do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-452/24, Lunapark Scandinavia: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 August 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein oikeus – Finland) – Lunapark Scandinavia Oy Ltd v Hardeco Finland Oy (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Trade marks – Directive (EU) 2015/2436 – Article 10 – Exclusive rights of the proprietor of a registered trade mark to oppose the use, by a third party, of a sign which is identical with, or similar to, that mark – Infringement action – Limitations of the exclusive rights of the proprietor of that trade mark – Article 9 and Article 18(1) – Preclusion due to acquiescence – Exhaustive nature of the conditions under which that preclusion can arise – Inapplicability of a general principle of national law that provides for preclusion of the right to prohibit the use of a sign in situations other than those provided for in those articles)
Date: 2025-08-01
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: application of EU law, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_202505193EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/5193


6.10.2025






Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 August 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein oikeus – Finland) – Lunapark Scandinavia Oy Ltd v Hardeco Finland Oy


(Case C-452/24,
                (1)
Lunapark Scandinavia)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Trade marks - Directive (EU) 2015/2436 - Article 10 - Exclusive rights of the proprietor of a registered trade mark to oppose the use, by a third party, of a sign which is identical with, or similar to, that mark - Infringement action - Limitations of the exclusive rights of the proprietor of that trade mark - Article 9 and Article 18(1) - Preclusion due to acquiescence - Exhaustive nature of the conditions under which that preclusion can arise - Inapplicability of a general principle of national law that provides for preclusion of the right to prohibit the use of a sign in situations other than those provided for in those articles)
(C/2025/5193)
Language of the case: Finnish

Referring court

Korkein oikeus

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant: Lunapark Scandinavia Oy Ltd

Respondent: Hardeco Finland Oy

Operative part of the judgment

Article 10 of Directive (EU) 2015/2436 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2015 to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks
must be interpreted as precluding the applicability of a general principle of national law which provides that the right of the proprietor of a registered trade mark to prohibit the use by a third party of a sign identical with, or similar to, that trade mark for goods identical with or similar to those for which that mark was registered is precluded, in a situation other than that referred to in Article 18(1) of that directive, read in conjunction with Article 9(1) or (2) thereof.


(1)  OJ C, C/2024/5221.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/5193/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.12056 – AEQUITA / LYONDELLBASELL INDUSTRIES HOLDINGS (PARTS OF EUROPEAN OLEFINS AND POLYOLEFINS BUSINESS))
Date: 2025-08-01
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: France, Germany, Netherlands, Spain, United Kingdom, chemical industry, economic concentration, hydrocarbon, investment company, merger control, motor vehicle industry, oil industry








C_202504529EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/4529


12.8.2025






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.12056 – AEQUITA / LYONDELLBASELL INDUSTRIES HOLDINGS (PARTS OF EUROPEAN OLEFINS AND POLYOLEFINS BUSINESS))
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2025/4529)

On 1 August 2025, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32025M12056. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4529/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections – SA.117742
Date: 2025-08-01
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Netherlands, State aid, aquaculture, control of State aid, fishing industry








C_202504395EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/4395


1.8.2025






Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union
Cases where the Commission raises no objections
SA.117742
(C/2025/4395)








Date of adoption of the decision


6.6.2025




Aid number


SA.117742




Member State


Netherlands




Region


Netherlands




Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)


NL_RVO_LVVN_NV_V - Regeling sanering garnalenvisserij




Legal basis


Regeling sanering garnalenvisserij




Type of measure


Scheme


 




Objective


Fisheries and aquaculture, Other measures (Fisheries Guidelines point 5.7)




Form of aid


Direct grant




Budget


Overall budget: 48 500 000  EUR
Annual budget: 16 170 000  EUR




Intensity


100,0 %




Duration


Until 1.1.2028




Economic sectors


Fishing and aquaculture




Name and address of the granting authority







Minister van Landbouw, Visserij, Voedselzekerheid en Natuur




Postbus 20401, 2500 EK Den Haag








Other information


 




The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search?caseInstrument=SA



ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4395/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-100/23 P: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 August 2025 – PNB Banka v ECB (Appeal – Economic and monetary policy – Prudential supervision of credit institutions – Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 – Procedural rights – Effective judicial protection – Inadmissibility)
Date: 2025-08-01
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU banking union, Latvia, admissibility, banking supervision, credit institution, financial supervision, right to justice








C_202505056EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/5056


29.9.2025






Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 August 2025 – PNB Banka v ECB


(Case C-100/23 P)
                (1)

(Appeal - Economic and monetary policy - Prudential supervision of credit institutions - Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 - Procedural rights - Effective judicial protection - Inadmissibility)
(C/2025/5056)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellant: PNB Banka AS (represented by: O. Behrends, Rechtsanwalt)

Other party to the proceedings: European Central Bank (ECB) (represented by: F. Bonnard, C. Hernández Saseta and A. Korb, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the appeal;










2.


Orders PNB Banka AS to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Central Bank (ECB).






(1)  
            OJ C 155, 2.5.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/5056/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections – SA.118136
Date: 2025-08-01
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Slovenia, State aid, aid to agriculture, cereal-growing, control of State aid, food industry, leguminous vegetable, oleaginous plant, regions of Slovenia, retail trade








C_202504394EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/4394


1.8.2025






Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union
Cases where the Commission raises no objections
SA.118136
(C/2025/4394)








Date of adoption of the decision


24.6.2025




Aid number


SA.118136




Member State


Slovenia




Region


Vzhodna Slovenija, Zahodna Slovenija




Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)


Promocija in informiranje o kmetijskih proizvodih v sektorju žit za obdobje 2025–2028




Legal basis


Odredba o Programu promocije sektorja pridelave in predelave žit za obdobje 2025–2027 (osnutek)




Type of measure


Scheme


 




Objective


Agriculture; Forestry; Rural areas, Aid for promotion measures in favour of agricultural products




Form of aid


Subsidised services




Budget


Overall budget: 575 800  EUR




Intensity


100,0 %




Duration


Until 31.12.2028




Economic sectors


Growing of cereals, other than rice, leguminous crops and oil seeds, Manufacture of grain mill products, starches and starch products, Retail sale of food, beverages and tobacco




Name and address of the granting authority







Ministrstvo za kmetijstvo, gozdarstvo in prehrano




Dunajska 22, 1000 Ljubljana








Other information


 




The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search?caseInstrument=SA



ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4394/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-76/24, Tradeinn Retail Services: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 1 August 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof – Germany) – Tradeinn Retail Services S.L. v PH (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Intellectual property – Trade marks – Directive (EU) 2015/2436 – Approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks – Article 10(3)(b) – Rights conferred by a trade mark – Right to prevent a third party from offering the goods, putting them on the market or stocking them for those purposes under the sign – Online trade – Goods offered for sale from a Member State other than that in which the mark is registered – Concept of stocking)
Date: 2025-08-01
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: approximation of laws, electronic commerce, goods, registered trade mark, storage, trade-mark law








C_202505185EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/5185


6.10.2025






Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 1 August 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof – Germany) – Tradeinn Retail Services S.L. v PH


(Case C-76/24,
                (1)
Tradeinn Retail Services)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Intellectual property - Trade marks - Directive (EU) 2015/2436 - Approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks - Article 10(3)(b) - Rights conferred by a trade mark - Right to prevent a third party from offering the goods, putting them on the market or stocking them for those purposes under the sign - Online trade - Goods offered for sale from a Member State other than that in which the mark is registered - Concept of ‘stocking’)
(C/2025/5185)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesgerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Tradeinn Retail Services S.L.

Defendant: PH

Operative part of the judgment







1.


Article 10(3)(b) of Directive (EU) 2015/2436 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2015 to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks
must be interpreted as meaning that the proprietor of a trade mark protected in one Member State may prohibit a third party from stocking, in the territory of another Member State, goods under a sign in the circumstances referred to in Article 10(2) of that directive in order to offer those goods for sale or to put them on the market in the Member State in which that mark is protected.










2.


Article 10(3)(b) of Directive 2015/2436
must be interpreted as meaning that in order to ‘stock’, within the meaning of that provision, goods under a sign in the circumstances referred to in Article 10(2) of that directive, it is sufficient to have control or direction over the person who has direct and actual control over those goods.






(1)  OJ C, C/2024/3149.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/5185/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-102/23 P: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 August 2025 – PNB Banka v ECB (Appeal – Economic and monetary policy – Prudential supervision of credit institutions – Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 – Procedural rights – Statement of reasons)
Date: 2025-08-01
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU banking union, Latvia, bank, banking supervision, credit institution, right to justice, trade licence








C_202505058EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/5058


29.9.2025






Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 August 2025 – PNB Banka v ECB


(Case C-102/23 P)
                (1)

(Appeal - Economic and monetary policy - Prudential supervision of credit institutions - Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 - Procedural rights - Statement of reasons)
(C/2025/5058)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellant: PNB Banka AS (represented by: O. Behrends, Rechtsanwalt)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Central Bank (ECB) (represented by: F. Bonnard, C. Hernández Saseta and M. Ioannidis, acting as Agents), Republic of Latvia

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the appeal;










2.


Orders PNB Banka AS to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Central Bank (ECB).






(1)  
            OJ C 155, 2.5.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/5058/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-528/25: Action brought on 1 August 2025 – Magic Box Int. Toys v EUIPO – KMA Concepts (SUPERZINGS RIVALS OF KABOOM)
Date: 2025-08-01
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, electronic game, registered trade mark, toy industry, trade-mark law








C_202504985EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/4985


22.9.2025






Action brought on 1 August 2025 – Magic Box Int. Toys v EUIPO – KMA Concepts (SUPERZINGS RIVALS OF KABOOM)


(Case T-528/25)

(C/2025/4985)
Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: Magic Box Int. Toys SL (Sant Cugat del Vallés, Spain) (represented by: M. Monteagudo Monedero, F. García Pérez and M. Calvo i Carmona, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: KMA Concepts Ltd (Kowloon, Hong Kong, China)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘SUPERZINGS RIVALS OF KABOOM’ – EU trade mark No 18 132 862
         

Proceedings before EUIPO: Invalidity proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 28 May 2025 in Case R 1606/2024-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should annul the contested decision.

Pleas in law







—


Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;










—


Infringement of Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4985/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-404/24, Dimnev: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 1 August 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski gradski sad – Bulgaria) – Criminal proceedings against KP (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Directive (EU) 2016/343 – Article 6 – Burden of proof that the accused person is guilty – Second paragraph of Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right of access to an independent and impartial tribunal – Charge withdrawn in part by the public prosecutor’s office during the hearing – Obligation for the court to rule on the elements of the charge not maintained at the hearing)
Date: 2025-08-01
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: charge, criminal proceedings, independence of the judiciary, judicial cooperation in criminal matters in the EU, proof, right to justice, rights of the defence








C_202505190EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/5190


6.10.2025






Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 1 August 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski gradski sad – Bulgaria) – Criminal proceedings against KP


(Case C-404/24,
                (1)
Dimnev
                (2)
)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Area of freedom, security and justice - Judicial cooperation in criminal matters - Directive (EU) 2016/343 - Article 6 - Burden of proof that the accused person is guilty - Second paragraph of Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Right of access to an independent and impartial tribunal - Charge withdrawn in part by the public prosecutor’s office during the hearing - Obligation for the court to rule on the elements of the charge not maintained at the hearing)
(C/2025/5190)
Language of the case: Bulgarian

Referring court

Sofiyski gradski sad

Party in the main proceedings

KP

other party: Sofiyska gradska prokuratura

Operative part of the judgment

Article 6(1) of Directive (EU) 2016/343 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 2016 on the strengthening of certain aspects of the presumption of innocence and of the right to be present at the trial in criminal proceedings, and the second paragraph of Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union,
must be interpreted as not precluding national legislation pursuant to which a criminal court is required to rule on the indictment on the basis of its own firm conviction, even though the public prosecutor, after submitting evidence at the hearing which, according to that criminal court, makes it possible to convict the accused person of the offences set out in that indictment, requests, as regards some of the acts referred to in that indictment, that that person be acquitted or convicted of a less serious offence.


(1)  OJ C, C/2024/4956.

(2)  The name of the present case is a fictitious name. It does not correspond to the real name of any party to the proceedings.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/5190/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-99/23 P: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 August 2025 – PNB Banka v ECB (Appeal – Economic and monetary policy – Prudential supervision of credit institutions – Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 – Procedural rights – Effective judicial protection – Inadmissibility)
Date: 2025-08-01
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU banking union, Latvia, bank, banking supervision, credit institution, right to justice








C_202505055EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/5055


29.9.2025






Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 August 2025 – PNB Banka v ECB


(Case C-99/23 P)
                (1)

(Appeal - Economic and monetary policy - Prudential supervision of credit institutions - Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 - Procedural rights - Effective judicial protection - Inadmissibility)
(C/2025/5055)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellant: PNB Banka AS (represented by: O. Behrends, Rechtsanwalt)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Central Bank (ECB) (represented by: F. Bonnard, C. Hernández Saseta and A. Korb, acting as Agents), European Commission (represented initially by A. Nijenhuis, A. Steiblytė and D. Triantafyllou, acting as Agents, and subsequently by A. Steiblytė and D. Triantafyllou, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the appeal;










2.


Orders PNB Banka AS to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Central Bank (ECB) and by the European Commission.






(1)  
            OJ C 155, 2.5.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/5055/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.12042 – DSBJ / GMD)
Date: 2025-08-01
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, electronics industry, hygiene product, medical device, merger control, motor vehicle industry, non-durable goods, research and development, solar energy, vehicle parts








C_202504543EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/4543


12.8.2025






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.12042 – DSBJ / GMD)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2025/4543)

On 1 August 2025, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32025M12042. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4543/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)