Clinical trial NCT01891812
Conditions: Sickle Cell Disease Vaso-occlusive Crisis
Keywords: Sickle cell disease Vaso-occlusive crisis Nitrous oxide Emergency department
Sponsor: Columbia University
Start date: 2013-11-12; Completion date: 2018-01-19
Enrollment: 5 participants; Allocation: NA; Intervention model: SINGLE_GROUP

Brief summary:
Patients who have sickle cell VOC are usually treated with opioids, such as morphine. However, this current way of treating them has not improved the health, medical outcomes, or rates of hospitalizations. In addition, since VOC can happen very frequently over a long period of time, giving opioids over and over again can cause both short-term and long-term problems. Nitrous oxide (N2O) is a way of treating pain that may provide a better alternative to repeatedly giving opioids over long periods of time. N2O has been shown to provide up to 3 hours of pain relief in inpatient patients with VOC whose pain did not improve with morphine infusions, and is used extensively in France, where almost half of 85 pediatric emergency departments use nitrous oxide to treat children with VOC whose pain did not get better with standard treatment with morphine. However, pain relief which N2O provides in the acute setting has not been well described. Therefore, the purpose of our study is to describe how well N2O can relieve the pain in patients with SCD who present to the emergency department and are experiencing a VOC.

Detailed description:

Arms: arm 1: Nitrous oxide 50% administered for 20 minutes.
Interventions: intervention 1: Nitrous oxide 50%
Intervention descriptions: intervention 1: None

Protocol documents:
Prot_SAP_000.pdf: 
 
 
1 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
“Nitrous Oxide for Analgesia in Sickle Cell 
Vaso-occlusive Crisis” 
 
ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT01891812 
Date of IRB approval: March 28, 2018 
Principal Investigator: Daniel S.Tsze, MD, MPH 
 
 
 


 
 
2 
 
Study Purpose and Rationale: 
Sickle cell disease (SCD) is an autosomal recessive disorder that produces abnormal hemoglobin and 
deformed red blood cells. Vaso-occlusive crisis (VOC) is a complication of SCD in which the abnormal red 
blood cells occlude small blood vessels, causing episodes of severe, unremitting pain. VOC is the most 
common cause of acute morbidity in SCD, and the number-one reason for hospitalization.(1) The current 
treatment of VOC consists primarily of opioids and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medications (NSAID).(2) 
However, this current approach is inadequate in decreasing the rate of hospitalization for VOC, lengths of stay, 
and subsequent morbidity. In addition, the repeated and chronic administration of opioids can lead to both 
short and long term adverse effects, including constipation, hypotension, respiratory depression, seizures, 
opioid induced hyperalgesia, opioid tolerance, and chronic pain irrespective of VOC episodes.(2-4) Nitrous 
oxide (N2O) is commonly used for VOC in France despite the absence of randomized trials to determine its 
efficacy or safety. N2O is a gas that produces analgesia, anxiolysis, and amnesia by NMDA receptor 
antagonism and release of endogenous opioid peptides (EOP).(5-7) A recent survey of 85 French pediatric 
emergency departments (PED) reported that almost half of them used N2O for analgesia when morphine was 
insufficient.(8) N2O administered for 20 minutes has also been shown to provide analgesia lasting up to 3 
hours in inpatient children with VOC refractory to morphine infusions.(9) In addition to providing acute relief 
from pain and serving as a potentially opioid-sparing modality, N2O may also be able to provide long-term 
benefit due to its antagonism of NMDA receptors, as N2O has been shown to alleviate opioid-induced 
hyperalgesia and neuropathic pain in other populations. (10,13-15) The purpose of this pilot study is to 
describe the analgesic effect that N2O has on patients with SCD who have a VOC in the emergency 
department. The investigators have the following specific aims:  
1. To determine whether N2O produces a clinically significant decrease in pain in patients with SCD who have 
a VOC that does not improve after initial standard treatment.  
2. To determine the duration of analgesia produced by N2O in the aforementioned population.  
Study Design:  
We will conduct a single center pilot study in the pediatric emergency department (PED) of an urban, tertiary 
care children's hospital. The study is an interdivisional study between pediatric emergency medicine (Dr. Tsze) 
and pediatric hematology (Dr. Ender).  
Patient demographics for each patient will be documented, and a baseline neurological exam performed by the 
attending pediatric emergency medicine physician responsible for their care during that PED visit An 8-week 
follow up physical examination will be performed if vitamin B12 levels obtained during the PED visit are low 
(see STUDY PROCEDURES: Follow-up Procedures). Vitamin B12 levels are being done solely for the conduct 
of this research. Our primary outcome will be the change in pain score from just prior administration to 
immediately following the discontinuation of N2O. The pain score will be measured using a numeric rating 
scale (NRS) of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain), which is a valid and responsive scale for measuring pain in 
children older than 8 years of age. Our secondary outcomes will include:  
1) the duration of analgesia resulting from N2O, which will be defined as the time elapsed from the 
discontinuation of N2O to the time at which the pain score becomes > or = 7/10 (for those whose score 
decreased below 7), the patient receives additional analgesia, is discharged home, or is admitted to hospital. 
This time will be measured in minutes. Additional secondary outcomes will include,  


 
 
3 
 
2) complaints or physical findings suggestive of peripheral neuropathies (which may present as numbness, 
tingling, pain, or loss of feeling in fingers or toes; or weakness or difficulty moving the arms or legs) at the 8 
week follow-up, as well as,  
3) the presence of macrocytic anemia at 8 weeks time in patients who had low vitamin B12 levels at the time of 
enrolment.  
STUDY PROCEDURES  
A) The following procedure is STANDARD care: Patients with SCD who present to the ED with VOC and a 
pain score of > or = 7/10 (i.e. severe pain) will receive IV fluids, NSAIDs, and IV morphine or 
hydromorphone. Blood work will be drawn and includes CBC, reticulocytes, and type and screen. After 
administration of the analgesics, the patient’s pain will be reassessed after 15 minutes. If pain is still > 
or = 7/10, the patient will receive a “rescue” dose of IV morphine or hydromorphone. The patient’s pain 
will be reassessed every 15 minutes and IV morphine or hydromorphone will be repeated until the pain 
score is < 7/10, at which point the patient’s pain is reassessed (usually at least once every hour – there 
is no standardized interval) and the patient is transitioned to an oral analgesic at the attending 
physician’s discretion, in conjunction with the hematology service.  
 
B) The following procedure is for RESEARCH purposes: Patients with SCD will be identified by a research 
assistant or study investigator if they have VOC and a pain score of > or = 7/10. If the patient has not 
already been consented (see informed consent), the primary physician providing care for the patient in 
the ED will be approached and asked to approach the patient and family to see if they would be 
interested in participating in the study. If they say yes, then a study investigator will approach the family 
to obtain informed consent. The reason why the family is approached at this point in time is so that the 
N2O treatment can be immediately initiated if the initial standard treatment is not effective, and so that 
there is no delay in care in providing analgesia when they have severe pain.  
 
The patient will still receive the standard care of IV fluids, NSAIDs, and IV morphine or hydromorphone. 
In addition to the standard blood work, a vitamin B12 level will be drawn for study purposes. An 
additional 1 mL of blood (less than a quarter of a teaspoon) will be required. The pain score will be 
reassessed 15 minutes after the initial is still > or = 7/10, we will administer N2O at a concentration of 
50% for 20 minutes. N2O is approved for use in the pediatric emergency department as per NYP Policy 
S100, and all standard procedures for administration and monitoring as per this policy will be followed.  
 
Five minutes after discontinuation of the N2O, the patient’s pain score will be assessed. If the pain 
score is still > or = 7/10, the patient will receive a “rescue” dose of IV morphine or hydromorphone, 
similar to the procedure in standard care, and will continue to be treated as per standard care.  
 
If the patient’s pain is < 7/10, the patient will have their pain reassessed by a study investigator every 
15 minutes for the first hour, and then every 30 minutes after the first hour is completed OR whenever 
the patient volunteers or requests a pain assessment. Pain assessments will continue until the patient 
is discharged home. This frequency of pain assessment is the same, if not more frequent, than what 
occurs in standard care. The primary attending, in conjunction with the hematology service, will 
determine the transition to an oral analgesic and when to discharge the patient home.  
 
C) The following follow-up procedure is for RESEARCH purposes: Within 48 hours of the ED visit, a study 
investigator will review the laboratory results drawn at the time of enrollment. If the vitamin B12 level is 


 
 
4 
 
normal, then a study investigator or research coordinator will conduct a follow-up telephone call at week 
8 to assess for any neurological symptoms. If the vitamin B12 level is low, the study investigators will 
notify the patient’s attending hematologist within 24 hours and a follow up appointment will be 
scheduled at 8 weeks post enrollment at an outpatient clinic (hematology clinic or CTSA outpatient 
resource [if approved]). During this visit, one of the study investigators will conduct a physical 
examination and obtain laboratory tests (CBC and differential, vitamin B12) to evaluate for any potential 
long term side effects of receiving N2O (e.g. peripheral neuropathies, megaloblastic anemia).(7,17) Of 
note, the chances of these adverse events are low; they do not present acutely (onset is typically 
between 1 to 8 weeks); they are completely reversible with vitamin B12 supplementation; and have only 
been reported in the context of severe vitamin B12 deficiency and prolonged and repeated N2O 
administration.(7,17,18) Sickle cell patients are not expected to have vitamin B12 deficiency that would 
predispose them to these adverse events.(19) In discussion with our hematologists at NYP, it is their 
experience that our population of patients with SCD are at low risk of being deficient in vitamin B12.  
 
Statistical Procedures:  
Sample size: Twelve patients will be analyzed for this pilot study. This sample size was selected as there is 
minimal increase in precision expected around the mean and variance in the pain score change with additional 
patients enrolled. (16) To meet this analysis sample size, we anticipate that we may enroll up to 24 patients 
with severe VOC. This is because we expect that 50% of patients who are consented will ultimately not fulfill all 
inclusion criteria (i.e. their pain may be adequately managed with initial standard treatment, and may not 
require additional parenteral analgesia). The experience at our institution is that approximately 53% of patients 
with SCD who present to the PED with a VOC requiring parenteral analgesia as initial standard treatment 
require additional parenteral analgesics. We will not wait until patients have demonstrated a need for additional 
analgesia to begin the consent process, as this would delay the administration of analgesia in a patient with 
severe pain.  
Statistical Plan: To assess the primary outcome, the mean difference and standard deviation in pain score 
before and immediately after N2O administration will be calculated for the NRS. Assessment of the secondary 
outcomes will be performed as follows:  
1) the duration of analgesia will be determined by calculating the mean time and standard deviation (minutes) 
after discontinuation of N2O administration until the time at which the pain score becomes > or = 7/10, the 
patient receives additional parenteral analgesia, is discharged home, or is admitted to hospital. The pain 
scores for each patient will also be plotted on a chart to illustrate the change in pain over time (y-axis = pain 
score, x-axis = time).  
2) The presence of signs or symptoms suggestive of peripheral neuropathies will be documented, and the 
proportion calculated.  
3) The presence of macrocytic anemia, if patients who have a low initial vitamin B12 level (see STUDY 
PROCEDURES: Follow-up Procedures) will also be documented and the proportion calculated.  
Potential Risks:  
There is limited data on the risks associated with N2O in patients with SCD. There are reports of long term side 
effects such as peripheral neuropathies and megaloblastic anemia).(7,17) The chances of these adverse 
events are low and have only been reported in case reports. They do not present acutely (onset is typically 
between 1 to 8 weeks), are completely reversible with vitamin B12 supplementation, and have only been 


 
 
5 
 
reported in the context of prolonged, continuous N2O administration (i.e. over 24 hours continuously), in the 
context of severe vitamin B12 deficiency, and prolonged and repeated N2O administration (e.g. 2 to 3 
exposures a week for 6 weeks, and up to 3 hours each exposure). (7,17 18) Sickle cell patients are not 
expected to have vitamin B12 deficiency that would predispose them to these adverse events.(19) In 
discussion with our hematologists, it is also their experience that our population of patients with SCD is at low 
risk of being deficient in vitamin B12.  
The risks associated with N2O in the general population are minimal (20,21). In a prospective sur vey of 
35,828 administrations of 50% N2O, there was an incidence of 4.4% adverse events. The most frequent 
adverse events were nausea and/or vomiting (2%) and agitation or euphoria (1.8%). There was a 0.08% 
incidence of serious adverse events, including oxygen desaturation and cardiac arrest. However, both of these 
episodes were linked to inappropriate use of the administrative device and insufficient surveillance.(22) The 
rate of major adverse events when administering N2O concurrently with opioids is low. In one study of 7511 
cases, there was no difference in the rate of major adverse events when 50% N2O was given with an opioid 
compared with when 50% N2O was given alone (0.33%).(23) In a separate report of 35,828 cases of 50% 
N2O administration, the overall rate of major adverse events when 50% nitrous administered alone was 0.08%, 
with the rate of major adverse events associated with any concomitant sedative administration (i.e. not 
exclusively opioids) being 0.03%.(22) 
Potential Benefits: 
The patient may experience pain relief of greater degree and duration than that achieved by receiving opioids. 
The patient may also receive more frequent assessment of their pain compared to the usual practice in the 
PED. The patient may benefit by avoiding short-term opioid-related side effects resulting from multiple doses of 
opioids acutely, such as hypotension, respiratory depression, or seizures. The patient may also benefit by 
attenuating, avoiding, or even improving long-term ad verse events related to chronic opioid use, such as 
opioid-induced hyperalgesia, opioid tolerance, and chronic pain irrespective of VOC.  
Alternatives: 
The patient and parent may choose not to participate in the study. 
Data and Safety Monitoring: 
Pediatric emergency medicine attendings and fellows will implement the N2O intervention. These physicians 
will have all been trained and certified as per NYP policy to administer N2O in the PED. On an ongoing basis, 
each enrolled patient will be reviewed by the investigators to monitor adherence to study protocol, assess data 
quality, and to collect and review any acute adverse events and other subject safety matters. The study team 
as a whole will meet at the start of the study, and then every 6 months during patient enrollment. A Data and 
Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) will be instituted, and will evaluate adherence to the protocol every 6 months, 
and will report any protocol violations to the IRB. In addition, a safety report will be provided to the DSMB after 
3 (three) patients complete participation. The DSMB will consist of two pediatric subspecialists who are not 
involved with the study and have no vested interest in the study (TBD). Adverse Event Reporting: An adverse 
event is any untoward medical occurrence experienced by a subject. For each patient, the study investigators 
will evaluate adverse events from commencement until completion of the study. These adverse events will 
include, but are not limited to: nausea, vomiting, agitation, oxygen desaturation, apnea, respiratory distress, 
cardiac arrest, hypotension, megaloblastic anemia, and peripheral neuropathies. All unanticipated problems 
(including adverse e vents that meet the criteria of an unanticipated problem) will be reported to the IRB 
promptly, but not later than one week following the occurrence of the unanticipated problem or the PI’s 
acquiring knowledge of the unanticipated problem, and at the time of continuing review. 


 
 
6 
 
REFERENCES  
1.Yang YM, Shah AK, Watson M, Mankad VN. Comparison of costs to the health sector of comprehensive and 
episodic health care for sickle cell disease patients. Public Health Rep 1995; 110:80-6. 
2.Vichinsky EP, Neumayr LD, Earles AN, et al. Causes and outcomes of the acute chest syndrome in sickle 
cell disease. National Acute Chest Syndrome Study Group. N Engl J Med 2000; 342:1855-65. 
3. Benjamin LJ. Nature and treatment of the acute painful episode in sickle cell disease. In: Steinberg MH, ed. 
Disorders of Hemoglobin: Genetics, Pathophysiology, and Clinical Management: Cambridge; 2001: 671-710. 
4. Ballas SK. Sickle Cell Pain. Progress in Pain Research and Management. Seattle, WA: IASP Press; 1998. 
5. Jevtovic-Todorovic V, Todorovic SM, Mennerick S, et al. Nitrous oxide (laughing g as) is an NMDA 
antagonist, neuroprotectant and neurotoxin. Nat Med 1998; 4:460-3. 
6. Fujinaga M, Maze M. Neurobiology of nitrous oxide-induced antinociceptive effects. Mol Neurobiol 2002; 
25:167-89. 
7. Sanders RD, Weimann J, Maze M. Biologic effects of nitrous oxide: a mechanistic and toxicologic review. 
Anesthesiology 2008; 109:707-22. 
8. Galeotti C, Courtois E, Al L awati L, Carbajal R. Nationwide French Survey on the Analgesic Management of 
Painful Sickle Cell Crisis in the Pediatric Emergency Department. Pediatric Research 2010; 68:420. 
9. Carbajal R, Hubert P, Treluyer JM, Jouvet P, Olivier-Martin M. Nitrous oxide and morphine in children with 
sickle cell crisis. Lancet 1996; 347:1621. 
10. Childers WE, Jr., Baudy RB. N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonists and neuropathic pain: the search for relief. 
J Med Chem 2007;50: 2557-62. 
11. Ballas SK. Current issues in sickle cell pain and its management. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ 
Program 2007: 97-105. 
12. Wang ZJ, Wilkie DJ, Molokie R. Neurobiological mechanisms of pain in sickle cell disease. Hematology Am 
Soc Hematol Educ Program 2010; 2010:403-8. 
13. Mao J. NMD A and opioid receptors: their interactions in antinociception, tolerance and neuroplasticity. 
Brain Res Brain Res Rev 1999; 30:289-304. 
14. Echevarria G, Elgueta F, Fierro C, et al. Nitrous oxide (N(2)O) reduces postoperative opioid-induced 
hyperalgesia after remifentanil-propofol anaesthesia in humans. British journal of anaesthesia 2011; 107:959-
65. 
15. Bessiere B, Laboureyras E, Chateauraynaud J, Laulin JP, Simonnet G. A single nitrous oxide (N2O) 
exposure leads to persistent alleviation of neuropathic pain in rats. The journal of pain: official journal of the 
American Pain Society 2010; 11:13-23. 
16. Julious SA. Sample size of 12 per group rule of thumb for a pilot study. Pharmaceut Statist 2005; 4:287-91. 
17. Weimann J. Toxicity of nitrous oxide. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 2003; 17:47-61. 


 
 
7 
 
18. Ogundipe O, Pearson MW, Slater NG, Adepegba T, Westerdale N. Sickle cell disease and nitrous oxide-
induced neuropathy. Clin Lab Haematol 1999; 21:409-12. 
19. Ajayi OI, Bwayo-Weaver S, Chirla S, et al. Cobalamin status in sickle cell disease. Int J Lab Hematol 2012. 
20. Eger EI. Nitrous Oxide. New York, New York: Elsevier; 1985. 
21. Clark MS, Brunick AL. Handbook of Nitrous Oxide and Oxygen Sedation. 3rd ed. St. Louis, Missouri: 
Mosby Elsevier; 2008. 
22. Onody P, Gil P , Hennequin M. Safety of inhalation of a 50% nitrous oxide/oxygen premix: a prospective 
survey of 35 828 administrations. Drug safety: an international journal of medical toxicology and drug e 
xperience2006; 29:633-40. 
23. Gall O, Annequin D, Benoit G, Glabeke E, Vrancea F, Murat I. Adv erse events of premixed nitrous oxide 
and oxygen for procedural sedation in children. Lancet 2001; 358:1514-5.