do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-190/24: Judgment of the General Court of 10 September 2025 – Comptoir Sel Solaire v Commission (Agriculture – Protected geographical indications – Opposition proceedings – Registration of the name Sel de Camargue/Fleur de sel de Camargue – Article 52(3)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 – Principle of sound administration)
Date: 2025-09-10
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: France, Occitanie, Portugal, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur, designation of origin, labelling, product designation, salt








C_202505580EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/5580


27.10.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 10 September 2025 – Comptoir Sel Solaire v Commission


(Case T-190/24)
                (1)

(Agriculture - Protected geographical indications - Opposition proceedings - Registration of the name ‘Sel de Camargue/Fleur de sel de Camargue’ - Article 52(3)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 - Principle of sound administration)
(C/2025/5580)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Comptoir Sel Solaire (Boffa, Guinea) (represented by: T. Lachacinski and F. Fajgenbaum, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: M. Konstantinidis and F. Thiran, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: French Republic (represented by: B. Fodda, B. Travard and P. Chansou, acting as Agents)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/423 of 31 January 2024, entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (‘Sel de Camargue/Fleur de Sel de Camargue’ (PGI)) (OJ L, 2024/423).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action.










2.


Orders Comptoir Sel Solaire to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission.










3.


Orders the French Republic to bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C, C/2024/3345, 3.6.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/5580/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Euro exchange rates – 9 September 2025
Date: 2025-09-10
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_202504491EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/4491


10.9.2025






Euro exchange rates (1)


            9 September 2025
         
(C/2025/4491)


1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,1728 




JPY


Japanese yen


173,39 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4660 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,86690 




SEK


Swedish krona


11,0005 




CHF


Swiss franc


0,9328 




ISK


Iceland króna


143,40 




NOK


Norwegian krone


11,7125 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


24,366 




HUF


Hungarian forint


393,58 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,2495 




RON


Romanian leu


5,0721 




TRY


Turkish lira


48,3955 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,7799 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,6190 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


9,1402 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,9761 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,5062 




KRW


South Korean won


1 627,71 




ZAR


South African rand


20,6029 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


8,3619 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


19 381,93 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,9463 




PHP


Philippine peso


66,555 




RUB


Russian rouble


 




THB


Thai baht


37,266 




BRL


Brazilian real


6,3400 




MXN


Mexican peso


21,8835 




INR


Indian rupee


103,2455 






(1)  
            Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4491/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-497/24: Judgment of the General Court of 10 September 2025 – Telefónica Germany v EUIPO (LOOP) (EU trade mark – Application for the EU word mark LOOP – Absolute grounds for refusal – Distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Objective characteristics inherent in the nature of the goods and services – Sufficiently direct and specific relationship – Decision taken following the annulment by the General Court of an earlier decision – Res judicata – Article 266 TFEU – Article 72(6) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Power of the General Court to alter decisions)
Date: 2025-09-10
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, electronic device, information technology industry, registered trade mark, telecommunications, trade-mark law








C_202505708EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/5708


3.11.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 10 September 2025 – Telefónica Germany v EUIPO (LOOP)


(Case T-497/24)
                (1)

(EU trade mark - Application for the EU word mark LOOP - Absolute grounds for refusal - Distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation 2017/1001 - Objective characteristics inherent in the nature of the goods and services - Sufficiently direct and specific relationship - Decision taken following the annulment by the General Court of an earlier decision - Res judicata - Article 266 TFEU - Article 72(6) of Regulation 2017/1001 - Power of the General Court to alter decisions)
(C/2025/5708)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Telefónica Germany GmbH & Co. OHG (Munich, Germany) (represented by: A. Fottner and M. Müller, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Eberl, acting as Agent)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment and alteration of the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 30 July 2024 (Case R 2469/2023-5).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the Office for Intellectual Property of the European Union (EUIPO) of 30 July 2024 (Case R 2469/2023-5).










2.


Upholds the appeal brought by Telefónica Germany GmbH & Co. OHG before that Board of Appeal.










3.


Orders EUIPO to pay the costs, including those incurred by Telefónica Germany before the Board of Appeal.






(1)  
            OJ C, C/2024/6450, 4.11.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/5708/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Cases T-191/24 to T-193/24: Judgment of the General Court of 10 September 2025 – Association pour la Promotion du Sel Artisanal and Others v Commission (Action for annulment – Agriculture – Protected geographical indications – Registration of the name Sel de Camargue/Fleur de sel de Camargue – Trade association – Standing to bring proceedings – Lack of direct concern – Inadmissibility)
Date: 2025-09-10
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: France, Occitanie, Portugal, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur, designation of origin, labelling, product designation, professional association, right of action, salt








C_202505697EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/5697


3.11.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 10 September 2025 – Association pour la Promotion du Sel Artisanal and Others v Commission


(Cases T-191/24 to T-193/24)
                (1)

(Action for annulment - Agriculture - Protected geographical indications - Registration of the name ‘Sel de Camargue/Fleur de sel de Camargue’ - Trade association - Standing to bring proceedings - Lack of direct concern - Inadmissibility)
(C/2025/5697)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant in Case T-191/24: Association pour la Promotion du Sel Artisanal (Guérande, France) (represented by: T. Lachacinski and F. Fajgenbaum, lawyers)

Applicant in Case T-192/24: Association des producteurs de sel marin de l’Île de Ré (Ars-en-Ré, France) (represented by: T. Lachacinski and F. Fajgenbaum)

Applicant in Case T-193/24: Terras de Sal – Comércio e Transformação de Sal Marinho Tradicional (Castro Marim, Portugal) (represented by: T. Lachacinski and F. Fajgenbaum)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: M. Konstantinidis and F. Thiran, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: French Republic (represented by: B. Fodda, B. Travard and P. Chansou, acting as Agents)

Re:

By their actions under Article 263 TFEU, the applicants seek the annulment of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/423 of 31 January 2024, entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (‘Sel de Camargue/Fleur de Sel de Camargue’ (PGI)) (OJ L, 2024/423).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Joins Cases T-191/24, T-192/24 and T-193/24 for the purposes of the judgment;











2.


Dismisses the actions as inadmissible;










3.


Orders Association pour la Promotion du Sel Artisanal, Association des producteurs de sel marin de l’Île de Ré and Terras de Sal – Comércio e Transformação de Sal Marinho Tradicional each to bear their own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission;










4.


Orders the French Republic to bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C, C/2024/3346, 3.6.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/5697/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-299/24: Judgment of the General Court of 10 September 2025 – KHG v EUIPO – Panther Deutschland (Baltic Breeze) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark Baltic Breeze – Earlier EU word mark HyBreeze – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
Date: 2025-09-10
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, furniture industry, registered trade mark, textile product, trade-mark law








C_202505701EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/5701


3.11.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 10 September 2025 – KHG v EUIPO – Panther Deutschland (Baltic Breeze)


(Case T-299/24)
                (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU word mark Baltic Breeze - Earlier EU word mark HyBreeze - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(C/2025/5701)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: KHG GmbH & Co. KG (Schönefeld, Germany) (represented by: D. Gehnen and K. Ritzmann, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Stoyanova-Valchanova, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Panther Deutschland GmbH (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: O. Brexl and Z. Balazünbül, lawyers)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 8 April 2024 (Case R 1462/2023-5).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders KHG GmbH & Co KG to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO);










3.


Orders Panther Deutschland GmbH to bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C, C/2024/4487, 22.7.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/5701/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-425/24: Judgment of the General Court of 10 September 2025 – Ffauf Italia v EUIPO – Industria de Diseño Textil (pastaZARA Sublime) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark pastaZARA Sublime – Earlier EU word mark ZARA – Relative ground for refusal – No injury to reputation – Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 – No link between the signs – No risk of unfair advantage being taken of the mark with a reputation – Existence of due cause for the use of the mark applied for)
Date: 2025-09-10
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, pasta, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_202505705EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/5705


3.11.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 10 September 2025 – Ffauf Italia v EUIPO – Industria de Diseño Textil (pastaZARA Sublime)


(Case T-425/24)
                (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative mark pastaZARA Sublime - Earlier EU word mark ZARA - Relative ground for refusal - No injury to reputation - Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - No link between the signs - No risk of unfair advantage being taken of the mark with a reputation - Existence of due cause for the use of the mark applied for)
(C/2025/5705)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Ffauf Italia SpA (Riese Pio X, Italy) (represented by: P. Creta, A. Lanzarini, B. Costa and V. Basilavecchia, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Chylińska and D. Gája, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Industria de Diseño Textil, SA (Arteixo, Spain) (represented by: G. Marín Raigal, E. Armero Lavie and J. Oria Sousa-Montes, lawyers)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 3 June 2024 (Case R 1576/2023-5).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 3 June 2024 (Case R 1576/2023-5);










2.


Orders EUIPO to bear its own costs and to pay one half of those incurred by Ffauf Italia SpA;










3.


Orders Industria de Diseño Textil, SA to bear its own costs and to pay one half of those incurred by Ffauf Italia.






(1)  
            OJ C, C/2024/5652, 30.9.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/5705/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.12084 – PLD / NBIM / GERMAN REAL ESTATE ASSETS)
Date: 2025-09-10
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Germany, economic concentration, holding company, investment, investment company, logistics, merger control, real property








C_202505394EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/5394


2.10.2025






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.12084 – PLD / NBIM / GERMAN REAL ESTATE ASSETS)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2025/5394)

On 10 September 2025, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32025M12084. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/5394/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-616/25: Action brought on 10 September 2025 – LI v EEAS
Date: 2025-09-10
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European official, allowances and expenses, misuse of a right, principle of legal certainty, staff regulations (EU)








C_202505969EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/5969


17.11.2025






Action brought on 10 September 2025 – LI v EEAS


(Case T-616/25)

(C/2025/5969)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: LI (represented by: N. de Montigny, lawyer)

Defendant: European External Action Service

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the decision of 11 August 2024 retroactively adjusting the annual travel allowance of the applicant;










—


annul, so far as necessary, in that it supplements or amends the decision of 11 August 2024, the refusal decision in respect of the claim of 4 June 2025;










—


order the defendant to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on a single plea in law alleging infringement of the relative scope of a finding of illegality based on a plea of illegality, the absence of a valid legal basis on which that decision was based, infringement of the principle of legal certainty and legitimate expectations and the abuse of rights.
That plea is divided into two parts:






—


As regards the first part, the applicant submits, first, that there is a lack of any erga omnes effect in respect of the finding of illegality raised by way of a plea of illegality in the judgment of 18 April 2024, Dumitrescu and Others v Commission and Court of Justice (C-567/22 P to C-570/22 P, EU:C:2024:336), since such a plea of illegality cannot entail the inapplicability of the contested provision to the situation submitted by the applicants in those cases. The applicant submits, secondly, that there is an absence of a valid legal basis for considering that the provision, which was found to be illegal, has been replaced by another rule enabling the adoption of the adverse decision and, thirdly, an infringement of the principle of legal certainty.










—


As regards the second part the applicant submits that there was an abuse of rights and an infringement of Article 52 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, in that the administration applied the principles of a former statutory provision which was amended without taking account of all the consequences of such an application for the situations existing at the time a right was created under the auspices of a rule which has since been disapplied and according to a reinterpretation of the applicable principles.






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/5969/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections – SA.103323
Date: 2025-09-10
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Italy, State aid, carriage of goods, control of State aid, rail transport








C_202504964EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/4964


10.9.2025






Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union
Cases where the Commission raises no objections
SA.103323
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2025/4964)








Date of adoption of the decision


26.7.2024




Aid number


SA.103323




Member State


Italy




Region


 




Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)


Reintroduzione dell'aiuto al servizio transitorio di Autostrada Ferroviaria Alpina




Legal basis


Legge di stabilità 2016 del 28 dicembre 2015 n° 208, Legge di bilancio 2017 del 11 dicembre 2016 n° 232




Type of measure


Ad Hoc Case


Autostrada Ferroviaria Alpina




Objective


Coordination of transport, Environmental protection




Form of aid


Direct grant




Budget


Overall budget: 15 000 000  EUR
Annual budget: 5 000 000  EUR




Intensity


 




Duration


1.1.2022 - 31.12.2024




Economic sectors


Freight rail transport




Name and address of the granting authority







Ministero delle Infrastrutture e dei Trasporti




Via Caraci 36 00157 Roma








Other information


 




The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search?caseInstrument=SA



ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4964/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-444/24: Judgment of the General Court of 10 September 2025 – Montres Tudor v EUIPO (1926) (EU trade mark – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark 1926 – Absolute ground for refusal – Descriptive character – Lack of distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
Date: 2025-09-10
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, clock and watch industry, jewellery and goldsmith's articles, precious metal, precious stones, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_202505706EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/5706


3.11.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 10 September 2025 – Montres Tudor v EUIPO (1926)


(Case T-444/24)
                (1)

(EU trade mark - International registration designating the European Union - Word mark 1926 - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptive character - Lack of distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(C/2025/5706)
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: Montres Tudor SA (Geneva, Switzerland) (represented by: C. Mesa Sánchez, I. Pascual de Quinto Santos-Suárez, B. Ganso Carpintero and M. Simón Razquin, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) (represented by: E. Nicolás Gómez, acting as Agent)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 25 June 2024 (Case R 600/2024-2).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Montres Tudor SA to pay the costs.






(1)  
            OJ C, C/2024/5848, 7.10.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/5706/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-18/23: Judgment of the General Court of 10 September 2025 – Greece v Commission (EAGF and EAFRD – Withdrawal of financial assistance – Interventions under the Guidance Section of the EAGGF – Legal basis – Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 – Application ratione temporis – Application ratione materiae – Manifest error of assessment – Transitional provisions)
Date: 2025-09-10
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EAFRD, EAGF, EAGGF, agricultural expenditure, aid to agriculture, eligibility criteria, financial aid, legal basis, reimbursement of aid








C_202505691EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/5691


3.11.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 10 September 2025 – Greece v Commission


(Case T-18/23)
                (1)

(EAGF and EAFRD - Withdrawal of financial assistance - Interventions under the ‘Guidance’ Section of the EAGGF - Legal basis - Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 - Application 
ratione temporis
 - Application 
ratione materiae
 - Manifest error of assessment - Transitional provisions)
(C/2025/5691)
Language of the case: Greek

Parties


Applicant: Hellenic Republic (represented by: E. Leftheriotou, A.-E. Vadilopoulou and O. Pastellas, acting as Agents)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: M. Konstantinidis and J. Aquilina, acting as Agents)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the Hellenic Republic seeks annulment of Commission Implementing Decision C(2002)8047 final of 15 November 2022 on the financial treatment to be applied to expenditure financed by the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF), Guidance Section, in certain cases of irregularity in Greece.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders each party to bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 179, 22.5.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/5691/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)