do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-464/25: Action brought on 13 July 2025 – Tokareva v Council
Date: 2025-07-13
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, Russo-Ukrainian issue, damages, economic sanctions, enforcement of ruling, freezing of assets, international sanctions, natural person, right to an effective remedy








C_202505350EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/5350


13.10.2025






Action brought on 13 July 2025 – Tokareva v Council


(Case T-464/25)

(C/2025/5350)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Maya Tokareva (Moscow, Russia) (represented by: T. Bontinck, M. Brésart, J. Goffin and F. Patuelli, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


find that the Council unlawfully failed to take the necessary measures to comply with the judgments of the General Court in Cases T-744/22 and T-269/24, in breach of Article 266 TFEU and of the principles of res judicata, effective judicial protection and good administration;










—


order the Council to pay EUR 10 000 in respect of the non-material damage suffered by the applicant;










—


order the Council to pay the costs of the proceedings.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on a single plea in law alleging infringement of Article 266 TFEU, read in the light of the principles of res judicata, effective judicial protection and good administration.
The applicant submits that the Council failed to take the necessary measures to comply with the judgments of the General Court in Cases T-744/22 and T-269/24, in clear breach of Article 266 TFEU.






—


Neutralisation of the effects of the judgments: the Council readopted acts identical to the annulled acts, without altering the criteria, grounds or evidence, in breach of the obligation of full and complete compliance with judgments.










—


No genuine review: no new evidence was adduced to justify maintaining the applicant’s name on the list at issue.










—


Breach of the principle of res judicata: the Council disregarded the operative part and the essential grounds of the annulment judgments, in particular concerning the lack of a sufficient factual basis for the adoption of the acts in respect of which annulment was sought.










—


Breach of the right to effective judicial protection: the applicant is still subject to restrictive measures notwithstanding two final judicial decisions in her favour.










—


Breach of the right to good administration: the Council did not invite the applicant to submit observations before adopting the March 2025 acts, in breach of Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/5350/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)