do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-756/25 P: Appeal brought on 20 November 2025 by Roman Arkadyevich Abramovich against the judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) delivered on 10 September 2025 in Case T-1105/23 Abramovich v Council
Date: 2025-11-20
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, Russo-Ukrainian issue, economic sanctions, indemnification, international sanctions, natural person, principle of proportionality, removal








C_202600306EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2026/306


26.1.2026






Appeal brought on 20 November 2025 by Roman Arkadyevich Abramovich against the judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) delivered on 10 September 2025 in Case T-1105/23 Abramovich v Council


(Case C-756/25 P)

(C/2026/306)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Appellant: Roman Arkadyevich Abramovich (represented by: T. Bontinck, J. Goffin, M. Brésart, S. Bonifassi and J. Bastien, lawyers, and C. Zatschler, Senior Counsel)

Other parties to the proceedings: Council of the European Union, European Commission

Form of order sought

The appellant claims that the Court should






—


Set aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union (First Chamber) of 10 September 2025, T-1105/23, including in so far as it ordered the appellant to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Council;










—


Refer the case back to the General Court for it to rule on the annulment of the acts at issue and on the application for compensation raised by the appellant;










—


Order the Council to pay the costs at first instance and those incurred before the Court of Justice.





Grounds of appeal and main arguments

In support of the appeal, the appellant raises four grounds of appeal:






—


The first ground of appeal, in which he alleges an error in law in the interpretation and application of the criterion laid down in Article 2(1)(g) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP (1) (‘the (g) criterion’);










—


The second ground of appeal, arising from procedural errors in so far as the General Court failed to discharge its obligation to state reasons and infringed provisions relating to the administration of evidence;










—


The third ground of appeal, in which he alleges procedural errors relating to the substitution of grounds;










—


The fourth ground of appeal, in which he alleges an error in law arising from a misinterpretation of Article 29 TFEU and in the application of the proportionality principle as far as concerns the prohibition on the appellant entering and circulating within the territory of the European Union.






(1)  Council Decision 2014/145/CFSP of 17 March 2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine (OJ 2014, L 78, p. 16).


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2026/306/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-401/24, Stockholms Hamn: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 20 November 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Stockholms tingsrätt – Sweden) – Staten genom Sjöfartsverket v Stockholms Hamn AB (Reference for a preliminary ruling – State aid – Agreement concluded before the accession of the Kingdom of Sweden to the European Union – Compensation for the loss of revenue arising from the abolition of passage fees for a lock – Concept of aid – Concept of undertaking – Economic activity – Existing or new aid)
Date: 2025-11-20
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: State aid, Sweden, accession to the European Union, aid to undertakings, company with share capital, control of State aid, engineering structure, indemnification, maritime transport, provision of services








C_202600267EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2026/267


26.1.2026






Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 20 November 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Stockholms tingsrätt – Sweden) – Staten genom Sjöfartsverket v Stockholms Hamn AB


(Case C-401/24,
                (1)
Stockholms Hamn)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - State aid - Agreement concluded before the accession of the Kingdom of Sweden to the European Union - Compensation for the loss of revenue arising from the abolition of passage fees for a lock - Concept of aid - Concept of undertaking - Economic activity - Existing or new aid)
(C/2026/267)
Language of the case: Swedish

Referring court

Stockholms tingsrätt

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Staten genom Sjöfartsverket

Defendant: Stockholms Hamn AB

Operative part of the judgment







1.


Article 107(1) TFEU
must be interpreted as meaning that an annual compensation paid under an agreement using State resources by a public authority to a municipal joint stock company as compensation for that company’s undertaking to provide free of charge a lock service on a waterway, which had been subject to a fee before the conclusion of that agreement, constitutes State aid if that company can be regarded as an undertaking and if that compensation confers on it an advantage which it would not have obtained under normal market conditions.










2.


Article 1(b)(i) and (c) of Council Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 of 13 July 2015 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 108 [TFEU]
must be interpreted as meaning that, assuming that it constitutes aid, within the meaning of Article 107(1) TFEU, compensation, the payment of which, in accordance with the original terms of the agreement which instituted it, has been extended for five-year periods in the absence of termination of that agreement and the amount of which has been altered, first, annually, on the basis of the consumer price index and, second, on the expiry of each five-year period, according to the volume of the traffic concerned, pursuant to a formula set out in the original agreement and remaining unchanged over time, constitutes existing aid.






(1)  OJ C, C/2024/4849.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2026/267/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Council Decision (CFSP) 2025/2373 of 20 November 2025 amending Decision (CFSP) 2024/3116 on the European Security and Defence College
Date: 2025-11-20
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: European school, common security and defence policy, education, operation of the Institutions, vocational training








L_202502373EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
L series













2025/2373


21.11.2025







            COUNCIL DECISION (CFSP) 2025/2373
         
of 20 November 2025
         
amending Decision (CFSP) 2024/3116 on the European Security and Defence College


THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union and in particular Article 28(1) and Article 42(4) thereof,


Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,

Whereas:







(1)


On 9 December 2024, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2024/3116 (1).












(2)


In accordance with Decision (CFSP) 2024/3116, the Head of the European Security and Defence College (ESDC) submitted to its Steering Committee an estimate of revenue and expenditure for the ESDC for the financial year 2026.












(3)


On 10 July 2025, the Steering Committee approved the estimate of revenue and expenditure for the ESDC for the financial year 2026, which was subsequently transmitted to the European Commission by the Head of the ESDC.












(4)


A new financial reference amount, intended to cover the expenditure of the ESDC for the period from 1 January 2026 to 31 December 2026, should be established.












(5)


Decision (CFSP) 2024/3116 should therefore be amended accordingly,





HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:



Article 1
In Article 16(1) of Decision (CFSP) 2024/3116, the following subparagraph is added:
‘The financial reference amount intended to cover the expenditure of the ESDC during the period from 1 January 2026 to 31 December 2026 shall be EUR 3 309 800,02.’.


Article 2
This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.




Done at Brussels, 20 November 2025.


For the Council


The President

K. KALLAS
            





(1)  Council Decision (CFSP) 2024/3116 of 9 December 2024 on the European Security and Defence College and repealing Decision (CFSP) 2020/1515 (OJ L, 2024/3116, 10.12.2024, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dec/2024/3116/oj).


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dec/2025/2373/oj
ISSN 1977-0677 (electronic edition)
Notice pursuant to Article 29(2) of the Staff Regulations – Publication of a vacancy for the function of Deputy Director-General responsible for the Coordination of Euratom Policies (Grade AD 15) – Directorate-General for Energy – COM/2025/10473
Date: 2025-11-20
Institutions: Directorate-General for Human Resources and Security, European Commission
Subjects: EU energy policy, Province of Luxembourg, administrator, competition (EU), job vacancy, managing director, recruitment








C_202506345EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/6345


20.11.2025







            NOTICE PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 29(2) OF THE STAFF REGULATIONS
         
Publication of a vacancy for the function of Deputy Director-General responsible for the Coordination of Euratom Policies (Grade AD 15)
Directorate-General for Energy
COM/2025/10473
(C/2025/6345)


          
      
The European Commission has published a vacancy notice (reference COM/2025/10473) for the function of Deputy Director-General responsible for the Coordination of Euratom Policies (Grade AD 15) in Directorate-General for Energy in Luxembourg.
To consult the text of the vacancy notice in 24 languages and to submit your application, please visit this dedicated webpage on the European Commission’s website: https://commission.europa.eu/node/5563/latest_en.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/6345/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-791/25: Action brought on 20 November 2025 – Clarembeaux v EUIPO – FX de Beukelaer (ELIXIR D’ANVERS)
Date: 2025-11-20
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, alcoholic beverage, non-alcoholic beverage, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_202600184EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2026/184


12.1.2026






Action brought on 20 November 2025 – Clarembeaux v EUIPO – FX de Beukelaer (ELIXIR D’ANVERS)


(Case T-791/25)

(C/2026/184)
Language in which the application was lodged: French

Parties


Applicant: Nicolas Clarembeaux (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: N. Heremans, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: FX de Beukelaer NV (Antwerp, Belgium)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ELIXIR D’ANVERS – EU trade mark No 16 981 631
         

Proceedings before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 10 September 2025 in Case R 320/2025-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order the defendant to pay the costs.





Plea in law

Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2026/184/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)