do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Euro exchange rates – 2 September 2025
Date: 2025-09-03
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_202504486EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/4486


3.9.2025






Euro exchange rates (1)


            2 September 2025
         
(C/2025/4486)


1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,1646 




JPY


Japanese yen


173,10 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4632 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,87020 




SEK


Swedish krona


11,0030 




CHF


Swiss franc


0,9366 




ISK


Iceland króna


143,60 




NOK


Norwegian krone


11,6740 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


24,485 




HUF


Hungarian forint


395,58 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,2653 




RON


Romanian leu


5,0822 




TRY


Turkish lira


47,9289 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,7897 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,6056 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


9,0915 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,9892 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,5006 




KRW


South Korean won


1 625,01 




ZAR


South African rand


20,6439 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


8,3202 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


19 110,27 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,9263 




PHP


Philippine peso


66,762 




RUB


Russian rouble


 




THB


Thai baht


37,704 




BRL


Brazilian real


6,3757 




MXN


Mexican peso


21,8726 




INR


Indian rupee


102,5795 






(1)  
            Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4486/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-225/24: Judgment of the General Court of 3 September 2025 – Huhtamaki Holding v Commission (Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Documents relating to State aid procedures – Advance tax agreements – Refusal of access – Exception relating to the protection of the commercial interests of a third party – Exception relating to the protection of the purpose of inspections, investigations and audits – General presumption of confidentiality – Not irrebuttable – Overriding public interest – Principle of sound administration – Obligation to state reasons)
Date: 2025-09-03
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: access to EU information, disclosure of information








C_202505453EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/5453


20.10.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 3 September 2025 – Huhtamaki Holding v Commission


(Case T-225/24)
                (1)

(Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Documents relating to State aid procedures - Advance tax agreements - Refusal of access - Exception relating to the protection of the commercial interests of a third party - Exception relating to the protection of the purpose of inspections, investigations and audits - General presumption of confidentiality - Not irrebuttable - Overriding public interest - Principle of sound administration - Obligation to state reasons)
(C/2025/5453)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Huhtamaki Holding Sàrl (Senningerberg, Luxembourg) (represented by: M. Struys, F. Pili, H. de Cazotte and V. Ciudin, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: M. Burón Pérez and K. Herrmann, acting as Agents)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of Commission Decision C(2024) 1212 final of 19 February 2024 refusing it access to documents relating to State aid procedures.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Huhtamaki Holding Sàrl to pay the costs.






(1)  
            OJ C, C/2024/3783, 24.6.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/5453/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections – SA.118796
Date: 2025-09-03
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Poland, State aid, carriage of goods, carriage of passengers, control of State aid, rail transport, urban transport








C_202504865EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/4865


3.9.2025






Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union
Cases where the Commission raises no objections
SA.118796
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2025/4865)








Date of adoption of the decision


31.7.2025




Aid number


SA.118796




Member State


Poland




Region


Poland




Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)


Pomoc na realizację projektów w zakresie wyposażenia pojazdów kolejowych z napędem lub z kabiną sterowniczą w system ERTMS w ramach programu FEnIKS




Legal basis


Rozporządzenie Ministra Funduszy i Polityki Regionalnej w sprawie pomocy publicznej na realizację projektów w zakresie wyposażenia pojazdów kolejowych z napędem lub z kabiną sterowniczą w system ERTMS w ramach programu Fundusze Europejskie na Infrastrukturę, Klimat, Środowisko 2021–2027.Fundusze Europejskie na Infrastrukturę, Klimat, Środowisko 2021–2027




Type of measure


Scheme


 




Objective


Coordination of transport, Sectorial development




Form of aid


Direct grant




Budget


Overall budget: 200 000 000  PLN




Intensity


85,0 %




Duration


Until 31.12.2029




Economic sectors


Freight rail transport, Passenger rail transport, interurban




Name and address of the granting authority







Centrum Unijnych Programów Transportowych




Plac Europejski 2, 00-844 Warszawa








Other information


 




The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search?caseInstrument=SA



ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4865/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Opinion of the Advisory Committee on restrictive practices and dominant positions at its meeting on 3.9.2025 concerning a draft decision in case AT.40966 – Synthetic Turf (Procedure) – Meeting by Video Conference – via Webex – Rapporteur: Denmark
Date: 2025-09-03
Institutions: Advisory Committee on Restrictive Practices and Dominant Positions
Subjects: EU competition policy, anti-trust legislation, control of restrictive practices, disclosure of information, sanction (EU), sports facilities, subsidiary








C_202600692EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2026/692


30.1.2026






Opinion of the Advisory Committee on restrictive practices and dominant positions at its meeting on 3.9.2025 concerning a draft decision in case AT.40966 – Synthetic Turf (Procedure)
Meeting by Video Conference – via Webex
Rapporteur: Denmark
(C/2026/692)


1.   

The Advisory Committee (12 Member States) agrees with the Commission that the conduct covered by the draft decision constitutes an infringement of the Commission request for information adopted by decision pursuant to Article 18(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 of 16 December 2002 on the implementation of the rules on competition laid down in Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty (‘Regulation 1/2003’) (1).



2.   

The Advisory Committee (12 Member States) agrees with the Commission that a fine should be imposed on the addressees of the draft decision pursuant to Article 23(1)(b) of Regulation 1/2003.



3.   

The Advisory Committee (12 Member States) agrees with the Commission on the final amount of the fine, including its reduction.



4.   

The Advisory Committee (12 Member States) recommends the publication of its opinion in the Official Journal of the European Union.




(1)  
            OJ L 1, 4.1.2003, p. 1. Commission Decision C(2023)7096 of 16 October 2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2026/692/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.12133 – LA CAISSE / TELUS / TERRION)
Date: 2025-09-03
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Canada, economic concentration, holding company, investment company, lease, maintenance, merger control, telecommunications equipment, transmission network








C_202505007EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/5007


9.9.2025






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.12133 – LA CAISSE / TELUS / TERRION)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2025/5007)

On 3 September 2025, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32025M12133. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/5007/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.11578 – BOEING / SPIRIT)
Date: 2025-09-03
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: aeronautical industry, after-sales service, aircraft, economic concentration, merger control, provision of services, sale








C_202504873EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/4873


3.9.2025






Prior notification of a concentration
(Case M.11578 – BOEING / SPIRIT)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2025/4873)


1.   
On 26 August 2025, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1).
This notification concerns the following undertakings:






—


The Boeing Company (‘Boeing’, the USA),










—


Spirit AeroSystems Holdings, Inc. (‘Spirit’, the USA).




Boeing will acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of Spirit.
The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.


2.   
The business activities of the undertakings concerned are the following:






—


Boeing, headquartered in the USA, designs, manufactures, and sells commercial airplanes, defence, space and security systems, and provides related services on a global basis,










—


Spirit, headquartered in the USA, manufactures aerostructures, serving commercial aircraft, military aircraft and business jets as well as provides aftermarket services for commercial and military platforms on a global basis.






3.   

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.



4.   
The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed concentration to the Commission.
Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:
M.11578 – BOEING / SPIRIT
Observations can be sent to the Commission by email or by post. Please use the contact details below:
Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Postal address:





European Commission




Directorate-General for Competition




Merger Registry




1049 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË







(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4873/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-553/23: Judgment of the General Court of 3 September 2025 – Latombe v Commission (Transfer of personal data to the United States – Commission Implementing Decision on the adequate level of protection of personal data ensured by the United States – Right to an effective remedy – Right to private and family life – Decisions based solely on the automated processing of personal data – Security of the processing of personal data)
Date: 2025-09-03
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: United States, cross-frontier data flow, data protection, data-processing law, personal data, protection of privacy, public authorities, right to justice








C_202505446EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/5446


20.10.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 3 September 2025 – Latombe v Commission


(Case T-553/23)
                (1)

(Transfer of personal data to the United States - Commission Implementing Decision on the adequate level of protection of personal data ensured by the United States - Right to an effective remedy - Right to private and family life - Decisions based solely on the automated processing of personal data - Security of the processing of personal data)
(C/2025/5446)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Philippe Latombe (Nantes, France) (represented by: N. Coutrelis, J.-B. Soufron and T. Lamballe, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: D. Calleja Crespo, A. Bouchagiar, H. Kranenborg and C. Ladenburger, acting as Agents)

Interveners in support of the defendant: Ireland (represented by: M. Browne, S. Finnegan and A. Joyce, acting as Agents, and by S. Brittain, Barrister, and C. Donnelly, SC), United States of America (represented by: B. Walsh, S. Barton and A. Finlay, Solicitors, E. Barrington, SC, and D. Hardiman, Barrister)

Re:

By his action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks, in essence, annulment of Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2023/1795 of 10 July 2023 pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the adequate level of protection of personal data under the EU-US Data Privacy Framework (OJ 2023 L 231, p. 118).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Mr Philippe Latombe to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission, including in the interlocutory proceedings;










3.


Orders Ireland to bear its own costs;










4.


Orders the United States of America to bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C, C/2023/348, 30.10.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/5446/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-577/25: Action brought on 3 September 2025 – European Commission v Kingdom of Sweden
Date: 2025-09-03
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: freedom to provide services, invoicing, national law, principle of proportionality, provision of services, remuneration of work, right of establishment, single market, tax law, wage cost








C_202505442EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/5442


20.10.2025






Action brought on 3 September 2025 – European Commission v Kingdom of Sweden


(Case C-577/25)

(C/2025/5442)
Language of the case: Swedish

Parties


Applicant: European Commission (represented by: P. Carlin and W. Roels, acting as Agents)

Defendant: Kingdom of Sweden

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


find that the Kingdom of Sweden has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 56 and 57 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and Articles 36 and 37 of the EEA Agreement by requiring that Swedish clients of service providers which are established in other Member States or EEA countries and which are not registered in Sweden for preliminary tax (F-tax approval), and which do not have any permanent establishment in Sweden, are to withhold preliminary tax of 30 percent of the gross remuneration paid to the foreign service provider (that is to say, the invoiced amount) for work carried out in Sweden or performed abroad within the framework of the client’s activity in Sweden;










—


order the Kingdom of Sweden to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

The Commission argues that Sweden has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 56 and 57 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and Articles 36 and 37 of the EEA Agreement by requiring that Swedish clients of service providers which are established in other Member States or EEA countries and which are not registered in Sweden for preliminary tax, and which do not have any permanent establishment in Sweden, are to withhold preliminary tax at a rate of 30 percent of the gross remuneration paid to the foreign service provider (that is to say, the invoiced amount) for work carried out in Sweden or performed abroad within the framework of the client’s activity in Sweden. Clients must therefore withhold and pay Swedish tax which the service provider is manifestly not liable to pay. The Commission claims that that obligation on clients constitutes a restriction on the freedom to provide services which is not justified by overriding requirements relating to the public interest.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/5442/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-404/24: Judgment of the General Court of 3 September 2025 – Starbuzz Tobacco v EUIPO – Mayflix (Discovery) (EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark Discovery – Genuine use of the trade mark – Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Proof of genuine use – Nature of use – Use in connection with the goods in respect of which the trade mark was registered – Independent subcategory of goods)
Date: 2025-09-03
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, registered trade mark, smoking, tobacco industry, trade-mark law








C_202505458EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/5458


20.10.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 3 September 2025 – Starbuzz Tobacco v EUIPO – Mayflix (Discovery)


(Case T-404/24)
                (1)

(EU trade mark - Revocation proceedings - EU word mark Discovery - Genuine use of the trade mark - Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Proof of genuine use - Nature of use - Use in connection with the goods in respect of which the trade mark was registered - Independent subcategory of goods)
(C/2025/5458)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Starbuzz Tobacco Inc. (Brea, California, United States) (represented by: C. Thomas and V. Adam, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Stoyanova-Valchanova, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Mayflix GmbH (Frankfurt am Main, Germany) (represented by: F. Pfefferkorn, lawyer)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment and alteration of the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 6 June 2024 (Case R 157/2024-2).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 6 June 2024 (Case R 157/2024-2);










2.


Dismisses the action as to the remainder;










3.


Orders EUIPO to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Starbuzz Tobacco Inc.;










4.


Orders Mayflix GmbH to bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C, C/2024/5429, 16.9.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/5458/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-410/24: Judgment of the General Court of 3 September 2025 – SA.PI.SE v EUIPO – Riso Gallo (VENERE) (EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark VENERE – Absolute grounds for invalidity – Article 52(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 – Lack of distinctive character – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation No 207/2009)
Date: 2025-09-03
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, alcoholic beverage, processed food product, processed foodstuff, registered trade mark, rice, trade-mark law








C_202505333EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/5333


13.10.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 3 September 2025 – SA.PI.SE v EUIPO – Riso Gallo (VENERE)


(Case T-410/24)
                (1)

(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU word mark VENERE - Absolute grounds for invalidity - Article 52(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Lack of distinctive character - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation No 207/2009)
(C/2025/5333)
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Applicant: Sardo Piemontese Sementi Soc. coop. – Soc. agr. (SA.PI.SE.Coop.agr.) (Vercelli, Italy) (represented by: D. Brambilla and E. Montelione, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: R. Raponi, Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Riso Gallo SpA (Robbio, Italy) (represented by: P. Gelato, S. Ricciotti, S. Vergano and G. Pira, lawyers)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 5 June 2024 (Case R 1445/2023-1).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Sardo Piemontese Sementi Soc. coop. – Soc. agr. (SA.PI.SE.Coop.agr.) to pay the costs.






(1)  
            OJ C, C/2024/5432, 16.9.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/5333/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-303/24: Judgment of the General Court of 3 September 2025 – OMV v EUIPO – Combe International (OMV! BY VAGISIL) (EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark OMV! BY VAGISIL – Earlier EU figurative marks OMV – Relative ground for refusal – Detriment to repute – Link between the marks at issue – Article 8(5) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
Date: 2025-09-03
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, cosmetic product, lubricants, medicinal product, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_202505455EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/5455


20.10.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 3 September 2025 – OMV v EUIPO – Combe International (OMV! BY VAGISIL)


(Case T-303/24)
                (1)

(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU word mark OMV! BY VAGISIL - Earlier EU figurative marks OMV - Relative ground for refusal - Detriment to repute - Link between the marks at issue - Article 8(5) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(C/2025/5455)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: OMV AG (Vienna, Austria) (represented by: C. Schumacher and B. Kapeller-Hirsch, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: R. Raponi, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Combe International LLC (White Plains, New York, United States)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 5 April 2024 (Case R 804/2023-4).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 5 April 2024 (Case R 804/2023-4);










2.


Orders EUIPO to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by OMV AG.






(1)  
            OJ C, C/2024/4605, 29.7.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/5455/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)