do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Corrigendum to Notice for the attention of the natural and legal persons, entities and bodies subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2014/145/CFSP, as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2025/1478, and Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014, as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1476 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine (OJ C, C/2025/4121, 19.7.2025)
Date: 2025-07-25
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, Russia, Russo-Ukrainian issue, Ukraine, economic sanctions, freezing of assets, international sanctions, legal person, natural person, territorial dispute, territorial law








C_202590058EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/90058


25.7.2025






Corrigendum to Notice for the attention of the natural and legal persons, entities and bodies subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2014/145/CFSP, as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2025/1478, and Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014, as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1476 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine
(
Official Journal of the European Union C 2025/4121, 19 July 2025
)

Page 1, at the end of the 4th paragraph:







for:





                           ‘before 16 July 2025
                           ’,












read:





                           ‘before 5 August 2025
                           ’.







ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4121/corrigendum/2025-07-25/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-502/25: Action brought on 25 July 2025 – Thom Browne v EUIPO – adidas (Device of three parallel stripes applied to a garment)
Date: 2025-07-25
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, clothing, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_202505086EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/5086


29.9.2025






Action brought on 25 July 2025 – Thom Browne v EUIPO – adidas


(Device of three parallel stripes applied to a garment)


(Case T-502/25)

(C/2025/5086)
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicant: Thom Browne, Inc. (New York, New York, United States) (represented by: T. van Innis, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: adidas AG (Herzogenaurach, Germany)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark (Device of three parallel stripes applied to a garment) – European Union trade mark No 3 517 612
         

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 14 May 2025 in Case R 1240/2024-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order EUIPO to pay the costs.





Pleas in law







—


Infringement of the right to good administration, including transparency, and the right to be heard;










—


Infringement of Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 on the Community trade mark.






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/5086/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-512/25: Action brought on 25 July 2025 – Kemmer v EUIPO – TikTok Information Technologies UK (TecTake)
Date: 2025-07-25
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, goods, registered trade mark, service, trade-mark law








C_202504982EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/4982


22.9.2025






Action brought on 25 July 2025 – Kemmer v EUIPO – TikTok Information Technologies UK (TecTake)


(Case T-512/25)

(C/2025/4982)
Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties


Applicant: Roland Kemmer (Bütthard, Germany) (represented by: S. Langer and L. Petri, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: TikTok Information Technologies UK Ltd (London, United Kingdom)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘TecTake’ – EU trade mark No 11 727 088
         

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 27 May 2025 in Case R 1872/2024-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul and alter the contested decision so that the application for revocation of the [EU] trade mark at issue is dismissed also in relation to goods in:






—


Class 6: Door handles of metal; Fireguards, fire screens of metal










—


Class 7: Pumps [machines]










—


Class 9: Cases especially made for photographic apparatus and instruments










—


Class 10: Medical apparatus and instruments










—


Class 12: Vehicle seats










—


Class 24: Bed linen; Freestanding partitions [furniture]










—


Class 25: Footmuffs, not electrically heated














—


order EUIPO to pay the costs.





Plea in law

Infringement of Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4982/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.12033 – HIG CAPITAL / RENTOKIL INITIAL HOLDINGS)
Date: 2025-07-25
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: France, cleaning industry, economic concentration, hiring, investment company, merger control, provision of services, public hygiene








C_202504361EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/4361


1.8.2025






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.12033 – HIG CAPITAL / RENTOKIL INITIAL HOLDINGS)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2025/4361)

On 25 July 2025, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32025M12033. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4361/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-506/25: Action brought on 25 July 2025 – GY v Commission
Date: 2025-07-25
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European official, abuse of power, family benefit, principle of legal certainty, staff regulations (EU)








C_202504821EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/4821


8.9.2025






Action brought on 25 July 2025 – GY v Commission


(Case T-506/25)

(C/2025/4821)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: GY (represented by: S. Rodrigues and A. Champetier, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the decision of 23 October 2024 entitled ‘Note for the attention of GY’ and notified via ARES to the applicant on the same day, annulling all family allowances and related benefits, with retroactive effect from his entry into service on 16 September 2021, along with the decision of 23 October 2024 whose subject is ‘Note for the attention of GY’ and notified via ARES to the applicant on the same day;










—


as far as necessary, annul the implicit decision of 19 May 2025, rejecting the applicant’s complaint of 17 January 2025 under Article 90(2) of the Staff Regulations; and










—


reimburse all legal costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on four pleas in law.






1.


First plea in law, alleging the manifest errors of assessment and wrong reasons.










2.


Second plea in law, alleging a breach of Articles 62 and 67 of the Staff Regulations, as well as Article 2 of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations, in the light of Article 34 of the Charter.










3.


Third plea in law, alleging a breach of Article 85 of the Staff Regulations.










4.


Fourth plea in law, alleging a breach of the right to good administration, of the duty of care and of the principle of legal certainty - misuse of powers.






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4821/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Commission Decision of 25 July 2025 amending Decision 2011/C 253/04 of 29 August 2011 setting up a Payment Systems Market Expert Group as regards its period of validity
Date: 2025-07-25
Institutions: Directorate-General for Financial Stability, Financial Services and Capital Markets Union, European Commission
Subjects: EU office or agency, operation of the Institutions, payment system








C_202504118EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/4118


29.7.2025







            COMMISSION DECISION
         
of 25 July 2025
         
amending Decision 2011/C 253/04 of 29 August 2011 setting up a Payment Systems Market Expert Group as regards its period of validity
(C/2025/4118)


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Whereas:







(1)


By Decision 2011/C 253/04 of 29 August 2011 (1) the Commission set up the Payment Systems Market Expert Group. That Decision is to apply until 31 December 2025. The expert group is comprised of various types of payment service providers and users whose primary tasks are to assist the Commission in preparation of policy initiatives regarding payment services, to provide insight concerning practical implementation of those initiatives and to exchange views on best practices or potential issues of concern for the payment services market.












(2)


In the context of rapid innovation and technological progress in the payments market, there is a perpetual need for the Commission to receive market expert advice on how to ensure payment service users’ access to convenient, innovative, efficient and secure payment services which are underpinned by interoperable payment solutions and resilient payment systems, and by the level-playing field conditions for various types of payment service providers.












(3)


Various initiatives across Europe are taken in order to encourage and drive the market towards greater standardisation, innovation, sovereignty and prevention of payment fraud under the auspices of, among others, the Euro Retail Payments Board and the European Payments Council. Having regard to those initiatives, the need for a formal forum which represents a broad up-to-date range of payment service provider and user categories and which allows for a structural exchange of views still remains. It is therefore appropriate that the Payment Systems Market Expert Group continues its work for another five years.












(4)


The Decision 2011/C 253/04 of 29 August 2011 should therefore be amended accordingly,





HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:



Sole Article
In Article 8 of Decision 2011/C 253/04 of 29 August 2011, the date ‘31 December 2025’ is replaced by the date ‘31 December 2030’.




Done at Brussels, 25 July 2025.


For the Commission

Maria Luís ALBUQUERQUE
            

Member of the Commission






(1)  
            OJ C 253, 30.8.2011, p. 3.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4118/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-511/25: Action brought on 25 July 2025 – LA v EUIPO
Date: 2025-07-25
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: damages, equal treatment, rights of the defence, servant (EU), staff assessment








C_202505966EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/5966


17.11.2025






Action brought on 25 July 2025 – LA v EUIPO


(Case T-511/25)

(C/2025/5966)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: LA (represented by: S. Rodrigues and A. Champetier, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the applicant’s 2024 performance assessment completed and available without certain comments in the system on 15 April 2025 and notified in full version by e-mail on 17 April 2025;










—


order compensation for the moral prejudice suffered in the amount of EUR 10 000;










—


order the defendant to reimburse all the costs of these proceedings.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on four pleas in law.






1.


First plea in law, alleging manifest errors of assessment.










2.


Second plea in law, alleging a breach of the principle of equal treatment and the use of inadequate assessment criteria.










3.


Third plea in law, alleging a breach of the right to be heard.










4.


Fourth plea in law, alleging a breach of the duty of care.






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/5966/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-501/25: Action brought on 25 July 2025 – Thom Browne v EUIPO – adidas (Device of three parallel stripes applied to a pair of trousers or shorts)
Date: 2025-07-25
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, clothing, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_202505085EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/5085


29.9.2025






Action brought on 25 July 2025 – Thom Browne v EUIPO – adidas


(Device of three parallel stripes applied to a pair of trousers or shorts)


(Case T-501/25)

(C/2025/5085)
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicant: Thom Browne, Inc. (New York, New York, United States) (represented by: T. van Innis, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: adidas AG (Herzogenaurach, Germany)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark (Device of three parallel stripes applied to a pair of trousers or shorts) – European Union trade mark No 3 517 661)

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 14 May 2025 in Case R 1223/2024-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order EUIPO to pay the costs.





Pleas in law







—


Infringement of the right to good administration, including transparency, and the right to be heard;










—


Infringement of Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 on the Community trade mark.






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/5085/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.12047 – TABREED / DIF / PAL COOLING JV)
Date: 2025-07-25
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Bahrain, Egypt, India, Oman, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, air conditioning, economic concentration, investment company, merger control








C_202504403EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/4403


1.8.2025






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.12047 – TABREED / DIF / PAL COOLING JV)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2025/4403)

On 25 July 2025, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32025M12047. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4403/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Council Decision (CFSP) 2025/1555 of 25 July 2025 amending Decision (CFSP) 2021/1277 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Lebanon
Date: 2025-07-25
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, Lebanon, economic sanctions, international sanctions, legal person, natural person








L_202501555EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
L series













2025/1555


28.7.2025







            COUNCIL DECISION (CFSP) 2025/1555
         
of 25 July 2025
         
amending Decision (CFSP) 2021/1277 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Lebanon


THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 29 thereof,


Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,

Whereas:







(1)


On 30 July 2021, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2021/1277 (1), which concerns restrictive measures in view of the situation in Lebanon.












(2)


Decision (CFSP) 2021/1277 applies until 31 July 2025. On the basis of a review of that Decision, the restrictive measures set out therein should be renewed until 31 July 2026.












(3)


Decision (CFSP) 2021/1277 should therefore be amended accordingly,





HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:



Article 1
In Article 9, first paragraph, of Decision (CFSP) 2021/1277, the date ‘31 July 2025’ is replaced by that of ‘31 July 2026’.


Article 2
This Decision shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




Done at Brussels, 25 July 2025.


For the Council


The President

M. BJERRE
            





(1)  Council Decision (CFSP) 2021/1277 of 30 July 2021 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Lebanon (OJ L 277 I, 2.8.2021, p. 16, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dec/2021/1277/oj).


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dec/2025/1555/oj
ISSN 1977-0677 (electronic edition)
Euro exchange rates – 24 July 2025
Date: 2025-07-25
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_202503657EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/3657


25.7.2025






Euro exchange rates (1)


            24 July 2025
         
(C/2025/3657)


1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,1756 




JPY


Japanese yen


172,22 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4643 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,86750 




SEK


Swedish krona


11,1850 




CHF


Swiss franc


0,9341 




ISK


Iceland króna


142,00 




NOK


Norwegian krone


11,8765 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


24,553 




HUF


Hungarian forint


397,95 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,2553 




RON


Romanian leu


5,0710 




TRY


Turkish lira


47,5853 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,7771 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,6009 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


9,2283 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,9427 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,5011 




KRW


South Korean won


1 610,08 




ZAR


South African rand


20,6866 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


8,4142 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


19 154,81 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,9557 




PHP


Philippine peso


66,610 




RUB


Russian rouble


 




THB


Thai baht


37,937 




BRL


Brazilian real


6,4923 




MXN


Mexican peso


21,8211 




INR


Indian rupee


101,5630 






(1)  
            Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3657/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-500/25: Action brought on 25 July 2025 – Thom Browne v EUIPO – adidas (Device of three parallel stripes applied to an upper garment)
Date: 2025-07-25
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, clothing, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_202505084EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/5084


29.9.2025






Action brought on 25 July 2025 – Thom Browne v EUIPO – adidas


(Device of three parallel stripes applied to an upper garment)


(Case T-500/25)

(C/2025/5084)
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicant: Thom Browne, Inc. (New York, New York, United States) (represented by: T. van Innis, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: adidas AG (Herzogenaurach, Germany)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark (Device of three parallel stripes applied to an upper garment) – European Union trade mark No 3 517 588
         

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 14 May 2025 in Case R 1224/2024-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order EUIPO to pay the costs.





Pleas in law







—


Infringement of the right to good administration, including transparency, and the right to be heard;










—


Infringement of Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 on the Community trade mark.






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/5084/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)