do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-700/25, Pieloski: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Gdańsku (Poland) lodged on 5 November 2025 – NN
Date: 2025-11-05
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU Member State, European arrest warrant, citizenship, enforcement of ruling, public prosecution








C_202600632EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2026/632


9.2.2026






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Gdańsku (Poland) lodged on 5 November 2025 – NN


(Case C-700/25, Pieloski
                (1)
)

(C/2026/632)
Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Sąd Okręgowy w Gdańsku

Parties to the main proceedings


Criminal proceedings against: NN

With the participation of: Prokuratura Okręgowa w Gdańsku

Question referred

Do the provisions of Article 4(7)(a) of [Council] Framework Decision 2002/584 [of 13 June 2002] on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States (2) and of Article 18 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union permit an interpretation thereof whereby those provisions take into account the possibility of introducing into national law a mandatory ground for non-execution of a European arrest warrant by a court of the executing State, if the act concerned by the European warrant was committed in whole or in part in the territory of the executing State and that warrant has been issued in respect of a prosecuted person who is a citizen of the executing State?


(1)  The name of the present case is a fictitious name. It does not correspond to the real name of any party to the proceedings.

(2)  
            OJ 2002 L 190, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2026/632/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-770/25: Action brought on 5 November 2025 – Adema v OCVV (Roat)
Date: 2025-11-05
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: pip fruit, plant breeding, plant variety right








C_202600342EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2026/342


26.1.2026






Action brought on 5 November 2025 – Adema v OCVV (Roat)


(Case T-770/25)

(C/2026/342)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Adema Srl (Appiano, Italy) (represented by: G. Würtenberger and A. Kockläuner, lawyers)

Defendant: Community Plant Variety Office

Details of the proceedings before CPVO


Community Plant Variety Right at Issue: Apple variety Roat (Application No. 2011/0185)

Contested decision: Decision of the Board of Appeal of CPVO of 2 September 2025 in Case A048/2023

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order CPVO to pay the costs.





Plea in law

Infringement of Articles 81, 76, 6 and 7 of Council Regulation (EC) No 2100/94.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2026/342/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections – SA.101201
Date: 2025-11-05
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Malta, State aid, aid to undertakings, control of State aid








C_202505894EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/5894


5.11.2025






Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union
Cases where the Commission raises no objections
SA.101201
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2025/5894)








Date of adoption of the decision


8.6.2023




Aid number


SA.101201




Member State


Malta




Region


 




Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)


IPCEI on Microelectronics and Communication Technology “ME/CT” - SA.101201




Legal basis


Malta Enterprise Act (CAP 463 of the Laws of Malta)




Type of measure


Ad Hoc Case


ST Microelectronics Malta Ltd.




Objective


Execution of an important project of common European interest




Form of aid


Direct grant




Budget


Overall budget: 60 000 000  EUR




Intensity


 




Duration


From 1.3.2022




Economic sectors


All economic sectors eligible to receive aid




Name and address of the granting authority







Malta Enterprise Corporation




Malta Enterprise Corporation, Gwardamangia Hill, Pieta’, MEC 0001, Malta








Other information


 




The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search?caseInstrument=SA



ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/5894/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-391/25 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 5 November 2025 – DLF Beet Seed and United Beet Seeds v ECHA (Interim relief – Access to documents – Regulation (EU) No 649/2012 – Export notifications for hazardous chemicals that are banned or severely restricted within the European Union – Documents concerning the applicants held by ECHA – Decision to grant a third party access to the documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Exception relating to the protection of the commercial interests of a third party – Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 – Concept of information [which] relates to emissions into the environment – Application for interim measures – No prima facie case)
Date: 2025-11-05
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: access to EU information, dangerous substance, disclosure of information, environmental protection, export (EU)








C_202506628EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/6628


22.12.2025






Order of the President of the General Court of 5 November 2025 – DLF Beet Seed and United Beet Seeds v ECHA


(Case T-391/25 R)

(Interim relief - Access to documents - Regulation (EU) No 649/2012 - Export notifications for hazardous chemicals that are banned or severely restricted within the European Union - Documents concerning the applicants held by ECHA - Decision to grant a third party access to the documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Exception relating to the protection of the commercial interests of a third party - Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 - Concept of ‘information [which] relates to emissions into the environment’ - Application for interim measures - No prima facie case)
(C/2025/6628)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicants: DLF Beet Seed ApS (Lolland, Denmark), United Beet Seeds (Tienen, Belgium) (represented by: B. Creve, T. Kölsch and J. Lefevre Olsen, lawyers)

Defendant: European Chemicals Agency (represented by: C. Buchanan and B. Áder, acting as Agents)

Re:

By their application under Articles 278 and 279 TFEU, the applicants request, first, suspension of the operation of the decision of the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) in Case ATD/127/2024, of 7 April 2025, by which ECHA informed the applicants of its intention to grant full access to a document requested under Article 2(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents (OJ 2001 L 145, p. 43) and, second, an order for any other interim measure that the President of the General Court considers appropriate.

Operative part of the order







1.


The application for interim measures is dismissed.










2.



The order of 18 June 2025, DLF Beet Seed and United Beet Seeds v ECHA (T-391/25 R), is cancelled.











3.


The costs are reserved.






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/6628/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)