do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-139/25: Order of the General Court of 24 November 2025 – Qisda Optronics (Suzhou) v Council (Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine – Removal of the applicant’s name from the list of entities concerned – Action which has become devoid of purpose – No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2025-11-24
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, Russia, Russo-Ukrainian issue, Ukraine, economic sanctions, international sanctions, legal person








C_202600480EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2026/480


2.2.2026






Order of the General Court of 24 November 2025 – Qisda Optronics (Suzhou) v Council


(Case T-139/25)
                (1)

(Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures adopted in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine - Removal of the applicant’s name from the list of entities concerned - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)
(C/2026/480)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Qisda Optronics (Suzhou) Co. Ltd (Suzhou, China) (represented by: L. Catrain González and F. Pili, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: P. Pecheux and E. Nadbath, acting as Agents)

Re:

By its action based on Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment, first, of Council Decision (CFSP) 2024/3187 of 16 December 2024 amending Decision 2014/512/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine (OJ L, 2024/3187), and of Council Regulation (EU) 2024/3192 of 16 December 2024 amending Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine (OJ L, 2024/3192), in so far as they included the applicant on the list in Annex IV to Council Decision 2014/512/CFSP of 31 July 2014 concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine (OJ 2014 L 229, p. 13) and on the list in Annex IV to Council Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 of 31 July 2014 concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine (OJ 2014 L 229, p. 1) (‘the lists at issue’), and, second, of Council Decision (CFSP) 2025/394 of 24 February 2025 amending Decision 2014/512 concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine (OJ L, 2025/394), and of Council Regulation (EU) 2025/395 of 24 February 2025 amending Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine (OJ L, 2025/395), in so far as they maintained the applicant’s name on the lists at issue.

Operative part of the order







1.


There is no need to adjudicate on the action.










2.


Qisda Optronics (Suzhou) Co. Ltd and the Council of the European Union shall each bear their own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C C/2025/2102, 14.4.2025.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2026/480/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-801/25: Action brought on 24 November 2025 – Athleta v EUIPO – Sports Group Denmark (ATHLETA)
Date: 2025-11-24
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, advertising, electronic commerce, personal effects, registered trade mark, retail outlet, trade-mark law








C_202600351EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2026/351


26.1.2026






Action brought on 24 November 2025 – Athleta v EUIPO – Sports Group Denmark (ATHLETA)


(Case T-801/25)

(C/2026/351)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Athleta (ITM), Inc. (San Francisco, California, United States) (represented by: B. Guimberteau, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Sports Group Denmark A/S (Silkeborg, Denmark)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark ATHLETA – European Union trade mark No 16 581 605
         

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 22 September 2025 in Case R 28/2025-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


Partially annul the contested decision, in that the Board of Appeal considered that the evidence of use was not sufficient to establish genuine use of the trade mark at issue in relation to all goods and services in Classes 18 and 35;










—


order the defendant and the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal to bear their own costs and to pay those of the applicant at every stage of the cancellation and appeal process, including the costs of these proceedings.





Plea in law

Infringement of Articles 18 and 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council and of Article 10(3) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2026/351/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)