do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Corrigendum to Directive (EU) 2024/1711 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2024 amending Directives (EU) 2018/2001 and (EU) 2019/944 as regards improving the Union’s electricity market design (OJ L, 2024/1711, 26.6.2024)
Date: 2025-11-17
Institutions: Council of the European Union, European Parliament
Subjects: consumer protection, electricity supply, energy cooperation, energy efficiency, market stabilisation, market supervision, price of energy, renewable energy, security of supply, single market




L_202590909EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
L series













2025/90909


17.11.2025






Corrigendum to Directive (EU) 2024/1711 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2024 amending Directives (EU) 2018/2001 and (EU) 2019/944 as regards improving the Union’s electricity market design
(
Official Journal of the European Union L, 2024/1711, 26 June 2024
)

On page 9, Article 2, point 3, new Article 6a(1), introductory wording:







for:





‘1.   The regulatory authority or another competent authority where a Member State has so provided shall develop a framework for transmission system operators and distribution system operators to offer the possibility of establishing flexible connection agreements in areas where there is limited or no network capacity availability for new connections as published in accordance with Article 31(3) and Article 50(4a), first subparagraph, of Regulation (EU) 2019/943. That framework shall ensure that:’

,










read:





‘1.   The regulatory authority or another competent authority where a Member State has so provided shall develop a framework for transmission system operators and distribution system operators to offer the possibility of establishing flexible connection agreements in areas where there is limited or no network capacity availability for new connections as published in accordance with Article 31(3) of this Directive and Article 50(4a), first subparagraph, of Regulation (EU) 2019/943. That framework shall ensure that:’.








ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2024/1711/corrigendum/2025-11-17/oj
ISSN 1977-0677 (electronic edition)
Case C-748/25 P: Appeal brought on 17 November 2025 by Association pour la promotion du sel artisanal against the judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) delivered on 10 September 2025 in Cases T-191/24 to T-193/24, Association pour la promotion du sel artisanal and Others v Commission
Date: 2025-11-17
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: France, Occitanie, Portugal, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur, designation of origin, labelling, product designation, restriction on competition, right of action, salt








C_202600301EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2026/301


26.1.2026






Appeal brought on 17 November 2025 by Association pour la promotion du sel artisanal against the judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) delivered on 10 September 2025 in Cases T-191/24 to T-193/24, Association pour la promotion du sel artisanal and Others v Commission


(Case C-748/25 P)

(C/2026/301)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Appellant: Association pour la promotion du sel artisanal (represented by: T. Lachacinski and F. Fajgenbaum, avocats)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission and French Republic

Form of order sought

The appellant claims that the Court should:






—


declare that it has jurisdiction to hear and determine the action brought at first instance by the appellant, rule that the appellant has standing to bring such an action and to seek annulment of the act at issue;










—


rule that the appeal against the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 10 September 2025 in Joined Cases T-191/24 to T-193/24 is admissible and well-founded;










—


annul the act at issue on the ground that the protected geographical indication (‘PGI’) ‘Sel de Camargue/Fleur de sel de Camargue’ is unlawful;










—


annul the act at issue on the ground that the PGI ‘Sel de Camargue/Fleur de sel de Camargue’ creates a situation of unfair competition between operators;










—


annul the act at issue on the ground that the name ‘Fleur de sel de Camargue’ is misleading for consumers.





Ground of appeal and main arguments

In support of its appeal, the appellant raises a single ground of appeal alleging that it has standing to bring an action since (i) the act at issue affects its own interests, (ii) the act at issue affects the legal situation of its members and (iii) the act at issue affects the interests of consumers.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2026/301/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)