do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-556/24: Judgment of the General Court of 19 November 2025 – Amphora Wineries v EUIPO – Bernabei Liquori (CHAMPAGNE LOUIS LAMAR LAMAR REIMS – FRANCE) (EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU figurative mark CHAMPAGNE LOUIS LAMAR LAMAR REIMS – Standing to bring proceedings before the Board of Appeal – Genuine use of a mark – Article 18 and Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
Date: 2025-11-19
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, champagne, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_202600322EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2026/322


26.1.2026






Judgment of the General Court of 19 November 2025 – Amphora Wineries v EUIPO – Bernabei Liquori (CHAMPAGNE LOUIS LAMAR LAMAR REIMS – FRANCE)


(Case T-556/24)
                (1)

(EU trade mark - Revocation proceedings - EU figurative mark CHAMPAGNE LOUIS LAMAR LAMAR REIMS - Standing to bring proceedings before the Board of Appeal - Genuine use of a mark - Article 18 and Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(C/2026/322)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Amphora Wineries AG (Zug, Switzerland) (represented by: A. von Mühlendahl and H. Hartwig, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: V. Ruzek, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Bernabei Liquori Srl (Rome, Italy) (represented by: A. Massimiani and F. Celluprica, lawyers)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 13 August 2024 (Case R 924/2023-5).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Amphora Wineries AG to pay the costs.






(1)  
            OJ C, C/2024/7375, 16.12.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2026/322/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Commission notice pursuant to Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community – Imposition of public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services
Date: 2025-11-19
Institutions: Directorate-General for Mobility and Transport, European Commission
Subjects: France, Grand Est, air transport, intra-EU transport, services of general interest, transport regulations








C_202506332EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/6332


19.11.2025






Commission notice pursuant to Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community
Imposition of public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2025/6332)







Member State


France




Route concerned


Strasbourg–Copenhagen




Date of entry into force of the public service obligations


9 April 2026




Address where the text and any relevant information and/or documentation relating to the public service obligation can be obtained


Order of 15 October 2025 imposing a public service obligation on scheduled air services between Strasbourg (France) and Copenhagen (Denmark)
NOR: TRAA2527314A

https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr

For further information please contact:





Direction Générale de l’Aviation civile




DTA/SDS1




50 rue Henry Farman




75 720 Paris CEDEX 15




FRANCE




Tel. +33 158094321






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/6332/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.12125 – SILVER POINT CAPITAL / ASCEND PERFORMANCE MATERIALS HOLDINGS)
Date: 2025-11-19
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: consultancy, economic concentration, investment company, merger control, plastics industry, supplier, textile industry








C_202600391EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2026/391


19.1.2026






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.12125 – SILVER POINT CAPITAL / ASCEND PERFORMANCE MATERIALS HOLDINGS)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2026/391)

On 19 November 2025, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32025M12125. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2026/391/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-367/23: Judgment of the General Court of 19 November 2025 – Amazon EU v Commission (Digital services – Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 – Designation as a very large online platform – Plea of illegality – Admissibility – Article 33(1) and (4) of Regulation 2022/2065 – Right to respect for private and family life – Freedom to conduct a business – Right to property – Equal treatment – Freedom of expression – Data protection)
Date: 2025-11-19
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Internet site, advertising, archives, electronic commerce, equal treatment, on line data service








C_202600104EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2026/104


5.1.2026






Judgment of the General Court of 19 November 2025 – Amazon EU v Commission


(Case T-367/23)
                (1)

(Digital services - Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 - Designation as a very large online platform - Plea of illegality - Admissibility - Article 33(1) and (4) of Regulation 2022/2065 - Right to respect for private and family life - Freedom to conduct a business - Right to property - Equal treatment - Freedom of expression - Data protection)
(C/2026/104)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Amazon EU Sàrl, successor in law to Amazon Services Europe Sàrl (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: A. Conrad, M. Frank, R. Spanó and I. Ioannidis, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Armati, P. Pernas Castrillo and P.J. Loewenthal, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the applicant: Bundesverband E-Commerce und Versandhandel Deutschland eV (bevh) (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: R. van der Hout and V. Lemonnier, lawyers)

Interveners in support of the defendant: European Parliament (represented by: M. Menegatti, E. Ni Chaoimh and L. Taïeb, acting as Agents), Council of the European Union (represented by: E. Sitbon, N. Brzezinski and M. Moore, acting as Agents), Bureau européen des unions de consommateurs (BEUC) (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: A. Fratini, lawyer)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant, successor in law to Amazon Services Europe Sàrl, seeks annulment of Commission Decision C(2023) 2746 final of 25 April 2023 designating Amazon Store as a very large online platform in accordance with Article 33(4) of Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Amazon EU Sàrl to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission, including those relating to the proceedings for interim measures;










3.


Orders the European Parliament, the Council of the European Union, Bureau européen des unions de consommateurs (BEUC) and Bundesverband E-Commerce und Versandhandel Deutschland eV (bevh) to bear their own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 296, 21.8.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2026/104/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-789/25: Action brought on 19 November 2025 – Olăneanu v Ombudsman
Date: 2025-11-19
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European Convention on Human Rights, administrative transparency, appeal to the European Ombudsman, right to information








C_202600655EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2026/655


9.2.2026






Action brought on 19 November 2025 – Olăneanu v Ombudsman


(Case T-789/25)

(C/2026/655)
Language of the case: Romanian

Parties


Applicant: Nicolae Cristinel Olăneanu (Voluntari, Romania) (represented by: M. Vijulie, lawyer)

Defendant: European Ombudsman

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


declare that, by failing to communicate any response to the application made by the applicant, the European Ombudsman has in no way acted in accordance with its obligations under Article 265 TFEU;










—


order the European Ombudsman to adopt an explicit position with regard to the applicant’s request of 20 August 2025, within a period to be determined by the Court;










—


order the communication of the decision;










—


order the defendant to pay the costs, if applicable.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law.






1.


First plea in law, based on Article 265 TFEU – lack of responsiveness, failure to act on the part of the institutions of the Union;










2.


Second plea in law, based on Article 41(1), (2) and (3) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – right to good administration;










3.


Third plea in law, based on Article 10 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, concerning the principle of transparency and the freedom to receive information.






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2026/655/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-750/25 P: Appeal brought on 19 November 2025 by Terras de Sal – Comércio e Transformação de Sal Marinho Tradicional against the judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) on 10 September 2025 in Cases T-191/24 to T-193/24, Association pour la promotion du sel artisanal and Others v Commission
Date: 2025-11-19
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: France, Occitanie, Portugal, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur, designation of origin, labelling, product designation, restriction on competition, right of action, salt








C_202600303EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2026/303


26.1.2026






Appeal brought on 19 November 2025 by Terras de Sal – Comércio e Transformação de Sal Marinho Tradicional against the judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) on 10 September 2025 in Cases T-191/24 to T-193/24, Association pour la promotion du sel artisanal and Others v Commission


(Case C-750/25 P)

(C/2026/303)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Appellant: Terras de Sal – Comércio e Transformação de Sal Marinho Tradicional (represented by: T. Lachacinski and F. Fajgenbaum, avocats)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission and French Republic

Form of order sought

The appellant claims that the Court should:






—


declare that it has jurisdiction to hear and determine the action brought at first instance by the appellant, rule that the appellant has standing to bring such an action and to seek annulment of the act at issue;










—


rule that the appeal against the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 10 September 2025 in Joined Cases T-191/24 to T-193/24 is admissible and well-founded;










—


annul the act at issue on the ground that the protected geographical indication (‘PGI’) ‘Sel de Camargue/Fleur de sel de Camargue’ is unlawful;










—


annul the act at issue on the ground that the PGI ‘Sel de Camargue/Fleur de sel de Camargue’ creates a situation of unfair competition between operators;










—


annul the act at issue on the ground that the name ‘Fleur de sel de Camargue’ is misleading for consumers.





Ground of appeal and main arguments

In support of its appeal, the appellant raises a single ground of appeal alleging that it has standing to bring an action since (i) the act at issue affects its own interests, (ii) the act at issue affects the legal situation of its members and (iii) the act at issue affects the interests of consumers.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2026/303/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-173/24: Judgment of the General Court of 19 November 2025 – DI v Parliament (Law governing the institutions – Member of the Parliament – Psychological harassment – Decisions of the President of the Parliament finding that an accredited parliamentary assistant suffered psychological harassment and imposing a reprimand on a Member of the Parliament – Rights of the defence – Principle of sound administration – Procedural deadlines – Misuse of powers – Concept of harassment – Article 12a of the Staff Regulations – Error of assessment)
Date: 2025-11-19
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: abuse of power, administrative sanction, assistant, disciplinary proceedings, harassment at work, maladministration, psychological harassment, rights of the defence, staff regulations (EU)








C_202600168EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2026/168


12.1.2026






Judgment of the General Court of 19 November 2025 – DI v Parliament


(Case T-173/24)
                (1)

(Law governing the institutions - Member of the Parliament - Psychological harassment - Decisions of the President of the Parliament finding that an accredited parliamentary assistant suffered psychological harassment and imposing a reprimand on a Member of the Parliament - Rights of the defence - Principle of sound administration - Procedural deadlines - Misuse of powers - Concept of ‘harassment’ - Article 12a of the Staff Regulations - Error of assessment)
(C/2026/168)
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: DI (represented by: S. Rodríguez Bajón and A. Gómez-Acebo Dennes, lawyers)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: E. Despotopoulou, D. Boytha and I. Lázaro Betancor, acting as Agents)

Re:

By his action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decisions of the President of the European Parliament of 30 January 2024 by which the President, first, found that certain conduct alleged against him, taken individually and as a whole, constituted psychological harassment within the meaning of Article 12a(3) of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union, and, second, imposed a reprimand on him.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders the European Parliament to bear its own costs and to pay half of the costs incurred by DI;










3.


Orders DI to pay half of his own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C, C/2024/3180, 21.5.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2026/168/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-565/23: Judgment of the General Court of 19 November 2025 – Aurelia Stiftung v Commission (Plant protection products – Active substance glyphosate – Application for renewal of an active substance – Extension of approval period – Delay in the renewal procedure – Reasons beyond the control of the applicant – Request for internal review – Article 10(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 – Decision to reject the request – Article 17 of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009)
Date: 2025-11-19
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: environmental protection, health risk, market approval, plant health control, plant health product, precautionary principle, risk management








C_202600106EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2026/106


5.1.2026






Judgment of the General Court of 19 November 2025 – Aurelia Stiftung v Commission


(Case T-565/23)
                (1)

(Plant protection products - Active substance glyphosate - Application for renewal of an active substance - Extension of approval period - Delay in the renewal procedure - Reasons beyond the control of the applicant - Request for internal review - Article 10(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 - Decision to reject the request - Article 17 of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009)
(C/2026/106)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Aurelia Stiftung (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: A. Willand and A. Mostler, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Becker, D. Milanowska and M. ter Haar, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Bayer Agriculture (Antwerp, Belgium) (represented by: H. Posser, F. Geber and T. Römhild, lawyers)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of Commission Decision Ares(2023) 4611321 of 3 July 2023 rejecting its request for internal review concerning Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/2364 of 2 December 2022 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011 as regards the extension of the approval period of the active substance glyphosate (OJ 2022 L 312, p. 99).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls Commission Decision Ares(2023) 4611321 of 3 July 2023 rejecting the request for internal review submitted by Aurelia Stiftung concerning Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/2364 of 2 December 2022 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011 as regards the extension of the approval period of the active substance glyphosate;










2.


The European Commission shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by Aurelia Stiftung;










3.


Bayer Agriculture shall bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C, C/2023/988, 27.11.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2026/106/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-645/24: Judgment of the General Court of 19 November 2025 – +pharma arzneimittel v EUIPO – PlusQuam Pharma (PlusQuam +PHARMA) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark PlusQuam +PHARMA – Earlier national word mark +PHARMA – Relative grounds for refusal – Article 8(1)(b) and (5) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Enhanced distinctiveness of the earlier mark through use – Reputation – Proof of use)
Date: 2025-11-19
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, cosmetic product, dietary product, food supplement, pharmaceutical product, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_202600330EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2026/330


26.1.2026






Judgment of the General Court of 19 November 2025 – +pharma arzneimittel v EUIPO – PlusQuam Pharma (PlusQuam +PHARMA)


(Case T-645/24)
                (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative mark PlusQuam +PHARMA - Earlier national word mark +PHARMA - Relative grounds for refusal - Article 8(1)(b) and (5) of Regulation 2017/1001 - Enhanced distinctiveness of the earlier mark through use - Reputation - Proof of use)
(C/2026/330)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: +pharma arzneimittel GmbH (Graz, Austria) (represented by: L. Wiltschek and D. Plasser, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Eberl, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: PlusQuam Pharma, SL (Badajoz, Spain)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment and alteration of the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 7 November 2024 (Case R 1217/2024-2).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 7 November 2024 (Case R 1217/2024-2);










2.


Dismisses the action as to the remainder;










3.


Orders EUIPO to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by +pharma arzneimittel GmbH.






(1)  
            OJ C, C/2025/743, 10.2.2025.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2026/330/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-384/23: Judgment of the General Court of 19 November 2025 – OQ v Commission (Civil service – Recruitment – Notice of competition – Open competition EPSO/AD/378/20 – Decision not to admit the applicant to the next stage of the competition – Compliance with a judgment of the General Court – Freedom of movement for workers)
Date: 2025-11-19
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Croatia, administrator, competition (EU), free movement of workers, information profession, job vacancy, legal profession, recruitment








C_202600105EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2026/105


5.1.2026






Judgment of the General Court of 19 November 2025 – OQ v Commission


(Case T-384/23)
                (1)

(Civil service - Recruitment - Notice of competition - Open competition EPSO/AD/378/20 - Decision not to admit the applicant to the next stage of the competition - Compliance with a judgment of the General Court - Freedom of movement for workers)
(C/2026/105)
Language of the case: Croatian

Parties


Applicant: OQ (represented by: R. Štaba, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: R. Mrljić and G. Niddam, acting as Agents)

Re:

By his action based on Article 270 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the selection board of 15 May 2023 rejecting his request for review and refusing to admit him to the next stage of open competition EPSO/AD/378/20 for the purpose of drawing up a reserve list of ‘Croatian-language (HR) lawyer-linguists (AD 7)’ for the Court of Justice of the European Union.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls the decision of the selection board of 15 May 2023 rejecting OQ’s request for review and refusing to admit him to the next stage of open competition EPSO/AD/378/20 for the purpose of drawing up a reserve list of ‘Croatian-language (HR) lawyer-linguists (AD 7)’ for the Court of Justice of the European Union;










2.


Orders the European Commission to pay the costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 304, 28.8.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2026/105/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)