do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-330/24: Judgment of the General Court of 29 October 2025 – KF v EIB (Civil service – EIB staff – Social security – Invalidity Committee – Refusal to recognise invalidity – Implementation of the terms of a settlement agreement – Obligation to state reasons – Liability)
Date: 2025-10-29
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European official, alternative dispute resolution, indemnification, legal expenses, pension scheme, staff regulations (EU)








C_202506506EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/6506


15.12.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 29 October 2025 – KF v EIB


(Case T-330/24)
                (1)

(Civil service - EIB staff - Social security - Invalidity Committee - Refusal to recognise invalidity - Implementation of the terms of a settlement agreement - Obligation to state reasons - Liability)
(C/2025/6506)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: KF (represented by: L. Levi, lawyer)

Defendant: European Investment Bank (represented by: J. Pawlowicz and K. Carr, acting as Agents, and by B. Wägenbaur, lawyer)

Re:

By her action under Article 270 TFEU and Article 50a of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union, the applicant seeks, first, the annulment of the decision of the European Investment Bank (EIB) of 25 March 2024, by which the EIB, in essence, defined its final position regarding the implementation of the settlement agreement ending the dispute in the case that gave rise to the order of 24 October 2023, KF v EIB (T-37/21, not published, EU:T:2023:679) and by which it confirmed its decision of 13 October 2020 not to recognise the applicant’s invalidity, and, second, compensation for the damage she allegedly suffered as a result of that decision.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls the decision of the European Investment Bank (EIB) of 25 March 2024, by which it defined its final position regarding the implementation of the settlement agreement ending the dispute in the case that gave rise to the order of 24 October 2023, KF v EIB (T-37/21, not published, EU:T:2023:679) and by which it confirmed its decision of 13 October 2020 not to recognise KF’s invalidity;










2.


Orders the EIB to pay the sum of EUR 20 000 as compensation for the non-material damage suffered by KF;










3.


Orders the EIB to pay the costs.






(1)  
            OJ C, C/2024/4872, 12.8.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/6506/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Special report 21/2025: RRF support for an improved business environment – Only partially addresses country-specific recommendations, but some first results contributed to progress in their implementation
Date: 2025-10-29
Institutions: European Court of Auditors
Subjects: EU financial instrument, EU financing arrangements, economic and social cohesion, economic governance (EU), economic recovery, economic reform, fiscal policy, investment, small and medium-sized enterprises, structural adjustment








C_202505873EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/5873


29.10.2025






Special report 21/2025:

            ‘RRF support for an improved business environment – Only partially addresses country-specific recommendations, but some first results contributed to progress in their implementation’
         
(C/2025/5873)

The European Court of Auditors has published its special report 21/2025: ‘RRF support for an improved business environment – Only partially addresses country-specific recommendations, but some first results contributed to progress in their implementation’.
The report can be consulted directly or downloaded at the European Court of Auditors’ website: https://www.eca.europa.eu/en/publications/sr-2025-21.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/5873/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-530/24: Judgment of the General Court of 29 October 2025 – FU v Parliament (Civil service – Officials – Social security – Article 73 of the Staff Regulations – Accident – Rejection of the accident report – Out of time submission of the accident report – Failure to observe the period of 10 working days from the occurrence of the accident – Concept of lawful reason)
Date: 2025-10-29
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European official, occupational accident, occupational accident insurance, principle of proportionality, report, staff regulations (EU)








C_202506509EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/6509


15.12.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 29 October 2025 – FU v Parliament


(Case T-530/24)
                (1)

(Civil service - Officials - Social security - Article 73 of the Staff Regulations - Accident - Rejection of the accident report - Out of time submission of the accident report - Failure to observe the period of 10 working days from the occurrence of the accident - Concept of ‘lawful reason’)
(C/2025/6509)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: FU (represented by: S. Orlandi, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: M. Mão Cheia Carreira and D. Boytha, acting as Agents)

Interveners in support of the defendant: Council of the European Union, (represented by: M. Bauer and M. Alver, acting as Agents), European Commission (represented by: J.-F. Brakeland and O. Dani, acting as Agents)

Re:

By her action under Article 270 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of 30 November 2023 of the European Parliament, by which the European Parliament rejected, on the ground that it was out of time, her accident report of 27 November 2023.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders FU to bear her own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Parliament;










3.


Orders the Council of the European Union and the European Commission to bear their own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C, C/2024/7180, 9.12.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/6509/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-688/25, Huther Immobilien Mannheim: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 29 October 2025 – AR v Huther Immobilien Mannheim GmbH
Date: 2025-10-29
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: consumer information, contract terms, digital contract, termination of a contract








C_202600291EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2026/291


26.1.2026






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 29 October 2025 – AR v Huther Immobilien Mannheim GmbH


(Case C-688/25, Huther Immobilien Mannheim)

(C/2026/291)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesgerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant and appellant in the appeal on a point of law: AR

Defendant and respondent in the appeal on a point of law: Huther Immobilien Mannheim GmbH

Questions referred







1.


Does the fourteen-day withdrawal period under Article 9(1) of Directive 2011/83/EU (1) begin to run if the trader has not provided the consumer with the model withdrawal form?










2.


Does it follow from the provisions of Directive 2011/83/EU that the consumer’s right of withdrawal under Article 9(1) of the Directive continues to apply even though both the consumer and the trader have fully performed a distance contract concluded between them? Does that apply, in any case, where applicable, if the trader has not provided the consumer with the model withdrawal form?






(1)  Directive 2011/83/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2011 on consumer rights, amending Council Directive 93/13/EEC and Directive 1999/44/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Directive 85/577/EEC and Directive 97/7/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ 2011 L 304, p. 64).


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2026/291/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-550/24: Judgment of the General Court of 29 October 2025 – Ningbo Vasa Intelligent Technology v EUIPO – Electronic Controls (Warning lights (part of -)) (EU design – Invalidity proceedings – EU design representing a part of a warning light – Ground for invalidity – Non-compliance with requirements for protection – Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002, in the version prior to Regulation (EU) 2024/2822 – No individual character – Article 6 of Regulation No 6/2002 – Proof of disclosure of the earlier design – Article 7(1) of Regulation No 6/2002 – Evidence submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Indication and reproduction of the earlier designs – Discretion of the Board of Appeal – Article 63(2) of Regulation No 6/2002 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 62 of Regulation No 6/2002, in its earlier version)
Date: 2025-10-29
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: designs and models, signalling device








C_202506510EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/6510


15.12.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 29 October 2025 – Ningbo Vasa Intelligent Technology v EUIPO – Electronic Controls (Warning lights (part of -))


(Case T-550/24)
                (1)

(EU design - Invalidity proceedings - EU design representing a part of a warning light - Ground for invalidity - Non-compliance with requirements for protection - Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002, in the version prior to Regulation (EU) 2024/2822 - No individual character - Article 6 of Regulation No 6/2002 - Proof of disclosure of the earlier design - Article 7(1) of Regulation No 6/2002 - Evidence submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal - Indication and reproduction of the earlier designs - Discretion of the Board of Appeal - Article 63(2) of Regulation No 6/2002 - Obligation to state reasons - Article 62 of Regulation No 6/2002, in its earlier version)
(C/2025/6510)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Ningbo Vasa Intelligent Technology Co. Ltd (Ningbo, China) (represented by: J. C. Erdozain López, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Ivanauskas, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Electronic Controls Co. (Boise, Idaho, United States) (represented by: G. Desrousseaux, lawyer)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 14 August 2024 (Case R 2347/2023-3)).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Ningbo Vasa Intelligent Technology Co. Ltd to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Electronic Controls Co.;










3.


Orders the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) to bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C, C/2024/7372, 16.12.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/6510/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-742/20 RENV: Judgment of the General Court of 29 October 2025 – UPL Europe and Indofil Industries (Netherlands) v Commission (Plant protection products – Active substance mancozeb – Non-renewal of approval – Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 and Implementing Regulation (EU) No 844/2012 – Procedure for assessing the application for renewal of approval of an active substance – Manifest error of assessment – Procedure for harmonised classification and labelling – Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008)
Date: 2025-10-29
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: classification, labelling, market approval, plant health control, plant health product, rights of the defence, withdrawal from the market








C_202506502EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/6502


15.12.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 29 October 2025 – UPL Europe and Indofil Industries (Netherlands) v Commission


(Case T-742/20 RENV)
                (1)

(Plant protection products - Active substance mancozeb - Non-renewal of approval - Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 and Implementing Regulation (EU) No 844/2012 - Procedure for assessing the application for renewal of approval of an active substance - Manifest error of assessment - Procedure for harmonised classification and labelling - Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008)
(C/2025/6502)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicants: UPL Europe Ltd (Warrington, Cheshire, United Kingdom), Indofil Industries (Netherlands) BV (Amsterdam, Netherlands) (represented by: C. Mereu and P. Parvati Martín Paredes, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Dawes, L. Vernier and M. ter Haar, acting as Agents)

Re:

By their action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicants seek annulment of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/2087 of 14 December 2020 concerning the non-renewal of approval of the active substance mancozeb, in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market, and amending the Annex to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011 (OJ 2020 L 423, p. 50).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders each party to bear its own costs in Case C-262/23 P;










3.


Orders UPL Europe Ltd and Indofil Industries (Netherlands) BV to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission in Case T-742/20 RENV.






(1)  
            OJ C 53, 15.2.2021.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/6502/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-399/23: Judgment of the General Court of 29 October 2025 – ClientEarth and Collectif Nourrir v Commission (Agriculture – CAP Strategic Plan – Regulation (EU) 2021/2115 – Rules on support for strategic plans drawn up by Member States under the CAP – Commission approval – Rejection of the request for internal review – Article 10(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 – Article 13 of Regulation 2021/2115 – Error of law – Manifest error of assessment)
Date: 2025-10-29
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EAGF, European Regional Development Fund, France, aid to agriculture, common agricultural policy, eligibility criteria, management planning








C_202506504EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/6504


15.12.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 29 October 2025 – ClientEarth and Collectif Nourrir v Commission


(Case T-399/23)
                (1)

(Agriculture - CAP Strategic Plan - Regulation (EU) 2021/2115 - Rules on support for strategic plans drawn up by Member States under the CAP - Commission approval - Rejection of the request for internal review - Article 10(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 - Article 13 of Regulation 2021/2115 - Error of law - Manifest error of assessment)
(C/2025/6504)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicants: ClientEarth (Ixelles, Belgium), Collectif Nourrir (Montreuil, France) (represented by: C. Baldon and N. Braoudakis, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A.-C. Becker, G. Gattinara, F. Le Bot and C. Perrin, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: French Republic (represented by: B. Fodda, B. Travard, M. de Lisi, P. Chansou and F. du Couëdic, acting as Agents)

Re:

By their action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicants seek the annulment of the European Commission’s decision of 5 May 2023 rejecting their request for internal review of Commission Implementing Decision C(2022) 6012 final of 31 August 2022 approving the 2023-2027 CAP Strategic Plan of France for Union support financed by the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund and the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls the European Commission’s decision of 5 May 2023 rejecting the request by ClientEarth and Collectif Nourrir for internal review of Commission Implementing Decision C(2022) 6012 final of 31 August 2022 approving the 2023-2027 CAP Strategic Plan of France for Union support financed by the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund and the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development;










2.


Orders the Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by ClientEarth and Collectif Nourrir;










3.


Orders the French Republic to bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C, C/2023/48, 9.10.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/6504/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-565/24: Judgment of the General Court of 29 October 2025 – Itron v EUIPO – Advanced Sanitairy Technologies (ITRON) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark ITRON – Earlier EU word marks ITRON – Relative grounds for refusal – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Distance between the goods and services in question)
Date: 2025-10-29
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, electric cable, electrical equipment, lighting equipment, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_202506511EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/6511


15.12.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 29 October 2025 – Itron v EUIPO – Advanced Sanitairy Technologies (ITRON)


(Case T-565/24)
                (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU word mark ITRON - Earlier EU word marks ITRON - Relative grounds for refusal - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001 - Distance between the goods and services in question)
(C/2025/6511)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Itron, Inc. (Liberty Lake, Washington, United States) (represented by: P. Olson, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Gája, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Advanced Sanitairy Technologies (Aix-en-Provence, France)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks, in essence, annulment of the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 26 August 2024 (Case R 1596/2023-1).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 26 August 2024 (Case R 1596-2023-1);










2.


Orders EUIPO to pay the costs.






(1)  
            OJ C, C/2024/7379, 16.12.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/6511/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/2239 of 29 October 2025 on the registration of the geographical indication Fragola della Basilicata (PGI) in the Union register of geographical indications pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2024/1143 of the European Parliament and of the Council
Date: 2025-10-29
Institutions: Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development, European Commission
Subjects: Basilicata, Italy, designation of origin, labelling, product designation, soft fruit








L_202502239EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
L series













2025/2239


5.11.2025







            COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2025/2239
of 29 October 2025
         
on the registration of the geographical indication ‘Fragola della Basilicata’ (PGI) in the Union register of geographical indications pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2024/1143 of the European Parliament and of the Council


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Regulation (EU) 2024/1143 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 April 2024 on geographical indications for wine, spirit drinks and agricultural products, as well as traditional specialities guaranteed and optional quality terms for agricultural products, amending Regulations (EU) No 1308/2013, (EU) No 2019/787 and (EU) 2019/1753 and repealing Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 (1), and in particular Article 21(2) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


Pursuant to Article 15(4) of Regulation (EU) 2024/1143, Italy’s application for registration of the geographical indication ‘Fragola della Basilicata’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).












(2)


No statement of opposition under Article 17 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1143 has been received by the Commission.












(3)


The geographical indication ‘Fragola della Basilicata’ should therefore be entered in the Union register of geographical indications,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
The geographical indication ‘Fragola della Basilicata’ (PGI) is hereby entered in the Union register of geographical indications referred to in Article 22 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1143.


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 29 October 2025.


For the Commission,


On behalf of the President,

Christophe HANSEN
            

Member of the Commission






(1)  
            OJ L, 2024/1143, 23.4.2024, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1143/oj.

(2)  
            OJ C, C/2025/3671, 7.7.2025, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3671/oj.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg_impl/2025/2239/oj
ISSN 1977-0677 (electronic edition)
Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections – SA.119573
Date: 2025-10-29
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: State aid, Sweden, control of State aid, inland waterway transport, maritime transport








C_202505866EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/5866


29.10.2025






Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union
Cases where the Commission raises no objections
SA.119573
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2025/5866)








Date of adoption of the decision


20.10.2025




Aid number


SA.119573




Member State


Sweden




Region


 




Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)


Prolongation of aid scheme in favour of seafarers (Sjöfartsstöd)




Legal basis


Shipping Aid Ordinance (2001:770)




Type of measure


Scheme


 




Objective


Sectoral development




Form of aid


 




Budget


Overall budget: 5 000 000 000  SEK
Annual budget: 1 700 000 000  SEK




Intensity


 




Duration


1.1.2026 - 31.12.2028




Economic sectors


Water transport




Name and address of the granting authority







The Board for Shipping Aid (Swedish Transport Administration)




Trafikverket, Delegationen för sjöfartsstöd, 405 33 Göteborg








Other information


 




The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search?caseInstrument=SA



ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/5866/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)