do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1288 of 27 June 2025 imposing a provisional anti-dumping duty on imports of choline chloride originating in the People’s Republic of China (OJ L, 2025/1288, 30.6.2025)
Date: 2025-08-01
Institutions: Directorate-General for Trade and Economic Security, European Commission
Subjects: China, anti-dumping duty, chemical salt, import (EU), organic chemical, originating product








L_202590623EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
L series













2025/90623


1.8.2025






Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1288 of 27 June 2025 imposing a provisional anti-dumping duty on imports of choline chloride originating in the People’s Republic of China

(
Official Journal of the European Union L, 2025/1288, 30 June 2025
)


On page 42, in Article 1(1):
for:


                  ‘A provisional anti-dumping duty is imposed on imports of choline chloride, in all forms and purities, whether or not on a carrier, with a minimum choline chloride content of 30 % by weight, excluding calcium phosphoryl choline chloride tetrahydrate with CAS number 72556-74-2, currently falling under CN codes ex 2923 10 00 , ex 2309 90 31 , ex 2309 90 96  and ex 3824 99 96  (TARIC additional codes as listed in paragraph 2 and in Annex to this regulation) and originating in the People’s Republic of China.’
               

read:


                  ‘A provisional anti-dumping duty is imposed on imports of choline chloride, in all forms and purities, whether or not on a carrier, with a minimum choline chloride content of 30 % by weight, excluding calcium phosphoryl choline chloride tetrahydrate with CAS number 72556-74-2, currently falling under CN codes ex 2923 10 00 , ex 2309 90 31 , ex 2309 90 96 , ex 2106  and ex 3824 99 96  (TARIC additional codes as listed in paragraph 2 and in Annex to this regulation) and originating in the People’s Republic of China.’.



ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg_impl/2025/1288/corrigendum/2025-08-01/oj
ISSN 1977-0677 (electronic edition)
Case C-68/24: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 1 August 2025 – Commission v Belgium (Work-life balance directive) (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Article 258 TFEU – Work-life balance for parents and carers – Directive (EU) 2019/1158 – Article 20(1) – Failure to transpose and notify transposition measures – Article 260(3) TFEU – Application for the imposition of a lump sum – Criteria for establishing the amount of the penalty)
Date: 2025-08-01
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: child care, national implementing measure, sanction (EU), work-life balance








C_202505182EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/5182


6.10.2025






Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 1 August 2025 – Commission v Belgium (Work-life balance directive)


(Case C-68/24)
                (1)

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Article 258 TFEU - Work-life balance for parents and carers - Directive (EU) 2019/1158 - Article 20(1) - Failure to transpose and notify transposition measures - Article 260(3) TFEU - Application for the imposition of a lump sum - Criteria for establishing the amount of the penalty)
(C/2025/5182)
Language of the case: Dutch

Parties


Applicant: European Commission (represented by: E. Schmidt and F. Van Schaik, acting as Agents)

Defendant: Kingdom of Belgium (represented by: C. Jacob, C. Pochet and L. Van den Broeck, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Declares that, by failing, on the expiry of the period laid down in the reasoned opinion of the European Commission, to adopt all of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive (EU) 2019/1158 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 June 2019 on work-life balance for parents and carers and repealing Council Directive 2010/18/EU, and, therefore, by failing to notify those provisions to the Commission, the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 20(1) of Directive 2019/1158;










2.


Order the Kingdom of Belgium to pay to the European Commission a lump sum in the amount of EUR 2 352 000;










3.


Orders the Kingdom of Belgium to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission.






(1)  OJ C, C/2024/2142.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/5182/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-602/24, W. (Exportation without the knowledge of the taxable person): Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 1 August 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Wojewódzki Sąd Administracyjny w Warszawie – Poland) – W. sp. z o.o. v Dyrektor Izby Administracji Skarbowej w W. (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Exemptions on exportation – Article 146(1)(b) – Supply of goods dispatched or transported to a destination outside the European Union – Transport of goods outside the European Union following an agreement between the person acquiring the goods and the supplier providing for their supply in another Member State – Goods which have actually left the territory of the European Union – Proof – Refusal of the exemption on exportation – Principles of fiscal neutrality and proportionality)
Date: 2025-08-01
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: VAT, carriage of goods, customs document, export (EU), extra-EU trade, intra-EU trade, principle of proportionality, proof, supply, tax exemption








C_202505196EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/5196


6.10.2025






Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 1 August 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Wojewódzki Sąd Administracyjny w Warszawie – Poland) – W. sp. z o.o. v Dyrektor Izby Administracji Skarbowej w W.


(Case C-602/24,
                (1)
W. (Exportation without the knowledge of the taxable person))

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Taxation - Common system of value added tax (VAT) - Directive 2006/112/EC - Exemptions on exportation - Article 146(1)(b) - Supply of goods dispatched or transported to a destination outside the European Union - Transport of goods outside the European Union following an agreement between the person acquiring the goods and the supplier providing for their supply in another Member State - Goods which have actually left the territory of the European Union - Proof - Refusal of the exemption on exportation - Principles of fiscal neutrality and proportionality)
(C/2025/5196)
Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Wojewódzki Sąd Administracyjny w Warszawie

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: W. sp. z o.o.

Defendant: Dyrektor Izby Administracji Skarbowej w W.

Operative part of the judgment

Article 146(1)(b) of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax
must be interpreted as meaning that the exemption provided for in that provision covers a supply of goods initially declared by the supplier as an intra-Community supply which, without the supplier’s knowledge, was made outside the territory of the European Union by the person acquiring the goods, where the export at issue has been established by the tax authorities on the basis of the customs documents.


(1)  OJ C, C/2025/139.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/5196/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-703/23 P: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 1 August 2025 – Timchenko v Council (Appeal – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine – Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 1(1) in fine – Restrictive measures imposed on a natural person associated with another natural person who is in turn subject to restrictive measures – Concept of association in the case of two people who have a family relationship)
Date: 2025-08-01
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, Russia, Russo-Ukrainian issue, Ukraine, association, economic sanctions, indemnification, international sanctions, natural person, territorial dispute, territorial law








C_202505069EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/5069


29.9.2025






Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 1 August 2025 – Timchenko v Council


(Case C-703/23 P)
                (1)

(Appeal - Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine - Decision 2014/145/CFSP - Article 1(1) 
in fine
 - Restrictive measures imposed on a natural person associated with another natural person who is in turn subject to restrictive measures - Concept of ‘association in the case of two people who have a family relationship’)
(C/2025/5069)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Appellant: Elena Petrovna Timchenko (represented by: S. Bonifassi, T. Bontinck and E. Fedorova, avocats)

Other parties to the proceedings: Council of the European Union (represented by: M.-C. Cadilhac and M. V. Piessevaux, acting as Agents), European Commission (represented by: M. Carpus-Carcea, C. Giolito and H. Krämer, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the appeal;










2.


Orders Ms Elena Petrovna Timchenko to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C, C/2024/539.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/5069/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-542/25: Action brought on 1 August 2025 – LC v Commission
Date: 2025-08-01
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European official, indemnification, maladministration, rights of the defence, staff assessment








C_202505218EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/5218


6.10.2025






Action brought on 1 August 2025 – LC v Commission


(Case T-542/25)

(C/2025/5218)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: LC (represented by: S. Rodrigues and A. Champetier, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the applicant’s appraisal report in respect of the year 2024;










—


order the defendant to pay compensation for non-material harm suffered by the applicant, valued, ex aequo et bono, at EUR 20 000;










—


order the defendant to pay all the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law, alleging, first, manifest errors of assessment and, secondly, breach of the right to be heard and infringement of Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/5218/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections – SA.103925
Date: 2025-08-01
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Netherlands, North Holland, State aid, control of State aid, pharmaceutical industry, testing








C_202504348EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/4348


1.8.2025






Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union
Cases where the Commission raises no objections
SA.103925
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2025/4348)








Date of adoption of the decision


26.7.2024




Aid number


SA.103925




Member State


Netherlands




Region


KOP VAN NOORD-HOLLAND




Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)


SA.103004_NL_VWS_Medical isotopes_NewCo: PALLAS-programme




Legal basis


The Dutch Accounting Act




Type of measure


Ad Hoc Case


NewCo




Objective


Regional development (including territorial cooperation), Research, development and innovation




Form of aid


Repayable advances, Other forms of equity intervention




Budget


Overall budget: 2 074 298 355  EUR




Intensity


 




Duration


From 1.7.2024




Economic sectors


Technical testing and analysis, Manufacture of pharmaceutical preparations, Manufacture of basic pharmaceutical products




Name and address of the granting authority







Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport




Parnassusplein 5, 2511 VX Den Haag








Other information


 




The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search?caseInstrument=SA



ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4348/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Joined Cases C-92/24 to C-94/24, Banca Mediolanum: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 1 August 2025 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Corte di giustizia tributaria di secondo grado della Lombardia – Italy) – Banca Mediolanum SpA v Agenzia delle Entrate – Direzione regionale della Lombardia (References for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Common system of taxation applicable in the case of parent companies and subsidiaries of different Member States – Directive 2011/96/EU – Article 4(1)(a) – Prohibition on taxing profits received by the parent company – Prevention of double taxation of dividends – Scope – Regional tax on production activities – Inclusion of 50 % of dividends received by the parent companies in the basis of assessment for that tax)
Date: 2025-08-01
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: basis of tax assessment, corporation tax, double taxation, local tax, nationality of legal persons, parent company, profit, subsidiary, tax law








C_202505186EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/5186


6.10.2025






Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 1 August 2025 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Corte di giustizia tributaria di secondo grado della Lombardia – Italy) – Banca Mediolanum SpA v Agenzia delle Entrate – Direzione regionale della Lombardia


(Joined Cases C-92/24 to C-94/24,
                (1)
Banca Mediolanum)

(References for a preliminary ruling - Taxation - Common system of taxation applicable in the case of parent companies and subsidiaries of different Member States - Directive 2011/96/EU - Article 4(1)(a) - Prohibition on taxing profits received by the parent company - Prevention of double taxation of dividends - Scope - Regional tax on production activities - Inclusion of 50 % of dividends received by the parent companies in the basis of assessment for that tax)
(C/2025/5186)
Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Corte di giustizia tributaria di secondo grado della Lombardia

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Banca Mediolanum SpA

Defendant: Agenzia delle Entrate – Direzione regionale della Lombardia

Operative part of the judgment

Article 4 of Council Directive 2011/96/EU of 30 November 2011 on the common system of taxation applicable in the case of parent companies and subsidiaries of different Member States
must be interpreted as precluding national legislation pursuant to which a Member State that has opted for the exemption system may levy tax on more than 5 % of the amount of the dividends which the financial intermediaries resident in that Member State receive, as parent companies within the meaning of that directive, from their subsidiaries resident in other Member States, including where that is done by way of a tax which is not a tax on corporate income, but which includes in its basis of assessment those dividends or a fraction thereof.


(1)  OJ C, C/2024/2926, C/2024/2927, C/2024/2928.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/5186/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-512/24, BÁV: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 1 August 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék – Hungary) – BÁV Zrt. v Budapest Főváros Kormányhivatala (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (REACH Regulation) – Registration, evaluation and authorisation of chemicals – Annex XVII – Restrictions on the manufacture, placing on the market and use of certain dangerous substances, mixtures and articles – Restrictions concerning cadmium – Maximum concentration in metal parts of jewellery and imitation jewellery articles and hair accessories – Derogation – Silver bracelet dating from the 1940s, the brazing of which contains cadmium)
Date: 2025-08-01
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: cadmium, carcinogenic substance, chemicals legislation, heavy metal, jewellery and goldsmith's articles, metalworking








C_202505195EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/5195


6.10.2025






Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 1 August 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék – Hungary) – BÁV Zrt. v Budapest Főváros Kormányhivatala


(Case C-512/24,
                (1)
BÁV)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (REACH Regulation) - Registration, evaluation and authorisation of chemicals - Annex XVII - Restrictions on the manufacture, placing on the market and use of certain dangerous substances, mixtures and articles - Restrictions concerning cadmium - Maximum concentration in metal parts of jewellery and imitation jewellery articles and hair accessories - Derogation - Silver bracelet dating from the 1940s, the brazing of which contains cadmium)
(C/2025/5195)
Language of the case: Hungarian

Referring court

Fővárosi Törvényszék

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: BÁV Zrt.

Defendant: Budapest Főváros Kormányhivatala

Operative part of the judgment

Entry 23(8) and (10) of Annex XVII to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), establishing a European Chemicals Agency, amending Directive 1999/45/EC and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 793/93 and Commission Regulation (EC) No 1488/94 as well as Council Directive 76/769/EEC and Commission Directives 91/155/EEC, 93/67/EEC, 93/105/EC and 2000/21/EC, as amended by Commission Regulation (EU) No 494/2011 of 20 May 2011,
must be interpreted as meaning that a silver bracelet, the brazing of which contains cadmium, falls within the scope of the prohibition laid down in entry 23(10)(ii) of Annex XVII to that regulation if the concentration level of cadmium referred to in that provision is reached or exceeded.


(1)  OJ C, C/2024/6404.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/5195/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections – SA.114928
Date: 2025-08-01
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Lithuania, State aid, aid to agriculture, control of State aid, oil industry, provision of services








C_202504393EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/4393


1.8.2025






Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union
Cases where the Commission raises no objections
SA.114928
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2025/4393)








Date of adoption of the decision


14.7.2025




Aid number


SA.114928




Member State


Lithuania




Region


 




Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)


Aid for the development of biofuel production (Amendment to State aid SA.100766 (2021/N))




Legal basis


Law on Alternative Fuels; Order No 3D-417 of 25 July 2008 of the Federal Minister for Agriculture, Forestry, Environment and Water management of the Republic of Lithuania on the approval of the Rules for Financing the development of biofuels production (“Isakymas dėl biodegalų gamybos plėtros finansavimo taisyklių patvirtinimo”)




Type of measure


Scheme


 




Objective


Environmental protection, Renewable energy




Form of aid


Direct grant




Budget


Overall budget: 90 000 000  EUR
Annual budget: 15 000 000  EUR




Intensity


 




Duration


Until 31.12.2030




Economic sectors


Support activities to agriculture and post-harvest crop activities, Manufacture of refined petroleum products




Name and address of the granting authority







The Ministry of Agriculture of the Republic of Lithuania




Gedimino pr. 19, LT -01103 Vilnius, Lietuvos Respublika








Other information


 




The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search?caseInstrument=SA



ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4393/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-97/24, Minister for Children, Equality, Disability, Integration and Youth and Others: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 1 August 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court (Ireland)) – S.A., R.J. v Minister for Children, Equality, Disability, Integration and Youth, Ireland, and Attorney General (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Liability of a Member State in the event of infringement of EU law – Sufficiently serious infringement – Asylum policy – Directive 2013/33/EU – Standards for the reception of applicants for international protection – Significant influx of applicants for temporary or international protection – No access to material reception conditions – Basic needs – Temporary exhaustion of housing capacity)
Date: 2025-08-01
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: asylum seeker, housing, infringement of EU law, international protection, right of asylum








C_202505187EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/5187


6.10.2025






Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 1 August 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court (Ireland)) – S.A., R.J. v Minister for Children, Equality, Disability, Integration and Youth, Ireland, and Attorney General


(Case C-97/24,
                (1)
Minister for Children, Equality, Disability, Integration and Youth and Others)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Liability of a Member State in the event of infringement of EU law - Sufficiently serious infringement - Asylum policy - Directive 2013/33/EU - Standards for the reception of applicants for international protection - Significant influx of applicants for temporary or international protection - No access to material reception conditions - Basic needs - Temporary exhaustion of housing capacity)
(C/2025/5187)
Language of the case: English

Referring court

High Court (Ireland)

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicants: S.A., R.J.

Respondents: Minister for Children, Equality, Disability, Integration and Youth, Ireland, and Attorney General

Notice Party: United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees

Operative part of the judgment

EU law must be interpreted as meaning that a Member State which has not guaranteed, for a number of weeks, access by an applicant for international protection to the material reception conditions provided for by Directive 2013/33/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 laying down standards for the reception of applicants for international protection may not avoid liability under EU law by pleading temporary exhaustion of the housing capacity normally available in its territory for applicants for international protection, owing to an influx of third-country nationals seeking temporary or international protection; an influx which, because of its significant and sudden nature, was unforeseeable and unavoidable.


(1)  OJ C, C/2024/3309.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/5187/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)