Clinical trial NCT02920177
Conditions: Femoroacetabular Impingement
Sponsor: University of Michigan
Start date: 2016-08-01; Completion date: 2018-08-10
Enrollment: 4 participants; Allocation: RANDOMIZED; Intervention model: PARALLEL

Brief summary:
The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical response of intra-articular platelet rich plasma (PRP) versus corticosteroid injection in patients affected by femoroacetabular impingement (FAI).

Detailed description:
This study will determine if PRP treatment of FAI improves (i) patient reported outcome scores and (ii) hip functional stability compared to standard corticosteroid treatment and if PRP treatment of FAI reduces (i) radiographic and (ii) biochemical markers of joint inflammation and cartilage degradation.

Arms: arm 1: platelet-rich plasma injection into the head-neck junction of the hip joint arm 2: corticosteroid injection into the head-neck junction of the hip joint
Interventions: intervention 1: platelet-rich plasma injection intervention 2: Kenalog 10 MG/ML Injectable Suspension
Intervention descriptions: intervention 1: platelet-rich plasma injection intervention 2: 4 mL corticosteroid injection

Protocol documents:
Prot_SAP_000.pdf: 
 
 
1 
 
Title:   
Platelet-rich plasma versus Corticosteroid injection for the treatment of femoroacetabular 
Impingement 
 
NCT: NCT02920177 
 
Date of Last IRB Approval: April 12, 2018 
 


 
 
2 
Title:   
Platelet-rich plasma versus Corticosteroid injection for the treatment of femoroacetabular 
Impingement 
 
PI   
Tariq Awan, DO; Assistant Professor of Orthopaedic Surgery  
 
Co-Investigators   
Joel Gagnier ND, MSc, PhD; Assistant Professor of Orthopaedic Surgery and Epidemiology  
Christopher Mendias PhD, ATC; Assistant Professor of Orthopaedic Surgery and Molecular & 
Integrative Physiology  
Asheesh Bedi, MD; Associate Professor of Orthopaedic Surgery 
Yoav Morag, MD; Associate Professor of Radiology 
 
Study Personnel 
Ranae Hoeft, MS; Clinical Research Coordinator 
Elizabeth Sibilsky Enselman, MEd, ATC, CCRP; Clinical Research Coordinator 
Christopher Robbins, PhD; Research Area Specialist Senior II 
Jaimee Gauthier, BS, CCRP; Department Clinical Research Coordinator 
 
Background/Significance: 
Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is a condition first described by Ganz et al. in 2003 
characterized by bony abnormalities of the femoral head and acetabulum1.  FAI can be divided 
into two groups based on this anatomic deformity—those that involve the femoral head-neck 
junction (cam impingement) or acetabulum (pincer impingement)3.  Because of these 
morphological alterations, contact can occur between the femur and acetabulum at normal ranges 
of motion.10  Repetitive contact because the femoral head and acetabulum can result in damage 
to the labrum and adjacent articular cartilage1.  FAI can give rise to pain and is widely regarded 
as the initiating factor for the onset of hip osteoarthritis11. At this point changing the bony 
abnormality and its effect of the natural history of FAI is unknown.  As a result the initial 
treatment of FAI is non-surgical and includes activity modification, physical therapy, and anti-
inflammatory drugs13.   Corticosteroid injections are commonly used in orthopedics to treat the 
pain and inflammation of joint and soft tissue conditions14.  Despite the current use of 
corticosteroid for the treatment of musculoskeletal conditions and the increased role of platelet 
rich plasma (PRP), there are no available studies evaluating their role in the treatment of FAI. 
 
More recent treatment efforts have focused on cellular based therapies such as platelet rich 
plasma (PRP) for the treatment of joint and soft tissue conditions.  PRP is defined as a volume of 
plasma fraction from autologous blood with platelet concentrations above baseline.  Platelets 
contain many bioactive proteins and growth factors that could potentially accelerate healing and 
stimulate anti-inflammatory properties21-22.  Recent studies show promising clinical results with 
intra-articular PRP injections for symptomatic knee osteoarthritis15-18.  Animal studies have also 
shown positive effects in stimulating cartilage matrix metabolism in osteoarthritis affected 
animal joints19,20. 
 
 


 
 
3 
Purpose: 
The purpose of this double-blinded study is to compare the clinical response of intra-articular 
platelet rich plasma (PRP) versus corticosteroid injection in patients affected by 
femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). 
 
Specific Aims: 
Specific Aim 1: To assess the effect of PRP treatment of FAI symptoms compared to standard 
corticosteroid treatment.  
 
 
Hypothesis 1: We hypothesize that compared to corticosteroids, patients with FAI that 
are treated  
with PRP will have (i) lower pain scores (ii) improved Hip Disability and 
Osteoarthritis Outcome  
Score (HOOS), Patient Reported Outcome Measurement 
Information System (PROMIS) Global  
Health Scale scores and (iii) increased hip stability 
scores as measured by BioDex stability station  
functional testing. 
 
Specific Aim 2: To determine if PRP treatment of FAI reduces (i) radiographic and (ii) 
biochemical markers of joint inflammation and cartilage degradation. 
 
 
Hypothesis 2: We hypothesize that compared to corticosteroids, patients with FAI that 
are treated  
with PRP will have (i) a diminished change in Kellgren-Lawrence radiographic 
scores and (ii)  reduced levels of circulating biomarkers C-reactive protein, cartilage oligomeric 
matrix protein  and type II collagen propeptide levels in circulation.  
 
Primary Outcome: 
 Pain as measured by Visual Analog Scale (VAS) 
 
Secondary Outcome(s): 
 Patient reported function and symptoms 
 Evaluate performance of serum biomarkers 
 Change in Kellgren-Lawrence classification scores calculated from anterior-posterior (AP) 
pelvis radiographs between pre-treatment and 1 year post-treatment 
 
Plan for measurement of these outcomes: 
 The Primary outcome measures will be: 
o Change in 7 point pain Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) 
 Secondary outcome measures include: 
o Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) 
 Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index  (WOMAC), 
calculated as a subscore of the HOOS 
o Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Global 
Health Scale 
o Serum Biomarker analysis:  IFN-g, IL-6, MCP-1, MIP-1b, IL-1b, TNF-alpha, high-
sensitivity CRP, COMP 
o Change in Kellgren-Lawrence classification scores calculated from AP pelvis 
radiographs between pre-treatment and 1 year post-treatment  
 


 
 
4 
 
Methods: 
Inclusion Criteria: 
 Patients with symptomatic FAI with duration of symptoms for at least 6 weeks 
 Clinical and radiographic evidence of FAI defined as the presence of a cam, pincer or 
combined lesion apparent from radiographs 
 Mild to moderate osteoarthritis (Kellgren-Lawrence grade ≤ 2) 
 Patients able to provide consent to study participation 
 VAS pain level of > 5 
 
Exclusion Criteria: 
 High grade osteoarthritis (Kellgren-Lawrence > 3) 
 Minimum joint space < 2 mm as measured on AP radiograph 
 Hip dysplasia (center edge angle < 20° on AP radiograph) 
 Patients with clinically significant cardiovascular, renal, hepatic, endocrine disease, cancer or 
diabetes 
 Patients with ongoing infection including Tuberculosis, HIV and Hepatitis 
 Patient with history of osteomyelitis/septic arthritis or active infections near the joint 
 Anticoagulation therapy 
 Patients who are pregnant or breast feeding 
 Patients with systemic, rheumatic or inflammatory disease of the knee or chondrocalcinosis, 
hemochromatosis, inflammatory arthritis, arthropathy of the knee associated with juxta-
articular Paget's disease of the femur or tibia, hemophilic arthropathy, infectious arthritis, 
Charcot's knee joint, villonodular synovitis, and synovial chondromatosis 
 Patients taking immunosuppressant medication 
 Patients with a recent history of abnormal hematology or serum chemistry lab results which 
is interpreted by investigation team as clinically significant 
 Patients receiving any injectable treatment to affected hip within 2 months of study 
enrollment 
 BMI greater than 35 or less than 20 
 Known hypersensitivity to kenalog, or lidocaine or any of the components 
 
Minimum Age:  18 
Maximum Age:  45 
 
Number of Subjects to be included in study:  N = 40 (n = 20 per arm) 
 
Proposed Study Start Date: 7/1/16 
Proposed Study End Date: 6/30/18 
 
Summary of Human Subject Involvement: 
Patients with symptomatic femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) identified from our MedSport 
clinic will be potential candidates for this study.  The diagnosis of FAI is based on the guidelines 
described by Ganz25. Exclusion/inclusion criteria are described above. Baseline data will include 
radiographs, serum biomarkers, pregnancy test, and clinical data regarding hip pain.  Patients 


 
 
5 
will be randomized to one of 2 treatment arms:  A) ultrasound guided hip intra-articular 
corticosteroid injection; or B) ultrasound guided hip intra-articular platelet rich plasma injection.   
 
Follow-up will be obtained at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months.  At each follow-up 
visit, the following will be collected:   
1. 7-point visual analog pain scale;  
2. The WOMAC, the HOOS, and the PROMIS Global Health scale;  
3. Radiographs (initial encounter and 12 months only);  
4. Serum biomarkers (IFN-g, IL-6, MCP-1, MIP-1b, IL-1b, TNF-alpha, highly sensitive 
CRP, COMP) at all time points. 
 
Screening: 
X days prior to randomization, potential subjects will have the following tests done as part of 
screening for eligibility: 
 A history and physical examination, including height and weight and BMI calculation; 
 Clinical assessment of hip pain; including history, physical exam and subjective patient 
reporting. 
 Radiographs; including standing AP pelvis, Dunn lateral views and false profile view 
 Blood will be drawn for serum biomarkers; 
 Serum or urine pregnancy test for females of child bearing potential 
 
 
Patient Selection: 
Dr. Awan and Dr Bedi see patients with hip pain as part of their routine clinical practice.  They 
will do all the screening of potential patients.  Once a patient has been enrolled in the study, 
he/she will be rescheduled and that subsequent visit will serve as their initial study visit.  During 
that initial study visit the patient will be randomized to one of the two treatment arms and the 
injection will be performed.  
 
Randomization Technique 
Patients who meet the eligibility criteria will be assigned to steroid or PRP treatment using 
randomly assigned permuted blocks of 5, created with the random number generator function 
within STATA, to maintain equal group sizes.  
 
Blood Draws and Serum Preparation 
Serum used for biomarkers analysis will be prepared from 4-5mL of blood drawn from an 
antecubital vein using standard clinical techniques. Serum will be aliquoted and stored in a de-
identified fashion at -80ºC until analyzed. CBC with Diff with also be done. This is being done 
one time to help evaluate patient’s overall health. 
 
PRP Preparation 
To maintain blinding, all patients will have approximately 125 mL of blood drawn from an 
antecubital vein.  For those individuals who are in the PRP treatment group, PRP will be 
prepared by Ms. Enselman who is trained in preparing PRP and who is unblinded to the 
treatment assignment. PRP will be prepared using a commercially available processing unit 
(Arthrex Angel system; Naples, FL).   The Arthrex Angel unit is a FDA cleared system (510k 


 
 
6 
number BK110046), and the PRP will be prepared using the manufacturers guidelines.   Patients 
will remain in the treatment room while the PRP is being prepared.  Once the blood is drawn 
from the patient, PRP is prepared using density gradient centrifugation with the processing unit 
mentioned above.  Centrifugation takes approximately 20 minutes. Of the PRP that was collected 
small sample will be sent to the lab for CBC and diff analysis. 
 
Sterile Technique 
For ultrasound guided procedures, a sterile probe cover will be used in addition to routine sterile 
techniques using Chloroprep cleansing solution and sterile drapes. 
 
Hip Intra-articular Corticosteroid 
A 22-gauge spinal needle will be advanced from distal to proximal under ultrasound guidance 
towards the head-neck junction of the hip joint.  Approximately 10 ml of 1% Lidocaine will be 
used for anesthesia of the skin and subcutaneous tissue.  Once the hip joint has been reached, the 
injectate will consist of 4 ml of 10 mg/ml Kenalog for a total dose of 40 mg.  
 
Hip Intra-articular PRP 
The hematocrit will be set at 2% to obtain a final product that is approximately 6-8 times higher 
than baseline in terms of platelet concentration.  This approach will also produce a leukocyte-
reduced preparation.  Final product will be approximately 6-8 ml of platelet rich plasma. 
 
A 22-gauge spinal needle will be advanced from distal to proximal under ultrasound guidance 
towards the head-neck junction of the hip joint.  Approximately 10 ml of 1% Lidocaine will be 
used for anesthesia of the skin and subcutaneous tissue.  Once the hip joint has been reached, the 
injectate will consist of the final PRP product (approximately 6-8 ml). 
 
Patient and Investigator Blinding 
In order to keep the subject blinded towards the type of procedure all patients will have a blood 
draw. Study investigators and personnel, with the exception of Ms. Enselman and Ms. Gauthier, 
will be blinded. Ms. Enselman will use the randomization code above and allocate consecutive 
patients to the intervention. When patients present for treatment, she will prepare the appropriate 
syringe (PRP or corticosteroid) and then place an opaque sleeve over it so as to conceal which 
intervention is being given. Each syringe will be marked with the patient’s name, ID number, 
and will be labeled ‘Investigational Use Only”, and the intervention assigned to this patient will 
be recorded by Ms. Enselman. This will ensure blinding of the patient, the treating physician (Dr. 
Awan), and the investigators.    
 
Post-Procedure Care: 
Patients will remain in the clinic 30 minutes after injection to monitor for any adverse reactions.  
 
All study patients will be advised to take Acetaminophen for up to 7 days post procedure, 650 
mg every 6 hours as needed.  Patients will also be provided with a standard FAI rehabilitation 
program27.  
 
Patients will be called 3-5 days after the procedure to collect information on any potential 
adverse events or reactions to the injection 


 
 
7 
 
Follow-up Visits: 
Subjects will return to the clinic at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months.   
At each visit, the following will be performed: 
 Physical exam; 
 7 point visual analog pain scale;  
 the WOMAC, the HOOS, and the PROMIS Global Health scale;  
  Hip Radiographs including standing AP pelvis, lateral Dunn views, and false profile 
view (initial encounter and at 12 months only); 
 serum biomarkers (IFN-g, IL-6, MCP-1, MIP-1b, IL-1b, TNF-alpha, highly sensitive 
CRP, COMP) at all time points; and 
 any adverse events, regardless of severity 
 
Billing: 
Neither patients nor their insurance companies will be billed for the costs of injection of steroid 
or PRP, blood draws or radiographs used in the study.  
 
Risks: 
Standard risks involved with intra-articular hip injection including bleeding, infection, nerve 
damage, increased pain, reaction to anesthetic. 
For Kenalog, complications are infrequent, though some mild local complications may occur, as 
listed in the FDA approved label dated June 2011. Some of these are atrophy of the skin at the 
injection site, facial flush, and post-injection flare (soreness and inflammation following the 
injection) . Systemic side effects such as infection, increased blood glucose, hypercortisolism, 
and others are rarely seen. There is a rare risk of anaphylaxis, including death 
 
Confidentiality: 
Standard clinical protocol regarding patient confidentiality. All data will be maintained by the 
primary investigator in a locked office and password-protected computer.   
 
Data Collection: 
Data collection will be collected and entered by orthopedic surgery research team member 
assigned to the study and stored into a REDCap database via Ipad.  This includes clinical data, 
radiographic data and analysis of serum biomarkers. 
 
Subjects’ hip pain levels will be assessed via standardized orthopedic survey tools (7 point pain 
VAS, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC), Hip Disability 
and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS), Patient Reported Outcome Measurement 
Information System (PROMIS) Global Health Scale) at baseline,  
6 weeks, 3 month, 6 months, and 12 months.   
 
Hip radiographs will be performed at baseline and at 12 months, and graded Stage 1-4 via 
Kellgren-Lawrence classification in a blinded fashion by Dr. Morag as described26.  
 
Biomarkers analysis will be performed in Dr. Mendias' lab as described23,24. Serum will be 
aliquoted and stored at -80ºC in a de-identified fashion in secured freezers in Dr. Mendias' lab. 


 
 
8 
Samples will be analyzed in duplicate at each time point, and interassay coefficients of variation 
will be calculated. For hsCRP (Calbiotech) and COMP (R&D Systems), ELISAs will be 
performed following manufacturer's instructions. For IFN-g, IL-6, MCP-1, MIP-1b, IL-1b and 
TNF-alpha, a multiplex Luminex-based assay (Millipore) will be performed following 
manufacturer's instructions.  
 
Data and Patient Safety Monitoring Plan 
All data will be maintained by the primary investigator in a locked office and password-protected 
computer.   
 
At each contact with the subject, the study team must seek information on adverse events by 
specific questioning and, as appropriate, by examination.  Information on all adverse events 
should be recorded immediately.  All clearly related signs, symptoms and abnormal diagnostics 
should be recorded. 
 
Recording of Adverse Events: 
All adverse events occurring during the study period will be recorded.  Adverse event data 
collection will begin the moment informed consent is signed.  The clinical course of each event 
will be followed until resolution, stabilization, or until it has been ultimately determined that the 
study treatment or participation is not the probable cause. 
 
When an adverse event has been identified, the study team will take appropriated action 
necessary to protect the study participant and then complete the necessary paperwork and/or log.  
The sponsor-investigator will evaluate the event and determine the necessary follow-up and 
reporting required. 
 
Survey Assessments: 
 7 point VAS for pain  
 Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) 
o Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index  (WOMAC), calculated 
as a subscore from HOOS 
 Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Global Health Scale 
 
Compensation: 
Patients will be compensated 25 dollars at the initial visit, and 10 dollars at each follow-up visit. 
This will be provided in the form of a Visa gift card mailed to the patient's home address. 
 
Data Analysis: 
The study sample size is based upon power calculations for change in pain score data from a 
previous study by our group in patients with FAI23. To detect a difference in the change in pain 
between the first and last visit of 1.7 units, on a 7-point pain scale, using a power of 80% and 
α=0.05, requires at total N of 32, or 16 per group. To account for 20% of patients who might 
withdraw, we will recruit 8 additional subjects for a total of 40 patients. We will use a mixed-
effects linear regression model to look at the changes in individual parameters at multiple time 
points over the course of the study, as well as the associations between changes of multiple 
parameters. Independent variables in the model are treatment assignment and time, dependent 


 
 
9 
variables are outcomes scores, biomarkers and Kellgren-Lawrence scores. First, we will perform 
univariate and univariable models to explore the relative importance of each predictor variable 
followed by a stepwise procedure in which we will include all significant variables in 
multivariable model followed by dropping the highest non-significant variable (significance will 
be set at p=0.10) until only significant variables remain. This will be repeated for each dependent 
variable. The robustness will be tested by performing model fitting and examining residual plots. 
 
Potential Pitfalls and Limitations: 
The study team has extensive experience studying FAI in patients in our MedSport clinic at the 
University of Michigan. All techniques and methodologies are currently in use and have 
previously been published in top orthopaedic journals. The main limitation we perceive is 
recruiting a sufficient number of subjects to the study. However, we have a high volume of 
patients pursuing treatment for FAI and anticipate it would be easy to recruit subjects into the 
study. While we think that a mixed-effects linear regression model is appropriate and informative 
for this study, an alternative approach would be a two-way repeat measures ANOVA. Given the 
statistical expertise of the study team, we do not anticipate any problems in performing analyses. 
 
Future Directions:   
We hope this study is the first of several evaluating the use of PRP in the treatment of FAI. If the 
results from this study are promising, larger multicenter studies and extended time points would 
be warranted. Identifying specific pro-inflammatory or pro-atrophy cytokines which are elevated 
could also support the potential use of targeted inhibitors of these factors to reduce inflammation 
and improve strength.  
 
Study Team Experience:  
Tariq M. Awan, D.O. is an Assistant Professor at the University of Michigan in the Department 
of Orthopaedic Surgery and will serve as the PI on this study. He will be responsible for IRB 
approvals and regulatory compliance, performing patient interventions, ensure patient safety, 
coordinate weekly meetings with research personnel, monthly meetings with study Co-Is, guide 
the translational nature of the project and prepare the manuscript to report the study findings. Dr. 
Awan completed his residency in Family Medicine at Henry Ford Hospital in Detroit, Michigan, 
where he served as Chief Resident. Dr. Awan completed his fellowship training in Primary Care 
Sports medicine at the Mayo Clinic in Jacksonville, Florida. Dr. Awan joined the Department of 
Orthopaedic Surgery faculty at the University of Michigan in July 2014. He has clinical 
experience in providing non-operative orthopaedic care ranging from the recreational to the 
professional athletes. Clinically, Dr. Awan treats multiple musculoskeletal conditions and sports 
injuries of the extremities and pelvis in adolescents and adults. He has a particular clinical 
interest in chronic tendon disorders, musculoskeletal ultrasound for interventional procedures, 
and the use of biologic treatments/platelet rich plasma for the treatment of musculoskeletal 
problems and acute sports injuries. Dr. Awan has also been active at the national level in 
teaching musculoskeletal ultrasound. He has been an invited lecturer and has been teaching 
faculty for multiple courses geared at teaching physicians how to incorporate this technology 
within an orthopaedic and sports medicine practice. Dr. Awan is board certified by the American 
Academy of Family Physicians, The American Osteopathic Board of Family Medicine and has a 
certificate of added qualification in Sports Medicine. 
 


 
 
10 
Joel J. Gagnier, PhD, MSc, ND, is a Clinical Epidemiologist and Assistant Professor in the 
Departments of Orthopedic Surgery and Epidemiology at the University of Michigan. Dr. 
Gagnier will serve as a Co-Investigator on this study and will provide expertise in clinical trials 
study design, data interpretation and statistical analyses and will supervise Dr. Robbins. Dr. 
Gagnier’s research program focuses on clinical and methodological research related to 
musculoskeletal conditions and clinical care.  
 
Christopher Mendias, PhD, ATC is an Assistant Professor of Orthopaedic Surgery and Molecular 
& Integrative Physiology at the University of Michigan Medical School. Dr. Mendias will serve 
as a Co-Investigator and perform the biochemical assays and analysis in his lab. Dr. Mendias is a 
rehabilitation clinician scientist with a basic and clinical research program focused on gaining a 
greater understanding of the genes and signaling pathways that regulate muscle and tendon 
structure and function, and in the development of new therapeutic interventions for the treatment 
of tendon and muscle injuries and diseases.  
 
Asheesh Bedi, MD is the Harold and Helen W. Gehring Early Career Professor of Orthopaedic 
Surgery and an Associate Professor of Orthopaedic Surgery and Chief of Sports Medicine. Dr. 
Bedi will serve as a Co-Investigator and will work with study investigators in analyzing and 
interpreting data. Dr. Bedi's research program is focused on clinical and translational 
musculoskeletal research. He has a large practice and research program focused on the surgical 
treatment of FAI and other hip degenerative conditions.  
 
Yoav Morag MD is an Associate Professor of Radiology and a member of the Division of 
Musculoskeletal Radiology. Dr. Morag will serve as a Co-Investigator and will be responsible 
for analysis and interpretation of radiographs in this study. Dr. Morag has broad research 
program and extensive in musculoskeletal radiology. 
 
Elizabeth Sibilsky Enselman, MEd, ATC, CCRP is a clinical research coordinator and athletic 
trainer and will assist Dr. Awan with preparing and delivering interventions and performing 
blood draws on subjects.  
 
Christopher Robbins, PhD is a Research Area Specialist Senior II in Dr. Gagnier's lab and will 
establish and maintain the REDCap database and perform data analyses in this study and assist 
Dr. Awan in preparing the manuscript for submission. 
 
Jaimee Gauthier, BS, CCRP is the department clinical research coordinator and will generate the 
randomization scheme, and assist Dr. Awan in maintaining IRB approvals and regulatory 
compliance.  
 
Bibilography: 
1. Ganz R, Parvizi J, Beck M, Leunig M, Nötzli H, Siebenrock KA. Femoroacetabular 
impingement: a cause for osteoarthritis of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003 
Dec;(417):112-20. 
2. Ganz R, Leunig M, Leunig-Ganz K, Harris WH. The etiology of osteoarthritis of the hip: an 
integrated mechanical concept. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008 Feb;466(2):264-72. 


 
 
11 
3. Beck M, Kalhor M, Leunig M, Ganz R. Hip morphology influences the pattern of damage to 
the acetabular cartilage: femoroacetabular impingement as a cause of early osteoarthritis of 
the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005 Jul;87(7):1012-8. 
4. Bedi A, Chen N, Robertson W, Kelly BT. The management of labral tears and 
femoroacetabular impingement of the hip in the young, active patient. Arthroscopy. 2008 
Oct;24(10):1135-45. 
5. Clohisy JC, St John LC, Schutz AL. Surgical treatment of femoroacetabular impingement: a 
systematic review of the literature. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 Feb;468(2):555-64. 
6. Kraus VB. Osteoarthritis year 2010 in review: biochemical markers. Osteoarthritis Cart. 2011 
Apr;19(4):346-53. 
7. Toncheva A, Remichkova M, Ikonomova K, Dimitrova P, Ivanovska N. Inflammatory 
response in patients with active and inactive osteoarthritis. Rheumatol Int. 2009 
Aug;29(10):1197-203 
8. van Spil WE, DeGroot J, Lems WF, Oostveen JC, Lafeber FP. Serum and urinary 
biochemical markers for knee and hip-osteoarthritis: a systematic review applying the 
consensus BIPED criteria. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2010 May;18(5):605-12. 
9. The FAI radiograph one 
10. Notzli HP, Wyss TF, Stoecklin CH, Schmid MR, Treiber K, Hodler J.  The contour of the 
femoral head-neck junction as a predictor for the risk of anterior impingement.  J Bone Joint 
Surg Br 2002; 84:  556-560 
11. Agricola R, Waarsing JH, Arden NK et al.  Cam impingement of the hip:  a risk factor for hip 
osteoarthritis.  Nat Rev Rheumatol 2013; 9:630-634 
12. Laborie LB, Lehmann TG, Engesaeter IO, et al.  Prevalence of radiographic findings thought 
to be associated with femoroacetabular impingement in a population based cohort of 2081 
healthy young adults.  Radiology 2011; 260:494-502 
13. Wall PD1, Fernandez M, Griffin DR, Foster NE. . Nonoperative treatment for 
femoroacetabular impingement: a systematic review of the literature.  PM R. 2013 
May;5(5):418-26 
14. Garg N1, Perry L, Deodhar A.Intra-articular and soft tissue injections, a systematic review of 
relative efficacy of various corticosteroids. Clin Rheumatol. 2014 Dec;33(12): 1695-706 
15. Filardo G, Kon E, Di Martino A, et al. Platelet-rich plasma vs hyaluronic acid to treat knee 
degenerative pathology: study design and preliminary results of a randomized controlled 
trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2012;13(1):229. 
16. Cerza F, Carni S, Carcangiu A, et al. Comparison Between Hyaluronic Acid and Platelet-
Rich Plasma, Intra-articular Infiltration in the Treatment of Gonarthrosis. The American 
journal of sports medicine. Dec 2012;40(12):2822-2827. 
17. Kon E, Buda R, Filardo G, et al. Platelet-rich plasma: intra-articular knee injections produced 
favorable results on degenerative cartilage lesions. Knee surgery, sports traumatology, 
arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA. Apr 2010;18(4):472-479. 
18. Sanchez M, Anitua E, Azofra J, Aguirre JJ, Andia I. Intra-articular injection of an autologous 
preparation rich in growth factors for the treatment of knee OA: a retrospective cohort study. 
Clin Exp Rheumatol. Sep-Oct 2008;26(5):910-913. 
19. Frisbie D, Kawcak C, Werpy N, et al.  Clinical biochemical and histological effects of 
intraarticular administration of autologous conditioned serum in horses with experimentally 
induced osteoarthritis.  Am J Vet Res.  2007; 68(3):290-296. 


 
 
12 
20. Saito M, Takahashi KA, Arai Y, et al.  Intraarticular administration of platelet-rich plasma 
with biodegradable gelatin hydrogel microspheres prevents osteoarthritis progression in the 
rabbit knee.  Clin Exp Rheumatol.  2009;27(2):201-207 
21. Bendinelli P, Matteucci E, Dogliotti G, et al.  Molecular Basis of anti-inflammatory action of 
platelet-rich plasma on human chondrocytes:  mechanisms of NF-B inhibition via HGF.  J 
Cell Physiol.  2010;225(3)757-766 
22. Menetrey J, Kasemkijwattana C, Day CS, et al.  Growth factors improves muscle healing in 
vivo.  J Bone Joint Surg Br.  2000;82(1):131-137 
23. Bedi A, Lynch EB, Sibilsky Enselman ER, Davis ME, Dewolf PD, Makki TA, Kelly BT, 
Larson CM, Henning PT, Mendias CL. Elevation in circulating biomarkers of cartilage 
damage and inflammation in athletes with femoroacetabular impingement. Am J Sports Med. 
2013 Nov;41(11):2585-90. 
24. Mendias CL, Lynch EB, Davis ME, Sibilsky Enselman ER, Harning JA, Dewolf PD, Makki 
TA, Bedi A. Changes in circulating biomarkers of muscle atrophy, inflammation, and 
cartilage turnover in patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and 
rehabilitation. Am J Sports Med. 2013 Aug;41(8):1819-26. 
25. Ganz R, Parvizi J, Beck M, Leunig M, Nötzli H, Siebenrock KA. Femoroacetabular 
impingement: a cause for osteoarthritis of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003 
Dec;(417):112-20. 
26. Philippon MJ, Briggs KK, Carlisle JC, Patterson DC. Joint space predicts THA after hip 
arthroscopy in patients 50 years and older. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Aug;471(8):2492-6. 
27. Enseki KR, Martin R, Kelly BT. Rehabilitation after arthroscopic decompression for 
femoroacetabular impingement. Clin Sports Med. 2010 Apr;29(2):247-55.