Clinical trial NCT03239210
Conditions: Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Tic Disorders Tourette Syndrome
Keywords: Brain Function functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) Sensory processing Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder OCD
Sponsor: NYU Langone Health
Start date: 2017-06-16; Completion date: 2022-05-16
Enrollment: 110 participants; Allocation: RANDOMIZED; Intervention model: PARALLEL

Brief summary:
This project investigates the use of 4 weeks of 24 mg/day ondansetron as compared to placebo on symptoms and brain functioning in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and tic disorders (TD). Patients will be randomized to receive ondansetron or placebo for 4 weeks, with MRI scans and symptom assessments occurring at baseline (before any drug) and at the end of the 4 weeks. Patients will also be asked to come into the lab approximately 2 weeks into the trial for symptom assessments. The investigators hypothesize that after 4 weeks there will be greater reduction from baseline in sensory symptoms and the activation of the insula and sensorimotor cortex compared for ondansetron as compared to placebo.

Detailed description:
Many psychiatric disorders are associated with altered sensory experiences arising from within the body. Examples include increased experience of sensations or urges in muscles, skins, joints or visceral organs in Tic/Tourette's Disorders, OCD patients with symptoms of "not just right experiences" or disgust sensitivity, and other disorders such as trichotillomania or excoriation disorder. In OCD, these sensory phenomena occur in approximately half of patients, are associated with earlier age of onset, and may be harder to treat with classic cognitive-behavioral approaches to OCD. Of interest, sensory phenomena in OCD are associated with Tourette's syndrome and respond to pharmacological treatments primarily used for tics. As such, abnormal sensory processing may be a basic mechanism that links various psychiatric disorders.

The process of attending to body sensations is referred to as interoception, abnormality of which may be related to sensory phenomena. Research has revealed a cortical interoceptive circuit involving insula, anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), and sensorimotor cortex. Ondansetron (OND) is a good candidate for the modulation of the above-described interoceptive circuit. It is a selective 5-HT3 (serotonin) receptor antagonist that acts on both peripheral and central receptors. OND has long been used to treat nausea and vomiting due to chemotherapy, radiation therapy, anesthesia, and opioid-induced emesis. It has also been used alone or as adjunctive therapy for the treatment of both OCD and Tourette's disorder, showing some efficacy in small clinical trials. The mechanisms by which ondansetron improves symptoms in OCD and tic disorders are unknown, although the investigator's earlier study found that single doses of ondansetron reduce activation of insula and somatosensory cortex in healthy controls. As a follow-up to this work, the current protocol will compare the effects of 24 mg/day of ondansetron vs. placebo for 4 weeks in patients with OCD or Tic Disorders on symptoms and brain functioning.

Arms: arm 1: 24 mg/day for 4 weeks arm 2: Placebo pill
Interventions: intervention 1: Ondansetron intervention 2: Placebo
Intervention descriptions: intervention 1: 5-HT3 (serotonin receptor type 3) antagonist commonly used to treat nausea and vomiting intervention 2: placebo equivalent

Protocol documents:
Prot_SAP_000.pdf: 
 
 
Official Title: 
Effects of Ondansetron in Obsessive-compulsive and Tic Disorders   
NCT Number: 
NCT03239210 
Study Number: 
17-01608 
Document Type:  
Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan  
Date of the 
Document: 
• 
February 8, 2022 
 
 


 
 
Page i 
CONFIDENTIAL 
This material is the property of the NYU School of Medicine and Langone Medical Center.  Do not disclose or use except as 
authorized in writing by the study sponsor 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Effects of ondansetron in obsessive-compulsive and tic disorders 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Principal Investigator: 
 
Emily Stern, PhD 
Department of Psychiatry 
One Park Avenue, 8th floor 
emily.stern@nyumc.org 
Phone number: (646) 754-4997 
NYULMC Study Number: 
17-01608 
Funding Sponsor:  
National Institute of Mental Health 
6001 Executive Blvd. 
Room 8184, MSC 9663 
Bethesda, MD 20892-9663 
301-443-4513 
 
Initial version: 01/17/2017 
Amended: 
01/21/2021 
 


Effects of ondansetron in obsessive-compulsive and tic disorders 
page 1 
Version: 13 
CONFIDENTIAL 
This material is the property of the NYU School of Medicine and Langone Medical Center.  Do not disclose or use except as authorized in 
writing by the study sponsor 
 
Statement of Compliance 
 
This study will be conducted in accordance with the Code of Federal Regulations on the Protection of Human 
Subjects (45 CFR Part 46), any other applicable US government research regulations, and institutional research 
policies and procedures. The Principal Investigator will assure that no deviation from, or changes to the protocol 
will take place without prior agreement from the sponsor and documented approval from the Institutional Review 
Board (IRB), except where necessary to eliminate an immediate hazard(s) to the study participants. All 
personnel involved in the conduct of this study have completed Human Subjects Protection Training. 
 
 


 
 
Page 2 
CONFIDENTIAL 
This material is the property of the NYU School of Medicine and Langone Medical Center.  Do not disclose or use except as authorized in 
writing by the study sponsor 
 
 
Table of Contents 
 
1 
PURPOSE OF THE STUDY AND BACKGROUND................................................................................... 3 
1.1 
PURPOSE OF THE STUDY ...................................................................................................................... 3 
1.2 
HYPOTHESES ....................................................................................................................................... 4 
1.3 
BACKGROUND ...................................................................................................................................... 4 
1.3.1 
References ..................................................................................................................................... 5 
2 
CHARACTERISTICS OF THE RESEARCH POPULATION ..................................................................... 5 
 
NUMBER, GENDER, AGE AND RACIAL/ETHNIC ORIGIN OF SUBJECTS ............................................................ 5 
2.1 .................................................................................................................................................................... 5 
2.1.1 
Number .......................................................................................................................................... 5 
2.1.2 
Gender ........................................................................................................................................... 5 
2.1.3 
Age ................................................................................................................................................. 5 
2.1.4 
Racial/Ethnic Origin ....................................................................................................................... 5 
2.2 
INCLUSION CRITERIA ............................................................................................................................. 5 
2.3 
EXCLUSION CRITERIA ........................................................................................................................... 6 
2.4 
VULNERABLE SUBJECTS ....................................................................................................................... 6 
3 
SUBJECT IDENTIFICATION, RECRUITMENT AND CONSENT/ASSENT .............................................. 7 
3.1 
METHOD OF SUBJECT IDENTIFICATION AND RECRUITMENT ...................................................................... 7 
3.2 
PROCESS OF CONSENT ......................................................................................................................... 8 
4 
METHODS AND PROCEDURES ............................................................................................................... 8 
4.1 
STUDY PROCEDURES............................................................................................................................ 8 
4.2 
DATA ANALYSIS AND DATA MONITORING .............................................................................................. 15 
4.3 
DATA STORAGE .................................................................................................................................. 16 
4.3.1 
Confidentiality .............................................................................................................................. 16 
4.3.2 
Data Sharing ................................................................................................................................ 17 
5 
 
EQUIPMENT………………………………………………………………………………………….…………...E
RROR! BOOKMARK NOT DEFINED.8 
6 
RISK/BENEFIT ASSESSMENT ............................................................................................................... 18 
6.1 
RISK .................................................................................................................................................. 18 
6.2 
PROTECTION AGAINST RISKS .............................................................................................................. 20 
6.3 
POTENTIAL BENEFITS TO SUBJECTS .................................................................................................... 21 
6.4 
ALTERNATIVES TO PARTICIPATION ....................................................................................................... 21 
6.5 
COSTS TO THE SUBJECT ..................................................................................................................... 21 
6.6 
PAYMENT FOR PARTICIPATION ............................................................................................................. 21 
7 
INVESTIGATOR’S QUALIFICATIONS & EXPERIENCE ........................................................................ 21 
8 
ATTACHMENTS ....................................................................................................................................... 21 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


 
 
Page 3 
CONFIDENTIAL 
This material is the property of the NYU School of Medicine and Langone Medical Center.  Do not disclose or use except as authorized in 
writing by the study sponsor 
 
 
1 Purpose of the Study and Background 
1.1 Purpose of the Study 
 
The overall objective of this study is to test the use of 4 weeks of 24 mg daily ondansetron as compared to 
placebo on symptoms and brain functioning in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and tic 
disorders (TD). This is the second phase (R33 phase) of a 2-phase R21/R33 project. In the first (R21) phase, 
we found that single doses of 24-mg ondansetron significantly reduced activation of insula and sensorimotor 
brain regions in healthy volunteers.  
 
Despite extensive research, 30-60% of OCD patients do not respond adequately to first-line treatments (1,2), 
with similarly disappointing rates in TD3. Treatment presents a particular challenge because these disorders 
are heterogeneous, with clusters of symptoms likely derived from differing neural etiologies. The Research 
Domain Criteria (RDoC) approach seeks to address this problem by investigating transdiagnostic components 
of behavior that more closely align with brain circuitry (4,5). This application focuses on sensory phenomena 
(SP) as a critical component of both OCD and TD with a discrete neural circuitry centered on the insula and 
somatosensory cortex. Consistent with the experimental therapeutic approach, the current project will test the 
ability of ondansetron, a 5-HT3 antagonist acting on sensory pathways, to engage this neural circuitry in order 
to modulate sensory phenomena.  
 
Sensory phenomena are uncomfortable or aversive sensations that precede compulsions in OCD and tics in 
TD (6-10). They are highly prevalent, occurring in up to 70% of OCD patients (7-9) and 93% of TD patients 
(11,12). In the majority of cases, SP may actually drive the repetitive behavior (7,13,14) and are experienced 
as highly distressing (7,12,13,15), yet these symptoms are not well addressed by standard treatment 
approaches in OCD or TD (6,16-19). The current project will address this issue by investigating the novel use 
of ondansetron as a means to target neural systems underlying symptoms of SP. Much research points to a 
discrete circuit involved in detecting sensory information from the body, with activation of the insula and 
somatosensory cortex associated with the conscious perception of visceral and somatic sensation (20-25).  
 
Our group (26-28) and others (29-35) have found hyperactivation and hyperconnectivity of insula and 
somatosensory cortex in OCD and TD. Furthermore, “urges-for-action” – everyday sensory experiences in 
healthy individuals (such as the urge to blink) that share phenomenological similarity with abnormal urges in 
OCD and TD – are linked to activation of the insula, somatosensory cortex, and adjacent motor regions (36-
40). Taken together, these data provide strong rationale for targeting insula and somatosensory cortex as a 
means to treat SP in OCD and TD.  
 
FDA-approved for nausea and vomiting (41), ondansetron is a promising novel candidate for the modulation of 
neural circuits related to SP. Ondansetron has been shown to decrease overall symptom severity in both OCD 
and TD (42-48), although the neural mechanisms associated with these effects are unknown. Ondansetron is 
an antagonist at 5-HT3 receptors, which are ligand-gated ion channels located abundantly throughout the 
peripheral and central nervous system (Wilde & Markham 1996; Ye et al., 2001; Farber et al. 2004; Jakab et 
al., 2000). The highest density of central nervous system (CNS) 5-HT3 receptors are located in subcortical 
regions of the interoceptive circuit, including the dorsal horn of the spinal cord, the NTS, and area postrema 
(Ye et al., 2001; Farber et al., 2004; Bloom & Morales 1998).  In addition, 5-HT3 receptors are located in limbic 
(hippocampus and amygdala) and cortical regions (Jakab & Goldman-Rakic 2000; Bloom & Morales 1998; 
Tecott et al., 1993; Tuerke et al., 2012), with receptor transcripts identified throughout the cortex including in 
insula and somatosensory areas (Bloom & Morales 1998; Hawrylycz et al., 2012). Data from the R21 phase 
showed that single 24 mg doses decreased activity in the insula and somatosensory cortex in healthy subjects, 
raising the possibility that ondansetron may reduce disorder severity by targeting sensory circuits. Building on 
these promising findings, this proposal will investigate the effects of 4 weeks of ondansetron on neural targets 
and SP in a sample of OCD and TD patients.  
 
 


 
 
Page 4 
CONFIDENTIAL 
This material is the property of the NYU School of Medicine and Langone Medical Center.  Do not disclose or use except as authorized in 
writing by the study sponsor 
 
 
1.2 Hypotheses 
 
Aim 1 of the study (the R21 phase) has been completed. This application applies only to the R33 phase (Aim 
2). 
 
Aim 2 (R33): Further validate neural targets in a sample of OCD and TD patients with sensory phenomena. 
Employing a placebo-controlled parallel group design, we will measure the effects of 4 weeks of optimal dose 
ondansetron (that with the greatest effect on neural targets in the R21 phase: 24 mg) on activation and 
connectivity of insula and somatosensory cortex in patients with at least moderate SP (measured with the 
Sensory Phenomena Scale7). Hyp. 2: Compared to placebo, ondansetron will be associated with greater 
decreases in the activation and connectivity of insula and somatosensory cortex from baseline to week 4. 
  
Aim 3 (R33): Examine the relationship between target engagement and clinical symptoms. Hyp. 3a: Compared 
to placebo, ondansetron will be associated with greater reductions of SP from baseline to week 4, Hyp. 3b: 
Decreases in overall symptom severity (measured with Y-BOCS and Yale Global Tic Severity Scale) from 
baseline to week 4 will be mediated by reductions in SP, Hyp. 3c: Decreases in SP between baseline and week 
4 will be mediated by reduced activation and connectivity of insula and somatosensory cortex. 
1.3 Background 
 
Many psychiatric disorders are associated with altered sensory experiences arising from within the body 
(Rosario et al, 2009). Examples include increased experience of sensations or urges in muscles, skins, joints 
or visceral organs in tic disorders, OCD patients with symptoms of “not just right experiences” or disgust 
sensitivity, and impulse control disorders (ICDs) such as trichotillomania or skin-picking. In OCD, sensory 
phenomena occur in approximately half of patients, are associated with earlier age of onset (Ferrão et al., 
2012), and may be harder to treat with classic cognitive-behavioral approaches to OCD (Summerfeldt, 2004). 
Of interest, sensory phenomena in OCD are associated with Tourette’s syndrome (Ferrão et al., 2012) and 
respond to pharmacological treatments primarily used for tics (Shavitt et al., 2006). As such, abnormal 
sensory processing may be a basic mechanism that links various psychiatric disorders.  
 
The process of attending to body sensations is referred to as interoception, and broadly includes the detection 
of, or attention to, experiences arising from the viscera and soma (Cameron 2001). In healthy individuals, 
research has revealed a cortical interoceptive network involving insula, anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), and 
somatomotor cortex (Simmons et al., 2012; Paulus & Stein, 2010; Cameron 2001, Khalsa et al., 2009; 
Critchley et al., 2004). Furthermore, our group (Stern et al., unpublished data) has obtained pilot data 
indicating that sensory phenomena in OCD are associated with activity in this interoceptive network (insula 
and somatosensory cortex).  
 
Ondansetron (OND) is a good candidate for modulation of the interoceptive circuit. It is a selective 5-HT3 
(serotonin) receptor antagonist that acts on both peripheral and central receptors (Ye et al., 2006; Haus et al., 
2004). OND has long been used to treat nausea and vomiting due to chemotherapy, radiation therapy, 
anesthesia, and opioid-induced emesis. The mechanism of action of OND for the treatment of nausea is 
thought to be its action on both peripheral enterochromaffin cells of the intestine as well as on the area 
postrema (chemoreceptor trigger zone) and the nucleus of the solitary tract (a key node of the interoceptive 
network). OND has also been used in a variety of conditions other than nausea and vomiting, including 
irritable bowel syndrome, pruritus, alcohol and substance dependence, and psychosis (Ye et al., 2006; Farber 
et al., 2004; Haus et al., 2004). Particularly relevant for the current application, OND has been used alone or 
as adjunctive therapy for the treatment of both OCD and Tourette’s disorder, showing some efficacy in small 
clinical trials (Toren et al., 1999; 2005; Soltani et al., 2010; Hewlett et al., 2003; Pallanti et al., 2009). The 
mechanisms by which ondansetron improves symptoms in OCD and tic disorders are unknown, but a recent 
study found that OND application directly into the insula decreased disgust reactions in rats (Tuerke et al., 


 
 
Page 5 
CONFIDENTIAL 
This material is the property of the NYU School of Medicine and Langone Medical Center.  Do not disclose or use except as authorized in 
writing by the study sponsor 
 
2012). These data suggest that ondansetron’s clinical efficacy in OCD and tic disorders could be related to 
effects on interoceptive circuit activity in the insula, a possibility that is being explored in the current protocol.  
 
The current project has two parts (R21 and R33 phases). We completed the first, R21 phase of the project, 
which was a dose-response investigation of 8, 16, and 24 mg of ondansetron on brain function in healthy 
volunteers, in May of 2017. From this study, we determined that the optimal dose for modulation of brain 
circuits of interest is 24 mg. The R33 phase uses a randomized double-blind parallel group design to compare 
the use of this dose (24 mg) vs. placebo taken daily for 4 weeks to reduce sensory symptoms and alter brain 
functioning in patients with OCD and tic disorders. 
1.3.1 References 
For references, please see pages 14-22 in the R21/R33 application. 
2 Characteristics of the Research Population 
2.1 Number, Gender, Age and Racial/Ethnic Origin of Subjects 
2.1.1 Number 
 
It is expected that approximately 45 participants will be enrolled at NYU Langone Medical Center in order to 
produce 30 eligible participants at this site. Approximately 45 participants will also be enrolled at Nathan Kline 
Institute to produce 30 evaluable participants at that site. Participants enrolled at NYU will primarily be recruited 
from flyers throughout the NYU campus, internet advertisements, newspaper advertisements, recruitment 
emails to university mailing lists and previous studies from prior studies conducted by the lab and will directly 
contact the Research Coordinator for more information.  
2.1.2 Gender 
 
Subjects would include both male and female volunteers.  
2.1.3 Age 
 
Subjects will be recruited between the ages of 18 to 60. 
2.1.4 Racial/Ethnic Origin 
 
Subjects will be of any racial or ethnic origin. 
2.2 Inclusion Criteria 
 
Criteria for all participants 
 
Ages between 18 and 60 years 
 
Fluent (speaking and writing) in English.  
 
Diagnosis of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) or tic disorder (OCD) according to DSM-5 criteria 
as determined with the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI, Sheehan et al., 1998; J Clin 
Psychiatry, 59 Suppl 20, 22-33) 
 
Moderate or greater disorder severity: ≥ 16 on the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) 
or ≥ 20 on the Yale Global Tic Severity Scale (YGTSS) 
 
Moderate or greater severity of sensory phenomena (≥ 6 on the Sensory Phenomena Scale, SPS) 
 
Stable on psychotropic medication for at least 6 weeks or unmedicated. 
Additional criteria for all participants who are screened remotely 
 
access to a computer or phone with a camera  


 
 
Page 6 
CONFIDENTIAL 
This material is the property of the NYU School of Medicine and Langone Medical Center.  Do not disclose or use except as authorized in 
writing by the study sponsor 
 
 
2.3 Exclusion Criteria 
 
 
Present or previous diagnosis of psychosis, bipolar disorder, or major developmental disorder (autism 
spectrum disorder with intellectual disability, intellectual developmental disorder) based on DSM-5 
criteria 
 
Present diagnosis of alcohol or substance use disorder (moderate or severe) based on DSM-5 criteria 
 
Current moderate or higher suicidality as assessed through the C-SSRS with clinician assessment that 
there is significant risk for the subject if they participate  
 
Major neurological illness (e.g., self-reported history of organic mental syndromes, head trauma with 
sequelae, chronic and severe migraines, history of seizures, or other significant medical illness that 
would make participation unsafe or unfeasible as determined by a licensed clinician on the team)  
 
Any disability or health problem that prevents them from completing study procedures (e.g. back 
problems, severe carpal tunnel syndrome, impaired vision that is not corrected with glasses or contact 
lenses, etc.).  
 
Pregnant or nursing women  
 
Positive urine toxicology (except for currently prescribed medications or cannabis) or positive 
pregnancy test  
 
MRI contraindications such as claustrophobia, ferrous implants, braces, or pacemakers  
 
Subjects with a medical condition or other predisposition that increases the risk of adverse effects when 
taking ondansetron (by self-report or medical clearance testing). These include, but are not limited to, 
individuals with drug allergies or known hypersensitivity to ondansetron (or other 5-HT3 antagonists), 
heart disease, congestive heart failure, heart rhythm disorder, congenital long QT syndrome, electrolyte 
abnormalities (e.g., hypokalemia, hypomagnesemia) or hepatic impairment.  
 
All subjects will have a thorough review of their medical history and concomitant medications to 
evaluate for potential interaction effects that may impact serum ondansetron concentrations. 
Participants felt to be at risk of having a significantly reduced effective serum ondansetron concentration 
(e.g., due to concomitant carbamazepine or phenytoin) or elevated effective serum ondansetron 
concentration (e.g. due to liver disease, significant potential P450 isoenzyme inhibitors, or known P450 
isoenzyme deficiencies) may be excluded at the determination of the study physician 
 
Subjects who report taking apomorphine (which is a contraindication to ondansetron) 
 
Subjects taking a 5-HT3 antagonist (as cross-reactivity with other 5-HT3 antagonists has been 
reported) 
 
Subjects with abnormal (with clinical significance) EKG including abnormal QT will either be excluded 
from participation or, if eligibility is unclear, will be referred to a cardiologist for further determination of 
safety for participation. Subjects with QT prolongation (QTc>450 ms for men and >470 ms for women) 
will be excluded. 
 
Subjects with abnormal liver function, electrolytes, or other lab results (as determined by CBC/CMP) 
will be excluded from participation if the study team physician determines these abnormalities make it 
is unsafe for them to participate 
 
Present diagnosis of Phenylketonuria (PKU).    
 
Excess ginger consumption (consumption in meal or with supplements > once per week) 
2.4 Vulnerable Subjects 
 
No member of vulnerable groups such as children, pregnant women, prisoners, institutionalized individuals, or 
others members of vulnerable populations will be recruited. However, Illiterate subjects are being excluded from 
enrollment as it is important that subjects understand the procedures and concepts involved in the research 
and the implications of taking the medication. The capacity to provide informed consent will be performed by a 
licensed physician at the screening visit. If there is any question regarding whether a participant has the capacity 
to consent, we will not enroll them in the study. 
 


 
 
Page 7 
CONFIDENTIAL 
This material is the property of the NYU School of Medicine and Langone Medical Center.  Do not disclose or use except as authorized in 
writing by the study sponsor 
 
Participation in our study requires a high degree of comfort with the English language both in oral and written 
form. The study procedures involve extensive in-person interviews involving regarding complex psychological 
concepts that will be difficult to explain to someone who does not have a fluent understanding of the English 
language. Furthermore, subjects fill out multiple English-language questionnaires and perform fMRI and 
behavioral tasks that require a good understanding of English.  
3 Subject Identification, Recruitment and Consent/Assent 
3.1 Method of Subject Identification and Recruitment 
 
Participants will be identified through the following methods: 
 
1. Flyers - We will put up flyers in different high-traffic, approved areas around NYU (pharmacies, libraries, 
coffee shops) and on the NYU Langone Medical Center campus. 
2. Internet Advertisements - We have "internet advertisement" language (included as attachment in this 
application) that we will use on Internet sites such as Craigslist, Research Match, Facebook, the 
International OCD Foundation (IOCDF) website, as well as Google Ads. With regard to social media, 
we have a dedicated lab Facebook page where we will be posting our approved ads. On this webpage 
we also occasionally post links to popular science articles about OCD and treatments for OCD. People 
are able to like and comment on our posts, and the posts would be made visible to the public, that is, 
anyone who visits our page. Although we do not currently, we may in the future wish to use the paid 
advertising feature that involves promoting our Facebook page so that a specified number of people 
see it per day. We will also google adwords that will be linked to our Facebook page and/or to our NYU 
webpage when it is set up with the approved language as submitted in the IRB application. We may 
wish to use a recruitment service called StudyKik to advertise our study as well. Our approved ad will 
be listed on the StudyKik website where potential participants can sign up to learn more about and 
participate in research studies.          
3. Websites - We will upload details of the study and how to participate on the webpage of our lab 
(Psychiatric Neurocognition Lab). On this website, on a “How to Participate” page, we would like to 
include a description of the study and an optional entry form for individuals interested in participating in 
our research to complete.  Individuals would be asked to enter their name and contact information. This 
entry form is powered by surveymonkey.com, and will be embedded into the webpage. To protect 
subjects’ privacy, all content submitted through the survey will be encrypted with SSL protection. 
Responses will only be accessible to study personnel through a password-protected surveymonkey 
account.  
4. We may reach out to participants from the lab’s own prior studies at Mount Sinai. We will only contact 
participants who have agreed to be recontacted during the initial consent. 
5. Reach out to physicians and psychologists in the community for referrals into the study via email or 
letter. If we solicit referrals, we will submit the email or letter text to NYULH IRB for prior approval. We 
would then e(mail) this approved text to clinics and clinicians with publicly available contact info (i.e. 
those clinics that provide their contact information on a webpage or in psychology/psychiatric 
newsletters/journals).  
6. Sending recruitment emails to the mailing list of different universities in New York.  
7. Place advertisements in local newspapers. 
8. This study will utilize EPIC to identify potentially eligible subjects in the NYU health system. For 
patients who have a recorded diagnosis of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder or Tic Disorder/Tourette’s 
Disorder, the study team will review age and other psychiatric and medical diagnoses to determine 
initial eligibility. If the patient appears eligible based on the EPIC search, an email (if email address is 
available) or written letter (if email address not available or if the email address is defunct) will be sent 
to them that briefly describes the study and provides the study team contact information (see letter 
included in application). 
 
We will also utilize DataCore to assist in the management and procurement of search queries and 
reports which will be used to execute EPIC searches. The research team will provide DataCore with 


 
 
Page 8 
CONFIDENTIAL 
This material is the property of the NYU School of Medicine and Langone Medical Center.  Do not disclose or use except as authorized in 
writing by the study sponsor 
 
the study eligibility requirements. DataCore will generate a report of individuals who meet those 
eligibility requirements. This report will be replicated in EPIC which will allow the study team to 
identify those individuals and view their health and contact information. For patients who have a 
recorded diagnosis of obsessive-compulsive disorder or tics/Tourette’s disorder, the study team will 
review age and other psychiatric and medical diagnoses to determine initial eligibility. If the patient 
appears eligible based on the EPIC search, an email (if email address is available) or written letter (if 
email address not available or if the email address is defunct) will be sent to them that briefly 
describes the study and provides the study team contact information (see letter included in 
application). Additionally, an approved message may be sent via the MyChart message portal. Any 
recruitment information sent by email will utilize Send Safe email.  
 
 
All study team members (Stern, Iosifescu, Brown, Shahab) are seeking approval to access the EPIC 
search results. Although Brown and Shahab will be doing the initial searches, they may have 
questions they will want to ask the PI (Stern) or study team physician (Iosifescu) to clarify information 
they view and/or to further determine whether something in the chart affects eligibility. Searches will 
be run to first look for diagnosis codes for OCD or Tic Disorders, and then, within that group, for 
subsets of patients who do not meet exclusionary criteria. To this end, PHI including name, contact 
information, age, and medical and psychiatric diagnoses will be viewed. The study team will search 
the EPIC database multiple times over the course of a year; the exact number of times that the team 
searches will depend on how many results each query produces (i.e. highly successful queries with a 
lot of eligible subjects will lead to less frequent searching).  
 
Once potential subjects have been identified through the above method, the study team will notify the 
treating physician that they have patients eligible to participate and that the study team would like to 
contact potential subjects directly, either by letter or email. Once contact is made with the potential 
subject, approved recruitment language (attached letter) will be used to communicate the reason they 
are being contacted and subjects will be asked if they are interested in participating in this specific 
study. Should the potential subjects agree, the study team will provide the subjects with information 
regarding the next steps for participation.  
9. If the patient reports that they have a sibling (SIB) during the administration of the Family History 
Questionnaire at the baseline visit, the experimenter will attempt to recruit the SIB for our other 
project, (#17-01606) “Neurobiology of sensory phenomena in obsessive-compulsive disorder”. The 
experimenter will provide an IRB-approved letter that explains the study and will ask for permission to 
contact their SIB to tell them about the study. If the patient agrees, he/she will indicate that on the 
letter and write down the SIB’s contact information.  
10. We will utilize the service BuildClinical’s online ads, landing page, and screening questions. We have 
entered into a contract with the online study recruitment company, BuildClinical LLC. BuildClinical is a 
data-driven software platform that helps academic researchers recruit participants for research 
studies more efficiently using social media, software, and machine learning. BuildClinical has worked 
with IRBs in the US to ensure they adhere to all the appropriate guidelines and procedures. On our 
behalf, BuildClinical has creating several study-specific advertisements (submitted as "BuildClinical 
R33 Online Ads) designed to engage participants on digital platforms such as Facebook, Google, 
WebMD, etc., and redirect them to a study-specific landing page should they click it. On this landing 
page (submitted as "BuildClinical Landing Page") the person can complete an online pre-screen 
questionnaire that gets routed into BuildClinical's platform and is to be reviewed by the study team. 
 
3.2 Process of Consent 
 
Informed consent will be obtained either remotely or in-person by a member of the research team 
authorized to obtain consent. The decision to conduct remote vs. in-person visits will be made 
according to NYU Langone rules and procedures for research participant contact during the COVID 
crisis. As long as the study team determines in-person contact presents an unecessary risk for the 


 
 
Page 9 
CONFIDENTIAL 
This material is the property of the NYU School of Medicine and Langone Medical Center.  Do not disclose or use except as authorized in 
writing by the study sponsor 
 
participant and study staff, screening procedures will be conducted remotely via video conferencing.  
 
A) Remote e-consent processes: To reduce the need for in-person contact during the COVID-19 
pandemic, we may collect consent via Webex video conferencing. A trained member of the study 
team will schedule a time with interested participants to go over the written consent via Webex. The 
researcher will email or mail a copy of the consent to participants in preparation for the remote e-
consent. After going over the written consent via Webex, the researcher will send the consent via a 
REDCap link where the participant has the opportunity to read a copy of the written consent and sign 
electronically, confirming that they read and understood the consent. The researcher will also 
document on REDCap the time and date of the consent and note that the consent process was done 
via Webex due to COVID-19. The researcher will also review the Nathan Kline Institute (NKI) 
Scanning Consent Addendum, which provides information on the research procedures conducted at 
the Nathan Kline Institute. 
The individual obtaining consent will provide an oral explanation of the research study during the 
Webex meeting. The individual obtaining consent will be responsible for assessing the subject’s 
comprehension of the information presented and the risks/benefits of participating in the study. 
Individuals obtaining consent will follow HIPAA guidelines in protecting privacy. A digital version of 
the signed form will be stored on the REDCap server. A member of the research team will print a 
copy of the signed/dated consent form and it will be filed as documentation of informed consent in 
locked file cabinets at NYU Langone Medical Center. 
 
B) In-person consent processes: When it is determined to be safe to resume in-person 
appointments due to the COVID-19 pandemic, in-person informed consent processes will be done 
in a quiet room in the psychiatry department offices at One Park Avenue at NYU Langone. Access 
to the facility is limited to authorized personnel. The individual obtaining consent will provide an oral 
explanation of the research study and allow the subject to read the consent form. The individual 
obtaining consent will be responsible for assessing the subject’s comprehension of the information 
presented and the risks/benefits of participating in the study. Individuals obtaining consent will 
follow HIPAA guidelines in protecting privacy. Subjects will receive a copy of their signed/dated 
consent form. The original signed/dated consent form will be filed as documentation of informed 
consent in locked file cabinets at NYU Langone Medical Center.    
4 Methods and Procedures 
4.1 Study Procedures 
 
All procedures described below (see schedule of events on the next page for overview) will be done for research 
purposes and are not part of standard clinical care.   
 
A) Initial Contact and Phone screening (Phone, email, in person) (20-30 minutes) 
All potential subjects will first come into contact with a research team member via phone, email, or in person. 
Either the potential subject will contact the research team member of his or her own accord, or the research 
team member will initiate first contact. Team members will initiate first contact only if the subject has previously 
signed a document (such as consent form) agreeing to be re-contacted. At this time, the potential subject will 
be told what the experiment generally involves, including time commitment and compensation.  
 
All subjects who are interested in participating in the study will be asked a series of initial screening questions 
to determine initial eligibility (see attached phone screen), including questions about physical and mental health 
and MRI safety. Verbal consent is obtained prior to asking questions on the phone screen (see introduction in 
phone screen). The Sensory Phenomena Scale (SPS) may also be administered during the phone screen to 


 
 
Page 10 
CONFIDENTIAL 
This material is the property of the NYU School of Medicine and Langone Medical Center.  Do not disclose or use except as authorized in 
writing by the study sponsor 
 
determine whether patients’ sensory symptoms are severe enough to be eligible for the protocol. Participants 
who encounter our BuildClinical advertising may elect to answer screening questions prior to the phone screen 
with a member of the research team. These questions are not a substitute for a comprehensive eligibility 
screening, and only ask about broader inclusion/exclusion criteria in significantly less detail.  If a subject meets 
eligibility recruitments based upon the phone screen, they will be scheduled for a screening visit on Webex 
or in-person at the NYU Langone Medical Center with a psychiatric evaluation and medical screening will be 
conducted. If the subject declines participation, the phone screening questionnaire will be destroyed and no 
protected health identifiers for the potential subject will be retained. 
 
Schedule of Events: 
 
Overview: If a patient is eligible based on the phone screen and wishes to participate, they will be asked to 
complete four study visits including: one screening visit online via Webex videoconferencing or in-person at 
NYU Langone Medical Center (Psychiatry department offices at One Park Avenue) or the Nathan Kline Institute 
(NKI) in Orangeburg, NY; one baseline scan visit at NKI; one mid-trial visit online via Webex or in-person at 
NYU Langone or NKI; one final (exit) scan visit including medical screening at NKI. They will also complete 2 
phone calls during the trial and one follow-up phone call after the trial has ended. 
 
(B) Screening Visit (1-2 visits, 3-4 hours) 
 
1. Informed Consent (30 minutes) 
At the Screening Visit, a member of the research team present participants with the consent form. The 
individual obtaining consent will review the form and answer any questions the subjects may have. 
This will be done through Webex for remote visits.   
 
2. Psychiatric and Symptom Evaluation (90-180 minutes): If consent is acquired, we will perform a longer 
screening for psychiatric history using the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I., Sheehan et 
al. 1998). This tool contains diagnostic modules for the assessment of several psychiatric conditions including 
mood, substance use, anxiety, psychotic, and eating disorders. The Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating 
Scale (C-SSRS; Posner et al., 2011) will be used to determine risk for suicide. Sensory phenomena will 
be assessed using the Sensory Phenomena Scale (SPS, Rosario et al., 2009). This semi-structured scale 
assesses the presence and severity of different types of SP preceding or occurring at the same times as 
repetitive behaviors in OCD. The SPS contains a checklist with examples of different types of SP encompassing 
all previous descriptions in the literature, including physical sensations, "just right" sensations, incompleteness, 
general energy or inner tension buildup, and urges. OC symptoms in OCD patients will be assessed using the 
Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS, Goodman et al., 1989), while tics symptoms in TD patients 
will be assessed using Yale Global Tic Severity Scale (YGTSS, Leckman et al., 1989). Psychiatric symptoms 
including suicidality will be confirmed by a licensed clinician on the protocol to ensure participant safety. If the 
clinician determines that the subject is at an immediate and significant health risk, they will be sent to the nearest 
Emergency Department. If the visit is conduted remotely via videoconferencing and no study clinician is 
available at that moment to speak with the participant, a member of the study team will direct the participant to 
call 911 or go to the nearest psychiatric emergency department. We will also have subjects complete several 
self-rated scales or questionnaires to assess a variety of other symptoms: Beck Depression and Anxiety 
Inventories (Beck et al. 1996), Dimensional Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (Abramowitz et al. 2010), Penn State 
Worry Questionnaire (Meyer et al. 1990), Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness (Mehling 
et al., 2012), Adolescent/Adult Sensory Profile Scale (Brown and Dunn., 2002), the Perseverative Thinking 
Questionnaire (PTQ; Ehring et al., 2011), Frost Multidimensional Perfectionism scale (Frost et al., 1990), 
Obsessive-Compulsive Trait Core Dimensions Questionnaire (Pietrefesa et al., 2009), Resilience Scale 
(Wagnild et al., 1993), Not Just Right Experiences Questionnaire, Revised (Coles et al., 2003), Obsessive-
Compulsive Inventory (Foa et al., 1998), Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (Rush et al., 2003).  
 
2a. Family History Assessment (15-30 minutes): A member of the research team will administer the Family 
History Questionnaire to the participant. This tool will be used to ask more detailed questions related to family 
psychiatric and medical history. 
 


 
 
Page 11 
CONFIDENTIAL 
This material is the property of the NYU School of Medicine and Langone Medical Center.  Do not disclose or use except as authorized in 
writing by the study sponsor 
 
3. Medical Screen (30-60 minutes)  
Some portions of the medical screen (3a, 3b, 3c) may be performed in a separate in-person visit if the psychiatric 
and symptom evaluation portion of the screening visit is conducted remotely due to COVID-19 safety concerns. 
In this case, participants will be transported to Clinical Research Center at Bellevue Hospital or the NKI 
Outpatient Clinical Research Division (OPRD) using a car service paid for by the study. The participant may 
drive themselves if they have a car available. A researcher will ask questions about the participant’s recent 
medical history, including inquiring about any surgeries, hospitalizations, or significant illness. This will include 
over-the-counter commercially-available urine drug and pregnancy tests purchased from Fisher Scientific or 
other approved vendors. Questions will again be asked to assess for the presence of exclusionary medical 
conditions (allergies to ondansetron or other 5-HT3 antagonists, heart disease, congestive heart failure, heart 
rhythm disorder, congenital Long QT syndrome, electrolyte abnormalities, and hepatic impairment). Any subject 
meeting these conditions will be excluded from participation (see 3a and b). Additionally, subjects who report 
taking apomorphine will also be excluded from participating in the study. Those with lab results (see 3a) or EKG 
abnormalities (see 3b) that would make participation unsafe will be excluded. 
 
3.a. Blood Tests:  During the Screening Visit, Complete Blood Count (CBC) and Comprehensive Metabolic 
Panel (CMP) tests will be run to ensure lack of major medical illness or abnormalities that would increase risk. 
For participants screened through NYU, these blood tests will be performed at either the Clinical Research 
Center at Bellevue Hospital through the resources of the CTSI or the blood will be collected by a nurse 
practitioner at NYU Langone Medical Center (One Park Ave, 8th floor) and processed at Clinical Laboratories, 
located at Tisch Hospital. Subjects undergoing medical procedures at NKI will have blood drawn and processed 
through the NKI Outpatient Clinical Research Division. Subjects with electrolyte abnormalities, hepatic 
impairment, or any other major medical illness that would increase risk will be excluded from further 
participation.   
 
3.b. EKG:  During the Screening Visit, an EKG will also be performed either at Clinical Research Center at 
Bellevue Hospital through the CTSI, on the 8th floor of One Park Avenue (Psychiatric department testing rooms), 
or the NKI OPRD, The results from the EKG will be read by a licensed study team physician or nurse practitioner 
regardless of where the EKG is acquired, to determine that it is safe for the subject to continue in the study. If 
the EKG results are abnormal, the patient may be referred to a cardiologist for follow-up and a repeat EKG may 
be conducted. If safety cannot be established, the subject will be excluded from further participation. 
 
Subjects with QT prolongation will be excluded for safety. For the purposes of the study, QT prolongation is 
defined as a QTc>450 ms for men and >470 ms for women. Should this be identified at screening, a repeat 
EKG will be obtained immediately as a confirmation and, if confirmed, the participant will be excluded from the 
study. If the QTc at screening is greater than 430 but less than 450 for a man or greater than 450 but less than 
470 for a woman, we will enroll pending other safety assessments and additionally perform two surveillance 
EKGs at week 1 and at week 2. While numerous psychotropic medications can prolong QT intervals, we do not 
determine that a participant being prescribed another medication known to prolong QT intervals prior to 
enrollment in the study constitutes additional risk assuming the pre-randomization EKG shows no evidence for 
QT prolongation. Should a participant have, for any clinical reasons, a medication change by their primary 
clinical outpatient team during the randomization period, this will be reviewed by a study physician and an EKG 
may be performed, if indicated.  
  
3.c. Vital Signs: The medical screening would also involve administering Vital Signs by a licensed CTSI or study 
team physician or nurse practitioner to ensure safety to participate. 
 
3d. Medical history: The coordinator will obtain information regarding the participant’s medical history which 
may involve administering the Patient-Rated Inventory of Side Effects (PRISE). This information will be 
reviewed by a licensed study clinician and discussed with the participant during a remote meeting between the 
clinician and the participant via phone or Webex. At that time, and after reviewing results from the bloodwork, 
EKG, and vital signs, the study clinician will determine whether a physical exam is required to determine safety. 
If the physical exam is required, it will be conducted during the baseline visit at Nathan Kline Institute, which 
already requires an in-person visit, prior to randomization.  
 


 
 
Page 12 
CONFIDENTIAL 
This material is the property of the NYU School of Medicine and Langone Medical Center.  Do not disclose or use except as authorized in 
writing by the study sponsor 
 
4. Picture Ratings and practice trials on task (10-30 minutes): Subjects will be asked to rate a series of 72 
images. These images include 24 OCD images from the Berlin Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Picture Set 
(Simon et al., 2012), as well as 24 threat-related and 24 neutral images. Threat-related images are from the 
standardized IAPS database and include pictures of snarling or ferocious looking animals, weapons, and injured 
or distressed-looking people. Neutral images are also taken from the IAPS database and include non-ferocious 
looking animals, people with neutral facial expressions, and objects such as books or tables. The images (OCD, 
threat and neutral) will be presented in random order. After viewing each image they will make two ratings: 1. 
how generally negative or positive the image makes them feel and 2. how much the image evokes their OCD 
symptoms. This task will be performed on REDCap if the visit is remote. Ratings made during this task will be 
used by the research team to pick images relevant to each subject's symptoms for the SP provocation task in 
the scanner (see below).  Subjects may also be asked to perform practice trials of the fMRI tasks during the 
Experiment Visits. 
 
The entire screening procedure is expected to take from 3-4 hours, depending on the pace of the subject in 
answering questions, the timeliness of the medical screen appointment, and whether practice trials for the task 
are performed. After the Screening Visit, if the subject is deemed safe and fit to participate in the study, they 
will be given the option to schedule an appointment for the Baseline Visit. 
 
Study Group Assignment after Screening Visit:  
After the Screening Visit, eligible subjects will be randomly assigned into two groups: one group will receive 24 
mg of ondansetron and the other group will receive placebo daily for 4 weeks. Participants will receive a 40-
day supply of drug at the Baseline Visit (Day 0) and instructed to take the first dose on the following day in the 
morning (Day 1). The 40-day supply includes a buffer so that participation in the trial is not disrupted in the rare 
case that a patient needs to reschedule the Mid-Trial or Final Visits at the last minute.  
 
Drug and placebo will be compounded and physically matched to each other by a pharmacy located near to 
the Nathan Kline Institute (Miller's Pharmacy). Blister packs containing 40-day supplies of blinded drug or 
placebo will be provided to the study team for each patient and stored in a secure locked room located at NKI. 
Drug will be ordered in bulk to cover 5-10 patients at a time (depending on expiration date and enrollment pace), 
and can be delivered directly to NKI or picked up by NKI staff at Miller's Pharmacy. Randomization will be 
conducted by Miller's Pharmacy, who will hold the link between subject code and active/placebo drug. They 
have experience doing this for other clinical trials at NKI. Study drug for patients recruited at both NKI and NYU 
sites will be provided through this method. The NYU site will only screen patients, while scanning and drug 
dispensation will be done for all patients at the NKI location, regardless of whether they are screened at NYU 
or NKI, and thus no coordination of randomization between sites is needed. 
 
Packs will be stored with a code number and will not identify whether they contain active drug or placebo. 
Dissemination of study drug will be logged in paper form located in the secure room and follow a two-step 
authentication procedure requiring signatures from two different NKI staff members confirming that the correct 
blister pack is being selected to provide to the patient. The logs will be reviewed by the PI on a regular basis to 
ensure there are no errors.  
 
(C) Baseline Visit (Day 0), 3-4 hours 
The baseline and final visits take place at the Nathan Kline Institute (NKI) for Psychiatric Research, a New York 
State Office of Mental Health research institute affiliated with NYU Langone. Subjects will meet a member of 
the research team at the offices of the study team at the Nathan Kline Institute (NKI) approximately 30-60 
minutes prior to the scheduled time for the scan. The following procedures will occur during the Baseline Visit: 
 
1. Physical Exam 
A licensed study team physician or nurse practitioner may perform a physical exam to ensure safety to 
participate. The physical exam will be determined to be necessary at the discretion of the licensed study clinician 
based on evaluation of the medical history, lab results, EKG results, and vital signs. 
 
2. Symptom review 


 
 
Page 13 
CONFIDENTIAL 
This material is the property of the NYU School of Medicine and Langone Medical Center.  Do not disclose or use except as authorized in 
writing by the study sponsor 
 
The experimenter will review the patient’s current symptoms (using Y-BOCS/YGTSS, SPS and PRISE) to 
determine if there have been any changes since the Screening Visit, and explain the cognitive tasks with them. 
An MRI safety screen will be performed to ensure that the individual is safe to enter the scanning environment.  
 
3. Practice trials on task/pre-task ratings of stimuli (optional, 10-20 minutes) 
Participants may be asked to perform practice trials of the task or answer questions about task stimuli.  
 
4. MRI set up and scanning (90 minutes) 
When it is time for subjects to be set up in the MRI scanner, they will be introduced to the MRI technician, who 
will prepare them. The technician is highly trained in participant safety protocols. The technician will run through 
a checklist with the subject to ensure that no metal objects are on the subject’s body. Once cleared, the 
technician will set up the subject in the scanner and make sure they are comfortable and ready to begin the 
experiment.  
 
4.a. Eye tracking and Physiological measurements (e.g., respiratory rate, pulse oximetry) may be taken while 
subjects perform the task inside the scanner. All physiological measurements are non-invasive (e.g., pulse is 
measured by attachment of device to finger). During the set-up of physiological equipment, participants will be 
asked to confirm that they are comfortable with the attachments. If they are not comfortable after or during the 
set-up: 1) the placement will be altered to achieve comfort, or 2) the equipment will be removed.  Subjects will 
never be required to wear the equipment if they are uncomfortable. Physiological measurements will be 
collected with commercially available BIOPAC equipment. 
 
4.b. MRI scanning 
The MRI scanning session will be no more than 90 minutes in total and may include a resting-state fMRI scan 
(subjects fixate on a crosshair with eyes open, 10 min), 3-4 brief fMRI tasks (35-45 min), diffusion-weighted 
MRI (10-15 min), and a structural T1-weighted scan (5-10 min).  
This may include the following tasks:  
1. "Urges-for-action" (UFA) task: This task examines neural activity during the buildup of the urge to blink. 
Blocks of eyes-open rest (30 s) alternate with blink suppression (60 s). During rest blocks, subjects fixate on 
the screen and are permitted to blink normally. During blink suppression blocks, subjects see the instruction 
"HOLD" and attempt to withhold blinking for the next 60 seconds. After 60s, subjects see a cue letting them 
know they are now permitted to blink (the word "OK" for 3 s), following which they rate the subjective urge 
experienced during the prior suppression block on a 5-point scale (1="none at all", 5="extreme") (3.5 s). 
Subjects are instructed to return to blink suppression should any accidental blinks occur. Eyes blinks are 
monitored (via eye tracking system connected to the scanner) to obtain rates of spontaneous blinking during 
rest as well as to identify accidental blinking during suppression blocks using an eyetracking device. Eight 
blocks of blink suppression and eight blocks of rest are presented over 2 runs. Each run lasts approximately 7 
minutes, for a total task length of 14 minutes.  
 
2. "Body-focused videos" (BFV) task: In the task, subjects view "body-focused" or control videos for 15 s. The 
body-focused videos depict 3 different scenarios: a brush stroking the underside of a hand, a close-up of a 
person's throat while swallowing, and a medical illustration of a heart beating. The event depicted in each 
scenario repeats several times, with the number of repetitions varying between blocks (e.g., videos depict the 
brush stroking the hand 3, 4, or 5 times). Each body-focused video has an associated control video showing 
repeating non-body-related events: a pen moving across a table, a ball sliding through a tube, and a colored 
rectangle changing in height. After watching the video, subjects report the number of repetitions using a 5-point 
scale (3.5 s) in order to ensure that attention is focused on the videos throughout the task (better accuracy 
leads to a small monetary bonus). A jittered ITI consisting of a fixation cross is then displayed for 2-6 s, after 
which a new video begins. In total, there are 27 body-focused and 27 control blocks (each of the 3 scenarios 
presented 9 times) over 3 runs. Each run lasts approximately 7 minutes, for a total task length of 21 minutes.  
 
3. SP provocation task: During the training session, the participant will rate images from the Berlin Obsessive-
Compulsive Disorder Picture Set (Simon et al., 2012) on how much they evoke their OCD symptoms or not (tic 
disorder patients will also complete this task, but if they do not have OCD symptoms they will rate that none are 
evoked from the task stimuli). They will also rate threat-related images and neutral images from the based on 


 
 
Page 14 
CONFIDENTIAL 
This material is the property of the NYU School of Medicine and Langone Medical Center.  Do not disclose or use except as authorized in 
writing by the study sponsor 
 
how negative they are or not. Threat-related images are from the standardized IAPS database and include 
pictures of snarling or ferocious looking animals, weapons, and injured or distressed-looking people. Neutral 
images are also taken from the IAPS database and include non-ferocious looking animals, people with neutral 
facial expressions, and objects such as books or tables. During the SP task in the scanner, patients view the 
OCD images that have been selected based on their ratings during the screening visit to trigger their OCD 
symptoms. Three different images of each type (SP, threat-related, neutral) are presented 6 times each in 
pseudorandom order over 2 runs. Each image is shown for 5 s, after which patients rate their current severity 
of SP on a 5-point scale ("none at all" to "very severe", 4 s), followed by a 2-6 s jittered ITI. Each run lasts 
approximately 4 min, for a total task time of 8 min.  
 
There may be minor changes to the content or timing of these tasks and the scanning protocol as the experiment 
is prepared and in the early stages of implementation. Specifically, if problems are encountered along the way 
regarding the length of the protocol or the utility of the tasks (e.g., if the total length of the scanning session 
appears to be too long for subjects), we may remove or alter some tasks or scans to address these issues. In 
no case will the risks to the subjects be increased by any changes, and the total time of the scanning session 
will never be increased above 90 minutes.  
 
5. Questionnaires: At the end of MRI scanning, subjects will be asked to fill out questionnaires about their 
emotions and beliefs, including: Beck Depression and Anxiety Inventories (Beck et al. 1996); Dimensional 
Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (Abramowitz et al. 2010); Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive 
Awareness (Mehling et al., 2012); Adolescent/Adult Sensory Profile Scale (Brown and Dunn., 2002); 
Perseverative Thinking Questionnaire (PTQ; Ehring et al., 2011); Frost Multidimensional Perfectionism scale 
(Frost et al., 1990); Obsessive-Compulsive Trait Core Dimensions Questionnaire (Pietrefesa et al., 2009); 
Resilience Scale (Wagnild et al., 1993); Not Just Right Experiences Questionnaire, Revised (Coles et al., 2003); 
Premonitory Urges for Tics Scale (Woods et al., 2005); The Psycho-Sensory hAllucinations Scale (PSAS) for 
Schizophrenia and Parkinson’s disease (Chéreau-Boudet et al., 2013); Quick Inventory of Depressive 
Symptomatology (QIDS, Rush et al. 2003).  
 
We will also ask participants to answer a few debriefing questions about the task stimuli, their subjective 
experience, and memory of the study. These inquiries may help illuminate flaws in study design.  
 
6. Drug dispensation 
At the end of the visit, patients will be given a 40-day supply of drug (ondansetron or placebo, blinded to study 
participant and investigator) and instructed to take the first dose on the following day in the morning with food 
(Day 1). There will be some flexibility with the timing of the first dose and the subject will be permitted to start 
within the first 3 days following the scan on a date that is convenient for them. 
 
7. Subject ID Card: 
Patients will be given a Subject ID Card that they will be asked to carry for the duration of the study. This Subject 
ID Card will indicate that they are enrolled in a clinical trial and may be taking 24mg of ondansetron and will 
include the research team's contact information. The research team will advise the patient to keep the card with 
them in case of any medical event or emergency during which a medical professional may need to know that 
they are enrolled in a clinical trial and/or may need to contact the research team for more information.  
 
8. Journaling Sheet: 
At the end of the visit, the patient will be given a “Journaling Sheet” where they will rate the severity of their 
OCD and sensory symptoms twice (afternoon and evening) during Week 1 (Days 1 to 7) and Week 4 (Days 21 
to 28). The purpose of the sheet is to track any changes over the course of the day related to the time that they 
took the study drug. 
 
(D and F) Phone Calls (Approximately Days 7 and 21, 30-60 minutes each call) 
The experimenter will call the subject on the phone at pre-arranged times to ask about study compliance, 
evaluate any side effects patients might be experiencing, and assess symptoms. This will involve administering 
the Patient-Rated Inventory of Side Effects (PRISE), the Y-BOCS or YGTSS (for OCD and TD patients, 


 
 
Page 15 
CONFIDENTIAL 
This material is the property of the NYU School of Medicine and Langone Medical Center.  Do not disclose or use except as authorized in 
writing by the study sponsor 
 
respectively), the SPS, and also assessing suicidal ideation in patients with QIDS item #12. During the Day 21 
Phone Call session, the study team member will remind the subject to start filling out the Journaling Sheet.  
For patients with EKG at screening within the normal range but within 430-450 ms for men or 450-470 ms for 
women, we will have them come into the lab at NYU or NKI at week 1 (approximately 7 days) instead of doing 
a phone call to perform a surveillance EKG to determine continued safety to participate. If the visit is remote, 
participants will be transported to CTSI or OPRD using a car service paid for by the study in order to complete 
the EKG. They may also drive themselves. All other non-medical procedures listed for this visit will be conducted 
over the phone.  
 
(E) Mid-Trial Visit (Approximately “Day 14”, 2 hours) 
For the Mid-Trial visit, the patient will meet with the study team remotely via Webex or come in-person to NYU 
or NKI to repeat symptom and side effects assessment (YBOCS/YGTSS, SPS, PRISE, and suicidal ideation) 
and fill out self-report questionnaires. In addition, the patient will meet with the licensed study team physician 
to ensure safety. This will be conducted in a separate, in-person visit if the first part of the visit is online. We will 
perform a repeat EKG during the mid-trial visit. The Mid-Trial Visit will ideally be scheduled for Day 14; 
realistically, we will allow patients to complete the procedures within a window of +/- 7 days. Participants will be 
transported to CTSI using a car service paid for by the study or using their own vehicles. 
 
(F) Final (Exit) Visit (Approximately Day 28, 4-6 hours) 
Participants will return to NKI to repeat MRI scanning (see Baseline Visit for procedures). In addition, they will 
fill out the same questionnaires as during the Baseline Visit and have their symptoms re-assessed with the Y-
BOCS/YGTSS and SPS. Side effects will again be evaluated using the PRISE. Suicidal ideation will be 
assessed using the QIDS item # 12. Repeat EKG and Bloodwork will be performed at the NKI Outpatient 
Research Department (OPRD; Director: Dr. Russell Tobe, co-investigator on the approved IRB protocol at the 
NKI site) and the subject will meet with a study team physician. The Final Visit will ideally be scheduled for Day 
28; realistically, we will allow patients to come into the lab within a window of +/- 7 days.  
 
In the rare instance that the patient wishes to break up the final visit, which is long, into two shorter appointments 
(scanning one day and medical testing on another day), we will try to accommodate their schedule. If the patient 
is from the NYC area and will be transported up to NKI via car service provided by the study, the repeat EKG 
and bloodwork and physician appointment may occur at the Bellevue CTSI instead of at the NKI OPRD. 
 
At the end of the Final Visit, subjects will be provided with psychiatric referral if desired. Arrangements will be 
made to compensate subjects for their time. 
 
Total time for participation, including the Screening Visit, Baseline Visit, Mid-Trial Visit and the Final Visit, and 
the 2 phone calls will be approximately 16-20 hours. 
 
Approximately one week after the Final Visit, the study coordinator will make a follow-up phone call with the 
patient to ask how they are functioning after completing the study and provide referral if necessary. 
4.2 Data Analysis and Data Monitoring 
 
(See R21/R33 application for section references) 
The primary endpoints of the study are clinical symptoms and fMRI data. The specific analyses (independent 
and dependent variables) will be unique to each task, as described below. Safety and tolerability of 4 weeks of 
24 mg ondansetron will also be evaluated.  
 
Alpha level will be set at 0.05 for all analyses. Task-based fMRI analysis will focus on brain activation in an a 
priori ROI consisting of bilateral insula and somatosensory cortex, although exploratory whole-brain analyses 
will also be conducted. Primary group-level analyses for the R33 phase will be performed on a modified intent 
to treat sample consisting of participants completing at least 2 weeks of treatment. Missing data values are 
expected to amount to 10% or less of the data. We will consider them as MAR and impute based on a regression 
model. The degrees of freedom of t-tests will be adjusted appropriately. Secondary per-protocol analyses will 
also be conducted.  


 
 
Page 16 
CONFIDENTIAL 
This material is the property of the NYU School of Medicine and Langone Medical Center.  Do not disclose or use except as authorized in 
writing by the study sponsor 
 
 
Task-based and symptoms analyses for R33: 
First-level fMRI analysis: For each fMRI task, image analysis at the first (subject) level will specify separate 
regressors for baseline and week 4 for conditions of interest (e.g., for the “urges-for-action” task: blink 
suppression at baseline, blink suppression at week 4, rest at baseline, rest at week 4) to examine contrasts 
between baseline and week 4 (e.g., blink suppression vs. rest for baseline vs. week 4). For each task, contrasts 
will also examine activation during the baseline scan only (e.g., blink suppression vs. rest at baseline scan). 
These latter contrasts will be performed in order to measure and adjust for any baseline differences in ROI 
activation between ondansetron and placebo groups. 
Group-level fMRI analysis: Testing for Hypothesis 2: Two-sample t-tests will compare ondansetron and placebo 
groups on change in activation over the 4-week trial (using first-level contrasts comparing baseline with week 
4). However, if there are significant baseline differences between the groups within the insula and 
somatosensory ROI (using two-sample t-tests on baseline scan contrasts), standardized parameter estimates 
will be extracted from these regions for each subject. These parameter estimates will then be specified as 
covariates in follow-up one-way ANOVAs comparing ondansetron and placebo groups on change in activation 
from baseline to week 4 after adjusting for baseline differences. 
 
Relationships with clinical symptoms: Testing for Hypothesis 3a: A change score will be computed between 
SPS score at baseline and after 4 weeks for each subject. Two-sample t-tests will compare ondansetron and 
placebo groups on SPS change scores to determine whether the intervention reduces SP significantly more 
than placebo. In addition, change scores from baseline to week 4 will be computed for measures of overall 
symptom severity (using Y-BOCS and YGTSS) and compared between ondansetron and placebo groups. If 
there are baseline differences between the groups in any of the symptom scales (SPS, Y- BOCS, or YGTSS), 
follow-up one-way ANOVAs will compare change scores between ondansetron and placebo groups after 
adjusting for baseline scores. Testing for Hypothesis 3b: If there are significant differences between 
ondansetron and placebo groups in (1) SPS change scores and (2) Y-BOCS or YGTSS change scores, a Sobel 
test of mediation205,206 will investigate whether group differences in Y-BOCS/YGTSS changes are mediated 
by SPS changes. Briefly, mediation analyses perform a series of regressions in order to determine whether the 
relationship between an independent and dependent variable (e.g., treatment group and Y-BOCS/YGTSS 
scores) reduces significantly after including a third mediator variable (e.g., SPS score). Testing for Hypothesis 
3c: If there are significant differences between ondansetron and placebo groups in (1) SPS change scores and 
(2) change in ROI activation or connectivity from baseline to week 4, a Sobel test will investigate whether group 
differences in SPS change are mediated by changes in activation or connectivity. 
 
Resting-state functional connectivity analysis: After heart rate and respiratory signals are removed from resting-
state 
data 
using 
“RETROICOR”207, 
analysis 
will 
proceed 
using 
the 
“conn” 
toolbox 
(www.nitrc.org/projects/conn) following our previous protocol26. Timecourses of the BOLD signal for each rest 
scan will be extracted from four seeds (6-mm radius spheres) in bilateral insula (two seeds in anterior and two 
seeds in mid-posterior insula, coordinates taken from prior work26,208). Partial correlations will be conducted 
between these timecourses and whole-brain gray matter, controlling for several factors. Timecourses from the 
top three principle components within white matter and CSF will be determined using the “CompCor” method209 
and included as covariates to control for noise without having to regress out global signal210,211. Additionally, 
the inclusion of 12 motion variables (6 realignment parameters and first derivatives) as covariates will control 
for movement. Because movement is a major concern for connectivity analysis212, we will exclude from resting- 
state analyses any subject moving > 1 mm or 0.5 degrees. Data will be filtered between 0.01 and 0.10 Hz213. 
At the first level, partial correlation coefficient images between each seed’s timecourse and the whole brain will 
be z-transformed and compared in contrasts between baseline and week 4. For Hypotheses 2 and 3c (R33), 
two-sample t-tests will compare ondansetron and placebo groups in change in connectivity between baseline 
and week 4. As with task analyses, baseline differences will be probed using t-tests and included as covariates 
in follow-up ANOVAs if necessary.  
 
Additional post-hoc analyses: Exploratory whole-brain analyses will be conducted for all contrasts of interest, 
correcting for multiple comparisons using cluster-level false discovery rate. For the R33 phase, we will probe 
for correlations between SPS score and whole-brain activation and connectivity in order to identify other future 
targets for treatment. We will also examine associations between other clinical measures (DOCS, PUTS, GAF) 


 
 
Page 17 
CONFIDENTIAL 
This material is the property of the NYU School of Medicine and Langone Medical Center.  Do not disclose or use except as authorized in 
writing by the study sponsor 
 
and ondansetron treatment as well as brain functioning. Investigation of symptom trajectories over the duration 
of the trial will use ANOVAs with time (baseline, week 1, 2, 3, 4) as a repeated measure. Any clinical or 
demographic differences remaining between the groups after randomization including age, gender, illness 
duration, and medication dosage (using fluoxetine equivalence) will be statistically controlled for in all analyses. 
For illness duration and medication, follow-up analyses will investigate the relationship between these variables 
and study measures (brain functioning and symptoms), not only to control for confounding but also to interrogate 
these variables as factors of interest. 
 
A Data Safety Monitoring Board consisting of external scientists was assembled in August of 2015 for the R21 
phase. This DSMB met every 6 months (February, August of 2016, and March 2017) via teleconference to 
review aggregate safety data. The board will continue to meet at this same schedule during the R33 phase. 
The DSMB meeting in March 2017 approved continuation to the R33 phase using the procedures described in 
this protocol. The board last met on December 20, 2017 (6 months after the start of the R33 phase in June of 
2017) and approved the continuation of the R33 phase. 
 
i. 
The primary safety measure discussed at DSMB meetings is the incidence of adverse events, 
which are assessed weekly throughout the trial using the Patient-Rated Inventory of Side effects 
(Rush et al., 2004, Control Clin Trials, 25, 119-142). The PRISE consists of a checklist of side 
effects in the categories of: Gastrointestinal, Heart, Skin, Nervous System, Eyes/Ears, 
Genital/Urinary, Sleep, Sexual Functioning, and Other (which includes symptoms related to energy 
and mood). Patients endorse items and indicate whether they are tolerable or distressing. 
Secondarily, safety outcomes related to results from medical surveillance tests (EKG, blood test) 
occurring during Mid-trial and Final visits will be discussed.  
ii. 
There are no predetermined stopping rules for the study. Every 6 months the DSMB will review 
side effects and determine whether the study may continue for the next 6 months. Critically, if any 
SAEs occur at any time during the trial, the study team will report this to the NYU Langone IRB and 
the DSMB within 48 hours and the determination regarding continuation of the study will be made 
at that time by both entities. In addition to the DSMB meetings, a study physician (Dr. Dan Iosifescu) 
will review side effects for each patient at the Mid-Trial and Final Visits. If there are any unexpected 
or severe side effects that the study physician determines pose a safety risk, this will be 
communicated immediately to the study team and the PI and a determination regarding 
continuation of the patient in the trial will be made.  
iii. 
Following the DSMB meetings, the Chair (Dr. Chris Pittenger, Yale University) discusses the safety 
data with the other board members, and together they make a determination about continuation of 
the study. This information is communicated both verbally to the PI (informally at the end of the 
teleconference), as well as in a written report prepared by the Chair and sent to the PI following the 
meeting. 
 
In addition to safety data, the DSMB also reviews any proposed amendments to the study protocol, performs 
ongoing monitoring of drop-outs, determines whether study procedures should be changed or the study should 
be halted, and performs periodic review of the completeness and validity of data to be used for analysis of 
safety and efficacy. The DSMB also ensures subject privacy and research data confidentiality. 
 
The Board comprises the following individuals: 
 
Chris Pittenger, MD, PhD 
Associate Professor of Psychiatry and in the Child Study Center 
Director, Yale OCD Research Clinic 
Co-Director, Neuroscience Research Training Program  
Yale University 
 
Dr. Pittenger is the Chair of the DSMB. He is an expert in neuroscience and obsessive-compulsive disorder. 
He has considerable experience in running clinical trials in OCD and related disorders, as well as conducting 
experimental studies in both animal and human subjects. Dr. Pittenger's research and clinical work have been 
acknowledged by a number of prestigious awards, including grant funding from the National Institutes of Health, 


 
 
Page 18 
CONFIDENTIAL 
This material is the property of the NYU School of Medicine and Langone Medical Center.  Do not disclose or use except as authorized in 
writing by the study sponsor 
 
NARSAD, the Tourette Syndrome of America, and the Doris Duke Charitable Trust, and awards from the 
National Institute of Mental Health, the Society for Neuroscience, the American College of 
Neuropsychopharmacology, the American Psychiatric Association, and the American College of Psychiatrists. 
He is a member of the Scientific Advisory Board of the International OCD Foundation and an active member of 
the Society for Neuroscience, the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, the Society of Biological 
Psychiatry, the American Neurological Association, the American Psychiatric Association, and other groups. 
 
Ted Satterthwaite, MD, MA 
Assistant Professor of Psychiatry 
University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine 
 
Dr. Satterthwaite is a psychiatrist and researcher with expertise in functional neuroimaging and its applications 
to psychiatric disorders. His research uses multi-modal neuroimaging to describe both normal and abnormal 
patterns of brain development, in order to better understand the origins of neuropsychiatric illness, and he has 
published extensively on data integrity and statistics in fMRI. He joined the faculty in 2014 and has served as 
the Director of Imaging Analytics of the Brain Behavior Laboratory since 2015. His work has been recognized 
with the Brain and Behavior Research Foundation's Klerman Prize for Clinical Research, the NIMH 
Biobehavioral Research Award for Innovative New Scientists (BRAINS) award, as well as several clinical 
teaching awards.  
 
Katherine Kirkwood 
Senior Biostatistician, Parexel 
 
Ms. Kirkwood is a biostatistician with experience in clinical trial methodology. Her primary research focuses on 
clinical trials, censored survival analysis, Bayesian inference, and methods for handling missing data. She has 
been a member of the DSMB for approximately 2 years when she was a staff member at the Icahn School of 
Medicine at Mount Sinai. As of April of 2020, she has left Mount Sinai for a position as Senior biostatistician at 
Parexel,  
 
4.3 Data Storage 
 
Subject names and contact information will be entered into a log sheet in a password-protected Excel document 
that is located on a password-protected network attached storage device behind a firewall at NYU Langone 
Medical Center. Only the research team members will have access to the passwords that will allow them to 
view this document. In this document, alongside the subject's name and contact information, a unique 
identifying code will be placed, which will be used for all other documents for the study. This information will not 
be carried outside the lab or left on flash drives. Paper consent forms containing identifying information (subject 
names) will be stored in locked filing cabinets at NYU Langone Medical Center. Digital consent forms will be 
stored on the REDCap server. Research data and files containing health information (such as files resulting 
from psychiatric evaluation) will not contain subject names and will only be labeled with subject ID numbers. 
De-identified paper documents (e.g., questionnaires and forms) will be stored in locked cabinets at NYU 
Langone Medical Center. All electronic files including MRI data are securely stored on a password protected 
network attached storage device protected behind a firewall that only study personnel have access to.  The 
password protected worksheet that links the identifying information (name, contact) with subject ID will be kept 
until the study is closed and all data analysis has been completed. Anonymized MRI and clinical data (without 
any identifying information) will be stored indefinitely.  
 
If potential participants locate our study information through a BuildClinical advertisement, they may be 
redirected to our study-specific landing page, and can elect to answer some screening questions prior to contact 
with a member of our research team. The potential participant's questions will be shared with the study team 
via a password-protected BuildClinical online account, and the data entered by potential participants gets routed 
into BuildClinical's platform. This platform utilises Secure Socket Layer (SSL) software, which encrypts all 
inputted information, keeps this information private and HIPAA compliant. This data is stored in BuildClinical's 


 
 
Page 19 
CONFIDENTIAL 
This material is the property of the NYU School of Medicine and Langone Medical Center.  Do not disclose or use except as authorized in 
writing by the study sponsor 
 
backend servers, which are stored in the USA at some of the most secure data centers in the world. Only the 
study team will have access to the login information to access our BuildClinical screening question data. 
4.3.1 Confidentiality 
 
If a subject calls or emails about participation, and a screening date is scheduled, then the subject's name and 
contact information will be entered into a log sheet in a password-protected Excel document that is located on 
a password protected network attached storage device protected behind a firewall. Only the research team 
members will have access to the passwords that will allow them to view this document. In this document, 
alongside the subject's name and contact information, a unique identifying code will be placed, which will be 
used for all other documents for the study. This information will not be carried outside the lab or left on flash 
drives. Participant names will not be submitted to the funding agency or used in any presentations of the data 
(posters, publications, reports). Paper consent forms containing identifying information (subject names) will be 
stored in locked filing cabinets. Only the PI and personnel employed by the PI will have access to these cabinets. 
MRI data are stripped of names and other identifiers and are only stored with a code number. De-identified 
paper documents (e.g., questionnaires and forms) will be stored in locked cabinets, separately from consent 
forms. Electronic files other than MRI data are also de-identified (labeled with code number only) and securely 
stored on a password protected network attached storage device protected behind a firewall that only study 
personnel have access to. Regular access to research records will be limited to NYU Langone Medical Center 
research staff employed by the PI and working on the project. However, fully de-identified data (e.g., MRI 
images, demographics) may be submitted to international neuroimaging consortia and/or publicly accessible 
neuroimaging databanks, as is encouraged by the funders of this project (NIH). 
 
Webex will be the platform used for remote screening visits. Webex is a HIPAA compliant platform that enables 
parties to communicate using a webcam. The study team member conducting the remote visits will be located 
in a private room to ensure confidentiality.  
 
4.3.2 Data Sharing  
 
These are the following institutions that data will be shared with: 
 
• 
NKI collaborators: Identifiable data may be shared with collaborators at the Nathan Kline Institute who 
are on the IRB-approved protocol at the NKI site, as it may be necessary to share this information for 
safety reasons.  
• 
A Data Safety Monitoring Board or other committee that will monitor the study on an ongoing basis for 
safety. 
• 
The sponsoring government agency and/or their representative who need to confirm the accuracy of 
the results submitted to the government or the use of government funds, as required by law:  National 
Institute of Health 
• 
The United States Food and Drug Administration as required by law 
• 
The United States Department of Health and Human Services and the Office of Human Research 
Protection as required by law 
• 
De-identified clinical and neuroimaging data, and associated files (e.g. behavioral response data 
generated during tasks), may be provided for use by other researchers. De-identified data may also be 
shared with public databanks and scientific consortia as it becomes available. 
• 
If requested, we will provide participants with a summary of the results from the study, without providing 
any names or individual level data from other participants. We also may provide subjects with images 
(jpegs) of their brain scan if they request it. 
 
The monitors, auditors, the IRB, the Office of Human Subjects Protection (OHRP) of the Department of Health 
and Human Services as well as the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) will be granted access to the data as 
required by law for the verification of the research procedures and integrity. Sharing de-identified data with other 
researchers/uploading to appropriate databases might help to expand upon and improve this research in the 


 
 
Page 20 
CONFIDENTIAL 
This material is the property of the NYU School of Medicine and Langone Medical Center.  Do not disclose or use except as authorized in 
writing by the study sponsor 
 
future. All shared clinical and neuroimaging data will be de-identified. De-identification will include removal of 
sensitive and identifying data (e.g. name, date of birth, contact information). The anonymized final data set will 
be made available upon request, with an announcement on the lab website providing information on how to 
obtain the data. In addition, final data may be uploaded to an appropriate database, such as the Open fMRI 
project, for broad availability. Data sharing will comply with local, state, and federal laws and regulations, 
including the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPPA), as well as institutional policies and 
review. 
 
Any shared data, whether it contains PHI or not, will be shared using secure methods including encryption and 
password protection. Shared external drives will be password protected and encrypted (using TrueCrypt or 
StorageCrypt). Alternatively, data may be transmitted over a secure network connection between two encrypted 
password-protected NAS devices or computers. If paper documents are shared, they will either be hand 
delivered to the recipient by a member of the study team or sent via certified mail. Data will not be shared using 
unsecured cloud-based methods or unencrypted USB drives. 
5 Equipment 
None of the equipment to be used in the study is investigational, and all have either received FDA 
approval or are exempt from FDA requlations. The list of equipment (located at NKI) includes:  
• 
Siemens 3T MAGNETOM Trio scanner with head coil (FDA approved; see attached 
documentation) 
• 
BIOPAC pulse oximeter transducer (clip on finger) and respiration transducer (belt placed 
across chest). These are commercially available, non-significant risk devices that are MR-
safe (see attached documentation).  
• 
SR Research Eyelink 1000 Eye tracker, which is a video camera mounted outside of the MRI 
scanner that monitors eye blinks and eye movements. This is a Class 1 non-significant risk 
device that is commercially available and MR-safe (see attached documentation). 
 
Several various types of software will be used to analyze the data, including AcqKnowledge software 
to analyze BIOPAC pulse and respiration data (https://www.biopac.com/product/acqknowledge-
software), Microsoft Excel and SAS (https://www.sas.com/en_us/software/stat.html) to analyze 
behavioral data, and MATLAB (https://www.mathworks.com/products/matlab.html) to analyze MRI 
data. As these products do not interact with subjects and are only used for data analysis, they pose 
no risk and are not subject to FDA regulations. 
 
6 Risk/Benefit Assessment 
6.1 Risk 
 
Screening and evaluation: There are no serious risks associated with the screening and evaluation phases of 
this study.  Participants may become uncomfortable when asked personal questions, and experience feeling 
embarrassed or nervous. However, they may refuse to answer individual questions. Interviewers will strive to 
help subjects feel as comfortable as possible. 
 
Medical Tests (Blood Test, EKG, Urine Test, Vital Signs, History & Physical): Mild temporary discomforts such 
as bleeding, bruising, or fainting may occur when blood samples are obtained.  Rarely, an infection develops 
at the site of the blood draw.  If an infection does occur, it can be treated. There are no known risks to the EKG 
and urine tests. A subject may find these tests uncomfortable.   
 
Rating scales and surveys: All are non-invasive and should add no risk. The major disadvantages are the time 
taken to complete them, and possible breach of confidentiality. Our past experience with these measures 
indicates that they are acceptable to subjects. Careful efforts aimed at maintaining confidentiality have been 


 
 
Page 21 
CONFIDENTIAL 
This material is the property of the NYU School of Medicine and Langone Medical Center.  Do not disclose or use except as authorized in 
writing by the study sponsor 
 
effective in previous research, and only patients’ code numbers will be recorded on the forms themselves to 
protect confidentiality. 
 
Paradigms: There is minor risk that subjects will feel uncomfortable or bored performing the tasks. Subjects 
may refuse to do any task, and research team members will seek to make sure they are not in psychological 
distress both during and after the task. There is very little risk associated with performing the tasks, which are 
similar to the risks posed by playing a computer or video game. 
 
Physiological measurement: There are no known risks associated with the physiological measurements taken 
using the BIOPAC system. There is a risk that subjects may feel uncomfortable with the placement of the 
equipment. If subjects are uncomfortable, the equipment will be altered or removed entirely. 
 
Ginger Consumption: Ginger is a 5HT3 antagonist and since it acts through a similar biological mechanism as 
ondansetron, high ginger consumption could pose a risk for patients receiving active drug by potentially 
increasing the overall amount of serotonin antagonism experienced. We will ask patients both during phone 
screen and the study doctor visit in the screening appointment how much ginger they consume and will ask 
them to limit ginger consumption during the length of the trial (to ginger consumption in food or with supplement 
to once or less per week). 
 
MRI scanning: Risks associated with the MRI imaging are minimal and include: (1) discomfort or anxiety from 
being in the confined space of the MRI scanner. The MRI scanner makes loud, vibrating noises. Sometimes, 
subjects report a temporary, slight dizziness or light-headedness when they come out of the scanner; (2) the 
MRI may reveal an abnormality that is already in the brain, such as a cyst or tumor. Many such abnormalities 
are not clinically significant, but may require further investigation. Such a finding might require additional tests, 
and maybe even treatment, neither of which would be paid for by the investigators, the sponsor, or NYU 
Langone Medical Center; (3) the strong magnetic field of the MRI scanner could disturb a foreign metallic body 
in the patient and cause injury. We have taken several steps to minimize these risks, including excluding 
subjects with metals in their body that would pose a risk; (4) A small number of people with tattoos have reported 
feeling mild tingling or heating during MRI scanning. If a patient has tattoos and reports an unpleasant tingling 
or heating during the scan, we will stop the scan immediately. The risks that MRI imaging may pose to an 
embryo or fetus are unknown as a result, pregnant subjects will be excluded. 
 
Ondansetron: Ondansetron hydrochloride is an FDA approved drug that has been used clinically in adult 
populations. Ondansetron has a high therapeutic index, and accidental ingestion of ten times the recommended 
daily dose with no fatality has been reported (Ye et al., 2006).  
 
Most adverse effects are rare and resolve after cessation of drug. They are most frequently reported after IV 
administration, in patient groups also receiving chemotherapy, are dose-dependent, and are more pronounced 
over repeated administration.  
 
Short-term dosing: 
 
Most commonly, ondansetron has been used as a single dose or multiple doses for a short period of time for 
the treatment of nausea and vomiting related to chemotherapy, radiation, or surgery.  
 
In a randomized clinical trial of 300 patients receiving a single 24 mg dose of ondansetron to treat nausea 
associated with highly-emetogenic cisplatin-based chemotherapy, the only side effect occurring in greater than 
5 % of patients was headache (at 11 %, reference: Zofran prescribing information). In a randomized clinical trial 
of 550 patients receiving 16 mg ondansetron and 531 patients receiving placebo for post-operative nausea, 
only headache had a higher rate of incidence in the ondansetron group (9 vs. 5 %) (reference: Zofran 
prescribing information). 
 
Among patients taking ondansetron for chemotherapy or surgery-related nausea, the most commonly reported 
side effects (> 5 %) include:  
• 
headache 


 
 
Page 22 
CONFIDENTIAL 
This material is the property of the NYU School of Medicine and Langone Medical Center.  Do not disclose or use except as authorized in 
writing by the study sponsor 
 
• 
dizziness 
• 
fatigue or drowsiness 
• 
diarrhea or constipation 
 
Rare but reported side effects, mostly with IV administration in patients receiving other medications, that have 
not been determined to be causally related to ondansetron include: 
• 
Neurological (acute reversible chorea, tonic-clonic seizure, grand mal seizure, extrapyramidal signs,  
oculogyric crisis) 
• 
Skin (paresthesia, hot and cold sensations) 
• 
Psychiatric (depression) 
• 
Cardiovascular (including angina, atrial fibrillation, cardiac dysrhythmia, hypotension, atrioventricular  
block, ST segment depression, syncope, tachycardia, Torsades de points, QT prolongation) 
• 
Endocrine (hypokalemia) 
• 
Hepatic (liver failure, hepatic necrosis, hepatitis, transient increases in liver enzymes) 
• 
Gastrointestinal (bowel obstruction) 
• 
Immunological (Anaphylactic and hypersensitivity reactions, fever) 
• 
Ophthalmologic (blurred vision and transient blindness)  
 
The FDA has issued a warning for the emergence of serotonin syndrome for ondansetron particularly when 
used in combination with other serotonergic drugs (serotonin-reuptake inhibitors (SSRI/SNRI), monoamine 
oxidase inhibitors, mirtazapine, fentanyl, lithium, tramadol, and intravenous methylene blue). Symptoms 
associated with serotonin syndrome may include the following combination of signs and symptoms: mental 
status changes (e.g., agitation, hallucinations, delirium, and coma), autonomic instability (e.g., tachycardia, 
labile blood pressure, dizziness, diaphoresis, flushing, hyperthermia), neuromuscular symptoms (e.g., tremor, 
rigidity, myoclonus, hyperreflexia, incoordination), seizures, with or without gastrointestinal symptoms (e.g., 
nausea, vomiting, diarrhea). The likelihood of experiencing serotonin syndrome is very small. Patients will be 
monitored for the emergence of symptoms related to serotonin syndrome, especially with concomitant use of 
ondansetron and other serotonergic drugs. If symptoms of serotonin syndrome occur, they will immediately 
discontinue ondansetron and be referred for treatment.  
 
In the R21 phase of the study, healthy volunteers were administered single doses of ondansetron (8, 16, or 24 
mg) prior to MRI scanning. Side effects were evaluated approximately 3 hours after drug administration using 
the PRISE. A table showing reported side effects across the 3 groups (n=56) is included with this submission. 
A significantly greater percentage of subjects reported ringing in the ears for the ondansetron (5/56) than 
placebo (1/56) session (McNemar’s test statistic (S)=4.0, p=0.05). When looking within each dose group 
separately, for the 8-mg dose group, a significantly greater percentage of subjects reported fatigue for the 
placebo (9/56) than ondansetron (4/56) session (S=5, p=0.03). For the 16-mg dose group, there was trend for 
a greater percentage of subjects to report ringing in the ears for the ondansetron (4/56) than placebo (1/56) 
session (S=3, p=0.08). For the 24-mg dose group, there was a trend for a greater percentage of subjects to 
report blurred vision for the placebo (4/56) than ondansetron (1/56) session (S=3, p=0.08).  As can be seen, 
the most commonly reported side effects for both sessions were fatigue and poor concentration, which is likely 
due to the fact that subjects had just completed the MRI scan.   
 
Longer-term (i.e., multiple weeks) repeated dosing: 
 
Previous studies in psychiatric disorders have used ondansetron over the course of multiple weeks. To our 
knowledge, no prior study has investigated the use of single 24 mg doses of ondansetron over multiple weeks. 
However, there are multiple published research studies using 24 mg over a 24-hour period (typically given as 
8 mg t.i.d.) for up to 4 weeks (Faris et al., 2000, The Lancet, 355, 792-797; Faris et al., 1998, Pain, 77, 297-
303; Muller et al., 1998, European Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 19, 865-870; Toren et al., 2005, 
Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 66, 499-503), with no reported safety concerns or adverse events except mild 
and transient abdominal pain, which was reported by 1 out of 15 patients in the ondansetron group and 1 out 
of 15 patients in the placebo group in the study by Toren et al. (2005). Adverse effects in this same study also 
included general gastrointestinal complaints leading to dropout of 1 patient in the ondansetron group. 
 


 
 
Page 23 
CONFIDENTIAL 
This material is the property of the NYU School of Medicine and Langone Medical Center.  Do not disclose or use except as authorized in 
writing by the study sponsor 
 
In an 8-week trial using 8 mg of daily ondansetron plus an antidepressant (fluvoxamine) (23 patients) vs. 
fluvoxamine only (23 patients) in OCD patients (Heidari et al., 2014), the frequency of adverse events was not 
significantly different between the groups. Adverse events reported in both groups included: headache (13-21 
%), dry mouth (13 %), constipation (17 %), dizziness (13-26 %), muscle cramps (8-17 %), insomnia (8-13 %), 
diarrhea (8 %), and nervousness (17-21 %).  
6.2 Protection Against Risks 
 
We plan to protect participants from adverse effects of ondansetron by excluding individuals predisposed to 
risk caused by allergies to ondansetron or other 5-HT3 antagonists, heart disease, congestive heart failure, 
heart rhythm disorder, congenital Long QT syndrome, known electrolyte imbalance, and hepatic impairment. 
Additionally, subjects who report taking apomorphine, and pregnant and nursing women will also be excluded. 
We will assess for the above conditions by evaluating medical history (via self-report during the phone screen 
and again during the Screening Visit), and conducting pregnancy testing during the Screening Visit. We will 
obtain a History & Physical, Vital Signs, and EKG during the Screening visit and will exclude for any cardiac 
abnormalities that the study physician (Dr. Dan Iosifescu) judges to pose a safety risk. Complete Blood Count 
(CBC) and Comprehensive Metabolic Panel (CMP) tests will also be run to ensure lack of major medical illness 
or abnormalities that would increase risk. We will exclude subjects with electrolyte abnormalities, hepatic 
impairment, or any other major medical illness that the study physicians believe would increase risk.  We will 
be carefully monitoring the subject during the experiment to ensure that any drug effects experienced are noted 
and medical intervention provided, if necessary. All side effects will be assessed weekly, and patients will have 
a surveillance EKG at the week 2 visit. Higher-risk patients (those with normal QTc within the range of 430-450 
ms for men and 450-470 ms for women) will have surveillance EKGs at both week 1 and week 2.  The EKG, 
blood testing, and physician meeting conducted at the Screening Visit will be repeated at the Final (exit) Visit 
and the study coordinator will also call the patients approximately one week after the Final Visit to ensure safety. 
 
At any point should a medical emergency arise, a study physician or other licensed medical provider will be 
available. Other facilities at NYU and NKI will be made available if the need arises. 
 
There could be a breach of confidentiality regarding participants study participation or research records, but 
there are measures in place to limit this risk (see above). 
6.3 Potential Benefits to Subjects 
There may be no direct benefits to a subject for participation in this study. However, it is possible that some 
patients will experience a reduction of symptom severity when taking the study drug. This research will 
contribute to the body of knowledge in psychiatric neuroscience by elucidating the neural mechanisms of OCD 
and tic disorders and the effects of ondansetron on brain function in these patient populations. 
6.4 Alternatives to Participation 
 
There are several medications for OCD that subjects can take as an alternative and can also seek therapy for 
symptom reduction. Another alternative is to not participate in the study. 
 
6.5 Costs to the Subject 
There are typically no additional costs to subjects for participating in this study. However, if the MRI identifies 
an abnormality, it may lead to extra medical costs for the subject. The cost of any extra tests would be billed to 
the subject’s insurance provider and will not be reimbursed by the research project or NYU.  
6.6 Payment for Participation 
Subjects will be compensated at a rate of 25 dollars per hour for their time and effort. In our prior experience 
running this trial for the past 5 months at the PI’s prior institution, we estimate that the maximum that they will 
end up being paid is $600. Most participants receive less than this (between 400 and 500) but since we pay at 


 
 
Page 24 
CONFIDENTIAL 
This material is the property of the NYU School of Medicine and Langone Medical Center.  Do not disclose or use except as authorized in 
writing by the study sponsor 
 
an hourly rate the subject compensation varies based on a number of factors including the complexity of the 
clinical presentation, the wait time (i.e. to see a study clinician or delays at the scanner), and if the subject 
withdraws from the study early. We will additionally pay for travel time to and from NKI for scanning visits (up 
to 1 hour each way) and will compensate the patient for the costs of transportation to and from NKI. If a 
subject is revealed to be ineligible to participate during the screening process, they will receive compensation 
for time already spent, or 25 dollars, whichever is greater. Subjects who participate in remote screening 
procedures but are found to be ineligible for the study will receive an electronic Amazon gift card worth 25 
dollars for each hour of time spent rounded up to the nearest hour. Eligible participants who continue on in the 
study will be paid for remote study visits at their next in-person study visit.The study drug will be paid for 
through a grant to the PI from the National Institutes of Health, and is at no cost to the subject.    
7 Investigator’s Qualifications & Experience 
 
Please find attached to the submission the CV/resume of the investigators of this protocol.  
8 Attachments 
 
1) Clinical Trial Consent Form_Clean 
2) Clinical Trial Consent Form_TrackChanges 
3) Phone Screen Form_Clean 
4) Phone Screen Form_TrackChanges 
5) Summary of Modifications 
6) Family History Questionnaire 
7) NYU Protocol_ Clean