do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-651/24: Judgment of the General Court of 1 October 2025 – Eti v EUIPO – Dr. Oetker RO (Poof!…and done) (EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark Poof!…and done – Earlier EU and national figurative marks ETI PUF – Relative grounds for invalidity – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – No damage to reputation – Article 8(5) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation 2017/1001)
Date: 2025-10-01
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, confectionery, confectionery product, foodstuff, prepared foodstuff, processed foodstuff, registered trade mark, retail trade, trade-mark law, wholesale trade








C_202505963EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/5963


17.11.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 1 October 2025 – Eti v EUIPO – Dr. Oetker RO (Poof!…and done)


(Case T-651/24)
                (1)

(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU figurative mark Poof!…and done - Earlier EU and national figurative marks ETI PUF - Relative grounds for invalidity - No likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - No damage to reputation - Article 8(5) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation 2017/1001)
(C/2025/5963)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Eti Gıda Sanayi ve Ticaret AŞ (Eskişehir, Türkiye) (represented by: A. Căvescu, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Stoyanova-Valchanova, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Dr. Oetker RO SRL (Curtea de Argeș, Romania) (represented by: C.-M. Macovei, lawyer)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 11 October 2024 (Case R 576/2024-1).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Eti Gıda Sanayi ve Ticaret AŞ to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Dr. Oetker RO SRL;










3.


Declares that the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) is to bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C, C/2025/1114, 24.2.2025.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/5963/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-1191/23: Judgment of the General Court of 1 October 2025 – Fincantieri NexTech v Commission (Award of grants in the field of defence – EDF – Funding of research actions – Call for proposals EDF 2022-RA – Rejection of the applicant’s proposal – Manifest error of assessment)
Date: 2025-10-01
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European Development Fund, call for proposals, common security and defence policy, defence policy, financial aid, military equipment, military research








C_202505957EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/5957


17.11.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 1 October 2025 – Fincantieri NexTech v Commission


(Case T-1191/23)
                (1)

(Award of grants in the field of defence - EDF - Funding of research actions - Call for proposals EDF 2022-RA - Rejection of the applicant’s proposal - Manifest error of assessment)
(C/2025/5957)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Fincantieri NexTech SpA (Milan, Italy) (represented by: F. Di Gianni, A. Scalini and G. Pregno, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: R. Tricot, T. Isacu de Groot and A. Koričić, acting as Agents)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant, the coordinator of the Nessos consortium, seeks the annulment of the Commission Decision of 20 October 2023 rejecting project proposal No 101121451 ‘NESSOS – Networked Sonars System of Systems’, submitted in response to the European Defence Fund (EDF) call for proposals EDF 2022-RA-UWW-ODAC and confirming the conclusions in the evaluation summary report of 23 June 2023.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Fincantieri NexTech SpA to pay the costs.






(1)  
            OJ C, C/2024/1549, 26.2.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/5957/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-370/24: Judgment of the General Court of 1 October 2025 – EP v Parliament (Civil service – Officials – Appointment of an official as Head of Unit – Unfavourable appraisal report – Decision not to confirm an official in his or her duties as Head of Unit – Decision to transfer that official to a post not involving managerial responsibilities – Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials – Liability – Non-material damage)
Date: 2025-10-01
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: administrator, appointment of members, indemnification, reassignment, staff assessment








C_202505960EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/5960


17.11.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 1 October 2025 – EP v Parliament


(Case T-370/24)
                (1)

(Civil service - Officials - Appointment of an official as Head of Unit - Unfavourable appraisal report - Decision not to confirm an official in his or her duties as Head of Unit - Decision to transfer that official to a post not involving managerial responsibilities - Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials - Liability - Non-material damage)
(C/2025/5960)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: EP (represented by: L. Levi and P. Baudoux, lawyers)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: S. Seyr, K. Zejdová and M. Marescaux, acting as Agents)

Re:

By her action under Article 270 TFEU, the applicant seeks, first, the annulment (i) of the decision of the Secretary-General of the European Parliament of 4 October 2023 not to confirm her in her duties as Head of the [confidential] Unit of the Parliament’s Directorate-General for [confidential], (ii) of the decision of the Secretary-General of the Parliament of 23 October 2023 approving her transfer to the [confidential] Unit of the same Directorate-General and (iii), in so far as necessary, of the decision of 17 April 2024 rejecting her complaint and, secondly, compensation for the non-material damage that she claims to have suffered as a result of those decisions.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls the decision of the Secretary-General of the European Parliament of 4 October 2023 not to confirm EP in her duties as Head of the [confidential] Unit in the Parliament’s Directorate-General for [confidential] and the decision of the Secretary-General of the Parliament of 23 October 2023 approving her transfer to the [confidential] Unit in the same Directorate-General, as supplemented by the decision of 17 April 2024 rejecting the complaint;










2.


Dismisses the action as to the remainder;










3.


Orders EP and the Parliament each to bear their own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C, C/2024/5425, 16.9.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/5960/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.11981 – AAM / DOWLAIS)
Date: 2025-10-01
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, merger control, metal product, metals, motor vehicle industry, supplier, supply, vehicle parts








C_202506553EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/6553


8.12.2025






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.11981 – AAM / DOWLAIS)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2025/6553)

On 1 October 2025, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32025M11981. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/6553/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Corrigendum to Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/3183 of 16 December 2024 implementing Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine (OJ L, 2024/3183, 16.12.2024)
Date: 2025-10-01
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, Russia, Russo-Ukrainian issue, Ukraine, economic sanctions, international sanctions, legal person, natural person, territorial dispute, territorial law








L_202590758EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
L series













2025/90758


1.10.2025






Corrigendum to Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/3183 of 16 December 2024 implementing Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine
(
Official Journal of the European Union L, 2024/3183, 16 December 2024
)

Page 10, Annex, entry 1851, second column (‘Name’),







for:





                           ‘Vladislav Bronislavovich TATUR’,












read:





                           ‘Vladimir Bronislavovich TATUR’.







ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg_impl/2024/3183/corrigendum/2025-10-01/oj
ISSN 1977-0677 (electronic edition)
Corrigendum to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/137 of 10 October 2022 amending Regulation (EC) No 1893/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the statistical classification of economic activities NACE Revision 2 (OJ L 19, 20.1.2023)
Date: 2025-10-01
Institutions: European Commission, Eurostat
Subjects: EU statistics, economic activity, economic statistics, statistical method, statistical nomenclature








L_202590757EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
L series













2025/90757


1.10.2025






Corrigendum to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/137 of 10 October 2022 amending Regulation (EC) No 1893/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the statistical classification of economic activities NACE Revision 2

(
Official Journal of the European Union L 19 of 20 January 2023
)


On page 41, in the Annex:
for:


                  ‘SECTION U – ACTIVITIES OF HOUSEHOLDS AS EMPLOYERS AND UNDIFFERENTIATED GOODS – AND SERVICE-PRODUCING ACTIVITIES OF HOUSEHOLDS FOR OWN USE’,

read:


                  ‘SECTION U – ACTIVITIES OF HOUSEHOLDS AS EMPLOYERS AND UNDIFFERENTIATED GOODS- AND SERVICE-PRODUCING ACTIVITIES OF HOUSEHOLDS FOR OWN USE’.



ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg_del/2023/137/corrigendum/2025-10-01/oj
ISSN 1977-0677 (electronic edition)
Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.12120 – INFRANITY / OMNES CAPITAL / PCRE JV) – Candidate case for simplified procedure
Date: 2025-10-01
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, energy industry, investment company, merger control, renewable energy, solar energy








C_202505296EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/5296


1.10.2025






Prior notification of a concentration
(Case M.12120 – INFRANITY / OMNES CAPITAL / PCRE JV)
Candidate case for simplified procedure
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2025/5296)


1.   
On 23 September 2025, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1).
This notification concerns the following undertakings:






—


Infranity S.A.S. (‘Infranity’, France), ultimately controlled by Assicurazioni Generali S.p.A. (‘Generali Group’, Italy),










—


Omnes Capital S.A.S. (‘Omnes Capital’, France),










—


Power Capital Renewable Energy Limited (‘PCRE’, Ireland).




Infranity and Omnes Capital will acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) and 3(4) of the Merger Regulation joint control of PCRE.
The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.


2.   
The business activities of the undertakings concerned are the following:






—


Infranity is an alternative investment fund manager specialised in infrastructure investments,










—


Omnes Capital manages funds that control portfolio companies active in sectors including renewable energy, including PCRE.






3.   

PCRE is a renewable energy company specialised in solar energy.



4.   
On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.
Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified treatment for certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 on the control of concentrations between undertakings (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.


5.   
The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed concentration to the Commission.
Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:
M.12120 – INFRANITY / OMNES CAPITAL / PCRE JV
Observations can be sent to the Commission by email or by post. Please use the contact details below:
Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Postal address:





European Commission




Directorate-General for Competition




Merger Registry




1049 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË







(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

(2)  
            OJ C 160, 5.5.2023, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/5296/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-1026/23: Judgment of the General Court of 1 October 2025 – Laudamotion v Commission (Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Aviation sector – Decision rejecting a complaint – Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 773/2004 – Concerted practice – Wet-leased aircraft – Access to the file – Principle of good administration – No Union interest – Probability of establishing the existence of an infringement – Reasonable time – Manifest error of assessment)
Date: 2025-10-01
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Austria, Germany, Vienna, airline, carriage of passengers, cartel, civil aviation, control of restrictive practices, restriction on competition








C_202505954EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/5954


17.11.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 1 October 2025 – Laudamotion v Commission


(Case T-1026/23)
                (1)

(Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Aviation sector - Decision rejecting a complaint - Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 773/2004 - Concerted practice - Wet-leased aircraft - Access to the file - Principle of good administration - No Union interest - Probability of establishing the existence of an infringement - Reasonable time - Manifest error of assessment)
(C/2025/5954)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Laudamotion GmbH (Schwechat, Austria) (represented by: N. Levy, G. Rizza and D. Pérez de Lamo, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: S. Baches Opi, T. Franchoo and I. Söderlund, acting as Agents)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of Commission Decision C(2023) 5177 final of 2 August 2023, by which the Commission rejected its complaint concerning an infringement of Article 101 TFEU allegedly committed by Deutsche Lufthansa AG and Air Berlin PLC & Co. Luftverkehrs KG (Case AT.40612 Lufthansa – Air Berlin (routes from/to Vienna)).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Laudamotion GmbH and the European Commission each to bear their own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C C/2023/990, 27.11.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/5954/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-1175/23: Judgment of the General Court of 1 October 2025 – Siemens Healthineers v EUIPO – Sunware (teamplay) (EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark teamplay – Earlier national word mark TEAMPLAY – Relative ground for invalidity – Genuine use of the earlier mark – Article 57(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 – Article 15(1) of Regulation No 207/2009 – Independent subcategory of goods and services – Likelihood of confusion – Similarity between the goods and services – Article 8(1)(b) and Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009)
Date: 2025-10-01
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, data transmission, database, information analysis, medical data, registered trade mark, software, statistics, trade-mark law








C_202505956EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/5956


17.11.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 1 October 2025 – Siemens Healthineers v EUIPO – Sunware (teamplay)


(Case T-1175/23)
                (1)

(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU word mark teamplay - Earlier national word mark TEAMPLAY - Relative ground for invalidity - Genuine use of the earlier mark - Article 57(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Article 15(1) of Regulation No 207/2009 - Independent subcategory of goods and services - Likelihood of confusion - Similarity between the goods and services - Article 8(1)(b) and Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009)
(C/2025/5956)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Siemens Healthineers AG (Forchheim, Germany) (represented by: M. Taxhet, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Stoyanova-Valchanova, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Sunware s. r. o. (Prague, Czech Republic)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment and alteration of the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 3 October 2023 (Case R 747/2022-5).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Siemens Healthineers AG to pay the costs.






(1)  
            OJ C, C/2024/1266, 12.2.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/5956/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Information relating to the entry into force of the Agreement between the European Union and the Federative Republic of Brazil amending the Agreement between the European Union and the Federative Republic of Brazil on short-stay visa waiver for holders of ordinary passports [2025/1998]
Date: 2025-10-01
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: Brazil, EU visa policy, Schengen Agreement, agreement (EU), external border of the EU, foreign national, revision of an agreement








L_202501998EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
L series













2025/1998


1.10.2025






Information relating to the entry into force of the Agreement between the European Union and the Federative Republic of Brazil amending the Agreement between the European Union and the Federative Republic of Brazil on short-stay visa waiver for holders of ordinary passports [2025/1998]

The Agreement between the European Union and the Federative Republic of Brazil amending the Agreement between the European Union and the Federative Republic of Brazil on short-stay visa waiver for holders of ordinary passports will enter into force on 1 March 2026, the procedure provided for in Article 2 of the Agreement having been completed on 9 September 2025.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/notice/2025/1998/oj
ISSN 1977-0677 (electronic edition)
Euro exchange rates – 30 September 2025
Date: 2025-10-01
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_202504506EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/4506


1.10.2025






Euro exchange rates (1)


            30 September 2025
         
(C/2025/4506)


1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,1741 




JPY


Japanese yen


173,76 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4649 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,87340 




SEK


Swedish krona


11,0565 




CHF


Swiss franc


0,9364 




ISK


Iceland króna


142,40 




NOK


Norwegian krone


11,7265 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


24,335 




HUF


Hungarian forint


390,26 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,2698 




RON


Romanian leu


5,0806 




TRY


Turkish lira


48,8227 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,7760 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,6346 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


9,1359 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


2,0257 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,5145 




KRW


South Korean won


1 648,05 




ZAR


South African rand


20,2820 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


8,3591 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


19 578,94 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,9412 




PHP


Philippine peso


68,375 




RUB


Russian rouble


 




THB


Thai baht


38,088 




BRL


Brazilian real


6,2432 




MXN


Mexican peso


21,5314 




INR


Indian rupee


104,2548 






(1)  
            Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4506/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-644/25, UCB Biopharma: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État (Belgium) lodged on 1 October 2025 – UCB Biopharma SARL v Région wallonne
Date: 2025-10-01
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: animal experimentation, competence of the institution, national competent authority, protection of animals, scientific research








C_202600154EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2026/154


12.1.2026






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État (Belgium) lodged on 1 October 2025 – UCB Biopharma SARL v Région wallonne


(Case C-644/25, UCB Biopharma)

(C/2026/154)
Language of the case: French

Referring court

Conseil d’État

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: UCB Biopharma SARL

Defendant: Région wallonne

Other party to the proceedings: Global action in the interest of animals (GAIA), non-profit association

Question referred

Must Articles 3, 7, 36 to 45 and 59 of Directive 2010/63/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2010 on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes (1) be interpreted as entailing that a body designated by a Member State as a ‘competent authority’ for the evaluation and authorisation of a project should be recognised as having its own imperium in order to take decisions which have binding effects vis-à-vis third parties?


(1)  
            OJ 2010 L 276, p. 33.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2026/154/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)