do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-491/24: Judgment of the General Court of 22 October 2025 – Puma v EUIPO – CMS (CMS Italy) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark CMS Italy – Earlier international figurative marks representing a feline bounding to the left – Relative ground for refusal – Injury to reputation – Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 – Strength of reputation – Obligation on EUIPO expressly to take into account the best-case scenario for the losing party before it – Duty of diligence)
Date: 2025-10-22
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, air conditioning, heating, machine tool, maintenance, refrigeration industry, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_202506135EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/6135


8.12.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 22 October 2025 – Puma v EUIPO – CMS (CMS Italy)


(Case T-491/24)
                (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - International registration designating the European Union - Figurative mark CMS Italy - Earlier international figurative marks representing a feline bounding to the left - Relative ground for refusal - Injury to reputation - Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Strength of reputation - Obligation on EUIPO expressly to take into account the best-case scenario for the losing party before it - Duty of diligence)
(C/2025/6135)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Puma SE (Herzogenaurach, Germany) (represented by: M. Schunke and P. Trieb, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Ivanauskas and V. Ruzek, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: CMS Costruzione macchine speciali SpA (Alonte, Italy)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 4 July 2024 (Case R 2215/2019-5).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 4 July 2024 (Case R 2215/2019-5);










2.


Orders EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings.






(1)  
            OJ C, C/2024/6662, 11.11.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/6135/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/343 of 17 February 2025 amending Regulation (EU) No 1332/2011 and Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/373 as regards airborne collision avoidance systems (OJ L, 2025/343, 18.2.2025)
Date: 2025-10-22
Institutions: Directorate-General for Mobility and Transport, European Commission
Subjects: air safety, air space, air traffic, air traffic control, satellite navigation, telecommunications, waveband








L_202590823EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
L series













2025/90823


22.10.2025






Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/343 of 17 February 2025 amending Regulation (EU) No 1332/2011 and Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/373 as regards airborne collision avoidance systems

(
Official Journal of the European Union L, 2025/343, 18 February 2025
)


On page 2, in Article 1, in the amendment to point AUR.ACAS.1005 of the Annex to Regulation (EU) No 1332/2011
for:

                  ‘AUR.ACAS.1005 Performance requirement

The following turbine-powered aeroplanes shall be equipped with ACAS II with a collision avoidance logic version 7.1 or with ACAS Xa:






(a)


aeroplanes with a maximum certificated take-off mass exceeding 5 700 kg;










(b)


aeroplanes authorised to carry more than 19 passengers.




Aircraft not referred to in point 1 but which are equipped on a voluntary basis with ACAS II, shall have collision avoidance logic version 7.1 or ACAS Xa.
Point 1 shall not apply to unmanned aircraft systems.’
               
read:

                  ‘AUR.ACAS.1005 Performance requirement







(1)


The following turbine-powered aeroplanes shall be equipped with ACAS II with a collision avoidance logic version 7.1 or with ACAS Xa:






(a)


aeroplanes with a maximum certificated take-off mass exceeding 5 700 kg;










(b)


aeroplanes authorised to carry more than 19 passengers.














(2)


Aircraft not referred to in point 1 but which are equipped on a voluntary basis with ACAS II, shall have collision avoidance logic version 7.1 or ACAS Xa.










(3)


Point 1 shall not apply to unmanned aircraft systems.’.






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg_impl/2025/343/corrigendum/2025-10-22/oj
ISSN 1977-0677 (electronic edition)
Case T-525/25 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 22 October 2025 – equensWorldline v ECB (Interim relief – Public service contracts – Tendering procedure – Banking and information technology services, consulting, software development, Internet and support – Application for interim measures – Balancing of competing interests)
Date: 2025-10-22
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Internet, award of contract, banking, consultancy, information technology applications, public procurement, services contract, software, tendering








C_202600175EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2026/175


12.1.2026






Order of the President of the General Court of 22 October 2025 – equensWorldline v ECB


(Case T-525/25 R)

(Interim relief - Public service contracts - Tendering procedure - Banking and information technology services, consulting, software development, Internet and support - Application for interim measures - Balancing of competing interests)
(C/2026/175)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: equensWorldline SE Germany (Frankfurt am Main, Germany) (represented by: R. Martens and P. Darras, lawyers)

Defendant: European Central Bank (represented by: I. Köpfer and J. Krumrey, acting as Agents, and by P. Friton, lawyer)

Re:

By its application based on Articles 278 and 279 TFEU, the applicant seeks, first, the suspension of operation of the decision of the Procurement Review Body of the European Central Bank (ECB) of 22 July 2025 dismissing its appeal against the ECB decision of 13 June 2025 awarding contract PRO-009485 and of that decision and, second, the adoption of any other interim measure for the protection of its rights, including the suspension of operation of the potentially signed agreement between the ECB and the successful tenderer.

Operative part of the order







1.


The application for interim measures is dismissed.










2.


The costs are reserved.






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2026/175/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)