do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-657/24, Versãofast: Judgment of the General Court (Chamber giving preliminary rulings) of 26 November 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Arbitral Tributário (Centro de Arbitragem Administrativa – CAAD) – Portugal) – Versãofast, Unipessoal, Lda. v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common system of VAT – Article 135(1)(b) of Directive 2006/112/EC – Exemptions for other activities – Negotiation of credit – Activities of a credit intermediary – Classification)
Date: 2025-11-26
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: VAT, consumer credit, provision of services, real estate credit, remuneration of work, tax exemption, trade intermediary








C_202600646EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2026/646


9.2.2026






Judgment of the General Court (Chamber giving preliminary rulings) of 26 November 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Arbitral Tributário (Centro de Arbitragem Administrativa – CAAD) – Portugal) – Versãofast, Unipessoal, Lda. v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira


(Case T-657/24,
                (1)
Versãofast)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Common system of VAT - Article 135(1)(b) of Directive 2006/112/EC - Exemptions for other activities - Negotiation of credit - Activities of a credit intermediary - Classification)
(C/2026/646)
Language of the case: Portuguese

Referring court

Tribunal Arbitral Tributário (Centro de Arbitragem Administrativa – CAAD)

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Versãofast, Unipessoal, Lda.

Defendant: Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira

Operative part of the judgment

Article 135(1)(b) of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax
must be interpreted as meaning that the exemption laid down by it in respect of transactions consisting in the negotiation of credit applies to the activities of a credit intermediary which searches for and canvasses customers for the purpose of offering them mortgage loan agreements, which assists customers by carrying out preparatory work prior to the conclusion of the agreements, which is responsible for communicating with the credit institutions and which is paid by those institutions on the basis of the volume of credit agreements concluded as a result of its intermediation, notwithstanding the fact that the credit intermediary has neither the power to act on behalf of the credit institutions nor any influence on the terms of the credit offers and that customers remain free to conclude or not to conclude a credit agreement and to choose the credit institution with which they will conclude the agreement.


(1)  
            OJ C, C/2025/1435, 10.3.2025.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2026/646/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Euro exchange rates – 25 November 2025
Date: 2025-11-26
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_202505665EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/5665


26.11.2025






Euro exchange rates (1)


            25 November 2025
         
(C/2025/5665)


1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,1551 




JPY


Japanese yen


180,42 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4691 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,87880 




SEK


Swedish krona


11,0480 




CHF


Swiss franc


0,9345 




ISK


Iceland króna


146,60 




NOK


Norwegian krone


11,8480 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


24,133 




HUF


Hungarian forint


381,56 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,2228 




RON


Romanian leu


5,0881 




TRY


Turkish lira


49,0072 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,7877 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,6301 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,9823 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


2,0603 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,5038 




KRW


South Korean won


1 692,08 




ZAR


South African rand


19,8881 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


8,1845 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


19 185,23 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,7758 




PHP


Philippine peso


67,974 




RUB


Russian rouble


 




THB


Thai baht


37,292 




BRL


Brazilian real


6,1977 




MXN


Mexican peso


21,3083 




INR


Indian rupee


103,0343 






(1)  
            Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/5665/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Scheduling of the continuation of the general review hearing in case No 07 K0.2016.672 – ON 7015
Date: 2025-11-26
Institutions: EFTA Secretariat
Subjects: European Economic Area, Liechtenstein, bankruptcy, claim, insurance, judicial review








C_202600709EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2026/709


29.1.2026






Scheduling of the continuation of the general review hearing in case No 07 K0.2016.672
ON 7015
(C/2026/709)









Bankrupt company:



 


Gable Insurance AG in Konkurs, 9490 Vaduz




 


 


represented by the bankruptcy administrator Batliner Wanger Batliner Rechtsanwälte AG, Am Schrägen Weg 2, 9490 Vaduz





in the matter of



 


Bankruptcy proceedings




The general review hearing concerning the claims submitted will be continued on

Wednesday 4 February 2026 at 11.15 a.m. in hearing room 5

at this Court.
Princely Court of Justice
Vaduz, 26 November 2025 / THCA
Stefan Rosenberger
Judge at the Princely Court of Justice


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2026/709/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-762/25, Foodinho: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio (Italy) lodged on 26 November 2025 – Foodinho Srl v Autorità per le Garanzie nelle Comunicazioni (AGCOM)
Date: 2025-11-26
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: delivery, foodstuff, postal service, provision of services, trade licence








C_202600633EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2026/633


9.2.2026






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio (Italy) lodged on 26 November 2025 – Foodinho Srl v Autorità per le Garanzie nelle Comunicazioni (AGCOM)


(Case C-762/25, Foodinho)

(C/2026/633)
Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Foodinho Srl

Defendant: Autorità per le Garanzie nelle Comunicazioni (AGCOM)

Questions referred







1.


Should the concept of ‘postal item’ defined in Article 2(6) of Directive 97/67/EC (1) be interpreted, when transposing it into national law, as including items in the context of food delivery services, and does that provision, also having regard to the requirements for harmonisation and uniform application of Directive 97/67/EC, therefore preclude a rule such as that provided for in Article 6 of decreto legislativo n. 261/1999 (Legislative Decree No 261/1999) and Article 8 of Annex A to delibera n. 129/15/CONS (Decision No 129/15/CONS), when it is interpreted as meaning that food delivery services are subject to the authorisation system laid down for the provision of postal services to the public?










2.


Does Article 2 of Directive 97/67/EC preclude a national rule, such as that provided for in Article 6 of Legislative Decree No 261/1999 and Article 8 of Annex A to Decision No 129/15/CONS, when it is interpreted as meaning that activities such as those carried out by Foodinho, as described in the contested measure and in paragraph I of this order, are subject to the authorisation system laid down for the provision of postal services to the public?






(1)  Directive 97/67/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 December 1997 on common rules for the development of the internal market of Community postal services and the improvement of quality of service (OJ 1998 L 15, p. 14).


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2026/633/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Notice for the attention of certain entities subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2014/512/CFSP and Council Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia's actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine
Date: 2025-11-26
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, Russia, Russo-Ukrainian issue, Ukraine, economic sanctions, international sanctions, legal person, territorial dispute, territorial law








C_202506416EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/6416


26.11.2025






Notice for the attention of certain entities subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2014/512/CFSP and Council Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia's actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine
(C/2025/6416)

The following information is brought to the attention of entities appearing in Annex IX of Council Decision 2014/512/CFSP (1) and in Annex XV of Council Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 (2).
The Council is envisaging maintaining the restrictive measures concerning those entities.
The entities concerned are hereby informed that they may submit a request to the Council to obtain the information related to the maintaining of restrictive measures before 3 December 2025
         , to the following address:





Council of the European Union




General Secretariat




RELEX.1




Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175




1048 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË




Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu







(1)  
            OJ L 229, 31.7.2014, p. 13.

(2)  
            OJ L 229, 31.7.2014, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/6416/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-690/24, Kolinsen: Judgment of the General Court (Chamber giving preliminary rulings) of 26 November 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Gerechtshof’s-Hertogenbosch – Netherlands) – Inspecteur van de Douane v FL (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Excise duties – Directive 2008/118/EC – Article 10(2) and (4) of Directive 2008/118 – Occurrence of an irregularity during a movement of excise goods – Movement of goods under a duty suspension arrangement – Detection of the irregularity during the movement – Quantity of missing goods detected when unloading the means of transport)
Date: 2025-11-26
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: carriage of goods, excise duty, intra-EU transport, suspension of customs duties








C_202600647EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2026/647


9.2.2026






Judgment of the General Court (Chamber giving preliminary rulings) of 26 November 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Gerechtshof’s-Hertogenbosch – Netherlands) – Inspecteur van de Douane v FL


(Case T-690/24,
                (1)
Kolinsen
                (2)
)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Taxation - Excise duties - Directive 2008/118/EC - Article 10(2) and (4) of Directive 2008/118 - Occurrence of an irregularity during a movement of excise goods - Movement of goods under a duty suspension arrangement - Detection of the irregularity during the movement - Quantity of missing goods detected when unloading the means of transport)
(C/2026/647)
Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Gerechtshof’s-Hertogenbosch

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Inspecteur van de Douane

Defendant: FL

Operative part of the judgment

Article 10(2) of Council Directive 2008/118/EC of 16 December 2008 concerning the general arrangements for excise duty and repealing Directive 92/12/EEC
must be interpreted as applying to a situation in which excise goods moving under a duty suspension arrangement have not arrived in their entirety at their destination and the missing quantity of goods has not been detected until the means of transport containing those goods was unloaded, so that, since the irregularity within the meaning of that provision is thus deemed to have occurred in the State of arrival, excise duty is chargeable there.


(1)  
            OJ C, C/2025/1543, 17.3.2025.

(2)  The name of the present case is a fictitious name. It does not correspond to the real name of any party to the proceedings.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2026/647/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.12156 – ADVENT / SAPIENS)
Date: 2025-11-26
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Israel, cloud computing, company with share capital, economic concentration, insurance company, merger control, software








C_202506528EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/6528


4.12.2025






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.12156 – ADVENT / SAPIENS)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2025/6528)

On 26 November 2025, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32025M12156. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/6528/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-572/24: Judgment of the General Court of 26 November 2025 – SiLog v EUIPO – Silog (Si Log International) (EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark Si Log International – Earlier national word mark SILOG – Relative ground for invalidity – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Evidence submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Article 95(2) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Right to be heard)
Date: 2025-11-26
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, carriage of goods, registered trade mark, road transport, trade-mark law








C_202600325EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2026/325


26.1.2026






Judgment of the General Court of 26 November 2025 – SiLog v EUIPO – Silog (Si Log International)


(Case T-572/24)
                (1)

(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU figurative mark Si Log International - Earlier national word mark SILOG - Relative ground for invalidity - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Evidence submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal - Article 95(2) of Regulation 2017/1001 - Right to be heard)
(C/2026/325)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: SiLog GmbH (Meudt, Germany) (represented by: D. Lindloff, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: E. Markakis, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Silog SAS (Bruges, France) (represented by N. Castagnon, lawyer

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment and alteration of the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 26 August 2024 (Case R 343/2023 5).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders SiLog GmbH to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Silog SAS;










3.


Orders the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) to bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C, C/2024/7380, 16.12.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2026/325/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-632/24: Judgment of the General Court of 26 November 2025 – EFFAS v EUIPO – CFA Institute (CEFA EFFAS Certified European Financial Analyst) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark CEFA EFFAS Certified European Financial Analyst – Earlier EU word mark CFA – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Absence of peaceful coexistence)
Date: 2025-11-26
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, education, electronic publishing, registered trade mark, teaching, teaching materials, trade-mark law, vocational training








C_202600478EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2026/478


2.2.2026






Judgment of the General Court of 26 November 2025 – EFFAS v EUIPO – CFA Institute


(CEFA EFFAS Certified European Financial Analyst)


(Case T-632/24)
                (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative mark CEFA EFFAS Certified European Financial Analyst - Earlier EU word mark CFA - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Absence of peaceful coexistence)
(C/2026/478)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: European Federation of Financial Analysts’ Societies (EFFAS) (Frankfurt am Main, Germany) (represented by: E. Manresa Medina, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Ivanauskas, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: CFA Institute (Charlottesville, Virginia, United States) (represented by: W. May and S. Reuvers, lawyers)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 3 October 2024 (Joined Case R 409/2024-1 and R 436/2024-1).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders European Federation of Financial Analysts’ Societies (EFFAS) to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by CFA Institute;










3.


Orders the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) to bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C, C/2025/920, 17.2.2025.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2026/478/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-810/25: Action brought on 26 November 2025 Jane v EUIPO Sureda Paredes (bbqool)
Date: 2025-11-26
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, early childhood, registered trade mark, safety device, trade-mark law








C_202600356EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2026/356


26.1.2026






Action brought on 26 November 2025 Jane v EUIPO Sureda Paredes (bbqool)


(Case T-810/25)

(C/2026/356)
Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: Jane, SA (Barcelona, Spain) (represented by: R. Guerras Mazón and M. Pérez Serres, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Claudio Raúl Sureda Paredes (Las Condes, Chile)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: International registration designating the European Union in respect of the figurative mark bbqool – International registration designating the European Union No 1 730 195
         

Proceedings before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 12 September 2025 in Case R 109/2025-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order EUIPO and the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal to pay the costs.





Plea in law

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2026/356/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-515/24: Judgment of the General Court of 26 November 2025 – Lavrentiadis v EUIPO – Dalli-Werke (DALL) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark DALL – Earlier EU word mark DALLI – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
Date: 2025-11-26
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, cosmetic product, essential oil, polishing and scouring preparations, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_202600321EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2026/321


26.1.2026






Judgment of the General Court of 26 November 2025 – Lavrentiadis v EUIPO – Dalli-Werke (DALL)


(Case T-515/24)
                (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU word mark DALL - Earlier EU word mark DALLI - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(C/2026/321)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Lavrentios Lavrentiadis (Athens, Greece) (represented by: E. Tsakiri, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: T. Klee, Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Dalli-Werke GmbH & Co. KG (Stolberg, Germany) (represented by: U. Lüken, lawyer)

Re:

By his action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment and alteration of the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 6 August 2024 (Case R 2552/2023-2).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Mr Lavrentios Lavrentiadis to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred by Dalli-Werke GmbH & Co. KG;










3.


Orders the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) to bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C, C/2024/7040, 2.12.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2026/321/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)