Clinical trial NCT01732718
Conditions: Sickle Cell Disease Sickle Cell Nephropathy
Keywords: sickle cell disease endothelial function albuminuria atorvastatin soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1
Sponsor: University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Start date: 2013-09-01; Completion date: 2018-01-09
Enrollment: 13 participants; Allocation: RANDOMIZED; Intervention model: CROSSOVER

Brief summary:
The purpose of this research study is to learn about the effect of the drug, atorvastatin, on blood vessels in patients with sickle cell disease.

The primary hypothesis is that endothelial dysfunction is an important contributor to the pathophysiology of albuminuria in SCD. The investigators propose that atorvastatin will improve endothelial dysfunction, decrease levels of soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 (sFLT-1), and decrease albuminuria in SCD patients.

Participants will be individuals with sickle cell disease, age 18 to 60, who have some degree of albuminuria. A total of 19 subjects, males and females, will be enrolled. The study is made up of Screening, Treatment, and Follow Up phases and has a cross-over design. After patients are screened for eligibility, they will be randomized to receive atorvastatin or placebo in the initial six-week treatment period. When that is complete, there will be a four-week washout period before they begin another six-week treatment period. In the second treatment period, they "cross-over" to the other treatment arm. Four weeks after the end of the second treatment period, follow-up safety assessments will be done.

Detailed description:
It is well recognized that sickle cell disease (SCD) is characterized by a vasculopathy, with involvement of multiple organs including the brain, lung, spleen, and kidney. This results in multiple clinical complications, including ischemic stroke, pulmonary hypertension, autosplenectomy, as well as albuminuria and chronic renal disease. Several recent studies have confirmed the association of both albuminuria and renal dysfunction with echocardiographically-defined pulmonary hypertension and other vasculopathic complications in SCD, suggesting that they may share a similar pathophysiology. Despite the high prevalence of albuminuria in patients with SCD and the known association of renal failure with increased mortality, the pathophysiology and treatment of albuminuria in this setting remain poorly defined.

The treatment options for nephropathy in SCD are limited. Although Angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors are the "standard of care" in the treatment of patients with proteinuria, there are to date no controlled, long-term studies confirming their efficacy and safety in this setting.

In this study, the investigators will evaluate the efficacy and safety of atorvastatin in SCD patients. At the completion of this trial, the investigators will have an improved understanding of the contribution of endothelial dysfunction to the pathophysiology of albuminuria in SCD. If the data support the hypothesis that atorvastatin is safe and effective in this population, the investigators plan on carrying out adequately powered studies to more definitively evaluate its safety and efficacy in the treatment and/or prevention of albuminuria in SCD.

Arms: arm 1: Participants first received Atorvastatin 40 mg tablets once daily for 6 weeks. After a washout period of 4 weeks, they then received placebo (matching Atorvastatin 40 mg tablets) once daily for 6 weeks. arm 2: Participants first received Placebo (matching Atorvastatin 40 mg tablets) once daily for 6 weeks. After a washout period of 4 weeks, they then received Atorvastatin 40 mg tablets once daily for 6 weeks.
Interventions: intervention 1: Atorvastatin intervention 2: Placebo
Intervention descriptions: intervention 1: 40 mg tablet by mouth daily for 6 weeks intervention 2: Matching placebo tablet by mouth daily for 6 weeks

Protocol documents:
Prot_SAP_000.pdf: 
 
The Effect of Atorvastatin on Endothelial Dysfunction 
and Albuminuria in Sickle Cell Disease (in the grant 
entitled:  Endothelial Dysfunction in the Pathogenesis of 
Sickle Cell Nephropathy)   
 
 
 
NCT number NCT01732718 
UNC IRB# 11-1354 
Document Date 06/13/2017 
 


 
Atorvastatin in Sickle Cell Disease 
 
 
 
  
 
The Effect of Atorvastatin on Endothelial Dysfunction and Albuminuria in Sickle Cell Disease (in the 
grant entitled:  Endothelial Dysfunction in the Pathogenesis of Sickle Cell Nephropathy) 
 
 
 
Principal Investigator 
 
Kenneth I. Ataga, M.D. 
Division of Hematology/Oncology 
University of North Carolina 
CB# 7305, 170 Manning Drive 
Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7305 
Telephone: (919) 843-7708 
Fax:  (919) 843-7693 
E-mail:  kataga@med.unc.edu 
 
 
 
 
 
Co-Investigators 
 
 
Alan Hinderliter, M.D. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Division of Cardiology 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
University of North Carolina  
 
 
 
 
 
 
Chapel Hill, NC 27599 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Vimal Derebail, MD  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Division of Nephrology and Hypertension 
 
 
 
 
University of North Carolina  
 
 
 
 
 
 
Chapel Hill, NC 27599 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Study Coordinator 
 
David Wichlan, MS 
UNC Comprehensive Sickle Cell Program 
Chapel Hill, NC 27599 
Telephone: (919) 966-6876 


 
Atorvastatin in Sickle Cell Disease 
 
 
 
 
 
SYNOPSIS 
Title of the Protocol:  The effect of atorvastatin on endothelial dysfunction and albuminuria 
in sickle cell disease 
Overview: It is well recognized that sickle cell disease (SCD) is characterized by a 
vasculopathy, with involvement of multiple organs including the brain, lung, spleen, penis, and 
kidney. This results in multiple clinical complications, including ischemic stroke, pulmonary 
hypertension, autosplenectomy, priapism, as well as albuminuria and chronic renal disease. 
Several recent studies have confirmed the association of both albuminuria and renal dysfunction 
with echocardiographically-defined pulmonary hypertension and other vasculopathic 
complications in SCD, suggesting that they may share a similar pathophysiology.  Despite the 
high prevalence of albuminuria in patients with SCD and the known association of renal failure 
with increased mortality, the pathophysiology and treatment of albuminuria in this setting 
remain poorly defined.  
The treatment options for nephropathy in SCD remain limited. Although ACE inhibitors are the 
“standard of care” in the treatment of patients with proteinuria, there are, to date, no controlled, 
long-term studies confirming their efficacy and safety in this setting.  
In this study, we will evaluate the efficacy and safety of atorvastatin in SCD patients. At the 
completion of this trial, we will have an improved understanding of the contribution of endothelial 
dysfunction and soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase (sFLT-1) to the pathophysiology of albuminuria 
in SCD. If the data support the hypothesis that atorvastatin is safe and effective in this population, 
we plan on carrying out adequately powered studies to more definitively evaluate its safety and 
efficacy in the treatment and/or prevention of albuminuria in SCD.  
Intervention: We will conduct a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial 
of atorvastatin (n = 19). Subjects will receive atorvastatin 40 mg/day or placebo for 6 weeks, 
separated by a 4 week washout phase. At the end of the washout period, a repeat history and 
examination and laboratory studies will be performed which will serve as a baseline for the 
second treatment phase, and patients will receive either atorvastatin or placebo, depending on 
their first treatment administration.  
IND Holder: EXEMPT 
Specific Aims:  
A) 
To evaluate the effect of atorvastatin on endothelial dysfunction, assessed using 
ultrasound imaging of the brachial artery, in sickle cell disease patients. 
B) 
To evaluate the effect of atorvastatin on plasma markers of endothelial 
activation, plasma levels of sFLT-1 and VEGF, heme oxygenase activity, 
rho/rho kinase activity, and TF-mediated sFLT-1 release from monocytes in 
sickle cell disease patients. 
C) 
To evaluate the effect of atorvastatin on albuminuria and estimated glomerular 
filtration rate in sickle cell disease patients 
D) 
To evaluate the association of endothelial dysfunction with pulmonary arterial 
pressure.  
 
Hypotheses/Estimates: Our primary hypothesis is that endothelial dysfunction is an important 
contributor to the pathophysiology of albuminuria in SCD. We propose that atorvastatin will 


 
Atorvastatin in Sickle Cell Disease 
 
 
 
 
 
Title of the Protocol:  The effect of atorvastatin on endothelial dysfunction and albuminuria 
in sickle cell disease 
improve endothelial dysfunction, decrease levels of sFLT-1, and decrease albuminuria in SCD 
patients.  
Criteria for Evaluation:   
Efficacy:  Primary Endpoint: Endothelial Dysfunction: This will be assessed non-invasively 
using a brachial artery shear stress method.  Assessments will be obtained at Baseline, and then 
at week 6 during the Treatment Phase. The primary efficacy measure will be a comparison of 
the % change in FMD from baseline to week 6.  
Secondary Endpoints: Endothelial Dysfunction: The % change in NTMD from baseline to week 
6 will be a secondary efficacy measure. 
Endothelial Activation, sFLT-1, VEGF, heme oxygenase activity, rho/rho kinase activity and 
TF-mediated sFLT-1 release: We will measure plasma levels of soluble VCAM and soluble 
ICAM, plasma levels of sFLT-1 and VEGF; and assess heme oxygenase and rho/rho kinase 
activities at Baseline and then at week 6 during the Treatment Phase. Flow cytometry will be 
performed to assess monocyte activation state, absolute cell counts, TF expression, as well as 
TF-mediated sFLT-1 release from monocytes at baseline and at week 6.   
Renal Function: We will assess the effect of atorvastatin on albuminuria (assessed by spot urine 
microalbumin/creatinine ratio) and estimated GFR at baseline and at week 6 during the Treatment 
Phase.  
To examine the relationship of endothelial dysfunction, assessed using ultrasound imaging of the 
brachial artery, with tricuspid regurgitation velocity (TRV), Doppler echocardiography will be 
performed at baseline and at Week 6 in both treatment periods. 
We will also evaluate patients for treatment-related complications by employing a history, 
physical examination, and routine laboratory tests (CBC, liver function tests, creatine kinase, lipid 
profile, and renal function). In addition to abnormal liver function tests and myopathy, we will 
monitor for episodes of SCD-related events.  
Study Design:  This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial of 
atorvastatin to evaluate the efficacy of atorvastatin in improving endothelial dysfunction and 
decreasing albuminuria in SCD. It will be divided into a screening/baseline phase, treatment 
phase, and follow-up phase. 
Study Population: Nineteen patients with SCD (HbSS or HbSβ0 thalassemia) between the 
ages of 16 and 60 who meet the eligibility criteria and provide consent to participate in the 
study, will be randomized in this crossover trial. 
 
Clinical and Laboratory Evaluations:  The Screening/Baseline Phase will occur within 28 
days of study drug administration and will include: informed consent, a history and physical 
examination, and clinical laboratory tests including: a complete blood count, routine 
coagulation studies, routine chemistries to assess liver and renal function, lipid profile, 
creatine kinase, urine microalbumin-creatinine ratio, chest x-ray, and serum pregnancy test (if 
female, and of child-bearing capacity). During the first visit of each Treatment Phase, prior to 
treatment initiation, we will also obtain a complete blood count, routine chemistries to assess 
liver and renal function, lipid profile, creatine kinase, urine microalbumin-creatinine ratio, 
serum pregnancy test (if female).  Finally, measurements of endothelial dysfunction (assessed 
non-invasively using a brachial artery shear stress method), endothelial activation (soluble 


 
Atorvastatin in Sickle Cell Disease 
 
 
 
 
 
Title of the Protocol:  The effect of atorvastatin on endothelial dysfunction and albuminuria 
in sickle cell disease 
VCAM, soluble ICAM), sFLT-1, VEGF, heme oxygenase activity, rho/rho kinase activity, 
tissue factor (TF) expression, TF-mediated sFLT-1 release from monocytes, estimated GFR 
and microalbumin-creatinine ratio will be obtained at specified time points during the 
Baseline, Treatment and Washout/Follow-up Phases. The Follow-up Phase will consist of 
safety assessments performed four weeks after the final dose of study treatment. 
Sample Size: In a 2x2 crossover design, the minimum required sample size is 9 per sequence  
to detect a clinically meaningful difference of 0.65 in mean changes in FMD% between 
atorvastatin and placebo groups at significance level α =0.05 with 80% power. Assuming a 5% 
attrition rate, we will enroll 19 patients in the study. 
Randomization:  1:1 randomization to receive atorvastatin or placebo. 
 
 
 


 
Atorvastatin in Sickle Cell Disease 
 
 
 
 
 
BACKGROUND, SIGNIFICANCE AND RATIONALE   
The increased survival into adulthood of SCD patients is associated with an increased incidence of organ 
dysfunction. Renal abnormalities are common in patients with SCD (1).  Proteinuria (used interchangeably with 
albuminuria), the most common clinical manifestation of glomerular injury, is especially prevalent in SCD (2-
4). Increasing proteinuria and glomerular injury lead to a progressive decline in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) 
and potentially end-stage renal disease (ESRD) (5-7). Multiple studies have shown an association between renal 
function and pulmonary hypertension (PHT) diagnosed using Doppler echocardiography (8-10), suggesting that 
both nephropathy and PHT may share a similar pathophysiology in SCD. Indeed, both renal failure and PHT are 
risk factors for death in SCD (8-11). We have recently reported that the level of soluble fms-like tyrosine 
kinase-1 (sFLT-1), a vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptor family member, is significantly higher 
in SCD patients with macroalbuminuria (urine albumin excretion [UAE] > 300 mg/g creatinine) when 
compared to patients with microalbuminuria (UAE: 30 - 299 mg/g creatinine) and normoalbuminura (UAE < 30 
mg/g creatinine) (12). sFLT-1 is also associated with proteinuria in multiple other clinical conditions, including 
preeclampsia, hypertension and diabetes mellitus (13-17). VEGF plays a critical role in glomerular development 
and function, and is important in maintaining the glomerular filtration barrier. VEGF has also been implicated 
in glomerular healing by facilitating glomerular capillary repair (18). Finally, sFLT-1, which lacks 
transmembrane and cytoplasmic domains, binds and reduces circulating VEGF, thereby abrogating its 
beneficial effects and inducing endothelial dysfunction. 
Despite the high prevalence of nephropathy in SCD, the available treatments for this complication are limited. 
Although angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors (as well as angiotensin receptor antagonists) are 
commonly used in patients with proteinuria (6), renal failure remains a significant cause of morbidity and 
mortality in this patient population. Understanding the role of endothelial dysfunction in the pathophysiology of 
SCD-associated nephropathy will have substantial implications for the treatment of this complication. An 
improvement in endothelial function has the potential to decrease the progression of nephropathy in SCD and 
improve the survival of these patients.   
Endothelial Dysfunction in Sickle Cell Disease 
Similar to patients with coronary artery disease, atherosclerosis and its risk factors, SCD patients exhibit 
endothelial dysfunction characterized by a blunted response to NO synthase inhibition and a resistance to 
exogenous NO (19-26). Endothelium-dependent, NO-dependent blood flow is also impaired in both children 
and adults with SCD, when measured by flow-mediated vasodilation (27,28). In response to hyperemia, brachial 
artery flow increases to a greater value in SCD patients than in controls, but the % flow increase is similar in 
both groups. Flow-mediated dilation (FMD) is lower in SCD patients than in controls despite the fact that the 
calculated wall shear stress reaches a higher value in patients following hyperemia, thus indicating blunted 
reactivity of the endothelium to an increase in blood flow (27). All of these provide evidence of marked 
alteration in wall shear stress-induced, endothelium-dependent vasodilation in SCD. Despite the evidence for 
endothelial dysfunction in SCD, its role in the pathophysiology of disease complications remains poorly 
defined. 
The plasma level of sFLT-1 is reported to be increased in SCD (12,29). Increased plasma levels of sFLT-1 have 
also been reported in non-SCD patients with chronic kidney disease (30). In addition, plasma markers of 
endothelial dysfunction (soluble VCAM-1 and vWF), the incidence of myocardial infarction and stroke, as well 
as the Framingham risk score were shown to be correlated with sFLT-1 levels. The administration of sFLT-1 or 
a VEGF neutralizing antibody to rats has been shown to produce glomerular endothelial cell damage and 
proteinuria (31). Recombinant sFLT-1 antagonizes VEGF action, and decreases the bioavailability of nitric oxide 
(NO) by inhibiting the phosphorylation of the protein kinase, Akt (30). Studies in newly diagnosed and untreated 
patients with hypertension show a relationship between microalbuminuria and markers of endothelial activation, 
including soluble E-selectin, soluble ICAM-1 and soluble VCAM-1 (32,33). Finally, endothelial dysfunction has 


 
Atorvastatin in Sickle Cell Disease 
 
 
 
 
 
been reported to be related to albumin excretion rate in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (34). All of these 
findings suggest an association between endothelial dysfunction and both albuminuria and kidney disease.   
We propose that in SCD patients, endothelial dysfunction mediated, at least in part by increased levels of sFLT-
1, contributes to the pathophysiology of albuminuria.  
Albuminuria in Sickle Cell Disease 
Renal abnormalities, including abnormalities of distal nephron function, supratubular proximal tubule function, 
hemodynamic changes and glomerular abnormalities are common in SCD (1). Proteinuria, the most common 
clinical manifestation of glomerular injury (1) is also common in SCD (2-4). Progressive decline in glomerular 
filtration rate (GFR) is often associated with increasing proteinuria and evidence of glomerular injury (5,6,35). 
Less often, SCD patients develop the nephrotic syndrome due to membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis 
(MPGN) (36). This may be related to a direct effect of sickled RBC, but patients may also have MPGN 
associated with hepatitis C infection acquired from multiple blood transfusions. In addition to the nephropathy 
associated with SCD, it is also possible that the medullary ischemia induced by sickling can exacerbate the 
course of other underlying renal diseases. There is, for example, some evidence that black patients with sickle 
cell trait and autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease develop end-stage renal disease earlier than those 
without sickle cell trait (37). 
The pathophysiology of albuminuria in SCD remains uncertain. However, a positive correlation has been found 
between the presence of increased GFR (hyperfiltration) and the likelihood of increased albumin excretion in 
young SCD patients (38). Hyperfiltration is particularly common in children with SCD (39). Progressive decline 
in GFR is often associated with increasing proteinuria and evidence of glomerular injury (5-7). Focal segmental 
glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) is the most common glomerular finding in sickle cell nephropathy and is intimately 
associated with glomerular hypertension and glomerular hypertrophy (6,40).  Multiple groups have observed an 
association of echocardiography-defined pulmonary hypertension with measures of renal function (8-10), 
suggesting that both pulmonary hypertension and SCD-related glomerulopathy may share a similar 
pathophysiology. Macroalbuminuria is associated with increased tricuspid regurgitant jet velocity in SCD 
(10,12). The plasma level of sFLT-1 is higher in SCD patients with macroalbuminuria compared to patients 
with microalbuminuria and normoalbuminuria (12). We have also observed an association between 
macroalbuminuria and plasma levels of soluble VCAM (12). . Finally, we observed an association of sFLT-1 
with soluble VCAM (12). This finding, combined with the observations in other disease states such as 
preeclampsia (13-17), suggests that endothelial dysfunction due, at least in part to increased sFLT-1 levels, 
contributes to the pathophysiology of albuminuria in SCD.  
Despite the high prevalence of albuminuria and its association with progressive renal failure in SCD, the treatment 
options remain limited. ACE inhibitors, and more recently angiotensin receptor blockers are the “standard of 
care” in the treatment of patients with proteinuria (6). The amount of proteinuria was observed to fall by over 
60% following a brief course of ACE inhibitor therapy (6). Other studies suggest that ACE inhibitors may also 
be beneficial in patients with microalbuminuria (41,42). Small studies suggest that hydroxyurea may decrease 
proteinuria in SCD patients (2,42). There are, however, no controlled, long-term studies confirming the efficacy 
of ACE inhibitors or hydroxyurea in this setting. Despite treatment with these agents, many SCD patients 
experience progressive glomerulopathy and renal failure. As a result, renal transplantation is increasingly 
employed as treatment for ESRD. Although comparable short-term allograft results have been reported when 
compared with age- and race-matched transplant recipients with other causes of ESRD, a somewhat shorter 
cadaveric graft survival beyond 1 year and a greater adjusted 3-year risk of graft loss in the SCD group has been 
reported (43). Whether survival is improved compared to dialysis remains uncertain (44-47). Furthermore, as the 
underlying pathogenetic processes are still present, recurrent disease is common following renal transplantation 
in SCD (47).  
 


 
Atorvastatin in Sickle Cell Disease 
 
 
 
 
 
Atorvastatin 
Statins inhibit 3-hydroxyl-3-methyl glutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase, which is an early rate-limiting 
step in the biosynthesis of cholesterol (48). By inhibiting HMG-CoA reductase, these drugs reduce hepatocyte 
levels of cholesterol, resulting in upregulation of LDL receptors and consequently increasing clearance of LDL 
cholesterol from plasma (49,50).  They also cause smaller reductions in triglyceride levels and minor increases in 
HDL-cholesterol (49). The cardiovascular benefits of statins may also be mediated by their potent anti-
proliferative and pro-apoptotic effects on vascular smooth-muscle cells through inhibition of ras and rho GTPase 
activities important for cell proliferation (51); enhanced endothelial production of nitric oxide through synergistic 
mechanisms of stabilizing endothelial NO synthase messenger RNA (52) and augmenting endothelial NO 
synthase phosphorylation and catalytic activity (53); and increased release of circulating endothelial progenitor 
cells that stabilize endothelial barrier function in response to injury (54-56). Statins also clearly possess anti-
inflammatory and antithrombotic (57-59) effects that contribute to their potency in preventing atherogenesis. 
Among the statins, atorvastatin exhibits a number of pharmacokinetic characteristics that are different from other 
members of the class. Atorvastatin is extensively metabolized to ortho- and para-hydroxylated derivatives and 
various beta-oxidation products (60) and around 70% of the HMG-CoA reductase inhibition achieved with 
atorvastatin is ascribed to these ortho- and para-hydroxylated metabolites (50). Both atorvastatin and its 
metabolites are principally eliminated through biliary excretion, with only small amounts excreted in the urine. 
The half-life of HMG-CoA reductase inhibition is approximately 20 - 30 hours as a result of the action of its 
active metabolites (48).  
Atorvastatin is not associated with neurological, cognitive or renal adverse effects and does not require dosage 
adjustment in patients with renal dysfunction due to its favorable pharmacokinetic profile. In patients aged ≥ 65 
years, atorvastatin is well tolerated with no dose-dependent increase in adverse events up to the maximum daily 
dosage of 80 mg/day. Various risk factors increase the likelihood of developing myopathy or rhabdomyolysis, 
including advanced age (61), small body frame, alcohol abuse and the presence of other systemic diseases (62), 
as well as the use of combination statin-fibrate therapy (63) and concomitant use of agents that inhibit the 
cytochrome (CYP) 3A4 enzyme, thereby blocking the oxidative metabolism of atorvastatin and increasing drug 
plasma concentrations (64). A retrospective analysis of pooled data in 14,236 patients treated for up to 52 
months comparing the safety of atorvastatin 10 mg, atorvastatin 80 mg, and placebo (65) showed that 
withdrawals due to treatment-related adverse events were 2.4%, 1.8%, and 1.2%; persistent elevations in 
hepatic transaminases >3 times upper limits of normal were observed in 0.1%, 0.6%, and 0.2%; and treatment-
associated myalgia was observed in 1.4%, 1.5%, and 0.7% of patients in the atorvastatin 10 mg, atorvastatin 80 
mg, and placebo groups respectively. No cases of rhabdomyolysis were reported in any group.  
The benefit of statin therapy on endothelial function remains somewhat controversial, with several studies 
showing no benefit (66-68). However, atorvastatin treatment has been reported to produce significant 
improvement in endothelium-dependent vasodilation (60,69-72) in patients with diabetes (types I and II).  The 
improvement in FMD does not appear to be related to basal cholesterol levels or cholesterol reduction (72). 
Statins have been reported to provide protection against chronic renal damage independent of their cholesterol 
lowering effects (73–75). The protective effects are thought to derive from anti-inflammatory and antioxidant 
actions, fibrogenesis attenuation and endothelial cell protection (76). Atorvastatin was found to improve 
effective renal plasma flow (ERPF) and GFR in aging rats subjected to ischemic-reperfusion injury, 
accompanied by an increase in the expression of endothelial NO synthase and NO production (77). Atorvastatin 
also dramatically reduced albuminuria and histological changes in the kidneys of autoimmune mouse model of 
anti-glomerular basement membrane glomerulonephritis compared to vehicle-treated control animals (78). 
Although transient and mild proteinuria has been reported in patients treated with high doses of statins (79,80), 
a randomized study comparing rosuvastatin 10 mg (titrated to 40 mg) with atorvastatin 10 mg (titrated to 80 
mg) in 469 patients with type 2 diabetes with dyslipidemia showed no significant change from baseline in 
urinary albumin excretion (UAE) for either treatment group or between-treatment groups at 16 weeks, and 


 
Atorvastatin in Sickle Cell Disease 
 
 
 
 
 
median UAE for both treatment groups remained within normal limits, providing evidence that patients can be 
treated with higher efficacy statins without clinically meaningful effects on UAE (81). Atorvastatin has been 
reported to produce a significantly greater GFR and effective renal plasma flow after the release of unilateral 
ureteral obstruction in rats at 1 hour, 6 hours and 12 hours, as well as significant reduction of urinary 
microalbumin/creatinine ratios at 12 hours, but not earlier (82).  Atorvastatin also produces significantly higher 
GFR as well as decreased urinary microalbumin in rats following 12 days of unilateral ureteral obstruction but 
not following 3 days of unilateral ureteral obstruction (83).  In a large study of patients with type 2 diabetes and 
prior cardiovascular disease, atorvastatin treatment for a median of 3.9 years was associated with a modest 
improvement in annual change in estimated GFR (net, 0.18 mL/min/1.73 m(2)/y; 95% confidence interval [CI], 
0.04 to 0.32; P = 0.01) that was most apparent in those with albuminuria (net improvement, 0.38 mL/min/1.73 
m(2)/y; P = 0.03), although it did not influence the incidence of albuminuria (hazard ratio, 1.49; 95% CI, 0.73 to 
3.04; P = 0.3) or regression to normoalbuminuria (hazard ratio, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.57 to 2.49; P = 0.6). Although 
atorvastatin did not influence albuminuria incidence, there was a low incidence rate of albuminuria and 
transition to more severe kidney status resulting in limited power to detect treatment effects (84).  
There are no published reports on the effect of atorvastastin in patients with SCD. Pretreatment with lovastatin 
eliminated excessive tissue factor (TF) expression in the pulmonary veins (~ 16% positive) following a period 
of hypoxia for 3 hours followed by reoxygenation in a mild sickle cell transgenic mouse model (NY1DD) and 
decreased VCAM expression modestly in the posthypoxic NY1DD mouse (85). Simvastatin has also been 
reported to prolong survival following pneumococcal challenge (86). In a study involving 26 SCD patients at 
steady state, treatment with simvastatin for 21 days was well tolerated and resulted in increased plasma levels of 
nitric oxide metabolite, and decreased levels of both high sensitivity CRP and IL-6 in a dose-dependent manner 
(87).  
With the evidence of chronic inflammation and endothelial dysfunction in SCD, and the ability of statins to 
decrease inflammation following hypoxia-reoxygenation injury and improve endothelial dysfunction, we 
propose that atorvastatin will have a beneficial role in patients with SCD.  
 
PRELIMINARY DATA 
Nephropathy is Associated with Vasculopathic Complications in Sickle Cell Disease: We have previously 
shown that PHT, diagnosed using Doppler 
echocardiography is associated with nephropathy (p = 
0.01) in SCD patients (9). Serum creatinine (1.1 ± 0.5 
mg/dL vs. 0.8 ± 0.3 mg/dL, p = 0.02) and blood urea 
nitrogen (16.1 ± 11.7 mg/dL vs. 10.1 ± 6.6 mg/dL, p = 
0.01) were higher in patients with PHT compared to those 
without PHT. We have recently confirmed the high 
prevalence of albuminuria (assessed by spot urine 
measurements of microalbumin/creatinine ratio) in SCD 
(Figure 1). In a cross-sectional study of 73 SCD patients, 
normoalbuminuria (urine albumin excretion [UAE] < 30 
mg/g creatinine) was observed in 34 patients (46.6%), 
microalbuminuria (UAE: 30 – 299 mg/g creatinine) in 24 
patients (32.9%) and macroalbuminuria (UAE: ≥ 300 mg/ 
g creatinine) in 15 patients (20.5%) (12). Albuminuria was 
correlated with age (r = 0.32, 95% CI: 0.09–0.51; p = 
0.006). As expected, albuminuria was inversely correlated 
with estimated GFR (MDRD method) (r = -0.24; p = 0.04) and positively correlated with cystatin C (r = 0.25; p 
= 0.03). We also observed significant associations between albuminuria and both echocardiography-defined 
Figure 1: The Prevalence of Albuminuria in SCD 


 
Atorvastatin in Sickle Cell Disease 
 
 
 
 
 
PHT (p = 0.04) and a history of stroke (p  = 0.002). In patients with measurable tricuspid regurgitant jet velocities 
(TRV), the TRV was significantly higher in those with macroalbuminuria compared to patients with microalbuminuria 
and normoalbuminuria (3.15 m/s vs. 2.45 m/s vs. 2.45 m/s; p = 0.00068). We were unable to detect significant 
associations between albuminuria and the number of acute pain episodes, history of acute chest syndrome, history of leg 
ulcers, history of priapism or retinopathy.  
Role of Endothelial dysfunction in Pathophysiology of Albuminuria and Other Vasculopathic Complications: 
We observed that sickle cell anemia and sickle β0 thalassemia patients with macroalbuminuria had significantly 
lower hemoglobin values compared to those patients with microalbuminuria and normoalbuminuria (7.1 g/dL 
vs. 9.1 g /dL vs. 8.7 g /dL, p = 0.033), although no significant differences in the levels of lactate dehydrogenase 
(1175 U/L vs. 901 U/L vs. 914.5 U/L; p = 0.25) or other hemolytic measures were observed (12). However, a 
significantly higher level of soluble VCAM-1 (1347 n/mL vs. 765.4 ng/mL vs. 753.4 ng/mL; p = 0.033) was 
observed in patients with macroalbuminuria compared to those with microalbuminuria and normoalbuminuria.  
The level of sFLT-1 was elevated in patients with SCD compared with healthy control subjects (98.2 pg/mL vs. 
61.6 pg/mL; p = 0.0005) (88). sFLT-1 is a member of the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) 
family (89) and is a splice variant of the VEGFR1. In addition to binding free VEGF and placenta growth factor 
(PlGF), sFLT-1 forms dominant-negative complexes with membrane-bound VEGFRs; hence, although VEGF 
can continue to bind to the cell surface, no signal is initiated, thereby inducing endothelial dysfunction. The 
level of sFLT-1 was significantly higher in patients with macroalbuminuria, compared to patients with 
microalbuminuria and normoalbuminura (120.1 pg/mL vs. 99.7 pg/mL vs. 85.4 pg/mL; p = 0.016). We also 
observed significant correlations between sFLT-1 and soluble VCAM (r = 0.42, p = 0.0003), suggesting that 
sFLT-1 may contribute to endothelial dysfunction in SCD.  
There was a negative correlation between sFLT-1 and hemoglobin (r = -0.52, p < 0.0001) (Figure 2A), and 
significant positive correlations with various measures of hemolysis (lactate dehydrogenase [r = 0.64, p < 
0.0001] [Figure 2B], total bilirubin [r = 0.3, p = 0.012], indirect bilirubin [r = 0.3, p = 0.012] and reticulocyte 
count [r = 0.33, p = 0.005]). Interestingly, sFLT-1 was correlated with absolute monocyte count (r = 0.25, p = 
0.039), suggesting that monocytes may 
be a source of sFLT-1 in SCD. 
Furthermore, sFLT-1 was correlated with 
D-dimer (r = 0.42, p = 0.0017) suggesting 
that sFLT-1 may contribute to 
coagulation activation in SCD. Finally, 
sFLT-1 was correlated with TRV (r = 
0.33, 95% CI: 0.04 – 0.58; p = 0.021) and 
was significantly associated with the 
presence of echocardiography-defined 
PHT (120.0 pg/mL vs. 86.5 pg/mL, p = 
0.017).  The level of sFLT-1 also 
appeared to be higher in patients with 
histories of priapism (114.1 pg/mL vs. 
91.0 pg/mL, p = 0.052) and stroke (132.9 
pg/mL vs. 93.3 pg/mL, p = 0.087) compared to patients without these complications, although the differences 
were not statistically significant.  
 
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS 
We will conduct a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial of atorvastatin to evaluate the 
efficacy of atorvastatin in improving endothelial dysfunction and decreasing albuminuria in SCD.  The study 
will consist of three phases: 1) Screening/Baseline; 2) Treatment; and 3) Follow-up. The Screening/Baseline 
Phase will occur within 28 days of study drug administration and will include: informed consent, a history and 
Figure 2: Association of sFLT-1 with hemoglobin and LDH in subjects 
with sickle cell disease. 


 
Atorvastatin in Sickle Cell Disease 
 
 
 
 
 
physical examination, and clinical laboratory tests including: a complete blood count, routine coagulation 
studies, routine chemistries to assess liver and renal function, lipid profile, creatine kinase, urine microalbumin-
creatinine ratio, chest x-ray, and serum pregnancy test (if female, and of child-bearing capacity). We will also 
obtain baseline levels of biomarkers and ultrasound imaging of the brachial artery to assess endothelial 
dysfunction.   The Treatment Phase is a 16-week phase with cross-over design and will consist of two, six-week 
treatment periods separated by a four week wash-out.  The sequence of treatment assignment will be determined 
randomly via block permuted randomization procedure. At the start of the first treatment period, half the 
patients will be assigned to receive atorvastatin while the other half will be assigned to receive placebo.   In the 
second treatment period, following the washout period, patients will be crossed-over to receive either 
atorvastatin or placebo, depending on their first treatment assignment.  Each treatment period will consist of 
drug administration, safety assessments and other study assessments.  Appendix 2 of the protocol provides a 
detailed schedule of assessments for the study period. 
An Investigational New Drug (IND) application to support the administration of atorvastatin to SCD patients is 
pending.  (FDA determined study to be EXEMPT from IND. Letter on file.) 
Inclusion Criteria: 
a) HbSS or HbSβ0 thalassemia between ages of 18 and 70; (Maximum age revised 06/03/2013and 04/07/2015.) 
b) albuminuria (micro- or macroalbuminuria, defined as > 30mg/g creatinine); 
c) serum ALT ≤ 2 times upper limits of normal and/or GGT (added 05/12/2015, revised 06/13/2017) ≤ 3 times 
upper limits of normal; 
d) platelet count ≥ 150,000 cu/mm; 
e) normal baseline coagulation profile (PT/INR, PTT); 
f) non-crisis, steady  state with no severe pain episodes during the preceding 4 weeks, and no documented 
infection in the 2 weeks prior to enrollment; (infection added 8/26/11) 
g) ability to understand the requirements of the study; 
h) if a woman of childbearing potential, must use an adequate method of contraception; and 
i) if receiving hydroxyurea, ACE inhibitors or ARBs, should be on a stable dose for at least 3 months.  
Exclusion Criteria: 
a) hypersensitivity to any component of atorvastatin, or history of adverse reaction to statins; (ADDED 
8/26/2011) 
b) pregnant or breastfeeding; 
c) on statin therapy; 
d) history of metastatic cancer; 
e) current history of alcohol abuse; 
f) history of diabetes mellitus or poorly controlled systemic hypertension; 
g) end-stage renal disease; 
h) total cholesterol level < 80 mg/dL and LDL cholesterol > 130 mg/dL; 
i) on a chronic transfusion program; 
j) ingested any investigational drugs within the past 4 weeks; 
k) prior history of any myopathy; 
l) allergy to nitroglycerin; 
m) taking any of the following drugs: phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors (e.g., sildenifil), CYP3A4 inhibitors (e.g., 
cyclosporine, protease inhibitors), macrolide antibiotics (e.g., clarithromycin, erythromycin), fibric acid 
derivatives (e.g. gemfibrizol), niacin, colchicines, antifungal agents (azole derivatives), amiodarone, danazol, 
daptomycin, diltiazem, verapamil, eltrombopag, everolimus, fosphenytoin, or lanthanum. 
Patients will also be encouraged to avoid grape fruit juice and red yeast rice for the duration of the study. 
Atovastatin is contraindicated during pregnancy and breast-feeding.(Added 08/26/2011.) 


 
Atorvastatin in Sickle Cell Disease 
 
 
 
 
 
Termination Criteria: Treatment with study drug will be discontinued at any time if the patient: a) withdraws 
consent; b) develops ALT > 3 times upper limits of normal or GGT (added 05/12/2015, modified 6/13/2017)    
> 5 times upper limits of normal;  c) develops symptoms and signs consistent with myopathy (muscle weakness 
and increased levels of creatine kinase); or if, d) in the judgment of the investigator, continuation of the study 
drug will be hazardous to the patient. The study will be terminated at the occurrence of treatment-related serious 
adverse events, including transaminitis or myopathy as above, in up to 3 study participants. 
Treatment: Subjects will receive atorvastatin 40 mg/day or placebo for 6 weeks and after a 4-week wash-out 
period will be “crossed-over” to receive 6 weeks of whichever treatment they did not receive initially. Pill 
counting will be used to assess compliance. If toxicity occurs the study drug will be discontinued and the patient 
followed until resolution of the problem. Subjects discontinued prematurely will continue to follow-up for 
efficacy assessments. 
Assessments: 
Endothelial Dysfunction – Vascular endothelial dysfunction will be assessed by measuring endothelium-
dependent (flow-mediated) and endothelium-independent (nitroglycerin-mediated) dilation of the brachial 
artery as described previously (90,91). This technique has been safely performed in SCD patients (92,93).  
Subjects will be asked to hold all morning medications on days they have study visits until after the brachial 
ultrasound test. The reason for this is to avoid any effects of vasoactive medications. They are also required to 
refrain from smoking, vigorous exercise, caffeine, and eating and drinking (except water) for at least 6 hours 
before the brachial ultrasound procedure is scheduled. (Revised 06/03/2013.)  Ultrasound images of the right 
brachial artery proximal to the antecubital fossa will be acquired using a 12 MHz linear-array transducer. The 
first set of baseline images will be obtained after 10 minutes of supine rest.  Reactive hyperemia will be induced 
by inflating a pneumatic occlusion cuff placed around the upper forearm to a suprasystolic pressure (~ 200 
mmHg) for 5 minutes, and then deflating the cuff.  Images of the artery will be recorded for two minutes after 
cuff deflation. After 10 minutes of rest, a second set of baseline images will be acquired. Sublingual 
nitroglycerin (0.4 mg) will then be administered with acquisition of ultrasound images for the subsequent 5 
minutes. 
Gated end-diastolic images will be stored in a digital format on a personal computer for subsequent offline 
quantification. Each set of recordings will be coded and analyzed in random order by a blinded observer.  
Measurements will be performed using customized software (Brachial Tools, Medical Imaging Applications, 
LLC).  Arterial diameter will be measured from the lumen-intimal interfaces of the proximal and distal arterial 
walls. Data from at least ten end-diastolic frames will be averaged for each baseline measurement and from at 
least three frames at maximum dilation during reactive hyperemia and following administration of nitroglycerin. 
FMD will be calculated as the % change in arterial diameter in response to reactive hyperemia, and NTMD will 
be quantified as the % diameter change following administration of nitroglycerin. 
Assessments will be obtained at Baseline, Week 4 and Week 6 during each Treatment Phase. The primary 
efficacy measure will be a comparison of the % change in FMD from baseline to week 6. NTMD is a secondary 
efficacy measure. 
Endothelial Activation, sFLT-1, VEGF, heme oxygenase activity, rho/rho kinase activity and TF-mediated 
sFLT-1 release: We will measure plasma levels of soluble VCAM and soluble ICAM, plasma levels of sFLT-1 
and VEGF (ELISA kits from R&D systems) and assess heme oxygenase and rho/rho kinase activities (see 
below) at baseline and then at week 6 of both treatment periods. Flow cytometry will be performed to assess 
monocyte activation state, absolute cell counts, TF expression, as well as TF-mediated sFLT-1 release from 
monocytes at baseline and at week 6. 
Heme oxygenase activity: Heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1) protein in plasma will be determined (ELISA kit from 
Cusabio Biotech, Newark, DE) according to the manufacturer’s directions. Tandem experiments will be 
performed using human microvascular endothelial cells (Lonza, Allendale, NY) to determine the ability of 
blood from SCD patients to induce HO-1 expression (94) and activity (95). Rho/rho Kinase Activity: The 


 
Atorvastatin in Sickle Cell Disease 
 
 
 
 
 
activity of rho kinase will be assayed by western blotting with a phospho-specific and activation specific 
antibody (Anaspec) as previously described (96), in lysates prepared from the endothelial cells exposed to 
blood.   
Renal Function – We will assess the effect of atorvastatin on albuminuria by spot urine microalbumin/creatinine 
ratio and estimated GFR at baseline, Week 4 and Week 6 of both treatment periods. 
Safety – Subjects will be evaluated for safety throughout the study by history-taking, measurement of vital 
signs, physical examinations, and routine laboratory tests (CBCs, and chemistries including liver function tests, 
creatine kinase, lipid profile, and tests of renal function).  In addition to abnormal liver function tests, 
myopathy, and other adverse events, we will monitor subjects for SCD-related events (Appendix 1).  
Doppler echocardiography will be performed at baseline and at Week 6 in each study arm to examine the 
relationship of endothelial dysfunction, assessed using ultrasound imaging of the brachial artery, with tricuspid 
regurgitation velocity (TRV). (Added 06/04/3013).   
A hemoglobin analysis will be performed at screening to confirm diagnosis of sickle cell anemia (or HbS-β0 
thalassemia). (Added 08/26/2011.) 
 
Statistical Methods: (revised 08/26/2011; revised 05/31/2013.) 
Statistical analysis strategy: Descriptive statistics of endothelial dysfunction measures (FMD%, NTMD%), 
soluble VCAM, soluble ICAM, sFLT-1, VEGF,  heme oxygenase activity and rho/rho kinase activity will be 
presented by treatment and by visit, along with corresponding charts. FMD% and NTMD% will be log-
transformed. To evaluate the effect of atorvastatin on endothelial dysfunction measures, we will perform a 
comparison of treatment by visit, using Student t-test subsequently followed by crossover ANOVA model 
testing carry-over effect and treatment effect. For soluble VCAM, soluble ICAM, sFLT-1, VEGF, heme 
oxygenase activity and rho/rho kinase activity, since they are not normally distributed, we will compare 
atorvastatin with placebo using Wilcoxon sign rank test. Similar analysis will be performed for the albuminuria 
and estimated GFR values. In addition, the relationship between outcome measures and treatment will be 
studied through a multiple regression analysis.  
To evaluate the effect of atorvastatin on albuminuria, we will examine albuminuria both as a continuous 
variable using a linear mixed model to analyze the effect and as a categorical variable using a generalized 
estimating equation approach. Point estimates and confidence interval for the effect of albuminuria will be 
presented. Distribution of any complication among patients by treatment will be presented. The association of 
side effects by treatment will be tested using McNemar’s test. 
Differences in pre- and post- treatment echocardiographically-defined TRV will be described in tabular and 
graphical terms. (Added 06/04/2013.) 
Sample Size Justification: Based on previous literature (70), we assume a standard deviation of 0.894 for 
changes in mean FMD%. In a 2x2 crossover design, the minimum required sample size is 9 per sequence to 
detect a clinically meaningful difference of 0.65 in mean changes in FMD% between atorvastatin and placebo 
groups at significance level α =0.05 with 80% power. Assuming a 5% attrition rate, we will enroll 19 patients 
for this study.  (Revised 06/03/2013.) 
 
Anticipated Outcomes: We anticipate that atorvastatin, by improving endothelial dysfunction, will decrease 
albuminuria in SCD. Furthermore, atorvastin will increase HO activity, but decrease rho kinase activity, sFLT-1 
levels and TF-mediated sFLT-1 release from monocytes. 
 
Potential Pitfalls: The main limitation in this exploratory study is that 6 weeks of treatment with atorvastatin 
may not be adequate to achieve an improvement in endothelial dysfunction assessed by flow mediated 


 
Atorvastatin in Sickle Cell Disease 
 
 
 
 
 
vasodilation or improvement in the estimated GFR. If the results suggest a promising risk-benefit ratio for the 
effects of atorvastatin on endothelial function, parameter estimates from the clinical intervention will be used to 
determine the most appropriate design and sample size requirements for a more definitive study.  
As hydroxyurea may affect endothelial function and is associated with decreased plasma levels of endothelial 
markers in SCD patients, the benefits of atorvastatin may be less for patients on hydroxyurea. To deal with 
these issues, patients on hydroxyurea will be on a stable dose for at least 3 months prior to starting the study and 
the dose will only be changed for safety reasons. In addition, analyses of the results will be adjusted for 
treatment with hydroxyurea as a post stratification variable. 
 
Feasibility: The UNC Comprehensive Sickle Cell Program is well suited to conduct the studies proposed here. 
Our program consists of a dedicated group of clinical researchers, nurses and scientists who have a track record 
of high quality clinical and laboratory-based studies. We have extensive experience in the conduct of clinical 
studies as proposed here. We will use the services of the NC TraCs Institute and the CTRC at UNC, Chapel 
Hill, with such resources as a state of the art database system, an investigational drug pharmacy, research 
ultrasound laboratory, and outpatient facilities where study patients will be evaluated.  The UNC 
Comprehensive Sickle Cell Program provides care to ~ 350 adults and 350 children with SCD. In addition to a 
weekly sickle cell clinic, we have a weekly clinical and research meeting where patient cases and research 
studies are discussed. This practice model fosters efficient accrual of subjects onto clinical research studies. 
 
Data Management:  For all study aims, a standardized set of data collection forms will be designed using the 
RED Cap system and a secure database will be created to support the compilation of study-specific information. 
All data will be stored under password protection on a secured server. A data manager will handle all data entry 
and the security of the database. This individual will work closely with the statistician on database design and 
quality assurance procedures. 
 
Timeline: The projected study duration is 5 years. We anticipate beginning recruitment within 3-6 months of 
the start date. This time period is required to confirm the presence of albuminuria. Recruitment is expected to 
take up to 48 months. The remaining few months will be dedicated to completing the studies, data analysis and 
publication. 
 
HUMAN SUBJECTS 
This human subjects’ research meets the definition of a clinical trial. An Investigation New Drug (IND) 
application to the FDA to support the administration of atorvastatin to SCD patients is pending. (FDA determined 
the study to be EXEMPT from IND. Letter on file.) 
Protection of Human Subjects 
1. Human Subjects Involvement and Characteristics: This study seeks to evaluate the contribution of 
endothelial dysfunction to the pathophysiology of albuminuria in SCD. It involves the conduct of a study to 
evaluate the effect of atorvastatin on endothelial dysfunction and albuminuria in SCD. Nineteen patients with 
SCD (HbSS or Sβ0 thalassemia) that meet the eligibility criteria will be enrolled in a randomized, double-blind, 
placebo-controlled, crossover trial. At the time of enrollment, all study subjects will be in the non-crisis, steady 
state. Informed consent will be obtained according to IRB approved procedure. Patients will be closely 
monitored for adverse events following randomization to the study drug. The primary goal of this study is to 
evaluate the effect of atorvastatin on endothelial dysfunction (FMD and NTMD). Furthermore, we will evaluate 
plasma markers of endothelial activation (soluble VCAM, soluble ICAM), plasma levels of sFLT-1, VEGF, 
nitric oxide metabolites, heme oxygenase activity, rho/rho kinase activity, tissue factor-mediated sFLT-1 release 
from monocytes, albuminuria, estimated glomerular filtration rate and safety as described in the application.  


 
Atorvastatin in Sickle Cell Disease 
 
 
 
 
 
2. Sources of Research Material: Enrollment and study participation will involve the collection of a full range 
of clinical data, including medical history. We will obtain brachial artery ultrasound data, as well as clinical and 
laboratory data at specified intervals during the course of the studies as described in the research plan.  
3. Plans for Recruitment: Patients will be recruited from amongst the patients that routinely receive their care 
at the UNC Comprehensive Sickle Cell Program. Dr Ataga and/or one of his co-investigators will discuss the 
studies with all eligible patients. Interested patients will be provided with a copy of the consent form(s), and the 
study coordinator or PI (or a co-investigator) will carefully go over the consent with each candidate before he/ 
she signs. We will strive to ensure that all patients understand the nature of the study and all their questions will 
be answered.  The original consent form will be placed in the study files, in a secure, locked cabinet.  Potential 
subjects will be contacted during regularly scheduled clinic visits, but may be contacted at home by study 
personnel if they are known to meet the eligibility criteria. The PI and study nurse involved in the study are 
regular staff of the program. Samples obtained from patients specifically for these studies will be collected as 
approved by the IRB. This is anticipated to occur during specified study visits.   
4.  Potential Risks: The clinical study with ancillary studies entail minor physical risk associated with 
venipuncture to obtain blood samples; administration of atorvastatin; administration of nitroglycerin; and 
pneumatic occlusion cuff placed around the upper forearm to a suprasystolic pressure (~ 200 mmHg) during the 
assessment of flow-mediated vasodilation. The most significant risks of blood tests are discomfort and bruising.  
There is extensive clinical experience with the use of atorvastatin, although there are no published studies using 
this drug in SCD. Atorvastatin is well tolerated in the general population. However, as the most common 
complications of statins are liver function test (LFT) abnormalities and myopathy, we will exclude those 
patients with significant liver disease or history of a myopathy. In addition, as SCD patients have low 
cholesterol levels, lipid profiles will be monitored closely. Nitroglycerin commonly causes a headache, and less 
often hypotension, dizziness and lightheadedness. We will exclude patients with systolic blood pressure < 90 
mmHg, severe aortic stenosis, and hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy. Headaches associated with 
nitroglycerin use are typically short lasting and respond to acetaminophen. Pneumatic occlusion of the forearm 
to a suprasystolic pressure is uncomfortable. However, this technique has been safely performed in SCD 
patients. Patients will be monitored very closely for any laboratory or clinical complications during the course 
of the studies.  
5. Procedures for Minimizing Risks: We will do everything possible to minimize the risks associated with 
participating in the studies. For patients receiving nitroglycerin during assessment of flow-mediated 
vasodilation, we will ensure there are no contraindications to receiving this drug. In addition, we will obtain 
baseline laboratory studies (including liver function tests and creatine kinase) prior to commencement on the 
study and monitor them closely during the course of the study due to the small risk of worsening LFT and 
myopathy with atorvastatin. This study will be monitored by a DSMB, which will review all reports to 
determine if there is a safety concern. Finally, we have established data safety and monitoring procedures as 
described below.  
Risks to Privacy:  All clinical information, including personal identifiers obtained on research subjects will be 
maintained in a locked and secured file drawer with access limited to clinical staff. All data will be coded to 
protect patient confidentiality. We will make all effort to maintain patient confidentiality. 
6. Potential Benefits of the Proposed Research to the Subjects and others: The projects proposed in this 
application will help to define the contribution of endothelial dysfunction to the pathogenesis of albuminuria in 
SCD.  The available treatments of nephropathy in SCD remain limited.  Treatment with atorvastatin may 
provide clinical benefit.  
7. Importance of the Knowledge to be Gained: Despite our improving understanding of the pathophysiology 
of SCD, treatment options for several SCD-related complications remain quite limited. This proposal aims to 
increase our understanding of the pathogenesis of albuminuria in SCD and evaluate the efficacy and safety of 


 
Atorvastatin in Sickle Cell Disease 
 
 
 
 
 
atorvastatin in SCD-associated nephropathy. The risks to patients from participating in this study are modest 
and are reasonable in relation to the potential benefits and the importance of knowledge to be gained. 
8.  Data and Safety Monitoring Plan: All SAEs will be reported to the IRB and the DSMB. The DSMB will 
review these data quarterly and notify the Principal Investigator if safety appears to be an issue in the study. In 
addition, after 5 patients and then 10 patients are enrolled, all of the available safety data will be presented by 
treatment group to the DSMB in a confidential report. The DSMB will review and determine if there is a safety 
concern. The study will be terminated at the occurrence of treatment-related serious adverse events, including 
transaminitis or myopathy, in up to three study participants.  
The UNC TraCS DSMB is a committee that has been established within the UNC School of Medicine. The 
membership is appointed by the Dean (or his designee), and is available to review any clinical trial that is being 
carried out by a UNC investigator. Most multi-center clinical trials funded by the NIH or by industry have 
national data and safety monitoring boards organized by the sponsoring organization. However, single- or dual-
site clinical trials such as the study proposed in this application depend on a local DSMB such as the one based 
here at UNC. The current makeup includes a chair (Dr. Ross Simpson), an ethicist, an 
epidemiologist/biostatistician, and several clinical researchers. In addition, ad hoc members are added to the 
DSMB when need for scientific expertise arises.  
9. Inclusion of Women and Minorities: Based on the results of our studies in this patient population to date, 
we anticipate that enrolled subjects will include 50-55% women. We have achieved this in the past without 
special efforts to recruit women, and this reflects the gender distribution of our patient population. In addition, 
due to the nature of the disease to be studied (sickle cell disease), over 95% of patients will identify themselves 
as African-American. A small number identifying themselves as Hispanic or Native American may be 
available; such patients typically comprise less than 2% of our clinic patients with this disease.  
10. Inclusion of Children: As the prevalence of albuminuria in children is thought to be lower than in adults, 
we anticipate that most of our study patients will be adults.  
REFERENCES 
1) Ataga KI, Orringer EP. Renal abnormalities in sickle cell disease. Am J Hematol 2000;63:205-211 
2) McKie KT, Hanevold CD, Hernandez C, Waller JL, Ortiz L, McKie KM. Prevalence, prevention, and 
treatment of microalbuminuria and proteinuria in children with sickle cell disease. J Pediatr Hematol 
Oncol 2007;29:140-144. 
3) Guasch A, Navarette J, Nass K, Zayas CF. Glomerular involvement in adults with sickle cell 
hemoglobinopathies: Prevalence and clinical correlates of progressive renal failure. J Am Soc Nephrol 
2006;17:2228-2235. 
4) McBurney PG, Hanevold CD, Hernandez CM, Waller JL, McKie KM. Risk factors for 
microalbuminuria in children with sickle cell anemia. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 2002;24:473-477. 
5) Powars, DR, Elliot-Mills, DD, Chan, L, et al. Chronic renal failure in sickle cell disease: Risk factors, 
clinical course, and mortality. Ann Intern Med 1991;115:614-620  
6) Falk, RJ, Scheinman, J, Phillips, G, et al. Prevalence and pathologic features of sickle cell nephropathy 
and response to inhibition of angiotensin-converting enzyme. N Engl J Med 1992;326:910-915  
7) Bhathena, DB, Sandheimer, JH. The glomerulopathy of homozygous sickle cell hemoglobin (SS) disease: 
Morphology and pathogenesis. J Am Soc Nephrol 1991;1:1241-1252 
8) Gladwin MT, Sachdev V, Jison ML, et al. Pulmonary hypertension as a risk factor for death in patients 
with sickle cell disease. N Engl J Med 2004;350: 886–895. 
9)  Ataga KI, Moore CG, Jones S, et al. Pulmonary hypertension in patients with sickle cell disease: a 
longitudinal study. Br J Haematol 2006; 134:109-115. 
10) De Castro LM, Jonassaint JC, Graham FL, et al. Pulmonary hypertension associated with sickle cell 
disease: clinical and laboratory endpoints and disease outcomes. Am J Hematol. 2008;83:19-25. 


 
Atorvastatin in Sickle Cell Disease 
 
 
 
 
 
11) Platt OS, Brambilla DJ, Rosse WF, et al. Mortality in sickle cell disease. Life expectancy and risk 
factors for early death. N Engl J Med. 1994;330:1639-1644.  
12) Ataga KI, Brittain JE, Moore D, Jones SK, Hulkower B, Strayhorn D, Adam S, Redding-Lallinger R, 
Nachman P, Orringer EP. Urinary albumin excretion is associated with pulmonary hypertension in sickle 
cell disease: potential role of soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1. Eur J Haematol 2010;85:257-263 
13) Koga K, Osuga Y, Yoshino O, et al. Elevated serum soluble vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 
1 (sVEGFR-1) levels in women with preeclampsia. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2003;88:2348–2351.  
14) Tsatsaris V, Goffin F, Munaut C, et al. Overexpression of the soluble vascular endothelial growth factor 
in preeclamptic patients: pathophysiological consequences. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2003;88:5555–
5563.  
15) Vuorela P, Helske S, Hornig C, Alitalo K, Weich H, Halmesmaki E. Amniotic fluid—soluble vascular 
endothelial growth factor receptor-1 in preeclampsia. Obstet Gynecol 2000;95:353–357. 
16) Kim NH, Oh JH, Seo JA, Lee KW, Kim SG, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and 
soluble VEGF receptor FLT-1 in diabetic nephropathy. Kidney Int, 2005;67:167-177 
17) Ayerden EF, Haksun E, Ulver DB, Koç E, Erten Y, Reis AK, Bali M, Turgay A, Sindel S. The 
relationship between vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and microalbuminuria in patients with 
essential hypertension. Intern Med. 2008;47:1511-1516 
18) Yoshimatsu J, Matsumoto H, Goto K, Shimano M, Narahara H, Miyakawa I. Relationship between 
urinary albumin and serum soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1 (sFlt-1) in normal pregnancy, Eur J of 
Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2006;128;204-208. 
19) Gladwin MT, Schechter AN, Ognibene FP, et al. Divergent nitric oxide bioavailability in men and 
women with sickle cell disease. Circulation. 2003;107:271–278.  
20) Eberhardt RT, McMahon L, Duffy SJ, et al. Sickle cell anemia is associated with reduced nitric oxide 
bioactivity in peripheral conduit and resistance vessels. Am J Hematol. 2003;74:104–111 
21) Mosseri M, Bartlett-Pandite AN, Wenc K, Isner JM, Weinstein R. Inhibition of endothelium-dependent 
vasorelaxation by sickle erythrocytes. Am Heart J. 1993;126:338-3468.  
22) Phelan M, Perrine SP, Brauer M, Faller DV. Sickle erythrocytes, after sickling, regulate the expression 
of the endothelin-1 gene and protein in human endothelial cells in culture. J Clin Invest. 1995;96:1145-
1151.  
23) Ibe BO, Morris J, Kurantsin-Mills J, Raj JU. Sickle erythrocytes induce prostacyclin and thromboxane 
synthesis by isolated perfused rat lungs. Am J Physiol. 1997;272:L597-L602  
24) Kaul DK, Liu XD, Fabry ME, Nagel RL. Impaired nitric oxide-mediated vasodilation in transgenic 
sickle mouse. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2000;278:H1799-H1806 
25) Rodgers GP, Schechter AN, Noguchi CT, Klein HG, Nienhuis AW, Bonner RF. Periodic microcirculatory 
flow in patients with sickle-cell disease. N Engl J Med. 1984;311:1534-15 
26) Tronc F, Wassef M, Esposito B, Henrion D, Glagov S, Tedgui A. Role of NO in flow-induced remodeling 
of the rabbit common carotid artery. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1996;16:1256-1262  
27) Belhassen L, Pelle G, Sediame S, Bachir D, Carville C, Bucherer C, Lacombe C, Galacteros F, Adnot S. 
Endothelial dysfunction in patients with sickle cell disease is related to selective impairment of shear 
stress-mediated vasodilation. Blood. 2001;97:1584-1589 
28) de Montalembert M, Aggoun Y, Niakate A, Szezepanski I, Bonnet D. Endothelial-dependent vasodilation 
is impaired in children with sickle cell disease. Haematologica 2007;92:1709-1710 
29) Landburg PP, Elsenga H, Schnog JB, Duits AJ; CURAMA Study Group. Increased serum levels of anti-
angiogenic factors soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase and soluble endoglin in sickle cell disease. Acta 
Haematol. 2008;120:130-133 
30) Di Marco GS, Reuter S, Hillebrand U, Amler S, Konig M, Larger E, Oberleithner H, Brand E, 
Pavenstadt H, Brand M. The Soluble VEGF Receptor sFlt1 Contributes to Endothelial Dysfunction in 
CKD. J Am Soc Nephrol 2009;20:2235–2245  


 
Atorvastatin in Sickle Cell Disease 
 
 
 
 
 
31) Sugimoto, H., Hamano, Y., Charytan, D., Cosgrove, D., Kieran, M., Sudhakar, A. and Kalluri, R. 
Neutralization of circulating vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) by anti-VEGF antibodies and 
soluble VEGF receptor 1 (sFlt-1) induces proteinuria. J. Biol. Chem. 2003;278:12605–12608 
32) Tatasciore A, Zimarino M, Renda G, et al. Awake blood pressure variability, inflammatory markers and 
target organ damage in newly diagnosed hypertension. Hypertens Res. 2008;31:2137–2146.  
33) Cottone S, Mule G, Nardi E, et al. Microalbuminuria and early endothelial activation in essential 
hypertension. J Hum Hypertens. 2007;21:167–172. 
34) Dogra G, Rich L, Stanton K, Watts GF. Endothelium-dependent and independent vasodilation studies at 
normoglycaemia in  type I diabetes mellitus with and without microalbuminuria. Diabetologia. 
2001;44:593-601. 
35) Bhathena, DB, Sandheimer, JH. The glomerulopathy of homozygous sickle cell hemoglobin (SS) 
disease: Morphology and pathogenesis. J Am Soc Nephrol 1991; 1:1241 
36) Serjeant GR. Sickle-cell disease. Lancet 1997; 350:725 
37) Yium, J, Gabow, P, Johnson, A, et al. Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease in blacks: clinical 
course and effects of sickle-cell hemoglobin. J Am Soc Nephrol 1994; 4:1670. 
38) Thompson J, Reid M, Hambleton I, Serjeant GR. Albuminuria and renal function in homozygous sickle 
cell disease. Arch Intern Med 2007;167:701-708. 
39) de Jong PE, Statius van Eps LW. Sickle cell nephropathy: new insights into its pathophysiology. Kidney 
Int 1985;27: 711–717 
40) Yoshida Y et al. Glomerular hemodynamic changes vs hypertrophy in experimental glomerular 
sclerosis. Kidney Int 1989;35:654–660 
41) Foucan L, Bourhis V, Bangou J, Merault L, Etienne-Julan M, Salmi RL. A randomized trial of captopril 
for microalbuminuria in normotensive adults with sickle cell anemia. Am J Med 1998;104:339-342. 
42) Fitzhugh CD, Wigfall DR, Ware RE. Enalapril and hydroxyurea therapy for children with sickle 
nephropathy. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2005;45:982-985. 
43) Ojo AO, Govaerts TC, Schmouder RL, Leichtman AB, Leavey SF, Wolfe RA, Held PJ, Port FK, 
Agodoa LY. Renal transplantation in end-stage sickle cell nephropathy. Transplantation 1999;67:291-
295 
44) Chatterjee, SN. National study in natural history of renal allografts in sickle cell disease or trait: a 
second report. Transplant Proc 1987;19:33-35 
45) Chatterjee SN. National study on natural history of renal allografts in sickle cell disease or trait.  
Nephron 1980;25:199-201 
46) Montgomery R, Zibari G, Hill GS, Ratner LE. Renal transplantation in patients with sickle cell 
nephropathy. Transplantation 1994;58:618-620 
47) Milner DJ, Jorkasky DK, Perloff LJ, Grossman RA, Tomaszewski JE. Recurrent sickle cell nephropathy 
in a transplanted kidney. Am J Kidney Dis 1987;10:306-313 
48) Poli A. Atorvastatin: pharmacological characteristics and lipid-lowering effects. Drugs. 2007;67 Suppl 
1:3-15 
49) Vaughan CJ, Gotto AM Jr, Basson CT. The evolving role of statins in the management of atherosclerosis. 
J Am Coll Cardiol 2000; 35 (1): 1-10  
50) Malhotra HS, Goa KL. Atorvastatin: an updated review of its pharmacological properties and use in 
dyslipidaemia. Drugs 2001; 61 (12): 1835-81  
51) Laufs, U, Liao, JK Direct vascular effects of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors. Trends Cardiovasc Med 
2000;10,143-148 
52) Laufs, U, Liao, JK Post-transcriptional regulation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase mRNA stability by 
Rho GTPase. J Biol Chem 1998;273,24266-24271 


 
Atorvastatin in Sickle Cell Disease 
 
 
 
 
 
53) Kureishi, Y, Luo, Z, Shiojima, I, et al The HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor simvastatin activates the 
protein kinase Akt and promotes angiogenesis in normocholesterolemic animals. Nat Med 2000;6,1004-
1010 
54) Llevadot, J, Murasawa, S, Kureishi, Y, et al HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor mobilizes bone marrow-
derived endothelial progenitor cells. J Clin Invest 2001;108,399-405 
55) Walter, DH, Rittig, K, Bahlmann, FH, et al Statin therapy accelerates reendothelialization: a novel effect 
involving mobilization and incorporation of bone marrow-derived endothelial progenitor cells. 
Circulation 2002;105,3017-3024 
56) Jacobson, JR, Dudek, SM, Birukov, KG, et al Cytoskeletal activation and altered gene expression in 
endothelial barrier regulation by simvastatin. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 2004;30,662-670 
57) Glynn RJ, Danielson E, Fonseca FA, Genest J, Gotto AM Jr, Kastelein JJ, Koenig W, Libby P, 
Lorenzatti AJ, MacFadyen JG, Nordestgaard BG, Shepherd J, Willerson JT, Ridker PM. A randomized 
trial of rosuvastatin in the prevention of venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med. 2009 Apr 
30;360(18):1851-61. 
58) Sparrow, CP, Burton, CA, Hernandez, M, et al Simvastatin has anti-inflammatory and 
antiatherosclerotic activities independent of plasma cholesterol lowering. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 
2001;21,115-121 
59) Kwak, B, Mulhaupt, F, Myit, S, et al Statins as a newly recognized type of immunomodulator. Nat Med 
2000;6:1399-1402 
60) Black AE, Hayes RN, Roth BD, et al. Metabolism and excretion of atorvastatin in rats and dogs. Drug 
Metab Dispos 1999; 27: 916-23 
61) Schech S, Graham D, Staffa J, et al. Risk factors for statin-associated rhabdomyolysis. 
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2007; 16: 352-8 
62) Pasternak RC, Smith SC Jr, Bairey-Merz CN, et al. ACC/AHA/NHLBI clinical advisory on the use and 
safety of statins. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002; 40: 567-72 
63) Chang JT, Staffa JA, Parks M, et al. Rhabdomyolysis with HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors and 
gemfibrozil combination therapy. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2004; 13: 417-26 
64) Law M, Rudnicka AR. Statin safety: a systematic review. Am J Cardiol 2006; 97: 52-60C 
65) Newman C et al. Comparative safety of atorvastatin 80 mg versus 10 mg derived from analysis of 49 
completed trials in 14,236 patients. Am J Cardiol; 97:61-67, 2006 
66) van Venrooij FV, van de Ree MA, Bots ML, et al. Aggressive lipid lowering does not improve endothelial 
function in type 2 diabetes: The Diabetes Atorvastatin Lipid Intervention (DALI) Study: A randomized, 
double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Diabetes Care 2002;25:1211–1216 
67) ter Avest E, Abbink EJ, Holewijn S, et al. Effects of rosuvastatin on endothelial function in patients with 
familial combined hyperlipidaemia (FCH). Curr Med Res Opin 2005;21:1469–1476.  
68) van de Ree MA, Huisman MV, de Man FH, et al. Impaired endothelium-dependent vasodilation in type 
2 diabetes mellitus and the lack of effect of simvastatin. Cardiovasc Res 2001;52:299–305. 
69) Mullen MJ, Wright D, Donald AE, et al. Atorvastatin but not L-arginine improves endothelial function 
in type I diabetes mellitus: A double-blind study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;36:410–416.   
70) Dogra GK, Watts GF, Chan DC, et al. Statin therapy improves brachial artery vasodilator function in 
patients with Type 1 diabetes and microalbuminuria. Diabet Med 2005;22:239–242.  
71) Taneva E, Borucki K, Wiens L, et al. Early effects on endothelial function of atorvastatin 40 mg twice 
daily and its withdrawal. Am J Cardiol 2006;97:1002–1006. Epub 2006 Feb 13 
72) Brunetti ND, Maulucci G, Casavecchia GP, Distaso C, De Gennaro L, Pellegrino PL, Di Biase M. 
Improvement in endothelium dysfunction in diabetics treated with statins: a randomized comparison of 
atorvastatin 20 mg versus rosuvastatin 10 mg. J Interv Cardiol 2007;20:481-487 


 
Atorvastatin in Sickle Cell Disease 
 
 
 
 
 
73) Usui H, Shikata K, Matsuda M, Okada S, Ogawa D, Yamashita T et al: HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor 
ameliorates diabetic nephropathy by its pleiotropic effects in rats. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2003; 18: 
265. 
74) Elisaf M and Mikhailidis DP: Statins and renal function. Angiology 2002; 53:493. 
75) Nakamura T, Ushiyama C, Hirokawa K, Osada S, Inoue T, Shimada N et al: Effect of cerivastatin on 
proteinuria and urinary podocytes in patients with chronic glomerulonephritis. Nephrol Dial Transplant 
2002; 17: 798. 
76) J.K. Liao, Isoprenoids as mediators of the biological effects of statins, J Clin Invest 110 (2002), p. 285. 
77) M. Sabbatini, A. Pisani, F. Uccello, V. Serio, R. Seru and R. Paterno et al., Atorvastatin improves the 
course of ischemic acute renal failure in aging rats, J Am Soc Nephrol 15 (2004), p. 901. 
78) Eller P et al, Atorvastatin attenuates murine anti-glomerular basement membrane glomerulopathies. 
Kidney Int. 77:428-435, 2010 
79) A. Verhulst, P.C. D'Haese and M.E. de Broe, Inhibitors of HMG-CoA reductase reduce receptor-
mediated endocytosis in human kidney proximal tubular cells, J Am Soc Nephrol 15 (2004), pp. 2249–
2257. 
80) D.G. Vidt, M.D. Cressman and S. Harris et al., Rosuvastatin-induced arrest in progression of renal 
disease, Cardiology 102 (2004), pp. 52–60. 
81) Sorof J, Berne C, Siewert-Delle A, Jørgensen L, et al. Effect of rosuvastatin or atorvastatin on urinary 
albumin excretion and renal function in type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes Res Clin Pract;72:81-87, 2006 
82) Kamdar C, Chou SY, Mooppan YM, et al. Atorvastatin protects renal function in the rat with acute 
unilateral ureteral obstruction. Urology 75;853-857, 2010 
83) Michli E, et al. Atorvastatin preserves renal function in chronic complete unilateral ureteral obstruction. 
The Journal of Urology;177:781-785, 2007 
84) Colhoun HM, Betteridge DJ, Durrington PN, Hitman GA et al. Effects of atorvastatin on kidney 
outcomes and cardiovascular disease in patients with diabetes: an analyses from the Collaborative 
Atorvastatin Diabetes Study (CARDS). Am J Kidney Dis. 54:810-819, 2009 
85) Solovey A, Kollander R, Shet A, et al. Endothelial cell expression of tissue factor in sickle mice is 
augmented by hypoxia/reoxygenation and inhibited by lovastatin. Blood 2004;104:840-846. 
86) Rosch JW, Boyd AR, Hinojosa E, Pestina T, Hu Y, Persons DA, Orihuela CJ, Tuomanen EI. Statins 
protect against fulminant pneumococcal infection and cytolysin toxicity in a mouse model of sickle cell 
disease. J Clin Invest 2010;120:627-635 
87) Hoppe C, Kuypers F, Larkin S, Hagar W, Vichinsky E, Styles L. A pilot study of the short-term use of 
simvastatin in sickle cell disease: effects on markers of vascular dysfunction. Br J Haematol. 
2011;153:655-63 
88) Ataga KI, Brittain JE, Jones SK, May R, Delaney J et al. Association of soluble fms-like tyrosine 
kinase-1 with pulmonary hypertension and hemolysis in sickle cell disease. Br J Haematol, 
2011;152:485-91  
89) Fischer C, Mazzone M, Jonckx B, Carmeliet P. FLT1 and its ligands VEGFB and PlGF: drug targets for 
anti-angiogenic therapy. Nature Rev 2008;8:942-956 
90) Schneider A, Neas L, Herbst MC, Case M, Williams RW, Cascio W, Hinderliter A, Holguin F, Buse JB, 
Dungan K, Styner M, Peters A,  Devlin RB. Endothelial Dysfunction: Associations with Exposure to 
Ambient Fine Particles in Diabetic Individuals. Environ Health Perspect 2008;116:1666–1674  
91) Corretti MC, Anderson TJ, Benjamin EJ, Celermajer D, Charbonneau F, Creager MA, Deanfield J, et al. 
Guidelines for the ultrasound assessment of endothelial-dependent flow-mediated vasodilation of the 
brachial artery. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;39:257-265 
92) Belhassen L, Pelle G, Sediame S, Bachir D, Carville C, Bucherer C, Lacombe C, Galacteros F, Adnot S. 
Endothelial dysfunction in patients with sickle cell disease is related to selective impairment of shear 
stress-mediated vasodilation. Blood. 2001;97:1584-1589 


 
Atorvastatin in Sickle Cell Disease 
 
 
 
 
 
93) de Montalembert M, Aggoun Y, Niakate A, Szezepanski I, Bonnet D. Endothelial-dependent vasodilation 
is impaired in children with sickle cell disease. Haematologica 2007;92:1709-1710 
94) Ali F, Zakkar M, Karu K, Lidington EA, Hamdulay SS, et al. Induction of the cytoprotective enzyme 
heme oxygenase-1 by statins is enhanced in vascular endothelium exposed to laminar shear stress and 
impaired by disturbed flow. J Biol Chem 2009;284:18882-18892. 
95) Bains SK, Foresti R, Howard J, Atwal S, Green CJ, Motterlini R. Human sickle cell blood modulates 
endothelial heme oxygenase activity: Effects on vascular adhesion and reactivity. Arterioscler Thromb 
Vasc Biol. 2010;30:305-312. 
96) Bryan BA, Mitchell DC, Zhao L, Ma W, Stafford LJ, Teng B, Liu M. Modulation of musckle 
regeneration, myogenesis, and adipogenesis by the rho family guanine nucleotide exchange factor 
GEFT. Mol Cell Biol 2005;25:11089-11101 
Endothelial function and renal disease, Specific Aim #3 
 
Screening/ 
Baseline* 
 Treatment Phase #1 
 
Washout 
Phase 
 
Treatment Phase #2 
 
Between Day 
-28 to Day 0 
 Day 0 
Week 
4 
Week 
6 
 
4 Weeks   
Day 0 
Week 4 
W
Informed Consent 
X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Medical History and 
Assessment of Eligibility 
X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Physical Exam 
X 
 
X 
 
X 
 
 
 
X 
 
Vital signs 
X 
 
X 
X 
X 
 
 
 
X 
X 
Hematology 
(CBC w/diff and retics) 
X 
 
X 
 
X 
 
 
 
X 
 
Chemistries (including 
creatine kinase) 
X 
 
X 
X 
X 
 
 
 
X 
X 
Lipid profile 
X 
 
 
 
X 
 
 
 
 
 
PT(INR) and PTT 
X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Urine microalbumin/ 
creatinine ratio 
X 
 
X 
X 
X 
 
 
 
X 
X 
Urinalysis 
X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Serum pregnancy test  
(for women of child bearing capacity) 
X 
 
X 
 
 
 
 
 
X 
 
Urine pregnancy test 
(for women of child bearing capacity) 
 
 
 
X 
X 
 
 
 
 
X 
Randomization/ initiation of 
study treatment 
X 
 
X 
 
 
 
 
 
X 
 
Brachial ultrasound 
X 
 
X 
X 
X 
 
 
 
X 
X 
Measures of  endothelial 
function 
X 
 
X 
 
X 
 
 
 
X 
 
Measures of hemolysis 
X 
 
X 
 
X 
 
 
 
X 
 
Adverse event probe 
 
 
X 
X 
X 
 
X 
 
X 
X 
 *Screening/Baseline Phase and Day 0 of the 1st Treatment Phase may be consolidated into one visit as long as eligibility 
is confirmed prior to initiation of study treatment