Corrigendum to Regulation (EU) 2024/1359 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 May 2024 addressing situations of crisis and force majeure in the field of migration and asylum and amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1147 (OJ L, 2024/1359, 22.5.2024)
Date: 2025-11-25
Institutions: Council of the European Union, European Parliament
Subjects: EU migration policy, EU visa policy, crisis management, cross-border cooperation, foreign national, migration control, migratory movement, return migration, right of asylum, third country




L_202590921EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
L series













2025/90921


25.11.2025






Corrigendum to Regulation (EU) 2024/1359 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 May 2024 addressing situations of crisis and force majeure in the field of migration and asylum and amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1147
(
Official Journal of the European Union L, 2024/1359, 22 May 2024
)







1.


Page 3, recital 10, first sentence











for:





                              ‘The rules and guarantees set out in Regulations (EU) 2024/1356 (8), (EU) 2024/1358 (9) and (EU) 2024/1347 (10) of the European Parliament and of the Council and in Directive (EU) 2024/XXX of the European Parliament and of the Council (11) should continue to apply irrespective of derogations applied under this Regulation.’,












read:





                              ‘The rules and guarantees set out in Regulations (EU) 2024/1356 (8), (EU) 2024/1358 (9) and (EU) 2024/1347 (10) of the European Parliament and of the Council and in Directive (EU) 2024/1712 of the European Parliament and of the Council (11) should continue to apply irrespective of derogations applied under this Regulation.’.











2.


Page 3, footnote 11











for:





                           ‘Directive (EU) 2024/XXX of the European Parliament and of the Council of XXX amending Directive 2011/36/EU on preventing and combating trafficking in human beings and protecting its victims (not yet published in the Official Journal).’,












read:





                           ‘Directive (EU) 2024/1712 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2024 amending Directive 2011/36/EU on preventing and combating trafficking in human beings and protecting its victims (OJ L, 2024/1712, 24.6.2024, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2024/1712/oj).’.











3.


Page 8, recital 49, first sentence











for:





                              ‘In a situation of instrumentalisation and to prevent a third country or a hostile non-state actor from targeting specific nationalities or specific categories of third-country nationals or stateless persons, it should be possible for a Member State to derogate from the asylum procedure set out in this Regulation by taking a decision in the framework of the border procedure, as set out in Articles 44 to 55 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1348 on the merits of all applications for international protection.’,












read:





                              ‘In a situation of instrumentalisation and to prevent a third country or a hostile non-state actor from targeting specific nationalities or specific categories of third-country nationals or stateless persons, it should be possible for a Member State to derogate from the asylum procedure set out in this Regulation by taking a decision in the framework of the border procedure, as set out in Articles 43 to 54 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1348 on the merits of all applications for international protection.’.











4.


Page 8, recital 49, last sentence











for:





                              ‘Where a Member State is authorised to broaden the scope of the border procedure, applications examined under that procedure should not be considered as part of the adequate capacity pursuant to Article 48 or counted for the application of the annual cap pursuant to Article 51 of that Regulation.’,












read:





                              ‘Where a Member State is authorised to broaden the scope of the border procedure, applications examined under that procedure should not be considered as part of the adequate capacity pursuant to Article 47 or counted for the application of the annual cap pursuant to Article 50 of that Regulation.’.











5.


Page 9, recital 56, last sentence











for:





                              ‘In such circumstances, the application should be examined in accordance with Articles 36 and 40 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1348.’,












read:





                              ‘In such circumstances, the application should be examined in accordance with Articles 35 and 39 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1348.’.











6.


Page 13, Article 3(6), point (c)











for:









‘(c)


whether the Member State is faced with abnormal and unforeseeable circumstances outside its control, the consequences of which could not be avoided notwithstanding of the exercise of all due care, and how such situation of force majeure prevents it from fulfilling its obligations set out in Article 27, Article 51(2) and Article 60(1) of Regulation (EU) 2024/1348 and in Articles 39, 40, 41 and 46 of the Regulation (EU) 2024/1351.’,















read:









‘(c)


whether the Member State is faced with abnormal and unforeseeable circumstances outside its control, the consequences of which could not be avoided notwithstanding of the exercise of all due care, and how such situation of force majeure prevents it from fulfilling its obligations set out in Article 27, Article 45(1) and Article 51(2) of Regulation (EU) 2024/1348 and in Articles 39, 40, 41 and 46 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1351.’.














7.


Page 19, Article 11(5) second sentence











for:




‘When applying paragraph 3, 4 or 6 of this Article, the Member State concerned may also prioritise the examination of application for international protection s which are likely to be well-founded.’
,










read:




‘When applying paragraph 3, 4 or 6 of this Article, the Member State concerned may also prioritise the examination of applications for international protection which are likely to be well-founded.’.











8.


Page 19, Article 11(7), second subparagraph











for:




‘This paragraph shall be without prejudice to the mandatory nature of the border procedure as referred to in Article 46 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1348.’
,










read:




‘This paragraph shall be without prejudice to the mandatory nature of the border procedure as referred to in Article 45 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1348.’.











9.


Page 22, Article 14(2)











for:





‘2.   Where, following the adoption of a recommendation as referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article, the determining authority applies Article 13(12), point (a), of Regulation (EU) 2024/1348 to omit the personal interview and Article 34(5), point (a), of that Regulation to prioritise the examination of the application because it is likely to be well-founded, it shall ensure, by way of derogation from Article 35(4) of that Regulation, that the examination of the merits of the application is concluded no later than four weeks from the lodging of the application.’

,










read:





‘2.   Where, following the adoption of a recommendation as referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article, the determining authority applies Article 13(11), point (a), of Regulation (EU) 2024/1348 to omit the personal interview and Article 34(5), point (a), of that Regulation to prioritise the examination of the application because it is likely to be well-founded, it shall ensure, by way of derogation from Article 35(4) of that Regulation, that the examination of the merits of the application is concluded no later than four weeks from the lodging of the application.’.












10.


Page 23, Article 20, second paragraph











for:




‘It shall apply from 1 July 2026.’
,










read:




‘It shall apply from 12 June 2026.’.







ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1359/corrigendum/2025-11-20/oj
ISSN 1977-0677 (electronic edition)