do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-497/25, Maxima LT: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administratīvā rajona tiesa (Latvia) lodged on 21 July 2025 – UAB Maxima LT v Valsts ieņēmumu dienests
Date: 2025-07-21
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU Member State, European tax cooperation, corporation tax, discretionary power, double taxation, tax authorities, tax exemption, tax law








C_202505316EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/5316


13.10.2025






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administratīvā rajona tiesa (Latvia) lodged on 21 July 2025 – UAB Maxima LT v Valsts ieņēmumu dienests


(Case C-497/25, Maxima LT)

(C/2025/5316)
Language of the case: Latvian

Referring court

Administratīvā rajona tiesa

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: UAB Maxima LT

Authority acting as defendant: Valsts ieņēmumu dienests

Questions referred







1.


Must Article 6(1)(b) of Directive 2017/1852 (1) be interpreted as meaning that the competent authority of a Member State has an obligation to set up an advisory commission, upon a request by the affected person, where the competent authorities of the Member States concerned have accepted the complaint submitted by the affected person but have failed to reach an agreement on how to resolve the question in dispute by mutual agreement within the period laid down in Article 4(1) [of that directive]?










2.


Must the concept of ‘double taxation’ as referred to in Article 2(1)(c) of Directive 2017/1852 be interpreted as meaning that, in circumstances such as those of this case, double taxation is also present in the situation where the same income is subject to the tax systems of two Member States, even though that income benefits from a tax exemption in one of those Member States?










3.


If the answer to the second question referred for a preliminary ruling is in the negative, must Article 16(7) of Directive 2017/1852 be interpreted as meaning that, in circumstances such as those of this case, it does not fall within the discretion of the competent authorities of the Member States to deny the affected person access to a dispute resolution advisory commission where the competent authorities of the Member States have failed to reach an agreement on the correct interpretation and application of the bilateral tax treaty, it being that agreement which in turn determines which Member State is entitled to tax the income?






(1)  Council Directive (EU) 2017/1852 of 10 October 2017 on tax dispute resolution mechanisms in the European Union (OJ 2017 L 265, p. 1).


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/5316/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-600/17: Order of the General Court of 21 July 2025 – Remolcadores Nosa Terra and Others v Commission and SRB (Action for annulment – Economic and monetary policy – Single resolution mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms – Resolution scheme in respect of Banco Popular Español – Manifest lack of jurisdiction in part – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
Date: 2025-07-21
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Spain, abuse of power, aid for restructuring, company in difficulties, credit institution, damages, financial solvency, ownership, right to justice








C_202505337EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/5337


13.10.2025






Order of the General Court of 21 July 2025 – Remolcadores Nosa Terra and Others v Commission and SRB


(Case T-600/17)
                (1)

(Action for annulment - Economic and monetary policy - Single resolution mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms - Resolution scheme in respect of Banco Popular Español - Manifest lack of jurisdiction in part - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
(C/2025/5337)
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Applicants: Remolcadores Nosa Terra, SA (Vigo, Spain), Grupo Nosa Terra 2000, SLU (Vigo), Hospital Povisa, SA (Vigo), Industrias Lácteas Asturianas, SA (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: J. Otero Novas, lawyer)

Defendants: European Commission (represented by: P. Němečková, A. Steiblytė and A. Manzaneque Valverde, acting as Agents, and by J. Rivas Andrés, lawyer), Single Resolution Board (represented by: H. Ehlers, M. Fernández Rupérez, A. Lapresta Bienz and J. Rius Riu, acting as Agents, and by B. Meyring, F. Fernández de Trocóniz Robles, T. Klupsch and S. Ianc, lawyers)

Re:

By their action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicants seek annulment of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/1246 of 7 June 2017 endorsing the resolution scheme for Banco Popular Español S.A. (OJ 2017 L 178, p. 15 and corrigendum OJ 2017 L 320, p. 31).

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed.










2.


There is no need to adjudicate on the applications for leave to intervene by the Kingdom of Spain, Banco Santander, SA and Banco Popular Español, SA.










3.


Remolcadores Nosa Terra, SA, Grupo Nosa Terra 2000, SLU, Hospital Povisa, SA and Industrias Lácteas Asturianas, SA shall bear their own costs and pay the costs incurred by the European Commission and the Single Resolution Board (SRB).










4.


The Kingdom of Spain shall bear its own costs relating to its application for leave to intervene.










5.


Banco Santander shall bear its own costs, and pay those of Banco Popular Español, relating to their applications for leave to intervene.






(1)  
            OJ C 382, 13.11.2017.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/5337/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-505/25, Caixa Geral de Depósitos: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal da Relação de Lisboa (Portugal) lodged on 21 July 2025 – AM, KA v Caixa Geral de Depósitos, S.A.
Date: 2025-07-21
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: agricultural holding, consumer, physician, real estate credit, rural tourism, teacher








C_202506119EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/6119


8.12.2025






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal da Relação de Lisboa (Portugal) lodged on 21 July 2025 – AM, KA v Caixa Geral de Depósitos, S.A.


(Case C-505/25, Caixa Geral de Depósitos)

(C/2025/6119)
Language of the case: Portuguese

Referring court

Tribunal da Relação de Lisboa

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicants: AM, KA

Defendant: Caixa Geral de Depósitos, S.A.

Question referred

Within the meaning and for the purposes of Article 4 of Directive 2014/17/EU, (1) must the concept of ‘consumer’ be interpreted as meaning that two natural persons, a doctor and a secondary school teacher by profession with no prior experience or training in relation to property investment, who conclude loan agreements with a bank for the purpose of purchasing, in full or in part, a farm to run it for rural tourism and as a farming project, do so for purposes which are outside their trade, business or profession, and, therefore, are not consumers?
Or
must they be regarded as ‘consumers’ within the meaning and for the purposes of Article 4 of Directive 2014/17/EU, given that they engaged in a professional or commercial activity which appeared to be highly profitable?


(1)  Directive 2014/17/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 February 2014 on credit agreements for consumers relating to residential immovable property and amending Directives 2008/48/EC and 2013/36/EU and Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010 (OJ 2014 L 60, p. 34).


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/6119/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-678/17: Order of the General Court of 21 July 2025 – Minera Catalano-Aragonesa v Commission and SRB (Action for annulment – Economic and monetary policy – Single resolution mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms – Resolution scheme in respect of Banco Popular Español – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
Date: 2025-07-21
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Spain, abuse of power, aid for restructuring, company in difficulties, credit institution, damages, financial solvency, ownership, right to justice








C_202505338EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/5338


13.10.2025






Order of the General Court of 21 July 2025 – Minera Catalano-Aragonesa v Commission and SRB


(Case T-678/17)
                (1)

(Action for annulment - Economic and monetary policy - Single resolution mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms - Resolution scheme in respect of Banco Popular Español - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
(C/2025/5338)
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Applicants: Minera Catalano-Aragonesa, SA (Ariño, Spain), Ángel Luengo Martínez (Saragossa, Spain) (represented by: R. Montejo Pérez, F. Ferrara and F. Banti, lawyers)

Defendants: European Commission (represented by: P. Němečková, A. Steiblytė and A. Manzaneque Valverde, acting as Agents, and by J. Rivas Andrés, lawyer), Single Resolution Board (represented by: H. Ehlers, M. Fernández Rupérez, A. Lapresta Bienz and J. Rius Riu, acting as Agents, and by B. Meyring, F. Fernández de Trocóniz Robles, T. Klupsch and S. Ianc, lawyers)

Re:

By their action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicants seek the annulment of Decision SRB/EES/2017/08 of the Executive Session of the Single Resolution Board (SRB) of 7 June 2017 concerning the adoption of a resolution scheme in respect of Banco Popular Español, S.A. and of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/1246 of 7 June 2017 endorsing the resolution scheme for Banco Popular Español S.A. (OJ 2017 L 178, p. 15 and corrigendum OJ 2017 L 320, p. 31).

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed.










2.


There is no need to adjudicate on the applications for leave to intervene by the Kingdom of Spain, Banco Santander, SA and Banco Popular Español, SA.










3.


Minera Catalano-Aragonesa, SA and Mr Ángel Luengo Martínez shall bear their own costs and pay the costs incurred by the European Commission and the Single Resolution Board (SRB).










4.


The Kingdom of Spain shall bear its own costs relating to its application for leave to intervene.










5.


Banco Santander shall bear its own costs, and pay those of Banco Popular Español, relating to their applications for leave to intervene.






(1)  
            OJ C 424, 11.12.2017.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/5338/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-445/24: Order of the General Court of 21 July 2025 – Gómez Jiménez and Others v EUIPO – Servei Andorrà d’Atenció Sanitària (Sistema Estructurado de Triaje SET) (EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark Sistema Estructurado de Triaje SET – Absolute ground for invalidity – Bad faith – Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
Date: 2025-07-21
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, in-service training, medical institution, registered trade mark, software, trade-mark law








C_202505341EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/5341


13.10.2025






Order of the General Court of 21 July 2025 – Gómez Jiménez and Others v EUIPO – Servei Andorrà d’Atenció Sanitària (Sistema Estructurado de Triaje SET)


(Case T-445/24)
                (1)

(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU figurative mark Sistema Estructurado de Triaje SET - Absolute ground for invalidity - Bad faith - Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
(C/2025/5341)
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Applicants: Josep Francesc Gómez Jiménez (Escaldes-Engordany, Andorra), Maria del Roser García Núñez (Escaldes-Engordany), Alba Gómez García (Escaldes-Engordany) (represented by: I. Barroso Sánchez-Lafuente, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Gája, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Servei Andorrà d’Atenció Sanitària (Escaldes-Engordany) (represented by: P. González-Bueno Catalán de Ocón and C. Aguilera Montáñez, lawyers)

Re:

By their action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicants seek the annulment of the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 21 June 2024 (Case R 170/2023-2).

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed as manifestly lacking any foundation in law.










2.


Mr Josep Francesc Gómez Jiménez, Ms Maria del Roser García Núñez and Ms Alba Gómez García shall bear their own costs and pay those incurred by Servei Andorrà d’Atenció Sanitària.










3.


The European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) shall bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C, C/2024/6105, 21.10.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/5341/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)