14 U.S.C. § 2902 (COAST GUARD)
§ 2902. Capital investment plan
(a) In General.—
On the date on which the President submits to Congress a budget pursuant to section 1105 of title 31, the Commandant of the Coast Guard shall submit to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate—
(1) a capital investment plan for the Coast Guard that identifies for each capital asset for which appropriations are proposed in that budget—
(A) the proposed appropriations included in the budget;
(B) the total estimated cost of completion based on the proposed appropriations included in the budget;
(C) projected funding levels for each fiscal year for the next 5 fiscal years or until project completion, whichever is earlier;
(D) an estimated completion date based on the proposed appropriations included in the budget; and
(E) an acquisition program baseline, as applicable; and
(2) a list of each unfunded priority for the Coast Guard.
(b) New Capital Assets.—
In the fiscal year following each fiscal year for which appropriations are enacted for a new capital asset, the report submitted under subsection (a) shall include—
(1) an estimated life-cycle cost estimate for the new capital asset;
(2) an assessment of the impact the new capital asset will have on—
(A) delivery dates for each capital asset;
(B) estimated completion dates for each capital asset;
(C) the total estimated cost to complete each capital asset; and
(D) other planned construction or improvement projects; and
(3) recommended funding levels for each capital asset necessary to meet the estimated completion dates and total estimated costs included in the such 1 asset’s approved acquisition program baseline.
(c) Definitions.—
In this section—
(1) the term “unfunded priority” means a program or mission requirement that—
(A) has not been selected for funding in the applicable proposed budget;
(B) is necessary to fulfill a requirement associated with an operational need; and
(C) the Commandant would have recommended for inclusion in the applicable proposed budget had additional resources been available or had the requirement emerged before the budget was submitted; and
(2) the term “new capital asset” means—
(A) an acquisition program that does not have an approved acquisition program baseline; or
(B) the acquisition of a capital asset in excess of the number included in the approved acquisition program baseline.
(Added Pub. L. 97–295, § 2(20)(A), Oct. 12, 1982, 96 Stat. 1303, § 663; amended Pub. L. 100–448, § 25, Sept. 28, 1988, 102 Stat. 1847; Pub. L. 101–595, title III, § 311(c), Nov. 16, 1990, 104 Stat. 2987; Pub. L. 107–295, title IV, § 408(a)(2), Nov. 25, 2002, 116 Stat. 2117; Pub. L. 112–213, title II, § 213(a), Dec. 20, 2012, 126 Stat. 1552; renumbered § 2902 and amended Pub. L. 114–120, title I, § 101(d)(2), title II, § 204(b), Feb. 8, 2016, 130 Stat. 31, 34.)
text: Historical and Revision Notes
Revised Section
Source (U.S. Code)
Source (Statutes at Large)
663
14:656(note).
Oct. 3, 1980, Pub. L. 96–376, § 12, 94 Stat. 1511.
The words “with the fiscal year 1982 budget request” and “subsequent” are omitted as executed.
heading: Amendments
text: 2016—Pub. L. 114–120, § 101(d)(2), renumbered section 663 of this title as this section.
Subsec. (a)(1)(B). Pub. L. 114–120, § 204(b)(1)(A), substituted “completion based on the proposed appropriations included in the budget;” for “completion;”.
Subsec. (a)(1)(D). Pub. L. 114–120, § 204(b)(1)(B), substituted “based on the proposed appropriations included in the budget;” for “at the projected funding levels;”.
Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 114–120, § 204(b)(2), added subsec. (b). Former subsec. (b) redesignated (c).
Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 114–120, § 204(b)(2), (3), redesignated subsec. (b) as (c) and amended it generally. Prior to amendment, text read as follows: “In this section, the term ‘unfunded priority’ means a program or mission requirement that—
“(1) has not been selected for funding in the applicable proposed budget;
“(2) is necessary to fulfill a requirement associated with an operational need; and
“(3) the Commandant would have recommended for inclusion in the applicable proposed budget had additional resources been available or had the requirement emerged before the budget was submitted.”
2012—Pub. L. 112–213 amended section generally. Prior to amendment, text read as follows: “The President shall submit to Congress with each budget request for the Coast Guard the current copy of the Coast Guard’s Capital Investment Plan, Cutter Plan, Aviation Plan, Shore Facilities Plan, and Information Resources Management Plan. Not later than 30 days after the date on which the President submits to the Congress a budget under section 1105 of title 31 which includes a proposed 2-year budget for the Coast Guard, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation and the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate, and to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure and the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives, detailed Coast Guard budget estimates for the fiscal years covered by such proposed 2-year budget.”
2002—Pub. L. 107–295 substituted “Transportation and Infrastructure” for “Merchant Marine and Fisheries”.
1990—Pub. L. 101–595 substituted “Shore Facilities Plan, and Information Resources Management Plan.” for “and Shore Facilities Plan.”
1988—Pub. L. 100–448 inserted at end “Not later than 30 days after the date on which the President submits to the Congress a budget under section 1105 of title 31 which includes a proposed 2-year budget for the Coast Guard, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation and the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate, and to the Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries and the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives, detailed Coast Guard budget estimates for the fiscal years covered by such proposed 2-year budget.”
heading: Additional Submissions
text: Commandant of the Coast Guard shall submit to the Committee on Homeland Security of the House of Representatives each plan required under this section, see section 101(f) of Pub. L. 114–120, set out as a note under section 569 of this title.
heading: Capital Investment Plan
text: Pub. L. 111–281, title IX, § 918, Oct. 15, 2010, 124 Stat. 3022, which required the Commandant to submit to Congress the Coast Guard’s 5-year capital investment plan concurrent with the President’s budget submission for each fiscal year, was repealed by Pub. L. 112–213, title II, § 213(c)(3), Dec. 20, 2012, 126 Stat. 1553.
heading: Deepwater Reports
text: Pub. L. 109–241, title IV, § 408, July 11, 2006, 120 Stat. 537, as amended by Pub. L. 112–213, title II, § 210(c)(1), Dec. 20, 2012, 126 Stat. 1551, provided that:
“[(a) Repealed. Pub. L. 112–213, title II, § 210(c)(1), Dec. 20, 2012, 126 Stat. 1551.]
“(b) Deepwater Acceleration Report.—
Not later than 30 days after the date of enactment of this Act [July 11, 2006], the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate and the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives a report on the acceleration of the current Deepwater program acquisition timeline that reflects completion of the Deepwater program in each of 10 years and 15 years and includes—
“(1) a detailed explanation of the number and type of each asset that would be procured for each fiscal year under each accelerated acquisition timeline;
“(2) the required funding for such completion under each accelerated acquisition timeline;
“(3) anticipated costs associated with legacy asset sustainment for the Deepwater program under each accelerated acquisition timeline;
“(4) anticipated mission deficiencies, if any, associated with the continued degradation of legacy assets in combination with the procurement of new assets under each accelerated acquisition timeline; and
“(5) an evaluation of the overall feasibility of achieving each accelerated acquisition timeline, including—
“(A) contractor capacity;
“(B) national shipbuilding capacity;
“(C) asset integration into Coast Guard facilities;
“(D) required personnel; and
“(E) training infrastructure capacity on technology associated with new assets.
“(c) Oversight Report.—
Not later than 90 days after the date of enactment of this Act [July 11, 2006], the Commandant of the Coast Guard, in consultation with the Government Accountability Office, shall submit to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate and the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives a report on the status of the Coast Guard’s implementation of the Government Accountability Office’s recommendations in its report, GAO–04–380, entitled ‘Coast Guard Deepwater Program Needs Increased Attention to Management and Contractor Oversight’, including the dates by which the Coast Guard plans to complete implementation of such recommendations if any of such recommendations remain open as of the date the report is transmitted to the Committees.
“(d) Independent Analysis of Revised Deepwater Plan.—
The Secretary may periodically, either through an internal review process or a contract with an outside entity, conduct an analysis of all or part of the Deepwater program and assess whether—
“(1) the choice of assets and capabilities selected as part of that program meets the Coast Guard’s goals for performance and minimizing total ownership costs; or
“(2) additional or different assets should be considered as part of that program.”
heading: Revised Deepwater Implementation Plan
text: Pub. L. 111–83, title II, Oct. 28, 2009, 123 Stat. 2153, provided in part: “That the Secretary [of Homeland Security] shall submit to the Committees on Appropriations of the Senate and the House of Representatives, in conjunction with the fiscal year 2011 budget request, a comprehensive review of the Revised Deepwater Implementation Plan, and every 5 years thereafter, that includes a complete projection of the acquisition costs and schedule for the duration of the plan”.
Similar provisions were contained in the following prior appropriation acts:
Pub. L. 110–329, div. D, title II, Sept. 30, 2008, 122 Stat. 3665.
Pub. L. 110–161, div. E, title II, Dec. 26, 2007, 121 Stat. 2056.
Pub. L. 109–295, title II, Oct. 4, 2006, 120 Stat. 1365.
Pub. L. 109–90, title II, Oct. 18, 2005, 119 Stat. 2072.
heading: Future-Years Capital Investment Plan
text: Pub. L. 113–6, div. D, title II, Mar. 26, 2013, 127 Stat. 351, provided in part:
“That the Commandant of the Coast Guard shall submit to the Committees on Appropriations of the Senate and the House of Representatives, at the time that the President’s budget is submitted each year under section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code, a future-years capital investment plan for the Coast Guard that identifies for each requested capital asset—
“(1) the proposed appropriations included in that budget;
“(2) the total estimated cost of completion, including and clearly delineating the costs of associated major acquisition systems infrastructure and transition to operations;
“(3) projected funding levels for each fiscal year for the next 5 fiscal years or until acquisition program baseline or project completion, whichever is earlier;
“(4) an estimated completion date at the projected funding levels; and
“(5) a current acquisition program baseline for each capital asset, as applicable, that—
“(A) includes the total acquisition cost of each asset, subdivided by fiscal year and including a detailed description of the purpose of the proposed funding levels for each fiscal year, including for each fiscal year funds requested for design, pre-acquisition activities, production, structural modifications, missionization, post-delivery, and transition to operations costs;
“(B) includes a detailed project schedule through completion, subdivided by fiscal year, that details—
“(i) quantities planned for each fiscal year; and
“(ii) major acquisition and project events, including development of operational requirements, contracting actions, design reviews, production, delivery, test and evaluation, and transition to operations, including necessary training, shore infrastructure, and logistics;
“(C) notes and explains any deviations in cost, performance parameters, schedule, or estimated date of completion from the original acquisition program baseline and the most recent baseline approved by the Department of Homeland Security’s Acquisition Review Board, if applicable;
“(D) aligns the acquisition of each asset to mission requirements by defining existing capabilities of comparable legacy assets, identifying known capability gaps between such existing capabilities and stated mission requirements, and explaining how the acquisition of each asset will address such known capability gaps;
“(E) defines life-cycle costs for each asset and the date of the estimate on which such costs are based, including all associated costs of major acquisitions systems infrastructure and transition to operations, delineated by purpose and fiscal year for the projected service life of the asset;
“(F) includes the earned value management system summary schedule performance index and cost performance index for each asset, if applicable; and
“(G) includes a phase-out and decommissioning schedule delineated by fiscal year for each existing legacy asset that each asset is intended to replace or recapitalize:
Provided further, That the Commandant of the Coast Guard shall ensure that amounts specified in the future-years capital investment plan are consistent, to the maximum extent practicable, with proposed appropriations necessary to support the programs, projects, and activities of the Coast Guard in the President’s budget as submitted under section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code, for that fiscal year: Provided further, That any inconsistencies between the capital investment plan and proposed appropriations shall be identified and justified”.
Similar provisions were contained in the following appropriation acts:
Pub. L. 114–4, title II, Mar. 4, 2015, 129 Stat. 48.
Pub. L. 113–76, div. F, title II, Jan. 17, 2014, 128 Stat. 256.
Pub. L. 112–74, div. D, title II, Dec. 23, 2011, 125 Stat. 954.
Pub. L. 111–83, title II, Oct. 28, 2009, 123 Stat. 2153.
Pub. L. 110–329, div. D, title II, Sept. 30, 2008, 122 Stat. 3665.
Pub. L. 110–161, div. E, title II, Dec. 26, 2007, 121 Stat. 2056.
Pub. L. 109–295, title II, Oct. 4, 2006, 120 Stat. 1365.
Pub. L. 109–90, title II, Oct. 18, 2005, 119 Stat. 2072.
Pub. L. 108–334, title II, Oct. 18, 2004, 118 Stat. 1306.
heading: Unfunded Priorities
text: Pub. L. 108–334, title V, § 514, Oct. 18, 2004, 118 Stat. 1317, provided that: “The Commandant of the Coast Guard shall provide to the Congress each year, at the time that the President’s budget is submitted under section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code, a list of approved but unfunded Coast Guard priorities and the funds needed for each such priority in the same manner and with the same contents as the unfunded priorities lists submitted by the chiefs of other Armed Services.”
heading: Status Reports on Polar Icebreaking Vessels
text: Pub. L. 99–640, § 15, Nov. 10, 1986, 100 Stat. 3552, provided that: “The Secretary of the department in which the Coast Guard is operating shall provide detailed reports to Congress concerning the status of design and construction plans for the procurement of at least two new polar icebreaking vessels. Such reports shall be included in the Cutter Plan required annually by section 663 [now 2902] of title 14, United States Code, and shall be submitted each year until at least two new polar icebreaking vessels have been delivered to the Coast Guard.”