do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Euro exchange rates – 11 June 2025
Date: 2025-06-12
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_202503105EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/3105


12.6.2025






Euro exchange rates (1)


            11 June 2025
         
(C/2025/3105)


1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,1433 




JPY


Japanese yen


166,17 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4591 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,84760 




SEK


Swedish krona


10,9845 




CHF


Swiss franc


0,9405 




ISK


Iceland króna


143,60 




NOK


Norwegian krone


11,5660 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


24,784 




HUF


Hungarian forint


400,38 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,2605 




RON


Romanian leu


5,0273 




TRY


Turkish lira


44,8064 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,7578 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,5647 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,9740 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,8973 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,4714 




KRW


South Korean won


1 572,70 




ZAR


South African rand


20,3080 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


8,2172 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


18 615,32 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,8447 




PHP


Philippine peso


63,865 




RUB


Russian rouble


 




THB


Thai baht


37,369 




BRL


Brazilian real


6,3772 




MXN


Mexican peso


21,7313 




INR


Indian rupee


97,7960 






(1)  
            Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3105/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.11825 – VERBUND / SW MÜNSTER / JV)
Date: 2025-06-12
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Germany, North Rhine-Westphalia, economic concentration, electricity storage device, energy supply, marketing, merger control








C_202503455EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/3455


24.6.2025






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.11825 – VERBUND / SW MÜNSTER / JV)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2025/3455)

On 12 June 2025, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in German language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32025M11825. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3455/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-415/23 P: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 12 June 2025 – OHB System AG v European Commission (Appeal – Public supply contracts – Tendering procedure – Procurement of Galileo transition satellites – Competitive dialogue – Rejection of a tenderer’s bid – Award of the contract concerned to other tenderers)
Date: 2025-06-12
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: award of contract, equal treatment, proof, public procurement, satellite communications, supplies contract, tendering








C_202504124EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/4124


4.8.2025






Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 12 June 2025 – OHB System AG v European Commission


(Case C-415/23 P)
                (1)

(Appeal - Public supply contracts - Tendering procedure - Procurement of Galileo transition satellites - Competitive dialogue - Rejection of a tenderer’s bid - Award of the contract concerned to other tenderers)
(C/2025/4124)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Appellant: OHB System AG (represented by: W. Würfel, Rechtsanwalt)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: L. André, J. Estrada de Solà and L. Mantl, acting as Agents), Italian Republic, Airbus Defence and Space GmbH (represented by: P.-E. Partsch, C.-E. Seestädt and B. ten Seldam, Rechtsanwälte)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Sets aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 26 April 2023, OHB System v Commission (T-54/21, EU:T:2023:210);










2.


Refers the case back to the General Court of the European Union;










3.


Reserves the costs.






(1)  OJ C, C/2023/1430.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4124/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-364/23 P: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 12 June 2025 – ZR v European Union Intellectual Property Office (Appeal – Civil service – Interinstitutional transfer – Transfer application on the basis of Article 8 of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union, submitted in response to a vacancy notice – Rejection of that application – Obligation to take account of the order of priority laid down in Article 29(1) of those regulations – Errors of law – Contradictory reasoning)
Date: 2025-06-12
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: European official, civil service, equal treatment, job vacancy, reassignment, staff regulations (EU)








C_202504123EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/4123


4.8.2025






Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 12 June 2025 – ZR v European Union Intellectual Property Office


(Case C-364/23 P)
                (1)

(Appeal - Civil service - Interinstitutional transfer - Transfer application on the basis of Article 8 of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union, submitted in response to a vacancy notice - Rejection of that application - Obligation to take account of the order of priority laid down in Article 29(1) of those regulations - Errors of law - Contradictory reasoning)
(C/2025/4123)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellant: ZR (represented by: A. Champetier and S. Rodrigues, avocats)

Other party to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: E. Lekan and A. Lukošiūtė, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Sets aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 29 March 2023, ZR v EUIPO (T-400/21, EU:T:2023:169);










2.


Annuls the decision of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 8 September 2020 rejecting the application made by ZR on 12 May 2020, by which she sought, in accordance with Articles 8 and 29 of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union, to be transferred to EUIPO;










3.


Orders the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by ZR in the present appeal and at first instance.






(1)  OJ C, C/2023/309.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4123/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Council Decision (EU) 2025/1209 of 12 June 2025 authorising the opening of negotiations with the Republic of Côte d’Ivoire for a sustainable investment facilitation agreement
Date: 2025-06-12
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: Côte d'Ivoire, European Commission, investment, negotiation of an agreement (EU), powers of the institutions (EU)








L_202501209EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
L series













2025/1209


17.6.2025







            COUNCIL DECISION (EU) 2025/1209
         
of 12 June 2025
         
authorising the opening of negotiations with the Republic of Côte d’Ivoire for a sustainable investment facilitation agreement


THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 207(4), first subparagraph, in conjunction with Article 218(3) and (4) thereof,


Having regard to the recommendation from the European Commission,

Whereas:

Negotiations should be opened with a view to concluding a sustainable investment facilitation agreement with the Republic of Côte d’Ivoire,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:



Article 1
The Commission is hereby authorised to open negotiations for a sustainable investment facilitation agreement with the Republic of Côte d’Ivoire.
The Commission is hereby nominated as the Union negotiator.


Article 2
The negotiations shall be conducted on the basis of the negotiating directives of the Council set out in the addendum to this Decision.


Article 3
The negotiations shall be conducted in consultation with the African, Caribbean and Pacific Working Party. The Trade Policy Committee shall be associated.


Article 4
This Decision is addressed to the Commission.




Done at Luxembourg, 12 June 2025.


For the Council


The President

A. BODNAR
            





ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dec/2025/1209/oj
ISSN 1977-0677 (electronic edition)
Case C-396/25 P: Appeal brought on 12 June 2025 by Alexandra Molitorisová against the order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 14 April 2025 in Case T-353/24, Molitorisová v Commission
Date: 2025-06-12
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: access to EU information, admissibility, enzyme, food additive, foodstuff








C_202504977EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/4977


22.9.2025






Appeal brought on 12 June 2025 by Alexandra Molitorisová against the order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 14 April 2025 in Case T-353/24, Molitorisová v Commission


(Case C-396/25 P)

(C/2025/4977)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellant: Alexandra Molitorisová (represented by: K. Purnhagen, Universitätsprofessor)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


set aside the order of the General Court in Case T-353/24,










—


declare the Appellant’s action for annulment admissible, or










—


refer the case back to the General Court for a ruling on the merits and reserve the costs,










—


annul the implied rejection decision and order the Commission to pay the costs of both sets of proceedings.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the appellant relies on seven pleas in law:






1)


First plea in law, alleging that the General Court erred in law by finding that the Appellant’s submission was ‘manifestly’ inadmissible.










2)


Second plea in law, alleging that the General Court erred in law by finding that the implied rejection decision of the Defendant of the first instance could not form the subject matter of an action for annulment.










3)


Third plea in law, alleging that the General Court erred in law by finding that the letter of 7 May does not constitute an initial statement of position.










4)


Fourth plea in law, alleging that the General Court erred in law by finding that the letter of 7 May 2024 is as a ‘merely preparatory measure’, which could not be subject of a confirmatory application.










5)


Fifth plea in law, alleging that the General Court erred in law by finding that the letter of 19 June 2024 constitutes an explicit decision to refuse partial access to documents.










6)


Sixth plea in law, alleging that the General Court erred in law by not drawing legal consequences from the fact that the Appellant’s access to her dossier was compromised and that the letter of 19 June 2024 was never delivered to the Appellant as the Appellant did not have access to it on the Defendant’s portal.










7)


Seventh plea in law, alleging that The General Court erred in law by not considering all pleas in law the Appellant brought forward in the first instance, especially those concerning the violation of the right to good administration.






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4977/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-815/24, Diamond Resorts Europe: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 12 June 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo – Spain) – Diamond Resorts Europe Limited (Sucursal en España) v M.D. and J.D. (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court – Answer which can be clearly deduced from the case-law – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters – Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 – Special jurisdiction – Article 7(5) – Concepts of branch agency or other establishment – Action seeking the annulment of timeshare contracts for the use of immovable property)
Date: 2025-06-12
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: branch, claim, consumer protection, judicial cooperation in civil matters in the EU, jurisdiction, property leasing








C_202504258EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/4258


11.8.2025






Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 12 June 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo – Spain) – Diamond Resorts Europe Limited (Sucursal en España) v M.D. and J.D.


(Case C-815/24,
                (1)
Diamond Resorts Europe)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - Answer which can be clearly deduced from the case-law - Judicial cooperation in civil matters - Jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters - Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 - Special jurisdiction - Article 7(5) - Concepts of ‘branch’‘agency’ or ‘other establishment’ - Action seeking the annulment of timeshare contracts for the use of immovable property)
(C/2025/4258)
Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Tribunal Supremo

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Diamond Resorts Europe Limited (Sucursal en España)

Defendants: M.D. and J.D.

Operative part of the order

Article 7(5) of Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2012 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (2)

must be interpreted as meaning that:
a dispute concerning an action seeking the annulment of timeshare agreements for the use of immovable property and the restitution of sums unduly paid under those agreements cannot be considered to be a ‘dispute arising out of the operations of a branch, agency or other establishment’ within the meaning of that provision, since none of those agreements was concluded by the consumer concerned with the branch of the contracting company to which the action relates and located within the jurisdiction of the court seised, and there is no other evidence to establish the involvement of that branch in the legal relationship between that consumer and that company.


(1)  Date lodged: 26.11. 2024.

(2)  
            OJ L 351, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4258/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-656/23, Karaman: Order of the President of the Fifth Chamber of the Court of 12 June 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Den Haag, zittingsplaats Haarlem – Netherlands) – B v Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid
Date: 2025-06-12
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: asylum seeker, refugee, residence permit, right of asylum








C_202505323EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/5323


13.10.2025






Order of the President of the Fifth Chamber of the Court of 12 June 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Den Haag, zittingsplaats Haarlem – Netherlands) – B v Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid


(Case C-656/23,
                (1)
Karaman
                (2)
)

(C/2025/5323)
Language of the case: Dutch
The President of the Fifth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C, C/2024/1392.

(2)  The name of the present case is a fictitious name. It does not correspond to the real name of any party to the proceedings.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/5323/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.12019 – APG / MACQUARIE / SKYNRG) – Candidate case for simplified procedure
Date: 2025-06-12
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: aviation fuel, economic concentration, energy transition, investment company, merger control








C_202503225EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/3225


12.6.2025






Prior notification of a concentration
(Case M.12019 – APG / MACQUARIE / SKYNRG)
Candidate case for simplified procedure
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2025/3225)


1.   
On 2 June 2025, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1).
This notification concerns the following undertakings:






—


APG Asset Management N.V. (‘APG’, the Netherlands), controlled by Stichting Pensioenfonds ABP (‘ABP’, the Netherlands),










—


Macquarie Green Energy Transition Solutions Fund (‘MGETS’, Luxembourg), ultimately indirectly controlled by Macquarie Group Limited (‘Macquarie’, Australia),










—


SkyNRG B.V. (‘SkyNRG’, the Netherlands).




APG and MGETS will acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) and 3(4) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the SkyNRG.
The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.


2.   
The business activities of the undertakings concerned are the following:






—


APG is a Dutch asset manager and manages the assets for ABP, the pension fund for government and education employees in the Netherlands,










—


MGETS is an energy transition investment fund that is part of the Macquarie group of companies.






3.   

SkyNRG is active in the production of sustainable air fuel.



4.   
On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.
Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified treatment for certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 on the control of concentrations between undertakings (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.


5.   
The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed concentration to the Commission.
Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:
M.12019 – APG / MACQUARIE / SKYNRG
Observations can be sent to the Commission by email or by post. Please use the contact details below:
Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Postal address:





European Commission




Directorate-General for Competition




Merger Registry




1049 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË







(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

(2)  
            OJ C 160, 5.5.2023, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3225/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections – SA.116353
Date: 2025-06-12
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Germany, Schleswig-Holstein, State aid, animal production, control of State aid, crop production, hunting, service








C_202503222EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/3222


12.6.2025






Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union
Cases where the Commission raises no objections
SA.116353
(C/2025/3222)








Date of adoption of the decision


16.12.2024




Aid number


SA.116353




Member State


Germany




Region


Schleswig-Holstein




Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)


Schleswig-Holstein: Ausgleichszahlungen für Grünlandlebensräume und Wertgrünland in Schleswig-Holstein




Legal basis


§ 44 Landeshaushaltsordnung Schleswig-Holstein; Entwurf Richtlinie über die Gewährung von Ausgleichszahlungen für Grünlandlebensräume und Wertgrünland in Schleswig-Holstein




Type of measure


Scheme


 




Objective


Agriculture; Forestry; Rural areas, Aid for agri-environment-climate commitments




Form of aid


Direct grant




Budget


Overall budget: 250 000  EUR
Annual budget: 50 000  EUR




Intensity


100,0 %




Duration


Until 31.12.2030




Economic sectors


Crop and animal production, hunting and related service activities




Name and address of the granting authority







Landgesellschaft Schleswig-Holstein GmbH




Fabrikstraße 6, 24103 Kiel








Other information


 




The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search?caseInstrument=SA



ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3222/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)