do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-556/23: Judgment of the General Court of 8 October 2025 – Swissgrid v ACER (Energy – Internal market for electricity – Guideline on electricity balancing – Article 1 of Regulation (EU) 2017/2195 – European platform for the imbalance netting process – Non-participation of the Swiss Transmission System Operator – ACER decision amending the Implementation Framework for the platform – Appeal brought before the ACER Board of Appeal – Specific conditions and arrangements for appeals – Article 28 of Regulation (EU) 2019/942 – Inadmissibility for lack of standing to bring proceedings before the Board of Appeal – Direct and individual concern)
Date: 2025-10-08
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Switzerland, admissibility, electrical energy, electricity supply, energy cooperation, energy distribution, energy grid, energy law, energy supply, trans-European network








C_202506168EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/6168


24.11.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 8 October 2025 – Swissgrid v ACER


(Case T-556/23)
                (1)

(Energy - Internal market for electricity - Guideline on electricity balancing - Article 1 of Regulation (EU) 2017/2195 - European platform for the imbalance netting process - Non-participation of the Swiss Transmission System Operator - ACER decision amending the Implementation Framework for the platform - Appeal brought before the ACER Board of Appeal - Specific conditions and arrangements for appeals - Article 28 of Regulation (EU) 2019/942 - Inadmissibility for lack of standing to bring proceedings before the Board of Appeal - Direct and individual concern)
(C/2025/6168)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Swissgrid AG (Aarau, Switzerland) (represented by: P. De Baere, P. L’Ecluse, K. T’Syen, V. Lefever and V. Ion, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (represented by: P. Martinet and E. Tremmel, acting as Agents, and by B. Creve and T. Kölsch, lawyers)

Intervener in support of the defendant: European Commission (represented by: O. Beynet, T. Scharf, B. De Meester and C. Hödlmayr, acting as Agents)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of Decision A-009-2022 of the Board of Appeal of the European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER) of 29 June 2023 dismissing as inadmissible the appeal against ACER’s Decision 16/2022 of 30 September 2022.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls Decision A-009-2022 of the Board of Appeal of the European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER) of 29 June 2023;










2.


Orders ACER to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Swissgrid AG;










3.


Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C, C/2023/227, 23.10.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/6168/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-691/25: Action brought on 8 October 2025 – Bank 131 v Council
Date: 2025-10-08
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, Russo-Ukrainian issue, credit institution, economic sanctions, financial transaction, international sanctions, legal person, principle of proportionality, proof, rights of the defence








C_202506191EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/6191


24.11.2025






Action brought on 8 October 2025 – Bank 131 v Council


(Case T-691/25)

(C/2025/6191)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Bank 131 AO (Kazan, Russia) (represented by: V. Ostrovskis and C. Cauvin, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should annul:






—


Council Decision (CFSP) 2025/1495 of 18 July 2025 amending Decision 2014/512/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine, in so far as it concerns the applicant;










—


Council Regulation (EU) 2025/1494 of 18 July 2025 amending Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine, in so far as it concerns the applicant.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on five pleas in law.






1.


First plea in law, alleging that the Council committed an error of assessment in concluding that the applicant is a Russian credit institution ‘relevant for the Russian financial and banking system’ and that the applicant ‘facilitates significant cross-border payments, thereby bolstering the Russian economy and its industry’.










2.


Second plea in law, alleging that the Council failed to discharge its burden of proof in breach of its obligation to base its decision to impose restrictive measures on a sufficiently solid factual basis.










3.


Third plea in law, alleging that the Council violated the applicant’s fundamental rights by violating the applicant’s rights of defense and its freedom to conduct a business, guaranteed by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.










4.


Fourth plea in law, alleging that the Council infringed the principle of proportionality by imposing restrictive measures that are neither necessary nor appropriate to achieve the stated objectives.










5.


Fifth plea in law, alleging that the Council breached the EU-Russia Partnership Agreement by imposing a blanket transaction ban on the applicant.






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/6191/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Commission notice pursuant to Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community – Changes to public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services
Date: 2025-10-08
Institutions: Directorate-General for Mobility and Transport, European Commission
Subjects: France, Ile-de-France, Occitanie, air transport, inland transport, services of general interest, transport regulations








C_202505506EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/5506


8.10.2025






Commission notice pursuant to Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community
Changes to public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2025/5506)







Member State


France




Route concerned


Tarbes-Paris (Orly)




Original date of entry into force of the public service obligations


1 May 2004




Date of entry into force of the changes


1 June 2026




Address where the text and any relevant information and/or documentation relating to the public service obligation can be obtained


Order of 12 September 2025 amending the public service obligations imposed on scheduled air services between Tarbes and Paris (Orly) and imposing public service obligations on air services between Pau and Paris (Orly)
NOR: ATDA2525455A

https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr

For further information please contact:





Direction Générale de l’Aviation Civile




DTA/SDS1




50 rue Henry Farman




75720 Paris CEDEX 15




FRANCE




Tel. +33 158094321






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/5506/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-542/24: Judgment of the General Court of 8 October 2025 – FW and Others v EEAS (Civil service – Staff of the EEAS – Remuneration – Family allowances – Education allowance – Article 15 of Annex X to the Staff Regulations – Refusal to reimburse nursery and school fees – Error of law – Manifest error of assessment – Principle of sound administration – Equal treatment)
Date: 2025-10-08
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European official, child care, dependant, education costs, education grant, family benefit, maladministration, nursery school, remuneration of work, staff regulations (EU)








C_202506176EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/6176


24.11.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 8 October 2025 – FW and Others v EEAS


(Case T-542/24)
                (1)

(Civil service - Staff of the EEAS - Remuneration - Family allowances - Education allowance - Article 15 of Annex X to the Staff Regulations - Refusal to reimburse nursery and school fees - Error of law - Manifest error of assessment - Principle of sound administration - Equal treatment)
(C/2025/6176)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicants: FW and the seven other applicants whose names are listed in the annex to the judgment (represented by: A. Guillerme, T. Bontinck and F. Patuelli, lawyers)

Defendant: European External Action Service (represented by: S. Falek, R. Coesme and T. Payan, Agents)

Re:

By their action under Article 270 TFEU, the applicants seek, first, annulment of the decisions of the European External Action Service (EEAS) of 23 February and 2 April 2024 rejecting their requests concerning the amount of the allowance provided for in Article 3(2) of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union for dependent children who are less than five years old and, second, recognition of their right to receive, for their children who are less than five years old, that allowance in an amount calculated in accordance with the rules laid down in Article 15 of Annex X to the Staff Regulations and taking into account the exceptional circumstances of their situation.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders FW and the other applicants whose names are listed in the annex to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European External Action Service (EEAS).






(1)  
            OJ C, C/2024/7367, 16.12.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/6176/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections – SA.102519
Date: 2025-10-08
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Italy, State aid, control of State aid, data processing, information technology industry, radio telecommunications, service








C_202505492EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/5492


8.10.2025






Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union
Cases where the Commission raises no objections
SA.102519
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2025/5492)








Date of adoption of the decision


5.12.2023




Aid number


SA.102519




Member State


Italy




Region


Italy




Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)


Important Project of Common European Interest on Next Generation Cloud Infrastructure and Services (IPCEI-CIS)-RRF




Legal basis


Legge di Bilancio




Type of measure


Ad Hoc Case


See Attachment Documents




Objective


Execution of an important project of common European interest, Research, development and innovation, Sectorial development




Form of aid


Direct grant




Budget


Overall budget: 409 280 000  EUR
Annual budget: 81 856 000  EUR




Intensity


 




Duration


From 1.2.2024




Economic sectors


Wireless telecommunications activities, Computer consultancy activities, Data processing, hosting and related activities




Name and address of the granting authority







Ministero delle Imprese e del Made in Italy




Via Veneto 33 - 00187 Roma








Other information


 




The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search?caseInstrument=SA



ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/5492/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-562/24: Judgment of the General Court of 8 October 2025 – Capella v EUIPO – Richemont International (COLORATURA) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark COLORATURA – Earlier national word mark COLORATURA – Priority claim – Concept of first application – Article 34(1) and (4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Legal certainty – Reasonable time)
Date: 2025-10-08
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, clock and watch industry, cosmetic product, jewellery and goldsmith's articles, polishing and scouring preparations, precious metal, precious stones, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_202505961EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/5961


17.11.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 8 October 2025 – Capella v EUIPO – Richemont International (COLORATURA)


(Case T-562/24)
                (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU word mark COLORATURA - Earlier national word mark COLORATURA - Priority claim - Concept of ‘first application’ - Article 34(1) and (4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Obligation to state reasons - Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 - Legal certainty - Reasonable time)
(C/2025/5961)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Capella EOOD (Sofia, Bulgaria) (represented by: A. Auer-Reinsdorff, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Gája, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Richemont International SA (Villars-sur-Glâne, Switzerland) (represented by: D. Marschollek, lawyer)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 29 August 2024 (Case R 1358/2022-2).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Capella EOOD to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Richemont International SA;










3.


Declares that the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) is to bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C, C/2025/92, 6.1.2025.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/5961/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Commission notice pursuant to Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community – Imposition of public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services
Date: 2025-10-08
Institutions: Directorate-General for Mobility and Transport, European Commission
Subjects: France, Ile-de-France, Nouvelle-Aquitaine, air transport, inland transport, services of general interest, transport regulations








C_202505496EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/5496


8.10.2025






Commission notice pursuant to Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community
Imposition of public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2025/5496)







Member State


France




Route concerned


Pau-Paris (Orly)




Date of entry into force of the public service obligations


1 June 2026




Address where the text and any relevant information and/or documentation relating to the public service obligation can be obtained


Order of 12 September 2025 amending the public service obligations imposed on scheduled air services between Tarbes and Paris (Orly) and imposing public service obligations on air services between Pau and Paris (Orly)
NOR: ATDA2525455A

https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr

For further information please contact:





Direction Générale de l’Aviation Civile




DTA/SDS1




50 rue Henry Farman




75720 Paris CEDEX 15




FRANCE




Tel. +33 158094321






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/5496/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)