do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-627/25 P: Appeal brought on 22 September 2025 by European Commission against the judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber, Extended Composition) delivered on 16 July 2025 in Case T-183/23, Ballmann v European Data Protection Board
Date: 2025-09-22
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: access to EU information, data protection, data-processing law, personal data, virtual community








C_202600085EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2026/85


5.1.2026






Appeal brought on 22 September 2025 by European Commission against the judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber, Extended Composition) delivered on 16 July 2025 in Case T-183/23, Ballmann v European Data Protection Board


(Case C-627/25 P)

(C/2026/85)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellant: European Commission (represented by: É. Gippini Fournier and A. Bouchagiar, Agents)

Other parties to the proceedings: Lisa Ballmann, European Data Protection Board and Meta Platforms Ireland Ltd

Form of order sought

The appellant claims that the Court should:






—


set aside the judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 16 July 2025 in Case T 183/23, Ballmann v European Data Protection Board;










—


rule itself on the application at first instance and reject the application in its entirety as inadmissible or, in the alternative, dismiss the first three parts of the applicant’s single plea of the application as unfounded and refer the case back to the General Court insofar as the fourth part of that plea is concerned; and










—


order the respondent and applicant at first instance to pay the costs of the proceedings.





Pleas in law and main arguments

By the first ground of appeal, the Commission argues that the General Court misinterpreted and misapplied Article 41(2)(b) of the Charter of fundamental rights of the EU by finding that the applicant had a right of access to the entire file of the European Data Protection Board (EDPB), irrespective of whether she could be adversely affected by the EDPB’s binding decision.
By the second ground of appeal, the Commission argues that the General Court misinterpreted and misapplied the admissibility requirement of a ‘challengeable act’ by finding that the applicant could challenge separately the EDPB’s refusal to grant to her access to the file.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2026/85/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.12146 – OEP / KBR / BRIS)
Date: 2025-09-22
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, investment company, maintenance, merger control, provision of services, public procurement, renewable fuel, soft energy, technology








C_202505370EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/5370


2.10.2025






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.12146 – OEP / KBR / BRIS)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2025/5370)

On 22 September 2025, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32025M12146. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/5370/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-650/25: Action brought on 22 September 2025 – Vacu Activ Marcin Leśniak v EUIPO – Lakhomoff and AR Group Roman Tchir (VACUACTIVUS)
Date: 2025-09-22
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, computer equipment, registered trade mark, sports equipment, therapeutics, trade-mark law








C_202505862EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/5862


10.11.2025






Action brought on 22 September 2025 – Vacu Activ Marcin Leśniak v EUIPO – Lakhomoff and AR Group Roman Tchir (VACUACTIVUS)


(Case T-650/25)

(C/2025/5862)
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicant: Vacu Activ Marcin Leśniak (Łosino, Poland) (represented by: J. Dudzik and E. Stec-Dobroczyńska, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office

Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Nick Lakhomoff (West Hollywood, California, United States), AR Group Roman Tchir (Przemyśl, Poland)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark VACUACTIVUS – European Union trade mark No 18 700 589
         

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 22 July 2025 in Case R 1648/2024-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order the defendant, and in case the other party before the Board of Appeal joins these proceedings, the intervener, to bear the costs of the proceedings.





Pleas in law







—


Infringement of Articles 20 and 41(1) and (2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union;










—


Infringement of Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/5862/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.12026 – ACM / DEUTSCHE POST / DHL PARCEL UK / EVRI)
Date: 2025-09-22
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: United Kingdom, consultancy, delivery, economic concentration, electronic commerce, holding company, investment company, merger control, postal service, provision of services








C_202505401EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/5401


6.10.2025






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.12026 – ACM / DEUTSCHE POST / DHL PARCEL UK / EVRI)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2025/5401)

On 22 September 2025, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32025M12026. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/5401/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-646/25: Action brought on 22 September 2025 – Marchesi v Commission
Date: 2025-09-22
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European official, Italy, children's rights, indemnification, judicial proceedings, legal aid, principle of proportionality, protection of privacy, right to health, staff regulations (EU)








C_202505727EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/5727


3.11.2025






Action brought on 22 September 2025 – Marchesi v Commission


(Case T-646/25)

(C/2025/5727)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Massimo Marchesi (Framura, Italy) (represented by: D. Rovetta and V. Villante, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


Annul the decision of the Appointing Authority of 30 August 2024 in response to the request for assistance pursuant to Article 24 of the Staff Regulation from the applicant (No D/206/24);










—


Annul the decision of the Appointing Authority of 11 June 2025 in response to the complaint pursuant to Article 90(2) of the Staff Regulation by the applicant (the ‘contested decisions’);










—


Order the Commission to pay to the applicant a total of EUR 18 564,48 which includes the reimbursement of the legal and administrative fees incurred in the Italian legal proceedings, as well as the non-material damage suffered;










—


Order the Commission to bear the costs of the present proceedings.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on five pleas in law.






1.


First plea in law: manifest error of assessment – Breach of Article 24 of the Staff Regulation – Request for compensation and damages under Article 24(2) of the Staff Regulation – Inadequate and deficient administrative inquiry and failure to consult with the Italian authorities;










2.


Second plea in law: manifest error of assessment – Breach of Article 20 of the Staff Regulation – Breach of Articles 11(b) and 13(1) Protocol n 7 on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Union (PPI) – as a subordinate inapplicability and plea of illegality under Article 277 Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union of Article 20 of the Staff Regulation;










3.


Third plea in law: breach of the duty to state reasons – Article 296 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Breach of the principle of sound administration – Article 41(2)(c) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Breach of the duty to care;










4.


Fourth plea in law: breach of the duty of sincere cooperation under Article 4(3) Treaty on the European Union;










5.


Fifth plea in law: breach of the principle of proportionality and of the applicant’s fundamental rights – Breach of the right to family life – Article 7 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU – Breach of the right to health care – Article 35 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU – Breach of the rights of the child – Article 24 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU.






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/5727/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Council Decision (CFSP) 2025/1935 of 22 September 2025 amending Decision 2012/285/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Guinea-Bissau
Date: 2025-09-22
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, Guinea-Bissau, economic sanctions, international sanctions, natural person








L_202501935EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
L series













2025/1935


23.9.2025







            COUNCIL DECISION (CFSP) 2025/1935
         
of 22 September 2025
         
amending Decision 2012/285/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Guinea-Bissau


THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 29 thereof,


Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,

Whereas:







(1)


On 31 May 2012, the Council adopted Decision 2012/285/CFSP (1).












(2)


Pursuant to Article 5(2) of Decision 2012/285/CFSP, the Council reviewed the restrictive measures in view of the situation in Guinea-Bissau and considers that six persons should be removed from the list of persons subject to restrictive measures, as set out in Annex III to that Decision.












(3)


Decision 2012/285/CFSP should therefore be amended accordingly,





HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:



Article 1
Annex III to Decision 2012/285/CFSP is amended in accordance with the Annex to this Decision.


Article 2
This Decision shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




Done at Brussels, 22 September 2025.


For the Council


The President

J. JENSEN
            





(1)  Council Decision 2012/285/CFSP of 31 May 2012 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Guinea-Bissau and repealing Decision 2012/237/CFSP (OJ L 142, 1.6.2012, p. 36, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dec/2012/285/oj).




ANNEX
In Annex III to Decision 2012/285/CFSP (‘List of persons, entities or bodies referred to in Article 2’), the entries concerning the following persons are deleted:






1.


António INJAI










2.


Mamadu TURE










3.


Estêvão NA MENA










4.


Ibraima CAMARÁ










5.


Daba NAUALNA










12.


Júlio NHATE.







ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dec/2025/1935/oj
ISSN 1977-0677 (electronic edition)
Council Decision (CFSP) 2025/1941 of 22 September 2025 amending Decision (CFSP) 2015/1763 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Burundi
Date: 2025-09-22
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: Burundi, EU restrictive measure, economic sanctions, international sanctions, natural person








L_202501941EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
L series













2025/1941


23.9.2025







            COUNCIL DECISION (CFSP) 2025/1941
         
of 22 September 2025
         
amending Decision (CFSP) 2015/1763 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Burundi


THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 29 thereof,


Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,

Whereas:







(1)


On 1 October 2015, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2015/1763 (1).












(2)


On the basis of a review of Decision (CFSP) 2015/1763 by the Council, the restrictive measures set out therein should be renewed until 31 October 2026 and the entry concerning one person included in the list of natural and legal persons, entities and bodies subject to restrictive measures, as set out in the Annex to that Decision, should be deleted.












(3)


Decision (CFSP) 2015/1763 should therefore be amended accordingly,





HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:



Article 1
Decision (CFSP) 2015/1763 is amended as follows:






(1)


in Article 6, second paragraph, the date ‘31 October 2025’ is replaced by that of ‘31 October 2026’;










(2)


the Annex is amended in accordance with the Annex to this Decision.






Article 2
This Decision shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




Done at Brussels, 22 September 2025.


For the Council


The President

J. JENSEN
            





(1)  Council Decision (CFSP) 2015/1763 of 1 October 2015 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Burundi (OJ L 257, 2.10.2015, p. 37, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dec/2015/1763/oj).




ANNEX
In the Annex to Decision (CFSP) 2015/1763 (‘List of natural and legal persons, entities and bodies referred to in Articles 1 and 2’), the following entry is deleted:







‘3.


Mathias-Joseph NIYONZIMA’.








ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dec/2025/1941/oj
ISSN 1977-0677 (electronic edition)
Corrigendum to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2024/197 of 19 October 2023 amending Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 as regards the harmonised classification and labelling of certain substances (OJ L, 2024/197, 5.1.2024)
Date: 2025-09-22
Institutions: Directorate-General for Environment, European Commission
Subjects: classification, dangerous substance, environmental protection, labelling, lead, packaging, public health








L_202590734EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
L series













2025/90734


22.9.2025






Corrigendum to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2024/197 of 19 October 2023 amending Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 as regards the harmonised classification and labelling of certain substances

(
Official Journal of the European Union L, 2024/197, 5 January 2024
)


On page 8, in the Annex, line 606-155-00-6, column ‘Specific Conc. Limits M-factors and ATE’:
for:


                  ‘Skin Sens. 1; H317: C ≥ 0,01 %’,

read:


                  ‘Skin Sens. 1A; H317: C ≥ 0,01 %’.



ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg_del/2024/197/corrigendum/2025-09-22/oj
ISSN 1977-0677 (electronic edition)
Case T-651/25: Action brought on 22 September 2025 – Vanlo v EUIPO – Azur (LPM)
Date: 2025-09-22
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, catering, catering industry, provision of services, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_202505974EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/5974


17.11.2025






Action brought on 22 September 2025 – Vanlo v EUIPO – Azur (LPM)


(Case T-651/25)

(C/2025/5974)
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicant: Vanlo (Nice, France) (represented by: B. Collett, Barrister-at-Law)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Azur Ltd (London, United Kingdom)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark LPM – European Union trade mark No 18 038 945
         

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 10 July 2025 in Case R 1406/2024-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision, return the matter to EUIPO to determine that the trade mark at issue was registered in bad faith and it must be removed from the EUIPO register of trade marks;










—


order EUIPO and the intervener, if any, to pay the costs of these proceedings and of the Cancellation Division and Board of Appeal proceedings and bear their own costs.





Plea in law

Infringement of Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/5974/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-652/25: Action brought on 22 September 2025 – Vanlo v EUIPO – Azur (LPM)
Date: 2025-09-22
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, catering, catering industry, provision of services, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_202505975EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/5975


17.11.2025






Action brought on 22 September 2025 – Vanlo v EUIPO – Azur (LPM)


(Case T-652/25)

(C/2025/5975)
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicant: Vanlo (Nice, France) (represented by: B. Collett, Barrister-at-Law)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Azur Ltd (London, United Kingdom)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark LPM – European Union trade mark No 18 038 948
         

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 10 July 2025 in Case R 1407/2024-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision, return the matter to EUIPO to determine that the trade mark at issue was registered in bad faith and it must be removed from the EUIPO register of trade marks;










—


order EUIPO and the intervener, if any, to pay the costs of these proceedings and of the Cancellation Division and Board of Appeal proceedings and bear their own costs.





Plea in law

Infringement of Article 59(1)(b) Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/5975/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.12104 – EDF / SAMSUNG GROUP / EURO LIVING)
Date: 2025-09-22
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, electrical energy, electricity supply, electronics, energy distribution, energy production, energy transport, insurance, merger control, shipbuilding








C_202505371EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/5371


2.10.2025






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.12104 – EDF / SAMSUNG GROUP / EURO LIVING)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2025/5371)

On 22 September 2025, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32025M12104. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/5371/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)