Clinical trial NCT01183416
Conditions: Neuroblastoma
Keywords: GM-CSF MAB 3F8 RETINOIC ACID (CIS-9 & 13) 09-158
Sponsor: Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Start date: 2010-08-01; Completion date: 2018-10-31
Enrollment: 4 participants; Allocation: NA; Intervention model: SINGLE_GROUP

Brief summary:
The purpose of this study is to see if high-dose 3F8 combined with GM-CSF is better than standard dose 3F8 in treating neuroblastoma. Another purpose of the study is to find out what effects, good and/or bad, 3F8 has on cancer. The investigators also want to see if the antibody works against a very small amount of neuroblastoma (minimal residual disease) that is left in the bone marrow.

Detailed description:

Arms: arm 1: This phase II, open-label, single arm trial assesses the anti-NB activity of high-dose 3F8 (80 mg/m2/day), which is used in cycles 1-2, with return to standard 3F8 dosage (20 mg/m2/day) in subsequent cycles. The patients are post-transplant and in 1st complete/very good partial remission (CR/VGPR),89 with no evidence of NB by standard studies, but are at high risk for relapse.
Interventions: intervention 1: 3F8 monoclonal antibody and 13-cis-Retinoic Acid
Intervention descriptions: intervention 1: A cycle consists of treatment with 3F8 for 5 days. GMCSF is started 5 days in advance of each 3F8 cycle. The break between end of a cycle of 3F8/GM-CSF and start of next cycle is 2-to-4-weeks through 4 cycles; subsequent breaks are \~6-8 weeks. 13-cis-retinoic acid is started after cycle 2.

Protocol documents:
Prot_SAP_000.pdf: 
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center 
IRB Protocol 
IRB#: 09-158A(4)
Amended:  04/10/12 
High-Dose 3F8/GM-CSF Immunotherapy Plus 13-Cis-Retinoic Acid for 
Consolidation of First Remission After Myeloablative Therapy and 
Autologous Stem-Cell Transplantation in Patients with High-Risk 
Neuroblastoma: A Phase II Study 
MSKCC THERAPEUTIC/DIAGNOSTIC PROTOCOL
 
 
Principal Investigator/Department: Brian H. Kushner, MD 
Department of Pediatrics 
 
 
Co-Principal 
Investigator(s)/Department: 
Nai-Kong V. Cheung, MD, Ph.D Department of Pediatrics 
 
 
Investigator(s)/Department: 
Ellen Basu, MD, PhD 
Kim Kramer, MD 
Shakeel Modak, MD 
Stephen Roberts, MD  
Li-Xuan Qin, Ph.D 
 
Department of Pediatrics 
Department of Pediatrics 
Department of Pediatrics 
Department of Pediatrics 
Department of Epidemiology  
and Biostatistics 
 
 
Consenting 
Professional(s)/Department:
Brian H. Kushner, MD 
Ellen Basu, MD, PhD 
Nai-Kong V. Cheung, MD, Ph.D 
Kim Kramer, MD 
Shakeel Modak, MD  
Stephen Roberts, MD 
 
Department of Pediatrics 
Department of Pediatrics 
Department of Pediatrics 
Department of Pediatrics 
Department of Pediatrics  
Department of Pediatrics 
 
 
 
Please Note: A Consenting Professional must have completed the mandatory Human 
Subjects Education and Certification Program. 
 
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center 
1275 York Ave. 
New York, NY 10021 
 


Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center 
IRB Protocol 
IRB#: 09-158A(4)
Amended:  04/10/12 
Table of Contents 
 
MSKCC THERAPEUTIC/DIAGNOSTIC PROTOCOL............................................................... 0 
1.0
PROTOCOL SUMMARY AND/OR SCHEMA ................................................................ 2 
2.0
OBJECTIVES AND SCIENTIFIC AIMS .......................................................................... 2 
3.0
BACKGROUND AND RATIONALE ............................................................................... 2 
4.0
OVERVIEW OF STUDY DESIGN/INTERVENTION .................................................... 8 
4.1
DESIGN .................................................................................................................. 8 
4.2
INTERVENTION ................................................................................................... 8 
5.0
THERAPEUTIC/DIAGNOSTIC AGENTS ....................................................................... 9 
6.0
CRITERIA FOR SUBJECT ELIGIBILITY ..................................................................... 11 
6.1
SUBJECT INCLUSION CRITERIA .................................................................... 11 
6.2
SUBJECT EXCLUSION CRITERIA................................................................... 11 
7.0
RECRUITMENT PLAN ................................................................................................... 12 
8.0
PRETREATMENT EVALUATION (TABLE 1) ............................................................ 12 
9.0
TREATMENT/INTERVENTION PLAN ........................................................................ 13 
10.0
EVALUATION DURING TREATMENT/INTERVENTION ........................................ 14 
11.0
TOXICITIES/SIDE EFFECTS ......................................................................................... 16 
12.0
CRITERIA FOR THERAPEUTIC RESPONSE/OUTCOME ASSESSMENT............... 17 
13.0
CRITERIA FOR REMOVAL FROM STUDY ................................................................ 18 
14.0
BIOSTATISTICS ............................................................................................................. 19 
15.0
RESEARCH PARTICIPANT REGISTRATION AND RANDOMIZATION 
PROCEDURES............................................................................................................................. 20 
15.1
RESEARCH PARTICIPANT REGISTRATION................................................. 20 
16.0
DATA  MANAGEMENT ISSUES .................................................................................. 20 
16.1
QUALITY ASSURANCE .................................................................................... 20 
16.2
DATA AND SAFETY MONITORING ............................................................... 21 
17.0
PROTECTION OF HUMAN SUBJECTS ....................................................................... 21 
17.1
PRIVACY ............................................................................................................. 22 
17.2
SERIOUS ADVERSE EVENT (SAE) REPORTING .......................................... 22 
18.0
INFORMED CONSENT PROCEDURES ....................................................................... 23 
18.1
RESEARCH AUTHORIZATION ..... ERROR! BOOKMARK NOT DEFINED. 
19.0
REFERENCE(S) ............................................................................................................... 24 
 


Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center 
IRB Protocol 
IRB#: 09-158A(4)
Amended:  04/10/12 
- 2 - 
1.0 
PROTOCOL SUMMARY AND/OR SCHEMA       
This phase II study of the anti-GD2 murine IgG3 monoclonal antibody 3F8 combined with 
granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) will assess relapse-free 
survival in patients who are post-stem-cell transplantation and in first complete/very good 
partial remission (CR/VGPR) but are at very high risk of relapse of neuroblastoma. The 
high-dose 3F8 usage is four fold greater than the standard 3F8 dosage used in prior phase 
II studies.  13-cis-Retinoic Acid will be used in this protocol after patients are evaluated 
for response to 3F8/GM-CSF. We will apply real-time quantitative RT-PCR 
methodology targeting GD2 synthase mRNA for monitoring response in bone marrow; we 
will test the hypothesis that early bone marrow response has prognostic importance.   
 
2.0 
OBJECTIVES AND SCIENTIFIC AIMS 
Primary Objectives 
• 
Assess the impact of high-dose 3F8/GM-CSF on relapse-free survival in patients 
who are post-stem-cell transplantation and in first complete or very good partial 
remission, but at high risk of relapse. 
 
Secondary Objectives 
• 
Apply real-time quantitative RT-PCR to test the hypothesis that the minimal 
residual disease content of bone marrow after the first treatments with 3F8/GM-
CSF has significant prognostic impact on relapse-free survival. 
• 
Monitor safety of the high-dose antibody treatment, to assure no side-effects or 
noxious sequelae develop or emerge that were not seen in the prior phase I study. 
 
3.0 
BACKGROUND AND RATIONALE 
3.1
Disease background: Neuroblastoma (NB) is the most common extracranial 
solid tumor of childhood; 50-60% of patients present with an unresectable primary tumor 
and metastases in bone marrow (BM).1  Intensive induction chemotherapy and aggressive 
surgery have improved remission rates in young patients2-4; results have been less 
impressive in adolescents and adults in whom NB is especially chemoresistant.5,6
Realization of an effective strategy for eradicating minimal residual disease (MRD) has 
remained a formidable challenge.  Post-surgical use of local radiotherapy helps control 
MRD in the primary site.7 Myeloablative therapy (with stem-cell support) has been the 
most common approach for eradicating MRD in distant sites.  The long-term relapse-free 
survival rate in a recent national study was only ~20%, although the vitamin A derivative 
13-cis-retinoic acid helped to improve overall survival.8
These results, plus the 
potentially severe toxicities of chemotherapy and radiotherapy, are compelling reasons 


Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center 
IRB Protocol 
IRB#: 09-158A(4)
Amended:  04/10/12 
- 3 - 
for pursuing novel therapeutic approaches, including immunotherapy mediated by anti-
GD2 monoclonal antibodies (MoAbs)9-22 which interact with granulocytes.23 
 
3.2
Rationale for 3F8: 3F8 is a murine IgG3 MoAb that is well suited for targeted 
immunotherapy.  The reasons are several.  First, the intensive chemotherapy required to 
produce in NB patients the minimal disease state optimal for immunotherapy results in 
 
prolonged lymphopenia. This setting is unfavorable for active immunotherapy but allows 
 
passive immunotherapy since the patient is unable to reject allogeneic, xenogeneic, or 
 
genetically-engineered MoAbs.  Second, 3F8 recognizes the ganglioside GD2.24  This 
 
target antigen is highly expressed on NB (but has restricted distribution in normal human 
 
tissues), is not modulated from the cell surface when bound by MoAbs, and is genetically 
 
stable (unlike tumor-associated antigens such as immunoglobulin idiotypes on lymphoma 
 
cells).25-27  Third, scintigraphy using 131I-3F8 confirms that 3F8 localizes selectively to 
 
GD2(+) tumor deposits in patients.28  The excellent targeting potential of 3F8 was 
 
evidenced by its high tumor to non-tumor ratio, the high percent injected dose per gram 
 
uptake, and the limited, if any, nonspecific liver and spleen uptake.28,29  Fourth, 3F8 
mediates destruction in vitro, in a dose-dependent manner, of GD2(+) human tumor cells 
 
by human complement30 and by human lymphocytes, cultured monocytes, and 
 
neutrophils.31-33  Finally, the capacity of 3F8 to activate complement (C’) on NB cells 
(which lack decay accelerating factor34) raises the possibility of C’-mediated lysis in 
 
patients and the release of C’ fragments that may elicit an inflammatory influx of 
 
granulocytes capable of lysing 3F8-labeled tumor cells.  Furthermore, the deposition of 
 
C’ fragments C3b and iC3b on NB cells may enhance ADCC because the receptor for 
 
iC3b – variously called Mac-1, CR3, CD11b/CD18, or άMβ2-integrin – is a key element 
 
in anti-GD2 MoAb-mediated tumor-cell kill by neutrophils,35,36 which are the most 
 
abundant circulating class of leukocyte. 
3.3
Rationale for GM-CSF:  GM-CSF can amplify 3F8 anti-NB activity in patients 
via effects on granulocytes and macrophages.  Reasons for combining GM-CSF with 3F8 
include the following.  First, granulocyte production is only transiently suppressed by 
chemotherapy, and GM-CSF increases neutrophil and eosinophil production and is well 
 
tolerated compared to other cytokines such as interleukin-2.37  Second, granulocytes from 
 
patients receiving chemotherapy and normal volunteers mount ADCC against NB cells 
 
via non-oxidative mechanisms, and GM-CSF enhances the ADCC.36,38-42 Third, 
 
eosinophilic infiltration of some cancers has favorable prognostic significance, and 
 
eosinophils exhibit potent antitumor activity in animal models.43,44  Fourth, activated 
 
monocytes-macrophages efficiently phagocytose NB cells, and exposure in vitro or in 
vivo 
to 
GM-CSF 
primes 
monocytes-macrophages 
for 
greater 
antineoplastic 
cytotoxicity.33,39,45-50  Fifth, GM-CSF enhances the proliferation, maturation, and function 
 
of antigen-presenting cells, including antigen processing and presentation by 
 
macrophages and dendritic cells37,51,52 - effects that might promote induction, or 
antitumor activity, of an idiotypic network.53-56  Finally, GM-CSF is not a growth factor 
 
for NB cells in vitro.57 


Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center 
IRB Protocol 
IRB#: 09-158A(4)
Amended:  04/10/12 
- 4 - 
 
3.4
Rationale for quantitating BM disease by real-time RT-PCR:  Curative 
 
strategies for stage 4 NB must encompass control of both the primary mass and distant 
 
disease.  Dose-intensive chemotherapy has had a favorable impact on resectability of 
 
primary tumors and surgical removal of all visible tumor, followed by local radiotherapy, 
 
reduces the risk of relapse in the primary site to <10%.4,7  Dose-intensive chemotherapy 
 
eliminates histologically evident BM involvement in 90% of high-risk cases.3  These 
encouraging results have shifted the focus of curative strategies to the problem of MRD – 
 
which is readily assessed in BM. 
 
Adjuvant treatments, such as immunotherapy with MoAbs, may make gradual and not 
quantum changes in MRD, which by definition is beyond the sensitivity of conventional 
histologic58 or radiologic techniques. The availability of more sensitive methods for 
quantitating occult tumor cells in sequential BM specimens can allow determination of 
the efficacy and optimal duration of adjuvant treatment.  The absence of detectable tumor 
cells in BM can serve as a surrogate end point for the adjuvant treatment strategy, while 
quantitative data on BM disease will help detect relapse earlier and indicate a need for a 
change in treatment.   
 
We58-65a and others66-70 have reported a series of studies aimed at improving the utility of 
BM testing, focusing on immunological and molecular methods for identifying MRD.  
The limit of detection for immunocytology is 1/105 to 1/106 cells; RT-PCR has slightly 
superior sensitivity with a range of 1/105 to 1/107 cells.  The results suggest that GD2
synthase might serve as a sensitive marker of MRD in BM and that its level might reflect 
clinical disease status as well as correlate with histologic response to immunotherapy.   
Histologic examination of aspirates and biopsies from bilateral posterior iliac crests has 
been the standard method for detecting NB in BM.  We have routinely also obtained 
specimens from bilateral anterior iliac crests since sampling from multiple sites increases 
detection rates.65a  Histologic studies alone, however, yield an underestimate of BM 
involvement, as shown by immunocytology with MoAbs.68.69  For >15 years, we have 
used anti-GD2 immunocytology to enumerate NB cells in BM of patients.92   Molecular 
markers have also been tested for detecting NB.  Thus, the gene transcript for tyrosine 
hydroxylase, which is a key enzyme in the catecholamine biosynthesis pathway, is useful 
for identifying NB in BM but its expression is down-regulated in some cells.64,67  We 
found cancer-testis antigen GAGE to be comparable in sensitivity to immunocytology in 
detecting NB in BM,59 and results with GAGE proved to have prognostic significance.61  
Ease of use, superior sensitivity, and greater specificity prompted us to study the utility of 
real-time quantitative RT-PCR of GD2 synthase mRNA for the detection of rare NB cells 
in BM.  The marker GD2 synthase is particularly pertinent because NB cells express 
ganglioside GD2 at high density, with little heterogeneity within tumors or among 
patients, and this surface antigen has limited expression in normal human tissues.25-27
The key enzyme required for GD2 synthesis is GD2 synthase (β1,4-N-


Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center 
IRB Protocol 
IRB#: 09-158A(4)
Amended:  04/10/12 
- 5 - 
acetylgalactosamineyltransferase, EC 2.4.1.92).62  In a study of 155 BM samples (100 
patients), the transcript levels correlated well with the number of NB cells in BM as 
measured by immunocytology.63  Further, in a study of BM findings in 86 NB patients 
treated with 3F8 and GM-CSF, molecular responders had a significantly lower risk of 
disease progression.65  The data provide compelling support for the utility of this 
molecular approach for assessing MRD. 
3.5
Clinical experience with 3F8/GM-CSF:   Prior clinical studies of 3F8/GM-CSF 
established 1) this combination’s excellent activity against refractory BM disease (IRB 
protocols 94-018 and 03-077); 2) the safety of markedly augmented 3F8 dosing (IRB 
protocol 05-015: “3F8 antibody dose escalation plus granulocyte-macrophage colony-
 
stimulating factor in high-risk neuroblastoma: A phase I trial”)71a compared to dosages 
derived from pilot studies in the 1980s, an important finding since in vitro studies show a 
 
3F8 dose-dependent lysis of NB cells (see section 3.2); and 3) the superiority of 
 
subcutaneous over intravenous (iv) use of GM-CSF, for both anti-NB effect and 
 
treatment simplification (which helps patients and medical staff - and promotes wide 
 
availability of this treatment) 71-73   
 
The long-standing standard daily dosage of 3F8 has been 20 mg/m2.  In the IRB protocol 
05-015 dose escalation phase I study, 3F8 dosages up to 160 mg/m2 were possible 
without dose-limiting toxicity, as reported71a (That protocol also used a small dose of 
heat-modified 3F8 – 2 mg/m2, iv over ~5 minutes – administered just before the 
treatment dose, as a way to modify the major acute toxicity of pain.)  For the current 
protocol, we chose daily 3F8 dosage 80 mg/m2 because in the dose escalation phase I 
study, serum levels were not significantly different at a 3F8 daily dosage of >80 mg/m2
(see Figure 1), and excellent anti-NB activity was seen at 80 mg/m2. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Figure 1: 


Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center 
IRB Protocol 
IRB#: 09-158A(4)
Amended:  04/10/12 
- 6 - 
 
 
 
3.6
HAMA response/idiotypic network:   In a study of 34 patients with MRD 
treated with 3F8 alone, patients with a self-limited (transient) HAMA response had 
significantly better PFS than patients who had persistently high HAMA titers or no 
HAMA formation.15 This association of a transient low level HAMA/anti-idiotype (Ab2) 
antibody response with better PFS was a seemingly paradoxical finding since 
HAMA/Ab2 blocks 3F8 binding to tumor cells.  The unexpected observation regarding 
HAMA/Ab2 and survival led to the hypothesis of a host idiotypic network induced by 
3F8 (Ab1) and responsible for long-term tumor control.  The idiotypic network was first 
postulated by Jerne75 for immune regulation and later demonstrated in human disease 
models, including cancer patients.76-79 Anti-idiotypic antibodies (Ab2) in the HAMA pool 
may mimic antigen GD2 and stimulate an Ab3 antibody response.  We previously reported 
the association of anti-anti-idiotype (Ab3) with prolonged survival among patients who 
underwent myeloablative therapy with autologous stem-cell rescue.53 Other investigators 
have postulated the development of an idiotypic network in patients treated with 17-1A 
antibodies, where both Ab3 antibodies as well as anti-idiotypic and anti-anti-idiotypic T 
cells have been demonstrated.54,55
In our study of 34 patients, consistent with the emergence of an idiotypic network, Ab3 
(anti-anti-idiotype) and Ab3' (anti-GD2) response at 6-14 months after treatment with 3F8 
alone correlated with improved PFS, and higher Ab3 titers showed a stronger correlation 
with improved outcome, while non-idiotype antibody responses (anti-mouse or anti-
tumor nuclear antigen) had no apparent impact on outcome.56  Since GD2 is an auto-
antigen, induced Ab3' response represented a breakdown in self-tolerance.  We 
hypothesized that significant rises in Ab3 or Ab3' would not be possible unless 
suppressor pathways were removed and naive T or B cells were allowed to repopulate.  
Following intensive chemotherapy that eliminates a large part of the lymphoid system, 
exposure to tumor-selective Ab1s (3F8) might induce unique Ab2s that could bias the 
recovering repertoire towards the GD2 antigen network.  The potential for biasing the 
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
Peak serum 3F8 (ug/ml)
Dose of 3F8 (mg/m2)


Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center 
IRB Protocol 
IRB#: 09-158A(4)
Amended:  04/10/12 
- 7 - 
immune system towards specific antigens has been well documented in murine models80
and human disease states.81,82  If true, one would expect such an idiotypic network to be 
most successful following intensive immunosuppressive therapy, and not easily induced 
in immunocompetent patients.  In fact, we found that myeloablative therapy suppressed 
HAMA and Ab2 but was followed by the appearance of Ab3 which in turn correlated 
with prolonged survival.53,56  The prerequisite of strongly immunosuppressive therapy 
may explain why in most clinical studies of MoAbs, such an idiotypic network is not 
commonly observed.  However, when found in patients with colorectal or ovarian 
carcinoma treated with specific MoAbs, the idiotypic network gave patients superior 
survival advantage.54,55,76,77,83-87 
 
 
3.7 
Isotretinoin (13-cis-retinoic acid) was shown in a randomized national study to 
significantly decrease the risk of early relapse in patients treated in complete remission 
and to significantly improve overall survival.8 This agent subsequently became standard 
of care for NB patients in remission.  It will be used in this protocol after patients are 
evaluated for response to 3F8/GM-CSF – same dosage, same timing as in the predecessor 
3F8/GM-CSF (IRB 03-077) protocol. 
 
3.8
Interpretations and implications:  Various strategies have undergone clinical 
testing to promote immune-mediated attack against cancer.  However, few clinical trials 
have used MoAb-targeted immunotherapy against solid tumors in children or adults,
especially with ADCC as the principal underlying immune cytotoxic mechanism.  Also, 
an antineoplastic role for granulocytes has received scant attention.23  A treatment 
program combining 3F8 and GM-CSF thus represents a step towards filling a gap in the 
emerging field of immunotherapy.   
This phase II trial exploits recent findings that promise to optimize the anti-NB activity of 
3F8/GM-CSF – namely, high dosing of 3F8 and subcutaneous use of GM-CSF.  Further, 
RT-PCR analysis of response in BM, which has proved informative in past studies, will 
be applied to monitor anti-NB activity of the immunotherapy, with an emphasis on early 
recognition of treatment efficacy.  The studies focus on BM; findings may not reflect 
total body tumor burden.  Metastatic NB is, however, a systemic disease, and, as with 
leukemia,88 BM status appears to approximate the overall disease state.  If the RT-PCR 
method proves to be sensitive, it will provide a useful tool for measuring NB-cell content 
in BM as a patient goes through treatment.  The ability to identify patients not likely to 
benefit from further use of a given adjuvant therapy will allow a more timely switch to a 
possibly better treatment.  We hypothesize that quantifying GD2 synthase transcript levels 
will help stratify patients by tumor load, define tumor thresholds that correlate with 
favorable clinical outcome, and provide prognostic classification for patients receiving 
immunotherapy.  Risk-related molecular guidelines can be rapidly incorporated into 
future treatment programs. 
 
Our RT-PCR method provides a quantitative measure, such that the percentage of 
patients who achieve CR in BM, and the degree of response with 3F8/GM-CSF, can be 


Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center 
IRB Protocol 
IRB#: 09-158A(4)
Amended:  04/10/12 
- 8 - 
calculated and compared to other adjuvant treatments.  With NB, where randomized trials 
are difficult to carry out because of the small number of affected patients, such 
quantitative analyses acquire even greater utility for rapidly identifying both the best 
agent and its optimal use in a curative treatment program.   
The findings regarding RT-PCR utility in the adjuvant setting, granulocyte activation, 
and idiotypic network will have general implications for MoAb-based therapeutic 
strategies against solid tumors in humans.   
 
The ease of administration of the treatments (a subcutaneous injection of GM-CSF, 
which is given at home, and a 30-minute iv infusion of 3F8 in the outpatient clinic), plus 
their transient acute side-effects, are compatible with usage of this regimen beyond our 
hospital – a strong positive factor in furthering product development, which in fact is 
underway in a multi-institutional study of 3F8/GM-CSF using the previous 3F8 dosage. 
 
4.0 
OVERVIEW OF STUDY DESIGN/INTERVENTION 
4.1 
Design 
This phase II, open-label, single arm trial assesses the anti-NB activity of high-dose 3F8 
(80 mg/m2/day), which is used in cycles 1-2, with return to standard 3F8 dosage (20 
mg/m2/day) in subsequent cycles. The patients are post-transplant and in 1st
complete/very good partial remission (CR/VGPR),89 with no evidence of NB by standard 
studies, but are at high risk for relapse.   
 
Clinical results will be compared to those in the predecessor trials which used only the 
standard 3F8 dosage.  Real-time quantitative RT-PCR63-65 will be used to assess MRD in 
BM.  13-cis-retinoic acid is started after cycle 2.   
 
4.2 
Intervention 
Road Map/Schema (1st CR/VGPR):  A cycle consists of treatment with 3F8 for 5 days. GM-
CSF is started 5 days in advance of each 3F8 cycle.  The break between end of a cycle of 
3F8/GM-CSF and start of next cycle is 2-to-4-weeks through 4 cycles; subsequent breaks are 
~6-8 weeks.  13-cis-retinoic acid is started after cycle 2.   
 
 
 
Cycle 1 
high-dose 3F8 + GM-CSF  
2-4 weeks off 
Cycle 2 
high-dose 3F8 + GM-CSF  
2-4 weeks off– 13-cis-retinoic acid x14 days on, x14 days off 
Cycle 3 
3F8 + GM-CSF 
2-4 weeks off– 13-cis-retinoic acid x14 days on, x14 days off 


Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center 
IRB Protocol 
IRB#: 09-158A(4)
Amended:  04/10/12 
- 9 - 
Cycle 4 
3F8 + GM-CSF 
6-8 weeks off – 13-cis-retinoic acid x14 days on, x14 days off, x14 days on
Cycle 5 
3F8 + GM-CSF 
6-8 weeks off – 13-cis-retinoic acid x14 days on, x14 days off, x14 days on
Cycle 6 
3F8 + GM-CSF  
 
Continue with ~6-8-week breaks through 24 months from 1st dose of 3F8.  The treatment 
schedule may require minor adjustment as clinically indicated (e.g., due to PDH closure for 
holidays).  Patients can complete the missed day of 3F8 the following week, so they receive 
a full 5-day cycle.  GM-CSF will be continued through the 3F8 make-up day at the 500 
mcg/m2 dose.   
 
 
5.0 
THERAPEUTIC/DIAGNOSTIC AGENTS 
5.1 
 3F8 monoclonal antibody (IND number of BB-IND-8449)  
 
 
 
5.1.1 Source and Pharmacology:  Monoclonal antibody 3F8 is purified by 
column chromatography. The final product is tested to assure that it is free of nucleic 
acid, murine viruses, bacteria, fungi, mycoplasma and pyrogens. Supplier: 3F8 is 
manufactured as an investigational agent. 
 
 
5.1.2 Formulation and Stability: The purified antibody is frozen at –80oC, at 2 
mg/mL 0.1 M citrate-phosphate pH 4.2 buffer in glass vials.  At –80oC it is stable for at 
least 3 years.  For iv administration, 3F8 should be diluted into 10 ml 5% human serum 
albumin and millipore (0.2 µm) filtered before use.  Route of Administration: iv infusion.  
 
 
 
 
5.2 
Yeast-derived human recombinant granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating f
 
actor GM-CSF; LEUKINE (sargramostim)) is produced by Berlex Laboratories, Seattle, 
 
WA. 
 
 
 
5.2.1 LEUKINE is a sterile, white, preservative-free, lyophilized powder 
 
suitable for iv infusion upon reconstitution of 250 mcg vials; these vials should be 
 
reconstituted aseptically with 1.0 ml Sterile Water for Injection, USP (without 
 
preservative). The reconstituted LEUKINE solutions are clear, colorless, isotonic with a 
 
pH of 7.4 ± 0.3, and contain 250 mcg/ml of Sargramostim.  The single-use vial should 
 
not be re-entered or reused.  Do not save any unused portion for later administration.  
 
Vials containing 500 mcg of LEUKINE are already in solution and are multiple dose 
 
vials. 
 
 
 
5.2.2  During reconstitution the Sterile Water for Injection, USP should be 
 
directed at the side of the vial and the contents gently swirled to avoid foaming during 
 
dissolution. Avoid excessive or rigorous agitation; do not shake. 


Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center 
IRB Protocol 
IRB#: 09-158A(4)
Amended:  04/10/12 
- 10 - 
 
 
5.2.3 Dilution for iv infusion should be performed in 0.9% Sodium Chloride 
Injection. USP. If the final concentration of LEUKINE is below 10 mcg/ml, Albumin 
(Human), add 1 mg Albumin (Human) per l ml 0.9% Sodium Chloride Injection, USP 
 
(e.g. use 1 ml 5% Albumin [Human] in 50 ml 0.9% Sodium Chloride Injection, USP). 
 
 
5.2.4 An in-line membrane filter is not to be used for iv infusion of LEUKINE.  
 
5.2.5 LEUKINE contains no antibacterial preservative and therefore should be 
administered as soon as possible, and within 6 hours following reconstitution and/or 
dilution for iv infusion. Store LEUKINE powder, reconstituted solutions, or diluted 
solutions under refrigeration at 2-8°C (36-46°F); do not freeze or shake. LEUKINE vials 
are intended for single use only; discard any unused solution after 6 hours.  Do not use 
beyond the expiration date printed on the vial. 
 
 
  
5.2.6 In the absence of compatibility and stability information, no other 
medication should be added to infusion solutions containing LEUKINE.  Use only 0.9% 
Sodium Chloride Injection, USP to prepare iv infusion solutions. 
 
  
5.2.7 Aseptic technique should he employed in the preparation of all LEUKINE 
Solutions. To assure correct concentration following reconstitution, care should be 
exercised to eliminate any air bubbles from the needle hub of the syringe used to prepare 
the diluent. Parenteral products should be inspected visually for particulate matter and 
discoloration prior to administration whenever solution and container permit. 
 
 
5.3 
13-cis-Retinoic 
Acid 
(NDC 
#0004-0155-01,0004-0169, 
0004-0156-01-
 
ISOTRETINOIN, ACCUTANE) 
 
 
5.3.1 Source and Pharmacology: 
The exact mechanism of retinoic acid (RA)-
induced maturation of tumor cells is not known. In NB cell lines it has been shown to 
down regulate MYCN RNA and protein expression, and such down regulation correlates 
with the ability of isotretinoin to induce tumor cell growth arrest.  Recent studies using 
gene transfection directly implicate down regulation of MYCN expression by isotretinoin 
as a key event in achieving sustained arrest of NB cell proliferation. RA also appears to 
enhance normal hematopoietic differentiation by increasing the responsiveness of 
myeloid and erythroid progenitor cells to the action of myeloid colony stimulating 
activity and erythropoietin, respectively. Metabolism: RA is 99.9% bound in plasma 
(almost entirely to albumin) and has a half-life of 10-20 hours. The major metabolite is 4-
oxoisotretinoin, and excretion is in the urine and feces. A single oral dose of 100mg/m2
isotretinoin will produce peak plasma levels of 1-2mM. The mean peaktime as 3.2 hours 
after 80mg orally, with a terminal t½ of 10 to 20 hours. Administering 160 mg/m2/day to 
children after autologous bone marrow transplantation has been shown to achieve 13-cis-
RA levels of 5 to 7 micromolar. 


Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center 
IRB Protocol 
IRB#: 09-158A(4)
Amended:  04/10/12 
- 11 - 
 
 
5.3.2 Formulation and Stability: Isotretinoin, which is the 13-cis isomer of 
retinoic acid, will be used. This is a yellow--orange crystalline powder with a molecular 
weight of 300.44.  Isotretinoin is sensitive to light and oxygen, and so it should not be 
removed from the capsule for longer than one hour prior to administration to the patient 
and it should be kept in subdued light as much as possible. 
 
 
 
5.3.3 Guidelines for Administration: PO with fat-containing food or milk to 
 
enhance absorption.  Administration of the entire capsule is to be encouraged and small 
 
children can be trained to swallow them using similar sized candy. 
 
 
 
5.3.4 Supplier: Isotretinoin is available commercially under the trade name 
ACCUTANE (Roche Laboratories) in 10mg, 20mg, and 40mg soft gelatin capsules.  See 
 
package insert for further information. 
 
 
6.0 
CRITERIA FOR SUBJECT ELIGIBILITY 
6.1 
Subject Inclusion Criteria 
6.1.1   Diagnosis of NB as defined by a) histopathology (confirmed by the 
MSKCC Department of Pathology), or b) BM metastases or MIBG-avid lesion(s) 
plus high urine catecholamine levels. 
 
6.1.2   High-risk NB as defined by risk-related treatment guidelines1 and the 
International NB Staging System,89 i.e., stage 4 with (any age) or without (>18 
months of age) MYCN amplification, MYCN-amplified stage 2 or stage 3 (any 
age), or MYCN-amplified stage 4S.   
6.1.3   The patients are post-stem cell transplantation and in first CR/VGPR, 
including no measurable MIBG-avid soft tissue tumor assessable for response. 
 
6.1.4   Signed informed consent indicating awareness of the investigational nature 
of this program. 
 
6.2 Subject Exclusion Criteria 
6.2.1 Creatinine > 3.0 mg/dL 
 
6.2.2 ALT, AST and Alkaline Phosphatase > 5.0 times the upper limit of normal 
 
6.2.3 Bilirubin > 3.0 mg/dL 
 
6.2.4 Patients with grade 3 or higher toxicities (using the CTCAE v4.0) related 
to cardiac, neurological, pulmonary or gastrointestinal function as 


Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center 
IRB Protocol 
IRB#: 09-158A(4)
Amended:  04/10/12 
- 12 - 
determined by physical exam.  Patients must have normal blood pressure 
for age. 
 
6.2.5
Progressive disease  
 
6.2.6 History of allergy to mouse proteins. 
 
6.2.7 Active life-threatening infection. 
 
6.2.8 Human anti-mouse antibody (HAMA) titer >1000 Elisa units/ml. 
 
6.2.9 Inability to comply with protocol requirements. 
 
7.0 
RECRUITMENT PLAN 
In each of the past 2 years, 46 patients were treated on the predecessor of this protocol.  
We anticipate at least maintaining this accrual rate, which will allow rapid realization of 
preliminary conclusions, with completion of the trial in 3-4 years.  Given the favorable 
prior efficacy-toxicity profile with 3F8/GM-CSF, we expect that all patients will 
complete the trial.  Patients will be offered participation in this study by their attending 
physician in the Department of Pediatrics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center.  No 
patient will be identified by chart review or direct advertising.  The attending physician 
will be responsible for explaining the study, obtaining written informed consent, and 
registering the patient on study.  Patients will mainly be children and adolescents because 
of the nature of NB (90% of patients are <6 years old at diagnosis).  Patients of both 
sexes and all ethnic backgrounds are eligible for this study.   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
8.0 
PRETREATMENT EVALUATION  
Pretreatment evaluations should be completed within 30 days of treatment. Refer to Table 1.  
 
 
8.1 
Complete history and physical examination. 
 
8.2 
Complete blood count, serum creatinine, blood urea nitrogen, serum aspartate 
aminotransferase, serum alanine aminotransferase, and serum total bilirubin 
 
 
8.3 
Echocardiogram. 
 


Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center 
IRB Protocol 
IRB#: 09-158A(4)
Amended:  04/10/12 
- 13 - 
8.4
Complete extent-of-disease evaluation. 
 
8.4.1 Urine catecholamine levels. 
 
8.4.2 BM aspirates from bilateral anterior and bilateral posterior iliac crests, and 
biopsies from any two separate sites.  The specimens are studied by: 
 
 Standard histochemical methods for the presence of tumor cells. 
 
 Immunocytology using a panel of monoclonal antibodies that react with 
antigens associated with NB (to Dr. Cheung’s lab). 
 
 RT-PCR quantitation of tumor cells (to Dr. Cheung’s lab) 
 
 
 
8.4.3 CT or MRI of primary- tumor site, plus other suspected sites of tumor. 
8.4.4 Scintigraphic studies (MIBG scan90 or PET scan91). 
 
 
8.5 
Biologic (blood) studies for phenotypes of leukocytes, and for DNA to do HLA 
and KIR typing, FcR2A and FcR3A polymorphism (to be drawn prior to 3F8). 
 
9.0 
TREATMENT/INTERVENTION PLAN 
9.1 
Schedule: 3F8 is dosed at 80 mg/m2/day (cycles 1-2) or 20 mg/m2/day (cycles 3 
and beyond) and infused iv over 30-90 minutes.  Patients who experience unacceptable 
pain (see section 11.2.1) or unacceptable hypertension (see section 11.2.2) with high-dose 
3F8 can continue on the protocol with standard-dose 3F8. To modulate pain from 3F8, 
patients are premedicated with analgesics (e.g., hydromorphone) and antihistamines (e.g., 
diphenhydramine or hydroxyzine). 3F8 is started ~1 hr after GM-CSF. GM-CSF is dosed 
at 250 mcg/m2/day from day –5 to day +1 (i.e. Wednesday to Tuesday is customary), and 
is 500 mcg/m2/day on days +2 to +4 (i.e. Wednesday to Friday), as in the predecessor 
protocols.18,74  Patients come off study if progressive disease occurs or if there is life-
threatening grade 4 toxicity from 3F8. 
 
 
The break from end of a cycle to start of next cycle is 2-to-4 weeks through 4 cycles; 
subsequent breaks are ~6-8 weeks.  13-cis-retinoic acid is started after cycle 2.  Road 
map/schema is in section 4.2.   
 
Patients who develop HAMA which precludes timely treatments with 3F8/GM-CSF are 
eligible to receive low-dose maintenance regimens such as irinotecan alone,92
temozolomide alone,93 irinotecan-temozolomide,94 or cyclophosphamide-topotecan.95
They can also receive anti-HAMA agents such as rituximab and cyclophosphamide.  
They resume treatment with 3F8/GM-CSF if HAMA becomes negative.   


Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center 
IRB Protocol 
IRB#: 09-158A(4)
Amended:  04/10/12 
- 14 - 
9.2
3F8/GM-CSF Treatment Schedule   
 
 
 
9.2.1   Treatment Schedule Cycles 1-2: 
 
 
Days -5 to -1:    GM-CSF 250 mcg/m2/day, subcutaneously. 
 
 
Days 0 and +1:   GM-CSF 250 mcg/m2/day, subcutaneously. 
 
 
 
   3F8 80 mg/m2/day by iv infusion over 30-90 minutes. 
 
Days +2 to +4:   GM-CSF 500 mcg/m2/day, subcutaneously. 
 
 
    
 
 
 
   3F8 80 mg/m2/day by iv infusion over 30-90 minutes. 
 
 
 
9.2.2   Treatment Schedule Cycle 3 and onwards: 
 
 
Days -5 to -1:    GM-CSF 250 mcg/m2/day, subcutaneously. 
 
 
Days 0 and +1:   GM-CSF 250 mcg/m2/day, subcutaneously. 
 
 
 
   3F8 20 mg/m2/day by iv infusion over 30-90 minutes. 
 
Days +2 to +4:   GM-CSF 500 mcg/m2/day, subcutaneously. 
 
 
 
   3F8 20 mg/m2/day by iv infusion over 30-90 minutes. 
 
 
Note: GM-CSF is not administered if the ANC is >20,000/ul. If HAMA develops, 
cycles are deferred until HAMA titer decreases to <1000 Elisa units/ml.    
 
9.3 
13-cis-retinoic acid is dosed at 160 mg/m2/day, divided into two doses, x14 days.  
It is not taken on same days as 3F8.  The treatment can be repeated after a minimum rest 
period of 14 days. 13-cis-retinoic acid is started after cycle 2, but it can be started sooner 
if early HAMA develops. All patients take a total of 6 cycles of 13-cis-retinoic acid. Dose 
reductions due to expected side effects of 13-cis-retinoic acid (e.g., headaches, dry skin, 
etc.) are allowed. 
 
 10.0 EVALUATION DURING TREATMENT/INTERVENTION 
Note: If for any reason tests cannot be completed on day 0, they will be completed on day 1 
 
10.1 
CBC on day 0 and +3 of each cycle.  If ANC >10,000/ul, CBC repeated next day. 
 
10.2 
C3, CH50, and phenotype of leukocytes, on day 0 and +4 (i.e. Monday and 
Friday) of cycles 1 and 2. 
 
10.3
Serum (2-5 ml) for 3F8 levels pre 3F8 infusion on Day 0 (i.e. Monday) and post-
3F8 infusion on Day 4 (i.e. Friday) for cycle 1 and 2.  


Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center 
IRB Protocol 
IRB#: 09-158A(4)
Amended:  04/10/12 
- 15 - 
 
10.4
Blood for studies of DNA to do HLA and KIR typing, FcR2A and FcR3A  
polymorphism (to Dr. Cheung’s lab) 
10.5
Blood for HAMA is obtained approximately every 1-2 months while on study (to
Dr. Cheung’s lab). 
 
10.6  Liver and kidney function blood tests on day 0 and +4 of each cycle. 
 
10.7 
Assessment of response is the same as in prior studies,96 including the predecessor 
3F8/GM-CSF (IRB 03-077) protocol: BM studies (8.4.2) after cycle 2 and 
complete extent-of-disease evaluation (section 8.4) after cycle 4 of 3F8/GM-CSF 
and at least every 3 months through 2 years.  BM studies are repeated in 
conjunction with MIBG or PET scan (section 10.8) through 2 years in patients 
with history of BM or cortical bone involvement, but are repeated ~every 6 
months in other patients (e.g., patients who were stage 4 by virtue of metastases in 
distant lymph nodes, patients with MYCN-amplified stage 4S lacking BM 
involvement, or patients with MYCN-amplified stage 2 or stage 3). 
 
10.8 
Pregnancy screen (females of child-bearing age) before starting cis-retinoic acid. 
 
10.9 
Blood to study minimal residual disease (to Dr. Cheung’s lab)98. 
10.10 Patients receiving 80 mg/m2 of 3F8 will be monitored for their blood pressure for 
at least 2 days after 3F8 until a normal blood pressure has been assured.  
Table 1. PRETREATMENT AND DURING THE STUDY EVALUATION 
WHAT? 
WHEN? 
Complete history and physical examination. 
Pretreatment evaluation
 
Complete blood count 
 
1. Pretreatment evaluation 
2.
On day 0 (i.e. Monday) and +3 (i.e. Thursday). 
If ANC is >10,000/ul, CBC is repeated next day. 
Liver and kidney function blood tests 
1. Pretreatment
2. On day 0 (i.e. Monday) and +4 (i.e. Friday) 
Blood for studies of DNA to do HLA and KIR 
typing, FcR2A and FcR3A polymorphism (to 
Dr. Cheung’s lab) 
Pretreatment
Blood for studies of phenotypes of leukocytes 
(to Dr. Cheung’s lab) 
1.
Pretreatment
2.  Day 0 (i.e. Monday) and Day 4 (i.e. Friday), 


Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center 
IRB Protocol 
IRB#: 09-158A(4)
Amended:  04/10/12 
- 16 - 
cycles 1 and 2 
Blood (2-5 ml) for 3F8 levels (to Dr. Cheung’s 
lab) 
1.    Pre 3F8 infusion day 0 (i.e. Monday), cycles 1  and 2 
2.    Post 3F8 infusion day 4 (i.e. Friday), cycles 1 and 2  
Blood for minimal residual disease studies (to 
Dr. Cheung’s lab)
1. Drawn with post cycle 2 bone marrow studies 
2.
Drawn with bone marrows during first work-up 
(~3 months from start of study) 
 
C3, CH50 
 
On day 0 and +4 (i.e. Monday and Friday), cycles 1 and 2. 
HAMA (Red Top Tube) (Dr. Cheung, Z1431) 
~Every 1-2 months while on study. 
Bone marrow studies (including 10 ml 
heparinized for immunocytology and/or RT-
PCR, to Dr. Cheung’s lab) 
1. Pretreatment
2. At end of cycle 2 
3. Subsequently,  
• 
BM studies are repeated with MIBG or 
PET through 2 years for patients with 
history of BM or cortical bone 
involvement.  
• 
But are repeated ~every 6 months in other 
patients (e.g., patients who were stage 4 
by virtue of metastases in distant lymph 
nodes) while on study. 
 
CT or MRI 
 
1. Pretreatment: of primary tumor site, plus other 
specific or suspected sites of tumor.
2. Followup: of primary site ~every 3 months 
through 1 year. 
MIBG scan90 or PET scan91  
Pretreatment and ~every 3 months through 2 years 
Echocardiogram 
Pretreatment
 
Urine catecholamine levels 
1. Pretreatment
2. ~Every 3 months through 2 years. 
Pregnancy screen (females of child-bearing age)  Before starting 13-cis-retinoic acid. 
Blood pressure monitoring with 80 mg/m2 of 
3F8
Measured for at least 2 days after 3F8 until normal blood 
pressure is assured.
Note: If for any reason tests cannot be completed on day 0, they will be completed on day 1 
* Pretreatment evaluation should be completed within 30 days of treatment 
11.0 
TOXICITIES/SIDE EFFECTS 
11.1
Toxicities are graded by the Common Toxicity Criteria (Version 3.0) developed 
by the National Cancer Institute (NCI) of the USA. 
 
11.2 
3F8: Reversible side-effects include pain, paresthesia, hypertension, hypotension, 
tachycardia, urticaria, fever, nausea, emesis, and rarely, diarrhea, serum sickness, 
hyponatremia, somnolence, and posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES). 


Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center 
IRB Protocol 
IRB#: 09-158A(4)
Amended:  04/10/12 
- 17 - 
Other potential side-effects that may occur are bronchospasm, anaphylaxis, peripheral 
neuropathy, impaired accommodation of the eye, and poor reactivity of pupils to light. 
 
11.2.1 The definition of unacceptable pain is the same as in the IRB 05-015 phase 
I 3F8 dose-escalation study, as reported71a: >7 doses of opioids administered within two 
hours. One dose of analgesic is defined as hydromorphone 0.015 mg/kg or equianalgesic 
dose of morphine sulfate. 
 
 
 
11.2.2 The definition of unacceptable hypertension is the same as in the IRB 05-
 
015 phase I 3F8 dose-escalation study, as reported71a: hypertension necessitating 
 
medicinal intervention for >24 hours.   
11.3
GM-CSF: Common side-effects include bone pain, flushing, local reaction at site 
of injection, leukopenia shortly after injection, and decrease in platelet count.  Rare side-
effects (predominantly in adults) include allergic reactions, weight gain, pleural or 
pericardial effusion, pericardial embolism, thrombosis, and difficulty breathing after first 
injection. 
 
11.4 
Isotretinoin: Dry skin, dry mouth, cheilitis, dry eyes, hypercalcemia, pseudotumor 
cerebri, rash, muscle or bone pain, fatigue, headache, cholesterol, nausea and vomiting, 
changes in skin color, upset stomach, dizziness, low red and white blood cells, retinoic 
acid syndrome, hepatotoxicity, teratogenic effect on fetus, depression, suicidal ideation. 
 
12.0 
CRITERIA FOR THERAPEUTIC RESPONSE/OUTCOME ASSESSMENT 
12.1 
Response duration is calculated from first day of treatment with 3F8. 
 
12.2
Patients are considered a treatment failure if progressive disease develops.   
 
 
12.3 
Disease status is defined by the International NB Response Criteria.89  
 
 
 Complete response/remission (CR): no evidence of disease. 
 
 Very good partial response/remission (VGPR): >90% decrease in all 
disease markers, except bone scan unchanged or improved; BM must be 
free of disease by histology and by scintigraphic studies. 
 
 Partial response/remission: >50% decrease in all disease markers, except 
bone scan unchanged or improved; <1 positive BM site; MIBG scan must 
be negative or improved in all abnormal sites. 
 
 Minor response: >50% decrease in >1 but not all disease markers; MIBG 
scan must be negative or improved in at least one site.  
 


Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center 
IRB Protocol 
IRB#: 09-158A(4)
Amended:  04/10/12 
- 18 - 
 No response: <50% decrease in all tumor markers, no change in MIBG 
scan. 
 
 Progressive disease (PD): new lesion, or >25 % increase in any disease 
marker.  
 
 
12.4
All patients who fulfill the eligibility requirements and receive a first dose of 3F8 
will be included in the analysis. 
 
13.0 
CRITERIA FOR REMOVAL FROM STUDY 
13.1
PD any time after cycle 1.  
 
 
13.2
Life-threatening grade 4 toxicity clearly attributable to 3F8. 
 
13.3
The investigators will make every reasonable effort to keep each patient in the 
study until all planned treatments and assessments have been performed.  The 
investigators may discontinue study drug treatment for the following reasons: 
 
• Adverse events, including unacceptable toxicity or exacerbation of underlying disease, 
associated with study drug administration and necessitating discontinuation of treatment.  
Patients who are removed from the study due to adverse events will be treated and 
followed according to established, acceptable medical practice.  All pertinent information 
concerning the outcome of such treatment will be entered in the Case Report Form or on 
the Serious Event Report, as applicable. 
 
• Withdrawal of consent.  The patient's desire to withdraw from the study may occur at
any time.  The investigator should carefully consider whether the patient’s withdrawal of 
consent is due to an adverse event, and if so, record the adverse event as the reason for 
withdrawal.
• Withdrawal by the physician for clinical reasons not related to study drug treatment, for 
example, clinical need to administer a concomitant medication that is excluded by the 
protocol, in the absence of an adverse event. 
 
• Violation of the study protocol, including failure to return for required treatments or 
assessments.  Patients who fail to return for treatments will be withdrawn from the study 
if more than 4 scheduled doses are missed 
 
13.4 
Patients will not be removed from study in order to receive radiotherapy.   
 
13.5  Patients removed from the study will not be replaced. Every effort will be made to  
follow these patients, with extent-of-disease evaluations performed at least every 3 
 
months through >2 years from study enrollment. 


Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center 
IRB Protocol 
IRB#: 09-158A(4)
Amended:  04/10/12 
- 19 - 
 
14.0 
BIOSTATISTICS 
The objective of this phase II trial is to assess the anti-NB activity of high-dose 3F8 plus 
GM-CSF in patients who are post-stem cell transplantation and in first CR/VGPR from 
high-risk NB. The 3F8 dosing is four fold greater than the standard 3F8 dosage used in 
prior phase II studies.   
14.1  Primary Endpoint 
 
The primary endpoint is two-year relapse-free survival (RFS).   
 
14.2  Sample Size 
We will use a Simon’s two-stage design.97 The type I error rate is set as 0.1 and the type 
II error rate as 0.1. 
 
In the predecessor trial (IRB 03-077: 3F8 at standard dosage of 100 mg/m2/cycle, 
combined with GM-CSF, plus 13-cis-retinoic acid), the 44 patients treated in CR/VGPR 
post-transplant achieved 78% two-year RFS.  By taking into account of the small sample 
variation, we will consider a two-year RFS rate 0.72 as not promising and 0.88 as 
promising with the new treatment. Eighteen patients will be accrued initially, and if there 
are less than 14 RFSs, further accrual to the protocol will be stopped and the new 
treatment will be declared ineffective in this protocol.  If there are at least 14 RFSs, then 
an additional 25 patients will be accrued for a total of 43.  If at least 35 RFSs out of 43 
patients, the protocol would be considered to have a positive result and the new treatment 
would be considered worthy of further testing in this patient population. The probability 
of stopping the study earlier is 54% under the null hypothesis. 
            
 
14.3  Accrual Rate 
 
We expect to accrue 10-15 patients per year.  This trial can be completed within 3-4 
years. The accrual will continue after the first stage of the study, and the two-stage design 
is used to guard against many early recurrences. 
 
14.4  Secondary Endpoint 
 
The association between histologic examination and real time RT-PCR regarding BM 
status will be assessed by the Wilcoxon statistic.  The clinical significance (relapse-free 
survival) of histologic results and real time RT-PCR findings will be assessed by log-rank 
test and Cox regression model. 
 


Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center 
IRB Protocol 
IRB#: 09-158A(4)
Amended:  04/10/12 
- 20 - 
15.0 
RESEARCH PARTICIPANT REGISTRATION AND RANDOMIZATION 
 
PROCEDURES 
15.1 
Research Participant Registration 
Confirm eligibility as defined in the section entitled Criteria for Patient/Subject Eligibility. 
 
Obtain informed consent, by following procedures defined in section entitled Informed 
Consent Procedures. 
 
During the registration process registering individuals will be required to complete a 
protocol specific Eligibility Checklist. 
 
All participants must be registered through the Protocol Participant Registration (PPR) 
Office at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. PPR is available Monday through 
Friday from 8:30am – 5:30pm at 646-735-8000. The PPR fax numbers are (646) 735-
0008 and (646) 735-0003. Registrations can be phoned in or faxed. The completed 
signature page of the written consent/verbal script and a completed Eligibility Checklist 
must be faxed to PPR. 
 
16.0 
DATA  MANAGEMENT ISSUES 
A Research Study Assistant (RSA) will be assigned to the study.  The responsibilities of 
the RSA include project compliance, data collection, abstraction and entry, data 
reporting, regulatory monitoring, problem resolution and prioritization, and coordinate 
the activities of the protocol study team.   
 
The data collected for this study will be entered into a secure database.  Source 
documentation will be available to support the computerized patient record. 
 
16.1 
Quality Assurance 
Weekly registration reports will be generated to monitor patient accruals and 
completeness of registration data.  Routine data quality reports will be generated to assess 
missing data and inconsistencies.  Accrual rates and extent and accuracy of evaluations 
and follow-up will be monitored periodically throughout the study period and potential 
problems will be brought to the attention of the study team for discussion and action. 
 
Random-sample data quality and protocol compliance audits will be conducted by the 
study team, at a minimum of  two times per year, more frequently if indicated. 


Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center 
IRB Protocol 
IRB#: 09-158A(4)
Amended:  04/10/12 
- 21 - 
16.2 
Data and Safety Monitoring 
The Data and Safety Monitoring (DSM) Plans at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer 
Center were approved by the National Cancer Institute in September 2001.  The plans 
address the new policies set forth by the NCI in the document entitled “Policy of the 
National Cancer Institute for Data and Safety Monitoring of Clinical Trials” which can be 
found at:  http://cancertrials.nci.nih.gov/researchers/dsm/index.html.   The DSM Plans at 
MSKCC were established and are monitored by the Office of Clinical Research.  The 
MSKCC Data and Safety Monitoring Plans can be found on the MSKCC Intranet at: 
http://mskweb2.mskcc.org/irb/index.htm 
There are several different mechanisms by which clinical trials are monitored for data, 
safety and quality.  There are institutional processes in place for quality assurance (e.g., 
protocol monitoring, compliance and data verification audits, therapeutic response, and 
staff education on clinical research QA) and departmental procedures for quality control,  
plus there are two institutional committees that are responsible for monitoring the 
activities of our clinical trials programs.  The committees: Data and Safety Monitoring 
Committee (DSMC) for Phase I and II clinical trials, and the Data and Safety Monitoring 
Board (DSMB) for Phase III clinical trials,  report to the Center’s Research Council and 
Institutional Review Board.   
 
During the protocol development and review process, each protocol will be assessed for 
it’s level of risk and degree of monitoring required.  Every type of protocol (e.g., NIH 
sponsored, in-house sponsored, industrial sponsored, NCI cooperative group, etc.) will be 
addressed and the monitoring procedures will be established at the time of protocol 
activation. 
 
Institutional monitoring plan for phase I and phase II trials: Memorial Sloan-Kettering 
Cancer Center (MSKCC) has established standard procedures for data safety monitoring 
of clinical research (see appendix).  For Phase II trials, these procedures include 
consideration of accrual rates, toxicity, adherence to dose-escalation schedules, adverse 
event notification and data recording.  Therapeutic responses are logged on a central 
database and approximately 50% are reviewed by an independent committee.  An annual 
report of the trial’s progress is sent to the IRB.  All of the procedures for Phase II studies 
outlined in MSKCC’s policy are applicable to the current trial and will be followed by 
the investigators.  The analysis of safety will include all patients who receive at least one 
dose of study medication.  Adverse events, including all toxic effects of treatment, will be 
tabulated individually, and summarized by body system, according to dosage of study 
medication (single dose as well as cumulative doses of 3F8 and GM-CSF), and according 
to severity or toxicity grade.  Laboratory data will be tabulated and summarized by 
descriptive statistics, as well as on the basis of MSKCC specified normal ranges. 
 
17.0 
PROTECTION OF HUMAN SUBJECTS 
 


Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center 
IRB Protocol 
IRB#: 09-158A(4)
Amended:  04/10/12 
- 22 - 
The investigator agrees to conduct this study in accordance with the International 
Conference on Harmonization (ICH) principles of Good Clinical Practice and with the 
Declaration of Helsinki (1989).  The investigator will conduct all aspects of this study in 
accordance with all national, state, and local laws of the applicable regulatory agencies. 
 
Most patients will be children, adolescents, and young adults because of the nature of 
these tumors.  Patients of both sexes and all ethnic backgrounds are eligible for this study.  
Alternative treatments are available and will be discussed with patient or legal guardian.  
Patients are responsible for the costs of physician visits and usual (routine) laboratory 
tests, all scans, usual (standard) bone marrow tests, hospitalizations, and outpatient care, 
GM-CSF, and isotretinoin. There is no charge for 3F8. If there is an injury as a result of 
this research study, emergency care, hospitalization, and outpatient care will be made 
available by Memorial Hospital and billed to the patient as part of the medical expenses.  
No money will be provided by Memorial Hospital as compensation for research-related 
injury.  
 
 
17.1 
Privacy 
MSKCC’s Privacy Office may allow the use and disclosure of protected health 
information pursuant to a completed and signed Research Authorization form.  The use 
and disclosure of protected health information will be limited to the individuals described 
in the Research Authorization form.  A Research Authorization form must be completed 
by the Principal Investigator and approved by the IRB and Privacy Board. 
 
17.2 
Serious Adverse Event (SAE) Reporting 
Any SAE must be reported to the IRB/PB as soon as possible but no later than 5 calendar 
days. The IRB/PB requires a Clinical Research Database (CRDB) SAE report be 
submitted electronically to the SAE Office at sae@mskcc.org containing the following 
information: 
 
Fields populated from the CRDB: 
• Subject’s name (generate the report with only initials if it will be sent outside of 
MSKCC) 
• Medical record number 
• Disease/histology (if applicable)
• Protocol number and title 
Data needing to be entered:
• The date the adverse event occurred 
• The adverse event 
• Relationship of the adverse event to the treatment (drug, device, or intervention) 


Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center 
IRB Protocol 
IRB#: 09-158A(4)
Amended:  04/10/12 
- 23 - 
• If the AE was expected 
• The severity of the AE 
• The intervention 
• Detailed text that includes the following information: 
o A explanation of how the AE was handled 
o A description of the subject's condition 
o Indication if the subject remains on the study 
o If an amendment will need to be made to the protocol and/or consent form 
The PI’s signature and the date it was signed are required on the completed report. 
For IND/IDE protocols: 
The CRDB AE report should be completed as above and the FDA assigned IND/IDE 
number written at the top of the report. The report will be forwarded to the FDA by the 
Institutional SAE Manager through the IND Office.  
 
17.2.1  All SAEs must be entered into the CRDB SAE form page. 
 
SAEs are defined as grade 4 toxicities other than fatigue, weight loss or weight gain, 
anorexia, nausea, anxiety, constipation, urinary retention from opioid analgesics, 
somnolence/hallucinations/ 
disorientation/confusion/ 
agitation/anxiety 
from 
anti-
histamine and opioid premedications, hypomagnesemia, fever, rash, dry skin from 
Accutane, urticaria from 3F8 or GMCSF, myelosuppression from the combination of 3F8 
and GM-CSF, pain and transient hypoxia from opioids, and breath-holding with or 
without transient oxygen requirement. Preexisting conditions e.g. hearing loss, 
hyperbilirubinemia or elevated LFTs from TPN, alopecia are not counted as SAEs.  
Hospitalizations that arise from complications of chemotherapy are considered part of 
standard care and therefore will not be reported. 
 
18.0 
INFORMED CONSENT PROCEDURES 
Before protocol-specified procedures are carried out, consenting professionals will 
explain full details of the protocol and study procedures as well as the risks involved to 
participants prior to their inclusion in the study. Participants will also be informed that 
they are free to withdraw from the study at any time. All participants must sign an 
IRB/PB-approved consent form indicating their consent to participate. This consent form 
meets the requirements of the Code of Federal Regulations and the Institutional Review 
Board/Privacy Board of this Center. The consent form will include the following:  
 
1. The nature and objectives, potential risks and benefits of the intended study.  
2. The length of study and the likely follow-up required. 


Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center 
IRB Protocol 
IRB#: 09-158A(4)
Amended:  04/10/12 
- 24 - 
3. Alternatives to the proposed study. (This will include available standard and 
investigational therapies. In addition, patients will be offered an option of 
supportive care for therapeutic studies.) 
4. The name of the investigator(s) responsible for the protocol. 
5. The right of the participant to accept or refuse study interventions/interactions and 
to withdraw from participation at any time.  
Before any protocol-specific procedures can be carried out, the consenting professional 
will fully explain the aspects of patient privacy concerning research specific information.  
In addition to signing the IRB Informed Consent, all patients must agree to the Research 
Authorization component of the informed consent form. 
 
Each participant and consenting professional will sign the consent form. The participant 
must receive a copy of the signed informed consent form. 
 
19.0 
REFERENCE(S) 
1. 
Maris JM, Hogarty MD, Bagatell R, Cohn S:  Neuroblastoma.  Lancet Oncol 369:2106-
2120, 2007 
 
2. 
Kushner BH, Kramer K, LaQuaglia MP, Modak S, Yataghene K, Cheung N-KV:  
Reduction from seven to five cycles of intensive induction chemotherapy in children with high-
risk neuroblastoma.  J Clin Oncol 22:4888-4892, 2004 
 
3. 
Pearson ADJ, Pinkerton CR, Lewis IJ, et al:  High-dose rapid and standard induction 
chemotherapy for patients over 1 year with stage 4 neuroblastoma: A randomized trial.  Lancet 
Oncol 9:247-256, 2008 
 
4. 
La Quaglia MP, Kushner BH, Heller G, Bonilla MA, Lindsley KL, Cheung N-KV:  Stage 
4 neuroblastoma diagnosed at more than one year of age: Gross total resection and clinical 
outcome.  J Pediatr Surg 29:1162-1166, 1994 
 
5. 
Franks LM, Bollen A, Seeger RC, et al:  Neuroblastoma in adults and adolescents.  An 
indolent course with poor survival.  Cancer 79:2028-35, 1997 
 
6. 
Kushner BH, Kramer K, LaQuaglia MP, Modak S, Cheung N-KV:  Neuroblastoma in 
adolescents and adults: The Memorial Sloan-Kettering experience.  Med Pediatr Oncol 41:508-
515, 2003 
 
7. 
Kushner BH, Wolden S, LaQuaglia MP, Kramer K, Verbel D, Heller G, Cheung N-KV:  
Hyperfractionated low-dose (21 Gy) radiotherapy for high-risk neuroblastoma following 
intensive chemotherapy and surgery.  J Clin Oncol 19:2821-2828, 2001 
 


Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center 
IRB Protocol 
IRB#: 09-158A(4)
Amended:  04/10/12 
- 25 - 
8. 
Matthay KK, Reynolds CP, Seeger RC, et al:  Long-term results for children with high-
risk neuroblastoma treated on a randomized trial of myeloablative therapy followed by 13-cis-
retinoic acid: A Children’s Oncology Group study.  J Clin Oncol 27:1007-1013, 2009 
 
9. 
Cheung N-KV, Lazarus H, Miraldi FD, et al:  Ganglioside GD2 specific monoclonal 
antibody 3F8: A phase I study in patients with neuroblastoma and malignant melanoma.  J Clin 
Oncol 5:1430-1440, 1987 
10. 
Handgretinger R, Baader P, Dopfer R, et al:  A phase I study of neuroblastoma with the 
anti-ganglioside GD2 antibody 14.G2a.  Cancer Immunol Immunother 35:199-204, 1992 
11.   
Handgretinger R, Anderson K, Lang P, et al:  A phase I study of human/mouse chimeric 
anti-ganglioside GD2 antibody ch14.18 in patients with neuroblastoma.  Eur J Cancer 31A:261-
267, 1995 
12.   
Frost JD, Hank JA, Reaman GH, et al:  A phase I/IB trial of murine monoclonal anti-
GD2 antibody 14.G2a plus interleukin-2 in children with refractory neuroblastoma. A report of 
the Children=s Cancer Group.  Cancer 80:317-333, 1997  
 
13. 
Yu AL, Batova A, Alvarado C, et al:  Usefulness of a chimeric anti-GD2 (ch14.18) and 
GM-CSF for refractory neuroblastoma: A POG phase II study.  Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 
16:513a, 1997  
 
14.   
Yu AL, Uttenreuther-Fischer MM, Huang CS, et al:  Phase I trial of a human-mouse 
chimeric anti-disialoganglioside monoclonal antibody ch14.18 in patients with refractory 
neuroblastoma and osteosarcoma.  J Clin Oncol 16:2169-2180, 1998 
15. 
Cheung N-KV, Kushner BH, Cheung IY, Canete A, Gerald W, Liu C, Finn R, Yeh SJ, 
Larson SM: Anti-GD2 antibody treatment of minimal residual stage 4 neuroblastoma diagnosed at 
more than 1 year of age.  J Clin Oncol 16:3053-3060, 1998 
 
16. 
Cheung N-KV, Kushner BH, Yeh SJ, Larson SM:  3F8 monoclonal antibody treatment of 
patients with stage IV neuroblastoma: A phase II study.  Int J Oncol 12:1299-1306, 1998  
17. 
Ozkaynak MF, Sondel PM, Krailo MD, et al:  Phase I study of chimeric human/murine 
anti-GD2 monoclonal antibody (ch14.18) with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor 
in children with neuroblastoma immediately after hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation: A 
Children’s Cancer Group study.  J Clin Oncol 18:4077-4085, 2001 
 
18. 
Kushner BH, Kramer K, Cheung N-KV: Phase II trial of the anti-GD2 monoclonal 
antibody 3F8 and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor for neuroblastoma.  J Clin 
Oncol 19:4189-4194, 2001 
 


Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center 
IRB Protocol 
IRB#: 09-158A(4)
Amended:  04/10/12 
- 26 - 
19.   
Cheung N-KV, Sowers R, Vickers AJ, Cheung IY, Kushner BH, Gorlick R: FCGR2A 
polymorphism is correlated with clinical outcome after immunotherapy of neuroblastoma with 
anti-GD2 antibody and granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor. J Clin Oncol 
24:2885-2890, 2006 
 
20. 
Simon T, Hero B, Faldum A, et al:  Consolidation treatment with chimeric anti-GD2-
antibody ch14.18 in children older than 1 year with metastatic neuroblastoma.  J Clin Oncol 
22:3549-57, 2004 
 
21. 
Modak S, Cheung N-KV:  Disialoganglioside directed immunotherapy of neuroblastoma.  
Cancer Invest 25:67-77, 2007 
 
22. 
Gilman AL, Ozkaynak MF, Matthay KK, et al: Phase I study of ch14.18 with 
granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor and interleukin-2 in children with 
neuroblastoma after autologous bone marrow transplantation or stem-cell rescue: A report from 
the Children’s Oncology Group.  J Clin Oncol 27:85-91, 2009 
 
23. 
Di Carlo E, Forni G, Lollini PL, et al:  The intriguing role of polymorphonuclear 
neutrophils in antitumor reactions.  Blood 97:339-345, 2001 
 
24. 
Cheung NKV, Saarinen UM, Neely JE, et al:  Monoclonal antibodies to a glycolipid 
antigen on human neuroblastoma cells.  Cancer Res 45:2642-2649, 1985 
 
25. 
Schulz G, Cheresh DA, Varki NM, et al:  Detection of ganglioside GD2 in tumor tissues 
and sera of neuroblastoma.  Cancer Res 44:5914-5920, 1984 
26. 
Sariola H, Terava H, Rapola J, Saarinen UM:  Cell-surface ganglioside GD2 in the 
immunohistochmeical detection and differential diagnosis of neuroblastoma.  Am J Clin 
Pathology 96:248-252, 1991 
 
27. 
Kramer K, Gerald WL, Kushner BH, Larson SM, Hameed M, Cheung N-KV:  
Disialoganglioside GD2 loss following monoclonal antibody therapy is rare in neuroblastoma.  
Clin Cancer Res 4:2135-2139, 1998 
 
28. 
Yeh SDJ, Larson SM, Burch L, Kushner BH, Finn R, Larson S, Cheung N-KV:  
Radioimmunodetection of neuroblastoma with iodine-131-3F8: Correlation with biopsy, iodine-
131-metaiodobenzylguanidine and standard diagnostic modalities.  J Nucl Med 32:769-776, 
1991 
 
29. 
Larson SM, Divgi C, Sgouros G, et al:  Monoclonal antibodies:  Basic principles – 
radioisotope conjugates.  In: DeVita VT, Hellman S, Rosenberg SA, (eds.):  Biologic Therapy of 
Cancer – Principles and Practice.  Philadelphia, J.B. Lippincott Co., 2000, pp 396-412 
 
 


Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center 
IRB Protocol 
IRB#: 09-158A(4)
Amended:  04/10/12 
- 27 - 
30. 
Saarinen UM, Coccia PF, Gerson SL, Pelley R, Cheung N-KV:  Eradication of 
neuroblastoma cells in vitro by monoclonal antibody and human complement: Method for 
purging autologous bone marrow.  Cancer Res 45:5969-5975, 1985 
 
31. 
Munn DH, Cheung N-KV:  Interleukin-2 enhancement of monoclonal antibody-mediated 
cellular cytotoxicity against human melanoma.  Cancer Res 47:6600-6605, 1987 
 
32. 
Kushner BH, Cheung N-KV:  GM-CSF enhances 3F8 monoclonal antibody-dependent 
cellular cytotoxicity against human melanoma and neuroblastoma.  Blood 73:1936-1941, 1989 
33. 
Munn DH, Cheung NK:  Phagocytosis of tumor cells by human monocytes cultured in 
recombinant macrophage colony-stimulating factor.  J Exp Med 172:231-237, 1990 
 
 
34. 
Cheung N-KV, Walter EI, Smith-Mensah WH, et al:  Decay-accelerating factor protects 
human tumor cells from complement-mediated cytotoxicity in vitro. J Clin Invest 8:1122-1128, 
1988 
 
35. 
Kushner BH, Cheung N-KV:  Absolute requirement of CD11/CD18 adhesion molecules, 
FcRII, and the phosphotidylinositol - linked FcRIII for monoclonal antibody-mediated neutrophil 
anti-human tumor cytotoxicity.  Blood 79:1484-1490, 1992 
 
36. 
Metelitsa LS, Gillies SD, Super M, et al:  Antidisialoganglioside/granulocyte macrophage 
colony-stimulating factor fusion protein facilitates neutrophil antibody-dependent cellular 
cytotoxicity and depends on FcγRII (CD32) and Mac-1 (CD11b/CD18) for enhanced effector 
cell adhesion and azurophil granule exocytosis.  Blood 99:4166-4173, 2001 
 
37. 
Armitage JO:  Emerging applications of recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage 
colony-stimulating factor.  Blood 92:4491-4508, 1998 
 
38. 
Barker E, Mueller BM, Handgretinger R, et al:  Effect of a chimeric anti-ganglioside GD2 
antibody on cell-mediated lysis of human neuroblastoma cells.  Cancer Res 51:144-149, 1991 
39. 
Chachoua A, Oratz R, Liebes L, et al:  Phase Ib trial of granulocyte-macrophage colony-
stimulating factor combined with murine monoclonal antibody R24 in patient with metastatic 
melanoma.  J Immunol 16:132-141, 1994 
 
40.   
Batova A, Kamps A, Gillies SD, et al:  The Ch14.18 GM-CSF fusion protein is effective 
at mediating antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity and complement-dependent cytotoxicity in 
vitro. Clin Cancer Res 5:4259-4263, 1999 
41. 
Kushner BH, Cheung N-KV:  The clinically effective monoclonal antibody 3F8 mediates 
nonoxidative lysis of human neuroectodermal tumor cells.  Cancer Res 51:4865-4870, 1991 
 


Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center 
IRB Protocol 
IRB#: 09-158A(4)
Amended:  04/10/12 
- 28 - 
42. 
Barker E, Reisfeld RA:  A mechanism for neutrophil-mediated lysis of human 
neuroblastoma cells.  Cancer Res 53:362-367, 1993 
 
43. 
Tepper RI, Coffman RL, Leder P: An eosinophil-dependent mechanism for the antitumor 
effect of interleukin 4.  Science 257:548-551, 1992 
 
44. 
Sanderson CJ:  Interleukin-5, eosinophils, and disease.  Blood 79:3101-3109, 1992 
 
45. 
Ragnhammar P, Masucci G, Frödin J-E, et al:  Cytotoxic functions of blood mononuclear 
cells 
in 
patients 
with 
colorectal 
carcinoma 
treated 
with 
mAb 
17-1A 
and 
granulocyte/macrophage-colony-stimulating factor.  Cancer Immunol Immunother 35:158-164, 
1992 
 
46. 
Charak, BS, Agah R, Mazumder A:  Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor-
induced antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity in bone marrow macrophages:  Application in 
bone marrow transplantation.  Blood 81:3474-3479, 1993 
 
47. 
Chachoua A, Oratz R, Hoogmoed R, et al:  Monocyte activation following systemic 
administration of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor.  J Immunol 15:217-224, 
1994 
 
48. 
Masucci G, Wersäll P, Ragnhammar P, Mellstedt H:  Granulocyte-monocyte-colony-
stimulating factor augments the cytotoxic capacity of lymphocytes and monocytes in antibody-
dependent cellular cytotoxicity.  Cancer Immunol Immunother 29:288-292, 1989 
 
49. 
Thomassen MJ, Barna BP, Rankin D, et al:  Differential effect of recombinant 
granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor on human monocytes and alveolar 
macrophages.  Cancer Res 49:4086-4089, 1989 
 
50. 
Ragnhammar P, Frödin J-E, Trotta PP, Mellstedt H :  Cytotoxicity of white blood cells 
activated by granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor, granulocyte/macrophage-colony-stimulating 
factor against tumor cells in the presence of various monoclonal antibodies.  Cancer Immunol 
Immunother 39:254-262, 1994 
 
51. 
Young JW, Szabolcs P, Moore MA:   Identification of dendritic cell colony-forming units 
among normal human CD34+ bone marrow progenitors that are expanded by c-kit-ligand and 
yield pure dendritic cell colonies in the presence of granulocyte/macrophage colony-stimulating 
factor and tumor necrosis factor alpha [published erratum appears in J Exp Med 183:1283, 
1996].  J Exp Med 182:1111-1119, 1995 
 
52.  
Szabolcs P, Moore MA, Young JW:  Expansion of immuostimulatory dendritic cells 
among the myeloid progeny of human CD34+ bone marrow precursors cultured with c-kit 
ligand, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor, and TNF-alpha.  J Immunol 
154:5851-5861, 1995 


Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center 
IRB Protocol 
IRB#: 09-158A(4)
Amended:  04/10/12 
- 29 - 
53. 
Cheung N-KV, Cheung IY, Canete A, Yeh SJ, Kushner B, Bonilla MA, Heller G, Larson 
SM:  Antibody response to murine anti-GD2 monoclonal antibodies: Correlation with patient 
survival.  Cancer Res 54:2228-2233, 1994 
54. 
Ragnhammar P, Fagerberg J, Frödin J-E, et al:  Granulocyte/macrophage-colony-
stimulating factor augments the induction of antibodies, especially anti-idiotypic antibodies, to 
therapeutic monoclonal antibodies.  Cancer Immunol Immunother 40:367-375, 1995 
 
55. 
Fagerberg J, Ragnhammar P, Liljefors M, et al:  Humoral anti-idiotypic and anti-anti-
idiotypic immune response in cancer patients treated with monoclonal antibody 17-1A.  Cancer 
Immunol Immunother 42:81-87, 1996 
 
56. 
Cheung NKV, Guo HF, Heller G, et al:  Induction of Ab3 and Ab3' antibody was 
associated with long-term survival following anti-GD2 antibody therapy of stage 4 
neuroblastoma.  Clin Cancer Res 6:2653-2660, 2000 
 
57. 
Foulke RS, Marshall MH, Trotta PP, Von Hoff DD: In vitro assessment of the effects of 
granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor on primary human tumors and derived lines. 
Cancer Res 50:6264-6267, 1990 
 
58. 
Cheung N-KV, Van Hoff DD, Strandjord SE, Coccia PF:  Detection of neuroblastoma 
cells in bone marrow using GD2 specific monoclonal antibodies. J Clin Oncol 4:363-369, 1986 
 
59. 
Cheung IY, Cheung N-KV:  Molecular detection of GAGE expression in peripheral 
blood and bone marrow: Utility as a tumor marker for neuroblastoma.  Clin Cancer Res 3:821-
826, 1997 
 
60. 
Cheung IY, Barber D, Cheung N-KV:  Detection of microscopic neuroblastoma in 
marrow by histology, immunocytology, and RT-PCR of multiple molecular markers.  Clin 
Cancer Res 4:2801-2805, 1998 
 
61. 
Cheung IY, Chi SN, Cheung N-KV:  Prognostic significance of GAGE detection in bone 
marrows on survival of patients with metastatic neuroblastoma.  Med Pediatr Oncol 35:632-634, 
2000  
 
62. 
LoPiccolo MS, Cheung N-KV, Cheung IY:  GD2 synthase:  A new molecular marker for 
detecting neuroblastoma.  Cancer 92:924-931, 2001 
 
63. 
Cheung IY, Cheung N-KV:  Quantitation of marrow disease in neuroblastoma by real-
time reverse transcription-PCR.  Clin Cancer Res 7:1698-1705, 2001 
 


Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center 
IRB Protocol 
IRB#: 09-158A(4)
Amended:  04/10/12 
- 30 - 
64. 
Cheung IY, Lo Piccolo MS, Collins N, Kushner BH, Cheung N-KV:  Quantitation of 
GD2 synthase mRNA by real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction.  Utility in 
bone marrow purging of neuroblastoma by anti-GD2 antibody 3F8.  Cancer 94:3042-3048, 2002 
 
65. 
Cheung IY, Lo Piccolo MS, Kushner BH, Kramer K, Cheung N-KV:  Quantitation of 
GD2 synthase mRNA by real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction: Clinical 
utility in evaluating adjuvant therapy in neuroblastoma.  J Clin Oncol 21:1087-1093, 2003   
 
65a. 
Cheung N-KV, Heller G, Kushner BH, Liu C, Cheung IY: Detection of metastatic 
neuroblastoma in bone marrow: When is routine marrow histology insensitive?  J Clin Oncol 
1997; 15:2807-2817.  
 
66. 
Moss TJ, Reynolds P, Sather HN, et al:  Prognostic value of immunocytologic detection 
of bone marrow metastases in neuroblastoma.  N Engl J Med 324:219-226, 1991 
 
67. 
Miyajima Y, Kato K, Numata SI, et al:  Detection of neuroblastoma cells in bone marrow 
and peripheral blood at diagnosis by the reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction for 
tyrosine hydroxylase mRNA.  Cancer 75:2757-2761, 1995 
 
 
 
68. 
Faulkner LB, Garaventa A, Paoli A, et al:  In vivo cytoreduction studies and cell sorting-
enhanced tumor-cell detection in high-risk neuroblastoma patients: Implication for leukapheresis 
strategies.  J Clin Oncol 18:3829-3836, 2000 
 
69. 
Seeger RC, Reynolds CP, Gallego R, et al:  Quantitative tumor cell content of bone 
marrow and blood as a predictor of outcome in stage IV neuroblastoma:  A Children’s Cancer 
Group study.  J Clin Oncol 18:4067-4076, 2000 
 
70. 
Hoon DSB, Kuo CT, Wen S, et al:  Ganglioside GM2/GD2 synthetase mRNA is a marker 
for detection of infrequent neuroblastoma cells in bone marrow.  Am J Clin Pathol 159:493-500, 
2001 
 
71. 
Cebon J, Bury RW, Lieschke Gj, Morstyn G:  The effects of dose and route of 
administration on the pharmacokinetics of human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating 
factor. Eur J Cancer 26:1064-1069, 1990 
 
71a. 
Kushner BH, Kramer K, Modak S, Cheung N-KV:  Successful multi-fold dose escalation 
of anti-GD2 monoclonal antibody 3F8 in patients with neuroblastoma: A phase I study.  J Clin 
Oncol 2011; 29:1168-1174. 
 
72. 
Stute N, Furman WL, Schell M, Evans WE:  Pharmacokinetics of recombinant human 
granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor in children after intravenous and 
subcutaneous administration.  J Pharmaceut Sci 84:824-828, 1995    
 


Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center 
IRB Protocol 
IRB#: 09-158A(4)
Amended:  04/10/12 
- 31 - 
73. 
Peters WP, Stuart A, Affronti ML, Kim CS, Coleman RE: Neutrophil migration is 
defective during recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor infusion 
after autologous bone marrow transplantation in human. Blood 72:1310, 1988 
 
74. 
Kushner BH, Kramer K, Cheung N-KV:  Anti-GD2 3F8 monoclonal antibody and 
granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), plus 13-cis-retinoic acid (CRA) 
for consolidation of complete/very good partial remission (CR/VGPR) of neuroblastoma (NB).  
Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 21:392a, 2002 
 
75. 
Jerne NK:  Toward a network theory of the immune system.  Ann Immunol 125C:373-
389, 1974 
 
76. 
Koprowski H, Herlyn D, Lubeck M, et al:  Human anti-idiotype antibodies in cancer 
patients: Is the modulation of the immune response beneficial for the patient?  Proc Natl Acad 
Sci USA 81:216-219, 1984 
 
77. 
Herlyn D, Lubeck M, Sears H, et al:  Specific detection of anti-idiotypic immune 
response in cancer patients treated with murine monoclonal antibody.  J Immunol Methods 
85:27-38, 1985 
78. 
Fagerberg J, Frodin JE, Wigzell H, Mellstedt H:  Induction of an immune network 
cascade in cancer patients treated with monoclonal antibodies (ab1). I. May induction of ab1-
reactive T cells and anti-anti-idiotypic antibodies (ab1) lead to tumor regression after mAb 
therapy?  Cancer Immunol Immunother 37:264-270, 1993 
 
79. 
Fagerberg J, Frodin JE, Ragnhammar P, et al:  Induction of an immune network cascade 
in cancer patients treated with monoclonal antibodies (ab1).  II. Is induction of anti-idiotype 
reactive T cells (T3) of importance for tumor response to mAb therapy?  Cancer Immunol 
Immunother 38:149-159, 1994 
 
80. 
Mackall CL, Gress RE:  Pathways of T-cell regeneration in mice and humans: 
Implications for bone marrow transplantation and immunotherapy.  Immunol Rev 157:61-72, 
1997 
 
81. 
Mackall CL, Fleisher TA, Brown MR, et al:  Distinctions between CD8+ T-cell 
regenerative pathways results in prolonged T-cell subset imbalance after intensive 
chemotherapy.  Blood 89:3700-3707, 1997 
 
82. 
Mackall CL, Hakim FT, Gress RE:  T-cell regeneration: All repertoires are not created 
equal. Immunol Today 18:245-251, 1997 
 
83. 
Wettendorff M, Iliopoulos D, Tempero M, et al:  Idiotypic cascades in cancer patients 
treated with monoclonal antibody CO17-1A.  Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 86:3787-3791, 1989 
 


Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center 
IRB Protocol 
IRB#: 09-158A(4)
Amended:  04/10/12 
- 32 - 
84. 
Baum RP, Niesen A, Hertel A, et al:  Activating anti-idiotypic human anti-mouse 
antibodies for immunotherapy for ovarian carcinoma.  Cancer 73 (Suppl.):1121-1125, 1994 
 
 
85. 
Madiyalakan R, Sykes TR, Dharampaul S, et al:  Antiidiotype induction therapy: 
Evidence for the induction of immune response through the idiotype network in patients with 
ovarian cancer after administration of anti-CA 125 murine monoclonal antibody B43.13.  
Hybridoma 14:199-203, 1995 
 
86. 
Schultes, BC, Baum RP, Niesen A, et al:  Anti-idiotype induction therapy: Anti-CA 125 
antibodies (Ab3) mediated tumor killing patients treated with ovarex mAb B43.13 (Ab1).  
Cancer Immunol Immunother 46:201-212, 1998 
 
87. 
Wagner U, Schlebusch H, Kohler S, et al:  Immunological responses to the tumor-
associated antigen CA 125 in patients with advanced ovarian cancer induced by the murine 
monoclonal anti-idiotype vaccine ACA 125.  Hybridoma 16:33-40, 1997 
 
88. 
Neale GAM, Campana D, Pui C-H:  Minimal residual disease detection in acute 
lymphoblastic leukemia: Real improvement with the real-time quantitative PCR method?  J 
Pediatr Hematol/Oncol 25: 100-102, 2003 
 
89. Brodeur GM, Pritchard J, Berthold F, et al:  Revisions of the international criteria for 
neuroblastoma diagnosis, staging, and response to treatment.  J Clin Oncol 11:1466-1477, 1993 
 
90.  Kushner BH, Yeh SDJ, Kramer K, Larson SM, Cheung N-KV:  Impact of MIBG 
scintigraphy on assessing response of high-risk neuroblastoma to dose-intensive induction 
chemotherapy.  J Clin Oncol 21:1082-1086, 2003 
 
91. 
Kushner BH, Yeung HWD, Larson SM, Kramer K, Cheung N-KV:  Extending PET scan 
utility to high-risk neuroblastoma: 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography as sole 
imaging modality in follow-up of patients.  J Clin Oncol 19:3397-3405, 2001 
 
92. 
Kushner BH, Kramer K, Modak S, Cheung N-KV:  Five-day courses of irinotecan as 
palliative therapy for patients with neuroblastoma.  Cancer 103:858-862, 2005 
93. 
Estlin EJ, Lashford L, Ablett S, et al: Phase 1 study of temozolomide in pediatric patients 
with advanced cancer.  Br J Cancer 78:652-661, 1998 
94. 
Kushner BH, Kramer K, Modak S, Cheung N-KV: Irinotecan plus temozolomide for 
relapsed or refractory neuroblastoma.  J Clin Oncol 24:5271-5276, 2006 
95. 
Saylors, RL, Stine KC, Sullivan J, et al:  Cyclophosphamide plus topotecan in children 
with recurrent or refractory solid tumors: A Pediatric Oncology Group phase II study.  J Clin 
Oncol 19:3463-3469, 2001 


Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center 
IRB Protocol 
IRB#: 09-158A(4)
Amended:  04/10/12 
- 33 - 
96. 
Kushner BH, Kramer K, Modak S, Cheung N-KV:  Sensitivity of surveillance studies for 
detecting asymptomatic and unsuspected relapse of high-risk neuroblastoma.  J Clin Oncol 2009; 
27:1041-1046. 
97. 
Incorporating Toxicity Considerations into the Design of Two-Stage Phase II Clinical 
Trials, Biometrics 51: 1372-1383, 1995 
98. 
Cheung IY, Sahota A, and Cheung NKV.  Measuring circulating neuroblastoma cells by 
quantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction analysis:  correlation with its paired 
bone marrow and standard disease markers.  Cancer 2004; 101:2303-2308. 
 
20.0    APPENDICES 
Appendix A: Patient diaries.