Corrigendum to Regulation (EU) 2023/1543 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 July 2023 on European Production Orders and European Preservation Orders for electronic evidence in criminal proceedings and for the execution of custodial sentences following criminal proceedings (OJ L 191, 28.7.2023)
Date: 2026-07-13
Institutions: Council of the European Union, European Parliament
Subjects: Internet, criminal proceedings, data protection, digital evidence, exchange of information, imprisonment, injunction, offence, personal data, provision of services




L_202690580EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
L series













2026/90580


13.7.2026






Corrigendum to Regulation (EU) 2023/1543 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 July 2023 on European Production Orders and European Preservation Orders for electronic evidence in criminal proceedings and for the execution of custodial sentences following criminal proceedings
(
Official Journal of the European Union L 191 of 28 July 2023
)







1.


Page 126, in recital 50, the second sentence











for:




‘Exceptionally, in emergency cases as defined in this Regulation, where the designated establishment or the legal representative of a service provider does not react to the accompanying European Production Order Certificate (EPOC) or European Preservation Order Certificate (EPOC-PR) within the deadlines or has not been designated or appointed within the deadlines set out in Directive (EU) 2023/1544 it should be possible to address …’,












read:




‘Exceptionally, in emergency cases as defined in this Regulation, where the designated establishment or the legal representative of a service provider does not react to the accompanying European Production Order Certificate (EPOC) or European Preservation Order Certificate (EPOC-PR) within the deadlines, it should be possible to address …’.











2.


Page 138, in Article 5(2)











for:





‘2.   A European Production Order shall be necessary for and proportionate to the purpose of the proceedings referred to in Article 2(3), taking into account …’

,










read:





‘2.   A European Production Order shall be necessary for and proportionate to the purpose of the proceedings referred to in Article 2(2), taking into account …’.












3.


Page 154, Annex I, Section B (‘Addressee’), the third tick-box











for:




‘This order is issued in an emergency case to the specified addressee because the designated establishment or the legal representative of a service provider did not react to the EPOC within the deadlines set out in Article 10 of Regulation (EU) 2023/1543 or has not been designated or appointed within the deadlines set out in Directive (EU) 2023/1544 of the European Parliament and of the Council (2)













read:




‘This order is issued in an emergency case to the specified addressee because the designated establishment or the legal representative of a service provider did not react to the EPOC within the deadlines set out in Article 10 of Regulation (EU) 2023/1543’.











4.


Page 165, Annex II, Section B (‘Addressee’), the third tick-box











for:




‘This order is issued in an emergency case to the specified addressee because the designated establishment or the legal representative of a service provider did not react to the EPOC-PR within the deadlines or has not been designated or appointed within the deadlines set out in Directive (EU) 2023/1544 of the European Parliament and of the Council (2)













read:




‘This order is issued in an emergency case to the specified addressee because the designated establishment or the legal representative of a service provider did not react to the EPOC-PR within the deadlines’.











5.


Page 169, in Annex II, Section F (Details of the issuing authority), the fourth tick-box, the first sentence











for:




‘This EPOC-PR was issued for subscriber data, or data requested for the sole purpose of identifying the user in a validly established emergency case without prior validation, because the validation could not have been obtained in time, or both.’,












read:




‘This EPOC-PR was issued in a validly established emergency case without prior validation, because the validation could not have been obtained in time.’.







(2)  Directive (EU) 2023/1544 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 July 2023 laying down harmonised rules on the designation of designated establishments and the appointment of legal representatives for the purpose of gathering electronic evidence in criminal proceedings (OJ L 191, 28.7.2023, p. 181).’,

(2)  Directive (EU) 2023/1544 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 July 2023 laying down harmonised rules on the designation of designated establishments and the appointment of legal representatives for the purpose of gathering electronic evidence in criminal proceedings (OJ L 191, 28.7.2023, p. 181).’,


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2023/1543/corrigendum/2026-07-13/oj
ISSN 1977-0677 (electronic edition)