator (count and 
percentage) including its 95% confidence interval will be used.
6.2.2
Secondary Analyses
Time-to-event variables (DOR, TTP, PFS, EFS and OS) and their fixed time estimates (i.e. 
OS6 and OS12) will be analyzed according to the Kaplan-Meier method.
Multivariate analyses by logistic regression could be carried out for ORR, and Cox 
regression for time-to-event endpoints, as supportive analysis.
If appropriate, exploratory multivariate models (e.g. Logistic/Cox regression) will include 
prognostic factors/covariates widely reported and recognized by hematologist such as: sex, 
age at diagnosis, baseline ECOG, Body Surface Area, MM type, number of prior lines of 
anti-myeloma treatment, previous SCT, cytogenetics and/or other covariates according to 
the hematologist’s criteria. 
6.2.3
Other Exploratory Analyses
The CBR is calculated as patients with sCR, CR, VGPR, PR, MR divided by the number of 
patients. The DCR is calculated as patients with sCR, CR, VGPR, PR, MR or SD divided 
by the number of patients.
Duration of minor response and time to response will be analyzed according to the Kaplan-
Meier method.
Waterfall plot will be used to describe the maximum reduction of M-protein in serum and 
urine.
7
STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY FOR SAFETY
The analysis of the secondary endpoint treatment safety will be based on the “All Evaluable 
for Safety Patients” analysis set.
7.1
Adverse Events
All the adverse events will be coded using the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities 
(MedDRA).
The adverse event evaluation will be coded with the National Cancer Institute-Common 
Toxicity Criteria (NCI-CTC), version 4.


CL_0289 1.0
Page 11 of 46
SAP APL-B-022-15
11 of 46
As far as all the adverse events are concerned, the NCI-CTC grade will be used wherever 
an NCI-CTC grading exists. Otherwise, the severity will be noted. As a convention, the 
term «Grade» will always be used. Adverse events will be described according to the worst 
NCI-CTC grade or, for events which do not form the subject of NCI-CTC classification, 
according to the worst severity.
AEs reported in EOT visit will be imputed to last cycle.
An overall summary of adverse events will be done by body system and preferred term, by 
severity (worst toxicity grade), by relationship to the study drug/s (drug related or 
relationship unknown / all adverse events regardless of relationship), and by AE outcome. 
Only events reported by the Investigator as ‘not related to plitidepsin +/- bortezomib +/-
dexamethasone’ will be excluded from the trial analysis of drug-related events. A second 
set of tables including all events will also be presented, and a third set of tables including 
treatment emergent events will also be presented.
A frequency table will be made for the AEs leading to cycle delay, dose reduction, dose 
omission, or withdrawal of study medication. Adverse events with outcome of death will 
also be presented by relationship to the study drugs.
All events entered in Adverse Event form with the onset date before the first drug 
administration, will be reported as Signs and symptoms. Only those events with start date 
after or on the date of first infusion will be included in AE tables in Safety section (except 
those already present at baseline).
7.2
Clinical Laboratory Evaluation
Laboratory results will be classified according to the NCI-CTC version 4. 
For hematology values: absolute neutrophil count, lymphocyte count, WBC count, platelet 
count and hemoglobin worst grade per patient and per cycle will be displayed. 
Laboratory results reported during the EOT visit will be imputed to last cycle.
Overall cross tabulation will be used to present the worst grade during treatment versus the 
baseline toxicity grade
for anemia, lymphopenia, leukopenia, neutropenia and 
thrombocytopenia, and also versus treatment-emergent events (i.e., those that worsened or 
appeared for the first time during treatment).
The worst grade per patient during treatment and per cycle will also be calculated for 
biochemical tests: ALT, AST, total bilirubin, AP, CPK, GGT, creatinine, calcium
(corrected by albumin levels), potassium, sodium, magnesium, glucose and albumin.
Time and duration of AST, ALT and CPK increases, platelet count and neutrophil count in 
cycles with grade 3-4 abnormality will be tabulated.
Overall cross tabulation will be presented for the worst grade during treatment versus the 
baseline toxicity grade of AST, ALT, bilirubin, creatinine, AP, CPK and electrolytes; and 
also versus treatment-emergent events.


CL_0289 1.0
Page 12 of 46
SAP APL-B-022-15
12 of 46
7.3
Vital Signs, Physical Examination, Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) and 
Electrocardiogram Findings
Tabulation will be used to summarize the performance status, body weight, and LVEF and 
electrocardiogram abnormalities at baseline and during the treatment, if appropriate, for 
each patient.
7.4
Deaths and Other Serious Adverse Events
Deaths and Serious Adverse Events will be tabulated according to their relationship with 
the study treatment and time from last dose (<=30d / > 30d).
8
OTHER ANALYSES
Categorical variables will be described in frequency tables using counts and percentages. 
Continuous variables will be described by median, mean, standard deviation, minimum and 
maximum.
8.1
Baseline and Demographic Data
Baseline data such as demographics, multiple myeloma history, prior therapy, prior relevant 
history, signs and symptoms, electrocardiogram, LVEF, laboratory values and concomitant 
medication (ATC-WHO coded) will be described following standard tables detailed in 
Appendix I. When two or more assessments have been done for the same parameter/test, 
the last assessment before or on the first drug administration will be taken into account for 
the analysis.
8.2
Treatment Administration
Total cumulative dose, time on treatment, dose intensity and relative dose intensity, cycle 
delays, dose omissions and dose reductions will be described following standard tables 
detailed in Appendix I.
Total cumulative dose, is the sum of all the study drug doses from the first cycle until last 
cycle, including the dose received in the last cycle.
Patients will be considered to be on-treatment for the duration of their treatment and 30 
days following the last treatment dose. If the patient starts any new antitumor therapy 
outside this clinical trial or dies within 30 days of last treatment dose, the date of 
administration of this new therapy or the date of death will be considered the date of 
treatment discontinuation.
However, as a convention, for dose intensity calculation purposes, the duration of the last 
cycle is considered to be 28 days.
Intended dose intensity is the planned dose per cycle divided by the planned number of 
weeks by cycle.
Absolute dose intensity is the actual cumulative dose divided by the number of weeks of 
treatment. Relative dose intensity (%) is the ratio of absolute dose intensity divided by the 
intended dose intensity.


CL_0289 1.0
Page 13 of 46
SAP APL-B-022-15
13 of 46
The item «Infusion delayed/omitted: yes/no» in the case report form (CRF) will be used to 
calculate the delayed infusions. For cycles considered as delayed by the investigator, the 
delay will be calculated as:
Delay:  Date of current drug administration – Date of previous drug administration – 28. 
The first infusion of the first cycle will be excluded from all cycle delays and cycle 
modification calculations.
8.3
Subsequent Therapy
A table summarizing all subsequent therapies received after treatment discontinuation will 
be shown.
Time to first subsequent therapy or death will be analyzed as a measure of the time from 
first drug administration to treatment failure that leads to the need of a further treatment 
regimen.
8.4
Protocol Deviations
Analysis of inclusion/exclusion criteria deviations, retreatment restrictions, used 
concomitant medication and clinically relevant discontinuations will be done as described 
in Appendix I.  
8.5
Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Analyses
These analyses will be detailed in separate documents.
8.6
Pharmacogenomic Analyses
This analysis will be detailed in a separate document.
8.7
Decimal Places
By default, all results will be rounded to one decimal, except in the case where variables are 
integer; in that case, they will be reported without decimals, for example, age in years, 
number of sites. For representing p-values four decimals will be selected as default but they 
could be rounded to fewer decimals if necessary.
8.8
Imputation of Incomplete Dates
The dates of certain historical or current clinical activities are a key component of statistical 
analysis. Incomplete date appears when day, month or year is/are missing, and it can be 
imputed so that variables like time to and duration of a certain event can be calculated. 
When none day, month or year are available, then the date is missing, no imputation can be 
applied.
Before registration
If day of a date is unknown then the imputed day will be the 15th of the month, if the month 
is also unknown then the imputed date will be July 1st. This assumption will be valid if the 
imputed date is earlier than the registration date; otherwise the imputed date will be the first 
day of the registration month (i.e. 1/Month of registration date/Year).


CL_0289 1.0
Page 14 of 46
SAP APL-B-022-15
14 of 46
Between treatment start and end of treatment
All date variables during treatment where information is needed and is not fully available, 
for example adverse events or concomitant medications, will be subject of imputation by 
means of SAS programming. If the day of a date is unknown then the imputed day will be 
1, if the month is also unknown then the imputed date will 1/January. This assumption will 
be valid if the imputed date is earlier than the treatment start date; otherwise, the imputed 
date will be the treatment start date.
After end of treatment
To ensure the most conservative approach for time-to-event variables (i.e. DOR, TTP, PFS, 
EFS and OS) that can be affected by missing values, the following rules will be 
implemented: if the day of a date is unknown then the imputed day will be the first of the 
month. This assumption will be valid if the imputed date occurs later than the last drug 
administration date; otherwise the imputed date will be the last drug administration date 
plus 1 day.
8.9
Subgroup Analyses
Specific subgroup analysis will be developed according to those variables considered 
clinically relevant.
The influence of prognostic factors on the efficacy endpoints will be studied in the 
multivariate analysis. These prognostic factors to be considered are; multiple myeloma 
status (relapse, refractory or relapse and refractory), cytogenetic risk (high risk vs standard 
risk), number of prior lines, etc.
Analysis of safety profile based on age, race, body mass index (BMI) or other clinically 
relevant variables will be performed. 
8.10
Methods for Handling Missing Data
Missing values will not be included in the calculation of outputs.
8.11
Interim and Group Sequential Analyses
A futility analysis based on the primary endpoint (ORR) is planned for the time when the 
first 20 evaluable patients have been recruited. The analysis will commence once the last of 
the 20 patients has completed two full treatment cycles. 
8.12 Data Analysis Conventions
All data analysis conventions, data calculations and grouping needed to perform the 
Clinical Study Report outside of this statistical analysis plan will be described in a separate 
document. 
9
STATISTICAL SOFTWARE
Medidata Rave® EDC will be used for data entry and clinical data management. 
EAST v.6.3.1 has been used to calculate sample size. 
SAS v.9.4 or superior will be used for all statistical analysis outputs.


CL_0289 1.0
Page 15 of 46
SAP APL-B-022-15
15 of 46
APPENDIX I
All tables will be created at the time of each analysis planned in the protocol if applicable, 
and at study end.
Summary tables will have source data footnotes that will refer to the relevant listings. The 
tables' layout may change to adequately accommodate group size as appropriate. 
If the number of categories or items does not yield appropriate tabular or graphic 
representations, detailed listings will be shown instead.
10 Study Patients
These analyses will be performed in “All Included patients” analysis set.
10.1 Patient Disposition 
Main characteristics concerning inclusion in the study, withdrawal from the study and 
protocol deviations will be displayed in this section. 
Table 10.1.1 Number of Patients Included, Evaluable for Safety, and Evaluable for the
Main Endpoint.
N
%
All Included patients
All evaluable patients for safety
All evaluable patients for efficacy
Listing 10.1.2 Patients who do not meet All Inclusion Criteria.
Patient id.
Criterion number(s) and description
Listing 10.1.3 Patients who meet Any Exclusion Criteria.
Patient id.
Criterion number(s) and description
Listing 10.1.4 Patients not Evaluable for Efficacy
Patient id.
Reason
Listing 10.1.5 Patient not Evaluable for Safety.
Patient id.
Reason


CL_0289 1.0
Page 16 of 46
SAP APL-B-022-15
16 of 46
Table 10.1.6 Patients Accrual by Institution
Country
Institution
N
%
No. included
Country 1
Institution 1
…
Total
…
Institution 1
…
Total
Total
Institution 1
…
Total
No. treated
Country 1
Institution 1
…
Total
…
Institution 1
…
Total
Total
Institution 1
…
Total
Table 10.1.7 Study Dates
Date of first registration
Date of first dose of the first patient
Date of last registration
Date of first dose of the last patient
Date of last dose
Date of last follow-up*
(*) Last follow-up or exam or procedure before clinical cut-off or study closure
10.2 Reasons for Treatment and Study Discontinuation
Table 10.2.1 Treatment Discontinuation
N
%
Progressive disease
Treatment related adverse event 
Non treatment related adverse event
Patient refusal to treatment
Investigator decision
Death 
Other *
Total
Note: This table will be based on treated patients .Other (*) Specify (see listing 10.2.2)
Listing 10.2.2 Reasons for Treatment Discontinuation Other than Progressive Disease.
Patient id.
Reason
Last cycle
Comments 
Note: This table will be based on treated patients
Listing 10.2.3 Treatment Discontinuation due to AEs
Patient 
id.
Cycle
Preferred  
term code
Adverse event 
reported 
(verbatim)
Grade 
Relationship 
Onset 
date
Resolved 
date
Seriousness 
criteria
Outcome


CL_0289 1.0
Page 17 of 46
SAP APL-B-022-15
17 of 46
Note: This table will be based on treated patients
Table 10.2.4 Study Discontinuation
N
%
Study termination (clinical cut-off)
Patient’s refusal
Never treated
Death 
Patient’s follow-up completed
Lost to follow-up
Other *
Total
Other (*) See Listing 10.2.5
Listing 10.2.5 Study Discontinuation due to Other Reason
Patient id.
Reason
Specify
10.3 Protocol Deviations 
Listing 10.3.1 Protocol Deviations
Patient id.
Deviation type
Description
11 Efficacy Evaluation
11.1 Demographic and Other Baseline Characteristics
These analyses will be performed in “All Included patients” analysis set.
11.1.1 Patient Characteristics at Baseline
Table 11.1.1.1 Baseline characteristics: Sex
N
%
Male
X
XX.X
Female 
Total
Table 11.1.1.2 Baseline characteristics: Age at treatment registration
N
Median
Mean
StD
Min
Max
Table 11.1.1.3 Baseline characteristics: Age grouped
N
%
<65 years
X
XX.X
65-75 yeas
≥75
Total
Table 11.1.1.4 Baseline characteristics: Race
N
%
White
X
XX.X
… 


CL_0289 1.0
Page 18 of 46
SAP APL-B-022-15
18 of 46
Total
11.1.2 Disease at Diagnosis, Time from Diagnosis and Current Disease 
Table 11.1.2.1 Time from diagnosis to first infusion (months)
N
Median
Mean
StD
Min
Max
Table 11.1.2.2 Time from last PD to first infusion (weeks)
N
Median
Mean
StD
Min
Max
Table 11.1.2.3 Multiple Myeloma Type.
N
%
Secretory
X
XX.X
Oligosecretory
Non-Secretory
Total
Table 11.1.2.4 Ig abnormality at diagnosis (for secretory and oligosecretory MM).
N
%
IgG
X
XX.X
IgA
IgD
IgE
IgM
Kappa light-chain Disease
Lambda light-chain Disease
Total
Table 11.1.2.5 Durie-Salmon Stage at First Diagnosis.
N
%
IA
X
XX.X
IB
IIA
IIB
IIIA
IIIB
Total
Table 11.1.2.6 ISS Stage at First Diagnosis.
N
%
I
X
XX.X
II
III
Not Done
Total
Table 11.1.2.7 Karyotype and FISH at First Diagnosis.
N
%
Done
X
XX.X
Not Done


CL_0289 1.0
Page 19 of 46
SAP APL-B-022-15
19 of 46
Total
Table 11.1.2.8 R-ISS Stage at Study Entry
N
%
I(ISS stage I and standard-risk *CA by iFish and normal LDH)
X
XX.X
II(Not R-ISS stage or III)
III(ISS stage III and either high-risk *CA by iFISH or high LDH)
Total
(* ) Standard-risk (or standard prognosis) and high-risk as defined below 
11.1.3 Cytogenetics 
Table 11.1.3.1 Cytogenetics.
Result **
N
%
del13
X
XX.X
del17
t(14;16)
…
Other*
Total
Other (*) Specify, see Listing 11.1.3.2
Listing 11.1.3.2 Cytogenetics: Result, ‘Other’.
Patient id.
Other
Patients will be classified in “high risk” or “standard prognosis” according to their genetic 
results (cytogenetic or FISH) at diagnosis or study entry.
Patients with translocations such as t(4;14), t(14;16), t(14;20), del 17, del 13 or single 
alterations such as +1q or +1p will be classified as “high risk”; patients with translocations 
such as t(11;14), t(6;14) or single alterations of trisomies 3, 5, 6, 9, 11, 15, 19 or 21 will be 
classified as “standard prognosis”. This classification will be done by clinical review.
Table 11.1.3.3 Cytogenetic Risk.
N
%
High risk
X
XX.X
Standard risk
Total
11.1.4 Prior Anticancer Therapy
Table 11.1.4.1 Number of Lines of Prior Medical Therapy.
N
%
1
X
XX.X
2
...
Total
Median (Range)
Mean (Std)


CL_0289 1.0
Page 20 of 46
SAP APL-B-022-15
20 of 46
Table 11.1.4.2 Prior Anti-myeloma Agents
(ATC-level)
N
%
X
XX.X
….
Median (Range)
Mean (Std)
Table 11.1.4.3 Prior Stem Cell Transplantation
N
%
Autologous HSCT
X
XX.X
Allogeneic HSCT
Both
Total
Table 11.1.4.4 TTP to Last Prior Anti-myeloma Therapy
Time to progression. Last 
anticancer therapy (months)
N
Median
Mean
StD
Min
Max
Total
Table 11.1.4.5 Best Response to Last Therapy
N
%
CR
sCR
VGPR
PR
…
NE / NA / UNK
Table 11.1.4.6 Status to Last Therapy
N
%
Relapse
Refractory
Relapse/Refractory
11.1.5 Physical Examination, Vital Signs, Electrocardiogram and Other Tests
For the physical examination, vital signs, electrocardiogram and other tests, the last 
examination available before or on treatment will be described in the following tables.
Table 11.1.5.1 Baseline characteristics: Physical Exam.
Parameter
N
Median
Mean
StD
Min
Max
Weight (kg.)
Height (cm.)
BSA (m2)
Table 11.1.5.2 Number of Lesions (Plasmacytomas) at Baseline.
No.of lesion
N
%
1 lesion
X
2 lesions
3 lesions
…
See listing 11.1.5.3 for details


CL_0289 1.0
Page 21 of 46
SAP APL-B-022-15
21 of 46
Listing 11.1.5.3 Plasmacytomas at Baseline
Patient 
id.
Lesion Number
New 
lesion
Anatomic 
Localization
Date
Method.
Lesion 
dim 1
Lesion 
dim 2
Product 
of the 
Cross-
diameters
Sum of 
the 
product 
of the 
Cross-
Diameters
Table 11.1.5.4 Baseline characteristics: Vital Signs.
Parameter
N
Median
Mean
StD
Min
Max
Heart rate (beats/min)
Systolic blood pressure (mmHg)
Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg)
Temperature (ºC)
Table 11.1.5.5 Baseline characteristics: Electrocardiogram
N
%
Normal
X
XX.X
Significant abnormalities*
Non-significant abnormalities
Total
(*)See listing 11.1.5.6 for details
Listing 11.1.5.6 ECG Abnormalities at Baseline
Patient id.
Result
QT interval (msec)
PR interval 
(msec)
QRS complex 
duration (msec)
Max Height 
of QRS (mm)
Heart Rate:
QTc (msec)
Table 11.1.5.7 Baseline Characteristics: ECOG Performance Status
N
%
0
X
XX.X
1
2
…
Total
Table 11.1.5.8 Baseline characteristics: Neurological Examination
N
%
Normal
X
XX.X
Abnormal*
Total
(*)See listing 11.1.5.9 for details
Listing 11.1.5.9 Neurological Examination Abnormalities at Baseline
Patient id.
Result
Specify
Table 11.1.5.10 Baseline characteristics: LVEF
N
%
Normal
X
XX.X
Significant abnormalities*
Non-significant abnormalities*
Total
(*)See listing 11.1.5.11 for details


CL_0289 1.0
Page 22 of 46
SAP APL-B-022-15
22 of 46
Listing 11.1.5.11 Patients with Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Abnormalities at Baseline
Patient id.
Date
Method
LVEF (%)
Institutional normal range (%)
Result
Abnormalities
Table 11.1.5.12 Baseline Characteristics: Adequate Contraception
N
%
Yes
X
XX.X
No
NA*
Total
(*) Specify reasons
Table 11.1.5.13  Baseline Characteristics: Pregnancy test
N
%
Positive
X
XX.X
Negative
NA*
Not done
Total
(*) Specify reasons
11.1.6 Viral Serology
Table 11.1.6.1  Viral Serology
N
%
Viral serology
  Yes
X
XX.X
Hepatitis B (HBC)
Surface antigen (HBsAg)
Positive
Negative
Not Done
Surface antibody (HBsAb or Anti-HBs):
Positive
Negative
Not Done
Core antibody (HBcAb or anti-HBc):
Positive
Negative
Not Done
Hepatitis C (HCV)
HCV
Positive
Negative
Not Done
Cytomegalovirus
CMV pp65 antigen
Positive
Negative
Not Done
Quantitative CMV DNA PCR
  Positive
  Negative
  Not Done


CL_0289 1.0
Page 23 of 46
SAP APL-B-022-15
23 of 46
11.1.7 Hematological Values at Baseline
Table 11.1.7.1 Hematological Abnormalities at Baseline  
N
Grade 
1
…
Grade 
4
All*
N
N
%
…
N
%
N
%
Leukopenia
Anemia
Thrombocytopenia
Neutropenia
Lymphopenia
(*)Any grade
Listing 11.1.7.2 Hematological Tests not Assessed at Baseline
Patient id.
Lab. test
Listing 11.1.7.3 Hematological Abnormalities at Baseline. Grade ≥ 2
Patient id
Parameter
Value
Grade
11.1.8 Biochemical Values at Baseline
Table 11.1.8.1 Biochemical Abnormalities at Baseline
N
Grade 
1
…
Grade 
4
All*
N
N
%
…
N
%
N
%
AST increase
ALT increase
Total bilirubin increase
AP increase
Creatinine increase
CPK increase
GGT increase
(*)Any grade
Table 11.1.8.2 Biochemical Values at Baseline
N
%
LDH > 2 .5× ULN
B2-microglobulin>ULN
Listing 11.1.8.3 Biochemical Tests not Assessed at Baseline
Patient id.
Lab. test
…
Listing 11.1.8.4 Biochemical Abnormalities at Baseline. Grade ≥ 2
Patient id
Parameter
Value
Grade


CL_0289 1.0
Page 24 of 46
SAP APL-B-022-15
24 of 46
11.1.9 Other Metabolic Values at Baseline
Table 11.1.9.1 Other Metabolic Abnormalities at Baseline
N
Grade 
1
…
Grade 
4
All*
N
N
%
…
N
%
N
%
Hyperglycemia 
Hypoglycemia
….
Hypoalbuminemia 
(*)Any grade
Listing 11.1.9.2 Metabolic Tests not Assessed at Baseline
Patient id.
Lab. test
…
Listing 11.1.9.3 Metabolic Abnormalities at Baseline. Grade ≥ 2
Patient id
Parameter
Value
Grade
11.1.10 Signs and Symptoms at Baseline
Table 11.1.10.1 Patients with Signs and Symptoms at Baseline
N
%
No. signs and symptoms per patient
0
1
2
3
Median (Range)
Mean (Std)
Table 11.1.10.2 Signs and Symptoms at Baseline
N
Grade 
1
…
Grade 
4
All*
SOC
Preferred Term
N
%
…
N
%
N
%
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhea NOS
…
General disorders and 
administration site conditions
Fatigue
…
(*)Any grade
Listing 11.1.10.3 Signs and Symptoms at Baseline
Patient id.
Sign/symptom
Grade
Onset date
Treated
11.1.11 Concomitant Medication/Procedures at Baseline
Concomitant medication at baseline according to the ATC classification.
Table 11.1.11.1 Agents of Concomitant Medication started at Baseline
Medication Term 
(ATC level 1 )
Medication Term 
(ATC level 2)
Medication Term
(ATC level 4)
Preferred Name
N
%
X
XX.X


CL_0289 1.0
Page 25 of 46
SAP APL-B-022-15
25 of 46
Listing 11.1.11.2 Concomitant Medication Therapy at Baseline
Patient 
id.
Type
Drug name
/Procedure
ATC 
Code
Route
Dose
Start date
End date
Ongoing
Indication 
Listing 11.1.11.3 Concomitant Procedures Therapy at Baseline
Patient id.
Test 
Date
Result
11.2 Efficacy Analysis
Efficacy analysis will be carried out on the “All Evaluable for Efficacy Patients” 
population.
11.2.1 Primary Analysis
Table 11.2.1.1 Overall Response 
Response
N
%
sCR 
CR
VGPR
PR
MR
SD
PD
Table 11.2.1.2 Overall Response Rate
Proportion
Lower 95% limit
Upper 95% limit
Response rate
Binomial exact estimator and 95% confidence interval
11.2.2 Secondary Analyses
Table 11.2.2.1 Duration of Response 
N
Events
Censored
Median DR
Kaplan-Meier plot will be also shown (Figure 11.2.2.1) 
Table 11.2.2.2 Time-To-Progression 
N
Events
Censored
Median TTP
TTP at 3 months
TTP at 6 months
TTP at 12 months
Kaplan-Meier plot will be also shown (Figure 11.2.2.2) 


CL_0289 1.0
Page 26 of 46
SAP APL-B-022-15
26 of 46
Table 11.2.2.3 Progression-Free Survival
N
Events
Censored
Median PFS
PFS at 3months
PFS at 6 months
PFS at 12 months
Kaplan-Meier plot will be also shown (Figure 11.2.2.3) 
Table 11.2.2.4 Event-Free Survival
N
Events
Censored
Median EFS
EFS at 3 months
EFS at 6 months
EFS at 12 months
Kaplan-Meier plot will be also shown (Figure 11.2.2.4) 
Table 11.2.2.5 OS
N
Events
Censored
Median OS
OS at 6 months
OS at 12 months
Kaplan-Meier plot will be also shown (Figure 11.2.2.5).
11.2.3 Other Exploratory Analyses
Table 11.2.3.1 Clinical Benefit Rate
Proportion
Lower 95% limit
Upper 95% limit
Clinical Benefit Rate
Binomial exact estimator and 95% confidence interval.
CBR defined as MR or better according to IMWG.
Table 11.2.3.2 Disease Control Rate
Proportion
Lower 95% limit
Upper 95% limit
Disease Control Rate
Binomial exact estimator and 95% confidence interval.
DCR defined as SD or better according to IMWG.
Table 11.2.3.3 Duration of Minor Response 
N
Events
Censored
Median Duration of Minor Response
Kaplan-Meier plot will be also shown (Figure 11.2.3.3) 
Table 11.2.3.4 Time to Response 
N
Events
Censored
Median Duration of Time to Response
Kaplan-Meier plot will be also shown (Figure 11.2.3.4) 


CL_0289 1.0
Page 27 of 46
SAP APL-B-022-15
27 of 46
11.2.4 Characteristics of Responders 
A summary of the main characteristics of patients with sCR, CR, VGPR, PR, MR or SD as 
best response will be shown.
Listing 11.2.4.1 Characteristics of Responders
Patient 
id.
Sex
Age
PS
MM 
type
Relapse
/Refractory
No. of 
prior lines
Cycles 
received
Best 
response
PFS
DOR
...
OS
11.2.5 Multivariate analyses
Multivariate analyses could be carried out as supportive analysis.
Table 11.2.5.1 Multivariate analysis of ORR 
Analysis of Maximum Likelihood Estimates
Variable Label
Variable 
values
DF
Parameter
Estimate
Standard
Error
       Wald
Chi-
Square
Pr > ChiSq
Odds
Ratio
95% Odds 
Ratio 
Confidence
Limits
X.X
X.X
X.X
X.XXXX
X.X
X.X-X.X
List of covariates will be provided by the medical responsible
Table 11.2.5.2 Multivariate analysis of TTP
Analysis of Maximum Likelihood Estimates
Variable label
Variable 
values
DF
Parameter
estimate
Standard
error
Chi-
square
Pr > ChiSq
Hazard
ratio
95% Hazard 
ratio confidence
limits
List of covariates will be provided by the medical responsible
Table 11.2.5.3 Multivariate analysis of PFS
Analysis of Maximum Likelihood Estimates
Variable label
Variable 
values
DF
Parameter
estimate
Standard
error
Chi-
square
Pr > ChiSq
Hazard
ratio
95% Hazard 
ratio confidence
limits
List of covariates will be provided by the medical responsible


CL_0289 1.0
Page 28 of 46
SAP APL-B-022-15
28 of 46
Table 11.2.5.4 Multivariate analysis of EFS
Analysis of Maximum Likelihood Estimates
Variable label
Variable 
values
DF
Parameter
estimate
Standard
error
Chi-
square
Pr > ChiSq
Hazard
ratio
95% Hazard 
ratio confidence
limits
List of covariates will be provided by the medical responsible
Table 11.2.5.5 Multivariate analysis of OS
Analysis of Maximum Likelihood Estimates
Variable label
Variable 
values
DF
Parameter
estimate
Standard
error
Chi-
square
Pr > ChiSq
Hazard
ratio
95% Hazard 
ratio confidence
limits
List of covariates will be provided by the medical responsible
Figure 11.2.5.6 . Response to Treatment per Cycle in All Patients Evaluable for Efficacy


CL_0289 1.0
Page 29 of 46
SAP APL-B-022-15
29 of 46
12 Safety Analysis
Safety analysis will be carried out on the “All Evaluable for Safety Patients” population. 
12.1 Extent of Exposure
12.1.1 Treatment Administration
Table 12.1.1.1  Number of Cycles Administered and Dose Intensity
No. of cycles administered per patient
N
%
1
2
3
…
Median (Range)
Mean (Std)
Time on treatment (weeks)
Median (Range)
Mean (Std)
Plitidepsin cumulative dose (mg/m²)
Median (Range)
Mean (Std)
Plitidepsin dose intensity (mg/m²/wk)
Median (Range)
Mean (Std)
Plitidepsin relative dose intensity (%) 
Median (Range)
Bortezomib cumulative dose (mg/m²)
Median (Range)
Mean (Std)
Dexa cumulative dose (mg)
Median (Range)
Mean (Std)
……….
12.1.2 Cycle Delays 
12.1.2.1 Number of Patients and Cycles with Dosing Delay, Any Relationship
Listing 12.1.2.1.1 Delays
Patient 
id.
Cycle
Day
Previous 
cycle
Previous 
cycle start 
date
Delayed 
cycle
Delayed 
cycle start 
date
Dose Delay 
calculated 
(days)
Reason 
for dose 
delay
Dose 
Delay 
Spec.


CL_0289 1.0
Page 30 of 46
SAP APL-B-022-15
30 of 46
Table 12.1.2.1.2 Number of Patients and Cycles with Dosing Delay, any Relationship
N
%
No. of patients susceptible of dose delay
No. of patients with any dose delay
No. of cycles administered
No. of cycles susceptible to be delayed*
No. of cycles with dosing delay**
No. of patients with 
No plitidepsin  delays
1 cycle with plitidepsin delayed 
2 cycles with plitidepsin delayed
3 cycles with plitidepsin delayed
      No BTZ  delays
…….
BTZ, bortezomib (*) All cycles excluding first cycle. (**) Denominator= Number of cycles susceptible to be delayed 
Table 12.1.2.1.3 Number of Patients and Cycles with Dosing Delay according to the 
Relationship
Drug Related AE*
Non-Drug Related 
AE*
Relationship 
Unknown*
Other*
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
No. of patients with 
1 cycle delayed 
2 cycles delayed
3 cycles 
delayed
No. of cycles with
dosing delay*
(*) Denominator= Number of cycles susceptible to be delayed. 
Table 12.1.2.1.4 Length of Dosing Delay.
Treatment-related**
Non-treatment-related***
Total
Length of delay 
Median (Range) 
/Mean(Std)
Length of delay
N
%
N
%
N
%
<= 7 days
>7 days and <=14 days
> 14 days
(*) Denominator= Number of cycles susceptible to be delayed. .(**) Drug Related AE, Relationship unknown (***)Non-
drug related AE, other
12.1.2.2 Number of Delays according to Cycle Number
Listing 12.1.2.2.1 Cycle Delays due to AEs
Patient id. Cycle
Preferred  
term code
Adverse event 
reported 
(verbatim)
Grade 
Relationship
Onset 
date
Resolved date
Significant 
consequences
AEs with action = ‘Dose delayed’ or ‘Dose delayed/reduced’ or ‘Dose delayed/omitted’ or ‘Dose 
delayed/omitted/reduced’ 


CL_0289 1.0
Page 31 of 46
SAP APL-B-022-15
31 of 46
12.1.3 Dose Omissions
12.1.3.1 Number of Patients and Cycles with Dose Omissions
Listing 12.1.3.1.1 Dose Omissions
Patient id.
Cycle
Day
Cycle start date
Reason for dose 
omission
Dose omission 
Spec.
Listing  12.1.3.1.2 Dose Omissions due to AEs
Patient id. Cycle
Preferred  
term code
Adverse event 
reported 
(verbatim)
Grade
Relationship
Onset 
date
Resolved 
date 
Significant 
consequences
AEs with action = ‘Dose Omitted’ or ‘Dose delayed/omitted’ or ‘Dose omitted/reduced’ or ‘Dose delayed/omitted/reduced’ 
12.1.4 Dose Reductions
All dose reductions should be considered and described, specifying the reason for 
reduction (drug related AE, non-drug related AE, relationship unknown and other).
Listing 12.1.4.1 Dose Reductions
Patient id.
Cycle
Day
Cycle start date
Previous dose
Reduced dose
Reason for 
dose 
reduction
Dose 
reduction 
Spec.
Table 12.1.4.2 Number of Patients and Cycles with Dose Reduction, any Relationship
N
%
No. of patients treated
X
XX.X
No. of patients with any dose reduced
No. of patients with:
No plitidepsin reduction
1 cycle with plitidepsin dose reduced 
2 cycles with plitidepsin dose reduced
….
No. of cycles administered
No. of cycles susceptible to have any dose reduced* 
No. of cycles with plitidepsin dose reduced **
No. of cycles with plitidepsin dose reduced (Treatment-related) **
….
(*) All cycles excluding first cycle of those patients who have only received the first infusion. (**) Denominator= Number 
of cycles susceptible to have a dose reduction
Table 12.1.4.3 Number of Patients and Cycles with Dose Reduction according to the 
Relationship
No. of cycles with dose reductions*
N
%
Treatment-related
   Drug Related AE
X
XX.X
   Relationship Unknown
Non–treatment-related
   Non-Drug Related AE
   Other *
(*) Denominator= Number of cycles susceptible to have a dose reduction


CL_0289 1.0
Page 32 of 46
SAP APL-B-022-15
32 of 46
Listing  12.1.4.4 Dose Reductions due to AEs
Patient id. Cycle
Preferred  
term code
Adverse event 
reported 
(verbatim)
Grade
Relationship
Onset 
date
Resolved 
date 
Significant 
consequences
AEs with action = ‘Dose Reduced’ or ‘Dose delayed/reduced or ‘Dose omitted/reduced’ or ‘Dose delayed/omitted/reduced’ 
12.2 Adverse Events (AEs)
12.2.1 Display of Adverse Events
Table 12.2.1.1 Summary of Adverse Events.
N (%)
    Patients with at least one AE regardless relationship
Any treatment-related AE
   Any plitidpesin-related AE
  Any BTZ -related AE
   Any DXM -related AE
   Any plitidepsin and DXM –related AE
   Any plitidepsin and BTZ –related AE
   Any DXM  and BTZ –related AE
  Any plitidepsin&DXM&BTZ –related AE
Any grade 3/4 AE
Any grade 3/4 treatment-related AE
   Any grade 3/4 plitidpesin -related AE
   Any grade 3/4 BTZ -related AE
   Any grade 3/4 DXM -related AE
   Any grade 3/4 plitidepsin and DXM –related AE
  Any grade 3/4 plitidepsin and BTZ –related AE
  Any grade 3/4 DXM  and BTZ –related AE
  Any grade 3/4 plitidepsin&DXM&BTZ –related AE
AEs leading to death
AEs treatment-related leading to death
   AEs plitidpesin -related leading to death
   AEs BTZ -related leading to death
   AEs DXM -related leading to death
  AEs   plitidepsin and DXM -related leading to death
  AEs plitidepsin and BTZ -related leading to death
  AEs DXM  and BTZ -related leading to death
  AEs plitidepsin&DXM&BTZ -related leading to death
AEs leading to dose delay
AE treatment-related leading to dose delay 
   AE plitidpesin -related leading to dose delay
   AE BTZ -related leading to dose delay
   AE DXM -related leading to dose delay
   AE plitidepsin and DXM -related leading to dose delay
  AE plitidepsin and BTZ -related leading to dose delay
  AE DXM  and BTZ -related leading to dose delay
AE plitidepsin&DXM&BTZ -related leading to dose delay
AEs leading to dose omission
AEs treatment-related leading to dose omission


CL_0289 1.0
Page 33 of 46
SAP APL-B-022-15
33 of 46
N (%)
   AEs plitidpesin -related leading to dose omission
   AEs BTZ -related leading to dose omission
   AEs DXM -related leading to dose omission
   AEs plitidepsin and DXM -related leading to dose omission
   AEs plitidepsin and BTZ -related leading to dose omission
   AEs DXM  and BTZ -related leading to dose omission
AEs plitidepsin&DXM&BTZ -related leading to dose omission
AEs leading to treatment discontinuation
AEs treatment-related leading to treatment discontinuation
   AEs plitidpesin -related leading to treatment discontinuation
   AEs BTZ -related leading to treatment discontinuation
   AEs DXM -related leading to treatment discontinuation
  AEs plitidepsin and DXM -related leading to treatment discontinuation
AEs plitidepsin and BTZ -related leading to treatment discontinuation
AEs DXM  and BTZ -related leading to treatment discontinuation
AEs   plitidepsin&DXM&BTZ -related leading to treatment discontinuation
AEs treatment-related leading to dose reduction
   AEs plitidpesin -related leading to dose reduction   
   AEs BTZ -related leading to dose reduction
   AEs DXM -related leading to dose reduction
   AEs plitidepsin and DXM -related leading to dose reduction
   AEs plitidepsin and BTZ -related leading to dose reduction
   AEs DXM  and BTZ -related leading to dose reduction
  AEs plitidepsin&DXM&BTZ -related leading to dose reduction
BTZ, bortezomib; DXM, dexamethasone
Table 12.2.1.2 Summary of Main Adverse Events.
Main Adverse Events*
N (%)
Fatigue
Diarrhea
Peripheral Neuropathy
Alanine aminotransferase increased
……
* Main AEs will be defined by medical responsible (or will be defined as the most common AEs)
Table 12.2.1.3 Treatment-related* Adverse Events. Worst Grade by Patient
Grade
1
…
Grade 
4
All*
SOC
Preferred Term
N
%
…
N
%
N
%
Blood and lymphatic 
system disorders
Anemia NOS
…
Cardiac disorders
Arrhythmia NOS
…
(*) or Unknown relationship (**) Any grade


CL_0289 1.0
Page 34 of 46
SAP APL-B-022-15
34 of 46
Table 12.2.1.4 Treatment-related* Adverse Events. Worst Grade by Cycle
Grade 
1
…
Grade 
4
All*
SOC
Preferred Term
N
%
…
N
%
N
%
Blood and lymphatic 
system disorders
Anemia NOS
…
Cardiac disorders
Arrhythmia NOS
…
(*) or Unknown relationship (**) Any grade
Table 12.2.1.5 Adverse Events regardless of Relationship. Worst Grade by Patient
Grade 
1
…
Grade 
4
All*
SOC
Preferred Term
N
%
…
N
%
N
%
Blood and lymphatic 
system disorders
Anemia NOS
…
Cardiac disorders
Arrhythmia NOS
…
(*) Any grade
Table 12.2.1.6 Adverse Events regardless of Relationship. Worst Grade by Cycle
Grade 
1
…
Grade 
4
All*
SOC
Preferred Term
N
%
…
N
%
N
%
Blood and lymphatic 
system disorders
Anemia NOS
…
Cardiac disorders
Arrhythmia NOS
…
(*) Any grade
Table 12.2.1.7 Treatment Emergent Adverse Events* .Worst Grade by Patient
Grade 
1
…
Grade 
4
All**
SOC
Preferred Term
N
%
…
N
%
N
%
Blood and lymphatic 
system disorders
Anemia NOS
…
Cardiac disorders
Arrhythmia NOS
…
(*)Treatment Emergent AE: Event that first appears during treatment, which was absent before or which worsens relative 
to the pre-treatment state (**) Any grade
Table 12.2.1.8 Treatment Emergent Adverse Events. Worst Grade by Cycle
Grade 
1
…
Grade 
4
All*
SOC
Preferred Term
N
%
…
N
%
N
%
Blood and lymphatic 
system disorders
Anemia NOS
…
Cardiac disorders
Arrhythmia NOS
…
(*) Any grade
Listing 12.2.1.9 Treatment-related* Grade 3-4 Adverse Events. Worst Grade by Patient
Patient id.
SOC Name
Preferred term
Grade
(*) or Unknown relationship (**) Any grade


CL_0289 1.0
Page 35 of 46
SAP APL-B-022-15
35 of 46
Listing 12.2.1.10 Treatment-related* Grade 3-4 Adverse Events. Worst Grade by Cycle
Patient id.
Cycle
SOC Name
Preferred term
Grade
(*) or Unknown relationship (**) Any grade
Listing 12.2.1.11 Adverse Events Grade 3-4 regardless of Relationship. Worst Grade by 
Patient
Patient id.
SOC Name
Preferred term
Grade
Listing 12.2.1.12 Adverse Events Grade 3-4 regardless of Relationship. Worst Grade by 
Cycle
Patient id.
Cycle
SOC Name
Preferred term
Grade
At the time of the analysis, if appropriate, grouping of similar or clinically related items 
will be made.
12.3 Serious Adverse Events and deaths. 
12.3.1 Serious Adverse Events
Table 12.3.1.1 Summary of Serious Adverse Events.
N (%)
Patients 
Any SAE
Any treatment-related* SAE 
Any grade 3/4 SAE 
Any grade 3/4 treatment-related* SAE 
(*)Broken down by drug/drugs
Table 12.3.1.2 Treatment-related* SAEs. Worst Grade by Patient
Grade 
1
…
Grade 
4
All*
SOC
Preferred Term
N
%
…
N
%
N
%
Blood and lymphatic 
system disorders
Anemia NOS
…
Cardiac disorders
Arrhythmia NOS
…
(*) or Unknown relationship (**) Any grade
Table 12.3.1.3 Treatment-related* SAEs. Worst Grade by Cycle
Grade 
1
…
Grade 
4
All*
SOC
Preferred Term
N
%
…
N
%
N
%
Blood and lymphatic 
system disorders
Anemia NOS
…
Cardiac disorders
Arrhythmia NOS
…
(*) or Unknown relationship (**) Any grade


CL_0289 1.0
Page 36 of 46
SAP APL-B-022-15
36 of 46
Table 12.3.1.4 SAEs Regardless of Relationship. Worst Grade by Patient
Grade 
1
…
Grade 
4
All*
SOC
Preferred Term
N
%
…
N
%
N
%
Blood and lymphatic 
system disorders
Anemia NOS
…
Cardiac disorders
Arrhythmia NOS
…
(*) Any grade
Table 12.3.1.5 SAEs Regardless of Relationship. Worst Grade by Cycle
Grade 
1
…
Grade 
4
All*
SOC
Preferred Term
N
%
…
N
%
N
%
Blood and lymphatic 
system disorders
Anemia NOS
…
Cardiac disorders
Arrhythmia NOS
…
(*) Any grade
Listing 12.3.1.6 SAEs
Patient 
id.
Cycle
Preferred  
term code
Adverse 
event 
reported 
(verbatim)
Status
Grade
Relationship
Onset 
date
Resolved 
date
Action
Serious Criteria
SAEs narratives will be provided by the pharmacovigilance department.
12.3.2 Deaths
Table 12.3.2.1 Cause of Death
Reason*
N
%
Malignant disease
Study drug related AE
Non study drug related AE
Other
Total
(*) Denominator=Number of patients who died.
Listing 12.3.2.2 Deaths
Patient 
id.
Death 
date
Cause
Autopsy
Autopsy report 
available
Number of 
cycles 
administered
Last
infusion 
date
Time on 
treatment*
Time from
Last dose**
(*)Time on treatment: defined as last infusion date plus 30 days, or date of death or subsequent therapy (whichever comes 
first) minus first infusion date.  (**)Time from last dose defined as death date minus last infusion date. 
Listing 12.3.2.3 Deaths due to AEs
Patient id. Cycle Preferred  term 
code
Adverse event 
reported 
(verbatim)
Grade
Relationship
Onset 
date 
Resolved date
Action


CL_0289 1.0
Page 37 of 46
SAP APL-B-022-15
37 of 46
12.4 Clinical laboratory evaluation
12.4.1 Hematological Abnormalities 
Table 12.4.1.1 Hematological Abnormalities during Treatment, Worst Grade per Patient
N
Grade 
1
…
Grade 
4
All*
N
N
%
…
N
%
N
%
Anemia
Leukopenia
Neutropenia
Lymphopenia
Thrombocytopenia
(*) Any grade
Table 12.4.1.2 Hematological Abnormalities during treatment, Worst Grade per Cycle 
N
Grade 
1
…
Grade 
4
All*
N
N
%
…
N
%
N
%
Anemia
Leukopenia
Neutropenia
Lymphopenia
Thrombocytopenia
(*) Any grade
Listing 12.4.1.3 Grade 3-4 hematological Abnormalities during Treatment. Worst Grade 
per Patient
Patient id.
Test
Grade
Listing 12.4.1.4 Grade 3-4 hematological Abnormalities during Treatment. Worst Grade 
per Cycle 
Patient id.
Test
Grade
Listing 12.4.1.5 Hematological Tests not Assessed at any Treatment Visit per Patient
Patient id.
Lab. test
Listing 12.4.1.6 Hematological Tests not Assessed by Patient and Cycle 
Patient id.
Cycle
Lab. test
Table 12.4.1.7 Blood Products during the study
N
%
Packed red cells
X
XX.X
Platelets
Plasma
Cryoprecipitates
Clotting factors
These tables will be complemented with plots for the median nadir of neutrophils (Figure
12.4.1.8), platelets count (Figure 12.4.1.9) and hemoglobin values (Figure 12.4.1.10) by 
cycle along the treatment. Furthermore, if appropriate, graphs of the intercycle time course 
of neutropenia and thrombocytopenia will be provided.


CL_0289 1.0
Page 38 of 46
SAP APL-B-022-15
38 of 46
12.4.2 Biochemical Abnormalities 
Table 12.4.2.1 Biochemical Abnormalities during Treatment, worst Grade per Patient
N
Grade 
1
…
Grade 
4
All*
N
N
%
…
N
%
N
%
AST increase
ALT increase
Total bilirubin increase
AP increase
Creatinine increase
CPK increase
(*) Any grade
Table 12.4.2.2 Biochemical Abnormalities during Treatment, Worst Grade per Cycle 
N
Grade 
1
…
Grade 
4
All*
N
N
%
…
N
%
N
%
AST increase
ALT increase
Total bilirubin increase
AP increase
Creatinine increase
CPK increase
(*) Any grade
Listing 12.4.2.3 Grade 3-4 biochemical Abnormalities during Treatment. Worst Grade per 
Patient
Patient id.
Test
Grade
Listing 12.4.2.4 Grade 3-4 biochemical Abnormalities during Treatment. Worst Grade per 
Cycle 
Patient id.
Cycle
Test
Grade
Listing 12.4.2.5 Biochemical tests not Assessed at any Treatment Visit by Patient
Patient id.
Lab. test
Listing 12.4.2.6 Biochemical Tests not Assessed by Patient and Cycle 
Patient id.
Cycle
Lab. test
These tables will be complemented with plots for the median peak of ALT (Figure 12.4.2.7, 
AST (Figure 12.4.2.8) and CPK values (Figure 12.4.2.9) by cycle along the treatment. If 
appropriate, graphs of the intercycle time course of ALT, AST and CPK will be provided. 


CL_0289 1.0
Page 39 of 46
SAP APL-B-022-15
39 of 46
12.4.3 Other metabolic parameters
Table 12.4.3.1 Metabolic Abnormalities during Treatment, Worst Grade per Patient
N
Grade 
1
…
Grade 
4
All*
N
N
%
…
N
%
N
%
Hyperglycemia
Hypoglycemia
Hypoalbuminemia
….
(*) Any grade
Table 12.4.3.2 Metabolic Abnormalities during Treatment, Worst Grade per Cycle 
N
Grade 
1
…
Grade 
4
All*
N
%
…
N
%
N
%
Hyperglycemia
Hypoglycemia
Hypoalbuminemia
….
(*) Any grade
Listing 12.4.3.3 Grade 3-4 metabolic Abnormalities during Treatment. Worst Grade by 
Patient
Patient id.
Test
Grade
Listing 12.4.3.4 Grade 3-4 metabolic Abnormalities during Treatment. Worst Grade by 
Cycle 
Patient id.
Cycle
Test
Grade
Listing 12.4.3.5 Metabolic Tests not Assessed at any Treatment Visit by Patient
Patient id.
Lab. test
Listing 12.4.3.6 Metabolic Tests not Assessed by Patient and Cycle 
Patient id.
Cycle
Lab. test
12.4.4 Laboratory values over time
Table 12.4.4.1 Evolution of Hematological Abnormalities from Baseline, Worst Case per 
Patient.
Worst grade per patient
Total
0
1
…
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
Baseline
Neutropenia 
Grade 0
Grade 1
……
Thrombocytopenia
Grade 0
Grade 1
……
….
Grade 0
Grade 1


CL_0289 1.0
Page 40 of 46
SAP APL-B-022-15
40 of 46
……
Table 12.4.4.2 Worsening of Hematological Abnormalities from Baseline, Worst Case per 
Patient.
Worst grade per patient
Total
0
1
…
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
Baseline
Neutropenia 
Grade 0
Grade 1
……
Thrombocytopenia
Grade 0
Grade 1
……
….
Grade 0
Grade 1
……
Table 12.4.4.3 Evolution of Biochemical Abnormalities from Baseline, Worst Case per 
Patient.
Worst grade per patient
Total
0
1
…
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
Baseline
AST increase
Grade 0
Grade 1
……
ALT increase
Grade 0
Grade 1
……
….
Grade 0
Grade 1
……
Table 12.4.4.4 Worsening of Biochemical Abnormalities from Baseline, Worst Case per 
Patient.
Worst grade per patient
Total
0
1
…
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
Baseline
AST increase
Grade 0
Grade 1
……
ALT increase
Grade 0
Grade 1
……
….
Grade 0
Grade 1
……


CL_0289 1.0
Page 41 of 46
SAP APL-B-022-15
41 of 46
Table 12.4.4.5 Grade 3-4 laboratory Abnormalities in the First Cycle and in all Other 
Cycles
Laboratory 
abnormalities
Cycle 1
Cycle>1
No. of cycles 
evaluated
No. of cycles
grade 3-4
%
No. of cycles 
evaluated
No. of 
cycles
grade 3-4
%
Thrombocytopenia 
Neutropenia 
AP 
Total bilirubin 
AST 
ALT 
CPK
Table 12.4.4.6 ALT,AST and CPK Time-Course Pattern
Laboratory abnormalities
Onset day 
grade 3/4
Days in grade 
3/4
Time to recovery to grade <=2
Median
95%CI
Lower limit
95%CI
Upper limit
ALT
AST
CPK
If considered relevant CPK relationship with muscular toxicity will be studied by means of 
descriptive tables/listings.
Table 12.4.4.7 Platelet Count and Neutrophil Count Time-Course Pattern
Laboratory abnormalities
Onset day 
grade 3/4
Days in grade 
3/4
Time to recovery to grade <=2
Median
95%CI
Lower limit
95%CI
Upper limit
Platelet count
Neutrophil count
12.5 Vital Signs, Physical Findings, LVEF, ECG and Other Tests Related to Safety
12.5.1 Vital Signs and Physical Findings
Table 12.5.1.1 ECOG Performance Status during the Study
(*) Worst ECOG PS of the cycle determinations.
Cycle/PS*
0
1
2
3
..
..
..
Patient id.
…
.
.
.
…
.
.
.


CL_0289 1.0
Page 42 of 46
SAP APL-B-022-15
42 of 46
Table 12.5.1.2 Physical Examination during the Study.
(*) Worst result per cycle.
Table 12.5.1.3 Weight by Patient per Cycle 
(*) % of changes respect to baseline
Table 12.5.1.4 Number of Lesions (Plasmacytomas) during the Study.
(*)Max.number of lesions of the cycle determinations.
12.5.2 LVEF and ECG 
Listing 12.5.2.1 LVEF Evolution during the Study
Patient id.
LVEF(%)
Baseline*
Minimun* 
End of treatment*
Median(Range)
Mean(Std)
(*) LVEF (%) value and method
Listing 12.5.2.2 Electrocardiogram Results . Evolution during the Study.
Patient id.
Cycle
ECG result
12.6 Concomitant Medication / Procedures according to the ATC Classification.
Table 12.6.1 Concomitant Medication during Treatment (ATC levels)
Medication Term 
(ATC level 1 )
Medication Term 
(ATC level 2)
Medication Term 
(ATC level 4)
Preferred Name
N
%
X
XX.X
Table 12.6.2 G-CSF, transfusions and Bisphosphonates during Treatment
N
%
G-CSF
Cycle/Physical examination result*
0
1
2
3
4
…
Patient id.
…
Cycle/Weight
0
(kg)
1*
(%)
2*
(%)
3*
(%)
..
..
..
Patient id.
…
.
.
.
Cycle/Nº of lesions*
0
1
2
3
..
..
..
Patient id.
…
.
.
.
…
.
.
.


CL_0289 1.0
Page 43 of 46
SAP APL-B-022-15
43 of 46
…
Table 12.6.3 Subsequent Therapy
N
%
Type
  Chemotherapy
   …
Subsequent chemotherapy agents (ATC)
  …
Table 12.6.4 Time to subsequent therapy or death
N
X
Events
X
Censored
X
Median Time
X.X
Kaplan-Meier plot will be also shown (Figure 12.6.4)
12.7 Safety Analysis in Special Subgroups.
Table 12.7.1 Worst grade 3-4 by patient in special subgroups (Race)
White
Other
N
Grade 3-4
%
N
Grade 3-4
%
Thrombocytopenia 
X
X
X.X
X
X
X.X
Neutropenia 
AP 
Total bilirubin 
AST 
ALT 
CPK
Nausea
Vomiting
Fatigue
Other*
(*)Any treatment-related toxicity present in >=5% of patients in any group


CL_0289 1.0
Page 44 of 46
SAP APL-B-022-15
44 of 46
12.8 MM Serum/Urine Protein Measurements
Figure 12.8.1 Individual M-protein Values of Responder Patients
Figure 12.8.2 Waterfall Plot. (Maximum Reduction of M-Protein in Serum/Urine)


CL_0289 1.0
Page 45 of 46
SAP APL-B-022-15
45 of 46
APPENDIX II
13 DB Listings
CRF Listings.
-Listing 13.1.1: Screening
-Listing 13.1.2: Demographics
-Listing 13.1.3: Contraception/Pregnancy test
-Listing 13.1.4: Medical history
-Listing 13.1.5: MM history
-Listing 13.1.6: Cytogenetics
-Listing 13.1.7: Prior AntiCancer Therapy: Surgery
-Listing 13.1.8: Prior AntiCancer Therapy: Palliative RadioTherapy
-Listing 13.1.9: Prior AntiCancer Medical Therapy for Study Disease
-Listing 13.1.10: Hematology laboratory values
-Listing 13.1.11: Coagulation Test
-Listing 13.1.12: Biochemical laboratory values
-Listing 13.1.13: Other metabolic laboratory values
-Listing 13.1.14: Urinalysis
-Listing 13.1.15: Physical examination
-Listing 13.1.16: Clinical neurological assessment
-Listing 13.1.17: Performance status
-Listing 13.1.18: Vital signs
-Listing 13.1.19: Electrocardiogram
-Listing 13.1.20: Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction
-Listing 13.1.21: Viral Serology
-Listing 13.1.22: Prophylactic medication
-Listing 13.1.23: Oral Dexamethasone Administration
-Listing 13.1.24: Plitidepsin Administration
-Listing 13.1.25: Plitidepsin Readministration
-Listing 13.1.26: Bortezomib Administration
-Listing 13.1.27: Treatment Continuation
-Listing 13.1.28: Adverse events (including signs and symptoms)
-Listing 13.1.29: SAE Summary
-Listing 13.1.30: Concomitant Medication/Procedures/Other Test
-Listing 13.1.31: Blood products use
-Listing 13.1.32: End of treatment
-Listing 13.1.33: Unscheduled
-Listing 13.1.34: Follow up
-Listing 13.1.35: Radiotherapy (after End of Treatment)
-Listing 13.1.36: Medical Treatment (after End of Treatment)
-Listing 13.1.37: MM Serum Protein Measurements
-Listing 13.1.38: MM Urine Protein Measurements
-Listing 13.1.39: Disease Evaluation
-Listing 13.1.40: C-Reactive Protein


CL_0289 1.0
Page 46 of 46
SAP APL-B-022-15
46 of 46
-Listing 13.1.41: Beta-2-microglobulin
-Listing 13.1.42: Tumor Evaluation (Plasmacytomas)
-Listing 13.1.43: Skeletal Evaluation
-Listing 13.1.44: Bone Marrow Evaluation
-Listing 13.1.45: Evaluation of Response
-Listing 13.1.46: Death Report Form
-Listing 13.1.47: Off Study
APPENDIX III
14 ICH Listings
In accordance with ICH E-3 guidelines, the patient listings specified as Section 16.2 will be 
prepared.
- 16.2.1 Discontinued Patients
- 16.2.2 Protocol Deviations
- 16.2.3 Patients Not Included in the Efficacy Analysis
- 16.2.4 Demographic Data
- 16.2.5 Compliance and/or Drug Concentration Data
- 16.2.6 Individual Efficacy Response Data
- 16.2.7 Adverse Event Listing (each patient)
- 16.2.8 Listing of Individual Laboratory Measurements by Patient