do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Opinion of the Advisory Committee on restrictive practices and dominant positions at its meeting on 8.9.2025 concerning a draft decision in Case AT.40721 – Microsoft Teams and case AT.40873 – Microsoft Teams II – Meeting by Video Conference – via Skype for Business – Rapporteur: Spain
Date: 2025-09-08
Institutions: Advisory Committee on Restrictive Practices and Dominant Positions
Subjects: EU competition policy, European Economic Area, cloud computing, control of restrictive practices, dominant position, information technology, social media, software








C_202506576EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/6576


18.12.2025






Opinion of the Advisory Committee on restrictive practices and dominant positions at its meeting on 8.9.2025 concerning a draft decision in Case AT.40721 – Microsoft Teams and case AT.40873 – Microsoft Teams II
Meeting by Video Conference – via ‘Skype for Business’
         
Rapporteur: Spain
(Only the English text is authentic)
(C/2025/6576)


1.   

The Advisory Committee (16 Member States) shares the Commission's concerns expressed in its draft Decision under Article 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and Article 54 of the EEA Agreement.



2.   

The Advisory Committee (16 Member States) agrees with the Commission that the proceedings can be concluded by means of a decision pursuant to Article 9(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003, as described in the draft Decision.



3.   

The Advisory Committee (16 Member States) agrees with the Commission that the offered commitments are suitable, necessary and proportionate and should be made legally binding, as set out in the draft Decision.



4.   

The Advisory Committee (16 Member States) agrees with the Commission’s draft Decision that, in light of the offered commitments, there are no longer grounds for action by the Commission, without prejudice to Article 9(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003.



5.   

The Advisory Committee (16 Member States) recommends the publication of its opinion in the Official Journal of the European Union.




ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/6576/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.12013 – DOORDASH / DELIVEROO)
Date: 2025-09-08
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Belgium, France, Ireland, Italy, cloud computing, economic concentration, foodstuff, logistics, merger control, prepared foodstuff, retail trade








C_202505103EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/5103


16.9.2025






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.12013 – DOORDASH / DELIVEROO)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2025/5103)

On 8 September 2025, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32025M12013. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/5103/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-613/25: Action brought on 8 September 2025 – Piperea v Commission
Date: 2025-09-08
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Member of the European Parliament, Russia, equal treatment, freedom of expression, indemnification, motion of censure, parliamentary immunity, protection of privacy, public statement, right to justice








C_202506136EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/6136


8.12.2025






Action brought on 8 September 2025 – Piperea v Commission


(Case T-613/25)

(C/2025/6136)
Language of the case: Romanian

Parties


Applicant: Gheorghe Piperea (Bucharest, Romania) (represented by: C.-C. Antonache, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


order the Commission to apologise to the applicant;










—


award damages in the amount of EUR 300 000;










—


order the Commission to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant requests the Court to order compensation for the damage caused to him, in that the Commission, through its spokesperson, allegedly stated that the ‘hand of Moscow’ lay behind the motion of censure initiated by him in his capacity as a Member of the European Parliament.
In support of the action, the applicant relies on six pleas in law.






1.


First plea in law, alleging infringement of Article 1 – Human dignity – and Article 7 – Respect for private and family life – of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.










2.


Second plea in law, alleging infringement of Article 11 – Freedom of expression and information – of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.










3.


Third plea in law, alleging infringement of Article 21 – Non-discrimination – of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.










4.


Fourth plea in law, alleging infringement of Article 8 – Privileges and immunities of Members of the European Parliament – of Protocol (No 7) on the privileges and immunities of the European Union.










5.


Fifth plea in law, alleging infringement of Article 41 and the relevance of Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.










6.


Sixth plea in law, alleging the applicability of Article 51 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/6136/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Euro exchange rates – 5 September 2025
Date: 2025-09-08
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_202504489EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/4489


8.9.2025






Euro exchange rates (1)


            5 September 2025
         
(C/2025/4489)


1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,1697 




JPY


Japanese yen


173,09 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4648 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,86780 




SEK


Swedish krona


11,0010 




CHF


Swiss franc


0,9390 




ISK


Iceland króna


143,00 




NOK


Norwegian krone


11,7505 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


24,421 




HUF


Hungarian forint


392,75 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,2505 




RON


Romanian leu


5,0786 




TRY


Turkish lira


48,1770 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,7870 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,6138 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


9,1263 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,9901 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,5045 




KRW


South Korean won


1 626,80 




ZAR


South African rand


20,6644 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


8,3489 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


19 207,00 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,9420 




PHP


Philippine peso


66,490 




RUB


Russian rouble


 




THB


Thai baht


37,635 




BRL


Brazilian real


6,3460 




MXN


Mexican peso


21,8523 




INR


Indian rupee


103,2210 






(1)  
            Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4489/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-610/25: Action brought on 8 September 2025 – Mylan Healthcare v EMA
Date: 2025-09-08
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: access to EU information, disclosure of information, drug surveillance, medicinal product, report








C_202506183EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/6183


24.11.2025






Action brought on 8 September 2025 – Mylan Healthcare v EMA


(Case T-610/25)

(C/2025/6183)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Mylan Healthcare BV (Amstelveen, Netherlands) (represented by: J. Tingen, S. de Jong and A. Collignon, lawyers)

Defendant: European Medicines Agency

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul, in full or in part, the decision of the European Medicines Agency of 27 June 2025 with reference number EMA/208014/2025, granting partial access to a Periodic Safety Update Report for the medicinal product Dymista (azelastine/fluticasone) to a third party, pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1); and










—


order the European Medicines Agency to pay the applicant’s costs or, in the alternative, an appropriate proportion of the costs pursuant to Article 134 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on the following plea in law.
Plea in law, alleging that the Agency erred in law in finding that the exception to the right of access to documents laid down in the first indent of Article 4(2) of Regulation No 1049/2001 does not justify the non-disclosure of certain information in a Periodic Safety Update Report for the medicinal product Dymista (azelastine/fluticasone). In particular:






—


disclosure of the names of business partners together with details of their contractual arrangements, would undermine Mylan’s commercial interests;










—


disclosure of patient and sales data would undermine Mylan’s commercial interests;










—


disclosure of information concerning a specific clinical trial would undermine Mylan’s commercial interests.






(1)  Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents (OJ 2001 L 145, p. 43).


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/6183/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)