do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-322/24, Sánchez Romero Carvajal Jabugo: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 10 July 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Mercantil de Alicante – Spain) – Sánchez Romero Carvajal Jabugo S.A.U. v Embutidos Monells S.A. (Reference for a preliminary ruling – EU trade mark – Directive 2008/95/EC – Article 9(1) – Action for invalidity – Bad faith on the part of the proprietor of the later trade mark when filing the application for registration of that mark – Absolute ground for invalidity – Limitation in consequence of acquiescence – Not enforceable against the proprietor of the earlier mark)
Date: 2025-07-10
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU trade mark, limitation of legal proceedings, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_202504728EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/4728


8.9.2025






Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 10 July 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Mercantil de Alicante – Spain) – Sánchez Romero Carvajal Jabugo S.A.U. v Embutidos Monells S.A.


(Case C-322/24,
                (1)
Sánchez Romero Carvajal Jabugo)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - EU trade mark - Directive 2008/95/EC - Article 9(1) - Action for invalidity - Bad faith on the part of the proprietor of the later trade mark when filing the application for registration of that mark - Absolute ground for invalidity - Limitation in consequence of acquiescence - Not enforceable against the proprietor of the earlier mark)
(C/2025/4728)
Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Juzgado de lo Mercantil de Alicante

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Sánchez Romero Carvajal Jabugo S.A.U.

Defendant: Embutidos Monells S.A.

Operative part of the judgment

Article 9(1) of Directive 2008/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2008 to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks
must be interpreted as meaning that the proprietor of an earlier mark who has indicated in an extrajudicial letter of formal notice, addressed to the proprietor of a later trade mark and seeking the cessation of its use, a time limit for bringing an invalidity action in respect of that mark, which coincides with the expiry of the period of limitation of five successive years laid down in Article 9(1) of that directive, may apply, after the date indicated, for a declaration of invalidity on the basis of bad faith on the part of the proprietor of the later mark when filing the application for registration of that mark, even if, at the time of that letter of formal notice, that proprietor of the earlier mark had all the information necessary to consider that the registration had been applied for in bad faith.


(1)  OJ C, C/2024/5206.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4728/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-212/23: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 10 July 2025 – European Commission v Republic of Poland (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Article 258 TFEU – Directive (EU) 2019/789 – Copyright and related rights – Rules on the exercise of copyright and related rights applicable to certain online transmissions of broadcasting organisations and retransmissions of television and radio programmes – Partial transposition – Article 260(3) TFEU – Financial penalties – Application for the imposition of a lump sum – Date on which the infringement was brought to an end)
Date: 2025-07-10
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Internet, audiovisual programme, broadcasting, copyright, national implementing measure, provision of services, sanction (EU), television








C_202504717EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/4717


8.9.2025






Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 10 July 2025 – European Commission v Republic of Poland


(Case C-212/23)
                (1)

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Article 258 TFEU - Directive (EU) 2019/789 - Copyright and related rights - Rules on the exercise of copyright and related rights applicable to certain online transmissions of broadcasting organisations and retransmissions of television and radio programmes - Partial transposition - Article 260(3) TFEU - Financial penalties - Application for the imposition of a lump sum - Date on which the infringement was brought to an end)
(C/2025/4717)
Language of the case: Polish

Parties


Applicant: European Commission (represented by: U. Małecka and J. Samnadda, acting as Agents)

Defendant: Republic of Poland (represented by: B. Majczyna, acting as Agent)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Declares that, by failing to adopt, before the expiry of the time limit laid down in the reasoned opinion of the European Commission of 19 May 2022, all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive (EU) 2019/789 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 April 2019 laying down rules on the exercise of copyright and related rights applicable to certain online transmissions of broadcasting organisations and retransmissions of television and radio programmes, and amending Council Directive 93/83/EEC, and by failing, accordingly, to inform the Commission of such measures, the Republic of Poland has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 12 of that directive;










2.


Orders the Republic of Poland to pay the European Commission a lump sum of EUR 8 300 000;










3.


Orders the Republic of Poland to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission.






(1)  
            OJ C 205, 12.6.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4717/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
New national side of euro coins intended for circulation
Date: 2025-07-10
Institutions: Directorate-General for Economic and Financial Affairs, European Commission
Subjects: Luxembourg, commemoration, euro, issuing of currency




C_202503832EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/3832


10.7.2025






New national side of euro coins intended for circulation
(C/2025/3832)







National side of the new commemorative 2-euro coin intended for circulation and issued by Luxembourg

Euro coins intended for circulation have legal tender status throughout the euro area. For the purpose of informing the public and all parties who handle the coins, the Commission publishes a description of the designs of all new coins (1). In accordance with the Council conclusions of 10 February 2009
             (2), euro-area Member States and countries that have concluded a monetary agreement with the European Union providing for the issuing of euro coins are allowed to issue commemorative euro coins intended for circulation, provided that certain conditions are met, particularly that only the 2-euro denomination is used. These coins have the same technical characteristics as other 2-euro coins, but their national face features a commemorative design that is highly symbolic in national or European terms.

Issuing country: Luxembourg

Subject of commemoration: The 25th anniversary of the accession to the throne of Grand Duke Henri

Description of the design: The design depicts in its centre the effigy of Grand Duke Henri and in the background the grand ducal Palace. The text "25. TROUNJUBILAUM VUM GROUSSHERZOG HENRI" is depicted in semi-circular form above the effigy. The indication of the issuing country "LETZEBUERG" as well as the year of issuance “2025” appear below the effigy.
The coin’s outer ring depicts the 12 stars of the European flag.

Estimated number of coins to be issued: 200 000
         

Date of issue: February 2025


(1)  See OJ C 373, 28.12.2001, p. 1 for the national faces of all the coins issued in 2002.

(2)  See the conclusions of the Economic and Financial Affairs Council of 10 February 2009 and the Commission Recommendation of 19 December 2008 on common guidelines for the national sides and the issuance of euro coins intended for circulation (OJ L 9, 14.1.2009, p. 52).


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3832/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-365/24, Purefun Group: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 10 July 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Svea hovrätt, Patent- och marknadsöverdomstolen – Sweden) – Purefun Group AB v Doggy AB (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Trade marks – Directive (EU) 2015/2436 – Free movement of goods – Articles 34 and 36 TFEU – Trade name – Company name – National legislation conferring an exclusive right on the proprietor of a company name)
Date: 2025-07-10
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU trade mark, brand name, free movement of goods, freedom to provide services, goods and services, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_202504730EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/4730


8.9.2025






Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 10 July 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Svea hovrätt, Patent- och marknadsöverdomstolen – Sweden) – Purefun Group AB v Doggy AB


(Case C-365/24,
                (1)
Purefun Group)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Trade marks - Directive (EU) 2015/2436 - Free movement of goods - Articles 34 and 36 TFEU - Trade name - Company name - National legislation conferring an exclusive right on the proprietor of a company name)
(C/2025/4730)
Language of the case: Swedish

Referring court

Svea hovrätt, Patent- och marknadsöverdomstolen

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant: Purefun Group AB

Respondent: Doggy AB

Operative part of the judgment

Directive (EU) 2015/2436 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2015 to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks, and Articles 34 and 36 TFEU,
must be interpreted as not precluding a national system which provides, first, that the exclusive right conferred by a company name allows its proprietor to prohibit a third party from using an identical or similar sign, as a trade name or as a domain name, for goods or services which are identical or similar to those falling within the scope of activities for which its company name is registered, and, second, that failure to use that company name may, under certain conditions, lead to the revocation of that exclusive right and that the proprietor is required to describe and limit the nature of the activities falling within its object with sufficient precision to enable third parties to be effectively informed of them.


(1)  OJ C, C/2024/4452.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4730/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
New national side of euro coins intended for circulation
Date: 2025-07-10
Institutions: Directorate-General for Economic and Financial Affairs, European Commission
Subjects: Monaco, commemoration, euro, issuing of currency




C_202503829EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/3829


10.7.2025






New national side of euro coins intended for circulation
(C/2025/3829)







National side of the new commemorative 2-euro coin intended for circulation and issued by Monaco

Euro coins intended for circulation have legal tender status throughout the euro area. For the purpose of informing the public and all parties who handle the coins, the Commission publishes a description of the designs of all new coins (1). In accordance with the Council conclusions of 10 February 2009
             (2), euro-area Member States and countries that have concluded a monetary agreement with the European Union providing for the issuing of euro coins are allowed to issue commemorative euro coins intended for circulation, provided that certain conditions are met, particularly that only the 2-euro denomination is used. These coins have the same technical characteristics as other 2-euro coins, but their national face features a commemorative design that is highly symbolic in national or European terms.

Issuing country: Monaco

Subject of commemoration: Marquisat des Baux

Description of the design: The coin commemorates the fiefdom of Marquisate of Baux. This title was first held in 1642 by Hercule Grimaldi, son of Honoré II. Today, by historical tradition, it belongs to HSH Hereditary Prince Jacques.
The design depicts the rock and the surrounding area of the village of Les Baux de Provence. At the top is the name of the issuing country "MONACO." At the bottom, in semi-circle is the inscription "MARQUISAT DES BAUX."
         
The coin’s outer ring depicts the 12 stars of the European flag.

Estimated number of coins to be issued: 15 000
         

Date of issue: November 2025


(1)  See OJ C 373, 28.12.2001, p. 1 for the national faces of all the coins issued in 2002.

(2)  See the conclusions of the Economic and Financial Affairs Council of 10 February 2009 and the Commission Recommendation of 19 December 2008 on common guidelines for the national sides and the issuance of euro coins intended for circulation (OJ L 9, 14.1.2009, p. 52).


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3829/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-287/24, Ligue royale belge pour la protection des oiseaux: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 10 July 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d'État – Belgium) – Ligue royale belge pour la protection des oiseaux ASBL v Région wallonne (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common agricultural policy – Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 – Practices beneficial for the climate and the environment – Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/484 – Validity – Obligation to state reasons – Invasion of Ukraine by Russia – Increase in the agricultural production potential of the European Union – Derogation from certain conditions relating to the direct greening payment – Land lying fallow considered as a distinct crop and ecological focus area even if it has been grazed, harvested for production purposes or cultivated – Necessary and justifiable nature of the measures adopted)
Date: 2025-07-10
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU direct payments, agricultural production, aid to agriculture, crop production, derogation from EU law, land use, utilised agricultural area








C_202504726EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/4726


8.9.2025






Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 10 July 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d'État – Belgium) – Ligue royale belge pour la protection des oiseaux ASBL v Région wallonne


(Case C-287/24,
                (1)
Ligue royale belge pour la protection des oiseaux)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Common agricultural policy - Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 - Practices beneficial for the climate and the environment - Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/484 - Validity - Obligation to state reasons - Invasion of Ukraine by Russia - Increase in the agricultural production potential of the European Union - Derogation from certain conditions relating to the direct greening payment - Land lying fallow considered as a distinct crop and ecological focus area even if it has been grazed, harvested for production purposes or cultivated - Necessary and justifiable nature of the measures adopted)
(C/2025/4726)
Language of the case: French

Referring court

Conseil d'État

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Ligue royale belge pour la protection des oiseaux ASBL

Defendant: Région wallonne

Operative part of the judgment

Consideration of the question referred has disclosed nothing capable of affecting the validity of Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/484 of 23 March 2022 providing for derogations from Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council and from Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 639/2014 as regards the implementation of certain conditions relating to the greening payment for claim year 2022.


(1)  OJ C, C/2024/4841.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4726/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-823/24, Centro Servizi Culturali Santa Chiara: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 10 July 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale ordinario di Trento – Italy) – KP, HG, MC, VM v Centro Servizi Culturali Santa Chiara (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Social policy – Directive 1999/70/EC – Framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP – Clause 4 – Principle of non-discrimination – No less favourable treatment of fixed-term workers – Granting of certain elements of remuneration only to permanent workers – Fixed-term workers receiving higher hourly remuneration than that of permanent workers)
Date: 2025-07-10
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: equal pay, equal treatment, framework agreement, full-time employment, hourly wage, temporary employment, wage determination








C_202505670EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/5670


3.11.2025






Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 10 July 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale ordinario di Trento – Italy) – KP, HG, MC, VM v Centro Servizi Culturali Santa Chiara


(Case C-823/24,
                (1)
Centro Servizi Culturali Santa Chiara)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Social policy - Directive 1999/70/EC - Framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP - Clause 4 - Principle of non-discrimination - No less favourable treatment of fixed-term workers - Granting of certain elements of remuneration only to permanent workers - Fixed-term workers receiving higher hourly remuneration than that of permanent workers)
(C/2025/5670)
Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Tribunale ordinario di Trento

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicants: KP, HG, MC, VM

Defendant: Centro Servizi Culturali Santa Chiara

Operative part of the judgment

Clause 4.1 of the framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded on 18 March 1999, set out in the Annex to Council Directive 1999/70/EC of 28 June 1999 concerning the framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP,
must be interpreted as meaning that it does not preclude national legislation which allows the payment of certain elements of remuneration only in the case of permanent workers, to the exclusion of fixed-term workers, where those fixed-term workers receive higher hourly remuneration than that received by permanent workers, including where account is taken of those elements of remuneration in the remuneration of permanent workers.


(1)  OJ C, C/2025/1524.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/5670/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-635/23, WBS GmbH: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 10 July 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Kammergericht – Germany) – Criminal proceedings (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – European Investigation Order (EIO) – Directive 2014/41/EU – Article 2(c)(ii) – Concept of other competent authority acting in its capacity as an investigating authority in criminal proceedings – Competence to order the gathering of evidence in accordance with national law – Search measures requiring the authorisation of an investigating judge – Article 6(1) and (2) – Conditions for issuing an EIO)
Date: 2025-07-10
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: courts and tribunals, judicial cooperation in criminal matters in the EU, judicial investigation, public authorities








C_202504719EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/4719


8.9.2025






Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 10 July 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Kammergericht – Germany) – Criminal proceedings


(Case C-635/23,
                (1)
WBS GmbH)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Judicial cooperation in criminal matters - European Investigation Order (EIO) - Directive 2014/41/EU - Article 2(c)(ii) - Concept of ‘other competent authority acting in its capacity as an investigating authority in criminal proceedings’ - Competence to order the gathering of evidence in accordance with national law - Search measures requiring the authorisation of an investigating judge - Article 6(1) and (2) - Conditions for issuing an EIO)
(C/2025/4719)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Kammergericht

Party in the main proceedings

WBS GmbH

Other party:

Generalstaatsanwaltschaft Berlin

Operative part of the judgment

Article 2(c)(ii) of Directive 2014/41/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3 April 2014 regarding the European Investigation Order in criminal matters
must be interpreted as meaning that it is possible to treat as an ‘issuing authority’, within the meaning of that provision, an administrative authority as defined by the issuing State which, in the specific case, is acting in its capacity as an investigating authority in criminal proceedings and whose investigative measures involving an interference with the fundamental rights of the person concerned must, in accordance with national law, first be authorised by a judicial authority.


(1)  OJ C, C/2024/934.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4719/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)