Clinical trial NCT03154086
Conditions: Irritable Bowel Syndrome
Keywords: REarranged during Transfection
Sponsor: GlaxoSmithKline
Start date: 2017-05-17; Completion date: 2018-03-05
Enrollment: 68 participants; Allocation: RANDOMIZED; Intervention model: CROSSOVER

Brief summary:
This FTIH study is designed to assess the safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetic (PK) of escalating single and repeat oral doses of GSK3352589 in normal healthy volunteers. This is a randomized, double-blind (sponsor unblinded), placebo controlled, dose escalation study that will have two parts; Part A and Part B.

Detailed description:

Arms: arm 1: Subjects will receive single oral dose of placebo tablet in Period 1 followed by GSK3352589 5 milligrams (mg) tablet in Period 2 followed by GSK3352589 15 mg tablet in Period 3 followed by GSK3352589 50 mg tablet in Period 4 of Cohort 1 in Part A of the study. Subjects will return for their next scheduled dosing period approximately 14 days (wash out period) after administration of the study drug during the prior dosing period. arm 2: Subjects will receive single oral dose of GSK3352589 2 mg tablet in Period 1 followed by Placebo tablet in Period 2 followed by GSK3352589 15 mg tablet in Period 3 followed by GSK3352589 50 mg tablet in Period 4 of Cohort 1 in Part A of the study. Subjects will return for their next scheduled dosing period approximately 14 days (wash out period) after administration of the study drug during the prior dosing period. arm 3: Subjects will receive single oral dose of GSK3352589 2 mg tablet in Period 1 followed by GSK3352589 5 mg tablet in Period 2 followed by Placebo tablet in Period 3 followed by GSK3352589 50 mg tablet in Period 4 of Cohort 1 in Part A of the study. Subjects will return for their next scheduled dosing period approximately 14 days (wash out period) after administration of the study drug during the prior dosing period. arm 4: Subjects will receive single oral dose of GSK3352589 2 mg tablet in Period 1 followed by GSK3352589 5 mg tablet in Period 2 followed by GSK3352589 15 mg tablet in Period 3 followed by Placebo tablet in Period 4 of Cohort 1 in Part A of the study. Subjects will return for their next scheduled dosing period approximately 14 days (wash out period) after administration of the study drug during the prior dosing period. arm 5: Subjects will receive single oral dose of GSK3352589 25 mg tablet in Period 1 (fasted state) and Period 2 (fed state). Subjects will return for their next scheduled dosing Period approximately 14 days (wash out period) after administration of the study drug during the prior dosing period. arm 6: Subjects will receive single oral dose of placebo tablet matching GSK3352589 25 mg in Period 1 (fasted state) and Period 2 (fed state). Subjects will return for their next scheduled dosing period approximately 14 days (wash out period) after administration of the study drug during the prior dosing period. arm 7: Subjects will receive single oral dose of GSK3352589 150 mg tablet in Period 1 followed by placebo tablet matching GSK3352589 150 mg in Period 2 in Cohort 3 of Part A. Subjects will return for their next scheduled dosing period approximately 14 days (wash out period) after administration of the study drug during the prior dosing period. arm 8: Subjects will receive single oral dose of placebo tablet matching GSK3352589 400 mg in Period 1 followed by single oral dose of GSK3352589 400 mg tablet in Period 2 in Cohort 3 of Part A. Subjects will return for their next scheduled dosing period approximately 14 days (wash out period) after administration of the study drug during the prior dosing period. arm 9: Subjects will receive single oral dose of GSK3352589 150 mg tablet in Period 1 followed by GSK3352589 400 mg tablet in Period 2 in Cohort 3 of Part A. Subjects will return for their next scheduled dosing period approximately 14 days (wash out period) after administration of the study drug during the prior dosing period. arm 10: Subjects will receive repeat oral doses of GSK3352589 of 5 mg, 15 mg, 50 mg, 100 mg or 200 mg twice daily administered for 14 days. arm 11: Subjects will receive repeat oral doses of placebo twice a day tablet administered for 14 days.
Interventions: intervention 1: GSK3352589 intervention 2: Matching Placebo
Intervention descriptions: intervention 1: It will be available in the dose of 1, 5, 25 and 100 mg tablet for oral administration. intervention 2: It will be available across all strengths to match active drug in the form of tablet for oral administration.

Protocol documents:
Prot_000.pdf: 
2016N303948_00
CONFIDENTIAL
GlaxoSmithKline group of companies
207440
1
TITLE PAGE
Protocol Title: A Phase I, First Time in Human, Two Part, Randomized, Placebo-
Controlled, Double-Blind (Sponsor Unblind), Single and Repeat Dose Escalating Study 
to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability and Pharmacokinetics of GSK3352589, a REarranged 
during Transfection (RET) Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor, in Normal 
Healthy Volunteers
Protocol Number: 207440
Short Title: A Phase 1, First Time in Human Study to Evaluate GSK3352589, a 
REarranged during Transfection (RET) Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase 
Inhibitor, in Normal Healthy Volunteers
Compound Number:
GSK3352589
Sponsor Name and Legal Registered Address: 
GlaxoSmithKline Research & Development Limited
980 Great West Road
Brentford
Middlesex, TW8 9GS
UK
Medical Monitor Name and Contact Information: 
 MD, MS
Approval Date: 31-MAR-2017
Copyright 2017 the GlaxoSmithKline group of companies.  All rights reserved.  
Unauthorised copying or use of this information is prohibited.
 
2018N363775_00
PPD


 
2018N363775_00
PPD
PPD
PP


2016N303948_00
CONFIDENTIAL
207440
3
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
1.
SYNOPSIS...............................................................................................................6
2.
SCHEDULE OF ACTIVITIES (SOA).......................................................................10
3.
INTRODUCTION....................................................................................................19
3.1.
Study Rationale ..........................................................................................19
3.2.
Background ................................................................................................19
3.2.1.
Nonclinical ...................................................................................20
3.3.
Benefit/Risk Assessment ............................................................................22
3.3.1.
Risk Assessment .........................................................................22
3.3.2.
Benefit Assessment.....................................................................23
3.3.3.
Overall Benefit:Risk Conclusion...................................................23
4.
OBJECTIVES AND ENDPOINTS...........................................................................24
5.
STUDY DESIGN ....................................................................................................24
5.1.
Overall Design ............................................................................................24
5.2.
Number of Participants ...............................................................................25
5.2.1.
Part A ..........................................................................................25
5.2.2.
Part B ..........................................................................................26
5.3.
Participant and Study Completion...............................................................27
5.4.
Scientific Rationale for Study Design ..........................................................27
5.4.1.
Part A ..........................................................................................27
5.4.2.
Part B ..........................................................................................28
5.5.
Dose Justification........................................................................................28
5.5.1.
Human Pharmacodynamic Predictions ........................................28
5.5.2.
Human Pharmacokinetic Predictions ...........................................29
5.5.2.1.
Predicted exposures for higher than expected 
bioavailability..............................................................33
5.5.3.
Dose Range and Safety Margins .................................................33
6.
STUDY POPULATION...........................................................................................35
6.1.
Inclusion Criteria.........................................................................................35
6.2.
Exclusion Criteria........................................................................................36
6.3.
Lifestyle Restrictions...................................................................................37
6.3.1.
Part A Fasted:  Meals and Dietary Restrictions............................37
6.3.2.
Part A Fed for Pilot Food Effect (Cohort 2, Dosing Period 
2):  Meals and Dietary Restrictions ..............................................38
6.3.3.
Part B QD Fasted:  Meals and Dietary Restrictions......................38
6.3.4.
Part B BID Fasted:  Meals and Dietary Restrictions.....................39
6.3.5.
Part B QD Fed:  Meals and Dietary Restrictions ..........................40
6.3.6.
Part  B BID Fed:  Meals and Dietary Restrictions.........................40
6.3.7.
Caffeine, Alcohol, and Tobacco ...................................................41
6.3.8.
Activity .........................................................................................41
6.4.
Screen Failures...........................................................................................41
7.
TREATMENTS.......................................................................................................42
7.1.
Treatments Administered............................................................................42
 
2018N363775_00


2016N303948_00
CONFIDENTIAL
207440
4
7.2.
Dose Modification .......................................................................................42
7.3.
Method of Treatment Assignment ...............................................................43
7.4.
Blinding.......................................................................................................43
7.5.
Preparation/Handling/Storage/Accountability..............................................43
7.6.
Treatment Compliance................................................................................44
7.7.
Concomitant Therapy..................................................................................44
7.8.
Treatment after the End of the Study ..........................................................45
8.
DISCONTINUATION CRITERIA.............................................................................45
8.1.
Discontinuation of Study Treatment ............................................................45
8.1.1.
Liver Chemistry Stopping Criteria ................................................45
8.1.2.
QTc Stopping Criteria ..................................................................46
8.2.
Withdrawal from the Study..........................................................................46
8.3.
Lost to Follow Up........................................................................................47
9.
STUDY ASSESSMENTS AND PROCEDURES .....................................................47
9.1.
Adverse Events...........................................................................................48
9.1.1.
Time Period and Frequency for Collecting AE and SAE 
Information...................................................................................48
9.1.2.
Method of Detecting AEs and SAEs.............................................48
9.1.3.
Follow-up of AEs and SAEs.........................................................49
9.1.4.
Regulatory Reporting Requirements for SAEs .............................49
9.1.5.
Pregnancy ...................................................................................49
9.2.
Treatment of Overdose...............................................................................49
9.3.
Safety Assessments ...................................................................................50
9.3.1.
Physical Examinations.................................................................50
9.3.2.
Vital Signs....................................................................................50
9.3.3.
Electrocardiograms......................................................................50
9.3.4.
Clinical Safety Laboratory Assessments ......................................51
9.3.5.
Bristol Stool Form Scale ..............................................................51
9.4.
Pharmacokinetics .......................................................................................51
9.4.1.
Sample Collection........................................................................51
9.4.1.1.
Blood sample collection..............................................51
9.4.1.2.
Urine Sample Collection .............................................52
9.4.2.
Sample Analysis ..........................................................................52
9.4.3.
Pharmacokinetic Analyses...........................................................52
9.5.
Pharmacodynamic Biomarkers ...................................................................53
9.6.
Genetics .....................................................................................................53
10. STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS........................................................................53
10.1.
Sample Size Determination ........................................................................53
10.2.
Populations for Analyses ............................................................................53
10.3.
Statistical Analyses.....................................................................................54
10.3.1.
Other Analyses ............................................................................54
10.3.2.
Interim Analyses ..........................................................................54
11. REFERENCES.......................................................................................................55
12. APPENDICES........................................................................................................57
12.1.
Appendix 1: Abbreviations and Trademarks................................................57
12.2.
Appendix 2: Human Pharmacodynamic Prediction Methods.......................60
 
2018N363775_00


2016N303948_00
CONFIDENTIAL
207440
5
12.2.1.
Systems pharmacology model of human colon tissue 
concentrations .............................................................................60
12.2.2.
Human Equivalent Dose (HED) Prediction Method using 
FDA guidance with and without small and large intestine 
surface area correction ................................................................61
12.2.3.
Human Dose Prediction for of GSK3352589 Adjusted for 
Colon Content and Gut Weight ....................................................63
12.3.
Appendix 3: Clinical Laboratory Tests.........................................................64
12.4.
Appendix 4: Bristol Stool Form Scale..........................................................66
12.5.
Appendix 5: Study Governance Considerations..........................................67
12.6.
Appendix 6: Adverse Events: Definitions and Procedures for 
Recording, Evaluating, Follow-up, and Reporting .......................................71
12.7.
Appendix 7: Contraceptive Guidance and Collection of Pregnancy 
Information..................................................................................................76
12.8.
Appendix 8: Liver Safety: Required Actions and Follow-up 
Assessments ..............................................................................................80
 
2018N363775_00


2016N303948_00
CONFIDENTIAL
207440
6
1.
SYNOPSIS
Protocol Title: A Phase I, First Time in Human, Two Part, Randomized, Placebo-
Controlled, Double-Blind (Sponsor Unblind), Single and Repeat Dose Escalating Study 
to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability and Pharmacokinetics of GSK3352589, a REarranged 
during Transfection (RET) Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor, in Normal 
Healthy Volunteers
Short Title: A Phase 1, First Time in Human Study to Evaluate GSK3352589, a 
REarranged during Transfection (RET) Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase 
Inhibitor, in Normal Healthy Volunteers
Rationale:
Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a relatively common gastrointestinal (GI) illness with a 
prevalence of approximately 5 to 20% and characterized by a constellation of clinical
symptoms including abdominal pain and discomfort, abnormal bowel habits, and bloating 
[Camilleri, 2012] [Halland, 2013] [Longstreth, 2006].  Because the etiology of the 
disease has not been established, diagnosis is difficult and relies primarily on the 
presence of a specific symptom complex occurring with a minimum frequency in the 
absence of an alternative explanation. It is generally believed that the sensory 
inputs/outputs in the peripheral and central nervous system are altered in such a way that 
a patient with IBS has a heightened and disproportionate sensory experience for a given 
stimulus, i.e. visceral hypersensitivity [Azpiroz, 2007].  Visceral hypersensitivity may 
result from increased nerve fiber density and sprouting in the intestinal mucosal tissues of 
patients with IBS [Dothel, 2015].
REarranged during Transfection (RET) is a neuronal growth factor receptor tyrosine 
kinase whose activity is critical for the development of the enteric nervous system (ENS), 
the kidney and spermatogenesis [Airaksinen, 2002].  While its role during the 
development of the ENS has been well established, recent data strongly implicate RET 
kinase in the maintenance and plasticity of the adult ENS. By reducing RET signaling, 
RET kinase inhibition may modulate sensory neuron activity in the enteric nervous 
system and ameliorate visceral hypersensitivity.  Preliminary in vitro and in vivo studies 
suggest that RET kinase inhibition is able to attenuate the function of cholinergic 
neurons. Taken together, these results suggest that treatment of IBS patients with a RET 
kinase inhibitor has the potential to reduce abdominal pain and discomfort in patients 
with IBS via a novel mechanism of action which may normalize both visceral 
hypersensitivity and abnormal motility by inhibiting the function of cholinergic neurons. 
Thus, the patient population that may derive the greatest benefit would consist of 
individuals with IBS-diarrhea (IBS-D).  
GSK3352589 is a potent and selective inhibitor of RET kinase.  The current study is 
designed to assess the safety, tolerability and PK of escalating single and repeat oral 
doses of GSK3352589 in normal healthy volunteers.  This study is the first administration 
of GSK3352589 to humans.
 
2018N363775_00


2016N303948_00
CONFIDENTIAL
207440
7
Objectives and Endpoints:
Objective
Endpoint
Primary
Part A Single Dose

To evaluate the safety and tolerability of 
single escalating oral doses of 
GSK3352589 administered in the fasted 
state and a single dose of GSK3352589 
administered in the fed state in healthy 
adult subjects

To evaluate the pharmacokinetic 
parameters of escalating single oral 
doses of GSK3352589 under fasting and 
fed (for one dose only) conditions in 
healthy adult subjects
Part B Repeat Dose

To evaluate the safety and tolerability of 
repeat escalating oral doses of 
GSK3352589 administered once or twice 
daily in the fasted or fed state

To characterize the PK of GSK3352589 
of repeat escalating oral doses 
administered once or twice daily in the 
fasted or fed state

Clinical safety and tolerability data 
including spontaneous adverse event 
(AE) reporting, clinical observations, 
physical examination findings, 12-lead 
electrocardiograms (ECG), vital signs, 
Bristol Stool Form Scores (BSFS), clinical 
laboratory tests.  

PK parameters obtained following 
administration of GSK3353589.  PK 
parameters include areas under the 
plasma concentration versus time curve,
AUC over the dosing interval (and other 
time intervals), Cmax, Tmax, and terminal 
half life (t ½), for Days 1 and 14 will be 
analyzed as data permit.
Exploratory

To explore the effect of GSK3352589 on 
the postprandial plasma profiles of total 
glucagon like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and total 
peptide YY (PYY) following repeat oral 
doses of GSK3352589 administered once 
or twice daily 

Postprandial challenge (mixed-meal) 
profiles of total GLP-1 and total PYY.

To investigate the biotransformation of 
GSK3352589 in plasma and urine

Provide samples of plasma and urine for 
the identification of any compound-
derived metabolite(s).
 
2018N363775_00


2016N303948_00
CONFIDENTIAL
207440
8
Overall Design:
This randomized, double-blind (sponsor unblinded), placebo controlled, dose escalation 
study will be divided into two parts: Part A is a single dose escalating, four period 
crossover (Cohort 1) with a two-period, single sequence pilot food effect study (Cohort 2) 
and Part B is a 14 day repeat dose escalating, ascending cohort study. 
The study will be composed of 3 periods for all subjects (Screening, Treatment, and 
Follow-up).  Subjects will participate in either Part A or Part B. A subject’s total time 
involved in the study will be approximately 10 weeks for subjects enrolled in Part A, 
Cohort 1 and approximately 8 weeks for subjects enrolled in Part A, Cohort 2.  Subjects 
enrolled in Part B will be involved in the study for a total time of approximately 7 weeks.
All dosing periods for subjects participating in Part A will be completed before beginning 
enrollment in Part B.  
Part A:
Number of Participants: A sufficient number of healthy volunteers (males and women 
of non-childbearing potential) will be screened to enroll 16 subjects (8 subjects/cohort).  
Treatment Period and Duration: The planned dose range for Cohort 1 is single doses 
of 2 to 400 mg in the fasted state.  The actual doses to be administered may be adjusted 
based on safety, tolerability and PK data at previous dose levels; these dose adjustments 
may involve either an increase or a decrease in the planned dose for Cohort 1. Dose 
escalation will occur only if mean systemic exposures are projected not to exceed the 
defined plasma toxicokinetic (TK) limits. A single dose of GSK33352589 will be 
administered in the fasted and fed states in Cohort 2.  The dose selected to evaluate the 
food effect will allow for a 2X increase in bioavailability and predicted exposures will 
not exceed the highest observed exposures at prior doses.
Cohort 1 (Single Dose Escalation1)
Treatment 
Sequence
Subjects
Period 1
Period 2
Period 3
Period 4
A
and
Placebo
D2
D3
D4
B
and
D1
Placebo
D3
D4
C
and
D1
D2
Placebo
D4
D
and
D1
D2
D3
Placebo
1
Dose escalation will occur only if mean systemic exposures are projected not to exceed the defined plasma 
toxicokinetic (TK) limits.
Cohort 2 (Pilot Food Effect)
Treatment Sequence
Subjects
Period 1
Period 2
E
D5
D5 + food
F
 and
Placebo
Placebo + food
 
2018N363775_00
PPD
PPD
PPD
PPD
PPD


2016N303948_00
CONFIDENTIAL
207440
9
Part B: 
Number of Participants: Up to six (6) cohorts are planned and will be conducted 
sequentially.  A sufficient number of healthy volunteers (males and women of non-
childbearing potential) will be screened to randomize 48 subjects (8 subjects/cohort; 6 
subjects will be randomized to GSK3352589 and 2 subjects will be randomized to 
placebo).  
Treatment Period and Duration: The planned dose range is 2 mg once daily to 200 mg 
twice daily administered for 14 days. Selection of the starting dose for Part B, along with 
requirements for fasted or fed state study drug administration, will occur after review of 
the safety, tolerability and PK data of all subjects enrolled in Part A.  The actual doses to 
be administered may be adjusted based on safety, tolerability and PK data at previous 
dose levels; these dose adjustments may involve either an increase or a decrease in the 
planned dose. Dose escalation will occur only if mean systemic exposures are projected 
not to exceed the defined plasma toxicokinetic (TK) limits.  
 
2018N363775_00


2016N303948_00
CONFIDENTIAL
207440
10
2.
SCHEDULE OF ACTIVITIES (SOA)
Part A: Cohort 1 and 2 – Single Dose – Screening and Day 1
Screening
Day -1
Day 1
Screen
(within 21d)
Day -11
Pre-
dose
0h
0.5h
1h
1.5h
2h
2.5h
3h
4h
5h
8h
12h
Informed Consent
X
Inclusion and exclusion criteria
X
Demography
X
Medical/medication/drug/alcohol 
history
X
X2
Full Physical Exam (Inc Wt, Ht)
X
X2
Vital Signs (BP, HR, Temperature)3
X
X
X
X
X
X
12-Lead ECG
X
X
X
X
X
Safety Labs (Chemistry, 
Hematology, and Urinalysis)
X
X
Pregnancy Test4
X
X
Estradiol/FSH5
X
Urine Drug Screen, Alcohol Screen & 
Cotinine6
X
X
HIV, Hep B, Hep C
X
Administration of mixed meal 
breakfast7
X
Dosing
X
 
 
 
2018N363775_00


2016N303948_00
CONFIDENTIAL
207440
11
Screening
Day -1
Day 1
Screen
(within 21d)
Day -11
Pre-
dose
0h
0.5h
1h
1.5h
2h
2.5h
3h
4h
5h
8h
12h
Plasma PK Sampling8
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS)9
============================================================
Concomitant Medication
=================================================
AE Assessment
===================================================================
SAE Assessment
========================================================================
Outpatient Visits
X
Inpatient Check-in
X
1.
Within each cohort, subjects will return for their next scheduled dosing period approximately 14 days after administration of the study drug during the prior dosing period
2.
Period 1 Day -1:  Update medical/ medication history; No Wt/ Ht at Day-1.
3.
Full vital signs to be taken at screening and Day-1, and on Day 1 predose.  Blood pressure and heart rate will be taken 1 hr, 4 hr and 12 hr after administration of study drug on 
Day 1.
4.
Serum hCG at screening, urine hCG pre-dose on Day -1 – all females.
5.
If indicated
6.
An alcohol breath test is acceptable.
7.
Mixed meal breakfast ONLY for Cohort 2, Period 2 immediately following dosing.
8.
PK will be collected on Day 1, 2 and 3 with time relative to Day 1 dose.  Day 1 at predose within 10 minutes prior to 1st dose at time zero and then postdose at the following 
timepoints: 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 5, 8, 12 hrs. 
9.
BSFS for all stool samples beginning Day -1.  
 
 
 
2018N363775_00


2016N303948_00
CONFIDENTIAL
207440
12
Part A: Cohort 1 and 2 – Single Dose – Days 2-3 and Follow Up
Day 2
Day 2
Day 2
Day 3
Follow Up1
16h
24h
36h
48h
(Days 7-10)
Medical/medication/drug/alcohol history
Brief Physical Exam 
X2
X2
Vital Signs (BP, HR, Temperature)
X
X
X
12-Lead ECG
X
X
Safety Labs (Chemistry, Hematology, and Urinalysis)
X
X
Pregnancy Test3
X
Plasma Pharmacokinetic Sampling4
X
X
X
X
BSFS5
===========================
Concomitant Medication
===========================
AE Assessment
===========================
SAE Assessment
===========================
Outpatient Visits
X
Inpatient Check-out
X
1.
Subjects will return approximately 1 week after check out from their last actual dosing period (i.e. Day 1 of Dosing Period 3) for a final follow up visit.  If a subject discontinues from 
the study prior to completing all 4 periods in Cohort 1 or all 2 periods in Cohort 2, they will complete their early termination visit 7-10 days after their last dose received.
2.
No Wt/ Ht, Brief, symptom directed Physical Exam.
3.
Serum hCG at follow up – all females.
4.
PK will be collected on Days 1, 2 and 3 with time relative to Day 1 dose.  Day 2 at: 16, 24, & 36 hrs & Day 3 at 48 hrs.
5.
BSFS for all stool samples beginning Day -1
 
 
 
2018N363775_00


2016N303948_00
CONFIDENTIAL
207440
13
Part B – Repeat Dose – Fasted (QD & BID)
Screening 
Period and 
Baseline 
Assessments
(within 21 
days)
Treatment 
Period
Follow Up 
Period or 
Early 
Termination
Screening
Day -2
Day -1
Day 1
Days 
2-6
Day 7
Day 
8-12
Day 13
Day 14
Day 15
Day 22-25
Informed Consent
X
Inclusion and exclusion criteria
X
X1
Demography
X
Medical/surgical/alcohol history
X
X1
Full Physical Exam (Inc Wt, Ht)
X
X1
X1
X1
X1
Vital Signs (BP, HR, Temperature) 2
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
12-Lead ECG3
X
X
X
X
X
Safety Labs (Chemistry, Hematology, 
and Urinalysis)
X
X
X
X
X
Pregnancy Test4
X
X
X
Estradiol/FSH5
X
Cotinine Test, Urine Drug Screen & 
Alcohol Screen6
X
X
HIV, Hep B, Hep C
X
Administration of standard meal at 
dinner
X
X
X
Administration of mixed meal at 
breakfast7
X
X
X
X
 
 
 
2018N363775_00


2016N303948_00
CONFIDENTIAL
207440
14
Screening 
Period and 
Baseline 
Assessments
(within 21 
days)
Treatment 
Period
Follow Up 
Period or 
Early 
Termination
Screening
Day -2
Day -1
Day 1
Days 2-
6
Day 7
Day 8-12
Day 13
Day 14
Day 15
Day 22-25
Pharmacodynamic testing8
X
X
X
Dosing9
X
X
X
X
X
X
Plasma PK Sampling10
X
X
X
X
X
X
Plasma Metabolite Sampling11
X
X
Urinary PK &Metabolite Sampling12
X
X
Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS)13
========================================
Prior and Concomitant Medication
================================================
AE Assessment
================================
SAE Assessment
==========================================================
Outpatient Visits
X
X
Inpatient Check-in
X
Inpatient Check-out
X
1.
Day -2: Confirm eligibility, update medical / medication history. Ht at Screening only.  Wt at screening and on Days -1, 7 and 15.  Brief symptom directed physical exam on Days 7, 
15 and at FU.
2.
Full vital signs will be taken at screening, D-2, D-1, Day 1, 7 and 14 predose, D15, & FU.  Vital signs on Day 1, 7 and 14 will be taken 4 hrs after admin of study drug.
3.
12 lead ECG will be on Days 1, 7 and 14 predose and approximately 4 hours after administration of study drug.
4.
Serum hCG at screening and follow up, urine hCG pre-dose on Day -2 – all females.
5.
If indicated 
6.
An alcohol breath test is acceptable.  
7.
Mixed meal breakfast to be eaten on days -1, 1, 7 and 14 at approximately 2 hours post dose and eaten within 15 minutes.
 
 
 
2018N363775_00


2016N303948_00
CONFIDENTIAL
207440
15
8.
Blood samples for PD on Day -1, Day 1 and Day 14 at the following timepoints: 15, 10, and 5 minutes prior to breakfast, and 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 hrs post breakfast.  Lunch to be 
eaten after 4 hr sample.  
9.
QD Dosing will be at approximately 0800 hours. BID Dosing will be at approximately 0800 and PM dose to be administered 10 hours following AM dose.
10. For QD dosing: Days 1 and 14 PK blood samples will be obtained predose within 10 minutes prior to 1st dose at time zero and then postdose at the following timepoints: 0.5, 1, 
1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 5, 8, 12, 16, and 24 hrs (within 10 minutes or less prior to next dose).
For QD dosing, Day 7: PK blood samples will be obtained predose within 10 minutes prior to 1st dose at time zero and then postdose at the following timepoints: 1, 2, 4, 8, and 24
hours (10 minutes prior to next dose on Day 8).
For BID dosing: Days 1 and 14 PK blood samples will be obtained predose within 10 minutes prior to 1st dose and then postdose at the following timepoints: 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 
4, 5, 8, 10 (10 mins prior to 2nd dose), 11, 12, 14, 16, and 24 hrs (within 10 minutes or less prior to next dose).
For BID dosing, Day 7: PK blood samples will be obtained predose within 10 minutes prior to 1st dose at time zero and then postdose at the following timepoints: 1, 2, 4, 8, 10 
hours (10 minutes or less prior to 2nd dose) and 24 hours (10 minutes prior to next dose on Day 8).
11. Plasma samples for metabolite profiling will be collected pre-dose and at all PK timepoints post-dose (for 0-24 hours for all cohorts, however only samples from the highest dose 
cohort will be analyzed.
12. Urine samples to aid metabolite structure identification will be collected pre-dose and over 0-24 hours for all cohorts and analyzed for the highest dose cohort samples only
13. BSFS for all stool samples beginning with time of check into clinical facility.
 
 
 
2018N363775_00


2016N303948_00
CONFIDENTIAL
207440
16
Part B – Repeat Dose – Fed (QD and BID)
Screening 
Period and 
Baseline 
Assessments
(within 21 
days)
Treatment 
Period
Follow Up 
Period or 
Early 
Termination
Screening
Day -2
Day -1
Day 1
Days 2-6
Day 7
Day 8-
12
Day 13
Day 14
Day 15
Day 22-25
Informed Consent
X
Inclusion and exclusion criteria
X
X1
Demography
X
Medical/surgical/alcohol history
X
X1
X1
X1
Full Physical Exam (Inc Wt, Ht)
X
X1
X1
X1
X1
Vital Signs (BP, HR, Temperature) 2
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
12-Lead ECG3
X
X
X
X
X
Safety Labs (Chemistry, Hematology, 
and Urinalysis)
X
X
X
X
X
Pregnancy Test4
X
X
X
Estradiol/FSH5
X
Cotinine Test, Urine Drug Screen & 
Alcohol Screen6
X
X
HIV, Hep B, Hep C
X
Administration of standard meal at 
dinner
X
X
X
Administration of mixed meal at 
breakfast7
X
X
X
X
 
 
 
2018N363775_00


2016N303948_00
CONFIDENTIAL
207440
17
Screening 
Period and 
Baseline 
Assessments
(within 21 
days)
Treatment 
Period
Follow Up 
Period or 
Early 
Termination
Screening
Day -2
Day -1
Day 1
Days 2-6
Day 7
Day 8-
12
Day 13
Day 14
Day 15
Day 22-25
Pharmacodynamic testing8
X
X
X
Dosing9
X
X
X
X
X
X
Plasma PK Sampling10
X
X
X
X
X
X
Plasma Metabolite Sampling11
X
X
Urinary PK &Metabolite Sampling12
X
X
Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS)13
================================
Prior and Concomitant Medication
======================================================
AE Assessment
====================================
SAE Assessment
========================================================
Outpatient Visits
X
X
Inpatient Check-in
X
Inpatient Check-out
X
1.
Day - 2: Confirm eligibility, update medical / medication history. Ht at Screening only.  Wt at screening and on Days -1, 7 and 15.  Brief symptom directed physical exam on Days 
7, 15 and at FU.
2.
Full vital signs will be taken at screening, D-2, D-1, Day 1, 7 and 14 predose, D15, & FU.  Vital signs on Day 1, 7 and 14 will be taken 4 hrs after admin of study drug.
3.
12 lead ECG will be on Days 1, 7 and 14 predose and approximately 4 hours after administration of study drug.
4.
Serum hCG at screening and follow up, urine hCG pre-dose on Day -2 – all females.
5.
If indicated 
6.
An alcohol breath test is acceptable.
7.
Mixed meal breakfast to be eaten on days -1, 1, 7 and 14 immediately following dose (approx 0800) and eaten within 15 minutes.  
 
 
 
2018N363775_00


2016N303948_00
CONFIDENTIAL
207440
18
8.
Blood samples for PD on Day -1, Day 1 and Day 14 at the following timepoints: 15, 10, and 5 minutes prior to breakfast and 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 hrs post breakfast.  Lunch to be 
eaten after 4 hr sample obtained
9.
QD Dosing will be at approximately 0800 hours and BID dosing will be at approximately 0800 and PM dose to be administered 10 hours following AM dose.
10. For QD dosing: Days 1 and 14 PK blood samples will be obtained predose within 10 minutes prior to 1st dose at time zero and then postdose at the following timepoints: 0.5,1, 
1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 5, 8, 12, 16, and 24 hr (within 10 minutes or less prior to next dose).
For QD dosing, Day 7: PK blood samples will be obtained predose within 10 minutes prior to 1st dose at time zero and then postdose at the following timepoints: 1, 2, 4, 8, 
and 24 hours (10 minutes prior to next dose on Day 8).
For BID dosing: Days 1 and 14 PK blood samples to be obtained predose within 10 minutes prior to 1st dose and then postdose at the following timepoints: 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 
2.5, 3, 4, 5, 8, 10 (10 mins prior to 2nd dose), 11, 12, 14, 16, and 24 hrs (within 10 minutes or less prior to next dose ). 
For BID dosing, Day 7: PK blood samples will be obtained predose within 10 minutes prior to 1st dose at time zero and then postdose at the following timepoints: 1, 2, 4, 8, 
10 (10 mins prior to 2nd dose) and 24 hrs (10 minutes or less prior to next dose).
11. Plasma samples for metabolite profiling will be collected pre-dose and at all PK timepoints post-dose (for 0-24 hours for all cohorts, however only samples from the highest dose 
cohort will be analyzed.
12. Urine samples to aid metabolite structure identification will be collected pre-dose and over 0-24 hours for all cohorts and analyzed for the highest dose cohort samples only.
13. BSFS for all stool samples beginning with time of check into clinical facility.
 
 
 
2018N363775_00


2016N303948_00
CONFIDENTIAL
207440
19
3.
INTRODUCTION
Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a relatively common gastrointestinal (GI) illness with a 
prevalence of approximately 5 to 20% and characterized by a constellation of clinical 
symptoms including abdominal pain and discomfort, abnormal bowel habits, and bloating 
[Camilleri, 2012] [Halland, 2013] [Longstreth, 2006].  Because the etiology of the 
disease has not been established, diagnosis is difficult and relies primarily on the 
presence of a specific symptom complex occurring with a minimum frequency in the 
absence of an alternative explanation. It is generally believed that the sensory 
inputs/outputs in the peripheral and central nervous system are altered in such a way that 
a patient with IBS has a heightened and disproportionate sensory experience for a given 
stimulus, i.e. visceral hypersensitivity [Azpiroz, 2007].  Visceral hypersensitivity may 
result from increased nerve fiber density and sprouting in the intestinal mucosal tissues of 
patients with IBS [Dothel, 2015].
The only drugs which are FDA-approved for treatment of IBS are alosetron, rifaximin 
and eluxadoline for refractory diarrhea-predominant IBS, and linaclotide and 
lubiprostone for constipation-predominant IBS.  The majority of these drugs and those 
used off label to treat IBS, treat patient symptoms by altering GI motility and are 
minimally effective in addressing abdominal pain and discomfort.  Of the approved 
agents, only alosetron is hypothesized to modulate the central and enteric nervous system. 
[Berman, 2002] [Gyermek, 1996]
3.1.
Study Rationale
The current study is designed to assess the safety, tolerability and PK of escalating single 
and repeat oral doses of GSK3352589 in normal healthy volunteers.  This study is the 
first administration of GSK3352589 to humans.
3.2.
Background
REarranged during Transfection (RET) is a neuronal growth factor receptor tyrosine 
kinase whose activity is critical for the development of the enteric nervous system, the 
kidney and spermatogenesis [Airaksinen, 2002].  The role of RET kinase in the 
development of the ENS has been aided by the study of patients with Hirschsprung’s 
disease who frequently suffer from colonic obstruction due to a lack of normal colonic 
innervation and possess RET loss of function mutations [Edery, 1994].  While its role 
during the development of the ENS has been well established, recent reports also 
implicate a significant role for RET kinase in the maintenance and plasticity of the adult 
ENS.  Indeed, neurons within the submucosal and myenteric plexus of the adult human 
colon have been shown to express RET kinase and its co-receptors glial cell line-derived 
neurotrophic factor family receptors alpha 1 and 2 (GFR1 and GFR2) while glial cell 
line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF), the ligand for RET kinase, is expressed in the 
muscularis mucosa, and circular and longitudinal muscle tissue [Barrenschee, 2013].  
Systemic administration of GDNF in adult rodents results in significant increases in 
submucosal neuron density in both the small intestine and colon and altered function 
[Wang, 2010].  Furthermore, a conditional knockout of the RET kinase co-receptor, 
GFRα3, results in decreased colonic hypersensitivity implicating a role for RET kinase 
 
2018N363775_00


2016N303948_00
CONFIDENTIAL
207440
20
signaling in visceral nociception [Tanaka, 2011].  Therefore, by reducing RET signaling, 
RET kinase inhibition may modulate sensory neuron activity in the enteric nervous 
system. 
GSK3352589 is a potent and selective inhibitor of RET kinase which has been shown to 
reduce visceral hypersensitivity in an animal model of IBS and inhibit cholinergic-
induced increases in colonic motility. The results from these preclinical studies suggest 
that RET kinase inhibition has the potential to reduce abdominal pain and discomfort in 
patients with IBS via a novel mechanism of action which may normalize both visceral 
hypersensitivity and abnormal motility by inhibiting the function of cholinergic neurons.  
Thus, the patient population that may derive the greatest benefit would consist of 
individuals with IBS-diarrhea with increased GI motility (IBS-D). 
GSK3352589 is the second RET kinase inhibitor to be assessed in normal volunteers.  To 
date, the first RET kinase inhibitor, GSK3179106, has been administered to 48 healthy 
volunteers in two Phase I clinical studies.  In general, administration of GSK3179106 to 
normal volunteers has been well tolerated.  Overall, systemic exposures GSK3179106 
were low due to poor oral bioavailability. A significant food effect was observed; the 
geometric mean ratio comparing fed to fasted for AUC0-t and Cmax was approximately 10-
fold and 8-fold, respectively. No clinically relevant risks that would preclude dosing a 
RET kinase inhibitor for up to 2 weeks in normal healthy volunteers have been identified.
GSK3352589 has different physicochemical properties than GSK3179106.  GSK3352589 
is a Biopharmaceutical Classification System (BCS) Class 3 compound with high 
solubility and low permeability and is expected to have more homogeneous GI tract 
tissue distribution which has the potential for improved effectiveness. Additionally, 
GSK3352589 systemic exposures are expected to be lower when compared to 
GSK3179106 and are not expected to increase when administered with food.
3.2.1.
Nonclinical
GSK3352589 is a potent ATP non-competitive reversible inhibitor of the RET kinase 
enzyme in biochemical and cell-based assays with a mean IC50’s of 0.07 and 21 nM 
respectively.  In vivo, the effect of GSK3352589 was assessed in a rat model of irritable 
bowel syndrome (IBS) for the inhibition of acetic acid induced colonic hypersensitivity 
as measured by the visceromotor response to colonic distension at different pressures 
[Plourde, 1997].  GSK3352589 significantly inhibited rat colonic hypersensitivity when 
administered orally twice daily at 10 mg/kg/dose for 3.5 days when compared to vehicle 
controls (49 and 43% inhibition at 40 and 60 mmHg, respectively; P<0.0001). Similarly, 
doses of GSK3352589 at 30 and 100 mg/kg/dose inhibited colonic hypersensitivity 
compared to vehicle controls (30 mg/kg/dose: 43 and 40% inhibition; 100 mg/kg/dose: 45 
and 44% inhibition at 40 and 60 mmHg, respectively, P<0.0001). GSK3352589 at all 
doses examined had no effect on stool consistency or colonic motility in the basal state. 
In contrast, GSK3352589 was able to inhibit increased colonic motility stimulated with 
the use of the cholinergic agonist neostigmine at doses ≥ 3mg/kg/dose.
In addition to its expression in the enteric nervous system, RET kinase is expressed in 
enteroendocrine cells lining the intestinal mucosa (data on file).  Preliminary test results 
evaluating the effect of a tool compound that inhibits RET kinase suggest a potential role 
 
2018N363775_00


2016N303948_00
CONFIDENTIAL
207440
21
of RET kinase in regulating levels of postprandial glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) (data 
on file).  Safety pharmacology studies have shown that GSK3352589 caused no overt 
treatment-related acute neurobehavioral effects in the conscious rat following single 
doses of 10, 100 or 1000 mg/kg.  GSK3352589 produced no treatment-related effects on 
the cardiovascular system in conscious dogs.  GSK3352589 had no effect on respiratory 
ventilation parameters in dogs after single doses of 10, 100 or 1000 mg/kg.  GSK3352589
produced a concentration-dependent prolongation in the QT interval in rabbit ventricular 
wedge preparations. Based on this finding, an investigative cardiovascular study was 
performed in conscious dogs.  Intravenous infusions of GSK3352589 yielding plasma 
concentrations greater than target concentrations determined by the rabbit ventricular 
wedge assay indicated no ECG waveform abnormalities/ arrhythmias or QT prolongation 
attributable to GSK3352589.  IC50 values for inhibition of hERG channel tail current 
could not be achieved at concentrations up to 44.67 M, however concentration-
dependent inhibition allowed calculation of an IC25 which was estimated to be 28.22 M 
(15.55 g/mL).  As these in vitro concentrations, which represent free drug, greatly 
exceed those anticipated in humans, it is considered unlikely that GSK3352589 would 
prolong QT interval at the proposed clinical dose.  In addition, as described above, no 
effects on the ECG measurements, including QT interval measurements, made at regular 
intervals throughout studies in which animals received GSK3352589 at doses up to 
1000 mg/kg/day for 28 days were observed.  It is therefore concluded that GSK3352589
is unlikely to cause any effects on the ECG in humans.
No test article-related findings were noted in the 1 month rat and dog oral toxicity 
studies, therefore the NOAEL was considered to be greater than or equal to 1000 
mg/kg/day, the highest dose tested. In dogs, the highest exposure was observed where 
gender averaged AUC(0-t) and Cmax were 40.4 ng.h/mL and 26.6 ng/mL, respectively; in 
rats gender averaged AUC(0-t) and Cmax were 51 ng.h/mL and 7.7 ng/mL, respectively.
In a non-GLP study conducted in rats, a dose range of GSK3352589 was given by 
intravenous infusion, 4 hours daily, for 7 consecutive days to identify target organs at 
systemic concentrations exceeding predicted clinical exposure.  Test article-related
effects were limited to cortical lymphocytolysis in the thymus and decreased lymphocyte 
and total white blood cell counts.  Systemic exposure in rats given 5 mg/kg/day by 4 hour 
daily intravenous infusion produced an AUC(0-t) and Cmax of 2490 ng.h/mL and 
578 ng/mL, respectively.
The genetic toxicity of GSK3352589 has been investigated in preliminary Ames and 
Mouse Lymphoma Assay (MLA) assays.  No mutagenic potential was demonstrated in 
either the absence or presence of S9-mix in these assay systems.
Low systemic exposure following single and repeat dose administration of the oral
formulations has been demonstrated in these nonclinical studies, consistent with very low 
oral bioavailability (rats2%; dogs1%). 
Preliminary data from two non-GLP dose ranging embryofetal development (EFD) 
studies conducted with GSK3352589 in rats and rabbits demonstrated no findings at 
exposures much higher than those achievable by oral administration (Cmax 623 ng/mL 
and AUC 5080 ng.h/mL).
 
2018N363775_00


2016N303948_00
CONFIDENTIAL
207440
22
Detailed summaries of all completed in vitro and in vivo nonclinical safety pharmacology 
and toxicity studies are provided in the GSK33352589 Investigator’s Brochure 
[GlaxoSmithKline Document Number 2016N305051_00].
3.3.
Benefit/Risk Assessment
Summaries of findings from non-clinical studies conducted with GSK3352589 can be 
found in the Investigator’s Brochure [GlaxoSmithKline Document Number 
2016N305051_00].  The following section outlines the risk assessment and mitigation
strategy for this protocol.
3.3.1.
Risk Assessment
The current study 207440 represents the first administration of GSK3352589 to healthy 
subjects and extensive safety monitoring will occur during the course of the study.  
Considerations for safety monitoring are derived primarily from experience dosing the 
first RET kinase inhibitor (GSK3179106) to normal healthy volunteers and GSK3352589 
non-clinical data. Administration of GSK3179106 in single doses up to 800 mg QD in the 
fasted state and repeat doses up to 200 mg BID, in the fed state, was in general, well 
tolerated with no clinically important AEs observed that would preclude dosing of 
GSK3352589 to normal healthy volunteers for up to 14 days.  The safety and tolerability 
profile of GSK3179106 is attributed to its low oral bioavailability.
Based on the absence of test article related adverse findings in the GLP safety 
pharmacology and repeat dose toxicity studies, coupled with the likelihood of very low 
GSK3352589 systemic exposures highest planned AUC exposure = 40.4 ng.h/mL, the 
risk of adverse events occurring in healthy adult male volunteers and female volunteers 
of non childbearing potential administered single or repeat doses of GSK3352589 in the 
fasted or fed state is judged to be low.
More detailed information about the known and expected benefits and risks and 
reasonably expected adverse events of GSK3352589 may be found in the the 
Investigator’s Brochure [GlaxoSmithKline Document Number 2016N305051_00].
Potential Risk of Clinical
Significance
Summary of Data/Rationale 
for Risk
Mitigation Strategy
Investigational Product (IP) [GSK 3352589]
Embryofetal development 
toxicity
Potential class effect of 
tyrosine kinase inhibitors. 
Lead RET kinase inhibitor 
is a multi-species teratogen.
Early studies with 
GSK3352589 suggest that it 
is not teratogenic.  
Definitive studies are 
planned.
Women of child bearing 
potential excluded from 
study participation.  Men 
with female partners 
required to use barrier 
contraception and 
females required to use a 
GSK approved method 
of hormonal 
contraception (see 
 
2018N363775_00


2016N303948_00
CONFIDENTIAL
207440
23
Potential Risk of Clinical
Significance
Summary of Data/Rationale 
for Risk
Mitigation Strategy
Section 12.7).
Drug drug interaction
Given possibility of 
CYP3A4 and p-
glycoprotein inhibition in 
gut
Appropriate 
inclusion/exclusion 
criteria.
Potential GI effects
Based on biological 
properties (putative)
Routine PV and BSFS to 
monitor changes in 
defecation pattern. 
3.3.2.
Benefit Assessment
Participants in the study are not expected to receive any direct medical benefits from their 
participation in the study.
3.3.3.
Overall Benefit:Risk Conclusion
Taking into account the measures taken to minimize risk to subjects participating in this 
study, the potential risks identified in association with GSK3352589 are justified by the 
eventual benefits that may be afforded to patients with IBS.
 
2018N363775_00


2016N303948_00
CONFIDENTIAL
207440
24
4.
OBJECTIVES AND ENDPOINTS
Objectives
Endpoints
Primary
Part A Single Dose

To evaluate the safety and tolerability of 
single escalating oral doses of 
GSK3352589 administered in the fasted 
state and a single dose of GSK3352589 
administered in the fed state in healthy 
adult subjects

To evaluate the pharmacokinetic 
parameters of escalating single oral doses 
of GSK3352589 under fasting and fed (for 
one dose only) conditions in healthy adult 
subjects.
Part B Repeat Dose

To evaluate the safety and tolerability of 
repeat escalating oral doses of 
GSK3352589 administered once or twice 
daily in the fasted or fed state.

To characterize the PK of GSK3352589 of 
repeat  escalating oral doses administered 
once or twice daily in the fasted or fed 
state

Clinical safety and tolerability data 
including spontaneous adverse event (AE) 
reporting, clinical observations, physical 
examination findings, 12-lead 
electrocardiograms (ECG), vital signs, 
Bristol Stool Form Scores (BSFS), clinical 
laboratory tests.  

PK parameters obtained following 
administration of GSK3353589.  PK 
parameters include areas under the 
plasma concentration versus time curve,
AUC over the dosing interval and other 
time intervals, Cmax, Tmax, and terminal 
t ½, for Days 1 and 14 will be analyzed as 
data permit.
Exploratory

To explore the effect of GSK3352589 on 
the postprandial plasma profiles of total 
glucagon like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and total 
peptide YY (PYY) following repeat oral 
doses of GSK3352589 administered once 
or twice daily

To investigate the biotransformation of 
GSK3352589 in plasma and urine

Postprandial challenge (mixed-meal) 
profiles of total GLP-1 and total PYY.

Provide samples of plasma and urine for 
the identification of any compound-derived 
metabolite(s).
5.
STUDY DESIGN
5.1.
Overall Design
This randomized, double-blind (sponsor unblinded), placebo controlled, dose escalation 
study will be divided into two parts: Part A is a single dose escalating, four period 
 
2018N363775_00


2016N303948_00
CONFIDENTIAL
207440
25
crossover (Cohort 1) with a two period, single sequence pilot food effect (Cohort 2) study 
and Part B is a 14 day repeat dose escalating, ascending cohort study. 
The study will be composed of 3 periods for all subjects (Screening, Treatment, and 
Follow-up).  Subjects will participate in either Part A or Part B. A subject’s total time 
involved in the study will be approximately 10 weeks for subjects enrolled in Part A, 
Cohort 1 and approximately 8 weeks for subjects enrolled in Part A, Cohort 2.  Subjects 
enrolled in Part B will be involved in the study for a total time of approximately 7 weeks.
All dosing periods for subjects participating in Part A will be completed before beginning 
enrollment in Part B.  
5.2.
Number of Participants
5.2.1.
Part A
Single dose, dose escalating, four period, crossover (Cohort 1) with a two period, single 
sequence pilot food effect (Cohort 2) study.  
A sufficient number of healthy volunteers will be screened to enroll 16 subjects (8 
subjects/cohort).  Two cohorts of subjects are planned.  Subjects assigned to Cohort 1 
will participate in 4 dosing periods: 1 placebo and 3 dose escalating periods.  The planned 
dose range for Cohort 1 is 2 to 400 mg.  Each dosing period during Cohort 1 will be 
staggered so that only 2 of the 8 subjects will be administered study drug initially.  Once 
24 hours have elapsed, and provided there are no safety concerns, the remainder of 
subjects scheduled for that dosing period may be dosed.  A review of safety and 
tolerability will occur prior to administration of the next dose level.  This same procedure 
will be followed for each escalating dosing period.  Within each cohort, subjects will 
return for their next scheduled dosing period approximately 14 days after administration 
of the study drug during the prior dosing period.  
Cohort 2 will proceed after completion of the treatment periods in Cohort 1.  Subjects 
assigned to Cohort 2 will participate in a pilot food effect in Periods 1 and 2 (see Table 1
below).  A single dose of GSK3352589 will be administered in the fasted and fed states 
in Cohort 2. The dose selected to evaluate the food effect will allow for a 2X increase in 
bioavailability and predicted exposures will not exceed the highest observed exposures at 
prior doses.
The actual doses to be administered may be adjusted based on safety, tolerability and PK 
data at previous dose levels; these dose adjustments may involve either an increase or a 
decrease in the planned dose for Cohort 1. Dose escalation will occur only if mean 
systemic exposures are projected not to exceed the defined plasma toxicokinetic (TK) 
limits.  Preliminary safety and PK data from all subjects will be reviewed prior to the 
next Dosing Period.  The decision to proceed to the next dose level will be made by the 
GSK Medical Monitor and the investigator based on safety, tolerability and available PK 
data.  
 
2018N363775_00


2016N303948_00
CONFIDENTIAL
207440
26
Table 1
Part A Treatment Sequence
Cohort 1 (Single Dose Escalation1)
Treatment 
Sequence
Subjects
Period 1
Period 2
Period 3
Period 4
A
and
Placebo
D2
D3
D4
B
and
D1
Placebo
D3
D4
C
and
D1
D2
Placebo
D4
D
and
D1
D2
D3
Placebo
1
Dose escalation will occur only if mean systemic exposures are projected not to exceed the defined plasma 
toxicokinetic (TK) limits.
Cohort 2 (Pilot Food Effect)
Treatment Sequence
Subjects
Period 1
Period 2
E
D5
D5 + food
F
and
Placebo
Placebo + food
5.2.2.
Part B
Part B is a 14 day randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, repeat dose escalating, 
ascending cohort study.  
Up to six (6) cohorts are planned and will be conducted sequentially.  A sufficient 
number of healthy volunteers will be screened to randomize 48 subjects (8 subjects/
cohort).  If subjects are prematurely discontinued from the study, additional replacement 
subjects may be enrolled at the discretion of the Sponsor in consultation with the 
Investigator.
The planned dose range is 2 mg once daily to 200 mg twice daily.  The starting dose for 
Part B will be selected after review of the safety, tolerability and PK data of subjects 
enrolled in Part A and completing all dosing periods.  An example dose escalation plan is 
shown in Table 2 below. The actual doses to be administered may be adjusted based on 
safety, tolerability and PK data at previous dose levels; these dose adjustments may 
involve either an increase or a decrease in the planned dose. Dose escalation will occur 
only if mean systemic exposures are projected not to exceed the defined plasma 
toxicokinetic (TK) limits.  
Table 2
Planned Dose Escalation for Part B
Regimen Descriptions
Number of Subjects
Cohort 1
2 mg of GSK3352589 administered QD
or matching placebo administered QD
GSK3352589 n=6
Placebo n=2
Cohort 2
10 mg of GSK3352589 administered QD
or matching placebo administered QD
GSK3352589 n=6
Placebo n=2
Cohort 3
25 mg of GSK3352589 administered BID
or matching placebo administered BID
GSK3352589 n=6
Placebo n=2
 
2018N363775_00
PPD
PPD
PPD
PPD
PPD


2016N303948_00
CONFIDENTIAL
207440
27
Regimen Descriptions
Number of Subjects
Cohort 4
50 mg of GSK3352589 administered BID
or matching placebo administered BID
GSK3352589 n=6 
Placebo n=2
Cohort 5
100 mg of GSK3352589 administered BID
or matching placebo administered BID
GSK3352589 n=6
Placebo n=2
Cohort 6
200 mg of GSK3352589 administered BID
Or matching placebo administered BID
GSK3352589 n=6
Placebo n=2
Subjects will undergo pretreatment baseline pharmacodynamic (PD) testing after 
administration of a breakfast mixed-meal challenge on Day -1 prior to receiving the first 
dose of study drug, on Day 1, and at the end of the treatment period on Day 14.  
Preliminary safety and tolerability from 14 days of dosing and PK data from 7 days of 
dosing for each cohort will be reviewed prior to dose escalation and will be used to 
determine the dose to be administered in the subsequent cohort.  The decision to proceed 
to the next dose level will be made by the GSK Medical Monitor and the investigator 
based on safety, tolerability and available PK data.
Additional subjects/cohorts may be enrolled to allow for evaluation of additional dose 
levels or dosing regimens.
5.3.
Participant and Study Completion
A participant is considered to have completed the study if he/she has completed all 
phases of the study including the follow up visit
The end of the study is defined as the date of the last visit of the last participant in the 
study.
5.4.
Scientific Rationale for Study Design
5.4.1.
Part A
A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind (sponsor unblind), single ascending dose 
crossover study design is based on well established and published methods to evaluate 
the single dose administration of experimental drugs.  The use of this design reduces 
inter-subject variability in the PK data, thus improving its quality and interpretation.  
Additionally, it reduces the number of subjects exposed to the investigational agent and 
required to guide selection of the starting dose for the repeat dose study to follow.  
Approximately a 2 week washout period between administrations of escalating doses 
assures that study drug has been cleared and in the event that an adverse event occurs, 
adequate time for resolution.  Placebo has been selected as the control.
A pilot food effect study is included because of the potential for a food effect with a high 
solubility, low permeability compound such as GSK3352589.  Theoretical potential 
exists for a decrease in bioavailability that could limit tissue exposure.
Placebo has been selected as the control.
 
2018N363775_00


2016N303948_00
CONFIDENTIAL
207440
28
5.4.2.
Part B
A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind (sponsor unblind), ascending cohort 
study design is based on well established and published methods to evaluate the repeat 
dose administration of experimental drugs.  Placebo has been selected as the control.
5.5.
Dose Justification
In the preclinical safety and repeat dose toxicity studies performed to date, GSK3352589
1000 mg/kg administered for up to 28 days by the oral route of administration, results in 
low exposure in rats or dogs without evidence of a test article related safety signal or 
finding.  Thus, the starting dose of 2 mg is derived from the minimum anticipated 
biological effect level (MABEL) dose related to its pharmacology rather than to NOAELs 
in the absence of safety or toxicity findings in animals [CDER, 2005].
5.5.1.
Human Pharmacodynamic Predictions
Five methods were used to estimate a therapeutic dose range for GSK3352589. The target 
tissue is the ENS within the colon. The pharmacological activity in the rat IBS visceral 
hypersensitivity model is driven by drug penetration from colon luminal contents to the 
ENS within colon tissue. The pharmacological response correlates with colon tissue 
concentrations rather than plasma concentrations. 
Because the pharmacology is thought to be driven by colon tissue drug concentrations, 
the human dose predictions are independent of the predicted human systemic 
pharmacokinetic profile.  A summary of the results for the various methods for 
translating rat to human pharmacology and doses are shown in Table 3. The dose range 
for minimal pharmacological effect is predicted to be 5 mg to 136 mg once daily. The 
dose range for maximum pharmacological effect is predicted to be 5 mg to 454 mg once 
daily.  It is unknown if these doses are best given once or twice daily, but twice daily 
dosing should provide more sustained tissue colon concentrations per day. The rat IBS 
visceral hypersensitivity model indicates steady state tissue concentrations and twice 
daily dosing is required.  Therefore low, single doses in humans are not expected to have 
an effect.  Detailed explanations of the methods are shown in Section 12.2.
 
2018N363775_00


2016N303948_00
CONFIDENTIAL
207440
29
Table 3
Summary of human dose predictions by method
Method
Pharmacologically Active Doses
Minimum Effect
Maximum Effect
Rat IBS model dose reference
3 mg/kg
10 mg/kg
Systems pharmacology model
5-10 mg QD or >2 mg BID
HED - body surface area extrapolation
30 mg
100 mg
HED with relative small intestine surface 
area correction (rat to human)
7 mg
23 mg
HED with relative large intestine surface 
area correction (rat to human)
136 mg
454 mg
Human dose scaled by colon content and gut 
weight
122 mg
406 mg
HED = human equivalent dose (FDA- CDER 2005)
5.5.2.
Human Pharmacokinetic Predictions
The model PK parameters that relate dose and plasma GSK3352589 concentrations were
based on several interspecies scaling and prediction methods. Small molecule drug 
candidates with moderately high hepatic clearance and any size volumes of distribution 
are more reliably scaled between species based on body weights and a few other 
methods.  Absolute bioavailability and absorption rates are estimated more directly from 
the animal data.  The absolute bioavailability of GSK3353589 is expected to be very low 
and therefore the primary source of uncertainty for the predictions of concentration-time 
profiles and exposure estimates (i.e., AUC, Cmax).
The systemic clearance (CLs) was obtained from five interspecies scaling methods. The 
CLs median (range) was 836 mL/min (528-1002 mL/min). The magnitude of the CLs
estimate implies GSK3352589 is a moderately high hepatic clearance compound. The
median volume of distribution (V) was 314 liters ranging from 126 to 546 liters and 
implies drug distribution is very large and extensively distributed into tissues. 
Consequently, the median (range) for plasma half-life (T1/2) is 3.7 (2.1-7.9) hours. The 
Tmax, time to reach Cmax, is expected to be about 1.5 hours ranging from 0.5 to 5.0 
hours. The variability in all parameters was taken into account with simulations that 
include probability distributions for each parameter in the PK model equation describing 
the GSK3352589 concentration time profiles.
 
2018N363775_00


2016N303948_00
CONFIDENTIAL
207440
30
In all nonclinical species tested, GSK3352589 has highly variable, limited, and less than 
proportional systemic exposure with increasing doses, consistent with its very low oral 
bioavailability (rats ≤2%; dogs ≤1%).  In the rat, oral administration with food slightly 
increased the systemic exposure of GSK3352589. The bioavailability (F) estimates used 
in the simulations are listed from low to high: 0.016% (mice solution, fasted), 0.02% 
(male rats GLP TK suspension, fed), 0.06% (rats suspension, fed), 0.07% (female rats 
GLP TK suspension, fed), 0.18% (rats solution, fasted), 0.24% (dogs solution, fed), 1.1% 
(rats non GLP TK suspension, fed), 1.9% (rats non GLP TK suspension, fed).  The F 
ranges from 0.016% to 1.9% and attributed to large variation in individual rats.  The 
overall group median is 0.125%.  More weight was given to the estimates of F that 
included all species and the predicted AUC and Cmax exposures for administration of 
single doses based on most likely bioavailability using F=0.16% can be seen in the Table 
4 below.  The higher estimates of 1.1% and 1.9% in rats appeared to be the outliers 
compared to other rat estimates, mice and dogs and the impact of assuming the highest 
potential exposure (1.5%) is shown in Table 6. These predictions were assumed to be 
linearly related to dose.  This assumption is conservative since animal PK shows either 
linear or less than dose proportional relationships. Plasma GSK3352589 concentration 
time profiles are shown in Figure 1 for two single doses (2 mg and 200 mg). The 
predicted AUC and Cmax exposures for repeat doses at steady state are shown in Table 5. 
The bioavailability of GSK3352589B is likely permeability-limited since it has low
permeability and high FaSSIF solubility and considered a biopharmaceutical 
classification system (BCS) Class III type compound.  Therefore, the compound is 
expected to be solubilized and well mixed in the gut contents and absorption across the 
enterocyte epithelial layer is the rate limiting step.  MALDI imaging studies indicate 
good GI tissue distribution despite a low permeability categorization.  With BCS class III 
compounds, it is more likely that there will be a decrease in bioavailability, where plasma 
AUC and Cmax are decreased [Radwan, 2012].  However, a food effect study in rats with 
rat chow showed an increase in plasma AUC of 2.6 fold.  The mixed prediction of a food 
effect will be considered when dose selection is made for the pilot food effect study.
Table 4
Predicted exposures based on mostly likely bioavailability estimates 
for single doses - Median (5th and 95th percentiles) predictions for 
plasma GSK3352589 AUC(0- ) and Cmax (FASTED) by dose
Dose (mg)
AUC(0-)a (h*ng/mL)
Cmaxa (ng/mL)
1
0.021 (0.0078, 0.095)
0.0028 (0.0013, 0.011)
2
0.044 (0.015, 0.19)
0.0058 (0.0026, 0.022)
5
0.105 (0.039, 0.48)
0.015 (0.0065, 0.06)
10
0.211 (0.077, 0.95)
0.029 (0.013, 0.11)
25
0.55 (0.19, 2.4)
0.075 (0.033, 0.29)
50
1.09 (0.39, 4.8)
0.15 (0.065, 0.57)
100
2.18 (0.77, 9.5)
0.29 (0.129, 1.14)
200
4.36 (1.53, 19.0)
0.579 (0.258, 2.27)
400
8.72 (3.06, 38.0)
1.16 (0.52, 4.54)
 
2018N363775_00


2016N303948_00
CONFIDENTIAL
207440
31
a.
median (5th, 95th percentiles), n=10,000 simulations,
Additional Output:  median (range) Tmax (h) = 1.5 (0.5-5.0);  median [(5th, 95th percentiles) and range] T1/2(h) = 3.7 
[(2.1, 7.9) and 1.6-12],
Predictions assume dose proportionality and this assumption is generally consistent with animal PK though with 
highly variability,
Bioavailability (F) average 0.16% ranging from 0.016%-1.5%; F is built into V/F as input variable, the 5th, 95th
percentiles include the low and high F estimates,
Input: median (5th, 95th percentiles) for K01(h-1) = 1.7 (0.66, 3.9); K10 (h-1) = 0.19 (0.09, 0.33); Vd/F (Liters) = 
262,858 (67,595- 568,451); mean and range for Vd (Liters) = 314 (126-546),
Single dose human exposures AUC(0-) are equivalent to steady state AUC(0-24 h) with once daily dosing.
Table 5
Predicted exposures based on mostly likely bioavailability estimates 
for repeat doses at steady state - Median (5th and 95th percentiles) 
predictions for plasma GSK3352589 AUCss (FASTED) by dose
Once Daily Dosing
Twice Daily Dosing
Dose (mg)
AUCss(0-24) (h*ng/mL) a
AUCss(0-24) (h*ng/mL) a
1
0.021 (0.0078, 0.095)
0.042 (0.016, 0.19)
2
0.044 (0.015, 0.19)
0.088 (0.030, 0.38)
5
0.105 (0.039, 0.48)
0.210 (0.078, 0.96)
10
0.211 (0.077, 0.95)
0.422 (0.154, 1.90)
25
0.55 (0.19, 2.4)
1.10 (0.38, 4.80)
50
1.09 (0.39, 4.8)
2.18 (0.78, 9.6)
100
2.18 (0.77, 9.5)
4.36 (1.54, 19.0)
200
4.36 (1.53, 19.0)
8.72 (3.1, 38.0)
400
8.72 (3.06, 38.0)
-
a.
median (5th, 95th percentiles), n=10,000 simulations.
Predictions assume dose proportionality and this assumption is generally consistent with animal PK though highly 
variability.
Single dose human exposures AUC(0-) are equivalent to steady state AUCss(0-24 h) with once daily dosing 
assuming no time dependent changes in drug disposition.
 
2018N363775_00


2016N303948_00
CONFIDENTIAL
207440
32
Figure 1
Simulation of median (5th, 95th percentiles) concentration-time
profiles in humans for 2 mg and 200 mg single doses of 
GSK3352589 assuming most likely bioavailability
2 mg 
Time (hour)
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
GSK3352589 plasma concentration (ng/mL)
0.000
0.005
0.010
0.015
0.020
0.025
0.030
median
5th and 95th percentile
200 mg
Time (hour)
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
GSK3352589 plasma concentration (ng/mL)
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
median
5th and 95th percentiles
 
2018N363775_00


2016N303948_00
CONFIDENTIAL
207440
33
5.5.2.1.
Predicted exposures for higher than expected bioavailability
The PK parameter that is most uncertain is oral bioavailability (F).  Although exposures 
remain very low, results of preclinical PK and TK assessments suggest the potential for 
up to a 100X increase in bioavailability.  An analysis of predicted exposures for the 
highest potential oral bioavailability, 1.5% (gender averaged) is included to illustrate the
effect of bioavailability on AUC and Cmax for single doses in Table 6 below.  All other 
parameters predictions are the same as in Table 5 above.
Table 6
Predicted exposures based on highest possible bioavailability 
estimates for single doses - Median (5th and 95th percentiles) 
predictions for plasma GSK3352589 AUC(0- ) and Cmax (FASTED) 
by dose
Dose (mg)
AUC(0-)a (h*ng/mL)
Cmaxa (ng/mL)
1
0.26 (0.128, 0.61)
0.036 (0.024, 0.06)
2
0.52 (0.26, 1.22)
0.072 (0.048, 0.12)
5
1.30 (0.64, 3.04)
0.18 (0.12, 0.30)
10
2.60 (1.27, 6.07)
0.36 (0.23, 0.59)
25
6.5 (3.2, 15.2)
0.90 (0.60, 1.5)
50
13.0 (6.4, 30.3)
1.8 (1.2, 3.0)
100
26.0 (12.8, 60.5)
3.6 (2.3, 6.0)
200
52.0 (25.5, 121)
7.11 (4.61, 11.9)
400
104 (51, 242)
14.2 (9.2, 24)
a.
 median (5th, 95th percentiles), n=10,000 simulations,
Additional Output:  median (range) Tmax (h) = 1.5 (0.5-5.0);  median [(5th, 95th percentiles) and range] T1/2(h) = 3.7 
[(2.1, 7.9) and 1.6-12],
Predictions assume dose proportionality and this assumption is generally consistent with animal PK though with 
highly variability,
Bioavailability (F) = 1.5% for outlier simulations.
Input: median (5th, 95th percentiles) for K01(h-1) = 1.7 (0.66, 3.9); K10 (h-1) = 0.19 (0.09, 0.33); Vd/F (Liters) = 
21,353 (13,131- 30332); mean and range for Vd (Liters) = 314 (126-546),
Single dose human exposures AUC(0-) are equivalent to steady state AUC(0-24 h) with once daily dosing.
5.5.3.
Dose Range and Safety Margins
The MABEL for this therapeutic is related to its pharmacology rather than to any safety 
or toxicity findings.  The lowest doses predicted to be minimally effective following 
repeat dosing to steady-steady are 5 mg QD or 2 mg BID.  The proposed starting dose for 
this single dose study is 2 mg, a conservative estimate for minimal, if any, effect.  The 
highest doses predicted to be maximally effective following repeat dosing to steady state 
are 406 – 454 once daily. A highest total daily dose of 400 mg was selected based on the 
predictions for the maximally effective dose.
Table 7 provides the predicted systemic exposures for administration of single doses up 
to 400 mg of GSK3352589, assuming linearity for both the most likely estimate for 
bioavailability (0.16%) and the highest expected estimate for bioavailability (1.5%), and
the estimated safety margins for these predicted exposures, respectively.  The safety 
 
2018N363775_00


2016N303948_00
CONFIDENTIAL
207440
34
margins are calculated from the systemic exposures observed in the 4 wk oral dog repeat 
dose toxicity study.  No test article-related findings were noted in the 1 month rat and dog 
oral toxicity studies, therefore the NOAEL was considered to be greater than or equal to 
1000 mg/kg/day, the highest dose tested in each species. In rats, the highest gender-
averaged exposures observed were AUC(0-t) and Cmax 51.0 ng.h/mL and 7.7 ng/mL, 
respectively; and in dogs the gender-averaged AUC(0-t)) and Cmax were 40.4 ng.h/mL 
and 26.7 ng/mL, respectively. Although these exposures are similar, the dog exposures 
were used to calculate the safety margins because of the higher Cmax.  
The safety margins for Cmax and AUC for the planned starting single dose of 2 mg 
GSK3352589 assuming the highest possible bioavailability (1.5%) are 742X and 155X, 
respectively.  The predicted mean steady-state Cmax and AUC for humans assuming 
dose proportionality administered the highest planned single dose of 400 mg are below 
the animal safety exposure limits if the exposures suggest that bioavailability is closer to 
the most likely predicted value, 0.16%. During both Part A (single dose) and Part B 
(repeat dose), dose escalation will occur only if mean systemic exposures are projected 
not to exceed the defined plasma toxicokinetic (TK) limits [AUC(0-t)) and Cmax of 40.4 
ng.h/mL and 26.7 ng/mL, respectively].  The risk of either exceeding the defined TK 
limits or occurrence of systemic adverse events is judged to be low because of the low 
oral bioavailability of GSK3352589.
Table 7
Predicted Most Likely and Highest Potential Human Systemic 
Exposures and Estimated Safety Margins for Single Doses of 
GSK3352589 (Fasted State)
Predicted Human 
Mean Cmax
ng/mL
Predicted Human 
Mean AUC
ng.h/mL
4 Week Oral Dog Repeat Dose Toxicity Study*
Most Likely Highest 
Potential
Most 
Likely
Highest 
Potential
Safety Margins for
Cmax
Safety Margins for 
AUC
2 mg
0.006
0.036
0.04
0.26
742 to > 9500X
155-1923X
10 mg
0.029
0.36
0.211
2.6
74 – 920X
16-192X
50 mg
0.15
1.8
1.09
13
15-178X
3.1-37X
200 mg
0.579
7.11
4.36
52
3.8-46X
0.8-9.3X
400 mg
1.16
14.2
8.72
104
1.9-23X
0.4-4.6X
*Safety margins are calculated with the dog NOAELs from the 1 month repeat dose toxicity study because mean Cmax 
was greater (26.7 ng/mL) than in rats (7.7 ng/mL) and the AUCs were similar (40.4 and 51 ng.h/mL for dogs and rats, 
respectively).
Although a negative food effect is predicted for this BCS III compound, the dose selected 
to evaluate the food effect will allow for a 2X increase in bioavailability due to the slight 
increase in bioavailability observed in the rat food effect study.
 
2018N363775_00


2016N303948_00
CONFIDENTIAL
207440
35
6.
STUDY POPULATION
Prospective approval of protocol deviations to recruitment and enrollment criteria, also 
known as protocol waivers or exemptions, is not permitted.
6.1.
Inclusion Criteria
Participants are eligible to be included in the study only if all of the following criteria 
apply:
AGE
1
Between 18 and 55 years of age inclusive, at the time of signing the informed 
consent.
TYPE OF SUBJECT AND DIAGNOSIS INCLUDING DISEASE SEVERITY 
2
Healthy as determined by the investigator based on a medical evaluation including 
medical history, physical examination, laboratory tests and cardiac monitoring.  A 
subject with a clinical abnormality or laboratory parameter(s) which is/are not 
specifically listed in the inclusion or exclusion criteria, outside the reference range for 
the population being studied may be included only if the investigator, in consultation 
with the Medical Monitor, agree and document that the finding is unlikely to 
introduce additional risk factors and will not interfere with the study procedures. 
3
History of regular bowel habits and no more than 3 bowel movements per day
SEX
4
Male or Female
a. Male participants:
A male participant must agree to use contraception as detailed in Section 12.7 of this 
protocol during the treatment period and for at least 7 days, corresponding to time 
needed to eliminate study treatment for both genotoxic and teratogenic study 
treatments after the last dose of study treatment and refrain from donating sperm 
during this period.
b. Female participants: 
A female participant is eligible to participate if she is not a woman of childbearing 
potential (WOCBP) as defined in Section 12.7.
INFORMED CONSENT
5
Capable of giving signed informed consent as described in Section 12.5 which
includes compliance with the requirements and restrictions listed in the informed 
consent form (ICF) and in this protocol.
 
2018N363775_00


2016N303948_00
CONFIDENTIAL
207440
36
6.2.
Exclusion Criteria
Participants are excluded from the study if any of the following criteria apply:
CONCURRENT CONDITIONS/MEDICAL HISTORY (INCLUDES LIVER 
FUNCTION AND QTc INTERVAL) 
1.
ALT and bilirubin >1.5xULN (isolated bilirubin >1.5xULN is acceptable if bilirubin 
is fractionated and direct bilirubin <35%).
2.
Previous Diagnosis of IBS
3.
Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate < 60 mL/min/1.73m2
4.
Current or chronic history of liver disease, or known hepatic or biliary abnormalities 
(with the exception of Gilbert's syndrome or asymptomatic gallstones)
5.
History of GERD, dyspepsia, GI bleeding, diverticulitis, diverticular stricture or 
other intestinal strictures, GI surgery that could affect motility, bezoars, dysphagia to 
solid food or pills, pelvic surgery within the past 3 months.
6.
Cardiac pacemakers or other implanted electromedical devices.
7.
Presence of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) at screening or within 3 months 
prior to first dose of study treatment
8.
Positive hepatitis C antibody test result at screening or within 3 months prior to first 
dose of study treatment.  NOTE: Participants with positive Hepatitis C antibody due 
to prior resolved disease can be enrolled, only if a confirmatory negative Hepatitis C 
RNA test is obtained
9.
A positive pre-study drug/alcohol screen.  
10. A positive test for HIV antibody.
11. History of regular alcohol consumption within 6 months of the study defined as: 
an average weekly intake of >14 standard drinks.  One standard drink is 
equivalent to 10 g of alcohol: 285 ml of beer, 100 ml of wine or 30 ml of 40% 
alcohol by volume distilled spirits. 
12. Current smoker or use of nicotine containing products within the past 3 months or 
unable to abstain from smoking tobacco or the use of nicotine-containing products 
while on study or positive pre-study cotinine test.
13. Unable to refrain from consumption of red wine, seville oranges, grapefruit or 
grapefruit juice and/or pummelos, exotic citrus fruits, grapefruit hybrids or fruit 
juices from 2 days prior to the first dose of Study Drug until inpatient check-out from 
the clinic.
14. QTcF>450 msec
NOTES:

The QTc is the QT interval corrected for heart rate according to Bazett’s 
formula (QTcB), Fridericia’s formula (QTcF), and/or another method, machine-
read or manually over-read.
 
2018N363775_00


2016N303948_00
CONFIDENTIAL
207440
37

The specific formula that will be used to determine eligibility and 
discontinuation for an individual subject should be determined prior to initiation 
of the study. In other words, several different formulae cannot be used to 
calculate the QTc for an individual subject and then the lowest QTc value used 
to include or discontinue the subject from the trial.

For purposes of data analysis, QTcB, QTcF, another QT correction formula, or a 
composite of available values of QTc will be used as specified in the Reporting 
and Analysis Plan (RAP).
CONCOMITANT MEDICATIONS
15. History of sensitivity to any of the study medications, or components thereof or a 
history of drug or other allergy that, in the opinion of the investigator or GSK 
Medical Monitor, contraindicates their participation. 
16. Unable to refrain from the use of prescription or non-prescription drugs, including 
vitamins, antacids, herbal and dietary supplements (including St John’s Wort) within 
7 days (or 14 days if the drug is a potential enzyme inducer) or 5 half-lives 
(whichever is longer) prior to the first dose of study medication for each dosing, 
unless in the opinion of the Investigator and GSK Medical Monitor the medication 
will not interfere with the study procedures or compromise subject safety.  
Paracetamol (≤ 2 grams per day) is acceptable.
RELEVANT HABITS
17. The subject has participated in a clinical trial and has received an investigational 
product within the following time period prior to the first dosing day in the current 
study: 30 days, 5 half-lives or twice the duration of the biological effect of the 
investigational product (whichever is longer).
18. Exposure to more than 4 investigational medicinal products within 12 months prior 
to the first dosing day
19. Unwillingness or inability to follow the procedures outlined in the protocol.
20. Where participation in the study would result in donation of blood or blood products 
in excess of 500 mL within a 56 day period.
6.3.
Lifestyle Restrictions
6.3.1.
Part A Fasted: Meals and Dietary Restrictions

Subjects must fast from all food and drink (except water) for at least 8 hours 
prior to dose and PK sampling on Day 1 and will remain fasted for 
approximately 4 hours postdose.  Water may be consumed ad libitum.

Subjects will consume a standard weight neutral-meal for all meals and with no 
time limits.

Each dose of study drug will be administered with 240 mL of water while the 
subject is sitting/ standing.  All of the water must be completely consumed 
 
2018N363775_00


2016N303948_00
CONFIDENTIAL
207440
38
within approximately 5 minutes.  Subjects may sit upright or stand, but must not 
lie down for at least 30 minutes after study drug administration.

Subjects must refrain from consumption of red wine, Seville oranges, grapefruit 
or grapefruit juice and/or pummelos, exotic citrus fruits, grapefruit hybrids or 
fruit juices from 2 days prior to the first dose of Study Drug on Day 1 until 
inpatient check-out from the clinic.
6.3.2.
Part A Fed for Pilot Food Effect (Cohort 2, Dosing Period 2):  
Meals and Dietary Restrictions

Subjects must fast from all food and drink (except water) for at least 8 hours 
prior to dose and PK sample on Day 1. Water may be consumed ad libitum.

Subjects will consume a mixed meal breakfast (also referred to as the PD meal
in Part B instructions) immediately following the dose on Day 1.  This identical 
mixed meal breakfast will consist of 55% carbohydrate, 15% protein, and 30% 
fat, representing 20% of subject’s total calorie intake.

The mixed meal breakfast must be eaten within 15 minutes and eaten in total.

Subjects will consume a standard weight-neutral meal for all other meals and 
with no time limits.

Each dose of study drug will be administered with 240 mL of water while the 
subject is sitting/ standing.  All of the water must be completely consumed 
within approximately 5 minutes.  Subjects may sit upright or stand, but must not 
lie down for at least 30 minutes after study drug administration.

Subjects must refrain from consumption of red wine, Seville oranges, grapefruit 
or grapefruit juice and/or pummelos, exotic citrus fruits, grapefruit hybrids or 
fruit juices from 2 days prior to the first dose of Study Drug on Day 1 until 
inpatient check-out from the clinic.
6.3.3.
Part B QD Fasted:  Meals and Dietary Restrictions

On PK days (Day 1, Day 7 and Day 14) Subjects must fast from all food and 
drink (except water) for at least 8 hours prior to dose and PK sample.  Subjects 
will remain fasted until mixed meal (PD) breakfast meal at approximately 2 
hours postdose.  Water may be consumed ad libitum.

On PD days (Day -1, Day 1 and Day 14) subjects must fast from all food and 
drink (except water) for at least 8 hours prior to PD sample.  Subjects will 
remain fasted until breakfast at approximately 2 hours postdose.  Water may be 
consumed ad libitum.

On the PD days (Day -1, Day 1, and Day 14) at approximately 2 hours postdose,
an identical mixed meal breakfast consisting of 55% carbohydrate, 15% protein, 
and 30% fat, representing 20% of subject’s total calorie intake will be 
consumed.

The PD breakfast meal must be eaten within 15 minutes and eaten in total.
 
2018N363775_00


2016N303948_00
CONFIDENTIAL
207440
39

The evening before PD testing days (Day -2, Day -1 and Day 13), subjects will 
consume a standard dinner, identical on all days.

Subjects will consume a standard weight neutral-meal for all other meals on PK 
and PD days as well as non PK and PD days with no time limits.

Lunch will be eaten approximately 4 hours after breakfast and dinner 
approximately 5 hours after lunch.

Each dose of study drug will be administered with 240 mL of water while the 
subject is sitting/ standing.  All of the water must be completely consumed 
within approximately 5 minutes.  Subjects may sit upright or stand, but must not 
lie down for at least 30 minutes after study drug administration.

Subjects must refrain from consumption of red wine, Seville oranges, grapefruit 
or grapefruit juice and/or pummelos, exotic citrus fruits, grapefruit hybrids or 
fruit juices from 2 days prior to the first dose of Study Drug on Day 1 until 
inpatient check-out from the clinic.
6.3.4.
Part B BID Fasted:  Meals and Dietary Restrictions

On PK days (Day 1, Day 7 and Day 14) Subjects must fast from all food and 
drink (except water) for at least 8 hours prior to AM dose and PK sample.  
Subjects will remain fasted until mixed meal (PD) breakfast meal at 
approximately 2 hours postdose.  Water may be consumed ad libitum.

On PK days (Day 1, Day 7 and Day 14) subjects must fast from all food and 
drink (except water) for at least 1 hour after PM dose administration.  Water 
may be consumed ad libitum.

On PD days (Day -1, Day 1 and Day 14) subjects must fast from all food and 
drink (except water) for at least 8 hours prior to PD sample.  Subjects will 
remain fasted until breakfast at approximately 2 hours postdose.  Water may be 
consumed ad libitum.

On PD days (Day -1, Day 1, and Day 14) subjects will receive an identical 
mixed meal breakfast at 1000 consisting of 55% carbohydrate, 15% protein, and 
30% fat, representing 20% of subject’s total calorie intake will be consumed.

The PD breakfast meal must be eaten within 15 minutes and eaten in total.

The evening before PD testing days (Day -2, Day -1 and Day 13), subjects will 
consume a standard dinner, identical on all days.

Lunch will be eaten at approximately 4 hours after breakfast meal and dinner 
approximately 5 hours after lunch.

Each dose of study drug will be administered with 240 mL of water while the 
subject is sitting/ standing.  All of the water must be completely consumed 
within approximately 5 minutes.  Subjects may sit upright or stand, but must not 
lie down for at least 30 minutes after study drug administration.

Subjects must refrain from consumption of red wine, Seville oranges, grapefruit 
or grapefruit juice and/or pummelos, exotic citrus fruits, grapefruit hybrids or 
 
2018N363775_00


2016N303948_00
CONFIDENTIAL
207440
40
fruit juices from 2 days prior to the first dose of Study Drug on Day 1 until 
inpatient check-out from the clinic.
6.3.5.
Part B QD Fed:  Meals and Dietary Restrictions

On PK days (Day 1, Day 7 and Day 14) Subjects must fast from all food and 
drink (except water) for at least 8 hours prior to dose and PK sample.  Subjects 
will consume a PD breakfast meal immediately following dosing.  Water may be 
consumed ad libitum.

On PD days (Day -1, Day 1 and Day 14) subjects must fast from all food and 
drink (except water) for at least 8 hours prior to PD sample.  Subjects will 
consume breakfast immediately following dosing.  Water may be consumed ad 
libitum.

On the PD days (Day -1, Day 1, and Day 14), an identical mixed meal breakfast 
consisting of 55% carbohydrate, 15% protein, and 30% fat, representing 20% of 
subject’s total calorie intake will be eaten immediately following administration 
of study drug.

The PD breakfast meal must be eaten within 15 minutes and eaten in total.

The evening before PD testing days (Day -2, Day -1 and Day 13), subjects will 
consume a standard dinner, identical on all days.

Subjects will consume a standard weight-neutral meal for all other meals on PK 
and PD days as well as non PK and PD days and with no time limits.

Lunch will be eaten at approximately 4 hours after breakfast and dinner 
approximately 6 hours after lunch.

Each dose of study drug will be administered with 240 mL of water while the 
subject is sitting/ standing.  All of the water must be completely consumed 
within approximately 5 minutes.  Subjects may sit upright or stand, but must not 
lie down for at least 30 minutes after study drug administration.

Subjects must refrain from consumption of red wine, Seville oranges, grapefruit 
or grapefruit juice and/or pummelos, exotic citrus fruits, grapefruit hybrids or 
fruit juices from 2 days prior to the first dose of Study Drug on Day 1 until 
inpatient check-out from the clinic.
6.3.6.
Part  B BID Fed:  Meals and Dietary Restrictions

On PK days (Day 1, Day 7 and Day 14) Subjects must fast from all food and 
drink (except water) for at least 8 hours prior to dose and PK sample.  Subjects 
will consume the PD breakfast meal immediately following dosing.  Water may 
be consumed ad libitum.

On PD days (Day -1, Day 1 and Day 14) subjects must fast from all food and 
drink (except water) for at least 8 hours prior to PD sample.  Subjects will 
consume breakfast immediately following dosing.  Water may be consumed ad 
libitum.
 
2018N363775_00


2016N303948_00
CONFIDENTIAL
207440
41

On the PD days (Day -1, Day 1, and Day 14), an identical mixed meal breakfast 
consisting of 55% carbohydrate, 15% protein, and 30% fat, representing 20% of 
subject’s total calorie intake will be consumed.

The PD breakfast meal must be eaten within 15 minutes and eaten in total.

The evening before PD testing days (Day -2, Day -1 and Day 13), subjects will 
consume a standard dinner, identical on all days.

Subjects will consume a standard weight neutral meal for all other meals on PK 
and PD days as well as non PK and PD days and with no time limits.

Lunch will be eaten at approximately 4 hours after breakfast and dinner 
approximately 6 hours after lunch.

Each dose of study drug will be administered with 240 mL of water while the 
subject is sitting/ standing.  All of the water must be completely consumed 
within approximately 5 minutes.  Subjects may sit upright or stand, but must not 
lie down for at least 30 minutes after study drug administration.

Subjects must refrain from consumption of red wine, Seville oranges, grapefruit 
or grapefruit juice and/or pummelos, exotic citrus fruits, grapefruit hybrids or 
fruit juices from 2 days prior to the first dose of Study Drug on Day 1 until 
inpatient check-out from the clinic.
6.3.7.
Caffeine, Alcohol, and Tobacco

Subjects will abstain from alcohol for 24 hours prior to Day -1 to the clinic until 
inpatient check-out from the clinic.

The use of nicotine-containing products (including nicotine patches) will not be 
permitted from 3 months prior to admission to the clinic until inpatient check-out 
from the clinic.
6.3.8.
Activity

Participants will abstain from strenuous exercise for 48 hours before each blood
collection for clinical laboratory tests. Participants may participate in light 
recreational activities during studies (eg, watching television, reading).
6.4.
Screen Failures
Screen failures are defined as participants who consent to participate in the clinical study 
but are not subsequently randomized. A minimal set of screen failure information is 
required to ensure transparent reporting of screen failure participants to meet the 
Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) publishing requirements and to 
respond to queries from regulatory authorities. Minimal information includes 
demography, screen failure details, eligibility criteria, and any serious adverse events 
(SAEs).
Individuals who do not meet the criteria for participation in this study (screen failure) 
may be rescreened. 
 
2018N363775_00


2016N303948_00
CONFIDENTIAL
207440
42
7.
TREATMENTS
Study treatment is defined as any investigational treatment or placebo intended to be 
administered to a study participant according to the study protocol.
7.1.
Treatments Administered
Study Treatment Name:
GSK3352589
Placebo
Dosage formulation:
Tablet
Tablet
Unit dose 
strength(s)/Dosage level(s):
1, 5, 25 and 100 mg
Placebos to match actives 
across all strengths
Route of Administration 
Oral
Oral
Dosing instructions:
Swallow whole with water, do 
not chew
Swallow whole with water, do 
not chew
Packaging and Labeling
Study Treatment will be labeled 
as required per country 
requirement. 
Study Treatment will be 
labeled as required per country 
requirement.
Manufacturer
WUXI/ GlaxoSmithKline
WUXI/ GlaxoSmithKline
7.2.
Dose Modification
This protocol allows some alteration from the currently outlined dosing schedule but the 
(predicted) maximum/cumulative exposure will not exceed a CMAX=26.6 ng/mL or 
AUC = 40.4 ng.h/mL.  The decision to proceed to the next dose level of GSK3352589 
(either an increase or a decrease) will be made by the Medical Monitor and the 
investigator based on safety, tolerability and preliminary PK data obtained in at least 4 
GSK3352589-treated subjects at the prior dose level.  The dosing schedule may also be 
adjusted to expand a dosing cohort to further evaluate safety or PK findings at a given 
dose level or to add cohorts to evaluate up to 2 additional dose levels or dosing regimens. 
The study procedures for these additional participants/cohorts will be the same as those 
described for other study participants/cohorts.   If moderate or severe AEs are 
consistently observed across participants in a cohort or if unacceptable pharmacological 
effects, reasonably attributable to study treatment in the opinion of the investigator are 
observed in more than 1 participant in a cohort, than dose escalation will be temporarily 
halted and no further participants will be dosed until a full safety review of the study has 
taken place.  Relevant reporting and discussion with Medical Monitor and the Ethics 
Committee will take place before resumption of dosing.  
 
2018N363775_00


2016N303948_00
CONFIDENTIAL
207440
43
7.3.
Method of Treatment Assignment
The randomization schedule will be computer generated by GSK. On Day 1, subjects
will be assigned a unique number (randomization number) in ascending numerical order. 
The randomization number encodes the participant’s assignment to a treatment arm or 
sequence, according to the randomization schedule generated prior to the study by the 
Statistics Department at GSK. Each participant will be dispensed blinded study 
treatment, labeled with his/her unique randomization number, throughout the study.
7.4.
Blinding
This will be a double blind (sponsor unblind) study and the following will apply.  GSK 
staff will be considered unblinded to treatments, though the number with access to 
treatment information will be minimized. 

The investigator or treating physician may unblind a subject’s treatment assignment 
only in the case of an emergency OR in the event of a serious medical condition 
when knowledge of the study treatment is essential for the appropriate clinical 
management or welfare of the subject as judged by the investigator. 

Investigators have direct access to the subject’s individual study treatment. 

It is preferred (but not required) that the investigator first contacts the Medical 
Monitor or appropriate GSK study personnel to discuss options before unblinding the 
subject’s treatment assignment. 

If GSK personnel are not contacted before the unblinding, the investigator must 
notify GSK as soon as possible after unblinding, but without revealing the treatment 
assignment of the unblinded subject, unless that information is important for the 
safety of subjects currently in the study. 

The date and reason for the unblinding must be fully documented in the eCRF 
A subject will be withdrawn if the subject’s treatment code is unblinded by the 
investigator or treating physician. The primary reason for discontinuation (the event or 
condition which led to the unblinding) will be recorded in the eCRF.

GSK’s Global Clinical Safety and Pharmacovigilance (GCSP) staff may unblind 
the treatment assignment for any subject with an SAE. If the SAE requires that an 
expedited regulatory report be sent to one or more regulatory agencies, a copy of 
the report, identifying the subject’s treatment assignment, may be sent to 
investigators in accordance with local regulations and/or GSK policy.
7.5.
Preparation/Handling/Storage/Accountability
The investigator or designee must confirm appropriate temperature conditions have been 
maintained during transit for all study treatment received and any discrepancies are 
reported and resolved before use of the study treatment.
Only participants enrolled in the study may receive study treatment and only authorized 
site staff may supply or administer study treatment. All study treatments must be stored 
 
2018N363775_00


2016N303948_00
CONFIDENTIAL
207440
44
in a secure, environmentally controlled, and monitored (manual or automated) area in 
accordance with the labeled storage conditions with access limited to the investigator and 
authorized site staff.
The investigator, institution, or the head of the medical institution (where applicable) is 
responsible for study treatment accountability, reconciliation, and record maintenance (ie, 
receipt, reconciliation, and final disposition records).
Further guidance and information for the final disposition of unused study treatment are 
provided in the Study Reference Manual.

A Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS)/equivalent document describing occupational 
hazards and recommended handling precautions either will be provided to the 
investigator, where this is required by local laws, or is available upon request from 
GSK.
Precaution will be taken to avoid direct contact with the study treatment.  A Material 
Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) describing occupational hazards and recommended handling 
precautions will be provided to the investigator. In the case of unintentional occupational 
exposure notify the monitor, Medical Monitor and/or GSK study contact.
7.6.
Treatment Compliance
Participants are dosed at the site and will receive study treatment directly from the 
investigator or designee, under medical supervision.  The date and time of each dose 
administered in the clinic will be recorded in the source documents.  The dose of study 
treatment and study participant identification will be confirmed at the time of dosing by a 
member of the study site staff other than the person administering the study treatment.  
Study site personnel will examine each participant’s mouth to ensure that the study 
treatment was ingested.
7.7.
Concomitant Therapy
Any medication or vaccine (including over-the-counter or prescription medicines, 
vitamins, and/or herbal supplements) that the participant is receiving at the time of 
enrolment or receives during the study must be recorded along with:

reason for use

dates of administration including start and end dates

dosage information including dose and frequency
The Medical Monitor should be contacted if there are any questions regarding 
concomitant or prior therapy.
Participants must abstain from taking prescription or nonprescription drugs (including 
vitamins and dietary or herbal supplements) within 7 days (or 14 days if the drug is a 
potential enzyme inducer) or 5 half-lives (whichever is longer) before the start of study 
treatment until completion of the follow-up visit, unless, in the opinion of the investigator 
and GSK medical monitor, the medication will not interfere with the study. 
 
2018N363775_00


2016N303948_00
CONFIDENTIAL
207440
45
Paracetamol, at doses of 2 grams/day, is permitted for use any time during the study.
Other concomitant medication may be considered on a case-by-case basis by the 
investigator, in consultation with the Medical Monitor, if required.
7.8.
Treatment after the End of the Study
Subjects will not receive any additional treatment from GSK after completion of the 
study because only healthy volunteers are eligible for study participation.
8.
DISCONTINUATION CRITERIA
8.1.
Discontinuation of Study Treatment
A subject may withdraw from study treatment at any time at his/her own request, or may 
be withdrawn at any time at the discretion of the investigator for safety, behavioural or 
administrative reasons. If a subject withdraws from the study, he/she may request 
destruction of any samples taken, and the investigator must document this in the site 
study records. 
8.1.1.
Liver Chemistry Stopping Criteria
Liver chemistry stopping and increased monitoring criteria have been designed to 
assure participant safety and evaluate liver event etiology.  
Study treatment will be discontinued for a participant if liver chemistry stopping criteria 
are met:
 
2018N363775_00


2016N303948_00
CONFIDENTIAL
207440
46
Phase I Liver Chemistry Stopping Criteria – Liver Stopping Event Algorithm
Continue Study Treatment 
Discontinue Study Treatment 
*INR value not applicable to subjects on anticoagulants 
ALT ≥3xULN 
No
Yes
Must refer to Liver Safety Required Actions and Follow up Assessments  section in the Appendix
Report as an SAE if possible Hy’s Law case: ALT≥3xULN and  Bilirubin≥2xULN (>35% direct)  or 
INR>1.5, if measured*
Liver Safety Required Actions and Follow up Assessments Section can be found in
Section 12.8.
8.1.2.
QTc Stopping Criteria

The QTcF correction formula must be used for each individual subject to 
determine eligibility for and discontinuation from the study.  This formula may 
not be changed or substituted once the subject has been enrolled.

The QTc should be based on averaged QTcF values of triplicate 
electrocardiograms obtained over a brief (e.g., 5-10 minute) recording period.  
A subject that meets either bulleted criterion based on the average of triplicate ECG 
readings will be withdrawn from the study:

QTcF > 500 msec,

Change from baseline: QTcF >60 msec
See the SoA for data to be collected at the time of treatment discontinuation and follow-
up and for any further evaluations that need to be completed.
8.2.
Withdrawal from the Study

A participant may withdraw from the study at any time at his/her own request, 
or may be withdrawn at any time at the discretion of the investigator for safety, 
behavioural, compliance or administrative reasons.
 
2018N363775_00


2016N303948_00
CONFIDENTIAL
207440
47

If the participant withdraws consent for disclosure of future information, the 
sponsor may retain and continue to use any data collected before such a 
withdrawal of consent.

If a participant withdraws from the study, he/she may request destruction of any 
samples taken and not tested, and the investigator must document this in the site 
study records.

Refer to the SoA for data to be collected at the time of study discontinuation and
follow-up and for any further evaluations that need to be completed.
8.3.
Lost to Follow Up
A participant will be considered lost to follow-up if he or she repeatedly fails to return for 
scheduled visits and is unable to be contacted by the study site. 
The following actions must be taken if a participant fails to return to the clinic for a 
required study visit:

The site must attempt to contact the participant and reschedule the missed visit 
as soon as possible and counsel the participant on the importance of maintaining 
the assigned visit schedule and ascertain whether or not the participant wishes to 
and/or should continue in the study.

Before a participant is deemed lost to follow up, the investigator or designee 
must make every effort to regain contact with the participant (where possible, 3 
telephone calls and, if necessary, a certified letter to the participant’s last known 
mailing address or local equivalent methods). These contact attempts should be 
documented in the participant’s medical record.

Should the participant continue to be unreachable, he/she will be considered to 
have withdrawn from the study with a primary reason of lost to follow-up. 
9.
STUDY ASSESSMENTS AND PROCEDURES

Study procedures and their timing are summarized in the SoA. 

Protocol waivers or exemptions are not allowed 

Immediate safety concerns should be discussed with the sponsor immediately upon 
occurrence or awareness to determine if the participant should continue or 
discontinue study treatment.

Adherence to the study design requirements, including those specified in the SoA, is 
essential and required for study conduct.

All screening evaluations must be completed and reviewed to confirm that potential 
participants meet all eligibility criteria. The investigator will maintain a screening 
log to record details of all participants screened and to confirm eligibility or record 
reasons for screening failure, as applicable. 
 
2018N363775_00


2016N303948_00
CONFIDENTIAL
207440
48

Procedures conducted as part of the participant’s routine clinical management (eg, 
blood count) and obtained before signing of ICF may be utilized for screening or 
baseline purposes provided the procedure met the protocol-specified criteria and was 
performed within the time frame defined in the SoA.

The maximum amount of blood collected from each participant over the 
duration of the study, including any extra assessments that may be required, will 
not exceed 470 mL.

Repeat or unscheduled samples may be taken for safety reasons or for technical 
issues with the samples.
9.1.
Adverse Events
The definitions of an AE or SAE can be found in Section 12.6.
The investigator and any designees are responsible for detecting, documenting, and 
reporting events that meet the definition of an AE or SAE and remain responsible for 
following up AEs that are serious, considered related to the study treatment or the study,
or that caused the participant to discontinue the GSK3352589 (see Section 12.6). 
9.1.1.
Time Period and Frequency for Collecting AE and SAE 
Information

All SAEs will be collected from the signing of the ICF until the follow-up visit
at the time points specified in the SoA (Section 2).

All AEs will be collected from the start of treatment until the follow-up visit at 
the time points specified in the SoA (Section 2).

Medical occurrences that begin before the start of study treatment but after 
obtaining informed consent will be recorded on the Medical History/Current 
Medical Conditions section of the case report form (CRF) not the AE section.

All SAEs will be recorded and reported to the sponsor or designee within 24 
hours, as indicated in Section 12.6. The investigator will submit any updated 
SAE data to the sponsor within 24 hours of it being available.

Investigators are not obligated to actively seek AEs or SAEs in former study 
participants. However, if the investigator learns of any SAE, including a death, 
at any time after a participant has been discharged from the study, and he/she 
considers the event to be reasonably related to the study treatment or study 
participation, the investigator must promptly notify the sponsor.

The method of recording, evaluating, and assessing causality of AEs and SAEs
and the procedures for completing and transmitting SAE reports are provided in 
Section 12.6.
9.1.2.
Method of Detecting AEs and SAEs
Care will be taken not to introduce bias when detecting AE and/or SAE. Open-ended and 
non-leading verbal questioning of the participant is the preferred method to inquire about 
AE occurrence. 
 
2018N363775_00


2016N303948_00
CONFIDENTIAL
207440
49
9.1.3.
Follow-up of AEs and SAEs
After the initial AE/SAE report, the investigator is required to proactively follow each 
participant at subsequent visits/contacts. All SAEs will be followed until the event is 
resolved, stabilized, otherwise explained, or the participant is lost to follow-up (as 
defined in Section 8.3). Further information on follow-up procedures is given in Section 
12.6.
9.1.4.
Regulatory Reporting Requirements for SAEs

Prompt notification by the investigator to the sponsor of a SAE is essential so 
that legal obligations and ethical responsibilities towards the safety of 
participants and the safety of a study treatment under clinical investigation are 
met. 

The sponsor has a legal responsibility to notify both the local regulatory 
authority and other regulatory agencies about the safety of a study treatment 
under clinical investigation. The sponsor will comply with country-specific 
regulatory requirements relating to safety reporting to the regulatory authority, 
Institutional Review Boards (IRB)/Independent Ethics Committees (IEC), and 
investigators.

Investigator safety reports must be prepared for suspected unexpected serious 
adverse reactions (SUSAR) according to local regulatory requirements and 
sponsor policy and forwarded to investigators as necessary.

An investigator who receives an investigator safety report describing a SAE or 
other specific safety information eg, summary or listing of SAE) from the 
sponsor will review and then file it along with the Investigator’s Brochure and
will notify the IRB/IEC, if appropriate according to local requirements.
9.1.5.
Pregnancy

Female subjects of child bearing potential are excluded from this study.

Details of all pregnancies in female participants and female partners of male 
participants will be collected for pregnancies occurring after the start of study 
treatment and until 7 days after the last dose.

If a pregnancy is reported, the investigator should inform GSK within 24 hours of
learning of the pregnancy and should follow the procedures outlined in Section 12.7.

Abnormal pregnancy outcomes (eg, spontaneous abortion, fetal death, stillbirth, 
congenital anomalies, ectopic pregnancy) are considered SAEs.
9.2.
Treatment of Overdose
For this study, any dose of GSK3352589 greater than 400 mg within a 24-hour time 
period 1 hour will be considered an overdose.
GSK does not recommend specific treatment for an overdose
 
2018N363775_00


2016N303948_00
CONFIDENTIAL
207440
50
In the event of an overdose the investigator should:
1.
Contact the Medical Monitor immediately.
2.
Closely monitor the participant for AE/SAE and laboratory abnormalities until 
GSK3352589 can no longer be detected systemically (at least 7 days for 
GSK3352589).
3.
Obtain a plasma sample for PK analysis within 24 hours from the date of the last 
dose of study treatment if requested by the Medical Monitor (determined on a case-
by-case basis).
4.
Document the quantity of the excess dose as well as the duration of the overdosing in 
the CRF.
Decisions regarding dose interruptions or modifications will be made by the investigator 
in consultation with the Medical Monitor based on the clinical evaluation of the 
participant.
9.3.
Safety Assessments
Planned time points for all safety assessments are provided in the SoA.  Additional time 
points for safety tests such as vital signs, physical exams and laboratory safety tests may 
be added during the course of the study based on newly available data to ensure 
appropriate safety monitoring.
9.3.1.
Physical Examinations

A complete physical examination will include, at a minimum, assessments of the 
Skin, Cardiovascular, Respiratory, Gastrointestinal and Neurological systems. 
Height and weight will also be measured and recorded.  Please refer to SoA as to 
when assessments are required.

A brief symptom directed physical examination will include, at a minimum, 
assessments of the skin, lungs, cardiovascular system, and abdomen (liver and 
spleen).

Investigators should pay special attention to clinical signs related to previous 
serious illnesses.
9.3.2.
Vital Signs

Vital signs will be measured in a semi-supine position after 5 minutes rest and 
will include temperature, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and pulse rate.

Three readings of blood pressure and pulse will be taken. The first reading 
should be rejected. The second and third readings should be averaged to give the 
measurement to be recorded in the CRF
9.3.3.
Electrocardiograms

Triplicate 12-lead ECGs will be obtained at each timepoint during the study 
using an ECG machine that automatically calculates the heart rate and measures 
 
2018N363775_00


2016N303948_00
CONFIDENTIAL
207440
51
PR, QRS, QT, and QTc intervals.  Refer to Section 8.1.2 for QTc withdrawal 
criteria and additional QTc readings that may be necessary

At each time point at which triplicate ECG are required, 3 individual ECG 
tracings should be obtained as closely as possible in succession, but no more 
than 2 minutes apart. The full set of triplicates should be completed in less than 
4 minutes.  The postdose timepoints for ECGs may be changed if PK data 
indicate an earlier or later tmax.
9.3.4.
Clinical Safety Laboratory Assessments

Refer to Section 12.3 for the list of clinical laboratory tests to be performed and 
to the SoA for the timing and frequency. 

The investigator must review the laboratory report, document this review, and 
record any clinically relevant changes occurring during the study in the AE 
section of the CRF. The laboratory reports must be filed with the source 
documents. Clinically significant abnormal laboratory findings are those which 
are not associated with the underlying disease, unless judged by the investigator 
to be more severe than expected for the participant's condition.

All laboratory tests with values considered clinically significantly abnormal 
during participation in the study or within 7 days after the last dose of study
treatment should be repeated until the values return to normal or baseline or are 
no longer considered significantly abnormal by the investigator or medical 
monitor. 

If such values do not return to normal/baseline within a period of time judged 
reasonable by the investigator, the etiology should be identified and the sponsor 
notified.

All protocol-required laboratory assessments, as defined in Section 12.3, must 
be conducted in accordance with the laboratory manual and the SoA.

If laboratory values from non-protocol specified laboratory assessments 
performed at the institution’s local laboratory require a change in participant 
management or are considered clinically significant by the investigator (eg, SAE 
or AE or dose modification), then the results must be recorded in the CRF.
9.3.5.
Bristol Stool Form Scale
The BSFS [Lewis, 1997] which describes 7 types of stool, will be used by the subject 
during the study.  Please refer to Section 12.4.
9.4.
Pharmacokinetics
9.4.1.
Sample Collection
9.4.1.1.
Blood sample collection
Blood samples for PK analysis of GSK3352589 will be collected at the time points 
indicated in Section 2, Schedule of Activities. The actual date and time of each blood 
 
2018N363775_00


2016N303948_00
CONFIDENTIAL
207440
52
sample collection will be recorded. The timing of PK samples may be altered and/or PK 
samples may be obtained at additional time points to ensure thorough PK monitoring. 
Collection details, Processing, storage and shipping procedures are provided in the SRM.
9.4.1.2.
Urine Sample Collection
Urine samples to aid in the structural identification of metabolites of GSK3352589 will
be collected at the timepoints listed in Schedule of Activities, Section 2. Details of urine 
sample processing, storage and shipping procedures are provided in the SRM.
9.4.2.
Sample Analysis
Plasma (PK) analysis will be performed under the control of PTS-IVIVT-BIB,
GlaxoSmithKline, the details of which will be included in the SRM. Concentrations of 
GSK3352589 will be determined in plasma samples using the currently approved 
bioanalytical methodology.  Raw data will be archived at the bioanalytical site (detailed 
in the SRM).
Plasma samples provided for metabolite analysis and any residual PK samples from the 
highest dose cohort in Part B (Days 1 and 14) will be analyzed for compound-related 
metabolites under a separate PTS-PD-Global Spectroscopy, GlaxoSmithKline protocol.  
In addition, urine samples will be collected pre-dose and over the post-dose time intervals 
0-24 hours (Days 1 and 14) and qualitatively analyzed for metabolites under a separate 
PTS-PD-Global Spectroscopy, GlaxoSmithKline protocol from the highest dose cohort 
only.
Genetic analyses will not be performed on any samples.
9.4.3.
Pharmacokinetic Analyses
Pharmacokinetic analysis will be the responsibility of the Clinical Pharmacology 
Sciences department within GlaxoSmithKline or designee. Plasma GSK3352589 
concentration-time data will be analyzed by non-compartmental methods with the most 
current version of Phoenix WinNonlin. Final calculations will be based on the actual 
sampling times recorded during the study. 
From the plasma concentration time data following single doses in Part A, the following 
pharmacokinetics parameters will be determined, as data permit, Cmax, Tmax, AUC(0-
last), AUC(0-24), AUC(0-infinity), t1/2 or MRT, Tlast, AUC extrapolated to infinity 
(AUCPEO), and Tlag for the food effect comparisons only.
From the plasma concentration time data following repeat doses in Part B, the following 
PK parameters will be determined, as data permit for both Days 1 and 14: maximum 
observed plasma concentration (Cmax) for both the dosing intervals and the 24 hour daily 
interval, Tmax for both dosing intervals and 24 hour daily interval, AUCs for both the 
dosing intervals (0-10h) or (0-24h) for both QD and BID repeat dose regimens. Tlast 
parameter will be included in the reporting. The Cmax and AUC parameters will be used 
 
2018N363775_00


2016N303948_00
CONFIDENTIAL
207440
53
to assess dose proportionality in both Part A and B and accumulation in Part B as data 
permits.
9.5.
Pharmacodynamic Biomarkers
Subjects in Part B will undergo PD testing of total GLP-1 and total PYY levels after 
administration of a breakfast mixed-meal (PD meal) challenge on Day -1 (baseline),  Day 
1 and Day 14 at the end of the treatment period according to Section 2.  The timing of PD
samples may be altered and/or PD samples may be obtained on additional days or at 
additional time points. The samples for peptide analyses must be handled with extra care 
due to ex vivo degradation. Details on collection, processing, storage and shipping of 
blood samples are provided in the SRM.
9.6.
Genetics
Genetics are not evaluated in this study.
10.
STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS
10.1.
Sample Size Determination
A sufficient number of subjects will be screened to enroll 16 subjects for Part A and 48 
subjects (8 subjects/cohort) for Part B for a total of 64 randomized subjects. Sample sizes 
are based on feasibility.  No formal power calculations were performed, and no statistical 
sample size re-estimation or adjustment will be used.
10.2.
Populations for Analyses
For purposes of analysis, the following populations are defined:
Population
Description
Safety
All randomized participants who receive at least one dose of study 
medication. Participants will be analyzed according to the treatment 
they actually received.
PK Concentration
All subjects for whom a pharmacokinetic sample was obtained.
PK Parameter
All subjects in the PK Concentration Population who receive at least 
one active dose of GSK3352589 and provide pharmacokinetic 
parameters.
PD
All subjects who receive at least one dose of study drug with a 
baseline value and at least one postprandial PD biomarker value. 
 
2018N363775_00


2016N303948_00
CONFIDENTIAL
207440
54
10.3.
Statistical Analyses
Safety and tolerability will be presented in tabular and/or graphical format and 
summarized descriptively.  No hypotheses will be tested.  Listings of adverse events and 
point estimates and 90% confidence intervals for numerical endpoints will be produced. 
BSFS will be summarized by frequency and proportion of stool types by subjects and by 
treatment arm.
Pharmacokinetic data will be presented in graphical and/or tabular form and will be
summarized descriptively. Descriptive statistics (n, arithmetic mean, standard deviation,
%CV, minimum, median, and maximum) will be calculated for all pharmacokinetic
parameters by treatment. For log-transformed variables, geometric mean, 95% confidence
interval, and %CVb (100 * √ (exp(SD2) -1)) will be provided, where the SD is the
standard deviation of log-transformed data. All pharmacokinetic data will be stored in the 
Archives, GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceuticals, R&D. Data permitting, the PK parameter 
data will be presented descriptively (e.g. n, arithmetic mean, median, minimum, 
maximum) by treatment and part. Further summaries, analyses, and/or graphs may be 
produced as appropriate to the data.
Statistical analyses of the pharmacokinetic data will be the responsibility of Clinical 
Statistics, GlaxoSmithKline or designee.  In Part A, dose proportionality of GSK3352589 
will be analyzed by using appropriate power and ANOVA models.  Food effect analyses 
will be done according to the FDA guidance standards. In Part B, the Cmax and AUC 
parameters will be used to assess accumulation and dose proportionality. 
Analyses of PD data will be the responsibility of Clinical Statistics, GlaxoSmithKline or 
designee.  PD data for total GLP-1 and total PYY will be presented in graphical and/or 
tabular form and will be summarized descriptively.
If data permit, the relationship between GSK3352589 and postprandial levels will be 
explored.  PK/PD analyses will be performed to determine if relationship(s) between dose 
and/or GSK3352589 concentrations and postprandial concentrations of GLP-1 and PYY 
levels exist. Graphical investigations will be initially explored and appropriate linear and 
non-linear models may be evaluated.
Biotransformation of GSK3352589 in plasma and urine will also be evaluated for the 
identification of any compound-derived metabolite(s).
10.3.1.
Other Analyses
Pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and biomarker exploratory analyses will be 
described in the reporting and analysis plan.
10.3.2.
Interim Analyses
No formal statistical interim analysis is planned for this study. Safety, tolerability, and 
pharmacokinetic data will be reviewed prior to each dose-escalation and prior to all 
within subject escalations.
 
2018N363775_00


2016N303948_00
CONFIDENTIAL
207440
55
11.
REFERENCES
Airaksinen, M.S., and Saarma, M. (2002). The GDNF family: signalling, biological 
functions and therapeutic value. Nature reviews Neuroscience 3, 383-394.
Azpiroz F, Bouin M, Camilleri M, Mayer EA, Poitras P, Serra J, Spiller RC. Mechanisms 
of Hypersensitivity in Irritable Bowel Syndrome and Functional Disorders. 
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2007 Jan;19(1 Suppl):62-88.
Barrenschee, M., Bottner, M., Hellwig, I., Harde, J., Egberts, J.H., Becker, T., and 
Wedel, T. (2013). Site-specific gene expression and localization of growth factor ligand 
receptors RET, GFRalpha1 and GFRalpha2 in human adult colon. Cell and tissue 
research 354, 371-380.
Berman, S.M., Chang, L., Suyenobu, B., Derbyshire, S.W., Stains, J., Fitzgerald, L., 
Mandelkern, M., Hamm, L., Vogt, B., Naliboff, B.D., et al. (2002). Condition-specific 
deactivation of brain regions by 5-HT3 receptor antagonist Alosetron. Gastroenterology 
123, 969-977.
Camilleri, M. (2012). Peripheral mechanisms in irritable bowel syndrome. The New 
England journal of medicine 367, 1626-1635.
DeSesso, J.M. and Jacobson, C.F., Anatomical and physiological parameters affecting 
gastrointestinal absorption in humans and rats.  Food and chemical toxicology, 39:209-
228, 2001.
Dothel G, Barbaro MR, Boudin H, et. al. Nerve fiber outgrowth is increased in the 
intestinal mucosa of patients with irritable bowel syndrome. Gastroenterology. 2015 
May;148(5):1002-1011.e4
Edery P, Lyonnet S, Mulligan LM, Pelet A, Dow E, Abel L,. et al. Mutations of the RET
proto-oncogene in Hirschsprung’s disease. Nature. 1994;367:378-90.
GlaxoSmithKline Document Number 2016N305051_00: GSK3352589 Investigator’s 
Brochure. March 2017.
Guidance for industry, estimating the maximum safe starting dose in initial clinical trials 
for therapeutics in adult healthy volunteers, US Department of Health and Human 
Services, FDA, CDER, 2005. (http://www.fda.gov/ucm/groups/fdagov-public/@fdagov-
drugs-gen/documents/document/ucm078932.pdf)
Gyermek, L. (1996). Pharmacology of serotonin as related to anesthesia. Journal of 
clinical anesthesia 8, 402-425.
Halland, M., and Talley, N.J. (2013). New treatments for IBS. Nature reviews 
Gastroenterology & hepatology 10, 13-23.
Lewis SJ, Heaton KW, Stool form as a useful guide to intestinal transit time. Scand J 
Gastroenterol 1997; 32 (9) 920-924.
 
2018N363775_00


2016N303948_00
CONFIDENTIAL
207440
56
Longstreth, G.F., Thompson, W.G., Chey, W.D., Houghton, L.A., Mearin, F., and Spiller, 
R.C. (2006). Functional bowel disorders. Gastroenterology 130, 1480-1491.
Physiological parameter values for PBPK models: a report by the international life 
sciences institute risk science institute.  U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of 
Health and Environmental Assessment, 1994.
Plourde V, St-Pierre S, Quirion R. Calcitonin gene-related peptide in viscerosensitive 
response to colorectal distension in rats. Am. J. Physiol. 1997; 273:G191-6.
Radwan, A., Amidon, G.L., Langguth, P. Mechanistic investigation of food effect on 
disintegration and dissolution of BCS class III compound solid formulations: the 
importance of viscocity.  Biopharm. Drug Dispos. 33:403-416 (2012).
Tanaka T, Shinoda M, Feng B, et.al.  Modulation of visceral hypersensitivity by glial cell 
line-derived neurotrophic factor family receptor-3 in colorectal afferents. Am J Physiol 
Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2011 Mar; 300(3):G418-24. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00456.2010. 
Epub 2010 Dec 30.
Wang H, Hughes I, Planer W, Parsadanian A, Grider JR, Vohra BPS et al.  The timing 
and location of glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor expression determine enteric 
nervous system structure and function.  The Journal of Neuroscience, 2010;30:1523-38.
 
2018N363775_00


2016N303948_00
CONFIDENTIAL
207440
57
12.
APPENDICES
12.1.
Appendix 1: Abbreviations and Trademarks
AE
Adverse Event
ALT
Alanine Transferase
ANOVA
Analysis of variance
AST
Aspartate Transferase
AUC
Area Under the Curve
AUCtau
Area under the plasma concentration-time curve over the 
dosing interval (0-4), (0-10), and  (0-24) hours 
AUClastor AUC (0-t)
Area under the plasma concentration-time curve from
time zero to last measurable time point
BCS
Biopharmaceutical classification system
BID
Twice a Day or twice daily
BSA
Body Surface Area
BSFS
Bristol Stool Form Scale
BUN
Blood Urea Nitrogen
CDER
Center for Drug Evaluation and Research
CL/F
Clearance
CLs
Systemic clearance
Cmax
Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration
CONSORT
Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials
CNS
Central Nervous System
CTT
Colonic Transit Time
CRF
Case Report Form
CV
Cardiovascular
CYP
Cytochrome P450
DDI
Drug-Drug Interaction
e.g.
exempli gratia (for example)
ECG
Electrocardiogram
ELISA
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
ENS
Enteric Nervous System
F
Bioavailability 
FDA
(US) Food and Drug Administration
FSH
Follicle Stimulating Hormone
FTiH
First Time in Human
g
gram
GCP
Good Clinical Practice
GCSP
Global Clinical Safety and Pharmacovigilance
GET
Gastric Emptying Time
GI
Gastrointestinal
GSK
GlaxoSmithKline
h
hour
HbsAg
Hepatitis B Surface Antigen
hCG
Human Chorionic Gonadotropin
 
2018N363775_00


2016N303948_00
CONFIDENTIAL
207440
58
HED
Human Equivalent Dose
Hep B
Hepatitis B
Hep C
Hepatitis C
hERG
Human ether-a-go-go-related gene
HIV
Human Immunodeficiency Virus
HRT
Hormone Replacement Therapy
IB
Investigator’s Brochure
IBS
Irritable Bowel Syndrome
IBS-C
Irritable Bowel Syndrome Constipation
IBS-D
Irritable Bowel Syndrome Diarrhea
IBS-M
Irritable Bowel Syndrome Mixed
IC50
Half Maximal Inhibitory Concentration
ICH
International Conference on Harmonisation
IEC
Independent Ethics Committee
INR
International Normalized Ratio
IP
Investigational Product
IRB
Institutional Review Board
IV
Intravenous
Ka
Absorption rate constant
kg
Kilogram
Ki
Inhibitory Constant
MABEL
Minimum anticipated biological effect level
MCH
Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin
MCV
Mean Corpuscular Volume
MedDRA
Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities
mg
milligram
mL
milliliter
MLA
Mouse Lymphoma Assay
MRTlast
Mean residence time up to last measurable concentration
MSDS
Material Safety Data Sheet
msec
Millisecond
ng/g
Nanogram per gram
ng/mg
Nanogram per milligram
nM
Nanometer
NOAEL
No Observed Adverse Effect Level
PAD
Pharmacological active dose
PD
Pharmacodynamic
PK
Pharmacokinetic
PI
Percentage Interval
PV
Pharmacovigiliance
QTc
Corrected QT Interval
QTcB
Corrected QT Interval to Bazett’s formula
QTcF
Corrected QT Interval to Fridericia’s formula 
RAP
Report and Analysis Plan
RBC
Red Blood Cell
RET
REarranged during Transfection
 
2018N363775_00


2016N303948_00
CONFIDENTIAL
207440
59
RSA
Relative surface area
SAE
Serious Adverse Event
SBTT
Small Bowel Transit Time
SD
Standard Deviation
SGOT
Serum Glutamic Oxaloacetic Transaminase
SGPT
Serum Glutamic Pyruvic Transaminase
SOA
Schedule of Activities
SOP
Standard Operating Procedure
SRM 
Study Reference Manual
T1/2
Apparent Terminal Phase Half-Life
Tmax
Time to Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration
g
Microgram
ULN
Upper Limit of Normal
V/F
Volume of distribution
WBC
White Blood Cell
WGTT
Whole Gut Transit Time
WMC
Wireless Motility Capsule
Trademark Information
Trademarks of the GlaxoSmithKline 
group of companies
Trademarks not owned by the 
GlaxoSmithKline group of companies
ADVAIR
Chiron RIBA
Phoenix WinNonlin
SAS
 
2018N363775_00


2016N303948_00
CONFIDENTIAL
207440
60
12.2.
Appendix 2: Human Pharmacodynamic Prediction Methods
A systems pharmacology model was developed for rats and then scaled to humans for
GSK3352589 in GI tract with a focus on colon lumen and colon tissue concentrations. 
Additional methods based on allometry concepts (body weight, BSA, and intestine 
surface areas) were applied for additional support and to facilitate expansion and account 
for error in the predicted dose range for this study. The dose range proposed for minimal 
pharmacological effect may be 5 mg once daily (2 mg twice daily) to 130 mg once or 
twice daily. The dose range for maximum pharmacological effect is predicted to be 5 mg 
to 440 mg.  It is unknown if these doses are best given once or twice daily, but twice 
daily dosing should provide more sustained tissue concentrations per day.  The rat IBS 
visceral hypersensitivity model indicates dosing to steady state tissue concentrations is 
required and that twice daily dosing is best in rats.  Efficacy with the rat PD colon 
hypersensitivity model correlates with a steady state colon tissue concentration of 
approximately 1218 ng/g (10 mg/kg for 3.5 days BID) and this target tissue concentration 
was assumed to be the same for human colon tissue.
12.2.1.
Systems pharmacology model of human colon tissue 
concentrations
Rat plasma profiles show little or no correlation with the rat model PD response. This 
presented a unique challenge as many established methods for determining dose/exposure 
response for a predetermined target concentration have been based on plasma drug 
concentrations. As colon tissue concentrations were determined to be the best predictor of 
patient response, it was determined a custom systems pharmacology modeling effort 
would be appropriate to address this challenge. A mechanistic model was developed to 
predict colon tissue concentrations as a function of colon content drug concentration. 
Development began with the determination of gut transit times, gut thickness, volumes 
and surfaces areas for rats and humans from the literature. Time course data from rat gut 
content and tissue concentrations were first used to estimate drug specific parameters, 
than once identified were fixed for subsequent human predictions. The model was used to 
simulate colon tissue concentrations for doses between 2 mg and 400 mg. Colon tissue 
time profile predictions were simulated to determine the time and duration above the 
target tissue concentration of 1218 ng/g following once daily (Figure 2) and twice daily 
(Figure 3). Following once daily oral doses of 7.5 mg and 10 mg and twice daily repeat 
dosing with 2 mg, 3 mg, and 5 mg, the colon tissue concentration remains above or near 
the target concentration of 1218 ng/g for the entire dosing interval. The duration of 
exposure needed or the time above 1218 ng/g is unknown.  
 
2018N363775_00


2016N303948_00
CONFIDENTIAL
207440
61
Figure 2
Predicted human colon tissue concentration-time profiles following 
once daily dosing for four days ranging from 1 mg to 10 mg
Figure 3
Predicted human colon tissue concentration-time profiles following 
twice daily dosing for four days ranging from 1 mg to 5 mg
12.2.2.
Human Equivalent Dose (HED) Prediction Method using FDA 
guidance with and without small and large intestine surface area 
correction
This HED method is generally recommended for estimating safe starting doses in FTiH 
studies (FDA - CDER 2005 guidance), herein the conversion factors have been applied to 
the pharmacologically active doses (PAD). The HEDs are shown in Table 9. HED is 
 
2018N363775_00


2016N303948_00
CONFIDENTIAL
207440
62
essentially a body surface area (BSA) correction. Because the rat and human have similar 
in vitro enzyme inhibition potency estimates, a potency adjustment was not needed.
Further correction was applied to the HED for small intestine surface area based on the
principle that more small intestine surface area will result in more absorption of drug in 
humans. It has been reported that the ratio of the human small intestine surface area 
normalized for BSA is 111. The same ratio for rat is 25. This comparison reveals that 
relative surface area of the human small intestine (RSA) is 4.4 times that of the rat 
[DeSesso, 2001]. The HED was divided by 4.4 and referred to as HED corrected for 
small intestine RSA and is considered a very conservative estimate.
In addition, correction was applied to the HED for colon surface area based on the 
principle there is less large intestine surface area in human compared to rat.  It has been 
reported that the ratio of the human large intestine surface area normalized for BSA is 
0.19.  The same ratio for rat is 0.85. This comparison reveals that the large intestine 
relative surface area of the human is 0.22 times that of the rat [DeSesso, 2001]. The HED 
was divided by 0.22 and referred to as HED corrected for large intestine RSA and is 
considered the more aggressive estimate.
Using these prediction methods, human doses anticipated to have minimum 
pharmacological effect are predicted to be between 7 mg and 136 mg for a 60 kg human 
following repeat dosing to steady state. The doses anticipated to achieve maximum 
pharmacological effect are predicted to be between 23 mg and 454 mg for a 60 kg 
human.
Table 8
Human  Dose Predictions
Rat
(0.25kg)
HED
(60 kg)
HED corrected for 
small intestine
RSA (rat to 
human)
HED corrected 
for large intestine
RSA (rat to 
human)
3 mg/kg*
Minimal effect; Rat 
visceral 
hypersensitivity 
model
0.48 mg/kg
  30mg
7 mg
136 mg
10mg/kg*
Maximal effect; Rat 
visceral 
hypersensitivity 
model
1.61 mg/kg
100 mg
23 mg
454 mg
*dosed twice daily for 3.5 days (7 doses) to steady state
 
2018N363775_00


2016N303948_00
CONFIDENTIAL
207440
63
12.2.3.
Human Dose Prediction for of GSK3352589 Adjusted for Colon 
Content and Gut Weight
The minimally effective dose in the IBS-hypersensitivity rat model was 3 mg/kg and the 
maximally effective dose was 10 mg/kg.  The estimated bioavailability is 0.18% for rat 
and approximately 0.16% for human; therefore 99.82% and 99.84% of the dose remains 
in the GI tract from oral to elimination. 
The calculations below assume that the amount of GSK3353589 per gram of whole GI 
tract tissue at doses linked to efficacy rat model will be the same amounts and doses 
needed for humans.  Assuming the target colon content for human is between 115,185 
ng/g and 384,000 ng/g, the corresponding human doses are 122 mg and 406 mg (Table 
9).
Table 9
Method for human colon content and gut weight estimation
Parameter
Rat
(0.25kg)
Rat
(0.25kg)
Human
(60 kg)
Human
(60 kg)
Dosed to steady state
3mg/kg
10mg/kg
2.03mg/kg
6.77mg/kg
Dose 
0.75 mg or 
750 µg
2.5mg or 
2500 µg
122 mg
406 mg
99.82% of dose remaining in 
gut contents
748.7 µg
2496 µg
-
-
99.84% of dose remaining in 
gut contents
-
-
121,635 µg
405,504 µg
Whole GI tract (grams or mL) 
(stomach, small and large 
intestine)1
6.5 g
6.5 g
1056 g
1056 g
Calculated amount of drug in rat 
colon contents
115,185 
ng/g
384,000 
ng/g
-
-
Targeted amount of drug in 
human colon contents 
-
-
115,185 
ng/g
384,000 
ng/g
NOTES :
1.
Physiological parameter values for PBPK models: a report by the international life sciences institute risk science 
institute. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Health and Environmental Assessment, 1994.
 
2018N363775_00


2016N303948_00
CONFIDENTIAL
207440
64
12.3.
Appendix 3: Clinical Laboratory Tests

The tests detailed in Table 10 will be performed by the local laboratory. 

Protocol-specific requirements for inclusion or exclusion of participants are 
detailed in Section 6 of the protocol.

Additional tests may be performed at any time during the study as determined 
necessary by the investigator or required by local regulations.
Table 10
Protocol-Required Safety Laboratory Assessments
Laboratory 
Assessments
Parameters
Hematology
Platelet Count
RBC Indices:
MCV
MCH
WBC count with 
Differential:
Neutrophils
Lymphocytes
Monocytes
Eosinophils
Basophils
RBC Count
Hemoglobin
Hematocrit
Clinical 
Chemistry1
BUN
Potassium
Aspartate 
Aminotransferase
(AST)/ Serum 
Glutamic-Oxaloacetic 
Transaminase
(SGOT)
Total and direct 
bilirubin
Creatinine
Sodium
Alanine 
Aminotransferase
(ALT)/ Serum 
Glutamic-Pyruvic 
Transaminase (SGPT)
Total Protein
Glucose -
nonfasting]
Calcium
Alkaline phosphatase
Albumin
Routine 
Urinalysis

Specific gravity

pH, glucose, protein, blood, ketones, [bilirubin, urobilinogen, nitrite, 
leukocyte esterase] by dipstick

Microscopic examination (if blood or protein is abnormal)
Other 
Screening 
Tests

HIV

Hepatitis B (HBsAg)

Hepatitis C (Hep C antibody)

FSH and estradiol (as needed in women of non-child bearing 
potential only)

Cotinine test

Alcohol and drug screen (to include at minimum: amphetamines, 
barbiturates, cocaine, opiates, cannabinoids and benzodiazepines)
 
2018N363775_00


2016N303948_00
CONFIDENTIAL
207440
65
Laboratory 
Assessments
Parameters

Serum hCG Pregnancy test (Screening and follow up) and urine pregnancy 
test on Day -1.
NOTES :
1.
Details of liver chemistry stopping criteria and required actions and follow-up assessments after liver stopping or 
monitoring event are given in Section 8.1 and Section 12.8. All events of ALT 3 × upper limit of normal (ULN) 
and bilirubin 2 × ULN (>35% direct bilirubin) or ALT 3 × ULN and international normalized ratio (INR) >1.5, if 
INR measured, which may indicate severe liver injury (possible Hy’s Law), must be reported as an SAE (excluding 
studies of hepatic impairment or cirrhosis).
2.
Local urine testing will be standard for the protocol unless serum testing is required by local regulation or IRB/IEC.
 
2018N363775_00


2016N303948_00
CONFIDENTIAL
207440
66
12.4.
Appendix 4: Bristol Stool Form Scale
 
2018N363775_00
CCI - This section contained Clinical Outcome Assessment data collection questionnaires or indices, which
are protected by third party copyright laws and therefore have been excluded.


2016N303948_00
CONFIDENTIAL
207440
67
12.5.
Appendix 5: Study Governance Considerations
Regulatory and Ethical Considerations

This study will be conducted in accordance with the protocol and with:

Consensus ethical principles derived from international guidelines 
including the Declaration of Helsinki and Council for International 
Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS) International Ethical 
Guidelines

Applicable ICH Good Clinical Practice (GCP) Guidelines

Applicable laws and regulations

The protocol, protocol amendments, ICF, Investigator Brochure, and other 
relevant documents (eg, advertisements) must be submitted to an IRB/IEC by 
the investigator and reviewed and approved by the IRB/IEC before the study is 
initiated. 

Any amendments to the protocol will require IEC/IRB approval before 
implementation of changes made to the study design, except for changes 
necessary to eliminate an immediate hazard to study participants. 

The investigator will be responsible for the following:

Providing written summaries of the status of the study to the IRB/IEC 
annually or more frequently in accordance with the requirements, policies, 
and procedures established by the IRB/EC

Notifying the IRB/IEC of SAE or other significant safety findings as 
required by IRB/IEC procedures

Providing oversight of the conduct of the study at the site and adherence to 
requirements of 21 CFR, ICH guidelines, the IRB/IEC, European 
regulation 536/2014 for clinical studies (if applicable), and all other 
applicable local regulations
Informed Consent Process

The investigator or his/her representative will explain the nature of the study to 
the participant or his/her legally authorized representative and answer all 
questions regarding the study. 

Participants must be informed that their participation is voluntary. Participants 
or their legally authorized representative will be required to sign a statement of 
informed consent that meets the requirements of 21 CFR 50, local regulations, 
ICH guidelines, Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) 
requirements, where applicable, and the IRB/IEC or study center. 

The medical record must include a statement that written informed consent was 
obtained before the participant was enrolled in the study and the date the written 
consent was obtained. The authorized person obtaining the informed consent 
must also sign the ICF.
 
2018N363775_00


2016N303948_00
CONFIDENTIAL
207440
68

Participants must be re-consented to the most current version of the ICF(s) 
during their participation in the study. 

A copy of the ICF(s) must be provided to the participant or the participant’s 
legally authorized representative. 

Participants who are rescreened are required to sign a new ICF.
Data Protection

Participants will be assigned a unique identifier by the sponsor. Any participant 
records or datasets that are transferred to the sponsor will contain the identifier 
only; participant names or any information which would make the participant 
identifiable will not be transferred. 

The participant must be informed that his/her personal study-related data will be 
used by the sponsor in accordance with local data protection law. The level of 
disclosure must also be explained to the participant. 

The participant must be informed that his/her medical records may be examined 
by Clinical Quality Assurance auditors or other authorized personnel appointed 
by the sponsor, by appropriate IRB/IEC members, and by inspectors from 
regulatory authorities.
Publication Policy

The results of this study may be published or presented at scientific meetings. If 
this is foreseen, the investigator agrees to submit all manuscripts or abstracts to 
the sponsor before submission. This allows the sponsor to protect proprietary 
information and to provide comments.

The sponsor will comply with the requirements for publication of study results. 
In accordance with standard editorial and ethical practice, the sponsor will 
generally support publication of multicenter studies only in their entirety and not 
as individual site data. In this case, a coordinating investigator will be 
designated by mutual agreement.

Authorship will be determined by mutual agreement and in line with 
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors authorship requirements.
Dissemination of Clinical Study Data

Tabular study results will be posted on the US National Institutes of Health’s 
website ww.clintrials.gov and other publically accessible sites.
Data Quality Assurance

All participant data relating to the study will be recorded on printed or electronic 
CRF unless transmitted to the sponsor or designee electronically (eg, laboratory 
data). The investigator is responsible for verifying that data entries are accurate 
and correct by physically or electronically signing the CRF. 

The investigator must maintain accurate documentation (source data) that 
supports the information entered in the CRF. 
 
2018N363775_00


2016N303948_00
CONFIDENTIAL
207440
69

The investigator must permit study-related monitoring, audits, IRB/IEC review, 
and regulatory agency inspections and provide direct access to source data 
documents. 

The sponsor or designee is responsible for the data management of this study 
including quality checking of the data. 

Study monitors will perform ongoing source data verification to confirm that 
data entered into the CRF by authorized site personnel are accurate, complete, 
and verifiable from source documents; that the safety and rights of participants 
are being protected; and that the study is being conducted in accordance with the 
currently approved protocol and any other study agreements, ICH GCP, and all 
applicable regulatory requirements. 

Records and documents, including signed ICF, pertaining to the conduct of this 
study must be retained by the investigator for 25 years from the issue of the final 
Clinical Study Report (CSR)/ equivalent summary unless local regulations or 
institutional policies require a longer retention period. No records may be 
destroyed during the retention period without the written approval of the 
sponsor. No records may be transferred to another location or party without 
written notification to the sponsor. 
Source Documents

Source documents provide evidence for the existence of the participant and 
substantiate the integrity of the data collected. Source documents are filed at the 
investigator’s site.

Data reported on the CRF or entered in the eCRF that are transcribed from 
source documents must be consistent with the source documents or the 
discrepancies must be explained. The investigator may need to request previous 
medical records or transfer records, depending on the study. Also, current 
medical records must be available.

Definition of what constitutes source data can be found in the study reference 
manual (SRM).
Study and Site Closure
GSK or its designee reserves the right to close the study site or terminate the study at any 
time for any reason at the sole discretion of GSK. Study sites will be closed upon study 
completion. A study site is considered closed when all required documents and study 
supplies have been collected and a study-site closure visit has been performed.
The investigator may initiate study-site closure at any time, provided there is reasonable 
cause and sufficient notice is given in advance of the intended termination.
Reasons for the early closure of a study site by the sponsor or investigator may include 
but are not limited to:

Failure of the investigator to comply with the protocol, the requirements of the 
IRB/IEC or local health authorities, the sponsor's procedures, or GCP guidelines
 
2018N363775_00


2016N303948_00
CONFIDENTIAL
207440
70

Inadequate recruitment of participants by the investigator

Discontinuation of further study treatment development
 
2018N363775_00


2016N303948_00
CONFIDENTIAL
207440
71
12.6.
Appendix 6: Adverse Events: Definitions and Procedures for 
Recording, Evaluating, Follow-up, and Reporting
Definition of AE
AE Definition

An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally 
associated with the use of a study treatment, whether or not considered related to the 
study treatment.

NOTE: An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an 
abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally 
associated with the use of a study treatment.
Events Meeting the AE Definition 

Any abnormal laboratory test results (hematology, clinical chemistry, or urinalysis) 
or other safety assessments (eg, ECG, radiological scans, vital signs measurements), 
including those that worsen from baseline, considered clinically significant in the 
medical and scientific judgment of the investigator (ie, not related to progression of 
underlying disease).

Exacerbation of a chronic or intermittent pre-existing condition including either an 
increase in frequency and/or intensity of the condition.

New conditions detected or diagnosed after study treatment administration even 
though it may have been present before the start of the study.

Signs, symptoms, or the clinical sequelae of a suspected drug-drug interaction.

Signs, symptoms, or the clinical sequelae of a suspected overdose of either study 
treatment or a concomitant medication. Overdose per se will not be reported as an 
AE/SAE unless it is an intentional overdose taken with possible suicidal/self-
harming intent. Such overdoses should be reported regardless of sequelae.
Events NOT Meeting the AE Definition 

Any clinically significant abnormal laboratory findings or other abnormal safety 
assessments which are associated with the underlying disease, unless judged by the 
investigator to be more severe than expected for the participant’s condition.

The disease/disorder being studied or expected progression, signs, or symptoms of 
the disease/disorder being studied, unless more severe than expected for the 
participant’s condition.

Medical or surgical procedure (eg, endoscopy, appendectomy): the condition that 
leads to the procedure is the AE.

Situations in which an untoward medical occurrence did not occur (social and/or 
 
2018N363775_00


2016N303948_00
CONFIDENTIAL
207440
72
convenience admission to a hospital).

Anticipated day-to-day fluctuations of pre-existing disease(s) or condition(s) present 
or detected at the start of the study that do not worsen.
Definition of SAE
If an event is not an AE per definition above, then it cannot be an SAE even if serious 
conditions are met (eg, hospitalization for signs/symptoms of the disease under study, 
death due to progression of disease).
A SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose:
a.
Results in death
b.
Is life-threatening
The term 'life-threatening' in the definition of 'serious' refers to an event in which the 
participant was at risk of death at the time of the event. It does not refer to an event, 
which hypothetically might have caused death, if it were more severe.
c.
Requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization
In general, hospitalization signifies that the participant has been detained (usually 
involving at least an overnight stay) at the hospital or emergency ward for observation 
and/or treatment that would not have been appropriate in the physician’s office or 
outpatient setting. Complications that occur during hospitalization are AE. If a 
complication prolongs hospitalization or fulfills any other serious criteria, the event is 
serious. When in doubt as to whether “hospitalization” occurred or was necessary, the AE 
should be considered serious.
Hospitalization for elective treatment of a pre-existing condition that did not worsen from 
baseline is not considered an AE.
d.
Results in persistent disability/incapacity

The term disability means a substantial disruption of a person’s ability to conduct 
normal life functions.

This definition is not intended to include experiences of relatively minor medical 
significance such as uncomplicated headache, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, influenza, 
and accidental trauma (eg, sprained ankle) which may interfere with or prevent 
everyday life functions but do not constitute a substantial disruption.
e.
Is a congenital anomaly/birth defect
f.
Other situations:

Medical or scientific judgment should be exercised in deciding whether SAE 
reporting is appropriate in other situations such as important medical events that may 
not be immediately life-threatening or result in death or hospitalization but may 
jeopardize the participant or may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent 
 
2018N363775_00


2016N303948_00
CONFIDENTIAL
207440
73
one of the other outcomes listed in the above definition. These events should usually 
be considered serious.
Examples of such events include invasive or malignant cancers, intensive treatment 
in an emergency room or at home for allergic bronchospasm, blood dyscrasias or 
convulsions that do not result in hospitalization, or development of drug dependency 
or drug abuse.
Recording AE and SAE
AE and SAE Recording

When an AE/SAE occurs, it is the responsibility of the investigator to review all 
documentation (eg, hospital progress notes, laboratory, and diagnostics reports) 
related to the event.

The investigator will then record all relevant AE/SAE information in the CRF.

It is not acceptable for the investigator to send photocopies of the participant’s 
medical records to GSK in lieu of completion of the GSK /AE/SAE CRF page.

There may be instances when copies of medical records for certain cases are 
requested by GSK. In this case, all participant identifiers, with the exception of the 
participant number, will be redacted on the copies of the medical records before 
submission to GSK.

The investigator will attempt to establish a diagnosis of the event based on signs, 
symptoms, and/or other clinical information. Whenever possible, the diagnosis (not 
the individual signs/symptoms) will be documented as the AE/SAE.
Assessment of Intensity
The investigator will make an assessment of intensity for each AE and SAE reported 
during the study and assign it to 1 of the following categories: 

Mild: An event that is easily tolerated by the participant, causing minimal discomfort 
and not interfering with everyday activities.

Moderate: An event that causes sufficiently discomfort and interferes with normal 
everyday activities.

Severe: An event that prevents normal everyday activities. An AE that is assessed as 
severe should not be confused with an SAE. Severe is a category utilized for rating 
the intensity of an event; and both AE and SAE can be assessed as severe.
An event is defined as ‘serious’ when it meets at least 1 of the predefined outcomes 
as described in the definition of an SAE, NOT when it is rated as severe.
Assessment of Causality

The investigator is obligated to assess the relationship between study treatment and 
each occurrence of each AE/SAE as follows: unrelated, likely unrelated, possibly 
 
2018N363775_00


2016N303948_00
CONFIDENTIAL
207440
74
related, probably related and related.

A "reasonable possibility" of a relationship conveys that there are facts, evidence, 
and/or arguments to suggest a causal relationship, rather than a relationship cannot 
be ruled out.

The investigator will use clinical judgment to determine the relationship.

Alternative causes, such as underlying disease(s), concomitant therapy, and other 
risk factors, as well as the temporal relationship of the event to study treatment 
administration will be considered and investigated.

The investigator will also consult the Investigator’s Brochure (IB) and/or Product 
Information, for marketed products, in his/her assessment.

For each AE/SAE, the investigator must document in the medical notes that he/she 
has reviewed the AE/SAE and has provided an assessment of causality.

There may be situations in which an SAE has occurred and the investigator has 
minimal information to include in the initial report to GSK. However, it is very 
important that the investigator always make an assessment of causality for
every event before the initial transmission of the SAE data to GSK.

The investigator may change his/her opinion of causality in light of follow-up 
information and send an SAE follow-up report with the updated causality 
assessment.

The causality assessment is one of the criteria used when determining regulatory 
reporting requirements.
Follow-up of AE and SAE

The investigator is obligated to perform or arrange for the conduct of supplemental 
measurements and/or evaluations as medically indicated or as requested by GSK to 
elucidate the nature and/or causality of the AE or SAE as fully as possible. This may 
include additional laboratory tests or investigations, histopathological examinations, 
or consultation with other health care professionals.

If a participant dies during participation in the study or during a recognized follow-
up period, the investigator will provide GSK with a copy of any post-mortem 
findings including histopathology.

New or updated information will be recorded in the originally completed CRF.

The investigator will submit any updated SAE data to GSK within 24 hours of 
receipt of the information.
Reporting of SAE to GSK
SAE Reporting to GSK via Electronic Data Collection Tool

The primary mechanism for reporting SAE to GSK will be the electronic data 
 
2018N363775_00


2016N303948_00
CONFIDENTIAL
207440
75
collection tool.

If the electronic system is unavailable for more than 24 hours, then the site will use 
the paper SAE data collection tool (see next section).

The site will enter the SAE data into the electronic system as soon as it becomes 
available.

The investigator or medically-qualified sub-investigator must show evidence within 
the eCRF (e.g., check review box, signature, etc.) of review and verification of the 
relationship of each SAE to IP/study participation (causality) within 72 hours of SAE 
entry into the eCRF.

After the study is completed at a given site, the electronic data collection tool will be 
taken off-line to prevent the entry of new data or changes to existing data.

If a site receives a report of a new SAE from a study participant or receives updated 
data on a previously reported SAE after the electronic data collection tool has been 
taken off-line, then the site can report this information on a paper SAE form (see 
next section) or to the medical monitor by telephone.

Contacts for SAE reporting can be found in the SRM and at the beginning of this 
protocol on the Sponsor/Medical Monitor Contact Information page.
 
2018N363775_00


2016N303948_00
CONFIDENTIAL
207440
76
12.7.
Appendix 7: Contraceptive Guidance and Collection of 
Pregnancy Information
Definitions
Woman of Childbearing Potential (WOCBP)
Female participants
Female participants of childbearing potential are NOT eligible to participate. 
A woman is considered fertile following menarche and until becoming post-menopausal 
unless permanently sterile (see below)
Women in the following categories are not considered WOCBP
1. Premenarchal
2. Premenopausal female with ONE of the following:

Documented hysterectomy

Documented bilateral salpingectomy

Documented bilateral oophorectomy
Note:  Documentation can come from the site personnel’s: review of participant’s 
medical records, medical examination, or medical history interview.
3. Postmenopausal female

A postmenopausal state is defined as no menses for 12 months without an 
alternative medical cause. A high follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) level in 
the postmenopausal range may be used to confirm a postmenopausal state in 
women not using hormonal contraception or hormonal replacement therapy 
(HRT). However, in the absence of 12 months of amenorrhea, a single FSH 
measurement is insufficient. 

Females on HRT and whose menopausal status is in doubt will be required to 
use one of the non-hormonal highly effective contraception methods if they wish 
to continue their HRT during the study. Otherwise, they must discontinue HRT 
to allow confirmation of postmenopausal status before study enrollment.
Contraception Guidance
Male participants

Male participants with female partners of child-bearing potential are eligible to 
participate if they agree to ONE of the following during the protocol-defined 
time frame in Section 6.1 (up to 7 days after administration of the last dose of 
study drug): 
 
2018N363775_00


2016N303948_00
CONFIDENTIAL
207440
77

Are abstinent from penile-vaginal intercourse as their usual and preferred 
lifestyle (abstinent on a long term and persistent basis) and agree to remain 
abstinent 

Agree to use a male condom plus an additional method of contraception 
with a failure rate of <1% per year as described in Table 11 when having 
penile-vaginal intercourse with a woman of childbearing potential 

Men with a pregnant or breastfeeding partner must agree to remain abstinent 
from penile-vaginal intercourse or use a male condom during each episode of 
penile penetration for 7 days after study completion or from last dose

Refrain from donating sperm for duration of study and for 7 days after study 
completion or from last dose
For female partners of males participating in the study, highly effective contraceptive 
methods are described in the table below. 
Table 11
Highly Effective Contraceptive Methods
Highly Effective Contraceptive Methods That Are User Dependent a
Failure rate of <1% per year when used consistently and correctly. 
Combined (estrogen- and progestogen-containing ) hormonal contraception associated with 
inhibition of ovulationb

oral

intravaginal 

transdermal 
Progestogen-only hormonal contraception associated with inhibition of ovulationb

injectable 
Highly Effective Methods That Are User Independent 

Implantable progestogen-only hormonal contraception associated with inhibition of 
ovulationb

Intrauterine device (IUD)

Intrauterine hormone-releasing system (IUS)

bilateral tubal occlusion
Vasectomized partner 
(A vasectomized partner is a highly effective contraception method provided that the partner is 
the sole male sexual partner of the WOCBP and the absence of sperm has been confirmed. If 
not, an additional highly effective method of contraception should be used.)
Sexual abstinence 
(Sexual abstinence is considered a highly effective method only if defined as refraining from 
heterosexual intercourse during the entire period of risk associated with the study drug. The 
 
2018N363775_00


2016N303948_00
CONFIDENTIAL
207440
78
reliability of sexual abstinence needs to be evaluated in relation to the duration of the study and 
the preferred and usual lifestyle of the participant.)
NOTES: 
a.
Typical use failure rates may differ from those when used consistently and correctly. Use should be consistent 
with local regulations regarding the use of contraceptive methods for participants in clinical studies. 
b.
Hormonal contraception may be susceptible to interaction with the study drug, which may reduce the efficacy of 
the contraceptive method. In this case two highly effective methods of contraception should be utilized during the 
treatment period and for at least 7 days  after the last dose of study treatment 
Collection of Pregnancy Information
Male participants with partners who become pregnant

Investigator will attempt to collect pregnancy information on any male participant’s 
female partner of a male study participant who becomes pregnant while participating 
in this study. This applies only to participants who receive study treatment.

After obtaining the necessary signed informed consent from the pregnant female 
partner directly, the investigator will record pregnancy information on the 
appropriate form and submit it to GSK within 24 hours of learning of the partner’s 
pregnancy. 

Partner will also be followed to determine the outcome of the pregnancy. 
Information on the status of the mother and child will be forwarded to GSK

Generally, follow-up will be no longer than 6 to 8 weeks following the estimated
delivery date. Any termination of the pregnancy will be reported regardless of fetal 
status (presence or absence of anomalies) or indication for procedure. 
Female Participants who become pregnant
Female participants who can become pregnant are not eligible to participate, 
however any female subject who becomes pregnant while participating will be 
withdrawn from the study.

Investigator will collect pregnancy information on any female participant, who 
becomes pregnant while participating in this study. 

Information will be recorded on the appropriate form and submitted to GSK within 
24 hours of learning of a participant's pregnancy. 

Participant will be followed to determine the outcome of the pregnancy. The 
investigator will collect follow up information on participant and neonate, which will 
be forwarded to GSK Generally, follow-up will not be required for longer than 6 to 8 
weeks beyond the estimated delivery date.  

Any termination of pregnancy will be reported, regardless of fetal status (presence or 
absence of anomalies) or indication for procedure. 

While pregnancy itself is not considered to be an AE or SAE, any pregnancy 
complication or elective termination of a pregnancy will be reported as an AE or 
SAE. 
 
2018N363775_00


2016N303948_00
CONFIDENTIAL
207440
79

A spontaneous abortion is always considered to be an SAE and will be reported as 
such.  

Any SAE occurring as a result of a post-study pregnancy which is considered 
reasonably related to the study treatment by the investigator, will be reported to GSK
as described in above. While the investigator is not obligated to actively seek this 
information in former study participants, he or she may learn of an SAE through 
spontaneous reporting. 
 
2018N363775_00


2016N303948_00
CONFIDENTIAL
207440
80
12.8.
Appendix 8: Liver Safety: Required Actions and Follow-up 
Assessments
Phase I Liver chemistry stopping criteria have been designed to assure subject safety and 
to evaluate liver event etiology. 
Phase I liver chemistry stopping criteria and required follow up assessments
Liver Chemistry Stopping Criteria 
ALT-absolute
ALT≥3xULN
If ALT≥3xULN AND bilirubin1,2 2xULN (>35% direct bilirubin) or  INR >1.5, 
Report as an SAE.
See additional Actions and Follow Up Assessments listed below
Required Actions and Follow up Assessments 
Actions
Follow Up Assessments

Immediately discontinue study treatment

Report the event to GSK within 24 hours

Complete the liver event CRF, and complete 
an SAE data collection tool if the event also 
meets the criteria for an SAE2

Perform liver event follow up assessments 

Monitor the subject until liver chemistries 
resolve, stabilise, or return to within baseline
(see MONITORING below)
MONITORING:
If ALT≥3xULN AND bilirubin 2xULN  or INR 
>1.5

Repeat liver chemistries (include ALT, AST, 
alkaline phosphatase, bilirubin) and perform 
liver event follow up assessments within 24 
hrs

Monitor subjects twice weekly until liver 
chemistries resolve, stabilise or return to 
within baseline

A specialist or hepatology consultation is 
recommended
If ALT≥3xULN AND bilirubin < 2xULN  and 
INR ≤1.5:

Viral hepatitis serology3

Obtain INR and recheck with each liver 
chemistry assessment until the 
transaminases values show downward 
trend

Obtain blood sample for pharmacokinetic 
(PK) analysis, obtained up to 5 days of last 
dose4 

Serum creatine phosphokinase (CPK) and 
lactate dehydrogenase (LDH).

Fractionate bilirubin, if total bilirubin 
2xULN

Obtain complete blood count with 
differential to assess eosinophilia

Record the appearance or worsening of 
clinical symptoms of liver injury, or 
hypersensitivity, on the AE report form

Record use of concomitant medications on 
the concomitant medications report form 
including acetaminophen, herbal remedies, 
other over the counter medications.

Record alcohol use on the liver event 
alcohol intake case report form
If ALT≥3xULN AND bilirubin 2xULN  or 
 
2018N363775_00


2016N303948_00
CONFIDENTIAL
207440
81
Liver Chemistry Stopping Criteria 

Repeat liver chemistries (include ALT, AST, 
alkaline phosphatase, bilirubin) and perform
liver event follow up assessments within 24-
72 hrs

Monitor subjects weekly until liver 
chemistries resolve, stabilize or return to 
within baseline
INR >1.5:

Anti-nuclear antibody, anti-smooth muscle 
antibody, Type 1 anti-liver kidney 
microsomal antibodies, and quantitative 
total immunoglobulin G (IgG) or gamma 
globulins.

Serum acetaminophen adduct high 
performance liquid chromatography 
(HPLC) assay (quantifies potential 
acetaminophen contribution to liver injury 
in subjects with definite or likely 
acetaminophen use in the preceding 
week).

Liver imaging (ultrasound, magnetic 
resonance, or computerised tomography) 
and /or liver biopsy to evaluate liver 
disease; complete Liver Imaging and/or 
Liver Biopsy CRF forms.
1.
Serum bilirubin fractionation should be performed if testing is available. If serum bilirubin fractionation is not 
immediately available, discontinue study treatment for that subject if ALT 3xULN and bilirubin 2xULN. 
Additionally, if serum bilirubin fractionation testing is unavailable, record presence of detectable urinary bilirubin on 
dipstick, indicating direct bilirubin elevations and suggesting liver injury. 
2.
All events of ALT 3xULN and bilirubin 2xULN (>35% direct bilirubin) or ALT 3xULN and INR>1.5, if INR 
measured, which may indicate severe liver injury (possible ‘Hy’s Law’), must be reported as an SAE (excluding 
studies of hepatic impairment or cirrhosis); INR measurement is not required and the threshold value stated will 
not apply to subjects receiving anticoagulants
3.
Includes: Hepatitis A IgM antibody; Hepatitis B surface antigen and Hepatitis B Core Antibody (IgM); Hepatitis C
RNA; Cytomegalovirus IgM antibody;  Epstein-Barr viral capsid antigen IgM antibody (or if unavailable, obtain 
heterophile antibody or monospot testing);  Hepatitis E IgM antibody 
4.
PK sample may not be required for subjects known to be receiving placebo or non-GSK comparator treatments.  
Record the date/time of the PK blood sample draw and the date/time of the last dose of study treatment prior to 
PK blood sample draw on the CRF. If the date or time of the last dose is unclear, provide the subject’s best 
approximation. If the date/time of the last dose cannot be approximated OR a PK sample cannot be collected in 
the time period indicated above, do not obtain a PK sample. Instructions for sample handling and shipping are in 
the SRM. 
 
2018N363775_00

SAP_001.pdf: 
Sponsor: The GlaxoSmithKline group of companies
Protocol No.: 207440
Version, Date: 
Final v1.0, 18 Jan 2018
This document is proprietary and confidential to INC Research LLC.
Statistical Analysis Plan 30.017A.00
INC Research © LLCPage 1 of 44
Statistical Analysis Plan
Document Type:
Template
Document ID:
30.017A.00
Issue Date:   
01APR2013
Effective Date:
01APR2013
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS PLAN
The GlaxoSmithKline group of companies
GlaxoSmithKline Research & Development Limited
980 Great West Road
Brentford
Middlesex, TW8 9GS
United Kingdom
Protocol No.: 207440
A Phase I, First Time in Human, Two Part, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-
Blind (Sponsor Unblind), Single and Repeat Dose Escalating Study to Evaluate the 
Safety, Tolerability and Pharmacokinetics of GSK3352589, a REarranged during 
Transfection (RET) Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor, in Normal 
Healthy Volunteers
Authors:
Final v1.0
18 Jan 2018
 
1
CONFIDENTIAL
2018N363775_00
207440
PPD


Sponsor: The GlaxoSmithKline group of companies
Protocol No.: 207440
Version, Date: 
Final v1.0, 18 Jan 2018
This document is proprietary and confidential to INC Research LLC.
Statistical Analysis Plan 30.017A.00
INC Research © LLCPage 2 of 44
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
GLOSSARY OF ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................................................................... 5
1.
INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................... 8
1.1. Responsibilities .................................................................................................................... 8
2.
OBJECTIVES AND ENDPOINTS................................................................................................... 9
2.1. Study Objectives .................................................................................................................. 9
2.1.1. Primary Objectives.................................................................................................... 9
2.1.2. Exploratory Objectives .............................................................................................. 9
2.2. Study Endpoints ................................................................................................................... 9
2.2.1. Primary Endpoints..................................................................................................... 9
2.2.2. Exploratory Endpoints............................................................................................. 11
2.3. Hypotheses ........................................................................................................................ 11
3.
STUDY DESIGN.......................................................................................................................... 12
3.1. Number of Centers ............................................................................................................. 12
3.2. Number of Subjects............................................................................................................ 12
3.3. Investigational Product and Other Study Treatment............................................................ 13
3.4. Treatment Assignment ....................................................................................................... 13
3.5. Planned Dose Adjustments ................................................................................................ 13
3.5.1. Part A Single Dose.................................................................................................. 13
3.5.2. Part B Repeat Dose................................................................................................ 14
3.5.3. Dose Modification ................................................................................................... 15
3.6. Randomization and Blinding............................................................................................... 16
4.
PLANNED ANALYSES ................................................................................................................ 16
4.1. Interim Analyses................................................................................................................. 16
4.2. Final Analysis ..................................................................................................................... 16
5.
SAMPLE SIZE CONSIDERATIONS............................................................................................. 16
5.1. Sample Size Assumptions.................................................................................................. 16
5.2. Sample Size Sensitivity ...................................................................................................... 16
6.
ANALYSIS POPULATIONS ......................................................................................................... 17
6.1. All Screened Population ..................................................................................................... 17
6.2. Safety Population ............................................................................................................... 17
6.3. PK Concentration Population.............................................................................................. 17
6.4. PK Parameter Population ................................................................................................... 17
6.5. Pharmacodynamic Concentration Population ..................................................................... 17
6.6. Pharmacodynamic Parameter Population........................................................................... 17
7.
TREATMENT COMPARISONS.................................................................................................... 18
7.1. Data Display Treatment and Other Subgroup Descriptors .................................................. 18
7.1.1. Part A Single Dose.................................................................................................. 18
7.1.2. Part B Repeat Dose................................................................................................ 19
8.
GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR DATA ANALYSES............................................................. 20
8.1. Multicenter Studies............................................................................................................. 20
 
2
CONFIDENTIAL
2018N363775_00
207440


Sponsor: The GlaxoSmithKline group of companies
Protocol No.: 207440
Version, Date: 
Final v1.0, 18 Jan 2018
This document is proprietary and confidential to INC Research LLC.
Statistical Analysis Plan 30.017A.00
INC Research © LLCPage 3 of 44
8.2. Examination of Subgroups.................................................................................................. 20
8.3. Multiple Comparisons and Multiplicity................................................................................. 20
9.
DATA HANDLING CONVENTIONS............................................................................................. 21
9.1. Premature Withdrawal and Missing Data............................................................................ 21
9.2. Partial Dates....................................................................................................................... 21
9.3. Derived and Transformed Data........................................................................................... 22
9.4. Assessment Windows ........................................................................................................ 24
9.5. Coding Dictionaries ............................................................................................................ 24
9.6. Values of Clinical Significance............................................................................................ 25
10.
STUDY POPULATION................................................................................................................. 25
10.1. Disposition of Subjects ....................................................................................................... 25
10.2. Protocol Deviations............................................................................................................. 25
10.3. Demographic and Baseline Characteristics ........................................................................ 26
10.4. Study Drug Administration.................................................................................................. 26
11.
EFFICACY ANALYSES ............................................................................................................... 26
12.
SAFETY ANALYSES ................................................................................................................... 26
12.1. Extent of Exposure ............................................................................................................. 26
12.2. Adverse Events .................................................................................................................. 26
12.3. Laboratory Evaluations....................................................................................................... 27
12.4. Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS)......................................................................................... 29
12.5. Vital Signs .......................................................................................................................... 29
12.6. Electrocardiogram (ECG) ................................................................................................... 29
12.7. Prior and Concomitant Medications.................................................................................... 30
12.8. Other Safety Parameters.................................................................................................... 30
13.
PHARMACOKINETIC ANALYSES............................................................................................... 31
13.1. PK Sampling Schedule....................................................................................................... 31
13.1.1. Part A Single Dose.................................................................................................. 31
13.1.2. Part B Repeat Dose................................................................................................ 31
13.2. Plasma PK Endpoints for GSK3352589.............................................................................. 32
13.3. Derived and Imputed Data.................................................................................................. 33
13.3.1. Handling of Data below the Limit of Quantification for PK Concentration Listings, 
Individual Plots, Summaries and PK Parameters Derivation............................................... 33
13.3.2. Data Summarization and Presentation.................................................................... 34
13.4. Assessment of Dose Proportionality for the PK of GSK3352589 in Cohort 1, 2 and 3 of Part 
A (fasted) and for Part B (fed) of the Study.................................................................................. 36
13.5. Assessment of Drug Accumulation using ANOVA for the PK of GSK3352589 for Part B of 
the Study..................................................................................................................................... 38
13.6. Assessment of the Pilot Food Effect for the PK of GSK3352589 in Cohort 2 of Part A of the 
Study........................................................................................................................................... 38
14.
PHARMACODYNAMIC ANALYSES ............................................................................................ 39
14.1. PD Sampling Schedule....................................................................................................... 39
14.2. Handling of Data below the Limit of Quantification for PD Concentration Listings, Individual 
Plots, Summaries and PD Parameters Derivation ....................................................................... 39
14.3. Presentation of PD Concentration Data.............................................................................. 40
14.4. Mixed Meal PD Parameters................................................................................................ 40
14.5. Comparative Analysis for PD Parameters........................................................................... 40
 
3
CONFIDENTIAL
2018N363775_00
207440


Sponsor: The GlaxoSmithKline group of companies
Protocol No.: 207440
Version, Date: 
Final v1.0, 18 Jan 2018
This document is proprietary and confidential to INC Research LLC.
Statistical Analysis Plan 30.017A.00
INC Research © LLCPage 4 of 44
14.5.1. Evaluation of the Short Term Variability Trends ...................................................... 40
14.5.2. Evaluation of the Long Term Variability Trends for Placebo.................................... 40
14.5.3. Evaluation of the Effect of BMI................................................................................ 41
14.5.4. Statistical Models for the Comparison of PD Endpoints between Treatment Days and 
Pre-Treatment Data............................................................................................................ 41
14.5.5. Statistical Models for the Comparison of PD Endpoints between Active Treatments 
and Placebo Controls ......................................................................................................... 42
14.6. PD/Dose Correlation Analysis ............................................................................................ 42
15.
CHANGES FROM PROTOCOL................................................................................................... 43
16.
REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................ 44
 
4
CONFIDENTIAL
2018N363775_00
207440


Sponsor: The GlaxoSmithKline group of companies
Protocol No.: 207440
Version, Date: 
Final v1.0, 18 Jan 2018
This document is proprietary and confidential to INC Research LLC.
Statistical Analysis Plan 30.017A.00
INC Research © LLCPage 5 of 44
GLOSSARY OF ABBREVIATIONS
Abbreviation
Explanation
%CVb
Between-subject Coefficient of Variation
AE
Adverse Event
ALT
Alanine Transferase
ANCOVA
Analysis of Covariance
ANOVA
Analysis of Variance
ATC
Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical
AUC
Area Under the Curve
AUC24h
Area Under the Curve from Time 0 to 24 hr post-dose (AUC over 24 
hr=2 doses for BID dosing)
AUCinf
Area Under the Curve from Time 0 extrapolated to infinity
AUCextrap%
Area Under the Curve from last measured concentration 
extrapolated to infinity, %
AUCPD4h
Area Under the Curve from Time 0 to the 4h Post-dose for PD 
Biomarkers 
AUCPDlast
Area Under the Curve from Time 0 to the Last Measured 
Concentration for PD Biomarkers 
AUCt
Area Under the Curve from Time 0 to the Last Measured 
Concentration
AUCtau
Area Under the Curve from Time 0 to the End of the Dosing 
interval (10 hr for BID morning dose)
BID
Twice Daily
BLQ
Below the Limit of Quantification
BMI
Body Mass Index
BSFS
Bristol Stool Form Scale
CI
Confidence Interval
Cmax
Maximum Observed Plasma GSK3352589 PK Concentration 
Clast
Last Measured Concentration
CPDmax
Maximum Observed Plasma for PD Biomarkers 
CPSR
Clinical Pharmacology Study Report
CRF 
Case Report Form
CV
Coefficient of Variation
 
5
CONFIDENTIAL
2018N363775_00
207440


Sponsor: The GlaxoSmithKline group of companies
Protocol No.: 207440
Version, Date: 
Final v1.0, 18 Jan 2018
This document is proprietary and confidential to INC Research LLC.
Statistical Analysis Plan 30.017A.00
INC Research © LLCPage 6 of 44
Abbreviation
Explanation
MRT
Mean Residence Time for GSK3352589
ECG
Electrocardiogram
FSH
Follicle Stimulating Hormone
GCP
Good Clinical Practice
GLP
Good Laboratory Practice
Total GLP-1
Total Glucagon Like Peptide-1 or GLP-1 Total
GMR
Geometric Mean Ratio
GSK
GlaxoSmithKline
HBsAG
Hepatitis B Surface Antigen
HIV
Human Immunodeficiency Virus
ICH
International Conference on Harmonization
ITT
Intent to Treat
LLQ
Lower Limit of Quantification for Bioassay Methods
MedDRA
Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities
NOAEL
No Observed Adverse Effect Level
PCI
Potential Clinical Importance
PD
Pharmacodynamic
PI
Principal Investigator
PK
Pharmacokinetic
PT
Preferred Term
Total PYY
Total Peptide YY or PYY Total
QD
Once Daily
R2adj
Correlation coefficient for log-linear regression to calculate 
terminal elimination rate for PK
RAUCt
Accumulation Ratio (R) for AUCt at Steady State compared to first 
dose interval
RAUCtau
Accumulation Ratio (R) for AUCtau at Steady State compared to first 
dose interval
RCmax
Accumulation Ratio (R) for Cmax at Steady State compared to first 
dose interval
RET
REarranged during Transfection
SAE
Serious Adverse Event
 
6
CONFIDENTIAL
2018N363775_00
207440


Sponsor: The GlaxoSmithKline group of companies
Protocol No.: 207440
Version, Date: 
Final v1.0, 18 Jan 2018
This document is proprietary and confidential to INC Research LLC.
Statistical Analysis Plan 30.017A.00
INC Research © LLCPage 7 of 44
Abbreviation
Explanation
SAP
Statistical Analysis Plan
SAS
Statistical Analysis System
SD
Standard Deviation
SE
Standard Error
SoA
Schedule of Activities
SOC
System Organ Class
t1/2,terminal
Terminal plasma half-life
Tmax
Time to Maximum Observed Plasma GSK3352589 PK Concentration 
Tlast
Time to Last Observed Plasma GSK3352589 PK Concentration 
TPDmax
Time to Maximum Observed Plasma for PD Biomarkers 
TEAE
Treatment Emergent Adverse Events
ULN
Upper Limit of Normal
 
7
CONFIDENTIAL
2018N363775_00
207440


Sponsor: The GlaxoSmithKline group of companies
Protocol No.: 207440
Version, Date: 
Final v1.0, 18 Jan 2018
This document is proprietary and confidential to INC Research LLC.
Statistical Analysis Plan 30.017A.00
INC Research © LLCPage 8 of 44
1.
INTRODUCTION
The purpose of this Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP) is to describe the handling of the data and 
planned statistical analyses for the GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) group of companies, study 
207440. This will include the planned analyses that will be undertaken at the time of the
final analysis.
This SAP is based on the following study documents:

Final Protocol, dated 31 March 2017;

Case Report Form (CRF) v2.0, dated 09 June 2017.
1.1.
Responsibilities
INC Research will perform the statistical analyses and are responsible for the production and 
quality control of all tables, figures and listings. The safety laboratory database will be 
handled by CMAX and transferred to INC data management. The pharmacokinetics (PK) 
database will be handled by GSK and transferred to INC data management. The PK 
concentration time and actual time merge will be the responsibility of INC. The PK parameter 
derivation and statistical analysis will be the responsibility of INC, including the tables, figures 
and listings for both drug concentrations and PK parameters under the auspices of GSK.
The pharmacodynamics (PD) database will be handled by BioAgilytix and transferred to INC 
data management. The PD concentration time and actual time merge will be the responsibility 
of INC. The PD parameter derivation and statistical analysis will be the responsibility of INC,
including the tables, figures and listings for the PD biomarker concentrations and derived PD 
parameters under the auspices of GSK.
Data permitting, exploratory dose response graphical relationships will be the responsibility 
of INC.
Quality assurance and oversight of all statistics, programming and data management 
activities performed by INC will be performed by GSK in line with the oversight plan.
 
8
CONFIDENTIAL
2018N363775_00
207440


Sponsor: The GlaxoSmithKline group of companies
Protocol No.: 207440
Version, Date: 
Final v1.0, 18 Jan 2018
This document is proprietary and confidential to INC Research LLC.
Statistical Analysis Plan 30.017A.00
INC Research © LLCPage 9 of 44
2.
OBJECTIVES AND ENDPOINTS
2.1.
Study Objectives
2.1.1.
Primary Objectives
The primary objectives for the Part A Single Dose section of this study are:

To evaluate the safety and tolerability of single escalating oral doses of GSK3352589 
administered in the fasted state and a single dose of GSK3352589 administered in the 
fed state in healthy adult subjects.

To evaluate the pharmacokinetic parameters of escalating single oral doses of 
GSK3352589 under fasting and fed (for one dose only) conditions in healthy adult 
subjects.
The primary objectives for the Part B Repeat Dose section of this study are:

To evaluate the safety and tolerability of repeat escalating oral doses of GSK3352589 
administered once or twice daily in the fasted or fed state.

To characterize the PK of GSK3352589 of repeat escalating oral doses administered 
once or twice daily in the fasted or fed state.
2.1.2.
Exploratory Objectives
The exploratory objectives for Part B of this study are:

To explore the effect of GSK3352589 on the postprandial plasma profiles of total 
glucagon like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and total peptide YY (PYY) following repeat oral doses 
of GSK3352589 administered once or twice daily.

To investigate the biotransformation of GSK3352589 in plasma and urine.
2.2.
Study Endpoints
2.2.1.
Primary Endpoints
The primary endpoints for this study will consist of clinical safety and tolerability data 
including:

Spontaneous Adverse Event (AE) reporting;

Clinical Observations;

Physical Examination findings;

12-Lead Electrocardiograms (ECG);
 
9
CONFIDENTIAL
2018N363775_00
207440


Sponsor: The GlaxoSmithKline group of companies
Protocol No.: 207440
Version, Date: 
Final v1.0, 18 Jan 2018
This document is proprietary and confidential to INC Research LLC.
Statistical Analysis Plan 30.017A.00
INC Research © LLCPage 10 of 44

Vital Signs;

Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS) Scores;

Clinical Laboratory tests.
They shall also consist of the PK parameters obtained following the administration of both 
single and multiple doses of GSK3352589.

PK parameters obtained following administration of single dose of GSK3353589:
AUCinf
Area under the concentration-time curve from the time of dosing extrapolated to 
infinity
AUCt
Area under the concentration-time curve from the time of dosing up to the last 
quantifiable concentration
Clast
Last observed quantifiable concentration
Cmax
Maximum observed PK concentration
MRT
Mean residence time MRT (0-infinity )
t1/2, terminal
Terminal elimination half- life
Tlast
Time of the last observed quantifiable concentration
Tmax
Time to Maximum Observed Plasma GSK3352589 PK Concentration

PK parameters obtained following administration of multiple doses of GSK3353589 over 
14 days in BID dosing regimen:
AUCt
Area under the concentration-time curve from the time of dosing to Tlast for Days 
1 and 14 for BID 1st dosing interval and BID dosing (i.e., 24h day)
AUCtau
Area under the concentration-time curve from the time of dosing during dosing 
interval for Days 1 and 14, 0-10 hrs for BID morning dose
Cmax
Maximum observed concentration after dose on Days 1 and 14 separately for 1st
dosing interval only (0-10) for BID
Tlast
Time of the last observed quantifiable concentration after dose on Days 1 and 14 
separately for 1st dosing interval only (0-10) for BID
 
10
CONFIDENTIAL
2018N363775_00
207440


Sponsor: The GlaxoSmithKline group of companies
Protocol No.: 207440
Version, Date: 
Final v1.0, 18 Jan 2018
This document is proprietary and confidential to INC Research LLC.
Statistical Analysis Plan 30.017A.00
INC Research © LLCPage 11 of 44
Tmax
Time of maximum concentration after dose on Days 1 and 14 separately for 1st
dosing interval only (0-10) for BID
RAUCt
Accumulation Ratio (R) for AUCt at Steady State compared to first dose interval 
RAUCtau
Accumulation Ratio (R) for AUCtau at Steady State compared to first dose interval 
RCmax
Accumulation Ratio (R) for Cmax at Steady State compared to first dose interval
2.2.2.
Exploratory Endpoints
The exploratory endpoints of the study will consist of:

Postprandial challenge (mixed-meal) profiles of total GLP-1 and total PYY: Ave Pre-
meal concentrations of biomarkers on each Days -1, 1 and 14 separately, AUCPDlast, 
AUCPD4h, CPDMAX and TPDMAX over the sampling interval.

Samples of plasma and urine for the identification of any compound-derived 
metabolite(s).
2.3.
Hypotheses
There are no formal hypotheses being tested. An estimation approach will be taken to 
provide a plausible range of values. For the PK endpoints, where appropriate, point 
estimates and 90% Confidence Intervals (CIs) will be provided.
 
11
CONFIDENTIAL
2018N363775_00
207440


Sponsor: The GlaxoSmithKline group of companies
Protocol No.: 207440
Version, Date: 
Final v1.0, 18 Jan 2018
This document is proprietary and confidential to INC Research LLC.
Statistical Analysis Plan 30.017A.00
INC Research © LLCPage 12 of 44
3.
STUDY DESIGN
This is a randomized, double-blind (sponsor unblind), placebo-controlled, dose escalation 
study that will be divided in to two parts: Part A is a single dose escalating, four period 
crossover (Cohort 1) with a two period, single sequence pilot food effect (Cohort 2) and a
two period crossover (Cohort 3) study, and Part B is a 14 day repeat dose escalating, 
ascending cohort study.
The study will be composed of 3 periods for all subjects (Screening, Treatment and Follow-
up). Subjects will participate in either Part A or Part B, and also subjects participating in 
Part A Cohorts 1 or 2 are will not be permitted to participate in Part A Cohort 3. A subject’s 
total time involved in the study will be approximately 10 weeks for subjects enrolled in Part 
A, Cohort 1 and approximately 8 weeks for subjects enrolled in Part A, Cohort 2 or Cohort 3. 
Subjects enrolled in Part B will be involved in the study for a total time of approximately 7 
weeks.
All dosing periods for subjects participating in Part A will be completed before beginning 
enrollment in Part B.
For Part A, the planned dose range for Cohort 1 is single doses of 2 to 400 mg in the fasted 
state, whilst a single dose of GSK3352589 will be administered in the fasted and fed states in 
Cohort 2 and the planned dose range for Cohort 3 is 150 to 400 mg in the fasted state. For 
Part B, up to six (6) cohorts are planned and will be conducted sequentially. The selection of 
the starting dose for Part B, along with requirements for fasted or fed state study drug 
administration, will occur after review of the safety, tolerability and PK data of all subjects 
enrolled in Part A. For Part A Cohort 1, Part A Cohort 3 and Part B, the actual doses to be 
administered may be adjusted based on safety, tolerability and PK data at previous dose 
levels; these dose adjustments may involve either an increase or a decrease in the planned 
dose. For Part A Cohort 2, the dose selected to evaluate the food effect will allow for a 2X 
increase in bioavailability and predicted exposures will not exceed the highest observed 
exposures at prior doses.
3.1.
Number of Centers
This is a single center study, conducted at one site in Australia.
3.2.
Number of Subjects
A sufficient number of healthy volunteers will be screened to randomize 24 subjects (8 
subjects/cohort) for Part A and 48 subjects (8 subjects/cohort; 6 subjects will be 
randomized to GSK3352589 and 2 subjects will be randomized to placebo) for Part B for a 
total of 64 randomized subjects. If subjects prematurely discontinue the study, additional 
replacement subjects may be randomized and assigned to the same treatment at the 
discretion of the Sponsor and in consultation with the Investigator.
 
12
CONFIDENTIAL
2018N363775_00
207440


Sponsor: The GlaxoSmithKline group of companies
Protocol No.: 207440
Version, Date: 
Final v1.0, 18 Jan 2018
This document is proprietary and confidential to INC Research LLC.
Statistical Analysis Plan 30.017A.00
INC Research © LLCPage 13 of 44
3.3.
Investigational Product and Other Study Treatment
The term ‘study treatment’ is used throughout the protocol to define any investigational 
treatment or placebo intended to be administered to a study participant according to the 
protocol design. Study treatment may therefore refer to the individual study treatments or 
the combination of those study treatments.
3.4.
Treatment Assignment
The randomization schedule will be computer generated by GSK. On Day 1, subjects will be 
assigned a unique number (randomization number) in ascending numerical order. The 
randomization number encodes the participant’s assignment to one of the four treatment
arms of the study in accordance to the randomization schedule generated prior to the start 
of the study, using validated software. Each participant will be dispensed blinded study 
treatment, labelled with his/her unique randomization number, throughout the study. 
3.5.
Planned Dose Adjustments
3.5.1.
Part A Single Dose
Single dose, dose escalating, four period, crossover (Cohort 1) with a two period, single
sequence pilot food effect (Cohort 2) and a two period crossover (Cohort 3) study.
Subjects assigned to Cohort 1 will participate in 4 dosing periods: 1 placebo and 3 dose 
escalating periods.  The planned dose range for Cohort 1 is 2 to 400 mg.  Each dosing period 
during Cohort 1 will be staggered so that only 2 of the 8 subjects will be administered study 
drug initially.  Once 24 hours have elapsed, and provided there are no safety concerns, the 
remainder of subjects scheduled for that dosing period may be dosed.  A review of safety 
and tolerability will occur prior to administration of the next dose level.  This same 
procedure will be followed for each escalating dosing period.  Within each cohort, subjects 
will return for their next scheduled dosing period approximately 14 days after administration 
of the study drug during the prior dosing period.  
Cohort 2 will proceed after completion of the treatment periods in Cohort 1. Subjects
assigned to Cohort 2 will participate in a pilot food effect in Periods 1 and 2 (see Table 1
below). A single dose of GSK3352589 will be administered in the fasted and fed states in 
Cohort 2. The dose selected to evaluate the food effect will allow for a 2X increase in
bioavailability and predicted exposures will not exceed the highest observed exposures at
prior doses.
Subjects assigned to Cohort 3 will participate in 2 periods where subjects will receive 
escalating (increasing) doses of GSK3352589 and/or placebo. Cohort 3 will be staggered so 
that only 2 of the 8 subjects will be administered study drug initially (1 subject will receive 
GSK3352589 and 1 will receive placebo). This is referred to as a sentinel dosing. Once 24 
hours have elapsed, and provided there are no safety concerns, the remainder of the 
subjects scheduled for that dosing period may be dosed. This same procedure will be 
followed for both periods of Cohort 3. For each dosing period, 2 subjects will be randomized 
 
13
CONFIDENTIAL
2018N363775_00
207440


Sponsor: The GlaxoSmithKline group of companies
Protocol No.: 207440
Version, Date: 
Final v1.0, 18 Jan 2018
This document is proprietary and confidential to INC Research LLC.
Statistical Analysis Plan 30.017A.00
INC Research © LLCPage 14 of 44
to placebo and 6 subjects will be randomized to GSK3352589, thus 4 subjects will be treated 
with placebo during the 2 dosing periods and all 8 enrolled subjects will receive at least one 
dose of GSK3352589.
The decision to proceed to the next dose level of GSK3352589 will be made by the GSK 
Medical Monitor and the investigator based on safety, tolerability and available PK data. The 
actual doses to be administered may be adjusted based on safety, tolerability and 
preliminary PK data at previous dose levels; these dose adjustments may involve either an 
increase or a decrease in the planned dose for Cohort 1. Dose escalation will occur only if 
mean systemic exposures are projected not to exceed the defined plasma toxicokinetic (TK) 
limits. Preliminary safety and PK data from all subjects will be reviewed prior to the next 
Dosing Period.
Table 1:
Part A Treatment Sequence
Cohort 1 (Single Dose Escalation1)
Treatment 
Sequence
Subjects
Period 1
Period 2
Period 3
Period 4
A
and
Placebo
D2
D3
D4
B
and
D1
Placebo
D3
D4
C
and
D1
D2
Placebo
D4
D
and
D1
D2
D3
Placebo
1
Dose escalation will occur only if mean systemic exposures are projected not to exceed the defined plasma toxicokinetic (TK) limits.
Cohort 2 (Pilot Food Effect)
Treatment Sequence
Subjects
Period 1
Period 2
E
D5
D5 + food
F
and
Placebo
Placebo  + food
Cohort 3 (Single Dose Escalation1)
Treatment Sequence
Subjects
Period 1
Period 2
G
and
D6
Placebo
H
and
Placebo
D7
I
D6
D7
1
Dose escalation will occur only if mean systemic exposures are projected not to exceed the defined plasma toxicokinetic (TK) limits.
3.5.2.
Part B Repeat Dose
The planned dose range is 2 mg once daily to 200 mg twice daily. The starting dose for Part 
B will be selected after review of the safety, tolerability and PK data of subjects enrolled in 
Part A and completing all dosing periods. 
 
14
CONFIDENTIAL
2018N363775_00
207440
PPD
PPD
PPD
PPD
PPD
PPD
PPD
PPD


Sponsor: The GlaxoSmithKline group of companies
Protocol No.: 207440
Version, Date: 
Final v1.0, 18 Jan 2018
This document is proprietary and confidential to INC Research LLC.
Statistical Analysis Plan 30.017A.00
INC Research © LLCPage 15 of 44
An example dose escalation plan is shown in Table 2 below. The actual doses to be 
administered may be adjusted based on safety, tolerability and PK data at previous dose 
levels; these dose adjustments may involve either an increase or a decrease in the planned 
dose. Dose escalation will occur only if mean systemic exposures are projected not to 
exceed the defined plasma toxicokinetic (TK) limits.
Subjects will undergo pretreatment pharmacodynamic (PD) testing after administration of a 
breakfast mixed-meal challenge on Day -1 prior to receiving the first dose of study drug, on 
Day 1, and at the end of the treatment period on Day 14.  
The decision to proceed to the next dose level will be made by the GSK Medical Monitor and 
the investigator based on safety, tolerability and available PK data. Preliminary safety and 
tolerability from 14 days of dosing and PK data from 7 days of dosing for each cohort will be 
reviewed prior to dose escalation and will be used to determine the dose to be administered 
in the subsequent cohort.
Additional subjects/cohorts may be enrolled to allow for evaluation of additional dose levels 
or dosing regimens.
Table 2:
Planned Dose Escalation for Part B
Regimen Descriptions
Number of Subjects
Cohort 1
2 mg of GSK3352589 administered QD
or matching placebo administered QD
GSK3352589 n=6
Placebo n=2
Cohort 2
10 mg of GSK3352589 administered QD
or matching placebo administered QD
GSK3352589 n=6
Placebo n=2
Cohort 3
25 mg of GSK3352589 administered BID
or matching placebo administered BID
GSK3352589 n=6
Placebo n=2
Cohort 4
50 mg of GSK3352589 administered BID
or matching placebo administered BID
GSK3352589 n=6 
Placebo n=2
Cohort 5
100 mg of GSK3352589 administered BID
or matching placebo administered BID
GSK3352589 n=6
Placebo n=2
Cohort 6
200 mg of GSK3352589 administered BID
Or matching placebo administered BID
GSK3352589 n=6
Placebo n=2
3.5.3.
Dose Modification
The protocol allows some alteration from the currently outlined dosing regimen, but the 
(predicted) maximum/cumulative exposure will not exceed a CMAX=26.6 ng/mL or AUC = 
40.4 ng.h/mL. 
The decision to proceed to the next dose level of GSK3352589 (either an increase or a 
decrease) will be made by the Medical Monitor and the investigator based on safety, 
tolerability and preliminary PK data obtained in at least 4 GSK3352589-treated subjects at 
the prior dose level. 
The dosing regimen may also be adjusted to expand a dosing cohort to further evaluate 
safety or PK findings at a given dose level or to add cohorts to evaluate up to 2 additional 
dose levels or dosing regimens. The study procedures for these additional participant(s) or 
cohort(s) will be the same as that described for other study participants/cohorts. 
 
15
CONFIDENTIAL
2018N363775_00
207440


Sponsor: The GlaxoSmithKline group of companies
Protocol No.: 207440
Version, Date: 
Final v1.0, 18 Jan 2018
This document is proprietary and confidential to INC Research LLC.
Statistical Analysis Plan 30.017A.00
INC Research © LLCPage 16 of 44
If adverse events (AEs), which are of moderate or severe intensity and are consistently 
observed across subjects in a cohort, or if unacceptable pharmacological effects, reasonably 
attributable in the opinion of the investigator to dosing with GSK3352589 are observed in 
more than 1 subject in a cohort, the dose escalation will be temporarily halted and no 
further subject will be dosed until a full safety review of the study has taken place. Relevant 
reporting and discussion with Medical Monitor, relevant GSK personnel, and with the Ethics 
Committee will take place prior to any resumption of dosing.
3.6.
Randomization and Blinding
Subjects will be randomized to one of the four treatment arms of the study in accordance 
with the randomization schedule generated prior to the start of the study by GSK, using 
validated software.
This will be a double blind (sponsor unblind) study and the following will apply. GSK staff 
will be considered unblinded to treatments, though the number with access to treatment 
information will be minimized.
4.
PLANNED ANALYSES
4.1.
Interim Analyses
No formal statistical interim analysis is planned for this study. Safety, tolerability and 
pharmacokinetic data will be reviewed prior to each dose-escalation and prior to all within 
subject escalations.
4.2.
Final Analysis
The final analysis for both Part A and Part B of the study will be conducted once all subjects 
have completed the study.
5.
SAMPLE SIZE CONSIDERATIONS
5.1.
Sample Size Assumptions
Sample sizes are based on feasibility; no formal power calculations were performed, and no 
statistical sample size re-estimation or adjustment will be used.
5.2.
Sample Size Sensitivity
Not applicable for this study.
 
16
CONFIDENTIAL
2018N363775_00
207440


Sponsor: The GlaxoSmithKline group of companies
Protocol No.: 207440
Version, Date: 
Final v1.0, 18 Jan 2018
This document is proprietary and confidential to INC Research LLC.
Statistical Analysis Plan 30.017A.00
INC Research © LLCPage 17 of 44
6.
ANALYSIS POPULATIONS
6.1.
All Screened Population
The All Screened population will include all subjects who consented to participate in the 
clinical trial. The All Screened Population will be used for the listing of subject enrolment 
and eligibility.
6.2.
Safety Population
The Safety population will comprise all randomized subjects who receive at least one dose 
of study medication and will be based on the actual treatment received, if this differs from 
that to which the subject was randomized to. This population will be used for the listing and 
summarization of subject disposition, all baseline and demographic data and for all general 
and safety analyses. With the exception of subject enrolment and eligibility, PD and PK 
outputs, all listings will be produced for the Safety Population.
6.3.
PK Concentration Population 
The PK Concentration population will comprise all randomized subjects who receive at least 
one dose of active treatment (GSK3352589) and for whom a pharmacokinetic sample was 
obtained and analysed. This population will be used for the listing of all PK concentrations. 
The PK data will be evaluated for significant protocol violations or deviations that would 
significantly affect the PK evaluation of the drug, and will be flagged and may be excluded 
from the summary statistics and PK parameters derivation.
6.4.
PK Parameter Population
The PK Parameter population will comprise all randomized subjects who receive at least one 
dose of active treatment and who have GSK3352589 PK parameter estimates from any 
portion of the study. This population will be used for the summaries and listings of PK 
parameters and tables for statistical models involving PK parameters, figures and analysis of 
all PK data.
6.5.
Pharmacodynamic Concentration Population
The Pharmacodynamic Concentration population will include all randomized subjects who 
receive at least one dose of the study medication or placebo and who have at least one
concentration of any PD biomarker (GLP-1
or
total PYY) available. PD Biomarker
concentrations will be listed for all subjects in PD Concentration population.
6.6.
Pharmacodynamic Parameter Population
The Pharmacodynamic Parameter population will include all randomized subjects who receive 
at least one dose of the study medication or placebo and who have at least two pre-meal
values and all four postprandial concentrations of any PD biomarker (GLP-1 or total PYY) 
 
17
CONFIDENTIAL
2018N363775_00
207440


Sponsor: The GlaxoSmithKline group of companies
Protocol No.: 207440
Version, Date: 
Final v1.0, 18 Jan 2018
This document is proprietary and confidential to INC Research LLC.
Statistical Analysis Plan 30.017A.00
INC Research © LLCPage 18 of 44
available on Days -1, 1 and 14. This population will only include subjects who completed at 
least 75% of the mixed meal breakfast on Days -1, 1 and 14. 
Though no subjects with available PD data will be excluded, the PD data will be evaluated for 
protocol violations or deviations that would significantly affect the PD evaluation of the drug 
and may be flagged and excluded from summary statistics and/or PD parameters derivation. 
7.
TREATMENT COMPARISONS
7.1.
Data Display Treatment and Other Subgroup Descriptors
For both Parts A and B, the actual doses may be adjusted based on safety, tolerability and 
PK data at previous dose levels.
For the purposes of the summary tables, all subjects randomized to placebo in Part A in the 
fasted state (Cohorts 1 and 3) will be grouped and in addition all subjects randomized to 
placebo in Part A in the fed state (Cohort 2) will be grouped and all subjects randomized to 
placebo in Part A in the fasted state (Cohort 2) will be grouped. In Part B, subjects (all 
cohorts) will be combined into a single placebo BID group.
7.1.1.
Part A Single Dose
Cohorts
The following labels for cohorts in Part A of the study will be used on all tabulations where 
the results are displayed by cohort, in the following order:

Cohort 1 and 3;

Cohort 2;
The actual dose levels (rather than planned/generic descriptions) will be used for relevant 
outputs:
Treatments

Placebo;

GSK3352589 Dose 1 mg;

GSK3352589 Dose 2 mg;

GSK3352589 Dose 3 mg;

GSK3352589 Dose 4 mg;

Fed Placebo;

Fasted Placebo;

GSK3352589 Dose 5 mg;
 
18
CONFIDENTIAL
2018N363775_00
207440


Sponsor: The GlaxoSmithKline group of companies
Protocol No.: 207440
Version, Date: 
Final v1.0, 18 Jan 2018
This document is proprietary and confidential to INC Research LLC.
Statistical Analysis Plan 30.017A.00
INC Research © LLCPage 19 of 44

Fed GSK3352589 Dose 5 mg;

GSK3352589 Dose 6 mg;

GSK3352589 Dose 7 mg.
Where:

Placebo will be Cohorts 1 and 3 combined;

Doses 1-4 in Cohort 1 will take values from 2 to 400 (mg);

Dose 5 in Cohort 2 will be selected to allow for a 2X increase in bioavailability and 
predicted exposures will not exceed the highest observed exposures at prior doses;

Fed Placebo will be from Cohort 2;

Fasted Placebo will be from Cohort 2;

Dose 6 and Dose 7 in Cohort 3 will take values from 150 to 400 (mg).
7.1.2.
Part B Repeat Dose
The following labels for treatment groups in Part B of the study will be used on all 
tabulations, in the following order. The actual dose levels (rather than planned/generic 
descriptions) will be used:

Placebo;

GSK3352589 Dose 1 mg;

GSK3352589 Dose 2 mg;

GSK3352589 Dose 3 mg;

GSK3352589 Dose 4 mg;

GSK3352589 Dose 5 mg;

GSK3352589 Dose 6 mg;

Overall.
Where:

Doses 1-6 in Part B are different to Doses 1-6 in Part A;

The starting dose will be selected after a review of the safety, tolerability and PK 
data of subjects enrolled in Part A and completing all dosing period;
 
19
CONFIDENTIAL
2018N363775_00
207440


Sponsor: The GlaxoSmithKline group of companies
Protocol No.: 207440
Version, Date: 
Final v1.0, 18 Jan 2018
This document is proprietary and confidential to INC Research LLC.
Statistical Analysis Plan 30.017A.00
INC Research © LLCPage 20 of 44

The example dose levels from the protocol are Dose 1 = 2 mg QD, Dose 2 = 10 mg QD, 
Dose 3 = 25 mg BID, Dose 4 = 50 mg BID, Dose 5 = 100 mg BID and Dose 6 = 200 mg BID.
8.
GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR DATA ANALYSES
The currently supported version of SAS software will be used to perform all data analyses. 
The actual SAS version used will be presented in the Clinical Study Report.
INC Research will be responsible for reporting the demographic and safety data, including 
the listings of the administration information for the collection of PK samples. INC Research 
is responsible for the PK analyses and the reporting of the PK analysis results, as well as the 
PD analysis and reporting of results.
All data in the database will be presented in the data listings. Unless otherwise stated, all 
listings will be presented by study part and sorted by treatment group, subject number and
assessment date/time. Summaries presented by study part and treatment will be displayed 
for Part A followed by Part B and then as follows: placebo first, then ascending dose levels 
of GSK3352589. Part A and Part B will be displayed on a separate page for all listings and 
summaries. Similarly, each treatment group will be displayed on a separate page for by 
treatment summaries.
Unless otherwise stated, continuous variables will be summarized using the statistics mean, 
median, standard deviation, minimum and maximum. The minimum and maximum values 
will be presented to the same number of decimal places as recorded in the CRF, mean,
median and standard deviation will be presented to one more decimal place than the raw 
data. Categorical variables will be summarized with frequency counts and percentages.
Percentages will be rounded to one decimal place, with the denominator being the number 
of subjects in the relevant population, unless otherwise stated.
Summary tables will indicate the number of subjects with complete data for each 
measurement, event or outcome. With the exception of the calculation of the PD 
parameters, no substitutions will be made for missing data unless otherwise stated (PK 
analysis considerations). All analysis will be based on available data, unless otherwise 
stated.
8.1.
Multicenter Studies
Not applicable for this study.
8.2.
Examination of Subgroups
Not applicable for this study.
8.3.
Multiple Comparisons and Multiplicity
Not applicable for this study.
 
20
CONFIDENTIAL
2018N363775_00
207440


Sponsor: The GlaxoSmithKline group of companies
Protocol No.: 207440
Version, Date: 
Final v1.0, 18 Jan 2018
This document is proprietary and confidential to INC Research LLC.
Statistical Analysis Plan 30.017A.00
INC Research © LLCPage 21 of 44
9.
DATA HANDLING CONVENTIONS
9.1.
Premature Withdrawal and Missing Data
For subjects who are withdrawn from the study prior to study completion, all data compiled 
up to the point of discontinuation will be used for analysis. All withdrawals will be included 
in all analyses up to the time of withdrawal.
Subjects who are withdrawn prematurely from study treatment will be included in all 
analyses regardless of the duration of treatment.

A participant may withdraw from the study at any time at his/her own request, or may 
be withdrawn at any time at the discretion of the investigator for safety, behavioral, 
compliance or administrative reasons.

If the participant withdraws consent for disclosure of future information, the sponsor 
may retain and continue to use any data collected before such a withdrawal of consent.

If a participant withdraws from the study, he/she may request destruction of any 
samples taken and not tested, and the investigator must document this in the site study 
records.

Refer to the SoA (Section 2 of the Protocol) for data to be collected at the time of 
study discontinuation and follow-up and for any further evaluations that need to be 
completed.
There will be no imputation for missing data, unless otherwise stated.
9.2.
Partial Dates
For the purposes of assigning AEs and concomitant medications to study periods the 
following algorithm will be used for partial start dates (AE start dates and concomitant 
medication start dates):

Should the full date be missing then the start date will be assumed to be the date of 
the first administration of study drug.

Should the day and month be missing and the year is the same as the year of the first 
administration of study drug then the date will be assumed to be the date of the first 
administration of study drug.

Should the day and month be missing and the year is not the same as the year of the 
first administration of study drug then the day and month will be assumed to be 1 
January.

Should the day be missing and the month and year are the same as the month and year 
of the first administration of study drug then the date will be assumed to be the date of 
the first administration of study drug. 
 
21
CONFIDENTIAL
2018N363775_00
207440


Sponsor: The GlaxoSmithKline group of companies
Protocol No.: 207440
Version, Date: 
Final v1.0, 18 Jan 2018
This document is proprietary and confidential to INC Research LLC.
Statistical Analysis Plan 30.017A.00
INC Research © LLCPage 22 of 44

Should the day be missing and the month and year are not the same as the month and 
year of the first administration of study drug then the day will be assumed to be first of 
the given month.
9.3.
Derived and Transformed Data
Baseline
In general, baseline will be defined for each subject and will be defined as the last 
available, non-missing assessment prior to the first administration of study assigned 
treatment. ‘Unknown’, ‘Not Done’, ‘Not Applicable’ and other classifications of missing data 
will not be considered when calculating baseline observations. However, valid categorical 
observations will be considered for baseline calculations. Unscheduled assessments will also 
be included for the derivation of baseline.
Baseline will be considered to occur at the following time points for the following 
parameters:
Table 3:
Part A Baseline Values
Safety End Point
Baseline Value is Captured on/at
Physical Examinations
Day -1 or Screening if the Day -1 data are 
not available/ Unscheduled time point
Laboratory Assessments
Day -1 or Screening if the Day -1 data are 
not available/ Unscheduled time point
ECG
Day 1 pre-dose or Screening if the Day 1 
data are not available/ Unscheduled time 
point
Vital Signs
Day 1 pre-dose or Day -1 if Day 1 pre-dose 
data are not available/ Unscheduled time 
point
PD for Mixed Meal Profiles
Not applicable
 
22
CONFIDENTIAL
2018N363775_00
207440


Sponsor: The GlaxoSmithKline group of companies
Protocol No.: 207440
Version, Date: 
Final v1.0, 18 Jan 2018
This document is proprietary and confidential to INC Research LLC.
Statistical Analysis Plan 30.017A.00
INC Research © LLCPage 23 of 44
Table 4:
Part B Baseline Values
Safety End Point
Baseline Value is Captured on/at
Physical Examinations
Day -2 or Screening if the Day -2 data are 
not available/ Unscheduled time point
Laboratory Assessments
Day -2 or Screening if the Day -2 data are 
not available/ Unscheduled time point
ECG
Day 1 pre-dose or Screening if the Day 1 
data are not available/Unscheduled time 
point
Vital Signs
Day 1 pre-dose or Day -1/ or Day -2 if Day 1 
pre-dose data are not available/ 
Unscheduled time point
PD Parameters for Mixed Meal Profiles
Day -1 (see section 14.5)
Age
Age, in completed years, at screening will be calculated for each subject and will be defined 
as:
•
Age (years) = year informed consent signed - year of birth.
Body Mass Index (BMI)
BMI, in kg/m2, at screening will be calculated for each subject and will be defined as:

BMI (kg/m2) = weight at screening (kg) / (height at screening (m))2.
Study Day
Study day will be calculated using the first study drug administration date as the reference 
date. If the date of interest occurs on or after the first study drug administration date, study 
day will be calculated as (date of interest – start of first study drug administration date) + 1. 
If the date of interest occurs prior to the start of first study drug administration date, study 
day will be calculated as (date of interest – start of first study drug administration date). 
There will be no study day 0.
Time on Study
Time on study will be calculated as follows and displayed in the following format day, hour, 
minute. Date/Time (min) = (day x 1440) + (hour x 24) + minute
Time since first dose will be calculated as follows:
 
23
CONFIDENTIAL
2018N363775_00
207440


Sponsor: The GlaxoSmithKline group of companies
Protocol No.: 207440
Version, Date: 
Final v1.0, 18 Jan 2018
This document is proprietary and confidential to INC Research LLC.
Statistical Analysis Plan 30.017A.00
INC Research © LLCPage 24 of 44

Day = Integer[(Onset Date/Time (min) - First Admin Date/Time (min))/1440].

Hour = Integer[{(Onset Date/Time (min) - First Admin Date/Time (min) - (Day x
1440)}/60].

Minute = Integer[{(Onset Date/Time (min) - First Admin Date/Time (min) - (Day x 1440) 
– (Hour x 60)].
Time since last dose will be calculated as follows:

Day = Integer[{Onset Date/Time (min) - Last Admin Date/Time (min)}/1440].

Hour = Integer[{(Onset Date/Time (min) - Last Admin Date/Time (min) - (Day x 
1440)}/60].

Minute = Integer[{(Onset Date/Time (min) - Last Admin Date/Time (min) - (Day x 1440) 
– (Hour x 60)].
Missing resolution date/time will not be imputed, and AE duration will not be calculated in 
those cases.
AE Duration
AE duration will be calculated as follows and displayed in the following format day, hour, 
minute.

Day = Integer[{Resolution Date/Time (min) - Onset Date/Time (min)}/1440].

Hour = Integer[{(Resolution Date/Time (min) - Onset Date /Time (min) - (Day x 
1440)}/60].

Minute = Integer[{(Resolution Date/Time (min) - Onset Date/Time (min) - (Day x 1440) –
(Hour x 60)].
Missing data will not be imputed.
9.4.
Assessment Windows
All assessments will be included in the listings. No visit windows will be applied to 
assessments.
9.5.
Coding Dictionaries
Concomitant medications will be coded using the latest version of the GSK Drug dictionary.
Adverse Events will be coded using the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities 
(MedDRA).
The actual dictionary versions used will be presented in the Clinical Study Report.
 
24
CONFIDENTIAL
2018N363775_00
207440


Sponsor: The GlaxoSmithKline group of companies
Protocol No.: 207440
Version, Date: 
Final v1.0, 18 Jan 2018
This document is proprietary and confidential to INC Research LLC.
Statistical Analysis Plan 30.017A.00
INC Research © LLCPage 25 of 44
9.6.
Values of Clinical Significance
Reference ranges for all laboratory parameters collected throughout the study are provided 
by the respective laboratory. A laboratory value that is outside of the reference range is 
considered either high abnormal (value above the upper limit of the reference range) or low 
abnormal (value below the lower limit of the reference range). Note: a high abnormal or low 
abnormal laboratory value is not necessarily of clinical significance.
The laboratory reference ranges will be provided on the listings of standardized laboratory 
data with out of range values flagged (low or high).
10. STUDY POPULATION
10.1.
Disposition of Subjects
The total number of subjects randomized to the study and in each population will be 
summarized, by study part, treatment group and overall for all subjects.
A listing of subject enrolment will include the date informed consent was signed, the version 
date of protocol effective at informed consent, the date and time of first treatment and 
whether included in each population.
The number of subjects prematurely terminated from the study along with the reason for 
early study termination will be both summarized and listed.
10.2.
Protocol Deviations
Prospective approval of protocol deviations to recruitment and enrollment criteria, also 
known as protocol waivers or exemptions, is not permitted.
Subject data will be examined for evidence of protocol deviations in order to assess how 
well the protocol was followed. These will be assessed before unblinding for the final 
analysis and according to data available on the CRF. Possible protocol deviations will be 
independently reviewed and approved by GlaxoSmithKline.
All protocol deviations will be detailed in a listing.
Protocol deviations are defined as follows:

Noncompliance with the clinical trial protocol (including intake of any prohibited 
medications, as detailed in Section 7.7 of the protocol), Good Clinical Practice (GCP), 
or Manual of Procedure requirements. The noncompliance may be either on the part of 
the subject, the site PI, or the study site staff. Any subject enrolled who does not meet 
eligibility criteria will be considered an enrollment deviation. Additional important 
protocol deviations include noncompliance with the informed consent procedure, 
concomitant medication use, Serious Adverse Event (SAE) reporting, and study drug 
dosing. 
 
25
CONFIDENTIAL
2018N363775_00
207440


Sponsor: The GlaxoSmithKline group of companies
Protocol No.: 207440
Version, Date: 
Final v1.0, 18 Jan 2018
This document is proprietary and confidential to INC Research LLC.
Statistical Analysis Plan 30.017A.00
INC Research © LLCPage 26 of 44
Protocol deviations will be listed including a classification of minor or major, as determined 
by clinical staff.
10.3.
Demographic and Baseline Characteristics
All baseline and demographic data recorded at screening and prior to dosing will be listed
for all subjects in the Safety Population.
Demography (age, gender, non-childbearing potential, race, ethnicity, height, weight and 
BMI) will be summarized, by study part, treatment group and overall for all subjects.
Medical and surgical history, comprising of System Organ Class (SOC) and Preferred Term
(PT) (coded using the MedDRA dictionary), start and end dates will be listed only for all 
subjects in the Safety Population.
Urine drug, cotinine, breath alcohol test, viral serology [Human Immunodeficiency Virus 
(HIV), Hepatitis B (HBsAG) and Hepatitis C antibody], Estradiol and Follicle Stimulating 
Hormone (FSH) levels will be listed only.
10.4.
Study Drug Administration
All study drug administration data will be listed only for all subjects in the Safety 
Population.
11. EFFICACY ANALYSES
There are no efficacy endpoints defined for this study.
12. SAFETY ANALYSES
All safety analyses will be conducted on the Safety population.
12.1.
Extent of Exposure
Extent of exposure will include the following analyses:

In Part A only, the frequency and percentage of subjects who completed the study, 3 
GSK3352589 dosing periods, 2 GSK3352589 dosing periods and 1 GSK3352589 dosing 
period will be summarized by cohort;

Dosing along with the cumulative dosing will be summarized by treatment for Part A 
and by visit and treatment group, and overall, for Part B.
12.2.
Adverse Events
Adverse Events will be coded using the MedDRA dictionary.
 
26
CONFIDENTIAL
2018N363775_00
207440


Sponsor: The GlaxoSmithKline group of companies
Protocol No.: 207440
Version, Date: 
Final v1.0, 18 Jan 2018
This document is proprietary and confidential to INC Research LLC.
Statistical Analysis Plan 30.017A.00
INC Research © LLCPage 27 of 44
Adverse Events will be grouped by SOC and PT and summarized by study part, treatment 
group and for all subjects overall (Part B only). The summary tables will present the 
frequency and percentage of total subjects, by SOC and by PT.
TEAEs are defined as AEs which commence on or after the start of first study drug 
administration. AEs without an onset date or time will be defined as treatment emergent 
except if an incomplete date (e.g., month and year) clearly indicates that the event started 
prior to the start of study drug administration or if the AE stop date indicates that the event 
started and stopped prior to the start of study drug administration. Partial AE start dates 
will be imputed (Section 9.2).
The summary tables will include the number of subjects and the number of events. For 
summaries by SOC and PT, a subject will be counted once at the SOC level and once at each 
PT within the SOC level. 
Relationships of un-assessable, unlikely, possibly, probably and certainly will be judged as 
being treatment-related for the summary tables. If the relationship to study drug is missing 
then the relationship will be counted as treatment-related for the summary tables. 
Similarly, missing intensity will be counted as the most severe intensity. 
The summaries presenting frequency of AEs by SOC and PT will be ordered by overall 
descending frequency of SOC and then, within a SOC, by overall descending frequency of PT.
The following AE tables will be provided:

TEAEs overall and by system organ class and preferred term;

TEAEs overall and by system organ class and preferred term and by severity;

TEAEs overall and by preferred term;

Treatment-related TEAEs overall and by system organ class and preferred term;

Treatment-related TEAEs overall and by preferred term.
All AEs will be listed and any TEAEs will be flagged. This will include listings of Serious 
Adverse Events (SAEs) and AEs leading to withdrawal of study treatment.
12.3.
Laboratory Evaluations
Hematology and clinical chemistry will be summarized at each protocol scheduled time point
by study part, treatment group and for all subjects overall (Part B only). Actual values and 
actual changes from baseline will be presented for the standardized laboratory data.
Shift tables for hematology and clinical chemistry will be provided relative to the normal 
ranges by treatment group. Subjects with a missing baseline value are to be assumed to have 
a normal baseline value. The summary of normal range category changes will illustrate the 
number and percentage of subjects who fall into specified categories (Decrease to Low, 
 
27
CONFIDENTIAL
2018N363775_00
207440


Sponsor: The GlaxoSmithKline group of companies
Protocol No.: 207440
Version, Date: 
Final v1.0, 18 Jan 2018
This document is proprietary and confidential to INC Research LLC.
Statistical Analysis Plan 30.017A.00
INC Research © LLCPage 28 of 44
Change to Normal or No Change, Increase to High) by comparing the baseline normal range 
category to the end of treatment (Follow-up) normal range category and the worst-case on-
therapy normal range category.
The worst-case post-baseline evaluation will be used to summarize the subjects’ overall 
worst-case change during a given treatment period (including Follow-up). The determination 
of the worst-case during the on-therapy period will take into account both planned and 
unscheduled assessments. Worst-case can be either High or Low.

If a subject has a ‘Decrease to Low’ and an ‘Increase to High’ during the same time 
interval, then the subject is counted in both the ‘Decrease to Low’ and ‘Increase to 
High’ categories.

If a subject was high at baseline and decreases to low during the time interval, then 
the subject is counted in the ‘Decrease to Low’ category.

Likewise, if a subject was Low at baseline and increases to High during the time 
interval, then the subject is counted in the ‘Increase to High’ category.

Subjects are only counted in the ‘Change to Normal or No Change’ category if they are:
o
Normal at baseline and have no normal range high and no normal range low values 
during the time interval;
o
High at baseline and do not change to low during the time interval;
o
Low at baseline and do not change to high during the time interval.
In all cases, subjects are only counted once in the overall for all subjects column (by 
treatment summaries).
Liver stopping criteria will be summarized by treatment, using frequency tabulations and 
listed separately as follows:
Table 5:
Liver Chemistry Stopping Criteria
Laboratory Parameter
Stopping Rule 
ALT
ALT ≥3 x ULN
Bilirubin
Bilirubin ≥2 x ULN (> 35% direct bilirubin)
INR
INR > 1.5, if INR measured
For Part B only, liver function testing (LFT) will be performed and summarized along with 
the clinical chemistry results.
In addition, urinalysis results will be summarized at each protocol scheduled time point, by 
treatment, using frequency tabulations. Urine microscopy results will be listed only if 
available.
 
28
CONFIDENTIAL
2018N363775_00
207440


Sponsor: The GlaxoSmithKline group of companies
Protocol No.: 207440
Version, Date: 
Final v1.0, 18 Jan 2018
This document is proprietary and confidential to INC Research LLC.
Statistical Analysis Plan 30.017A.00
INC Research © LLCPage 29 of 44
All abnormal laboratory values will be identified in the listings.
12.4.
Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS)
BSFS daily scores and daily frequency of bowel movement will be listed for Parts A and B.
For Part B only, average BSFS daily score and daily frequency of bowel movement will be 
summarized by day (beginning with Day -1 through to Day 14) and by time intervals (Day -1, 
Days 1-3, Days 4-7, Days 1-7 and Days 8-14) by treatment group and for all subjects overall.
Time profiles for the average BSFS daily score and daily frequency of bowel movement for 
each individual subject by day will be presented by treatment for Part B only. The average
BSFS daily score and average daily bowel movement frequencies will also be presented as 
box plots by time intervals and for each treatment separately for Part B only.
12.5.
Vital Signs
Vital signs (systolic/diastolic blood pressure, pulse rate and temperature) will be 
summarized at each protocol scheduled time point by study part, treatment group and for 
all subjects overall (Part B only). Actual values and actual changes from baseline will be 
presented.
The Potential Clinical Importance (PCI) ranges are noted in the table below for vital sign 
results. Values outside these ranges will be flagged as either low or high relative to the PCI 
ranges. The number of subjects with out of PCI range results will be summarized by 
treatment group.
Table 6:
Vital Signs PCI Ranges
Vital Signs Parameter
PCI Range 
Unit
Systolic Blood Pressure
< 85 (Low) and > 160 (High)
mmHg
Diastolic Blood Pressure
< 50 (Low) and > 100 (High)
Pulse Rate
< 40 (Low) and > 110 (High)
bpm
Three readings of blood pressure and pulse rate will be taken. The first reading should be 
rejected and the second and third readings recorded in the CRF. The average of the second 
and third values will be used for all summary tabulations and PCI range comparisons.
12.6.
Electrocardiogram (ECG)
ECG data (heart rate, PR interval, QRS interval, QT interval, QTc interval (QTcF interval) 
values will be summarized at each protocol scheduled time point by study part, treatment
group and for all subjects overall (Part B only). Actual values and actual changes from 
baseline will be presented.
In addition, a frequency tabulation of ECG interpretation (Normal, Abnormal Not Clinically 
Significant or Abnormal Clinically Significant) at each protocol scheduled time point, by 
study part, treatment group and overall (Part B only), will be provided.
 
29
CONFIDENTIAL
2018N363775_00
207440


Sponsor: The GlaxoSmithKline group of companies
Protocol No.: 207440
Version, Date: 
Final v1.0, 18 Jan 2018
This document is proprietary and confidential to INC Research LLC.
Statistical Analysis Plan 30.017A.00
INC Research © LLCPage 30 of 44
The mean value of the triplicate assessments will be used for all summary tabulations and 
the worst clinical interpretation of the triplicate assessments will be used for the descriptive 
summaries.
Prolongation of QTcF intervals [as per the definition of International Conference on 
Harmonization (ICH)] will be summarized by treatment according to the following 
categories: 

QTcF > 500 msec;

QTcF > 480 msec and ≤ 500 msec;

QTcF > 450 msec and ≤ 480 msec;

QTcF Change from Baseline > 30 and ≤ 60 msec;

QTcF Change from Baseline > 60 msec.
12.7.
Prior and Concomitant Medications
Prior and concomitant medications will be grouped by preferred drug name by using the GSK
Drug dictionary. The summary tables will show the number and percentage of subjects 
taking each medication by preferred term, by study part and treatment group and for all 
subjects overall (Part B only) and sorted by descending frequency of preferred term.
Only concomitant medications will be summarized. Prior and concomitant medications will 
be listed separately.
Prior medications are those medications that were stopped prior to first study drug 
administration. Concomitant medications are medications taken at least once after first 
study drug administration. Medications stopped on the same day as first study drug 
administration will be considered as concomitant medication. Medications without an onset 
date will be defined as concomitant, except if an incomplete date (e.g., month and year) 
clearly indicates that the medication was started prior to the start of study drug 
administration or if the medication stop date indicates that the medication was started and 
stopped prior to the start of study drug administration. Partial medication start dates will be 
imputed (Section 9.2).
For the summaries of concomitant medications, subjects who take the same medication (in 
terms of the preferred term more than once will only be counted once for that medication.
12.8.
Other Safety Parameters
Physical examination data and pregnancy data will be listed only.
 
30
CONFIDENTIAL
2018N363775_00
207440


Sponsor: The GlaxoSmithKline group of companies
Protocol No.: 207440
Version, Date: 
Final v1.0, 18 Jan 2018
This document is proprietary and confidential to INC Research LLC.
Statistical Analysis Plan 30.017A.00
INC Research © LLCPage 31 of 44
13. PHARMACOKINETIC ANALYSES
All GSK3352589 plasma concentrations and plasma PK parameter data will be listed. The PK 
Concentration population will be used for the descriptive statistics of the PK concentrations 
and the PK Parameter population will be used for the descriptive statistics of the PK 
parameters.
The merge of PK concentration-actual time data, randomization and CRF data will be 
performed under the direct auspices of GSK Clinical Statistics by INC Research, Inc.
Derivation of pharmacokinetic parameters will be performed under the direct auspices of 
GSK Clinical Pharmacology Modeling and Simulation by INC Research, Inc.
Statistical analysis of pharmacokinetic parameters will be performed by, or under the direct 
auspices of GSK Clinical Statistics by INC Research, Inc.
13.1.
PK Sampling Schedule
The timing of PK samples may be altered and/or PK samples may be obtained at additional 
time points to ensure thorough PK monitoring.
13.1.1.
Part A Single Dose
PK sampling for GSK3352589 single dose PK will be collected on Days 1, 2 and 3, with time 
relative to Day 1 dose. Sampling will be taken pre-dose within 10 minutes prior to first dose 
at time zero and then post-dose at the following time points: 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 5, 8 and 
12 hrs on Day 1, at 16, 24, and 36 hrs on Day 2 and at 48 hrs on Day 3.
13.1.2.
Part B Repeat Dose
PK sampling for GSK3352589 repeated (multiple) dosing, in either the fed or fasted condition, 
is to be determined based on the pilot food effect cohort (Cohort 2) in Part A. BID Dosing will 
be at approximately 0800, with the PM dose to be administered 10 hours following the AM 
dose.
On Days 1 and 14 PK blood samples will be obtained pre-dose within 10 minutes prior to first 
dose at time zero and then post-dose at the following time points: 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 5, 
8, 10 (10 mins prior to 2nd dose), 11, 12, 14, 16, and 24 hrs (within 10 minutes or less prior to 
next dose).
On Day 7, sparse sampling schedule for PK blood samples will be obtained pre-dose within 10 
minutes prior to first dose at time zero and then post-dose at the following time points: 1, 2, 
4, 8, 10 hrs (10 minutes or less prior to 2nd dose) and 24 hrs (10 minutes prior to next dose on 
Day 8).
 
31
CONFIDENTIAL
2018N363775_00
207440


Sponsor: The GlaxoSmithKline group of companies
Protocol No.: 207440
Version, Date: 
Final v1.0, 18 Jan 2018
This document is proprietary and confidential to INC Research LLC.
Statistical Analysis Plan 30.017A.00
INC Research © LLCPage 32 of 44
13.2.
Plasma PK Endpoints for GSK3352589
The pharmacokinetic parameters will be calculated by non-compartmental analysis (data 
permitting), according to current working practices and using Phoenix WinNonLin version 6.4 
or higher (Certara, Princeton, NJ, USA). The PK parameters will be derived using actual 
sampling time with the following considerations: 

The sampling time of pre-dose samples relative to dosing will be treated as zero for all 
sampling periods separately;

Concentration values below the assay’s lower limit of quantification (BLQ) in pre-dose 
samples and in samples taken before the time of the first quantifiable concentration 
will be treated as zero;

Post-dose BLQ concentrations after the last quantifiable point will be set to missing.
Secondary parameters will be derived to assess the reliability of the elimination parameters 
– R2adj, interval for calculation of λz, AUCextrap. There parameters will be listed and will not 
be summarized.
Dose normalized Cmax and AUC parameters will be calculated to facilitate the assessment of 
dose proportionality. Additional PK parameters for both parts of the study may be included if 
needed.
The PK parameters for the GSK3352589 will be estimated using concentrations in ng/ml units 
as follows:

The apparent Cmax and the corresponding Tmax will be read directly from the 
concentration-time plot (observed data).

AUCt will be calculated using the Linear up-Log down Trapezoidal Rule for extravascular 
model.

AUCtau and AUC24hBID will be calculated using the Linear up-Log down Trapezoidal Rule
for extravascular model with the possible extrapolation to the end of dosing interval if 
needed.

The terminal elimination rate constant (λz) will be determined by log linear regression 
obtained on at least the 3 last quantifiable concentrations and will not include Cmax; t1/2
is calculated by the program as ln2/λz.

The AUCinf is calculated by the program as:
o
AUCinf = AUCt + AUCextrap
where Tlast is the sampling time point of the last measurable concentration. AUCextrap
is calculated by the program as: Clast/λz, where Clast is the observed concentration at 
time Tlast and λz is the elimination rate constant during the apparent terminal 
elimination phase; AUCinf will only be presented for subjects with a reliable λz;
 
32
CONFIDENTIAL
2018N363775_00
207440


Sponsor: The GlaxoSmithKline group of companies
Protocol No.: 207440
Version, Date: 
Final v1.0, 18 Jan 2018
This document is proprietary and confidential to INC Research LLC.
Statistical Analysis Plan 30.017A.00
INC Research © LLCPage 33 of 44
RCmax, RAUCtau and RAUCt will be calculated as ratios of the parameters on Day 14 to Day 1 for 
Part B using the GMR from the ANOVA statistical model only and will not be calculated on a 
subject level basis.
The following PK acceptance criteria will be applied to assess the reliability of elimination 
parameters:
1. Number of points to calculate λz is greater than or equal to 3, excluding Cmax point;
2. Interval for calculation of λz is longer than half-life;
3. The adjusted square of the correlation coefficient (Rsquare adjusted; R2adj) for the 
goodness of fit of the regression line through the data points must be ≥0.80;
4. AUCextrap ≤30%;
5. Estimation of initial half-life will use a minimum of 3 time points.
13.3.
Derived and Imputed Data
13.3.1.
Handling of Data below the Limit of Quantification for PK 
Concentration Listings, Individual Plots, Summaries and PK 
Parameters Derivation

The sampling time of pre-dose samples relative to dosing will be treated as zero for all 
sampling periods separately for Days 1, 7 and 14;

Concentration values below the assay’s lower limit of quantification (BLQ) in pre-dose 
samples and in samples taken before the time of the first quantifiable concentration 
will be treated as zero for all purposes;

Post-dose one or more consecutive BLQ concentrations flanked by quantifiable 
concentrations will be set to missing for all purposes;

Post-dose BLQ concentrations after the last quantifiable point will be set to zero for 
mean and individual presentations of PK concentrations;

The mean/median value at a time-point where one or more samples have BLQ values 
will be reported (in tabular or graphical fashion) even if the mean/median value is 
below the lower limit of quantification (BLQ) of the assay;

Zero mean or median values will be included in summary tables.
It should be noted that a high proportion of BLQ values may affect the standard deviation 
(SD); if more than 30% of values are imputed, then the SD will not be displayed. 
 
33
CONFIDENTIAL
2018N363775_00
207440


Sponsor: The GlaxoSmithKline group of companies
Protocol No.: 207440
Version, Date: 
Final v1.0, 18 Jan 2018
This document is proprietary and confidential to INC Research LLC.
Statistical Analysis Plan 30.017A.00
INC Research © LLCPage 34 of 44
Tables of summary statistics for concentration-time data will report N (number of subjects 
in the analysis population), n (number of actual observations) and the percentage of BLQ 
values relative to the total number of observations. 
For linear plots, zero concentration value(s) before the first quantifiable concentration will 
be included in the plot. For log-linear plots, zero concentration value(s) before the first 
measurable concentration will be assigned a missing value.
For PK parameter estimation post-dose, one or more consecutive BLQ concentrations flanked 
by quantifiable concentrations as well as post-dose BLQ concentrations after the last 
quantifiable point will be set to missing.
13.3.2.
Data Summarization and Presentation
All the derived parameters described in Section 13.2 will be listed and summarized for Parts
A and B separately. For each of these parameters, the following statistics will be calculated 
for each active treatment group: n, median, minimum, maximum, arithmetic mean, 
standard deviation, between-subject coefficient of variation (CV) for the untransformed 
data, geometric mean, 95% CI for the geometric mean, standard deviation of logarithmically 
transformed data, and the between-subject CV based on the geometric standard deviation 
for the transformed data. For Tmax and similar parameters (Tlast), the median, maximum, 
minimum for the untransformed data will be calculated.
For the purposes of calculating summary statistics and for statistical analysis, all PK 
parameters, with the exception of Tmax and similar will be loge transformed. Geometric 
mean for the transformed data will be calculated according to the following method:

Geometric mean = exp(mean on loge scale).
The between-subject CV (%CVb) and Geometric %CVb will be calculated according to the 
following methods:

Untransformed Data: %CVb = 100 * (SD/Mean), where SD and Mean are the standard 
deviation and mean of the untransformed data.

Transformed Data: Geometric %CVb = 100 * (sqrt(exp(SD2)-1)), where SD is the 
standard deviation of the loge-transformed data.
If a plasma drug concentration is excluded from the PK parameter analysis, it will be 
documented in the results and/or discussion of the study report.
The following conventions will be used for the presentation of the descriptive statistics of PK 
parameters and of plasma concentrations: 
Table 7:
PK Reporting Precision
 
34
CONFIDENTIAL
2018N363775_00
207440


Sponsor: The GlaxoSmithKline group of companies
Protocol No.: 207440
Version, Date: 
Final v1.0, 18 Jan 2018
This document is proprietary and confidential to INC Research LLC.
Statistical Analysis Plan 30.017A.00
INC Research © LLCPage 35 of 44
Statistics
Degree of Precision
Minimum, Maximum
Actual number of significant digits for raw 
data
Mean, SD (arithmetic and geometric), 
Median and 95% CI for the geometric mean
Actual number of significant digits for raw 
data + 1
%CVb and Geometric %CVb
1 decimal place
Additionally, the following inferential analyses will be performed, as described below in 
Sections 13.4, 13.5 and 13.6 of the SAP:

Dose proportionality assessed using parameters Cmax, AUCt and AUCinf (Parts A and B 
separately) and steady state parameter AUCtau, (Part B only).
Nominal time will be used for the descriptive summaries and plots of summary measures. 
Actual time will be used in the listings, individual PK concentration-time profiles and in 
calculation of pharmacokinetic parameters. The PK concentrations obtained with the 
protocol deviations will be flagged (for example sampling obtained outside the nominal 
window) and may be excluded from summaries.
Any deviation(s) from the original analyses planned in the SAP will be reported in the Clinical 
Pharmacology Study Report (CPSR).
Individual subject PK parameters will be listed separately for Parts A and B by treatment 
group, subject and summarized by treatment group. The PK parameters with protocol 
deviations will be flagged (for example emesis after dosing, incomplete sampling or not 
meeting PK acceptance criteria) (Section 13.2) and may be excluded from summaries.
Individual plasma concentration-time profiles (one plot per subjects) and mean profiles by 
treatment group will be plotted. Each of the figures will contain one plot for the 
untransformed scale (i.e. a linear plot) and one plot on the log transformed scale (i.e. log-
linear plot).
The following presentations of individual PK concentrations will be produced:

Listing of PK sampling times including nominal and actual time elapsed from dose with 
the deviation from the nominal time and measured concentrations of the drug. The PK 
samples taken outside the scheduled window will be flagged in listing and may be 
excluded from summary statistics of PK concentrations by nominal time (± 10% of the 
nominal time point e.g. ±6 minutes for 1 hr point).

Individual PK profiles in linear and log-linear scale for all subjects within the same 
treatment (dose level and fed/fasted condition for Cohort 2) combined on one graph 
and plotted vs. actual time of the samples elapsed from the start of infusion. For Part B 
these profiles will present the intense PK sampling on Days 1, 7 and 14 separately.
The following presentations of mean PK concentrations will be produced:
 
35
CONFIDENTIAL
2018N363775_00
207440


Sponsor: The GlaxoSmithKline group of companies
Protocol No.: 207440
Version, Date: 
Final v1.0, 18 Jan 2018
This document is proprietary and confidential to INC Research LLC.
Statistical Analysis Plan 30.017A.00
INC Research © LLCPage 36 of 44

Table of PK concentrations summarized by nominal time within scheduled window for 
each treatment (dose level and fed/fasted condition) for Part A separately. For Part B 
summaries will be presented by Day 1 or 14.

Plot for mean PK profiles in linear and log-linear scale for Part A will be combined for 
all dose levels in fasted condition in Cohort 1. Mean PK profiles for fed and fasted 
condition will be presented for Cohort 2 within Part A. Error bars on the plot will 
represent SD values.

For Part B these profiles will present the intense PK sampling on Days 1, 7 and 14 
separate for each day with all dose levels combined. Error bars on the plot will 
represent SD values.

Additional presentation for Part B will combine the intense PK sampling on Days 1, 7
and 14 separately for each dose level. Error bars on the plot will represent SD values.
Additional figures will be produced for statistical models involving PK results as described 
below in Sections 13.4-13.6.
13.4.
Assessment of Dose Proportionality for the PK of GSK3352589 
in Cohort 1, 2 and 3 of Part A (fasted) and for Part B (fed) of 
the Study
Exploratory dose proportionality will be analyzed with the method originally described by 
Gough et al. (1995)2 and modified as described by Smith et al. (2000)3 and further adapted 
by Hummel et al. (2009)4. Hereby an ANOVA method will be performed on the logarithm 
transformed PK parameter endpoints. The model will be applied to following parameters 
separately for Parts A and B of the study:

Part A: Single dose parameters Cmax, AUCt, AUCinf;

Part B: multiple dose parameters Cmax, AUCt (for when AUCtau not available), AUCtau for 
Days 1 and 14 separately.
The model will include the loge-transformed GSK3352589 dose level as an independent 
variable. This model will be used to investigate the null hypothesis (H0: ß=1). Dose-
proportionality will be rejected (H1: ß1) if the 90% CI of the estimated slope falls outside 
the critical interval.
The linear form of the model will be as following:
Yij=α + β * Xi+ εij
Where:

Yij= logarithm of the pharmacokinetic endpoint for subject j at dose level i; where i = 1, 
2, …m, j = 1, 2, …, n;

α = intercept parameter;
 
36
CONFIDENTIAL
2018N363775_00
207440


Sponsor: The GlaxoSmithKline group of companies
Protocol No.: 207440
Version, Date: 
Final v1.0, 18 Jan 2018
This document is proprietary and confidential to INC Research LLC.
Statistical Analysis Plan 30.017A.00
INC Research © LLCPage 37 of 44

β = slope parameter;

Xi= logarithm of dose i;

εij= random error associated with subject j at dose level i (assumed to be independent 
and identically normally distributed).
The critical interval will be calculated as follows: 

The ratio (r) of the highest dose level to the lowest dose level will be calculated. The 
lower limit of the critical interval will be calculated as: ln(0.5)/ln(r) + 1.The upper 
limit of the critical interval will be calculated as: ln(2.0)/ln(r) + 1.
r value is based on the ratio between the highest and lowest dose levels of GSK3352589. For 
single dose, the planned dose level range is 2 to 400 mg and r equals 400 / 2 mg = 200. Thus, 
the critical interval for planned dose ranges in Part A to declare dose linearity will be 0.87 
to 1.13 for the 90% CI of the slope estimate. The critical interval will be estimated for actual 
dose ranges used in the study.
The planned dose ranges in Part B are 25-200 mg for BID administrations. Alternative 
methods such as ANOVA comparison of dose normalized parameters between the two dose 
levels will be considered (see secondary analysis below). For the planned dose range of 25-
200 mg BID the r equals to 200 / 25 = 8 and the respective critical interval for the range will 
be 0.67 to 1.33. The critical intervals will be adjusted based on the actual dose levels 
tested. The critical interval will be estimated for actual dose ranges used in the study.
This study (Parts A and B) was not powered to assess dose proportionality; therefore these 
critical interval limits for the 90% CI of the slope estimate are to be used as a guide only for 
comparison.
Secondary analysis of dose proportionality will be performed by an ANOVA model using the 
SAS Proc Mixed procedure for Parts A and B separately. The analysis will be performed for 
the loge-transformed, dose-normalized, parameters for single and multiple doses depending 
on the study part. For Part A Cmax/D, AUCt/D, AUCinf/D will be compared between dose 
levels. For Part B AUC24h/D, AUCtau/D and Cmax/D for Days 1 and 14 will be similarly 
compared with a fixed effect term for treatment. The reference dose will be 15 mg. 90% CIs 
for the geometric mean ratios (GMRs) will be obtained from the mixed-effects model. In the 
base model for Part B parameters for Days 1 and 14 will be modelled separately. If the 
model will not converge the data may be analyzed in combined model with day as a 
categorical fixed term with day*treatment interaction term. Subject ID will be included as a 
random term for both parts.
The formula for the calculation of the estimated ratio between the test and reference and 
the (1-2*α)*100 % CI of the ratio is given below. 

Difference = Estimate of difference between test and reference least square means;

Ratio = 100 × eDifference;

(1-2*α)*100% CIs for the Ratio:
 
37
CONFIDENTIAL
2018N363775_00
207440


Sponsor: The GlaxoSmithKline group of companies
Protocol No.: 207440
Version, Date: 
Final v1.0, 18 Jan 2018
This document is proprietary and confidential to INC Research LLC.
Statistical Analysis Plan 30.017A.00
INC Research © LLCPage 38 of 44
o
Lower = 100 × e(Lower Bound (1-2*α )% CIs for the Difference);
o
Upper = 100 × e(Upper Bound (1-2*α )% CIs for the Difference).
Where the differences and the (1-2*α)*100% CIs are obtained from the ANOVA model results.
Dose proportionality will also be explored graphically:

Regression/scatter plot in the log-log scale for the Hummel power analysis by day;

Box plot for ANOVA comparison of dose proportionality for dose-normalized PK 
parameters by treatment and day.
13.5.
Assessment of Drug Accumulation using ANOVA for the PK of 
GSK3352589 for Part B of the Study
Accumulation ratio (R) for the GSK3352589 exposure will be determined by an ANOVA model 
using the SAS Proc Mixed procedure for Part B of the study. The analysis will be performed 
for the loge-transformed parameters for Cmax, AUCtau, and AUCt will be compared between 
Day 14 and 1. 90% CIs for the geometric mean ratios (GMRs) will be obtained from the 
mixed-effects model. The PK parameters will be log-transformed for the comparison and 
exponentiated for the estimate of GMR. The model will be evaluated as a cross-over 
comparison for the same subjects; the subject ID will be included as random effect to 
account for missing values on Day 14. Inter- and intra-subject variability will be evaluated. 
Treatment as a dose level for GSK3352589 will be used as fixed effect in the model. 
Treatment effect will be also included in the output to demonstrate if the dose has an effect 
on accumulation of exposure with visit by treatment interaction.
The graphic presentation for the analysis will be:

Box plot for ANOVA comparison of PK parameters by treatment and day.
13.6.
Assessment of the Pilot Food Effect for the PK of GSK3352589 
in Cohort 2 of Part A of the Study
Assessment of the pilot food effect will be performed through the comparison of key PK 
parameters for the fed and fasted conditions, such as Cmax, AUCt and AUCinf. The comparison 
will be done using the ANOVA approach. Loge-transformed PK parameters will be compared 
using subject as a random effect and fed/fasted condition as a fixed effect in a cross-over 
design. Inter- and intra-subject variability will be assessed. The PK parameters obtained for
the fasted conditions will be used as a reference whilst the PK parameters for the fed 
condition will be treated as test. 90% CIs for the geometric mean ratios (GMRs) will be 
obtained from the mixed-effects model for the ratio of PK parameters. The comparison will 
be also presented graphically as box plots:

Box plot for ANOVA comparison of food effect for PK parameters by fasted/fed 
conditions.
 
38
CONFIDENTIAL
2018N363775_00
207440


Sponsor: The GlaxoSmithKline group of companies
Protocol No.: 207440
Version, Date: 
Final v1.0, 18 Jan 2018
This document is proprietary and confidential to INC Research LLC.
Statistical Analysis Plan 30.017A.00
INC Research © LLCPage 39 of 44
14. PHARMACODYNAMIC ANALYSES
The PD analysis will be based on the PD Concentration and PD Parameter populations. PD 
data for the subjects who received placebo will be pooled across all dose levels.
14.1.
PD Sampling Schedule
PD sampling for total glucagon like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and total peptide YY (PYY) will be 
taken for multiple doses of study drug or placebo in Part B only. GLP-1 will be analyzed
before PYY and if data suggests no PD effect then PYY will not be analyzed. If this happens 
then only GLP-1 data will be included as a PD endpoint.
Blood samples for PD on Days -1, 1 and 14 will be taken at the following time points: 15, 10, 
and 5 minutes prior to breakfast, and at 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 hrs post breakfast. Lunch is to be 
eaten after 4 hr sample. The average of pre-meal concentrations for PD biomarkers will be 
defined separately for each day of intense PD sampling as an average of the 3 measurements 
obtained prior to breakfast.
14.2.
Handling of Data below the Limit of Quantification for PD 
Concentration Listings, Individual Plots, Summaries and PD 
Parameters Derivation
For the summary of PD concentration data and the calculation of PD parameters AUCs, CPDmax
and TPDmax for postprandial challenge (mixed-meal) profiles of total GLP-1 and total PYY, the 
following imputation rules will be used for values below the limit of quantification (BLQ):

The concentration values below the limit of quantification for the PD concentration 
summaries and plotting of individual and mean PD results will be imputed as 0;

The concentration values below the limit of quantification for the PD parameters 
derivation will be imputed as missing. The impact of actual missing or BLQ 
measurements will be evaluated on a case by case basis and the affected derived PD 
parameters will be flagged and may be excluded from PD summaries and PK/PD 
analysis. 
The PD concentration data will be summarized by nominal time. Samples taken outside the 
scheduled windows for nominal time points will be listed and presented on individual plots. 
The samples taken outside the scheduled windows may be used for the PD parameters 
derivation based on a case by case assessment. 
The pre-meal PD values will be evaluated for outliers. Outliers will be identified on 
individual basis for each subject and each day of testing. The outliers will be defined as 
values of PD biomarker concentrations 3 fold higher or lower than the average of the 
remaining two pre-meal measurements. Excluded outliers will be flagged in PD listings and 
average values will be indicated in summaries with explanation in the footnote.
 
39
CONFIDENTIAL
2018N363775_00
207440


Sponsor: The GlaxoSmithKline group of companies
Protocol No.: 207440
Version, Date: 
Final v1.0, 18 Jan 2018
This document is proprietary and confidential to INC Research LLC.
Statistical Analysis Plan 30.017A.00
INC Research © LLCPage 40 of 44
14.3.
Presentation of PD Concentration Data 
Total GLP-1 and total PYY concentrations will be listed individually and presented 
graphically on individual plots. The PD concentrations will be summarized by actual 
treatment i.e. dose level, at each planned relative time point and presented graphically on 
mean plots. Data for placebo subjects will be pooled from all cohorts in Part B for the 
summaries and presentations. The pre-meal concentrations will be listed for reference and 
summarized by treatment.
14.4.
Mixed Meal PD Parameters
The following PD parameters will be derived, presented individually and summarized by 
treatment and day of assessment (Days -1, 1 and 14) using absolute measured values only:

Average pre-meal concentrations for PD biomarkers will be estimated for each subject 
and each PD sampling day from 3 pre-meal measurements with the removal of outliers 
as described in the Section 14.2 of the SAP;

CPDmax (maximum observed plasma concentration value) and TPDmax (Time to Maximum 
Observed Plasma PD Concentration value);

AUCPDlast and AUCPD4h (partial areas), calculated using the Linear Trapezoidal rule. The 
starting point (pre-dose) for y axis will be the average of the three pre-meals and start 
from zero for the linear trapezoidal rule and the x axis will be put at zero (even though 
the timepoints were -15, -10 and -5 mins).
14.5.
Comparative Analysis for PD Parameters 
14.5.1.
Evaluation of the Short Term Variability Trends 
To evaluate changes in baseline in the absence of drug treatment within short term, the
following comparisons will be made using ANOVA model:

Average pre-meal concentrations on Day 1 (test) vs. average pre-meal concentrations
on Day -1 (reference) for all subjects including pooled placebo to evaluate natural short 
term day to day variability of pre-meal concentrations of PYY and GLP-1 without drug 
treatment;

AUCPDlast and AUCPD4h on Day 1 (test) vs. Day -1 (reference) for placebo subjects to 
evaluate natural short term day to day variability of AUC of PYY and GLP-1 without drug 
treatment.
14.5.2.
Evaluation of the Long Term Variability Trends for Placebo
To evaluate changes in baseline in the absence of drug treatment within long term, the 
following comparisons will be made using ANOVA model:
 
40
CONFIDENTIAL
2018N363775_00
207440


Sponsor: The GlaxoSmithKline group of companies
Protocol No.: 207440
Version, Date: 
Final v1.0, 18 Jan 2018
This document is proprietary and confidential to INC Research LLC.
Statistical Analysis Plan 30.017A.00
INC Research © LLCPage 41 of 44

Average pre-meal concentrations on Day 14 (test) vs. average pre-meal concentrations
on Day -1 (reference) for all placebo subjects to evaluate long-term trend in the drift 
of pre-meal concentrations of PYY and GLP-1 without drug treatment;

AUCPDlast and AUCPD4h on Day 14 (test) vs. Day -1 (reference) for all placebo subjects to 
evaluate long-term trend in the drift of AUC of PYY and GLP-1 without drug treatment.
The concentrations will be log-transformed to give the estimated geometric mean ratios
(GMRs) and 95% confidence interval for the natural short and long-term variability of the 
biomarkers before meal.
Intra- and inter-subject variability will be also estimated in the model with subject as a 
random effect.
The determined variability will be used to put into context any results observed when 
comparing between treatment groups. 
14.5.3.
Evaluation of the Effect of BMI
To evaluate the effect of BMI on PD parameters, scatter plots will be presented for each 
treatment and visit for visual comparison:

Scatter plots of PD parameters (average pre-meal concentrations, AUCPDlast and AUCPD4h)
vs. BMI on Days -1 and 14 by treatment;

Scatter plots of the change from baseline PD parameters (average pre-meal 
concentrations, AUCPDlast and AUCPD4h) vs. Day -1 (baseline) BMI by treatment.
14.5.4.
Statistical Models for the Comparison of PD Endpoints between 
Treatment Days and Pre-Treatment Data
The log-transformed PD parameters (average pre-meal concentrations, AUCPDlast and AUCPD4h)
will be compared for the subjects on active treatments between Days 1 and 14 of treatment 
with the data on Day -1 using an ANOVA model, with treatment group including pooled 
placebo as fixed effect covariates. GMRs, 95% CIs for the GMRs and corresponding p-values 
will be presented. Intra- and inter-subject variability will be also estimated. The model will 
include subject as random effect and day as fixed effect. Interaction factor between 
treatment and day will be included in the model.
The results of the differences, including the GMRS, will be compared with the natural short 
and long-term variability described in the Section 14.5.
Box plots will be presented for each treatment and visit for visual comparison:

Box plots for the comparison of PD parameters (average pre-meal concentrations, 
AUCPDlast and AUCPD4h) on Days -1, 1 and 14 combining all treatments, including placebo.
 
41
CONFIDENTIAL
2018N363775_00
207440


Sponsor: The GlaxoSmithKline group of companies
Protocol No.: 207440
Version, Date: 
Final v1.0, 18 Jan 2018
This document is proprietary and confidential to INC Research LLC.
Statistical Analysis Plan 30.017A.00
INC Research © LLCPage 42 of 44
14.5.5.
Statistical Models for the Comparison of PD Endpoints between 
Active Treatments and Placebo Controls
The log transformed change from baseline PD parameters (average pre-meal concentrations, 
AUCPDlast and AUCPD4h) will be compared between each treatment and placebo for each of 
Day 1 and 14 separately using an ANCOVA model, with treatment group and day as a fixed 
effect. The model will include subject as a random effect and interaction factor between 
treatment and day as a fixed effect. PD parameters will be used as change from baseline 
with PD parameters on Day -1 subtracted as the baseline value. Baseline (Day -1) PD 
parameter will be used as a covariate in the model. 
The models will be supported through graphic presentations:

Box plots, with the individual data points plotted, for change from baseline PD 
parameters for Days 1 and 14, with all dose levels combined on the same plot;

In addition, box plots, with the individual data points plotted, for AUC PD parameters 
for Days -1, 1 and 14, with all dose levels  combined on the same plot. 
14.6.
PD/Dose Correlation Analysis
The comparison between natural variabilities in biomarker pre-meal concentrations and PD 
parameters (Section 14.5) and observed differences for active treatments with the pre-
treatment results (Section 14.5.3), together with the findings about dose proportionality of 
pharmacokinetics for GSK3352589 will guide the further analyses.
If the differences between PD data for active treatments will be significantly outside the 
natural variability for one or both biomarkers and dose of GSK3352589 will be demonstrated 
to be dose proportional the linear mixed effect model will be applied to evaluate PD/dose 
correlation. The statistical model is described in the Section 13.6 of the SAP. PD parameters 
or pre-meal values on Days 1 and 14 will be used as dependent parameters. To allow the use 
of placebo data in the model the placebo dose will be imputed as 0 for untransformed data 
analysis and as 1/100th of a lowest dose used for log-transformed data analysis.
The graphical presentation of the analysis will include scatter plots with a regression line for 
the PD parameters vs. dose levels. Data for pooled placebo subjects from all cohorts will be 
also presented using a value of 0 for dose.
 
42
CONFIDENTIAL
2018N363775_00
207440


Sponsor: The GlaxoSmithKline group of companies
Protocol No.: 207440
Version, Date: 
Final v1.0, 18 Jan 2018
This document is proprietary and confidential to INC Research LLC.
Statistical Analysis Plan 30.017A.00
INC Research © LLCPage 43 of 44
15. CHANGES FROM PROTOCOL
PK Concentration and PK Parameter populations were defined similar to prior studies.
The PK and PD parameters were further defined compared to protocol. Additional 
parameters were added to facilitate the analyses.
Additional analyses for the evaluation in pre-meal biomarker concentration and PD 
parameters post-meal variability were added.
PD/drug exposure and PD/PK exploration were planned as staged optional analyses 
predicated on the results for preceding comparisons.
Cohort 3, to complete dose escalation, was added in the analyses.
Added analysis of PD results relationship to BMI.
 
43
CONFIDENTIAL
2018N363775_00
207440


Sponsor: The GlaxoSmithKline group of companies
Protocol No.: 207440
Version, Date: 
Final v1.0, 18 Jan 2018
This document is proprietary and confidential to INC Research LLC.
Statistical Analysis Plan 30.017A.00
INC Research © LLCPage 44 of 44
16. REFERENCES
1. The Clinical Evaluation Of QT/QTc Interval Prolongation And Proarrhythmic Potential 
For Non-Antiarrhythmic Drugs E14, 12 May 2005.
2. Gough K, Hutchinson M, Keene O, Byrom B, Ellis S, Lacey L, Mckellar J. Assessment Of 
Dose Proportionality: Report From The Statisticians In The Pharmaceutical 
Industry/Pharmacokinetics Uk Joint Working Party. Drug Inf J. 1995; 29:1039-1048.
3. Smith Bp, Vandenhende Fr, Desante Ka, Farid Na, Welch Pa, Callaghan Jt, Forgue St. 
Confidence Interval Criteria For Assessment Of Dose Proportionality, Pharmaceutical 
Research, Volume 17, Number 10, October 2000.
4. Hummel J, Mckendrick S, Brindley C and French, R. Exploratory Assessment Of Dose 
Proportionality: Review Of Current Approaches And Proposal For A Practical Criterion. 
Pharmaceut. Statist. 2009; 8: 38-49.
5. Maganti L, Panebianco DL, Maes AL. Evaluation of Methods for Estimating Time to 
Steady State with Examples from Phase 1 Studies. The AAPS Journal. 2008; 10(1):141-
147.
6. Kenward, M. G. and J. H. Roger Small sample inference for fixed effects from 
restricted maximum likelihood. Biometrics, 1997, 53(3), 983–997.
 
44
CONFIDENTIAL
2018N363775_00
207440