Clinical trial NCT02712788
Conditions: Cerebral Vasospasm
Keywords: Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Cerebral Vasospasm Milrinone Hyperdynamic Therapy
Sponsor: Indiana University
Start date: 2016-04-18; Completion date: 2018-05-03
Enrollment: 4 participants; Allocation: RANDOMIZED; Intervention model: PARALLEL

Brief summary:
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the usefulness of adding Milrinone to the current standard treatment for cerebral vasospasm.

Detailed description:
The goal of this study is to assess the efficacy of milrinone as an agent to treat cerebral vasospasm by adding it to standard therapy. This will take the form of a randomized, controlled trial in which patients will receive either standard hyperdynamic therapy or hyperdynamic therapy + milrinone. The hypothesis of this study is that good outcomes will be 25% more common in the experimental (milrinone) group than the control (standard therapy) group.

Arms: arm 1: Milrinone will be administered intravenously at an initial rate of 0.75mCg/kg/min and titrated based on symptoms in addition to hyperdynamic therapy and angiographic therapy as indicated per institutional protocol. arm 2: Placebo (Normal Saline) will be administered intravenously and titrated based on symptoms in addition to hyperdynamic therapy and angiographic therapy as indicated per institutional protocol.
Interventions: intervention 1: Milrinone intervention 2: Placebo
Intervention descriptions: intervention 1: None intervention 2: None

Protocol documents:
Prot_SAP_000.pdf: 
Revision 11.30.16 
 
1 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Milrinone in addition to hyperdynamic therapy in 
the treatment of vasospasm following aneurysmal 
subarachnoid hemorrhage 
 
 
Scott A Shapiro, MD, Professor of Neurological Surgery 
Goodman Campbell Brain and Spine and Indiana University Department of 
Neurological Surgery 
355 W 16th  St Ste 5100 
Indianapolis, IN 46202 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Shaheryar Ansari, MD, Resident, Department of Neurological Surgery 
Rebecca VanDerWall, PharmD, Resident, Indiana University Health Pharmacy 
Laura Aykroyd, PharmD, Neurocritical care pharmacist, Indiana University Health Methodist 
Hospital 
Ranjeet Singh, MD, Medical Director, Neurocritical Care, Indiana University Health Methodist 
Hospital 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


Revision 11.30.16 
 
2 
 
 
Table of Contents: 
Study Schema 
1.0 
Background 
2.0 
Rationale and Specific Aims 
3.0 
Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria 
4.0 
Enrollment/Randomization 
5.0 
Study Procedures 
6.0 
Reporting of Adverse Events or Unanticipated Problems involving Risk to 
Participants or Others 
7.0 
Study Withdrawal/Discontinuation 
8.0 
Statistical Considerations 
9.0 
Privacy/Confidentiality Issues 
10.0 Follow-up and Record Retention 


Revision 11.30.16 
 
3 
 
 
1.0 
Background 
 
Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage affects 6-8/100,000 people every year4. In 
addition to the various medical comorbidities that accompany this disease, about 50% will 
experience angiographic narrowing of the cerebral arteries (radiographic vasospasm) and 20- 
30% will experience delayed ischemic neurologic deficit (DIND, formerly clinical vasospasm) 1. 
The onset of vasospasm is most commonly between days 4 and 14 after the hemorrhage. 
Patients afflicted with DIND may go on to suffer permanent neurologic deficits which can impair 
their quality of life or be fatal. Although there has been much advancement in the last 15-20 
years in the ability to monitor and assess this condition, there has unfortunately been scarce 
progress in treating it effectively3. 
The current mainstay of therapy is so-called hyperdynamic therapy, in which the 
patient’s blood pressure is augmented and blood volume increased with the hope that 
resistance to flow can be overcome and the brain perfused2. This comes with its own set of 
complications, such as cardiac injury and fluid overload. It is also important to note that this 
modality of therapy has never been validated in a randomized, controlled trial, though it is 
accepted as the standard of care in many institutions5. Patients that are refractory to medical 
therapy may undergo angiographic therapy with infusion of agents such as calcium-channel 
blockers or papaverine or in extreme cases, balloon angioplasty. Some groups, such as the 
Montreal Neurological Hospital, have used infusions of the drug milrinone (Hospira, Inc Lake 
Forest, IL) to counter cerebral vasospasm. The smooth muscle of cerebral blood vessels is rich 
in phosphodiesterase-III (PDE-III), making it a promising target for this drug6. Milrinone is 
currently FDA approved for the treatment of congestive heart failure as it has both vasodilatory 
and inotropic effects. It is thought that these same effects may be beneficial in cerebral 
vasospasm.  Milrinone also has anti-inflammatory effects through inhibition of interleukins5. 
Milrinone is known to be safe with a relatively low incidence of complications. The 
Montreal group had no patients (out of 88 presented) with complications from milrinone 
infusion for as long as 9 days. To date, no study has compared the current standard-of-care, 
hyperdynamic therapy, with milrinone in addition to standard treatment. 
 
2.0 
Rationale and Specific Aims 
 
The goal of this study is to assess the efficacy of milrinone as an agent to treat cerebral 
vasospasm by adding it to standard therapy. This will take the form of a randomized, controlled 
trial in which patients will receive either standard hyperdynamic therapy or hyperdynamic 
therapy + milrinone. The primary outcome of interest will be modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 6 
months (+/- 60 days). Secondary outcomes assessed will be need for angiographic therapy, 
mRS at 12 months (+/- 60 days), duration of vasospasm (in days), hospital and ICU lengths of 
stay, side effects/complications of both modalities of therapy, milrinone dose, name and dose of 
drug(s) used for intra-arterial injection, number of times angiographic therapy is required, 
vasopressor usage, and discharge disposition. 


Revision 11.30.16 
 
4 
 
 
3.1 
Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria 
 
Inclusion 
• 
Subjects ≥18 years of age 
• 
Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage, proven on CT angiogram or digital subtraction 
angiography 
• 
Aneurysm treated, either by endovascular embolization or surgical clip ligation 
• 
Evidence of increased velocities on transcranial dopplers (TCDs) and/or radiographic 
evidence of vasospasm as seen on angiogram 
• 
Cerebral vasospasm as demonstrated by patient’s clinical exam (new focal deficit or 
change in mental status not attributable to any other cause) 
Exclusion 
• 
Recurrent subarachnoid hemorrhage 
• 
Untreated ruptured aneurysm, for any reason 
• 
Patients who die prior to treatment for aneurysm 
• 
Patients who are not able to complete at least 6 months of follow-up 
• 
Patients who are admitted already in vasospasm (i.e. a delayed admission) 
• 
Creatinine clearance less than 20 ml/min 
• 
Women with a positive pregnancy test or who are lactating 
• 
Other comorbidity which may adversely affect patient outcome, at the discretion of the 
principal investigator 
 
4.0 
Enrollment/Randomization 
 
Location: IU Health Methodist Hospital, 1701 N Senate Ave, Indianapolis, IN 46202 
 
Process: Patients diagnosed with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage will be identified at the 
time of diagnosis and the research team will be contacted by the admitting team to monitor the 
patient. The patients will be consented and enrolled into the study as soon as possible following 
surgery or endovascular intervention, if the PI (or his assigned designee) determines the patient 
to meet all criteria other than evidence of vasospasm. A subject ID number, which is arbitrary, 
will be assigned to the patient once consented so that patient confidentiality may be protected. 
They will not, however, be randomized at this point. The patient’s Legally Authorized 
Representative (LAR) will be contacted for consent if the patient is unable to provide it.  If a 
LAR is not present at the bedside, initial contact may take place over the phone to establish a 
time to discuss the study and obtain consent in person. At the time of diagnosis of clinical 
vasospasm, the treating physician(s) will notify the research team.  At this time, eligibility will 
again be reviewed with the PI (or his assigned designee) and the protocol orders will be signed 
and scanned to the pharmacy where they will be entered into CERNER and the pharmacy will 
randomize the patient to standard hyperdynamic therapy with placebo (normal saline) or 
standard therapy + milrinone. Randomization will take place at the time of protocol entry into 
CERNER. The diagnosis will be at the judgment of the treating physician and confirmed by the 
PI (or his assigned designee). Providers and patients will remain blinded to the drug. An index 
of which patients received the drug will be maintained by pharmacy services. 
 
5.1 
Study Procedures (see Figure 1) 
 
Every effort will be made to initiate the protocol as soon as possible following confirmation of 
diagnosis and all eligibility criteria and to deliver the drug or placebo to the patient within two 
hours of order placement/protocol initiation. Diagnosis of clinical vasospasm will be at the 


Revision 11.30.16 
 
5 
discretion of the treating physician or practitioner, and verified by the PI (or his assigned 
designee). The pharmacy services will then randomize the patient to receive either milrinone or 
placebo (normal saline). All patients will undergo treatment per the institutional protocol, which 
is to infuse fluids (crystalloid or colloid) at an increased rate to maintain a central venous 
pressure greater than 8 mmHg and progressive increase in blood pressure either by removing 
antihypertensive medications or using vasopressors, with the addition of milrinone or placebo 
based on randomization. Standard protocol in our institution calls for progressive increase of 
systolic pressure until symptoms subside, up to 220 mmHg. All patients will receive an infusion 
of milrinone or placebo at 0.75 mCg/kg/min. If no improvement is noted within 24 hours, the 
infusion will be increased to 1.25 mCg/kg/min. All patients in both groups will receive the same 
infusion at the same rate with the same parameters for increase of dose and for weaning (see 
below). The drug will be ordered by the physician and provided by pharmacy services in the 
standard institutional preparation. These parameters are the same as those used at the 
Montreal Neurological Hospital. 
 
 
Once the patient is randomized in the study, they will continue to undergo TCDs on a three 
times per week basis as per institutional protocol. This number, along with the patient’s clinical 
status, will be followed until symptoms resolve. Angiographic therapy may be utilized as needed 
based on the patient’s needs and judgment of the treating physician. If no symptoms are 
evidenced for 72 hours, then the milrinone/placebo infusion will be weaned at a rate of 0.25 
mCg/kg/min every 24 hours until a rate of 0.25 mCg/kg/min is reached, then the infusion will 
be turned off after 24 hours at this rate. For patients receiving an initial dose of 0.25 
mCg/kg/min and titrated up to 0.375 mCg/kg/min, the infusion will be weaned to 0.125 
mCg/kg/min for 24 hours then turned off. The weaning will not occur at a rate faster than 0.75 
mCg/kg/min over 72 hours. HHH therapy will be weaned according to the standard institutional 
protocol. If symptoms recur, the protocol will be restarted. Patients with severe, refractory 
symptoms may still undergo angiographic rescue therapy. Special dosing will be followed for 
patients with impaired renal function, based on creatinine clearance (CrCl), checked at some 
point during the current hospital admission and prior to study drug initiation. This will be as 
follows: 
 
CrCl (mL/min) 
Initial Dose 
Titration Dose 
Greater than 50 mL/min 
0.75 mCg/kg/min 
1.25 mCg/kg/min 
41- 50 mL/min 
0.5 mCg/kg/min 
0.75 mCg/kg/min 
31-40 mL/min 
0.375 mCg/kg/min 
0.5 mCg/kg/min 
21-30 mL/min 
0.25 mCg/kg/min 
0.375 mCg/kg/min 
Table 1 – Renal dosing parameters 
 
This dosing schema is reflective of the Montreal protocol5. While the initial dose of 0.75 
mcg/kg/min is less than the currently maximum approved dose of 1.13 mcg/kg/min for 
congestive heart failure, the maximum titration dose of 1.25 mcg/kg/min is above this. The 
Montreal group presented 88 patients who were given this same dosing titration with minimal 
side effects5, so the investigators believe this procedure to be safe. 
 
Data will be collected and entered into the study database. See Appendix A for a list of data 
points that will be collected. mRS collection will be carried out at follow-up appointments in the 
office or over the phone depending on patient availability. 
 
The infusion of the drug may pose risks, including hypotension, arrhythmias, tachycardia, chest 
pain, and headache. In a very small number of cases, patients may develop severe arrhythmias 


Revision 11.30.16 
 
6 
or anaphylaxis if allergic to the compound or an ingredient in the preparation.  Any patients 
with low blood pressure will be treated with increased rates of intravenous (IV) fluids and 
vasopressor agents to raise the blood pressure. This is standard of care for patients suffering 
from vasospasm already. At the discretion of the treating provider, any patients with 
dangerously low blood pressure, or other symptoms of shock, will have milrinone/placebo 
discontinued, however, their data will still be used in final analysis.  Final outcome data will 
also still be collected on these patients.  
 
Angiographic therapy may include: 
• 
Diagnostic angiogram (using dye in the artery to look at blood flow in the brain) 
• 
Use of medications injected into the arteries to dilate the arteries and relieve spasm 
• 
Use of a balloon to dilate parts of the artery that are very tight. 
 
The type of angiographic therapy that is used will be at the discretion of the treating provider. 
This is standard of care for patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage. 
 
Women of childbearing age will receive a urine pregnancy test when they present to the 
hospital/emergency room as standard of care. This will occur prior to being approached by the 
research team. 
 
6.0 
Reporting of Adverse Events or Unanticipated Problems involving Risk to 
Participants or Others 
 
6.1.1 
Adverse Event (AE) 
An adverse event is defined as any unintended or abnormal clinical observation that is not of 
benefit to the patient. Either the condition was not present prior to study intervention, or it has 
worsened in intensity or frequency following study intervention. Adverse events will be graded 
according to the NCI Common Toxicity Criteria, Version 4.0 and will be logged for all patients in 
both arms of the study.  The following grading scale will be used: 
0 = No adverse event or within normal limits 
1 = Mild adverse event 
2 = Moderate adverse event 
3 = Severe and undesirable adverse event 
4 = Life-threatening or disabling adverse event 
5 = Death related to adverse event 
 
6.1.2 
Serious Adverse Event (SAE) 
A serious adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence resulting in one or more of the 
following: 
• 
Results in death or ANY death occurring within 28 days of last dose of study drug (even 
if it is not felt to be drug related) 
• 
Is life-threatening (defined as an event in which the patient was at risk of death at the 
time of the event; it does not refer to an event which hypothetically might have caused 
death if it were more severe) 
• 
Requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization 
NOTE: Hospitalizations that are not considered SAEs are: 
 
Hospitalization planned prior to first administration of study drug 


Revision 11.30.16 
 
7 
 
 
 
Hospitalization for elective treatment of a pre-existing condition unrelated 
to the study medication 
• 
Results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity 
• 
Is a congenital anomaly or birth defect 
• 
Is an important medical event (defined as a medical event(s) that may not be 
immediately life-threatening or result in death or hospitalization but, based upon 
appropriate medical and scientific judgment, may jeopardize the patient or may require 
intervention (e.g., medical, surgical) to prevent one of the other serious outcomes listed 
in the definition above). Examples of such events include, but are not limited to, 
intensive treatment in an emergency room or at home for allergic bronchospasm; blood 
dyscrasias or convulsions not resulting in hospitalization; or the development of drug 
dependency or drug abuse. 
 
6.1.3 
Unexpected Adverse Event 
 
An adverse event not mentioned in the Investigator's Brochure or package insert or the 
specificity or severity of which is not consistent with the Investigator's brochure or package 
insert. 
 
6.1.4 
Determining Attribution to the Investigational Agent(s) 
 
Attribution: An assessment of the relationship between the AE and the medical intervention. 
CTCAE does not define an AE as necessarily “caused by a therapeutic intervention”. After 
naming and grading the event, the clinical investigator must assign an attribution to the AE 
using the following attribution categories: 
 
Table 2 – Adverse event relationships 
Relationship 
Attribution 
Description 
Unrelated to investigational 
agent/intervention 
Unrelated 
The AE is clearly NOT related 
Unlikely 
The AE is doubtfully related 
Related to investigational 
agent/intervention 
Possible 
The AE may be related 
Probable 
The AE is likely related 
Definite 
The AE is clearly related 
 
6.2 
Adverse Event (AE) Reporting Requirements 
Adverse events (AEs) will be recorded from the time of first study drug administration and for at 
least 30 days after treatment discontinuation, regardless of whether or not the event(s) are 
considered related to trial medications. All AEs considered related to trial medication will be 
followed until resolution, return to baseline, or deemed clinically insignificant, even if this occurs 
post-trial. 
 
6.2.1 
Reporting to the IRB 
1. Unanticipated problems involving risks to subjects or others will be reported promptly to the 
IRB if they: 
• 
were unexpected; 


Revision 11.30.16 
 
8 
 
 
• 
were related or possibly related to the research; and 
• 
suggests that the research places subjects or others at a greater risk of harm than was 
previously known or recognized. 
 
If the adverse event does not meet all three (3) criteria listed above, the event does not 
have to be promptly reported to the Indiana University IRB. However, it should be 
reported at the time of continuing review. 
2. Prompt reporting of adverse events to the IRB is defined as within 5 days for on-site studies 
and 5 days for offsite studies. 
 
6.3 
Data Safety Monitoring Board 
A board to monitor safety of the intervention will be convened when 10 patients have been 
enrolled into the study, or at 3 months after the initiation of enrollment, whichever comes first. 
At the initial meeting, the DSMB will determine its meeting schedule for the remainder of the 
study. This board will consist of one intensive care physician, one pharmacist, one 
interventional neuroradiologist, and a statistician will be consulted to assist with data analysis. 
All adverse events will be reviewed by the board and summarized to be reported to the Indiana 
University IRB. The board will reserve the right to terminate the study based on quantity and 
severity of SAEs or if the data reveals there is no benefit. 
 
7.0 
Study Withdrawal/Discontinuation 
 
Any participant or family member wishing to withdraw themselves from the study may alert the 
treating nurse, physician, or study coordinator at any time during their course. If a participant 
wishes to withdraw, this will be noted on the study database, no further information will be 
collected from that patient, however data collected up to that point may be used in final 
analysis. The investigators reserve the right to withdraw any patient it if is felt that further 
participation in the study will endanger the patients' health. If a patient is withdrawn by the 
investigator, the study team will still collect outcome data and all data collected may be used in 
final analysis.  If a subject voluntarily withdraws from the study, they will be presented with 
the option to consent to continued data collection via a separate informed consent document.  
If they decline, no further data collection will occur. 
 
8.0 
Statistical Considerations 
 
Sample size justification: Literature on the natural history and outcomes specifically of patients 
who suffer DIND is sparse. Based on our own experience, we expect to see mRS of 2 or less in 
approximately 50% of patients in the control group. With a sample size of 59 patients per 
group, the study will have 80% power to detect a 25% difference between the experimental 
and control groups (75% vs. 50% with mRS of 2 or less), assuming a two-sided chi-square test 
conducted at a 5% significance level. 
 
The experimental and control groups will be compared for differences in baseline demographics 
and clinical characteristics using chi-square tests for categorical variables and Wilcoxon Rank 
Sum tests for ordinal and continuous variables. The primary outcome, mRS 2 or less at 6 
months, will be compared between groups using chi-square tests. Secondary outcomes, 
including need for angiographic therapy, mRS 2 or less at 12 months, presence of side 
effects/complications, and discharge disposition will be compared between groups using chi- 
square tests, and mRS scores at 6 and 12 months, duration of vasospasm, and hospital and ICU 
lengths of stay will be compared between groups using Wilcoxon Rank Sum tests. 


Revision 11.30.16 
 
9 
 
 
 
 
9.0 
Privacy/Confidentiality Issues 
 
All medical information about patients will be maintained in secure and encrypted electronic 
medical record systems. As mentioned above, each patient will be assigned a unique and 
arbitrary identifier. The index for the identifiers will be maintained on a secure device which is 
encrypted and kept behind a firewall at all times. All efforts will be made to prevent 
transmission of this information, however if it should need to be transmitted, encryption will be 
used. All efforts will be made to minimize dissemination of this information. All paper records 
will be kept stored in secure locations with locking enclosures. 
 
10.0 
Follow-up and Record Retention 
 
The duration of the study will be 3 years or as long as needed to enroll the required number of 
patients to meet the power analysis above. Minimum follow-up will be 6 months, and 12 month 
follow up will also be of interest for the study. The database generated from the study will be 
maintained indefinitely for possible future retrospective analyses. 
 
 
References 
 
1. 
Adib A. Abla, David A. Wilson, Richard W. Williamson, Peter Nakaji, Cameron G. 
McDougall, Joseph M. Zabramski, et al: The relationship between ruptured aneurysm 
location, subarachnoid hemorrhage clot thickness, and incidence of radiographic or 
symptomatic vasospasm in patients enrolled in a prospective randomized controlled trial. 
Journal of Neurosurgery 120:391-397, 2014 
2. 
Diringer MN, Bleck TP, Claude Hemphill J, 3rd, Menon D, Shutter L, Vespa P, et al: 
Critical care management of patients following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: 
recommendations from the Neurocritical Care Society's Multidisciplinary Consensus 
Conference. Neurocrit Care 15:211-240, 2011 
3. 
Fraticelli AT, Cholley BP, Losser MR, Saint Maurice JP, Payen D: Milrinone for the 
treatment of cerebral vasospasm after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Stroke 
39:893-898, 2008 
4. 
Greenberg M: Handbook of Neurosurgery, ed Seventh. New York, NY: Thieme 
Medical Publisher, 2010 
5. 
Lannes M, Teitelbaum J, del Pilar Cortes M, Cardoso M, Angle M: Milrinone and 
homeostasis to treat cerebral vasospasm associated with subarachnoid hemorrhage: the 
Montreal Neurological Hospital protocol. Neurocrit Care 16:354-362, 2012 
6. 
Nishiguchi M, Ono S, Iseda K, Manabe H, Hishikawa T, Date I: Effect of vasodilation by 
milrinone, a phosphodiesterase III inhibitor, on vasospastic arteries after a subarachnoid 
hemorrhage in vitro and in vivo: effectiveness of cisternal injection of milrinone. 
Neurosurgery 66:158-164; discussion 164, 2010 


 
Revision 11.30.16 
 
10 
 
 
Appendix A – Data Points for Milrinone Protocol 
 Demographics 
o Name 
o DOB 
o Age 
o MRN 
o Study ID# 
o Gender 
o Ethnicity 
o Race 
 Past Medical History 
o HTN 
o Smoker 
 Presentation/Pre-Intervention Data 
o Date of SAH symptom onset 
o Date of hospital admission 
o Time of hospital admission 
o Hunt/Hess score on admission 
o Fischer score on admission 
o Location of aneurysm (side and vessel) 
o Size of aneurysm 
o # of aneurysms 
o Modality of treatment indicated (clip/coil/both) 
o Date of treatment procedure 
o Time of treatment procedure 
 Post-Intervention Data 
o First date of elevated TCD 
o Time of first elevated TCD 
o Measurement of first elevated TCD 
o Severity of spasm 
o Mean TCD throughout hospitalization 
o Max TCD throughout hospitalization 
o Need for EVD 
o Date of clinical diagnosis of vasospasm 
o Time of clinical diagnosis of vasospasm 
o Duration of spasm 
o Date of end of spasm 
o Evidence of ischemic changes on CT prior to study drug initiation (date/time) 
o Evidence of ischemic changes on CT any time during hospitalization (date/time) 
o Vasopressor usage 
 
Drug(s) used 
 
Duration of use 
 Study Drug Data 
o Date study drug initiated 
o Time study drug initiated 
o Duration of study drug exposure 
o Study drug dose at initiation 
o Was study drug titrated up? 


Shapiro and colleagues 
12 
 
Revision 11.30.16 
 
12 
 
o Hemodynamic parameters 
o Creatinine clearance checked during current admission prior to study drug initiation 
o Was study drug discontinued early due to complications? 
 Angiographic Therapy Data 
o Results of angiogram 
o Severity of spasm on angiogram 
o Intra-arterial drug use? 
o Number of times angiographic therapy required 
 Complications 
o Hypotension 
o Tachycardia 
o Arrhythmias 
o Chest pain 
o Others at discretions of provider 
 Outcomes 
o Length of ICU stay 
o Date of transfer to floor 
o Date of discharge 
o Length of hospital stay 
o Discharge disposition 
o Modified Rankin Score at 6 months 
o Modified Rankin Score at 12 months 
o Whether patient received milrinone or placebo 
 
 
 


Shapiro and colleagues 
13 
 
Revision 11.30.16 
 
13 
 
Figure 1