do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-583/25: Action brought on 19 August 2025 – Pumpyanskiy v Council
Date: 2025-08-19
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, Russia, Russo-Ukrainian issue, Ukraine, economic sanctions, indemnification, international sanctions, maladministration, natural person, right to an effective remedy








C_202505361EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/5361


13.10.2025






Action brought on 19 August 2025 – Pumpyanskiy v Council


(Case T-583/25)

(C/2025/5361)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Alexander Dmitrievich Pumpyanskiy (Conches, Switzerland) (represented by: T. Bontinck, M. Brésart, J. Goffin and F. Patuelli, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:






—


find that the Council unlawfully failed to take the measures necessary to comply with the judgment of the General Court of 2 April 2025 in Case T-221/24, thereby infringing Article 266 TFEU and the principles of res judicata, effective judicial protection and sound administration;










—


order the Council to pay an amount of EUR 10 000 in respect of the non-material harm suffered by the applicant;










—


order the Council to pay the costs of the proceedings.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on a single plea in law alleging infringement of Article 266 TFEU and of the principles of res judicata, effective judicial protection and sound administration.
The applicant claims that the Council has failed to take the measures necessary to comply with the judgment of 2 April 2025, Pumpyanskiy v Council (T-221/24, not published, EU:T:2025:350) in manifest breach of Article 266 TFEU. Despite the lack of suspensive effect of that judgment, the Council has failed to reconsider the applicant’s situation and has maintained the latter under restrictive measures for several months, with no new justification. That conduct has neutralised the effects of the aforementioned judgment annulling the original act, in breach of res judicata. Furthermore, that failure constitutes an infringement of the right to effective judicial protection, guaranteed by Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (‘the Charter’), in that it deprives the applicant of the practical effects of the decision handed down in his favour. The prolonged silence on the part of the Council, despite the finding of illegality, reveals serious institutional deficiencies and a breach of the principle of sound administration, enshrined in Article 41 of the Charter, which requires that the administration handle affairs impartially, fairly and within a reasonable time.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/5361/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-679/24: Order of the General Court of 19 August 2025 – Menacho v Commission (Civil service – Members of the contract staff – Retirement pension – Pension rights acquired before entry into the service of the European Union – Transfer to the EU scheme – Crediting of additional pensionable years – Request for repayment of part of the capital transferred – Decision determining pension rights – Equal treatment – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law – Unjust enrichment – Inadmissibility)
Date: 2025-08-19
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: damages, equal treatment, retired person, servant (EU), staff regulations (EU), transfer of pension rights








C_202505584EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/5584


27.10.2025






Order of the General Court of 19 August 2025 – Menacho v Commission


(Case T-679/24)
                (1)

(Civil service - Members of the contract staff - Retirement pension - Pension rights acquired before entry into the service of the European Union - Transfer to the EU scheme - Crediting of additional pensionable years - Request for repayment of part of the capital transferred - Decision determining pension rights - Equal treatment - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law - Unjust enrichment - Inadmissibility)
(C/2025/5584)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Manuela Menacho (Alicante, Spain) (represented by: D. Grisay, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J.-F. Brakeland and A. Baeckelmans, acting as Agents)

Re:

By her action under Article 270 TFEU, the applicant seeks, in essence, primarily, the annulment of the implicit decision of the European Commission of 30 September 2024 rejecting her complaint brought against the notice of 18 March 2024 determining her retirement pension rights and, consequently, referral of her case back to the appointing authority for a determination of the amount to be repaid to her and, in the alternative, an order for payment by the Commission of the amount of EUR 3 265,94 on the ground of unjust enrichment

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed as manifestly lacking any foundation in law in part and inadmissible in part.










2.


There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the applications for leave to intervene lodged by the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union.










3.


Ms Manuela Menacho shall bear her own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.










4.


The Parliament and the Council shall bear their own costs relating to their applications for leave to intervene.






(1)  
            OJ C, C/2025/928, 17.2.2025.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/5584/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-10/25: Order of the General Court of 19 August 2025 – Stassin v Commission (Civil service – Members of the contract staff – Retirement pension – Pension rights acquired before entry into the service of the European Union – Transfer to the EU scheme – Crediting of additional pensionable years – Request for repayment of part of the capital transferred – Decision determining pension rights – Unjust enrichment – Time limit for complaints – Inadmissibility)
Date: 2025-08-19
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: damages, retired person, servant (EU), staff regulations (EU), transfer of pension rights








C_202505586EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/5586


27.10.2025






Order of the General Court of 19 August 2025 – Stassin v Commission


(Case T-10/25)
                (1)

(Civil service - Members of the contract staff - Retirement pension - Pension rights acquired before entry into the service of the European Union - Transfer to the EU scheme - Crediting of additional pensionable years - Request for repayment of part of the capital transferred - Decision determining pension rights - Unjust enrichment - Time limit for complaints - Inadmissibility)
(C/2025/5586)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Maryline Stassin (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: D. Grisay, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Baeckelmans and G. Niddam, acting as Agents)

Re:

By her action under Article 270 TFEU, the applicant seeks, in essence, primarily, the annulment of the decision of the European Commission of 4 October 2024 rejecting her complaint brought against the notice of 6 November 2023 determining her retirement pension rights and, consequently, referral of her case back to the appointing authority for a determination of the amount to be repaid to her and, in the alternative, an order for payment by the Commission of the amount of EUR 93 909,69 on the ground of unjust enrichment.

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed as inadmissible.










2.


There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the applications for leave to intervene lodged by the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union.










3.


Ms Maryline Stassin shall bear her own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.










4.


The Parliament and the Council shall bear their own costs relating to their applications for leave to intervene.






(1)  
            OJ C, C/2025/932, 17.2.2025.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/5586/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-681/24: Order of the General Court of 19 August 2025 – Inescop v Commission (Arbitration clause – Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007-2013) – OLAF investigation – Rejection of costs – Repayment of the sums advanced – Damages – Locus standi of the defendant – Excusable error – Inadmissibility)
Date: 2025-08-19
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European Anti-fraud Office, Framework Programme for Research and Development, damages, eligibility criteria, financial aid, reimbursement of aid








C_202505585EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/5585


27.10.2025






Order of the General Court of 19 August 2025 – Inescop v Commission


(Case T-681/24)
                (1)

(Arbitration clause - Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007-2013) - OLAF investigation - Rejection of costs - Repayment of the sums advanced - Damages - 
Locus standi
 of the defendant - Excusable error - Inadmissibility)
(C/2025/5585)
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: Asociación de investigación para la industria del calzado y conexas (Inescop) (Alicante, Spain) (represented by: C. Morales Ruiz, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: S. Romoli, acting as Agent)

Re:

By its action based, primarily, on Article 272 TFUE, and, in the alternative, on Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of the letter of the Research Executive Agency (REA) of 28 October 2024, by which the latter requested the applicant to repay the sum of EUR 128 271,95 in respect of an unjustified contribution paid in the context of grant agreements relating to the Smartpif, Nanofoot and Demoultragrip projects, financed under the Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007-2013), as well as the sum of EUR 12 827,20 in respect of damages, as a result of irregularities in the implementation of those projects.

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed as inadmissible.










2.


Asociación de investigación para la industria del calzado y conexas (Inescop) shall pay the costs.






(1)  
            OJ C, C/2025/1439, 10.3.2025.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/5585/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Euro exchange rates – 18 August 2025
Date: 2025-08-19
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_202503812EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/3812


19.8.2025






Euro exchange rates (1)


            18 August 2025
         
(C/2025/3812)


1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,1673 




JPY


Japanese yen


172,27 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4639 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,86210 




SEK


Swedish krona


11,1570 




CHF


Swiss franc


0,9423 




ISK


Iceland króna


143,00 




NOK


Norwegian krone


11,8840 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


24,471 




HUF


Hungarian forint


395,55 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,2500 




RON


Romanian leu


5,0599 




TRY


Turkish lira


47,7015 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,7931 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,6098 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


9,1256 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,9665 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,4972 




KRW


South Korean won


1 618,17 




ZAR


South African rand


20,5604 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


8,3798 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


18 934,19 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,9289 




PHP


Philippine peso


66,522 




RUB


Russian rouble


 




THB


Thai baht


37,908 




BRL


Brazilian real


6,3128 




MXN


Mexican peso


21,9597 




INR


Indian rupee


101,9985 






(1)  
            Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3812/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-571/25: Action brought on 19 August 2025 – Europastry v EUIPO – Rupp (ALMA DE CEREAL)
Date: 2025-08-19
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, bakery, bread, confectionery product, frozen product, pastry-making, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_202505094EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/5094


29.9.2025






Action brought on 19 August 2025 – Europastry v EUIPO – Rupp (ALMA DE CEREAL)


(Case T-571/25)

(C/2025/5094)
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicant: Europastry, SA (Sant Cugat del Vallès, Spain) (represented by: L. Estropá Navarro, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Rupp AG (Hörbranz, Austria)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark ALMA DE CEREAL – Application for registration No 18 836 357
         

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 23 June 2025 in Case R 434/2025-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order EUIPO and Rupp AG, should the latter intervene, to pay the costs.





Plea in law







—


Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/5094/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-556/25, Haluška: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Najvyšší správny súd Slovenskej republiky lodged on 19 August 2025 – Haluška, s.r.o. v Okresný úrad Ružomberok, katastrálny odbor
Date: 2025-08-19
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: administrative transparency, easement, electrical energy, energy law, energy production, equal treatment, right of establishment, single market








C_202505813EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/5813


10.11.2025






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Najvyšší správny súd Slovenskej republiky lodged on 19 August 2025 – Haluška, s.r.o. v Okresný úrad Ružomberok, katastrálny odbor


(Case C-556/25, Haluška)

(C/2025/5813)
Language of the case: Slovak

Referring court

Najvyšší správny súd Slovenskej republiky

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Haluška, s.r.o.

Defendant: Okresný úrad Ružomberok, katastrálny odbor

Questions referred







1.


Should national legislation in which the national legislator has automatically excluded small-scale producers of electricity operating in accordance with a simplified procedure under Article 8(3) of Directive (EU) 2019/944 (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 June 2019 on common rules for the internal market for electricity and amending Directive 2012/27/EU (recast) from entitlement to rights granted under national law corresponding to easements which facilitate business operations in the energy sector, [while] allowing all remaining producers of electricity entitlement to those rights, be deemed to fall within the scope of EU law in the light of Article 194(1)(a) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and Article 8(1) and (3) and Article 9(1) of that Directive?










2.


In the event that the first question is answered in the affirmative: should Article 8(1) and (3) in conjunction with Article 9(1) of Directive (EU) 2019/944 of the European Parliament and of the Council be construed as being incompatible with national legislation in which the national legislator has automatically excluded small-scale producers of electricity operating in accordance with a simplified procedure under Article 8(3) of that Directive from entitlement to rights granted under national law corresponding to easements which facilitate business operations in the energy sector, [while] allowing all remaining producers of electricity entitlement to those rights?






(1)  
            OJ 2019 L 158, p. 125.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/5813/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Commission notice pursuant to Article 17(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community – Public tender for the operation of scheduled air services in accordance with public service obligations
Date: 2025-08-19
Institutions: Directorate-General for Mobility and Transport, European Commission
Subjects: Bavaria, France, Grand Est, air transport, intra-EU transport, invitation to tender, services of general interest, transport regulations








C_202504675EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/4675


19.8.2025






Commission notice pursuant to Article 17(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community
Public tender for the operation of scheduled air services in accordance with public service obligations
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2025/4675)







Member State


France




Routes concerned


Strasbourg – Munich




Period of validity of the contract


9 April 2026 to 8 April 2028




Deadline for the submission of applications and tenders


20 October 2025 by 17:00, Paris (France) time




Address where the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the public tender and the public service obligation can be obtained







Directorate-General of Civil Aviation




Directorate for Air Transport




Sub-Directorate for Air Services (SDS1)




50 rue Henry Farman




75720 Paris Cedex 15




FRANCE




Tel. +33 388594141
Fax +33 388594146
Buyer profile: https://www.marches-publics.gouv.fr







ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4675/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Commission notice pursuant to Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community – Imposition of public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services
Date: 2025-08-19
Institutions: Directorate-General for Mobility and Transport, European Commission
Subjects: Bavaria, France, Grand Est, air transport, intra-EU transport, services of general interest, transport regulations








C_202504672EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/4672


19.8.2025






Commission notice pursuant to Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community
Imposition of public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2025/4672)







Member State


France




Route concerned


Strasbourg-Munich




Date of entry into force of the public service obligations


9 April 2026




Address where the text and any relevant information and/or documentation relating to the public service obligation can be obtained


Order of 23 July 2025 amending the public service obligations of scheduled air services between Strasbourg and Munich
NOR: ATDA2521162A

https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/jorf/id/JORFTEXT000052001231

For further information please contact:





Directorate-General of Civil Aviation




DTA/SDS1




50 rue Henry Farman




75720 Paris Cedex 15




FRANCE




Tel. +33 158094321






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4672/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-574/25: Action brought on 19 August 2025 – Nutristar v EUIPO – Anielska and Tyrawski (NUTRISTAR)
Date: 2025-08-19
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, animal feedingstuffs, cattle, food additive, food supplement, registered trade mark, trade-mark law, vitamin








C_202505225EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/5225


6.10.2025






Action brought on 19 August 2025 – Nutristar v EUIPO – Anielska and Tyrawski (NUTRISTAR)


(Case T-574/25)

(C/2025/5225)
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicant: Nutristar SpA (Reggio Emilia, Italy) (represented by: M. Gómez Calvo and E. Cebollero González, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office

Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Agnieszka Anielska (Warsaw, Poland) and Bartosz Tyrawski (Warsaw)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark NUTRISTAR – European Union trade mark No 8 232 258
         

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 20 June 2025 in Case R 1846/2024-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision to the extent that it revoked the trade mark at issue for all registered products in classes 5 and 31;










—


order EUIPO to bear the costs of the proceedings before the General Court and the other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal to bear the costs deriving from the proceedings before the Cancellation Division and the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO.





Plea in law







—


Infringement, in substance, of Article 94 read together with Article 18 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/5225/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Corrigendum to Commission Delegated Decision (EU) 2025/934 of 5 March 2025 amending Decision 2000/532/EC as regards an update of the list of waste in relation to battery-related waste (OJ L, 2025/934, 20.5.2025)
Date: 2025-08-19
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: classification, dangerous substance, electricity storage device, hazardous waste, lithium, waste management








L_202590657EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
L series













2025/90657


19.8.2025






Corrigendum to Commission Delegated Decision (EU) 2025/934 of 5 March 2025 amending Decision 2000/532/EC as regards an update of the list of waste in relation to battery-related waste

(
Official Journal of the European Union L, 2025/934, 20 May 2025
)


On page 2, Article 2, second paragraph:
for:


                  ‘It shall apply from 9 November 2026.’,

read:


                  ‘It shall apply from 9 December 2026.’.



ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dec_del/2025/934/corrigendum/2025-08-19/oj
ISSN 1977-0677 (electronic edition)