do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-433/24, Galerie Karsten Greve: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 1 August 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État – France) – Galerie Karsten Greve v Ministère de l’Économie, des Finances et de la Souveraineté industrielle et numérique (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Special arrangements for second-hand goods, works of art, collectors’ items and antiques – Taxable dealers – Margin scheme – Article 316(1)(b) – Option to apply the margin scheme – Concept of supply of a work of art by the creator – Supply by the creator through a legal person)
Date: 2025-08-01
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: VAT, legal person, literary and artistic property, supply, work of art








C_202505192EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/5192


6.10.2025






Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 1 August 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État – France) – Galerie Karsten Greve v Ministère de l’Économie, des Finances et de la Souveraineté industrielle et numérique


(Case C-433/24,
                (1)
Galerie Karsten Greve)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Taxation - Common system of value added tax (VAT) - Directive 2006/112/EC - Special arrangements for second-hand goods, works of art, collectors’ items and antiques - Taxable dealers - Margin scheme - Article 316(1)(b) - Option to apply the margin scheme - Concept of ‘supply of a work of art by the creator’ - Supply by the creator through a legal person)
(C/2025/5192)
Language of the case: French

Referring court

Conseil d’État

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Galerie Karsten Greve

Defendant: Ministère de l’Économie, des Finances et de la Souveraineté industrielle et numérique

Operative part of the judgment

Article 316(1)(b) of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax must be interpreted as meaning that the supply by taxable dealers of works of art supplied to them by the creator or his or her successors in title acting through a legal person falls within the scope of that provision, provided that, first, the supply by the legal person is attributable to the creator or his or her successors in title, which is the case where the creator or successors in title have established that legal person for the purpose of marketing the works of art created by the creator and, second, the supply of those works of art to the taxable dealer constitutes the first introduction of those works of art onto the EU market.


(1)  OJ C, C/2024/5403.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/5192/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-101/23 P: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 August 2025 – PNB Banka v ECB (Appeal – Economic and monetary policy – Prudential supervision of credit institutions – Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 – Procedural rights – Effective judicial protection – Inadmissibility)
Date: 2025-08-01
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU banking union, Latvia, bank, banking supervision, right to justice, shareholding








C_202505057EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/5057


29.9.2025






Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 August 2025 – PNB Banka v ECB


(Case C-101/23 P)
                (1)

(Appeal - Economic and monetary policy - Prudential supervision of credit institutions - Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 - Procedural rights - Effective judicial protection - Inadmissibility)
(C/2025/5057)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellant: PNB Banka AS (represented by: O. Behrends, Rechtsanwalt)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Central Bank (ECB) (represented by: F. Bonnard, C. Hernández Saseta and A. Korb, acting as Agents), European Commission (represented initially by A. Nijenhuis, A. Steiblytė and D. Triantafyllou, acting as Agents, and subsequently by A. Steiblytė and D. Triantafyllou, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the appeal;










2.


Orders PNB Banka AS to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Central Bank (ECB) and by the European Commission.






(1)  
            OJ C 155, 2. 5.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/5057/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Euro exchange rates – 31 July 2025
Date: 2025-08-01
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_202503662EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/3662


1.8.2025






Euro exchange rates (1)


            31 July 2025
         
(C/2025/3662)


1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,1446 




JPY


Japanese yen


171,52 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4626 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,86490 




SEK


Swedish krona


11,1575 




CHF


Swiss franc


0,9297 




ISK


Iceland króna


142,20 




NOK


Norwegian krone


11,7740 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


24,571 




HUF


Hungarian forint


400,00 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,2728 




RON


Romanian leu


5,0757 




TRY


Turkish lira


46,4644 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,7762 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,5838 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,9851 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,9375 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,4845 




KRW


South Korean won


1 596,29 




ZAR


South African rand


20,7390 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


8,2350 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


18 882,87 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,8817 




PHP


Philippine peso


66,770 




RUB


Russian rouble


 




THB


Thai baht


37,400 




BRL


Brazilian real


6,3899 




MXN


Mexican peso


21,5455 




INR


Indian rupee


100,2950 






(1)  
            Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3662/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-70/24: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 1 August 2025 – Commission v Spain (Work-life balance directive) (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Article 258 TFEU – Work-life balance for parents and carers – Directive (EU) 2019/1158 – Article 20(1) – Failure to transpose and notify transposition measures – Article 260(3) TFEU – Application for the imposition of a lump sum and a daily penalty payment – Criteria for establishing the amount of the penalty)
Date: 2025-08-01
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: child care, national implementing measure, sanction (EU), work-life balance








C_202505184EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/5184


6.10.2025






Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 1 August 2025 – Commission v Spain (Work-life balance directive)


(Case C-70/24)
                (1)

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Article 258 TFEU - Work-life balance for parents and carers - Directive (EU) 2019/1158 - Article 20(1) - Failure to transpose and notify transposition measures - Article 260(3) TFEU - Application for the imposition of a lump sum and a daily penalty payment - Criteria for establishing the amount of the penalty)
(C/2025/5184)
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: European Commission (represented by: I. Galindo Martín and E. Schmidt, acting as Agents)

Defendant: Kingdom of Spain (represented by: A. Pérez-Zurita Gutiérrez, acting as Agent)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Declares that, by failing, on expiry of the period laid down in the reasoned opinion of the European Commission, to adopt all of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive (EU) 2019/1158 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 June 2019 on work-life balance for parents and carers and repealing Council Directive 2010/18/EU and, therefore, by failing to notify them to the Commission, the Kingdom of Spain has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 20(1) of Directive 2019/1158;










2.


Declares that, by failing, at the time of the Court’s examination of the facts, to adopt all of the necessary measures to transpose the provisions of Directive 2019/1158 into domestic law and, therefore, to notify those measures to the European Commission, the Kingdom of Spain has persisted in its failure to fulfil its obligations.










3.


Orders the Kingdom of Spain to pay to the European Commission:






—


a lump sum in the amount of EUR 6 832 000;










—


in the event that the failure to fulfil obligations established in point 1 of the operative part were to persist on the date of delivery of the present judgment, a daily penalty payment in the amount of EUR 19 700 from that date until that Member State has put an end to the failure to fulfil obligations.














4.


Orders the Kingdom of Spain to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission.






(1)  OJ C C/2024/2144.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/5184/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.12032 – BROOKFIELD / QATAR HOLDING / QUBE HOLDINGS / PATRICK TERMINALS)
Date: 2025-08-01
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Australia, New Zealand, South-East Asia, container, economic concentration, holding company, investment company, logistics, merger control, provision of services








C_202504522EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/4522


11.8.2025






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.12032 – BROOKFIELD / QATAR HOLDING / QUBE HOLDINGS / PATRICK TERMINALS)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2025/4522)

On 1 August 2025, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32025M12032. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4522/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections – SA.118444
Date: 2025-08-01
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Spain, State aid, control of State aid, telecommunications industry








C_202504396EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/4396


1.8.2025






Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union
Cases where the Commission raises no objections
SA.118444
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2025/4396)








Date of adoption of the decision


23.7.2025




Aid number


SA.118444




Member State


Spain




Region


 




Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)


TDIG - RRF – Spain – amendment of SA.103451 – Deployment of backhaul networks for mobile connectivity




Legal basis


Orden ETD/1054/2022, de 21 de octubre, por la que se establecen las bases reguladoras de la concesión de ayudas para la provisión de conexión de backhaul mediante fibra óptica a emplazamientos de las redes públicas de telefonía móvil y se procede a una primera convocatoria, en el marco del Plan de Recuperación, Transformación y Resiliencia, financiado por la Unión Europea-NextGenerationEU. Programa “Único 5G Redes-Backhaul Fibra Óptica”.




Type of measure


Scheme


 




Objective


Other




Form of aid


Direct grant




Budget


Overall budget: 500 000 000  EUR




Intensity


90,0 %




Duration


17.10.2022 - 31.12.2025




Economic sectors


Telecommunication




Name and address of the granting authority







Secretaría de Estado de Telecomunicaciones e Infraestructuras Digitales,




C/ Poeta Joan Maragall, 41 28071 MADRID








Other information


 




The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search?caseInstrument=SA



ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4396/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-69/24: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 1 August 2025 – European Commission v Ireland (Directive on work-life balance) (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Article 258 TFEU – Work-life balance for parents and carers – Directive (EU) 2019/1158 – Article 20(1) – Failure to transpose and notify transposition measures – Article 260(3) TFEU – Application for the imposition of a lump sum – Criteria for establishing the amount of the penalty)
Date: 2025-08-01
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: child care, national implementing measure, sanction (EU), work-life balance








C_202505183EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/5183


6.10.2025






Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 1 August 2025 – European Commission v Ireland (Directive on work-life balance)


(Case C-69/24)
                (1)

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Article 258 TFEU - Work-life balance for parents and carers - Directive (EU) 2019/1158 - Article 20(1) - Failure to transpose and notify transposition measures - Article 260(3) TFEU - Application for the imposition of a lump sum - Criteria for establishing the amount of the penalty)
(C/2025/5183)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: European Commission (represented by: J. Norris and E. Schmidt, acting as Agents)

Defendant: Ireland (represented by: M. Browne, Chief State Solicitor, S. Finnegan and A. Joyce, acting as Agents, and by C. Toland, Senior Counsel, and S. Brittain Barrister-at-Law)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Declares that, by failing, on expiry of the period laid down in the reasoned opinion of the European Commission, to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive (EU) 2019/1158 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 June 2019 on work-life balance for parents and carers and repealing Council Directive 2010/18/EU and, therefore, by failing to notify them to the Commission, Ireland has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 20(1) of Directive 2019/1158;










2.


Orders Ireland to pay to the European Commission a lump sum in the amount of EUR 1 540 000;










3.


Orders Ireland to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission.






(1)  OJ C, C/2024/2143.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/5183/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-772/24, Interfel: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 1 August 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État – France) – Association interprofessionnelle des fruits et légumes frais (Interfel) v Premier ministre and Others (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Packaging and packaging waste – Meaning – Directive 94/62/EC – Article 3 and Annex I – Labels affixed directly to fruit or vegetables – National legislation prohibiting such labels, with the exception of labels that are home-compostable and composed, in whole or in part, of biosourced materials)
Date: 2025-08-01
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: fruit, labelling, packaging product, vegetable








C_202505198EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/5198


6.10.2025






Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 1 August 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État – France) – Association interprofessionnelle des fruits et légumes frais (Interfel) v Premier ministre and Others


(Case C-772/24,
                (1)
Interfel)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Packaging and packaging waste - Meaning - Directive 94/62/EC - Article 3 and Annex I - Labels affixed directly to fruit or vegetables - National legislation prohibiting such labels, with the exception of labels that are home-compostable and composed, in whole or in part, of biosourced materials)
(C/2025/5198)
Language of the case: French

Referring court

Conseil d’État

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Association interprofessionnelle des fruits et légumes frais (Interfel)

Defendants: Premier ministre, Ministre de la Transition écologique, de l’Énergie, du Climat et de la Prévention des risques, Garde des sceaux, ministre de la Justice, Ministre de l’Économie, des Finances et de l’Industrie, Ministre de l’Agriculture, de la Souveraineté alimentaire et de la Forêt

Operative part of the judgment

Point (iii) of the third subparagraph of Article 3(1) of Directive 94/62/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 December 1994 on packaging and packaging waste, as amended by Directive (EU) 2018/852 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2018, and Annex I to Directive 94/62, as amended
must be interpreted as meaning that labels directly affixed to fruit and vegetables do not always constitute packaging within the meaning of Directive 94/62, as amended. Such labels can be regarded as packaging only if they fulfil one of the three packaging functions defined in the first subparagraph of Article 3(1) of Directive 94/62, as amended, and fall within the scope of one of the three categories of packaging listed and defined in points (a) to (c) of the second subparagraph of Article 3(1) of that directive, as amended.


(1)  OJ C, C/2025/887.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/5198/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-375/24, Keesing Deutschland: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 1 August 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Berlin-Brandenburg – Germany) – Keesing Deutschland GmbH v Finanzamt für Körperschaften II (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 98 – Option for the Member States to apply a reduced rate of VAT to certain supplies of goods and services – National legislation using the Combined Nomenclature to establish the coverage of the category of goods subject to a reduced rate – Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 – Combined Nomenclature – Tariff headings – Heading 4902 – Scope – Concept of periodicals – Books containing number sudoku games and published periodically – Absence of text composed mainly of alphabetic characters)
Date: 2025-08-01
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Combined Nomenclature, VAT rate, serial publication, specification of tariff heading, tax relief








C_202505189EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/5189


6.10.2025






Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 1 August 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Berlin-Brandenburg – Germany) – Keesing Deutschland GmbH v Finanzamt für Körperschaften II


(Case C-375/24,
                (1)
Keesing Deutschland)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Taxation - Common system of value added tax (VAT) - Directive 2006/112/EC - Article 98 - Option for the Member States to apply a reduced rate of VAT to certain supplies of goods and services - National legislation using the Combined Nomenclature to establish the coverage of the category of goods subject to a reduced rate - Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 - Combined Nomenclature - Tariff headings - Heading 4902  - Scope - Concept of ‘periodicals’ - Books containing number sudoku games and published periodically - Absence of text composed mainly of alphabetic characters)
(C/2025/5189)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Finanzgericht Berlin-Brandenburg

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Keesing Deutschland GmbH

Defendant: Finanzamt für Körperschaften II

Operative part of the judgment

Tariff heading 4902  of the Combined Nomenclature set out in Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff, in the version resulting from Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1602 of 11 October 2018,
must be interpreted as meaning that goods described as books bound in paper which contain mainly printed sudoku games, in which certain numbers in the series 1 to 9 are already entered in a grid, the other numbers having to be entered in the grid in a precise order, and which are published every eight weeks, come under that heading.


(1)  OJ C, C/2024/5211.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/5189/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-426/24 P: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 1 August 2025 – Romagnoli Fratelli v CPVO (Appeal – Community plant variety rights – Regulation (EC) No 2100/94 – Regulation (EC) No 874/2009 – Potato variety Melrose (EU 31618) – Failure to pay on time the annual fee due in respect of the Community plant variety right – Service – Cancellation of Community plant variety rights – MyPVR user area – Application for restitutio in integrum – Dismissal of application)
Date: 2025-08-01
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: payment, plant breeding, plant variety right, potato








C_202505191EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/5191


6.10.2025






Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 1 August 2025 – Romagnoli Fratelli v CPVO


(Case C-426/24 P)
                (1)

(Appeal - Community plant variety rights - Regulation (EC) No 2100/94 - Regulation (EC) No 874/2009 - Potato variety Melrose (EU 31618) - Failure to pay on time the annual fee due in respect of the Community plant variety right - Service - Cancellation of Community plant variety rights - MyPVR user area - Application for restitutio in integrum - Dismissal of application)
(C/2025/5191)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellant: Romagnoli Fratelli SpA (represented by: A. Iurato and E. Truffo, avvocati)

Other party to the proceedings: Community Plant Variety Office (CPVO) (represented initially by F. Mattina, M. Fortin and A. Christ as well as M. García-Moncó Fuente and O. Lamberti, acting as Agents, subsequently by F. Mattina, M. Fortin and A. Christ as well as M. García-Moncó Fuente and A. Pontecorvi, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the appeal;










2.


Orders Romagnoli Fratelli SpA to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C, C/2024/7153.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/5191/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)