do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.11976 – VARO ENERGY / PREEM)
Date: 2025-07-14
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, energy supply, logistics, lubricants, merger control, oil refining, petroleum product, renewable resources, sale, storage








C_202504114EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/4114


22.7.2025






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.11976 – VARO ENERGY / PREEM)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2025/4114)

On 14 July 2025, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32025M11976. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4114/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Council Decision of 14 July 2025 appointing the chairperson of a Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office
Date: 2025-07-14
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: European Union Intellectual Property Office, administrator, appointment of members, decision-making body (EU)




C_202504088EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/4088


18.7.2025







            COUNCIL DECISION
         
of 14 July 2025
         
appointing the chairperson of a Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office
(C/2025/4088)


THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 June 2017 on the European Union trade mark (1), and in particular Article 166(1) thereof,

Whereas:

On 5 June 2025, the Management Board of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) submitted a list of candidates for the post of chairperson of a Board of Appeal of the EUIPO to the Council,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:



Article 1

1.   Ms Cinzia NEGRO is hereby appointed chairperson of a Board of Appeal of the EUIPO for a term of five years.


2.   The date on which the five-year term referred to in paragraph 1 commences shall be set by the Management Board of the EUIPO.



Article 2
This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




Done at Brussels, 14 July 2025.


For the Council


The President

J. JENSEN
            





(1)  
            OJ L 154, 16.6.2017, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2017/1001/oj.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4088/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-223/24: Order of the General Court of 14 July 2025 – Pinpoint Innovations v Commission (Research and technological development – Horizon 2020 Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2014-2020) – Development of a data analysis system to reduce delays in healthcare – Grant agreement – Actual recovery of a debt by the mutual insurance mechanism – Manifest lack of jurisdiction in part – Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
Date: 2025-07-14
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU aid, Framework Programme for Research and Development, claim, financial aid, healthcare industry, jurisdiction, project funding, reimbursement of aid








C_202504884EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/4884


15.9.2025






Order of the General Court of 14 July 2025 – Pinpoint Innovations v Commission


(Case T-223/24)
                (1)

(Research and technological development - Horizon 2020 Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2014-2020) - Development of a data analysis system to reduce delays in healthcare - Grant agreement - Actual recovery of a debt by the mutual insurance mechanism - Manifest lack of jurisdiction in part - Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
(C/2025/4884)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Pinpoint Innovations Ltd (Clarina, Ireland) (represented by: K. Kelly, Solicitor)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Van Noyen, acting as Agent)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of Commission Decision C(2024) 1172 final of 17 February 2024 relating to the recovery of an amount of EUR 122 662,74, together with default interest.

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed.










2.


Pinpoint Innovations Ltd shall pay the costs.






(1)  
            OJ C, C/2024/4092, 8.7.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4884/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-461/25: Action brought on 14 July 2025 – Instanta v EUIPO – Heineken España (LEONHART)
Date: 2025-07-14
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, coffee, instant product, non-alcoholic beverage, registered trade mark, tea, trade-mark law








C_202504809EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/4809


8.9.2025






Action brought on 14 July 2025 – Instanta v EUIPO – Heineken España (LEONHART)


(Case T-461/25)

(C/2025/4809)
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicant: Instanta sp. z o.o. (Żory, Poland) (represented by: P. Gutowski, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Heineken España, SA (Sevilla, Spain)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark LEONHART – Application for registration No 18 906 152
         

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 12 May 2025 in Case R 2434/2024-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order EUIPO to pay the costs of the instant proceedings and the costs incurred in the proceedings before the Opposition Division and the Board of Appeal.





Plea in law







—


Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4809/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.12009 – OAKVIEW / FORTRESS / SPP)
Date: 2025-07-14
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: carriage of passengers, chartering, economic concentration, holding company, investment company, logistics, maritime shipping, merger control








C_202504241EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/4241


29.7.2025






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.12009 – OAKVIEW / FORTRESS / SPP)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2025/4241)

On 14 July 2025, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32025M12009. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4241/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-468/25: Action brought on 14 July 2025 – Victron Energy v EUIPO – Bayerische Motoren Werke (BMV)
Date: 2025-07-14
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, electricity storage device, registered trade mark, screen, trade-mark law








C_202504813EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/4813


8.9.2025






Action brought on 14 July 2025 – Victron Energy v EUIPO – Bayerische Motoren Werke (BMV)


(Case T-468/25)

(C/2025/4813)
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicant: Victron Energy BV (Almere, Netherlands) (represented by: Q. Meijnen, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Bayerische Motoren Werke AG (Munich, Germany)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union word mark BMV – Application for registration No 18 219 355
         

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 19 May 2025 in Case R 1831/2024-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order that the opposition be rejected in its entirety;










—


order the EUIPO and the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal to pay the costs.





Plea in law







—


Infringement of Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4813/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)