do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-469/23 P: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 June 2025 – eins energie in sachsen v Commission (Appeal – Competition – Concentrations – Decision declaring a concentration compatible with the internal market – Action brought by a third party – Admissibility – Fourth paragraph of Article 263 TFEU – Locus standi)
Date: 2025-06-26
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: economic concentration, electrical energy, electricity supply, energy distribution, energy industry, energy production, energy transport, merger control, renewable energy, right of action








C_202504426EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/4426


18.8.2025






Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 June 2025 – eins energie in sachsen v Commission


(Case C-469/23 P)
                (1)

(Appeal - Competition - Concentrations - Decision declaring a concentration compatible with the internal market - Action brought by a third party - Admissibility - Fourth paragraph of Article 263 TFEU - Locus standi)
(C/2025/4426)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Appellant: eins energie in sachsen GmbH & Co. KG (represented by: T. Heymann and I. Zenke, Rechtsanwälte)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: G. Meessen and I. Zaloguin, acting as Agents, and by T.G. Funke, Rechtsanwalt), Federal Republic of Germany (represented by: J. Möller and R. Kanitz, acting as Agents), E.ON SE (represented initially by C. Barth, C. Grave, D.-J. dos Santos Gonçalves and R. Seifert, Rechtsanwälte, and subsequently by C. Barth, A. Fuchs, C. Grave and D.-J. dos Santos Gonçalves, Rechtsanwälte), RWE AG (represented initially by U. Scholz, J. Siegmund and J. Ziebarth, Rechtsanwälte, and subsequently by U. Scholz, J. Siegmund and M. von Armansperg, Rechtsanwälte)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Sets aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 17 May 2023, eins energie in sachsen v Commission (T-318/20, EU:T:2023:262);










2.


Dismisses the action brought by eins energie in sachsen GmbH & Co. KG for annulment of Commission Decision C(2019) 1711 final of 26 February 2019, declaring a concentration compatible with the internal market and the EEA Agreement (Case M.8871 – RWE/E.ON Assets) as inadmissible;










3.


Orders eins energie in sachsen GmbH & Co. KG, E.ON SE, RWE AG and the European Commission to bear their own costs in relation to the proceedings at first instance and to the appeal proceedings;










4.


Orders the Federal Republic of Germany to bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 321, 11.9.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4426/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections – SA.115201
Date: 2025-06-26
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: France, State aid, control of State aid, textile industry








C_202503465EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/3465


26.6.2025






Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union
Cases where the Commission raises no objections
SA.115201
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2025/3465)








Date of adoption of the decision


13.1.2025




Aid number


SA.115201




Member State


France




Region


France




Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)


Aide au sauvetage à la société LCS International SAS




Legal basis


Décret prêt FDES




Type of measure


Ad Hoc Case


 




Objective


Rescuing undertakings in difficulty, Restructuring undertakings in difficulty




Form of aid


Loan/ Repayable advances




Budget


Overall budget: 12 500 000  EUR




Intensity


100.0%




Duration


16.7.2024 - 16.1.2025




Economic sectors


Manufacture of wearing apparel




Name and address of the granting authority







Ministère de l'Economie, de l'Industrie et de l'Emploi




12 rue Villiot 75012 -Paris








Other information


 




The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search?caseInstrument=SA



ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3465/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-410/25: Action brought on 26 June 2025 – Vitabalans v EUIPO – Hasco TM (Ibumax-Lysin)
Date: 2025-06-26
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, over-the-counter drug, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_202504475EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/4475


18.8.2025






Action brought on 26 June 2025 – Vitabalans v EUIPO – Hasco TM (Ibumax-Lysin)


(Case T-410/25)

(C/2025/4475)
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicant: Vitabalans Oy (Hämeenlinna, Finland) (represented by: P. Eskola, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Hasco TM sp. z o.o. sp.k. (Wrocław, Poland)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union word mark Ibumax-Lysin – Application for registration No 18 779 393
         

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 29 April 2025 in Case R 1385/2024-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


reject the opposition filed by the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal in its entirety;










—


order EUIPO and the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal to bear the applicant’s costs in the present proceedings and in those before the Board of Appeal.





Plea in law







—


Infringement of the Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4475/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Summary of European Commission Decisions on authorisations for the placing on the market for the use and/or for use of substances listed in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) (Published pursuant to Article 64(9) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006)
Date: 2025-06-26
Institutions: Directorate-General for Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs, European Commission
Subjects: chemical product, chromium, copper, health control, health risk, market approval, marketing standard, metal coating, oxide, thin sheet








C_202503357EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/3357


26.6.2025






Summary of European Commission Decisions on authorisations for the placing on the market for the use and/or for use of substances listed in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH)


(Published pursuant to Article 64(9) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006
                (1)
)


(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2025/3357)


Decision granting an authorisation in the context of a review














Reference of the decision (2)



Date of decision


Substance name


Holder of the authorisation


Authorisation number


Authorised use


Date of expiry of review period


Repealed decision


Reasons for the decision




C(2025) 3764


19 June 2025


chromium trioxide (EC No 215-607-8; CAS No 1333-82-0)


Circuit Foil Luxembourg SARL, Zone industrielle C. Salzbaach, 9559 Wiltz, Luxembourg


REACH/25/34/0/R1


Industrial use of chromium trioxide for the treatment of copper foil used in the manufacture of printed circuit board and Li-ion batteries


21 November 2034


C(2018) 8564


In accordance with Article 60(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, the socio-economic benefits outweigh the risk to human health and the environment from the use of the substance and there are no suitable alternative substances or technologies.






(1)  
            OJ L 396, 30.12.2006, p. 1.

(2)  The decision is available on the European Commission website at: Authorisation (europa.eu)



ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3357/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.11874 – FRASERS / XXL)
Date: 2025-06-26
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Finland, Norway, Sweden, clothing, economic concentration, electronic commerce, footwear industry, merger control, retail trade, sport, sports equipment








C_202503663EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/3663


3.7.2025






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.11874 – FRASERS / XXL)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2025/3663)

On 26 June 2025, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32025M11874. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3663/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Summary of European Commission Decisions on authorisations for the placing on the market for the use and/or for use of substances listed in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) (Published pursuant to Article 64(9) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006)
Date: 2025-06-26
Institutions: Directorate-General for Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs, European Commission
Subjects: aeronautical industry, chemical product, chromium, health control, health risk, market approval, marketing standard, metal coating, oxide








C_202503360EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/3360


26.6.2025






Summary of European Commission Decisions on authorisations for the placing on the market for the use and/or for use of substances listed in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH)


(Published pursuant to Article 64(9) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006
                (1)
)


(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2025/3360)


Decision granting an authorisation













Reference of the decision (2)



Date of decision


Substance name


Holder of the authorisation


Authorisation number


Authorised use


Date of expiry of review period


Reasons for the decision




C(2025) 3814


19 June 2025


chromium trioxide (EC No 215-607-8; CAS No 1333-82-0)


Safran Aircraft Engines, 2, boulevard du Général-Martial-Valin, 75724 Paris CEDEX 15, France


REACH/25/32/0


Slurry mixtures containing chromium trioxide for the surface treatment of aircraft engines parts of compressors or turbines


31 December 2030


In accordance with Article 60(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, the socio-economic benefits outweigh the risk to human health and the environment from the use of the substance and there are no suitable alternative substances or technologies.






(1)  
            OJ L 396, 30.12.2006, p. 1.

(2)  The decision is available on the European Commission website at: Authorisation (europa.eu)



ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3360/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-484/23 P: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 June 2025 – Mainova v Commission (Appeal – Competition – Concentrations – Decision declaring a concentration compatible with the internal market – Action brought by a third party – Admissibility – Fourth paragraph of Article 263 TFEU – Locus standi)
Date: 2025-06-26
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: economic concentration, electrical energy, electricity supply, energy distribution, energy industry, energy production, energy transport, merger control, renewable energy, right of action








C_202504427EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/4427


18.8.2025






Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 June 2025 – Mainova v Commission


(Case C-484/23 P)
                (1)

(Appeal - Competition - Concentrations - Decision declaring a concentration compatible with the internal market - Action brought by a third party - Admissibility - Fourth paragraph of Article 263 TFEU - 
Locus standi
)
(C/2025/4427)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Appellant: Mainova AG (represented by: C. Schalast, Rechtsanwalt)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: G. Meessen and I. Zaloguin, acting as Agents, and by F.C. Haus and J. Mädler, Rechtsanwälte), Federal Republic of Germany (represented by J. Möller and R. Kanitz, acting as Agents), E.ON SE (represented initially by C. Barth, C. Grave, D.-J. dos Santos Gonçalves and R. Seifert, Rechtsanwälte, and subsequently by C. Barth, A. Fuchs, C. Grave and D.-J. dos Santos Gonçalves, Rechtsanwälte), RWE AG (represented initially by U. Scholz, J. Siegmund and J. Ziebarth, Rechtsanwälte, and subsequently by U. Scholz, J. Siegmund and M. von Armansperg, Rechtsanwälte)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Sets aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 17 May 2023, Mainova v Commission (T-320/20, EU:T:2023:264);










2.


Dismisses the action brought by Mainova AG for annulment of Commission Decision C(2019) 1711 final of 26 February 2019, declaring a concentration compatible with the internal market and the EEA Agreement (Case M.8871 – RWE/E.ON Assets) as inadmissible;










3.


Orders Mainova AG, E.ON SE, RWE AG and the European Commission to bear their own costs in relation to the proceedings at first instance and to the appeal proceedings;










4.


Orders the Federal Republic of Germany to bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 321, 11.9.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4427/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)