10 U.S.C. § 2410p (ARMED FORCES)
[§ 2410p. Renumbered § 4292]
heading: Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
heading: Update of Regulations on Lead System Integrators
text: Pub. L. 109–364, div. A, title VIII, § 807(b), Oct. 17, 2006, 120 Stat. 2316, which required the Secretary of Defense to update acquisition regulations regarding lead system integrators, was repealed by Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, § 812(b)(35), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1849.
heading: Prohibition on New Lead Systems Integrators
text: Pub. L. 110–181, div. A, title VIII, § 802, Jan. 28, 2008, 122 Stat. 206, as amended by Pub. L. 110–417, [div. A], title I, § 112, Oct. 14, 2008, 122 Stat. 4374; Pub. L. 116–92, div. A, title IX, § 902(100), Dec. 20, 2019, 133 Stat. 1555, provided that:
“(a) Prohibitions on the Use of Lead Systems Integrators.—
“(1) Prohibition on new lead systems integrators.—
Effective October 1, 2010, the Department of Defense may not award a new contract for lead systems integrator functions in the acquisition of a major system to any entity that was not performing lead systems integrator functions in the acquisition of the major system prior to the date of the enactment of this Act [Jan. 28, 2008].
“(2) Prohibition on lead systems integrators beyond low-rate initial production.—
Effective on the date of the enactment of this Act, the Department of Defense may award a new contract for lead systems integrator functions in the acquisition of a major system only if—
“(A) the major system has not yet proceeded beyond low-rate initial production; or
“(B) the Secretary of Defense determines in writing that it would not be practicable to carry out the acquisition without continuing to use a contractor to perform lead systems integrator functions and that doing so is in the best interest of the Department.
“(3) Requirements relating to determinations.—
A determination under paragraph (2)(B)—
“(A) shall specify the reasons why it would not be practicable to carry out the acquisition without continuing to use a contractor to perform lead systems integrator functions (including a discussion of alternatives, such as the use of the Department of Defense workforce, or a system engineering and technical assistance contractor);
“(B) shall include a plan for phasing out the use of contracted lead systems integrator functions over the shortest period of time consistent with the interest of the national defense;
“(C) may not be delegated below the level of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment; and
“(D) shall be provided to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives at least 45 days before the award of a contract pursuant to the determination.
“(b) Acquisition Workforce.—
“(1) Requirement.—
The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that the acquisition workforce is of the appropriate size and skill level necessary—
“(A) to accomplish inherently governmental functions related to acquisition of major systems; and
“(B) to effectuate the purpose of subsection (a) to minimize and eventually eliminate the use of contractors to perform lead systems integrator functions.
“(2) Report.—
The Secretary shall include an update on the progress made in complying with paragraph (1) in the annual report required by section 820 of the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Public Law 109–364; 120 Stat. 2330) [10 U.S.C. 1701 note].
“(c) Exception for Contracts for Other Management Services.—
The Department of Defense may continue to award contracts for the procurement of services the primary purpose of which is to perform acquisition support functions with respect to the development or production of a major system, if the following conditions are met with respect to each such contract:
“(1) The contract prohibits the contractor from performing inherently governmental functions.
“(2) The Department of Defense organization responsible for the development or production of the major system ensures that Federal employees are responsible for—
“(A) determining courses of action to be taken in the best interest of the government; and
“(B) determining best technical performance for the warfighter.
“(3) The contract requires that the prime contractor for the contract may not advise or recommend the award of a contract or subcontract for the development or production of the major system to an entity owned in whole or in part by the prime contractor.
“(d) Definitions.—
In this section:
“(1) Lead systems integrator.—
The term ‘lead systems integrator’ means—
“(A) a prime contractor for the development or production of a major system, if the prime contractor is not expected at the time of award to perform a substantial portion of the work on the system and the major subsystems; or
“(B) a prime contractor under a contract for the procurement of services the primary purpose of which is to perform acquisition functions closely associated with inherently governmental functions with respect to the development or production of a major system.
“(2) Major system.—
The term ‘major system’ has the meaning given such term in section 2302d of title 10, United States Code [now 10 U.S.C. 3041].
“(3) Low-rate initial production.—
The term ‘low-rate initial production’ has the meaning given such term in section 2400 of title 10, United States Code [now 10 U.S.C. 4231].
“(e) Status of Future Combat Systems Program Lead System Integrator.—
“(1) Lead systems integrator.—
In the case of the Future Combat Systems program, the prime contractor of the program shall be considered to be a lead systems integrator until 45 days after the Secretary of the Army certifies in writing to the congressional defense committees [Committees on Armed Services and Appropriations of the Senate and the House of Representatives] that such contractor is no longer serving as the lead systems integrator.
“(2) New contracts.—
In applying subsection (a)(1) or (a)(2), any modification to the existing contract for the Future Combat Systems program, for the purpose of entering into full-rate production of major systems or subsystems, shall be considered a new contract.”