do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Notice of the impending expiry of certain anti-dumping measures
Date: 2025-07-22
Institutions: Directorate-General for Trade and Economic Security, European Commission
Subjects: Belarus, China, Russia, anti-dumping duty, import (EU), iron, originating product, piping, steel, tube








C_202504008EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/4008


22.7.2025






Notice of the impending expiry of certain anti-dumping measures
(C/2025/4008)


1.   

As provided for in Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2016 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Union (1), the Commission gives notice that, unless a review is initiated in accordance with the following procedure, the anti-dumping measures mentioned below will expire on the date mentioned in the table below.


2.   Procedure

Union producers may submit a written request for an expiry review. This request must contain sufficient evidence that the expiry of the measures would be likely to result in a continuation or recurrence of dumping and injury. Should the Commission decide to review the measures concerned, importers, exporters, representatives of the exporting country and Union producers will then be provided with the opportunity to amplify, rebut or comment on the matters set out in the review request.
3.   Time limit

Union producers may submit a written request for a review on the above basis, to reach the European Commission, Directorate-General for Trade (Unit G-1), CHAR 4/39, 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel, BELGIQUE/BELGIË (2) at any time from the date of the publication of the present notice but no later than three months before the date mentioned in the table below.








4.


This notice is published in accordance with Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036.









Product


Country(ies) of origin or exportation


Measures


Reference


Date of expiry (3)





Welded pipes and tubes of iron or non-alloyed steel


Belarus
The People’s Republic of China
Russia


Anti-dumping duty


Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/635 of 16 April 2021 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain welded pipes and tubes of iron or non-alloyed steel originating in Belarus, the People’s Republic of China and Russia following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council
(OJ L 132, 19.4.2021, p. 145)


20.4.2026










(1)  
            OJ L 176, 30.6.2016, p. 21, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2016/1036/2020-08-11.

(2)  
            TRADE-Defence-Complaints@ec.europa.eu.

(3)  The measure expires at midnight (00:00) of the day mentioned in this column.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4008/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Notice of the impending expiry of certain anti-dumping measures
Date: 2025-07-22
Institutions: Directorate-General for Trade and Economic Security, European Commission
Subjects: China, Malaysia, anti-dumping duty, import (EU), organic acid, originating product








C_202504007EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/4007


22.7.2025






Notice of the impending expiry of certain anti-dumping measures
(C/2025/4007)


1.   

As provided for in Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2016 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Union (1), the Commission gives notice that, unless a review is initiated in accordance with the following procedure, the anti-dumping measures mentioned below will expire on the date mentioned in the table below.


2.   Procedure

Union producers may submit a written request for an expiry review. This request must contain sufficient evidence that the expiry of the measures would be likely to result in a continuation or recurrence of dumping and injury. Should the Commission decide to review the measures concerned, importers, exporters, representatives of the exporting country and Union producers will then be provided with the opportunity to amplify, rebut or comment on the matters set out in the review request.
3.   Time limit

Union producers may submit a written request for a review on the above basis, to reach the European Commission, Directorate-General for Trade (Unit G-1), CHAR 4/39, 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel, BELGIQUE/BELGIË (2) at any time from the date of the publication of the present notice but no later than three months before the date mentioned in the table below.








4.


This notice is published in accordance with Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036.









Product


Country(ies) of origin or exportation


Measures


Reference


Date of expiry (3)





Citric acid


The People’s Republic of China
Malaysia


Anti-dumping duty


Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/607 of 14 April 2021 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of citric acid originating in the People’s Republic of China as extended to imports of citric acid consigned from Malaysia, whether declared as originating in Malaysia or not, following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council
(OJ L 129, 15.4.2021, p. 73)


16.4.2026










(1)  
            OJ L 176, 30.6.2016, p. 21, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2016/1036/2020-08-11.

(2)  
            TRADE-Defence-Complaints@ec.europa.eu.

(3)  The measure expires at midnight (00:00) of the day mentioned in this column.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4007/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-499/25, Strinotto: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte d’appello di Venezia (Italy) lodged on 22 July 2025 – Criminal proceedings against B.C.
Date: 2025-07-22
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: European arrest warrant, charge, criminal proceedings, legal hearing, rights of the defence, video conference








C_202505317EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/5317


13.10.2025






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte d’appello di Venezia (Italy) lodged on 22 July 2025 – Criminal proceedings against B.C.


(Case C-499/25, Strinotto
                (1)
)

(C/2025/5317)
Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Corte d’appello di Venezia

Accused person in the main proceedings

B.C.

Questions referred







1.


Does Article 24 of Directive 2014/41/EU, (2) in so far as it provides that the issuing authority may issue a [European Investigation Order (EIO)] even for the purpose of hearing a suspected or accused person by videoconference or other audiovisual transmission, read in the light of recitals 24 and 26 of that directive, permit the issuance of an EIO for the hearing by videoconference of an accused person who is not detained in the executing State, with a view to ensuring that person’s presence and participation in the ongoing criminal trial in the issuing State?










2.


If the answer to the first question is in the affirmative, may the executing judicial authority, where a ‘procedural’ [European arrest warrant (EAW)] has already been issued for the sole purpose of ensuring the participation of the accused person in the trial in the issuing State, request the withdrawal of the EAW and the issuance of an [EIO] for the hearing by videoconference of the accused person, with a view to ensuring that person’s presence and participation in the ongoing criminal proceedings in the issuing State?










3.


If the answer to the second question is in the affirmative, must the judicial authority of the issuing State withdraw the EAW and issue an [EIO] in its place for the hearing by videoconference of the accused person, with a view to ensuring that person’s presence and participation in the ongoing criminal trial in the issuing State?










4.


If the answer to the second question is in the negative, where the accused person has declared that he or she intends to be present at the ongoing criminal trial in the issuing State and his or her defence counsel have given assurances that they will accompany the accused person to the hearing in the criminal trial before the court of the issuing State, may, or must, that State withdraw the EAW?






(1)  The name of the present case is a fictitious name. It does not correspond to the real name of any party to the proceedings.

(2)  Directive 2014/41/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3 April 2014 regarding the European Investigation Order in criminal matters (OJ 2014 L 130, p. 1).


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/5317/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)