do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-219/24, Tallinna linn: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 12 June 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Riigikohus – Estonia) – A and Others v Tallinna linn (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Protection of the safety and health of workers – Directive 89/391/EEC – Measures to encourage improvements in the safety and health of workers at work – Articles 5, 6 and 9 – Obligations on employers – Directive 2000/54/EC – Protection of workers from risks related to exposure to biological agents at work – Article 14(3) – Health surveillance – Making available of effective vaccines – Annex VII, points 1 and 2 – National legislation allowing employers to require workers who are exposed to a biological risk to undergo vaccination – SARS-CoV-2 virus)
Date: 2025-06-12
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: employer, health risk, occupational safety, staff, vaccination, work contract








C_202504128EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/4128


4.8.2025






Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 12 June 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Riigikohus – Estonia) – A and Others v Tallinna linn


(Case C-219/24,
                (1)
Tallinna linn)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Social policy - Protection of the safety and health of workers - Directive 89/391/EEC - Measures to encourage improvements in the safety and health of workers at work - Articles 5, 6 and 9 - Obligations on employers - Directive 2000/54/EC - Protection of workers from risks related to exposure to biological agents at work - Article 14(3) - Health surveillance - Making available of effective vaccines - Annex VII, points 1 and 2 - National legislation allowing employers to require workers who are exposed to a biological risk to undergo vaccination - SARS-CoV-2 virus)
(C/2025/4128)
Language of the case: Estonian

Referring court

Riigikohus

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicants: A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, K, L, M, N

Defendant: Tallinna linn

Operative part of the judgment

Article 6(1) and (2) and Article 9(1) of Council Directive 89/391/EEC of 12 June 1989 on the introduction of measures to encourage improvements in the safety and health of workers at work, and Article 14(3) of Directive 2000/54/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 September 2000 on the protection of workers from risks related to exposure to biological agents at work (seventh individual directive within the meaning of Article 16(1) of Directive 89/391/EEC), as amended by Commission Directive (EU) 2020/739 of 3 June 2020, read in conjunction with points 1 and 2 of Annex VII to Directive 2000/54, as amended,
must be interpreted as not precluding national legislation pursuant to which an employer may require workers with whom it has concluded an employment contract to undergo vaccination if they are exposed to a biological risk.


(1)  OJ C, C/2024/3163.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4128/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-125/24, Palmstråle: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 12 June 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen – Sweden) – AA v Allmänna ombudet hos Tullverket (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – VAT exemption – Article 143(1)(e) – Reimportation of goods – Condition relating to exemption from customs duty on the importation of returned goods – Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 – Article 86(6) and Article 203 – Incurrence of a customs debt as a result of failure to comply with a formal obligation laid down in the customs legislation – Cases where such a debt is incurred)
Date: 2025-06-12
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU customs procedure, VAT, customs debt, exemption from customs duties, import (EU), import levy, re-import, tax exemption








C_202504127EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/4127


4.8.2025






Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 12 June 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen – Sweden) – AA v Allmänna ombudet hos Tullverket


(Case C-125/24,
                (1)
Palmstråle
                (2)
)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Taxation - Common system of value added tax (VAT) - Directive 2006/112/EC - VAT exemption - Article 143(1)(e) - Reimportation of goods - Condition relating to exemption from customs duty on the importation of returned goods - Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 - Article 86(6) and Article 203 - Incurrence of a customs debt as a result of failure to comply with a formal obligation laid down in the customs legislation - Cases where such a debt is incurred)
(C/2025/4127)
Language of the case: Swedish

Referring court

Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: AA

Defendant: Allmänna ombudet hos Tullverket

Operative part of the judgment

Article 143(1)(e) of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax and Article 86(6) and Article 203 of Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 October 2013 laying down the Union Customs Code
must be interpreted as meaning that, except where there is an attempt at deception, non-compliance with formal obligations such as the presentation of goods to customs provided for in Article 139(1)(a) of that regulation and the declaration for release for free circulation provided for in Article 203 of that regulation does not preclude the entitlement to the VAT exemption provided for in Article 143(1)(e) of that directive in respect of the reimportation into the territory of the European Union of goods in the state in which they were exported.


(1)  OJ C, C/2024/2599.

(2)  The name of the present case is a fictitious name. It does not correspond to the real name of any party to the proceedings.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4127/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections – SA.117255
Date: 2025-06-12
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Italy, State aid, control of State aid, forestry holding, forestry policy








C_202503234EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/3234


12.6.2025






Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union
Cases where the Commission raises no objections
SA.117255
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2025/3234)








Date of adoption of the decision


3.2.2025




Aid number


SA.117255




Member State


Italy




Region


 




Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)


PSP 2023 2027 - Avviso Pubblico Intervento SRA27 - Pagamenti Impegni silvoambientali e impegni in materia di clima




Legal basis


Determinazione n. DPD021/462 del 29/06/2023




Type of measure


Scheme


 




Objective


Agri-environmental commitments, Agriculture; Forestry; Rural areas




Form of aid


Direct grant




Budget


Overall budget: 2 500 000  EUR




Intensity


100,0 %




Duration


Until 31.12.2029




Economic sectors


Forestry and logging




Name and address of the granting authority







Regione Abruzzo – Giunta regionale – Dipartimento Agricoltura – Servizio Foreste e Parchi




Via Catullo, 65127 Pescara PE








Other information


 




The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search?caseInstrument=SA



ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3234/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)