do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-701/25, Fischölimporteur: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof (Germany) made on 24 September 2025 – A v Hauptzollamt C
Date: 2025-09-24
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Combined Nomenclature, animal fats, by-product, chemical process, specification of tariff heading, vegetable fats








C_202506395EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/6395


8.12.2025






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof (Germany) made on 24 September 2025 – A v Hauptzollamt C


(Case T-701/25, Fischölimporteur)

(C/2025/6395)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesfinanzhof

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant and appellant in the appeal on a point of law: A

Defendant and respondent in the appeal on a point of law: Hauptzollamt C

Question referred

What is the minimum triglycerides content required for goods to be classified as ‘fats and oils’ within the meaning of heading 1516  of the Combined Nomenclature if they otherwise consist predominantly of mono- and diglycerides produced as by-products of re-esterification?


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/6395/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-196/24: Judgment of the General Court of 24 September 2025 – Digi International v EUIPO – Teraoka Seiko (DIGI) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark DIGI – Earlier EU figurative mark DIGI – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 – Genuine use of the earlier mark – Article 42(2) of Regulation No 207/2009 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
Date: 2025-09-24
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, computer equipment, computer system, electronic device, registered trade mark, service, software, telecommunications, trade-mark law








C_202505833EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/5833


10.11.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 24 September 2025 – Digi International v EUIPO – Teraoka Seiko (DIGI)


(Case T-196/24)
                (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - International registration designating the European Union - Figurative mark DIGI - Earlier EU figurative mark DIGI - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Genuine use of the earlier mark - Article 42(2) of Regulation No 207/2009 - Obligation to state reasons - Article 94(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(C/2025/5833)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Digi International, Inc. (Hopkins, Minnesota, United States) (represented by: M. Hawkins, T. Dolde and C. Zimmer, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Ringelhann and V. Ruzek, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Teraoka Seiko Co. Ltd (Tokyo, Japan)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment and alteration of the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 31 January 2024 (Case R 1906/2022-1).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 31 January 2024 (Case R 1906/2022-1);










2.


Dismisses the action as to the remainder;










3.


Orders EUIPO to pay the costs.






(1)  
            OJ C, C/2024/3350, 3.6.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/5833/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-326/24: Judgment of the General Court of 24 September 2025 – Tamasu Butterfly Europa v EUIPO – Domu Brands (BTFY) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark BTFY – Earlier EU word mark Butterfly – Earlier national trade names Butterfly and BTY – Relative grounds for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – No use in the course of trade of a sign of more than mere local significance – Article 8(4) of Regulation 2017/1001 – No damage to reputation – Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001)
Date: 2025-09-24
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, clothing, footwear industry, glass, leather, registered trade mark, retail trade, textile product, toy industry, trade-mark law








C_202505837EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/5837


10.11.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 24 September 2025 – Tamasu Butterfly Europa v EUIPO – Domu Brands (BTFY)


(Case T-326/24)
                (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - International registration designating the European Union - Word mark BTFY - Earlier EU word mark Butterfly - Earlier national trade names Butterfly and BTY - Relative grounds for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - No use in the course of trade of a sign of more than mere local significance - Article 8(4) of Regulation 2017/1001 - No damage to reputation - Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001)
(C/2025/5837)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Tamasu Butterfly Europa GmbH (Krefeld, Germany) (represented by: C. Röhl, J. Haßold and P. Richnow, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Eberl, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Domu Brands Ltd (Salford, United Kingdom) (represented by: M. Pemsel, lawyer)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 18 April 2024 (Case R 433/2023-1).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Tamasu Butterfly Europa GmbH to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by Domu Brands Ltd;










3.


Orders the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) to bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C, C/2024/4870, 12.8.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/5837/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Removal from the register: Order of the President of the Court of Justice of 24 September 2025 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Corte d’appello di Roma – Italy) – Questura di Roma v JD and Others (Joined Cases C-88/25 to C-113/25, Gaspaschi and Others)
Date: 2025-09-24
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: asylum seeker, foreign national, fundamental rights, international protection, right of asylum, right to an effective remedy








C_202600078EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2026/78


5.1.2026






Order of the President of the Court of Justice of 24 September 2025 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Corte d’appello di Roma – Italy) – Questura di Roma v JD and Others


(Joined Cases C-88/25 to C-113/25,
                (1)
Gaspaschi and Others
                (2)
)



(Removal from the register)


(C/2026/78)
Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Corte d’appello di Roma

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Questura di Roma

Defendants: JD, PV, CB, MD, PJ, VW, EZ, RA, WQ, IH, XR, WG, JR, IZ, NW, TF, MJ, DL, NY, MN, MM, PN, TQ, AL, YB, SY

Operative part

Joined cases C-88/25 to C-113/25 are removed from the Register of the Court.


(1)  Date lodged: 3.2.2025.

(2)  The name of the present case is a fictitious name. It does not correspond to the real name of any party to the proceedings.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2026/78/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-413/24: Judgment of the General Court of 24 September 2025 –Shammout v Council (Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Syria – Freezing of funds – Restriction on entry into the territory of the Member States – Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources and subject to restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists – Concept of leading businessperson operating in Syria – Presumption of a link with the Syrian regime – Error of assessment)
Date: 2025-09-24
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Syria, economic sanctions, entrepreneur, freezing of assets, international sanctions, natural person, travel ban (EU)








C_202505841EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/5841


10.11.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 24 September 2025 –Shammout v Council


(Case T-413/24)
                (1)

(Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Syria - Freezing of funds - Restriction on entry into the territory of the Member States - Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources and subject to restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States - Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists - Concept of ‘leading businessperson operating in Syria’ - Presumption of a link with the Syrian regime - Error of assessment)
(C/2025/5841)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Issam Shammout (Damascus, Syria) (represented by: L. Cloquet, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Di Gaetano, E. Kübler, P. Mahnič and A. Antoniadis, acting as Agents)

Re:

By his action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of Council Decision (CFSP) 2024/1510 of 27 May 2024 amending Decision 2013/255/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria (OJ L, 2024/1510) and Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/1517 of 27 May 2024 implementing Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria (OJ L, 2024/1517), in so far as those acts concern him.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Mr Issam Shammout to pay the costs.






(1)  
            OJ C, C/2024/5833, 7.10.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/5841/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.12017 – KKR / HHS / DATAGROUP)
Date: 2025-09-24
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, holding company, information technology industry, investment company, merger control, parent company, private limited company, provision of services








C_202505399EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/5399


3.10.2025






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.12017 – KKR / HHS / DATAGROUP)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2025/5399)

On 24 September 2025, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32025M12017. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/5399/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Euro exchange rates – 23 September 2025
Date: 2025-09-24
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_202504501EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/4501


24.9.2025






Euro exchange rates (1)


            23 September 2025
         
(C/2025/4501)


1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,1793 




JPY


Japanese yen


174,30 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4643 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,87290 




SEK


Swedish krona


10,9887 




CHF


Swiss franc


0,9344 




ISK


Iceland króna


142,60 




NOK


Norwegian krone


11,6720 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


24,242 




HUF


Hungarian forint


389,25 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,2553 




RON


Romanian leu


5,0772 




TRY


Turkish lira


48,8372 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,7854 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,6307 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


9,1696 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


2,0113 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,5137 




KRW


South Korean won


1 644,59 




ZAR


South African rand


20,4235 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


8,3869 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


19 639,89 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,9513 




PHP


Philippine peso


67,526 




RUB


Russian rouble


 




THB


Thai baht


37,572 




BRL


Brazilian real


6,2967 




MXN


Mexican peso


21,6265 




INR


Indian rupee


104,6918 






(1)  
            Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4501/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-159/24: Judgment of the General Court of 24 September 2025 – WAAA v CPVO – Teak Enterprises (Cripps Pink and Cripps Red) (Plant varieties – Application for a Community plant variety right for apple varieties Cripps Pink and Cripps Red – Nullity proceedings – Article 53a of Regulation (EC) No 874/2009 – Serious doubts – Article 10(1) of Regulation (EC) No 2100/94 – Novelty)
Date: 2025-09-24
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: pip fruit, plant breeding, plant variety right








C_202505832EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/5832


10.11.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 24 September 2025 – WAAA v CPVO – Teak Enterprises (Cripps Pink and Cripps Red)


(Case T-159/24)
                (1)

(Plant varieties - Application for a Community plant variety right for apple varieties Cripps Pink and Cripps Red - Nullity proceedings - Article 53a of Regulation (EC) No 874/2009 - Serious doubts - Article 10(1) of Regulation (EC) No 2100/94 - Novelty)
(C/2025/5832)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Western Australian Agriculture Authority (WAAA) (South Perth, Australia) (represented by: T. Bouvet and C. Devinant, lawyers)

Defendant: Community Plant Variety Office (CPVO) (represented by: M. García-Moncó Fuente, F. Mattina, A. Christ and A. Pontecorvi, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of CPVO, intervener before the General Court: Teak Enterprises Pty Ltd (Applecross, Australia) (represented by: R. Manno, lawyer)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Board of Appeal of the Community Plant Variety Office (CPVO) of 12 January 2024 (Joined Cases A 019/2021 and A 020/2021).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders the Western Australian Agriculture Authority (WAAA) to pay the costs of Teak Enterprises Pty Ltd and to bear its own costs;










3.


Orders the Community Plant Variety Office (CPVO) to bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C, C/2024/3083, 13.5.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/5832/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-256/23: Judgment of the General Court of 24 September 2025 – Mylan Ireland v Commission (Medicinal products for human use – Variation of the marketing authorisation for Tecfidera – Dimethyl fumarate, a medicinal product for human use – Directive 2001/83/EC – Article 14(11) of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 – Article 266 TFEU)
Date: 2025-09-24
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: disease of the nervous system, drug surveillance, market approval, medicinal product








C_202505818EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/5818


10.11.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 24 September 2025 – Mylan Ireland v Commission


(Case T-256/23)
                (1)

(Medicinal products for human use - Variation of the marketing authorisation for Tecfidera - Dimethyl fumarate, a medicinal product for human use - Directive 2001/83/EC - Article 14(11) of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 - Article 266 TFEU)
(C/2025/5818)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Mylan Ireland Ltd (Dublin, Ireland) (represented by: K. Roox, T. De Meese, J. Stuyck and C. Dumont, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Haasbeek, E. Mathieu and A. Spina, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Biogen Netherlands BV (Amsterdam, Netherlands) (represented by: C. Schoonderbeek and B. Jong, lawyers)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of Commission Implementing Decision C(2023) 3067 (final) of 2 May 2023 amending the marketing authorisation granted by Decision C(2014) 601 (final) for ‘Tecfidera – Dimethyl fumarate’, a medicinal product for human use.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls Commission Implementing Decision C(2023) 3067 (final) of 2 May 2023 amending the marketing authorisation granted by Decision C(2014) 601 (final) for ‘Tecfidera – Dimethyl fumarate’, a medicinal product for human use;










2.


Dismisses the action as to the remainder;










3.


Orders the European Commission, in addition to bearing its own costs, to pay the costs incurred by Mylan Ireland Ltd, including those relating to the interim proceedings before the Court;










4.


Declares that Biogen Netherlands BV is to bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 252, 17.7.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/5818/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-257/23: Judgment of the General Court of 24 September 2025 – Neuraxpharm Pharmaceuticals v Commission (Medicinal products for human use – Variation of the marketing authorisation for Tecfidera – Dimethyl fumarate, a medicinal product for human use – Directive 2001/83/EC – Article 14(11) of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 – Article 266 TFEU)
Date: 2025-09-24
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: disease of the nervous system, drug surveillance, market approval, medicinal product








C_202505819EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/5819


10.11.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 24 September 2025 – Neuraxpharm Pharmaceuticals v Commission


(Case T-257/23)
                (1)

(Medicinal products for human use - Variation of the marketing authorisation for Tecfidera - Dimethyl fumarate, a medicinal product for human use - Directive 2001/83/EC - Article 14(11) of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 - Article 266 TFEU)
(C/2025/5819)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Neuraxpharm Pharmaceuticals SL (Barcelona, Spain) (represented by: K. Roox, T. De Meese, J. Stuyck and C. Dumont, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Haasbeek, E. Mathieu and A. Spina, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Biogen Netherlands BV (Amsterdam, Netherlands) (represented by: C. Schoonderbeek and B. Jong, lawyers)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of Commission Implementing Decision C(2023) 3067 (final) of 2 May 2023 amending the marketing authorisation granted by Decision C(2014) 601 (final) for ‘Tecfidera – Dimethyl fumarate’, a medicinal product for human use.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls Commission Implementing Decision C(2023) 3067 (final) of 2 May 2023 amending the marketing authorisation granted by Decision C(2014) 601 (final) for ‘Tecfidera – Dimethyl fumarate’, a medicinal product for human use;










2.


Dismisses the action as to the remainder;










3.


Orders the European Commission, in addition to bearing its own costs, to pay the costs incurred by Neuraxpharm Pharmaceuticals SL, including those relating to the interim proceedings before the Court;










4.


Declares that Biogen Netherlands BV is to bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 252, 17.7.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/5819/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-32/24: Judgment of the General Court of 24 September 2025 – Barry’s Bootcamp v EUIPO – Hummel (Device of eight inverted chevrons) (EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark representing eight inverted black chevrons – Genuine use of the mark – Article 18(1)(a) and Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Nature of use of the mark – Form differing in elements that do not alter the distinctive character of the mark – Cross-claim – Subject matter of the action – Interest in bringing proceedings – Admissibility)
Date: 2025-09-24
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, clothing, footwear industry, personal effects, registered trade mark, sports equipment, trade-mark law








C_202505831EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/5831


10.11.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 24 September 2025 – Barry’s Bootcamp v EUIPO – Hummel (Device of eight inverted chevrons)


(Case T-32/24)
                (1)

(EU trade mark - Revocation proceedings - International registration designating the European Union - Figurative mark representing eight inverted black chevrons - Genuine use of the mark - Article 18(1)(a) and Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Nature of use of the mark - Form differing in elements that do not alter the distinctive character of the mark - Cross-claim - Subject matter of the action - Interest in bringing proceedings - Admissibility)
(C/2025/5831)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Barry’s Bootcamp Holdings LLC (Miami, Florida, United States) (represented by: M. Hawkins, T. Dolde and C. Zimmer, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: R. Raponi, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Hummel Holding A/S (Aarhus, Denmark) (represented by: S. Pedersen, lawyer)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 7 November 2023 (Joined Cases R 1415/2022-2 and R 1421/2022-2).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the main action and the cross-claim;










2.


Orders Barry’s Bootcamp Holdings LLC to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) in the main action;










3.


Orders Hummel Holding A/S to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by EUIPO in the cross-claim.






(1)  
            OJ C, C/2024/1879, 11.3.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/5831/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)