do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.12051 – TIKEHAU CAPITAL / CDC / CCIG / ALYSE GUYANE / AIRPORT OF CAYENNE-FELIX EBOUE)
Date: 2025-09-10
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: French Guiana, airport, economic concentration, investment company, merger control, public authorities








C_202505232EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/5232


24.9.2025






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.12051 – TIKEHAU CAPITAL / CDC / CCIG / ALYSE GUYANE / AIRPORT OF CAYENNE-FELIX EBOUE)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2025/5232)

On 10 September 2025, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in French and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32025M12051. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/5232/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-55/24: Judgment of the General Court of 10 September 2025 – Meta Platforms Ireland v Commission (Digital services – Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 – Commission decision determining the amount of the supervisory fee for 2023 – Article 43(3) to (5) of Regulation 2022/2065 – Article 4(2) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/1127 – Method for calculating the number of average monthly active recipients – Temporal adjustment of the effects of an annulment)
Date: 2025-09-10
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: administrative supervision, digital single market, equal treatment, principle of proportionality, provision of services, rights of the defence, social media








C_202505578EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/5578


27.10.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 10 September 2025 – Meta Platforms Ireland v Commission


(Case T-55/24)
                (1)

(Digital services - Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 - Commission decision determining the amount of the supervisory fee for 2023 - Article 43(3) to (5) of Regulation 2022/2065 - Article 4(2) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/1127 - Method for calculating the number of average monthly active recipients - Temporal adjustment of the effects of an annulment)
(C/2025/5578)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Meta Platforms Ireland Ltd (Dublin, Ireland) (represented by: A. Komninos, G. Forwood, I. Sarmas and H. Gafsen, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: O. Gariazzo, P.-J. Loewenthal and L. Armati, acting as Agents)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of Commission Implementing Decision C(2023) 8176 final of 27 November 2023 determining the supervisory fee applicable to Facebook and Instagram pursuant to Article 43(3) of Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls Commission Implementing Decision C(2023) 8176 final of 27 November 2023 determining the supervisory fee applicable to Facebook and Instagram pursuant to Article 43(3) of Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 of the European Parliament and of the Council;










2.


Maintains the effects of Implementing Decision C(2023) 8176 until such time as the measures necessary to comply with the present judgment have been taken, which must occur within a reasonable period that cannot exceed 12 months from the day on which the present judgment becomes final;










3.


Orders the European Commission to pay the costs.






(1)  
            OJ C, C/2024/2171, 25.3.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/5578/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-198/24: Judgment of the General Court of 10 September 2025 – DM and DN v EUBAM Libya (Non-contractual liability – Common foreign and security policy – Jurisdiction of the EU judicature – European Union Integrated Border Management Assistance Mission in Libya – Private security staff engaged by a third-party company for the protection of members of the mission – Causal link)
Date: 2025-09-10
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU police mission, Libya, border control, damages, jurisdiction, security services, staff








C_202505698EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/5698


3.11.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 10 September 2025 – DM and DN v EUBAM Libya


(Case T-198/24)
                (1)

(Non-contractual liability - Common foreign and security policy - Jurisdiction of the EU judicature - European Union Integrated Border Management Assistance Mission in Libya - Private security staff engaged by a third-party company for the protection of members of the mission - Causal link)
(C/2025/5698)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicants: DM, DN (represented by: T. Bontinck, M. Brésart and F. Patuelli, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Integrated Border Management Assistance Mission in Libya (EUBAM Libya) (represented by: J. Vyčítal, acting as Agent, and by E. Raoult, lawyer)

Re:

By their action under Article 268 TFEU, the applicants seek compensation for the damage they suffered owing to the allegedly unlawful conduct of the European Union Integrated Border Management Assistance Mission in Libya (EUBAM Libya).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders DM and DN to pay the costs.






(1)  
            OJ C, C/2024/4731, 5.8.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/5698/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-371/24: Judgment of the General Court of 10 September 2025 – La Superquímica v EUIPO – Monta Klebebandwerk (Monta) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark Monta – Earlier national figurative mark MONTACK – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
Date: 2025-09-10
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, adhesive, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_202505704EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/5704


3.11.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 10 September 2025 – La Superquímica v EUIPO – Monta Klebebandwerk (Monta)


(Case T-371/24)
                (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU word mark Monta - Earlier national figurative mark MONTACK - Relative ground for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(C/2025/5704)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: La Superquímica, SA (Barcelona, Spain) (represented by: D. Pellisé Urquiza and K. Bitton Fernández, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Ivanauskas, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Monta Klebebandwerk GmbH (Immenstadt, Germany) (represented by: M. Hoffmann, lawyer)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 21 May 2024 (Case R 2006/2023-2).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders La Superquímica, SA to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Monta Klebebandwerk GmbH.










3.


Orders the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) to bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C, C/2024/5327, 9.9.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/5704/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)