do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-165/23: Judgment of the General Court of 2 July 2025 – Arkema France v Commission (Commercial policy – Dumping – Imports of fatty acids originating in Indonesia – Definitive anti-dumping duty – Article 9(1) of Regulation (UE) 2016/1036 – Continuation of the investigation after withdrawal of the complaint – Article 1(1) of Regulation 2016/1036 – Article 3(6) of Regulation 2016/1036 – Injury analysis – Article 21(1) of Regulation 2016/1036 – Union interest analysis – Manifest error of assessment – Error of law)
Date: 2025-07-02
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Indonesia, anti-dumping duty, import (EU), organic acid, originating product








C_202504444EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/4444


18.8.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 2 July 2025 – Arkema France v Commission


(Case T-165/23)
                (1)

(Commercial policy - Dumping - Imports of fatty acids originating in Indonesia - Definitive anti-dumping duty - Article 9(1) of Regulation (UE) 2016/1036 - Continuation of the investigation after withdrawal of the complaint - Article 1(1) of Regulation 2016/1036 - Article 3(6) of Regulation 2016/1036 - Injury analysis - Article 21(1) of Regulation 2016/1036 - Union interest analysis - Manifest error of assessment - Error of law)
(C/2025/4444)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Arkema France (Colombes, France) (represented by: S. Dumon-Kappe, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Di Masi, G. Luengo and J. Zieliński, agents)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/111 of 18 January 2023 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of fatty acid originating in Indonesia (OJ 2023, L 18, p. 1).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Arkema France to bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 179, 22.5.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4444/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-489/21: Judgment of the General Court of 2 July 2025 – Spain v Commission (State aid – Digital television – Aid for the deployment of DTT in remote and less urbanised areas (outside Castilla-La Mancha) – Decision declaring the aid unlawful and incompatible with the internal market – Decision to open the formal investigation procedure – Article 6(1) of Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 – Concept of aid scheme – Selectivity – Burden of proof – Technological neutrality – Advantage – Unjust enrichment)
Date: 2025-07-02
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Castile-La Mancha, State aid, control of State aid, high-definition television, peripheral region, proof, reimbursement of aid, telecommunications








C_202504442EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/4442


18.8.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 2 July 2025 – Spain v Commission


(Case T-489/21)
                (1)

(State aid - Digital television - Aid for the deployment of DTT in remote and less urbanised areas (outside Castilla-La Mancha) - Decision declaring the aid unlawful and incompatible with the internal market - Decision to open the formal investigation procedure - Article 6(1) of Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 - Concept of ‘aid scheme’ - Selectivity - Burden of proof - Technological neutrality - Advantage - Unjust enrichment)
(C/2025/4442)
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: Kingdom of Spain (represented by: A. Gavela Llopis and M. Morales Puerta, acting as Agents)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: P. Němečková, B. Stromsky and J. Carpi Badía, acting as Agents)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the Kingdom of Spain seeks the annulment of Commission Decision (EU) 2021/2034 of 10 June 2021 on the State aid SA.28599 (C 23/2010) (ex NN 36/2010, ex CP 163/2009) implemented by Spain for the deployment of digital terrestrial television in remote and less urbanised areas (outside Castilla-La Mancha) (OJ 2021 L 417, p. 1).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders the Kingdom of Spain to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission.






(1)  
            OJ C 412, 11.10.2021.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4442/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-423/25: Action brought on 2 July 2025 – Aurora v CPVO – SESVanderhave (Beta vulgaris L.)
Date: 2025-07-02
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: plant breeding, plant variety right, principle of legal certainty, proof, root vegetable








C_202504621EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/4621


25.8.2025






Action brought on 2 July 2025 – Aurora v CPVO – SESVanderhave (Beta vulgaris L.)


(Case T-423/25)

(C/2025/4621)
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicant: Aurora Srl (Padua, Italy) (represented by: C. Dekoninck, L. Coucke and P. Springorum, lawyers)

Defendant: Community Plant Variety Office

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: SESVanderhave NV (Tienen, Belgium)

Details of the proceedings before CPVO


Community Plant Variety Right at Issue: M 02205 (EU 15118)

Procedure before CPVO: Nullity proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Board of Appeal of 16 April 2025 in Case A 030/2022

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


declare the application admissible and well-founded;










—


annul the contested decision;










—


alter the contested decision by declaring Community plant variety right No EU 15118 null and void; and










—


order CPVO to pay the costs incurred by the Applicant.





Pleas in law







—


The Board of Appeal erred in law when deciding that, following the judgments of the General Court of 23 November 2017 and 13 March 2020, the burden of proof still lay with the Applicant;










—


The Board of Appeal breached an essential procedural requirement by not responding to the Applicant’s arguments based on legal certainty or, at the very least, it breached the principles of legal certainty and protection of legitimate expectations when it implicitly considered that the CPVO was entitled to change retroactively the characteristics used to justify the grant of a Community plant variety right; and










—


The Board of Appeal erred in law and in fact when deciding that the plant variety right at stake was distinct from the reference variety KW 043.






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4621/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Corrigendum to Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2024 on horizontal cybersecurity requirements for products with digital elements and amending Regulations (EU) No 168/2013 and (EU) 2019/1020 and Directive (EU) 2020/1828 (Cyber Resilience Act) (OJ L, 2024/2847, 20.11.2024)
Date: 2025-07-02
Institutions: Council of the European Union, European Parliament
Subjects: EC conformity marking, computer crime, computer equipment, digital technology, information security, information warfare, market approval, market supervision, single market, software








L_202590555EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
L series













2025/90555


2.7.2025






Corrigendum to Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2024 on horizontal cybersecurity requirements for products with digital elements and amending Regulations (EU) No 168/2013 and (EU) 2019/1020 and Directive (EU) 2020/1828 (Cyber Resilience Act)
(
Official Journal of the European Union L, 2024/2847, 20 November 2024
)

Page 65, Article 64(10), introductory wording:







for:




‘By way of derogation from paragraphs 3 to 9, the administrative fines referred to in those paragraphs shall not apply to the following:’
,










read:




‘By way of derogation from paragraphs 2 to 9, the administrative fines referred to in those paragraphs shall not apply to the following:’.







ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/2847/corrigendum/2025-07-02/oj
ISSN 1977-0677 (electronic edition)
Notice pursuant to Article 29(2) of the Staff Regulations – Publication of a vacancy for the function of Principal Adviser – Head of the Task Force on Startups and Scaleups (Grade AD 14) – Directorate-General for Research and Innovation (DG RTD) – COM/2025/10472
Date: 2025-07-02
Institutions: Directorate-General for Human Resources and Security, European Commission
Subjects: administrator, competition (EU), consultancy, job vacancy, recruitment, scale-up company, start-up








C_202503650EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/3650


2.7.2025







            NOTICE PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 29(2) OF THE STAFF REGULATIONS
         
Publication of a vacancy for the function of Principal Adviser – Head of the Task Force on Startups and Scaleups (Grade AD 14)
Directorate-General for Research and Innovation (DG RTD)
COM/2025/10472
(C/2025/3650)


          
      
The European Commission has published a vacancy notice (reference COM/2025/10472) for the function of Principal Adviser – Head of the Task Force on Startups and Scaleups (Grade AD 14) in Directorate-General for Research and Innovation (DG RTD) in Brussels.
To consult the text of the vacancy notice in 24 languages and to submit your application, please visit this dedicated webpage on the European Commission’s website: https://europa.eu/!c4qc9f.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3650/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-278/25 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 2 July 2025 – Duchenne Research & Advocacy v Commission (Interim relief – Medicinal products for human use – Refusal to renew the conditional marketing authorisation for Translarna – ataluren – Application for suspension of operation of a measure – Application for interim measures – Failure to comply with procedural requirements – Inadmissibility)
Date: 2025-07-02
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: admissibility, drug surveillance, market approval, orphan disease, orphan drug








C_202504612EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/4612


25.8.2025






Order of the President of the General Court of 2 July 2025 – Duchenne Research & Advocacy v Commission


(Case T-278/25 R)

(Interim relief - Medicinal products for human use - Refusal to renew the conditional marketing authorisation for Translarna - ataluren - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - Application for interim measures - Failure to comply with procedural requirements - Inadmissibility)
(C/2025/4612)
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Applicant: Associazione Duchenne Research & Advocacy APS (Parma, Italy) (represented by: V. Salvatore and G. Ragucci, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: E. Mathieu and A. Spina, acting as Agents)

Re:

By its action under Articles 278 and 279 TFEU, the applicant seeks, inter alia, suspension of the operation of Commission Implementing Decision C(2025) 2025 final of 28 March 2025 refusing the renewal of the conditional marketing authorisation for the medicinal product for human use Translarna – ataluren, granted by Decision C(2014)5619 final.

Operative part of the order







1.


The application for interim measures is dismissed.










2.


The costs are reserved.






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4612/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-473/24: Judgment of the General Court of 2 July 2025 – Villafrut v EUIPO – Venture Fruit Global (JOLi) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark JOLi – Earlier national word mark JOLIFE – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
Date: 2025-07-02
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, agricultural product, fresh fruit, fresh vegetable, horticulture, pip fruit, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_202504458EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/4458


18.8.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 2 July 2025 – Villafrut v EUIPO – Venture Fruit Global (JOLi)


(Case T-473/24)
                (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative mark JOLi - Earlier national word mark JOLIFE - Relative ground for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(C/2025/4458)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Villafrut Srl (Oppeano, Italy) (represented by: A. Rizzoli, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: C. Bovar and D. Stoyanova-Valchanova, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Venture Fruit Global Ltd (Auckland, New Zealand)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment and alteration of the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 23 July 2024 (Case R 2468/2023-5).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Villafrut Srl and the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) each to bear their own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C, C/2024/6114, 21.10.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4458/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections – SA.107476
Date: 2025-07-02
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Italy, State aid, control of State aid, processing industry








C_202503591EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/3591


2.7.2025






Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union
Cases where the Commission raises no objections
SA.107476
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2025/3591)








Date of adoption of the decision


30.1.2024




Aid number


SA.107476




Member State


Italy




Region


Italy




Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)


RRF - TCTF 2.6 - Regime di aiuti agli investimenti per la decarbonizzazione dei processi industriali in settori hard to abate




Legal basis


Decree of the Director General of Energy Incentives of the Ministry of the Environment and Energy Security No. 254 of 15 March 2023, which, in application of article 11, paragraph 2 of the Decree of the Minister of Ecological Transition of 21 October 2022, defines the technical-operating procedures for the granting of subsidies for the use of hydrogen in hard-to-abate sectors




Type of measure


Scheme


 




Objective


Environmental protection, Energy efficiency




Form of aid


Direct grant




Budget


Overall budget: 550 000 000  EUR
Annual budget: 183 300 000  EUR




Intensity


60,0 %




Duration


Until 31.12.2025




Economic sectors


MANUFACTURING




Name and address of the granting authority







Ministry of Environment and Energy Security – Directorate General of Energy Incentives




Via Cristoforo Colombo, 44 - 00147 Roma








Other information


 




The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search?caseInstrument=SA



ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3591/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-1103/23: Judgment of the General Court of 2 July 2025 – Ferrari SpA v EUIPO – Hesse (TESTAROSSA) (EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark TESTAROSSA – Genuine use of the mark – Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Use by third parties – Nature of the use – Implied consent of the proprietor of the mark – Proof of genuine use – Second-hand cars – Parts and accessories)
Date: 2025-07-02
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, engine, motor car, motor vehicle industry, registered trade mark, trade-mark law, vehicle parts








C_202504448EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/4448


18.8.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 2 July 2025 – Ferrari SpA v EUIPO – Hesse (TESTAROSSA)


(Case T-1103/23)
                (1)

(EU trade mark - Revocation proceedings - International registration designating the European Union - Word mark TESTAROSSA - Genuine use of the mark - Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Use by third parties - Nature of the use - Implied consent of the proprietor of the mark - Proof of genuine use - Second-hand cars - Parts and accessories)
(C/2025/4448)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Ferrari SpA (Modena, Italy) (represented by: K. Muraro, G. Russo and C. Comolli Acquaviva, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: E. Markakis, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Kurt Hesse (Nuremberg, Germany) (represented by: M. Krogmann, lawyer)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 29 August 2023 (Joined Cases R 334/2017-5 and R 343/2017-5), as corrected on 28 September 2023.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 29 August 2023 (Joined Cases R 334/2017-5 and R 343/2017-5);










2.


Orders EUIPO and Mr Kurt Hesse to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by Ferrari SpA, including the costs necessarily incurred for the purposes of the proceedings before the Board of Appeal.






(1)  
            OJ C, C/2024/759, 22.1.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4448/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-1104/23: Judgment of the General Court of 2 July 2025 – Ferrari v EUIPO – Hesse (TESTAROSSA) (EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark TESTAROSSA – Genuine use of the mark – Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Use by third parties – Nature of the use – Implied consent of the proprietor of the mark – Proof of genuine use – Scale toy land motor vehicles)
Date: 2025-07-02
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, motor vehicle, registered trade mark, toy industry, trade-mark law








C_202504449EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/4449


18.8.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 2 July 2025 – Ferrari v EUIPO – Hesse (TESTAROSSA)


(Case T-1104/23)
                (1)

(EU trade mark - Revocation proceedings - International registration designating the European Union - Word mark TESTAROSSA - Genuine use of the mark - Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Use by third parties - Nature of the use - Implied consent of the proprietor of the mark - Proof of genuine use - Scale toy land motor vehicles)
(C/2025/4449)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Ferrari SpA (Modena, Italy) (represented by: K. Muraro, G. Russo and C. Comolli Acquaviva, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: E. Markakis, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Kurt Hesse (Nuremberg, Germany) (represented by M. Krogmann, lawyer)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment and the alteration of the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 29 August 2023 (Case R 887/2016-5).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 29 August 2023 (Case R 887/2016-5) to the extent that the contested mark was revoked in respect of ‘scale toy land motor vehicles’ in Class 28;










2.


Dismisses the action as to the remainder;










3.


Orders EUIPO and Mr Kurt Hesse to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by Ferrari SpA, including the costs necessarily incurred for the purposes of the proceedings before the Board of Appeal.






(1)  
            OJ C, C/2024/760, 22.1.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4449/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Opinion of the European Central Bank of 2 July 2025 on a proposal for a Council regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 974/98 as regards the introduction of the euro in Bulgaria and on a proposal for a Council regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 2866/98 as regards the conversion rate to the euro for Bulgaria (CON/2025/15)
Date: 2025-07-02
Institutions: European Central Bank
Subjects: Bulgaria, Euro Group (euro area), conversion rate, euro, money, participating country (euro area)








C_202503948EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/3948


10.7.2025







            OPINION OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK
         
of 2 July 2025
         
on a proposal for a Council regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 974/98 as regards the introduction of the euro in Bulgaria and on a proposal for a Council regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 2866/98 as regards the conversion rate to the euro for Bulgaria
(CON/2025/15)
(C/2025/3948)


Introduction and legal basis

On 5 June 2025 the European Central Bank (ECB) received a request from the Council of the European Union for an opinion on a proposal for a Council regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 974/98 as regards the introduction of the euro in Bulgaria (1). On 1 July 2025 the ECB received a request from the Council of the European Union for an opinion on a proposal for a Council regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 2866/98 as regards the conversion rate to the euro for Bulgaria (2).
The ECB’s competence to deliver an opinion is based on Article 140(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. In accordance with Article 17.5, first sentence, of the Rules of Procedure of the European Central Bank, the Governing Council has adopted this opinion.

Observations









1.


The proposed regulations will enable the introduction of the euro as the currency of Bulgaria following the abrogation of Bulgaria’s derogation in accordance with the procedure set out in Article 140(2) of the Treaty.












2.


The ECB welcomes the proposed regulations.






Done at Frankfurt am Main, 2 July 2025.


The President of the ECB

Christine LAGARDE
               





(1)  COM(2025) 301 final.

(2)  COM(2025) 372 final.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3948/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)