do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Corrigendum to Council Regulation (EU) 2025/932 of 20 May 2025 amending Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine (OJ L, 2025/932, 20.5.2025)
Date: 2025-06-25
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, Russia, Russo-Ukrainian issue, Ukraine, economic sanctions, international sanctions, legal person, natural person, territorial dispute, territorial law, trade restriction








L_202590523EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
L series













2025/90523


25.6.2025






Corrigendum to Council Regulation (EU) 2025/932 of 20 May 2025 amending Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine
(
Official Journal of the European Union L, 2025/932, of 20 May 2025
)

Page 279, Annex II concerning the amendment of Annex VII to Council Regulation (EU) No 833/2014, Part B, under point ‘6. Energetic materials and precursors’
            

for:








‘CN Code


Description




2804 50 10 


Boron




2829 90 


Perchlorates; bromates and perbromates; iodates and periodates




2829 11 00 


Chlorates of sodium




2829 19 00 


Other chlorates




4706 10 


Pulps of fibres derived from recovered (waste and scrap) paper or paperboard or of other fibrous cellulosic material: Cotton linters pulp




7603 10 00 


Powders of non-lamellar structure




7603 20 00 


Powders of lamellar structure; flakes




8104 30 00 


Magnesium raspings, turnings and granules, graded according to size; powders’






read:








‘CN Code


Description




2804 50 10 


Boron




2829 11 00 


Chlorates of sodium




2829 19 00 


Other chlorates




2829 90 


Perchlorates; bromates and perbromates; iodates and periodates




4706 10 


Pulps of fibres derived from recovered (waste and scrap) paper or paperboard or of other fibrous cellulosic material: Cotton linters pulp




7603 10 00 


Powders of non-lamellar structure




7603 20 00 


Powders of lamellar structure; flakes




8104 30 00 


Magnesium raspings, turnings and granules, graded according to size; powders’







ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2025/932/corrigendum/2025-06-25/oj
ISSN 1977-0677 (electronic edition)
Case T-495/24: Judgment of the General Court of 25 June 2025 – FG v Commission (Civil service – Officials – Retirement pension – Pension rights acquired before entry into the service of the European Union – Transfer to the EU scheme – Deduction of the capital appreciation between the date of the application for a transfer and the actual date of the transfer – Repayment of part of the amount of the appreciation – Right to property – Plea of illegality)
Date: 2025-06-25
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: interest, ownership, servant (EU), transfer of pension rights








C_202504291EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/4291


11.8.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 25 June 2025 – FG v Commission


(Case T-495/24)
                (1)

(Civil service - Officials - Retirement pension - Pension rights acquired before entry into the service of the European Union - Transfer to the EU scheme - Deduction of the capital appreciation between the date of the application for a transfer and the actual date of the transfer - Repayment of part of the amount of the appreciation - Right to property - Plea of illegality)
(C/2025/4291)
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Applicant: FG (represented by: M. Velardo, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Baeckelmans and C. Molinari, acting as Agents)

Re:

By his action under Article 270 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment in part of the decision of the European Commission of 28 September 2023 confirming the transfer to the pension scheme of the institutions of the European Union of his pension rights acquired prior to his entry into the service of the European Union, in so far as the Commission refused to reimburse him the amount of EUR 32 723,22.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders FG to pay the costs.






(1)  
            OJ C, C/2024/7038, 2.12.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4291/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Euro exchange rates – 24 June 2025
Date: 2025-06-25
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_202503114EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/3114


25.6.2025






Euro exchange rates (1)


            24 June 2025
         
(C/2025/3114)


1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,1607 




JPY


Japanese yen


168,27 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4597 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,85270 




SEK


Swedish krona


11,0630 




CHF


Swiss franc


0,9387 




ISK


Iceland króna


142,20 




NOK


Norwegian krone


11,7130 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


24,794 




HUF


Hungarian forint


402,13 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,2538 




RON


Romanian leu


5,0487 




TRY


Turkish lira


46,0086 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,7834 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,5915 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


9,1114 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,9244 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,4855 




KRW


South Korean won


1 578,75 




ZAR


South African rand


20,5836 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


8,3262 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


18 947,15 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,9260 




PHP


Philippine peso


66,288 




RUB


Russian rouble


 




THB


Thai baht


37,926 




BRL


Brazilian real


6,3613 




MXN


Mexican peso


22,0972 




INR


Indian rupee


99,8517 






(1)  
            Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3114/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-372/24: Judgment of the General Court of 25 June 2025 – K-Way v EUIPO – Gubbini (Representation of five coloured parallel strips) (EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU figurative mark representing five coloured parallel strips – Genuine use of the mark – Nature of use – Use in relation to goods in respect of which the mark is registered – Article 18(1)(a) and Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
Date: 2025-06-25
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, personal effects, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_202504289EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/4289


11.8.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 25 June 2025 – K-Way v EUIPO – Gubbini (Representation of five coloured parallel strips)


(Case T-372/24)
                (1)

(EU trade mark - Revocation proceedings - EU figurative mark representing five coloured parallel strips - Genuine use of the mark - Nature of use - Use in relation to goods in respect of which the mark is registered - Article 18(1)(a) and Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(C/2025/4289)
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Applicant: K-Way SpA (Milan, Italy) (represented by: D. Sindico and E. Ravezzani, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: R. Raponi, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Adorno Gubbini (Bagnolo Mella, Italy)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the alteration and, in the alternative, the annulment of the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 21 May 2024 (Case R 1748/2023-2).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Alters the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 21 May 2024 (Case R 1748/2023-2) in so far as it concerns shopping bags, in Class 18, and upholds, in respect of those goods, the action brought before that Board of Appeal of EUIPO by K-Way SpA against the decision of the Cancellation Division of 11 July 2023;










2.


The decision of the Cancellation Division of 11 July 2023 is annulled to the extent that it revoked the EU trade mark registered under No 3971561 for non-use in respect of the abovementioned shopping bags;










3.


Dismisses the action as to the remainder;










4.


Orders each party to bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C, C/2024/5244, 2.9.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4289/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-510/20 RENV: Judgment of the General Court of 25 June 2025 – Fachverband Spielhallen and LM v Commission (State aid – Tax treatment of operators of public casinos in Germany – Levy on the profits – Deductibility of the amounts paid in respect of that levy from the tax base for corporation and trade tax – Decision not to raise any objections – No serious difficulties – Concept of State aid – Selective nature)
Date: 2025-06-25
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Germany, North Rhine-Westphalia, State aid, control of State aid, game of chance, gaming establishment, tax exemption, tax relief, tax system








C_202504281EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/4281


11.8.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 25 June 2025 – Fachverband Spielhallen and LM v Commission


(Case T-510/20 RENV)
                (1)

(State aid - Tax treatment of operators of public casinos in Germany - Levy on the profits - Deductibility of the amounts paid in respect of that levy from the tax base for corporation and trade tax - Decision not to raise any objections - No serious difficulties - Concept of ‘State aid’ - Selective nature)
(C/2025/4281)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicants: Fachverband Spielhallen eV (Berlin, Germany) and LM (represented by: A. Bartosch and R. Schmidt, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: B. Stromsky and C. Kovács, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Federal Republic of Germany (represented by: J. Möller and R. Kanitz, acting as Agents)

Re:

By their action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicants, seek the annulment of Commission Decision C(2019) 8819 final of 9 December 2019 on State aid SA.44944 (2019/C) (ex 2019/FC) – Tax treatment of public casinos operators in Germany and SA.53552 (2019/C) (ex 2019/FC) – Alleged guarantee for public casinos operators in Germany (Wirtschaftlichkeitsgarantie), in so far as it rejects their complaint directed against the fact that the sums paid to the Land Nordrhein-Westfalen (Land of North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany) by operators of public casinos by way of a levy on the profits were deductible from the tax bases for trade tax and income or corporation tax.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Fachverband Spielhallen eV and by LM in connection with the appeal proceedings before the Court of Justice in Case C-831/21 P;










3.


Orders Fachverband Spielhallen and LM to bear, in addition to their own costs, those incurred by the Commission relating to the proceedings referred back to the General Court in Case T-510/20 RENV and to the initial proceedings before the General Court in Case T-510/20;










4.


Orders the Federal Republic of Germany to bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 329, 5.10.2020.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4281/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.12019 – APG / MACQUARIE / SKYNRG)
Date: 2025-06-25
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: aviation fuel, economic concentration, energy transition, investment company, merger control








C_202503606EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/3606


1.7.2025






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.12019 – APG / MACQUARIE / SKYNRG)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2025/3606)

On 25 June 2025, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32025M12019. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3606/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Initiation of proceedings (Case M.11753 – MARS / KELLANOVA)
Date: 2025-06-25
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: animal feedingstuffs, cereal flakes, confectionery product, economic concentration, merger control, rice, supplier








C_202503673EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/3673


4.7.2025






Initiation of proceedings
(Case M.11753 – MARS / KELLANOVA)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2025/3673)

On 25 June 2025, the Commission decided to initiate proceedings in the above-mentioned case after finding that the notified concentration raises serious doubts as to its compatibility with the internal market. The initiation of proceedings opens a second phase investigation with regard to the notified concentration, and is without prejudice to the final decision on the case. The decision is based on Article 6(1)(c) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1).
The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their observations on the proposed concentration to the Commission.
In order to be fully taken into account in the procedure, observations should reach the Commission not later than 15 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by email to COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu or by post, under reference No. M.11753 – MARS / KELLANOVA, to the following address:





European Commission




Directorate-General for Competition




Merger Registry




1049 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË






(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3673/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-424/25, Overgaard Gods: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Vestre Landsret (Denmark) lodged on 25 June 2025 – Overgaard Gods A/S v Miljøstyrelsen
Date: 2025-06-25
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Denmark, State aid, control of State aid, drinking water, principle of proportionality, reimbursement of aid, tax exemption, tax relief, water protection, water supply








C_202504584EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/4584


25.8.2025






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Vestre Landsret (Denmark) lodged on 25 June 2025 – Overgaard Gods A/S v Miljøstyrelsen


(Case C-424/25, Overgaard Gods)

(C/2025/4584)
Language of the case: Danish

Referring court

Vestre Landsret

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Overgaard Gods A/S

Defendant: Miljøstyrelsen

Question referred

In situations such as the one at issue in the main proceedings, where the volume actually extracted constitutes only a small fraction of the permissible volume and where the beneficiary cannot be said to have derived any actual economic benefit from the entire permissible volume, do fundamental principles of EU law, including the principle of proportionality, preclude the unlawful and incompatible State aid, which the Danish State is recovering under the Law on recovery and the Decree on recovery in order to enforce the repayment obligation imposed by Commission Decision of 16 October 2017 on aid measure SA.32874 (2012/C), from being determined on the basis of permissible volumes, so that the claim must be extinguished or determined on the basis of the volume actually extracted?


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4584/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-466/23 P: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 June 2025 – Stadtwerke Hameln Weserbergland v Commission (Appeal – Competition – Concentrations – Decision declaring a concentration compatible with the internal market – Action brought by a third party – Admissibility – Fourth paragraph of Article 263 TFEU – Locus standi)
Date: 2025-06-25
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: economic concentration, electrical energy, electricity supply, energy distribution, energy industry, energy production, energy transport, merger control, renewable energy, right of action








C_202504425EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/4425


18.8.2025






Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 June 2025 – Stadtwerke Hameln Weserbergland v Commission


(Case C-466/23 P)
                (1)

(Appeal - Competition - Concentrations - Decision declaring a concentration compatible with the internal market - Action brought by a third party - Admissibility - Fourth paragraph of Article 263 TFEU - Locus standi)
(C/2025/4425)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Appellant: Stadtwerke Hameln Weserbergland GmbH (represented by: T. Heymann and I. Zenke, Rechtsanwälte)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: G. Meessen and I. Zaloguin, acting as Agents, and by T.G. Funke, Rechtsanwalt), Federal Republic of Germany (represented by: J. Möller and R. Kanitz, acting as Agents), E.ON SE (represented initially by C. Barth, C. Grave, D.-J. dos Santos Gonçalves and R. Seifert, Rechtsanwälte, and subsequently by C. Barth, A. Fuchs, C. Grave and D.-J. dos Santos Gonçalves, Rechtsanwälte), RWE AG (represented initially by U. Scholz, J. Siegmund and J. Ziebarth, Rechtsanwälte, and subsequently by U. Scholz, J. Siegmund and M. von Armansperg, Rechtsanwälte)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Sets aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 17 May 2023, Stadtwerke Hameln Weserbergland v Commission (T-314/20, EU:T:2023:258);










2.


Dismisses the action brought by Stadtwerke Hameln Weserbergland GmbH for annulment of Commission Decision C(2019) 1711 final of 26 February 2019, declaring a concentration compatible with the internal market and the EEA Agreement (Case M.8871 – RWE/E.ON Assets) as inadmissible;










3.


Orders Stadtwerke Hameln Weserbergland GmbH, E.ON SE, RWE AG and the European Commission to bear their own costs in relation to the proceedings at first instance and to the appeal proceedings;










4.


Orders the Federal Republic of Germany to bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 321, 11.9.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4425/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-366/22: Judgment of the General Court of 25 June 2025 – Ryanair v Commission (Condor II; COVID-19) (State aid – German air transport market – Public loan guaranteed by Germany to Condor Flugdienst in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic – Decision not to raise any objections – Aid intended to make good the damage caused by an exceptional occurrence – Article 107(2)(b) TFEU – Assessment of the damage – Direct causal link – Assessment of the amount of the aid – Principle of non-discrimination – Freedom to provide services – Freedom of establishment – Obligation to state reasons)
Date: 2025-06-25
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Germany, State aid, airline, control of State aid, coronavirus disease, epidemic, equal treatment, freedom to provide services, public borrowing, right of establishment








C_202504282EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/4282


11.8.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 25 June 2025 – Ryanair v Commission (Condor II; COVID-19)


(Case T-366/22)
                (1)

(State aid - German air transport market - Public loan guaranteed by Germany to Condor Flugdienst in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic - Decision not to raise any objections - Aid intended to make good the damage caused by an exceptional occurrence - Article 107(2)(b) TFEU - Assessment of the damage - Direct causal link - Assessment of the amount of the aid - Principle of non-discrimination - Freedom to provide services - Freedom of establishment - Obligation to state reasons)
(C/2025/4282)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Ryanair DAC (Swords, Ireland) (represented by: E. Vahida, S. Rating and I.-G. Metaxas Maranghidis, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Nicolae and V. Bottka, acting as Agents)

Interveners in support of the defendant: Federal Republic of Germany (represented by: J. Möller and P.-L. Krüger, acting as Agents), Condor Flugdienst GmbH, (Neu-Isenburg, Germany) (represented by: A. Rosenfeld, S. Lünenbürger, S. Blazek, A. Birnstiel and K. Reiter, lawyers)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of European Commission of 26 July 2021 on State Aid SA.56867 (2020/N, ex 2020/PN) – Germany – Compensation for the damage caused by the COVID-19 outbreak to Condor Flugdienst GmbH (OJ 2022 C 177, p. 1).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Ryanair DAC to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission and by Condor Flugdienst GmbH;










3.


Orders the Federal Republic of Germany to bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 311, 16.8.2022



ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4282/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)