do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-413/23 P: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 4 September 2025 – EDPS v SRB (Concept of personal data) (Appeal – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Procedure for granting compensation to shareholders and creditors of a banking institution following the resolution of that institution – Decision of the European Data Protection Supervisor finding that the Single Resolution Board failed to fulfil its obligations relating to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 – Article 15(1)(d) – Obligation to inform the data subject – Transmission of pseudonymised data to a third party – Article 3(1) – Concept of personal data – Article 3(6) – Concept of pseudonymisation)
Date: 2025-09-04
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: anonymisation, bank, bank resolution, claim, data protection, data-processing law, disclosure of information, shareholder








C_202505551EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/5551


27.10.2025






Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 4 September 2025 – EDPS v SRB (Concept of personal data)


(Case C-413/23 P)
                (1)

(Appeal - Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data - Procedure for granting compensation to shareholders and creditors of a banking institution following the resolution of that institution - Decision of the European Data Protection Supervisor finding that the Single Resolution Board failed to fulfil its obligations relating to the processing of personal data - Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 - Article 15(1)(d) - Obligation to inform the data subject - Transmission of pseudonymised data to a third party - Article 3(1) - Concept of ‘personal data’ - Article 3(6) - Concept of ‘pseudonymisation’)
(C/2025/5551)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellant: European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS) (represented initially by P. Candellier, G. Devin, X. Lareo, D. Nardi and T. Zerdick, and subsequently by P. Candellier, X. Lareo, D. Nardi, N. Stolić and T. Zerdick, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings: Single Resolution Board (SRB) (represented by: H. Ehlers, M. Fernández Rupérez and A. Lapresta Bienz, acting as Agents, and by M. Braun, H.-G. Kamann, Rechtsanwälte, and F. Louis, avocat)

Intervener in support of the appellant: European Data Protection Board (represented by: C. Foglia, M. Gufflet, G. Le Grand and I. Vereecken, acting as Agents, and by E. de Lophem, avocat, G. Ryelandt, advocaat, and P. Vernet, avocat)

Intervener in support of the other party: European Commission (represented by: A. Bouchagiar and H. Kranenborg, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Sets aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 26 April 2023, SRB v EDPS (T-557/20, EU:T:2023:219);










2.


Refers Case T-557/20 back to the General Court of the European Union;










3.


Reserves the costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 296, 21.8.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/5551/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.12088 – SWISS LIFE HOLDING / APG / ITINERE)
Date: 2025-09-04
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: consultancy, economic concentration, insurance company, merger control, road transport tariff, service concession, toll








C_202505019EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/5019


11.9.2025






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.12088 – SWISS LIFE HOLDING / APG / ITINERE)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2025/5019)

On 4 September 2025, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32025M12088. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/5019/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.12073 – VELOBANK / BANK HANDLOWY)
Date: 2025-09-04
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Poland, bank, banking, consumer, economic concentration, merger control, provision of services, universal service








C_202505497EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/5497


8.10.2025






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.12073 – VELOBANK / BANK HANDLOWY)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2025/5497)

On 4 September 2025, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32025M12073. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/5497/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-201/23: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 4 September 2025 – Commission v Poland (Directive on copyright in the Digital Single Market) (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Article 258 TFEU – Directive (EU) 2019/790 – Digital Single Market – Copyright and related rights – Failure to transpose and notify the transposition measures – Article 260(3) TFEU – Financial penalties – Application for the imposition of a lump sum – Date on which the infringement was brought to an end)
Date: 2025-09-04
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: copyright, digital single market, digital technology, directive (EU), national implementing measure, sanction (EU)








C_202505550EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/5550


27.10.2025






Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 4 September 2025 – Commission v Poland (Directive on copyright in the Digital Single Market)


(Case C-201/23)
                (1)

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Article 258 TFEU - Directive (EU) 2019/790 - Digital Single Market - Copyright and related rights - Failure to transpose and notify the transposition measures - Article 260(3) TFEU - Financial penalties - Application for the imposition of a lump sum - Date on which the infringement was brought to an end)
(C/2025/5550)
Language of the case: Polish

Parties


Applicant: European Commission (represented by: J. Samnadda and B. Sasinowska, acting as Agents)

Defendant: Republic of Poland (represented by: B. Majczyna, acting as Agent)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Declares that, by failing to adopt, before the expiry of the time limit laid down in the reasoned opinion of the European Commission of 19 May 2022 all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive (EU) 2019/790 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 April 2019 on copyright and related rights in the Digital Single Market and amending Directives 96/9/EC and 2001/29/EC, and, consequently, by failing to communicate those provisions to the Commission, the Republic of Poland has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 29 of that directive;










2.


Orders the Republic of Poland to pay the European Commission a lump sum of EUR 8 300 000;










3.


Orders the Republic of Poland to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission.






(1)  
            OJ C 179, 22.5.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/5550/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-625/24, ClaimCompass: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 4 September 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski rayonen sad – Bulgaria) – ClaimCompass EOOD (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94(c) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Requirement to provide reasons justifying the need for an answer from the Court – Lack of sufficient information – Manifest inadmissibility)
Date: 2025-09-04
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: civil proceedings, establishment, injunction, judicial cooperation in civil matters in the EU, jurisdiction








C_202600075EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2026/75


5.1.2026






Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 4 September 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski rayonen sad – Bulgaria) – ‘ClaimCompass’ EOOD


(Case C-625/24,
                (1)
ClaimCompass)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) and Article 94(c) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Requirement to provide reasons justifying the need for an answer from the Court - Lack of sufficient information - Manifest inadmissibility)
(C/2026/75)
Language of the case: Bulgarian

Referring court

Sofiyski rayonen sad

Party to the main proceedings


            ‘ClaimCompass’ EOOD

Operative part of the order

The request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski rayonen sad (Sofia District Court, Bulgaria), made by decision of 24 September 2024, is manifestly inadmissible.


(1)  OJ C, C/2025/1212.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2026/75/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Information communicated by Member states regarding closure of fisheries
Date: 2025-09-04
Institutions: Directorate-General for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries, European Commission
Subjects: Atlantic Ocean, EU waters, Ireland, United Kingdom, catch by species, catch quota, fishing area, fishing rights, international waters, sea fish, sea fishing, territorial waters








C_202504932EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/4932


4.9.2025






Information communicated by Member states regarding closure of fisheries
(C/2025/4932)

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Union control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:






Date and time of closure


1.8.2025




Duration


1.8.2025 – 31.12.2025




Member State


Ireland




Stock or Group of stocks


HER/5B6ANB




Species


Herring (Clupea harengus)




Zone


6b and 6aN; United Kingdom and international waters of 5b




Type(s) of fishing vessels


—




Reference number


8/TQ202






(1)  
            OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4932/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections – SA.106117
Date: 2025-09-04
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Germany, Saxony, State aid, control of State aid, electronics industry








C_202504870EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/4870


4.9.2025






Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union
Cases where the Commission raises no objections
SA.106117
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2025/4870)








Date of adoption of the decision


20.2.2025




Aid number


SA.106117




Member State


Germany




Region


DRESDEN




Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)


Infineon MEGAFAB-DD project




Legal basis


§§ 23, 44 Bundeshaushaltsordnung (Federal Budget Regulation)




Type of measure


Ad Hoc Case


Infineon Technologies Dresden GmbH & Co. KG (IFD)




Objective


Sectorial development




Form of aid


Direct grant




Budget


Overall budget: 920 000 000  EUR
Annual budget: 920 000 000  EUR




Intensity


 




Duration


 




Economic sectors


Manufacture of electronic components




Name and address of the granting authority







Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Klimaschutz, Referat IVA2




Scharnhorststraße 34-37, 10115 Berlin








Other information


 




The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search?caseInstrument=SA



ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4870/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Euro exchange rates – 3 September 2025
Date: 2025-09-04
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_202504487EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/4487


4.9.2025






Euro exchange rates (1)


            3 September 2025
         
(C/2025/4487)


1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,1653 




JPY


Japanese yen


173,17 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4633 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,86870 




SEK


Swedish krona


11,0015 




CHF


Swiss franc


0,9374 




ISK


Iceland króna


143,60 




NOK


Norwegian krone


11,7000 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


24,446 




HUF


Hungarian forint


393,30 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,2523 




RON


Romanian leu


5,0774 




TRY


Turkish lira


47,9724 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,7823 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,6079 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


9,0909 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,9857 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,5015 




KRW


South Korean won


1 619,10 




ZAR


South African rand


20,5442 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


8,3268 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


19 170,53 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,9263 




PHP


Philippine peso


66,787 




RUB


Russian rouble


 




THB


Thai baht


37,668 




BRL


Brazilian real


6,3550 




MXN


Mexican peso


21,7972 




INR


Indian rupee


102,5820 






(1)  
            Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4487/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries
Date: 2025-09-04
Institutions: Directorate-General for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries, European Commission
Subjects: Atlantic Ocean, EU waters, Portugal, catch by species, catch quota, fishing area, fishing rights, international waters, sea fish, sea fishing








C_202504931EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/4931


4.9.2025






Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries
(C/2025/4931)

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Union control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy, amending Regulations (EC) No 847/96, (EC) No 2371/2002, (EC) No 811/2004, (EC) No 768/2005, (EC) No 2115/2005, (EC) No 2166/2005, (EC) No 388/2006, (EC) No 509/2007, (EC) No 676/2007, (EC) No 1098/2007, (EC) No 1300/2008, (EC) No 1342/2008 and repealing Regulations (EEC) No 2847/93, (EC) No 1627/94 and (EC) No 1966/2006 (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:






Date and time of closure


7.8.2025




Duration


7.8.2025 – 31.12.2025




Member State


Portugal




Stock or Group of stocks


BET/ATLANT




Species


Bigeye tuna (Thunnus obesus)




Zone


Atlantic Ocean




Type(s) of fishing vessels


—




Reference number


9/TQ202






(1)  
            OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4931/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-588/25: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Craiova (Romania) lodged on 4 September 2025 – Preenergyvis SRL v Agenţia Naţională de Administrare Fiscală – Direcţia Regională Antifraudă Fiscală Târgu-Jiu and Ministerul Finanţelor – Direcţia Generală de Soluţionare a Contestaţiilor
Date: 2025-09-04
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU energy policy, EU statistics, coal, economic activity, energy crisis, natural gas, oil industry, petroleum, price of energy, statistical nomenclature








C_202506123EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/6123


8.12.2025






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Craiova (Romania) lodged on 4 September 2025 – Preenergyvis SRL v Agenţia Naţională de Administrare Fiscală – Direcţia Regională Antifraudă Fiscală Târgu-Jiu and Ministerul Finanţelor – Direcţia Generală de Soluţionare a Contestaţiilor


(Case C-588/25)

(C/2025/6123)
Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Curtea de Apel Craiova (Romania)

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant and applicant at first instance: Preenergyvis SRL

Respondents and defendants at first instance: Agenţia Naţională de Administrare Fiscală – Direcţia Regională Antifraudă Fiscală Târgu-Jiu and Ministerul Finanţelor – Direcţia Generală de Soluţionare a Contestaţiilor

Questions referred







1.


Is the expression ‘activities in the crude petroleum, natural gas, coal and refinery sectors’ in Article 14(1) of [Regulation 2022/1854] (1) to be interpreted as also covering activity under CAEN [(Clasificării activităților din economia națională) (National Classification of Economic Activities)] Code 1920 ‘Manufacturing of products obtained from the processing of crude petroleum’ – ‘manufacturing of combustible briquettes from hard coal and lignite’, as found in national law in Article 1(1) of [Ordonanța de urgență a Guvernului nr. 186 din 28 decembrie 2022 privind unele măsuri de punere în aplicare a Regulamentului (UE) 2022/1854 al Consiliului din 6 octombrie 2022 privind o intervenție de urgență pentru abordarea problemei prețurilor ridicate la energie (Government Emergency Order No 186 of 28 December 2022 on measures for the implementation of [Regulation 2022/1854]) (‘OUG nr. 186/2022’)]?










2.


If the answer is in the affirmative, is Article 14 of [Regulation 2022/1854] to be interpreted as precluding a piece of national legislation, such as Article 1(1) of OUG nr. 186/2022, which requires a solidarity contribution on the basis of a formal CAEN code classification, without making a distinction as to whether or not the taxpayer’s activity is covered by the exceptional purpose pursued through the adoption of that measure in Community law in accordance with [that regulation]?






(1)  Council Regulation (EU) 2022/1854 of 6 October 2022 on an emergency intervention to address high energy prices (OJ 2022 L 261 I, p. 1).


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/6123/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-19/25, Claim Compass II: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 4 September 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski rayonen sad – Bulgaria) – ClaimCompass EOOD (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94(c) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Requirement to state the reasons justifying the need for a response by the Court and the relationship between the provisions of EU law whose interpretation is sought and the applicable national legislation – Lack of sufficient information – Manifest inadmissibility)
Date: 2025-09-04
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU law - national law, admissibility, carriage of passengers, civil aviation, indemnification, preliminary ruling procedure, traveller








C_202505671EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/5671


3.11.2025






Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 4 September 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski rayonen sad – Bulgaria) – ‘ClaimCompass’ EOOD


(Case C-19/25,
                (1)
Claim Compass II)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) and Article 94(c) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Requirement to state the reasons justifying the need for a response by the Court and the relationship between the provisions of EU law whose interpretation is sought and the applicable national legislation - Lack of sufficient information - Manifest inadmissibility)
(C/2025/5671)
Language of the case: Bulgarian

Referring court

Sofiyski rayonen sad

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant:
            ‘ClaimCompass’ EOOD

Operative part of the order

The request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski rayonen sad (Sofia District Court, Bulgaria), made by decision of 15 January 2025, is manifestly inadmissible.


(1)  Date lodged: 15.1.2025.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/5671/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)