Question: Regarding a city which is the birthplace of Joseph Fiennes, why should be the statement, that GSS code (2011) is E04010464,  considered depreciated ?
Choices:
retraction
item/value with less accuracy
not been able to confirm this claim
former entity
anachronism
does not exactly match
withdrawn identifier value
treaty not ratified
broken link
forgery
Answer: withdrawn identifier value
SPARQL: SELECT DISTINCT ?qpv WHERE { ?e <pred:instance_of> ?c . ?c <pred:name> "city" . ?e_1 <place_of_birth> ?e . ?e_1 <pred:name> "Joseph Fiennes" .  ?e <GSS_code_(2011)> ?pv . ?pv <pred:value> "E04010464" . [ <pred:fact_h> ?e ; <pred:fact_r> <GSS_code_(2011)> ; <pred:fact_t> ?pv ] <reason_for_deprecation> ?qpv .  }
Program:
function: Find
inputs: Joseph Fiennes
function: Relate
dependencies: 0
inputs: place of birth
forward
function: FilterConcept
dependencies: 1
inputs: city
function: QueryAttrQualifier
dependencies: 2
inputs: GSS code (2011)
E04010464
reason for deprecation