do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-83/24: Judgment of the General Court of 3 September 2025 – Eti v EUIPO – Star Foods E.M. (Decoration for bags of packaging) (European Union design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered European Union design representing decoration for bags of packaging – Earlier national word and figurative marks – Ground for invalidity – Use in the subsequent design of a distinctive sign the holder of which has the right to prohibit such use – Article 25(1)(e) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Applicable substantive law – Rights of the defence – Scope of the examination carried out by the Board of Appeal)
Date: 2025-09-03
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: designs and models, packaging product








C_202505330EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/5330


13.10.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 3 September 2025 – Eti v EUIPO – Star Foods E.M. (Decoration for bags of packaging)


(Case T-83/24)
                (1)

(European Union design - Invalidity proceedings - Registered European Union design representing decoration for bags of packaging - Earlier national word and figurative marks - Ground for invalidity - Use in the subsequent design of a distinctive sign the holder of which has the right to prohibit such use - Article 25(1)(e) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 - Applicable substantive law - Rights of the defence - Scope of the examination carried out by the Board of Appeal)
(C/2025/5330)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Eti Gıda Sanayi ve Ticaret AŞ (Eskişehir, Türkiye) (represented by: A. Căvescu, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: C. Bovar and J. Ivanauskas, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Star Foods E.M. SRL (Bucharest, Romania) (represented by: V. von Bomhard and J. Fuhrmann, lawyers)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 15 December 2023 (Case R 1017/2023-3).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Eti Gıda Sanayi ve Ticaret AŞ to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Star Foods E.M. SRL;










3.


Orders the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) to bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C, C/2024/2769, 29.4.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/5330/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-377/24: Judgment of the General Court of 3 September 2025 – Verband der Islamischen Kulturzentren v EUIPO – Inaba Shokuhin (TUNA) (EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark TUNA – Absolute ground for refusal – Mark of such a nature as to deceive the public – Article 7(1)(g) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 – Article 63(3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Authority of a final decision)
Date: 2025-09-03
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, cereal product, fishery product, foodstuff, meat product, registered trade mark, retail trade, sea fish, trade-mark law, wholesale trade








C_202505457EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/5457


20.10.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 3 September 2025 – Verband der Islamischen Kulturzentren v EUIPO – Inaba Shokuhin (TUNA)


(Case T-377/24)
                (1)

(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU word mark TUNA - Absolute ground for refusal - Mark of such a nature as to deceive the public - Article 7(1)(g) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Article 63(3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Authority of a final decision)
(C/2025/5457)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Verband der Islamischen Kulturzentren eV (Cologne, Germany) (represented by: C. Sánchez Margareto and M. Pastor Palomares, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Gája, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Inaba Shokuhin Co. Ltd (Shizuoka, Japan)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 24 May 2024 (Case R 1651/2023-5).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders each party to bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C, C/2024/5246, 2.9.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/5457/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-92/24: Judgment of the General Court of 3 September 2025 – Eti v EUIPO – Star Foods E.M. (Packaging) (European Union design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered European Union design representing packaging – Earlier national figurative mark – Ground for invalidity – Use in the subsequent design of a distinctive sign the holder of which has the right to prohibit such use – Article 25(1)(e) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Rights of the defence – Scope of the examination carried out by the Board of Appeal)
Date: 2025-09-03
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: designs and models, packaging product








C_202505332EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/5332


13.10.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 3 September 2025 – Eti v EUIPO – Star Foods E.M. (Packaging)


(Case T-92/24)
                (1)

(European Union design - Invalidity proceedings - Registered European Union design representing packaging - Earlier national figurative mark - Ground for invalidity - Use in the subsequent design of a distinctive sign the holder of which has the right to prohibit such use - Article 25(1)(e) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 - Rights of the defence - Scope of the examination carried out by the Board of Appeal)
(C/2025/5332)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Eti Gıda Sanayi ve Ticaret AŞ (Eskişehir, Türkiye) (represented by: A. Căvescu, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: C. Bovar and J. Ivanauskas, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Star Foods E.M. SRL (Bucharest, Romania) (represented by: V. von Bomhard and J. Fuhrmann, lawyers)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 15 December 2023 (Case R 912/2023-3).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Eti Gıda Sanayi ve Ticaret AŞ to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Star Foods E.M. SRL;










3.


Orders the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) to bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C, C/2024/2771, 29.4.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/5332/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.12074 – FIRST DUTCH GROUP / CEFETRA)
Date: 2025-09-03
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Central and Eastern Europe, Northern Europe, animal nutrition, distributor, economic concentration, foodstuff, holding company, logistics, merger control, supply chain








C_202505618EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/5618


16.10.2025






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.12074 – FIRST DUTCH GROUP / CEFETRA)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2025/5618)

On 3 September 2025, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32025M12074. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/5618/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-331/24: Judgment of the General Court of 3 September 2025 – Costa Pujadas v EUIPO – Yasunimotor (Speed variator) (European Union design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered EU design representing a speed variator – Ground for invalidity – No individual character – Visible features of a component part of a complex product – Concepts of normal use and visibility – Article 4(2) and (3) and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Burden of proof)
Date: 2025-09-03
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: designs and models, vehicle parts








C_202505456EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/5456


20.10.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 3 September 2025 – Costa Pujadas v EUIPO – Yasunimotor (Speed variator)


(Case T-331/24)
                (1)

(European Union design - Invalidity proceedings - Registered EU design representing a speed variator - Ground for invalidity - No individual character - Visible features of a component part of a complex product - Concepts of ‘normal use’ and ‘visibility’ - Article 4(2) and (3) and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 - Burden of proof)
(C/2025/5456)
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: Juan Costa Pujadas (L’Ametlla del Vallès, Spain) (represented by: R. Guerras Mazón and C. Pérez Serres, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: E. Nicolás Gómez, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Yasunimotor, SL (Canovelles, Spain) (represented by: E. Sugrañes Coca, lawyer)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 19 April 2024 (Case R 1315/2023-3).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Mr Juan Costa Pujadas to pay the costs.






(1)  
            OJ C, C/2024/5110, 26.8.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/5456/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-525/24: Judgment of the General Court of 3 September 2025 – Princesse de Paris v EUIPO – Printsesa Sheih Khaled i s-ie (Princesse de Paris) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark Princesse de Paris – Earlier national figurative mark Princess P Gold – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Proof of genuine use – Article 47(2) and (3) of Regulation 2017/1001)
Date: 2025-09-03
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, advertising, clothing, cosmetic product, miscellaneous industries, registered trade mark, retail trade, textile product, trade-mark law








C_202505334EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/5334


13.10.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 3 September 2025 – Princesse de Paris v EUIPO – Printsesa Sheih Khaled i s-ie (Princesse de Paris)


(Case T-525/24)
                (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU word mark Princesse de Paris - Earlier national figurative mark Princess P Gold - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Proof of genuine use - Article 47(2) and (3) of Regulation 2017/1001)
(C/2025/5334)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Princesse de Paris (Paris, France) (represented by: V. Guillon, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: V. Ruzek, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Printsesa Sheih Khaled i s ie OOD (Sofia, Bulgaria)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment and alteration of the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 14 August 2024 (Case R 1491/2023-1).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders each party to bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C, C/2024/7358, 16.12.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/5334/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-1102/23: Judgment of the General Court of 3 September 2025 – DJO v EUIPO – Hallufix and Huber [Gouttières (bandages chirurgicaux)] (European Union design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered European Union design representing an orthosis for hallux valgus – Ground for invalidity – Failure to comply with the requirements for protection – Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Features of appearance of a product solely dictated by its technical function – Article 8(1) of Regulation No 6/2002)
Date: 2025-09-03
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: designs and models, medical device








C_202505447EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/5447


20.10.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 3 September 2025 – DJO v EUIPO – Hallufix and Huber [Gouttières (bandages chirurgicaux)]


(Case T-1102/23)
                (1)

(European Union design - Invalidity proceedings - Registered European Union design representing an orthosis for hallux valgus - Ground for invalidity - Failure to comply with the requirements for protection - Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 - Features of appearance of a product solely dictated by its technical function - Article 8(1) of Regulation No 6/2002)
(C/2025/5447)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: DJO LLC (Carlsbad, California (United States)) (represented by: N. Schmitz and A.-K. Hoffman, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: E. Nicolás Gómez, acting as Agent)

Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, interveners before the General Court: Hallufix AG, (Grünwald, Germany), Vitus Maria Huber, (Munich, Germany) (represented by: A. Wenninger-Lenz and S. Horlacher, lawyers)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment and alteration of the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 25 September 2023 (Case R 1499/2022-3).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders DJO LLC to pay the costs.






(1)  
            OJ C, C/2024/758, 22.1.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/5447/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-348/23: Judgment of the General Court of 3 September 2025 – Zalando v Commission (Digital services – Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 – Designation of a very large online platform – Plea of illegality – Article 33(1) and (4) of Regulation 2022/2065 – Legal certainty – Equal treatment – Proportionality – Obligation to state reasons)
Date: 2025-09-03
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: consumer protection, digital single market, electronic commerce, equal treatment, principle of proportionality, provision of services, service








C_202505445EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/5445


20.10.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 3 September 2025 – Zalando v Commission


(Case T-348/23)
                (1)

(Digital services - Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 - Designation of a very large online platform - Plea of illegality - Article 33(1) and (4) of Regulation 2022/2065 - Legal certainty - Equal treatment - Proportionality - Obligation to state reasons)
(C/2025/5445)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Zalando SE (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: R. Briske, K. Ewald, L. Schneider and J. Trouet, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Armati, L. Wildpanner and P.-J. Loewenthal, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the applicant: Bundesverband E-Commerce und Versandhandel Deutschland eV (bevh) (Berlin) (represented by: R. van der Hout and V. Lemonnier, lawyers)

Interveners in support of the defendant: European Parliament (represented by: U. Rösslein, M. Menegatti and G. Bartram, acting as Agents), Council of the European Union (represented by: E. Sitbon, N. Brzezinski and M. Moore, acting as Agents), European Information Society Institute o.z. (EISi) (Košice, Slovakia) (represented by: M. Husovec, lawyer)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of Commission Decision C(2023) 2727 final of 25 April 2023 designating Zalando as a very large online platform in accordance with Article 33(4) of Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Zalando SE to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission;










3.


Orders the European Parliament, the Council of the European Union, the European Information Society Institute o.z. (EISi) and Bundesverband E-Commerce und Versandhandel Deutschland eV (bevh) to bear their own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 314, 4.9.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/5445/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-1/24: Judgment of the General Court of 3 September 2025 – Kartroi v EUIPO – Luxvide Finanziaria per Iniziative Audiovisive e Telematiche (SANDOKAN) (EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark SANDOKAN – Lack of genuine use of the mark – Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
Date: 2025-09-03
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, audiovisual industry, book trade, clothing, film production, gaming, registered trade mark, software, toy industry, trade-mark law








C_202505450EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/5450


20.10.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 3 September 2025 – Kartroi v EUIPO – Luxvide Finanziaria per Iniziative Audiovisive e Telematiche (SANDOKAN)


(Case T-1/24)
                (1)

(EU trade mark - Revocation proceedings - International registration designating the European Union - Word mark SANDOKAN - Lack of genuine use of the mark - Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(C/2025/5450)
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Applicant: Kartroi LLC (Orlando, Florida, United States) (represented by: M. Baccarelli, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: R. Raponi, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Luxvide Finanziaria per Iniziative Audiovisive e Telematiche SpA (Rome, Italy) (represented by: L. Goglia and B. Villa, lawyers)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 21 September 2023 (Case R 20/2023-2).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Kartroi LLC to pay the costs.






(1)  
            OJ C, C/2024/1704, 4.3.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/5450/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-1024/23: Judgment of the General Court of 3 September 2025 – London EV v Commission (Environment – Regulation (EU) 2019/631 – Carbon dioxide emission performance standards – New passenger cars – Commission Decision specifying the values relating to the performance of manufacturers and pools of manufacturers of new passenger cars and new light commercial vehicles for 2021 – Scope – Special purpose vehicle – Wheelchair accessible vehicle – Equal treatment – Proportionality – Legitimate expectations – Obligation to state reasons – Plea of illegality)
Date: 2025-09-03
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: environmental standard, equal treatment, greenhouse gas, light-duty vehicle, motor car, motor vehicle, motor vehicle industry, motor vehicle pollution, principle of proportionality, reduction of gas emissions








C_202505328EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/5328


13.10.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 3 September 2025 – London EV v Commission


(Case T-1024/23)
                (1)

(Environment - Regulation (EU) 2019/631 - Carbon dioxide emission performance standards - New passenger cars - Commission Decision specifying the values relating to the performance of manufacturers and pools of manufacturers of new passenger cars and new light commercial vehicles for 2021 - Scope - Special purpose vehicle - Wheelchair accessible vehicle - Equal treatment - Proportionality - Legitimate expectations - Obligation to state reasons - Plea of illegality)
(C/2025/5328)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: London EV Co. Ltd (Coventry, United Kingdom) (represented by: M. Struys, V. Ciudin and C. Verney, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Flett and B. Cullen, acting as Agents)

Interveners in support of the defendant: European Parliament (represented by: W. Kuzmienko and L. Taïeb, acting as Agents), Council of the European Union (represented by: A. Maceroni and N. Brzezinski, acting as Agents)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2023/1623 of 3 August 2023 specifying the values relating to the performance of manufacturers and pools of manufacturers of new passenger cars and new light commercial vehicles for the calendar year 2021 and the values to be used for the calculation of the specific emission targets from 2025 onwards, pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2019/631 of the European Parliament and of the Council and correcting Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/2087 (OJ 2023 L 200, p. 5), in so far as it concerns the applicant.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders EV Co. Ltd to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission;










3.


Orders the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union to bear their own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C, C/2023/1308, 11.12.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/5328/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-260/25, Olteski: Order of the President of the Court of 3 September 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie – Poland) – mBank S.A. v AWP, KP
Date: 2025-09-03
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: access to the courts, bank, claim, consumer protection, limitation of legal proceedings, principle of legal certainty, principle of proportionality, unfair terms of contract








C_202600097EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2026/97


5.1.2026






Order of the President of the Court of 3 September 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie – Poland) – mBank S.A. v AWP, KP


(Case C-260/25,
                (1)
Olteski
                (2)
)

(C/2026/97)
Language of the case: Polish
The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C, C/2025/4133.

(2)  The name of the present case is a fictitious name. It does not correspond to the real name of any party to the proceedings.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2026/97/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)