do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Information to be provided pursuant to Article 5(2) – Dissolution of European Groupings of Territorial Cooperation (EGTC) (Regulation (EC) No 1082/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 July 2006 (OJ L 210, 31.7.2006, p. 19))
Date: 2025-11-10
Institutions: The Member States
Subjects: Czechia, European territorial cooperation, Poland, Slovakia, cross-border cooperation, economic and social cohesion, economic cooperation, local authority, regional authority, regional cooperation, regional development








C_202506079EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/6079


10.11.2025






Information to be provided pursuant to Article 5(2)
Dissolution of European Groupings of Territorial Cooperation (EGTC)


(Regulation (EC) No 1082/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 July 2006 (
OJ L 210, 31.7.2006, p. 19))




Name: European Grouping of Territorial Cooperation TRITIA limited

Seat: Zamkowa 3a, 43-400 Cieszyn, Poland
      

Countries involved: CZ/PL/SK

Dissolution: 29.9.2025
      


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/6079/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Explanatory notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union
Date: 2025-11-10
Institutions: Directorate-General for Taxation and Customs Union, European Commission
Subjects: Combined Nomenclature, common customs tariff, polymer








C_202506087EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/6087


10.11.2025






Explanatory notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union
(C/2025/6087)

Pursuant to Article 9(1), point (a), of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 (1), the Explanatory notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union (2) are amended as follows:

on page 198, in the Explanatory note to CN subheadings


               3907 61 00  and 3907 69 00 
            

, a new paragraph is added after the existing text:



            ‘These subheadings also include copolymers of terephthalic acid, ethylene glycol and one or more other diols, such as cyclohexane dimethanol or neopentyl glycol, provided that monomer units of polyethylene terephthalate predominate by weight in the copolymer.
Polyester products in which monomer units of polyethylene terephthalate do not predominate by weight in the copolymer shall be classified as other polyesters (subheading 3907 99 )’
         



(1)  Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff (OJ L 256, 7.9.1987, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/1987/2658/oj).

(2)  
            OJ C 119, 29.3.2019, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/6087/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-777/25: Action brought on 10 November 2025 – NT v Entreprise commune Semi-conducteurs
Date: 2025-11-10
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European official, administrative procedure, harassment at work, indemnification, legal aid, maladministration, staff regulations (EU)








C_202600344EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2026/344


26.1.2026






Action brought on 10 November 2025 – NT v Entreprise commune ‘Semi-conducteurs’
               


(Case T-777/25)

(C/2026/344)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: NT (represented by: N. de Montigny, lawyer)

Defendant: Entreprise commune ‘Semi-conducteurs’
         

Form of order sought

The applicant claims the Court should:






—


annul the decision of 12 February 2025 rejecting the request for assistance submitted under Article 90(1) and Article 24 of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union;










—


annul, so far as necessary, in that it supplements or amends the decision of 12 February 2025, the explicit decision rejecting the claim of 1 August 2025;










—


order the defendant to compensate the applicant for the damage resulting from the misconduct of the administrative procedure, assessed ex aequo et bono at EUR 10 000;










—


order, in the alternative and in so far as necessary, the production by the defendant of the administrative inquiry report and all its annexes pursuant to Articles 91(b) and 92 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court of the European Union;










—


order the defendant to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.






1.


First plea in law, alleging violation of the definition of harassment, failure to take a decision, (manifest) error of assessment and contradictions between the grounds and conclusions of the inquiry report and breach of the duty to provide assistance.










2.


Second plea in law, alleging breach of the duty of care and of the duty to provide assistance, maladministration, violation of the principle of reasonable time limits and unlawfulness of the suspension of the administrative inquiry. The applicant argues that those violations and breaches engage the non-contractual liability of the administration.






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2026/344/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-778/25: Action brought on 10 November 2025 – NU v Commission
Date: 2025-11-10
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European Anti-fraud Office, European official, presumption of innocence, principle of proportionality








C_202600653EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2026/653


9.2.2026






Action brought on 10 November 2025 – NU v Commission


(Case T-778/25)

(C/2026/653)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: NU (represented by: N. Korogiannakis, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the Commission Decision (Ares(2025)1297343) of 18 February 2025;










—


annul the Appointing Authority Decision (No R/283/25) (Ares(2025)7249780) in response of the complaint of the applicant of 4 September 2025;










—


condemn the Commission to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law.






1.


First plea in law, alleging manifest errors of assessment regarding the proceedings before the national courts and a violation of the presumption of innocence.










2.


Second plea in law, alleging manifest errors of assessment regarding the OLAF report.










3.


Third plea in law, alleging a breach of the principle of proportionality.






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2026/653/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-713/25, Suomen Elintarviketyöläisten Liitto: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Työtuomioistuin (Finland) lodged on 10 November 2025 – Suomen Elintarviketyöläisten Liitto SEL ry v Elintarviketeollisuusliitto ry
Date: 2025-11-10
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: bonus payment, child care, collective agreement, equal treatment, leave on social grounds, part-time employment








C_202600297EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2026/297


26.1.2026






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Työtuomioistuin (Finland) lodged on 10 November 2025 – Suomen Elintarviketyöläisten Liitto SEL ry v Elintarviketeollisuusliitto ry


(Case C-713/25, Suomen Elintarviketyöläisten Liitto)

(C/2026/297)
Language of the case: Finnish

Referring court

Työtuomioistuin

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Suomen Elintarviketyöläisten Liitto SEL ry

Defendant: Elintarviketeollisuusliitto ry

Questions referred







1.


Are Article 157 TFEU, Articles 21 and 23 of the Charter, Articles 4, 14(1)(c) and 15 of Directive 2006/54/EC (1) and Article 10(2) of Directive (EU) 2019/1158 (2) to be interpreted as precluding a provision in a collective agreement under which a one-off special payment agreed in the collective agreement is made only to employees who are in receipt of pay at the time of that one-off payment, so that employees who, at the time of the special payment, are on unpaid pregnancy leave, special pregnancy leave, parental leave or childcare leave are denied the special payment?










2.


Are the aforementioned rules and provisions to be interpreted as precluding a provision in a collective agreement under which a one-off special payment agreed in the collective agreement is made in proportion to the working hours of employees who take parental leave or childcare leave in the form of part-time work and is thus made on the basis of the same principles which apply to other part-time employees?






(1)  Directive 2006/54/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 July 2006 on the implementation of the principle of equal opportunities and equal treatment of men and women in matters of employment and occupation (OJ 2006 L 204, p. 23).

(2)  Directive (EU) 2019/1158 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 June 2019 on work-life balance for parents and carers and repealing Council Directive 2010/18/EU (OJ 2019 L 188, p. 79).


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2026/297/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-787/25: Action brought on 10 November 2025 – Baur v Commission
Date: 2025-11-10
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: State aid, VAT, control of restrictive practices, game of chance, gaming establishment, restriction on competition, tax system








C_202600654EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2026/654


9.2.2026






Action brought on 10 November 2025 – Baur v Commission


(Case T-787/25)

(C/2026/654)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Peter Baur (Prüm, Germany) (represented by: B. Hansen, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the decision of the European Commission of 11 September 2025, reference CPLT (2024) 02183;










—


declare that the European Commission was required to initiate the formal initiation procedure under Article 108(2) TFEU;










—


order the European Commission to pay the costs of the proceedings.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law.






1.


Infringement of Article 107(1) TFEU (selective State aid)






—


Casinos are subject to favourable treatment in terms of turnover tax, as their turnover is taxed solely in respect of gross proceeds from gambling, in breach of EU law.










—


The conditions laid down in the case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union for a reduction of the tax base (mandatory statutory payout ratio and technical separation of the stakes) are not satisfied.










—


The favourable treatment is selective as compared to commercial arcade operators, even though both are active on the same relevant market.














2.


Manifest error of assessment on the part of the Commission






—


The Commission stated, without carrying out its own examination, that casinos are subject to statutory payout obligations.










—


The applicant substantiated an assertion that such a legal basis does not exist.










—


Despite existing doubts, the Commission failed to initiate the formal investigation procedure.














3.


Infringement of essential procedural requirements (Article 108(2) TFEU, Article 296 TFEU)






—


Infringement of the Commission’s duty to investigate and of the complainant’s procedural rights










—


The decision is not sufficiently reasoned, since it announces the outcome without stating the underlying considerations.










—


The failure to state reasons amounts to an independent ground for annulment.










ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2026/654/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Corrigendum to Directive (EU) 2024/1760 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2024 on corporate sustainability due diligence and amending Directive (EU) 2019/1937 and Regulation (EU) 2023/2859 (OJ L, 2024/1760, 5.7.2024)
Date: 2025-11-10
Institutions: Council of the European Union, European Parliament
Subjects: climate change policy, company law, corporate governance, corporate social responsibility, economic instrument for the environment, environmental impact, environmental liability, environmental protection, human rights, labour law




L_202590894EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
L series













2025/90894


10.11.2025






Corrigendum to Directive (EU) 2024/1760 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2024 on corporate sustainability due diligence and amending Directive (EU) 2019/1937 and Regulation (EU) 2023/2859
(
Official Journal of the European Union L, 2024/1760, 5 July 2024
)







1.


On page 27, footnote 33:











for:










‘(33)


Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on prudential requirements for credit institutions and investment firms and amending Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 (OJ L 176, 27.6.2013, p. 1).’,
















read:










‘(33)


Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on prudential requirements for credit institutions and amending Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 (OJ L 176, 27.6.2013, p. 1).’.















2.


On page 32, in Article 6(1):











for:





‘1.   Member States shall ensure that parent companies falling under the scope of this Directive are allowed to fulfil the obligations set out in Articles 7 to 11 and Article 22 …’

,










read:





‘1.   Member States shall ensure that parent companies falling under the scope of this Directive are allowed to fulfil the obligations set out in Articles 7 to 16 and Article 22 …’.








ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2024/1760/corrigendum/2025-11-10/oj
ISSN 1977-0677 (electronic edition)
Explanatory notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union
Date: 2025-11-10
Institutions: Directorate-General for Taxation and Customs Union, European Commission
Subjects: Combined Nomenclature, common customs tariff, construction equipment, machinery








C_202506088EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/6088


10.11.2025






Explanatory notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union
(C/2025/6088)

Pursuant to Article 9(1), point (a), of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 (1), the Explanatory notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union (2) are amended as follows:

On page 332, the following explanatory note is inserted:








‘8427




Fork-lift trucks; other works trucks fitted with lifting or handling equipment:


and












8429




Self-propelled bulldozers, angledozers, graders, levellers, scrapers, mechanical shovels, excavators, shovel loaders, tamping machines and roadrollers:

These headings include, self-propelled, wheeled machines, equipped with a telescopic front boom – designed to accommodate various interchangeable tools (such as forks, pallet forks, arms, pliers, shovels) – making them potentially classifiable in headings 8427  or 8429 .
Depending on their configuration at the time of the presentation, their classification is determined according to the following principles:






(1)


machines presented with a specific interchangeable tool, are classified under the heading corresponding to the function of the machine equipped with that tool. For example, if the machine is presented with a fork-lift, it should be classified under heading 8427 . (See also the HS Classification opinion 842720/1.),










(2)


machines presented with several interchangeable tools that enable them to perform functions falling under the scope of headings 8427  and 8429 , are classified in accordance with Note 3 to Section XVI or by application of General Interpretative Rule 3 (c). (See also the (HSEN) to heading 8426 , SELF-PROPELLED AND OTHER “MOBILE” MACHINES (b) (1)),










(3)


the same machines presented without any interchangeable tools as mentioned above are classified by application of General Interpretative Rule 3 (c) under heading 8429 .’











(1)  Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff (OJ L 256, 7.9.1987, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/1987/2658/oj).

(2)  
            OJ C 119, 29.3.2019, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/6088/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries
Date: 2025-11-10
Institutions: Directorate-General for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries, European Commission
Subjects: Atlantic Ocean, EU waters, Ireland, United Kingdom, catch by species, catch quota, crustacean, fishing area, fishing rights, international waters, sea fishing, territorial waters








C_202506071EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/6071


10.11.2025






Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries
(C/2025/6071)

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Union control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:






Date and time of closure


15.9.2025




Duration


15.9.2025 – 31.12.2025




Member State


Ireland




Stock or Group of stocks


NEP/5BC6.




Species


Norway lobster (Nephrops norvegicus)




Zone


6; United Kingdom and international waters of 5b




Type(s) of fishing vessels


—




Reference number


11/TQ202






(1)  
            OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/6071/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL on the delegation of power under Directive 2008/96/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on road infrastructure safety management
Date: 2025-11-10
Institutions: Directorate-General for Mobility and Transport, European Commission
Subjects: common transport policy, powers of the institutions (EU), road network, road safety, road traffic, traffic signs, trans-European network, transfer of competence, transport accident, transport infrastructure, transport network

EN 

  EN 

   EUROPEAN COMMISSION  Brussels, 10.11.2025  COM(2025) 672 final  REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL on the delegation of power under Directive 2008/96/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on road infrastructure safety management  
 
 
1. 

INTRODUCTION 

Directive 2008/96/EC1 of the European Parliament and of the Council (‘the Directive’) establishes a framework 
and an obligation for the EU Member States to perform road safety procedures aimed at improving the road safety 
aspects of both road projects and the built road infrastructure. The Directive’s annexes provide an indicative and 
non-exhaustive list of aspects to be considered when performing road safety procedures. 

The Directive was amended by Directive (EU) 2019/19362 of the European Parliament and of the Council. One 
of the amendments, Article 12, confers delegated powers  on the Commission, stating that ‘The Commission is 
empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 12a amending the Annexes in order to adapt them 
to technical progress.’ 

In connection with this empowerment, under the Directive’s Article 12a(2) the Commission is required to report 
to Parliament and the Council on the delegation of power conferred on it by the Directive, ensuring transparency 
and accountability in the exercise of its delegated powers. 

2. 

EXERCISE OF THE POWER TO ADOPT DELEGATED ACTS 

2.1. Delegated acts adopted 

Since the entry into force of Articles 12 and 12a, the Commission has not exercised its delegated powers, and no 
delegated acts have been adopted under the Directive. 

3. 

CONCLUSIONS 

In  accordance  with Article 12a(2)  of  the  Directive,  the  Commission  will  again  prepare  a  report  on  delegated 
powers before the end of the next five-year period. 

The Commission invites the European Parliament and the Council to take note of this report. 

1 Directive 2008/96/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on road infrastructure safety management (OJ 
L 391, 29.11.2008, p. 59), ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2008/96/oj, as amended. 
2 Directive (EU) 2019/1936 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2019 amending Directive 2008/96/EC on road 
infrastructure safety management (OJ L 305, 26.11.2019, p. 1), ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2019/1936/oj.
Explanatory notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union
Date: 2025-11-10
Institutions: Directorate-General for Taxation and Customs Union, European Commission
Subjects: Combined Nomenclature, common customs tariff, polymer








C_202506093EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/6093


10.11.2025






Explanatory notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union
(C/2025/6093)

Pursuant to Article 9(1), point (a), of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 (1), the Explanatory notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union (2) are amended as follows:

on page 196, a new Explanatory note to Note 4 of Chapter 39 is added with the following text:



                     ‘
                     Note 4

Calculation of mass ratios of monomer units in copolymers:
The mass ratios of the respective monomer units in copolymer chains are calculated based on the molecular structure of the copolymer (not the starting materials), taking into account the formation reaction of the polymer. When applicable, the atom linking two adjacent monomer units is attributed to the monomer unit from which the atom originates.
The following examples illustrate the calculation of the monomer unit content in copolymers:






—


In poly(ethylene terephthalate), which is a polyester comprised of terephthalic acid and ethylene glycol moieties, both alcoholic oxygens are attributed to the glycol monomer unit. Hence, ethylene glycol is calculated as C2H4O2, and terephthalate is calculated as C8H4O2.










—


In polyamide-6,6, which is a polyamide comprised of hexamethylenediamine and adipic acid, both nitrogen atoms are attributed to the diamine monomer unit. Hence, hexamethylenediamine is calculated as C6H14N2 and adipic acid is calculated as C6H8O2.’
                  







(1)  Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff (OJ L 256, 7.9.1987, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/1987/2658/oj).

(2)  
            OJ C 119, 29.3.2019, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/6093/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)